you can't just point at the XP=$300, Linux=$0 as evidence that OSS is cheaper or has a higher ROI. It's just not as simple as that
Yes it is. Linux does in fact = $0. Microsoft just doesn't want you to see it that way, and they succeeded.
The government has to be able to support the software they use, and if they don't have a Linux support agreement then they'll have to pay additional staff to handle those duties
Instead of paying MS for support? What's the difference? Supporting Linux yourself for your needs could be a lot cheaper than MS supporting your business for you. Cut out the middle man.
Even if it visibly and audibly censors, there is no way to censor the theme of a movie. Many parents might turnthis on and let their kids watch whatever they want, and if it's a movie about drug dealers, or a horror movie, how is it really going to censor terror or plot or drugs?
Could SCO be accused of pulling a Bait & Switch? First SCO distributes Linux under the GPL, companies become dependant on it, and now they demand cash for Linux.
I don't think this helps anyone, because consumers will still want to share music. How about telling them what they ARE allowed to do, such as copying music for themselves or to have friends listen to under "fair use"?
Instead of giving customers a dead end and having them break through anyway, why not just point them to the correct avenue?
I *hate* systems that interrupt me in real time, which is why I use email instead of IMs. I've pretty much stopped answering my phone, too, because I can, and now I depend on my machine to queue up calls, so I can deal with them when it makes sense to do so.
You can do this with ICQ. ICQ luckily lets you send offline messages, so you can set yourself to invisible and still get messages when people think you're offline. Then you can respond to them as you see fit. You can also control who sees your REAL status and who doesn't, if you want that. That's what I've gotten used to doing.
I also don't answer the phone and share your concerns about being interrupted, however I can't dispense with IM, it is very handy and I would much rather use it than the phone.
I can talk to as many people as I choose, not having one monopolize my attention. I can also get up, do whatever I want, come back and continue the conversation without forcing someone else to hold on the other end. I can continue working on my projects, with IM becoming an almost automatic thing (especially with Miranda's easily customizable keyboard shortcuts). In the end, it's like using the phone (if I have to) except with a lot more freedom. Much better than a headset too, because you can have music blasting, the TV on, whatever you want.
But Mono is using properly documented information isn't it? Wine is reverse engineering. Developers will have more of a reason to support Linux on a platform that works as expected.
First PC had a 5.25" only, after that though the only thing that's been in pretty much all of my personal computers since I started has been my 3.5" Floppy drive.
I've got 5.25" drives, 300 baud & 2400 baud modems, etc, but I'm not using them. I just can't bear to throw them out:)
If Roland were to begin producing the MT-32 again, I would see absolutely no point to my emulator. However, since the MT-32 is now a rare commodity (due to so few working ones in existance), an emulator serves a purpose for those unable to obtain one.
But since an original MT-32 is required (for the ROM), how could this benefit those who are unable to obtain one?
I think this should be for those who are unable to use one in their PC (i.e. no ISA slots, or if they have a different PC under which it is not supported). Was it offered in PCI?
This is surely a result in hacks that have appeared over the years which depend on hard-coded properties where one change in Windows would break many apps. Microsoft was afraid to touch COMDLG32.DLL for the same reasons.
The new Windows interface is an even bigger leap over what XP's capabilities are, with 8X AGP and 256MB video RAM required to render 1024x768 with full detail! Has anyone paid attention to this yet? A PDF found on the internet describes this in detail but I cannot find it at the moment. Instead:
To use full function, the DirectX9 class GPU to necessarily
In order to use all functions of such Longhorn UI, the DirectX9 class GPU becomes necessary. But, at the time of Longhorn appearance of 2005 years is, and others, it is not the case that all PC have loaded the DirectX9 class GPU. Because of that, the Microsoft offers phased UI function to the Longhorn. They are 2 stages of the " Tier 1 Experience " and the " Tier 2 Experience ".
As for the Tier 1 Experience, BASIC of the Longhorn UI it is the mode which offers function. Windows XP like in the desktop, it becomes something which adds the function such as high DPI scaling and the semi- transmitted window. The picture of the demonstration which has been introduced in this report seems that basically this Tier 1 suitable function is center.
" The Graphically stunning UI (the graphically splendid UI)" it designates the Tier 2 Experience, as the base vis-a-vis that. At present point in time, you do not know yet whether this, it becomes some contents.
In addition, these other things, also the UI of the " Windows 2000 compatibility mode " is prepared in the Longhorn.
So really in the Longhorn UI some GPU being necessary? Basic required environment becomes like under. Lowest being, DirectX7 class, to use the true UI of the Longhorn, DirectX9 class becomes necessary.
http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2003/0509/kaiga i01.htm
It's gotta be great to have a custom platform built to work with Linux. No more hardware or software compatibility issues.
I wonder what hardware will be available?
Perhaps you should try an FPS that was developed with the console in mind. TimeSplitters is a good example, and the sequel will be out across all platforms, so everyone can check it out. Make sure to buy a multitap if you're getting the PS2 version. There's even a level editor, so it may well keep you as busy as any PC FPS.
Here's a review of TimeSplitters, and some news bits on TimeSplitters 2.
It's reporting the facts. If you saw that piece of news without the "Kodak" bit of information, you'd probably be pissed that you had to check the story just to see that. Then again, maybe it's a good idea to make users read the story...:P
Has anyone noticed that the latest versions of these applications take up more RAM than even Mozilla*?
Luckily, there is now an official ICQ Lite client which will hopefully start a trend. Personally, I still like Miranda (Start a Linux port anyone? It's open source).
*I'm using this as an example because unlike IE, it doesn't have system tie-ins and is an application we are all familiar with on every OS.
Slashdot Mirror
Didn't realize they were synonymous.
ICQ has got to be the guiltiest of all. I don't think there was ever a final version!
Yes it is. Linux does in fact = $0. Microsoft just doesn't want you to see it that way, and they succeeded.
The government has to be able to support the software they use, and if they don't have a Linux support agreement then they'll have to pay additional staff to handle those duties
Instead of paying MS for support? What's the difference? Supporting Linux yourself for your needs could be a lot cheaper than MS supporting your business for you. Cut out the middle man.
Even if it visibly and audibly censors, there is no way to censor the theme of a movie. Many parents might turnthis on and let their kids watch whatever they want, and if it's a movie about drug dealers, or a horror movie, how is it really going to censor terror or plot or drugs?
It's called TV (during reality shows at least)
A very well-featured bootable OS.
Well, that's always the first thing I look for!
Could SCO be accused of pulling a Bait & Switch? First SCO distributes Linux under the GPL, companies become dependant on it, and now they demand cash for Linux.
I don't think this helps anyone, because consumers will still want to share music. How about telling them what they ARE allowed to do, such as copying music for themselves or to have friends listen to under "fair use"? Instead of giving customers a dead end and having them break through anyway, why not just point them to the correct avenue?
You can do this with ICQ. ICQ luckily lets you send offline messages, so you can set yourself to invisible and still get messages when people think you're offline. Then you can respond to them as you see fit. You can also control who sees your REAL status and who doesn't, if you want that. That's what I've gotten used to doing.
I also don't answer the phone and share your concerns about being interrupted, however I can't dispense with IM, it is very handy and I would much rather use it than the phone.
I can talk to as many people as I choose, not having one monopolize my attention. I can also get up, do whatever I want, come back and continue the conversation without forcing someone else to hold on the other end. I can continue working on my projects, with IM becoming an almost automatic thing (especially with Miranda's easily customizable keyboard shortcuts). In the end, it's like using the phone (if I have to) except with a lot more freedom. Much better than a headset too, because you can have music blasting, the TV on, whatever you want.
Didn't MS just set up a lab to do research on Linux? That would give them an excuse to purchase licenses from SCO.
After this be sure to check out Ace's Hardware
But Mono is using properly documented information isn't it? Wine is reverse engineering. Developers will have more of a reason to support Linux on a platform that works as expected.
I've got 5.25" drives, 300 baud & 2400 baud modems, etc, but I'm not using them. I just can't bear to throw them out :)
If Roland were to begin producing the MT-32 again, I would see absolutely no point to my emulator. However, since the MT-32 is now a rare commodity (due to so few working ones in existance), an emulator serves a purpose for those unable to obtain one. But since an original MT-32 is required (for the ROM), how could this benefit those who are unable to obtain one? I think this should be for those who are unable to use one in their PC (i.e. no ISA slots, or if they have a different PC under which it is not supported). Was it offered in PCI?
It's gotta be great to have a custom platform built to work with Linux. No more hardware or software compatibility issues. I wonder what hardware will be available?
I don't believe it.
It isn't Baseball that's the American sport?
Go with the reverse mowhawk (a la Prodigy) for a hip young look and no-one will be the wiser...
Here's a review of TimeSplitters, and some news bits on TimeSplitters 2.
It's reporting the facts. If you saw that piece of news without the "Kodak" bit of information, you'd probably be pissed that you had to check the story just to see that. Then again, maybe it's a good idea to make users read the story... :P
If I put up such a sign at my house, can I sue telemarketers?
Followed by playing with your palm back at your place!
Luckily, there is now an official ICQ Lite client which will hopefully start a trend. Personally, I still like Miranda (Start a Linux port anyone? It's open source).
*I'm using this as an example because unlike IE, it doesn't have system tie-ins and is an application we are all familiar with on every OS.
I thought Splashdown on the PS2 was the first under the Atari label?