Apparently too many. Now over 40 minutes after your post, and 5 minutes after I clicked on the link,
I'm still waiting. Previewing now, still waiting.
Another minute, it finished. At least it didn't
drop any packets.
The stats from the article indicate not overloaded.
Therefore, they must have slow bandwidth.
we must disclose to the CFO any relative that works for a customer, competitor or vendor;
For starters, it's none of the companies business
whom your relatives work for. Second, it is vague
as almost *any* company could be considered to
potentially have *some* business relationship with
your company, especially if you are bug (for example Microsoft). Third, are you personally supposed
to keep track of your relatives and their job
changes?
Finally, in this effort to prevent
kickbacks and other shenanigans, the CFO is the
person to be informed? Why the CFO, why not HR?
And who is watching the CFO?
1. Don't worry about the kernel, it's pretty tight
already. Definitely compile it for your proper platform, but I would not waste time on additional tweaks.
2. Do re-compile your C library however. Most of
your applications spend a lot of their time
executing code from the C library.
It is a band-aid if few people use it.
However, if enough people (and ISPs) use it,
then the effectiveness of spam will
be reduced, possibly to the point that many
of the spammers give up. It's too soon to
dismiss a possible solution.
You're almost almost definitely incorrect.
I mean, you're almost almost psychic if you
can determine his speaking ability from
his writing! And I'm not guessing.;~)
LOL. I caught your drift. I could not
help but envision a Monty Python skit with
your Microsoft Lawyer as prosecutor, judge, and jury on this case. A true farce just as Jon is
enduring now.
Seriously, Microsoft is making a big mistake
by over-reacting and fighting the world.
They (Microsoft) would be much better off
if they just STFU, fixed their bugs (if possible),
opened up and inter-operated, and were just happy with their market share
they already have.
You're spot on. This sentence caught my eye immediately:
Techies and customers almost always speak a completely different language and likely the specs were written by a tech person who doesn't quite comprehend the customer's workflow, or sometimes even worse, by the customer himself, trying to 'speak tech' without having the technical background.
The key section is bolded. I thought B.S.!
My experience was a NON-technical
salesperson driving the requirements
because they flat out LIE to the customer
to get the sale.
Can you really trust 10-best-web-site-and-domain-hosting-services?
I mean, really, a site that still has
a Y2k bug on their home page, nearly 3 years
after the fact?
No. Conversion to any other base does not make
Pi become non-irrational. The base does not make
any magic transformation occur that changes Pi
from an irrational number to a rational number.
It's just not possible.
An clueless entity in the U.S. that shall remain nameless,
has canceled their plans to upgrade to XP, and
decided to remain on 2K. It's truely shocking
that they got a clue as they never had seen a clue
before. Can you say 'security'?
Slashdot Mirror
The stats from the article indicate not overloaded. Therefore, they must have slow bandwidth.
And pixie dust.
...can you hear me now?
Well, he is missing a few links.
helloworld >/var/log/messages
we must disclose to the CFO any relative that works for a customer, competitor or vendor;
For starters, it's none of the companies business whom your relatives work for. Second, it is vague as almost *any* company could be considered to potentially have *some* business relationship with your company, especially if you are bug (for example Microsoft). Third, are you personally supposed to keep track of your relatives and their job changes?
Finally, in this effort to prevent kickbacks and other shenanigans, the CFO is the person to be informed? Why the CFO, why not HR? And who is watching the CFO?
Yeah, that's it. That's the ticket. Coincidence.
Billy boy has nothing but good intentions
for the telco user. Really. He's as pure as dial-tone.
2. Do re-compile your C library however. Most of your applications spend a lot of their time executing code from the C library.
Sort of like mentioned here?
Or found here?
It is a band-aid if few people use it.
However, if enough people (and ISPs) use it, then the effectiveness of spam will be reduced, possibly to the point that many of the spammers give up. It's too soon to dismiss a possible solution.
Morons are too stupid to masturbate.
You're almost almost definitely incorrect. I mean, you're almost almost psychic if you can determine his speaking ability from his writing! And I'm not guessing. ;~)
LOL. I caught your drift. I could not help but envision a Monty Python skit with your Microsoft Lawyer as prosecutor, judge, and jury on this case. A true farce just as Jon is enduring now.
It's part of the Monty Python skit.
Confirmed. No BSOD.
Seriously, Microsoft is making a big mistake by over-reacting and fighting the world.
They (Microsoft) would be much better off if they just STFU, fixed their bugs (if possible), opened up and inter-operated, and were just happy with their market share they already have.
please, please, do NOT leak it.
The bugs could get corrected, which could lead to competition for Linux.
Step 4: Profit!
Techies and customers almost always speak a completely different language and likely the specs were written by a tech person who doesn't quite comprehend the customer's workflow, or sometimes even worse, by the customer himself, trying to 'speak tech' without having the technical background.
The key section is bolded. I thought B.S.!
My experience was a NON-technical salesperson driving the requirements because they flat out LIE to the customer to get the sale.
Can you really trust 10-best-web-site-and-domain-hosting-services?
I mean, really, a site that still has a Y2k bug on their home page, nearly 3 years after the fact?
Actually, that relationship makes sense due to methane emissions.
No. Conversion to any other base does not make Pi become non-irrational. The base does not make any magic transformation occur that changes Pi from an irrational number to a rational number. It's just not possible.
More details available from McPaper
...even if everything on T.V. is crap and not work recording anyway.
An clueless entity in the U.S. that shall remain nameless, has canceled their plans to upgrade to XP, and decided to remain on 2K. It's truely shocking that they got a clue as they never had seen a clue before. Can you say 'security'?