Slashdot Mirror


PC Annoyances

hawkeegn writes "This is the latest book in the O'Reilly "Annoyances" series. Over the last few years, I've managed to glean several valuable tips about Windows 95 and 98 from the Annoyances books about those OSes. So even if I've used computers for years, I looked with glee and anticipation (well maybe not glee, much more like relief) when I discovered this book was out." Read on for hawkeegn's review of PC Annoyances. PC Annoyances author Steve Bass pages 175 publisher O'Reilly Publishing rating 8 reviewer hawkeegn ISBN 0596005938 summary How to deal with common PC annoyances, like Windows, Email, Microsoft Office, sound & video and hardware issues.

How often do you sit down for a relaxing session at your PC, only to discover you can't find that file you saved six months ago but forgot the name of it. Or to go into Word and realize several dreary tasks could mre easily be put into macros if only you knew how? Or you decide to browse the Web only to be "attacked" by pop-ups and extra windows? AAUGHH!

This book deals with the folk who use Windows and PC's. I realize there are those who loathe Windows ("Linux rools d00d!") and point to the chapter on Windows annoyances as an example of an OS gone terribly wrong. However, until the day comes that everyone uses Linux (or finds a way around Billy Boy's "evil empire"), we're stuck with it. But I digress.

The book's several chapters are divided into specific topics, like E-mail, Windows, the Internet, MS Office, Windows Explorer. Music, Video & CDs, and last but not least Hardware. And yes there's a few suggestions and software for dealing with spam. Spam spam, spam, spam, wonderful spammmmm...not! Also mentioned are items like turning off return receipt (who cares whether or not your sender received your message, it got sent didn't it?), embedded images in email, and so on. There are also sections on dealing specifically with flaws in Outlook Express, Eudora, AOL, and Hotmail.

One thing that bummed me a little personally was that the chapter on Windows annoyances for the most part are for Windows XP. In fact, the author strongly recommends, in fact almost implores you, gentle reader, to switch from Win 98 to XP. In spite of my system running slowly and sometimes crashing (and the fact that I'm rather broke these days), I'll stick with my 98 for now. Of course, one could point out if previous versions of Windows had been created "right" or "ran correctly," there wouldn't be need for a whole chapter (or even reams of books) on Microsoft fixes or how to get it to run properly.

The Internet chapter deals with getting rid of pop-ups while browsing, and introduces a nifty tool for checking dead links on your bookmarks. It's quite annoying to save a page on your favorite band or obscure sport and then discover three months later it's disappeared. Also mentioned are a few "tricks" with using Google and even AOL IMs, like making AOL IM an "ad-free" zone. In fact, several tricks in this book are centered on cutting down the amount of on-line advertising we all seem to be bombarded with.

MS Office ... ah yes, Office. What would we ever do without it? What can we do with it? Among other tips, the author describes ways of "outfoxing" Word's Auto Correct feature (but gee, Mr Word officer, I swear that's the way rutabaga is spelled!) and my personal favorite: getting rid of Clippy -- Yeah! Also mentioned are some nifty tricks for using Excel and Power Point.

Windows Explorer ... ah yes, Windows Explorer. Not bad, but it could be better. And the author points us to two alternatives to Explorer: Power Desk and Total Commander, two inexpensive utilities that do everything WE does and more. However, if you insist on staying loyal to WE, there are some nice tips here about dealing with it.

The last two chapters discuss ways of making it easier to listen to tunes on your PC, watching video streams, and recording audio from any source. But most importantly, the author advises that if you share CDs with others to use 74-minute CDs because not all CD ROMs are created equal. The 80-minute CDs may get cranky if they're put in an old CD ROM that won't read them.

Last but not least, the Hardware chapter touches upon such wondrous things as "The Wonders of a Modem Reset," "tuning up your monitor," and also a way to keep that color ink printing cartridge you just bought to last more than two weeks, just by switching your prints to the lowest quality for most of your work. When you're broke like myself, those $50 printer cartridges add up fast!

I've just touched upon a few tips here ... the book has many more, all designed to be very helpful to the PC user.

The back inside cover has a place where the CD with all these nifty utilities should be, except O'Reilly decided to save a few bucks on the book's cost by pointing to a URL and telling we gentle readers to go there to get the utilities. Alas, I'm lazy and impatient (not to mention being too damn cheap to get a DSL line) so I haven't gotten around to getting most of the utilities yet. My bad. I've gotten used over the years to books that had the CD that I could just slide into my drive and install away. I have however so far gotten SpyBot, AMDeadLink, and MailWasher. Great stuff, and I do plan to download at least a few more of these utilities. Of course, the web site where you download all this stuff is a great plug for PC World.

The "enlightened ones," as I mention, won't need to bother with this book, as they have Linux, or a Mac. But the rest of us, who do battle with our PCs daily, will get a lot of useful information out of this book.

You can purchase PC Annoyances from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to submit a review for consideration, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

505 comments

  1. There's A Solution by tds67 · · Score: 4, Funny
    How to deal with common PC annoyances, like Windows, Email, Microsoft Office...

    Try Linux!

    1. Re:There's A Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up!! Not moderated funny enough!! This is a really funny post!! Maybe even INSIGHTFUL!! If you do not underestand the joke, he is saying that you can use the Linus operating sysgem and you will not have thesaane problems asd Windoze!! (we use a z to mean it isnsleepy!) So it IS funny but you don't get it becauser you are sypid stupid using software from M$ (we use the dollor sign because it means they are greedy$$$!!) so uou alexander dumass should use Linux st0-0pid!! (we use zeroes bcuz we r three-leet( and ahain, it is FUNNY!!! mod up polz!!

    2. Re:There's A Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi its me again an intesting tirivia is that linus was actually inbvenntted by sir linus pauling whop also invented the aquantum particle "muron", you may also know it is pronounced "lar-nox"

    3. Re:There's A Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Try Linux!

      Also try Mac OS X!

    4. Re:There's A Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Try Linux!


      Ah ha ha! So very funny! So very very funny! I totally did not expect that one on slashdot! Try Linux! YOU are a comedic genius, sir!

    5. Re:There's A Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, then you've got PC annoyance number one to deal with: DRAG AND DROP!

      Welcome to 2003, folks.

    6. Re:There's A Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But somebody tell us how to deal with Slashdot annoyances, like people who make obvious and predictable jokes that lemmingoderators mod up like they're comedy gold...

  2. more reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    VeryGeekyBooks has more reviews of this book.

  3. whoa boy! by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Funny

    This book deals with the folk who use Windows and PC's. I realize there are those who loathe Windows ("Linux rools d00d!") and point to the chapter on Windows annoyances as an example of an OS gone terribly wrong. However, until the day comes that everyone uses Linux (or finds a way around Billy Boy's "evil empire"), we're stuck with it. But I digress.

    Opening up the can of worms I see.

    Pardon me while I put on the 'ol asbestos suit and run for my life.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  4. Ummmm. by BWJones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    However, until the day comes that everyone uses Linux (or finds a way around Billy Boy's "evil empire"),

    Its here and its called OS X :-)

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Ummmm. by steveha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, until the day comes that everyone uses Linux (or finds a way around Billy Boy's "evil empire")

      It's here and it's called Debian GNU/Linux :-)

      There. Can I get moderated "Insightful" too now?

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    2. Re:Ummmm. by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hear MEPIS is a Debian install done friendly and well.

      I wanna be insightful too!

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    3. Re:Ummmm. by Selecter · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, becuase his answer was 10 times better than yours, just like OS X is 10 times the operating system DebianGNU/Linux is. Not a troll, it's the stone truth. If all of you free op systems guys would unite behind Apple and OS X on the desktop and put all your efforts into making *nix the absolute server OS of all time THEN you would make Microsoft sweat bullets. OS X on the desktop and a unified ( yeah I know, thats a running joke ) Linux Server that kicks anything from MS in the ass - imagine that. oh yeah, thats right - Apple's hardware is too pricey too slow the gay computer etc etc etc...even though OS X is the holy grail, you cant accept it becuase it's not free. What you seek is right in front of your nose, but you wont take it becuase you're too proud. If half of you guys would buy a G5 or iBook you would do a lot more to hurt MS and dilute it's power than yet another linus distro. How about Apple with a 30% market share? Think that would'nt grab ole Billy Boy's attention? Yeah, mod this a troll. I dont care. It's real.

    4. Re:Ummmm. by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can play this game too! It is here and it's called FreeBSD.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    5. Re:Ummmm. by O · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's here and it's called Gentoo Linux and I'll be modded as a troll.

      --

      1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 -- Mathematics is the Language of Nature.
    6. Re:Ummmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about your sig I belive it's spelled Indian not endian just so you know (ok mods TROLL ME!!) :)

    7. Re:Ummmm. by Lussarn · · Score: 0, Troll

      Mac OS isn't just expensive, it's seems ultra expensive. $130 (in eurpoe even more) everytime a minor upgrade comes out is for a Linux guy expensive. I rather buy a new disk for that.

      Also, software libre is important for some of us. I say no to core libraries not being open source. Which rules out much of the OS X experience. The programs I write and the programs I run should be able to run easily on whatever platfrom my users or I choose for the moment. With OS X this is not true if you choose the Aqua gui.

    8. Re:Ummmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, as you have mentioned, for the price of a low end apple, I can by a rather high end PC. So, until either apple prices drop or there is a port of Mac OS X for Intel architecture, most people will not try it. What are you waiting for? Go, get porting! Oh, you don't have the source? Too bad.

    9. Re:Ummmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:Ummmm. by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      Mac OS isn't just expensive, it's seems ultra expensive. $130 (in eurpoe even more) everytime a minor upgrade comes out is for a Linux guy expensive.

      I don't think anyone who actually saw Jaguar and Panther in action would call it a "minor upgrade". It was certainly bigger than Win 95 -> Win 98.

    11. Re:Ummmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's here and it's called a ZX Spectrum?

    12. Re:Ummmm. by sydb · · Score: 1

      No, becuase his answer was 10 times better than yours, just like OS X is 10 times the operating system DebianGNU/Linux is. Not a troll..... Yeah, mod this a troll. I dont care. It's real.

      You are a troll, but anyway.

      OSX is nice and Apple put a nice UI on top of FreeBSD. That's fine. But if you think OSX is 10 times "the operating system" Debian is you have another thing coming.

      People want different things from an operating system. Debian gives me:

      * 100% Free Software system. Plus a large non-Free software archive should I want to go there.

      * A vast choice of prepackaged software, installable within minutes over the network

      * A decent packaging policy which every package must honour (or it's a bug) which ensures that every package comes with at least a README for documentation, and plays nice with all the other packages on my system.

      * The ability to upgrade my entire system from a simple command (except kernel) over the network without rebooting.

      * Timely and comprehensive security updates to the stable release.

      * A stable release that IS stable.

      * The choice to downgrade to "other distro" stability and run more up-to-date software ("testing" release).

      * The choice to downgrade to "from CVS" stability and run the bleeding edge ("unstable" release)

      * Masses and masses of quality documentation on their website

      * Unrivalled community help on mailing lists, IRC and Usenet.

      * An open development system where I can report bugs, trace them through the fix cycle and speak to the actual package maintainer in the process.

      * A system where I can become a package maintainer for my favourite application and have it incorporated into the main archive.

      * Independence from corporate success and failure - Debian is not going to go bust, it's just going to get better.

      * The ability to run the same system on x86, PowerPC, SPARC, M68k, PA-RISC, ...

      * Did I mention choice of software? My system is setup for me, the way I like it.

      We're not all in this to make Microsoft sweat bullets, frankly some of us have smaller fish to fry (like using and enjoying our own computer systems).

      What does OSX give you that Debian can't? Apart from a clutch of overpriced proprietary graphics applications.

      Now don't get me wrong, I'm about to buy OSX for my girlfriends iMac. But her needs are different to mine. She needs to run a clutch of overpriced proprietary graphics apps.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    13. Re:Ummmm. by billimad · · Score: 1

      HA! Screw you guys - I wanna +5 Funny. hahahafyin7&^E&w3dssa[NO CARRIER]

    14. Re:Ummmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It even includes regular payments for upgrades and security fixes just like Microsoft Windows. Have you paid your mac tax yet?

    15. Re:Ummmm. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      So I can either be a Borg or an Imperial Storm Trooper?

      Not really a great choice!

    16. Re:Ummmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid fanboy

  5. Sounds good... by funkywhat2 · · Score: 1

    It sounds like a decent book for new users... maybe I should get it for my mom...

    --
    Personally, I prefer to blame the incomprehensible Michael Spindler, CEO of Red Ink Corps.
  6. How did they come up with these? by whackco · · Score: 1

    Was it suggestion, poll, focus group? I'm going to go check this out to see if they missed anything. Like the, when you map a drive, and WE has to keep polling till it eventually freezes. I hate that.

    1. Re:How did they come up with these? by itsari · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's all from this whole website dedicated to making the lives of the windows users much easier. I like the animation of clippy getting stomped.

  7. Windows 95 and 98 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    > I've managed to glean several valuable tips about Windows 95 and 98
    > from the Annoyances books about those OSes

    Windows? Annoyances? Isn't that redundant?

    1. Re:Windows 95 and 98 by the_real_rs · · Score: 0

      or maybe a Oximoron?

      --
      Some software money can't buy. For everything else there's Micros~1
  8. "telling we gentle readers" by jd142 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Grammar Nazi alert. This should be "telling us gentle readers". Think about how the sentence would sound if you ended on the pronoun:

    They did it without telling us.
    They did it withoug telling we.

    1. Re:"telling we gentle readers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did it withoug telling we.

      worst. grammar-nazi. EVER.

  9. RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the article:
    This book deals with the folk who use Windows and PC's. I realize there are those who loathe Windows ("Linux rools d00d!") and point to the chapter on Windows annoyances as an example of an OS gone terribly wrong. However, until the day comes that everyone uses Linux (or finds a way around Billy Boy's "evil empire"), we're stuck with it. But I digress.

    RTFA

  10. Where's the review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A review... ah yes a Review

    I gotta admint this book sounds interesting and I could easily be persuaded to buy it had you actually reviewed the book and not just spattered the page with anecdotes about your own life and computing practices.

    Worst... review.... EVER!!!!!!!

  11. Even the enlightened ones... by Soulfader · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...can't always pick what they use at work.

    Or if they're really unlucky, they get the support the Win32 users.

    [Or if they're really unlucky, they lose their job right before the holidays and don't even do that any longer. But I digress.]

    To be fair, it's not like non-MS software is annoyance-free. =) One nice difference with Linux, Evolution, and all of the other OS software I use is that I can learn about the annoyances before I pony up my increasingly scarce cash for it....

    1. Re:Even the enlightened ones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can find a way to get Windows for free... like everyone else.

  12. does this strike anyone else as useless? by aurelito · · Score: 1

    most of the examples cited by the reviewer can be gleaned from cursory investigations of the options menu or (heavens forbid) a quick query of the help contents. despite the o'rilley stamp, this book seems targetted at the 40+ discover-the-magic-of-PCs! where's-the-any-key crowd.

    1. Re:does this strike anyone else as useless? by Dark+Nexus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, that makes ME classify it as a book for geeks..... .....to give to family members who are relatively computer illiterate, to reduce the number of "come fix my computer!" phone calls.

      Doesn't sound useless to me!

      --
      Dark Nexus
      "Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
    2. Re:does this strike anyone else as useless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Press the "any" key? forget it, I'll order a sandwich and put it on my tab. Whoops, no time for that now, the computer's starting! Man all this hacking is making me tired.

    3. Re:does this strike anyone else as useless? by nickyj · · Score: 1

      Wish that would work for me but everyone that asks me for computer help is too lazy to read, hence the problem with the computer (they didn't read the help).

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    4. Re:does this strike anyone else as useless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And is that bad? I'm glad that there's something I can give my family that doesn't say "for dummies" on the title. We geeks think it's cute, but I know some people who find the whole "for dummies" thing kinda demeaning. You're a dummy just because you don't know what's under the hood of your system? Puhleeze...

    5. Re:does this strike anyone else as useless? by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      most of the examples cited by the reviewer can be gleaned from cursory investigations of the chronosynclastic infundibulum or (heavens forbid) a quick query of the early medieval central European political succession contents.

      True enough, but we're not all capable of understanding this stuff even when we're looking directly at it. Ergo, this sort of book for the less well endowed mentally, when it comes to dealing with such childishly simple subject matter.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    6. Re:does this strike anyone else as useless? by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      yeah, i was going to say that too. i mean, if i want windows annoyances, i just come to work an hour early and hang out with the the BOFFs on the sales floor.

    7. Re:does this strike anyone else as useless? by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I recently picked up the Windows XP Annoyances book, and though most of the things in there (so far) have been either obvious or things I really don't care about, I have found a few more detailed and in-depth items that are useful, as well as some links to some shareware that might prove useful.

      OReilly also released a Windows XP pocket reference which I may start picking up for everyone I know getting started on that OS that doesn't have much experience with computers (or just doesn't seem to learn). The book starts with the very basics (like what is left- and right- and double- click and what do they do), but goes onto some nice detail on the command line utilities and registry entries. Well worth $10-12 a pop if even half the people I give it to actually answer some of their own questions with it.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    8. Re:does this strike anyone else as useless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this book seems targetted at the 40+

      And why bring age into it?

      I'll bet I am more "geeky" than you, and I am most certainly older. I was using a command line (CP/M and DOS 1.0) before you were even a gleam in your father's eye. I built my first computer (with a soldering iron) many years ago.

      I am conversant with over 15 computer languages, 5 operating systems, and more editors than I can remember.

      Go blow...

    9. Re:does this strike anyone else as useless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...actually, these books are slightly more than that. They tend also to point out some of the things you would think would work a certain way, but don't, and have no real work-around. Most other Windows-fan books are just that, rehashes of the Helpfile, the product marketing literature, etc., because most of them are quickly written based on the pre-release versions, where that is all that there is to be had, because there is not enough time to collect a bunch of user feedback on what is broken (still...like Styles) or plain stupid about the current versions. At least Woody Leonhard, et al., take enough time to look at and document many of the more painful negatives and provide workarounds for most of them.

      There are probably still bugs in Word 2003 that I'm sure have been there since Word 6 days...

  13. Program Not Responding by Treacle+Treatment · · Score: 5, Insightful


    One of my favorite dialogs from Windows is the one saying "This program is not responding". Excuse me but wouldn't it be nice to tell me which one that is? Obviously Windows knows which one it is. Arrrr!

    --
    TT
    1. Re:Program Not Responding by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Funny

      My favorite one (which makes me swear everytime I see it) is, when uninstalling a program, I see these too dialog boxes:

      1) the file yaddayadda.dll is not being used by any other programs and can be safely removed. Remove? (yes/no)

      Then when you click 'OK'...

      2) Another program may be using that DLL!!! Dear god! Are you sure?!!! (no/no)

      friggin CYA programmers :)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    2. Re:Program Not Responding by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And those not responding processes that Windows can't close are fun too, like if the Visual Studio .NET IDE crashes, I've ran into situations where you can't close it from the task manager, it's still there and using 99% cpu if you log off and log back on, and you must flip the switch to shut down your PC.

      Also exciting are the local Access Denied messages you sometimes get when logged in as Administrator, which can get in your way when trying to close a misbehaving process.

    3. Re:Program Not Responding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This user has performed an illegal operation and will now be terminated.
      -RIAA on the mp3 downloading teen

    4. Re:Program Not Responding by AltControlsDelete · · Score: 1

      You might try this.

    5. Re:Program Not Responding by skinfitz · · Score: 2, Informative

      er.. that information would be in the title of the window that says "This program is not responding"...

      Actually it's true that people simply do not read dialog boxes - one of our support guys was called out yesterday after a user complained that her computer kept giving an error every time she shut down this new program she has.

      The "error" was a dialog box that said "Are you sure you want to quit?"

    6. Re:Program Not Responding by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      I like when you bring up Task Manager and then try to end a dead task, which turns into a 30-second pause before a window pops up saying "This program is not responding." Uhh, yeah, that's why I want to kill it. Very helpful.

    7. Re:Program Not Responding by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And those not responding processes that Windows can't close are fun too, like if the Visual Studio .NET IDE crashes, I've ran into situations where you can't close it from the task manager, it's still there and using 99% cpu if you log off and log back on, and you must flip the switch to shut down your PC.

      Also exciting are the local Access Denied messages you sometimes get when logged in as Administrator, which can get in your way when trying to close a misbehaving process.


      I can't stress enough how badly you want to download PStools

      This will allow you to view hidden processes that Windows does not normally expose to the task manager, and kill just about anything, even the normal "access denied" processes.

      Every windows admin needs this.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    8. Re:Program Not Responding by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      You can kill the process that is even if you cannot see the application in that window. if you're suing 2K or XP. click on the processes tab, find it, kill it, done.

    9. Re:Program Not Responding by m_pll · · Score: 1
      On XP and win2003 you can use tasklist.exe and taskkill -f. This should be just as effective as pskill.

      Taskkill will enable debug privilege (so admins can open processes they don't own) and call TerminateProcess. In rare cases (usually when a process is stuck in some kernel mode driver and the driver can't cancel IO request) it will fail to kill the process, but then pskill would fail also.

    10. Re:Program Not Responding by m_pll · · Score: 1
      Sometimes a GUI process might appear to be hung but would still close if you send WM_CLOSE to its main window. This is better than terminating the process so when you do "End Task" in task manager, it tries this first and if the process doesn't respond it then shows this dialog (btw the timeout is more like 5 seconds).

      If you want to kill the process immediately, go to the Processes tab (or right-click the task and say Go to process) the click on End Process.

    11. Re:Program Not Responding by m_pll · · Score: 1

      Well it does tell you the main window title of the process. What else do you need? Process id might be useful for people who know what that is, but most users would just be confused by it.

    12. Re:Program Not Responding by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Par chance, do any of you know of a program in Windows (XP) which will allow the end-user to send messages directly to programs? Is it even possible?

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    13. Re:Program Not Responding by nafe_ys · · Score: 1

      Speaking of ridiculous error messages: Turned on my pc the other day with the keyboard disconnected. The error message? "Keyboard not detected. Please press any key to continue"...

    14. Re:Program Not Responding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS has a long history of such wonderful messages. My favorite DOS message is:

      KEYBOARD NOT FOUND.
      PRESS TO CONTINUE.

      Of course if the computer doesn't know it has a keyboard, what use is it to push keys? Was the programmer an idiot or did (s)he have an odd sense of humor?

    15. Re:Program Not Responding by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Except in those cases where the title bar is empty

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    16. Re:Program Not Responding by Zirtix · · Score: 1

      That just shows you what terrible usability the 'are you sure you want to quit?' dialog has. It's an awful idea (except when there is unsaved data obviously)

    17. Re:Program Not Responding by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I was using the processes tab. I avoid the applications tab because it's basically useless and is no more effective than clicking X.

    18. Re:Program Not Responding by splorp! · · Score: 1

      This is an actual, unedited file dialog I received on my Windows system. Tell me, what would you do?

      --
      Please don't humanize the morons around me. It makes me very uncomfortable.
    19. Re:Program Not Responding by Treacle+Treatment · · Score: 1


      I wind up with lots of them where there is nothing in the title area. YMMV.

      --
      TT
    20. Re:Program Not Responding by Treacle+Treatment · · Score: 1

      The title of the window is completely BLANK. There is an exclamation point Icon in the dialog with the following text.

      This program is not responding. It may be busy waiting for a response from you, or it may have stopped running.

      Like I said... annoying

      --
      TT
  14. and if you do... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    be prepared for annoyances like:

    - not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you

    - not being able to browse every site online (some are definitely IE specific, others require plugins not available on linux)

    - figure out how users, accounts, software installations etc. work (click on a link and the program installs automatically? yeah, right), not to mention the joys of the command line

    - become confused by some desktop environments where settings are spread around 3 different menus and where sometimes they inexplicably don't stick etc. etc. in general using software developed by developers with sometimes not much thought given to user friendliness and good UI guidelines.

    - not being able to play commercial games (unless you shell out for winex and even then some things don't work)

    I could go on and on, I've been using linux on my desktop primarily for more than 10 years now and there's no way that I'd give it to somebody not extremely computer literate...

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:and if you do... by computersareevil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      be prepared for annoyances like:

      - not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you

      Shame on them for using proprietary formats! They don't enhance communication, they limit it!

      - not being able to browse every site online (some are definitely IE specific, others require plugins not available on linux)

      Shame on them for not adhering to published web standards. Their website it broken, not my browser, dammit!

      - figure out how users, accounts, software installations etc. work (click on a link and the program installs automatically? yeah, right), not to mention the joys of the command line

      Are you talking about Windows XP?

      - become confused by some desktop environments where settings are spread around 3 different menus and where sometimes they inexplicably don't stick etc. etc. in general using software developed by developers with sometimes not much thought given to user friendliness and good UI guidelines.

      Oh! You're talking about every version of Windoze! I get it!

      - not being able to play commercial games (unless you shell out for winex and even then some things don't work)

      "Unless you shell out for the latest Winders version, then still have to download the latest version of DirectX". 'Nuff said.

      I could go on and on, I've been using linux on my desktop primarily for more than 10 years now and there's no way that I'd give it to somebody not extremely computer literate...

      I gave it to my Mom, over 1000 miles away, and now she never calls me with complaints about the computer displaying that "Lovely blue screen"...

      NO WAY would I give a WINDOWS PC to somebody not extrememly computer literate...

    2. Re:and if you do... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "- not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you"

      if everyone at the company is using Linux, not likly to happen. owever, I have not seen I word document that I couldn't open under Linux in over a year.

      "- not being able to browse every site online (some are definitely IE specific, others require plugins not available on linux)"
      is that really an issue? The few sites that are IE only, have alternatives.
      The only site I had an issue with was my bank. I sent them an email explaing to them my problem, and that a large portion of there customers have dial-up, and thus, they should be complient for those users. They made it more towards standards, and now I can use it, easy peasy.

      "- figure out how users, accounts, software installations etc. work (click on a link and the program installs automatically? yeah, right), not to mention the joys of the command line
      "

      That would be a boon in the corporate enviromaent, make it difficult for user to install that 'harmless' app.
      However, this is changing,m and a lot of installs are becoming point and click.

      all the major issue you note are becoming a moot point. And if enough people start using Linux, MS will release a Linux version of office. It makes to much money not to.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:and if you do... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 3, Insightful


      - not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you

      - not being able to browse every site online (some are definitely IE specific, others require plugins not available on linux)


      I fail to see how these have anyting to do with linux. If you publish something in a proprietary format, then by definition only those with the proprietary application will be able to use it.

      Doesn't matter whether it is linux or any other operating system (or even windows without the proper applications installed).

      If you want your work to be useable by as many people as possible, publish in a standard format. If you don't, well then why would you be surprised when you find out that people can't view your work?

    4. Re:and if you do... by October_30th · · Score: 1
      If you can't figure out how software installation works in Mandrake or Redhat you're probably too much of a stupid dick to be using a computer anyway

      Heh. Just listen to yourself. You are just making new Linux converts by the bushel there with that attitude...

      Good job, jackass.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    5. Re:and if you do... by Rhys · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not being able to run the latest email virus is an annoyance?

      I need a life more like yours.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    6. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "he only subject you're an expert in is the fine art of making a fucking ass of yourself."

      yeaaaah, and you're not?

      This is a typical kneejerk Linux jerkoff reaction. Frothing at the mouth because someone wants to do something with their OS that your precious cannot do.

      The commercial games point is viable. A very few titles do end up with some Linux support, but most do not. Those that do often come out much later.

      And of course the Linux basement trolls always enjoy basing people's intelligence on what OS they know how to use. Because you know, that's the most important thing in everyone's lives! Yep everyone in the whole fucking world spends all day worrying about the OS they use and what it can and can't do. And hell if this Linux thingy you're foaming at the mouth about can't run application x that they wish to run, well aren't they fucking retards for wanting to run a program not supported by Linux.

      Yeah that's right everyone's stupid except you. Now why don't you run along and find a broomstick and go practice being a Jedi in the gym some more!

    7. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The only subject you're an expert in is the fine art of making a fucking ass of yourself.

      That comment seems to apply equally well to your obnoxious self.

    8. Re:and if you do... by October_30th · · Score: 1
      Shame on them for using proprietary formats! They don't enhance communication, they limit it!

      I just don't get this attitude. So it's the WORLD that should change to accommodate the views held by the free software camp

      computer displaying that "Lovely blue screen"...

      Blue screen? What blue screen? Ever since I installed W2K I have never seen the blue screen again.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    9. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I fail to see how these have anything to do with linux.
      Umm, I do. The original poster was saying that this would be a problem if you switch to linux - and it will be. It's not linux's FAULT, but it has everything to do with using linux.

    10. Re:and if you do... by Wylfing · · Score: 1
      It's a blizzard where I live right now, but I see you are living comfortably on your astroturf. Let's begin.

      not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you

      Great! Now you can have all the latest viruses How very productive. If someone sends me a Word file I just politely ask them to make a PDF or RTF, and they always do. No problem there. The truth is, 95% of the time I get a Word file it's just a wrapper for a bunch of graphics. When I tell the sender that it's possible to just send the actual graphic files, they go "Oh! That's much easier!"

      figure out how users, accounts, software installations etc. work (click on a link and the program installs automatically? yeah, right), not to mention the joys of the command line

      Mandrake doesn't make you figure any of those things out. But PLEASE let's not start auto-installing programs by clicking a link and having everyone run as root all the time. That is unnecessary and totally fucking crazy. But while I'm at it, typing "apt-get install [program]" on the command line is every bit as easy as clicking a dozen or so times through a Windows installer. It's also substantially faster, because I don't have to hunt for the download.

      become confused by some desktop environments where settings are spread around 3 different menus

      Er, I guess I forgot about the Windows MONOMENU that contains all the settings for the entire computer on a single menu. Where is that again? I click My Computer, and then what?

      not being able to play commercial games

      You mean like Neverwinter Nights? Oh wait...

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    11. Re:and if you do... by October_30th · · Score: 1
      publish in a standard format

      And MS Office is not a de facto standard?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    12. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not the debate. yes, in the long term it would be nice if everyone used a non-propriety format, but what the poster was talking about is if he switch to linux now, that he would run into problems such as being unable to properly open some Office files.

    13. Re:and if you do... by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      THIS, more than the command line, more than the lack of standardization on desktops, in fact more than anything else, is what keeps most folks from using linux. Its the too damned rude, holier than thou, attitude of the vocal Linux advocate. I realize that they are likely the minority, but they are the ones that EVERY newbie has a horror story about delaing with.

      Yes, Mandrake makes installing software easier, but its still not as easy as Windows. Yes, you can name a handful of commerical games for linux that don't require WineX, but I can walk into compusa or best buy or whatever and choose from HUNDREDS of titles on the shelf.

      The real annoyance about Linux is listening to stupid fuckwit idiots who think they know it all because they have nothing better to do than remember which freaking conf file has to be changed to set somethign up that should be configurable without reading the freaking manual by using the UI of the program itself.

      I use Windows, I use MacOSX, I use linus. I have met hostile users on all platforms. I have never met the sheer number of hostile users on any other platform as I have the vocal linux advocates out there. Maybe the command line brings out the worst in people, I don't know, but there are a lot fo bright folks out there who COULD figure out how linux works, but figure its not worth it, and with this attitude hitting them everyt time they point out a valid flaw, or ask a question, they are right, its not.

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
    14. Re:and if you do... by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      Dude, I'll accept that you've been using Linux on your desktop for more than 10yrs now (BTW, so have I) but I'd like to dispel some of the myths you point to here:

      - not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you

      What kinds of coworkers do you have? I've never had this problem using StarOffice. Back when I used ApplixWare or maybe the old StarOffice 5.2, sure. But I've never had this problem with the recent StarOffice 6 and 7. I'm sure the same applies with OpenOffice 1.x but I'm a believer in supporting Linux software vendors with $$ when they turn out good product.

      - not being able to browse every site online (some are definitely IE specific, others require plugins not available on linux)

      I've only had this problem on a very limited number of sites. Most of those have been web sites for movies. I can use flash, java, etc. with my Linux browser of choice (Mozilla.)

      - figure out how users, accounts, software installations etc. work (click on a link and the program installs automatically? yeah, right), not to mention the joys of the command line

      Are you still stuck in the command line?? Yes, the command line is there if you want to use it. I use it on a daily basis because I find some data files are easier to work with that way (for example, parsing log files on my web servers at work.) But you don't need to use the command line, even to do admin things like creating users.

      My wife has been a Linux user since Red Hat 7.3, and she's definitely not a technical person. She's pretty much confused by the command line (gotta love her) so she sticks to the GNOME and the GUI apps.

      - become confused by some desktop environments where settings are spread around 3 different menus and where sometimes they inexplicably don't stick etc. etc. in general using software developed by developers with sometimes not much thought given to user friendliness and good UI guidelines.

      It can come down to the distro that you prefer. I liked RH8 and RH9 because of the end user experience they've built up (common Bluecurve theme, for example.) I'm switching my personal desktop and laptop to Fedora for the same reason.

      What settings have been spread throughout 3 menus? Sorry, but I don't think I've seen this in Red Hat 8/9 or Fedora.

      - not being able to play commercial games (unless you shell out for winex and even then some things don't work)

      This one I'll give you. A friend of mine at work does have several commercial FPS shooter games (I think 'Unreal' is one of them) but I don't prefer to play PC games. I'm a console gamer.

      -jh

    15. Re:and if you do... by flamingnight · · Score: 1

      Blue screen? What blue screen? Ever since I installed W2K I have never seen the blue screen again. What, your computer won't boot now that you've installed Win2K?

      Seriously though, every operating system has its annoyances, just as most have their good points. If I want to do some graphics or audio, I use my Mac. Generic C/C++ programming gets done on the Linux box. If I get a complex Word document, I open VPC and run Windows.

    16. Re:and if you do... by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      I could go on and on, I've been using linux on my desktop primarily for more than 10 years now and there's no way that I'd give it to somebody not extremely computer literate...

      There's your problem. New versions have come out in the last 10 years. You should upgrade, you may be pleasantly surprised.

      Seriously, I don't see any of those arguments as being valid any longer. Not the Word document argument, not the web argument, not even the management and configuration arguments. You do have a mild point about games, but there are a lot of people who just don't care about games. I'm one of those people.

    17. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if enough people start using Linux, MS will release a Linux version of office.

      Yeah, when hell freezes over. Microsoft would sooner open-source Windows than create a Linux version of Office.

    18. Re:and if you do... by blixel · · Score: 1

      - not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you

      Hmm... Is that really a big problem? In my experience with Open Office I've been able to view Word Documents without any problem. But admittedly I'm not a big Document person... I usually prefer gEdit (Wordpad) so my formatting is pretty simple.

      - not being able to browse every site online (some are definitely IE specific, others require plugins not available on linux)

      I'm sure that's true but I haven't ran into any IE-only sites in a long time. But I'm relatively sure they exist. Regardless if I'm using Windows or Linux though, I think it's the web developers fault. In most cases (i.e. any one but microsoft.com) if you e-mailed the webmaster and told them their site was "broken", they would probably be interested in fixing the problem.

      - figure out how users, accounts, software installations etc. work (click on a link and the program installs automatically? yeah, right), not to mention the joys of the command line

      User accounts - mixed blessing. On the one hand it is kind of annoying going from Windows 95/98 where you are always root to a *nix world where you are highly pressured into using a non root account. Personally I think the security bennefits of using a non root account far outweigh the so-called inconveniences. Once you get use to it, it's second nature.

      Software installations - Agreed. It's not "there yet" in my opinion. But I think it has more to do with a lack of being able to find quality pre-packaged software for a given distro than it does with the technology. When packages are done well, they "just work". Click it, the installer fires up, 0%, 10%... 100% complete, done. I'm totally confident that this will become a non issue very soon.

      Joys of the command line - Umm... agreed I guess. I'm a power user. I like that the command line is there. *However*, I would prefer it to be an *optional* way of doing things. I've never used Mac OSX but as I understand it, you can do everything from the GUI. But the command line is still there for people who care to indulge themselves with it. I think that is ideal.

      - become confused by some desktop environments where settings are spread around 3 different menus

      I use to have a problem with that when I was trying to make Gnome work with Window Maker. Or make KDE work with some other Window Manager. But now I'm using straight Gnome and I don't think it's an issue.

      and where sometimes they inexplicably don't stick etc. etc. in general using software developed by developers with sometimes not much thought given to user friendliness and good UI guidelines.

      I'll agree with that sentiment as well. I think there is still some work to be done regarding the overall "polish". But if you compare things to where they were a couple of years ago, you can really appreciate how much has been done and can envision how much better it's going to be in another year or two.

      - not being able to play commercial games (unless you shell out for winex and even then some things don't work)

      I agree 100%, no questions asked. With very few exceptions (Quake 3, UT2K3, America's Army), *real* games and Linux don't mix. I'm confident it will get better but in the mean time I have a dedicated hard-drive with Windows installed on it for my gaming needs.

      I could go on and on, I've been using linux on my desktop primarily for more than 10 years now and there's no way that I'd give it to somebody not extremely computer literate...

      You're frustrated. I understand completely. I've been there myself. I wanted to run Linux on the Desktop so bad it made my head hurt just thinking about it. But I was always running into insurmountable obstacles and it infuriated me. Finally the day came and I haven't looked back since. Give it time. Your day will come.

    19. Re:and if you do... by advocate_one · · Score: 0, Troll
      "I just don't get this attitude. So it's the WORLD that should change to accommodate the views held by the free software camp"

      The world is changing... it's just you stick in the muds who're not...

      "Ever since I installed W2K I have never seen the blue screen again"

      nah... it just spontaneously reboots instead...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    20. Re:and if you do... by shog9 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So it's the WORLD that should change to accommodate the views held by the free software camp


      So MS-Word == The WORLD now, eh?

      This neither begins nor ends with "the free software camp". Making information more difficult to extract is a Bad Idea, 'k? What if i want to search in it / translate it / distribute it / insert it in a Web CMS?

      Ever since I installed W2K I have never seen the blue screen again.


      Ol' Mrs. computersareevil i presume?
      How 'bout you go work in a Windows shop for a few years, and then come back with some decent arguments.
    21. Re:and if you do... by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Informative
      parent to poster wrote:
      publish in a standard format
      and poster wrote:
      And MS Office is not a de facto standard?
      MS Office is NOT a standard format, which is what the parent poster was talking about. For one thing, there is no standard MS Office document format - it changes with every major release, as part of marketings' way of forcing people to upgrade. For another, the format is not documented. And pleasse, don't talk about XML - even that's still in flux'n'sux land
    22. Re:and if you do... by October_30th · · Score: 1
      How 'bout you go work in a Windows shop for a few years, and then come back with some decent arguments

      Is it really that hard to admit that W2K and subsequent versions really are stable? I pity you.

      For your information, my lab runs nothing but Windows because of the compatibility issues when it comes to the preparation of manuscripts. I will not edit a PhD student's LaTeX file because I see no need to learn a whole new language just to typeset a manuscript.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    23. Re:and if you do... by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      Blue screen? What blue screen? Ever since I installed W2K I have never seen the blue screen again.

      Pansy. You are clearly not trying hard enough. I've had 4 W2K workstations, 1 W2k laptop, 1 WXP laptop, and 8 W2K servers. I've seen them all either blue-screen or lock-up completely. And about half have unexplicably and spontaneously rebooted themselves.

    24. Re:and if you do... by October_30th · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And RedHat 8.0 Linux on my file server inexplicably hard-locked yesterday. So? Software fails and that's perfectly OK.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    25. Re:and if you do... by blixel · · Score: 1

      THIS, more than the command line, .... is what keeps most folks from using linux. Its the too damned rude, holier than thou, attitude of the vocal Linux advocate.

      I have to agree with you on that. A while back I threw in the proverbial towel with Linux due to all the "I am GOD" attitudes I was running into. I'm back though. (Back with Linux that is.) But I'm wiser. I've learned to just tune out the zealots and I'm much happier now.

    26. Re:and if you do... by 24-bit+Voxel · · Score: 1

      I sure have.

    27. Re:and if you do... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Most of these are solved by just using Mandrake, with the exception of commercial games.

      I would have no qualms about giving Mandrake to someone not computer literate. In fact, I'd be more likely to give them Mandrake than Windows, since on Mandrake they are less likely to get viruses and spyware.

    28. Re:and if you do... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      "not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you"

      many Windows users can't do that. Don't forget that Microsoft Works DOES NOT like Word files. I know of companies who standardized on Works to save money. They use Windows, but they don't use MS Office.

      So, it seems this has nothing to do with Linux. It just has to do with whether or not they run the software YOU want them to run.

    29. Re:and if you do... by bombom · · Score: 1

      Shame on them for not adhering to published web standards. Their website it broken, not my browser, dammit!

      Standards compliant like Slashdot is?

      --
      IOException - Can't Speak
    30. Re:and if you do... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Honestly, was XFree86 out 10 years ago for Linux? The Linux _project_ just started in 1992, didn't it?

    31. Re:and if you do... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you

      The annoyance is your coworker, not your OS.

      not being able to browse every site online

      The annoyance is the website, not your OS.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    32. Re:and if you do... by shog9 · · Score: 1
      Is it really that hard to admit that W2K and subsequent versions really are stable


      W2K and subsequent versions really are stable. Happy? Here, i'll even throw in a "and in fact are getting more stable with each new release".

      Now, is it really so hard to concede you've just been lucky? Some of us have to work with users who aren't PhDs, and who don't care much for computers. They just want to find their Word documents and get their flakey HP printers to print them. They don't know what service packs they need to apply, or when to update their drivers, or which emails never to open. It's not their job.

      It's an imperfect world, with imperfect people, imperfect hardware, and imperfect software. Things are going to break. Rather than pretending there is perfection in Windows, you would be better off to note that these same problems apply to [Linux|BSD|OS/X|...] also.
    33. Re:and if you do... by viware · · Score: 1

      Although WindowsXP and 2k are more stable than previous versions, they are not as stable as linux. I install OS's for a living, and of course deal with them later in their lives. One thing I can say for sure: I've crashed WindowsXP and 2k many-a-time, and so rarely crashed linux that I can't even remember one instance (I can remember a windowsXP instance - last night! Damn scorched3d is buggy!).

      Truth is, if I setup a windowsXP machine and spend the time to make it slick, and then do the same with a linux box, the linux box will last virtually forever without any problems (even with dumb users - you have to set them up properly to deal with lay people), whereas the windows box is having problems within a few months. There really isnt any comparison: If the computer is setup by an expert, a linux box is substantially better than a windows box. The only circumstances where windows is more desireable than linux is when there are specific software or hardware requirements which can't be met, such as games.

    34. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I experience BSODs on both my XP and Win2K installations. I have yet to figure out why the same machine, when running SuSE, never has so much as a hiccup...

      Kreschurb

      --
      "People ask why I'm negative: it's because I can't leave my kids to a world
      of control, alt, delete." - Scott McNealy, Sun Microsystems

    35. Re:and if you do... by computersareevil · · Score: 1

      I just don't get this attitude. So it's the WORLD that should change to accommodate the views held by the free software camp

      No, The world SHOULD NOT change to accomodate a format foisted on us by a monopoly, that makes communication HARDER!

      Oh yeah; then PATENT it so they have to PAY somebody else to read YOUR work! GENIUS!

      Blue screen? What blue screen? Ever since I installed W2K I have never seen the blue screen again.

      You have to turn it on every now and then... ;-)

    36. Re:and if you do... by (trb001) · · Score: 1

      MS Office is NOT a standard format

      not standard, but de facto standard, meaning that when you ask someone for a 'document', the vast majority are going to assume you mean an MS Office word/powerpoint/excel file.

      standard MS Office document format - it changes with every major release

      but, if I'm not mistaken, most if not all Office programs are backwards compatible...ie, 2000 can read 97's files and save to that format as well. It's called progress...everything from databases to programming languages to file formats goes through changes. I've actually been amazed how simple it is to upgrade from one version of Office to another, just open and Save and you have a new file in the new format.

      --trb

    37. Re:and if you do... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I sure as hell hope you don't think .doc is a typesetting format.

      If so, I then hope you don't actually have anything to do with any PhD students files.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    38. Re:and if you do... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      So MS-Word == The WORLD now, eh?

      Yes, that's what most people in the world (or at least in the US, I haven't spent much time elsewhere) use.

      "People keep sending me these emails and the text is in English. And people post in slashdot in English. How am I supposed to understand them? Why can't they write in Esperanto, the truly universal language that everyone knows and loves?" Ok, it would make more sense if that quote were in Esperanto. But I don't know it. Nor does anyone else in the real world. Which is the point.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    39. Re:and if you do... by rakanishu · · Score: 1
      "- not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you"
      if everyone at the company is using Linux, not likly to happen. owever, I have not seen I word document that I couldn't open under Linux in over a year.
      I'm sure you could open the document, but it was probably gibberish. =)
      Unfortunately, in my experience with Open Office 1.1, many Word documents will open but are obfuscated. i.e. much of the formatting gone making it look like a mess that hard to follow. Some have refused to open.
      Lately, I've been using Open Office 1.1. When I need to send a document to co-workers. I save it as PDF and email the PDF.
    40. Re:and if you do... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      The problem is that once you've saved in the "new" format, you can't send it to someone who doesn't also have the new format. In this case, the format changes aren't for improving the product, but for breaking compatability.

      A good counter-example was wordperfect. versins 6 thru 9 were the same file format, and were not just backwards-compatible, but forward-compatible as well (version 6 could open version 9 wpd documents). Other producst demonstrated the same ability (dBaseIV/dBase5 used the same database file format, for example).

      Then, there's vim. ASCII will never go out of date.

    41. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is fairly forgiving on memory errors, windows really isn't. I personally use linux, but it is something I've ended up tracing "windows only" errors to before.

    42. Re:and if you do... by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've noticed that too. Users call me because their computer is spontaneously rebooting, and they automatically think that it's a hardware issue. For example:

      User: "My computer is rebooting every 10 minutes. I think that the power supply (or hard drive, or power cable, etc.) must be bad."

      Am I the only one who has noticed this happenning? I hate to be a conspiracy theorist, but I'm fairly convinced that MS changed the BSOD default action on purpose to divert the attention (of users who don't know any better) from OS errors, so that they don't form the opinion that Windows 2000 is still not *that* great.

    43. Re:and if you do... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      They don't know what service packs they need to apply, or when to update their drivers,

      I guess you haven't used windows in a while, but they have this thing now called Windows Update that automatically tells you when then are new patches you need to install, and can even download them in the background for you (and then let you choose whether to install them, if you want).
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    44. Re:and if you do... by inquisitor · · Score: 1

      Sorry - this is a pet bug of mine. Don't want to sound like a Microsoft ass-kisser (I use the best tool for the job, nothing more), but I am rather too familiar with MS Office.

      MS Word - which I assume you're referring to - has not changed its file format since Word 97, and that includes 2003. That is four major releases in seven years. Office XML is optional right now. Also, if you still use WfW95, you can get a plugin from Microsoft to allow you to r/w Word97 (and thus Word2K and onward) files, or use the free Word Viewer (which is available for Windows 3.1). There are similar Excel and PPT viewers available.

      (Admittedly, this excludes Access - but then again, since when does anyone release MDB files on their web site? Anyone that isn't really, really stupid, anyway.)

      In fact, this is very much one of the unknown PC Annoyances as seen in this book: you don't need to pay for Office in order to read Word documents The Way They Were Meant To Be Read. Word Viewer and OOo make for a fairly good free office; it's a much better situation than it used to be.

    45. Re:and if you do... by BlewScreen · · Score: 1

      yes - now that I've donned my tin-foil hat, you can't see me :)

      -bs

      --
      That that is is not that that is not. That that is not is not that that is.
    46. Re:and if you do... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but I remember having to show people who were using Word2000 how to "save as..." so people who were complaining about not being able to open their files using Word97 could read them, so compatibility never was complete between versions.

      Then there's the whole wvXXXXX series for linux (just type wv and press the tab key for autocomplete and see all your options). Finally, there's strings.

      Mind you' I haven't read a .doc file in years (lucky me :-) plain text does pretty much everything I want, and the few exceptions (about once a year), I fire up an old version of Windows and run Wordperfect 9.

    47. Re:and if you do... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Yes. I had 'plug and play Linux' from Yggdrasil in the fall of 1993. The Boot floppy/CD combo took you straight into X to do the install from.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    48. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, you could say the same things about Windows, except for the games thing.

      As far as desktop environment confusion, just think about the confusion we will have when Longhorn comes out. When I use XP, I try to create a user account for myself so I can make it use Classic mode, so I can find where everything is. Windows 9x/NT->2000 wasn't too bad, but anything->XP's new "environment" just sucks.
      The Windows desktop went downhill in XP, IMHO.

      At least with Linux, those settings that don't stick are probably in a text-based configuration file. Once found, these files are 10x easier to deal with than the Registry.

      How do you change the Administrator password in XP Home? How do you login as Administrator in XPHome?

      As far as IE-specific, how about sites that correctly use CSS that IE mangles, that Mozilla renders w/o flaws?

      As far as "complex" word documents...I'd like to see one in the wild... (I'm assuming such a beast includes lots of links to Excel files, other ActiveX objects, etc.). 99% of people who use Word would be better off with a typewriter.

    49. Re:and if you do... by October_30th · · Score: 1
      Why should the author typeset an article in the first place? No, that's the publisher's job.

      I want my PhD students to write their manuscripts in Word so that I can easily write in my proposed changes and comments so that they will show up in red, underlined text when "show modifications" is enabled.

      Furthermore, most journals accept submissions in Word format these days.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    50. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, an Office Document is a COM Compound document, which contains the overhead wrapper, with the real document-specific stuff inside it.

      For example, the real document format for Excel files is called "XBiffN", and previous versions (the last one I looked at slightly was XBiff5) of this have been documented in the MSDN. The stuff for dealing with a COM Compound document is probably also in the MSDN.

      The real trick to nailing Word document conversions down is to understand the various versions of RTF fully, as these are really Word's "Rosetta Stone" (i.e., non-Word formats are converted to RTF before importing into Word, and Word is converted to RTF first before exporting to non-RTF).

    51. Re:and if you do... by shog9 · · Score: 1
      Yes, that's what most people in the world [...] use.


      And all of these people use Word because it is difficult for 3rd-party programs to extract information from the file format it defaults to saving in? I had no idea!

      Why can't they write in Esperanto,


      Oh, you're good at this. Because that is an excellent analogy. Except for how it isn't analogous. And no one speaks Esperanto. Here, at very least, you could have picked an example that makes sense:

      "People keep sending me these emails and the text in Simplified Chinese. How am i supposed to understand them? Why can't they write in English? It would be so much easier to process with existing software, and take up less storage space, and i'd know what they were writing to me."

      But even this is a piss-poor analogy, as instead of a few billion people who would need to spend serious time learning a new language, you've maybe a few million who wouldn't give a rat's ass if MS changes Word to output XML, LaTeX, PostScript, or Morse Code.
    52. Re:and if you do... by shog9 · · Score: 1
      I guess you haven't used windows in a while

      I guess you haven't been paying attention.

      they have this thing now called Windows Update that
      ...is only available on WinXP and up...
      ...is turned off by default...
      ...generally does a shitty job of explaining why you're consenting to install what (and after all the work i go through to make people paranoid about what they install)...
      ...doesn't update flakey printer drivers (although the update website will update flakey video drivers... with ones that are even flakier).

      From the sound of things, MS will finally get this right in XP SP2... or maybe Longhorn.
    53. Re:and if you do... by repetty · · Score: 1

      The term "de facto" is used by people who don't know dick about standards. Managers like to use the term "de facto" a lot (which figures).

      Something is either a standard or it is not a standard. What's so fucking hard to understand about that?

      A lot of people confuse "commonly used" with "standard", too. And here's a funny thought... ask a Microsoft marketing droid what "standard" means and then ask a Microsoft lawyer. Compare the results.

    54. Re:and if you do... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      ...is only available on WinXP and up...

      Yes, the current version of windows. Hey, it's easy to knock a software product when we look at things that were wrong in all previous versions as well as the version one would be getting today. Do you reply to people who say that new users should buy a Mac rather than Windows by saying that that's bogus since many of it's features are "only available in OS X"?
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    55. Re:and if you do... by sfe_software · · Score: 1

      I just don't get this attitude. So it's the WORLD that should change to accommodate the views held by the free software camp

      I can't speak for the grandparent, but I think proprietary formats suck for many reasons. It's not just about free software, either. If you chose to use some other, non-free office suite, you'd still have to deal with compatibility issues if using proprietary, non-standards-based file formats.

      You can't just expect/assume that everyone you might deal with will be using Windows and Office. PDF, that's slightly more reasonable, as the format is much more portable. XML is even better, being that it's a published, standard format (not proprietary, anyone can support it without worry of lawsuits).

      The only other point in the grandparent post I agree with is web standards. A web site that assumes Windows + MSIE, and only works there -- in the vast majority of cases the site doesn't even validate (it's not valid, correct code). Many times it's not even close (missing tags, etc) and the "webmaster" is relying on the particular way that IE handles piss-poor code. Just type some crap in, trial and error, until it loads and looks "correct" in whatever IE version the "webmaster" is using.

      In other cases, the "web designer" didn't feel HTML/CSS was enough, and had to use ActiveX widgets (again assuming Win+IE), telling the rest of us to "upgrade" (HA!) (I don't mind Flash or Java so much, honestly, and that's not what I'm talking about here).

      The absolute worst case, though, was Capital One's online banking site. It told me that MSIE was required for -- be prepared for this -- security reasons! Seriously, these people seem to be under the impression that only MSIE supports 128-bit SSL encryption. The proper thing to do would have been to configure their SSL web server to only allow 128-bit connections (it takes two parties to hand-shake...) regardless of the particular client software in use. Not to mention the laughability of requiring a browser riddled with holes, for "security reasons".

      Now, on the blue screen issue, I have to agree with you. I've seen maybe two blue-screens since going to 2000 and later XP. One was due to a faulty power supply, with the other a corrupt hard drive (third Maxtor in a row to flake out on me...) Not since 1999 have I seen random BSODs or mysterious freezes. I still get the occasional issue where it can't recoup from a memory/CPU-hogging, mis-behaving program that I've since terminated (to the point that hitting "reset" proves much faster)... but nothing like before with Win9x...

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    56. Re:and if you do... by sfe_software · · Score: 1
      While I somewhat agree about MS Word documents...
      "Ever since I installed W2K I have never seen the blue screen again"
      nah... it just spontaneously reboots instead...

      This was an issue for me only the first time I ever installed Win2k. Since then I learned to change the setting that does this, and the only BSODs I've had since were directly hardware related (bad PSU, failed hard disk). XP is, annoying as it may be at times, pretty solid. I reboot it as often as my linux boxes, which is to say, only when I move hardware around or upgrade components (all run 24x7 for months at a time).

      You might say (and I would agree) that it's stupid for that ("auto reboot") to be the default setting; in fact, that one thing had me very pissed at Windows for a while. However, many stupid defaults apply to other OS's as well (RedHat on up to 7.x enabling tons of services, even on a "workstation" install, for example; or the 50-something Set-UID binaries...). In all cases I've learned to change the options I don't agree with and move on.
      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    57. Re:and if you do... by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      Windows Update only on WinXP and up??!!? The first poster is clueless on that. It's been there since Win95. You are in the same boat for not realizing he was wrong.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    58. Re:and if you do... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      I know the website has existed since 95, but I had never seen the little task bar app until XP. Has it been around longer?

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    59. Re:and if you do... by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You were doing so well shooting down his arguments, but then you got greedy, trying to come up with an answer for every one.

      "not being able to play commercial games"
      "You mean like Neverwinter Nights? Oh wait..."

      What if people prefer, um, anything other than that game? This is a point you can't disprove by mentioning one of very few exceptions. I think the fault is on the game developers' side, rather than Linux, but the fact remains that it is currently a weakness.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    60. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has taken me about five seconds to develop the general design for a PS displayer that allows the desired markup. I'm thinking one week to implement it is generous. I'm hoping these aren't CS PhD students, or your just some tech who manages PhD student labs.

      Anyway, since you obviously don't see the pitfalls of using word I'm not even going to try.

    61. Re:and if you do... by rekkanoryo · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was introduced in the piece of crap stopgap known as Windows ME. Then XP came out with it, then SP3 added that feature to Win2k.

    62. Re:and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and some folks (like me) hate folks sending PDF files around as much as we hate folks sending Word documents around.

    63. Re:and if you do... by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      I've got Win98SE, and it's always been right there in the start menu. I thought it was in 95, too.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    64. Re:and if you do... by rekkanoryo · · Score: 1

      My post's parent was referring to the automatic updates, which are not part of any Windows 98/98SE installation I've ever seen. If the automatic updates ability is in 98SE, it's been backported since IE6SP1 was introduced.

  15. Stuck with Windows? by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only thing that keeps people stuck on Windows is their attitudes. I have not had the displeasure of using a Windows machine in over a year. Everyone that uses OS X or Linux regularly knows that Windows provides no significant benefits, is overpriced and wrought with drawbacks. Anyone that wishes to drop Windows is free to do so at any time. The resigned attitude that you are stuck with anything is rediculous. You are scared. Be honest, say "I am scared of other operating systems".

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
    1. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You are scared. Be honest, say "I am scared of other operating systems".

      How about: I don't *like* other operating systems? That's the one concept that you Mac and Linux fanatics don't seem to get. In my experience, WinXP just *works*. I've used both Linux and OSX extensively, and WinXP is the only one I keep on coming back to. -1, Micro$oft Lover

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    2. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell that to my MMORPG-freak friends who would die without Everquest or that starwars stuff.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    3. Re:Stuck with Windows? by rogue409 · · Score: 1

      I am scared of other operating systems.

    4. Re:Stuck with Windows? by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Replying to my own post again.. I forgot to point out that the reviewer is even afraid to upgrade to the latest version of Windows and feels safe and secure with Windows 98! I had not considered that this kind of person reads /. How many feeble, trembling, gutless Windows 98 users are there still out there?

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
    5. Re:Stuck with Windows? by spockman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Believe he was referring to a monetary issue for not upgrading, not a fear of WinXP, at least according to his comments.

    6. Re:Stuck with Windows? by NerdSlayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are scared. Be honest, say "I am scared of other operating systems".

      Hmm... after you repeat these words:

      "I am afraid to move out of my parent's basement, get a job, and stop posting dumbass comments on Slashdot all day"

      Say it! Say it!

      Some of us work for "companies" with "IT Departments" who have "rules" and tell us what to "do" to get "money".

      Also, some of us like playing video games, or having a home theatre PC, both of which are a giant pain/impossible on Linux.

    7. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      This is one of the things I like about Open-Source. It's wonderful when it works great. But if it doesn't, I don't have to get angry about wasting any hard-earned cash on it, because it's free (and Free). I have cause to complain about something I got for nothing. And even better, if I really need it to work better, I can put in some of my own time and fix it myself, which isn't at all possible with proprietary software.

      Similarly, this is something I really hate about dealing with users of proprietary software: they're always whining about all the problems that they have with it. I really hate whining; I like constructive attitudes, but proprietary software users (read: Windows users) don't have it. They just complain about all the problems they have, but then they absolutely refuse to do anything about it. When I got tired of all the problems with Windows, I kept my eyes open and found out about Linux. I looked into it, downloaded it, tried it out, and switched. I've never looked back. But Windows users refuse to look at alternatives, and it's infuriating. So I just try to avoid these people.

      It's like dealing with a relative who's an alcoholic or drug addict. The solution is so simple (stop taking drugs), but they just get angry if you suggest that.

    8. Re:Stuck with Windows? by NerdSlayer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I forgot to point out that the reviewer is even afraid to upgrade to the latest version of Windows and feels safe and secure with Windows 98! I had not considered that this kind of person reads /. How many feeble, trembling, gutless Windows 98 users are there still out there?

      Actually, ASSHEAD, according to the reviewers comment he might have the balls to upgrade if you sent him a contribution. Or are you AFRAID?

    9. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>WinXP just *works*.

      So does OS X or Linux. To someone who has never been exposed to Windows.

      Stick a kid or adult w/o ANY computer experience in front of all 3 and see which one 'just works'. That is the only fair test.

      Your years of Windows use are a heavy bias, just like my years of Unix use.

    10. Re:Stuck with Windows? by JWW · · Score: 1

      I still have Windows 98 at home (just for games mostly). The only reason is that I will never ever give Microsoft any of my own money ever again and I won't pirate newer versions of Windows either. Oh and for security, I never connect to the net from Windows 98.

      Of course my Myth box only has linux on it :-)

    11. Re:Stuck with Windows? by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I work for and own companies. While the IT department is dealing with hundreds of requests from Windows users to help them deal with removing spyware, crashing, installing restricively licensed and overpriced software, etc.. me and my co-workers are busy being productive on Linux machines. We can interoperate with Microsoft products without a problem using samba, open office and other nice software, control other users PC's or test windows applications using rdesktop, run lots of games and multimedia apps, all on fast, cheap linux boxes. At my companies, everybody runs OS X or Linux, depending on their jobs. In fact, the least productive part of my day is when I have to fire up rdesktop and log into a windows machine to test some code to make sure it behaves nicely on Windows. We have one sales guy running XP on his laptop, but the admins are installing Linux on there next week because he can't get XP to stop crashing. I'm sorry you think you have to be told what to 'do' to make 'money'. Thats a really unfortunate place to be.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
    12. Re:Stuck with Windows? by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I smelled fear. I struck.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
    13. Re:Stuck with Windows? by fred666 · · Score: 1

      I keep a copy of Windows 98 on my HD for only one purpose: GAMES.

      The games i play with is the Visual Pinball/PinMAME emulator suite: i tried to run those under Win2K and all i have is drop-outs in the sound and erratic ball movements, even with a minimal install. Newer versions of Windows are just bloatware.

      I even tried to run those under Wine with no success. :-(

      For the rest (web, mail, some other games, CD burning, photo editing, programming,...), it's GNU/Linux all the way.

    14. Re:Stuck with Windows? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      10.1 -> 10.2 "Jaguar" ($129)
      10.2 -> 10.3 "Panther" ($129)

      OS X isn't cheap either... not to mention the price of buying a Mac desktop these days.

    15. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll agree and disagree with you. I actually know very few Windows users who don't like the OS. That is the secret that most slashdotters don't want to admit. There isn't this great disgruntled community out there. I do agree though that there is no reason, other then not wanting to spend $100, to not upgrade to XP. XP isn't perfect but it really solves a lot of the worst woes (except security dangit).

    16. Re:Stuck with Windows? by syates21 · · Score: 1

      "At my companies" everyone is also a millionaire stock optionee, and they are all married to Morgan Fairchild.

      Geez, may want to think about asking Nurse Ratchet to dial down your dosage.

    17. Re:Stuck with Windows? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      The only thing that keeps people stuck on Windows is their attitudes

      Actually, for me, it's time and money. I don't have the time and money to dick around with Linux shit, and Windows works just fine for me. So, when you grow up, get a job, a family, and a life, *then* come talk to me about "attitudes", kiddo.

    18. Re:Stuck with Windows? by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      The only thing that keeps people stuck on Windows is their attitudes.

      Hate to burst your bubble, but some people don't have a choice. My current client is still using Windows NT, as THEIR client still uses it. Why haven't they upgraded/migrated? "Legacy" (i.e. ten year old) applications and cost - both software and manpower. They're more interested in getting their jobs done than playing with the newest skinnable MP3 player.

    19. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "he can't get XP to stop crashing"

      Maybe your IT staff should learn how to properly admin Windows or give the guy some training (even if he is in sales). Windows NT and 2000 have never been that unstable at any place I've worked (and they use them heavily).

    20. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      Being raised on Linux won't change some of the problems that Linux has. For instance, what about commercial programs that are compiled for a certain distro, meaning they are compiled against certain versions of libc, assume certain placement/structure of config files, etc.? Trying to install the software on one of the (uncountably many) distros may or may not work. I've seen this happen a number of times (*Java* didn't work because in my case because Redhat Enterprise shipped with a different, apparently incompatible version of libc than the one the Java executable was linked against).

      Sure, being familiar with Linux might mean that you know how to work around these things, and maybe it's not even that difficult to work around them (I think that's why many Linux zealots tend to forget "regular" people, or even those that value their time, see problems like the one stated above as unacceptable). But still, knowing how to do the workaround doesn't change the fact that Linux, in that regard "doesn't just work" as well as Windows does. Be honest and think objectively about this -- Windows really doesn't have that issue (among many others). You can pretty much take any software off the shelf and pop it in and go on any of the Win9x/NT line. There are exceptions obviously. There is software that for whatever reason, known ahead of time, limits compatibility to either Win9x or NT only, but generally app compatibility within either line of Windows is a given. This is a good thing, and it's something that Linux just doesn't quite achieve as well as Windows does.

    21. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am going to go out on a limb and guess that you have never used XP. It not only runs faster than 98 on the same equipment but it crashes way less frequently and runs pretty much all but the oldest DOS games. But if you want to stick with that crap because of some FUD you read on slashdot or somewhere else then you go right ahead. It's your life.

    22. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rediculous is not a word. Ask your mom to buy you a dictionary for x-mas..

    23. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a PS2 to play my games. My PC is for real work and stability. :)

    24. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Tengoo · · Score: 1
      Tell that to my MMORPG-freak friends who would die without Everquest or that starwars stuff.
      Clicky clicky
    25. Re:Stuck with Windows? by logicassasin · · Score: 1

      Let's see... There are those of us who use a PC for specific tasks (in my case, music composition) that relies on hardware that will not work with any OS other than 9x. Case in point: Any musician using any of the following audio interfaces: Korg 1212 I/O, Korg Oasys, Emagic Audiowerk 8 or Audiowerk 2, or a Pinnacle Multisound Pro. You can't use NT/2000/XP if you happen to use ProTools Free as it only works on 98 and ME. There's a lot more out there that will not run with XP/2000 (Cubase 3.7 for instance) that works just fine with 9x.

      The company I work for now has a number of apps that we keep 9x and NT boxes around for. Custom apps may or may not run on XP, it's a crapshoot.

      Sometimes it's not a matter of being scared, it's about what works with what.

      --
      Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    26. Re:Stuck with Windows? by lrucker · · Score: 1

      There are only two things that keep me stuck on windows - corporate policy which requires me to have one, and one weird Solaris app that requires 8-bit color to run. My desktop machine is a Solaris.

    27. Re:Stuck with Windows? by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      get yourself another box then... just for games... and you can use the Linux one to share it's connection and do double duty as a firewall in the process...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    28. Re:Stuck with Windows? by praxis · · Score: 1

      Some of us work for a company writing software for Windows because that's the most profitable platform to write for these days. I *could* use Linux, but it would be more trouble than just learning to deal with the annoyances.

    29. Re:Stuck with Windows? by ryanvm · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've posted 9 comments in an hour and a half here. How freakin' productive could you possibly be?

    30. Re:Stuck with Windows? by ccp · · Score: 1

      How many feeble, trembling, gutless Windows 98 users are there still out there?

      Do you have an idea about how many 32 Mb of memory machines are still out there?
      Running Win 95/98?

      Hint: a lot.

      Cheers,

    31. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Brandybuck · · Score: 0

      Some of us work for "companies" with "IT Departments" who have "rules" and tell us what to "do" to get "money".

      Your company tells you what OS to use at *home*? Wow!

      But not surprising. My company just changed their telecommuting policy so that you MUST use a company owned PC running approved software at home. It solved the telecommuting problem. No one does it anymore.

      But so far they haven't had the guts to tell me that I have to always use Windows at home. It's only a matter of time.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    32. Re:Stuck with Windows? by karlandtanya · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'll stand up and be counted.

      Windows works. For the most part, I can do what I want to do in Windows.

      GLX mostly works. I just downloaded and installed kde-3.1.94 on my slackware box at home. One cool thing new to this version of kde: You can adjust your screen resolution in REAL TIME--no restarting of X required! (I know, this really a new "X" feature, and you could do it with the keyboard from kde...But I digress).

      Wow--that was cool! Just like...that other OS. Except you can't change the color depth without editing XF86Config.

      But I still use GLX. Why? Because it's FUN. I like farting around with my OS. I like installing new stuff, learning about how it works, and getting it running. I like dealing with the community of users and developers and learning new stuff from folks. And, ever so infrequently, teaching somebody how to do something I learned last week.

      It feels more like it's "my" computer.

      The GNU OS, on top of Linux and under X functions. I can do what I want with it. But that's not why I use it.

      I use it because it's fun.

      I can stumble around in Windows. I can hack the registry and get what I want. I have book marked ntfaq.com. I have set up exotic hardware in Windows. I have used weird proprietary software in Windows.

      But in the end, Windows is not fun. Windows is frustrating. It's sneaky. It's secretive. Windows tells me what I can and can't do. It's truly easier to use. But it's not fun.

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    33. Re:Stuck with Windows? by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      That's a problem with your proprietary application's vendor. If you have a proprietary application, you should either statically link or include the libraries you link against. This is how Mathematica works, and it works with every incarnation of Linux known to man. I believe OpenOffice/StarOffice does this as well. Your proprietary application vendor probably also has difficulties making applications work consistently across Windows versions. The issues are exactly the same, as are the solutions.

    34. Re:Stuck with Windows? by AssClown2520 · · Score: 1
      Plenty of people have already posted to this obvious mis-statemet of yours. I am a huge linux advocate. I own a small business (~50 employees) and use it for every server need I have. But to blatently say that it is right for every application shows a lack of knowledge. Tell me what the replacement to Autocad is on linux/mac-os. And while openoffice has done a great job at word/excel interoperability, try to open an excel template with macros/visual basic routines. How about those that have special hardware needs. I am contemplating getting an M-audio firewire 410 for recording/MIDI purposes. This currently has not support under Linux. I hate to bring games into the argument, but I do play games and I currently only have two titles that work under Linux.

      I just think you should think before posting comments like this. I use Linux in every situation that I can, but there are plenty of situations that there is no option available.

    35. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      The only thing that keeps people stuck on Windows is their attitudes

      And specialized hardware, and specialized software. I work in a research lab, and there are at least four pieces of very expensive equipment in our lab that are shipped with proprietary software, only available for Windows. There are also a number of critical applications for which there is no Linux equivilent (at least not that I've found yet, after extensive searches). I use Linux for most of my day to day work; writing, online research, graphing, etc. but there are many times when I have to use a Windows box, simply because there is no Linux of Mac alternative.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    36. Re:Stuck with Windows? by macmastery · · Score: 1

      What you say is not an issue with "Windows users" it's an issue with (some) people.

      Complaining always takes less effort than taking responsibility for fixing it yourself (by learning and/or switching).

    37. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EQ does work with WineX. At least that's what transgaming says.

    38. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Li0n · · Score: 1

      unnecesary expense for many many people.

      --

      ~
      ~
      :wq
    39. Re:Stuck with Windows? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      You've posted 9 comments in an hour and a half here. How freakin' productive could you possibly be?

      This from somebody who takes the time to research hourly statistics on somebody's posting record? :-) Sorry. Couldn't resist.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    40. Re:Stuck with Windows? by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I agree with you here, there is no suitable replacement for Autocad (that I can think of) for Linux. When I was doing 3D modelling a lot more, I NT.
      I wish I could recommend something besides the M-audio interface. It is very pretty and probably works better than their other stuff used too. I've had a few cheap M-audio interfaces. Hated them all, mostly due to random driver errors and crashing. Like I said, I don't know of anything better in that price range, although the Digi002 (more expensive, apps must support Direct I/O or be pro-tools) and the Emagic A26 USB interface (less expensive, less features, not firewire) are both very good for the job. And I did leave out games, although I play a few on linux when I have time (I don't).

      And anyway, since when did trolling require thinking? Generally the more thoughtless a comment is, the more responses it will get. As long as someone feels belittled, cheated, threatened, opposed, etc..

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
    41. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1
      It's like dealing with a relative who's an alcoholic or drug addict. The solution is so simple (stop taking drugs), but they just get angry if you suggest that.

      Are you this condescending when you tell them that? No wonder they're angry. Open Source is a Good Thing, and needs to be promoted whenever possible. But if you can't promote what's good about Linux without denigrating Windows users, you're no longer an evangelist; you're just an asshole.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    42. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's an issue with a lot of people. Since Linux takes some effort to switch to, I guess it tends to attract more responsible people who would rather fix problems than complain about them.

    43. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not condescending at all. I only sound condescending when I talk amongst people who I think would tend to agree with my position (which apparently is not Slashdot as I've found out). Around Windows users, I simply pointed out the existence of alternatives, but I was completely ignored or not taken seriously. So I've mostly given up on promoting OS to any proprietary users. My alcoholism analogy doesn't seem to be go over well here for some reason, but I still think it's quite appropriate; it's like dealing with an alcoholic. They have to see the need for change themselves. Until then, nothing you tell them will have any effect on them, so it's better to just avoid them and let them suffer on their own. I use Linux at home and at work, so I'm pretty happy with my computing environments. I just act clueless when people ask me Windows-related computer questions, and now I don't get tapped much for free tech support anymore.

    44. Re:Stuck with Windows? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      I don't have the time and money to dick around with Linux shit,...

      Time is a good argument. Money isn't, unless you're referring to the age-old axiom "time is money." But I get your drift. The parent post was a little on the arrogant side.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    45. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about a non-sequiter.

      > "I am afraid to move out of my parent's basement,
      > get a job, and stop posting dumbass comments on Slashdot all day"

      Yes, you are very funny, all linux users and people who suggest trying it are basement dwelling losers. Oh, wait, that's all "computer enthusiasts" (pronounced nerd). This is so unoriginal.

      > Some of us work for "companies" with "IT
      > Departments" who have "rules" and tell us what to
      > "do" to get "money".

      Your IT department controls what you do at home now too? Oh, you just don't want to try it at home? Then SAY THAT for chris'sake.

      I am not angry at or ashamed of people who say "I am just not interested in trying linux." The people who do annoy me are the ones like you who rather than just saying that have to attack those "losers" who even suggest doing so.

      People are extremely irritating. [1]

      [1] and by people, I mean you (and by irritating, I mean fucking stupid)

    46. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you honestly think you like Windows better than OS X, then you haven't tried to do anything actually interesting with your system. Seriously, Mac software is so much better than Windows software it's not even funny

      OS X and Linux both beat Windows in terms of technology and speed. OS X beats it in usability, but looses in cost. Linux wins in cost, but looses in usability.

      Windows is a nice, happy medium.

    47. Re:Stuck with Windows? by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm sure Linux can provide some equally addictive and life-destroying experiences... and I don't think I mean that in a positive sense.

      Everyone throw your computers out the window and head for the hills! It's our only hope!

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    48. Re:Stuck with Windows? by NerdSlayer · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are very funny, all linux users and people who suggest trying it are basement dwelling losers. Oh, wait, that's all "computer enthusiasts" (pronounced nerd). This is so unoriginal.

      Hey, thanks for the positive comments! It IS funny, now that you mention it. Hence my comment modded +5 funny!

      Your IT department controls what you do at home now too? Oh, you just don't want to try it at home? Then SAY THAT for chris'sake.

      Actually, both my machines at work are linux. But when I go home, I occasionally play some video games, so I run windows. It's also easier for my girlfriend to use! Give it a shot!

      I am not angry at or ashamed of people who say "I am just not interested in trying linux." The people who do annoy me are the ones like you who rather than just saying that have to attack those "losers" who even suggest doing so.

      Well, we're mercifully offtopic at this point, but I think what originally irked me about this asshead's post was that he was essentially demanding that everyone should stop using windows. Apparently this book should never have been printed. We should burn all the C# books in the street, draw and quarter bill gates, and run around forcing open source down peoples' throats.

      I find it most ironic that "open source" asshead, as I like to call him, doesn't like "choice". Go figure, another dirty linux hippocrite.

      by people, I mean you (and by irritating, I mean fucking stupid)

      Two things:
      - your mom doesn't like being called stupid
      - I'm not fucking her, she just gives me rimjobs.

      Have a nice day!

    49. Re:Stuck with Windows? by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Ehm, changing resolutions in X, like ctrl-alt-+ and ctrl-alt-- would do that in XFree at least as long as I use it (1998). I think you need to have configured XFree right and have some permissions.
      Win98 could also do change resolutions on the fly.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    50. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you can't legally statically link most Linux libs (such as glibc). Unless you write your own Linux libc.

      And even if Sun did statically link that wouldn't change the fact that it was RedHat's kernel threads that broke the Java, not glibc.

    51. Re:Stuck with Windows? by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      "Except you can't legally statically link most Linux libs (such as glibc)"

      2 things:

      1) you don't need to, you can just ship it with the product

      2) yes, you can. On LGPL libraries, you can statically link as long as you also provide somewhere unlinked .o files so that the user can link with a later version if they wish.

      "And even if Sun did statically link that wouldn't change the fact that it was RedHat's kernel threads that broke the Java, not glibc."

      I'm pretty sure it was glibc. It was just that glibc was compiled for the new threads interface, not the old one. The old one is still around if you make the right system calls (which is what glibc does).

    52. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that, or he'll find out he's got a hardware problem that makes ANY OS crash like Robert Downey Jr after a bender. But he won't tell anyone about, because that would be admitting he's wrong. Meanwhile, a thousand slashbots, whose last experience with Windows was back in the bad old days of 9x, will add this to their "evidence" that Windows still bluescreens on a daily basis. Everyone will pat each other on the back, assert that Open Source will solve the Software Crisis (kind of like Object Technology did... or was supposed to) and another fairy will die.

      Actually, I'm not sure about the fairy thing.

    53. Re:Stuck with Windows? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      But I still use GLX. Why? Because it's FUN. I like farting around with my OS. I like installing new stuff, learning about how it works, and getting it running. I like dealing with the community of users and developers and learning new stuff from folks. And, ever so infrequently, teaching somebody how to do something I learned last week.

      This is what makes you and me different. I don't like farting about with my OS, I don't care how it works and I don't like spending hours of my time fiddling with config files to get that perfect experience.

      I just want to use it as an enabler for something that is more interesting to me. Such as playing a game, or doing a website, hacking a bit of perl or C etc.etc.

      It is true, Windows is not fun. I don't care if it isn't fun. It allows me to do the fun things and if I were to list them, "fiddling with my OS" wouldn't be one of them.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    54. Re:Stuck with Windows? by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but if you haven't seen NT/2k be unstable then clearly you've only worked at places with either less than 50 workstations or haven't been one of the people to deal with these kinds of problems.

      This stuff happens all the time. And it's not always windows fault. It could easily be a hardware or driver problem, but it still causes windows to be unstable. It would probably cause any OS to be unstable. The point is I've never seen any place with a decent amount of computer not have at least some instability problems with a certain number of PCs at any given time.

  16. Annoyances? by Metallic+Matty · · Score: 5, Funny

    My biggest PC annoyance is my father. Am I the only one who has a father (or some other relation), that knows nothing about computers, yet insists upon playing with all the settings they can find?

    Oy.

    1. Re:Annoyances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your father only changes settings on his PC, whereas my car no longer goes in reverse due to changing some "settings."

    2. Re:Annoyances? by Xner · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Same here. I got him a hardware-based router and didnt give him the password. It cut down drastically on "the internet doesnt work" complaints.

      I'd love to have him log on on a non-previleged account, but then he'd call me every time he wants to install stuff, that's even less practical than re-installign him once in a while.

      --
      Pathman, Free (as in GPL) 3D Pac Man
    3. Re:Annoyances? by billimad · · Score: 1

      You can shout back at your father. Your supposed to be nice towards the GODDAMN LUSERS! Arrggghhhh they mock me everyday...

    4. Re:Annoyances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found "Patricide for Dummies" to be very helpful in this area.

    5. Re:Annoyances? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree. I would rather have my father try to do things on his own than call me all the time to fix it. Sure he makes mistakes that I have to fix every now and then, but at least he isn't calling me to make tiny simple tweaks every 5 minutes.

      This is how I learned, I messed up my PC many o'time but I learned something each time I did it.

      Be thankful at least your father isn't afraid of the computer.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    6. Re:Annoyances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mine is so afraid to f**** up windows (indeed, it is shamelessly easy to do that, even with Win2k's ACL in place because the implementation of ACL in Win2k must be very inconsistent) that he asks me what he should do before hitting any "OK/Cancel/Help" button.

      Have I told that he does this for every single dialog that asks him something?!

      Worse, when I setup a new box, the plugins he used to have are usually not installed and those pesky dialog boxes come up again, asking permission to install themselves onto the computer. The problem is that I haven't found a way to install all the plugins he might need (because, I sincerely do not know) and there are a lot of evil Active X controls who want to install spyware. I gave him a rule of "always click 'no'" but this created the situation above. Any tips?

    7. Re:Annoyances? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      I've got a couple friends who delete things at random. Far beyond the teddy bear icon.

      I don't know what this is, so that must mean I don't use it, so I'll just delete it. Hey, my computer isn't working. I'll wait until Dave comes over to fix it.

      Both of 'em learned after a doing this 2 or 3 times to not do that. Or they just quit asking me about it.

    8. Re:Annoyances? by canadiangoose · · Score: 1

      Heh, my dad drives me nuts. The power supply on his old computer was failing, so the computer didn't allways like to power up. His solution was to tear the plastic front off of the computer so he could push the button "from the inside". Damn.

      --
      Never eat more than you can lift -- Miss Piggy
    9. Re:Annoyances? by BassAkwards · · Score: 5, Funny
      Oh, yeah, my Dad is outta control with his downloads. He's gotta try every little utility and app he reads about in PCWorld. (Boy, that was a bad Christmas present to get him.).

      Each time I look at his laptop he's got like twenty things running in the taskbar, including three anti-virus programs.

      Me: Dad, why do you have three anti-virus programs running in your taskbar?
      Dad: Can't be too careful, you know. That darn internet is full of viruses these days. I figure you can't have enough anti-virus programs, am I right?
      Me: No, Dad, you're not right.

    10. Re:Annoyances? by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      My father is only fluent in Chinese and the computer back home runs Windows XP in English. He knows better than to pretend to know what he is doing and messing with it... My sister on the other hand...

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    11. Re:Annoyances? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Worse than that is when your Mom finally gets online and not only needs tech support all the time, but constantly sends you 10 year old, spectacularly-unfunny 'jokes' via e-mail all the time, despite repeated pleas to stop.

      Even worse are the 'inspiriational', totally-irrational Christian-themed stories via e-mail. Ugh. Jesus, ole pal, your followers are both tacky and stupid. Please bring them on the Rapture ASAP! *sigh*

    12. Re:Annoyances? by AC5398 · · Score: 1

      Yours knows the keyboard? Count your blessings! Mine regularly gets mad because he types web addresses wrong -- he uses 2 w's and not three -- and then wants me to fix the computer.

      My brother set up a web link to his favourite site from the desktop, only the old guy couldn't quite double-click the icon fast enough.

      There should be a law mandating computer use illegal to anyone over 60 years of age who hasn't passed some sort of Computer Newbie 101 course.

    13. Re:Annoyances? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Get the box set, with both "Patricide for Dummies," and "Matricide for Dummies." You save money buying both at once.

      Hmmm, I wonder what the word for killing any ole Luser is? Aw, probably 'suicide.'

    14. Re:Annoyances? by Tingler · · Score: 1

      My biggest PC annoyance is my father.

      Apparently you are not the only one.....

      Macboy

    15. Re:Annoyances? by pickapeppa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yes. I love the holidays. Food, presents, and fixing everybody in my family's ill PCs (they bring them, I set 'em up in a row, and type 'till triptophane/ cheap scotch does me in).

    16. Re:Annoyances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet your sister is a hottie. Asian chicks are cute!

    17. Re:Annoyances? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

      I used to try to help him learn, but I got tired of that, and he knows enough to get himself into trouble, then reinstall the OS. And he always wants to install WinME, for some crazy reason.

      My grandfather, on the other hand, keeps playing with things (and keeps twelve icons on his desktop, each one a link to a specific month on his Win3.1-generation calendar program) and keeps breaking them, and my dad (his son-in-law), always eager to fix a computer problem, jumps in and reinstalls Windows ME every time.

      I now know enough to keep my mouth shut and just agree with my dad that those two guys from the Screen Savers really do know everything about computers.

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    18. Re:Annoyances? by rossz · · Score: 1

      That's why I put a special filter in my mail server configuration (I use Exim). If the subject contained more than one "fwd:", it would refuse the message. I did this after repeatibdly asking my mother and sister to stop sending me "funny" stuff, email tax alerts, reports of viruse that make your monitor explode, etc., etc., et al, ad naseum. I have no idea how long they kept trying to send me that crap before finally getting the message.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    19. Re:Annoyances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must have gotten the Oedipus version. Mine came with a knife and an engagement ring. /ducks

    20. Re:Annoyances? by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
      This is older than the PC.


      Reminds me of a story my Dad told me about a TV. The Doctors' lounge in the Women's Hospital in Baton Rouge, LA had just been graced with a new COLOR television.


      The TV repairman (yes, this was a while ago) set the thing up and got a signal. Then he spent about two hours with a tweeker. He adjusted all the picture settings, and there were a lot of them.


      Then he called the Doctors in for a meeting:

      Do you like the picture on your TV?

      Oh, yes, all the highly educated physicians in the room replied.

      Do you want it to look good forever?

      Of course, came a few replies.

      OK, then. See all these little knobs?

      Yes.... one of the more technically inclined Doctors replied.

      Don't fuck with 'em!

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    21. Re:Annoyances? by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

      My biggest PC annoyance is my father. Am I the only one who has a father (or some other relation), that knows nothing about computers, yet insists upon playing with all the settings they can find?

      Isn't that how you started out?

    22. Re:Annoyances? by bedouin · · Score: 1

      The easiest solution is just to quit talking to them. Works for me.

    23. Re:Annoyances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's an easy one. Cleanup your dad's PC, then install a new "anti-virus" program. This program, of couorse, identifies every new downloaded file as containing a virus. Problem solved.

    24. Re:Annoyances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Much more fun to move, don't leave a forwarding number and change your phone to unlisted (oh, and change e-mail addresses regularly).

      Kinda like being in the Witness Protection program, but nobody's out to kill me.

      Posted as AC for the obvious reasons...

  17. Is this the right site? by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Should Slashdot be covering books that are considered "novice books" for windows. I thought the concept here is to discuss a little deeper issues. I can get this same review from "Better Homes and Gardens"

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
    1. Re:Is this the right site? by Otter · · Score: 1
      Given the number of people here who complain about spelling autocorrection in Word -- yes, apparently a book that tells them "Look! You can turn it off!" probably would be invaluable. As you say, it does sound like a cover story in Home Windows User -- 12 Super-Secret Ways to Tweak Windows by Changing Your Preferences!

      Curiously, if you complain that some open-source word processor doesn't have autocorrection, the same Slashbots who can't turn it off in Word will tell you to "Write it yourself, you moron! You have the source code!"

  18. I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    But they said it only comes in a set of 32 hardbound volumes.

    1. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by tds67 · · Score: 1
      But they said it only comes in a set of 32 hardbound volumes.

      No, you're thinking about the Warren Commission report on the Kennedy Assassination, another PC (Political Conspiracy) annoyance.

    2. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by Kenja · · Score: 1

      The realy sad part is that the first 30 volumes are just a lost of all the annoying Linux geeks handels.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by cachorro · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...it only comes in a set of 32 hardbound volumes...

      Not true. You can download it free, distributed among the many GNU/Linux source packages.

      The title is README.

    4. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      And the worst part is, you have to compile all 32 volumes yourself! And no RPMs or .debs. :(

    5. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the fonts are rendered poorly, too. That is, until I ran rpm -i truetypebookfonts-2.2.145-7-i386-mdk.rpm. Er, wait, that requires glib-2.4.16 or higher, and I'm running glib-2.4.18mdk!

      Maybe I can do a google search for this. Oh! Here we go, a mailing list where a guy had this same problem. Let's look at the solution... oh crap, does anybody speak French? Maybe I'll just go to my distro's ftp site and... uh-oh, too many users. Screw this, I'm just going to check my webmail.

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    6. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by svallarian · · Score: 1

      ...and it's written in esperanto.

      Steven V.

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
    7. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      NOT FUNNY

      Don't quit your day job of being unemployed.

    8. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 1

      Well, I was able to emerge it using my uber-l33t distro, Gentoo. Portage was able to download and compile all 32 volumes specifically for my machine. Man, is it sweet-assed optimized!!! Switching between volumes is so fast!!!

    9. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by rleibman · · Score: 1

      Do, kiu problemo? Cxu vi ne parolas/legas eo?

    10. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by jared_hanson · · Score: 2

      It is funny.

      Please quit your day job of booking stand-up comics.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    11. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm, so let me upgrade glibc. Seems pretty, rpm --upgrade new-glibc.rpm, ! What's going on?! "Segmentation fault"? You mean that this version of RPM isn't compatible with glibc >= 2.4, but you installed the RPM anyway!? Why can't I downgrade to an older RPM? Because RPM's broken!!!

      Really, why does this happen to me under Linux but not Windows!? What's the point of these dynamically linked libraries if upgrading to a newer version of the library will break things!

    12. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by Sumocide · · Score: 1

      Because Windows works with COM, if you want to change an API you expose another interface. Old applications still find their API. Under Linux if the lib's API has changed the dynamic linking will fuck up and segfault.

    13. Re:I wanted a Linux Annoyances paperback book by shird · · Score: 1

      Windows uses some COM, but mostly it uses shared and static libaries just like Linux. I guess the equivalent to glibc would be msvcrt.dll (Visual C Runtime Library), and this is just a DLL with a bunch of exported APIs just like glibc.

      The C runtime and just about every other implementation has just been done a lot better under Windows. It has been designed by proffessionals with backwards compatibility in mind. Frankly I dont know how Linux users actually get anything done with the amount of fucking around that OS requires to just run properly.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
  19. Biggest PC annoyance... by Tired_Blood · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is watching someone else use a computer!

    Example comments:
    You know, you don't have to double-click the webpage link...
    You could just type the web address in the white box at the top instead of using a search engine...
    Damn it! No! Just... Forget it, let me do it.

    All last night. There were a few more I'm sure.

    --
    This is not my sig.
    1. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I've killed men for less that that.

    2. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Funny

      More example comments:
      Caps Lock...hit Caps Lock. It's not on the screen, it's on your keyboard. On top of 7. No, not F5!

      You can't do research on antarctica by typing "www.antara.com" on the SEARCH ENGINE BOX. It also helps if you spell it right.

      Just because we restrict right-clicking doesn't mean you can't paste. Click on edit, then paste...or hit ctrl+v -- on your keyboard. ON YOUR KEYBOARD. Dude, off the mouse!!!

      Ah, users. Truly the biggest PC annoyance (and amusement) ever made.

    3. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 1

      YES. You are so right!

      Happens all the time to me. Before I got PISSED, now I find it comical in a way...

    4. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by PW2 · · Score: 1

      You know, you don't have to double-click the webpage link...
      (yes)

      You could just type the web address in the white box at the top instead of using a search engine...
      this is a little safer (work safe) than just guessing/remembering the URL -- also MSN sets focus to their search box after the huge page loads which usually results in people clicking on an address bar, but typing the URL in the search box

    5. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just because we restrict right-clicking doesn't mean you can't paste. Click on edit, then paste...or hit ctrl+v -- on your keyboard. ON YOUR KEYBOARD. Dude, off the mouse!!!

      Ah, users. Truly the biggest PC annoyance (and amusement) ever made.

      You're bitching about USERS being annoying, when you're such a Nazi that you don't even let users RIGHT FUCKING CLICK? What kind of moronic shop are you running? If anyone has anything to complain about, it's your users: about their dumbfuck administrator.

    6. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by CaptainBaz · · Score: 1
      You could just type the web address in the white box at the top instead of using a search engine...
      My ex-girlfriend used to insist on typing the "http://" before every URL. Slowly. So frustrating...

      Oh, and she's a web developer.
    7. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      is backseat drivers...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    8. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      I've come to the conclusion that most new users get zombified when they sit in front of a computer. This is most evident when they look at a browser on a search engine or any web form for that matter.

      I see a lot of "look, a box! I must fill it with information." Then they fail to read what information is required. They type URLS in search boxes, search texts in the address bar (thanks to default searches and autocomplete, people get dumbed down again), and keying in misc. information otherwise.

      I've been a part of 2-hour E-mail classes where a vast majority of the time was spent filling in the forms at yahoo because users don't read what is required. "It's not taking it" "well what does it say?" "I don't know" -- at which point I walk over there and read the error message to them and explain that passwords need to be n characters long. Then they go to the USER NAME box and change that! Why? I have no frickin' idea.

      Somewhere in the classes that involve Internet use, I strongly emphasize that they READ. Unfortunately, they've found it easier to ask for help rather than figure things out for themselves.

    9. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You know, you don't have to double-click the webpage link...

      But the more you click the link, the faster the page loads!

    10. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by teslatug · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...oh and by the way, you're welcome!

    11. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by soundsop · · Score: 4, Funny

      The most difficult thing in the world is to know
      how to do a thing and to watch someone else doing
      it wrong, without commenting.
      -- T.H. White

    12. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by superflippy · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...is someone else watching me use a computer!

      Get your grubby fingers off my screen! I know which button I'm supposed to click.
      Yes, I know what I'm doing. I did it this way last time and it worked.
      Fine, I give up. Have a seat, do it your way. I'm going to go make some coffee.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    13. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      sounds like that SNL skit "Nick Burns, your company's computer guy" (Jimmy Fallon?)

      MOVE!!!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    14. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... surely you mean Num Lock?

    15. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, num lock. Oopsies. /me rants at himself for getting caps lock and num lock wrong. Idiot luser

    16. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by g0hare · · Score: 1

      It's like getting my kids to rake the yard. 4 times as long as it would have taken me and a shittier job. Just get out of the way & I'll fix it. FOrtunately 98 is finally purged, all users are restricted users in 2k or XP and I spend my days on slashdot.........

      --
      Vote Quimby!
    17. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      It seems like it's high time some psychologists did some research on this. How is it that perfectly ordinary, or even fairly intelligent, people become complete idiots when they sit down at a computer?

      I don't always get pissed at my parents when I have to do tech support for them. I think that as far as they can tell, I'm completely random about whether or not I get annoyed at their computer illiteracy. However, there's a perfectly good reason for my sometime annoyance--sometimes (seldom, since we all use Macs) their questions are legitimate cases of having to figure out a poorly designed interface, but more often they simply fail to have even the most basic concept of how to use a computer.

      One hint that newbies need to understand: Even if the error wasn't your fault, it's your responsibility to remember or write down what the error message says. Error messages exist for a reason, they give useful information, and to just click "Okay" without reading the message is to ensure that the problem will continue.

      I have to say, though, that my dad (the less computer literate of my parents) has gotten much better at understanding and following instructions, and has even managed to figure a few things out for himself. Recently his router fried, putting his computer, my mom's computer, and the server hosting his website offline. I had just gotten a new router, so he came to Ann Arbor to get my old one from me. I explained what each port was for, fully expecting him to plug the wrong thing into the WAN port, but he got it right. When he called to get further instructions on setting up the "new" router (my fault that it wasn't ready to go already), I was able to walk him through using its Web interface without too much trouble.

      However, when additional problems a couple days later required that he hook up a monitor and keyboard to the server, he had to ask me this when taking the keyboard from his computer: "It's plugged into this sort of interchange thing [a USB hub], and I'm just wondering if there's going to be a place to plug it into Arthur [the server]." I actually had to say, "Yes, there will be a place to plug the keyboard in on the back of Arthur." At least he managed to find the USB port himself--a year ago I would have had to describe it to him and tell him exactly where on Arthur's back he could expect to find it. Hopefully he chalked the weariness in my voice up to the fact that I was sick and studying for my upcoming exams.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    18. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You two wouldn't happen to work with one Nick Burns would you? He's my company's computer guy and he sounds a lot like you two, except he says "move!" when he wants me out of the way.

    19. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Li0n · · Score: 1

      Actually is a good practice.
      Especially if you're typing addresses that do not use the port 80 on an internal network.

      intranet:8080 won't always work across browsers while http://intranet:8080 will.

      Also if you're doing web work, the fact that when you crate links you must include it, makes it a (good) habit.

      --

      ~
      ~
      :wq
    20. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC salesmen on commission. Overheard convincing a sweet little old lady she had to buy a powered-USB hub to use a mouse with her USB-equipped laptop. %&*#*

    21. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Get your grubby fingers off my screen

      Some years ago I convinced local VP-level management in a medium-sized multinational to purchase a high-end 21" Hitachi monitor (1600x1200@85Hz) for CAD use. At the time, the price was about CAN$3K.

      At that time the company was on an ISO 2001 compliance bender and they had adopted one of those "control-all-purchases-down-to-the-paperclip-level " programs.

      Needless to say, the clueless were ported to work on the consultant's "task force" for the implementation of this latest, greatest business development.

      To make a long story short, I was having some trouble deciphering the intricacies of the software, and the designated support guy shows up. With his ball-point pen. And proceeds to point out dialog boxes, in blue ink, on the screen.

    22. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by CaptainBaz · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. I've never come across an address which needs it, and intranet:8080 works fine for me.

      Most links created in web work are relative links, and so don't need it either.

    23. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      NO! For the last freakin' time, that is NOT a porn site in my bookmarks! Look, see?

      Oh crap...

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    24. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by Li0n · · Score: 1

      *rolls eyes*

      "I've never seen it so it can't be true!"

      --

      ~
      ~
      :wq
    25. Re:Biggest PC annoyance... by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      My personal webserver runs on port 90 to get around my ISP's block on port 80. IE6 (in a school lab) can't handle my address that doesn't start with "www" on port 90 without specifying the full http://... URL.

      Mozilla works fine. Go figure.

  20. reminds me of slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where people who don't understand law or economics talk about it anyways.

  21. How to get rid of clippy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't install the Microsoft Office Assistant. Duh. It's right there, in the installer. It's not rocket science, you know.

    Jeez... you'd think a bunch of geeks would know their way around an installer...

    1. Re:How to get rid of clippy... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Funny
      Don't install the Microsoft Office Assistant Yeah, and then you keep getting popups saying "Cannot find Office Assistant. Maybe your install is deficient". I have already thrown bricks at three perfectly good monitors because of this :-)

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:How to get rid of clippy... by secondsun · · Score: 3, Funny

      I used to throw bricks at my monitor until I realized that my monitor had done nothing wrong.

      Finally I had to break down and buy a magnesium alloy case becuse computers are su much more expensive than tubes.

      --
      There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    3. Re:How to get rid of clippy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Amateurs ... you need to smash the KEYBOARD. You can get a new keyboard for like $10, and a lot of problems could be the fault of the keyboard.

      Spend an hour looking for a missing ; in a .c program? I'm sure you hit it, the keyboard probably didn't register it. SMAAAAAAAAASH

      And how about that process locking up, it's probably polling the keyboard somewhere in its code, that could be the problem. SMAAAAASH!!!

  22. Linux annoyances by slash-tard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    *Installing new apps from the command line

    *Missing packages and circular dependencies - a wont install without b, b wont install without c, c wont install without a.

    *Maybe no .DLL hell but certainly library hell

    *Plug and play works ok during the initial setup but not very well after that. Try changing your video card after already doing the initial install.

    *Cut and paste doesnt work most of the time.

    *Crappy fonts - most web pages look like crap, even slashdot. I dont consider stealing fonts from windows a fix to this problem.

    *X and Gnome and Kde are just as bloated as XP.

    *Everything is a beta. Wheres all the version 1.0+ software?

    1. Re:Linux annoyances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Command line utils sucks. I haven't use those tools for many reasons like i hate scripting.

    2. Re:Linux annoyances by heathcaldwell · · Score: 1

      Try a different Distro.
      Most of these problems have been fixed in modern ditros (Except for the Gnome and KDE being bloated).

      - Heath

    3. Re:Linux annoyances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Installing new apps from the command line

      rpm -ivh blah.rpm too hard? Or is it "./configure; make; make install" that doesn't agree with you?

      *Missing packages and circular dependencies - a wont install without b, b wont install without c, c wont install without a.

      rpm -ivh blah*.rpm works for me.

      *Maybe no .DLL hell but certainly library hell

      Add /usr/local/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf then rerun ldconfig. I hate Red Hat distros for not doing this by default.

      *Plug and play works ok during the initial setup but not very well after that. Try changing your video card after already doing the initial install.

      Thats because it isn't Plug and Play, it an issue with XFree. Plug and Play refers to the newer jumperless ISA cards that were replaced by PCI devices. Linux's isapnp utilities were IMO much better than Windows because you didn't even need to reboot to change ioports, IRQs, etc. As for your problem, Red Hat's kudzu has never had a problem correctly configuring a new video card, sound card, NIC, or anything else I throw at it.

      *Cut and paste doesnt work most of the time.

      Left mouse is highlight, middle mouse is paste, right mouse for a menu. For 90% of Linux apps you use the left button to copy and the middle to paste, including the command line. The problem is with Netscape, Mozilla and a couple other apps that refuse to copy unless you use the context menu or keyboard shortcuts. I got used to it.

      *Crappy fonts - most web pages look like crap, even slashdot. I dont consider stealing fonts from windows a fix to this problem.

      I agree. I tried to fix this once and hosed XFree big time. There's a new fontconfig utility out for Gnome thats supposed to be easier, I may give it a try.

      *X and Gnome and Kde are just as bloated as XP.

      X is getting better, KDE has always been a nightmare, and Gnome seems to be the leanest IMO. I'd suggest something simple like AfterStep, but configuring them is another mess.

      *Everything is a beta. Wheres all the version 1.0+ software?

      Alpha, Beta, 1.0, 5.0, 8.0, doesn't matter, they all crash and do other stupid shit. I can crash anything given enough time. My job lent me a PowerBook G4 to play with, so I loaded up iTunes and it crashed loading up my mp3s. I crashed Finder several times. IE is up to 6.something, yet it still has security holes.

    4. Re:Linux annoyances by Trbmxfz · · Score: 1

      *Installing new apps from the command line

      While I don't see this as a problem, I can understand it comes as a schock to new users. Especially if they come from a "where do I click?" world.

      But distributions usually allow one to install a package simply by clicking on its icon. One has to give the root password to complete the operations, but that's usually it.

      *Missing packages and circular dependencies - a wont install without b, b wont install without c, c wont install without a.

      Just install all dependent packages simultaneously... Although I must recognize I don't know how to do this other than with the command line.

      *Maybe no .DLL hell but certainly library hell

      I wonder how a non-programmer could really suffer from this (certainly programmers don't mind and likely prefer the command line), hm?

      *Plug and play works ok during the initial setup but not very well after that. Try changing your video card after already doing the initial install.

      True, I guess. One has to click the HardDrake thingie and ask for the new hardware to be recognized. Granted, it's automatic on Windows, but from time to time, Windows will also decide that you don't have a mouse, or that you have a new monitor.

      *Cut and paste doesnt work most of the time.

      I can't comment on this. I'm under the impression that copy-pasting is incredibly easy under Unix, since one doeasn't have to popup a menu or learn a keayboard short cut. Typically, whatever is selected goes to the X clipboard, and the second mouse button pastes. But then again, maybe I've been wrong all these years and it's true that cut and paste doesn't work.

      *Crappy fonts - most web pages look like crap, even slashdot. I dont consider stealing fonts from windows a fix to this problem.

      *X and Gnome and Kde are just as bloated as XP.


      That's subjective, I suppose. Although I do use an old version of Gnome so as to enjoy short loading times.

      *Everything is a beta. Wheres all the version 1.0+ software?

      You mean the XP Extreme Edition software :-)? Well, anyway, in my experience, software marked "beta" is, for many projects, quite stable. Don't be afraid a priori to use pre-1.0 software; just see what the developers have to say about the stability of their current version. If developpers know their program isn't ready for prime-time, they will usually be honest about rather than risking making their users unhappy.

    5. Re:Linux annoyances by Nailer · · Score: 1

      * Plug and play works ok during the initial setup but not very well after that. Try changing your video card after already doing the initial install.

      True for some distros, but not for most modern ones. Plug in a new video card, Red Hat / Mandrake / whatever detects your old one was removed, your new card plugged in, configured your video settings and then continues booting.

      Linux currently has better plug and play than XP (yes, less drivers, but way better plug and play). Pull a dual boot Fedora / XP hard disk out of one machine and pop it into another to compare the time it takes to detect and install all the new drivers. Fedora will kick XPs arse.

      *Cut and paste doesnt work most of the time.
      A lot of the time. But yeah, I agree. I know how X cut and paste works. But I still can't reliably paste a large bunch of text out of OpenOffice 1.1 into Konqueror 3.1.

      * Crappy fonts - most web pages look like crap, even slashdot. I dont consider stealing fonts from windows a fix to this problem.

      Again, distro specific. Most modern distros come with some high quality fonts from Bitstream, including Bitstream Vera Sans, which looks a whole lot like MSs lovely verdana font.

      FYI, Jennifer Vesperman is writing the Linux Annoyances book anyway.

  23. the CD is not missing by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    it was stolen. Thats what you get for buying the demo copy, sans utilities CD.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
    1. Re:the CD is not missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was stolen

      Probably someone from slashdot did it.

  24. LIAR - good link, mod up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LIAR - good link, mod up

  25. My Biggest PC Annoyance... by tds67 · · Score: 1
    ...is the politically-correct renaming of the "Trash Can" to "Recycle Bin".

    It leaves me with the impression that I can never truly destroy my data, and that someone else will get my recycled bits.

    1. Re:My Biggest PC Annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well since you cant really "throw away" the bits on your hdd, recycle is probably more correct.

    2. Re:My Biggest PC Annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are recycling the bits genius. Otherwise you would go through harddrive a hell of a lot faster. Recycle bin is much more accurate in realation to what is happening to the memory.

    3. Re:My Biggest PC Annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not (just?) "politically correct" - it's (a little bit) more fscking accurate. "Deleting" a file under windows (and many o.s.) just recycles the space by making it available for overwriting. The data is available to anyone with a lower-level disk reader. Rather than getting silly, get the subtle clue.

    4. Re:My Biggest PC Annoyance... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      You mean you'd rather have your data shipped off to a publicly accessible junk pile that anyone can rummage through instead of melted down to unrecognizeable slag?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    5. Re:My Biggest PC Annoyance... by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather have...

      !!! The Shredder !!!

      You could even include a special option for special documents you want to wipe, instead of just unlinking.

    6. Re:My Biggest PC Annoyance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you didn't get it, this is an OS/2 reference.

  26. me too!! by crabpeople · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "How often do you sit down for a relaxing session at your PC, only to discover you can't find that file you saved six months ago but forgot the name of it. "

    oh yeah its ANNOYING when i stupidly name files! here i was thinking it was my fault and not the inatimate object that just takes what i give it... duh!

    dont get me started on how i can never remember my aol password! why doesnt the computer remember it for me? surely this would save people MILLIONS of hours of time!

    come on. i mean, come on.

    "They that can give up essential control of the PC to obtain a little temporary comfortability deserve neither control nor comfortability." -- Benjamin Franklin v.2.0

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    1. Re:me too!! by jot445 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This gives rise to one of my favorite acronyms:

      DWIMNWIT (lovingly pronounced as 'dimwit')

      Do What I Mean Not What I Typed

      So, it _was_ the computer's fault all along!

      --
      The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
    2. Re:me too!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pray tell, what is the logical basis for that Benjamin Franklin re-work you have done? Or does it just make as much sense as:

      "They that can give up monkey apples to obtain kryptonite quarts watches deserve neither apples nor watches ." -- Benjamin Franklin v.3.0

    3. Re:me too!! by alexo · · Score: 1

      > oh yeah its ANNOYING when i stupidly name files! here i was thinking it was
      > my fault and not the inatimate object that just takes what i give it... duh!
      >
      > dont get me started on how i can never remember my aol password! why doesnt
      > the computer remember it for me? surely this would save people MILLIONS of
      > hours of time!


      I really hate this damned machine
      I wish that they would sell it
      It never does quite what I want
      but only what I tell it

  27. GayseX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...It's here ... and it's called steve jobs dumper.....

    Get to know it....It likes boi(y)s!

    AcaBen

  28. why here? by Coneasfast · · Score: 1

    seriously, i dont think this is the right place for such a book. most people who read /. either use linux, bsd, or they probably know windows to its full potential.

    or maybe i have too much confidence in readers here? :)

    just my 2 cents

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:why here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't assume you know everything. You can always be surprised by some cool tricks and tips you never knew were out there.

    2. Re:why here? by demon · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, way back when, I'd have agreed with you. I'm still a happy Linux user (running Debian on a PowerBook, no less), but I know a lot of the /. readership anymore is comprised of people who've probably never used anything other than Windows. Too bad, really.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  29. Um, never... by Quarters · · Score: 4, Funny
    How often do you sit down for a relaxing session at your PC

    About as often has I have a heart-to-heart discussion with my cordless drill. Maybe slightly less frequently than I take my telephone on a nice vacation to the beach?

    A computer is a tool, nothing more, nothing less. I've got no emotional attachment to it whatsoever.

    1. Re:Um, never... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      where is the emotional atachment in that statement. relaxing session at your PC. Like a relaxing session at the pool, or infront of the TV.

      I play the occasional game at the PC. Because it relaxis me..except undying, that just creeps me out and winds me up.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Um, never... by zulux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A computer is a tool, nothing more, nothing less. I've got no emotional attachment to it whatsoever.

      I actually had a fondness for my old TRS-80. It was a tool, but it was a *FUN* tool.

      Modern x86 Windows boxes arn't much fun - you just maintain them and if you're lucky, you can get some work done.

      Linux and Mac useres tend to actaully *like* their tools - sort of how a good woodworker likes his hand-made chisels.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    3. Re:Um, never... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      You don't use OSX then...i enjoy my sessions. But i am a powerbook owner and i do love this machine.

    4. Re:Um, never... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cordless drill speaks to me. I call him Phil. Phil the drill.

      He likes to shoot cards in a top hat and drink Yoohoo through all hours of the night. Without him, I'd sure be lonely.

    5. Re:Um, never... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Methinks thou dost protest too much...

    6. Re:Um, never... by (trb001) · · Score: 2, Funny

      A computer is a tool, nothing more, nothing less. I've got no emotional attachment to it whatsoever.

      Hi, you must be new around here, welcome to Slashdot!

      --trb

    7. Re:Um, never... by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

      If woodworkers like their hand-made chisels that much, maybe they should look into sexual deviancy counseling...

      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  30. gotcha beat by mckwant · · Score: 3, Funny

    Father-in-Law. I live in Texas, he lives in Pennsyvlania. One glorious Saturday afternoon, we reformatted his hard drive and reinstalled Windows. Over the phone.

    Did I mention that he's practically deaf?

    "FORMAT C:/ \s"
    "E?"
    "No, C"
    "G?"

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
    1. Re:gotcha beat by CycleMan · · Score: 2, Funny
      There's a solution for that, if it happens again. The international phonetic alphabet, which any war vet would know, makes each letter sound quite different from others. See the revised conversation:

      "Format Charlie :/ \Sierra"
      "Echo?"
      "Echo off."
      "Golf?"
      "Sure - it's better than fixing your computer!"

      Or you could just hope it never happens again.

    2. Re:gotcha beat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you off the phone yet?

  31. the most annoying thing by theMerovingian · · Score: 3, Insightful


    about windows are the themed 'schemes' that people can load.

    i am doing an install at a clients PC today, and I absolutely hate wagging around the "reigndeer" pointer that goes with the X-mas scheme. This feature should be disable on "windows professional", and be relegated to home users.

    Gag - this is worse than Clippy.

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:the most annoying thing by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think its great. The ability for users to customize the PC they use.

      You could turn it off while your using it, then turn it back on when your done.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:the most annoying thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ghey. How the fuck are you support to point with a reindeer? Or a lizard with a round head? Or a star fish?

      I can only imagine what doing any graphics would be like. The fucking lizard covers like 100 square pixels!

      Pointless, unnecessary, stupid, waste of time. Maybe we should switch our keyboard keys around to spell our name. It's a pain in the ass at first, but you get used to it and people think it's neat!

    3. Re:the most annoying thing by bedouin · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Redmond, where tackiness and lack of style reign supreme. Like father like son; like developer, like user.

    4. Re:the most annoying thing by demon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but so many users spend so much time on changing the wallpaper, colors, fonts, sounds, mouse cursors, and on and on, that (a) they don't get anything else done, and (b) no one else can make heads or tails of their desktop. Some people would say "so? this means they can customize to their hearts' content!" But considering how Windows' big benefit, as a "universal platform" is anybody can supposedly sit down and use any Windows machine... that kinda throws that out the window, hm?

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  32. Getting Rid Of Clippy... by Quarters · · Score: 3, Informative
    and my personal favorite: getting rid of Clippy

    Do you really need to buy a book to figure out how to uncheck the "Office Assistants" checkbox in the list of available modules during the install of Office?

    1. Re:Getting Rid Of Clippy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The damn thing still comes up under certain conditions even if you check that box. He probably tells you how to nuke it completely.

    2. Re:Getting Rid Of Clippy... by jot445 · · Score: 1

      Right click Clippy (or other annoying icon), select Options tab, uncheck Use the Office Assistant. Works in Office XP and Office 2003. Clippy _never_ shows up for me. Its a good thing.

      --
      The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
    3. Re:Getting Rid Of Clippy... by Quarters · · Score: 1

      I've never had it appear when I tell the installer to not add it. How could it appear?...it's not on the HD.

    4. Re:Getting Rid Of Clippy... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Do you really need to buy a book to figure out how to uncheck the "Office Assistants" checkbox in the list of available modules during the install of Office?

      Well actually...yes. The Office installer has its own entirely different interface, which still really doesn't make all that much sense to me.

      I was doing some consultation work the other day, and I needed to reinstall some part of Office.

      When I got to the customization part, it seemed like the amount of hard drive space needed was a pretty high number, in comparison to the only thing I needed to install. Since I only needed this one thing, I changed everything else to "do not run from my computer."

      Which of course, uninstalled Office.

      Two problems here:

      a.) the installer's estimate on hard drive space needed is only for new installations, it doesn't take old installations into account (which i figure are probably reinstalled, though i didn't need them to be)

      b.) this is both an installer and uninstaller. if you tell it not to install something, it actually will uninstall it (i guess "run from my computer/don't run from my computer" should make this obvious, but then my brain doesn't work that way since not a single other windows installer in this world works that way)

      c.) I changed clippy to the cat. His animations and sounds amuse me.

    5. Re:Getting Rid Of Clippy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scarry thing is... Some people do need a book to tell them how to get rid of clippy.

  33. Known spammer, mod down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it wasn't for your daily book-review spam, Abdullah, I don't know what I'd do.

    1. Re:Known spammer, mod down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why does it bother you? If you actually link across to the site, you'll see that there are some great reviews that I found to share with everyone.

  34. jesus, this review sucked by tsmccaff · · Score: 0

    This was a terrible review...Yeah! Someone let the a moron loose on a O'Reilly review...yessss, O'Reilly, yessss. It was pandering and pointless and strayed off topic repeatedly...off topic? hmmmm? whaaaa? Look at me!!! I am writing a review....uhhhhhmmmm, review [licking lips]. Uh-huh, uh-huh!

    --
    "the starry sky above and the moral law within"-Kant
    1. Re:jesus, this review sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh grow up

  35. Stick with Windows and if you do... by cgenman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    be prepared for benefits like:

    - being able to enjoy those cute "I love you" and "Anna Kurovina" messages automatically forwarded from your best friends, co-workers, and total strangers.

    - The ability to browse every site online, at least every one selling X10 cameras and pictures you wouldn't want your boss to see.

    - Software so advanced it installs automatically while you browse, no user intervention required. Uninstalling is as simple as wiping your main partition and re-installing Windows.

    - Enjoy desktop environments where settings are spread around 3 different menus and where sometimes they inexplicably don't stick etc. etc. in general using software developed by investors free from the limiting boundaries of friendliness and caring about your users.

    - A wide swath of available content, all provided to your trusted platform ensuring that your purchased programs will run forever... Until you lose the disk, upgrade your system, ban the program from spying on your browsing habits, or the producer decides to turn the software off remotely.

    Linux is no longer hard. Once you have a modern Debian, Red Hat, or Mandrake installed, everything runs easy-peasy. I've been using it on and off for 6 years, and in that time frame it's gone from nothing but command line editing of .ini files to something downright usable.

    We have a woman in the office who had never used a computer before in her life. We plunked her down in front of a Windows box and a Linux box. While Covad required Internet Explorer, she was always using Linux. She likes the multiple desktops (Microsoft has a power tool multidesktop, BTW), changes her wallpaper every few days, and prefers browsing around in Konqueror. To her, editing the registry is as baffling as editing a shell script, but she doesn't need to do that anyway. If she wants something installed on Debian, it is an apt-get away (whereas in windows she has to look for it). I'd feel comfortable putting newbies in front of a Linux install. In fact, I've done it, many times, and with success.

    I respect the opinions of my Linux elders, but I fear your perceptions of the OS may be a little out of date.

    1. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .ini files?? that's windows.

    2. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by aero6dof · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You forgot this benefit:

      - being the customer of a giant corporation intent on locking you onto their platform while extracting every penny from your pockets.

    3. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      - being able to enjoy those cute "I love you" and "Anna Kurovina" messages automatically forwarded from your best friends, co-workers, and total strangers.

      Anyone with half a brain and/or access to someone that can take the time to teach them a bit will be perfectly safe from such things.

      - The ability to browse every site online, at least every one selling X10 cameras and pictures you wouldn't want your boss to see.

      Funny, I don't see any ad pop-ups at all while i'm browsing with Firebird's blocking on, and everyone I know that's still using IE (even my computer-cluelesss grandma) has a pop-up blocker installed. I'll let you in on a little secret, too - those ads and porn pop-ups aren't limited to only Windows.

      - Software so advanced it installs automatically while you browse, no user intervention required. Uninstalling is as simple as wiping your main partition and re-installing Windows.

      This is a legitimate gripe. Again, however, anyone with half a brain or access to a help desk minion/techie friend or family member will be able to remove such software through programs like Ad-Aware or Spybot. I'm sorry, but if someone thinks the only way to get rid of ad/spyware is a complete wipe of the drive, then they're an idiot. Even for the stuff that can't be auto-removed somehow, there's almost always a fairly easy way to fix it in the registry, found through Google.

      - Enjoy desktop environments where settings are spread around 3 different menus and where sometimes they inexplicably don't stick etc. etc. in general using software developed by investors free from the limiting boundaries of friendliness and caring about your users.

      Way to generalize. And settings spread out in Windows? I think not. 99.9% of anything you need to change can be accessed through the Control Panels or a simple file search for something to edit.

      - A wide swath of available content, all provided to your trusted platform ensuring that your purchased programs will run forever... Until you lose the disk, upgrade your system, ban the program from spying on your browsing habits, or the producer decides to turn the software off remotely.

      True for some software, not true for the vast majority. I won't claim to know exactly what you do for a living, but you sound like the type that uses only (in Windows) MS Office, and maybe some development apps, along some small utilities - and you draw your opinions on Windows software behavior soley from that base. Please, feel free to respond and prove me wrong, though.

      Don't get me wrong, i'm not saying Windows is perfect, i'm just saying that your perceptions seem to be a bit off as well.

    4. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Christian+Engstrom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd feel comfortable putting newbies in front of a Linux install.

      What you say may very well be true, that for a newbie it isn't all that more complicated to start with Linux instead of Windows. However, if we are talking about reasonably experienced computer users, then I think the situation is different. I believe that the single most important factor that is holding back the spread of Open Source programs is the fact that Open Source developers are too proud to adopt a user interface that makes it easy for experienced Windows users to switch.

      I know that this is swearing in the Linux church, but I'll say it anyway: If Linux is ever going to have a chance on the desktop, it will have to become as similar to the Windows user interface as is humanly possible. Why? The answer is extremely simple:

      90% of all computer users are used to Windows

      You can feel that it shouldn't be like that, and you can make hundreds of snide and clever remarks to the effect that Windows users are too stupid to recognize their own best interests, but you can't change the facts: at least 90% of the people who are using a computer today are using Windows.

      It is not every day that a court of law makes an official market survey and releases it freely on the net, in line with the finest traditions of the Open Source movement. Yet it seems that the very people who really believe the most in the benefits of free and open information, are remarkably reluctant to use it when it's available. Think what you will in private, but please please listen to judge Jackson: if Linux is going to have any impact at all in the desktop market, it is Windows users that will have to be converted.

      There are a number of good reasons to make the switch to Open Source --- open file formats, control over future license costs, etc., etc. --- but if it means that you have to spend six months cursing all the little things that are different, so that you can't focus on what you're supposed to be doing because you have to relearn all your automatic reflexes, how many people will decide that it's worth the effort?

      A lawyer might perhaps consider switching from MS Word to StarOffice simply to make sure that all the files that he creates today can be opened and read on another computer ten years from now, when the case has finally reached the Supreme Court or whatever. But how may chargeable hours is he prepared to let it cost him in the first six months?

      It somehow seems that a lot of the people who develop Open Source applications take a special pride in inventing amusing little pitfalls for the Windows user who might be prepared to switch camps. In StarOffice, the keyboard combination to insert a non-breaking space is "Ctrl-Space", rather than Word's "Ctrl-Shift-Space". Please, somebody, why? Of course this is something that one can relearn if one has to, but what's the point of it? The first time a would-be convert, who has been using non-breaking spaces in Word, tries to insert one in a text in StarOffice, it won't work. Whether he decides that non-breaking spaces are not available and that the product does not fulfill his needs, or interrupts what he was originally trying to achieve and starts exploring the help system to find out what it is that he has to do, he will not feel more favorably disposed towards Open Source programs for having tried one. And so unnecessarily.

      I could recite any number of examples: if you type "Ctrl-A Ctrl-Return" to mark all posts in a newsgroup as read, Mozilla will instead choose to open a couple of hundred windows (one for each post in the newsgroup), which will cause the system to freeze, so that it has to be rebooted. Excellent marketing ploy.

      To change some settings in Mozilla you should of course look under "Edit" in the menu system, and not under "Tools" like in all other programs in the Windows world. Brill

      --
      Christian Engström, Former Member of the European Parliament 2009-2014 for The Pirate Party, Sweden
    5. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by JacobO · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are people out there that pay for MS licenses? Really?

    6. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by NialScorva · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So by the time you make windows reliable and usable, you've invested as much time and energy as using linux?

      Fair enough...

    7. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Where, exactly, did I say or imply that?

      Personally, i've learned to use Linux fairly well, but it took much longer than it did for me to learn Windows.

    8. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by the+web · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone with half a brain and/or access to someone that can take the time to teach them a bit will be perfectly safe from such things.

      The windows world is not proliferated with users like you though.

      By knowing what to do with something that you didn't ask for, and file types you don't recognize, you can automatically count yourself in the top 95th percentile of the smartest windows/PC users.

      Windows thrives on people who know nothing about computers.

      --
      __
      Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
    9. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by cyclist1200 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone with half a brain and/or access to someone that can take the time to teach them a bit will be perfectly safe from such things.

      Again, however, anyone with half a brain or access to a help desk minion/techie friend or family member will be able to remove such software through programs like Ad-Aware or Spybot.

      While both of these arguments may be true, they seem to run counter to reality. Most people are blissfully unaware of just how much garbage their machine is collecting - and spewing. I always enjoy reading my firewall logs right after new worm comes out.

      I'm sorry, but if someone thinks the only way to get rid of ad/spyware is a complete wipe of the drive, then they're an idiot.

      That may be, but that idiot is often just doing what the "knowledgable" tech support rep told them to do!

    10. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 0

      True enough...As I said in that sentence, though, some users need to be taught what's wrong or right by that top 95th percentile.

      I'd say just about anyone with a Windows-based computer has access to some way of learning how to protect themselves, the problem's just getting them to take advantage of it, or getting the geeky types to deign to help a bit. Which is another whole discussion in itself, I suppose.

    11. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by ccp · · Score: 1

      I use ONLY Linux and KDE, and I can attest, that, at least in MDK 9.2, the

      Enjoy desktop environments where settings are spread around 3 different menus and where sometimes they inexplicably don't stick etc.

      part is true. Really annoying.

      Cheers,

    12. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By knowing what to do with something that you didn't ask for, and file types you don't recognize, you can automatically count yourself in the top 95th percentile of the smartest windows/PC users.

      Windows thrives on people who know nothing about computers.


      And so Linux is going to fix this? It won't. Most of the worms and trojans that have come out in the past year or so have exploited the idiocy of users; not holes in the OS. If these same idiots were running Linux then they'd have the same problems (and now you can't rely purely on file extension, since they're meaningless -- I can send you a .jpg that's actually an executable/script. Smart email programs won't +x files that aren't allegedly executable, but I don't count on there being a whole lot of smart emailers out there. And yes, they'll need to allow you to auto-execute email attachments because that's what people want and expect. Deal.)

      I run both XP and RH9 at home. Different uses, different OSes. I wouldn't turn my desktop PC into a Linux box because it won't do what I want from my home PC -- play games. I could turn my RH9 box into a XP box, but since it's just a file server it's a lot cheaper and more efficient to run it as a Linux box.

      At work I wish to God I could run Linux. I'm a Unix developer. But our upper management isn't sold on Linux as a solution yet (we do have some customers on RH; most on AIX) and we have some Windows specific programs that we use. So I'm stuck on Windows, even though most of my day is simply spent using putty terminals to our AIX box (I could and do use CygWin at times, but our dev box is horrendously slow as is).

    13. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Time to torch some karma..

      I haven't used linux in years, and even then not much. You just might be the perfect person to give me an update (answers from anyone are most welcome), as I've been thinking about running Debian at home, maybe as dual boot with XP, but going cold turkey on Windows would be nice.

      So if you or anyone has the time to answer, here's my list of possible concerns:

      1. Can you plug cameras, flash card readers, printers, etc etc, into the USB ports and "they just work"? It's not that I'm lazy (well yes that's exactly what it is) but there are a ton of doo-dads that I own/borrow/swap and I don't want to have to do a driver dance every time I plug one in. I don't have to do it when I plug in a toaster, and I don't have to do it w/ XP.
      2. Same question as above only Firewire/1394?
      3. Windows emulator, I'll need one for some things. Which one?
      4. SHN files? WinAmp replacement?
      5. Managing multiple connections... XP (finally) does it fairly well. VPN's, Dial-out, broadband ISP, 802.11g to my laptop, etc. A dummy could do it. I appreciate that, I've outgrown the thrill configuring routers via CLI and telnet. I've outgrown the thrill of patting myself on the back because I know the 7 layer OSI model and can therefore figure out all over again how to tunnel through this, NAT that, etc. I spent half a day on the hardware firewall, it's already configured, after that, I want point and click.
      6. MS Outlook (NOT Express), I love it. I love all the non-email extras and use them for work so I'm not switching. Can I run it via an emulator and will it suck?


      There's an insightful post above claiming it's fear of other OS's that keep people with Windows. Pending any (much appreciated) answers, I'm betting its lazyness, or in other words, I'm fearful of all the effort I'll have to put it. ;)
      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    14. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Not always. I've run into programs that have a watcher on the registry, and then a watcher on the program watching the registry. AdAware didn't take it out. It took quite a while to find a program that could actuallly handle this bugger (NOTE - this was on a friend's machine - at least we were friends before he started wasting my time fixing his computer...)

    15. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by craigtay · · Score: 2, Funny

      "We have a woman in the office who had never used a computer before in her life. We plunked her down in front of a Windows box and a Linux box."

      Holy hell, a woman can use Linux? Then Linux must be pretty easy to use if a simple woman can figure it out

    16. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "At work I wish to God I could run Linux. I'm a Unix developer. But our upper management isn't sold on Linux as a solution yet..."

      So...why don't you do like I've done...reconfigure your machine to be dual boot linux/windows...? I only boot over to win. for the one or two apps I rarely have to use that are win only.

      You could eventually show the powers that be how well Linux works in the office...ESPECIALLY with interracting with other Unix type servers....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by the+web · · Score: 1

      In the first place I wasn't proposing linux to be any kind of solution. I wasn't providing any solution, niether did I find the need to undertake the task of solution-ing (OED).

      I was mearly pointing out that most windows/PC users have little computer education.

      Since, however, you bring it up...
      I don't know much about Linux, I've played with RH once here at work. That's about it. I understand it enough though to know that to use it, you must know how to use a computer. And so in a nutshell roundabout way, it kinda does solve that particular problem.

      I don't see to many dummies or casual home users using Linux out there do you?

      And no ones forcing your hand to use windows (larf). There is always an alternative. You'll have to pay your exit fee like everyone else however.

      --
      __
      Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
    18. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Where, exactly, did I say or imply that?

      Read your post!

      - being able to enjoy those cute "I love you" and "Anna Kurovina" messages automatically forwarded from your best friends, co-workers, and total strangers.

      Anyone with half a brain and/or access to someone that can take the time to teach them a bit will be perfectly safe from such things.

      The same person with half a brain or someone to teach them can use Linux.

      Funny, I don't see any ad pop-ups at all while i'm browsing with Firebird's blocking on, and everyone I know that's still using IE (even my computer-cluelesss grandma) has a pop-up blocker installed. I'll let you in on a little secret, too - those ads and porn pop-ups aren't limited to only Windows.

      Never been bit by the Windows Messenger Popups? You must have a firewall or you know enough to disable the Messenger service. Starting to look like a Linux candidate to me.

      This is a legitimate gripe. Again, however, anyone with half a brain or access to a help desk minion/techie friend or family member will be able to remove such software through programs like Ad-Aware or Spybot. I'm sorry, but if someone thinks the only way to get rid of ad/spyware is a complete wipe of the drive, then they're an idiot. Even for the stuff that can't be auto-removed somehow, there's almost always a fairly easy way to fix it in the registry, found through Google.

      Again, anybody with the brains and energy to go through this ritual could easily handle the "fun" of installing Linux.

      Way to generalize. And settings spread out in Windows? I think not. 99.9% of anything you need to change can be accessed through the Control Panels or a simple file search for something to edit.

      Let's see, in Windows, settings can be changed by using the control panel, customizing the start menu, using the registry editor or searching for files to edit. In modern Linux distributions, settings can be changed by using the desktop manager's control panel, using the DM menu builder or searching for config files to edit. Guess which one sounds easier.

      - A wide swath of available content, all provided to your trusted platform ensuring that your purchased programs will run forever... Until you lose the disk, upgrade your system, ban the program from spying on your browsing habits, or the producer decides to turn the software off remotely.

      True for some software, not true for the vast majority....

      Not yet, but it's becoming more and more prevalent. When the OS manufacturer starts heading down this path, others follow.

      Don't get me wrong, i'm not saying Windows is perfect, i'm just saying that your perceptions seem to be a bit off as well.
      Nor am I a Linux zealot. But I wanted you to see that your post does a much better job of arguing in favor of Linux than you might have thought.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    19. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1) I just installed Debian this weekend. A lot of USB devices are detected automatically in Debian. From experience RedHat is much better at this though. There is a very useful program in Debian called modconf, you can use it to load drivers(modules) very easily.
      2) My firewire dvd burner worked like a charm in RedHat 9.0 Haven't goten it to work right in Debian yet. RedHat automatically set it up for me, :)
      3) A good windows emulator is WINE, evern though the name means Wine is not a emulator, go figure.
      4) There are several good WinAmp replacements, xmms, zinf and the mplayer(also plays just about any video format you can throw at it)
      5) I just use one network connection right now, so I'm not so sure about that part. I have goten a wireless card to work really well under RedHat.
      6) I've heard theat Evolution is a good replacement for Outlook, but I've never used it. There is a program for Linux you can buy called CrossOver Office that uses wine to make Office run well in Linux, I think you can also run QuickTIme and some other programs with it.

      I'm still getting new to Debian, apt-get is really nice as is apt-cache search nameOfProgram. I am having some problems getting all of my hardware to work in it though and avoid dselect like the plague if you switch to Debian. I've had the most experience with RedHat. I switched to Debian because RedHat is droping support for RedHat 9.0, they did however release Fedora, which is pretty much RedHat 10 except I think it doesn't have RedHat Network(Like Windows Update for RedHat),but I could be wrong on that point.
      -End Of Rant

    20. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Linux is no longer hard. Once you have a modern Debian, Red Hat, or Mandrake installed, everything runs easy-peasy. I've been using it on and off for 6 years, and in that time frame it's gone from nothing but command line editing of .ini files to something downright usable.

      No longer hard? That's what they were saying a couple of years ago when I gave Linux a try. It sucked. There was not a single area where it worked better than the Win2k I was used to. Installers for major distributions looked amateurish. "But they just fixed it!" Sure. I bet it does seem great now if you've been using it for 6 years while watching it improve.

    21. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As one of those tech support reps, I can tell you it's a lot cheaper for the user to wipe and reinstall, than to go through the process of cleaning it out. I can't spend the time [painfully] walking them through the process over the phone, and they don't want to spend the money on a long house call.

    22. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by FroMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone with half a brain and/or access to someone that can take the time to teach them a bit will be perfectly safe from such things.

      Sounds like you expect the user to know something. And there certainly is a lot of people who do not seem to fit that bill.

      Funny, I don't see any ad pop-ups at all while i'm browsing with Firebird's blocking on, and everyone I know that's still using IE (even my computer-cluelesss grandma) has a pop-up blocker installed. I'll let you in on a little secret, too - those ads and porn pop-ups aren't limited to only Windows.

      Again, above and beyond the average user level (installing Firebird or a popup blocker). Atleast with Firebird/Mozilla you will get a popup telling about the feature the first time you install it, instead of needing to know there is such a thing as a popup blocker.

      This is a legitimate gripe. Again, however, anyone with half a brain or access to a help desk minion/techie friend or family member will be able to remove such software through programs like Ad-Aware or Spybot. I'm sorry, but if someone thinks the only way to get rid of ad/spyware is a complete wipe of the drive, then they're an idiot. Even for the stuff that can't be auto-removed somehow, there's almost always a fairly easy way to fix it in the registry, found through Google.

      Auto installed software/adware means the machine has been compromised. Period, you reinstall. Ad-aware is a hack to fix a problem, and as such cannot be fully trusted to remove 100%. I feel the same way about anti-virus removal utilities, how does the developer know they found every variant and their utility works correctly for all variants?

      And you expect mom to look into google for a registry edit? Get real.

      Way to generalize. And settings spread out in Windows? I think not. 99.9% of anything you need to change can be accessed through the Control Panels or a simple file search for something to edit.

      So, tell me where do I edit my database connections? And where do I turn off "personalized menus?" Where do I change my machine/network name? Where do I change my ipaddress/dns? Everyone of those are in different places.

      Now, I am not saying windows or linux is the solution. But my argument is that like cars, some people work on their cars in the garage, but most bring them to a mechanic. I think the same thing applies to computers. If you do not know how to use a computer, pay someone else to administrate it. And for your admin's sake, bring your machine to his place too, just as you do for your mechanic. I have the proper tools to work on a machine at my place, they do not travel well (internet connection being one of the best tools). Now, there are times I do not mind helping a friend out with their computer, like my sister in law had a problem with linux loading a sound driver. Well, I sshed into her box (from my home to hers) and played around. Sure enough, it was up and working once I was finished. I cannot do that with windows, so I will not support windows over the phone, if you want support, bring it to me.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    23. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out OSX, it sounds like it might meet your needs as well.

    24. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something tells me OSX won't run on my PC, with SiS 648 MB, P4 2.8, 1 boot drive and 4 drives in a 240G RAID 0+1, Radeon 9700, Audigy 2, 1 Gig of DDR 400, etc etc. (Except for the Radeon and audigy for games and music, it's all for photography) Considering all the $$$$$ I've put into various hardware, I'm not about to buy a new platform. If it weren't for GIMP, I wouldn't be considering Linux either. Thanks though.

    25. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      I agree that it would meet his needs - but I think he was not looking to buy a completely new set of hardware.

      Jedidiah

    26. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err...you mean "Anna Kournikova"

    27. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by aero6dof · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your post in the slashdot forums. The Business Sofware Alliance is now on the way to give you a special award for your participation. :)

    28. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      http://gphoto.sourceforge.net/proj/libgphoto2/supp ort.php

      nice big list of cameras that you can just plug in.

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    29. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by TheOv3rminD · · Score: 0, Troll

      You linux types really dont give windows enough credit...if software would have remained free the way you like it, no one would have had to money to create an operating system easy enough for the masses to use. eg there would have been no boom in personal computing, hardware manufactures would have had no reason to devolpe new technologies at the rate they do today, it would still cost me 500 beucks for a megabyte of ram, i would have nothing near the quality of applications i had today...the cascade effect goes on and what is your arguement anyway! install linux and i wount have to format my hard drive a few times a year hah i could easily do that in the time i would save not having to attempt to install a linux app or find one that suits my needs for that matter. dont get me wrong linux does have its place...it works great as a file server or a web server or a database where extreme reliabality is an issue. But misrosoft isnt going anywhere so get used to it.

    30. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      The same person with half a brain or someone to teach them can use Linux.

      Quite true. What I was attempting to say, though, is that even if it can't be made as good as Linux, you can at least batten down the hatches, so to speak. That way it'll be relatively secure and yet still what they're used to.

      Never been bit by the Windows Messenger Popups? You must have a firewall or you know enough to disable the Messenger service. Starting to look like a Linux candidate to me.

      Nope. And yes, I do have a firewall. Two, I guess, if you count the software firewall behind my router/switch. That said, though, none of my non-techie family, friends, classmates, etc. have ever mentioned recieving Messenger popups. Maybe i'm just extremely lucky in that regard, I dunno.

      Again, anybody with the brains and energy to go through this ritual could easily handle the "fun" of installing Linux.

      I'll grant that the registry editing may not be trivial to everyone. But have you ever actually used Ad-Aware? You start the program, pick which drive you want scanned, and hit the Start button. 15 or 20 minutes later, after watching the progress bar crawl by, you select (near) everything that it found, and hit the button to clean it all off. Done. Once in a while you have to update the definition file, which takes 2 clicks.

      Easy though Linux may be to install these days, it's still not that easy.

      Let's see, in Windows, settings can be changed by using the control panel, customizing the start menu, using the registry editor or searching for files to edit. In modern Linux distributions, settings can be changed by using the desktop manager's control panel, using the DM menu builder or searching for config files to edit. Guess which one sounds easier.

      Well, seeing as we're talking about less knowledgeable users here, who likely don't even know the registry or config files exist, let alone how to edit them, i'd have to say they're both pretty close to the same. Probably a slight edge to Windows again, due to the handholding of the environment.

      Nor am I a Linux zealot. But I wanted you to see that your post does a much better job of arguing in favor of Linux than you might have thought.

      Well, I did ask for an explanation. Nothing like a little critiquing to make things clearer :)

    31. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. A friend took a machine in to get a trojan removed. Although NAV and McAffee can remove it, and googling for it returns instructions on how to remove it as the #1 match, they formatted her machine and charged her $80, plus the cost of re-installing XP. (Although they were generous and didn't charge for the warezed copy of XP they installed)

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    32. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      I'll grant that the registry editing may not be trivial to everyone. But have you ever actually used Ad-Aware?

      Yeah. I use both that and Spybot Search and Destroy. However, I stopped using Internet Explorer for anything but our corporate intranet, and neither of the spyware scanners every really finds anything. I think you said you were using Firebird (correct me if I don't remember correctly), so you probably experience similar results. I honestly can't figure out why anybody would put up with such spyware nonsense when they don't have to. :-)

      I personally think that within the next three years, you'll see a major Linux desktop distribution that provides users with an experience very much like Windows. However, it'll probably be from a major vendor, will contain some proprietary code, and will probably bear a cost not much below MS Windows.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    33. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Kahm-Hime · · Score: 1

      While both of these arguments may be true, they seem to run counter to reality. Most people are blissfully unaware of just how much garbage their machine is collecting - and spewing.

      I'm an internet support tech for a large ISP, and I've seen customers who decided to drop ADSL and go back to dial up rather than try to remove a virus from their machine. (Me "You have a virus." Them "Well, it works on dial up so please switch my account over."

    34. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      If she wants something installed on Debian, it is an apt-get away (whereas in windows she has to look for it).

      So will she know the name of the application or library to use with apt get, sufficiently that apt get will know what she is wanting so it can download it? If not, does apt get have a search feature like she would have if she went to google and searched for a windows application in order to download it to install? Point being, how finicky is apt get?

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    35. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by NiTr|c · · Score: 1

      I'm only 20 and I've used Mac, Linux, and Windows. Currently, I'm on Windows XP. Disabled all the frilly crap, uninstalled messenger, use Opera for browsing (Only use IE to access MS Exchange online). I do Windows administration for work and I'd like to think I'm pretty good at it. I haven't had a crash in XP as long as I can remember. I keep the system optimized (defrag, cleaned up, organized, yadda yadda). I can use Linux, not very well, but I can. The installs ARE easier now than they were, and a lot of programs/devices work a lot better than before. The only reasons I won't switch is because of the time I will have to spend setting it up. I have everything configured on my Windows box exactly the way I want it. I know how to fix problems quickly, and I hardly ever have them as it is.

      Linux seems nice and all, but I just don't want to take all the time to familiarize myself with a whole other OS. I do have RedHat on my laptop, hardly use it though. Installing different programs has been a pain in my rear. Getting everything set up on a Linux box the way I have it on my Windows box would take me far too long. I would completely agree with the parent poster that TIME is one of the biggest drawbacks of converting to linux. I have absolutely zero gripes with my Windows install. If I could ask for anything, it'd be the time and patience to be able to sit down infront of linux and learn from scratch. A daunting task when I can go sit down infront of windows and know what's going on.

      --
      Try actually thinking for yourself. It's quite refreshing.
    36. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by rekkanoryo · · Score: 1
      Way to generalize. And settings spread out in Windows? I think not. 99.9% of anything you need to change can be accessed through the Control Panels or a simple file search for something to edit.

      So, tell me where do I edit my database connections? And where do I turn off "personalized menus?" Where do I change my machine/network name? Where do I change my ipaddress/dns? Everyone of those are in different places.

      All of those are in the Control Panel, if you care to pay attention. "Taskbar and Start Menu" is the proper applet in CP for turning off personalized menus, "Network and Dial-up Connections" or "Network" (depending on your Windows version) is the proper place to change your networking configuration, and, again depending on your windows version, the "System" or "Network" applets provide the ability to change your machine/network name.

      Don't let your lack of knowledge let you assume that the way you know is the only way to do something. Even Windows provides multiple ways to configure things--some are just prettier/easier/quicker than others.

    37. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      But... There are some people who make money developing software, and don't appreciate it when others take their work without paying for it.

    38. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      In modern Linux distributions, settings can be changed by using the desktop manager's control panel, using the DM menu builder or searching for config files to edit. Guess which one sounds easier.

      Definately not the last one. If there isn't a nice user interface to configure simple things that your desktop user will need (we're ignoring servers) then it's broken.

      I can't think of the number of times I scream when people tell me that I can enable so and so feature in Firebird if i stick some "userprefs" line into a text file somewhere. Editing configuration text files is not the way to go.

      The firebird thing is so intuiative, I've forgotten what the actual line looks like.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    39. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Anyone with half a brain and/or access to someone that can take the time to teach them a bit will be perfectly safe from such things.


      And anyone with a half a brain and/or access to someone that can take the time to teach them a bit can use Linux just fine. So what was your point again?
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    40. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      1.- Yes if they are supported (like Windows).
      2.- Do not know.
      3.- Google.
      4.- ?
      5.- Why on hell do you need Dial out and broadband on same machine? In any case, Linux can of course. They are different network devices, you just configure routing (don't come with the bullshit that WIndows points an clicks its way through this, you have to confer the same information as in Linux).
      6.. If you specification is "I need a machine that works with MS software" then why are you bothering to ask all of the above????

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    41. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by FroMan · · Score: 1

      I am not saying that MS didn't help computers arrive on most people desktops because it is perceived as easy. However, realize what businesses have realized: it takes an administrator to properly setup machines.

      To me, linux is as easy to use as windows, which is to say there is some effort. I have setup soem scripts to automate linux stuff for me, so linux tends to be easier even. Documentation is easier to find for me for linux, but again, I am biased as I use linux at home 90% of the time.

      The point is though, to use linux as a desktop, it is here. I and my wife (she's a programmer also) both use linux on our desktops. I would ratehr setup my folks with linux if they could get over the barrier that "linux is hard." Why, cause I can fix it remotely, instead of having to be there to work on it. And there is a key point I didn't say directly, but exists, windows and linux require soemone to keep an eye on it, which has to be done by someone who actually knows what they are doing.

      On your point for pirating software in your reply to the parent. You are disgusting. You are proud that you can take someone's work without paying for it? I'm glad to see it marked troll as it should be.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    42. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Ah yes... Why is the machine name done with the system applet on the second/third tab and your network connections done under network connections?

      If you noticed also, I did have all the proper places to change those settings. Maybe you didn't recognize them?

      Also, why does each iteration of windows change where to do settings?

      And, wasn't the point of the orignal post I replied to "windows is easy"? Guess its not, huh?

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    43. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by TheOv3rminD · · Score: 0

      ohh get off it theres only an elite core of people that can get anything they want for free...programmers are in no danger of losing monies over it. besides its just for personal use anyway. you people make most of your money off enterprise licensing and i havent heard of a major corp. use pirated software for a long time. arrrrrr

    44. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they have enough money from corporate users, they don't need my money do they? Why do you get to make the decision that these software companies make enough? And how about companies like Loki? I know folks that have pirated their software, but I guess they had enough sales to continue working huh? Nope, they went under because they did not have enough sales.

      And you think you are elite because you know how to pirate software? Fool you are. It take google and maybe a few minutes to locate serials or ftp sites. It takes talent to write software you are pirating, it takes zero talent to be part of the "elite" who do pirate.

      Welcome to my foes list.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    45. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by TheOv3rminD · · Score: 0

      wow you can get serials.... any moron can get serials in seconds with a few keystrokes. and how do you know i dont write software? you dont know me at all....your just another outdated user trying to cling tightly to the end wake of the digital revolution. i.am.the.future.

    46. Re:Stick with Windows and if you do... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I've had customers with virii, but being on dial-up never helped them. What did your customers do once they discovered that dial-up didn't help?

  36. You need a book for this? by DingoBueno · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't think I need a book to tell me about the annoyances of Windows 98...

    --
    ascii art
  37. Fighting by Andrea_from_Arg · · Score: 1

    Wow, there's not a single /. article that doens't generate a fight (especially the linux/windows ones)...

    --
    :: Andrea ::
    Anime Wallpapers
  38. No no no by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In spite of my system running slowly and sometimes crashing (and the fact that I'm rather broke these days), I'll stick with my 98 for now.

    I've been running XP for almost 6 months and it has *never* crashed.

    Switch you fool! (Oh, and inquire your fellow nerds for a, um, *cough*, discount)

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been running XP for almost 6 months and it has *never* crashed.

      I've been running XP for almost 9 months and it's crashed every other day. Time to move on to better things... like Linux, or even better, Mac OS X.

    2. Re:No no no by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

      Actually that comment almost made me quit reading. My sole WIndows box is a Latitude 350CPx. It had W2K installed when I worked at [nevermind]. When I bought it during the great post-9/11 RIFs, they reinstalled the original OS - W98. 98 is much faster on that laptop than W2K ever was. From what I've seen at work, it's faster than XP as well. Not *quite* as stable, but stable enough, given the speed and relative ease of use.

      W2K was the first (IMO) real OS from MS, ever. At least sinece the DOS days. But for home use, 98 is fine. Annoying, but fine.

      Meanwhile, I use it only for a few limited apps and some games. Everything else I do on Linux!

    3. Re:No no no by gosand · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've been running XP for almost 6 months and it has *never* crashed.

      I was forced to switch OSs at work. I was one of the last holdouts on Win98. Yeah, I got the BSOD about every other day, but I didn't want to deal with the downtime of upgrading. (it isn't simple, because of corporate policy) I finally got a new machine with XP on it, and it took me a few days to configure it so I didn't think I was using a Fischer Price toy. (anyone know how to get rid of that damn animated dog when doing a file find?)

      While XP itself hasn't crashed on me yet, I have had to reboot several times because the system slowed to a crawl, or applications hang and cannot be restarted correctly. You know the defacto solution to most Windows problems - say it with me now - reboot! Do I prefer rebooting it myself instead of having the system force a reboot? Of course. Do we have to reboot our Windows systems to keep them happy? Yes, and often.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    4. Re:No no no by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      It's pretty easy. If you read the options the dog gives you, one is called "Change Preferences." Click that, then click "Without a Search Companion." Watch it walk away and you're done.

      Honestly, if you couldn't find that, you weren't looking very hard.

    5. Re:No no no by gatzke · · Score: 1


      I occasionally use XP.

      I have never seen it crash, but I have seen it hang to the point that CTRL-ALT-DEL would not bring up the task manager. The mouse still moves, occasionally, but I don't think this is a actual crash of XP.

      I love my linux desktop. Use matlab -nojvm and I have no worries. And Office works great for me using codeweaver office.

      Non responsive is just as bad as a flat out BSOD. At least my unix boxes I can usually ssh in and kill jobs if something really hangs.

  39. lets kill it once and for all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, until the day comes that everyone uses Linux (or finds a way around Billy Boy's "evil empire")

    It's here and it's called goatse.cx

    Wanna bet this isn't going to be modded as insightful?

  40. Best Book for Dealing With Windows Problems Ever by sjvn · · Score: 1

    Seriously, and I've seen a lot of this kind of book over the years.

    Steven

  41. You can rename it to whatever you want! by BigGerman · · Score: 1

    http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-010

  42. I'd expect more from this book by TopherC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm surprised that this book got an "8" for offering such profoundly useful advice such as how to eliminate popups or to use less ink in your printer by using economy mode. Did any of the advice mentioned in the review even remotely pique your interest (assuming you have to deal with Windows at all)? When auto-correct annoyed me (which it also did in OpenOffice), I looked through the options and turned it off. If that's too hard to figure out without a book, then you need some basic software education instead of a grab-bag of "tricks".

    I wonder what versions of Windows the book refers to? I thought PowerDesk only worked for Windows 95-ME. And what software is it really addressing? If it's giving any advice about Internet Explorer, I hope that it's to remove all file associations and hide all links to it by deleting them or burying them deeply in Start Menu/Programs/Accessories/Unsupported Software/Mistakes/Don't Go Here/Did You Try Mozilla?/FireBird?/Opera?/You Can't Be Serious!/Are You Really Really Sure?/Okay But Don't Blame OReilly/.

  43. Mod parent up, or repeat it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how I learned, I messed up my PC many o'time but I learned something each time I did it.


    Unlike the grandparent poster who apparently believes that somebody knows nothing about computers should be berated for playing with one that they own. Wrong, grandparent.

    Nobody on this planet emerged from their mother's womb fully capable of navigating the command line. Nobody here on /. was born knowing anything other than mewling and expelling waste. People grow and learn by doing.

    I guess there's no "community" to be in unless there's someone to keep out, huh, computer savants?

  44. Fluff, pure fluff! by hcuar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Besides being a poor review; as in no real insight into the book.... The reviewer doesn't seem to be a reliable source. I don't put much faith into someone who is unwilling to upgrade to XP when they are having terrible problems with 98. It wouldn't have surprised me if he was running ME. ;-) I get tired of people complaining about a six year old operating systems. If he doesn't want to pay for Windows, he could easily use SUSE, Fedora, Mandrake, Debian, Gentoo, etc...

    1. Re:Fluff, pure fluff! by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 1

      Pay for WINDOWS!!! Who on /. actually PAYS for WINDOWS?

  45. Elitist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ you sound arrogant. I guess those of us with jobs that require using Windows or need to use software that only runs on Windows are a bunch of whiners? I can hear you now, "Well, no one forced you to work there, switch jobs!" Sorry, I'll choose a stable income over ideology. With comments like "I really hate whining; I like constructive attitudes" you should practice what you preach. Try leaving your tiny little hole in the ground sometime.

    1. Re:Elitist? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You moron; if you're working at a job, you use whatever tools they give you. This is about people who purchase Windows and then complain about it.

      If I have problems with Windows at work, I just explain any impact this has on my schedule as being caused by Windows problems. No skin off my ass. I'm not the one who picked it, so I don't have to feel stupid for wasting money on something that sucks.

      But if you willingly buy it, and then complain about it, that's your own fault.

  46. WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent post contains link to bill gates' evil empire. MoD DOWN!!

  47. Why this guy?? by blom · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who let this guy review this book?

    It's like me reviewing a Mariah Carey concert, if you fundamentally dislike it don't buy the damn ticket (or book in this case) in the first place.

  48. Is that.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    a confession or a plea for help. ;-)

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Is that.. by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I haven't run Windows for over a year, and I never used it for games (except the reinstalling game).

      I have a Linux box with a four month uptime, that gets used a good bit.

      I'm referring to a pair of friends with 3.5 computers between them, one of them is big on XP and the winblows media player. Its disturbing to me.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  49. I'l bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it's nazi. Frankly, I don't know why it's being done. However, it's not my decision. Just your local peon who has to deal with it and support its users.

  50. You are not alone... by djeaux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My dad, who's in his late 70s, bought a PC last year (because it was cheap & he is parsimonious). This replaced an antique Mac Classic, which still runs BTW. After many phone calls for advice about Win XP, I showed him the Annoyances web site. He looked at me & looked relieved. "So other people are just as annoyed with this stuff as I am, huh?" And he's had fun implementing the various fixes, although he's still too stingy to go buy the book. Maybe I'll get him the book for Christmas... I've already left him a Knoppix CD to play with, though ;-)

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  51. woo! first post! by foggi3 · · Score: 1

    FP!! .......... frick. my biggest annoyance is slow internet.

    --
    ~~
    1. Re:woo! first post! by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1
      my biggest annoyance is slow internet.
      Tell me about it... your post was supposed to be a reply to this one.

      think about that for a few minutes!
      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  52. Microsoft cannot make non-Windows x86 software by nsayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's go back in time a bit.

    A while ago, Microsoft released IE for Solaris. Sparc solaris. Not x86 Solaris. It wouldn't have cost them anything but typing 'make' on a Solaris x86 box, but they would not do it.

    If Microsoft were to release software for non-Microsoft x86 operating systems, then they'd be helping to validate the proposition that Microsoft is not the only game in town. They simply cannot afford to do that (there are a couple cases where they have done so - the .Net framework for FreeBSD being one. But there they were trying to build an even bigger replacement monopoly, so it made some sense).

    If Microsoft releases Linux office on Monday, Dell will start selling Linux desktops on Tuesday.

    Maybe if Microsoft actually loses its monopoly status in operating systems, we might start to see them port their software, but they're working very, very hard (and playing very, very dirty) to make sure that won't happen. Ever.

    And every product of theirs anyone uses (note I didn't say "purchases" - even users who pirate their shite help keep them in control) helps make it possible.

    1. Re:Microsoft cannot make non-Windows x86 software by TomGroves · · Score: 1

      Microsoft makes Office for Max OSX. Macs run PPCs.

    2. Re:Microsoft cannot make non-Windows x86 software by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't have cost them anything but typing 'make' on a Solaris x86 box, but they would not do it.

      You have evidence or a cite to back this claim up?

      There are tons and tons more third-party tools for Solaris/Sparc than there are for Solaris/x86. It's quite concievable that whatever toolkit they used for the Solaris/Sparc port of IE would be an arduous task, or impossible to build for Solaris/x86. Certainly it wouldn't be simply typing 'make.' Don't be ridiculous.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  53. Annoying to a Windows user by apoplectic · · Score: 0, Troll

    You know what would qualify as an annoyance for a Windows user? The login screen.

  54. You WIN!! by goldspider · · Score: 1
    "But Windows users refuse to look at alternatives, and it's infuriating. So I just try to avoid these people.

    It's like dealing with a relative who's an alcoholic or drug addict. The solution is so simple (stop taking drugs), but they just get angry if you suggest that."

    You, sir, win the daily "Elitist Prick Award"!!

    It's no wonder a lot of people regard Linux with suspicion and contempt with people like you championing its cause.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:You WIN!! by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      You, moron, sound like all the other idiotic Windows users that complain about "elistism" every time someone points out an alternative or tries to do something different.

      It's no wonder a lot of people regard Windows users with contempt because of their commitment to mediocrity and resistance to change.

    2. Re:You WIN!! by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Actually I use Linux as well, and that doesn't make you any less of an elitist prick with a chip on your shoulder.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  55. No! by revividus · · Score: 1
    Sorry, that's not my experience. I started with Linux a rank beginner -- I didn't have C/C++ experience, I wasn't already a TCP/IP geek, I did not build my own PCs from spare parts -- I have posted plenty of questions to forums/mailing lists, and even my stupid questions (like when I thought my system's lousy performance was due to a Gnome bug, rather than my not having installed nvidia's graphics drivers :oops:) were always answered respectfully.

    I was never once told to RTFM, even in cases where reading the documentation was really what I should have been doing.

    But hey, you go ahead and rant anyways. Do you feel better?

    By the way, I know the people you describe exist, and you're right; I'm sure they do turn a certain percentage of potential Linux users off to the idea of trying it. I just wanted to say that I had not had this experience, and I don't really expect to. All the Linux users I communicated to via forum or IRC have been nothing but helpful.

  56. Nice book... by Taicho · · Score: 0

    Seems like an interesting book but one of the annoyances I discovered was going to that "util" url and finding decent software mixed in with really crappy software I suggest downloading ad-aware before downloading the other stuff on that page lol!

  57. It would be my contention that... by clifgriffin · · Score: 1

    anyone who uses Windows 98 and sees no reason to upgrade, or at least hasn't used XP extensively is not qualified to review a book on common PC annoyances.

    As far as annoyances go, I find much more "annoyances" on my Slackware installation then I do on Windows.

    No platform will be free of annoyances...ever... A book on dealing with them is helpful, but using this as an anti-MS tool isn't helping anyone.

    Clif

  58. Re:Stuck with Windows? You're just a NERD. by lcsjk · · Score: 1
    My upgrades are based on the premise that "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"

    Obviously, many people think there is a great benefit in upgrading from W-98 to W-XP. My most reliable computer is still running W-95, (5 years, no crash or downtime) and when my W-98 box is tied up with a circuit analysis program, the W95 box allows me to keep working. My W-98 finally crashed because I got in too much of a hurry with REGEDIT for a program that would not correctly allow a re-install for something that got messed up. (Mozilla, no less) I use W-2000 at work (and sometimes XP), W-98 at home mostly, and since both work for me flawlessly, I can't come up with a reason to change either to the other, regardless of which might be better for some tasks I don't do. I agree with the author about using W-98.

  59. But Linux has a few annoyances too by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1
    How often do you sit down for a relaxing session at your PC, only to discover you can't find that file you saved six months ago but forgot the name of it.

    Never, everything goes under /home/username or in my home directory on a NetWare server which is soft linked to an icon on my desktop.

    Or to go into Word and realize several dreary tasks could mre easily be put into macros if only you knew how?

    Never had the need for anything that fancy, but I look forward to the day.

    Or you decide to browse the Web only to be "attacked" by pop-ups and extra windows? AAUGHH!

    It doesn't happen. I run Mozilla.
    I can control cookies too. w00t!

    But frankly Linux also has some annoyances. Care to list any?

  60. Your IP is scanned in a "harsh glance" manner. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skuld, Sakura, Loki, Dayglo, and Lilith would all like to send you a packet or two.

    (These are my work/home machines. They don't like being un-anthromorphized)

  61. Ob-Dilbert by mccrew · · Score: 1
    The parent comment reminds me of one of the funniest Dilber cartoons that I can remember. I did a quick look around the net for the Dilbert comic, but couldn't find it, so you'll just have to use your imagination.

    Panel 1
    Pointy Haired Boss (PHB) approaches Dilbert, who is sitting at his computer, and announces that he want to be more of a hands-on manager.

    Panel 2
    PHB begins micro-managing Dilbert to the point where he is directing him mouse movements. "Now move the mouse. Click it! CLICK IT!!"

    Panel 3
    Dilbert apparently doesn't do the right thing, and the PHB explodes:
    "Oh no! You IDIOT!!!"
    Dilbert (thinking): "This has long day written all over it."

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  62. Good troll.. by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    I smelled fear. I struck.

    Nice trolling man!

    You had me laughing more and more ;-)

  63. That's a very bad analogy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because there does happen to be some people out there that actually happen to like Windows! :-)

  64. Your examples.... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    aren't all that compelling.

    I won't comment on all of them (because I can't comment on something I'm not familiar with), but I will comment on 1) the OS. IT can be and has been made to look and act like Windows. You need look no further than Lindows; 2) I don't know what version of StarOffice/OpenOffice you'e using, but in my version (OO1.1) Ctrl-Space is what is used to insert a nnon-breaking space - that's out of the box, not something you have to configure. But let's say you want a function to perform differently: All you need to do is go to "Tools"... "Configure..." and configure it to your liking.

    The examples you give most certainly do will not take "six months cursing all the little things that are different".

    I've had the pleasure (for the most part) to see more than just a few people - some family, some friends, some co-workers - shift away from MS (both OS and Office) and the things you mention are not the problem. The problems come about when they wanted to take things like their macros from Office to OpenOffice, use their Access DB on Linux, etc. Of course those situations will cause problems. Until you see MS port their office suite to Linux (or shell out the bucks for Crossover Office), those will always be problems. And those problems aren't trivial to begin with. It took a long time for users to learn their macros and DBs.

  65. Auto-correct for fun and profit by khasim · · Score: 1

    When an unsuspecting co-worker leaves their machine unattended and logged in, add their boss' name to their auto-correct list and have it "correct" it to "my butt-headed boss".

    See how long it takes them to notice.

    1. Re:Auto-correct for fun and profit by oshy · · Score: 1

      This may be starting to drift off topic but...

      I did set up someones autocorrect to change "the" to "the f***ing" (without the politeness filter) so that the guy's typing matched the way he spoke when drunk.

  66. sweet! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should make that a default configuration option, the '-mother' switch. :)

    "Click here if your mother sends you e-mail." hehe

  67. crazy newbie stuff by Tired_Blood · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of "look, a box! I must fill it with information.

    I don't know why, but my first year of computer use, when a program would produce a little temporary 'cancel' box while busy, I could not keep myself from moving the mouse over it. I noticed that my friends were unconciously doing this too. Something inside compelled all of us to do it.
    And then, since the mouse was directly over the cancel button, I sometimes would accidentally/involuntarily click the mouse thereby cancelling the process which would really piss me off. It took a while to recondition myself.

    --
    This is not my sig.
    1. Re:crazy newbie stuff by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      On a semi-related note, an ol' boss of mine enlightened me as to the proper use of the "Reset" button on a web form I was creating. That proper use was to get it as far away from the submit button as possible, if not get rid of it.

      If nothing else, people have a tendency to get click-happy and accidentally hit reset, therefore aggravating your users. I was younger and naive enough to believe users are more advanced but complied by getting rid of the reset button. I've grown older and more bitter since then.

      Someone pass me a lart.

  68. here's a flame^H^H^H^Hact by twitter · · Score: 1
    The "enlightened ones," as I mention, won't need to bother with this book, as they have Linux, or a Mac. But the rest of us, who do battle with our PCs daily, will get a lot of useful information out of this book.

    In less time than it takes to read and implement solutions presented in this book, you could become enlightened several times over. Then Microsoft will make changes that break your workarounds to their problems. For less money than you will spend on the two systems you will be forced to buy in the next three years, you could have bought a Mac and been happy. That's why most of us consider Windoze so annoying, it's not cheap , it's not easy and it hardly works.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  69. If Windows had been created "right"? by kc0dxh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Of course, one could point out if previous versions of Windows had been created "right" or "ran correctly," there wouldn't be need for a whole chapter (or even reams of books) on Microsoft fixes or how to get it to run properly.


    What... right like Linux? Which version of the kernel? Or did you mean a specific distro? Which one?

    Or are you talking about having the computer configured the correctly out of the box? Configured to whose preferences? Which hardware?

    Remember the "P" in PC stands for "Personal". The whole idea is that you can whack it into submission, unlike servers run by us uptight, high-strung operators.

    Go configure.
    --

    --- "1.21 Jigawatts!" -Doc

  70. Alternative to 98 by suitti · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I bought and read the first Windows Annoyances. That was despite the URL on the back to the on-line complete and up to date version. I even liked it. It had useful suggestions. Certainly, there are alternatives to Windows when you have a choice. I'm often not paid to choose. My liking the book has to do with the signal to noise ratio. Many books have no signal.

    The original book was a compilation - kind of a blog. People submitted content to the site.

    One scary piece was that, every now and then, Windows would delete a folder containing an MS competitor's product. Not a problem - since essentially all Windows users back up their systems on a regular basis...

    Note that Windows XP is too large and slow to run on many machines that run Windoze 98. And, '98 is still a virus/worm nightmare. For these smaller and slower machines, the options are - get a firewall, antivirus, etc., or, load it with Linux.

    I still prefer Win 2000 pro over XP, in a lesser of evils sort of way.

    --
    -- Stephen.
  71. Easy by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
    How to deal with common PC annoyances, like Windows, Email, Microsoft Office, sound & video and hardware issues.

    Install linux :-D
    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  72. Ah yes, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    MS Office ... ah yes, Office. .
    .
    .
    Windows Explorer ... ah yes, Windows Explorer.

    Reminds me of the M*A*S*H episode where they're teaching Radar to impress the ladies, and tell him to say 'ah...Bach' when Bach comes up in conversation about music...

  73. You and dad have a problem, but it's the OS by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Am I the only one who has a father (or some other relation), that knows nothing about computers, yet insists upon playing with all the settings they can find?

    Both your attitudes are symptoms of the problem. Your OS should be solid enough that an inexperienced user can fool around and not feel scared about what she's going to do.

    And you -- You're basically saying newbies should shut up and work and not tweak anything?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  74. MS Office is the standard by mccrew · · Score: 1
    MS Office is NOT a standard format

    According to whom? The Inter-office Memo Standards board? The Clippy Commission? Friends of ASCII? The I-Hate-Microsoft Committee?

    The poster was completely correct when he asserted that MS Office is a de-facto standard. For your information, that means that while it has not been officially blessed by some lofty standards board, the indisputable fact is that everyone uses it.

    Even those who do not use MS Office, and use other such as Open Office, Star Office, etc., save their documents in MS Office format. I have yet to see anybody who uses an alternate office suite save their documents in the native format of that package. It's always in MS Office format. Further, any office package that does not have at least a minimal level of interoperability with .doc files is dead-on-arrival.

    You have raised a valid point about the intentional breakage that is periodically introduced to force upgrades, but that is a separate question.

    Since we're veering off topic here, I'll just mention that it is the exact same situation with Internet browsers - IE is the standard. That's what 98% of the universe uses, that what 98% of all internet sites are written for. And we still get the whiners who just keep pissing into the wind, complaining about compliance with some "standard" or another.

    The fact of the matter is that when you command a large enough slice of the market, you become the standard. Period.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    1. Re:MS Office is the standard by Salsaman · · Score: 1

      I use Star Office's own format. So your whole argument falls down.

    2. Re:MS Office is the standard by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      MS Office is NOT a standard format

      According to whom? The Inter-office Memo Standards board? The Clippy Commission? Friends of ASCII? The I-Hate-Microsoft Committee?


      It isn't a standard because it is not publicly documented (in its entirety) and not implementable by anyone but Microsoft.


      The poster was completely correct when he asserted that MS Office is a de-facto standard. For your information, that means that while it has not been officially blessed by some lofty standards board, the indisputable fact is that everyone uses it.


      I can dispute that fact: I don't use it. I'm sure plenty of other people here also do not use it.

      You have raised a valid point about the intentional breakage that is periodically introduced to force upgrades, but that is a separate question.

      It is not a separate question. It is integral to the whole standards argument. Something can't possibly be a standard if one entity can simply go off and change it on their whim. A standard defines a format/process/protocol so that that format/process/protocol can be implemented by multiple parties. Being changeable on one entity's whim is completely contrary to that.

      Since we're veering off topic here, I'll just mention that it is the exact same situation with Internet browsers - IE is the standard. That's what 98% of the universe uses, that what 98% of all internet sites are written for. And we still get the whiners who just keep pissing into the wind, complaining about compliance with some "standard" or another.

      IE is not a standard. It is a web browser. HTML 4.0 is a standard. HTTP 1.1 is a standard. IE is a (partial) implementation of those standards. People can write "web pages" that only work in IE all they want. That is fine. But they are not writing standard web pages. They're writing IE documents.

    3. Re:MS Office is the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The de-facto office standard is PDF for sharing documents.

    4. Re:MS Office is the standard by ndqc · · Score: 1

      i use Open Office 1.1 own format. so argument falls down even further :-)

    5. Re:MS Office is the standard by mccrew · · Score: 1
      It isn't a standard because it is not publicly documented (in its entirety) and not implementable by anyone but Microsoft.

      This is incorrect 2 ways:

      1. Even if it were publicly documented, it would just be a publicly documented proprietary format.
      2. Open Office, Star Office, and AbiWord are 3 implementations by organizations other than Microsoft.

      But you are missing the point. When you own 98% of the market, you are the standard. I am not saying that I like it, or that it is a good thing. That's just life in the big city.

      Apparently folks didn't get the [ humor | sarcasm ] in my original post about setting standards for office suites data format. There is no committee which sets any standard. All there is is de-facto standards.

      IE is not a standard.

      Uh, yeah it is - a de-facto standard. While you are correct in stating the obvious that IE is a web browser, there is no standard for "Web browser." Different web browsers make attempts to implement different standards. You may cite certain three-letter-acronym "standards" that IE either does not implement, or implements in a broken way, but all that is 100% irrelevent: at the end of the day, 98% of the users use the broken, non-committee-standards compliant browser.

      If your paycheck depends on paying customers coming to your website, and 98% of them use IE, then you code to IE, warts and all. You work around its limitations, its different object model.

      I'd love to see you start up some mission-critical website, coding only to "committee standards" (IE be damned), and see how long you would last. You'd change your tune then.

      --
      Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    6. Re:MS Office is the standard by mccrew · · Score: 1
      OK, so now we have 2 data points. So I guess we can just extrapolate a line to prove that nobody uses MS Office format anyway. :)

      Seriously, when it comes to number of users, or number of documents in a non MS Office format, we "alternate office suite" folks are just statistical noise. Let's not fool ourselves.

      --
      Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    7. Re:MS Office is the standard by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1


      This is incorrect 2 ways:

      1. Even if it were publicly documented, it would just be a publicly documented proprietary format.


      Why would it be both publicly documented and proprietary? If it were publicly documented, then it could be completely implemented by third parties and thus no longer proprietary. Unless you're talking about publicly documented but patented or some other use-inhibitor.

      Open Office, Star Office, and AbiWord are 3 implementations by organizations other than Microsoft.

      They are incomplete and not always correct. That's what started this whole tread. They were developed by reverse engineering. There's no publication that says "here is thee MS office format, in its entirety".

      Uh, yeah it is - a de-facto standard. While you are correct in stating the obvious that IE is a web browser, there is no standard for "Web browser."

      Yes there is. HTTP and HTML.

      Different web browsers make attempts to implement different standards. You may cite certain three-letter-acronym "standards" that IE either does not implement, or implements in a broken way, but all that is 100% irrelevent: at the end of the day, 98% of the users use the broken, non-committee-standards compliant browser.

      It doesn't matter how many people use IE. It still does not properly implement the web standards. There is only one HTML. If you're writing a web page that only works in IE, then you technicaly aren't using HTML any more. You're using IE's proprietary language. You can't use IE's proprietary language and say it is HTML any more than I can claim my toyota is a submarine.

      98% of the world can use the broken web implementation just as most of the world uses Word. That's fine. I was never discussing popularity, I was discussing standards.

      I'd love to see you start up some mission-critical website, coding only to "committee standards" (IE be damned), and see how long you would last. You'd change your tune then.

      Done. I spent 2 years at a former job building a web application. All of the users there used IE. I used Linux+Mozilla to do my job. I wrote standard HTML. The application worked. I got paid.

    8. Re:MS Office is the standard by JamMule · · Score: 1
      Done. I spent 2 years at a former job building a web application. All of the users there used IE. I used Linux+Mozilla to do my job. I wrote standard HTML. The application worked. I got paid.

      That's the nice part about standards. If your site's HTML and CSS validates, it's almost quaranteed to work on any browser (well, not some old Netscape's, which crash at the smell of CSS). Granted, not all the nice visual tricks work as supposed, but web should be about content anyway.

      Of course, "web should be about content" is wishful thinking. Just look at almost any corporate web site. Either the information just isn't there or you have to dig in their artistic dirt for half an hour to find anything.

      And another point: I have never ever seen a web site, which couldn't have been implemented in a standards compliant way instead of the IE-way they were done. Never. Granted, I'm not a web developer, but I think I know enough of the technologies. I'd suppose I know more than some of the actual developers. Just look at the sites and you'll agree.

    9. Re:MS Office is the standard by Salsaman · · Score: 1
      The original poster stated:

      Even those who do not use MS Office, and use other such as Open Office, Star Office, etc., save their documents in MS Office format. I have yet to see anybody who uses an alternate office suite save their documents in the native format of that package. It's always in MS Office format.

      I was only disputing that part of his argument by providing a counter example. The original poster seemed to be using this argument to claim that .doc format was somehow intrinsically superior to other formats.

  75. Suuuurrrrreeeee.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    I'm just kidding. I'm not a huge Linux zealot myself. Windows has got some things right and its more about building a good free (as in mind) OS then proving Microsoft sucks.

    And of course we can still learn a lot about GUI consistency and user configuration from both Apple and Microsoft.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Suuuurrrrreeeee.. by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I don't have alot of Linux zeal due to my rocky road towards it, I'm hoping my not compilitg some iptable bad packet detection with my kernel fixes a HORRIBLE degenerative network slowdown (which had the kernel liberally munching on the CPU, no way to renice).

      I don't worry about GUI consistency, once fuctionality is there we can talk about that. (and I actually like my programs looking different)

      To me Linux is about proving Windows in crap and hopefully arsing them into fixing their problems. At this rate I'd worry Microsoft will get steamrollered because of their inertia. I do hold Ill will towards them for selling me the OS and not fixing even really basic bugs (32 bit overflow in file copy progress indicator for example). It always scared the crap out of me when I (or anything else) pointed IE to the internet too.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  76. Am I the only one... by moitz · · Score: 1

    Who doesn't want people to know about this book?

    For example:

    What they said: "The interweb thingy on my hard disk RAM isn't working. Something about an invalid USB googlehertz."

    What I heard: "Money money money money money money money money money money. Money money money money money money."

    -moitz-

    --
    Screw 'em...who cares what anyone thinks.
  77. How many of you have had the following exchange? by ThinkingGuy · · Score: 1

    Me: Click Start
    User: [click]
    Me: Now click Programs
    User: [click]
    [this goes on for a while until...]
    Me: Click on "Network Neighborhood" so it's highlighted
    User: [click]
    Me: Now right-click the icon so a little menu appears.
    User: [click]
    Me: Next click Properties
    User: Uh, right click or left click?

  78. How about by Second_Derivative · · Score: 2, Informative

    Backspace key in Internet Explorer goes back a page, and promptly trashes the contents of whatever form you were filling out before you clicked in the wrong place.

    Now WHOSE bright idea was that?

    1. Re:How about by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      You're IE is broken dude. Mine doesn't do that.

    2. Re:How about by Second_Derivative · · Score: 1

      Hey whoever said I use IE ;)

    3. Re:How about by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      Uh... I'm pretty sure you did:

      "Backspace key in Internet Explorer goes back a page"

  79. Bad Review by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    Heavy editorializing.
    Sidetracked multiple times, and STATED IT.
    I still don't know anything about the book.

    I do not want to buy this book, right now.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  80. To easy to turn around. by twitter · · Score: 1
    You claim:

    How about: I don't *like* other operating systems [besides unnamed windows version]?

    and offer this as the most important reason:

    WinXP just *works*

    and offer this as well:

    That's the one concept that you Mac and Linux fanatics don't seem to get.

    The last statement really should be a question. Here's part of the answer.

    Mac heads may be fanatics but there's nothing like a Micfosoft fanboy. People who are not Microsoft fanboys actually look at and enjoy other software. I actually like Solaris, Mac, Mac OSX, HPUX, Just about every thing Linux, BSD, even OS/2, but not Windows. I'm not a fanatic for saying that Windows is buggy and that Microsoft demands way too much money and EULA restrictions for such buggy junk in it's XP forms. Experience shows me that, I'm nothing special. No one that's ever really used another OS for long is really able to put up with Microsoft. Microsoft has to invent switchers because they can't find real ones. Because of this and from my own experience confirmed by many others, I have to suspect that you are paid to say what you just did. That might not be true, I have met people who describe themselves as "Wintel all the way", who blindly refuse to look at anything but Microsoft on Intel. They froth at the mouth with violent hatred of anything different. It's really wierd, but that's the kind of stuff Microsoft actively promotes, is it not?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:To easy to turn around. by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

      yea, one of my friends is turning into one of those "froth at the mouth" kind of people, he used to use linux and mac os x, liked alternate computing platforms (e.g. ppc) ,but finally decided to switch on over to Windows. Now if you mention os x or linux, chances are he will start going off on how much windows/microsoft "rule".

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    2. Re:To easy to turn around. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh yeah, judging from your posting history you are the definitely the one to point out how users of other operating systems "froth at the mouth". You are the one who can "tell us how it is". It's pretty apparent that you do nothing but "froth at the mouth" every time you post something. Right off the bat I see at least half a dozen posts with MS vitriol that incidentally are completely offtopic. And I didn't try to go back that far.

      I'd suggest you take your own advice and stop "frothing at the mouth".

    3. Re:To easy to turn around. by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      You're absolutely right. Sorry for trying to deceive you. My other username, BillGates, just gets flamed way too often.

      Dude, how exactly is WinXP buggy? I can go from power off to my desktop in under 10 seconds. I don't have crashes, don't have slowdown, don't have software conflicts, and certainly don't have to bother with glib or java dependencies any more. I've got a student copy of WinXP from 2001 which costs less than the last three updates for OSX (Microsoft updates for free) and is much more stable IMHO than Mandrake 9.0 or Redhat 8.0. $140 CAD for an OS for two years and counting. How is this a bad deal?

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    4. Re:To easy to turn around. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You have to understand twitter. In his world, anyone who uses Microsoft software is a borderline retard, trapped in the twilight zone and constantly having his wallet raided by masked terrorists with colorful logos on their flak jackets. Nobody does anything because the computer has to be rebooted every five minutes. All Windows computers have been taken over by evil hackers and are being used to send out spam 24/7. All of them.

      Of course the fact that he spends thousands of hours per year trying to figure out why Linux won't boot or why X won't display a font correctly or why [application] won't run because it has 70 interlinked dependencies that require 6 hours of apt-get or whatever is completely besides the point. That's "the fun" of Linux. That's why it's "superior" and "completely secure" - nevermind it has proven to be as secure as Windows to being with. Which is not really saying a lot.

      Your post is a good example of how things are in the real world. But he lives in another dimension, and he only sees what he wants. Kinda like... a zealot.

  81. this isn't a book review by LordSah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's a rant against Microsoft. I'd suggest criticizing the book from the context in which it was written.

  82. Dear Sysadmin by Letter · · Score: 0
    Dear Sysadmin,

    Would you please come and put me back on the desk?

    Much thanks,
    Your PC

  83. Assuming Cancel Stupidity by ivanmarsh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    By far the most annoying and ridiculous thing in Windows (and it's STILL in W2k and AFAIK XP) is when you do a large file operation, like moving or deleting a large group of files, it gives you an error because one of the files is locked or something and when you hit OK it stops.

    I still want all the other files that aren't locked to move. What idiot thought that up?

  84. Pop-up's by CjKing2k · · Score: 1

    I've seen pop-up blockers in just about every shape and form, whether it comes from ISP software or a third party (like the kinds you see advertised in banners). My favorite pop-up blocker is Mozilla, but I know it will be a very long time until everyone else I know catches on. What's even more sad is how many self-proclaimed *nix "fans" I see using Internet Explorer.

  85. Problem with "get a job" by tepples · · Score: 1

    I am afraid to move out of my parent's basement, get a job

    Do you know anybody hiring programmers in Fort Wayne, Indiana? The web sites I checked sure don't.

  86. Do what I did to My 82 YO Mom by unix+guy · · Score: 1
    Remove the hard drive from an old PC. then build a Linux install on CD - configure it to dial her ISP, get her an account on www.mybookmarks.com and write "This Side Up" on the CD.

    It boots, she can do whatever she wants, but she can't effect any local settings.

    The only trouble we ever had is why it says "This Side Up" on the CDs - I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out what she did...

    --
    "Straddling the sword of technology..."
  87. Re:Who mods this shit up? by TGK · · Score: 1

    No, His mods are infalable.

    --
    Killfile(TGK)
    No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  88. Linux annoyances. by claes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    O'Reilly has a book about Linux annoyances as well. However, they named it Linux Server Hacks

  89. Home theater pc... Knoppmyth. by dameron · · Score: 2, Informative
    Also, some of us like playing video games, or having a home theatre PC, both of which are a giant pain/impossible on Linux.

    Can you spell your name and remember a password? If so you can install Knoppmyth, a fully installable Knoppix(debian) distro with mythtv. Knoppmyth is a pvr, has tv with a guide to your local cable/sat provider, weather, news, a dvd playing, an mp3 player (and indexing, by group and album, with visualizations), cd ripper with artist and title lookup, emulator frontend, and vcd player.

    -dameron

  90. actually by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

    in those 10 years I've been through most distros, currently running RH9 and I =still= wouldn't give it to somebody not extremely computer literate.

    The word document is valid if you want to work with your coworkers, the web argument is valid if your bank happens to target only IE (my bank did that for a while then FINALLY they tested their site with NS7 so it works fine in Galeon). The management/config is valid, as despite having RH9 I still have problems with KDE 'forgetting' that I want certain windows to be sticky etc. etc. not to mention that in order to force it to work with my custom .Xmodmap I had to edit the XSession startup script.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  91. Somebody this man a beer! by Zorkerman · · Score: 0

    (and the fact that I'm rather broke these days)
    When you're broke like myself, those $50 printer cartridges add up fast!
    (not to mention being too damn cheap to get a DSL line)


    Well my heart burns for you buddy. If you were in Austin I'd buy you a beer for the entertainment value of you review. In fact I know a quixstar/amway guy that I met a b&n who'd love to help you make a couple bucks, but that'd just be if you bought the $8 dollar bottle. hehe

  92. Google searches by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Yes, whenever I have a Windows problem and do a Google search, I find dozens, maybe hundreds of posts with the same problem, with most in English.

    What I don't find are solutions.

  93. Unintential FUD by repetty · · Score: 1

    "I realize there are those who loathe Windows ("Linux rools d00d!") and point to the chapter on Windows annoyances as an example of an OS gone terribly wrong. However, until the day comes that everyone uses Linux (or finds a way around Billy Boy's "evil empire"), we're stuck with it."

    Indroctrination can be insideous... even well meaning people become, unintentionally, part of the problem.

    The quoted statement above is just FUD.

    Question: Why are you stuck with Windows if so many other people using it? I'm not. I know a lot of people who aren't.

    Now I'll click on the "Submit" button in my Mozilla web browser which is running in Mac OS X so that I can submit this post across the non-Microsoft owned Internet so that it can be viewed by patrons who are viewing Slashdot, which is powered by Perl, via Apache server.

    Yeah, now we all have to use Microsoft.

  94. XP? by Bad+Ad · · Score: 1

    am i the only one that finds XP to be the worse MS OS yet? windows 2000 is cleary the best, its stable (as can be) and doesnt require 2x the resources just to run the OS which leaves more for apps/games....

    1. Re:XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

  95. All annoyances pale compared to Customer "Service" by K8Fan · · Score: 1

    I've spent the ENTIRE DAY on the telephone trying to get HP to service my laptop. Calls back and forth to HP's various telephone numbers - all of which lead me speak to unfailingly polite, but utterly clueless, people in Bangalore, India.

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  96. Sample chapter by darkpurpleblob · · Score: 1

    A sample chapter from the book, Email is available in PDF format from O'Reilly.

  97. Book Reviews... by sfe_software · · Score: 2

    Not to complain (a phrase that is always followed by a complaint), but... this has to be one of the worse book reviews I've read in a while (even on Slashdot). Many of the comments were unnecessary, and it seemed to really just be an excuse to bash Microsoft. I'm not sure the Slashdot audience is the best audience to pitch this book to, either, though I'm sure many will find it quite useful.

    I just had to comment about the review itself. The reviewer gives a couple of specific examples from the book. And his own comments, like:

    MS Office ... ah yes, Office. What would we ever do without it? What can we do with it?
    Windows Explorer ... ah yes, Windows Explorer. Not bad, but it could be better.

    And sentances like:

    Of course, one could point out if previous versions of Windows had been created "right" or "ran correctly," there wouldn't be need for a whole chapter (or even reams of books) on Microsoft fixes or how to get it to run properly.

    (emphasis mine)

    There's not much of a teaser or compelling "cliff hanger" to make one want to go buy this book. I suspect /. only posted it in hopes of getting people to use the affiliate link...

    About the book itself, aside from the one chapter about hardware issues, it seems to be yet another Windows (and Windows software) annoyances book, though if you're targetting the mainstream I suppose PC == Windows. It just doesn't sound much like an O'Reilly title, though...

    --
    NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
  98. My PC Annoyance? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    People who confuse the term PC with Windows.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  99. Remove Clippy? by ajiva · · Score: 1

    Why are people always talking about removing Clippy? I never install him in the first place! There is an option called "Office Asstaint" (or something to that affect). Just uncheck that when installing and Clippy never existed!

  100. Delete index.dat by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    I am but a lowly Windows 2000 user and know not of the intricacies of the magic of programs, so please forgive me. What is index.dat and why can't it be deleted without buying some software that claims to do so?

  101. Change Linux resolution in REALTIME!!! by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    OMG. The parent poster is heralding the arrival of X windows's newest feature: changing resolution instantly.

    It's ironic how today Microsoft declares Win98 EOL'd (which had instant res. changing) and we have this new feature everyone is so excited about.

    1. Re:Change Linux resolution in REALTIME!!! by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      What's ironic is that all us Windows users are practically required to buy and run a 3rd party virus scanner at all times, because MS still can't figure out how secure the OS.

      How long has *nix had this feature now?

  102. Glurge by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    ...'inspiriational', totally-irrational Christian-themed stories...

    Glurge

  103. tainted. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll
    You're absolutely right. Sorry for trying to deceive you. My other username, BillGates, just gets flamed way too often.

    Microsoft is a dishonest company that pays people to lie on their behalf. When you say XP is stable and not buggy, you are either decieved or paid to say that. When you are dishonest, you bring down even your honest advocates, tough luck. When you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas. When you tie your system down with Microsoft, you get popups and all manner of buggy anoyances. My little brother keeps one of those nasty little boxes. He's good, but it sucks time and life. Good for you if you managed to weather the Slammer storm and all the other nasties that have jammed the web for the last 2 years thanks to XP.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:tainted. by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      ...popups and all manner of buggy annoyances... Slammer storm and other nasties that have jammed the web for the past 2 years thanks to XP...

      Are you kidding? Killing popups is as easy as selecting an option in Opera. Messenger popups are a simple registry hack. Avoiding slammer is as easy as turning off HTML e-mail and keeping your system up to date.

      These are not ridiculously difficult hacks. I *wish* MS paid me cash to push their products. Seriously, you need to start taking your meds and lay off the FUD.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    2. Re:tainted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft is a dishonest company that pays people to lie on their behalf. When you say XP is stable and not buggy, you are either decieved or paid to say that

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!1!!!

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!!!!!!!!

      HAHAHAH!!!!!

      *wipes tears*

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!1!!!

      You kill me twit, you really, really do!

      BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

    3. Re:tainted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft is a dishonest company that pays people to lie on their behalf. When you say XP is stable and not buggy, you are either decieved or paid to say that.

      Oh wow, I didn't know RMS had a kid.

  104. Clippy by ElliotLee · · Score: 1
    Among other tips, the author describes ways of ... getting rid of Clippy

    I don't want to just get rid of him... I want REVENGE!

  105. Mozilla omission is a PC Annoyances DEFECT by TropicalHotDogNight · · Score: 1

    The book never mentions Mozilla as a MUCH better and SAFER browser than any version of Internet Exploder. And the list of links for downloads also omits any mention of Mozilla. Now THAT is annoying. ANY book about annoyances in Windoze that doesn't even mention Mozilla is annoying.
    Better book: SuSE Linux documentation that comes with SuSE Linux, with CDs, more software than can be listed, & ready to install on a Windoze PC (making it a dual boot PC), so you can use a stable & secure PC & avoid the annoyance of having to use Windoze. The SuSE distribution of Linux has the best printed documentation there is in Linux land.

    "PC Annoyances" has one great feature: it shows how much better to just use Linux (or Mac OS X). Otherwise, it's mainly a plug for PC World (all the links go there also). I'm sick of that magazine. CPU magazine (Computer Power User) has a page by CmdrTaco (Slashdot creator) and another called Open Sauce in every issue.

    "It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the truth and expose lies."
    "If the Nuremberg laws were applied today, then every Post-War American president would have to be hanged." --MIT Professor Noam Chomsky

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -MIT Ling
  106. and winner of biggest annoyance in PCs is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IRQs and generally the entire archaic PCI interface.Comming in at a close second is the Troll(much like me you pink motherfuckers)...

  107. Author's lack of insight... by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1
    Of course, one could point out if previous versions of Windows had been created "right" or "ran correctly," there wouldn't be need for a whole chapter (or even reams of books) on Microsoft fixes or how to get it to run properly.
    This can be said of just about anything, even things that are not software. If cars were manufactured to be perfect the first time, then there would be no reason to get a new car after 80 years. Things change, new and better designs are made. It's just the way things are.

    As far as Clippy.... right click on clippy, then click hide. I can't believe so many people are so annoyed by it, yet fail to see the obvious. This is an MS product after all, not something on the Mac. Think like someone who's got more than one button by default.

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  108. No to All by Nailer · · Score: 1

    That reminds me of something else.

    Almost every dialog that has `no, yes, yes to all' option needs a `no to all' option.

    I've never seen one, but I've needed it a stack of times.

    1. Re:No to All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac OS X's file manager has dialogs like that. "Don't Replace," "Stop," and "Replace" as buttons, and "Apply to all" as a checkbox.

    2. Re:No to All by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's another one that's pure idiocy.
      I can remember times when I've had to press "NO" hundreds of times. Very useful.

  109. How to get rid of the search assistant: by gblues · · Score: 1

    Here is a way to get the Windows 2000 search screen in Windows XP.

    You're welcome. :)

    Nathan

    1. Re:How to get rid of the search assistant: by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I find it kind of funny how that website is so horribly broken outside of IE.

  110. modem? by trifster · · Score: 1

    whats that? you review a book and willingly addmit to not having broadband? there goes this reviewers credibility... jk

  111. Let's face it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Human engineering is a whore to money, thus our technology is not formed of "tools" but "products."

  112. Ok I'll bite by Bugmaster · · Score: 1
    being able to enjoy those cute "I love you" and "Anna Kurovina" messages automatically forwarded from your best friends, co-workers, and total strangers.
    The only way to stop those messages from being forwarded to you is to have no friends. Hmmm... Linux users... no friends... Hmmm. Anyway, if you actually want to block spam, you can use PopFile, which works just fine on Windows and Linux.
    The ability to browse every site online, at least every one selling X10 cameras and pictures you wouldn't want your boss to see.
    Unless your Linux distro automatically disables all Internet popups (mine did: it could not detect my network card), you'll be seeing them everywhere just like everyone else. The solution is to use Mozilla or Opera, which -- as you well know -- work just fine on Windows. Actually, the Windows version of Mozilla works better, because it can actually use fonts like they were meant to be used.
    Software so advanced it installs automatically while you browse, no user intervention required. Uninstalling is as simple as wiping your main partition and re-installing Windows.
    ...Which is still a lot easier than installing Linux even once so that it works as well as a Windows system does (xconfig... xconfig... xconfig... screw it). But, in general, nothing will save you from your own stupidity. Telnet, finger, unsecured apache running as root, buggy OpenSSH... Ah the wonders.
    Enjoy desktop environments where settings are spread around 3 different menus...
    I'm honestly not sure what you mean by that. Try changing the screen resolution/color depth/refresh rate in Linux sometime, let's see how many menus (read: config files) you'll have to go through. And I'm not even talking about the joys of having Gnome/KDE/Qt/XYZ all on the same system. Dual-booting Win98 is fun compared to that.
    A wide swath of available content, all provided to your trusted platform ensuring that your purchased programs will run forever... Until you lose the disk, upgrade your system, ban the program from spying on your browsing habits, or the producer decides to turn the software off remotely.
    This is a feature of giant software monopolies, not a feature of the OS. Personally, I don't use any of this software; Photoshop 6 is just dandy for me. Besides, you can download the open-source versions of all this stuff for Windows (OpenOffice, emacs, etc.), and they run better than the Linux versions. You can copy/paste between them all, for one thing.
    Linux is no longer hard. Once you have a modern Debian, Red Hat, or Mandrake installed, everything runs easy-peasy.
    Yeah, and once you build a base on Mars, going from there to Jupiter is easy too. The problem is getting there in the first place, across the interstellar void. Oh, and of course, you'd better not upgrade any of your hardware, or, if you do, prepare to face the consequences. You'll be lucky if some bootleg driver for your graphics card even exists at all.

    Can Linux be used as a desktop system ? Absolutely -- provided that it's used for a fixed and limited number of tasks, and that a Linux guru is available on hand to maintain it. Will Linux be ready for the mainstream ? Perhaps, but that seems a long time in the future.

    --
    >|<*:=
  113. File format incompatibility common on any platform by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    - not being able to open that complex word attachment that your coworker mailed you
    You get this anyway between different versions of MS Word. Not every department is guaranteed to run the same version of the same word processor, nor are your "coworkers" guaranteed to be in the same department or even the same company or organization. So you're still looking at loss of data, especially metadata, and formatting.

    Let's say for the sake of argument that you're all in the same department and running the same version of MS-Word. Wait 3 years and you've likely gone through at least two different versions of MS-Word and your older documents are not in the new file format. So you're still looking at loss of data, especially metadata, and formatting.

    This is a long standing PC annonance and is starting to cost. Therefore many government agencies, businesses and institutions are looking at the OASIS format, which being open would reduce the rate at which it becomes obsolete. The Kingdom of Denmark is even taking the issue so seriously that there is consideration of an additional open format.

    Personally, I figured out that most of my PC annoyances were really MS annoyances and things have been much simplified by using better products even if they are free (Linux, KDE, OOo, Mozilla) or not free (OS X, Opera).

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  114. Harddisk wipe = tactic to block competing software by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    Uninstalling is as simple as wiping your main partition and re-installing Windows.
    Were it that simple. Third party apps cannot be reinstalled that way, they get removed again and again. Eventually the maintenance staff get tired or run out of time to reinstall them and you're left with the cruft.

    I'm dissapointed that the EU anti-trust activities have not yet taken this tactic into account.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  115. No stable sort in Explorer! by Eigenray · · Score: 1

    One of the things that's always just really bugged me is that when you sort files in an explorer window by name, type, size, etc, it never does a stable sort. It tries to be helpful by, if you sort by type, listing all files of the same type in order by filename, but that's not what I freaking want!

    Try to find, say, the largest txt file in a directory. Well, I'll just sort by size, then by type, right? WRONG! WTF is wrong with a stable sort?

    A related thing is that it's impossible to sort by extension. It's pretty common for all image files to have the same "Type" (e.g., "Irfanview"), which makes it a real pain in the ass if you've just done a conversion and want to select JUST .jpg files, because sorting them by type mixes all image files together, and sorts them by filename.

    I think a real useful program could just crawl through all your file associtaions and make it so .foo files are just called "FOO" files. That would also solve the problem of having to look under "W" for mp3s, asfs, and rars, etc, which should be under, oh, I don't know, maybe M, A, and R?!?

  116. A computer? For games? by autechre · · Score: 1

    I play video games. Right now, a huge amount of my life is being sucked away by a great game called Disgaea. If you like games like Final Fantasy Tactics or Shining Force, you should immediatly buy this game.

    But wait, it's not for the PC, it's for the Playstation 2. A piece of hardware which is smaller than and costs less than any PC, even the incredibly crappy ones. It doesn't need to be upgraded, runs basically silently, and has a MASSIVE library of great games. No crashing, no driver incompatibilities.

    I love games, and I run Linux on the desktop. For me, it's a case of the right tool for the right job.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  117. Niche markets by autechre · · Score: 1

    Where I work, we have building automation software which is only available for NT variants. Same deal with the software that controls our central plant, and the software that controls paint mixes for the paint shop. We're looking into facilities management software, and the one that does what we want, Maximus, will require 3 Windows servers (though we can use what we want for the client).

    People not working in a traditional office WILL have that one weird piece of software that only runs on Windows. Half the time it's expensive and sucks, but you have no choice because no one is working on an alternative. OSS programmers don't tend to also be steamfitters.

    Sure, I want to change this as much as possible, but it's a tall order. At least open source GIS stuff is being tackled.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  118. Why is this book titled "PC Annoyances"? by doom · · Score: 1

    Why is this book titled "PC Annoyances"? If it were called "Windows XP Annoyances" I would have known that I didn't want to bother reading the review. "PC Annoyances" makes it sound like a hardware book that I might have some interest in.

  119. MOD PARENT UP by ssstraub · · Score: 1

    +1 funny please :)

  120. Obligatory clippy movie link by mehgul · · Score: 1
  121. Recursive humor by fm6 · · Score: 1
    the name means Wine is not a emulator, go figure.
    The computer language culture at MIT is based on functional languages instead of the procedural languages most of us rely on. In really serious function programming, you use recursion a lot, even for iteration. So of course MIT people love recursive acronyms, like "GNU's not Unix!" And of course, this bunch sort of culturally dominate the whole Free Software movement, since the whole thing basically started at the MIT AI lab.

    The first time I saw a recursive acronym ("MUNG Until No Good") I thought it was very funny. But that was 20 years ago, and the joke's beginning to get stale.

  122. You're the oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Gay Nigger Association of America (GNAA) is the group that represents the world's Gay Nigger population as well as those non gay, non nigger patrons that support it. Its mission is to foster a gay and free-loving climate that supports and promotes our members' creative and financial vitality. Its members are the gay niggers that comprise the most vibrant national gay nigger conglomerate in the world. GNAA members create, manufacture and/or distribute approximately 90% of all legitimate pro-homosexual propaganda and blue, rubber dicks produced and sold in the United States.

    We strongly urge you to join the GNAA and support our cause. Gay Niggers everywhere need your help!

    BE NIGGER!

    BE GAY!

    JOIN THE GNAA!!

    Join #GNAA on the EFNet IRC Network today! (irc.secsup.org, irc.easynews.com, irc.servercentral.net)

    ________________________________________________
    | ______________________________________._a,____ |
    | _______a_._______a_______aj#0s_____aWY!400.___ |
    | __ad#7!!*P____a.d#0a____#!-_#0i___.#!__W#0#___ |
    | _j#'_.00#,___4#dP_"#,__j#,__0#Wi___*00P!_"#L,_ |
    | _"#ga#9!01___"#01__40,_"4Lj#!_4#g_________"01_ |
    | ________"#,___*@`__-N#____`___-!^_____________ |
    | _________#1__________?________________________ |
    | _________j1___________________________________ |
    | ____a,___jk_ GAY_NIGGER_ASSOCIATION_OF_AMERICA_|
    | ____!4yaa#l___________________________________ |
    | ______-"!^____________________________________ |
    ` _______________________________________________'
    -posted by GNAA member Penisbird