In a previous message, there was a reference to the logo, npw it is red book compliance. not the same thing. So I repeat: show me a valid cd that is copy protected. (double toc is not really copy protection, as one can bypass it with a little adhesive on the disk) And I was starting my previous comment by:
don't know where you live, but in some country,... so you don't know how to read. as for my laughable illiteracy, let speak about it when you use the second foreign langage you learned (added to your mother tongue) to have a coherent conversation with someone I don't know if I must consider as a troll, or as s RIAA spin doctor.
don't know where you live, but in some country, they are laws protecting consumer again deception. If it is marketed like a standard cd, in sale where standard cd are, the "not specially attentive consumer" tricked in buying it, believing it is the standard product(that is, the product he can play on his computer, in the car on the hifi, and everywhere else he want), is prodected.
... in P2P and open source, creating a gift economy, not with one monopolistic company wanting to extend an exchange economy*, no matter how good and benevolent they are. The world is for all to create.
* and during this time, GWB is trying to transform USoA in a command economy...
Face it, Ogg Vorbis is dead as disco. No, it isn't (disco neither, for that matter). Why I want ogg is because I have a lot of it allready encoded (far more than mp3) and I don't want to re-encode it (those are my CDs). Perhaps most people want mp3 because it is what is most used on kazaa and friends, but this reason is irrelevant for me. Now, saying I'm a statistic and ignoring me is in total contradiction with currents trends in marketing. They can, for a small cost, provide me with a solution using ogg, and make me and many others happy customers. But ogg support is only a small part of the question. What I deduce from their site is that geek are not a target for them at all, or else, my questions in the parent post would have been answered.
The Challenge is open only to US entities. This includes U.S. corporations, U.S. non-profit organizations, U.S. universities, U.S. citizens, sole proprietors that are U.S. citizens or permanent residents, and partnerships of U.S. citizens or permanent residents.
the moral right of the crator is about the only right left to the creator once he has a contract with a publisher.
What I said about Berne convention is: when I was young, it was death +25 , a few year later, death + 50, now death + 75 (and I'm not 50). All aspect being the same about the creator, I don't know who benefit except the publishing industry. The moral right of the creator is a little remnant of the fact that protection derive from creation, and so creator must have some compensation. What is the moral right? essentially three things: *no one except the creator can claim being the creator. *the creator can oppose usages of the work he consider does not repect the integrity of the work. ( this permit to have some films on tv without any advertising). Ok, this one is perhaps not good for the publishing industry. *the creator can retract one of his works , provided he pay the current owner of the (non moral) rights. Very costly to exerce.
You seem to display a bias toward the old US system, where someone has to pay in order to have protection (sound like mafia;). I live in the european one, and I'm fully in favor of automaticaly giving right to the creator. I'm completely against copyright extensions which are, if decided in Berne, decided not for the best interest of the public, but for the interest of the publishing industry. I don't speak about the creator, because in all cases(25,50,75 years), it is something that happen long after his death.
no, it is on of the problem that arise from the fact that the only representatives who created the Berne convention where members of (or influenced by) the publishing industry, and not of the public. If the public have been represented, extention would not have occured.
I think we need some breakthrough in technology. I've heard about some technic using a silver based substrat. The file is written in parallel, using some light encoding. Total writing of the file can take as little as 1/1000 second. Calculate the througput, it is very impressing. Compression is lossy, and it is more similar to cd-r than to cd-rw, and long term stability is not guaranted. But give it a few years, and I'm sure we will have a solution derived from this principle.
as long as you trust make, and take the time to verify configure, and you check all the programms called from here. Remember the article about the compiler who was specially adapted to introduce backdoor in login, which was not visible in the source of the compiler, cause the compiler added it to itself when it was self compiling?
It is stating under penalty of perjury that it has the authority to act on behalf of Joe Bob Copyright holder for preventing you to provide open office. It is an obvious lie.
from the mail: BSA represents that the information in this
notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is
authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed
above.
they (BSA) obviously played it very softly(apologies and thanks), cause they feel a little weak on this one.
Slashdot Mirror
...a beowulf cluster of dupes!
it must be a slow day
it had before:
create a plugin project, fire the wizard, choose xml editor, and you have one
just associate it with your xml files, and your done.
to conceal ... from any communication service provider ... the existence or place of origin or destination of any communication
...because France guaranteed a veto...
If us and british journalist made a little effort to learn french, and report correctly, you could not honestly write that.
and some english speaking people wonder why the rest of the world don't like them...
no need to reply, you troll.
In a previous message, there was a reference to the logo, npw it is red book compliance. not the same thing. So I repeat: show me a valid cd that is copy protected. (double toc is not really copy protection, as one can bypass it with a little adhesive on the disk)
And I was starting my previous comment by:
don't know where you live, but in some country,...
so you don't know how to read.
as for my laughable illiteracy, let speak about it when you use the second foreign langage you learned (added to your mother tongue) to have a coherent conversation with someone I don't know if I must consider as a troll, or as s RIAA spin doctor.
don't know where you live, but in some country, they are laws protecting consumer again deception.
If it is marketed like a standard cd, in sale where standard cd are, the "not specially attentive consumer" tricked in buying it, believing it is the standard product(that is, the product he can play on his computer, in the car on the hifi, and everywhere else he want), is prodected.
Show me a copy protected cd respecting fully the spec for compact disc as defined by phillips and sony, and you have perhaps an argument
... in P2P and open source, creating a gift economy,
not with one monopolistic company wanting to extend an exchange economy*, no matter how good and benevolent they are.
The world is for all to create.
* and during this time, GWB is trying to transform USoA in a command economy...
...on additionnal chargers that I'm sure they don't want this type of solution.
Or else, charger would have been compatible a long time ago.
Face it, Ogg Vorbis is dead as disco.
No, it isn't (disco neither, for that matter).
Why I want ogg is because I have a lot of it allready encoded (far more than mp3) and I don't want to re-encode it (those are my CDs).
Perhaps most people want mp3 because it is what is most used on kazaa and friends, but this reason is irrelevant for me.
Now, saying I'm a statistic and ignoring me is in total contradiction with currents trends in marketing. They can, for a small cost, provide me with a solution using ogg, and make me and many others happy customers.
But ogg support is only a small part of the question. What I deduce from their site is that geek are not a target for them at all, or else, my questions in the parent post would have been answered.
ogg?
wep?
pc link to a mac or a linux?
can we have more than one on a network?
any no is a show stopper for me.
3.1 Team Must Be U.S. Entity
The Challenge is open only to US entities. This includes U.S. corporations, U.S. non-profit organizations, U.S. universities, U.S. citizens, sole proprietors that are U.S. citizens or permanent residents, and partnerships of U.S. citizens or permanent residents.
the moral right of the crator is about the only right left to the creator once he has a contract with a publisher.
;). I live in the european one, and I'm fully in favor of automaticaly giving right to the creator. I'm completely against copyright extensions which are, if decided in Berne, decided not for the best interest of the public, but for the interest of the publishing industry. I don't speak about the creator, because in all cases(25,50,75 years), it is something that happen long after his death.
What I said about Berne convention is: when I was young, it was death +25 , a few year later, death + 50, now death + 75 (and I'm not 50).
All aspect being the same about the creator, I don't know who benefit except the publishing industry.
The moral right of the creator is a little remnant of the fact that protection derive from creation, and so creator must have some compensation.
What is the moral right? essentially three things:
*no one except the creator can claim being the creator.
*the creator can oppose usages of the work he consider does not repect the integrity of the work. ( this permit to have some films on tv without any advertising). Ok, this one is perhaps not good for the publishing industry.
*the creator can retract one of his works , provided he pay the current owner of the (non moral) rights. Very costly to exerce.
You seem to display a bias toward the old US system, where someone has to pay in order to have protection (sound like mafia
no, it is on of the problem that arise from the fact that the only representatives who created the Berne convention where members of (or influenced by) the publishing industry, and not of the public.
If the public have been represented, extention would not have occured.
I, for one, don't trust internationnal organizations. (Who elected them ? governments, money, NSA?)
why :
CALDERA SYSTEMS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation d/b/a THE SCO GROUP,
Plaintiff,
vs.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
take place in THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF SALT LAKE COUNTY
STATE OF UTAH
?
why not in Delaware?
I think we need some breakthrough in technology. I've heard about some technic using a silver based substrat. The file is written in parallel, using some light encoding. Total writing of the file can take as little as 1/1000 second. Calculate the througput, it is very impressing. Compression is lossy, and it is more similar to cd-r than to cd-rw, and long term stability is not guaranted. But give it a few years, and I'm sure we will have a solution derived from this principle.
but if the Library Of Congress continue initiatives to archive the net, even if all traffic is not new content, the unit is not constant.
yeh, I understand now what paladium and trusted computing is all about...
not so funny, MS "proved" in a law suit that internet explorer was to generic to be trademarked (by a small company not bougth by them)
as long as you trust make, and take the time to verify configure, and you check all the programms called from here.
Remember the article about the compiler who was specially adapted to introduce backdoor in login, which was not visible in the source of the compiler, cause the compiler added it to itself when it was self compiling?
yes, but the legalese of the bsa email seems (from memory) directly extracted from the dcma
It is stating under penalty of perjury that it has the authority to act on behalf of Joe Bob Copyright holder for preventing you to provide open office. It is an obvious lie.
not for defamation, for perjury:
:
from the mail
BSA represents that the information in this
notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is
authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed
above.
they (BSA) obviously played it very softly(apologies and thanks), cause they feel a little weak on this one.