Slashdot Mirror


Kazaa-lite Shut Down

atari2600 writes "Finally it has happened. Zeropaid is reporting that the Kazaalite K++ project has been shutdown by Sharman Networks. The project, which had been set up to block spy and ad ware within the Kazaa Media Desktop Program has achieved notoriety within the P2p world through its simplistic approach and success in reverse engineering the Kazaa application."

634 comments

  1. thats one way by Zed2K · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well I guess thats one way to stop P2P usage. Destroy the only good kazaa client.

    1. Re:thats one way by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      What about giFT-fasttrack?

    2. Re:thats one way by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Well I guess thats one way to stop P2P usage. Destroy the only good kazaa client."

      Of course, you can still get the kazzaalite application from any of the P2P networks, including Kazaa.

      -1: ironic.

    3. Re:thats one way by bluntNhonest · · Score: 1

      It's fun reading the trolls from RIAA. Though it's not funny to them because it's their job and future they are fighting for. They don't understand there is nobody coming to save them. Too bad they are so stupid.

    4. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Klite is available here...

      http://kppdate.kickme.to

    5. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's fun reading about desperate people trying to keep from losing their homes, families and careers.

      Nice troll.

    6. Re:thats one way by red_gnom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Download k-lite 2.4.1 from:
      Kazaa Lite

    7. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not stop P2P. Use Direct Connect instead. Much better. Kazaa is for losers

    8. Re:thats one way by w3bbi3 · · Score: 1

      noooooooo, kazaa lite is still alive and well for those of us that already have it. do a quick search and you should be able to find it. the network will hopefully never die

    9. Re:thats one way by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      weren't third party clients cut out from the official kazaa network?(being the reason on why one would hack the kazaa rather than just code your own).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:thats one way by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, yes I know you can still connect and I know the "network" is still up and I know you can still p2p the client and get it else where. It was an attempt at humor. Some of you got it, others were clueless.

    11. Re:thats one way by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      I don't know - it seems to be working, so that's unlikely.

    12. Re:thats one way by gl4ss · · Score: 0

      well, in it's '_own_' network at least, seperate from sharmans. you can count that as a plus or as a minus. that's my guess and i'd wish to know if it's true still.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    13. Re:thats one way by billimad · · Score: 1

      or slashdot the server

    14. Re:thats one way by togofspookware · · Score: 2, Interesting

      DC is a neat idea but I gave up on it because of this: Lose your connection to a hub, and all our downloads are screwed :(

      --
      Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
    15. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about this site?

      http://www.k-lite.tk

    16. Re:thats one way by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 5, Insightful

      or slashdot the server

      Slashdotting is just one of the reasons that P2P is a useful part of the internet, in addition to HTTP. The bandwidth is bourne by the people receiving the content, and the bandwidth increases the more people are requesting something. It's a pretty sensible model, and scales very well indeed.

      Try setting up a server to stream video to people. Big-Brother spent millions on a server farm, with *-loads of bandwidth, all of which they paid for themselves. Do that with P2P, and all you need is a node and some DSL.

      Maybe people don't realise the real gains to the internet when they whine about P2P as being some sort of illicit activity...

    17. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's a fraud site trying to get people to pay for something that's free.

      idiot

    18. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how to get Kazaa Lite without Kazaa Lite? That's question.

    19. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kazaa-lite, a P2P client barely alive. Gentlemen, we can rebuild it, we have the technology. We have the capability to make the worlds next Bionic, ad blocking.spyware killing, RIAA fingering, file sharer, the new Kazza-lite will be that client. Better than it was before. Better. Stronger. Faster.

    20. Re:thats one way by damiam · · Score: 1

      They were, but the encryption has been broken. I assume they don't want to change it, because that would disable all current official clients too.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    21. Re:thats one way by xQx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I haven't heard about visual artists complaining about photocopiers.

      Art was never a career. Get over it.

      I haven't seen a successful busker who's playing a CD and expecting money. People need to *WORK* for their money. .. if you're a musician, that means concerts, or selling out into advertising.

      Did ford get sued by the horse and cart companies?

    22. Re:thats one way by norsk_hedensk · · Score: 2, Informative

      apollon is a great QT frontend to giFT. http://apollon.sourceforge.net

    23. Re:thats one way by redJag · · Score: 1

      New releases will be distributed over kazaa. Hopefully you have the old kazaa lite so you can update without spyware
      :-P No, I don't know that this is true, but it'd be a good idea.

    24. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like BitTorrent.

    25. Re:thats one way by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can't Kazaa now just change the protocol for the initial handshaking, thereby breaking the old versions of kazaa lite?

    26. Re:thats one way by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      That was my worry. Now that they aren't updating it, all they really have to do is change one minute little thing and everything goes to shit, just like what Yahoo! did with Trillian earlier.

    27. Re:thats one way by sploxx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, P2P has good uses. But your mentioned Video/Audio streaming for the masses can be accomplished in an even better way:

      MULTICASTING!

      This is completely ignored by today's networking people.
      Somehow, P2P got buzzword status and now noone thinks of multicasting any more. But it has been invented just for efficient 1 to n distribution of data.

      Hopefully, with IPv6, multicast will spread.

    28. Re:thats one way by anonamussone · · Score: 0

      I haven't heard about visual artists complaining about photocopiers.

      Art was never a career. Get over it.

      I haven't seen a successful busker who's playing a CD and expecting money. People need to *WORK* for their money. .. if you're a musician, that means concerts, or selling out into advertising.

      Did ford get sued by the horse and cart companies?

      try posting a copyright protected image online and see if the artist complains. the act of making a copy isnt the problem, its the distribution of that copy. notice who is getting sued? the people UPLOADING files. those who are downloading them are not breaking the law, since they are only downloading something that is being freely offered. thats why the riaa hasnt sued the people who have downloaded songs provided by the moles on kazaa. they put stuff on there to see who is downloading it, then request a list of what you are sharing. if they find copyright protected files, they sue. if not, they troll for another fish, and you have a free song. if they tried to sue you for downloading, it would be entrapment. and as for frod, the cart makers didnt sue him, but the other car manufacturers did. and no, ford didnt invent the car, he just made them cheap and affordable thru assembly line production.

    29. Re:thats one way by limekiller4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      gnu-generation-one writes:
      "Of course, you can still get the kazzaalite application from any of the P2P networks, including Kazaa."

      That will work until Kazaa does something to the protocol or client that makes K++ no longer work. This will happen within a week, I predict.

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    30. Re:thats one way by blincoln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Art was never a career. Get over it.

      Programming in the United States was never a career. Get over it and find something else to do now that it's being outsourced to other countries where people work for less.

      People need to *WORK* for their money. .. if you're a musician, that means concerts, or selling out into advertising.

      Yes, because doing composition in a studio for hundreds of hours isn't work, or anything.

      Did ford get sued by the horse and cart companies?

      That is an incredibly poor analogy. Ford produced a replacement for an old type of transportation. P2P apps don't make music on their own.

      If you don't mind listening to 100% machine-generated music, then don't worry about supporting artists. If you want to hear original music, they need to get paid.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    31. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Multicasting fits the "old" inconvenient broadcast model where you tune into channels at a specific times to get the content you want. P2P is much more in the spirt of the web model where the users pull content when they want it.

      It's also very unlikely that 2 users on the same subnet are going to want the same MP3 at the same time, which removes the efficiency argument.

      PS: mentioning IP multicasting is guaranteed karma -- nothing like the crazy, unimplemented wonder technology of the future, even when it's totally dopey.

    32. Re:thats one way by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Informative

      "MULTICASTING!"

      Broadcasting on MC requires an expensive contract with a provider, whereas P2P simply requires one, single, node. Cheap, simple, and very scary to people who want control.

      P2P can be largely untraceable, barring massive government involvement around the world, while multicasting is as controllable as TV. The company providing the MC is a single point of control; P2P is democratic, spontaneous, and as hard to control as the Internet itself.

    33. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they sould distribute new versions over p2p.

    34. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If there is a mistake...well, you should have used the 'Preview' button!

      Words to live by.

    35. Re:thats one way by sp0 · · Score: 1

      what the hell are you talking about go to www.klitesite.com that is the main site, just because the other domains are down means little. YOU CANNOT STOP A PEOPLE WHO WANT TO SHARE INTERESTING TXT FILES ON SUBJECTS LIKE DAILY LIFE ACTIVITIES!@!!!

    36. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As somebody who has made a career out of art... blow me you fuckwit.

    37. Re:thats one way by anonamussone · · Score: 0, Troll

      art is a passion, not a career, you cum sucking fag. if you had a career, or any artistic talent, you wouldnt hide behind that AC posting bullshit.

    38. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, when the current batch of Lite clients gets locked out due to a protocol 'enhancement', you can always fall back to running the original version in a virtual machine like VMware, so it won't be able to get its nasty tentacles all over your *real* OS...

    39. Re:thats one way by unixbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The RIAA aren't really supporting 'artists' though. They are protecting the revenues of large corporates. Record producers and managers get significantly more money than most of the young popstars today. Britney Spears is an attarctive woman who can sing. But she doesn't write her own songs and she isn't singing about experiances real to her. She isn't making original music. Popstars (who create the majority of product the RIAA is trying to protect) aren't artists, they are performers.

      --
      The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
    40. Re:thats one way by darxyde · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What's to stop somebody reverse engineering the handshake? Or the K-lite author releasing his code so others can continue his/her/its legacy?

      --
      Hey relax fella, you need a rest, guy.
    41. Re:thats one way by sploxx · · Score: 1

      It only requires an expensive contract with your ISP because it is considered "nonstandard" and they often have to change their routers to support it.
      I hope that IPv6 will include multicasting functionality from the beginning, for every host. Multicasting is not a "SHOULD" requirement in IPv6, it's a "MUST".

      Regarding the single point of control: If you do radio broadcasting on the net, it's like radio broadcasting into the air. Then, there will always be some hierarchy in the protocol, if it's P2P or MC.

      Regarding the censorship argument: First of all, the society should support and enable free speech. P2P to circumvent it should only be a temporary measure or you would use P2P for anonymity/privacy reasons. If you do not want anonymity (are e.g. proud of your radio programme) and it is not made illegal by some industry cartel, why should you want to do less effiecient P2P? Here, MC would be the choice.

      I hope my relatively poor english doesn't obscure the main points of my post :)

    42. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Britney Spears is an attarctive woman who can sing

      Holy Shit! Britney Spears can sing? Who told you that? Bush?

    43. Re:thats one way by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      And if the power were on at my house, I'd fire up the server and start KL++ - version 2.4.1 is in my shared folder.

    44. Re:thats one way by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure on how Fasttrack works, but wouldn't the current batch of K-Lite clients just get locked out of Fasttrack 3 (what post-KL++ KaZaA clients will use), and not the current Fasttrack 2? So, anyone with KL++ could still swap with anyone who has an old version of KaZaA or KL++ users, right?

    45. Re:thats one way by MrBlackBand · · Score: 1
      If you want to hear original music, they need to get paid.

      I'm in a band. We're not artists (too fancy!), but we are entertainers. We've been playing for 18 months now and haven't made one thin dime. In fact, with equipment costs we're over a thousand in the hole. Yet we still make original music. Why? For the love of it. It's fun, and it satisfies an urge we have to create something. Sure, we might not make great music, but that's not the point.

      People will always make music even if you don't pay them. In fact, this will weed out the bastards who are only in it for the money. Music can only get better!

      Mr. Black
      Making original music for the hell of it.

      --
      "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
    46. Re:thats one way by uucp · · Score: 1
      Programming in the United States was never a career. Get over it and find something else to do now that it's being outsourced to other countries where people work for less.


      I program computers for a living. While I don't consider it a "career", either, I'm sure some do. A group of people required a piece of software, then paid people like me to write that software and then finally continued paying for the the software authors to maintain and expand that software. I understand when other people call this scenario a career.


      Yes, because doing composition in a studio for hundreds of hours isn't work, or anything.


      If someone paid the author of these musical compositions (I assume music here) to create them before this work began, then I would probably call that a career as well. If the author works on some piece of music and then expects to be paid later by people he doesn't know, then I'd call that a misguided gamble, and not a career.


      P2P apps don't make music on their own.


      Correct. Nature (human and otherwise) creates music.


      If you don't mind listening to 100% machine-generated music, then don't worry about supporting artists. If you want to hear original music, they need to get paid.


      I expect that many people would continue to write music whether they get paid or not, because I write music without getting paid, and I know many others who do as well. Your last sentence seems ironic to me also, because I notice that many of the musicians who get paid by major labels use computers to generate the loops instead of using real musicians who can peform the same function more creatively than the computer.

      While debating this with others, I have noticed another unexpected, interesting outcome that I'd like to share with everyone. I judge the music made for little or no cost to have a higher quality then the music made at the whims of the RIAA affiliates. I've inauspiciously dubbed this "the Metallica syndrome". I find that the early Metallica years were passionate but unfocused. Once they got a little label money they refined their sound and improved their technique, producing some great albums. Then they got rich off of the sales of this music and relaxed, losing much of their drive, until they finally degenerated into a bunch of whiny little bitches who have no more passion, but must pretend like they do in order to keep themselves in this new lifestyle that they enjoy. I now personally regret buying their albums. I feel that I have contributed to the decline in the quality of their music, and I wonder whether they would still produce the aggressive music I enjoyed so much if the majority of listeners avioded "purchasing the right to listen", consequently eroding the band's passion to create it.

      This said, I expect that music made by those artists who do not get paid for it will have a greater value to me (and to the world) than the music currently produced by those artists who have a career with an RIAA-affiliated company.


      This message was written in accordance with the rules of the language "E-Prime". Please feel free to point out any errors in grammar or sentence form.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    47. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true 700K level slashdotter with nothing whatsoever to lose...

    48. Re:thats one way by blincoln · · Score: 1

      The RIAA aren't really supporting 'artists' though.

      I didn't say anything about the RIAA. However, as much as people like to slam them, their labels do have a lot of good musicians: Evanescence the only currently popular band I actually like, and they're on an RIAA label. So were Nirvana, who I was a huge fan of back in the day.

      In any case, this is a diversion from the post I was responding to, which was a load of the usual "I'm not a musician, but I know that REAL musicians don't care about getting paid" horseshit.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    49. Re:thats one way by unixbob · · Score: 1

      I sgree with you that the "REAL musicians don't care about getting paid" thing is horseshit. My point was that the current popular argument that users of P2P networks are stealing money from artists is misleading. The groups (one of which is the RIAA) who are taking out legal injuctions against P2P networks aren't protecting musicians interests, they are protecting the interests of the music publishing companies. The protection of the musicians income is secondary / ancillary to the main goal.

      --
      The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
    50. Re:thats one way by anonamussone · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true 700K level slashdotter with nothing whatsoever to lose...

      i suppose you are a single digit member? my member number is only an indication of when i registered with slashdot, not my intelligence. your member number is probably higher than mine, and thats why you hide behind AC.note that the C stands for COWARD. go abuse yourself, and leave your dog alone.

    51. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im an artist too. and i would gladly send anyone who asked my cd online for free. because i care about music as an art, not as a easy way to get money.

    52. Re:thats one way by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      Well, the name of the newly-born Dutch princess is being announced in about seven minutes, and the news stream can't handle the load, so multicasting would work really, really well in this situation.

      Other than that, fair point.

    53. Re:thats one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marconi was sued by vaudiville promoters.

  2. Thanks a lot, Sherman by sageres · · Score: 1

    Wait until MPAA and RIAA shut you down now too...

    1. Re:Thanks a lot, Sherman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can stop P2P, but they can't stop good old sneakernet.

    2. Re:Thanks a lot, Sherman by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Which is occurring with 250 Gb. hard drives now instead of floppies.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Thanks a lot, Sherman by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      I actually saw it happen. SOmeone down the hall transfered their music collection to someone else's computer by yanking his hard drive and running down the hall with it lol.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    4. Re:Thanks a lot, Sherman by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That won't happen. Sharman is secretly in league with them. All that spyware crap in Kazaa is there to rat you out to the RIAA and MPAA. P2P is not what it was in the Napster era. Still, this won't make Kazaa lite go away, it will just make it go back underground, which will make it even cooler.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  3. Was forbidden anyway by deja206 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    P2P is forbidden in our campus anyway, not much has changed for me...

    1. Re:Was forbidden anyway by Ateryx · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Try a DC++ hub w/ 900+ users and growing at a large Midwest campus, utilizing the Resident Halls network. I hoesntly don't know what I'll do when I leave I've become so addicted to 1.2 mb/s downloads.

      On a side note, my best friend the sys admin for the hub was shut down because in a month he had uploaded roughly 1.5 tera of data. His friend and insider in the networking department looked up his file and found the following note:

      "DO NOT RE-CONNECT WITHOUT FIRST TALKING TO B_______ E_______ FIRST! This is the most flagrant misuse of network reasorces I have ever seen in my career."

      Needless to say we framed it and put it on the wall.

      --
      "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
    2. Re:Was forbidden anyway by trinitrotoluene · · Score: 1

      Indeed. DC++ and reznet is freakin' bliss. Unforunately, everything else about the internet service here sucks. Browsing is slow, file sharing programs are blcoked, so it's tough to get new material for the hub, and all the good newsgroups are missing. The nagain, I filled a new 120Gig HDD in about a month, so I'm not complaining too loudly.

      --
      boom boom boom
    3. Re:Was forbidden anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh noes! teh riaa will arrest you now that you have admitted to it!

      Viva la resistance!

    4. Re:Was forbidden anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being so cheap and just invest in a pay newsgroup service. $10/month or so for gigabytes of stuff.

    5. Re:Was forbidden anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was for a couple months.

      UWO blocked stuff after i used it for a while. I tried to be respectful an limit my downloads. it took them a week or 2 to figure it out.

      so once i realized that. all bets were off. download as fast and as much as possible before they capped the speed.

      i still like freshmen year when napster still existed. and we had the dorm meeting about uploading data. about two weeks before i had started sharing my entire collection. I was uploading 750 meg of data per hour. for two consectuive weeks. you could actually see the increase on the little graphs they handed out.

      ohhhh welll, MIO was a bunch of tools anyways, too busy playing quake. Atleast ACS could figure problems out when hthey needed to

    6. Re:Was forbidden anyway by afluffybunny · · Score: 1

      Hmm, Sounds a bit like what happened at a certain university I go to... I wonder if his email included the term "unprecidented" in all caps :)

      --
      -fear the penguins, for they are short and stubby and show no mercy.
    7. Re:Was forbidden anyway by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Let this be a lesson to folks taking advantage of their lovely college networks: THROTTLING. 100K/s forever is better than unthrottled sharing for a term at most. Keep your head down and perhaps your network admins will let it slide.

  4. thats ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sombody will just come up with something better to replace it. (they always do)
    the king is dead, long live the king!

  5. I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I've found that the time it takes to get good (192kbps+) versions of songs off of a complete album is much longer and expensive than simply shelling out 10 bucks for the CD at a music store.

    So, I don't even use P2P anymore. I have no interest in movies or games or whatever, just music.

    Unless your time is worth nothing, you should just buy the factory CDs anyway. Plus, you can show the artists you like (White Stripes, Strokes, Outkast) that you enjoy what they do.

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
    1. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, there are no convenient music outlets available in my bedroom, at 11.30 p.m, on a Sunday evening.

    2. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by NiKnight3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe except this one and this one and this one and this one and...

    3. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Plus, you can show the artists you like (White Stripes, Strokes, Outkast) that you enjoy what they do.

      Judging by the "music" you listen to, I can't imagine why anything over 96kbps is even necessary.

    4. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've found that the time it takes to get good (192kbps+) versions of songs off of a complete album is much longer and expensive than simply shelling out 10 bucks for the CD at a music store.

      I can download a 600 meg movie from other people on campus in about 15 seconds. I have also found this time to be way too long for it to be worthwhile. So, I just let my roomates download it.

    5. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but wal-mart only sells the 'clean' versions of songs.

    6. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to get a whole album in good quality off one of the p2p networks usually sucks, yes. But there aren't just p2p networks to get your stuff off the net :)

    7. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've found that the time it takes to get good (192kbps+) versions of songs off of a complete album is much longer and expensive than simply shelling out 10 bucks for the CD at a music store.

      A complete album? Maybe. If you want the ENTIRE album then there is some justification for, well, buying it.

      But I've never had any problems that people seem to gripe about. My downloads are seldom interrupted and the music I download is virtually always on par with what I ask for (i.e., if you download a 128 bit version, you get what you ask for, if you go for 320 it's going to sound better).

      I've stopped buying CDs, period. My wife asked me a couple months ago if she could buy a CD (because she knows I have an issue with buying CDs now) because she said she liked most of the songs on the CD. I shrugglingly accepted (wife is more important than sticking it to the RIAA). We went to the store and she found that it didn't have as many songs as she thought and it cost $24. Without any pressure she said, "No, not worth it."

      The only thing CDs are useful for is burning them. I don't see myself buying any more pre-recorded CDs. Besides, it's seldom that any new music comes out that I "have to have" anyway.

    8. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by kevdaman · · Score: 0

      hey you mind telling me where i can get a 10 dollar CD? oh wait, thats right. they dont cost 10 bucks!

    9. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would gladly pay $10 for a good CD (i.e. one that has more than 2 decent songs on it) by a band that I like. I think what people have a problem with is paying almost $20 for a CD with maybe 1 or 2 songs they actually want to hear. As much as I dislike Wal-Mart and Best Buy, these stores have been holding down the price of most new music.

    10. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhhhhhhh.......... eric krout........... u'r a dumass............

    11. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free is more convenient than not.

    12. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My main usage for P2P is still to sample songs from an artist. It used to be radio was the way to do so. With the radio playlists being controlled so heavily by a few companies. And those companies (Clear Channel, etc) in bed with the recording industry how do we as consumers get to listen to new artists that we might enjoy rather than what the industry wants me to buy? I stopped listening to the radio years ago because my musical tastes did not revolve around gangster rap or boy bands or female teenage pop sensations. So when I get a recommendation from my friends, I find the song. If I like it, I buy the album. If not, I delete the song. Others may not be as moral, but like most things in life, it's how you use something, not the item itself that really determines its value.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    13. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So go steal something, that's more convenient than paying for it.

    14. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by brain159 · · Score: 1

      And they provide 192kbit+ unencumbered mp3 files?

    15. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      usenet

      may not get it right away but i get full albums biatch

    16. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by hellswraith · · Score: 1

      $24 - WHAT! Where do you shop? Did she want some collectors edition signed by the artist?

      Come on. $15 I could have believed.

    17. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but none of the wal-marts's within a hundred miles of me are open past 11 nor do they open before 9. All of you retarded "let's support the artist" fanboys can try and push your 'it's just as convenient to buy the cd' all you want but it is bullshit. Especailly for people like me who like the smaller, less known bands that don't sell in big (if ANY) stores. And it is also more than just convenience... Why should I buy a 48min CD for $20 when I only want ONE song and the artist seed $.75 at most of that $20??? Fuck buying CD's... I use Rhapsody on the rare ocasion that they have a song I like. But for the artists that I like, I would rather pirate their CD and send them the $20 directly. I don't care if that is illegal.

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
    18. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but none of the wal-marts's within a hundred miles of me are open past 11 nor do they open before 9.

      Mail-order companies also refuse to deliver there? What is this place, Antarctica? International Space Station? Los Angeles South Central?

      Especailly for people like me who like the smaller, less known bands that don't sell in big (if ANY) stores.

      A "smaller, less known band" is usually also harder to find at the p2p's.

      But for the artists that I like, I would rather pirate their CD and send them the $20 directly.

      Nice idea, but somehow everyone stops on the first half.

    19. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I've found that the time it takes to get good (192kbps+) versions of songs off of a complete album is much longer ... Unless your time is worth nothing, you should just buy the factory CDs anyway."

      Your assumptions of a slow connection and no free time are somewhat skewed by:

      (a) at work: time costs nothing, lots of bandwidth
      (b) at university: time costs nothing, lots of bandwidth

    20. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have no interest in movies or games or whatever, just music."

      "Plus, you can show the artists you like (White Stripes, Strokes, Outkast)"

      So, you don't like movies or games, and your musical tastes lean toward the pedestrian and spoon-fed?

      I suppose people have always told you that you're something special. I disagree.

      Might I suggest starting over?

    21. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by pyite · · Score: 1

      Well, emusic.com used to provide unlimited lame --preset standard downloads for as low as $9.99 a month. They now don't have unlimited downloads and I expect DRM to follow.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    22. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by K8Fan · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I've found that the time it takes to get good (192kbps+) versions of songs off of a complete album is much longer and expensive than simply shelling out 10 bucks for the CD at a music store.

      That's fine, assuming that everything you want is available for sale. My wife and I have several thousand CDs and an even larger number of LPs (remember those?).You'd be amazed at how many things that were issued on vinyl have never re-appeared on CD.

      During the "Golden Age" of file sharing we were in that group of people who were uploading far more tracks than we ever downloaded. And the vast majority of our uploads were tracks we had ripped from vinyl and cleaned up. Tracks like obscure Siouxsie Sioux EPs and b-sides. We were the first people to rip the "Will Powers" album.

      It's fine if you don't know what I'm talking about and it's also fine if you don't care. But the point is that there were a lot of people who wanted these tracks and the no way to get them. What are they supposed to do? For instance, it's the Xmas season. Labels release special tracks to radio stations - Warner Brothers' collection used to be called "Winter Warnerland" and had some really bizzare stuff. Fans want every track and every track simply isn't for sale.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    23. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you haven't tried eDonkey. It's the one p2p system that actually delivers even for music lovers like me.

    24. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's time you expand your musical horizon then. I usually don't buy an album unless I like almost all of the songs, and my primary constraint is that I don't make enough money (so only 3-5 cd's a month).

      Now, I don't buy music from a store that doesn't have listening stations (where they have a real cd player where you can skip and seek and they play the cd YOU asked for). But just for the heck of it, I went by wal-mart and best buy when I visited the states a month ago. No surprise that I didn't find much music in those stores.

    25. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by FartFuckingPervertHa · · Score: 1

      you buy music at walmart and best buy?

      theres your problem buddy...

      --
      DRUGS ARE BAD.
    26. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What ab bunch of crap this guy, who is obviously a consumer and not some plant is modded flamebate for an opinion that clearly come from his use of misc p2p apps, but the guy who flames hiom is modded insightful? Shouldn't they be modded flamer?

      People DO use P2P to get entire albums. Or they would if it wasn't so lame.

      The ***number one*** way to find new music I like (with a computer or not) is to listen to other songs off the same album as the one I got a single from. If this wasn't the case, The RIAA probably would have stopped putting out entire albums by the same artist a long time ago. Albums are often conceptual, which also create a sum>parts situation when listening. Do most people downloading Pink Floyd's Ummagumma only want the radio hits? And if I only find out that Lucinda Williams has a new album from playing online, why would I go elsewhere to get it? IF P2P could provide gull albums, it should. Just like if the RIAA could not be lame, it should. And the griping here doesn't help.

      I just spent several searches getting two recent pop albums, both had mulitiple great singles. One however, was awful just filler, the other was excellent. How do I know this, because I searched over a p2p network many times at many rates, searched allmusic for the track names and tediously found them. I make decent money so I hate the time and am tempted to buy CD's, but this was still better than spending $36 for ONE good album and a coaster.

      Besides, the only thing I do with a CD is ripp it and stuff it in a box. Those boxes take up a lot more space than a external drive.

      So, to sum it all up, RIAA sucks, P2P Album searching sucks, Fascist moderators trying to remove discussion by experienced users by modding things "Oldspeak" sucks, and I suck (I actually liked Timberlake's CD!!!) BTW, I am doing something about this exact problem (the album issue, not my taste).

    27. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by future+assassin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I find the song. If I like it, I buy the album. If not, I delete the song.

      See the RIAA doesnt want you to sample tracks before you buy them because they want you to buy the cd to sample the track. This way no matter what they always get the sale. Now that the consumer has such an easy way to sample whole albums/track to decide where they like it or not RIAA is loosing money from you and me not buying the whole cd. They hate you and me for that. All of a sudden my cd purchase choices have gotten smarter and "I" save myself money by not spending $20 for a piece of plastic because most of the album sucks.

      Thats right RIAA "I" save money by pre listening to music from P2P.

      Anyways Im hung over so all ove the above might not make any sence once I reread it in a few hours.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    28. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Kirin3 · · Score: 1

      A "smaller, less known band" is usually also harder to find at the p2p's.

      I have to disagree somewhat. Given 15 minutes and 2 P2P nets to choose from, I can find almost anything anyone could want unless it hasn't been released yet. Maybe 6-12 months ago you might have had some difficulties.

      But for the artists that I like, I would rather pirate their CD and send them the $20 directly.

      Nice idea, but somehow everyone stops on the first half.


      Again, 6-12 months ago maybe. I have personally in the last 3 months, purchased a 2CD album of an artist I like (Junkie XL), in which was the URL to go to the RadioJXL site, and purchase 2 more CD's worth of music for the same album for $4.95US through PayPal. Darn right I'm going to pay the artist directly.

      It's the COST of things that is the bottom line. I have no doubts that (at least where I live, Western Canada) plenty of people would buy the albums if only they were less than $15-20CDN for SINGLE CD albums. Like half the price.

      I buy CD's from bands live. The CDs are rarely over $10CDN, because the band themselves are directly selling them. I wouldn't be too surprised to find out they get at least half of that money as profits.

      Of course, Canadian artists (unless you're known as Nickelback, Shania Twain, Celine Dion or The Barenaked Ladies) have to market like a small-town US band... or sell out to the RIAA and move in to your lovely new home in Malibu complete with live-in ho-ma's.

    29. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where are you finding all of these mysterious $10 albums?

    30. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Armacham · · Score: 1

      "Plus, you can show the artists you like (White Stripes, Strokes, Outkast)" So, you don't like movies or games, and your musical tastes lean toward the pedestrian and spoon-fed? Because of course YOUR musical taste is VASTLY superior to any of the rest of us. Why don't you just let people enjoy the music they like? Do you feel some sort of great disturbance in the force everytime someone listens to a song you don't like? As far as the P2P debate goes, I would not have bought any of the last 20 or so CDs I have purchased if I had not previewed the songs off KazaaLite. I probably would still have bought the same number of CDs, but they definitely would have been more mainstream then the CD's I have purchased.

    31. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by DrFunktacular · · Score: 1

      In scanning the replies, I haven't seen any reference to these: what about non-network methods of download like mIRC and FTP (I guess technically mIRC has networks)?

      I generally hit up indexing services like packetnews or oth to find downloads (for mIRC or FTP servers, respectively). Is there some secret evil (other than the dirty feeling of piracy) to these or are they just less well-known?

      Between the two of these and SoulSeek, I can find just about anything I'm looking for, including full 192+ kbps album rips.

      And as a plug to those of you who enjoy live music, check out the scads of SHN/FLAC BT downloads at bt.etree.org.

    32. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So when I get a recommendation from my friends, I find the song. If I like it, I buy the album. If not, I delete the song. Others may not be as moral, but like most things in life, it's how you use something, not the item itself that really determines its value.

      Right... And what if the artist doesn't want you to sample the song on Kazaa? You're amazing. You're more moral than I am because you only do it a little? Nonsense. Either copying without permission of the copyright holder is moral, or it's immoral. Personally I say it's moral. Actually, personally I say it's immoral to pay those bastards at the RIAA money when you could be donating it to charity or using it to make this world better. But hey, that's just me.

    33. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by gantrep · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's more convenient to steal things without leaving my chair.

    34. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by poptones · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Tellyawhat: if you can tell me WHERE to send money I'll do it. It's not as if I haven't tried to find an address to send Russian rock star Linda a few of my American dollars to help fund her lifestyle (whatever it is). Sure, you can buy CDs from one or two places - but only her very most popular work, and I want them all. And the CDs that are for sale here through mail order come from a Russian importer who will not vouch for the pressing company - which means even if I DO buy their CDs odds are I'm not giving any money at all to Linda, but to some Mafia klan.

      Any idea how hard it is to find Sultana in the US? There's one mail order company I have found that has one of her CDs despite her allegedly being one of the more popular Turkish rap acts.

      And where do I send my money to buy a new copy of Bjork's "Telegram" (which I had on CD and lost and now have only the case it came in). That was a fan club release of which only a few hundred copies were ever distributed - so I guess I just never get to hear those songs again? How does that help the artist? How does Bjork (or her label) profit from my never being allowed again to listen to music from her that I once enjoyed?

      Siouxsie and Budgie took the initiative long ago and setup their own online label and they have been able to profit from it ever since. I have no qualms about shelling out $20 for one of their CDs because I know where most of that money is going and I've enjoyed their music for nearly 30 years now. There's a lot of other artists I'd love to send money to - Neil Young, Kate Bush, Linda, Sultana, Bjork (whose albums I have purchased in the past but, sadly, I have had to forego in the last release because of my commitment to boycott the RIAA) and Moloko.

      Is it my fault most of these artists either cannot put up personal web spaces because of record company contracts or they simply don't realize there may be profit in it for them?

      Even if it was, it ain't anymore. The net has been the best thing in the history of recorded music for the dedicated music fan. It's too bad it's taking so long for the artists to catch up with that revolution... but they will. Just as soon as their old contracts run out.

    35. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I've found that the time it takes to get good (192kbps+) versions of songs off of a complete album is much longer and expensive than simply shelling out 10 bucks for the CD at a music store."

      So you spent $15 for 2 good songs and supported an organization who'll claim you are a thief when you rip that CD to your iPod. Yeah you found a brilliant solution there.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    36. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm...you strangely sound like the RIAA's latest media whore advocate; your taste in cheesy pop music gave you away. We know it's you Hilary Rosen. You don't belong here.

    37. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 1

      I've found that the time it takes to get good (192kbps+) versions of songs off of a complete album is much longer and expensive
      Im not sure how downloading music from kazaa is expensive. Ok, so you have to buy a highspeed internet connection for what, 30/month (CDN), that's 3 of your cheap CD's, and last time i bough a CD it definitly wasnt 10 bucks, (18.00). 3 CD's bought, or, roughly 1 CD a day downloading, but, yah, i can definitly see how downloading music is expensive, especially off of Kazaa. Takes longer, that's debatable, if you have high speed, and Download off of more than 1 source, you should be getting fairly good speed. If by longer you mean the time it takes to find what songs are on the CD, then search for them, you are just lazy

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    38. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      Convenience the right way is not necessary without shortfalls. Buy from what's available at 11PM or wait until later when what you really want is available. It's a choice.

      -Slashdot Junky

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    39. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you that P2P has positive effects,
      such as allowing fans to trade songs that are not
      for sale. (out of print, the label that made the cd is dead, etc.) A lot of people who listen
      to international music also benefit greatly from
      P2P, because there are artists in other countries
      that release material that is only available
      in that country. (eg. There is a band called
      "Killing Heidi", they are from Australia...
      I found out about them from p2p. According
      to their website, they have 2 albums out,
      but only one of them is available in the
      USA.

      Still having some LP's myself, I agree
      with seeing stuff in my vinyl collection
      that I don't see in the records shops now.

    40. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by efflux · · Score: 1
      Good reasoning... only I'd rather not give the record labels another cent. If they founder and we have new distribution medium that's not centered around a few fucks getting rich, then maybe I'll consider buying in.

      It's a bit of a quandry, actually. I *want* better quality songs than what I've been able to get off of p2p, but I feel *morally oblidged* not to buy from the big labels. I know, I should be listening to independent music then... unfortunately, there are a few *really* good bands who aren't independent.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    41. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry, there are no convenient music outlets available in my bedroom, at 11.30 p.m, on a Sunday evening.

      There are these things called a "life" and a "car." You should look into them.

    42. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      I fully agree that Wal-Mart, Best Buy and similar stores do not exactly have a great selection of music (outside of top 40 pop). Lets not even get started on their lack of listening stations or employees' lack of knowledge about music. The reason I say they have kept prices in check is because when they are selling CDs for about $12-$13, it makes it much harder for the mall music store to sell them for $20, even though some still do. So even if your musical tastes have evolved beyond the flavor of the month pop bands, you are still likely benefitting from lower prices in part caused by Wal-Mart and others.

    43. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      Through P2P searches, I came across an artist I didn't know before (Maria Dolores Pradera). Downloaded many songs, then decided I wanted to buy one or two CDs.

      My reasons were:

      1. Get the quality (whatever some teenager listening to the latest hit on $10 computer speakers tells you, even at 256kbs, MP3 is NOT "CD quality"; listen to it on a good stereo, and you will definitely hear the diference).

      2. To give money to the artist instead of indirectly giving it to my ISP. (even if there is not much left for the artist after the rest of the industry has tken their part).

      3. To avoid the hassle getting, checking, ID3ing, renaming, moving, whatevering the MP3.

      Well, I went to a big store in Geneva, Switzerland (FNAC).

      - The vendor had never heard of the artist
      - Searching in his database, after quite a long time, he came up with 1 or 2 records
      - He could have ordered them, but I would have to wait a week or 2 until he gets them
      - Of course, since he didn't have anything, I couldn't listen to make my choice.

      Well, I'm still listening to my MP3s. Maybe I'll get a record from Amazon next time I have to order something there...

    44. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Yawgm8th · · Score: 0

      How does it cost money to dowload music? Do you mean paying for the internet connection, because you would have to pay for that regardless if you are actualy using it.

      --
      do unto others as you would have them do unto you
    45. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      Those smaller, less known bands are probably managing the distribution on their own. You should look harder online for contact info and then get in touch with the artist to learn what the outlets are. If the artist wants it music heard, then they probably distributing it some way. I bet they will mail you one; just ask!

      You should buy the whole CD, because that is how the artist/label has chosen to package that track you want. The artist/label own it. You might be surprised to find that other tracks are good even though you haven't heard them.

      How many times have you sent money directly to the artist? I would bet you have not yet gotten the first check out! Yet, you claim that you would do this if only you had that contact information you. Yeah, yeah, every reason you have is just an excuse.

      For those artists signed to a label, big or small, had to accept the terms of doing so. They knew that the label would probably make more and most in many cases, money off that CD. Yet, they accepted the terms, because they understood that the label's distribution and marketing efforts would help them develop a much larger fanbase. By increasing the fanbase, an artist will begin to make more money from touring.

      The bottom line is this. The only right you have when the terms are not what you would prefer is the right to say no.

      -Slashdot Junky

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    46. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by HalliS · · Score: 1

      wtf do you mean by time and money? If I already have a fast internet connection (with, in my case, free domestic downloads), it is enough for me to
      1. fire up emule
      2. go to search and write name of songs or almbum
      3. double-click the song or album. Now I can go and go do some homework or meet my friends or s-g.


      how does that take more time and money than it takes for you to walk over to the music shop and shell out your 10$?

      Did you perhaps, back when you "cared", always watch the computer screen as the music got dl'ed? That's just stupid if you ask me.

      PS. I just downloaded the white stripes new cd, and it SUCKED, big time. I had previously bought the first album and after hearing 2 songs from the new one, I thought I might check it out. I can't begin to describe my disgust over the rest. So I deleted all but the 2 songs I liked. How's that for saving time and money?

      --


      My other UID is 1337
    47. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Elusive_Cure · · Score: 1

      Well, i just came back from an Iron Maiden concert which was awsome! There are plenty of ways to support your favourite band/music and that is contributing by buying official merchandise, buy gig tickets,etc. I personaly spent nearly 100 on tshirts and tour programme and stuff, not including their new released album. On the other hand as much as like Metallica i'd never buy anything since they screwed their hard core fans and aimed to the money,though, i'd buy a ticket for a concert. My point is, if you download music from p2p/ftp/bittorrent/whatever, do it to sample/search for new artists/music styles and support them accordingly. that way you don't have the RIAA as a pimp for music,and you got both your artists and fans satisfied.

      --
      Roses are red, violets are blue, most poems rhyme, but this one doesn't... ;^)
    48. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Random832 · · Score: 1

      it doesn't matter if the artist doesn't want it. you have the RIGHT to be an informed consumer. this is just a way to get around stores that ILLEGALLY refuse returns on opened merchandise... except, it makes no sense, since most stores have a thing with headphones, etc, you can listen to in the store.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    49. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      it doesn't matter if the artist doesn't want it.

      I agree. That's why I said I don't have a moral problem with copyright infringement.

      you have the RIGHT to be an informed consumer.

      Only as much as you have the RIGHT to copy music.

    50. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by lukior · · Score: 1

      The problem is you are using the wrong tools. For music Soulseek is the only place to go. I can download 5 full 256 kbit albums in a single night with no problem. Also I am not stuck into mainstream acts like the White Stripes and The Strokes. I use the money I save not buying albums to really support the bands by going to there shows. I would much rather support the artist than give my money to the RIAA. If I really must have a cd copy ill buy that while im at the show. 100 percent of the money I spend on Music goes to the artist. Most of the artists I know support my method of contribution to their art.

      --
      I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
    51. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are lots of things i still can't find. i had the best luck finding rare stuff on audiogalaxy, which is sadly dead now.

    52. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Brightest+Light · · Score: 1

      do you have any obscure Sisters of Mercy tracks? contact me at slashdot@gur[NOSPAM]ney.co[NOSPAM]tse.net if you're feeling generous :-D

    53. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mIRC is a client. A crappy client.
      Not a protocol, or a network.

    54. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      You dont have any such right to be an informed consumer, any more than its illegal for stores to refuse opened merchandise. First of all, your consumer rights (which are carefuly listed in law, at least here in America) are simply to not be deceived, i.e. you're protected from intentional deceit. However, you have no right to demand information (except for safety issues) from the companies that make these products.

      As for return policies, there isn't a single law or court case that I've ever heard of that indicates that you have any "right" right return merchandise that isn't faulty. If you buy a book, they dont have to let you return it after you read the whole thing because you didn't like the story. Its the same thing with CDs, especially since you can browse music in the store these days.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    55. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White Stripes, Strokes, Outkast

      Three good reasons not to buy CDs, unless your money is worth nothing.

    56. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try before you buy. that's the only way i find new music anyways, since i don't have (nor do i want) a radio.
      then, of course, i don't even bother buying .. all the music i like is already in the public domain.

    57. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Vess+V. · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're loosing money at their lawyer, but that's about it...

    58. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by cfuse · · Score: 1
      I've found that the time it takes to get good (192kbps+) versions of songs off of a complete album is much longer and expensive than simply shelling out 10 bucks for the CD at a music store.

      Well, you obviously don't live where I do. Here you have to sell your first born to afford a Britney single.

    59. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, Bjork's Telegram is easily available. It can be bough at my local music stores (in Iceland admittedly) and Amazon.

    60. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Is it my fault that the hottie down the hall didn't want to sell herself to me? She still filed rape charges even after I told her I'd pay her!

      The nerve!

    61. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by wud · · Score: 1

      Unless your time is worth nothing, you should just buy the factory CDs anyway. Plus, you can show the artists you like (White Stripes, Strokes, Outkast) that you enjoy what they do.

      I dont think many people sit and watch the bar go by, im sure they do drugs and touch themself instead.

      Now for showing the artists that you enjoy what they do, most of the money goes to the stores and the record companies

      now my personal problem with p2p is that I end up downloading porn, and eating up all my banwith while waiting for what I really want. ;-)

      --
      wud
    62. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      I thought I made it pretty clear that that's exactly not what I do.

    63. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are wal-marts that close? I've never heard of such a thing! You should move to a first world country immediately!

    64. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Nice idea, but somehow everyone stops on the first half."

      Well put. I've also noticed that virtually everybody on Slashdot seems to be that exception... they would never pirate music simply to avoid paying for it.

      If only that were the reality. Artists and record companies would be making money on an unprecedented level, and there would simply be no reason at all to sue music pirates.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    65. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by WarmBoota · · Score: 1

      I just saw Maiden's most recent tour over the summer - definitely awesome stuff. Bruce Dickinson (not Perens :-) ) said that if the new recording sucks you can feel free to send it all over the Internet. Personally, I really, really want their new recording, but I've given up supporting the RIAA. Is there any way to get the recording without cheating Maiden and without supporting the RIAA?

      --
      90% of everything is crap. Also, crap is relative.
    66. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Jessta · · Score: 1

      musicians are supposed to be poor.
      they are artists and are ment to be struggling to pay the rent.
      Music is not about money. music is about telling people about the things you have to say.

      so we should all steal music and make those musical artists poor again. they should be playing in their local pub, not on an international stage.

      --
      ...and that is all I have to say about that.
      http://jessta.id.au
    67. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm just an olde time sort of guy, but I have no problem downloading the music, then if I actually like it, buying the cd (hopefully from cdbaby.com or another record store that supports small artists). The artists do deserve some $ for their time if they are *GOOD* most of the crap these days is just that.

      Maybe someday we'll have $5-$7 cds where the musicians get more then 5% of the revenue. 50% sounds good... ;-)

    68. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by teklob · · Score: 1

      Finding out if music is good before paying for it is as outrageous as telling your friends about a bad movie, therefore depriving the MPAA of their hard-earned money
      oh wait...

    69. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1
      You're more moral than I am because you only do it a little?

      No. His actions are moral because he pays for what he uses. The artists, record companies, retail outlets and all the others involved in the process make the profit that they are not only legitimately entitled to but would not otherwise have made; I can't see him paying for an album without any idea what is on it.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    70. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by jshare · · Score: 1

      Why is this a troll, and its parent isn't? This guy's joke is funnier.

    71. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where do I send my money to buy a new copy of Bjork's "Telegram" (which I had on CD and lost and now have only the case it came in)

      Good Lord, man. Telegram is not a fan-club-only release. You can pick up a copy through any major online retailer. Hell, I see 2-3 copies in every used CD shop I go into.

    72. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Random832 · · Score: 1

      if it's not illegal to refuse such returns, then why do software places/companies give you the runaround (M$ claims it's the store's responsibility, store claims only M$ can do the refund, etc) instead of simply flat-out saying "no returns"? i guess my perception was distorted by their lack of honesty.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    73. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by hyperizer · · Score: 1

      And where do I send my money to buy a new copy of Bjork's "Telegram" (which I had on CD and lost and now have only the case it came in). That was a fan club release of which only a few hundred copies were ever distributed - so I guess I just never get to hear those songs again?

      Methinks you are mistaken.

      Would you have heard of Bjork were it not for her label and distributors? Quick--name five great P2P-only artists!

    74. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      His actions are moral because he pays for what he uses.

      No. He only pays for what he uses and then decides he likes enough to purchase.

      The artists, record companies, retail outlets and all the others involved in the process make the profit that they are not only legitimately entitled to but would not otherwise have made; I can't see him paying for an album without any idea what is on it.

      Likewise myself and other people wouldn't pay for any RIAA album regardless of what is on it. So the artists, record companies, retail outlets, and all the others involved in the process make the profit that they are not only legitimately entitled to but would not otherwise have made.

      And don't tell me I'm full of it. I haven't bought a CD from an RIAA-affiliated artist in 7 years, and I haven't used a P2P filesharing network in 2 years.

      Finally, there is absolutely no moral requirement that one pay for what he uses. You've read my comments here on slashdot. You've found them interesting enough to respond to. But I don't see you sending me money, and I don't see anyone saying that you have a moral obligation to do so.

    75. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by poptones · · Score: 1
      Those copies of telegram are NOT new. They may be "like new" or they may even be "old but never opened" (although I don't know how). Go to her website and look around - it's not even in her discography.

      So, please explain to us all how me shelling out even six bucks for a USED CD that's not even in release anymore generates income for Bjork? It's not as if she's signing them and shipping them out herself. So far as "five great p2p only artists" that's easy. I already named a few... let's do it again.

      Linda (Rusia)

      Creatures (GB/France) Sultana (Turkey)

      Hi-Fi (Russia)

      Control Machete (Mex)

      Banco Da Gaia (GB)

      Native Tongue (US?)

      I can name more if you like. Many of these are actually ON labels in their native countries but are unavailable - or very nearly so - internationally. Others you may find in a store but first existed online outside "the machine" before being picked up for meatspace distribution. A couple absolutely are NOT available anywhere except at one of their shows or via downloads or purchase from the web. And ALL of them came to my attention via usenet - from shopping "point and click" at easynews and discovering I liked what I heard.

      Don't forget that high quality downloads from MANY of these artists are available via their own websites. Not ALL artists see music downloads as a threat to their ability to earn income from performing.

      BTW Moloko can be had via their website as well - apparently this has also changed since last ( ~2mo ago) I looked. $20 or so will get you a CD signed by Roison, which seems like a fair enough deal. Now if Neil Young would setup a tip jar it would all be great...

    76. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by sfm · · Score: 1

      Okay, I can see your point about the time spent on P2P networks. How would you handle the fact that many CD's are "broken" so they don't play on computer CD drives?

      In their effort to stop people from ripping CD's the record companies have made it impossible to play legal copies of some songs on a computer.

      I listen to 90% of my music on a computer CD player while working. What recourse do I have now??

    77. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Besides the fact that I've never experienced any "run around" when trying to return defective merchandise, and never been stupid enough to purchase anything without having used it or read reviews of it, I have no validation that what you're talking about even happens. Frankly, I'd attribute it - if it occurs - to poorly trained employees.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    78. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and run into people like YOU out there? No thanks!

    79. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Jaycatt · · Score: 1
      I've found that the time it takes to get good (192kbps+) versions of songs off of a complete album is much longer and expensive than simply shelling out 10 bucks for the CD at a music store.

      But, you know something? It's all give and take. If I'm not willing to pay for an album, I'm willing to settle for poor quality. If I really wanted the quality to matter, it's worth a purchase.

      --
      "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    80. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you haven't heard the new OutKast. The production is incredible.

    81. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, but if you read my post closely, you would see that I would RATHER... never said I have. Well, I have but because I knew or met the band - so that really doesn't count for these . But if there was a way to contact Linkin Park and get the money to them somehow without it being pocketed by some temp worker hired to sort their mail, then I would. My problem is not with buying the CD... My problem lies in funding the greed and ego-centric selfishness of organizations like the RIAA. I don't buy this bullshit they give where you have to support the artist because an artist's income is less than 10% from their CD sales. I use my insignificand and mute voice to challenge them to do as they say... But nobody seems to realize that - you are all too busy leeching the free music because you don't want to pay and use the RIAA as the excuse. I do pay - when I can... but I don't pay WHO I can... I could buy every CD with every song I have tomorrow if I HAD to, but it would take the same act of God to get me to do that as it would to make the RIAA die and realize what retarded selfish assholes they are. And yes, when a company makes it a good offer for all sides (EG Universal lowering the prices of their CD's while raising the percentage given to the artist - I bought the 8 alblums they publish that I like.

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
    82. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I BUY MUSIC LATELY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh.. as a off-topic point.. I don't know that I could count on one hand the number of 24-hour WalMarts within 100 miles of me.. and I'm in a low-population density area..

  6. GiFT by marcelC · · Score: 5, Informative

    Who cares, there ae enough GiFT frontends for both linux and windows available which will give you the same functionality.

    1. Re:GiFT by Sp4c3+C4d3t · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I use giFT myself, and I find the clients much cleaner and nicer to work with than Kazaa or Kazaa Lite. I just hope they never block that out, because it lacks their spyware and ads.

      --
      Happy New Year, it's 1984!
    2. Re:GiFT by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What are these gift front ends of which you speak? I've been looking for a linux-kazaa client for quite some time. (thanks)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    3. Re:GiFT by capt.mellow · · Score: 1

      http://gift.sourceforge.net/

    4. Re:GiFT by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 3, Informative

      giFToxic is a Gtk2 frontend (development seems to have stalled); giFT and giFT-FastTrack are needed to use it with FastTrack.

    5. Re:GiFT by mike3411 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      wtf if GiFT

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    6. Re:GiFT by Danse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is there a decent working GiFT frontend for Windows? The only ones listed on SourceForge seem to be dead or still in alpha...

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  7. A little ironic, don't you think? by Wigfield · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sharman shutting down K++ for copyright infringement? Isn't that what the RIAA is trying to do to Sharman... I know, I know, sharman doesn't actually host illegal files on their site, but it seems their entire business model revolves around copying music illegally.

    1. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But Kazaa Lite IS copyright infringement. It's like somebody taking the linux kernel, modifying it, and posting it without source. Not everything shared on kazaa is illegal.

    2. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Wigfield · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not everything shared on kazaa is illegal.

      Almost everything on kazaa is illegal. I challenge you to name the last time you saw something that was in the public domain or under a free license (GPL, FDL, BSD, etc.) If you pressure Sharman enough they will have to admit the main attraction of their program is to facilitate copyright infringement. Personally I don't like copyright as it stands one bit, but they are being rather hypocritical.

    3. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by bconway · · Score: 4, Informative

      A couple weeks ago: the Mandrake 9.2 ISOs were available on Kazaa.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    4. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to mention publicly released music by the bands of 3 of my friends...

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    5. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by ExtremeTomato · · Score: 1

      Since when did hypocrisy change anything?

    6. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by bigberk · · Score: 1
      Almost everything on kazaa is illegal. I challenge you to name the last time you saw something that was in the public domain or under a free license
      slackware 9 ISO images
    7. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a retard you would have to be to download them from Kazaa and not BT...

    8. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does this mean they can release a K++ patch instead? Then they wouldn't be distributing parts of the original client.

    9. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like rain on your wedding day.
      It's like a free ride when you've already paid.
      It's the good advice that you just can't take,
      and who would have thought, it figures.

    10. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everything shared on kazaa is illegal.

      Almost everything on kazaa is illegal


      There is nothing logically inconsistant with these two statments.

      What's your point?

    11. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like somebody taking the linux kernel, modifying it, and posting it without source.

      Or perhaps it's like someone trying to create a version of System V for x86. FWIW, k-lite is a clean-room implementation of the kazaa protocol.

      Besides, comparing Linux to Kazaa is like comparing apples to biker shorts...one tastes good and the other fits poorly and should never be used when alternatives exist.

    12. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by thales · · Score: 1

      You can smoke tobacco in a bong, but that dosen't mean that most bong owners are smoking tobacco.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    13. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yippy. I'd rather use Xmodem on a 2400 bajad modem to download it. Prolly get done faster.

    14. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by eht · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather get my ISOs from a more trusted source and then md5 checking them, than getting them from Kazaa, finding they don't match and then regetting them from a trusted source.

    15. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by dissy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > You can smoke tobacco in a bong, but that dosen't mean that most bong owners are
      > smoking tobacco.

      Bongs are not illegal to own or buy either.

    16. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > Bongs are not illegal to own or buy either

      Actually, that Chong guy (of Cheech and Chong) is currently serving a jail term for selling bongs over the internet.

      Granted, it *shouldn't* be illegal, but there it is.

      --
      -JC

    17. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      I recently downloaded spybot search and destroy over a fast track client, using a link provided by the spybot website.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    18. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by PorkNutz · · Score: 1

      Dude, the preffered nomenclature is "water pipe".

    19. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Troll? Kazaa Lite/K++ were hacked Kazaa clients; there was nothing clean room about them.

    20. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      But, see, K++ isn't an official Kazaa client from what I can recall. Why the hell would they release a spyware-free version and push the spyware-full version more heavily?

    21. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, download them from Kazaa at 463 kbytes/sec? Or from BT at 7 kbytes/sec. Tough choice.

    22. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1
      I challenge you to name the last time you saw something that was in the public domain

      I downloaded most of Beetohven's symphonies the other day from Kazaa using Kazaa Lite. I didn't check, but I'm pretty damn sure they are in the public domain!

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
    23. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by jea6 · · Score: 1

      Drug paraphernalia is defined in U.S. Code Title 21, Section 863 as, "any equipment, product, or material of any kind which is primarily intended or designed for use in manufacturing, compounding, converting, concealing, producing, processing, preparing, injecting, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance . . ." [northeastcapt.org, faq#12]

      Drug paraphernalia, including bongs, are illegal - to a varying degree - in most of the United States.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    24. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they are. Ashcroft is currently charging the owners of the "Third Eye" in Portland Oregon for suppling paraphenelia.

      Another thing if you take glow sticks to a concert it becomes a Rave and as such the promoter, the talent and the venue owner can be charged under the crack house laws. What is really funny is that the whole glow stick thing is based on Hawaian fire dancing which is a relgious activity so once again Bush and his cronies have taken a big shit on the bill of rights. Freedom of religion for all christians, crack house laws for everyone else.

    25. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you must not know how to use BT or something. Which again speaks for your utmost retardedness.

    26. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      There are at least THREE "glass shops" like that in the city of New Brunswick, NJ, one right across the street from the city's municipal building. One of them going so far as to be named "J Friendly" And they've all get to shut down in the two years I knew of their existence. Not that I shop in these store, I just find it somewhat amusing that the cops could literally open the front door to their station, walk around 50-100 feet, and drag the shop owners to a cell if they so desired.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    27. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      I meant to say. "They've all yet to get shut down." Doh. Preview button? Whats that!?

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    28. Re:A little ironic, don't you think? by jea6 · · Score: 1

      Well, suffice it to say that there is a minor distinction between there being a law on the books and that law being actively enforced. My post was in reponse to a previous post on the legality on bongs. I break the law every time I go 70. Don't always get a ticket for it, though.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  8. Only a few seconds in... by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    And already /.'ed. Doesn't anyone have a mirror?

  9. The K++ Network by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 2, Informative
    I ran K++ today, and it is still running.

    Well, it is a decentralized network, so it cannot be shut down. Nut there will be no more updates, I suppose.

    1. Re:The K++ Network by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uhm.. They shutdown K++ , the CLIENT, not the fasttrackk network...

    2. Re:The K++ Network by p0rnking · · Score: 3, Informative

      K, it's one thing not to read the original article, and another to not read what was posted on /.
      "... that the Kazaalite K++ project has been shutdown by Sharman Networks. The project, which had been ..."
      Kazaalite is just a "hacked" up version on Kazaa ... it runs on the same network. What Sharman Networks has done, is shutdown the project (K++).

    3. Re:The K++ Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not only has Sharman Networks succeeded in eliminating nearly every major resource of Kazaa Lite K++, they are systematically forcing it off the network.

      How you ask?

      Recent upgrades to Kazaa clients (2.5 and higher) make them less tolerant with outdated or non official clients such as Kazaa Lite K++. Kazaa Lite is based on a version prior to 2.5, therefore a current supernode will not accept its shares. Although this will cause network headaches in terms of traffic, the client will not be able to participate or download off the main FastTrack network. This will effectively cluster and isolate all modified Kazaa clients from FastTrack.


      from http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=339

    4. Re:The K++ Network by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      The last time I checked, Kazaa required a special server and was thus not at all decentralized. Unless by "decentralized" you meant that more than one computer runs the client or something.

      --
      True story.
    5. Re:The K++ Network by Random832 · · Score: 1

      that's napster... the so-called "supernodes" in kazaa are normal computers running the client on a fast processor/connection, which switches it to a different mode.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    6. Re:The K++ Network by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "This will effectively cluster and isolate all modified Kazaa clients from FastTrack."

      I think Sharman won't be laughing too long once they figure out that the vast majority of the sharers with the serious bandwidth are on this isolated cluster.

      Here's a hint Sharman, WE DON'T WANT YOUR SPYWARE! If you didn't put that crap in there, people would use your client.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:The K++ Network by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Recent upgrades to Kazaa clients (2.5 and higher) make them less tolerant with outdated or non official clients such as Kazaa Lite K++. Kazaa Lite is based on a version prior to 2.5, therefore a current supernode will not accept its shares.

      Ah, so here we have the reason why the RIAA continues to believe use in P2P services is declining. They're using Sharman's Kazaa client!

      Seriously, I'm using K-Lite and I've noticed virtually no change in anything. Could it be that K-Lite users are so numerous that the K-Lite network is now the "defacto" Kazaa network? Is anyone actually running a 2.5 Spyware-enhanced Kazaa client here? How well is it working, and how many users/files do you see on at any given time? How are the search results?

      It's my understanding that with the Fasttrack network, the users themselves function as servers - so if everyone's running K-Lite and everyone's happy with it, there's really no effective way for Sharman to lock them out. It will probably inhibit growth in the K-Lite network (now that you have to run stock Kazaa first to find and get it... though I imagine some people still will), but it will more likely kill the real Fasttrack network as people find out how little content is accessible via the stock client.

      What's Sharman's thinking here? It seems like they're trying to do pretty much exactly what the RIAA is doing, trying to put the genie back in the bottle.

  10. Oh Well, there not the first, there not the last by UltraSkuzzi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think Sharman will be in for a surprise once the find out that 75% of its 'users' were on the bootleged client. It's pretty obvious, those users aren't coming back either. The RIAA has already turned that network to shit with their corrupted songs. I guess we call all move on up to BitTorrent :D

    --

    ~UltraSkuzzi
    This comment is liscensed by SCO.
  11. Zeropaid and Sharman by Grassferry49 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That was a very fast slashdotting of Zeropaid, perhaps Sharman shut them down too?

    --
    Visit BobtheKing.com it's perhaps the best thing I've ever made to waste your time with.
    1. Re:Zeropaid and Sharman by Pejorian · · Score: 1

      Zeropaid was crawling yesterday when I submitted this story to Slashdot. It probably didn't take much to push it over the edge.

      As an interesting corollary, you'll notice that if you search for Kazaa or Kazaa Lite on Google, you get "In response to a complaint we received under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 2 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint for these removed results."

      --
      - Murphy's Corollary: - It is impossible to make things foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
  12. So what? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The binary will be alive forever in hacker circles...

    And someone will strip-out the spyware.

    And, pray tell, how can something out of the reach of the RIAA's long legal arm can have things done????

  13. Thank God You Can Still Download the .exe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Just search for kazaa lite ++.

  14. i give it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i give it oh, another 3 months before we see an equivalent replacement....

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. SH*T !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and I only had 1 meg left till I finished my Hulk download

  17. In other news... by frostbane · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has taken down Zeropaid...

    1. Re:In other news... by dynoman7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget about Low Sodium K too...

      --
      Blarf.
    2. Re:In other news... by dalutong · · Score: 5, Informative

      I assume that your comment is meant call gift-fasttrack "yet another kazza clone." It is not. What it IS is very worth your consideration.

      GIFT (http://gift.sf.net) is now a wonderful program that connects to Fasttrack (kazaa,) the old fasttrack network (openfasttrack), the opennapster network (old napster), and gnutella. When you do a search in one of the gift frontends you do a search in all of those protocols.

      The interfaces could use some polishing (i like giFTcurs the best), but I think gift has a tremendous amount of potential.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    3. Re:In other news... by bongholio · · Score: 1

      They guy in the alley will sell you Special K (sorry this is NO shareware available from him)...

    4. Re:In other news... by alpharoid · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are forgetting the crucial network supported by giFT: OpenFT. The old fasttrack network is long gone, dead ever since Sharman Networks dumped it for the new version. OpenFT is being developed exactly because it's tough to depend on proprietary software that chooses which platforms to support and leaves everybody else in the dark.

      We should benefit a lot from OpenFT as it matures. So far, it's the best offering we have for a non-centralized, Kazaa-style network.

    5. Re:In other news... by dalutong · · Score: 1

      I did indeed forget that. Thank you for throwing that in. I might have been distracted. I originally wrote my message to say just what you said. Oh well. :)

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    6. Re:In other news... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was hoping there would be a low Potassium K.

      ha ha... get it, funny, isn't it.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gnutella2 is the best offering for a non-centralized, Kazaa-style network.

    8. Re:In other news... by moranar · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's an excellent graphical frontend for giFT: Apollon, which uses the qt libraries. After using it, even kazaalite seems confusing and bloated!

      On the other hand, I've had troubles connecting to the OpenFT network (read: I cannot connect). Perhaps it's just me...

      Anyway, the links:

      1. giFT, the daemon
      2. giFT-FastTrack, the plugin
      3. Apollon, the frontend
      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    9. Re:In other news... by dalutong · · Score: 1

      Thanks -- looking into it.

      OpenFT sometimes takes a while to connect. You can't just hop on. i don't know why. it usually connects eventually for me though.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    10. Re:In other news... by Snaller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The interfaces could use some polishing (i like giFTcurs the best), but I think gift has a tremendous amount of potential.

      The potential being a fine from the RIAA.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    11. Re:In other news... by dalutong · · Score: 1

      very funny... i only meant technologically.

      i am a independent artist and i keep my music shared on as many networks as I can. gift is perfect for me.

      I also ask all of my friends to keep my music shared on their systems, if they use p2p.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    12. Re:In other news... by xScruffx · · Score: 1

      What about good old Special K?

    13. Re:In other news... by burbilog · · Score: 1

      They mature far too long :( It started a lot of time ago and still there is no usable program and no userbase.

  18. Don't worry by einer · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can still find it on Kazaa. Oh the irony.

    1. Re:Don't worry by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, you have to install the spyware-enhanced version to get the spyware-free version, irony++.

    2. Re:Don't worry by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      The current users will be able to upgrade, yes. But potential new users will not be able to join the service, and so the whole service could well become stagnant and start dieing. I think this was the desired outcome, and this side-effect was probably realised.

    3. Re:Don't worry by hendridm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would love it if Sharman blocked downloads of its signature :D

      You know, how the whole P2P industry claims that they don't have control over their content, and that it's really a medium intended for legal distribution. Heh.

    4. Re:Don't worry by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      K++ is not a SERVICE, it's a CLIENT, in the same way that Trillian is not an instant messaging service, it is a separate client. Sharman is simply trying to recoup what is probably millions of dollars in money lost from the spyware that wasn't installed in K++ installations and run during the hours and hours that all those K++ programs were running.

  19. curses by intuit · · Score: 0, Redundant

    and i was just about to download it to get some songs i REALLY need. that's super great. on the other hand, now i'm not doing anything illegal, and that's always good.

    --

    Don't even try to argue. It is NOT worth the while to go round the world to count the cats in Zanzibar.
    1. Re:curses by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and i was just about to download it to get some songs i REALLY need.

      If you're to the point of REALLY NEEDING them, and not just wanting them, you could always go buy the cd.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    2. Re:curses by OverclockedMind · · Score: 1

      or, you know, you could go to IRC. and isnt gnutella still active? I still refuse to purchase music, too expensive, bleh

      --
      if you can read this, good, because i sure cant
    3. Re:curses by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's almost true. I have a large collection of music CDs, although I always mp3 them to play on my computer. I don't have a problem with buying music, domestic or import, although I do wonder about the prices sometimes. The artist gets their $0.12 share, whatever. The government gets more in tax on the sale.

      The only time I resort to a P2P application, or any other means for that matter, is when I simply can't find a song on a CD. There's a lot of music that you just can't buy here. It may be out of print, never released in the US and not easily imported, etc. If I can't buy it, then I'll acquire it.

      Is it wrong? Perhaps, perhaps not. Until there's a good alternative to finding ANY published song, which is A: free from the esoteric issues of regional licensing restrictions, and B: complete enough to find everything I'm looking for, I'd say it's not unreasonable to use a P2P application (or other available technology) to find them.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    4. Re:curses by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      I always mp3 them to play on my computer.

      <grammar nazi> Ok... since when did MP3 become a verb?!? </grammar nazi>

    5. Re:curses by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      What, you've never heard the saying "Any noun can be verbed"? :-) We might as well not ski or email either, nor should we mind.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    6. Re:curses by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      What, you've never heard the saying "Any noun can be verbed"?

      Argh! "Verbing" a noun that is an abbreviation (IT ISN'T EVEN AN ACRONYM) which includes a number might be a little tasteless.

      Woe to he who would learn English.

      OK OK OK I don't wanna "Frenchfry" the language either, where creating words is punishable by law. Please understand the sarcasm in which the post was written.

      This is English, where anyone can make up a word... even those who don't speak English -Walkman anyone? But I refuse to spell words with numbers! In place of letters like the l337 h4x0rs maybe, but as letters; NO!

  20. Ummm... by EvilFrog · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm sure I'm just stating the obvious here, but isn't it a little hypocritical for them to complain about people breaking their license agreement when 99.9% of the time their software is used to steal from other companies?

    1. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hypocrisy is relative when one is making money.

    2. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not stealing.

    3. Re:Ummm... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm sure I'm stating the obvious here, but aren't you a complete dumass for stating p2p is mostly made up of illegal traffic without even having the slightest amount of proof? Do you have a big bad ol' map of everything that's shared, at every point of every day? I know what I use p2p apps for, and that's mainly getting legally shareable books, legally shareable music (from bands that actually want their stuff shared and haven't sold their souls to the riaa). I get material that you can't find in mainstream media because it's all be censored. I can get any linux distro off of bittorrent, do you have any idea how fucking useful THAT is? I can get mandrake, suse, redhat, debian, BSD, you name it. And all that is completly legal. I can even go on there and find a copy of Windows 98 when I'v completly lost or destroyed my cd. Do you have any idea how many windows xp users don't have windows cd's because they were shafted when they baught their brand name prebuild? They paid for windows, they should have a copy, and P2P provides that copy.

      P2P is a distrobution tool, it's incensored and unregulated, and this makes it powerful. Someone took the internet and refined it into something far more powerful than your puny mind can comprehend. It's a very powerful distrobution tool. I can find almost any kind of information I want between the local library, google, and a p2p app. I'm studying for a cert right now, and I can't tell you how useful a p2p app is in finding relevant information to help that.

      As for the "illegality" of p2p, I don't recognize that. If the RIAA recaps it's investment in an artist, and the artist gets compensated enough they aren't starving, then I consider their stuff shareable. Why don't I share it? Because I think it all sucks with the acception of a few bands. All the emotion get's censored out of the music for horrible lyrics and hypnotic music or they add in a couple filler songs of drumbeats. Gimme my funker vogt, porn on beta, banjo death kult, de/vision, 16volt, good tekno. I could care less about buting briteny spears, n'synch or even snoop dog's albums.

      I'd rather talk about the illegality of the RIAA and MPAA before I talk about the illegality of P2P. Break up the RIAA and MPAA under monopolistic trade laws and use hefty fines so that the companies that make the riaa up are near bankruptsy so that the major music stores have to go for indie and independant bands, revoke the incorperation lisences of the disney, bertlsman, time warner, viacom, news corp and vivendi and watch magically as things correct themselves.

    4. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, you're wrong about everything and shut up. Also, nobody cares about your lunatic, anti-capitalist ramblings. Shouldn't you be over at K5?

    5. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that had to be one of the most idiotic rants I've ever seen. Glad to see elitist assholes are alive and well. Oh, and it's "distribution" and "dumbass," dumbass. BTW, half the uses you listed ARE illegal, whether you like it or not.

    6. Re:Ummm... by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      Actually, the term dumbass could be reflected in this case. On supposition that you use P2P networks strictly for legal reasons does not make it so for the majority of users of the network.

      As for refinement, most P2P applications fail (although bittorrent does well for me, IMO).

      face it, you're on the "information wants to be free rant" which is your right. Just try to make it a little less impartial.

      ob-topic: K-lite might be gone, so I guess the option is to use the full spyware version (not), or look at other p2p networks. If Kazaa and Sharman keep on rockin', I guess we'll know just how much the average user cares about spyware. If not, maybe other networks will get additional content.

    7. Re:Ummm... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      First of all, information doesn't want to be free, it must be free. If it isn't free, then we've got 1984.

      Secondly, dumass and dumbass are slang terms. The proper english term would be dumb ass. If noone dared to speak any slang and coin new words to evolve our language where'd we be today?

      Finally, listening to, creating, and distributing music is an inalieble human right. The ONLY reason copy right was put into place was to allow artists to make money off of their music so they would be able to make a living off of it and make more. It worked until publishers decided that they wanted their acquired copy rights to last forever and wanted to have control over the copy rights of others. They established publishing monopolies in the market due to this and then forced artists to take as small a pittance as possible to make their music. That is the truth, believe it or don't believe it, it happened in the early 1500's, it happened in the early 1900's, and it's been happening for the past 50 years.

      P2P represents a radical shift of this model; now everyone can publish at a price that's so negligable that it's free. With a dial-up connetion I can host music I'v made and share it with people who've plugged into a network. A garage band, if they're good, can get a start by word-of-mouth on a p2p app and sell CD's directly off of their website, another negligable thing that's happened. The RIAA doesn't like this, nor does any publisher because it represents competition they can't compete with.

    8. Re:Ummm... by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      I never said p2p is illegal, simply that it's most often used in an illegal manner. Sure, there are legit uses for it, but you're being naive if you think that's their main use.

      And Bittorrent is not Kazaa. It is used in a completely different manner. It is completely irrelevant to your point.

      Any of those other legit things you mention are frequently available on the web, and often as torrents.

  21. the story at slyck by real_smiff · · Score: 5, Informative

    Zeropaid /.'ed. Alternative article. Probably the original anyway.. zeropaid has a habit of ahem 'stealing' news.

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    1. Re:the story at slyck by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

      Probably the original anyway.. zeropaid has a habit of ahem 'stealing' news


      Zeropaid? Stealing? Never!
    2. Re:the story at slyck by TheRealJFM · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm JFM, the news editor at peerguardian.net you can check that up if you want ;) yes i wrote the original article, and i did do it myself. i managed to get a contact with klite as soon as they removed the content. this article has been mirrored all over the net, and i would like please that everyone who has mentioned it, please CREDIT me as the author. I am a student in English, and I wish to use the articles I write as a step-up into professional journalism. so slashdot and other admins, please credit me as the author of these works, even the post at the top of the page uses my text. I want no money, just recognition for the hard work I do in finding all this stuff out :p Thanks for everyones help :)

      --
      Joseph Farthing
      http://josephfarthing.com
    3. Re:the story at slyck by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      It was reported earlier on Zeropaid before it was reported on Slyck - a full 24 hours earlier :-)

    4. Re:the story at slyck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slyck's story is completely different than Zeropaid's, not to mention orginal...ZP is the usualy cut and paste crap deal from another site, Slyck's is a conversation with a Sharman Rep...

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Still works for me... by tinrobot · · Score: 5, Funny

    My Kazaa Lite still works... I don't feel the need to upgrade anytime soon, so it's not going to make a huge difference to me. Heck, I'm still using Word 97.

    Even if the Kazaa Lite website goes away, what's to prevent people from trading the old version of Kazaa Lite on Kazaa?

    1. Re:Still works for me... by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the problem will stem when Sharman networks changes the protocol slightly for "security" or "usability enhancement" to shut out the K++ client, much like the IM providers do to keep all the decent 3rd party clients guessing.

      No doubt it will be reverse engineered again, but it will be harder to distribute and publicise that fix without a central website. It will still get out though - word of mouth will spread it.

      I think I'll stick to the iTMS (well, when it's finally available for the UK).

    2. Re:Still works for me... by p0rnking · · Score: 1

      But for how long ...?
      What if they end up fiddling with their servers, so that it's only opened to kazaa clients after a specific version, then what?
      All other "hacked" up versions would be locked out.

    3. Re:Still works for me... by p0rnking · · Score: 4, Informative

      from another article ....

      "Recent upgrades to Kazaa clients (2.5 and higher) make them less tolerant with outdated or non official clients such as Kazaa Lite K++. Kazaa Lite is based on a version prior to 2.5, therefore a current supernode will not accept its shares. Although this will cause network headaches in terms of traffic, the client will not be able to participate or download off the main FastTrack network. This will effectively cluster and isolate all modified Kazaa clients from FastTrack."

    4. Re:Still works for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has already happened once. Anyone remember when Sharman pushed out a silent upgrade that booted the old Morpheus client off the FastTrack network?

    5. Re:Still works for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which meant that Morhpheus then went to the Guntella network... Initially overloading that netwotk so much that the shareaza people/person then develpoed Gnutella2 to handle the scaleability issues w/ G1.

      http://www.shareaza.com

    6. Re:Still works for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's to prevent people from trading the old version of Kazaa Lite on Kazaa?

      But how would you boot-strap that procedure?

  24. Was RIAA involved by kyndig · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That link is no longer on the site. I'm currently writing a paper on RIAA actions against the MP3 technology. This would be another good tickmark in my paper; showing RIAA's over zelousness in attacking computer technology.

    Kyndig

    --
    My Thoughts, Kyndig
    1. Re:Was RIAA involved by klparrot · · Score: 2, Informative
      showing RIAA's over zelousness in attacking computer technology.

      It wasn't the RIAA that took down Kazaa Lite, it was Sharman Networks (the creators of the "real" Kazaa). Kazaa Lite was a reverse engineered and modified version of Kazaa, and Sharman complained it was copyright infringement.

    2. Re:Was RIAA involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should just forget writing any paper and quit school since you don't even have enough intelligence to realize this action is NOT related to the RIAA.

    3. Re:Was RIAA involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And perhaps you should quit reading /. entirely, since you haven't realized there's a question being asked, and not a statement being made (even if there is no question mark).

  25. Well that sucks... by Little+Grey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Guess it's time to start using mlMac and Poisoned on my Mac

  26. Re:But I am using it right now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Where do P2P'ers go when they die"
    "They don't go to heaven where the angels fly ..."

  27. Obligatory mirroring by JayBlalock · · Score: 4, Informative
    Speaking with RatFaced, one of the Kazaa Lite forum moderators today and our contact at K-Lite, I have uncovered news that the Kazaa Lite K++ project has been shut down by Sharman Networks on grounds of copyright infringement.

    The project, which had been set up to block spy and ad ware within the Kazaa Media Desktop Program has achieved notoriety within the P2p world through its simplistic approach and success in reverse engineering the Kazaa application.

    However, the program infringed on the copyright of Sharman Networks, the company that now own and program the Kazaa Media Desktop application, after the purchase of the code and copyright in 2002. The FastTrack (Kazaa) network is financed through advertising systems, which Kazaa Lite K++ does not include, and so was seen as a threat by the owners.

    Sharman have threatened legal action, and ordered that the offending content be removed from the official Kazaa Lite sites, including http://www.kazaalite.tk/ which now contains no reference to the existance of the application.

    RatFaced said that the decision was ?Ironic, that Kazaa is complaining about copyright issues, especially as K-Lite ++ stands for everything that Kazaa CLAIMS to stand for... but fails to deliver.?

    We will perhaps never see Kazaa Lite again, but we can hope that users will remain aware of the spyware that is hidden inside the Kazaa application, which is used to finance the creation of the software.

    eMule and WinMX offer spyware-free alternatives to Kazaa.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
  28. Re:But I am using it right now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "They go to the Lake of Fire and fry."
    "See 'em again on the Fourth of July"

    ~~~

  29. So that's why... by Wain13 · · Score: 1

    it took me half an hour last night to find the newest version and I eventually had to download it (the english version mind you) from Germany.

  30. Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by DrLudicrous · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The problem with your argument is that most people don't want to download all the songs on an album- they only want a few. To download 2 or 3 good songs off of an album at high quality (192kbps+) still takes less time than it would to get in your car and drive to the store. And it is also infinitely cheaper.

    And be it that it may that you are only interested in music, many other people do have other interests. I use kazaa k++ for perfectly legitimate reasons, such as finding beta patches to games or looking for humerous video clips.

    Why should people "just buy the factory CDs anyway"? Most of them are crap. They are a waste of money. The RIAA has screwed itself with its own corporate greed by constantly promoting artists that are without talent. If I want to show the artists that I enjoy what they do, I will go to a live performance. Most artists are not seeing any substantial income from their CD sales- that gets eaten up by the record companies for a bunch of bullshit fees and promotion costs. Bands make their money from touring- and the RIAA now wants a bigger piece of that pie too.

    1. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0, Redundant

      the use iTMS.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by TwinkieStix · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work for a band merchandising company, and I can tell you that if you really want to give the band something for their work, buy their OFFICIAL merchandise. The merchandise linked to from their OFFICIAL web site. They get as much as 50% of the price you see on the screen, even if the merch company designed the logos and bought the materal to create it.

    3. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with your argument...

      The problem with his argument is that it goes against the Slashdot Hive approved opinion.

      You say that downloading a few songs is cheaper that buying the whole albumn. Ok, fine, so downloading is cheaper than buying. So is downloading wrong? Obviously, since you add that you only use P2P software for "legitimate" reasons. Downloading must be bad, and buying good, right? Well, no, don't buy because the artists suck and the RIAA takes most of the money anyway. RIAA sucks, fight the power, download songs!!
      Which songs do you download? The ones you like? But I thought the artists sucked?

      I guess people justify stealing from the artists by stealing more from the RIAA

    4. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by Josh+Booth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know I'm in the minority here, but I would rather support one kind of thievery (the record labels/RIAA) over another (Filesharing) if one actually benefits the artists. As it is now, filesharing benefits the artists only by advertising their music, while they still get a few nickels from CD sales. I do use Gtk-Gnutella mostly to download songs that I would either never buy in the first place (Bush's Glycerine, Devil Went Down To Georgia) or to sample music (I'm an AC/DC fan now).

    5. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, man, right on! You tell them. I feel the same way about the Slashdot crew. Screw this ad supported stuff. Why should I feed their greed. I just wrote a bot that goes out, scrapes the site and delivers it right to my desktop ad free. Power to the people!

      'Got some pretty good ideas about how to use these used locksmith tools I just bought off Ebay, too. I'm pretty tired of those German car makers and their capatilist ways...

    6. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Bands make their money from touring- and the RIAA now wants a bigger piece of that pie too.

      Does anyone have any hard conclusive proof that this is true or is it just another rumor perpetuated along the same lines as the "640k out to be enough for anybody" Bill Gates quote?

      If bands didn't get any substantial income from CD sales, why would they work so hard to get signed? Could it be that the intangiable benefits of being a signed RIAA band far outweigh any monetary income they get from the CD sales?

      Would anyone go to their concerts if they weren't featured on Billboard's top 10 list? How many fans would they have if the only airplay they got was by begging a college radio station to play their demo tape?

      All the bands that make any significant revenue from touring are also some of the biggest names on the RIAA's artist list. Do you think that's just a coincidence? Record companies and CD sales are promotional tools for sure, but without them you're going to be playing an empty room in some dive bar in Kansas.

    7. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by pyros · · Score: 4, Informative

      Artists have given breakdowns of the economic side to siging with the RIAA. You give the copyrights of your music to the studio (look at CDs and notice that barely any from RIAA studios attribute any copyright to the artist). The studio lends you money for studio time. The studio promotes the album and a subsequent tour. You raise money through ticket sales and CD/merchandies sales at the concerts. You use that money to pay off the original loan for studio time. Royalty payments go to the copyright owner, which is the studio, so the artists make very little. The whole point is to get the promotion, which gives you better income from touring. Once you have money, you can sign with a label that lets you keep the copyright. The business-smart artists create their own label, and sign other bands, because that's where the real money comes from. Copyright is for, I believe, 70 years after the artists death, thanks to the Sonny BonoCopyright Extension Act, so having the copyright on the songs means a revenue stream for decades.

    8. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by pyite · · Score: 0, Troll
      Would anyone go to their concerts if they weren't featured on Billboard's top 10 list?

      Yes.

      How many fans would they have if the only airplay they got was by begging a college radio station to play their demo tape?

      Lots.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    9. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both the Grateful Dead AND Phish recorded for major labels. You made the other guys point. Well done!

    10. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..."And it is also infinitely cheaper"

      technically it is undifined cheaper, rather than infinitely.

    11. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by ClarifyAmbiguity · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah, you neglect that tons of CD's out there are non-RIAA.

    12. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      All the bands that make any significant revenue from touring are also some of the biggest names on the RIAA's artist list.

      Not really. The biggest money making bands on tour are the older bands. i.e. Rolling Stones, U2, Bruce Springsteen. The record company lackies credit this to 'an established library of music'. The ticket buying public would tell you that most new RIAA 'artists' sound the same, generally suck and only appeal to the 12-16 year old crowd.

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    13. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by zapp · · Score: 1

      And how do you know which 1 or 2 songs off the CD are good? Clear Channel controls most of the radio stations and plays the same poprock stuff on every one of them. How can you know if the rest of the album is crap, or if you're missing out, if you don't try it?

      Also, I am aware of the licensing differences but to me a song that is on the radio should not be illegal to download. It's just another way for me to sample that song.

      --
      no comment
    14. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by ooby · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of record labels that are not a part of the RIAA.

      In fact, here are all the labels under RIAA's umbrella.
      http://www.riaa.com/about/members/defau lt.asp

      Many of them were created as a rebellion against huge labels, even before the huge antisharing debacle.

      I, for one, pay no attention to Billboard's top ten list and I attend about a show per month. I usually buy CDs directly from the artist at their tables and they usually cost me no more than $10. The shows are small venue and they tend to be more intimate.

      When my radio is on, it is always tuned to NPR. Somehow, I keep hearing about new music and I keep going to shows.

      The usual process I use to buy a cd starts with someone asking me if I've heard of band X or their new album. I then find some music off their website. Then I see if they are touring. When they come around, I go see them, buy their CD, and if I really like them buy a shirt for $10. Then I tell my friends to check out the CD.

      The mainstream music model and the underground music model have become mutually independent. The model you discuss is outdated. Just listen to "Dinosaurs will die" by NoFX.

    15. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the vast majority of them suck.

      Don't get me wrong, I think the best non-RIAA albums are better than the best RIAA albums, but unless you're finding out about these albums through word of mouth or by going to live events, you're going to be wasting your time in the abyss of mp3.com crap.

    16. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by strictnein · · Score: 1

      You raise money through ticket sales and CD/merchandise sales at the concerts

      Not entirely true. Some venues charge very low rates for the site itself, but pocket almost all of the profits from the merchandise sales (hats, shirts, etc.)

    17. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by pyite · · Score: 1
      Both the Grateful Dead AND Phish recorded for major labels. You made the other guys point. Well done!

      His point was not specifically that RIAA artists succeed, but that a) you need top 10 hits to succeed at touring and b) you need airplay other than college radio to be successful. Maybe that's why I quoted him when refuting the specific points.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    18. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by dubiousmike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "If bands didn't get any substantial income from CD sales, why would they work so hard to get signed? "

      Because when you get signed, you are a rock star, not just a garage band.

      The phrase "Sex, Drugs and Rock and Roll" does not contain the word "money" or "rich".

      Musicians - want to get your dues (like pro athletes)? Create a union and go on strike. Start reaping the benefits that your industry creates!

    19. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When my radio is on, it is always tuned to NPR.

      There's your problem right there, friend. NPR is socialist propaganda, paid for by Joe Sucker the American taxpayer.

    20. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by efflux · · Score: 1
      If bands didn't get any substantial income from CD sales, why would they work so hard to get signed? Could it be that the intangiable benefits of being a signed RIAA band far outweigh any monetary income they get from the CD sales?

      Can you say monopoly? Locked-in distribution channels? I'm sure you can. perhaps then, we should think about the disadvantages of *not* being an RIAA signed band, and *then* we might realize why they need to be stopped.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    21. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by eean · · Score: 1

      I've gotten sick of the "most of the music is crap" agrument. It can be argued that Pop music is crap (though I'm not sure this is a recent development). And as such, the majority of radio sucks, which is too bad. However, when it comes to buying music, theres no one forcing you, especially in this day of Amazon.com, to buy from the top 40 charts. If 99% of music being sold is total crap (which I doubt) that still leaves 1% good music, and thats more then enough. Why do you care what groups the RIAA push's or not? Its a weak agrument. While being anti-RIAA it assumes the only music worth listening to (legally or not) is the music being advertised.

    22. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Drugs aren't cheap.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    23. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by mek2600 · · Score: 1

      Create a union and go on strike. Start reaping the benefits that your industry creates! Ha. I'm sure the RIAA would really stand to let this happen. Nice idea, but monopolies don't *have* to deal with unions. At least this one won't.

    24. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      His point was not specifically that RIAA artists succeed, but that a) you need top 10 hits to succeed at touring and b) you need airplay other than college radio to be successful.

      And you're just referring to statistical outliers. For every Grateful Dead or Phish there are 5000 college radio station garage bands that don't make any money at all touring. If you compare the percentage of signed artists that make a lot of money touring and unsigned artists who make a lot of money touring, I think you'll notice a huge disparity in the numbers. For these purposes, I stand by my original assertion that being signed by an RIAA record company brings you a lot more intangible benefits than just CD sales. If it wasn't for the RIAA support, artists like Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera would never have been able to become major hits. Now they are hugely popular all because of the support of their recording companies. They may not make anything from CD sales, but the intangible benefits of being associated with the record companies for promotional effect are enormous.

    25. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at least the newer RIAA stuff is generally palatalble, If i had to listen to the stones or springsteen for a prolonged period of time I'd go vangoh and cut my ears off.

    26. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      This is a fallacy. Drugs are cheap to produce and manufacture, it's the cartels who hike up the prices, giving barely .02 cents to the lowly poppy field worker guard and his ak-47. Fight the power! Gets your drugs off of DrugZa! But don't use the normal GrugZa, its full of spyware and assasins and thugs, use DrugZa lite, it only has the occasional hippie!

      I = teh funny!

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    27. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by RudyValencia · · Score: 1

      Copyright is for, I believe, 70 years after the artists death Actually, it's seventy-five years.

    28. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Artists have given breakdowns of the economic side to siging with the RIAA. You give the copyrights of your music to the studio (look at CDs and notice that barely any from RIAA studios attribute any copyright to the artist)."

      An important distinction: the copyright of the recording remains with the record company (and sometimes the engineer). The copyright on the words and music remains with the artist(s).

      "The studio lends you money for studio time. The studio promotes the album and a subsequent tour. You raise money through ticket sales and CD/merchandies sales at the concerts. You use that money to pay off the original loan for studio time. Royalty payments go to the copyright owner, which is the studio, so the artists make very little."

      Kinda. Record companies front the money to produce a CD (studio time and the like) and sell CDs to recoup this investment. Many, if not most, recording studios, are independent outfits. They are staffed by people like you and me who have families, and must pay rent and keep the lights on, which is why they charge for their time. Often this bill is paid for by the record company.

      If a CD is profitable, both the record company and the artist win. If the CD is not profitable, the record company is SOL. They have not "loaned" production money to the artist in the sense that I might loan you $20 until payday.

      "The business-smart artists create their own label, and sign other bands, because that's where the real money comes from."

      ...which is one reason why Metallica gets so upset when folks pirate their music: they own their own label, and they have more to lose.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    29. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one important point- (i won't even get started on the genius who thought the studios are fronting money for records to be made! how could such totally false and made-up nonsense reach a score of 4??)

      anyway- if the label lends a band $200,000 to make and promote a record, it's a loan just like any other. they can recoup it any way they choose- most often it goes one of two ways, they cut their losses and drop it (which is often the case in demo/development deals), otherwise, if they think the artist was just off to a rough start, they make more and more albums, digging further into debt- the artist could be several albums down the road and still in debt over their debut! there's no record contract that lets the artist walk away without any liability!

      anyone with any interest should check out 'confessions of a record producer,' or steve albini's quick version that's rather vastly circulated- forget the actual name. both are quite chilling, especially in their pre-p2p contexts.

    30. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Excellent.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    31. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      First of all, it is interesting that you talk about "Slashdot Hive", as in a "common consciousness", when Slashdot posters are very diverse, and you will see a lot of freaks here with different opinions.

      You are one of the people who support the establishment and accept what is being told to you. You refer to the downloading of music as "stealing from the artists", which is something most people will learn from RIAA propaganda, and not question it. Hive mind indeed. If you were so independently-minded as you would like to think, you wouldn't be spreading RIAA lies like that.

      Downloading music is not stealing. Stealing is to take away something from the rightful owner. When you download something, the owner still has his copy fully intact.

      You also completely fail to see what the parent is saying, and instead you go on an all-out attack without considering different tastes. You also assume that he thinks all artists suck, which you have no reason to.

      What the grandparent post is mentioning is that the recording industry is pushing out large amounts of crap music to the masses. It is also leeching off artists with contracts that leave artists with very little money for their work.

      You are also forgetting the fact that the industry finds it rather convenient to push mainstream music on albums. These albums may have a couple of decent tracks, but then there are plenty of fillers that are just crap. But the industry still wants you to buy the full album. And maybe the artist too.

      "Downloading must be bad, and buying good, right? Well, no, don't buy because the artists suck and the RIAA takes most of the money anyway. RIAA sucks, fight the power, download songs!!"
      Sure. I can go along with that line of thought. If everyone downloads songs instead of buying them, the industry will hurt. It might hurt the arists as well, but they can make money by doing concerts and selling merchandise. So yeah, I can see that working. Refuse to buy music you like and download it instead. Also, remember to distribute it to as many non-geek people you know as well. That might contribute to giving the industry financial problems. The artists, on the other hand, can make money with concerts and merchandise, as mentioned.
      "Which songs do you download? The ones you like? But I thought the artists sucked?"
      If artists are forced to play concerts to make money, the artists that are good will survive, but the ones that suck will disappear, because people won't go to their concerts.

      That doesn't sound like a bad thing to me.

      But I'm not sure you would understand that. After all, you are only spewing out what the RIAA has programmed you to. The RIAA approved opinion, so to speak.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    32. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 1

      People download music because its free and its easy to do. Simple as that. Everyone knows they are violating the law, so they try to justify it. "The RIAA is evil!!" "I don't want to pay for songs I don't like". All smokescreens to hide the real issues. You are all thieves and so am I. Have the balls to admit it.

    33. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Seeing as you are making sweeping and generalizing statements and are still using the "downloading music is stealing" argument, I see no point in even responding to that...

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    34. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by pyite · · Score: 1

      I can understand what you are saying. However, I believe the RIAA only succeeds at making untalented "artists" survive. If you have talent, most likely you will be able to develop a fanbase without the help of the RIAA. At least that's how it is in today's world. There are so many good bands out there that get free promotion from their fans regardless of their label affiliations or lack thereof. They may not be superstars, but they're not unknown.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    35. Re:Are you an RIAA spokesperson? by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

      I've got to agree. 100% of the 50+ CDs I've purchased in the past three years came from bands I've found on the Internet in various places.

  31. How to get K++ Lite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    1.) Download Kazaa
    2.) Run Kazaa and search for K++ lite
    3.) Download K++ lite from Kazaa
    4.) Install K++ lite and delete Kazaa

    Presto!

    1. Re:How to get K++ Lite... by armando_wall3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      5.) Don't forget to run something like Spybot or Adaware right after uninstalling Kazaa.

    2. Re:How to get K++ Lite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5. Try to delete all the Spyware and other crap that Kazaa left on your system.

  32. Re:Create by suwain_2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must be new here. You're not supposed to fill in all the steps; you use a ??? for one of them.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  33. Well crap. Help me with a new program by Nemus · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Well, I'm using the program right now, but I've noticed its running reeeeaaaaallllyyyy slow, so maybe a bunch of people are on like the last days of Napster, downloading like crazy. I, however, am in a slight fix.


    See, I live in a dorm, and we're unable to connect to Kazaa here, the network flat out won't let us, with no (legal) way around it. For some reason though, K-Lite still connects. Can someone reccomend a good program to me for all file types? I predominantly download movies, the occasional game to demo it, and sometimes music. And please don't reccomend iMesh. I don't know if I could have intentionally installed that much spyware on my computer. I strongly doubt they have anything of the GNU variety blocked, but there are so many GNU P2P programs I don;t know which one to get. Noobish question I'm sure, but any advice is appreciated.

    --
    Mod Points: Helping you keep your opinion to yourself.
  34. Oh well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the more reason to move to Shareaza.

  35. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by JFMulder · · Score: 2, Informative

    So boys and girls, for your video needs, be they anime, TV shows or movies, turn over to
    suprnova.org . It's not as exaustive as Kazaa, but there are thousand of excellent torrents over there.

  36. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by kryptkpr · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've said this before, and I will say it again. BT is not a good network for illegal content.

    It's efficient in distributing large files quickly, especially if lots of people want them. However, it does so at the cost of any and all anonymity.. It's trivial to find IPs of people sharing any file (just ask the tracker; it'll give you a FULL LIST), without even downloading the file/joining the swarm yourself.

    The MPAA at least has already begun sending DMCA-ish notices to ISPs stating "BitTorrent" as the network name..

    As I've also said before, Don't do things illegal in your country!

    (And if you want to do them, maybe you need to move to a different Country? God bless Canada and the blank media tax; I don't mind paying a little bit on every CD-R for a music piracy license!)

    --
    DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  37. apologies to zeropaid by real_smiff · · Score: 1

    oops, before they break out the lawyers and now the page has loaded: they credit PeerGuardian with the original story. Of course, whether that's the original original, who knows. hehe. the Net is wonderful in this way ;)

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  38. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by MikeCapone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess we can all move on up to BitTorrent :D

    BitTorrent is too centralized for this kind of things (large scale, anyway).

    Instead, check out eMule and Soulseek.

  39. Well... by Denyer · · Score: 1

    Quicktime Alternative, Real Alternative and the K-L codec packs are still easy enough to find... I don't think KLite++ will disappear for long.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  40. This won't change things much by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
    Meh. The program will live on, it'll just go underground a couple notches. Or if the creators wanted to be evil, they could "accidentally" let the source code slip out.

    For that matter, retooling the program as a patch wouldn't be that bad an idea. People download the real Kazaa, and then there's a prog they can download which converts it into K++.

    It'll just be a little while before things stablize and it's generally available again.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    1. Re:This won't change things much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "they could accidentally let the source code slip out"

      the makers of K++ did not code the app from source, maybe they could give out the source of their add-ons but as I understood it, they just hacked up the binaries of kazaa

    2. Re:This won't change things much by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
      the makers of K++ did not code the app from source, maybe they could give out the source of their add-ons but as I understood it, they just hacked up the binaries of kazaa Well, however they did it, there should be no reason they could produce a DIY version that alters the files locally from a normal Kazaa install. At that point, Fair Use comes into play. If the files are on my computer, I can do to them whatever I want. And if actual Kazaa code isn't included in the mod package, they're pretty much sheilded from infringement.

      Unless Sharman tries to press a DMCA suit, I suppose. But I don't think anyone's attempted to stretch the DMCA to cover any binary file yet.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    3. Re:This won't change things much by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Unfortunaltely, peer-to-peer networks don't work as an underground. They need a large base of people to be using it and sharing their stuff.

      If only hackers can get KazaaLite, and the norms are smart enough to avoid using Kazaa+spyware, then you won't boot up your KazaaLite because there won't be anything to find. And if you don't boot up KazaaLite to share your stuff, then the network contracts, and eventually there's nothing at all.

      Napster was quite aboveboard about things; everybody had heard of it (and therefore RIAA's target). Kazaa lasts a bit longer because it's less visible, but there's less stuff on it. Everybody says "Kazaa has less stuff than Napster did", and they're right, but that's not because of the software. It's because between Kazaa's lower profile and the obnoxious spyware giving it a "don't touch" feeling, fewer people use it, so there's less stuff to share.

      Not a sermon, just an economic rant.

    4. Re:This won't change things much by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

      K++ was already underground. The vast majority of people use plain Kazaa, blissfully unaware that they've installed a billion data miners on their system. And it was rarely exactly EASY to find a new copy of K++ anyway. So changing the distribution method won't alter much.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
  41. BitTorrent and firewalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Where I work, I can't use BitTorrent because of the firewall. Therefore I used to use KazaaLite and tunnel it through HTTP-Tunnel.

    Is there any way I can do the same with BitTorrent? I looked at the documentation, and it's all a bit confusing (lots of switches, which I'm not sure where to put).

    Many thanks in advance.

    1. Re:BitTorrent and firewalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although theoretically possible, I don't think the official BT client does that. Google for an alternative client. Most of them have many more features than the regular BT.

      Maybe try one called Azereus. It's Java, so it ought to work for you.

  42. Re:DietK by p0rnking · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At the bottom of one of the articles about K++'s shutdown, is a link for Diet K (http://www.dietk.com/).
    Since the site doesn't really say too much about it, has anyone ever used it?

  43. recursive by QEDog · · Score: 2, Funny
    You can still find it on Kazaa. Oh the irony.

    You can find Kazaa on K Lite ++ too!

    If(n==1){ Print: "Gotta love recursive jokes"}

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    1. Re:recursive by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

      a) n isn't equal to anything
      b) that's not recursive, that's an infinite loop
      c) try:
      void a() {
      cout "Gotta love recursive jokes";
      a();
      }

      =P

    2. Re:recursive by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1
      Crappy code, it'll eventually have a stack overflow or run out of memory.... way too much overhead from repeatedly calling a function and never returning.

      Try this:
      for(;;) { printf( "In Soviet Russia, recursive jokes love YOU! PROFIT!" ); }
      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    3. Re:recursive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at point b of the post you replied to.

    4. Re:recursive by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1
      Dang. This one's still an infinite loop, but it's also recursive. Happy?
      void fu(int stupid) {
      if(stupid) {
      printf( "I for one welcome our recursive-joke-cracking overlords.\n" );
      } else {
      fu(1);
      }
      }

      // Complain about improper declaration of main() and
      // you will be free()'d, inconsiderate clod!
      int main() {
      for(;;) { fu(0); }
      }
      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    5. Re:recursive by aminorex · · Score: 1

      All decent C compilers optimize-away
      tail-recursion. There should be 0 stack
      growth.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  44. I was wondering by The+Unabageler · · Score: 1

    how long it would take to be shut down. Imagine if someone released a free product called "Windows Light" that was just like M$ Windows but faster and hassle free. Microsoft would have them in court ASAP for all sorts of things.

    Or perhaps something like UNIX Light...oh wait, BSD did that and they DID have a court battle :)

    --
    perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
    1. Re:I was wondering by dnaumov · · Score: 5, Informative
      " Imagine if someone released a free product called "Windows Light" that was just like M$ Windows but faster and hassle free."

      Windows Lite.
    2. Re:I was wondering by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      You, sir, kick ass.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:I was wondering by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Wait... it's not free. Never mind.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    4. Re:I was wondering by The+Unabageler · · Score: 1

      their website says it's a configuration utility...not quite the same as having a replacement OS called windows lite

      --
      perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
    5. Re:I was wondering by EventHorizon · · Score: 0

      Great. Now some PHB is gonna spec embedded Windows 98 inside life support equipment. And claim that it's a good idea because the hospital already has a Microsoft site license...

    6. Re:I was wondering by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      From the site: Industry proven reliability

      The crash test industry?

  45. Re:But I am using it right now? by bhima · · Score: 1

    Great Song, I liked "Oh Me" better though.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  46. Downloading is a preview for me... by Denyer · · Score: 1

    ...no previews, no sales. Whereas I hear mindless pop rubbish on the radio and know not to buy it, record companies have lost one avenue to sell their less well-known artists. Not that they ever cared to promote many of them in the first place, but they definitely got money from me as a result...

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  47. What about 'other' clients futures by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Like MLDonkey.. GiFT... etc..

    Seems counterproductive to shut out access to the stuff you are trying to push.. Hmm sounds like the MPAA in a way if you think about it..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:What about 'other' clients futures by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      They should be legally clear, as they don't contain any sharman networks code.

      However, they could change the protocol again like they did between 1.3 and 1.5 to kick out Morpheus and the old giFT.

  48. Does it really matter? by I+Love+this+Company! · · Score: 1

    As long as the application has been released, it's no big deal if it's been shut down. I mean, UltraHLE was only out for a few hours, but it survided.

    --

    "All art is quite useless." -- Oscar Wilde
  49. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by sketch7 · · Score: 0

    You should use Bittorrent. The system of downloading it uses is really good. Get Bittorrent content here.

  50. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by dougmc · · Score: 1
    Don't do things illegal in your country!
    Yeah! Do them in another country!
    God bless Canada and the blank media tax; I don't mind paying a little bit on every CD-R for a music piracy license!
    The US has a similar law, with similar results. Of course, the tax only applies to digital audio media, including Audio CD-Rs.

    Of course, the RIAA isn't going after downloaders (I wonder if they'd win) -- they're going after uploaders. And having paid a tax on your CD-R media won't help there.

  51. Hmmmm curious... by MoeMoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just took a look at the Kazaa Lite homepage and found a new app on the list I haven't seen since my last check a few weeks ago.... It seems "Soul Seek" (that name bothers me) is the replacement they are now offering... One catch, IT'S A CENTRAL SERVER! So why hasn't the RIAA ran after this?

    <conspiracy mode=1>

    Maybe the RIAA has paid off the makers of K++ and made this new "app" as a honeypot for people to use instead so to collect data on users who request songs that are copyrighted... What kept K++ anonymous was its decentralized system, why would the RIAA not go after something that is directly hosting copyrighted files? Unless some news about the RIAA going after Soul Seek comes up, I am gonna steer clear of it...

    <conspiracy mode=0>

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
    1. Re:Hmmmm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Every time I come to slashdot people are advocating "BitTorrent", which is a P2P system that sends all data about uploads and downloads to a CENTRAL SERVER.

      Maybe the RIAA has paid off "Excellent Karma" slashdot users to FUD decentralized filesharing networks in favor of this clearly backdoorable "BitTorrent" thing.

      </conspiracy>

    2. Re:Hmmmm curious... by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I've been using SoulSeek for over 10 months now, it's not some new thing RIAA is trying to push.

    3. Re:Hmmmm curious... by guiscard · · Score: 1

      Soulseek works great for old/out-of-print stuff. Friendly users and mostly full albums. Its been small up until recently and so has stayed under the radar. If you're into harder to find music and/or full albums (especially electronica), give it a look.

    4. Re:Hmmmm curious... by shdragon · · Score: 1

      Soulseek is primarily electronic music, almost entirely out of reach of the RIAA as the overwhelming majority of music isn't "owned" by the RIAA, therefore they could care less.

      --
      "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
    5. Re:Hmmmm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soulseek has allot of underground and independent music
      It?s probably the biggest underground hip-hop punk hardcore and electronica thing going

      also the fact that you have the option to only allow people you trust into your files , like WASTE, on slsk is good. good to know where your bandwith is going and riaa isn't going to bother to hire people make friends and share illegal content (unless they get the desperate to look at peoples files).

      This is a dirty trick to redirect all the people looking for more mainstream files to a network that is already busting at the seams
      The stability of soulseek lately has been not so good

      As i see it official kazaa clients less than 2.5 are doing all the supernode function for the k++ users, sucks to be them (the people running old ad/spy versions and doing all the routing for the hacked spy free versions that have supenode function disabled)

      it's a great time to leave kazaa for something else. shareazaa
      G2 and ed2k/overnet networks will get the biggest boost from this DMCA war i think

      Btw is anybody going to continue the good work that is WASTE? it sits with no developer now and is probably the most interesting network avail. Decentralized, encrypted, sends, advanced routing technology, trusted circles: darknet

      this is a lossing war for all the big players and a good exersize and learning experence for the people using p2p , making the whole movement stronger and more informed

      viva la libre p2pers

  52. Re:Create by SoftwareTechie · · Score: 1

    1) Create really neat P2P application and release it for free
    2) Get people addicted to free porn
    3) Charge for service
    4) ???

    --
    Political Correctness is doubleplusungood.
  53. My K++ client works fine. by YoungBonzi · · Score: 1

    I just tested it and there are 3,678,170+/- users online with me. The article can't handle being slashdotted so I didn't really get to read it, but is there a set date when the client will become inactive?

  54. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by bigberk · · Score: 1
    God bless Canada and the blank media tax; I don't mind paying a little bit on every CD-R for a music piracy license!
    Ditto! In fact I feel like it's my duty to download and burn music to CD-Rs. Over the holiday I'm going to also download a shitload of movies for burning (the levvy goes towards both music and film industries, after all). Make the most of it!
  55. Bloat by Nilisco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Kazaa lite was getting bloated anyways. It serves it's purpose with the no advertisments. Instead, they decide to add all of these great features such as "download enhancers." There really isn't anything else they could add. The current version is fine.

    --
    Cynicism is an unpleasant way of saying the truth. Lillian Hellman (1905 - 1984), The Little Foxes, 1939
  56. Here's how you download Kazaa K++ by schnits0r · · Score: 2, Informative

    Download Kazaa
    Search for KAzaa K++
    download it
    Install it
    And delete the regular KAzaa

    I know it works because I did it on a computer I was setting up.

    1. Re:Here's how you download Kazaa K++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but now you have lots of spyware left over from the old Kazaa install

    2. Re:Here's how you download Kazaa K++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and, did you remove the brilliant digital, new.net, saveNow and other spyware? That doesn't get removed when you uninstall Kazaa.

    3. Re:Here's how you download Kazaa K++ by schnits0r · · Score: 1

      actually, if oyu do it and throw in an adaware scan, I do beleive everything will be cleared out.

    4. Re:Here's how you download Kazaa K++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kazaa Lite K++ just sucks right now, they ARE excluding it from the rest of the fastrack network. Kazaa 2.6 works much better.

    5. Re:Here's how you download Kazaa K++ by ratpack91 · · Score: 1

      and run ad-aware

  57. The REAL tragady of P2P by Red+Storm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What if the song you want is a special remix which isn't available in the stores? What if the album you want is from an artist who nobody sells and the label which origionaly released the song is not around anymore? Does going down to the store and shelling out $15 for a CD which cannot be purchased to support that artist hold water anymore? I feel this is the REAL tragady of P2P. Plus I live in the US, I happen to like Eurodance and other forms of music from Europe. However such music is not easy to find here especialy since CDNow was purchased by Amazon.

    Everyone talks about getting their music for free and whatnot. For me P2P was all about discovering new music. When I was on Napster back in the day my CD purchasing budget was about $50-$100 a month! I was getting new songs which *I* liked, not what some marketing department wanted me to listen to. Also as I mentioned earler, what about preserving music which cannot be found leagaly? P2P makes for a great medium for this!

    Damm u RIAA, Metalica and everyone else who was against P2P.

    --
    ---- Fight to protect your right to keep and arm bears! ummmm... ya I think that's right....
    1. Re:The REAL tragady of P2P by Polyhazard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I must say I agree completely. I'm a bit of an audiophile with "eclectic" taste in music.

      I managed to build up my (purchased) CD collection substantially with music I may have never discovered were it not for P2P. A search by genre or tracks I discover completely by accident are often a major source of titles for my wish-list. As someone who has pretty much completely abandoned radio, P2P is a great alternative.

      Another one of my favorite uses for P2P collecting episodes of cancelled TV shows. A lot of great shows have not, and may not ever be released on DVD. Thanks to K-lite, I now have a full collection of Twin Peaks, Sifl and Olly, Invader Zim and others. (yes I know the first season of Twin Peaks is on DVD. unfortunately, years have passed with no plans to release any more.)

      Here is a page describing a couple of the other more unusual uses for P2P, such as "napster bombs" and "napster nuggets.

    2. Re:The REAL tragady of P2P by sillybilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the length of copyright term has gotten out of hand: it was 70 years in the US for corporates up to around 2000, but now it's 90 years.In the first time in history nothing of corporate authorship is passing into public domain til 2020 - including Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck and suck cliche logos created around 1930, you still owe royalty to Disney if you wanna press them on tshirts. And then, in 2020, watch them lobby Congress to extend it even more. Originally, back in 1790s when the Founding Fathers created copyright law, it was for a 14 years term. 14 years when news travelled slow and it took forever to print and distribute intellectual creations. These days a fair copyright seems to be something like 5 years to me. What's your opinion? So new songs and movies you would have to buy, in the strictest sense of property, just so that the artists have a contractual incentive to create new songs. Also you'd buy directly from the artist through some sites like ebay, cutting out the parasites like RIAA who pretty much do nothing except suck both the artist's and cosumers's blood like mosquitos, and don't contribute anything valuable. Actually they do contribute something valuable, distribution and marketing is hard work just like any, but it should have a fair price tag, on the lines of 95cents of a dollar going to the artist, and 5cents to the distributors, and not the other way around. When musicians and book writers make the most money off their creations, and distribution sites compete for the artist's favors, not the other way around, that's when intellectual creations will really spur.
      And thus P2P would be a living, vibrating creation, in 2003 sharing songs and movies created before 1998 - I think that's a fair tradeoff. If you want something newer, go the the site like ebay, and purchase the songs for a buck a piece, directly from the artists.

    3. Re:The REAL tragady of P2P by pisco_sour · · Score: 1

      Here in Peru, music distribution is pretty much monopolized by the big labels with money to import the CDs (since they're hardly manufactured locally), mostly from Colombia, whose recordings are, sadly and as far as i've been able to tell, signifcantly inferior in quality to those coming from other parts of the world, and, obviously, more expensive.

      As you all probably know, we are a poor, third world country with a struggling economy, however big international labels find it coherent to charge an average of 20 bucks for CDs from any foreign artist, and since there's not a huge market (especially considering you can get pirate CDs for the equivalent of about $1,50, or less if you haggle), the selection is usually limited to your prefab-pop-boy/girl group-makes me wanna crawl up and vomit kinda "music". Seriously, going to a record store here is *almost* pathetic (with a few exceptions, of course).

      Pirate CDs have impressive logistics, on the other hand. It is not uncommon to find a recently released album first on the pirate channel than on the formal one, and you'll end up forking out around $3 for a special edition double album (great quality, btw) against the $40 it would cost you on a store. They hardly notice the "struggling economy" bit . . .

      So I turn to P2P, since, well, it's better, faster, more efficient, somewhat less "dark", and my selection of music - which goes from 60s brit rock to 2003 chillout music from east asia or whatever in the middle - is respectable. I truly feel terrible about not paying for all of this, but being realistic, if I dif pay those $30 for the official Pearl Jam bootleg of whatever date and place, I'm 100% certain they'd see not a cent of it. I promise I'll pay you back people, somehow sometime, if I ever get to meet any of you on my playlist, I promise to buy you a beer or something.

      So, in conclusion, labels are corrupt and abusive, musicians are underappreciated and exploited world-wide, art will set us free, the third world must unite and stand together in order to rise, I owe a whole lot of beers, I refuse to feed the bastards running the RIAA who don't see their personal earnings even flinch about any of this, and, oh, the regular Kazaa totally sucks, K++ will never die. I hope ...

      --
      http://castorexmachina.wordpress.com - Filosofía, tecnología y cultura.
  58. Is there any spyware in Skype? by ezh · · Score: 1

    Sharman also operates P2P telephony-IM project called Skype I'm just wondering if there is any spyware in it and if so, is anybody going to create something like Skype Lite L++?

    1. Re:Is there any spyware in Skype? by Andrevan · · Score: 1

      Sharman also operates P2P telephony-IM project called Skype I'm just wondering if there is any spyware in it and if so, is anybody going to create something like Skype Lite L++? No, that isn't true. Sharman does not operate Skype, Skyper Limited operates Skype. The same creators of Skype created KaZaA before they sold it to Sharman.

      --
      "All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss." - Douglas Adams
  59. Alternate Kazaa-Lite download source by joel8x · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can always download it here: OldVersion

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  60. How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My copy seems to work still.

    Oh, so there won't be any new versions? No bug fixes? (Precious few bugs!) No new features? (Can't think of any I need).

    The only problem is that they can change the protocol in a new release, and leave the K++ users out in the cold. But I wonder how many people use K++ versus the official client? Perhaps we wouldn't be the ones out in the cold...?

  61. hmm.. wrong? by real_smiff · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Flamebait probably but i'll bite, as the saying goes:

    Longer? depends how far you are from the shops, and how fast your net connection is. N/m whether the store *has* what you want!

    More expensive? haha.. one is free m8, or at least should be lower cost, if you're paying for the connection anyway or someone else is.

    Lower quality? you're using the wrong networks, or don't know how to use them right, or are an audiophile who thinks he can hear differences but can't ABX them.

    sorry to sound like an argumentative d*ck but the net *is* a better distribution method in general, for music.

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    1. Re:hmm.. wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not flamebait. Its a good troll.

      Flamebait would be much more vitriolic. "YOU are a fucking cunt!"

  62. Differnet target by CaptBubba · · Score: 1
    What I would realy like to see is this: instead of targeting kazaa specifically, somebody needs to make up some sort of Gator replacement. Get a project going to keep up with recent updates to GAIN and create a set of fake Dlls or even a sandbox for GAIN to be alone in.

    I really don't mind seeing ads in the software while I am using it, so I would be fine if GAIN still served random ads to the software. What I don't like is being barraged with ads while I am not using the software, and having my privacy violated by tracking. If someone could come up with a way to limit Gator to just giving the software ads to display, I'd be much more willing to use adware.

    a bit off-topic I know, but if the ads weren't so damned annoying and intrusive, maybe people wouldn't turn to stuff like K++.

    1. Re:Differnet target by bozzaj · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about the Form Filling and password saving features of Gator, have you ever tried RoboForm?

      If you've talking about the adware part of Gator, sorry can't help you there. :)

  63. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by Sevn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does running btdownloadheadless on a foreign shell account while going through an open proxy in brazil through your neighbors insecure wireless access point count as another country?

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
  64. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In some peoples' experience, suprnova.org has not been very good in serving the torrent files and/or downloads have been slow. May I suggest popping over to www.filesoup.com and registering yourself there. It seems a much better service.

    On another note, there still lies the problem that trackers do not scale with the actual bittorrent transfers, so the more people on a given torrent collection site, the slower the trackers are going to be serving up the torrents

  65. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

    Bittorrent uploads as well as downloads. Uploads are illegal in Canada.

  66. Re:Create by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    New formula:
    1) Find old not-so-funny joke
    2) Ruin it
    3) Profit!

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  67. Specifics from the Slyck Article by Yi+Ding · · Score: 3, Informative

    The main thing that people may not be getting is that not only is Sharman shutting down the Kazaa Lite download sites (which in it of itself would not be so much of a problem since it can be distributed over P2P), it's also making the new client (2.5) not let K-Lite (or any Kazaa under 2.4 for that matter) participate in its shares, basically banning it from the mainstream Kazaa network. If we factor in the fact that K-Lite users generally disable becoming a supernode, this becomes a real problem.

    However, the article also mentions that there is DietK which strips all of the adware off of Kazaa (although it doesn't have all of the other nice features of K-Lite), and other clients which are still compatible with the fast track network.

  68. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

    WinMX is good for music/video content. Emule is good for anything else, if a bit slow.

  69. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by captainclever · · Score: 1

    kazaa lite k++ will still work you just wont be able to download the installer any more.

    --
    Last.fm - join the social music revolution
  70. Don't care?...you should by mutewinter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alot of people don't seem to care about Kazaalite. To some degree I don't either; it certainly doesn't effect me. This does, however, set a very bad legal precident.

    Alot of the spyware out there is destructive. It can and does slow your computer down, mess with your system settings, and in some cases completely disable your computer. Perhaps if Kazaalite was making money off this (i think they might have been..maybe it was diet kazaa) it would be a slightly different matter. Regardless, users of their own computers should have the right to disable software which causes their computer to do things which they don't want it to. Hell, forget doing it for a profit. A car manufacturer can't prevent me from buying a modified or refurbished car from a private dealer.

    Alot of people out there want to pass consumer rights laws to combat the DMCA and other intrusive laws. This is not a good solution -- its only an eternal game of cat and mouse. These laws need to be repealed. Sure, let microsoft use copy-protection and other schemes for their xbox, but don't stop me, as the owner of that piece of equipment, from modifying it so that it does what *I* want it too.

    1. Re:Don't care?...you should by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      Only problem is that Kazaa already offers a Kazaa Plus version free of spyware for a fee. So if Sherman didn't offer such a thing he'd have probably lost the case.

  71. The end of albums by jaaron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem with your argument is that most people don't want to download all the songs on an album- they only want a few. To download 2 or 3 good songs off of an album at high quality (192kbps+) still takes less time than it would to get in your car and drive to the store. And it is also infinitely cheaper.

    Funny you should say that because there was a USA Today article in today's newspaper that discussed the implications of a single song music market, ie- the end of the album. There are still some artists who produce albums as an artistic whole, not just a bunch of singles, but as a complete artistic statement. The fear is that if the per song market becomes dominent, that the art of albums will consequently suffer.

    Definitely some interesting thoughts to consider. I've been on both sides of the fence. I've bought albums that I thought, "Wow, the rest of this sucks." and I've also bought albums and thought, "Wow, I'm so glad I have all of this, it rocks!".

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
    1. Re:The end of albums by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Interesting
      There are still some artists who produce albums as an artistic whole, not just a bunch of singles, but as a complete artistic statement. The fear is that if the per song market becomes dominent, that the art of albums will consequently suffer

      Yeah, but they aren't the ones that'll be impacted by the single song download market. It'll be your Britney (et al) CDs with 2-3 "good" tracks and the rest filler.

      Besides. How hard is it to search for a zip/rar of the whole album anyway?

    2. Re:The end of albums by phyrebyrd · · Score: 1
      Funny you should say that because there was a USA Today article [usatoday.com] in today's newspaper that discussed the implications of a single song music market, ie- the end of the album. There are still some artists who produce albums as an artistic whole, not just a bunch of singles, but as a complete artistic statement. The fear is that if the per song market becomes dominent, that the art of albums will consequently suffer.

      There's a saying for this... Lemme think... Oh yea, It's "Out with the new, on with the old!" No, no, that's not it... Oh yea! "Out with the old, In with the New!" Yep, that's it...

      Things change, times Change. The RIAA will either bend to the pressure of the market, or be thrown out on its haunches in utter defeat. It's been done in the past in other industries, and it will be done with the music industry and any other industry that doesn't change with the customer's demands.

      There is another key quote that has always served business well to remember. One which industry as a whole seems to have forgotten: "The customer is always right.", and "Without the customer, there is no business."

      Quotes are great, insightful and usually right on the money... Oops... I said the M word. Someone tape my mouth shut.

      -Phyrebyrd

      --
      "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." -Thom
    3. Re:The end of albums by Dinny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Downloading songs does not make the recoding industry single song any more then radio does. Britney Spears and INSYNC might only make single songs, but is that really any different then the current system?

      Albums as an art for are limited by CDs. If we move to a strictly file based system, there will still be albums, but they will have the flexibility to be longer or shorter then common wisdom says they should be.

    4. Re:The end of albums by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are still some artists who produce albums as an artistic whole, not just a bunch of singles, but as a complete artistic statement. The fear is that if the per song market becomes dominent, that the art of albums will consequently suffer.

      But that uses the same assumption as the RIAA, when they try to extend copyright longer and longer and make it stronger and stronger. The assumption is that the only factor musicians care about is making money. That's simply not the case. Sure, there are some musicians who only care about money, but there are many others who also care about other things. The end of the album could actually be a good thing for those musicians, as they wouldn't have to fill up a whole album in order to release their works. There are artists out there who produce albums as an artistic whole, but there are also good artists out there who don't do this. Producing albums as a whole isn't intrinsically better, it's just a different style.

    5. Re:The end of albums by real_smiff · · Score: 1
      "How hard is it to search for a zip/rar of the whole album anyway?"

      for non-techies, surprisingly hard. i've been through this with family - they can manage to type a band name into kazaa, but trying to explain archives and decompression, you start to lose them. i think this is a bigger issue than you or I appreciate.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    6. Re:The end of albums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It'll be your Britney (et al) CDs with 2-3 "good" tracks and the rest filler.

      Kinda like Britney herself...

    7. Re:The end of albums by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      Yup. I agree with you there. If they want to sell me one artistic work, then they had best sell it to me in one song (mp3).

      For that matter, they had best play the entire CD on the radio, instead of giving us this one song. No really, it came straight from the artist that it's only to be listened to as a complete work.

      Anyway, I don't see where new artists have anything useful to say on this matter. They are all 'hit wonders' as they compete for radio time. Not since bands like Pink Floyd have I seen much music that really blends the gaps between tracks. Even then, you can mix the music between albums and still have a satisfying listening experience.

      Regardless of these gripes, it's not really up to the artist how we listen to their creation. It's up to me, since I am listening to it on my time, on my nickel, and in my home/car.

    8. Re:The end of albums by efflux · · Score: 1

      You seem to be implying that the length of an "artistic statement" by musicians would merely total that of the 3-minute pop song. What makes you think that songs won't simply be much longer like the 20 minutes songs of Can? Have you stopped to think what has popularized the three minute pop song? Perhaps it was a distribution medium that was antagonistic to anything over four minutes because it wanted to cram as much junk together as possible? If p2p is the death of the album, it's also the death of the 3 minute song, as it will be the death of radio.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    9. Re:The end of albums by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      but trying to explain archives and decompression, you start to lose them.

      Don't then. ;-) Tell them it's a box of files and you have to unpack it to get them all. Mention it's easier to bring home the shopping when it's in one bag, rather than lot's of little bags. They'll get what you mean.

      Plain English works most of the time! Just mention whatever you need to teach in a form they are already familiar with.

    10. Re:The end of albums by Temsi · · Score: 1

      The fear is that if the per song market becomes dominent, that the art of albums will consequently suffer.

      That is true. However, if they truly want to keep up the "art" of the album, the solution to that is easy. Save the entire album as one 50mb DRM'd WM9 file, and sell it for $9.95. How hard is that?
      These people constantly complain and whine, yet they have all the tools at their disposal to take advantage of new technology, in order to stay ahead of the game (or at least keep up).
      If they can DRM one song and sell it, surely they can DRM one big album file and sell that?
      I'm pretty sure wm9 audio files support chapters (correct me if I'm wrong on that one). If not, they should - that way you can jump to the songs you like, and still have the "whole" album.

      Of course, this goes to the very heart of the recording industry (not artistry, industry). They sell albums with one or two good songs plus 10 fillers. By selling on a song by song basis, people will only buy the ones they like, forcing the industry to get rid of fillers and artists can go back to making real albums again, like they used to do a couple decades ago.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    11. Re:The end of albums by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      doh! yes you're right i need to think about the language more. actually... i've moved everyone to foobar2000, which (apart from looking like a windows app) allows dropping of zip and rar albums into the playlist. of course lots of albums come in .ace which has no support... so i have to "do something clever to those" (convert .ace->.zip with powerarchiver). ok it's not rocket science but it's just the kind of stupid thing that people can do without. i just checked the foobar forum and apparently there's no free code to allow developers to add .ace support. so back to square one, maybe i explain archives.. i mean shopping bags ;) but then they've got archives and files and no hard drive space! still trying to think of a simpler way to set this up for people heh :)

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    12. Re:The end of albums by BSDKaffee · · Score: 1

      I've got a few CD's that sort of hamper ripping them into singles. The beginning of the next track is the end of the previous song. It takes some editing if you just want one song by itself, but this sort of thing plays to the idea of the whole album being the art and the songs are just a piece of it. Generally I listen to CDs in order and play them all the way through anyway. When I rip them, I keep the tracks in order too by naming the file by the track number first. I like all the songs on the CDs I have like that, so I never bothered editing them. I'd rather preserve the track as it was on the CD anyway.

    13. Re:The end of albums by Erno_Rubaiyat · · Score: 1
      And I am certain that these "artists" will refuse to have single songs played on the radio as well since it upsets the "artistic integrity" of the whole.

      If however that is the case then I will buy the whole album as artistic statement argument, otherwise it is about money.

    14. Re:The end of albums by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are still some artists who produce albums as an artistic whole, not just a bunch of singles, but as a complete artistic statement. The fear is that if the per song market becomes dominent, that the art of albums will consequently suffer.

      The "single song" market has always dominated the market. With the demise of vinyl, it just became hard to buy single songs, as the music companies only offered most music as part of a bundle, i.e. an album padded out with what have been B-sides.

      The "concept album", (complete artistic statement) is a relatively recent format (except for classical music, of course). Up to the LP, most music was produced in singles, 10" 78 rpm, that lasted about 4 minutes, a single song per side. The 33rpm 12" LP "album", total about 45 mins, as its name suggests, was simply a compilation of singles. As by then radio was hugely important in the promotion of music there was little interest in extending the units pop music was produced in beyond the 3-4 minutes radio was used to. And the 45rpm single reinforced that.

    15. Re:The end of albums by phyrebyrd · · Score: 1

      Well spoken! I completely agree. The "artists" have forgotten that it takes *US* to make *THEM* successful... By denying us what *WE* want, as a whole, they only hurt themselves... I just hope that they realize that before their industry goes belly up... But then again, maybe that'd be the best thing to happen since sliced bread?

      Pink Floyd, The Doors and bands like those... Ya just don't see them anymore. It's a shame too.

      -Phyrebyrd

      --
      "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." -Thom
    16. Re:The end of albums by Python · · Score: 1
      Sigh... the "but albums will disappear!" argument is a red herring. If people want albums, they will buy albums. To force a product on a market is to deny the market forces themselves. As it is right now people buy albums because they must. With choice, the market will decide and thats a good thing. It will cause artists to only put together combinations of songs when fans want them that way.

      The bottom line is that its utter bunk that the albums must be protected somehow. Fans will buy what interests them. Anything else is just creating artifical markets via legislative fiat, and thats not capitalism.

      --

      Python

  72. I predict... by mgcsinc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I predict that the only consequences that this could have for Sherman's network are negative ones. Honestly, have the sharers with fast connections been using the proper, sherman client? Simply, NO! Can one really expect, after so long sans spyware, these advanced, high-speed users to begin to use their spyware-filled client? Simply, NO! These users will maintain the status quo by continuing to use their existing Kazaa-lite clients, or they won't share on the Kazaa network at all; either way, how does this help you, Sherman?

  73. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by neoform · · Score: 1

    and due to the masses of people going there, they're having bigtime bandwidth problems.

    not only that, but their trackers keep going down.

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
  74. shhh by real_smiff · · Score: 1

    SS is a seperate network developed by an ex-Napster programmer (you can see the similarities in the client app) which has managed to stay under the radar fairly nicely and i for one don't want to see shutdown, seeing as it has a nice community and song selection. yes it is centralised, currently it is two networks in fact, but your conspiracy theory is way off ok; these things are not connected, i'm 99% sure.

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  75. No big loss by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    ... and I only had 1 meg left till I finished my Hulk download

    No big loss, let me assure you. Just go the video store and rent "The Hot Spot" or "Career Opportunities" instead.

    I'm assuming the biggest reason anyone would want to watch Hulk would be for Jennifer Connolly (or maybe I should say biggest reasons ).

    GMD

  76. It seems to still exist... by Andrevan · · Score: 1
    KaZaA Lite K++

    It looks fine to me, weirdly.

    --
    "All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss." - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:It seems to still exist... by Andrevan · · Score: 1

      Well, actually it doesn't. I had a cached version. Sorry.

      --
      "All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss." - Douglas Adams
  77. Been done! by TitleSeventeen · · Score: 0

    http://www.litepc.com/

  78. this IS a good thing by mikers · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall that our friend Bay TSP was using a modified version of Kazaa Lite K++ to search for enfringers on the Kazaa network.

    Bay TSP is run by that ex-hacker guy and they specialize in finding all MP3s share on all sources, and log the IP as well as time, date, other info.

    Maybe its not a bad thing Kazaa Lite was shut down, at least it will keep Bay TSP off the Kazaa network.

    m

  79. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by guiscard · · Score: 1

    Tried MLDonkey? (Google it). It works on Fasttrack as well as Bittorrent, EDonkey, even has Soulseek support.

  80. Gah by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    Someone mirror the Kazaa Lite binary somewhere, how else am I supposed to tell people through tech support to download it?

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Gah by quadelirus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Kazaa lite is available on Kazaa.

  81. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    carefull, don't ruin it for everybody.

  82. We should not paid musicians for there music by five0greek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Music should be made because it is fun and it brings joy and happiness to peoples lives, not for money. Musicians should have real jobs to make money, or make there money entirely from appearances. The fact musicians want many for there music is a form of prostitution, not of women, but of music. I don't charge people when I make them laugh or they have a good time this me. My reward, being more valuable then money, is the knowledge that I elevated this this persons level happiness.

    1. Re:We should not paid musicians for there music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, hows life in your basement?

    2. Re:We should not paid musicians for there music by reiggin · · Score: 1

      "We should not paid [teachers] for there" educating of you, either.

    3. Re:We should not paid musicians for there music by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      No.

      Musicians NEED to be paid. Would you rather that they're happy in the knowledge that you are happy with their music while they're homeless and on the street?

      When you make someone laugh or have a good time, it's ENTIRELY different from a musician spending weeks in a recording studio trying to perfect an album. How do you expect the musician to pay for that time spent doing that if the music is free? Why shouldn't they just get a normal job and leave music altogether if they aren't going to receive any financial compensation for it? Do you think that creating music is free or doesn't take up valuable time?

      Back to reality with you.

      That said, I'm not willing to pay the exorbitant amounts that the RIAA wants us to, nor am I willing to support them with my money so that they can quelch P2P and filesharing. Thus, I'm very interested in places like Magnatune that are totally unrelated to the RIAA, let us choose the price (within reason), and let us hear the entire album before buying the full CD-quality non-compressed version.

      What we need (I've mentioned this before) is a P2P service that charges a monthly fee, not based on per-download, that reasonably supports the artists. That is something I'd be willing to pay for.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    4. Re:We should not paid musicians for there music by five0greek · · Score: 1

      The time spent in recording studios is waste of money. How does it benifit society? I do not think creating music is free. There is a cost, but the payment should be found in the joy of producing it and knowledge that you are bring entertainment to the world. It should be a weekend hobby instead of a pay for job.

    5. Re:We should not paid musicians for there music by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      You are living in a dreamworld, Neo. How do you expect to have high-quality MP3s with good recording of instruments and good editing without professional-quality hardware?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    6. Re:We should not paid musicians for there music by five0greek · · Score: 0

      You don't need over expensive sound stages and expensive equipment to record good music. Have you ever heard an mp3 from an independent artist?

    7. Re:We should not paid musicians for there music by TheDormouse · · Score: 1

      The only way I can get the music business model to adapt to technology is to throw out the recording part and only bother with live music:

      As an artist, I could give concerts for a price, and then let everyone have free legal reign over recording the concert and distributing the recordings (for free, of course, because a recording has no value anymore).

      If someone wants to pay me more money to record me in a studio setting, that's fine as long as I get paid. They can do what they want with the whiz-bang recording, but they certainly won't get any return on their investment distributing the recording since it has no value.

      So my only incentive to make my own recordings is to spur interest in my music enough for people to want to see me live.

      So who loses here? Professional recording engineers and record companies. People whose music is not interesting or not performable live (e.g., some electronic music) And me, since most people don't have the time to give a rat's ass about live music.

    8. Re:We should not paid musicians for there music by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      The time spent in recording studios is waste of money. How does it benifit society? I do not think creating music is free. There is a cost, but the payment should be found in the joy of producing it and knowledge that you are bring entertainment to the world. It should be a weekend hobby instead of a pay for job.

      Well, as a weekend musician, I've gotta say that I agree and disagree. Personally, I have no interest in getting money for anything I produce (musical, graphical, or otherwise). It is indeed for the sheer pleasure of making. However, the tradeoff for this is that I have to work 10 hours a day doing something else in order to feed myself, which means I don't have as much time (and energy, by the end of the day) to hone things out. It would be awesome if I could just work on various forms of art all day, but to do that one needs to be supported, either by the death of a rich relative or the art itself. Money is not the carrot that draws this particular donkey, but it's still a nice dream. And if it should happen someday, that my love can also be my job, I'm gonna milk it for all I can. Why not?

  83. Re:Create by plasmator · · Score: 1

    come on, everyone knows the last step is Profit!

    --
    --Hi, I'm Bob--
  84. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by prider · · Score: 1

    You should try limewire, it's much better than Kazaa anyways; Recently it's download speed and efficiency has improved greatly. When you pay for it, you don't have any ad-ware, and you get free updates for 6 months.

  85. and in a related story by SteelRat · · Score: 1

    ..no one cared, as they have all moved to other methods of file-getting. :D

  86. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by Aeiri · · Score: 5, Informative

    Overnet (formerly eDonkey)
    Games, Software, Keygens, Cracks, anything you can think of, just a little slow at beginning of download, but after awhile, downloads from over 100 sources at a time.

    DC++
    Games, Software, Keygens, Cracks, anything you can think of, just a little harder to use and overall slower, unless you use the 1stleg hublist (http://www.1stleg.com/PublicHubList.config)

    Soulseek
    Mainly for music. Search for artists, select lots of tracks, leave on overnight and PRESTO! Instant GIGABYTES of music.

    BitTorrent
    Use other sites to search for files, and download with this software.


    That's all I can think of right now, but that should get you started.

  87. Not that big of a loss by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

    I used to love Kazaa lite. But, without it, I'll just stop wasteing time downloading songs that static out after 20 seconds, or are mislabeled, or whatever. I haven't found a decent copy of a song in weeks. I think the RIAA is purposefully filling up Kazaa with junk, it's certainly a more effective tactic than sueing people.

    --
    "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    1. Re:Not that big of a loss by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing people say this but ive had no problems (in the UK), i always get good files and will still be using my Kazaa lite until something better comes out. I've even connected to supernodes in the US and no problems on everything from rare songs to RIAA teeny-pop crap!?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Not that big of a loss by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      I envy you.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  88. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by frission · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the new shareaza beta is amazing, hasn't crashed, but it includes the gnutella, gnutella2 (mike's...),edonkey, and bittorrent download here PS: No Spyware

  89. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

    "trackers keep going down"

    For people who don't understand the severity of this, what ends up happening when a tracker goes down is you have 30 or so people connected who all have 99.1% of the download, and no one has the remaining .9%. It stays that way until they get another tracker up.

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  90. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

    Konspire2B. I'd post a URL, but it's in my sig anyway ^^^

  91. Re:But I am using it right now? by eyeye · · Score: 1

    Yeah its good, I wouldnt use normal kazaa.

    Now where am I going to get my 5mb porn clips from :-(

    --
    Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  92. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You should use Bittorrent. The system of downloading it uses is really good. Get Bittorrent content here.

    The trouble with Bittorrent is, how do you search for things? You need to point it to one of those bittorrent files right? How do you find ones with good pirated content?

  93. K++ Source by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

    OOh... Wonder how long it will take K++ Source to Appear on Kazza's network :)

    --
    Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  94. Kazaa lite.. by Lordfly · · Score: 1

    Kinda went downhill for me after going to their page required you to click on all these annoying popup ads and all this other garbage.

    It sorta made the whole thing ironic... he made the program so others wouldn't have to listen to all the popup and spyware that came up on kazaa... yet this web page where you DOWNLOAD kazaalite is filled with gator ads, popups, and other annoying things.

    Even worse, you couldn't just block the popups; he banned you from the page if you were using anything but IE!

    Bah.

    --
    hookers and grits.
  95. In other news... by Afromelonhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's a new Kazaa spyware-free client out called Fat-Free Decaffinated K!

    --
    Procrastination sucks.
  96. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

    "And please don't reccomend iMesh. I don't know if I could have intentionally installed that much spyware on my computer."

    Instructions:

    1. Go to Google.
    2. Search for CleaniMesh
    3. Download CleaniMesh
    4. ???
    5. Profit, I suppose

  97. Solution to problem: by DakotaK · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Download KaZaA Step 2: Search for KaZaA Lite Problem solved!

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  98. pleanty of other options by NSash · · Score: 1
    It was just a means to an end. Alternatives abound, such as:

    LimeWire (and other Gnutella clients)

    Emule

    Soulseek

    Blubster

    Elf

    SuprNova (and other BitTorrent indicies)

    Freenet

    Earthstation 5

    And many others, as well.

  99. Alternative to Kazaa Lite to appear soon by armando_wall3 · · Score: 2, Insightful


    C'mon, guys.... as the RIAA shuts down p2p networks and applications, new ones appear every now and then.

    Sherman is doing a similar thing, and won't be the exception.

    I guess we'll soon see Kazaa Ultra Lite++++.

  100. Are you a weak-willed pirate spokesperon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    So take a stand, and boycott it all. Don't even download it. Pick one:

    A> buy the album, listen to the music.

    B> don't buy the album, don't listen to the music.

    Anything other than those two options is screwing someone over. I love how all 'high and mighty' people get when they say 'screw the RIAA' but then download the latest Britney hit.

    "But wait!" says Sefirroth6969 (or another similarly clever handle), "I don't listen to that crap, I listen to *insert band name here*! They are just being screwed over by The Man!"

    Guess what? They didn't have to sign a contract. They did, and now they have to abide by those rules. If you aren't going to play the game, then stop whining at the players for free handouts.

    1. Re:Are you a weak-willed pirate spokesperon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick one:

      A> buy the album, listen to the music.

      B> don't buy the album, don't listen to the music.

      Anything other than those two options is screwing someone over.


      Bullshit. What if I hear the music on the radio? I'm not paying for it, yet I'm hearing it.

      What if I go to the Dentist's office and I hear th esong on the Muzak? I'm not paying for it, yet I'm hearing it.

    2. Re:Are you a weak-willed pirate spokesperon? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      A> buy the album, listen to the music.

      B> don't buy the album, don't listen to the music.

      Anything other than those two options is screwing someone over.

      Who is "screwed over" by my downloading an album off kazaa and listening to the music? And how are those same people not "screwed over" by option B?

    3. Re:Are you a weak-willed pirate spokesperon? by emilpop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The rules can be changed dude! RIAA aren't gods. If people don't like the rules anymore than a process of changing the rules starts, and that's what happens now. I bet you never liked history.

    4. Re:Are you a weak-willed pirate spokesperon? by utlemming · · Score: 1

      So radio is screwing someone over? Sorry, your either-or fallacy does not work. There are legit ways to listen to the music with out paying, you just don't get the convience of being able to choose which song when.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    5. Re:Are you a weak-willed pirate spokesperon? by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      You're listings to the adverts that paid for it though.

      Or you're happier at the dentist, because you're listing to the music that THEY're paying for, you pay the dentist, everyone happy.

    6. Re:Are you a weak-willed pirate spokesperon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you hear the music on the radio and you don't buy the album, you're a thief. The record companies pay good money to Clear Channel in order to get their music heard, the least you can do is spend your hard earned paycheck on some Britney Spears.

  101. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by amlutias · · Score: 1

    or... the tracker comes back. or you get the parts from the people you're already downloading from, because the people they're already downloading from have 100%. dead trackers are much more of a pain in the ass for people trying to start downloads, because they can't get hooked into the torrent.

  102. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by neosake · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, I object to the stupid cd-r tax! I mean, I don't ever burn my downloaded music! Why should I pay the RIAA to burn my warez ! ;)

    --
    "When a ball dreams, it dreams it's a frisbee"
  103. FreeNet by AndreyF · · Score: 1

    Why not move the project to freenet? They can develop and distribute it anonymously there, and with the lastest builds, it has become quite bearable (especially the popular sites - like the one with all the playboy centerfolds)...

    1. Re:FreeNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      becuase its slow as a dog? and we are waiting for .6 to see if that will change

  104. 'infinitely cheaper' by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

    Saying downloading music is infinitely cheaper is false; as the original author stated, the amount of time taken to get the file required of sufficient quality can be quite high. It depends how much you value your free time. I work normal office hours like anyone else, and I think my free time (this is bringing back memories of backwards bending J-curves from economics) is normally better spent either checking my favourite online media vendors or just popping into the music shop while I'm in town anyway. YMMV.

    1. Re:'infinitely cheaper' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also interesting is the main reason many people have highspeed internet is downloading. So they're spending $40-50/mo to get music for "free". Sure, they _could_ use the Internet for other things, but doing tech support I've seen a lot of people who only use 3 applications: IE for light browsing, OE for email, and KaZaA.

    2. Re:'infinitely cheaper' by emilpop · · Score: 1

      You don't have to watch it how it downloads! I hope you know that!

    3. Re:'infinitely cheaper' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your stupid ... Just download the CD in the night ... wake up extract it your done. Boom you have all you need. If you really want a CD in 10 seconds then go buy it. Most of us don't mind waiting the 15 minutes to download an entire CD.

    4. Re:'infinitely cheaper' by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      But its so fun to see Sheryl Crow and Metallica race to the finish! Chills! Thrills! Lawsuits! Life doesn't get better.

      Then I woke up.

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    5. Re:'infinitely cheaper' by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      but then you have to sift through a bunch of crap afterwards, so it really makes no difference how you do it.

    6. Re:'infinitely cheaper' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh uh... It's easy:

      1) Someone clues you into an artist you know nothing about, so you search in Kazaa for it.

      2) Then, proceed to queue up anything that 5 or more people are sharing, because those must be their "popular" songs.

      3) Wait until they all arrive (while doing anything else under the sun, including playing those resource-hogging games because Kazaa doesn't care or slow them down)

      4) Sift through them, discovering which ones you actually like, or deciding that you don't really like any of them, and delete them all.

      Benefits: All it takes is probably 10 minutes for the search to complete and maybe another 10 to listen to the songs to see if you like them (of course, you don't have to listen to the whole song to figure that out). You're not charged for bandwidth or quota or anything, so even if you got 20 pieces of crap you're still no worse off (except that now you don't have to shell out those bucks for a CD that sucks).

    7. Re:'infinitely cheaper' by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      Picture this: 1) I'm in the shops anyway, because I need to buy things like food. 2) I pick up 3 CD's 3) I purchase them Suddenly I have a hardcopy of ~35 songs of better quality than I'd ever find on kazaa, and a nice little book to boot! In less than 10 minutes!

  105. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bittorrent is centralized for P2P.

    Shareaza 1.9 is out. It supports 4 protocols.

  106. Re:Create by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no no...

    New formula:
    1) Find old not-so-funny joke
    2) Ruin it
    3) ???

  107. Humorous Video Clips? Highly suspect ... by bryz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I use kazaa k++ for perfectly legitimate reasons, such as finding beta patches to games or looking for humerous video clips.

    Who's he trying to fool with "humorous video clips" We all know what he's really downloading.

    1. Re:Humorous Video Clips? Highly suspect ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I find a shoddy night-vision recording of a vacant-eyed rich girl answering her cell phone while getting nailed to be quite humorous.

  108. Something to consider. by Dr.+Descartes · · Score: 1

    THere's been an article or two about it n /., but mp3 trading can be good for business. Three years ago, when Penny Arcade had a radio station, I heard a song by Matthew Good and went out and downloaded about 20 of his songs. This was over the period of a week or so and in 3-5 song increments. After that, I went out and over another period of time bought almost every single one of his CDs. Sure, I had a burner but it's not the same quality. I've since quit file sharing (unless you're my friend and you know how to use scp) and for that matter, I've quit purchasing CDs. Anecdotal evidence but I'm very aware I'm not the only one that's done this. It's not a "thief's ethic" it's good common sense.

  109. For the record... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the original is from the most excellent Meat Puppets II record. Everyone should own that CD. The wonderful "Plateau" is also from the same record and was thankfully brought to a wider audience by Nirvana, but everyone should experience the original. Also get Meat Puppets "Up on the Sun". Beautiful work.

    1. Re:For the record... by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      I'm downloading it now!

      i dont think kurt much cares if i download his music. all dead peoples music should be public domain. unless that made for insane fans who killed people to pirate their music but i cant really control that.

      whats a dead guy going to do with my money? oh his children/heirs are intitled to it? yeah thats what we need, more paris hiltons.
      " Im too upset to party! "

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  110. anyone else read metafilter? by igorxa · · Score: 1

    heh, glad to see /. is up to date. this was on metafilter yesterday. and they included a link to a site that still has K++ for download. you can find it here.

    this is the fourth article in three days that i've read on mefi before slashdot. if this is a continuing trend, there's no need to be a subscriber. mefi is free.

    1. Re:anyone else read metafilter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Free, yes, but it means putting up with literally weeks of mind NUMBINGLY dull left-wing weepings and utterly worthless US political minutia in order to see the nuggets of gold.

      Not worth it.

  111. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
    It's trivial to find IPs of people sharing any file (just ask the tracker; it'll give you a FULL LIST), without even downloading the file/joining the swarm yourself.

    And how is that different from any other p2p network? The only difference is that with some others you may need to initiate a download to get the list, but if you are working for a company working for the RIAA to monitor p2p (which is a growing industry), I somehow think they won't be charging you with copyright infringement.

  112. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by HawkingMattress · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (And if you want to do them, maybe you need to move to a different Country? God bless Canada and the blank media tax; I don't mind paying a little bit on every CD-R for a music piracy license!)

    Ha ! Think so ?
    I don't know about Canada, but here in France we pay a tax on every cdrs, and IIRC on every storage device, HDD whatever (because everyone knows that if you buy a HDD or a CDR, it's to fill it with mp3s...)
    It'a quite stupid, but at least you'd think that since you've paid a tax because you copy medias it's now your right to do so...
    Not at all ! copying a cd to your friend is still illegal, file sharing is still illegal, and we hear all time on TV that "media producing companies" are complaining because we're nasty pirates who suck their money. Never mind the fact that on any CDR I buy (mostly for archiving raw sounds that I produced), I have to pay 5% (IIRC) more to compensate them.
    Still, we never heard them complaining so much...

  113. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

    Just so you know, I wasn't talking out of my ass

    It's been that way since 3 AM too.

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  114. Should they leak out the source code? by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

    Always pondered over this. If you were faced with being destroyed, why not removing names and such from the code and leak it out? I'm sure its not very legal.. but how are they going to force you to acknowledge its yours? I mean, they spent how long fighting with SCO just to show code that they themselves are ranting on about, Microsoft fought it off too, why cant you just say you accidently deleted it? :P

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
  115. Simplistic? by shking · · Score: 1
    through its simplistic approach

    I'm not sure why a "simplistic approach" (i.e. OVER simplified) is a good thing. Did you mean "simple"

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  116. kazaa functionality with K++ tidiness by igorxa · · Score: 2, Informative

    there is also an alternative to the adware/spyware-free K++. diet kazaa is an add-on for kazaa that strips it of adware and spyware. so who really needs K++ anymore?

  117. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by spiritraveller · · Score: 4, Insightful
    God bless Canada and the blank media tax; I don't mind paying a little bit on every CD-R for a music piracy license!

    I do. We have a similar thing in the US. Every time you buy a blank audio tape, video tape, or DAT tape, Disney and others get a cut of the sale.

    Why should the producers of "Martin Luther King Speaks" have to pay Disney for the privilege of producing their own program?

  118. Try shareaza by Seves · · Score: 2, Informative

    www.shareaza.com connects to multiple networks at one time and is a bitorrent client.

    Takes a little longer to get music files, but for larger downloads, it's worked faster than kazaa.

    --
    /. .\
  119. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    At the moment, I really like two programs:

    1. eMule - lmule is a pretty decent if a bit crashy program, the downside is that most of my large downloads are overnight things and it won't even connect immediately... also, there's always that problem of not finding the right server right away, I prefer "connect to a true unbounded p2p network without any of that server list crap" approach.
    2. giFT. The OpenFT network rules... well, at least it used to rule tremendously, now it just "rules". =)
  120. United States? by FsG · · Score: 1

    Am I really to believe that each and every one of those K-Lite download sites was hosted from a server inside the United States, and thus was vulnerable to DMCA threats? Sounds fairly hard to believe - and even if it's true, how long until someone gets it back online with a server in, say, Finland?

    --
    I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
  121. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a thought: why not PAY FOR THE FUCKING MOVIE??? Why not get a job and pay the lousy few dollars for the DVD?

  122. Sharaza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't there be a plug for this on here somewhere? I mean, it has no adware, it looks beautiful and it is mutch better for hashing files than Kazaa, but is still as no-brainer to use. Right now it is best for porn and warez, but it just needs exposure to get better in the music department, and isn't too bad for anything popular right now. And a better name.

    http://www.shareaza.com

    Hopefully enough people will switch to it that I could just use the g2 network and not hav to go slumming it in gnutella land!

  123. linux only? by real_smiff · · Score: 1

    seems to be linux only... is there anything similar for Windows do you know? i would be interested to try it, because i find Kazaa (Lite) a bad system hog.

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    1. Re:linux only? by Zach978 · · Score: 1

      Looks like there are some windows clients: http://gift.sourceforge.net/clients.php

      --

      "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
    2. Re:linux only? by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      thanks yes, the windows support is clearly some way behind the 'nix - for a change! - but i'll give KCeasy a go i guess.. if anyone knows a better way to connect to the fasttrack network (with basic search/download support of course) from a WinXP machine without running any Kazaa variant i'd love to hear about it.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    3. Re:linux only? by ndqc · · Score: 1

      MLDonkey can connect to FastTrack too. Mainly being developed for Linux/Unix, but is also compiled and running on Windows and even MacOS X.

  124. I don't pay for much by Hommerabi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I would just like to add, the only reason I steal music, games, movies is because I don't want to pay for them. There's no way of justifying it, it's theft, and I do it everyday day after day, because it's cheap and easy.

    --
    --- "Beginnings are rarely noticed."
    1. Re:I don't pay for much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright infringement != theft.

  125. /. .sig feature/bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time you might want to include it, even if it IS in your sig. Why? It has been a long time now, but /. does NOT show .sigs to people that are not logged in. eg. me. I have no idea what they were thinking when they introduced this. But I am expecting too much to think that /. would be logical.

    1. Re:/. .sig feature/bug by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's in his info at the top of his post:

      by gnu-generation-one (717590) on Sunday December 07, @12:10PM (#7653838) (http://konspire.sourceforge.net/)

    2. Re:/. .sig feature/bug by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "Actually, it's in his info at the top of his post"

      Yeah, thanks. I don't know what to call that text, as it's kind'a like a .sig, but not a .sig. And no, I have slashdot set to filter stuff to.

      Here's a link to the best distributed publishing system around.

      It's a bit like a cross between bittorrent and freenet. The data bandwidth multiplies virus-like the more people are downloading something, so it's like bittorrent where the most popular files get the most people serving them. It's also bittorrent-like, in that it works well in the immediate aftermath of publishing something, and gradually slows down as time passes.

      It's like freenet, in that anybody can publish anonymously*, though. Get connected, setup a channel, and broadcast the public keys. People can sign-up to your channel, and then they automatically download anything signed with your key.

      * so long as a significant percentage of the nodes aren't controlled or monitored by an adversary, but still deniable because you can't prove that someone didn't receive the file from a node that you didn't know about

      So it's also a bit like the million-channel television. You create a channel, as your TV show, your radio show, your blog, your news site, your picture site, and people listen in. If people like your stuff, they get the updates every time you transmit.

      Nice system.

  126. K++ still works. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Fast track is still pretty good if your not being real specific, and its better than most for music and some videos. For games and specific videos though, your better off kickin' it old school on IRC. Also, lets see the school try to block IRC.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  127. Think of it like a pirate movie by mcc · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you watch a pirate movie, everyone's a criminal, and technically everyone's a "bad" guy, but still within the logic of the movie there are distinct people you come to think of as "good guys" and "bad guys".

    Napster is the crazy, "bad but cool", immoral and greedy but gallant and kind pirate. His death scene is dramatic and gets you all pissed off at whoever it was who took him down. Afterward his crew scatters and his ship is sold off to some random merchant group.

    Gnutella is the romantic, moral, and heroic pirate who fails either because of incompetence but because his own lack of cruelty (or, depending on how you look at it, his softness) is in the end exploited as a weakness.

    Sharman Networks is the band of pirates which is just plain EVIL. They don't care about anything, they have no positive qualities, and despite the whole pirates-are-cool mentality of the movie, I mean, come on, they're just *evil*. Their leader, Kazaa, is bloodthirsty and cruel, and he killed his gallant and kind first mate Morpheus-- who is played by Orlando Bloom and who most of the audience had fallen in love with at that point-- in cold blood, out of pure envy and greed.

    The RIAA, of course, is the stock British Navy captain, because even though he technically represents "good", and technically one supposes his job is to go around and save lives and stuff, you root against him anyway, because he's a slimeball, he's blatantly corrupt, and everyone who works for him was cruelly and forcibly conscripted into a hellish life of prison-like service to the navy during raids on passing ships which are not really (when you think about it) much different from the raids performed by the pirates.

    1. Re:Think of it like a pirate movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo.

    2. Re:Think of it like a pirate movie by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 1

      And AudioGalaxy would be the sultry love interest that you were just getting to love before the British Captain kills her (think: Wallace's honey in Braveheart). She was sort of crude and a pirate (and hence technically bad), but lovable despite her bouts of bitchiness.

      Her death is what really incites the viciousness and malice of Sharman.

      Man, I loved AudioGalaxy back in the day.

    3. Re:Think of it like a pirate movie by KirkH · · Score: 1

      Hey...it sounds like you just watched the Pirates of the Carribbean DVD!

  128. Get your old versions here by santos_douglas · · Score: 5, Informative
    The excellent old version archive site OldVersion.com has old versions of the K-lite client, plus many other 'out of print' apps. It is unclear if the 'legit' Kazaa will be able to block access even by existing K-lite installs, anyone more knowledgeable care to comment?

    I could care less, I stopped downloading from it some time ago. Another /.er recommended iRate, which is quite good.

    1. Re:Get your old versions here by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

      It won't block access for two reasons. First, it always reports itself as an actual KaZaa program (That's how KaZaa Lite K++ users were able to have and make use of the karma download rating stuff) and second, because a lot of the KaZaa Lite K++ users upload more than they download and by finding a way to block them would hurt the network. Of course, that's never stopped them before.

    2. Re:Get your old versions here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "could care less" = "couldn't care less" Get it right, people!

    3. Re:Get your old versions here by TPFH · · Score: 1

      Of the official KaZaA people were able to block K++ users, would the people using K++ be able to connect to each other? In other words, would it sort of create 2 networks, one for official KaZaA users and the other for the KaZaA lite users?

      (OK, I'm kinda re-itterating what you just said but I still want to ask the question.)

      As you say, it might be counter-productive to block out content that Offical KaZaA users would want access to.

      (OK, this seems redundant now but I still want to post this.)

      --
      This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
  129. Why didn't Kazaa Lite... by dankdirk77 · · Score: 1

    Incorporate in Vanatu? Idiots...

    --


    SCO: 800-726-8649
    Verisign: 800-361-8319, 888-642-9675
    Diebold: 800-433-VOTE (8683)
    1. Re:Why didn't Kazaa Lite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot, too.

  130. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Man, where is the open proxy in Brazil? I've been searching for it, like, forever!

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  131. SIMPLE SOLUTION!!! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 4, Informative
    Use VMware to run the P2P client in. After downloading the file, ftp it to the main box. No shared drives, and with sw firewall on main box AND inside the VMware session, the main box is clean from whatever nastyness is happening inside VMware. RAM is cheap. Get 2 gigs of it. It'll change your life.

    I could care less what a program wants to "spy" on when it's on a VMware os with a bare bones WinXP Pro install. Shut down VMware, don't save the changes, and I start VMware every time with a fresh, uh... virgin :) os and my P2P app.

    www.vmware.com

    Here's a tip, make one VMware session that has all the known P2P apps outthere. Let the spyware install! Horray! Bwcause there is nothing to spy on. Inside the dedicated "P2P machine" I keep all the P2P's in the startup and hide all desktop icons and even the taskbar is set to autohide. Start the machine, download stuff, then just ftp to main box. Then shut down vmware without saving. Simple.

    Open source equivs to VMware? There are some I think. Know of any?

  132. Shadow Source? by programmeratarms · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me that (for this, as well as for similar projects) it would be convenient to build a "shadow source" development network - something that would resemble the mutant hybrid child of Freenet and Sourceforge. If the system includes anonymous relaying/distributed storage, combined with some means of trust verification (to keep saboteurs out of codebases), it would become essentially impossible for anyone to squelch a development effort (such as "Kazaa Lite" or "Freecraft".)

  133. KazaaLite was doomed from day one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It was just a matter of time before Sharman decided to deal with KazaaLite. When your entire app is a plug-on to the real program, the main program can shake you off like a dog shakes off fleas. I'm not sure why everyone finds this so shocking as it was as predicable as the sunrise.

    Current versions of Kazaalite probably won't be good in the near future.

    Sharman will most likely change Kazaa to keep Kazaalite and other leeches (like giFT) off their network. Why go through all this copyright lawsuit effort if they aren't going to follow through? I'm just trying to read the writing on the wall.

    Won't all the Kazaalite nodes form their own separate network?

    Sorry. KazaaLite defaults the user to not being a supernode. No supernodes = no network.

    If the author of KazaaLite had spent more time writing his own p2p app, instead of leeching, hacking and destroying other p2p apps, maybe he wouldn't be left holding his knob in the wind.

    1. Re:KazaaLite was doomed from day one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that shareaza has a plugin sdk avail for it, it should be pretty easy for the MLDonkey or others to write a plugin that connects and uses the FT network...

      [Shareaza's author will not add an FT plugin himself since that would open shareaza to licensing and copyright issues.... BUT the door is open for a third party plugin to be written]

  134. I DON'T CARE -- I OUTSOURCED ALL MY MUSIC TO INDIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Instaed of listening to western crap (Britney & Co.) I get cheap CDs from India, and the music is much better!

  135. If you need to trade files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use this: http://jumnious.com/upload.php

  136. How can this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I haven't read it yet (site is hosed), but ...

    How can Sharman actually shut down a project that doesn't belong to them?

    I can see how Sharman can shut down certain sites that distribute the software -- but isn't is possible for the work on Kazaalite K++ to continue in private, and be distributed through "the grapevine" or via whack-a-mole web-sites?

  137. A good use for P2P by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 1

    I've put all my free software (Linux ISO's, Open Office and other free stuff) on Kazaa because it's quicker than setting up a FTP server. And, it's easier for people to search.
    It's too bad that more people don't utilize P2P in the same way.
    Yes, I download music, too.

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
    1. Re:A good use for P2P by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      BitTorrent, fool!

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  138. Plant! by bottlerocket · · Score: 1

    Today is Sunday. USA Today doesn't come out on Sundays. You must be a plant/narc/in cahoots with SCO!

    --
    where the comment ends and sig begins
  139. T-shirt sales by Facekhan · · Score: 2, Informative

    While a band does get a large chunk of the price of their shirts and other merchandise, a lot of times the shady vendors simply never send them their check.

    1. Re:T-shirt sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like say... people who post to slashdot saying that 50% of the revenue from their shoppe goes to the artists.

    2. Re:T-shirt sales by TwinkieStix · · Score: 1

      That's very true. Some merch companies will give hundreds of thousands of dollars up front and then RAPE artists. But, it's the artists choice to sign such contracts, and they are betting that they will be one-hit wonders unless they get that cash fast. My company only operates inside short term contracts and is NEVER purposly late. On rare occasions that it happens, we do something to say sorry, like running a promotion at our expense. Please understand that, unlike the RIAA, the merchandising industry is highly competitive and without monopoly or lobby. Supply and demand dictate it's behavior. The consumers and artists win.

  140. Perfect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All my non-technical friends I've set up with KL thruout the years will now self-deactivate, not allowing their operators to [unknowingly] get into legal trouble for DLing this or that.

  141. Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure there are many like myself who have been into mp3's before it was cool, like back in the pre-napster days when IRC and ftp were how one would get files.

    They can shut down all the clients they want, it's not going to change anything. Worst case scenario people will just go back to using IRC DCC for getting music.

    I'd like to see the RIAA try to shut down EfNET.

  142. eMule is better anyways. by idealego · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    http://www.emule-project.net

    But if you really want Kazaa Lite there are still many places to get it from. Just do an advanced search on google groups for "kazaa lite download" from the last few months and you'll find plenty of working links. I doubt this is going to stop the project.

  143. internet radio by adamruck · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ever since I started to listen to internet radio I never used a p2p network again, and I havent looked back. Go to www.shoutcast.com. They have all types of music, for free, at decent quality. You can use winamp to play streaming audio for windows, or xmms to play streams on linux. No more dicking around with dcc or kazaa networks. Oh yeah.. unlike normal radio there are no commercials either.

    --
    Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
    1. Re:internet radio by robpoe · · Score: 1

      There _is_ a lot of good listening on shoutcast.

      "Something for everyone"..

      --
      = Grow a brain...
    2. Re:internet radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget StreamRipper. It saves shoutcast streams to your hard drive and names the mp3 accordingly and knows when to start/end the song so you leave it running overnight on your favorite shoutcast station and in the morning you have a bunch of mp3s that sound perfect.

      I use it with winamp, im not sure if it supports other players.. and i just noticed theres a streamripper32 (search google) that looks like a stand-alone version of streamripper that doesnt require winamp

    3. Re:internet radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, 1999, but roughly 100% of us already knew that.

    4. Re:internet radio by GuySmiley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      God, I love internet radio. I have a full 30GB ipod but don't want to listen to anything on it. 95% if my music, I own, I download to sample the native flavors.

      I consume music, like water, not wanting to re-rink the same glass twice. On that rare occasion finding a rare gem one cannot live without, I am more than happy to purchase the disk. ( http://www.eslmusic.com will do no wrong to your collection.)

      My absolute favorite is any station at HBR1.com or jazzmusique (part of the netmusique network) I streamrip overnight, d/l to my ipod for the next day at work, and purchase what I am intrigued by.

      Sampling music of unknown flavors is getting more and more difficult to do. iSwipe for OSX is interesting, but as all P2P, the quality of track is hit or miss, especially if you have far-out tastes.

      People who P2P are not cheap. We are searching for the ultimate buzz and are more than happy to pay for magic.

      r

      --
      Hey, leave comments about my mother out of this!
    5. Re:internet radio by syukton · · Score: 1

      also unlike normal radio, you can't pull in the signal with a transitor radio and 2 AA batteries.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  144. 10 bucks? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    If I could get a cd at my music store 40 minutes away for $10 I might consider. Try $22.

  145. edonkey is an xterm console is fun by capt.mellow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lately I've been just running the Linux CLI version of EDonkey2000. It's actually kind of fun using a terminal instead of a gui.it's at http://www.edonkey2000.com/downloads.php if you're interested.

    http://mutella.sourceforge.net/ is another terminal client. It is more aesthetially pleasing than the Edonkey, but there seem to be less people there. I've generally had more success w/ Edonkey, but "your mileage may vary".

    As was mentioned elsewhere in this page, gift (http://gift.sourceforge.net/) is another one, and it comes in CLI version as well as the gui. I haven't tried this one yet, but it looks like it uses its own network OpenFT, which could mean less people/files. Not sure if it also connect to other networks as well.

    1. Re:edonkey is an xterm console is fun by capt.mellow · · Score: 1

      Okay, I stand corrected after reading the gift page more closely than my initial, cursory glance: gift supports all file transfer networks, it seems.

  146. just a simple yet profound question.. by 56ksucks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yesterday as I drove to work I listened to a song on the radio broadcast city wide for anyone to listen to free of charge. When I came home I listened to the same song on my PC in MP3 format that I downloaded free of charge. What's the difference? I didn't pay for either one. And, chances are, I'm not going to invest in many of the radio station's advertised products. And also, since it's free on the radio, and really isn't that great, I don't feel like paying for it. So again, what's the difference?

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

    1. Re:just a simple yet profound question.. by numark · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference is that the radio station has to go out and buy ASCAP and BMI licenses to distribute the music. That license only applies to the first distributor, i.e. the radio station.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
  147. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by JFMulder · · Score: 1

    I understand. Personnally, I buy all my movies (over 40 DVDs and still buying) and make a point never downloading a movie, well, except when it's not available in my country (Ringu 0 and Ringu 2 for example). as for TV shows, Kazaa and Bittorent have enabled me to catch up with TV shows I didn't watch during their first season like Alias, The Sopranos and 24, which I now watch each week on TV, as opposed to downloading them each week, and thanks to them the broadcasters can now make money off me with their ads.

  148. almost... but not quite by Vitriolix · · Score: 1

    chong got busted for selling bongs explicitely for marijuanna use. he didnt pretend that it was for tobacco use only like most other bong sellers do.

  149. Another move in the arms race by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    First of all, let me say "good riddance". Hopefully, this will lead the better sharers to give up on the FastTrack network entirely and turn to something with better design, like ed2k.

    But shutting down the hacked Kazaa client doesn't mean that a totally different client can't be written to connect to even the updated FastTrack. Doesn't Shareaza already do this? I don't know... I don't touch that ad-driven crap.

    It was a nice idea to remove all the crap from the standard Kazaa client. But now that it's shut down, maybe it's time to rewrite a client from the ground up, or maybe to add FastTrack compatibility to some already-awesome open-source client like DC++ or eMule.

    What's Sherman gonna do? Cry that it's reverse-engineering, banned by the DMCA? Ha! What court will listen?

    1. Re:Another move in the arms race by iammaxus · · Score: 1

      Shareaza doesnt connect to FastTrack. It does conenct to ed2k/g2/g1/bittorrent though. Neither is it ad-driven. It's a pretty good program in fact.

    2. Re:Another move in the arms race by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      Ok, people keeps saying that ed2k is better designed and similar, but from my tests I seem to get files a lot faster over Kazaa (Lite).

      How exactly is the ed2k network better?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  150. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by westlake · · Score: 1

    There have been 300 million downloads of "Kazaa Media Desktop" through Download.com.
    2.5 million last week. If the bootleg clients have drawn and held anything like those numbers, I would be very much surprised.

  151. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    I'm 30 mins from Canada's border.

    I wonder, for argument's sake, if I could buy the blank CD-R's there and bring them back over to the US.

    Technically I paid the music piracy tax. If I was taken to court and I proved that I paid this tax, wouldn't I then be let off?

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  152. Still using Kazaa to access FastTrack? by sirReal.83. · · Score: 1
    Check out MLDonkey. Here's the description from one of their sites:
    MLdonkey is a multi-platform multi-networks peer-to-peer client. Originally, it was the first open-source client to access the eDonkey network . The protocol was reverse-engeneered using an efficient protocol sniffer, Pandora .

    Currently, with eDonkey , it supports several large networks, such as Overnet , Bittorrent , Gnutella (Bearshare, Limewire,etc), Gnutella2 (Shareaza), Fasttrack (Kazaa, Imesh, Grobster), Soulseek (beta), Direct-Connect (alpha), and Opennap (alpha). Networks can be enabled/disabled, searches are performed in parallel on all enabled networks, but each file is only downloaded from one network (wait for next release !), but from multiple clients concurrently.

  153. RIAA is keying on KAZAA mainly since they don't by zymano · · Score: 2, Informative

    hide you IP number . Very easy for them to bill you.

    Use anonymous P2P.

  154. The radio and tv stations are at fault for this... by StandardCell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When do you hear wide playing of so-called "B" sides? All you hear are what the companies consider the top 3-4 songs at most to promote the album. If that's all people hear, then that's all people want.

  155. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by lommer · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of people reccomending the standard alternatives (overnet, bittorrent, etc.), but no-one has mentioned sharescan. While it's not really useful on a home connection, on residence dorms (where I live), sharescan is a gold mine. It's super-fast (all traffic is within your network) and in large universities the selection is almost as good as the largest P2P networks (as long as you don't like stuff that's too esoteric). Try it, you'll be amazed at the amount of content on there.

  156. WinMX Eh? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a comment left by my friend in a different P2P story.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  157. In related news... by judicar · · Score: 0

    Zero paid has been shutdown by Slashdot

    Yeah I know it's an old joke.

  158. Clever... by neurosis101 · · Score: 1
    Sorry I don't have mod points for you..

    Mod parent up

  159. Fool! Pakistan is where it's at! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PK REPRESENT!

  160. Re:DietK by joe_bruin · · Score: 5, Informative

    diet kazaa is an interesting product.
    it modifies the kazaa client at runtime, and therefore is not in dmca-trouble (the authors are rather careful about it).
    it suppresses ads, paid search results, and kazaa spyware. it also allows more than the limited number of searches, automatic re-searching for files, and other nifty things.
    the only problem with it, is that you need a full kazaa install, and therefore must install the kazaa spyware (which is then removed by dietk).
    i would recommend it.

  161. Use a Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you've got a Mac, Carracho is excellent.
    Once you've got enough files, you can set up your own server & create rules about who uses & what you want.
    [Whole albums only, see what I've got first, etc.]
    Check every other day to see what the beautiful people on the Intarweb have given you.
    I think Hotline can work in the same way...

    Of course, it's even easier if you have a roommate to do all this for you. I highly recommend it!

    1. Re:Use a Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, Hotline/Carracho is just wonderful, with the kiddies all requiring PayPal payments to enter their servers. When I tried it out, all I accomplished was to send some PayPal IDs IP addresses to PayPal abuse and the BSA. I enjoy good warez as much as the next guy, but charging money for pirated software should land one's sorry ass in jail.

      ~~~

  162. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by generationxyu · · Score: 2, Informative

    giFT is good for a few reasons: 1. OpenFT is kind of in shambles now, but 90% of the time, if you find a file on OpenFT, you'll be able to download it at 100kB/sec. 2. giFT supports plugins for different networks, like gift-gnutella, gift-fasttrack, and the soon coming gift-opennap and gift-soulseek. 3. One of the lead devs on the gift-fasttrack plugin, Julian Ashton, has just cracked the Fasttrack 0xA9 encryption, so gift-fasttrack can connect to new (Kazaa 2.5) supernodes. It currently takes about 30 seconds to connect to Fasttrack with giFT. 4. It's open source (GPL I believe). 5. No malware of any sort (it's open source, after all). 6. gift-fasttrack supports malicious host blocking with a long list of hosts that aren't friendly for p2p sharing.

    --
    I mod down pyramid schemes in sigs.
  163. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

    Not only do you have to start the download first, you have no guarantee that you've got a) everyone, and b) the correct file (exception: edonkey)..

    There are many php-based trackers that will gladly give a nice html formatted list of every single peer, including how much they have uploaded and downloaded since the their joining the swarm.

    As for getting the correct file, I think that's fairly self explanitory.. networks without file hashes (ie, filename-based) suffer greatly from this problem.

    --
    DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  164. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

    .. unless you configure your client to download only from seeds :)

    There are always ways around these things, if you were so inclined.

    --
    DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  165. Re:I DON'T CARE -- I OUTSOURCED ALL MY MUSIC TO IN by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

    I prefer soviet russian music, because it listens to me.

    --
    Ron Paul 2012
  166. Re:the blank media tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, we've got that here too--except that the RIAA has its fingers crossed behind its back when they collect it.

    gewg_

  167. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by PorkNutz · · Score: 1
    Personally, I use Shareaza.

    It has some interesting features like MD5 & Tiger Tree hash verification and user comment system. It connects to EDonkey as well as Gnutella 1 & 2 and also works as a Bit Torrent client.

    I've been using it for about 6 months now and have only once recieved a file that was something other than what it was named (that was my fault for not reading the comments attached to the file by other users). One of the features I really like is that it works with the links provided by ED2KLinks.com and ShareReactor.com.

    It is a resource hog, but if you've got a extra box you can run it on, it's worth it. I regularly see my total DL bandwidth rise above 1.5 Mb/s.

    Sorry, no linux client though.

  168. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Captain Obvious.

    I don't think people have a problem with Kazzaa, it's the corperation$ that have the problem with it -- you know lack of control and all.

    1. Re:Thank you by Black+Hitler · · Score: 1
      I don't think people have a problem with Kazzaa, it's the corperation$ that have the problem with it
      Well, except for the corporation that created Kazaa and is throwing around DMCA threats to keep people from stripping out all their spyware.
  169. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by manly_15 · · Score: 1

    I've found that BitTorrent works the best in the dorm that I'm in - it takes longer for the downloads to start when compared to my DSL @ home, but once they do I routinely see 500-600 KB/s. Of course, if you're going to use bittorrent, make sure to check out www.suprnova.org, where you can find things like linux ISO's, and ..... stuff ;)

  170. Whatever... FUCK RIA/MPAA/BSA!@!~~```1!!1!1 by 0x1337 · · Score: 1

    I have KPP - and I have the setup file. As long as people mirror Kazaa Lite++ then we have nothing to worry about.

  171. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

    Uhh...no? That'd be the equivalent of going to another country when it's time to pay your taxes, pay them at cheaper rates to this other country, and then come back with proof you've payed your taxes to another country expecting to not have to pay taxes for your country of residence...

    IANAL, of course...

  172. UK Prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the UK a CD costs up to 20 for chart CD's I do buy CD's when I think they are worth it, However, I sample them first and see if they are. 20 is around 30 - 35 USD, are you paying this much as Im thinking of emigrating and letting the immigrants have whats left of England !

  173. Re:We should not paid doctors for there treatment by TheDormouse · · Score: 1

    Doctors should treat patients because it is helpful and it brings wellness to peoples lives, not for money. Doctors should have real jobs to make money, or make there money entirely from practices. The fact doctors want many for there treatment is a form of prostitution, not of women, but of medical science. I don't charge people when I make them laugh or they have a good time this me. My reward, being more valuable then money, is the knowledge that I elevated this this persons level wellness.

  174. Re:YOU SHOULD -- YOU'RE ERODING OUR RIGHTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've found that when I buy CD's a very small portion of the money goes to the artist. Since my primary objective in buying a CD would be to support that artist, it doesn't make sense for me to purchase a CD.

    When you add to that the fact that the RIAA is a very political entity; a political entity which has been instrumental in bringing about legislation which I vehemently oppose, it makes it quite clear that I cannot buy CD's from bands represented by an RIAA label.

    The RIAA has gotten into politics. They've gotten into my life. This is the result. It's not about how easy it is to get an mp3 for me anymore. It's a matter of principle. And on that principle I will happily sacrifice quality and time to avoid funding and supporting a political entity which I do not agree with.

    Most of the bands I listen to support taping of their live shows 100%. The rest of them are either dead or rich beyond belief and really won't feel any pain if I don't buy my copy of Forty Licks.
    Unless your civil liberties and freedom mean nothing, you should not buy the factory CDs.

    Show the artists that you enjoy what they do by buying some merchandise from them at a show or off their website, and then sending them a letter or email explaining that you are a fan, and that you can't buy their CD for political reasons, but that you bought some of their stuff at a concert or off their site to show your support.

  175. Google censors results for Kazaa Lite by insanegadgets.com · · Score: 1

    FYI:

    If you search for "Kazaa Lite K++" in google, some of the results are omitted along with a message from google...

    In response to a complaint we received under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 4 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint for these removed results.

    Links to http://www.google.co.uk/dmca.html and http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512/notice.cgi? NoticeID=861

    1. Re:Google censors results for Kazaa Lite by insanegadgets.com · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Anyone else see the irony in this.......

      (sorry for replying to own post, damn submitbuttonitous)

  176. Re:We should not paid doctors for there treatment by acceleriter · · Score: 1

    An amusing little twist of the OP's words, but you fall into the same trap as all the other intellectual "property" toadies by comparing a good or service not easily reproduced with bits. If physcians' care could be copied like music or movies or slashdot trolls, it wouldn't be worth anything, either.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  177. Poisoned by useosx · · Score: 3, Informative

    Who says Macs don't have good P2P? Poisoned is an excellent giFT front end for OS X. Open source and everything. Supports OpenFT, Fasttrack, Gnutella, with OpenNapster and eDonkey on the way.

    1. Re:Poisoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, poisoned is great unless you use windows only.

      -ashton

  178. Windows Media? by BSDKaffee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My God, as a FreeBSD user I think I'd have a heart attack if all these companies started putting their online music into Windows Media format and DRM to boot. I think I speak for most if not all of the Linux and BSD users out there too. Anyway, think about it -- you're getting a "CD" that is compressed in a lossy format by about 13 times over. That is not worth 10 bucks. If you take quality into account, a $15 CD in that format is worth only $1.15.

    1. Re:Windows Media? by Temsi · · Score: 1

      People are already buying DRM'd files compressed in a lossy format by about 13 times over. And they're paying 99 cents per song. How many songs per album on average? Around 12-14 songs. That makes a $10 album a fair price in my book.
      People are buying Windows Media files by the ton. They're buying AAC files through iTunes by the shiploads. The fact is, artists have every right to use DRM, and at the moment, the only open source alternative I know of is for OGG Vorbis (itself a lossy format, although less so than mp3, wma or aac), and is not nearly ready for primetime use. So for better or for worse, the DRM options are pretty limited.

      You being a FreeBSD user shouldn't have anything to do with you respecting copyrights. I use FreeBSD too, but I still support copyrights and digital rights management.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
  179. Latest version is 2.4.3, from September 24th by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If anyone can start mirroring it, or even hacking it to keep it up to date as though the project never quit, this official "shutdown" won't even matter.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  180. Shut down? by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Funny

    So they have shut down the SITE used to distribute new k-lite builds. Now if only the authors could find some new way to distribute programs. Prefferably something decentralised and difficult to stop... hmmm... I know, how about the fasttrack network? ;)

    1. Re:Shut down? by burns210 · · Score: 1
      well you can't use fasttrack to distributed the website, only the builds... something like freenet might be an idea though.

      Also, i think the k-lite crew actually has an opportunity in freenet... Imagine kazaa lite over freenet, not fasttrack... Put aside stability concerns (they are being worked on) and think of how you could be free from the RIAA concerns, free to download and upload anything you want, where speed is bittorrent like (increases with demand) and also can include webpages to boot!

      Here is to a kazaa like gui for freenet(frost is in the right direction, but not there yet.

  181. What I'm wondering is... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...when we'll see the first network (that I'd know of anyway) that'll use "friends" that'll route the content. Basicly, you send out requests looking for a friend of a friends of a friend that has what you seek, and it'll get routed through them.

    Yes, it would slow the network speed to about 1/nth, where n is the average number of people you have to route through. However, n needn't be very large in practice. As has been shown with the socalled "small world" network theory, each person needs few outside links to make n small. And online, that is easier than ever.

    Basicly, I'd think it would be most useful if each node kept a small search database (e.g. the share lists of all their direct friends), and if not found, pass the request on. Would make for a bit more transfers, but a (zipped) metadata file is trivially small compared to an mp3 or divx rip. Think it'd be more efficient than searching local node only. It would also give you a good list of files you could browse where transfers should be fast (direct P2P), which is always nice.

    The advantages would be great: No central point of attack. No way to "scan" the network. Your identity is only revealed to your friends, who already know you. Because I know many people do not appriciate opening up their files to the entire Internet. However, they'd have no problem sharing with friends and family.

    Also, your bandwidth goes to someone "close" to you. (Priority should probably be given to closer friends, both because of less links involved (more efficient) and because they're friends per se).

    I think that'd be a welcome addition to the current crop of P2P nets, not to replace the current P2P nets but rather to replace the direct IRC/ICQ/MSN/FTP/whatever transfers. I definately think there's a market here for all those that have been scared off more traditional P2P nets.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:What I'm wondering is... by scenturion · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is exactly what I use WASTE for. They descibe the project as "a mesh-based workgroup tool that allows for encrypted, private communication between distant parties on the internet, independant [sic] of local network organization."

      I'm hooked up with my brother, my friends and his friends. Granted it's not ideal for obscure searching, but it's the best we can do while still flying under the radar, so to speak.

      Besides, I wouldn't trust my friend's friend's friend's friend's friend that you never met and whose name you don't know as a source to download from. That's what gets people into trouble for using Kazaa/whatever.

  182. Off-topic--your sig by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

    That was disproven long ago. Sophia Stewart has no leg to stand on. The only "evidence" offered was hilarious things like the fact that "Neo" was an anagram for "One"--everybody already knew that--and a photocopy of a printout from IMDB showing that Carrie-Ann Moss once worked on a show coincidentally known as "Matrix," which proves absolutely nothing (and was also something everybody already knew...Carrie used to mention it in interviews laughingly).

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:Off-topic--your sig by zymano · · Score: 1

      well, if you read a little deeper you would see that she was smart enough(balls) to call the FBI and have them do the dirty work. WB and Wachowskis didn't copy her essay line by line. They just took what they liked.

      And a sig is never offtopic.

  183. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by jwlidtnet · · Score: 1

    Bittorrent no longer works for many colleges either. Y'know, like IRC, Soulseek, etc...

    If my college provided me with some sort of opportunity to use an outside network, I would, but because they don't I'm stuck with their hobbled network that blocks internet gaming traffic half the time when the multiplicity of filters get overzealous.

  184. Humming the catchy tune by xixax · · Score: 1

    In the longer term, people have generally gone for "singles" anyway (except maybe for things like opera). I'd guess that albums are a fairly recent phenomenon driven by the capacity of physical media (that we don't need anymore).

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  185. Re:DietK by JThundley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've used DietK before I used Kazaa Lite, and it is very awesome. It achieves the same effect as Kazaa Lite, but instead goes on top of regular Kazaa. Give it a spin!

    I do however, still recommend GiFT and Apollon for P2P, it's simply the best.

  186. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by shark72 · · Score: 1

    "I think Sharman will be in for a surprise once the find out that 75% of its 'users' were on the bootleged client."

    They are aware of the high adoption rate of unauthorized versions of their client, which is exactly why they did this. Sharman is a for-profit business and relies on advertising revenues to survive. They're not getting ad revenue from the ad-free clients. Without ad revenue, they are history.

    "It's pretty obvious, those users aren't coming back either."

    It's a numbers game. They don't need them all back, but any percentage which do go back to the authorized client means more ad money in their pocket. Even if that's 1% or 5%.

    Sharman has everything to gain and very little to lose by fighting the use of ad-free clients.

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  187. MLdonkey by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Don't forget MLdonkey, a single client which supports eDonkey, OverNet, OpenFT, SoulSeek, BitTorrent, and a couple of others I can't remember.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  188. Poisoned works well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you are privilaged enough to use a mac you can download Poisoned and search the FastTrack(Kazaa), giftd, OpenFT and Gnutella network all at the same time! No adware here either!

  189. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe your IT people are getting wise and using traffic shaping?

    If you want unrestricted internet content, move to an apartment and buy DSL. Stop being a leech.

  190. http://wwww.Kazaa-lite.tk by cypherwise · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Anyone check out the Kazaa-lite website? They are now serving up eMule, SoulSeek, and BitTorrent. Hehe.

    Way to go Sharman! You have now hurt your branding appeal.

  191. Hmmm... by SubKamran · · Score: 1

    Well, at least I can still use it :D It doesn't really shut it down does it? People can just add the installation to their sites for others to download, can't they?

    --
    Kamran A
  192. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check here. Even if you have paid the tax for it, you can still be liable for the damages when you get caught.

    This is the main reason why I go to the states to buy my media (5 American cents for one CD!). If I pay for the license and still not be off the hook, I'm not paying for it again.

    Besides, the first time I checked the site, they reported that the music and other industries haven't received a cent from this levy. I just checked it and they've sent only 6.8 million of 28 collected.

  193. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beyond that, why does the grandparent poster think paying that tax somehow relieves him from being named in an RIAA lawsuit for music piracy?

  194. linux filesharing client by eljasbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Check out Apollon (apollon.sf.net) for a nice linux front end for gift. I like it much better than the kazaalite client and it can use the gift plugins to connect to the kazaa network as well as others.

  195. Download Kazaa Lite 2.4.3 from: by red_gnom · · Score: 2, Informative


    Download Kazaa Lite 2.4.3 from:
    Kazaa Lite 2.4.3

  196. Other Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remeber that the Kazaa lite site had some other software too.
    One thing I liked was avi preview, and another was the K-lite codec pack.

    Anybody know if this software is available elsewhere?

  197. What about patches? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    I remember when I used to dabble in warez for the Mac, lots of sites would host patches so that people could take the version that they have and make it work like the warez version.

    Would that be legal in this case?

    If the K++ people didn't actually host the copyrighted material of the other company, could they be open to criminal or civil prosecution?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  198. Re:SIMPLE SOLUTION!!!--but IP/MAC by blastedtokyo · · Score: 1

    Since you're bridging the same network adapter or sitting behind the same router (physical or virtual), they've still got your IP Address and MAC address.

  199. Re:My wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight from fark.

  200. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by strider_starslayer · · Score: 1

    Well, in Canada, the wording of our CD-R tax is that it is for the compensation of the authors for the copying of there music while removing the distribution medium, or something to that effect after translated from leagalees. Which according to some lawyers means that it's completely legal to download music in canada, as long as you burn it to a CD that you paid the tax on; IE the $15 is the cost of the distribution, and the $.30 is the ammount of compensation when that is removed

    --
    -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
  201. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by amlutias · · Score: 1

    well, it happened to you once, so it must happen the way you describe every time.

  202. Earth Station 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally i've been using earth station 5 available at www.es5.com. While it doesn't yield as many results as the k++ engine does it is much harder for it to be blocked and it encrypts the transmission of files to make it harder for idiots like the local cable company to complain about dmca violations that with some other ways preventing monitoring (or at least slowing it down) is a nice little alternative if you're being bugged by your local ISP.

  203. KLITE IS NOT SHUTDOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the hell are you talking about go to www.klitesite.com that is the main site, just because the otehr domains are down means little. YOU CANNOT STOP A PEOPLE WHO WANT TO SHARE INTERESTING TXT FILES ON SUBJECTS LIKE DAILY LIFE ACTIVITIES!@!!!

  204. Re:We should not paid doctors for there treatment by lostchicken · · Score: 1

    Just to let ya know, "there" is used in this sense:
    "Over there is a 2 dollar bill"

    The word you are looking for is "their"
    "Doctors should be paid for their treatment."

    --
    -twb
  205. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

    Just to inform those who may not know, eDonkey is probably the most flagrant abuser of network resources to ever exist. It frequently uses upwards of 250 concurrent connections and while you may have a lot of pipe left your web browsing will slow to a meander.

  206. Re:SIMPLE SOLUTION!!!--but IP/MAC by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
    True... but I'm only working the problem regarding spyware, adware, keystroke loggers, trojans, etc. Apart from IP, which they are welcome to have, they don't touch my real box.

  207. Re:SIMPLE SOLUTION!!!--but IP/MAC by bmetzler · · Score: 1
    Since you're bridging the same network adapter or sitting behind the same router (physical or virtual), they've still got your IP Address and MAC address.

    So? I'm failing to see why this should be an issue. Unless you don't ever access the internet expect through a trusted third party proxy. I mean, your IP address is supposed to be relatively public to begin with, isn't it?

    -Brent
  208. Re:We should not paid doctors for their treatment by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1
    I agree. What we should do is have everyone pay Doctors a small amount of money as a retainer every month, and when we get sick we stop paying them until we are better.

    I don't think this model will work for the music industry however!

  209. Yeah, internal Uni hubs are the best... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...I've graduated now, but the internal hubs (IP restricted) of our Uni were the best. At least 10Mbit in the wall, up to 10Gbit interconnects. And the best part? As far as I know, the networks admins wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole unless they were forced to. They knew, that if they shut down the internal net, everybody and their mother would go on outside nets, clogging the Internet connection.

    1,5Tb of data to the internal network, well that's 1,5Tb of traffic that didn't happen on the Internet connection. Ok sure both are probably "misuse of network resources" but it's still the lesser evil. And I think most realistic sysadmins understand that.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  210. K-Lite K++ still available at www.ouSharing.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current software is still available at www.ouSharing.com. I am not speaking as an authority of K-Lite K++, but DOWNLOAD AND CLOG UP THAT NETWORK. www.ouSharing.com Web Site

  211. Usage figures by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    Assuming Sharman's impressively high Kazaa usage figures included KL, boy are they going to get a rude awakening when they actually turn it off. (AFAIK this will be done by releasing a new version, as they did when they went to v2.1.)

    Ironically they've probably done more to kill off P2P for the informed user than the RIAA have ever managed.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  212. Re:We should not paid doctors for there treatment by SpudDoctor · · Score: 1

    Wow, some people are ignorant. Doctors have to spend the first 12 years of their life, particularly the senior high ones working their fingers to the bone to achieve high enough results to get into the tertiary institute of their choice. They then have to spend the next 3 years working their fingers to the bone of theory, the next 4 in practice and field training, the next year in finalisation and then blame!, they are doctors. (not including any refresher courses and various types of experience they need to gain) That's roughly the first 20 years of their life studying and working so they are qualified.

    They then have to, everyday, operate/practise on/diagnose people for another 50 or so years, and that's includes prescriptions and treatment. And you are saying they should be paid a "nominal fee". And then get "real" jobs on the side to supplement their income, meaning more years of study and toil.

    Your complete ignorance and amazing attitude of they should help people for almost nothing defies imagination. You are saying that the relative few who have the intelligence, motivation and resources to help others, spend a good quater of their life studying, the next 60 making decisions daily that decide wether a person lives or dies, and constantly cop flak from pathetic ingrates like you is frivolous and they should get no reward?! Maybe they should all become engineers and make millions, while at the same time let everyone else die, suffer and live a miserable existence?

    Quite frankly, you and everyone else who shares your opinion should go to Africa and see what it is like where there are no doctors. Or you should be shot. Either way, wake up and smell the proverbial rose's morons.

  213. Re:We should not paid doctors for there treatment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either way, wake up and smell the proverbial rose's morons

    So the rose has morons? Or did you mean to say "smell the proverbial roses, morons"?

  214. Why limit copyright at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont understand why things should go into public domain after xyz years, can someone explain this to me?

    If a person creates something, with their mind, their hands, their ideas. And people still want to used their creation 20, 30, 100 years later why should they suddenly be out of the loop simply because it was created xyz years ago?
    If people still want their creation they should pay for it, not get it for free because it is old.

    And 5 year copyright? That is an amazingly stupid idea.
    Lets say I create and copyright a cartoon character, or better yet I create an entire cartoon and copyright it.
    I work on it, pitching it to people, changing it, until 6 years later I finally get the Cartoon Network to put it on...
    Hold on, now my cartoons on TV by I have lost the copyright to it, and anyone can just create something exactly the same and I dont have any rights to stop them, or claim compensation. I spent 6 years to perfect this cartoon, the ideas, the story, the characters, and now someone can use it all just because it is 6 years old.
    Oh well, on to the next cartoon, this time I just have to make sure I get it on TV in a year or two after coming up with the idea so that I can make some money from it.

    1. Re:Why limit copyright at all? by alexo · · Score: 1
      Why are you posting AC?

      > I dont understand why things should go into public domain after xyz years,
      > can someone explain this to me?

      I could try but this "Public Knowledge" page does a better job.
      Why do we have Copyright?

      The Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8) reads Congress shall have the power to

      "promote the progress of science...by securing for limited times to authors...the exclusive right to their respective writings..."

      What does that mean? The easy answer is that scientists and artists alike, who enrich our society with their discoveries and works, are granted an additional incentive to innovate and create new works of art. It's an exchange-share the work with society and society will allow you a limited monopoly. The goal is to disseminate ideas and enrich the public, while creating an incentive for the artist. After a limited time the artist's monopoly would dissolve and the work would return completely to the public.

      The concept of "returning" works to the public suggests that no new idea is truly new, that it is only built from some previous societal knowledge. Perhaps this return concept can be best understood through the words of Sir Isaac Newton, "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." The Constitution specifies, "limited times" to ensure that artists to not rest on their laurels but continue to innovate.
      There is no inherent "right to profit". Copyright is granted by society as an incentive for creating things that enrich society, not the creator.

      > If a person creates something, with their mind, their hands, their ideas.
      > And people still want to used their creation 20, 30, 100 years later why
      > should they suddenly be out of the loop simply because it was created xyz
      > years ago?

      Not "out of the loop", just "on a level playing field".

      Imagine a world where only one company can produce bicycles.

      > If people still want their creation they should pay for it, not get it for
      > free because it is old.

      Think about it when you take your children to see Disney's "Cinderella", "Sleeping beauty", "Beauty and the beast", "Bambi", "Aladdin", "Snow white", "Robin hood" or some of the other multitude of their movies based on classic stories.

      The only reason that they were able to create those films (and reap huge profits from them) was because the original stories were in the public domain.

      > And 5 year copyright? That is an amazingly stupid idea.

      Not any more stupid than min(120, life+95).
  215. Re:We should not paid doctors for there treatment by sdcharle · · Score: 1

    Fittingly, he does not believe teachers should be paid for there (sic) work either.

  216. MAGNATUNE.COM by obstreperousness · · Score: 1

    :: http://www.magnatune.com ::
    Check out this site if you want to see where the future of recorded music distribution is headed. You can listen to whole albums in MP3 for free. If you decide to buy one, you can download the WAV files (losslessly compressed with FLAC) and burn your own CD. You choose what to pay for the download ($5-$18 USD), and the artist gets exactly 50%. They are even starting to offer high-resolution digital (so you could burn a DVD-A disc at home). This is the kind of artist-centric system that will eventually sink the Warners, Universals, and Sonys of the world (are there only three now??).

    from Magnatune.com:
    "We're a record label. But we're not evil.
    We call it "try before you buy." It's the shareware model applied to music.
    Listen to hundreds of MP3'd albums from our artists. Or try our genre-based radio stations.
    If you like what you hear, buy our music online for as little as $5 an album or license our music for commercial use.
    Artists get a full 50% of the purchase price. And unlike most record labels, our artists keep the rights to their music.
    Founded by musicians, for musicians.
    No major label connections.
    We are not evil."

  217. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    "eDonkey is probably the most flagrant abuser of network resources to ever exist. It frequently uses upwards of 250 concurrent connections"
    Unless I am misunderstanding something, you can set the max number of connections used by the program in the preferences.
    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  218. BBS by icebones · · Score: 1

    this is why sometimes I still miss theold BBS's. You didn't have to worry about being spyed on because the only person watching was the SYSOP, and they didn't care as long as you didn't try to Hack/Crack it. Dail in, DL what you want, UL something good, logoff. Yea you couldn't get 1.5MB/s DL's but then again, the fiels weren't that big then either. A 56k modem still works great, if you can find any still up. a couple of years ago there were still a few around and they were great. GOD I miss BBS's

    --
    Life is pain. Anyone who says differently is selling something.
  219. Kazaa-Lite 2.43 English Download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    http://www.nvplanet.com/modules.php?name=Downloa ds &d_op=viewdownloaddetails&lid=74&ttitle=KaZaA_Lite _2.43

    Go there. Kazaa-Lite still works. And don't panic ever. If anything, p2p file sharing is just going to get worst for the RIAA and easier for us.

  220. Artists releasing CD-R's by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

    Some local artists are releasing their CD's which are really CD-R's.

    But the price is the same regular expensive one.

    I wonder how right it is to label it a CD when it's a CD-R?

  221. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by jafuser · · Score: 1

    I also support Shareaza. It's free, doesn't seem to have any advertising or spyware, and it's a pretty smart application.

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  222. Re:Oh Well, there not the first, there not the las by SteelRat · · Score: 1

    well why not just call it what it is; a tax subsidy.

    given some of the new trade rules coming down from the ivory tower of the WTO regarding subsidies, there is a chance that this may be illegal. :D

  223. Another download link by tunnie · · Score: 1

    For those of you that want it: ftp://tunnie.kicks-ass.net/kazaalite.exe

  224. Downloading mp3s for stuff I already own on vinyl by TPFH · · Score: 1

    I own a lot of vinyl. Probably around 500 lp records. I'd like to have them in digital format for ease of use. When I'm on a road trip I like to play CDs full of mp3s, so I don't have to change disks. So far I'm too lazy to hook up my turntable (and a pretty good one at that) to my computer. I probably will someday but I digress.

    One of the reasons I want to do p2p stuff is to download songs that I already legally own in another format. 128kbps is OK for me. I've found some stuff, but not as much as I was expecting. (I'd like to download a lot of stuff from the old Wax Trax! catalog.)

    I was also hoping to find more rare music that is impossible to buy for love or money. Unfortunately I've found that it is much easier to download top 40 crap than rare stuff.

    I need to try other networks besides the Fast Track network. Anyone have advice on which networks are better for unpopular music?

    (Is there a problem with your caps lock key? I noticed that the last 10 of your subject lines are in all caps.)

    --
    This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
  225. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

    I installed Overnet and it appears to have installed a lot of Spyware and Adware type crap, despite explicitly claiming not to. What's up with that?

  226. Re:Well crap. Help me with a new program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BOOYA! ashton in tha house!

    p.s. use poisoned

    -ashton

  227. K++ Still Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kazaa Lite K++ is still available in two ways!

    1) It's still on the web!(if you know where to look) --Hint: Open Kazaa Lite K++, Go to the Web Screen, Join the K-Lite IRC chat, ask around in there; you need mIRC (www.mirc.com)--

    2) Search the Fast Track Network using the client that you already have (for instance an older version of Kazaa Lite K++)

  228. Re:We should not paid doctors for there treatment by TheDormouse · · Score: 1
    Doctors have to spend the first 12 years of their life, particularly the senior high ones working their fingers to the bone to achieve high enough results to get into the tertiary institute of their choice.
    So do professional musicians.
    They then have to spend the next 3 years working their fingers to the bone of theory, the next 4 in practice and field training, the next year in finalisation and then blame!, they are doctors. (not including any refresher courses and various types of experience they need to gain) That's roughly the first 20 years of their life studying and working so they are qualified.
    Sounds a lot like what musicians have to go through. Have you ever sat through a music theory course? Then the real world: having to take a couple dozen auditions (if you're lucky) before you ever get a steady job that pays less than a teacher's salary.
    You are saying that the relative few who have the intelligence, motivation and resources to help others, spend a good quater of their life studying, the next 60 making decisions daily that decide wether a person lives or dies, and constantly cop flak from pathetic ingrates like you is frivolous and they should get no reward?! Maybe they should all become engineers and make millions, while at the same time let everyone else die, suffer and live a miserable existence?
    My post was primarily satire (I wasn't *really* bashing doctors), but the same could be said again about musicians. For the amount of hard work that goes into being able to produce good music, musicians are very underpaid. I realize that not all musicians are college-educated classical musicians whose story matches the descriptions above, but it still requires a lot of work. Even Britney Spears didn't just get up one morning and say "hey! I think I'll be a multi-million dollar pop starlet." And popular music is an exceptional case as far as the money goes. Do you know how much the orchestra musicians that record soundtracks make? How about that clarinet player in all the Zoloft commercials? Did you also know that if they make a mistake they will likely never be hired again in the same town (at least not for quite a while)? At least doctors have malpractice insurance; there's no "wrong-note" insurance for studio musicians.

    Just as if all doctors stopped working the world be a much worse place, if all musicians stopped working the world would become less desirable (at least quite boring). If all firefighters stopped working, the world become less desirable. Who decides that doctors make more money than firefighters? Is it training? (No, since musicians require at least as much training) Is it the fact that they save lives? (No, because firefighters also save lives) A lot to ponder....

    Notice I didn't comment on any of your rude banter. You seem to be smart enough to figure out what I am not going to say.

  229. Re:We should not paid doctors for there treatment by five0greek · · Score: 0

    Music is a fun hobby. Doctoring is work. Doctors save lives, they make the world a better place. Popular musicians promote killing, stealing, rape. Most could care less about you and your happiness. Why should they make more then Teachers, firement, police, soldier, scientist and yes doctors and many other, who contribute to the betterment of sociaty.

  230. Re:DietK by Moloko_Plus · · Score: 0

    This app sucks, I installed the latest 2.60 kazaa along with 2.60 dietK, it all used way too much ram, and after starting it a few times kazaa shutdown after saying "Kazaa has detected that the advertising programs cannot run" or some gibberish. Next time you shamelessly post a URL, do your research. We all need to just wait for a new K++ based off the 2.60 build.

  231. Re:Create by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only people who ruin jokes are the ones who think them ruined.

    Take it easy.