Maybe that's why no one is releasing an updated Amiga. Everytime they get some engineers to come up with a system architecture, Steve Jobs reveals something almost exactly the same at MacWorld.
Best conspiracy theory ever. The tinfoil hat is in the mail.
I propose an easter egg be placed into diff so that if you type the above command (and you don't actually have files called man and woman) it prints: "diff: cannot perform miracle".
Thanks! I'm going to save this somewhere so I don't lose it.
I had already figured that starting at the bottom would be an idiotic thing to do. I was thinking of setting up a distributed system, starting smack-dab in the middle of the "likely" range, and moving in both directions. That way there's no need to specify a range; simply continue until you find what you're looking for.
And yes, I know that it requires either lots of time, or incredible luck. I have the CPU-time, and friends who may donate CPU-time. (Who wouldn't donate CPU-time for potential cashola?)
Which specific project are you talking about? An attempt at RSA-576, or another number?
Re:Biggest PC annoyance...
on
PC Annoyances
·
· Score: 1
NO! For the last freakin' time, that is NOT a porn site in my bookmarks! Look, see?
Man, I had no idea that was so funny... I was actually serious (okay, semi-serious), in fact I downloaded the text file of RSA-576 a few weeks ago. If you don't believe me, browse my journal... you'll see a reference to it. (I'm too lazy to provide a link.)
But now I have at least one clue: both factors were of equal length, and were both half the length of the full number... anybody got any other hints? RSA-640, here I come!
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe that's why no one is releasing an updated Amiga. Everytime they get some engineers to come up with a system architecture, Steve Jobs reveals something almost exactly the same at MacWorld.
Best conspiracy theory ever. The tinfoil hat is in the mail.
How the F do you "steal" open source code?
By paying for it?
SCO is dead!
So icc runs on Athlon XP? Sweet.
You forgot: ... Natalie Portman ...
If that's a true statement (too lazy to read story)...
Am I the only one who finds that to be the most retarded decision since the performa 62xx line?
#include
Hey, does anybody know how well it optimizes for the Athlon XP?
Painfully so. I used to live in Connecticut.
+5, Insightful
I haven't, you insensitive clod! And I for one DON'T welcome our LotR overlords. I mean, who do they think they are, anyway?
Here in the United States we have a pathetic little pile of sod that we call Al Gore. Does that count?
You don't. Choose "Plain Old Text" when posting. Especially when karma whoring.
OMFG U R TEH N00B! (just kidding.)
Whatever you're running, it's probably melted by now... slashdotted.
Nice touch with the "bork" language setting.
Whoever modded you up is a... oh forget it.
An even better question is, why are you using BBcode on slashdot? While trolling, no less.
Where?
OpenVMS is better, dammit!
w00t OMG t3h mac os X rules j00 we have t3h only 1.5.1!
(calm down, I'm joking.)
Thanks! I'm going to save this somewhere so I don't lose it.
I had already figured that starting at the bottom would be an idiotic thing to do. I was thinking of setting up a distributed system, starting smack-dab in the middle of the "likely" range, and moving in both directions. That way there's no need to specify a range; simply continue until you find what you're looking for.
And yes, I know that it requires either lots of time, or incredible luck. I have the CPU-time, and friends who may donate CPU-time. (Who wouldn't donate CPU-time for potential cashola?)
Which specific project are you talking about? An attempt at RSA-576, or another number?
NO! For the last freakin' time, that is NOT a porn site in my bookmarks! Look, see?
Oh crap...
Man, I had no idea that was so funny... I was actually serious (okay, semi-serious), in fact I downloaded the text file of RSA-576 a few weeks ago. If you don't believe me, browse my journal... you'll see a reference to it. (I'm too lazy to provide a link.)
But now I have at least one clue: both factors were of equal length, and were both half the length of the full number... anybody got any other hints? RSA-640, here I come!
Excellent.
Crap, there go my plans to factor it myself.