I am not sure it is a good news. When hiring, a huge time is spent filtering out opportunist candidates whose profile does not match the position. Easier finding by hardly interested Google users will probably not help.
For what they propose to happen, trading AI will need to understand it fights other AI. Understanding their mindsets means understanding self mindset. Will that lead to self-conscious AI?
I understand the biggest problem with human right violations is not to display them on screen, but to investigate them. If investigation is weak, the beautiful IT system will work in "garbage in, garbage out" mode
All EV will require a huge boost in electricity production. How will we do it? Since the easiest and fastest way to increase capacity is to burn coal, oil or gas, perhaps oil will not vanish that fast.
Scotland will forfeit any North Sea bonanza. Russia, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, and Venezuela will be in trouble.
Russia has a more diversified economy than the others and may be able to handle the change. Venezuela is already in trouble.
Tidal energy has pretty much been universally abandoned as a waste of time.
Scotland produces 7,5 GW from Tidal power, and 14 GW from wave power. That is far from being a waste of time, especially given the all-time availability of these renewable energies.
the Académie Française has been around for hundreds of years fairly successfully for the purpose of prescriptively defining French language
I disagree a bit. Most of the time, the Académie Française sets up an official french translation for a foreign word way too late: many people already adopted the foreign word and they will not change their habits.
Right, foreign hackers miss their target, but french banking establishment managed to get its candidate elected. This is foreign operation beaten by local influence.
Google already have a Magenta AI project. Is it wise to reuse the same name for something else? We already had the problem with the Go language (well, in that case at least it was "Go!" vs "Go")
The only missing number is non registered citizens. You get it from France national statistics agency (INSEEE). On march 1st 2017, you had 45.678 million registered voters, and you get the number of 61.621 million nationals from 2014 census. Then you still have to dig statistics to find the number of citizen (people of more than 18 years old and that were not deprived from their civil rights) and get the number of 9%.
An alternative explanation is that government bonds are the only reliable investment on the market, hence the high demand for them when economy is depressed. And EU economies still struggle to recover from 2008 crisis.
As Le Pen will not and cannot deliver on her promises (just look at what Trump does), she is the worst worst for the working poor as wel
Well, that may even sound for some voters as a point favorable to Le Pen: Many would prefer a president that does nothing rather than Emmanuel Macron doing what he promised.
Another issue at work is that despite his low score on first round, Macron said he would consider votes for him on second round as support for his project, which include a blitz krieg against labor laws. That drives many poor workers toward Le Pen.
That psyop will not save France from Macron's presidency, unfortunately. Most of his vote will come from its own opponents that feat Le Pen even more than him.
That odd situation happens because only 34% of citizen did cast a vote for Macron or Le Pen during election's first round.
Could you please have an icon other than the EU flag for France related news? Especially to cover a national election where some voters/candidates reject EU.
The problem is that the worst is different depending of who you speak to. For instance, Emmanuel Macron is the worst for many working poors that have already being victims of his laws during Francois Hollande presidency. For slightly wealthier people, Marine Le Pen is the worst because she is a fascist.
You are a bit quick at pointing fingers to voters. The french presidential election is very badly designed. Here the two finalists gathered 45% of votes, and if you count citizen that did not vote, it falls to 34%.
Slashdot Mirror
I am not sure it is a good news. When hiring, a huge time is spent filtering out opportunist candidates whose profile does not match the position. Easier finding by hardly interested Google users will probably not help.
After the Go! and Go programming languages, the Go project. I know there is Go in Google, but come on, it is not that hard to find new names!
For what they propose to happen, trading AI will need to understand it fights other AI. Understanding their mindsets means understanding self mindset. Will that lead to self-conscious AI?
I understand the biggest problem with human right violations is not to display them on screen, but to investigate them. If investigation is weak, the beautiful IT system will work in "garbage in, garbage out" mode
All EV will require a huge boost in electricity production. How will we do it? Since the easiest and fastest way to increase capacity is to burn coal, oil or gas, perhaps oil will not vanish that fast.
Scotland will forfeit any North Sea bonanza. Russia, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, and Venezuela will be in trouble.
Russia has a more diversified economy than the others and may be able to handle the change. Venezuela is already in trouble.
It is capital that drives the place where talent resides, not morons like Macron.
But climate research is a non profitable activity, hence no capitalist is going to invest on it.
Tidal energy has pretty much been universally abandoned as a waste of time.
Scotland produces 7,5 GW from Tidal power, and 14 GW from wave power. That is far from being a waste of time, especially given the all-time availability of these renewable energies.
Yes you pay more in taxes and you get more from society like affordable healthcare and education.
And for entrepreneurs, this means healthy and well-educated workers, which is a requirement to be productive.
I understand it sends sound data to IBM and get the result. How usable is it, considering introduced network latency?
the Académie Française has been around for hundreds of years fairly successfully for the purpose of prescriptively defining French language
I disagree a bit. Most of the time, the Académie Française sets up an official french translation for a foreign word way too late: many people already adopted the foreign word and they will not change their habits.
Right, foreign hackers miss their target, but french banking establishment managed to get its candidate elected. This is foreign operation beaten by local influence.
This is a stupid move from US, with its world-dominating software industry. Following the same logic, most countries in the world should ban Windows.
I cannot wait to see AI fights, with multiple AI adjusting tactics to each others. Will price converge? Oscillate around equilibrium? Diverge?
Google already have a Magenta AI project. Is it wise to reuse the same name for something else? We already had the problem with the Go language (well, in that case at least it was "Go!" vs "Go")
Here you are: results from France interior minister which is in charge of organizing elections at the national level.
The only missing number is non registered citizens. You get it from France national statistics agency (INSEEE). On march 1st 2017, you had 45.678 million registered voters, and you get the number of 61.621 million nationals from 2014 census. Then you still have to dig statistics to find the number of citizen (people of more than 18 years old and that were not deprived from their civil rights) and get the number of 9%.
Here are the results with abstention and protest vote
An alternative explanation is that government bonds are the only reliable investment on the market, hence the high demand for them when economy is depressed. And EU economies still struggle to recover from 2008 crisis.
As Le Pen will not and cannot deliver on her promises (just look at what Trump does), she is the worst worst for the working poor as wel
Well, that may even sound for some voters as a point favorable to Le Pen: Many would prefer a president that does nothing rather than Emmanuel Macron doing what he promised.
Western EU countries like France or Germany get loan with negative interests. Austerity makes no sense here.
Yes, election system could be even worse.
Another issue at work is that despite his low score on first round, Macron said he would consider votes for him on second round as support for his project, which include a blitz krieg against labor laws. That drives many poor workers toward Le Pen.
Who gains the most from dividing the EU?
People from EU nations would gain by weakening the EU bureaucracy that enforces austerity on them.
With many institutions moving to MS and Google cloud mail service, it seems we head toward a dangerous monoculture, or duoculture, at least.
That psyop will not save France from Macron's presidency, unfortunately. Most of his vote will come from its own opponents that feat Le Pen even more than him.
That odd situation happens because only 34% of citizen did cast a vote for Macron or Le Pen during election's first round.
Dear Slashdot,
Could you please have an icon other than the EU flag for France related news? Especially to cover a national election where some voters/candidates reject EU.
The problem is that the worst is different depending of who you speak to. For instance, Emmanuel Macron is the worst for many working poors that have already being victims of his laws during Francois Hollande presidency. For slightly wealthier people, Marine Le Pen is the worst because she is a fascist.
You are a bit quick at pointing fingers to voters. The french presidential election is very badly designed. Here the two finalists gathered 45% of votes, and if you count citizen that did not vote, it falls to 34%.