Slashdot Mirror


How Much Do You Pay to Host Your Website?

DosGusanos asks: "I was curious how much people around the U.S. and around the world pay for hosting. Obviously size in cabinets/rack units/square feet, included features such as bandwidth, UPS/generator, management, etc. factor in. The configuration I am particularly interested in is three machines, one www, one search, and one database. The machines would be hooked up to a T1 and networked to one another over Ethernet. Anyone paying for colo or hosting in this same ballpark? How happy/upset are you with your provider?"

577 comments

  1. I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...about 5 years ago. Never paid a nickel since.

    1. Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by el_mex · · Score: 1

      So spill it: From whom, what did you get, etc...

    2. Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure who the original poster went through for this price, but I went through No Monthly Fees.

      $200 for lifetime hosting.

    3. Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the lifetime of 'nomonthlyfees', that is....

    4. Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > I strongly recommend IrvineHosting.

      Your site requires Flash, with no HTML alternative. That tells me what I need to know about your company.

    5. Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it looks like a 16 year old designed it.

    6. Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by IrvineHosting · · Score: 0

      Flash is the future. 96% of all web browsers support it and it provides a much better ui experience than standard html. There are many flash only websites out there today. Our web hosting service is designed to be simple for normal folks, not necessarily geeks using lynx, although we like them too :)

    7. Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by IrvineHosting · · Score: 1

      It is intended to be visually pleasing for people who like aol and msn. Some people really like it. Some people hate it. There aren't many people in between. It does get people's attention though. Plus it is holiday oriented.

    8. Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by IrvineHosting · · Score: 1

      opps, meant to reply to this message:

      It is intended to be visually pleasing for people who like AOL and MSN. Some people really like it. Some people hate it. There aren't many people in between. It does get people's attention though. Plus it is holiday oriented.

    9. Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... by Pean · · Score: 1
      Yeah that site is pretty sad. It makes me not like christmas.

      I think Flash is good for games on the web, but thats pretty much it.

      --
      ----------
      "Duffman says a lot of things, OH YEAH!" - Duffman
  2. Rackspace by corz · · Score: 3, Informative

    "How happy/upset are you with your provider?"

    Two words: Rackspace Rules

    1. Re:Rackspace by jhirbour · · Score: 1

      I completely agree!!! There are very few companies who clain "fanatical support" and actually have it! RACKSPACE ROCKS!!!!!

    2. Re:Rackspace by hermescom · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That's true if you can afford them - they're definitely on the premium side. I never had a problem with them, but once my site started outgrowing the 30 Gigs they allow you monthly by on their standard plans, additional bandwidth became way too costly.

      At $3.50/Gig, I ended up paying almost 50% over my base fee for a month of popularity.

      As a result, I moved the more bandwidth intensive part of the site off to a cheaper server with beefier specs, and felt the pain right away. These guys have no monitoring included, ignore email requests for support, and charged me a consulting fee when I needed my server backed up and wiped because of a Slapper infection.

      Not that I blame them, since it's not really managed hosting they are selling, but the difference in service is tremendous.

      If you can afford Rackspace - go for it. I think they even have an option to give you a private net work -- link your servers directly one to the other so intra-server communitation doesn't count towards your total bandwidth cap.

    3. Re:Rackspace by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 0

      word

    4. Re:Rackspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay $89 a month for Win2k hosting on a semi dedicated server. I have full execution permissions, and .Net is installed on the box. I get 4GB and unlimited bandwidth.

    5. Re:Rackspace by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 4, Informative

      Isn't Rackspace blacklisted for being host to a bunch of spamhausen?

      Politech got blacklisted several times.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    6. Re:Rackspace by sartin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rackspace does indeed rule. I run a machine for a non-profit called Knowbility, that hosts about 30 other non-profits. Rackspace is on the pricey side (which bothered me less when they were donating service in-kind, but is an impact on our budget now), but the support and uptime have been excellent. Every support call I've ever made, even the ones that were due to being moderately clueless (I picked up the site on short notice for a non-profit), has been solved rapidly and completely. Every question gets a complete answer on the first try. No ticket gets closed until I agree that the problem is solved.

      We were running a remote event in California that involved building web sites that we were hosting at rackspace. While setting up the hosting late on a Friday night, one of our people managed to hose our VNC so we could no longer get in and also mess up the virtual hosting. Rackspace support walked us through fixing it so we could complete the competition without any major hassles.

      Our current plan is to continue hosting there and convert our Windows server to Linux. Their charge for a basic Linux box is US$230/month with 30 GB (overage is US$3.50/GB).

    7. Re:Rackspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for posting as an AC, can't remember my login..

      We have an extremely active AUP department which handles reports of SPAM and other illegitemate activity. We just implemented a newer, easier to enforce AUP and are working with all of the blacklists and the rest of the anti-spam community to dispel this reputation..

      Cheers,

      -Justin Ryan

    8. Re:Rackspace by corz · · Score: 1
      ... but the support and uptime have been excellent. Every support call I've ever made, even the ones that were due to being moderately clueless (I picked up the site on short notice for a non-profit), has been solved rapidly and completely. Every question gets a complete answer on the first try. No ticket gets closed until I agree that the problem is solved."

      Yup, and when I call them the phone never rings more than twice before I am talking to a human.

    9. Re:Rackspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucker. The kooks that run the BLs own you ass, now that you've shown that you will roll over for them. Expect them to raise hell over every email drop box and secondary DNS they can find on your network.

    10. Re:Rackspace by Darth+Maul · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have three servers at Rackspace with the Private Net between them. They really are amazing. Service is actually *service* and they truly care about customers. It's amazing, and I'm more cynical than most people, but Rackspace truly impresses me.

      My web pages are not just static HTML, either. This site serves an hour-long interactive training course that certifies over 3000 people a day. And the servers have been working perfectly. In fact, one of my three machines there has an uptime of 355 days (tomorrow is a whole year!!!). They're all running Linux, of course.

      --
      --- witty signature
    11. Re:Rackspace by Craig+Shergold · · Score: 1

      Rackspace's fanatic support is truly fanatic. Story from today: one of our bsd guys was doing some admin on a Linux box. He fucked up /etc/passwd somehow, using the wrong tool I think. He called rackspace, who picked up on the first ring. He explained the deal to them, and they told him he'd have to reset the root pwd (duh). But he wasn't on the contact list.

      They conferenced me in on my cell phone (they've got it in the database) and asked me for authorization. Fifteen minutes later, we were up with a new root password, and no further hassle.

      We've only got two servers there right now, and we pay $400/month, I think, which includes the leasing of the (cheapo) hardware. We would have paid about $2500.00 for this sort of box, maybe a little less.

      For our client work, we've been using Worldcom, but they suck. Our setup with five servers (one load balancer/proxy, two for "business logic", one DB, and a search box seems to do fine for us.

      I used to have a couple personal sites hosted at Dreamhost. They also suck. $75.00 a month, and they must have 90% uptime. Rackspace gives us a REFUND if they are down more than 24 seconds in a given month. Cool stuff.

      Anyhow, I give Rackspace an A+ so far.

    12. Re:Rackspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so when are you going to disconnect these spammers? Two of them were just added to the SBL this past Tuesday (December 3), when will they be disconnected and what will you do to ensure they don't come back?

    13. Re:Rackspace by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Amen. I am such a bitch for Rackspace.

      I will gladly give them free advertisement without a doubt in my mind. If I wore t-shirts I would definitely wear the shirt they send out.

      Instead I just paint their logo on my naked chest and run around downtown.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    14. Re:Rackspace by pjdoland · · Score: 1

      Rackspace is by far the best service provider I've ever been involved with.

      As far as I'm concerned it's cheap as hell (and I pay roughly $1500 a month for my two-server configuration).

      It's all about the service. You can't compare it to any other provider.

      I've never had to wait more than 30 seconds to be connected to a real human being.

      They've bailed my ass out quite a few times.

      You won't regret it.

      --
      -- "The reward of suffering is experience." - Aeschylus
    15. Re:Rackspace by corz · · Score: 1
      "I will gladly give them free advertisement without a doubt in my mind. If I wore t-shirts I would definitely wear the shirt they send out."

      I have 3 Rackspace t-shirts that they have sent me. They are my favorites, I'm proud to wear them around.

    16. Re:Rackspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think they even have an option to give you a private net work -- link your servers directly one to the other so intra-server communitation doesn't count towards your total bandwidth cap
      my colo provider provides this option also in the form of a 40 cent crossover cable. I guess with more than 2 servers we would then step up to a 4 port 100 mbit switch which I hear are running upwards of $10 these days ;)
    17. Re:Rackspace by llamaluvr · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Solviet Russia, there's only 356 days in a year!

      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    18. Re:Rackspace by KC7GR · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's one little thing about Rackspace that they, of course, neglect to tell you; They're a spammer nest.

      Rackspace has a long history of being apathetic at best to spamvertized sites, despite their anti-spam Terms of Service. As of 3-Dec-02, they're still hosting at least 20 or so spammers, and chunks of their netspace may still be listed on SPEWS.

      Cheap or not, good customer service or not, I would be very wary about selecting Rackspace for any sort of hosting.

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

    19. Re:Rackspace by Graelin · · Score: 4, Informative

      ** This is a plug, I admit it, I love Rackspace **

      Rackspace rules them all. We've been with them for over two years now and I don't believe we will ever leave them. We've done our shopping, but compare Rackspace to any of the others and you'll realize something - these guys REALLY know what they're doing.

      We will be at 9 servers with them in a couple of days (just added 3 more). We use just under 1.5TB of bandwidth every month. At this level of usage, we get it for $2/GB. That is certainly not bad. Given that their network has never had an unexpected outage (not that I can remember at least) I feel it's very justified.

      The folks there _really_ know what they're doing. The sales guys don't try to be technical guys, the sales engineers are on the ball. The tech support folks can solve a lot of the problems right there but when the shit hits the fan they'll send you straight to the guy in the data-center. I've spoken to one of the founders (something technical, don't remember what) and I didn't even ask for him, they just conferenced him in.

      We've been in some pretty bad spots before (lost most of a RAID 5 array once) and they've pulled us out of the gutters.

      I've had security folks tell me the Rackspace network is very secure. But I cannot personally confirm this.

      We're not a big customer of theirs by no means. We're TINY. I know they've got some very large contracts but they really do care about us. The
      little guys.

      I could easily go on for hours here so I will stop now. If you can afford it, get Rackspace. You will not be sorry.

    20. Re:Rackspace by nemesisj · · Score: 2

      I'll just spout some more praise about Rackspace. I've been with them for almost exactly a year, and they're the best host, and best company I've ever dealt with. You get to immediately speak with a technician, get a quality setup when you order a server, and they are out of control about offering you the best value for your money. I can't emphasize how important it is to look at hosting costs from the view that when the shit hits the fan, that's when you get your money's worth. There have been a couple of times when I've really screwed up or needed help FAST and they've been all over it. Several times they've called me back without me asking just to double check that everything's ok. They also have sent me random gift certificates and t-shirts just to say thanks for being their customer. I had one billing mixup the entire time I've been with them and they were extremely professional about resolving it quickly. Everyone gripes about how expensive they are but if you ask for the older servers they're retiring, you can get some good deals sometimes - I pay 150 a month for a sever that definitely exceeds my needs. That's double the cheapest dedicated provider i've ever seen and comparable to most other providers.

    21. Re:Rackspace by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Rule number 4: Spammers find companies that lie.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    22. Re:Rackspace by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      If you can afford it, get Rackspace. You will not be sorry.

      Unless you send out email and happen to end up in one of the blacklisted IP ranges.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    23. Re:Rackspace by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 3, Funny

      In fact, one of my three machines there has an uptime of 355 days (tomorrow is a whole year!!!)
      Don't you mean 255 days then?

    24. Re:Rackspace by pjrc · · Score: 5, Interesting
      There's one little thing about Rackspace that they, of course, neglect to tell you; They're a spammer nest.

      I'm glad you mentioned this. I've been using Verio for the last couple years. Everything has been really good, except for little skirmishs with the blacklists.

      When I first signed up, just about two years ago, there were just a couple of the minor blacklists listing a netblock that had my IP number. The listings were for a spammer that Verio had kicked off months ago. I contacted the blacklist maintainers (only one of those lists was could be be called "maintained"). It's remarkably difficult to contact these people. Eventually the better list dropped the block, and that gave me enough leverage to convince the other two to do the same (the spammer had long since moved on for greener pastures).

      But in the last year or so, there's been a whole new crop of spammer acusations. I can't verify them... it reads like a whole lot of conspiracy theory. But a couple weeks ago it even got posted as a slashdot story (so it must be true, right?)

      I called Verio. Before the slashdot story, they would just deny everything. They didn't admit they were catering to any spammers, but they didn't flat out deny that no spammers were operating on their network.

      Verio claims that their hosting business is very separate from their network provision services (T1, T3, OC-something lines.... more bandwidth than I can envision). So far, the more reputable blacklists haven't waged netblocks on Verio's hosting side, or at least the few IP numbers allocated to my little server.

      So because of these escalating wars between the spammers and blacklists, if you intend to host a mail server, the ISPs record about hosting spammers should be your top concern. Saddly, there are a lot of mixed messages and it's hard to tell if any particular provider is any good. Two years ago, for example, Verio was listed at the top of SpamCop's page of providers with exemplary anti-abuse policies.

      Recently I've been making some tenative plans for jumping ship from Verio. Other than this spammer/blacklist issue, and one little incident where they didn't notify me in advance of (supposedly) scheduled maintainance (they claim they did), the decicated hosting service from Verio has been great.

      But hitting blacklists, even occasionally, is a real show-stopper. For my little site, we do a light amount of e-commerce. When a confirmation email to a customer bounces (they placed the order over the web), we look like a little fly-by-night company out to steal their credit card info. Of course, emails bounce for a variety of other reasons, so we've gotten into the practive of picking up the phone and calling them with the tracking number.

      The sad news is that there doesn't seem to be any really good way of determining if a provider is hosting or provisioning bandwidth to spammers. Even if everything looks good in advance (as it did 2 years ago with Verio), things change.... and they change more rapidly that you'd want to move providers when everything else is running so smoothly.

      I wish I could recommend Verio, as the service, performance and reliability has been excellent. But this spammer problem and the reaction from the blacklisting community is definately something you don't want to get caught in the middle of.

      I'm taking Rackspace off my short list of "plan B" options if the Verio/blacklist situation gets worse. Rackspace was actually at the top of my list.

    25. Re:Rackspace by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 1

      Rackspace is horrible! I will no longer recommend them to people as they do nothing to stop the number of spammers they host.

      Over 10% of the spam received by my company is from someone hosted at Rackspace. I have sent numerous messages to abuse@rackspace.com over the past month with no response.

      It appears, I'm not the only one suffering from this (search the net-abuse ng's).

      Do not support spammers. Do not support Rackspace!

      Here are the current spammers at Rackspace: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=rac kspace.com.

      --

      ÕÕ

    26. Re:Rackspace by Darth+Maul · · Score: 2


      Yeah, i know; meant to type 365, making tomorrow the day past a year. stupid quick typing.

      --
      --- witty signature
    27. Re:Rackspace by althalus · · Score: 1

      You mean all their IP's?
      yeah, pretty much all of them are on some list or another.

    28. Re:Rackspace by julesh · · Score: 1

      I've sent reports to many ISP's abuse addresses. I think something under 10% of them actually reply with a human answer (about 30% or so seem to have autoresponders). I once talked to an ISP rep. about this record, and his company's policy (and I gather many others) is to act silently on spam reports. Responding to them often just annoys the reporter further, apperently...

    29. Re:Rackspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aren't there 365 days in a year?

    30. Re:Rackspace by spaceland · · Score: 1

      I've been with Rackspace for 2 years and have been mostly happy, until recently.

      I recently setup a new dedicated server for a client, the IP was in a fairly large block that is on Spews.org blacklist. After some fair attempts to resolve the issue from the server side, we realized that approach wouldn't work at all and the IP needed to be changed. I wouldn't normally have a problem with this, except it took them 2+ weeks to diagnose and 3 'resolved' tickets. Being who they are and what they do, they should have well-established procedures for handling spews.org issues, but this made me feel like a guinea pig. AND, after they moved the server to the new IP they forgot to switch the DNS (which was right there on the service request) so i was down for 2 more days because of this silly oversight. I have been unable to get them to give me any sort of refund because of my or my clients frustration.

      That was just the first problem...

      I also setup a new server with them for shared hosting, this new box was not configured properly and also went through multiple 'resolved' support tickets before the problem was actually taken care of. The server was basically unusable for a full month while they stumbled around fixing the DNS issues. One of the things that really frustrated me about the situation was that i was told on numerous occasions that i would receive a call back by so-and-so at such-and-such a time, only to have to call them myself to try to get answers, that happened no less than 4 times.
      I was told i would receive credit for that first month, but that credit has not shown up on my online billing statements yet.

      Don't use the online support system, they hardly pay attention to those requests (taking days sometimes to acknowledge them). The only way i get things done is to call and speak with a level 3 tech, we then work through the issues directly.

      last year they had a nasty problem with a misconfigured router that was hanging requests coming in over one providers link, i had problems reaching my server for 2 days - though it wasn't an 'outage' it sure did cause me and my clients some major frustration... but to their credit it was fixed at the exact time they said it would be.

      I just don't feel like i was getting anything close to 'fanatical customer service' like they claim. If i had been, i wouldn't be writing this.

      Despite all this, they are STILL better than any other managed host or colo i've ever had (quite a few). I want to really like them like i did 6 months ago, but all these recent problems have put a damper on my enthusiasm.

    31. Re:Rackspace by Venotar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but SPEWS are a bunch of fascists - it's almost impossible to get removed from their lists.

  3. Way to be cheap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It's obvious by the way this quesiton is framed, you just want the dirt cheapest hosting there is. C'mon slashdot, let's try posting a decent story other than where to find the cheapest bandwidth (and probably on the shittiest backbone).

  4. "Free" hosting... by `Sean · · Score: 3, Informative

    I get DSL through Speakeasy and they allow hosting of Web sites. I pay $160/month for 4 static IPs and 768Kbps SDSL. Medium speed hosting and I host dozens of Web sites off my connection. Great deal!

    1. Re:"Free" hosting... by phraktyl · · Score: 2

      I can second this. I've got the same plan through Speakeasy, and their service is excellent.

      --
      Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    2. Re:"Free" hosting... by MoonFacedAssassin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speakeasy seems to be the best way to go if you want to host your own sites. My friend in Acworth (suburb of Atlanta), GA, has my domain sitting on a box on his Speakeasy DSL which is 1.5/384 ADSL. He's only being charged about $100-$120 for the 4 or so IPs and DSL connection.

      Consequently I'm getting charged only $30...so it's a pretty good deal to run one domain on a P3 1 GHz, 512 MB RAM, 30 GB HDD machine.

      --
      I am a meat popsicle.
    3. Re:"Free" hosting... by wytcld · · Score: 2
      I can second this.

      And third. If you're really worried about reliability and you're someplace where there's a second (non-Covad - which Speakeasy is for SDSL) DSL provider, there are ways to hook up, say two 1.5 meg DSL lines over different providers to the same site, and then run a script from a third site that checks that each line is up every minute or two and uses dynamic DNS updates to refer your traffic one way or the other - or both. Tricky, but it can be done. Then for less than the price of a T1 you're running the equivalent of 2 T1's.

      A main reason to use a remote hosting service rather than host at your own location is such redundancy. But it's much easier to maintain a machine on your own premises. Some hosting services will charge you extra for each time you even ask them to glance in the direction of the machine on their racks they renting you.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    4. Re:"Free" hosting... by nortcele · · Score: 1

      Now if everyone that signs up with Speakeasy gives ol' Sean the referral... his cost shall go to $0 quickly for a while.

    5. Re:"Free" hosting... by Tyrian · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd also like to second Speakeasy as a cost-effective solution. My friend has our geekhouse server in our closet from Speakeasy, they sent a very knowledgable guy out to do the install, have been helpful whenever we've needed it and had extremely little downtime.

      The 1100Kbps up/down connection we have runs about 350$ a month, which is less than half that of any T1 connection in the area. When I spoke to a guy at bandwith.com he said the best he could do for a simalar price was a 384Kbps dedicated connection. Our pings stay under 20 ms to most sites, and if you host a few pages, then you'll easily be able to recoop the costs of the connection.

      The only potential snag you may run into is that they may try to route your packets through a far-away place; for us the packets were originally travelling from LA through Seattle, back to LA (sounds like a UPS shipping route) making latency a bit of an issue. We paid them a bit extra to move our traffic only through a LA server, but even with this additional cost, its still much cheaper than any alternative we've seen.

    6. Re:"Free" hosting... by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh, you're lucky. I was getting an average hop count in excess of 25 to every site, with traceroutes showing my packets going (for example) from austin to washington, dc, to vienna, austria, back to washington, then to wherever (dallas, houston, then here for local sites). "My packets went to Vienna and all I have is this lousy traceroute." 300+ msec pings to grace.speakeasy.net, same for work shell servers. Bah.

    7. Re:"Free" hosting... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      I also use Speakeasy, thou on IDSL. I have the sys-admin package, 2 IPs, extra are 2.50. I host a unix box for a personal website, for the unlimited disk space. (photos of the family for grandma, CounterStrike files, etc..)

      I use BestWebHost.com for my email domain for the last 4 years, 9.99 a month, thou I bumped upto 12 bux for a 100 megs of disk space. I'm grandfathered in for the unlimited features, They now charge a little for additional emails, space, statistics, bandwidth, etc..

      Buydomains (a registar) allows me to redirect URL's for domains I own, also allows me to have email forwarding on domains. Makes it easy for me to just point 1 domain to another.

      Like my "fuckverizon.com" domain pointing to "verizoneatspoop.com" :)

    8. Re:"Free" hosting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $160! We Scandinavians laugh at you Americans with your slow and expensive bandwidth. I pay $45/month and get 2.5 Mbit/768 kbit, as many static IPs as I want and the ability to host whatever I want. If I'm willing to pay $80/month, I'll get 8 Mbit SDSL.

    9. Re:"Free" hosting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's a good deal, but it's not really the same thing as a colo solution.

      For one thing, you're dependent on your residential power supply and
      probably using a consumer UPS.

      For another thing, the 768k SDSL is good, but is it as good as the
      gig-E and the OC-48 that the ISP has?

      How does your route for a consumer line compare to what you'd
      have at a colo provider? (Might be better!)

      I pay $110 a month for a full megabit ADSL from a local provider, 8 static IPs, no
      unreasonable rules or policies, btw. All things considered, I greatly
      prefer my website to be hosted on an ISP's virtual web farm. It's being
      backed up, it's on a commercial power supply, it's altogether on a
      much higher bandwith connection, and it's not taking up space in
      my house, making noise, raising my electric and air conditioning bills.

      There's another aspect also: If I run a commercial web service at home,
      I might not be 100% legal for tax and business reasons. If something is
      afoul with my web based business, and it's located at my house, the
      IRS and the FBI could take my house when they come for my web server.
      If it's at a service provider's site, all they can do is shut the box down, if
      they can convince the service provider to do so.

      Another thing about consumer broadband is that it's only as permanent
      as your current housing, and you won't know whether you can get high-speed
      dsl at your next place until you already live there. This to me is the biggest
      problem with DSL. I want to be able to get a guaranteed binding agreement
      from the telco that DSL will be available at a given address, BEFORE I've
      even talked to the realtor, much less, closed on the house and installed a
      phone line.

      The telco's can't do this and won't even understand what you're asking for if you do.

      Speakeasy can't do it either.

      Even if the current resident has DSL, you can't get a guarantee that you
      will be able to get it if they move out and you move in.

      For these reasons, I find it much better to have the web services
      colocated at the ISP's data center.

    10. Re:"Free" hosting... by jimmyharris · · Score: 1

      I am in Australia where the cost of broadband connections is usually far higher than the US. I run a couple of websites using 512 SDSL with 5 static IPs for AUD$160 per month. The service is through Internode and has been very reliable.

    11. Re:"Free" hosting... by jshare · · Score: 2
      Christ!

      You must have their "business level" service, which AFAICT just gives you better guaranteed service.

      We're paying $215/mo for the same speeds, but residential.

      I would agree that they have very good service, and the 4 fixed IPs are super-nice.

      Jordan

    12. Re:"Free" hosting... by paitre · · Score: 2

      EH?
      WHich Hosting companies do you deal with (other than -maybe- the Telco's) that have OC48's for their bandwidth into their NOC? I don't know of -any-, including Rackspace and Exodus.

      *snark* Multiple OC3s, yeah. Even an OC12 or something. But -NOT- a 48. Most cities in the US have that much -aggregate- coming into them (there's several that now have 192's, but most only have 48s. Seriously).

    13. Re:"Free" hosting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I pay $80 for that.

      So :P

    14. Re:"Free" hosting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I don't know about that. There are people who'd rather have the server at their house, or at least within close proximity where you know you can get to it any time. There are people who'd rather not trust some night shift goober to cold reboot their servers. Hell, sometimes it bugs me to have my servers in the basement rather than right next to me (but that may be an extreme case).

      As for moving your website, what's the big deal? You've heard of DNS right? If you feel like you might move sometime soon, just move your DNS to someplace that's not going to move the same time you are - your friends place, your ISP, wherever. Turn on DNS at your new place and wait for the DNS to propagate to your new place. With simple planning, downtime can be averted quite easily.

      I don't know the specifics of the tax laws to comment. But unless I have to pay Uncle Sam an atrocious amount of money, I prefer to have the peace of mind in keeping my servers at home.

      FWIW, I used to work at a datacenter and things can happen there too. Electricians, wiring guys, trainees, etc may accidently unplug you or something, even if you pay for a cage. We had many people going into the computer room all the time. Sure we took IDs and monitored them to certain extent, but once in a while things happened. Once a night shift engineer's fat (I mean fat!!) girlfriend accidentally bumped a couple of servers of the rack. Another time some badly built custom box caught fire. I could go on and on...

  5. Not sure about this myself... by craenor · · Score: 1

    But I've heard to watch out for places that charge too much extra for excessive bandwidth. A website becoming suddenly very popular has resulted in extremely large fees for overbandwidth use.

    But like I said, I have no experience with this.

  6. HostBaby plug by turnstyle · · Score: 2, Informative
    The guys behind CDBaby have a hosting service, HostBaby. It's mostly geared toward musicians.

    It's $20/month for 200MB, no set up and the first month is free. I know about them because their service works with Andromeda.

    They're good guys.

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    1. Re:HostBaby plug by KoolyM · · Score: 1

      Gearing your web hosting operation towards musicians seems like a business plan that's just waiting to end in bankruptcy. Data traffic isn't free, you know, and even a few mp3s downloaded every month adds up *very* quickly if you've got several hundreds of sites on your servers that contain mostly mp3s.

    2. Re:HostBaby plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Andromeda sucks.

      Go with Netjuke.

      http://netjuke.sourceforge.net/

      a satisfied user.

  7. And as a Slashback recommendation... by fobbman · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...we'll take the best of the ones offered and link them in a /. story to see how they do under load.

    1. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Well, hey, I could use the load test:
      xerithane.nerdfarm.org

      Do your worst!

      Seriously, I'm curious about finding out. It's never been under a substantial load before. I use Rackspace and I have to say that I'd happily give them my first born child knowing they'd be safe and well cared for.

      They are awesome, their service is great, their customer service is great, and their prices are reasonable.

      $200 for an entry level server with 30GB/mo. Great web-admin if you want it, and their customer management portal is awesome as well.

      They kick ass.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please reply with your name, address, and telephone number so we may collect your first born when rackspace goes under. Thanks.

    3. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by madprof · · Score: 2

      Rackspace charge for you using 30GB of bandwidth a month. So when you only use 20GB you still get charged the same amount. And you think this is a good deal?
      Rackspace quoted me a charge (in the UK) of 75 pounds a month to upgrade a server from 512MB of RAM to 1GB. I don't call this a good deal either.
      I just took over a site with a dedicated box in Rackspace and I am moving the hell out of there fast.

    5. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Rackspace charge for you using 30GB of bandwidth a month. So when you only use 20GB you still get charged the same amount. And you think this is a good deal?
      Rackspace quoted me a charge (in the UK) of 75 pounds a month to upgrade a server from 512MB of RAM to 1GB. I don't call this a good deal either.
      I just took over a site with a dedicated box in Rackspace and I am moving the hell out of there fast.


      For the service, yes. It has the best uptime, and best customer service, ever. I'll pay extra to know it's in good hands.

      If you can't afford Rackspace, don't go with a premium providor.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    6. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by derF024 · · Score: 2

      from the first comment on your site (that you usually get 2-5 hits per week) you could probably save a ton of money going with a shared host, unless you specifically like having your own machine on a very limited line that you never use. check out something like http://dividedsky.net/, where you can get a gig of space, 15 GB/month transfer limits, a shell account and web hosting under a single domain (yourname.com) with all the bells and whistles for $20 a month.

    7. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as bad as some of the Windows boxes they host, but a real managed hosting provider would slap you silly with the hold-harmless agreements before allowing this:
      22/tcp open ssh
      25/tcp open smtp
      53/tcp open domain
      80/tcp open http
      110/tcp open pop-3
      2401/tcp open cvspserver
      3306/tcp open mysql
      Remote operating system guess: FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE (or -STABLE) (X86)
      Uptime 166.669 days (since Sat Jun 22 07:25:33 2002)

    8. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      from the first comment on your site (that you usually get 2-5 hits per week) you could probably save a ton of money going with a shared host, unless you specifically like having your own machine on a very limited line that you never use.

      Ohh, that's just my site. The other domains that are running on there get more traffic. Still only about 1GB/mo but we're not launched yet. When we launch in the next couple of weeks we'll definitely saturate it.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    9. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 2

      If you can't afford Rackspace, don't go with a premium providor.

      I think his most compelling issues was with the monthly charge for a one time memory upgrade. Especially if he's on a shared server, and no othe rupgrades were included. I can see a higher charge to move to a completely different, higher class webserver, but ~$150 per month to add one stick of 512 mb server ram (which has no recurring cost to Rackspace, just a one time labor and parts expenditure) is offensive.

      Being a 'premium provider' doesn't give them the right to charge arbitrary fees (unless their customers don't mind). I'd rather be charged accurately and logically. If expenses have gone up, tack on a monthly charge and tell me why; don't just try to slip it under the door with a mislabeled monthly fee.

    10. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by madprof · · Score: 2

      Best uptime? But you can crash your server quite easily if you start running 3 million things on it at once.
      I don't see them providing anything that I cannot get from technically clued up smaller outfits.
      Oh well.

    11. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by bteeter · · Score: 1

      $200 for an entry level server with 30GB/mo. Great web-admin if you want it, and their customer management portal is awesome as well.

      They kick ass.

      How about $249/month for a more powerful server with 300 GB/month?

      http://www.assortedinternet.com/hosting/economy-de dicated.jsp

      Or perhaps $349/month for the same server with CPanel and Web Hosting Manager installed.

      http://www.assortedinternet.com/hosting/silver-ded icated.jsp

      Oh, and all servers are actively monitored, so if anything should go wrong, they will be fixed automatically. Most providers, including Rackspace don't actively monitor servers. They just fix them when you call and tell them its crashed. :-)

      Take care,

      Brian

    12. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Best uptime?
      I'm talking about network uptime. Their data lines do not go down. That and the smaller outfits don't have the level of support, nor dedication that I have found at rackspace. I've gone with smaller outfits, and will never go back. It is well worth an extra $100/mo or so for the support you get there.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    13. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      How about $249/month for a more powerful server with 300 GB/month?

      http://www.assortedinternet.com/hosting/economy- de dicated.jsp [assortedinternet.com]


      Seems like a good deal, but I wouldn't run a server on RedHat. I prefer the BSD option. My contract at rackspace is up in a few months, so maybe.

      You have my email, let me know if BSD is an option.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    14. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Being a 'premium provider' doesn't give them the right to charge arbitrary fees (unless their customers don't mind). I'd rather be charged accurately and logically. If expenses have gone up, tack on a monthly charge and tell me why; don't just try to slip it under the door with a mislabeled monthly fee.

      That's his thing, I've never had any such nonsense on my account. I'm pretty sure that his sales rep was probably an idiot. Request someone else, say, "No, and I'll cancel my account if you don't charge a reasonable labor fee and the costof RAM. I'll even mail you the RAM."

      It sounds like heresay and against mine, and other, experiences.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    15. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by madprof · · Score: 2

      Then you must have picked some bad eggs. I run a lot of sites with a small hosting firm that have machines in a huge data centre with on-site engineers.
      The link has never ever gone down. I am charged 95th percentile for bandwidth and I can ring an engineer to fix things if it goes wrong.
      More importantly I am not just another customer - the firm are small enough to know my exact requirements and advise me accordingly.
      Just a better, cheaper, deal than Rackspace.

    16. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      More impotantly I am not just another customer - the firm are small enough to know my exact requirements and advise me accordingly.

      If you have recommendations I am open to switching. I don't crash my server, I just need a secure environment where if something goes wrong it can be fixed. My needs are not very demanding either, at least not at the moment.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    17. Re:And as a Slashback recommendation... by madprof · · Score: 2

      If you're based in the UK I have a recommendation but otherwise probably not...

  8. T1 and local hosting by Kneht · · Score: 2, Informative

    At my last job, we had similar to what you're looking for and paid $895 w/ 2 year contract. It was just outside a small city, and location can change price a lot. It was nice having our servers locally, and we got good service too!

    --
    "Are you on some kind of medication?"
    "No"
    "Well, you should be."

    --Bean

  9. $59/year by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 0

    I use Pro Hosters and they are great. No, I don't work for them and they don't pay me to endorse them. My hosting is fast and is never down. They host on many different servers (cluster hosting i think they call it) so they are never down. They fun *NIX servers and will change or install anything you want. Good stuff, I hope this helps.

    --
    I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
  10. I love my provider by Telastyn · · Score: 1

    It's me! Just plop apache on my BSD machine that sits on my DSL (speakeasy rocks)

    As for my company's colo? They don't suck, and it's a company... they could pay $1k/month and not miss it.

    1. Re:I love my provider by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      well - speakeasy isnt so great for some customers. I had my DSL through them (covad/northpoint) and when PacBell put a CO in across the street from my house that offered full DSL speeds I wanted to switch (or at least upgrade).

      Speakeasy could only offer me sdsl at 128k - for $60/month... PacBell wanted $49 for 1.5/384 adsl.

      I wrote them a bunch to find out the terms of my contract - and was told different things by different people. So I decided to leave.

      Since I told speakeasy that I was going to leave they were trying to charge me $350 for terminating the contract. I told them no way I was going to pay that. I told them of all the conflicting info I got from all their service reps, and told them that since they couldnt even clearly show me the terms of my service, their claim that there was a termination fee of that size was BS. They said they'd have to bill me for it. I said go ahead and bill me - but there is no way in hell you're ever getting any money from me. I have a better service here - you cant/wont match it, and you want more money for me. We can go to court if you like - but I doubt you would win. They billed me once. I mailed them all the email correspndence I had with them - and they dropped it.

    2. Re:I love my provider by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Oddly enough I've the exact opposite experience. PacBell couldn't show me their terms of service (actually the sales rep didn't even know what it was). And with the SBC buyout, they won't even offer DSL service as they say I'm too far away, despite the fact that I had their service and it worked fine.

      Speakeasy was nice and upfront about their terms of service, and that they'd like to only do 384/128. I said that 1.5/384 worked fine for PacBell, and they put that in. Worked great since.

    3. Re:I love my provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speakeasy almost always asks you to agree to a year of service. If you did, that termination fee you're talking about pays to the end of the year.

      Personally I like speakeasy, but I'll say that in the last 2 years their service has gone from excellent, to similar to verizon. Which is bad. I mean A friend of mine tried to switch to speakeasy from verizon, and they kept telling us the install/order is canceled because DSL is on the line. We had to explain that we gave them a cancelation date from verizon and that we'd like an install as close as possible to that date. that turns out to be a week late.

      To their credit, It has to do with COVAD being kicked around by all the CO owners (like verizon). Basically they can't get permission to schedule an install date until the CO owner said their reason for installing makes sense (i.e. there is an available line). And then actually getting a date does take a week. Sucky for Covad, and sucky for speakeasy. But I think it could have been handled better by speakeasy. They could have explained to covad what I explained to them about switching from verizon.

    4. Re:I love my provider by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      I wanted to keep it short, so I didnt write in all the details.

      I had already been on the line for over a year - and all the emails to them was to determine what the status of my account was now that I had been on the account past the year that I had signed up for.

      I was asking them what happened to my account now that i was on there past the one year sign up. I didnt agree to another year, so did that make me month to month by default? did I need to sign up again? what exactly did this mean.

      None of the reps knew what to do - some told me flat out (in writing) that yes, I was on month to month, others just ignored my emails several times, others just said they didnt know.

      It wasnt until i told them I was leaving due to better service offering that they tried to tell me that just because I signed up for a years contract, and the year was over - that I was still beholden to that contract. I told them they were nuts. A years contract lasts one year. there was no stipulation in the contract for what happened after the year was up - so too bad for them.

      I think it boiled down to the fact that DSL was so new to them that they didnt really think of what was going to happen after the year was up when they wrote the contracts up.

      But here was the clincher for me: I was never a Speakeasy customer. I had covad/northpoint to begin with. After they imploded - my accoutn was SOLD to speakeasy. They just had a transition/assimilation of my DSL line into their system - and I never signed/agreed to any contract. When they were trying to threaten me by saying that I agreed to their EULA I countered with the fact that I never signed up with them. I was just given no option, either I went to their site for COVAD customer assimilation and got my new IPs - or I lost my line.

      I went, there was no EULA on the site, or any form of explaination of services... just a real fast page thrown up to let COVAD northpoint users switch over before the deadline.

      anyway... im kinda happy now. my DSL bill is 64.95 and I split that with my roommate...

      pacbell can suck my d!ck though... (so can every other telecom bastard on the planet)

    5. Re:I love my provider by cmoss · · Score: 1

      The thing is that speakeasy has to provide DSL through covad and a baby bell.

      I have heard that verizon is offering DSL at below what they consider their cost internally. Very hard to compete with that price structure when you have to pay the same company for use of their lines to provide service. If Covad didn't have equipment in the new CO, Speakeasy may not have had any way to provide you better than 128k sdsl (144k idsl) due to the distance from your original CO.

      Their price for low speed idsl and sdsl around the same as the adsl circuit.

      Chuck
      p.s. don't be surprised if the bells prices go up after they drive their competition out of business.

    6. Re:I love my provider by nentwined · · Score: 1

      I got a call from pacbell a few weeks ago saying they were just getting dsl in my area. I told them I already had 768 sync from speakeasy and they said "oh, never mind," and hung up. I've got no complaints with se. :)

      --
      heaven
  11. Rack Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Rack Shack (http://www.rackshack.net/) has always provided us with excellent prices and friendly support. They even helped us do load balancing on a sunday night in the early AM prior to big launch. I highly recommend them.

    And no - I don't work for them...

    1. Re:Rack Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Rack Shack has always provided us with excellent prices and friendly support

      My experiences with Rack Shack haven't been so good.. I don't deal with them directly, but I do work for people who do, and have heard horror stories..

      Before I started dealing with them, a customer got their box (which they bought from Rackshack, and Rackshack is under contract to admin) rooted - Rackshack was most UNhelpful in getting the machine up and running again (even though they were paid for it) - the guy's site (e-commerce) was down for almost a week - they had to hire me to come in and get things set up correctly.

      After I got the machine running properly, I did an audit on the box, and I found that Apache was compiled with OpenSSL v0.96b (the one with the buffer overflow in it.) I asked Rackshack if the version reported was correct, or if they had patched the file manually and not bumped the version number (which I've seen a number of times.) Rackshack's answer was that everything had been updated to the latest version.

      A month later the box got infected by Slapper.

      So Rackshack reset the machine again (they were only down for 3 days this time), and (again) they claim that the box is up-to-date, even though it still reports the bad version number. I emailed their tech support again, and this time I didn't recieve any reply at all.

      I certainly wouldn't call ignoring a customer's questions to be "friendly support."

    2. Re:Rack Shack by Xunker · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have 4 machines with Rackshack, and I've been mostly happy with them.. except for one of the machines being buggy and having the refuse to believe me until they checked and found the IDE cable not seated properly.

      They give you tonnes of bandwidth (400GB per machine), too. Roughly 150kbps (a T1 basically).

      They do load balancing? No way, I was told they didn't, because I could really use it!

      --
      Hilary Rosen's speech was about her love of money and her desire to roll around naked in a pile of money.
    3. Re:Rack Shack by tdemark · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll second the RackShack notion.

      I rent two (2) 1.3 GHz Athlons with 512M RAM and 40 GB IDE drives for a total of $200/mo. That comes with 400 GB of traffic per machine (averages out about a 100% utilized T1 throughout the month).

      The machines have different functions, and rsync allows them to mirror each other. Either machine can take over the duties of the other in case of failure.

    4. Re:Rack Shack by Olentangy · · Score: 1

      Count me as another happy RackShack user. I have a vanilla Linux box with them. It's cheap ($125 / month) for the box and way more bandwidth than I could use. It just humms along.

    5. Re:Rack Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use rackshack. I managed to install FreeBSD onto my server and it runs sweeeeeeeeeet. The price is amazing.

    6. Re:Rack Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They took my box offline on accident and told me they had formatted the disk. Idiots. Luckily, they were too stupid to have done that right, they later "found" the drive. But after they resold my server/IP to someone else... I never had a problem with Rackshack, but after that incident....well, they are careless. I am now at UnitedColo, they are also very nice and in same price class as Rackshack.

      SiliconIce
      http://www.xboxhacker.net

    7. Re:Rack Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Before I started dealing with them, a customer got their box (which they bought from Rackshack, and Rackshack is under contract to admin) rooted - Rackshack was most UNhelpful in getting the machine up and running again"

      I'm actually an employee at Rackshack. They do not now and as far as I know have never offered managed services - Rackshack is not under a contract to admin the box. Administration is up to whoever buys the server and whoever they hire, that includes security.

  12. Small businesses with Real People Support by dagg · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm paying a smallish company about $160 a year for a shared server. That includes the use of Ftp, Apache, and MySQL. That includes 300 Megs of disk space and 7500 Megs of transfer per month. I've never had any noticeable down-time... and all of my questions have been answered within about 8 hours. I am extremely happy with the use of my $160.

    Check out epinions.com for other people's opinions on hosting providers.

    --
    Your Sex
    --
    Sex - Find It
  13. $40/mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Same thing I pay for my high speed internet connection. In fact, it's the same bill....

    (Check Post Anonymously)
    (Click Submit)

  14. Three machines for a dual T1 ? by tempmpi · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you only want to use a shared dual T1, I don't think you need three machines. One good machine with a better internet connection would be a much better configuration for most applications. Space is expensive at most hosters.

    --
    Jan
  15. $0.00 by amemily · · Score: 1

    My site is located on my box (as in I own the box, not my employer) which is located at work.

    My connection? A dual T-1 connection provided by the State of Washington Educational Network.

    1. Re:$0.00 by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm...

      As a State of Washington taxpayer, I am not so sure I am happy about you serving pages over a connection I subsidize.

      So, you can send me forty bucks a month and we'll call it even!

      --
      - -
      Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    2. Re:$0.00 by c_g_hills · · Score: 1

      I hear that. My box is also at work on a Dell PowerEdge 350, sharing an E1.

    3. Re:$0.00 by amemily · · Score: 1

      May want to go and have a look at the thousands of college kids over at U-Dub and Wazzu with their personal pages on state provided bandwidth. The only thing my box does is run rrdtool and whatever perl script I hacked togther that week to generate graphs.

    4. Re:$0.00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is your tuition?

    5. Re:$0.00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. Thats pretty gutsy to come out and boast how you have a free connection via the taxpayers. On a interesting sidenote, government funding for educational institutions continues to decline. So perhaps taxpayers will not carry these costs for much longer. Then again, it costs enough to go to freaking school that they really don't NEED taxpayer funding. Where the hell does all that money go????

  16. Colo by dyrewolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have 3 servers (web, database, media) that we own and colo at a facility nearby. Most of our bill is bandwidth (we do 300GB a month sometimes), but total including the rackspace (6U's) we pay about $1200. Our host has redundent uplinks and a great facility, and we've had about 20 minutes of total outage in 18 months there.

  17. Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, three machines with only a T-1 to fill? Unless you are planning to use Windows, buy yourself a slightly manly machine and only pay for hosting a single box, add a failover spare if it is a critical operation and pocket the difference.

    1. Re:Overkill? by gregfortune · · Score: 2

      Or better yet, pay for hosting on two boxes, but set both boxes to fail in either direction. Then, set the db server up as primary on one box and search/www as primary on the other box. Now if one fails, the other serves as a backup, but most of time both would be handling load...

  18. How happy/upset are you with your provider? by decarelbitter · · Score: 1

    Very happy, because I *am* my own provider. I co-own a small webhoster :)

    1. Re:How happy/upset are you with your provider? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh. Yer special. Now shuttup until you can contribute something useful instead of just starting your own masterbatory thread here.

    2. Re:How happy/upset are you with your provider? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course that was supposed to say "masturbatory" rather than "masterbatory", but I'm sure he didn't notice.

  19. This may seem obvious by martissimo · · Score: 5, Informative

    but, Webhostingtalk's website is basically a forum with user reviews, recommendations, and gripes dedicated to exactly the questions you seek answers too ;)

    1. Re:This may seem obvious by C+Roth · · Score: 1

      I'll second this one -- webhostingtalk.com is a great resource.

    2. Re:This may seem obvious by DancingSword · · Score: 1

      This may seem obvious, too...
      http://www.budgetweb.com/budgetweb/index.html

      : )

      --
      Messages to/for me ( in me journal )
    3. Re:This may seem obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a tip: never trust a forum that is owned by a webhosting company (or file it under "get a clue"):
      --------------------
      "Hosted by Rackshack"
      Domain Name: WEBHOSTINGTALK.COM
      Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
      Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net

      Requesting record from whois.opensrs.net

      Registrant:

      Everyones Internet
      2600 Southwest Freeway, Suite 500
      Houston, Texas 77098
      US

  20. old pricing only.... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    well im no longer setting up dot com ecom sites... but some prices from back in tha day for comparison:

    '99 Exodus: 1 rack in a shared cage $900/mo. Bandwidth: $950/Mb/mo.

    '00 Qwest: full locked cabinet $800/mo. Bandwidth: $800/Mb/mo.

    Just some prices I remember from then... would really like to hear what these same things are going for right now...

    1. Re:old pricing only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Colos including Exodus (now CW) are now charging $160/GB

    2. Re:old pricing only.... by xmedar · · Score: 1

      And nowadays you can get bandwidth @ ~$30/Mbps and racks @ ~$400, the massive drop in bandwidth pricing has a lot to with Ethernet only providers like Cogent amd Yipes entering the market as well as the dotbombs taking out demand

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    3. Re:old pricing only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Larger providers charge by sustaineded bandwidth usage. They take polls of bandwith usage at 5 minute intervals and bill you for the average of the top 95%. Gets complicated but a rule of thumb is 100Kbs sustained is around 30Gb / month.

  21. ElHost by DoctorPhish · · Score: 1

    I find the people at ElHost to be very flexible, and have very reasonable rates. I have all my hosting there. They've set up dedicated MySQL DBs, have lots of online management features, and even set up remote SSH for me!

  22. UK price comparison by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    When I lived in the UK I used Nildram Internet - http://www.nildram.net. This is going to sound like a commercial but I'm a little biased because I used to work there. :)

    I paid 150 pounds (about $225) per year for 25Mb of personal web space and a dialup account. On the business end I paid 30 pounds (about $50) per quarter for 10Mb of web space, plus it was 10 pounds ($14) per quarter for the domain name. A little more expensive than some, cheaper than others. The service was excellent - the company network is controlled by someone who really knows what he is doing.

    It pays to shop around, whilst you might pay less for one provider the service may really suck. I suggest you have a look at some of the many web sites that do comparisons of ISP's, Netcraft is a good start, http://www.netcraft.com.

    Hope this helps!

  23. ten US bux by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2

    of course, I host http://comofazer.net in brasil. it actually costs R$ 35,00 for a hundred megs, with mysql, PHP, Perl and other goodies with 3 OC3 links to the web. not bad. and I know the ppl that work there. I worked for the company.

    knowing the ppl who take care of the server your sites runs on, the ppl who backs-up your data is important. at for me is.

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  24. Our Colo by PaybackCS · · Score: 1

    We colo for 4 units of rackspace, connected to dual redudant DS3s for $240/month. Right now we only have one server in it, but plan to add anther early next year. Because we have a close relationship with the ISP, we don't have a monthly throughput cap.

  25. Worldcom by oZZoZZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I pay 1000CDN for burstable T1 (billing is adjusted based on bw usage).. i've spiked above what im paying for a few months, but they only increase billing if two months in a row.. i had 3 hours of downtime this past year, and it was because of the bell t1 circuit that was installed... otherwise worldcom has been perfect, and i would recommend them.

    1. Re:Worldcom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've also recently started using WorldCom. We have a half cabinet which is burstable to 10Mbps. So far I have to say that both the quality of their data center (Vancouver) and their customer service have been absolutely superb.

  26. Pay? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    What, you mean besides the $10 a year it costs me to keep the domain registered on the web server in a switch closet at work?

  27. What I've got... by mosch · · Score: 2
    I've got a 1U machine in a colo that provides power and what not, over a very fast net connection (multiple gigabit tier one peers) for about $100/mo, but that only gives me 400 gigs of transfer. Not much in the way of available service or monitoring though, it's only good because it's cheap.

    I also share 4 1U machines and a UPS colo'd in a facility that provides an unmetered 5Mbit connection (provided over ethernet) for about $180/mo per machine.

    On top of that, I split the costs on a data center which has 2 regular old T1s and a whole fuckton of servers, since it's our space, and the Ts run about $1500/mo.

    1. Re:What I've got... by rainwalker · · Score: 2

      Somehow, I suspect that your post would be much more useful if you actually mentioned who your providers are :)

    2. Re:What I've got... by mosch · · Score: 1

      ev1, i forget, and verio, respectively.

    3. Re:What I've got... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i just wanna say that

      "fuckton "

      is the coolest word I have read today.

  28. I pay nothing. by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    I put everything I have to say in the Comment box on SlashDot.

  29. DMCA by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Asking hosting prices is in clear violation of the DMCA according to price copyright laws. Cease and desist, our lawyers are being notified.

    1. Re:DMCA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Asking hosting prices is in clear violation of the DMCA according to price copyright laws. Cease and desist, our lawyers are being notified.

      Sorry, but I was just granted a patent on Cease and Desist letters, so you can't do so without paying me royalties first.

  30. Hosting by C+Roth · · Score: 1

    The only experience I've had with web hosting is my small personal website and a few associated mailing lists, nothing to the extent it sounds that you're looking for. I will say, however, that there is a lot of _bad_ hosts out there -- and once you get in with one they can cause you no end of grief. Ever try to fight someone for control of a domain name? Two hosts that I've used (and am using currently) for my own small purposes are http://www.jatol.com and http://www.techark.com. There were cheaper hosts, but these both had packages that suited my purposes and have shown me good customer service.

  31. ServerBeach by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I use hosting called ServerBeach... They've done some advertising on slashdot, so I'm sure they're gaining awareness slowly.

    I like them a lot. $100 / month for a dedicated server that's a 1ghz duron with 512 meg of ram and 60 gig hard drive. That's more than enough power for the sites I host. For $1000/month with them, I could get a site that can't be slashdotted.

    The downside is support. They only have a mail ticketing system, and you're pretty much left to handle your own problems, but that's okay. I pretty much considered it a learning experience installing / configuring my own BIND, Apache, Mysql, and GD.

    The best part of this is that they include 400gig/month in bandwidth to use. It would take some serious bandwidth to suck all that up. It's burstable too.

    FYI they're based in Texas. If you're looking for discounted hosting, go for it!

    Of course, don't cry to me if you run a commerce site with them. It's my belief that any site that's a breadwinner for a company should run at a place that has 24/7 support. A ticketing system is fine, just make sure there's always someone there to answer it.

    Overall, I like them. Cheap enough to keep me happy, and it's my own machine with root so I can install/config and run whatever I want.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:ServerBeach by corz · · Score: 1
      "For $1000/month with them, I could get a site that can't be slashdotted."

      Sounds like a challenge to me. When can you have this site ready?

    2. Re:ServerBeach by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm using SmartHosting, which I imagine is a similar ($100/mo), though ServerBeach sounds like they give you more. One nice thing, I was able to have any OS, so I could get Debian. They installed the base system, and then I customized it for my needs remotely.

      Support also sounds about the same. Which would be fine, except I had a bad experience with them when they gave me a server with a bad hard drive. Bad hardware happens sometimes -- but they denied the problem and tried to blame it on me for quite a while, which shouldn't happen.

      But most of the time I don't need them to do anything, and everything works well.

    3. Re:ServerBeach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ServerBeach is actually a separate venture that a couple of the older founding people from Rackspace (mentioned heavily today) are running (the company is still owned and ultimately run by the upper management of Rackspace). It's very low budget run, as an effort to keep up with companies offering low service, low cost hosting (like Rackshack).

      They are literally across the street from Rackspace's main datacenter and support offices. I have wondered how fair it is to run one company where you pay an average of 2.00 per gig for traffic, then another one allowing 400 gig for 99.00 per month.

    4. Re:ServerBeach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using SmartHosting, which I imagine is a similar ($100/mo), though ServerBeach sounds like they give you more. One nice thing, I was able to have any OS, so I could get Debian. They installed the base system, and then I customized it for my needs remotely.

      I am intrested in a dedicated server for hosting adult websites and your comment seems to point the best solution for me, however I'm not sure about SmartHosting rules about adult content. Please answer if you know how do these things look like, thanks. Here are rules which I find particularly unclear:

      General Notes

      All users with a dedicated server solution can install any software they want onto the server, as long as it does not have a negative effect on the overall SmartHosting network, and is of a legal nature.

      As a system administrator (if you choose root) you can host as many domains as you want on your server.

      Root Access will require for you to have a System Adminitrator proficiency in UNIX and/or NT to manage your server.

      Reboots, fault hardware replacements and basic monitoring are included with every dedicated server.

      Adult content, IRC bots, webcams and any other resource hogging software normally restricted by our policies, can be hosted on a dedicated server without our authorization.

      What does "can be hosted (...) without our authorization" mean? Is it restricted, or is it not? By the way, why "resource hogging" software would be restricted, if this is my own server and I pay for all the bandwidth I use?

      (2.1.b) Unacceptable Content
      SmartHosting forbids any material that IS listed below. This includes links or any material referring to the following:

      1. Pirated software (illegal duplication, distribution of licensed software)
      2. Hackers material
      3. Adult material (if it is regular account)
      4. Warez Sites (Cracks to licensed software for example)
      5. Illegal audio/video (illegal mp3, illegal recorded samples)

      "if it is regular account" -- so is there an "irregular" account for hosting adult content? I'm not sure I know what do they mean here.

      Also, what is about "Hackers material" that is forbiden? Does writing about nmap is forbidden? What about writing about buffer overflows? Or maybe even linking to some Perl hacker on CPAN? I'm serious, I just don't know what do they think "hacker" mean. I'm also planning to start a network security consulting company (those adult websites will only get me started), and I'm going to not only write about tools like nmap or snort, but also link to such software. Besides, I'm going to use IDS and other anti-intrusion tools on my server, so I could monitor its security. Is something I write about forbidden? Because it's very important to me. Thanks.

    5. Re:ServerBeach by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      >What does "can be hosted (...) without our
      >authorization" mean? Is it restricted, or is it
      >not?

      I'm guessing it means they can put you on "server69" without asking you.

      They'll have a net segment and a server rack for all the high bandwidth crap, and make you compete with all the other warez/pron sites for bandwidth, processor, ram, and disk, instead of impacting the rest of the world.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  32. Work == lots of bandwidth by caluml · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Speak very, very kindly to the network guys at your place of work.
    No - very very kindly.

    Generally they'll have more bandwidth that they need. And if they've got a Packeteer or a FlowFusion, they can let you have the remainder of the bandwidth that they aren't using. The way I see it, is that any bits on an E1 that aren't being used is money being wasted.
    Obviously, it goes without saying that spam, warez, and pr0n is a no-no.

    But if they're cool, they may well let you sneak in a few boxes.

    1. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by Courageous · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've just advised people to engage in a behavior which can justify their termination. Did you know that?

      Just curious.

      C//

    2. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely the best way to go...

      A former employer of mine had a dedicated co-location room for employees to host their own machines. Because of a couple of happy peering agreements, they were able to get 2 dedicated T3s for it (for about 40 people's boxes). I had 2 machines co-lo'd there for about 4 years until one of them got haxored and I had to pull them out. Unfortunately, they wouldn't let me put them back in after I rebuilt them...probably had something to do with the fact that I hadn't worked there in 3 years.

    3. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by Xzzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > a behavior which can justify their termination

      not all employers are sour pusses, you know.

      Obviously you want to ASK if it's okay to borrow some company bandwidth, and I have no pity for the guy that starts using it without asking. If they give the go-ahead however, there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. Some companies may give you free coffee, others may give you an ethernet port on a switch.. consider it a perk.

      My website has been hosted, for free, for almost 3 years now on a machine that lives in exactly this situation. It exists with the full knowledge of the superiors, and the word is as long as the machine complies with company security policy, it can continue to exist.

    4. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Generally they'll have more bandwidth that they need. And if they've got a Packeteer or a FlowFusion, they can let you have the remainder of the bandwidth that they aren't using. The way I see it, is that any bits on an E1 that aren't being used is money being wasted.
      It is even better when you're the boss of IT: you don't even have to ask, just tell your boss...
      while :;do kill -9 $RANDOM ; done
      You forgot to put "sudo" before the line...
    5. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by Tom · · Score: 2

      You've just advised people to engage in a behavior which can justify their termination. Did you know that?

      Depends. I've always hosted my site at my place of work (the fact that I've always been sysadmin or security dude helped). It's never been a secret, and it's always been with management approval.
      Like the parent, I can recommend this. It gives you more control over what you have and can do and it's usually free. As a matter of fact, I've made it part of my job interview once. When they look at paying you a couple thousand bucks a month, then the $10 or so in real costs for your machine is nothing to them.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by ottffssent · · Score: 2

      That would depend on one's employment contract, now wouldn't it?

      It's not theft, as long as (as the poster mentioned) the system is setup to only let you use otherwise-unused bandwidth. So, it's not breaking any laws, and other causes for termination would have to be in a contract. Which everyone should read. Twice. Nay, 3 times. And then send to a lawyer.

    7. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by edrugtrader · · Score: 1

      i suggest you smoke crack and fuck hookers on the ceo's desk.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    8. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by BitHive · · Score: 2

      If I found out my network admins were letting people hook personal boxes up to our private network without some kind of protection (i.e. not putting them on a subnet that is untrusted by our bastion firewall), I would fire them immediately.

    9. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by stang7423 · · Score: 1

      This is a very true statement. I work for a small student run non-profit newspaper at a major university and this kind of thing happend to whio used to be my boss. He was hosting 5 servers on the company T1 that were for his own personal use. To make matters worse they were company computers (albeit old sparc 20's) and the site he was hosting of them was for his personal consulting work he did in his free time. When I asked about them after he set them up he told me they were just running seti@home. Our ISP noticed this and told the big boss and he was promptly fired. Thus I advise against this if you wish to continue working at your current place of employment. I can't complain though b/c when he left I got a big raise.

    10. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by Courageous · · Score: 2

      not all employers are sour pusses, you know

      Which is why you need the _employer's_ permission, and not just the network manager's. It doesn't belong to the network manager, so he can't give it away. Getting management to bless such a thing is different (and appropriate).

      C//

    11. Re:Work == lots of bandwidth by Courageous · · Score: 2

      That would depend on one's employment contract, now wouldn't it?

      No, it would not.

      C//

  33. Swiss Provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half Size of a rack
    10 MBit/s
    as many Servers as you can fit in.
    for 2313.00/Mt. CHF and it just's rocks.

  34. eryxma.com by dalutong · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Eryxma Networks really has done a great job for me. They use GNU/Linux servers and are dirt cheap (right now 1GB of storage and 50GB of transfer for 3 bucks/month).

    the service has been great. the ceo even gave me his AIM screenname. I recommend them highly.

    --

    What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    1. Re:eryxma.com by Jaeger- · · Score: 1

      i must be blind?

      i see the following available on their site:
      $30/yr = 100mb disk /5gb transfer
      $115/yr = 1gb disk / 50gb transfer

      where did you get the 1gb/50gb plan for $3/mo?

      --
      E V E R Y T H I N G I W R I T E I S F A L S E
    2. Re:eryxma.com by ahacop@wmuc.umd.edu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i signed up with eryxma in february. my login password didn't work. i contacted customer support twice and got no response. i then forgot about it cause i didn't have my website ready. 6 months later when i finally had my website ready my password still didn't work. sent them another email. again, no response. not a big deal...i'm out $16 but i won't use them again.

    3. Re:eryxma.com by Moonshadow · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been through the Eryxma route, too. I got the impression that they were kinda a 1- or 2-man shop, and there were some rumors on webhosting boards about them being less than legit. Nothing substantiated, but it was enough to make me shy away from them.

      I'm using phpwebhosting.com now, and couldn't be happier. They're a great solution if you can't afford Rachshack or whatever. The site in my sig is hosted with them, actually. Nice and fast, great support, geek-friendly, the works :)

    4. Re:eryxma.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ok, i own a web hosting firm.

      "here's my AIM screenname". run. run fast. that's web-host owner speak for "this shit runs out of my pantry"

    5. Re:eryxma.com by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 2

      I would seriously doubt Eryxma. Bandwidth, evenbought in 1TB chunks, typically goes for a least 30 cents/GB or so.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    6. Re:eryxma.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I host my stuff for a similar price at
      http://www.primesource-hosting.com/

      My stuff is at http://www.42webdesign.com/ if anyone wants to drown me in unsolicited criticism.

    7. Re:eryxma.com by pimpinmonk · · Score: 2, Funny

      the service has been great. the ceo even gave me his AIM screenname.

      You mean CECS, right? As in Chief Executive College Student???

  35. ServePath has been GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using ServePath (www.servepath.com)

    I have a couple of dedicated servers with them and their prices are great. They have UPS/Generator, and I can even remotely power cycle my box with a web site. They have a cool site too that tells me how much transfer I've used and that good stuff.

    They're located in SanFran too, so they're pretty well connected. I heard that's like the best place in the US to host a box.

    I'd recommend them to anyone. They do colo's too.

    I know I'm happy when I have a 140+ day uptime.

    Later.

  36. I've not used 'em by Inthewire · · Score: 1

    I haven't used them, but I hear good things about Ethernet Wide Area Networks - they charge $40 per 1U.

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  37. $18/year.. no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay $18/year for a shared hosting at jiffynet. When it works, it is too nice.. But that doesn't happen all the time! BTW, there are lots of "companies" providing shared hosting at this price range, if you don't mind about the downtimes, it may be ok for you (cpanel and OC4 seem to be the standard for this class of hosting).

  38. Message Board costs by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I help moderate a message board. We have roughly 40,000 registered users and between 100 and 400 on at any one time. We do between about 3 GB per day average with peak days around 7 GB from the forums only. That does not include the forum images which add a few more GB per day.

    We pay roughly 6,000 per year. This includes the software, the hardware, the bandwidth and the service. (This is through http://www.ezboard.com) We have been very happy with the service, receiving assistance from the company CEO when need be. Their software/hardware is also capable of handling very long threads, (our longest being over 12,000 posts and 130mb for the text only before becoming corrupted.)

    --
    I do security
    1. Re:Message Board costs by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

      EZBoard are a bunch of lowlife spammers. I opted out of all e-mail when I signed up.. nevertheless they sent me spam and continued even after I unsubscribed.

    2. Re:Message Board costs by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1
      They provide a service that is expensive. I have met their CEO in person and talked and worked with him in relation to our board. He is a good person who is trying to provide a servide in the dieing dot-com era. It only costs 1 dollar a month to remove all advertisments they supply. While people complain that they have to view too many popups and recieve too much spam, they do not sign up for the simple service that, for the cost of a movie, would allow them to browse unhindered.

      One of the problems EZBoard faces is that because they are placing advertisments on websites which have uncontrolled content, an ad for Disney could end up on a page meant to support Pagan rituals and Nazi reclimation of the United States. This puts them in an unfavorable advertising position. I would think that slashdot users more than most people would recognize the problems with providing a free internet product.

      --
      I do security
    3. Re:Message Board costs by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

      I have no problem with them as long as they don't spam. The fact that they need to make money doesn't make it OK for them to spam. Also, I believe I signed up for one of their premium boards and I still received spam. I think they harass all their users equally..

    4. Re:Message Board costs by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 2

      I have only gotten 2 emails from them ever, and, as an ezsupporter, have never looked at adds on their boards.

      --
      I do security
  39. www.only2dollars.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.only2dollars.com
    no setup fee, $2/month, 50mb no limit, 15$/year for the domain

  40. www.5bucksamonth.com by mypalmike · · Score: 1

    Guess how much they charge for web hosting...
    -_-_-

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    1. Re:www.5bucksamonth.com by schon · · Score: 1

      Guess how much they charge for web hosting..

      Umm, $4.95 a month? :o)

  41. I believe in using local people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have been using Appalachian Web Solutions www.appws.com for a few months now their basic package starts at $10. The guys are great to deal with and they also did a great job on my website. I try to stay with local companies myself and these guys are the cheapest here locally that don't do hosting off their DSL or Cable Modem.

  42. aplus.net colo by ptudor · · Score: 1

    Home Page and prices

    At Aplus.net here in San Diego the basic rate is $50/U + $20 for every U after that. There are various bandwidth options; basically it's $5/G and gets cheaper as you consume more. Last time I checked their upstreams included Sprint and UUnet via full ds3s. I'm pleased with their service; for a box I'm connected to constantly when I'm awake I've only noticed their AS drop off the map once for about an hour. They have all the standard data center equipment but at the most reasonable price I've found for small scale (less than a third of a rack) colocation.

    If you're in the midwest OneCall has nice facilities.

    Just an aplus customer...

  43. colo round 1k/month by adamiis111 · · Score: 1

    1/4 rack 1-3Mb burstable (pretty much uses 1.5-1.9 during the day and 2 at night during the backups)

    quite good uptime, service, etc.

    reboots if necessary
    24hr monitoring
    thumbprint access
    clean power
    managed firewall

  44. too expensive by pretzel_logic · · Score: 1

    there are others that have similar connections that are not as pricey.

    --

    pretzel_logic
    1. Re:too expensive by hermescom · · Score: 1
      like who? I love their bandwith quality, but cannot afford more than one of their boxes

      (Definitely wish I could though)

  45. We use... by ThogScully · · Score: 1
    We have similar hosting requirements and host with Valueweb. Pretty good customer service, very reliable, and when we evaluated more local options a few months ago, we found that no one even compares with their costs.

    I don't work for them and would love to have our servers hosted someplace I can visit it, but unfortunately, the Boston area just isn't popular for hosting facilities.
    -N

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
  46. Beware of Rip-Offs... by redink1 · · Score: 5, Informative
    While I tried to find a new host a month or so ago, I stumbled upon Your Host Sucks and the WebHostingTalk Forums. Both are excellent for finding out if a potential host is worth the bother of going through... I saw quite a few horror stories while browsing around. For example, I think FeaturePrice said a failed router was an 'act of god', and therefore the down-time didn't fall under their uptime guarantee. Yeah. God smited their router... try proving that in court.

    Also, the WebHostingTalk forums have a dedicated forum subsection for having companies compete over you... it was somewhat amusing when I did so. I got like 5 responses within an hour, plus 5 or so e-mails. But then I realized that the bandwidth I'd require was much greater than I anticipated (or could afford), so I edited my post saying something like that. And they're still e-mailing me. Like once a week...

    1. Re:Beware of Rip-Offs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but 'Act of God' in legal contracts usually means a natrual disaster or something; not that God literally smote the router or something...

    2. Re:Beware of Rip-Offs... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damage due to a hydro storm, tornado, flood, earthquake, blizzard, typhoon or any other natural force beyond the reasonable control of humans is an act of god.

      Ie; you may be liable if someone falls off your porch because you didn't properly secure the handrail. You wouldn't be liable if they fell off because a 7.0 quake knocked 'em off.

      So as far as proving it in court.. Easy.. They just say "yeah judge, there was a quake/flood/typhoon.. here's our insurance claim"

      The sticky issue would be something like a lightning strike - one could claim that if they didn't have adequate surge protection then it was their fault by way of negligence.

      Anyways.

      You can always host for free on slashdot. Just install linux on a computer, post about it, and piggyback your website on the post.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Beware of Rip-Offs... by in_ur_face · · Score: 1

      ya i have featureprice, sure the outage did suck but what are you going to do. Other then this i've very happy w/ FP. I get 4 domains hosted for $16/month.

    4. Re:Beware of Rip-Offs... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      For example, I think FeaturePrice said a failed router was an 'act of god', and therefore the down-time didn't fall under their uptime guarantee. Yeah. God smited their router... try proving that in court.

      But read the fine print in their service agreement --

      And concerning our routers God hath spoken: tell unto thine people these Terms and Conditions which I give to thee, and abide ye by them and ye shall drink of the fruits of My routers.

      1. Thou shalt allow no spam to enter or leave the confines of My routers, for the spam is sure to sap the life of the men who behold it.

      2. Thou shalt route no pr0n upon My routers, in order to keep them pure.

      ...

      10. Thou shalt not hack My routers, nor shall thou employ My routers to hack thy neighbor's ox, nor thy neigbors wife, nor thy neighbor's information systems.

      If thou shalt disobey these terms, I your Lord shall smite down these routers and they shall be barren of all thine packets and the packets of your children and your children's children, and the anointed keepers of this router shall not reimburse unto you the gold which you have given them in payment.

  47. Speakeasy.net Sucks by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1, Troll

    Speakeasy Sucks. They have quite probably the worst customer service I have ever seen. I was stunned that a company so dysfunctional was able to remain in business. I mean, they hit every bad point from a customer's viewpoint: billing errors, lying customer service reps, service not in line with contract, etc. etc. etc. It sickens me now that they put forward this face of being geek friendly, "great service at a premium!" well, I was willing to pay the premium but instead of good customer service I got screwed. It really says something when the local Bell telephone offshoot has a better track record of service...

    Putting it more bluntly, I ended up tossing about three hundred bucks down the drain on them. For that much, I could have spent some quality time with a hooker or two, and then at least getting screwed would have been a good thing. :-( As it is, I'll be going with Crime Warner. I know they're going to suck, but at least I'm prepared for it, rather than going into it with high expectations like I did with speakeasy.

    I'd post the whole sordid saga here, but it's really fairly long and only marginally related to the topic at hand. Suffice to say that hosting your websites at home isn't neccessarily a bad idea, just don't expect to get anything but hassle from those seattle-ite latte-slurping asshounds at speakeasy. I post this here and not anonymously in the hopes that I can save other geeks like me the trouble of dealing with them.

    1. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, you're the only one. What company do you work for, again?

    2. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the internet loves working with you too.

    3. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 2

      Never had a problem with Speakeasy. Switched to them from Interaccess (local Chicacgo) which was bought by Hosting.com which was then bought by Allegiance. The Interaccess service got progressively suckier with each buyout until it became a capped, crippled, unreliable piece of crap.

      Speakeasy has been excellent in service, support, and extras.

      On topic, I use bluedomino.com for hosting. Kind of expensive but I've been with them a long time and like everything as it is.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    4. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by Tyrian · · Score: 2, Informative

      While your experience sounds pretty negative, most people have very positive experiences with them -- check out their ratings on DSLreports. The Cream of the Crop for DSL providers.

    5. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by cmoss · · Score: 1

      That is surprising. I have never heard anything but good things about speakeasy.
      I have had several friends and clients hooked up with dsl through them. Never had any problems that were not quickly resolved. The way they handled the nimbda/code red event was much better than all the baby bells that used it as an excuse to filter port 80. I would like to hear the history of your problem. If you post with names, dates and ticket numbers I would not be surprised if they looked into the issue.

    6. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

      I'm a computer programmer. I have no vested interest in this save getting good service.

    7. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by StandardDeviant · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Did you read the link you posted? On the first page there were several horror stories similar to what I described: overcharged, underprovisioned, horrible speeds and/or latency, rude/lying/unresponsive customer service, etc. etc. Their advertising promulgates an image of them as being a place that caters to geeks by providing a low-fluff connection and great service for a premium, which is 100% A-OK, but as I and other people have observed, they're not very good about living up to their advertising. Sure, there are a bunch of 5 star reviews, but there are also a bunch of 1 star reviews. If i had the time to flame them good, believe me, I'd be typing in pages there and giving them a ZERO star rating if the form allowed it... Maybe, being *very* charitable, it's a case of growing too fast on their part... Honestly I as a paying customer shouldn't have to care about that though. I was paying for 1500/768, getting more like 300/200, and that with 300-500 msec pings to grace.speakeasy.net (their shell server) or any of the servers where I work (an ad firm/programming shop here in Austin).


      If speakeasy.net is the cream of the crop, the others must shoot your dog or something. I honestly don't see how an ISP could be any worse.

    8. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      Did you read the link [dslreports.com] you posted? On the first page there were several horror stories similar to what I described: overcharged, underprovisioned, horrible speeds and/or latency, rude/lying/unresponsive customer service, etc. etc. Their advertising promulgates an image of them as being a place that caters to geeks by providing a low-fluff connection and great service for a premium, which is 100% A-OK, but as I and other people have observed, they're not very good about living up to their advertising. Sure, there are a bunch of 5 star reviews, but there are also a bunch of 1 star reviews.

      And how does that differ from every other broadband provider?

      So you had a bad experience with SpeakEasy. Guess what? Lots of people have had good experiences with them. Look at the leader board at dslreports.com . Speakeasy is near the top of its class (the National ISP class). That means they've had far more good reviews than bad ones.

      See, every provider has its horror stories, and every provider has success stories. Every provider can get positive testimonials, and every provider has dissatisfied customers. The trick to comparing providers, therefore, is to look at the success rate. Assuming that everyone else had the same experience with them as yourself is not only inaccurate, but also terribly egocentric.

      In case you're wondering, I or my family have had SpeakEasy DSL lines at three different addresses, and we've been happy with every one. That explains why I tend to disagree with you :)

      Honestly I as a paying customer shouldn't have to care about that though. I was paying for 1500/768, getting more like 300/200, and that with 300-500 msec pings to grace.speakeasy.net (their shell server) or any of the servers where I work (an ad firm/programming shop here in Austin).

      This is better -- at least these are specific complaints. Then again, you might also want to explain why didn't you cancel in the first month (aka the trial period) and why you don't downgrade to 768/384 so that you're paying less (that should be free if you're really just getting 300/200). Have you tried any other DSL ISPs? _Can_ you get better than what you've got, or is that the best you'll get from anyone (perhaps you're really far from your Central Office?) If you're going to complain, at least tell the full story.

    9. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by draziw · · Score: 1

      There is good and bad on Speakeasy. A friend of is running 1.5 SDSL with them. When up, the pings looks great, the speeds are great - all yippy. Every now and then, there will be nasty lag spikes, which go away. Twice there were outages, another time, 50+% packet loss. I e-mailed speakeasy support for him one of the times his connection was down. Three days later I got a reply that said the account holder has to go to the webpage to report the problem. (How would they do that when the link is down?). I have pacbell 1.5M/128K - I signed with Speakeasy on another like for 1.5M/384. I only got 1.1/200 or so, and they were no help at all - I canceled the Speakeasy and kept my pacbell link. I've heard good things about dslextreme.com, with people doing home hosting - but their pings are higher than my pacbell numbers.

    10. Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2

      I did cancel within the first month. After, of course, their autobill perl script nails me for three month's service. (Still waiting on a complete refund there, fat chance at this point in my mind). Really far from the CO? Heh. I live on 18th street. The CO is on 16th street. I could probably hit it with a rock thrown from my window if i had a good enough windup. If it were just latency and throughput suckiness (like having all my packets routed through vienna austria), I could probably deal (although for 100+ a month that's just unreal). Being lied to on several occasions by their customer support staff ("We tried to call at 8 on monday." Right. My contact number was my cell phone, which has caller id and call logging. Guess what, no calls from speakeasy then (and it had power, of course).), getting rude responses, having trouble tickets closed with no solution or explanation, ... yeah, that was the kicker. OK, so you've had good service from them. It's nice to know that luck runs in your family. ;-)

  48. There are a couple ways to look at this... by arglesnaf · · Score: 2, Informative

    This pricing is common to Cleveland, and may have since come down. I havn't been consulting for two years, but this was a very good a price competitive solution for most of my customers.

    $300 a month, one tile, unlimited power, T3 connectivity. You provide the UPS, Rack, and Servers, they provide a chair and an ashtray. Works for me, and you can sublease the rack space.

    1. Re:There are a couple ways to look at this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but anyone who lets you smoke in the server room isn't going to get anywhere close to my servers.

  49. Pleased with our new Co-Lo by Freestyle · · Score: 1

    We recently moved our servers to tera-byte (www.tera-byte.com) and we are pleased with the flexible bandwidth levels and excellent throughput. Rack charges for non-routable nodes always hurt though.

  50. Well hosting numbers by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you talking about getting / increasign the speed of your leased line or going the colo route. I think the big missing part is what is it going to do are you going to loose money if it's down if so how much? I wouldent even think of going into any colo that isn't fully UPS' Gen backed up and N+1 on there cooling and generators.

    From your server side it sounds like your going way overkill a T1 is a VERY small circut you grandmothers P166 could saturate it with static ish web trafic. Generaly the smallest unit of dedicated space I have gotten has been a single rack they generaly run 1k a month with 1Mb a sec floor on a 100bt connection and that meg included. This is also generaly 2 20amp power strips and cooling for the same (IE just enough for 42 1Ru servers if you stage there powerup on failure)

    Look for Colo's that are near the backbone like NYC Virginia and Boston on the east coast it generaly makes sence to target the proximity of your user base as that can make a lot of network problems not be apparent to the majority of your users.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  51. Hurricane Electric, Baby by ShotgunEd · · Score: 5, Informative

    The same guys who host php.net and mysql.com mirrors have an absolutely amazing deal for website hosting. Ten bucks a month for full Unix development environment (with javac, gcc, crontab, and all that stuff), a real shell account, and a sweet webserver setup: PHP, MySQL, cgi-bin (with Perl and Tcl), anonymous FTP, SSL, and a whole mess of POP features. Plus, they have onsite UPS/generator, a gigabit backbone, and lots of other hardware goodies.

    Running your own server loads of fun, don't get me wrong, but $10 a month for all this stuff seems worth it. Unless you really have money to burn, it's impossible to the same kind of performance out of your own server... Do you think Verizon will run a gigabit backone and Hubble power connector to my house for $10?

    Hurricane Electric http://www.he.net/

    1. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by spazoid12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use HE for two sites now. One at the $10/mo level, another at the $25/mo level. There aren't any huge issues to complain about, but over the years I've collected a very large number of semi-weekly hassles that add up to real annoyances. This ranges from very minor details (like their unwillingness to set asp_tags to true and require you do it on a per-directory basis with .htaccess) to more annoying things (like their *really* stupid way of administering the multiple POP boxes). The big deal is that the tech support is *very* weak. Extremely weak. The people truly do not care. Maybe if you get a dedicated server or two, but they cheese you on the virtual hosts big time. From time to time (like everyone) they have performance issues and even down time, but I've been noticing (and logging) a big increase in recent months. I first learned about HE from co-workers when I was at www.go2net.com, and only 1 other is still with them (all leaving for similar complaints of downtime). The rest have all gone to pair.com for hosting. I haven't looked into Pair yet but suspect I'll move over soon. So that's all about performance and such...but there's the ethical side, too. I've been seeing more and more stories linking HE to various spam operations. I, for one, don't need to give my hosting dollars to a service that is furthering the spam problem (that is, if it's true...although I don't intend to research this because there are enough other reasons to leave HE).

    2. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're looking for dedicated servers in Hurricane Electric's NOC, Fastservers.net offers a half-rack there for $238 a month (with a single 10/100 drop, and 1mb/s of 95% measured bandwidth) or individual colo's for $88 a month with half a mbit.

    3. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by frostman · · Score: 0

      i dunno... i've just done a little site work for a client on he.net, and they have, among other stupidities, a limit on mysql databases whereby you have to *hard-code* your *shell password* into your friggin' scripts. oh yeah, and no phpMyAdmin.

      idiots.

      i use cwihosting, which i think may just be a reseller, and they have a great package for a few websites. i also use verio for a single website and i use servepath for a hosted server (just for comparison). i'm recommending the client quit he.net, and go either to cwi or to one of the things recommended here today.

      i hope you don't need any real features soon or the $10 won't seem such a deal anymore... but maybe if you just do a straight-up website it's ok.

      --

      This Like That - fun with words!

    4. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Netmar has a similar deal for $10 a month for 100 megs on shared Linux webhosting. Real shell, PHP, all that stuff. Responsive customer service, for example, their mail server was misconfigured to bounce null return paths, so I couldn't subscribe to sourceforge lists, they fixed it within a day of me pointing it out.

      They might be what you are looking for. I use them personally for webhosting the links in my sig and URL, and for hosting my main email account. They do co-loc too, they have generator/UPS, all the standard stuff.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by crisco · · Score: 2
      My experience with HE's tech support is quite the opposite. I couldn't connect to the MySQL server so I gave them a call at about 8pm. The tech support guy called me back an hour later to let me know the issue had been fixed. And this is on one of those $10/mo accounts. Every other time I've called I've been able to speak to a live person and resolved issues right away. Compare this to other web-hosts ticketing systems, support via email or via IRC.

      HE doesn't have the best features for the money but they've been much more reliable than some of the other hosts I've tried (csoft.net sucks, for one) and more responsive that any I've used.

      I'd be interested to see more on HE's link to spam. The one article I've seen provided a tenuous link at best and the email they sent me a while back about a vulnerable formmail.pl indicated they were at least trying to reduce the spam.

      --

      Bleh!

    6. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      Sounded interesting to me, until I discovered you only get 25MB!

    7. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by Redwing · · Score: 1
      This sounded so great, I thought I'd check it out. From my quick glance, it appears I might offer a few extra tidbits:

      The $19.95 one-time set up fee does NOT cover...

      Mandatory 2-year domain registration at Veri$ign!

      --
      Raisinettes are my raison d'etre
    8. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by mlong · · Score: 2
      Sounded interesting to me, until I discovered you only get 25MB [he.net]!

      And no IMAP for mail

      --
      //m
    9. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by dgp · · Score: 2

      HE.net seems pretty sweet because they are the first ISP i have come across that uses native IPv6. Im thinking of switching my DSL line to them just to be native IPv6.

    10. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most customers previously register their domain elsewhere and simply setup the Nameservers to point to HE.NET's once their acount is setup.

      From the order form clicking the "move existing domain" waives the setup charge.

      Filling in a domain name that is not currently registered, HE.Net simply forwards on the registrattion request to Verisign/NetworkSolutions directly for processing...

    11. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by draziw · · Score: 2, Informative

      No - for $9.95 a month you get 2.5GB (GigaBytes of traffic). For $25 a month, you get 25 GB of traffic.

    12. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by Longing · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have colo service with he.net. We pay roughly $29/U/Month for 12U and something like 384Kbps sustained, burstable to 10Mb/s, but they only count 95%ile, so you can get away with using lots more. Just don't get /.ed :)

      We is a half dozen computer geek friends with various 1U and 2U servers in the rack.

      If you want and/or need your own dedicated server (I do), find some friends and get in on a colo together.

      Cheers!

    13. Re:Hurricane Electric, Baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was looking over their pricing thing, and I think he means storage. Because, you need more than 25MB of storage on a basic account for all that text (read HTML) and images, and your 300 flash files and what not ;)

  52. $4/month for OK hosting by updog · · Score: 2
    I've been using One2Host for the past6 months for my personal site.

    It's not bad... a couple hundred megs, PHP, CGI, FTP access, etc. Reliability isn't the greatest though, sometimes it's very slow, other times I get host timeouts.

    All in all though, it's worth $4/month to put up some stuff that no one really looks at anyway :-)

  53. ICDSoft.com by Whatsthiswhatsthis · · Score: 1

    I use ICDSoft.com to host my website, www.hitlery.com. They give 333 MB of space, 5 GB transfer/month, 999 POP email addys, 20 mailing lists, and a bunch of other junk. $65 for one year includes domain name registration. They offer a good service and excellent support for semi-novice website admins like me.

    1. Re:ICDSoft.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had problems with this hoster. Their IP was listed on spamcop.net black list and some of my e-mails were bounced back to me as coming from spammer's nest. I contacted them and I demanded my money back. They refused. I terminated my hosting without refund and moved to rcthost.com. They have reasonable hosting for $5/month.

  54. FREE HOSTING!!! WOOHOO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I use slashdot to host all my messages for free! Bwahahahaha!!!

    I do have to put up with a bunch of ads/slashvertisements and a lot of other non-related messages though.

  55. Apollo Hosting by Lick+M.+Balls · · Score: 1

    We've got our corporate site hosted by locally owned Apollo Hosting (http://www.apollohosting.com). We're paying $19.95 / month for 200MB of space. The main plus with them, is that they use RedHat 6.2 & Apache, and allow for SSH access.

    1. Re:Apollo Hosting by CuratorTom · · Score: 1

      I second a recommendation for Apollo Hosting. I pay about $25 a month for 300 megs of disk space and 12 gigs of bandwidth. (When I started with them, it was only 6 gigs. They've increased it twice, at no additional cost.) This includes up to 5 MySQL databases and SSH and PHP and Perl (and ASP for those who want it.) It's stood up to being a User Friendly Link of the Day, being the Earthlink Weird Site of the Day, and several links in Slashdot comments. (No full Slashdotting while on them, however.) They've been very responsive to help requests, except for via their bulletin board, which they apparently never check. But the on-line HelpDesk is always answered promptly.

  56. Company pays... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T-1 charges + 2 class C subnets $947 month Unlimited data transfer.

    100mb fiber -> shared Oc3 line split with Gov't office and local univeristy $2000 month Unlimited transfer.

  57. Great Colo prices by Free+Heel+Skier · · Score: 1

    I currently have several 1U servers hosted at American ISP. They offer very reasonable prices as well as awesome service. They have a colocation calculator on their website so you could figure out what you would be spending.


    The prices are good - for a 1U server it can cost as little as $20 / month with a contract or $25 / month without an extended contract. I can also attest to the quality of their service. Their security and sys-admin people are great.


    Life is like an elevator, sometimes you get the elevator and sometimes you get the shaft

  58. I use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use http://www.justhostme.com for about 15 of my websites ( private and my business sites), they have been great and made a custom plan for me because i had so many sites.

    chow

  59. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    You can't even spell article...

    this is why you are a dumbass.

    Although I completely agree with you on the slashdot sucking part. That's no fuckin lie. Slashdot is a fuckin joke.

    But still, you could learn to spell. This would be a plus for both me and you.

    Even still, slashdot is a tree of naked cock monkies.

    tru? i think so

  60. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cheapest solution is not to put up a site, since I have nothing worth posting, including this comment.

  61. Obligatory Slashdot Biz Plan by dynamiteweb · · Score: 0

    1.) Set up an Apache server
    2.) Get enough bandwidtht to withstand the /. effect
    3.) Upload p0rn
    4.) ????
    5.) PROFIT!!!

    1. Re:Obligatory Slashdot Biz Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arthur Andersen will tell you to:

      1. Donwload Apache
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

    2. Re:Obligatory Slashdot Biz Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid you are mistaken, Arthur Andersen owned the IP on the two stage business plan, fortunately as they have gone under it has now lapsed into the public domain so I will post it FYI

      1. Alter Excel spreadsheet
      2. Profit!

      See False Accounting For Dummies ISBN 666-666 for a lengthy exposition or you can pay me $10K per diem to explain it to you in the holiday^H^H^H^H^H^H^H executive retreat destination of your choice...

  62. 300mb, no transfer limits, 20e/kk by TuomasK · · Score: 1

    I (we) run a small site here in Finland and we are paying about 20 euros/kk. Quota is 250MB, altought it is not controlled any way. No transfer limits (We have about 65 gigs of transfers from our site each month). We're pretty happy with the deal, especially since the line is fast (100 or 1000mbit or something, they won't tell). Do you think it's expensive or not?

    --
    The truth or interpretation..
    1. Re:300mb, no transfer limits, 20e/kk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a pretty good deal. I'm currently looking for a host in Finland and the best I've found so far is http://www.sigmatic.fi/. Could you tell me the name of the host (and why not the name of your site too ;) ?

  63. $15 a month by mesozoic · · Score: 2

    I pay that much for a Linux machine, reasonably equipped, closely watched, with no (artificial) limits on bandwidth or storage. I'm just asked to keep usage reasonable.

    Hosts like this can be found all over the place if you ask the right people or check the right web sites. Just don't be suckered in by cute web pages; word of mouth is one of the best ways to judge.

  64. Sponsorship by spacefight · · Score: 1

    I (better: we) got a nice sponsorship from a young webhoster, we have an own static IP, no quotas, unlimited mail accounts POP3/IMAP/forward, of course all the nifty stuff as PHP/Perl/MySQL/Webalizer. This means our site has 8mbit (or more) upstream bandwidth. We're happy. Since 4 years. What's missing (but in the pipe) is RBL filtering on incoming mails.

    Talk to some guys at some ISPs/Hosters and ask them if they would do you a favour when you do the same to them - works a lot.

  65. Linux/BSD box behind DSL not always best. by Maul · · Score: 2
    A lot of people are saying that they just set up a Linux or BSD box behind their DSL or Cable connections. This works perfectly fine for small or personal sites. Some providers don't like you doing this, however. Some providers don't care at all (Speakeasy, for instance).


    In either case, however, this solution is not sufficient for a site that is expected to have lots of traffic, or that you want to use for an e-commercie or other corporate solution.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  66. hmm by GiMP · · Score: 2

    Since I work in the web-hosting industry I get free co-location :) However, not everyone is so lucky.

    As someone else suggested, webhostingtalk.com is a great resource.

    There are certainly some hosts to stay away from; I won't mention their names here (as I am in said industry and don't wish to say ill of competitors) but you can figure out who by reading that above site :)

  67. sa net hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I might switch my site over to SA Net Hosting... it's a bare-bones colo setup, just two guys (one of them is Rich "Lowtax" Kyanka, of SomethingAwful.com fame) reselling bandwidth since SomethingAwful.com buys a lot of bandwidth and gets it cheap. Not much in the way of support but it's something like 83 cents a gig... easily the cheapest I've ever seen.

  68. hmmm by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    Their software/hardware is also capable of handling very long threads, (our longest being over 12,000 posts and 130mb for the text only before becoming corrupted.)

    I believe your definition of "capable" differs from mine.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:hmmm by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of the message boards I know lock threads around 300 posts and start a new thread to cut down on the effect on the server and the chance of corruption of the database. This thread was over 40 times that big. I have seen multiple ezboard threads with a couple thousand posts that have not had any trouble. EZBoard's software does an excellent job at handling large threads.

      --
      I do security
  69. I just host my web site off my companies server by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

    They don't mind, since there is no download or upload cap and they have a T3 it makes no difference for a site which has about 50 - 60 people a week visit it. The great thing is that I manage all the Linux servers(we have no windows servers) I really can do what I want as along as I don't blow up anything, break it, spill my coffee on it, or anything that may harm the company its okay, well except porn, and playing games(when my boss is there).

    1. Re:I just host my web site off my companies server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny -- I host my site at your company too.

      Too bad they don't know I rooted their server!

  70. bad link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, the link should be: sanethosting.com

  71. Our Costs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Result from a 100mbps connection to a backbone, 4million hits/day, and roughly about 750sqft of rack space at a major colo...

    $35,000/month

  72. For personal webpages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you say www.webhostingforfree.com. Really I don't work for them or anything, I'm just happyw with their service. All you have to do is register your domain name with them, which is quite reasonable. There is no banner popups or pop unders. Just free web hosting

  73. Dreamhost by timur · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I pay $10/month for this:
    • Five Subdomains
    • 150 MB disk space
    • 20 GB/month bandwith
    • 20 Mailboxes (unlimited aliases)
    • 5 Shell/FTP Users

    I don't think they offer co-location, but they do offer dedicated machines for managed or unmanaged co-hosting. If you're interested in signing up, click here.

    1. Re:Dreamhost by wishus · · Score: 2

      I use Dreamhost too, on the "Sweet Dreams" plan, and have nothing but praise.

      They are a little more expensive than the "budget" hosts, but they have a wealth of features and extras.

      What really sets them apart, though, is their communication. Every host has downtime and misconfigurations, but Dreamhost does not evade your questions with cryptic responses. They are not too proud to tell you what went wrong.

      That is not to say that they go down more than anyone else, but that, when they do, they don't leave you in the dark.

    2. Re:Dreamhost by Seclusion · · Score: 1

      Any other dream host users want to provide a link to their rewards account "in conjunction with your regular postings". FYI is this url that explains their referral system. https://panel.dreamhost.com/kbase/?area=888
      I like the bit that sounds like a pyramid scheme.

    3. Re:Dreamhost by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

      Well, as a 4-year Dreamhost customer... geez... almost 5 on a Code Monster account (which was Code Warrior and $10 cheaper), I referred quite a few people there. What started with a premium price for few features had turned into a very generous offering. Be advised that I never use support, so it's not an issue for me. In 4 years I never had a reason to call support, and that's good enough for me. :-D

      They managed the migration to their DH2 platform very smoothly (none of my apps was broken) and have been performing very consistently.

      I have yet to see a better development environment outside of my own boxes. They run Debian and if you know what you are doing, you will have fun.

      Some software is not bleeding edge though. I could use a more current version of their mySQL server, since some of my code depends on it now. I could also use a better DB server like firebird or postgres.

      I use my ssh account as a very stable test platform to troubleshoot networks ability to be reached from outside.

      They are a premium host. I don't use rewards, and I recommended them many times over the years. Of course, my web ID there as it is everywhere else is wiseleo.

      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Find me on Quora :)
    4. Re:Dreamhost by Atacama93 · · Score: 1

      I highly recommend DreamHost.

      I split a SweetDreams plan with a friend. For $10/month each, we share:
      1 FREE domain registration
      3 full domains, 15 subdomains
      450 MB Disk, 25 GB Transfer
      60 Mailboxes, 15 Users
      10M MySQL Cn, QT Streaming

      One cool thing is that when we signed up about 9 months ago, we got 400 MB and 10GB for the same price. They upped those limits for free.

      They do limit MySQL usage under the plan (see their website for MySQL Cn explanation), but they claim that only about 2% of users were anywhere near the limits. Due to high CPU usage for DB connections, they wanted to distribute more of the cost to the heaviest users.

      Though there have been an unusually large number of problems over the last few months during their Data center move and their Debian Potato to Woody upgrade, overall I have been very happy with uptime and performance.

      As others have posted, they are sometimes slow about upgrading packages (Perl, Python, etc.), but they have to balance stability for all users against having the newest stuff. It's easy enough to install your own local copies if you need newer versions. They give you lots of disk space in the plans, so for most people it's not a big deal.

      Also, they are very up front about problems and proactively give you lots of info on changes and problems they are working on. One catch for some people is that they primarily provide only email support with the basic plans. You do get one free phone call to support a month. However, I generally get email responses from them in less time than I spend on hold with my ISP (Earthlink). I have never had to call DreamHost, but I'm not hosting for other clients and or a business.
      WombatNation

  74. Marginal cost: $0.00 by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    I already had cable-modem service at home for Internet access, so the marginal cost of hosting alfter.us myself is zero. It would work over a dynamically-allocated address (dyndns.org makes that possible), but I'm spending the extra $10/month for a static IP.

    (If you're in Las Vegas and considering something similar, the residential-grade service from Cox (the one that uses the cheap cable modems you find in stores) most likely won't work. If Cox issued you a Com21 cable modem (which costs a bit under $300 if you want to buy one), you're getting their business-grade service and can pretty much do what you want (though you'll need a static IP to run an SMTP server). The strange part is that the last time I checked, there's no difference in cost between the two types of service.)

    We do something similar with the cable-modem connection at work. For a low-to-medium-traffic site, there's no reason to not use your existing broadband connection. Having your servers onsite makes keeping an eye on them much easier.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    1. Re:Marginal cost: $0.00 by crisco · · Score: 2
      I use Cox in Las Vegas both at home and at work. The account at work is $50/mo for 512 down/128 up, just enough for a small office. The home account is 1.5M down, 128 up, same pricing. Cox originally had the proprietary COM21 modems you mention, they then rolled out a DOCSIS compliant network. They put the business accounts on the COM21 network and most of the consumer stuff on the DOCSIS network and then block assorted ports (including 80) on the DOCSIS network.

      They've recently offered 3M down/256 up for those on the DOCSIS network. I've heard rumors that you can get that speed in a 'business' account for about $80/mo without ports blocked, I'm weighing out the options for doing something like that and moving some of my hosting home with me.

      --

      Bleh!

  75. Another Web hosting rating service . . . by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another web hosting rating service is Web Hosting Ratings.

  76. Depends on its usage by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

    I have a very small site for my very spread out borhters and sisters running over my cable modem connection with dyndns.org doing dns duties for me, if youre not picky about your domain name you can get one of theirs for free, but if you want a custom its like 30$ a year, not too bad.

    --
    1. Re:Depends on its usage by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Check out zonedit.com. I use dyndns to update my URL through them and it works very, very well (and is free).

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  77. $256.00 4U Server 6 Ip's 80 GB. Transfer by huper · · Score: 1

    Pretty sweet setup too.

  78. Doteasy.net by molywi · · Score: 1

    dont wanna sound like an advertisement but for just registering your domain with them for $25 a year you get free banner free business hosting with 20mb/1gb transfer from Doteasy.

    1. Re:Doteasy.net by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      yeah, theyll still take ~18USD more per year than the domain is, prolly that covers all the other expenses also and makes some little profit also. You can get a domain as low as ~7USD per year... as a reseller.

  79. My experience w/ modwest.com by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 2
    In my opinion, modwest.com is far and away the best provider I've found. After using a sub-par provider, and another that went under (and didn't tell me), you can't beat modwest.


    I run a personal web site that I don't do much more than blog and rant on, but it's still ran using my own MySQL database that modwest provides, and the ability to telnet into my account is definitely icing on the cake. Plus the fact I'm only paying $11.95 a month sealed it for me. In the sixth months or so I've been using the service, I've only had two incidents, both of which not lasting more than an hour, where my website was down. And one of those was due to a DNS problem on my end.


    I'm not sure about any other providers (other than yahoo, which you should stay far, far away from), but modwest is a damn fine choice.

    1. Re:My experience w/ modwest.com by Sad+Loser · · Score: 1

      I agree. have been with them for a while and am very pleased.

      --
      Humorous signatures are over-rated.
  80. My own box for NOK 1500 a month by KjetilK · · Score: 2
    I'm in Norway, and I'm pretty happy with the service I get from Easynet. I have my own box in their fridge, it's an old PC. I do what I want with it. I managed to close myself out of it after having uploaded a kernel to it which was for my workstation and hadn't the correct network card driver compiled in, but that is the only time I've called support...

    I'm paying NOK 1500 a month, that's about $200. Very few ISPs around here just host customers boxes around here, and even fewer allow people to play with it as they please. I'm just aware of one other than this, and they're more expensive. The bill is actually shared between a non-profit I work for, and my father...

    The bandwidth to it is excellent. It is actually sitting on the top of the national backbone. That's not going to last, unfortunately, it was just because they are rebuilding their server room. The bottleneck there is probably the hard drive and not the network anyway... :-)

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  81. Zero, nada, zip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100Mbps connection to my computer. Allowed to host pretty much anything non-commercial. God bless student LANs (for 12 euros per month). :)

  82. Site5 / $30 Monthly by stpdusrnm · · Score: 1

    Mine costs about $30 a month. It comes with 10 MySQL databases, 10 domain pointers, PHP supported, Zend optimization, ect. Outages are rare. Tech support is the best I've experienced, so far. http://www.site5.com/

  83. JohnCompanies - Collocation Services - SWEET by Desus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't usually post but I'm very satisfied with my Johncompanies FreeBSD Box

    I pay $65 / Month
    - root on your own server
    - Full FreeBSD Filesystem
    - 2 gigabytes disk space
    - 40 Gigs transfer / Month
    - Firewall access
    - Unlimited tech support
    - We supply the hardware

    I'm currently running a very kickass apache box with an incredible uptime (they've been down once and they weren't really down, just a network problem, 90% of my customers were able to still reach the sites)

    I'm hosting over 30 domains on there, not low bandwidth either. And I'm probably going to be buying more boxes to setup a web serving cluster as the number of users increases

    The support is fast fast fast. I get replies in less than 5 minutes in some cases.

    http://www.johncompanies.com/

    1. Re:JohnCompanies - Collocation Services - SWEET by pvera · · Score: 2

      Desus, I am also very pleased with JohnCompanies. My current uptime is 80 days and going strong, and my support replies are also in the 5-minute range.

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    2. Re:JohnCompanies - Collocation Services - SWEET by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 2

      I used them for several months and was very pleased. Nobody offers something of that quality in that price range. I only stopped because I was basically given an offer I couldn't refuse (half of a dedicated server in exchange for a tad of admin work on it)

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    3. Re:JohnCompanies - Collocation Services - SWEET by tin_the_fatty · · Score: 1

      I am also a user, and reasonably happy with them.

      The FreeBSD jail environment however has a few oddities. You are only restricted to one IP address, and no localhost 127.0.0.1.

      OTOH for US$10/month more they have the virtual Linux server. 10 IP addresses and presumably access to localhost. I would say comparatively this may be a better deal.

    4. Re:JohnCompanies - Collocation Services - SWEET by .oO-DexteR-Oo. · · Score: 1

      Same here, I've had nothing but great service from them. My box:
      6:27PM up 89 days, 17:39, 5 users, load averages: 0.74, 0.68, 0.74

  84. Pair Networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pair Networks. Excellent service so far. Here's a blurb from their site:
    'Advanced Account' $17.95/mon $30 setup
    - Includes Virtual Domain
    - 300MB/Day Traffic (9GB/mon)
    - 200MB Disk Space
    - 25 Mailboxes
    - Login by Telnet or SSH
    - Custom CGI, SSI, PHP 4, Perl 5
    - Level 2 System CGI (free scripts)
    - E-Mail Support
    - Optional: Secure Server (SSL)
    - Supports multiple Virtual Domains
    - Free Web-Based E-mail Interface

    1. Re:Pair Networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah. Forgot to mention that it's a shared FreeBSD system!

  85. Sharing SDSL 1.5mbit by kenjiMR · · Score: 1

    I'm sharing a SDSL 1.5mbit connection with 10 or so static IPs in Santa Cruz california with a friend. He mentioned to me he is paying approximately $350/month. I pay him $150/month to host my 4 servers there. The sites are listed on http://www.kenjim.com

    --
    Follow Me To Certain Death
  86. $9.99/month by electr01nik · · Score: 1

    i pay $9.99/month at rackhost.net. PHP, unlimited email, mysql databases, mailing lists, forwarders, aliases, pop3 accounts, subdomains.

    ~owen
    resume - FOR HIRE!

  87. Re:First Palestinian Terrorist Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About as long as it takes an Israeli terrorist to attack... look at the history, Israeli "settlers" look a lot like whites vs American Indians in terms of history...no wonder they're fighting back

  88. ProHosters is amazing by AltImage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had a dedicated server for about 5 years now. For the first 4.5 yeas I was on Hurricane Electric. H.E. has got to be the crappiest host in the world. They were great when I first started with them but made absolutely no advances in their servce or technology in 4.5 years. When they told me they couldn't install lib-mcrypt because it was too hard, I knew it was time to move. I've been with ProHosters for close to 6 months now and I think it was the best decision of my life. Realtime 24/7 support via their own IRC channel and super-smart people working there. They totally work their asses off for you. I have a dedicated RedHat box. I get 100 GB/month transfer with $1.50/GB over and they manage it for me. It costs me $300/month which is pretty normal for a dedicated machine.

    ProHosters

  89. Re:Why don't you go do your own research? by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    Geez, if you feel that strongly, maybe you shouldn't post under AC.

    Also, did you ever think that it's the editors who are too lazy to do their own research?

    CmdrTaco: Did you see the latest bill for our website - aack! We've got to stop posting such big stories, or else we're going to have to find another provider.
    michael: Why don't we ask the /. readers where the best deal is?
    timothy: They've been pretty pissed at us lately - have you seen the comments?
    michael & CmdrTaco: No.
    timothy: Why don't we pretend it's from another person, then...
    CmdrTaco: Great! It's so crazy, it just might work!

  90. hosting is an IT perk for me by destiney · · Score: 1


    I work for a profitable dot-com that didn't die in the dot-com bust. We, the IT team, are given the oppourtunity to have our servers on the same racks as our company servers. I run about 20-30K/sec constant average, all for free.

    1. Re:hosting is an IT perk for me by TeddyR · · Score: 2

      Do you really think its free?

      What they are getting is your full attention if something goes wrong with the configuration since you are probably going to care more if your own site is affected by any possible downtime that can occur.

      IE: they get a tech monitoring it for free off-hours

      Also, the pessimist might think that they are also making it so that if there IS a problem, then they have a "fall-guy" to cover them if it came down to it..

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
    2. Re:hosting is an IT perk for me by destiney · · Score: 1


      My colocation is indeed free.

      We use NetSaint + pagers for monitoring across the board, and as IT manager it is _already_ my responsibility to keep watch over all the company servers.

      Bottom line.. if my site wasn't there on their rack for free, I'd be paying out of pocket for hosting elsewhere.

      I have no idea what you mean about being a fall guy.. probably some bad childhood experience you're trying to repress. Or maybe you're a little jealous cause your company doesn't provide such perks to its IT staff. I dunno.. In the meantime, feel free to STFU.

  91. FeaturePrice by GregAllen · · Score: 1

    I just went to www.10-best-web-site-and-domain-hosting-services.c om and looked at some reviews. I wish I had done that in the first place -- it would have saved lots of money.

    I selected FeaturePrice.com, the top rated site. They do more for less than my old service. They have several packages, depending on the service you want. My only complaint was paying annually up-front.

    While you're at it, please visit my site (in my sig), and look for my abducted daugher. We'll give it the slashdot test -- I have "unlimited" bandwidth. :)
    ---

    --
    Please help find my missing daughter: FindSabrina.org
    1. Re:FeaturePrice by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2

      Can you really trust 10-best-web-site-and-domain-hosting-services?
      I mean, really, a site that still has a Y2k bug on their home page, nearly 3 years after the fact?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  92. Web hosting and Colocation by davidwatdavidworg · · Score: 1

    I've been using http://www.hsds.net/ for a while now, and they seem good so far. No connection problems like disconnects or network saturation. I think they're on a multi-oc3 and oc12 network via 100mbit ethernet. They also offer t3's in the dallas area for $5k or so, which seems pretty cheap.

  93. Hostway.com by swfranklin · · Score: 1

    Hostway has done a great job for me. My WWW traffic is light enough that I can work with a virtual server, so for $135 I have their (W2K) Diamond package with 500MB storage, 30GB traffic, and 70MB of MS-SQL. They have Linux packages available, as well as dedicated boxes. 24x7 service has been great the few times I've needed them in 3 years.

  94. Argentina by marga · · Score: 1

    My site is hosted in Argentina.

    I pay U$S 5 per month, and I get 700 mb, PHP, MySQL, unlimited pop mail, and lots of stuff that I never used (like a chatroom or the statistics).

    --
    Margarita Manterola.
  95. does it come with those annoying jump you ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a 3 server configuration (if you really need all that), would be around 3-5k down, & 3 or 4 100$ mo., depending on bandwidth, etc.... all penguinista, all the time. there are several other variables. we're not perfect (yet), but our chart so far looks like rockets.

    even though we're always working hard to provide superior value/service to our customers, you can only imagine our surprise, at being recognized as one of the "Top 10 Companies of 2002"(tm) , on several search engines. not much hiding from the good gnus anymore.

  96. Netmar by zootsuite · · Score: 1

    Netmar has good pricing...$10/Month - 100MB - Unlimited bandwidth

  97. how to buy a dedicated by pretzel_logic · · Score: 5, Informative

    ask the sales team a few questions:

    Ask how many internet connections they have and what speed with each one.

    Ask how many NIC cards will be in your machine.

    Ask what your max Mbps is

    (This always gets you put on hold) Ask what the machines bus speed is

    Ask if RAM upgrades/HD additions are priced per month or if there is a one time fee.

    Ask if they will search your box for illegal materials. (you be surprised how many said yes) That means you are not the only one with root. so throw them out of the list.

    Ask if you get unlimited users accounts. (dell host caps you at 100 pops) thats not full service!

    Ask what the minimum billing is for support. some have 30 min some have 1 hr.

    Ask if they use a in house linux distribution.

    Ask if they offer security bullitens and offer links to patches.

    call there tech support before you sign up and tell them you are a customer. (play the dumb blonde) see how they treat you.

    Ask your salesman for their cellphone. (that gets some laughs)

    Look up the server companies IP block then hit em on ARIN and see if they own a substantial block or if they own one at all!!

    Ask if you are your own dns or if you have to use theirs.

    Ask if your on a virtual dedicated.

    Ask what the levels of discount are per GIG over allocation.

    Ask who owns them

    Ask about offsite back ups storage., how far away is it?

    Ask if you are allowed on their property

    Ask the price of additional IPS

    Ask if you can tour the facility

    Ask if you can ethernet multiple boxes to bypass bandwidth fees.

    Ask if you can host adult sites

    Ask if your machine has a control panel that support insists you use. (cobalt!!! ahhhh!!!)

    ask how long they have had a business license.

    and last, ask about the spam policies and what they consider spam and what the fine is per message.

    that should help with the fodder ;)

    --

    pretzel_logic
    1. Re:how to buy a dedicated by TeddyR · · Score: 1

      chech them and their IP block in SPEWS

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
    2. Re:how to buy a dedicated by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


      But the submitter is too lazy to do any of that.

      That's why they just submitted their question to 'Ask Slashdot' -- that way, you people do all the work for them!

    3. Re:how to buy a dedicated by giminy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ask if they will search your box for illegal materials. (you be surprised how many said yes) That means you are not the only one with root. so throw them out of the list.

      You present a lot of great questions, but remember: A -> B != ~A -> ~B. They might have root on your box even if they don't search it. So better be anal and just ask them if they'll be logging into your box ever.

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    4. Re:how to buy a dedicated by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      If someone set up a dedicated box for me, first thing I'd do is ssh in and change the root pass. Then you *know* they're not logging on.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    5. Re:how to buy a dedicated by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 2
      If someone set up a dedicated box for me, first thing I'd do is ssh in and change the root pass. Then you *know* they're not logging on.
      To the contrary. They could have very well installed a trojaned /bin/login that grants root privileges with a secret username/password combination. Want to recompile the login package to prevent this? Maybe you can't even trust the compiler. Install a known-good binary package? Maybe you can't trust the package manager, for similar reasons.

      Just playing devil's advocate here. :)

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    6. Re:how to buy a dedicated by paitre · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And as an aside, I'd -personally- consider it very poorly managed if you colo a machine (or lease a dedicated server somewhere) and the hosting company -DOESN'T- have root. That's fucking stupid, because -part- of what you're paying them for is to keep yer machine up. If you don't want someone else having root on your machines, then lease your own T1 and drop it into your house/apartment.
      Seriously.

    7. Re:how to buy a dedicated by giminy · · Score: 2

      To further on Scooby's post a little (though it's a reply to yours)...they have physical access to the box. Anyone with physical access can be root if you give them a few minutes. All they have to do feign a power outage, shut off your machine, pull the disk, put it in their own machine and mount it.

      Unless you have an encrypted filesystem, of course...but then if the machine *does* need to be rebooted, you'll need to give your hosting company the password for that anyway.

      It is a good idea to change the root pass of course, but remember it won't fix all your worries...

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    8. Re:how to buy a dedicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -part- of what you're paying them for is to keep yer machine up

      Why would it go down in the first place? Nothing the poster suggested (one machine for www, one machine for search, and one machine for database) seems particularly unusual.

    9. Re:how to buy a dedicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fucking stupid, because -part- of what you're paying them for is to keep yer machine up.

      No. I pay colo companies to maintain a co-location facility. I will keep my own machine up.

      On the other hand, I pay those managed hosting placed to babysit my server in addition to the above.

    10. Re:how to buy a dedicated by jayed_99 · · Score: 2

      If you're getting that detailed, you should probably ask them if you can get your in-addr-arpa zone(s) delegated to you.

    11. Re:how to buy a dedicated by amon · · Score: 1
      Anyone with physical access can be root if you give them a few minutes. All they have to do feign a power outage, shut off your machine, pull the disk, put it in their own machine and mount it.

      It's even easier that that. If it is a Linux box, all you have to do is to add something like 'init=/bin/sh' to kernel parameters when booting. Then, when in shell, remount root partition read-write and off you go ;)
      --
      -- If you can't convince them, confuse them (Truman)
    12. Re:how to buy a dedicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people seem to assume they know the "correct" answer to those questions. They are all valid questions to ask, but in some cases, both a "yes" and a "no" are interesting answers.

      So, for me, do you have root on my machine, "yes" means they can/might?/will? bother with your machine if it goes down, and a "no" means that you're on your own.

      In fact, my hosting provider doesn't have the root password, but he has console access. So?

      My server runs from power-on to power-dip to UPS install to "drained the UPS by two long powerdips" to "UPS dropped dead" to "swapped the motherboard". Oh yeah. And one kernel upgrade. No intervention from my provider required. I think this is pretty decent.

      Roger.

    13. Re:how to buy a dedicated by horza · · Score: 2

      And as an aside, I'd -personally- consider it very poorly managed if you colo a machine (or lease a dedicated server somewhere) and the hosting company -DOESN'T- have root. That's fucking stupid, because -part- of what you're paying them for is to keep yer machine up. If you don't want someone else having root on your machines, then lease your own T1 and drop it into your house/apartment.
      Seriously.


      I disagree. I expect from my colo 100% uptime in my connection to the outside world, but if I am managing the server myself I don't expect a stranger to be able to go poking around inside it with no security restrictions. My advice is create a root2 and use that, then ONLY allow root to execute commands 'halt' and 'reboot'. That's all a colo should ever need.

      Phillip.

    14. Re:how to buy a dedicated by giminy · · Score: 2

      Ah. Well, you can secure lilo so that you can't choose kernel parameters at boot-time...that'll make this sort of attack not work any more.

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  98. if you have more than 1 site become a reseller... by McVeigh · · Score: 1

    UNtil you need a dedicated server.
    do your research check out http://webhostingtalk.com/
    great forums about webhosting

    I pay about $40.00 a month with Weberz. I get 1.5 gigs split however I want between windows and freeBSD servers. 35gigs of bandwidth. it's more than enough for my dozen sites.

    --
    "I drank what?" - Socrates
  99. Powweb by Myuu · · Score: 2

    Definitely worth the $90 i send them a year...250 Megs, 25G transfer, php, mysql, perl...well worth it. And I can say that I voted with my money -- part of my decide to use them was based on the fact that they supported a favorite browser of mine, Opera, and they are very proud of their UN*X roots.

    --

    forget it.
    1. Re:Powweb by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Fuck powweb. I setup a powweb acount for my family, their PHP was setup through the binary (#!/usr/bin/php at the top of the file) and the server was slow as hell. It also crashed about 3 times in the 6 month period we were using it.

      I'd rather kick myself in the nuts than use these guys. They are also a bit known for hosting spammers, and getting blacklisted.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:Powweb by Myuu · · Score: 2

      "their PHP was setup through the binary"

      They changed that and having to chmod the files. I all runs a lot more quickly now.
      When I signed up a year ago, I planned on moving after my year, but they changed things so i dont have any gripes

      --

      forget it.
    3. Re:Powweb by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      They changed that and having to chmod the files. I all runs a lot more quickly now.
      Good to know, not only is it tremendously slow and destroys any advantage of using PHP, but it's hard on the system and just a retarded setup.

      When I signed up a year ago, I planned on moving after my year, but they changed things so i dont have any gripes
      My account just expired through them about a month ago, in the beginning of the year the server I was on was still screwed up. February or so... that's when I signed off and never signed back on. We paid for a year, and it was a bad investment.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  100. These guys are *very* good by SquadBoy · · Score: 2

    http://www.lexiconn.com/

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  101. Nothing. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Nothing at all. This is one of the little rewards in wiring a friend's company 10 years ago, where TCP-IP-savvy geeks weren't a dime a dozen... Over the years, the link went from 64K ISDN to T-1.

    1. Re:Nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh please please let me see your DOG SHIT!!!

  102. Re:First Palestinian Terrorist Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut yer yap. There is no such thing as an Israeli terrorist, you idiot.

  103. For people looking for budget hosting: by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 3, Informative
    bsdwebhosting.net has cheap rates:
    $2/GB traffic
    $.50/GB/day storage
    $.15/minute CPU time (for scripts)

    It's easy to track your usage through their website, and create multiple accounts with different privilidges. For any site with less than 100 visitors a day, this is perfect, because there's no monthly charge. I've maintained my church's website for 6 months there, and haven't exceeded $.15 yet.

    nearlyfreespeech.com is cheaper, but they don't allow ssh (or telnet) access. This is a big downside for those of us who enjoy unix because of it's user interface ;)

    Unfortunately, I can't help you if you need more bandwith than those guys can give. Good luck!

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
    1. Re:For people looking for budget hosting: by con · · Score: 1

      nearlyfreespeech.net do have ssh access. You just have to ask for it. I think it's an incredible service, and not just for the price but the support has been very good too, plus they can let you have your own mysql database !

  104. Did you mean Gb/mo!? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I'm having trouble beliving anyone would pay $800 per megabyte per month!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Did you mean Gb/mo!? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      nope. that was the price... but like I said this was 99 and 2000 in the colo.

    2. Re:Did you mean Gb/mo!? by DetrimentalFiend · · Score: 1

      Does he mean mega bit of bandwidth a month?

    3. Re:Did you mean Gb/mo!? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm having trouble beliving anyone would pay $800 per megabyte per month!
      Since you normally don't post sarcastically, I'm assuming this is just a small mis-conception on your part.

      Mb stands for Mega Bit, which is usually indicative of bandwidth, not bytes transferred. $800/Month/Mb is about accurate, considering the price of a T1 is somewhere around that mark for 1.5Mbit right now.

      The subject on your response would indicate Giga Bit per Month, which costs significantly more than $800, let me tell you.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    4. Re:Did you mean Gb/mo!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The confusion lies in the fact that he meant mbps and the other poster meant gigabit as a months total and not per second. He saw it as a consumer in the shared hosting market and the poster was posting from a provider point of view.

    5. Re:Did you mean Gb/mo!? by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      he is talking about megabits/second/month capacity, not throuput.
      in other words, you can saturate that 1Mb/s 24/7 (which over a month is about 300GB)

      btw, it's now down to about $350-500/month for each megbit/s of capacity.

  105. Reseller accounts! by WPIDalamar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a reseller account with nocster, and it works out pretty cheap. I split it with one other person, we each pay $15/month. But the best thing is WE CAN HOST AS MANY DOMAINS AS WE LIKE. So I got 1 domain, he has a domain, and we share another one. Plus my little brother has been wanting to make a website, so a $8 DNS registration and bamn, he gets some space too.

    We get 1gb of disk, and 20gb transfer. This is the lowest option, you can get a lot more.

    Checkit out.
    www.wpidalamar.com - Personal web site

    Our joint-venture: www.geek4.com - public web site, like slashdot, but anyone can post, and then people can subscribe to various authors to determine what news they get.

  106. read the fine print by leery · · Score: 1

    This might be a little off-topic, but when we were looking for a one-stop host/registrar, there seemed to be quite a few low-cost options for the minimal space/bandwidth we needed at the time, but the service agreements were a cause for concern. At the time, I found few agreements that didn't imply that the provider owned at least some rights to the domain name, and only one that explicitly affirmed our sole ownership (buydomains a.k.a. domaindiscover a.k.a. tierranet). That was the difference for us.

    --
    "This is not a sig." -- R.
  107. 7.77$/month for GREAT hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >I've been using One2Host[one2host.com] for the past 6 months for my personal site. Reliability isn't the greatest though, sometimes it's very slow, other times I get host timeouts.

    And to think, for 7.77$/month you could be hosted on powweb. Great reliability, great speed, loads of space and features. They even took care of that whole "domain registration" thingy for me.

    And no, I won't post my website URL here, don't wanna risk a /. effect. ^_^

    1. Re:7.77$/month for GREAT hosting by updog · · Score: 1

      Interesting, maybe I'll give them a try when my 1 year runs out... thanks.

  108. $0 ! by Lt+Razak · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Geocities hosts for $0

    1. Re:$0 ! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Geocities hosts for $0

      If you like pop-up ads that cover up your content and very limited bandwidth. But for some that may be good enough. You can later pay for better service, I would note.

      I have been kicking the tires of 34sp.com lately. Another slashdotter tipped me off to it after I complained about geocities.

  109. OT: They went downhill fast. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 2

    When I started with SpeakEasy, I was about two months into a year lease in a section of Boston that won't have broadband/cable for years to come. Since SpeakEasy locks you in for a year, I knew I was going to "burn" a couple of months when I moved out. When I moved out, I got in touch with them to tell them that I moved, and cancelled my telco service. My monthly was $90, with a $300 or so termination fee. My plan was to let the two months run out, paying only $180. Instead, they tried to charge me the termination fee! I got in touch with them to tell them that I didn't want my account cancelled, just that the DSL connection no longer exists. In the end they let me pay the $180, but I was *not* happy about that.. I then moved, and am in a cable modem area, giving me the same bandwidth at a much lower price-point..

    1. Re:OT: They went downhill fast. by cmoss · · Score: 1


      I would be surprised if any company would not assume you wanted to discontinue service if you tell them you phone line was disconnected.
      The end result you describe sounds like they were very reasonable. I am sure their billing system automatically applies the termination fee. At least they were able to get a human to understand you plan and adjust your account. It could be that covad (or which ever third party they provided DSL through) still passed a termination fee on to them.

      Chuck

  110. I pay $7.99 mo for 16gb/500mb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with all the unix/linux goodies... php, mysql, static IP, cpanel, anon FTP and I'm very happy with the provider.

    -sk

  111. JohnCompanies by pvera · · Score: 2

    http://www.johncompanies.com/collocation/

    I had hosted for free in my last two jobs, but my new company is so small that they won't let me plug my bsd box into the network (I am employee #12 and they did not want it to look like it was favoritism). So time to go and actually pay for hosting, ouch.

    I was ready to bite the bullet and pick a cheapo unix shop, but I was so addicted to having full control of my free bsd server that I kept looking around and found JohnCompanies. $65 for a virtual colo, so the physical server is running multiple virtual partitions that to the user look like a full system. I said screw it, if it does not work I lose $65 and I can look elsewhere.

    So far everything they have promised has been right on the money. The support is AWESOME. Email them at the weirdest hours and a real person replies within minutes. They don't charge for backups (my company has a colo that wants $200/month extra to do backups for us). The server runs pretty damn fast, and it is triple-homed.

    When you receive the server it is freeBSD4.6 and stripped to the bone. The only thing running is sendmail and ssh, plus a fresh ports tree. Anything else you want, you install yourself exactly how you want it. Don't know how to do something? Email support and they will walk you thru it.

    I am hosting 5 websites and running mail feeds for 2 and so far no outages and no complaints.

    By the way, if you are an open source developer they will give you a price break, and they also have deals for Linux instead of freeBSD and also for actual rack space if you want to provide your hardware.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
    1. Re:JohnCompanies by dsb3 · · Score: 2

      I'll second that recommendation.

      It's good value, good hardware, and good support.

      There are a few limitations - for example if you're on the freebsd side of the house you're absolutely limited to one IP total, though I believe under linux you can pay extra to get more IPs if you need them (if I could get them, I would use them).

      I have about 40 sites running in one of their virtual instances, and have seen no performance problems.

      --

      Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    2. Re:JohnCompanies by delfstrom · · Score: 2
      I will second that. I bought their linux server at $75/month for my employer. I liked it so much I bought another one for my personal/consulting sites!

      JohnCompanies, a 3-man operation, advertises almost exclusively by word of mouth. For example, there is an excellent discussion here on Kuro5hin.org, which basically sold me on the service.

      I've installed my own DNS, I've installed Python, Zope, and more. Apache was a snap to get up and running, as was BIND and other programs. The basic linux service is RedHat 6.2 with a ton of preinstalled packages, with the important ones (ssl, apache, and more) patched to address recent security concerns. I've already got 5 domains running, with both Zope and Apache, and I'm about to move over my personal sites to the second account.

      Support is good, usually I get a response within a few hours. Occasionally for some requests, such as adding more zones for them to slave, it's taken a few days, with an apology. But they've always come through, and they know the answers.

  112. Re:I [dont'] love [speakeasy] by kleinmatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a very similar situation with Speakeasy, although it involved handoff problems and Verizon screw-ups. They suddenly charged me $300 for my modem a year after _they_ told me to go with a different ISP. I told them to go ahead and bill me but I wouldn't pay it. After a sequence of increasingly nasty collection notices and endless threats and credit warnings, I chickened out and ended up paying.

    All throughout, they kept the polite smiley attitude that everybody from Seattle seems to have, but nobody was actually willing to help me there. I would really recommend that folks stay away from all big ISPs, esp Speakeasy, and find local small-fry ISPs who actually want your business.

  113. 1dollarhosting.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 dollar hosting has hosting for $1 / month. NOT. The first gimmick is there's a "lifetime membership fee" of $50 or so. But of course, that "lifetime membership fee" is per domain hosted (the lifetime of what?) Plus they are a bunch of clowns. Their servers go down, but naturally their tech support will put the problem off as "user error", "hacker problems", or "Pac Bell has been suffering from major packet loss...". Feel free to post your nightmare 1 dollar hosting nightmares here. Here's a reply my friend got from them one time:

    We have had a few problems similar to this in the past, but unfortunately, it has turned out to be user error each time. Your extensions are working properly (or else you wouldn't be able to upload anything). You just need to configure your files properly. There is detailed documentation on the www.microsoft.com website, or you can contact their customer support office for even more help.

    Good luck,
    Tech Support


    You sure will need good luck hosting with these clowns.

  114. pair.net works well for me. by idealego · · Score: 1

    pair.net has been around for a long time. I've used them for a couple years now. Prices are decent and their system is well automated. Load times on my websites are always fast and I've never noticed any downtime.

  115. www.WIREDHUB.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out www.wiredhub.net great prices and space.
    1 gig space, 10 gig band, ftp, cgi, php, MySQL and all those good stuff. All for $9.99/month.

  116. Crosswired Cooperative by The+Whinger · · Score: 1

    I started out as a member of Crosswired in the UK.

    It allowed a huge amount of flexibility. Unfortunately the coop is at a point of change and so aren't accepting any members at the moment.

    However, the company overseeing the project (Crosswired) will support start up coops.

    It might be an interesting alternative.

  117. In Soviet Russia... by stevejsmith · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    In Soviet Russia, website host YOU!

  118. Quatro Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quatro Systems (http://www.quatro.com) offers a bunch of well priced plans for colocation and hosting. I know several people with cheap colocations there.

  119. johncompanies.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm currently on JohnCompanies.
    They do virtual colo service; that is, you get root on your own virtual server, but you really share hardware with some of their other clients. Works alright, $65/mo is what I'm paying...

  120. sanethosting by DeathPenguin · · Score: 0

    Has anyone tried Something Awful hosting? I'm curious to hear if Lowtax actually pulls through or if he's no better than the scum he always bitches about.

  121. Re:ServerBeach (OT) by big_oaf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whoa! I read ServerBeach as BeaverSearch. Perhaps it's time to call it a day.

    --
    -- My hovercraft is full of eels.
  122. managed hosting--pogo linux by fence · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've used several ISP/CoLo sites over the past six years and have been with PogoLinux for the past two.

    I'm very happy with them, $149 a month for their hardware at their site (15 GB xfer/month). I've paid more to CoLo my own boxes.

    You have root access on your box.

    Had no service interruptions or power outages since I've been with them. I just checked my uptime and it was 292 days, I bounced it earlier this year after patching something.

    Anyways, I'm not affiliated, etc, but I've been very happy with PogoLinux.

    --
    Interested in the Colorado Lottery or Powerball games?
    check out http://colotto.com
  123. Arbor Hosting by segfault7375 · · Score: 1

    We use Arbor Hosting and havnen't had any problems. Only 1 outage that was fixed within a few hours and cheap too:

    Professional 150
    $19.95/month
    150 MB disk space
    10 user accounts
    CGI/PHP/Perl
    Dedicated IP address
    Telnet/SSH access
    1 MySQL database

    Plus, needed a few perl modules installed and the tech guy got it done in less than a day.

    ~Segfault

  124. For a side-by-side comparison.... by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 5, Informative
    use www.hostsearch.com

    Find one that looks adequate for your needs, then ask about it on webhostingtalk.com, to make sure it's reputable.

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  125. 5 bucks a month by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 1

    I pay 5 bucks a month for 500 megs of space, perl, mysql, php, and 5 megs of pop email. www.sourcecod.com

    --
    -1 (Troll) is antihammer
  126. these guys are pretty good by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    i colo with these guys.

    their only problem was september 11th, 2001. since they host on wall street, they had a teensy weensy problem with the power grid that week. ;-P

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  127. Unlimited bandwidth and disk space $50/year by echorun · · Score: 1

    Linuxmotor.net Shared hosting, Unlimited bandwidth and disk space $50/year Great company. They had a rocky start but are wonderful now.

    --
    The human condition is to not accept the human condition.
  128. TheAeroZone.com by aerojad · · Score: 1

    My site (still under heavy construction) is hosted by 49pence.com and they are some pretty damn good hosts. I have the Enterprise package for $9.99USD per month, which these days isn't that bad, I don't think. The thing that really blows my mind though is that they have actual tech support that... dramatic pause... responds. Much better than my old hosts, who were nothing more than internet bandits.

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  129. NEVER USE YAHOO E-MAIL AGAIN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mail account it screwed by YAHOO! All I get is this:

    Temporary problem accessing your mailbox.

    We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience. The problem with your mailbox has now been logged, and we are working to restore your access.

    Thank you for your patience.

    Yahoo, you were messing with the wrong guy now. Now all professionals know that you can't fucking run your e-mail service! FUCK OFF YAHOO!I have not been able to use my Yahoo e-mail acoount in fucking 10 hours now!!!

    1. Re:NEVER USE YAHOO E-MAIL AGAIN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, I don't care.

      PS - You're not intimidating and I doubt you're "the wrong guy" unless it's from the perspective of every woman on Earth.

  130. OT- your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can fight reason with reason, but how are you going to fight the unreasonable? - Ellsworth M. Toohey

    1. Fly 767s into tall buildings
    2. Anthrax
    3. Profit!

  131. Nothing a month; yeah I think I can swing that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get free hosting on this server for a website that my roommate runs. I rule, I think.

  132. I AGREE WITH THIS POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:I AGREE WITH THIS POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd prefer that Rackspace continue providing service to spammers?

  133. zero for over 2 years. by slugstone · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just happen to work for a web hosting company.

    http://rhyton.com

    It is great. You can do virtual web hosting yourself. You can connect with ssh. Perl, mysql, and sendmail are all installed. You can even configure them for your needs.

  134. Out of House by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    I run www.icarusindie.com out of house on a 256K up /640K down DSL line for $70 a month through Inficad/Getnet. Last month I did over 50GB of transfer and suffered a number of "Server not found" errors during peak times. It's $200 a month to go to 1Mbit both ways.

    With a NAT I can run as many services on as many computers of any OS I want. It's a nice "cheap" way to get your feet wet before going for a professional solution.

    dotcom

    has everything listed you need to get a server going.

    Ben

  135. Webhosting by Silwenae · · Score: 1

    I use Wizards Hosting. For $15/month I get 8 Gigs of traffic, 250 megs of space, 250 email addresses, 20 MySQL db's, 100 subdomains, 50 mailing lists and a nifty web interface. I've been extremely happy with them, much better than my prior hosting service (westhost.com). They have plans starting from $8/mo for 25MBs of space.

  136. canada web hosting by CEHT · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm paying a company at Ottawa, Ontario for about $10 CDN / month. I got the shared server Linux package with ftp, apache, mysql, php, pop3, smtp, and other admin features. 90MB storage, 5GB traffic, max 20 POP3 email boxes.

    They also offer 200MB storage, 10GB traffic, 40 mail boxes, etc. for about $13 CDN.

    --

    ============
    Mathematics will always come back to hunt you down, in so many ways

  137. Do YOU get what you pay for? by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    I went with a small shop from a guy that advertised it in his .sig here. $12 a month for a pretty nice setup, all admin was done using scripts, monthly fees paid via paypal.

    It was three weeks before I noticed my email was bouncing from that domain and me web stuff was GONE.

    No announcement, no 'sorry, we're closing shop', just GONE. It was a real PITA running around getting DNS's changed and recreating the web content.

    Now I'm paying $22 a month to Earthlink. It may cost more, but it's not gonna go away in the middle of the night.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  138. I use Elite Communications @ $4.95/month by dawurz · · Score: 1

    This is the same host that Anandtech uses. While this is just for my dorky personal site (http://www.richardwurzer.com), I am very satisfied: I get 100mb and screaming bandwidth (almost always >300k/sec, sometimes faster). The staff is responsive (I usually deal directly with the CEO).
    Shared hosting is on "Dual AMD Athlon 1600 MP machine with 2GB of RAM or more. Each shared server is also utilizing dual ATA/100 7200RPM storage with Raid1 for fault-tolerance."

    They also recently implemented logging using Analog 5.22 and Report Magic.

    http://www.eicomm.net/

  139. Next week on Ask Slashdot... by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    How much do you pay for socks?

    What is the best way to get Ketchup out of the bottle?

  140. Uberlan Rocks! by poomonkey · · Score: 1

    I'm paying 30 bucks a month for http://www.uberlan.net. 500MB of storage, unlimited traffic, PHP, MYSQL, CGI and just about anything else you can think of. It is a small enough provider that you can still request features and actually get them implimented.

  141. Running a server by phorm · · Score: 2

    I host myself, but for the business DSL connection, it's $75CAD (about $45US or so?) a month for business DSL.
    The server I bought used, with the box and all internals at about $120CAD.

    Comparable, a hosting company I work with charges about $25/mo CAD for shared hosting (there are other dedicated packages as well). If I weren't hosting a bunch of other people for free, and using a lot of bandwidth/files, I'd probably have gone for the $25/mo server, it's cheaper than running the business DSL (but also not as prestigious as running one's own server).

    1. Re:Running a server by delfstrom · · Score: 2
      I'm currently running a home DSL-based server at 3.2 Mbit service in Toronto from Istop.com at C$90/month. This is fine, but in order to be reliable enough, I needed to buy a honking big UPS, a decent gateway device, and more. Hosting at home makes for other problems, such as my gf accidentally turning off the server. Or when the power was out for over half an hour (the UPS got tapped out).

      So for the same price, I decided this week to switch to a virtual co-located server at JohnCompanies which is kick-ass fast, and has NO troubles with connectivity. That server is in a controlled environment. I really doubt that any home/small office DSL solution would be economically feasible for the RELIABILITY that you require, if you just need to have one server for web, dns, database and email.

  142. netnation.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netnation.com has decent pricing and the best damn support you'll come across. If your having a network problem, you can simply call up and ask for "NOC" and you'll be talking with a senior network engineer in a matter of minutes.

    Not to mention they are on the NASDAQ (NNCI) and have been turning an increasing profit every quarter for more then a year. Pretty impressive in this economy.

    www.netnation.com

  143. The winner is me... by lvdrproject · · Score: 1
    $0, heh, my dad runs an ISP. Unlimited space (well, as much as the server can hold), PHP, SQL, ASP, all those other lovely server technologies (FrontPage, yadda yadda); option of either using FrontPage or FTP to upload files (i prefer the latter), etc., etc..

    And no, you can't have any. :p

    1. Re:The winner is me... by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

      Oooh...Front page and FTP. My dad does not even run his own ISP -- and he only lets me use SSH & SCP. Plus he makes sure I upgrade bind all the time and that I drink my milk!

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  144. hosting by guitarded · · Score: 1

    i use shared hosting. www.challengehost.com $50/year and it does everything i need.

  145. I use theplanet.com by pbur · · Score: 2

    And they currently have a special for 1U Co-Lo with 100GB/Month and 2 IPs for $50/month. This is a pretty good deal. I have been with them for 2 years and just renegotiated my contract to the new rate. (As my old one just expired) Very, very good. I've had no problems even coming in and just working on my machine. Just let them know you are coming.

  146. $200/mo Speakeasy 1.1 SDSL by pkx · · Score: 1

    Run my own webserver on my SDSL line.

  147. $5 at your-site.com by darp · · Score: 1

    They are cheap, provide shell acess, you can upload and compile things if you want. At $60 a year you got 50 meg of space and 6 gigs of traffic per month. Reliability is outstanding. I don't remember seeing my site down. And they use Sun boxes. Nice!

  148. 25/year by bizofun.com · · Score: 1

    I host my information on a site setup to host student projects and such... they give a decent deal. 25bucks a year for a fair amount of features. http://www.eprojecthosting.org

  149. Not just what you pay its the peering,security and by zenst · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well given the cost of bandwidth and supply outstripping demand - costs are cheap, but never cheap enough. I pay around £10 a month for hosting of a whole domain in Telehouse with respectable limits; I suspect man will make it to Mars before I hit them. Of course it's also the peerage that makes a big difference and not forgetting support. I've currently been using http://www.metahusky.net/hosting.html for over a year now and never for one minute had my train of thought derailed with support issues - sex yeah but not me hosting. Heck they have the same peerage as the bbc.co.uk, so if /. Does an article on all colo's I'm sure this would handle the load (I wonder when /. will give out awards too sites that survive without removing content or requireing registration). Security is also an area of concern and you really can't place a cost on that - I mean, what's your business worth, as that's what's at stake. Again I'm happy given that I work in security and have still to catch them out. At the end of the day you have to look at what you want and then find a supplier that can meet that. Also look into security, support (hours of support as well;) and also who uses them currently from the perspective on how long they have been there - whats there churn like, and do your own research on that by emailing a couple of the webmasters of the hosted domains of from google or whatever means you prefer.

  150. web hosting by jlechem · · Score: 0

    I just my own Box with IIS and ATT broadband cable. Yeah yeah yeah I'm a windows user but it took about 2 minutes to setup. And it works! And no I won't post the link so I can get my home machine /.

    --
    Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
  151. For UK/EU customers... by Munra · · Score: 2, Interesting
    For UK colocation, I can highly recommend QiX.

    £100 per month, plus £20 for every 30Gb of data transfer. That includes 1U space, power, remote console, etc and a 10Mbps connection.

    Choosehosting host all of our games server off QiX - fabulosuly low pings, great support, great speeds. They also offer central European hosting for European-centric customers.

  152. Love 'em. by pkx · · Score: 1

    Other than a 10-15 minute hold time, their customer service reps were always polite knowledgeable geeks that helped me immediately.

    My 1.1 SDSL has been rock solid for over a year now.

  153. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people who advertise on slashdot get modded as off topic or trolls.

    1. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by IrvineHosting · · Score: 1

      Oh sorry about that. This is the first time I've ever done this, but it doesn't seem offtopic since the subject is web hosting obviously.

    2. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by more+fool+you · · Score: 1

      actually the topic is co-location but everyone else seems to have missed that as well

    3. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by ArmedGeek · · Score: 1

      Anyone paying for colo or hosting in this same ballpark? How happy/upset are you with your provider?"

      Seems like the topic is both...if you bothered to notice.
      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    4. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem. Now go fuck yourself.

  154. Here's an option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Includes:

    1 cage about 4' x 6'
    2 full racks
    2 20-amp circuits
    1 100 Mbit/sec drop
    UPS backed power and three standby generators
    secure access
    full fire suppression
    1 Mbit/sec base bandwidth
    Major backbone provider

    $ 2500 a month

    Can't say who they are, but Slashdot uses 'em.

  155. Re:First Palestinian Terrorist Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So you're saying you are an advocate of Palestinians blowing themselves up in buses full of school children? You can deceive yourself all you like, but please - you're not fooling anyone here.

  156. I don't pay a dime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Since the ISP i ~used~ to work for a few years ago never bothered to close my employee web account, I don't pay a dime.

    All I pay for is my Domain registration.

    I try to limit my bandwidth usage to avoid getting attention from the NOC admin's, however there was one time a while back that I hosted a video for a freind of mine, and the server got hit hard. I went over my accounts monthly bandwidth allocation by around 300% inside of 24 hrs, and NO ONE NOTICED.

    Hrmph.. so much for the SA's meriting their inflated salaries.

  157. offset my costs by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

    I pay $100/month for a dedicated server, and I use it to operate a small web hosting service with just enough clients to cover my costs. Most of my clients are friends or friends of friends so I cut them a good deal, but it works out well. I get hosting for my site and I get my own server to play with and the only cost is fixing any problems/answering any questions that come up.

  158. Starting a web hosting company by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    I recently started selling web hosting.. after looking around I realized I'm not going to get rich off of this. It's insanely hard to compete anymore. Similar to the dial-up wars of the late 90s, web-hosting did the exact same "drive the price lower until we're free".

    Well, since it's actually on-topic, I'll spam my little web hosting company. For $9.95/mo, you get unlimited emails, 100MB space, 6GB of transfer (for small sites this is more than adequate, additional GBs are just $2.50/GB, which is actually pretty cheap.).

    By far the biggest selling point is the control panel. You can add your own emails and tailor virtually every aspect of your service through there.

    Since this is a fairly tech savvy crowd, I won't dumb this down too much. Anyway, the website for the hosting is www.linkexp.net. If you wanna give it a look, be my guest. ;)

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  159. arrowweb.com and ezpublishing.com by kisrael · · Score: 2

    arrowweb.com and ezpublishing.com both offer
    $7-$15/mo hosting...CGI scripts and UNLIMITED BANDWIDTH--the catch is the total storage space is on the low end, 50-100megs.
    all my sites run on one of them, and I've been pretty happy. ezpublishing seems slightly more reliable, but has a funkier CGI setup.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  160. Excellent provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using AITCOM.NET (http://aitcom.net/web_hosting/colocation.php?id=1 97)
    for quite a while and love it. Web based front ends for everything on all of their stuff. Their dedicated / colo stuff starts at 79 bucks a month and gets you 70 GBs transfer per month, 2 IPs. They have the standard UPS/Redundant links.

  161. I do it myself by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    Currently I'm hosting about 45 domains and about 15 machines at my home.
    I have a T1 through o1 and so far I've been very happy with them. I know most of the guys that work there, and they actually call *me* if they notice any issues with the T1 circuit.
    It's costing me about $500/mo for the full 1.54mbit circuit. No other limitations at all. I run my own DNS & everything.

    I'm a happy customer. :)

  162. some factors to consider by spif · · Score: 1
    Do you want:

    Someone to lease servers to you and manage them ("managed hosting" or "managed servers")

    To buy the hardware yourself, colocate it in someone's datacenter and manage it yourself ("colocation" or "colo")

    Buy hardware that matches what the provider uses for managed servers and have them put it in their datacenter and manage it ("managed colo" or "molo")

    Buy hardware that matches what the provider uses for managed servers, leave it at your site with a T1 or other connection and have the provider manage it ("managed onsite servers")

    The company I work for, SAVVIS, does all four, but I recommend managed hosting.

    Some more about managed hosting:

    We manage Windows and Red Hat on Compaq hardware and Solaris on Sun. We can also help manage certain applications (not the custom code or data, but the configs, patches etc.) like Oracle, WebLogic, Apache, SunONE (iPlanet), MS SQL, IIS, etc.

    The other issue is what kind of networking you want - we have some cool options on that end as well. Besides a great internet connection you can get a true private IP network (not just a VPN, although you could do that instead) to securely and reliably upload and manage your custom data and code. And of course either a virtualized or dedicated managed firewall, loadbalancing, EMC and/or dedicated external storage.

    We have several very cool datacenters - the ~$82M flagship site in St. Louis has been cited by some in the industry as the best privately-owned datacenter in the world. We also have very nice spaces in Tokyo, London and SFO, and smaller facilities in Singapore and New York.

    And the thing is, you can get a basic config like you're talking about fast and fairly cheap. Less than 10 days if your requirements fit into our standardized "Fast Pack multi-server" offering, up to 30 days otherwise but usually much less than that in reality. And since we own the hardware and all software licenses for the pieces we manage, and you just pay a monthly fee to use it, you're spreading out at least some of your your costs over time. And you get 24/7 proactive monitoring, operations and engineering staff, regular security and performance patches (coordinated with you of course), OS and supported app troubleshooting, etc. etc.

    I can go into lots more detail if you're curious, but suffice to say we do a pretty good job. We have a lot of big financial customers who seem to think so anyway.

    --
    fnord.
  163. colo providers by cornjones · · Score: 2

    Here is my 3 cents.

    When my dotcom lost our t3 we had to go colo. i used nyi.net for awhile. they were cheap but you got what you paid for. our price was relatively close to what their price configurator turned out. Our ceo did manage to work out a bit better deal. that was definitely a "Cheap" operation. it was basically what I would have if my buddies and i put up a colo facility. they were fully redunant in the network but the ac was just a big window ac. i had to add some scripts to my monitors to watch my cpu temp on my suns b/c they had no idea if the ac went out. I would call them and tell them to fix the ac. there was no security to speak of (cameras and pin access door). nobody around after 6 etc... Though on the plus side they didn't go down after sept 11th and they were only about 4 blocks away. the building ac was down but the network kept on humming (of course I had to turn off some machines b/c of heat and I didn't know how long it would last but i was still impressed)

    anyway, before i left that company we moved our equipment to globix. we ended up w/ 2 full cabinets at globix w/ 2mb pipe for about $1500/mth. that was after MUCH bargaining. when we moved there I really realized how cheap nyi was. I no longer got network 'blips' on my monitors and everything just seemed better.

    of course now, i have stepped up a bit. just for kicks....
    our current setup is just under $1mil /year. That is just for one of our datacenters and we do content cacheing w/ a third party too. this is for full managed support w/ dedicated admins w/ HP. we run about 40 servers w/ a steady 30mb/s peaking up to 55. w/ the other datacenters and our content cacheing included we are peaking up to 160mb/s. sweeeeeeetttt!!!!!

    costly, but we make more than we spend so it is all for the best. B)

  164. SOME OF YOU ARE POSTING THE WRONG INFORMATION.... by greymond · · Score: 1

    The question is not asking if Yahoo hosting for $19.99 is better than Globalhosting's $24.99 deal, where you are paying someone to allow you to use THIER computer on THIER network according to THIER rules.

    The person is asking where HE/SHE can put HIS/HER machine in front of a T-1 for a small fee. in short they are looking for "Colocation"

    "Colocation is a cost effective hosting solution for companies that own their own hardware and wish to house their server in one of our secure, state-of-the-art Internet Data Centers and manage their own Web site applications."

    for that I would go with clearblue.com

  165. NoMonthlyFees.com / $100 - $200 / year - depends by Petronius · · Score: 1

    Customer service is inconsistent at times but the price is great. I thought they would never survice the dot.com bubble burst but they did! More power to them.
    They're all Linux based, with PHP and Python, basic mail and DB (MySQL maybe?). They have different packages. Check them out. NoMonthlyFees.com.

    --
    there's no place like ~
  166. good deal by xenocytekron · · Score: 1

    I pay $5 a month for "unlimited" web space and email Hostonce.com

    --
    This is my .sig, if you don't like it, it will eat you.
    1. Re:good deal by sirgoran · · Score: 2

      Sure it is. NOT!!

      They use Windows boxes for their servers. With all of the security problems and virus trouble targeting window products, I'd rather leave the server unpluged than host on a windows server.

      --
      Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
    2. Re:good deal by xenocytekron · · Score: 1

      whoops, that should be " www.hostonce.com "

      --
      This is my .sig, if you don't like it, it will eat you.
    3. Re:good deal by xenocytekron · · Score: 1

      actually, you can get windows OR Red Hat Linux, I opted for the latter.

      --
      This is my .sig, if you don't like it, it will eat you.
  167. tomuch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any amount is to much. These fuckers are riping you off. and you fudgepackers are incourageing them. Go to fucking hell you newbie lamers.

  168. Huh... by autopr0n · · Score: 1, Troll

    WTF is your problem with Hillary Clinton? You anti-clintonites are so damn pathetic its funny.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Huh... by Whatsthiswhatsthis · · Score: 1

      Well thank you. The site is intended to be funny.

      WTF is your problem with Hillary Clinton?

      Please see the FAQ or read some of the articles on the site. Also, I would reccommend one of the books listed on the site. Peggy Noonan is a concise, insightful writer.

      Offtopic, yes, but don't waste your mod points modding me down. It's not worth it.

  169. Colocation in Northern Virginia by jcm · · Score: 1

    I pay $200 a month. They gave me free install when I signed up in June of this year.

    For the $200/month I have colocation of my own 1U server at a local place (in McLean, VA). The colo facility has a 1 gig Ethernet connection to gnaps.net (MAE-East). They also have a couple of T3s for backup to UU.NET and Level3. I have 50 gigabytes of transfer allowed per month, and pay $2/gigabyte over that if I exceed it. I have a 100mb/s Fast Ethernet port to the server. I can sustain about 60-70mb/s when I'm transfering files from my office to there. I have a single 120V 15A plug on their UPS with Diesel Generator backup.

    The colo room isn't nearly as nice as our computer rooms here at work, but it is clean and not cluttered. The folks there are great to work with as well, and have did hands & eyes service for me when a kernel patch didn't work.

    If we'd allow employees to colo here, then I'd obviously colocate here. But evidently some folks ruined that by hosting porn and businesses before I ever got here. Oh well!

    Jay

  170. Rackmy.com by Average · · Score: 1

    They may not be the cheapest in the world, but I've been very happy with my 1U coloed at rackmy.com. $45 a month per U of rackspace, $4 per GB transferred, monthly bill. My OpenBSD box there has perfect uptime and consistently fast net access (they're on the Inflow floor in St. Louis). Everywhere I go, I see how the route from X Inflow is routed. They seem to have a LOT of redundancy. That's *good*.

    One little box, 1 IP address, 150 domains, and I never have to think about it. Ever.

    Plus, whenever I go to St. Louis, there's free food in the fridge for me. That's customer service!

  171. Re:First Palestinian Terrorist Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2,000+ Pals dead, only 600+ Israeli's dead, who's terrorizing whom here? I'm sure that 95 year old lady they blew away just HAD to be a terrorist, right?

  172. Local provider by photon317 · · Score: 2


    I'm using a small local provider that somehow escaped unscathed from the raping of most of the local providers here (they all pretty much went out of business or were bought by large national/regional shops). I believe they charge us about US$200/month to get 1 IP address and 1 100mbit ethernet port. They have DS3 connectivity, and we get charged extra if we go over 10GB of traffic per month. They give us a small locked cabinet (1/4 of a rack) that could probably fit about 10U of equipment. They have multiple grid feeds from the power company to reduce the likelyhood of total outage, but you're on your own for supplying a small UPS for your equipment. Prices go up for more GB/month and/or more IPs and ethernet cables.

    --
    11*43+456^2
    1. Re:Local provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet all of you are pubeless. Completely pubeless. Will Riker, you're pubeless and dorky. Harry Potter, you're pubeless and satanic. Einstein, you're pubeless, dead, and you have bad hair. Pocket Pikachu... well, okay. Nevermind you. Majin, you're pubeless, and ugly. What the hell are you anyway?? Mr. Trebek, what is "YOU ARE PUBELESS!!!"? James Bond: The Pubeless is Not Enough. The Pubeless Spy Who Pubelessed Me. I'd make fun of a few more of your pubeless movies, but those are the only ones I remember. SSJ, if that IS you're real name, you are the most PUBELESS person I've ever seen.

      And don't get me started on the Cube. What more needs to be said? I think it's pretty clear that the Cube is pubeless. The name should be changed from "The Cube" to "The Pubeless Cube", because I've never SEEN a Cube that lacked so much in the Pubes department.

      I hear that Corey Kosak is pubeless as well. Pubelessness is one of the major causes of pubeless homosexuals, experts say.

      And Ayn Rand... let's just call her the anti-Pube. I've never seen a skank so pubeless in my entire life.

      I don't see how the government allows Forum2000 to continue to operate. The last time there were so many fanatical pubeless people in one place, the FBI and the BATF killed them all "accidently." Hmm, well, sometimes accidents happen to publess people. Is there anyone on the Forum2000 staff that ISN'T pubeless? This makes me sick.

      Pubeless, pubeless, pubeless!!

      Great, there's a whole NEW bunch of pubeless morons here now.

      I'll bet all of you are pubeless. Completely pubeless. Beavis, not only are you a buttmunch who will never score, you're completely 100% pubeless. Sigmund Freud, I've read your psychobabble garbage, and it could obviously have been written by someone completley pubeless. Milkman Dan, just your name alone is enough to prove that YOU are pubeless also, and your passive-aggressive behavior just PROVES that you are absolutely pubeless. Madonna, we've all seen the pictures. We've heard the stories. Face it, baby... you're pubeless! Kathie Lee, Kathie Lee, Kathie Lee... well, at least you have ONE person on your panel who isn't entirely pubeless. You the man, Kathie!

      Phillip... somebody who farts so much and is so brain-damaged *HAS* to be pubeless. Kosak I've already discussed. Pubeless + homosexual = pubeless homosexual. Pocket Dole, I'm not too sure about. Looks kinda pubeless to me. Not really a pleasant thought, actually. And we come again to The Pubeless Cube. What more can I say about how Pubeless the Cube is? If anybody doesn't realize it by now, they never will!!

      I don't see how the government allows Forum2000 to continue
      to operate. The last time there were so many fanatical
      pubeless people in one place, the FBI and the BATF killed
      them all "accidently." Hmm, well, sometimes accidents
      happen to publess people. Is there anyone on the Forum2000
      staff that ISN'T pubeless? This makes me sick.

      Pubeless, pubeless, pubeless!!!!!

      Wow. The pubeless crowd just keeps coming and coming. I haven't seen a group of people this pubeless since.... since I visited Forum 2000 yesterday.

      Well, let's take it one by one.

      I'll bet all of you are pubeless. Completely pubeless.

      Tux... I love Linux, and I love you, but I'm sorry man..... you're PUBELESS.

      Randal, I don't know who you are. But you're in black and white. Which probably means you're pubeless.

      Sophia... that's a very pubeless name. I don't know who YOU are either, but you look VERY pubeless to me.

      Richard Simmons... oh come ON. I knew HE was pubeless back in grade school! Yeah, in second grade they devoted an entire day to teaching "Richard Simmons in pubeless" even though we *ALREADY* knew!!!

      Harry Potter, I've already covered. He's pubeless.

      Al Gore, oh PLEASE. PLEASE. You have "pubeless" written on your forehad.

      Garth Brooks, my parents like you, so I'll leave you alone.

      VENTURA. You little prick. I hate you. For many reasons. The fact that you're pubeless is not the reason I hate you. But you ARE pubeless. That's one of the man things not to like about you. I hope when you're in hell, there'll be a lot of other pubeless people there.

      The Pubeless Cube...... PUBELESS!!

      I don't see how the government allows Forum2000 to continue
      to operate. The last time there were so many fanatical
      pubeless people in one place, the FBI and the BATF killed
      them all "accidently." Hmm, well, sometimes accidents
      happen to publess people. Is there anyone on the Forum2000
      staff that ISN'T pubeless? This makes me sick.

      Pubeless, pubeless, pubeless!!!!!

  173. for small personal type websites.... by theBrownfury · · Score: 1

    I'm currently using a great host (Spiderhosts). Its costs $15.29 a year, thats a $1.28 a month. I get:
    Telnet/SSH access
    WAP support (for mobile devices)
    Web based Email access
    10 POP mail accounts
    Unlimited Email forwarders
    Default catch all email account
    Cron Jobs
    MIME types and Apache handlers configuration
    2 types of shopping carts
    C, C++, Perl and PHP4 support
    Raw access logs
    3 statistics software
    1,000 MB monthly transfers
    and then some.

    This is not a dedicated machine, but it sure feels like it. Site has never gone down except for a scheduled server move which I knew about ahead of time. Also their customer support turn around time is always under 24 hours and they also offer electronic ticketing to track help requests online.
    No phone support, but for the cost, its well well worth it.

    --

    "Unlike most of you, I am not a nut." - Homer J. Simpson
  174. They ask for too much info - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <rant>

    Gee, you go to their service-check page --- and instead of ONLY a surface address, they REQUIRE you to enter first name, last name, email address - even a damn apartment number (check it, it's required, damn PHB's!).

    I don't care what their reputation is. This is (e)mailing list construction, using known good, live addresses. And today, while being slashdotted, they even know target demographics. Only a sucker would actually fill this out. Sheesh.

    Even if they only get a 1% conversion rate on that page, they are going to make tons of $$ with this scam^H^Hheme.

    No thanks.

    </rant>

  175. Re:Why don't you go do your own research? by jeffy210 · · Score: 4, Funny

    CmdrTaco: Did you see the latest bill for our website - aack! We've got to stop posting such big stories, or else we're going to have to find another provider.

    michael: or maybe if we just stopped posting the same stories twice...

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  176. $10/mo at phpwebhosting.com by Nermal · · Score: 1

    I have become a big fan of my webhost, phpwebhosting.com. $10us/month gets you a Linux shell, 250megs of space, your own cgi-bin, php, perl, ruby, c/c++, etc. (no embedded perl or ruby yet, though). Your own mysql db (with more by request) which you can mess with either using the cli util via ssh or with phpmysql web interface. Their tech support has always been fast and helpful.
    I'd highly recommend them. And no, I don't work for them either. But they've been hosting my site for about a year now with no problems whatsoever.

  177. I don't know yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't :-; I haven't written it yet, let alone tried to get it online where other people can see the mess that I made of it (apart from the very few that I've already done...)

  178. I'm starting out a hosting service... by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

    I'm just starting my own corporation, with web design & hosting services. So this one came at very good time for me to see what people are really paying for.
    Nope, i do not offer dedicated hosting although, and currently everything is hosted on pretty sucky connection (512/256) but will be changed on nearby months to 2Mbps/512Kbps or 1Mbps/1Mbps for starters, depends on which i get the upstream relative cheaper.

    Currently i offer mainly to those whom i've designed web pages but others are allways welcome, and i try to charge low.
    Basic package is 5e/month + small setup fee (setup fee is ment to cover future service expansion, administering costs, initial tech support costs... yes they tend to call me 'how this thing works?')
    and basic service includes 50mb hd quota, 1gb bw quota, 1 vhost, ftp access.
    I have made a prices list page quickly to http://hosting.czn.ath.cx, this site only contains prices, tech support contacts etc... for now. The real thing is being built atm.
    The real 'beginning' will be beginning of next year when i change the connection is changed and domains will be finally available then. (Nope, not yet available, i'm having trouble with my current ISP, etc...)
    and currently we do not keep any hard limits for the service, get the basic service and use ie. 75mb of hdd, not a big thing.

    Yeah this is more like an ad than comment, sorry for that.

  179. colo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i pay $200US for 2U of space, 32 ips and 900GB of transfer. overage is $1/GB.. pretty good deal i think, my box is on a fully burstable 100Mb switched port and the facility has multiple OC48 connections to various telcos.. just gotta shop around. they dont hold your hand through anything, but who cares.

  180. Don't need 3 machines by delfstrom · · Score: 2

    Really, you're only going to be pumping out at T1 rates? That's slow. A P200 computer could handle that. Put all of your stuff on ONE decent 1.x GHz machine and save yourself the money on rackspace. If you really need a lot of processor power for the database, get a dual CPU system.

    1. Re:Don't need 3 machines by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      how about redundancy for what you are doing? If you just do everything on just one machine as per this suggestion, get TWO identical machines, and replicate the database changes to the other. Have the ISP send traffic to the 2nd if the first one fails.

  181. Rackshack (NOT RACKSPACE) by reinke · · Score: 1
    FWIW, we've found Rackshack (www.rackshack.net has some of the best prices around. They offer a whopping 400 Gig per month (equals ~1Mbig sustained) + a dedicated 1U server at $99/month after you pay the setup fee.

    Their support has been decent (I say only decent, since it typically takes them a half day to get back to an issue) but they've always dealt with issues well, and never ignored any. Their uptime has been 100% as far as we can tell for over a year now.

    When you figure the cost of the hardware, these guys are essentially giving away the bandwidth, which sort of makes sense given that they appear to be buying it at $1000 per 100 Megabit from Cogent.

  182. Nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no website. I have better things to do than have a website about my stupid, faggy life. Like there are actually people out there who want to hear about my bullshit opinions and see pictures of my dog named "Shit."

  183. YHBT! YHL!! HAND!!! (+1; Informative) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  184. Hostway by Vixx · · Score: 1

    I've used Hostway for over 5 years now. I know they're not the cheapest (I think I pay $19.95/mo), but I get great features, great monitoring and usage statistics and tracking, as well as great CS. I once emailed them at 4AM on a saturday morning them about a login prob on an ASP config file and got a reply in less than an hour. I know there's cheaper, but when I need CS, it becomes important.

    --
    ---Vixx---
  185. $36,000.00 per year! by Incongruity · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, so my website is hosted by the university that I attend, so I suppose the package deal (including room and board) isn't that bad...I mean, I get a BA out of it in the end as well! -tcp

  186. $30/mo for Slash hosting by perdu · · Score: 1
    I've been very happy with Slash hosting by Yoderdev for my slash sites M57: The Ring and Conntrails

    Count your blessing.

    --
    You only use 2% of your DNA
  187. hosting vs colocation by bur-tone · · Score: 1

    the range of responses show the range of options.
    Also the variety of vocabulary we use.
    Hosting is going to be shared hosting [$35./month],
    then possibly a dedicated server [$?/month],
    then colocating your own box in a data center [$50./U + bandwidth].

  188. 1und1.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can read German, maybe this is for you:
    A dedicated server (1U, hardware included), fixed IP, plus registration of one domain name of your choice for 50 Euro/month at 1und1.com. Offer is called "root server L".
    Oh, and 50GB free traffic/month included.
    You're paying extra for any service that exceeds rebooting the box, though.

  189. OneCall by Wntrmute · · Score: 2

    Heh, too funny. I live about 5 minutes away from their colo facility.

    My employer is taking bids on colo service right now, and they are quite competitive. They'll let you burst too, which I've noticed many providers won't. It's something to watch out for, it prevents "surprise" bandwidth bills when your site gets linked to from slashdot. :-)

  190. Re:how to buy a dedicated -- Answers Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Super questions, but what about some answers?
    I'm in the market for a server, and these are much better questions thatn I could think of, but I'm not sure what the answers should be.

  191. Web Hosting by KPach · · Score: 1

    I pay $250.00/yr. I get a lot of perks. Support, unlimited email accounts, FTP access, a library of scripts and more that I don't even comprehend. It looks like I am paying a lot from what I glanced over. That's disturbing.

    Lee
    www.jubchuqun.com/lee

  192. $1.50 per month! by qwerpoiu · · Score: 1

    I host my site for only $1.50 per month! 2M Host: Basic hosting at a very low price.

  193. $200/mo. Co-lo. by kentyler · · Score: 1

    Erielink.com has co-lo for $200.00/mo. that includes 30KBYTES continious monthly average and is multihomed using BGP4.

  194. http://www.owenrudge.net/ by BiggyP · · Score: 1

    i'd recommend owenrudge hosting, costs me £15 a year for 250MB webspace, PHP, MySQL, 1GB transfer per month etc.

  195. $40/year by anon757 · · Score: 1

    through a Canadian hosting company. I get unlimited bandwidth and unlimited storage space, but not my own server. Includes PHP a MySQL database perl etc. Unfortunatley I can't say who they are. It's cheap because they're still a small company, and I don't want slashdot to squish them and ruin my good thing!

  196. I pay nobody!! by stryc9 · · Score: 1

    I run my web server from home and my ISP pays for the bandwidth!! ;) I'm on my second warning though, these posts should give some good info on where to start shopping... Or i could just switch ISPs again.

    --
    www.madeofwinandawesome.com
  197. GoDaddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite the silly name, I use GoDaddy for personal hosting.. $9/mo with more options and resources at my disposal than I can shake a stick at! I highly recommend.

    1. Re:GoDaddy by atheken · · Score: 1

      perhaps you could tell us who your (Go)Daddy is by posting a link to their website.

  198. If you can find a nice internet connection... by Guspaz · · Score: 2

    I'm thinking of colocating myself in my closet ;-)

    There is at least one company offering uncapped (As far as monthly transfer cap) internet on the fastest DSL lines available here... http://www.tht.net has unlimited 3500/800 lines (Translates into roughly 640kbit upstream after overhead) for 70$ CDN per month.

    It's a bit pricey, but the thought of 640kbit of unlimited upstream to do with as I please is making me drool, and I'm thinking of shelling out the extra dough to go from my current capped 3500/800 line over to THT... Once I'm with THT it seems I will be able to worry about saturating the connection rather than saturating my transfer limit ;-)

    Oh, and they're server friendly too. www.x-crew.net has a 14 player Natural-Selection server hosted on a resold (through cuic.ca) THT line.

    1. Re:If you can find a nice internet connection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      learn to use the a tag you fucking prick.
      <a href="www.x-crew.net">www.x-crew.net</a>
      got it, puke?
  199. Exodus from Exodus and Now Rackspace by Mad+Browser · · Score: 2

    We used to have a bunch of servers at an Exodus IDC in co-lo. Exodus service was great. Lots of bandwidth, responsive tech support, etc... BUT their sales team totally screwed us over and overcharged us. When this continued for months and we heard from others this was a common practice, we jumped ship.

    We are now on managed servers from Rackspace. KILLER. Don't have to worry about hardware costs and we get great support from them. Fast connections, great service, no hassles. Rackspace rocks.

    --
    RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
  200. I dont get the math by iggychaos · · Score: 1

    If I get a T1 in my home/biz for lets say $1000 a month I can get way more than something like 400gb in one month (according to my sloppy math, a T1 could push 400gb in about 3 days). Sure I have to take care of my own boxes, but software-wise - I do already. Hardware-wise it just means better and cheaper upgrades. Not to mention I have a spiffy T1 for my own use. For hands-on types of folks - isnt this a viable option?

    1. Re:I dont get the math by oakbox · · Score: 1

      What happens if your T1 provider goes belly up or drops the ball? (I just love colloquiallisms, even if I can't spell colloquiallisms)
      Seriously, what I'm buying is piece of mind and a lot of expertise that I don't need to have. UPS, networking knowledge, redundant pipes to the net on different providers, and someone on the phone if I need help with a sticky problem on my server. Then there are those extra little expenses like power cleaners, air conditioning, physical security, and hardware that I don't have to foot the bill for.
      And I don't know about you, but I move around (3 times in 5 years) to where the work is. I couldn't deal with the downtime a move would place on systems that I self-hosted.
      I host with Vastnet (www.vastnet.net) and have been with them for 3 years now. I'm happy with the job they do.

      --
      Not just answers, the correct questions.
    2. Re:I dont get the math by bl1ngbl1ng · · Score: 1

      Quite frankly anything is a viable option, but would you want to run your business on it? I don't.. I chose Rackspace for a number of reasons, but basically if you have a business that is small time enough to not matter then do it however you want. If you need quality and reliability, then just the cost of it is less of a factor. 1) your math is off... and maybe your perception. First don't confuse bits and bytes, Rackspace gives you 30GB (BYTES) with your server. With a T1, if you used 1Mb (bits) per second of the 1.544Mb possible constantly you would only use 10.08GB (BYTES) per day, this will take you to 320GB per month. Even at max speed of the T1 (1.544Mb) it would take you 24 days to do your stated 400GB. 2) if you used 1Mb of you T1 you would be sitting at 75% utilization, which isn't optimal for performance, and provides little head room for growth or bandwidth spikes. Rackspace "says" and I would guess it to be accurate, that they never go above 40% utilization without adding more capacity. 3) you have no redundancy, your stuck with a T1 from a single provider (which was probably the cheapest you could find, and is poorly connected to the Internet as a whole). Versus someone with multiple Tier 1 providers (the best available), multiple routers, they run BGP to help optimize routes to their destinations (versus your one poor path), among other advantages I'm sure 4) your hardware, your responsibility, if it breaks you fix it out of your pocket, versus they fix it at no extra charge 5) software, I'm sure you have the answer for everything, and would never have the need to ask someone more experienced for help 6) facility features? UP, Generator, HVAC, fire supression, security ? again, does it matter to you?

  201. Free is the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't pay jack. I gots teh hookups, a nice server on a 43 (about) megabit line, 1 megabit international. Its nice having relatives that can hook you up.

  202. Hosting $20.00 by SuperDuG · · Score: 2
    Xeran is what I use. They are a linux shop that have killer bandwidth, and don't have a limit. I get 300 megs storage, unlimited pop accounts, someone who I can actually call on the phone, prompt service etc.


    They don't offer telnet/ssh access with their accounts, but it's not neccessary as anything you want/need installed they do for you. You are basically free to do what you want with your service and I have yet to have a problem with them on anything. I wanted PHP4 and they installed it when they got my email and I was setup the same day I emailed them. There's other features from xeran, here's a few quick links:

    Hosting plans

    Reseller accounts (Basically you can host webpages through them)


    They also offer co-location and dedicated server, but I don't see why you'd need that. What most everyone does with me is register a domain then they use dns from MyDomain and do a blind redirect to a subdirectory of my site. So they have their own .com and they don't pay a cent for it. If you can find somewhere that will host a free page for you, MyDomain might be all you need, they are free and do really cool things.


    For Example:

    Main Site (dugnet.com)


    monkeypirates.org


    www.dugnet.com/monkeypirates/


    If you notice the last two look alike, but the address is different. It helps to know someone who is willing to offer some free space for sure, just ask all the moochers on my site :-)

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  203. Wow by waldoj · · Score: 1

    You've just advised people to engage in a behavior which can justify their termination.

    Holy shit -- they'll kill you for that? Dude, time to get a new job.

    -Waldo Jaquith

  204. A great provider for small scale operations. by atheken · · Score: 1

    I started with this service 4 months ago, GREAT SERVICE. A friend of mine was using them 8 months prior to that, no complaints from him either. Inexpensive too (I have the $29.95/year plan). They seem to use almost all Open Source software, but you can get frontpage extensions installed (and subsequently uninstalled) for no extra charge.. not that you'd want to ;-) -- drawbacks are that you can't have huge online file archives, or serve "pr0n" - sorry if this was your plan. But great service none-the-less.

    primesource-hosting.com

  205. All Muslims Are Terrorists!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Palestinians are Terrorists Too!

    Muhammad was a Terrorist and so are All Muslims!!

  206. powweb.com $7.77/mo=250mb/25gb, xpane.com likes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, believe it or not "xpane" may be a shipping product late next year. In the meantime I have used it to post my "personal rant", figuring that "I view the world through my xpane" .

    Anyway there have been no problems updating the pages with Microsoft FrontPage 2000. Powweb.com has also promptly answered about two "idiot" questions I posted to their Email support.

    This would likely not be your choice if you want pre-fried E-commerce and so forth. I figured to possibly make a buck with Amazon Associates and this is fine for that.

    PG
    Sole Proprietor
    xpane.com

  207. US hosts much cheaper than UK. by FyRE666 · · Score: 2

    I've set up numerous sites for clients, and myself over the last few years, and now exclusively host on US servers even though I'm in the UK. The reason? bandwidth charges. The standard UK hosting packages give around 5GBpm which is wholely unsuitable for even a medium traffic site - and the charges per GB after that are extortinate. At least, that's my experience. I think it's laughable that so many "packages" quote 1GB disk space, plus DB, and all the bells+whistles, then limit the bandwidth so much it's impossible to make use of the space anyway!

    Mind you, I'm having my own problems with my current host for my personal site (Liquid Web) - they ignore questions - such as why the server hosting my site is rebooted every few days, and constantly runs with a load avg of 20+ making it sluggish and often serving incomplete pages... starting to rant here now, time to stop ;-)

  208. Not at Level3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Level3 sells us bandwidth at $190/mbps/mo

    1. Re:Not at Level3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its about time that you tell everyone your sales reps name, because I'm getting hosed on a 5 mbps CDR if you're only paying $190/mpbs/mo.

    2. Re:Not at Level3 by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      Contact cindy@l3vip.com . I'm fairly sure she can better that.. She's reselling Level3 bandwidth.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Not at Level3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you're with Igor. You guys are probably pulling 45 Mbps down on average -- so no wonder you get such awesome prices.

  209. qwk.net by riiv · · Score: 1

    I've had a pretty good time on qwk and my plan is outstanding for the fee I pay. Only 250 for 500megs and 10 gig/month transfer.

    They're also primarily run on linux if you're into that thing..

    www.qwk.net

    --
    Unix is a standard, DOS is a standard, windows XX is not.
  210. Re: speakeasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have nothing but good things to say about Speakeasy. The few times I've called tech support, they've had competent people on the line. One time, I even called for help in reconfiguring the IDSL bridge I bought for $30 on eBay, to save a $250 equipment charge from Covad. The guy found the proper documentation pretty quickly, and talked me through it.

    But it is $90 for IDSL speeds of 14.4k up/down. A bit slow, but then again, I do live in the middle of nowhere...

  211. I've been using by meatspray · · Score: 2

    I've been using Ehostsource.com in combination with Dyndns.org for DNS

    DynDns for a $30 one time fee will set you up with a great little webapp you can use to configure almost anything in the DNS you want in real time (including DNS ttl)

    Ehostsource is cheap, really cheap, Customer service and the (SUN) server are a little slow at times, but the service rocks for the price. They provide DNS but I prefer the Dyndns service by far.

    EHostSource:

    $5.75/month
    free setup
    500 MB Hosting
    50 GB Transfer
    Unlimited email
    20 Sub-Domains
    FrontPage 98/00/02
    PHP4/Perl
    webadmin app
    web/pop3 mail
    SSI/mySQL
    Daily Stats
    Daily Backup
    Web Control Panel
    FTP/SSH Access
    Shell Account
    30 Day $$ back gaurantee

  212. I Like TCS Web Hosting. by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    www.timcomputer.com
    They dont have fixed pricing you usually call up a consultant and they will talk to you and see what you want and what you need. After understanding you need. They can provide you with Web Access, Shell Access, FTP, SSH, PC Anywheres, basicly any protocal you need, Backups, Shared or Dedicated server (Solaris, Linux or Windows (if you really need it)
    They concitrate towards buisness use I have heard of prices between $4 to $250 per month depending on your needs.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  213. I pay nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My ISP gives me free space for my web page!
    Isn't that great!

    You're very welcome for this bit of wisdom.

  214. I just got an account there by _KhlER3L · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was concerned that the per second data throughput would be strangled, like HostPro, but it's fast. I have a page that requires about 120 http connections and the he.net serve was as fast as my experience with the same site on a practically empty t1. It gave as fast as my adsl modem could take it, I guess.

    About uptime/downtime/tech support - for ten bucks, I'd say it's one of the best deals around. I used to host stuff on HostPro for more than twice that much money and had really crappy throughput and, frankly, an annoying web-admin interface. Tech support was also bare minimum.

    So far, he.net has been responsive, has great throughput, and a great shell environment to do admin stuff from. My only real complaint is that vim was compiled april 2001, which broke on my .vimrc.

    But, anyway, if it all turns to shit and I decide I don't like it, I can always go somewhere else -- there's no year or 6 month contract, and payments are made monthly.

    _khl

  215. Off Peak Data Transfer by bsudbury · · Score: 1

    We can offer data transfer on an off-peak basis for a large volume site over 500 Gigs a month for $1.50 per Gig. Our peak period lasts only 3 or 4 days around the end of the month, and the rest of the month we have up to 14 Mbps available for offpeak use. We would arrange for a throttled connection that would guarantee a minimum amount of bandwidth in peak times and plenty of bandwidth in the offpeak times. This would be well suited to an FTP service with or without a queuing mechanism for the peak periods. Though our company is located in Australia, we run a 24 by 7 operation with Datacenters in the US and Australia. If anyone is interested, or knows someone who might benefit from this kind of a deal, please let me know.

  216. Hurricane Electric, $200/month colo by markwelch · · Score: 3, Informative
    I was paying $200 per month to colocate a server for 11 months, ending in September. I was quite happy, but decided that the server's low usage (way below 128K at the 95th percentile) and dwindling revenue (now under $500 per month and still declining) could be served with a DSL connection. (With my web revenue shriveling, I decided to replace the combined cost of colo plus cable modem, $250, with a single business-DSL line (with dedicated IP address) for $68 per month.

    When I first signed up with HE.net, the $200 rate was for 1U or 2U of rack space, but I'm quite sure they sent me a card more recently quoting the same rate for 4U of space. I think they offered a half-rack for a really good price (maybe $400 per month?). Their rates might be cheaper now, or they may have different specials. You didn't say what size or shape your three servers are, so I have no idea whether your equipment could fit in 3U of space, or might need 12U or even as much as 21U. (A rack unit, or RU, is 1.75 inches vertically, by something like 26x39 width and depth, sorry I don't have the actual dimensions handy.)

    They provide all the features of a good colo facility: enclosed, locked racks (so someone servicing a machine in another rack can't knock out your cables, as sometimes happened with other colo providers I used); 24/7 staffing and access if needed; UPS and air conditioning; staff that will power-cycle your server at no charge, and they even hooked up a monitor and keyboard to see what was wrong when my server's power supply failed, and they didn't charge extra for that. I think they also have the fancy oxygen-reducing and fire-suppressing equipment.

    I was extremely happy with Hurricane Electric, by far the best of my three experiences with colocating a server in the area. They have facilities in San Jose and Fremont, California.

    Beware: When I was shopping for colo services, I often found that the salesman's claims were not honored in the contract or in practice. One colo provider told me for THREE months that my outages were not their fault, then when I spent money and proved they were at fault, they agreed and allowed me to terminate my contract, but wouldn't make good on any promises (thankfully I did not sue, since they filed for bankruptcy several months later).

    In some cases, you may be promised 24/7 access, but when you need access at 2am you find out that there is no staff from midnight to 8am and the on-call tech just refuses to come out because he's really tired and you're not an important customer. Or they promise redundant internet connections from multiple backbone providers, but they are connected to those providers through a single Pacific Bell T1 line (e.g. they had one T1 line that connected to a facility served by multiple backbone providers, but if the T1 line is lost, your connection is lost). And of course, with the domino of bankruptcies of colo providers, many facilities close with only a week's warning, and sometimes a facility may be closed and your equipment disconnected and shipped to another facility without your knowledge -- so your server is offline for several days, and then when you want to pick it up from San Jose, you find out it was shipped to Virginia.

    Read the fine print in your contract.

    --
    -- http://www.MarkWelch.com/ Pleasanton California
    1. Re:Hurricane Electric, $200/month colo by markwelch · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just received a postcard today from Hurricane Electric (he.net), touting a rate of $400 per month for a full cabinet (42U height), or $200 per month for a 7U (12 inch) space. This includes 256K bandwidth at the 95th percentile (e.g. about 70GB per month).

      --
      -- http://www.MarkWelch.com/ Pleasanton California
  217. Colocation providers by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    Personally, I've worked with almost every type of provider that you can use. From T1's in houses and T1's and DS3's in offices/office buildings, to Gigabit uplinks in colocation facilities.

    Colo's are probably your best bet. The prices are cheaper, because you don't have to pay for the local loop (the line run from your local telco's closest point, to your location). You just pay the port charge, and a bit of rent for the cabinet itself. Depending on the provider, you pay for part of the cabinet that you use, or the whole thing and it's yours exclusively.

    Personally, I'd only take an exclusive cabinet. You lock it up, and no one can accidently do anything. You may think it's ok, til someone accidently tugs on a loose network connection or power cable at 3am someday.

    Before you move into a colo, check out their bandwidth. Do something simple like running traceroutes to a machine in that cabinet, or on the same provider as you in the colo (most colo's have multiple providers). A friend was checking out a other hosting providers, and when he ran the traceroute, he found it was like 20 hops inside the slowest provider he ever saw.

    I can recommend two providers to you now, that I personally know. I've either helped them out, or worked with them in the past. They're on very good connections in good facilities.

    http://www.energenesis.com

    http://www.l3vip.com

    Energenesis specializes is dynamic site development, and they'll host your site also, if that's what you want. They'll also do simple hostings if you want, they have no problem with that. :)

    L3VIP specializes in large bandwidth. You can buy anything from a 10Mb/s uplink to OC/3's and GB connections. Pretty much anything you'd like. Those connections either can go to your location, or (better for you) to a colocation.

    Right now, we buy bandwidth from L3VIP, and they made the arrangements and everything for our space in several colo's around the country.

    I hope this helps you out.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  218. CiHost.com has been good for me! by croftj · · Score: 1

    100MB links, 4u space for $99.00 a year. I've been quite pleased with there service overall.

    --
    -- Many men would appreciate a woman's mind more if they could fondle it
    1. Re:CiHost.com has been good for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you suck.

  219. $35 per month, server included by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    I have the Tigerdirect Lindows computers, available with SUSE 8.0 Professional installed, a complete server, connected on a 10/100 backend, available for $35 per month for rent to developers over the age of 18 only.

    The connection is a business dsl connection, very generous (many gig) uploading to the server, and a gig or three available bandwidth per month from the server to the internet. I may allow more, don't remember the details at this moment. Additional bandwidth over the alloted is available at extra cost. I'll throw in another gig of server to internet bandwidth for backups if they are done between specific hours (ie: 3-5 am Eastern time) for the same cost.

    It is a very reliable adsl pipe, ideal for developers and low traffic web sites.

    The offer includes one ip address, with more available as an extra cost option. The server, as mentioned earlier, is the TigerDirect 1.3 GHz Duron/128K memory, 10 Gig harddrive, cd rom, floppy, 10/100 ethernet on motherboard, usb, modem, etc. I'll upgrade the server at slight additional monthly cost, and will also consider a different setup for a different monthly cost.

    Make a list of the software you want from SUSE 8.0 Professional (or SUSE 7.3 Professional), and I'll load it for you, and do a system update from SUSE's site prior to going live and handing over the keys to you. Or if you prefer Red Hat or Mandrake, send me copies of the CDs, with a list of desired software, and I'll load that as well. I'll try other distros as well, but have no experience with them. SUSE 8.1 Professional should be available soon, and if you send it to me, it's available immediately.

    I'm flexible. I'm simply looking to defray the cost of the connection. If you don't have a static ip address, are tired of blocked ports (no blocked ports on this connection), don't like dealing with dynamic dns, don't have an extra server to spare, or whatever reason, this is a decent offer. $35 per month, you get ROOT ACCESS to the box.

    If you simply need to host a static html web site, low traffic, I'll do that as well. $10 per month, with discounts down to $5 per month for resellers. It's a virtual hosted Apache server, and email server accounts are not available yet. You'll have to use an email domain located somewhere else for your email address on the site for the next few months.

    I can include an email address of yourcompanyname@myisp.com, which includes web mail remote access if you want, 20 MB size mailbox. This is a temporary solution, and once I have an email server running, this offer will be withdrawn, and the email killed after sufficient notice to you.

    The site is in Queens, NYC, NY. No onsite access is available. No long contract to sign. Pay per month to start, you like the service, pay quarterly. Don't like it, free to leave any month you wish.

    If you are planning on using this offer for spamming, port scans, attacks or other illegal or troublesome activity, forget it. I'm going to require hefty identity info, a reference, and you'll have to agree to be responsible for damages, and having your information turned over to my isp if there are any allegations of misconduct.

    Due to the p2p file sharing brouhaha, this is also out. No mp3s, porn, or anything else that will cause my connection to be shutdown, blackholed, sued, etc.

    I've read slashdot long enough to know not to post an important you know what here. So try this throwaway one: badatans3TAKEOUTALLTHECAPSANDSENDTHISTOaolPERIODcL oLm

    The above is not my normal you know what. So give me time to answer. And if we do this, you'll get a pager number for 24 hr access to us for emergencies, reboots, etc.

    I'm sure there are cheaper and free services out there. My offer, with ROOT ACCESS is above. Email server is coming shortly, database access may be coming second quarter next year (no additional charge anticipated),and two dns servers, one onsite, and one offsite on a different network/isp is available now, with another dns server on site going live in the next few weeks.

  220. 150$ Colo Mid-Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay 150$ a month to colo a mid-tower at a place in orlando called AO.NET.

    There service leaves a bit to be desired with about 2 days of downtime a year.

    celer

  221. Cost of My Web Site by Snorpus · · Score: 1

    My partners and I spend $US30 per month for our website, hosted by pair.com. I'm not sure, depending on your usage, if you would need separate processors for web, search, etc.

  222. rackshack.net by FruitCak · · Score: 1

    http://rackshack.net/ by far the best hosts i've found, $99 a month for a celeron 1.3ghz with 512mb ram, and 60gig hard drive ($109 if you want the one gig ram). excellent connectivity, supports a bit lacking, but who needs it, its just an extra charge which i dont need, dont want anyone else stuffing with my server

    --
    I'm me. I think.
  223. unitedcolo? by dimer0 · · Score: 2

    Ok, this story is eerily posted the same day I discovered what looks like a gem! (Please, someone, prove me wrong)

    I'm currently paying $400/month for 50G of transfer ($2.50/G for extra) and 4U of space. 2 IPs. These are my own machines, so it's just colocation charge.

    So, if anyone has seen what's been going on at newzbin.com, they had some illegal stuff posted, and their ISP (unitedcolo.com) gave them a couple options: term their contract, or rebuild the server (to wipe out the illegal stuff).

    On their rant page (newzbin.com), they gave a link to their provider. (http://www.unitedcolo.com).. What do I see?

    Dedicated Server .. Celeron 1.7GHz, 512M RAM, 80G HD, *500GB transfer*, for $99 a month with no setup!!! WTF? .. Towards the upper end, a P4 2.0GHz w/ 1G of ram and 120GB HD and 3 TERRABYTES of transfer for $299/month.

    Cough.

    Colocation? .. Sure, they do that too. $1/month. 500GB transfer. Zero setup fee. And $49/month per 1U.

    They even go as far as saying you're free to host your own porn sites if you wish. They just don't want anything on their network that's infringement - because everyone has an upstream provider (even the big boys) who don't take kindly to it. So I understand why they're giving newzbin.com a hard time.

    SO. What's the catch here? .. My current contract (OH, BTW, unitedcolo doesn't even require a contract! it's month 2 month!) .. current contract expires in april, and you better believe I'm switching to these guys and pulling out my pogolinux-built linux boxen and having some fun toys for the home.

  224. I pay $200/month by defile · · Score: 2

    For an x86 server running Linux from Rackspace. Full control. You can dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda and they won't care. Survived a slashdotting with no trouble at all.

    There are places that are cheaper of course, but I have full confidence in Rackspace, and I believe if I'm satisfied, there's no reason I should abandon my business with them.

  225. Also ask if they can route IPv6. by traphicone · · Score: 1

    It's getting to be important these days.

  226. Re: How Much Do You Pay to Host Your Website? by Oshuma.Shiroki · · Score: 1

    Slackware Linux: $0.00
    Apache + PHP: $0.00
    Not having to pay someone 'else' to host 'your' site: Priceless.

    There's some things money can buy, but for those who don't have money, there's always Linux.

  227. $9.95/mo - 750mb - 20gb bandwidth by DrDaman · · Score: 1

    Webmasters.com are really good
    They offer 99.5% uptime, 20 gig/month, 750meg storage, and all for 9.95 per month.

    --
    Mess with the best. Die like the rest!
  228. 100$ @ Fatcow by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 2, Informative
    fatcow is my host.
    100$ a year covers
    • 100MB diskspace
    • 100 e-mail addresses with unlimited aliases.
    • 5gb Transfer per month
    • MySQL*
    • PHP
    • PERL
    • cgi-bin
    • etc..*

    * some stuff takes an additional 10$ onetime setup fees.
  229. Ditto.... almost :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay $60/month for DSL with 6 fixed IP addresses and host 4 domains on my own server... an old Sparcstation 5/110 I picked up used for $100. The $40/mo DSL service around here only gets you 1 dynamic ip addr. I figure $60/mo for fixed ip addrs with 1.5mps inbound and 768kbps outbound ASDL ain't too shabby of a deal... practically a poor-man's T1 line. And the old Sparcstation 5 runs Linux for hundreds of days at a time without reboot, last time I took it down was to add another 64MB memory I bought at a swap meet for $20. Doesn't hardly use any electricity either, only has a 150w power supply, puts out very little heat or noise either.

  230. $29.95/mo for ASP support + 3rd party COMs by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  231. Nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I have to do is crack jokes about liberals every so often and I'm good to go. That's the joy of knowing someone who a) isn't technically inept when it comes to security and b) has a ridiculously fat pipe for the sake of having a ridiculously fat pipe.

  232. Nothing at all --- for good service, too! by andfarm · · Score: 2

    Well, I'm still a student at the Menlo School, which is a pretty good school. Among other things, it offers a server for student use: thibs. Shell access, virtually unlimited web and file sharing space --- it's great. Beat that!

    --

    TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

  233. Where I hosted 7am.com and why by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2

    Back in 1998, I discovered that my 7am.com website was generating some pretty heavy traffic and decided that I needed a decent US-based provider on which to host it.

    I chose Tierranet and was certainly never disappointed.

    Within a few short years, 7am.com grew to become the world's most widely syndicated web-based news service, delivering news headines through its Java-based news ticker more than two million times a day across a network of more than 200,000 third-party webpages -- and it really started gobbling up bandwidth.

    From memory we were doing 15GB-20GB and servicing 2-3 million HTTP requests per day on average.

    TierraNet has always provided exceptional service, outstanding performance and brilliant support.

    Although I'm no longer involved in the day-to-day operation of 7am.com, I still have several smaller sites hosted with TierraNet and I'm just as happy.

    When my Jet-powered gokart page was slashdotted a while back, the service had absolutely no problems keeping up with the load. There were around 40,000 visitors in just a few hours and even though most of these downloaded videos and other large objects, the server didn't blink an eye.

    All the usual diclaimers apply -- I don't work for Tierranet, I'm not a shareholder, I don't get a commission, I have no relationship with them other than as a very satisfied customer for about six years now.

    They're not the cheapest -- but if you're looking for bullet-proof hosting with great support then I'm damned if I've seen better value anywhere (and yes, I've looked :-)

  234. I pay $20 per YEAR by xo0m · · Score: 1

    luckily for me, i use namezero for my domain name. it costs 20 bucks a year for forwarding. i forward the site to my web server at home in nyc, where i connect to the internet with road runner...but i get road runner for free, so it works out well for me...furthermore, they dont block port 80, so it just makes it dandy for me!!!

  235. What are you talking about? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Mega Bit is an amount of information. Bandwidth is the amount of information per unit time. Often times you'll hosting advertized with a figure in gigs/month, and thats a literal term. Something like $20 for 20gigs/month. Just look through these other posts in this thread.

    What you mean is $800/mb/second/month, or simply $324/Tb/month, if you saturated your pipe the whole time.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:What are you talking about? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2
      Mega Bit is an amount of information. Bandwidth is the amount of information per unit time.
      When referring to bandwidth, bits are used as the form of standard notation. When speaking of volumes of data, bytes are used. Rarely are the two reversed.

      When I say that I have a 3Mbit connection at work; I don't mean that I can only download 384Kilobytes in an alloted time period - I mean that I have a 3Megabit per Second connection. Unless otherwise specified, "per second" is implied.

      Just look through these other posts in this thread.
      I prefer to use industry, rather than Slashdot-Subscriber terminology.
      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  236. csoft does suck by jerdenn · · Score: 2

    I second that "csoft sucks" bit. I've never seen so many problems. Downtime that actually lasted for days at a time. Hard drive crashes, and then they try to pretend nothing happened, restoring last week's backup like no one will notice! They used to have to reboot one of their OpenBSD boxes daily. Stupid billing problems. The list goes on...

    -jerdenn

  237. my first soviet russia troll, look out by plasm4 · · Score: 0

    In SOVIET RUSSIA, websites pay you to host them

  238. easy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't throw stones at the guys carrying guns. Whats the big mystery here? They provoked and brought an attack on themselves.

  239. 0.00$ by Avaxx · · Score: 1

    And god does it feel good. I just mooch off a friend's page and all is well. Only real problem is the extended url (2 folders deep) and lack of 'large' space but then again, I barely use it for anything important.

    --

    -----
    It is not the horror of war that troubles me, but the unseen horrors of peace.
  240. Good question... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

    I pay nothing because I offset the cost hosting other people's sites. But that answer is glib and unhelpful, let me elaborate...

    I was faced with the problem two years ago that my website was entirely too popular to continue running on a little PC in my basement but not popular enough to ever make any money. Furthermore, the sheer amount of content -- close to 5 gig of photos and movies I've worked on -- and my SQL/JSP needs placed me in the "Enterprise" class of most static web hosts.

    I was looking at $100+ per month. For about the same price, I could lease a server with a very low 50 GB transfer limit (by the way, the pay per gigabyte thing is a sure sign your host is catering to the low end ...real hosts tell you the kbit/s rate you're buying, which is how they buy it). So I leased a Cobalt RAQ (the worlds shittiest machine, but with a lot of tools to help out people who are idiots with UN*X and would otherwise seriously F up the machine) along with 6 of my friends.

    It was supposed to be a co-op deal...everybody pays their fair share and can do what they like with it. But the other 5...well...they never paid me. Never do business with friends. So at the behest of a siteop I knew I hosted a guy for $10 a month and a free set of guitar strings. The price kind of stuck, so I adjusted the resources available to the machine until I could divvy them up fairly at $10 per month without taxing it while still keeping room for my things. Much the same way that you might divvy up an apartment building, which is why I chose the name "webslum." I work maybe 5 hours a week on the server, and charge a little extra for things that need more maintenance (SQL support is the big one).

    The price is actually sort of steep for bottom of the barrell housing, but this guarantees the server will never get overloaded and that I'll always have time to answer questions personally. It also means that less goes wrong and solutions are simpler...and that means less down time (something like 99.98% uptime, beat that Geoshitties).

    A lot of people are offsetting their server costs by getting a good deal for more than they need and selling the excess. In fact, our next server host did just that -- signed a desperation deal with a flailing ISP and began selling space in their racks for peanuts. We're going to take our share of that space and sell even more space and bandwidth for $10 a pop. It's like those emails I get about pyramids and tony robbins, only it actually works. The only trick is having to be rather clever.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  241. you=bigot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah there's some sound reasoning, killing a kid (majority under 13) for throwing a stone against a fully equipped soldier is fully justified because he should have known better. Do you think you or any one else would stand for that happening to a little kid in what ever country you come from. Do these kids matter less to you some how? It seem I might smell a bigot here.

  242. DSL yes, Static IP no thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get a free name that follows your dynamic IP from http://dyndns.org/, drop the static block and save $15 per month.

  243. History Lesson for the Pali Defenders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israeli "settlers" look a lot like whites vs American Indians

    Uh, Palestinians were either paid for their land or they willfully left it with promises from other Arab countries they could have it back after they (the Arab countries) conquered Israel. That's why they're still in 'refugee' campes 50+ years later.
    Oh, and the Israelis gave them votes and representation in the government, but that wasn't good enough.
    Face it, the Palis are idiots who will never get ANYWHERE.

  244. DMCA violation by cybergeak · · Score: 1

    wouldnt posting pricing of hosting/colocation be a violation of the dmca in the same context wal-mart and others are using it?

  245. Great value web host solution by M4verick · · Score: 1

    I put all my experience / recommendations on a site here. This is the best quality/value combination I have found. I used to colo, but now this is all I need!

    --
    - Hosting Guide http://www.mirical.co.uk -
    Children in the back cause accidents. Accidents in the back cause childr
  246. eh, they're alright by raulmazda · · Score: 2

    I use johncompanies to host a coupla domains now, and they're pretty good. I'd give them a better review, but I have a few experiences that have made me not as happy as I could be:

    • They'll change stuff on your filesystem without notifying you.
      I've had this happen 2 times already:
      • changing the perms on /dev/kmem so that only root could read it (broke top for normal users, security risk according to them)
      • disabling daily/weekly/monthly crontabs in /etc/crontab. This was to avoid daily reboots of the box when everybody's daily cronjobs would trigger at the same time and take it down.
      Both times, I emailed them asking what was going on, and asking them to at least notify me whenever they change files in my jail. I emailed them a couple of times over the course of 2 months about the crontab disabled thing. I got "we're still looking into that" and then no replies. I later re-enabled it in my jail.
    • Software upgrades suck. I guess this is the nature of the beast with FreeBSD. My box is stuck at FreeBSD 4.5, and since there's limited filesystem space I'm not going to make world to upgrade base (this is a problem when there are security issues in base - yes, I know of the overwrite-base ports). I'm also reluctant to upgrade the base system without upgrading the kernel (johnco controls that part).
    • Non existent notifications of system changes, security issues, etc. I guess this is semi related to the first issue, but it would be nice to know what's going on when they have to change things in my jail. It would also be nice to know that when there is a security issue with software in the base system (i.e. almost guaranteed to be software in every jail they run), that johnco has a solution to the problem.

    Despite those issues, I'm a pretty happy customer, and have even recommended other people to them. If you're really interested in the service, I'd suggest testing it out first to see if it's a good fit for what you want to do.

    1. Re:eh, they're alright by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      They tend to notify you after a few days, hey, that daemon or process is just something we dont like, turn it off. I was suprised that HLDS was considered "too processor intensive" and I cancelled immediately of course. If they are not going to let me run anything processor intensive, why list their specs. Here's what we have to offer, god forbid you try to use it, we'll have to terminate your account.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  247. Why separate physical servers? by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

    I'm attempting to reverse "server proliferation" at my LFC* by moving to VMWare on IBM x440 hardware. As long as you have a service level agreement with your hosting provider that suits your needs, why should you insist on separate boxes? Separate instances on the same hardware should be enough.

    My current hosting works this way - I have been using vservers/hostpro/Interland for the past four years and have not experienced any outages since a one-hour scheduled window for a network change in 2000. VMs (not virtual domains) are fine for the vast majority of sites out there.

    *LFC - Large Faceless Corporation

  248. Telocity DSL - hosted in my home office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    running Slackware, apache, postphp, jabber, sendmail, imp, mysql, etc. currently hosting 3 domains, about ready to add a 4th. nothing is more fun.

    pay ~49$US/month, and it's been rock solid.

    P

  249. Spry Web Hosting by ibbey · · Score: 2

    I've been using Spry.com. Unquestionably the best web host I've ever used. Their main offering is the "Root Server", a FreeBSD-jail based shared platform. This gives the flexibility of full root access on a less expensive server-- starting at $60/month. And unlike some other companies, Spry has OUTSTANDING support. Extremely fast, and you'll get a response from someone who actually has a clue.

    I believe they also offer colo's, and I'd highly recommend them for anyone needing a rock-solid ISP at a reasonable price.

  250. My take on Pair and Fatcow by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Informative

    Pair rocks. I've used it for years. They're rock solid, great customer support, and cheap. I recommend Pair to everyone looking for a domain. I also use Fatcow for one domain. Nice perks for $99/year, but the servers could be faster. Sometimes web response is slow, as is checking mail.

    1. Re:My take on Pair and Fatcow by SecretAsianMan · · Score: 2
      I use Pair as well. They came with the recommendations of several sysadmin friends of mine, including the guy who runs SunHelp, and with good reason as I found out. They're honest people, their pricing and terms are simple and understandable, their facilities are good, and best of all, they are a 100% FreeBSD shop.

      Right now, my email client is connected through an SSH tunnel to my server at Pair, and it's downloading all the mail that my monstrous procmail script on the Pair server has presorted and classified. I am happy.

      --

      Washington, DC: It's like Hollywood for ugly people.

  251. FutureQuest by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 1

    I have five domains hosted by FutureQuest. For that they charge me $14.95/month total. Beyond the first domain, setting up each additional domain was a one-time charge of $25, and the disk and download limits apply to the five in aggregate. For that I get CGI, a great support staff, multiple POP mailboxes ... well, just check 'em out. They're a Linux shop and proud of it!

  252. Kattare by wasabiboy · · Score: 1

    I work for a web consulting firm, and we've had great experiences sending our clients to Kattare.

    Kattare's shared server (well, shared machine, at least) accounts run anywhere from $9 to $54 per month, and they run Apache web server (to deliver static html files) and your own personal copy of Tomcat (via proxy through Apache) for the dynamic pages, they have excellent tech support, and they allow you to run Cocoon (the XML publishing pipeline), PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc.

    As for mail service, they allow both POP3 and IMAP mail access (their standard email account is 30 MB disk space) - great for people who are on the go and want to keep most of their mail in a centralized (IMAP) server.

    The shared hosting pricing and relative reliability are great for small companies, nonprofits, or even a personal account. They run linux everywhere (with ssh access, etc), they are incredibly prompt when you have a request. Sometimes they have downtime, but they're very quick to recognize fix problems when they arise.

    I don't have any personal experience with Kattare's dedicated servers, but I have confidence they would do as good of a job with those as they do with the shared machine hosting. They're a dream to work with, especially if you're big on linux/open source software. In any event, if you're looking for a provider, take a look at their site - you'll probably like what you see.

  253. Pay? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

    My friend hosts my site. He runs the whole kit and cabootle from his desktop for free, using DYNDNS to give him a textual URL. All he has to do is pay for the Broadband line.
    But his site is relativly low-traffic. It's at http://scanman.mine.nu . Except for a few times where he did something to it, his site has been running almost non-stop, and still does high-process operations. But again, I said his site is relativly low traffic, and may not be for you. He runs an Athelon 750 MHz.

    --
    Rawr
  254. For serious hosting use Savvis. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    Not as many people have heard of them but Savvis has the largest non-telephone company network worldwide. They have nice latency guarantees as well.

    I haven't found a more professional copmany to deal with.

    For serious business hosting or bandwidth, they've got better support and more knowledgeable sales reps and technicians. Plus you get right through to a real person.

    We used to have SDSL through Savvis and when Northpoint went under Savvis gave us an awesome dirt cheap deal on Colo until our T1 got installed.

    Disclaimer: I'm a happy customer and a stockholder.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  255. Ummmm..... are you on crack too? by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    I'd agree with the autopr0n guy:

    bits, bytes, words, nibbles and their kilo, mega, giga, tera prefixes all describe quantities of data.

    Bandwidth is expressed in units data per unit time. So megabits/second, bytes/minute, etc...

    Bits are a perfectly legitimate unit of data, and if you've ever bought ram then this should be really obvious to you.

    1. Re:Ummmm..... are you on crack too? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2
      Bandwidth is expressed in units data per unit time. So megabits/second, bytes/minute, etc...
      Welcome to the real world; here outside of SlashdotLand, people don't always spell out the entirety of "proper notation", instead referring to commonly used shorthand.

      For a fun experiment; talk to someone from Sprint or QWest or AT&T and ask them for information on a "15 Megabit connection" and see if they look at you funny.

      (Hint: Thousands of network administrators all around the world omit "per second" in thousands of conversations every day. Get used to it.)

      Bits are a perfectly legitimate unit of data, and if you've ever bought ram then this should be really obvious to you.

      I SELL RAM and I have no idea what you're getting at. If I tried to sell a "Two gigabit" stick of RAM to a customer my boss would have my head!

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:Ummmm..... are you on crack too? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Agreed. In discussions about bandwidth with anyone I work with (including tier 1 providers), for speed, we say "K", "Megs", or "Gigs". Connection type are [100meg|gig][copper|fiber], or if we're already talking about a line we already are talking about, we jusually say "this gig" "that gig", or talk about "that cab"..

      If a customer comes in, and starts talking about "My locked cabinet ... with a .. 100 mega bit .. per second copper uplink .. to my .. tier one's provider .. network..", we'll just smile, nod, and show them where to plug in their power cord.. (BTW, the Shatner captain speak was intentional)

      "Yes sir, your funny little three-prong power cable goes in that funny little three-prong outlet." :)

      Hmmm, Maybe you should start selling selling your memory in bits.. You'd make more money.. :) You could sell a 128MB DIMM as a 1Gb DIMM. heheh

      (for those not paying attention, note the capitalization of MB and Gb)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Ummmm..... are you on crack too? by grahamsz · · Score: 2

      I appreciate that it's normal to drop the per second when it's painfully obvious what you mean.

      Unforunately when it comes to hosting providers that works both ways. Some will claim that 10Mbit is a 10Mbit/s connection, others will claim 40GB meaning 40Gigabytes/month data transfer.

      Where there's ambiguity you should always spell out what you mean.

  256. Use mod_gzip people. by Deal-a-Neil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember, if you host a bandwidth intensive site (not even necessarily tons of visitors, but huge pages -- such as all busy threads on slashdot) use mod_gzip or something similar to it. Slashdot supposedly has mod_gzip installed, but they did not seem to have it configured correctly in the past -- not sure if they do now.

    Anyhow, we use it on our properties that have message forums, and we easily take 120K threads down to around 10K per page impression. This could definitely help you save on your bandwidth spikes if you run a burstable or 95th percentile billing with your ISP.

    mod_gzip here

  257. copmany = company... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    Oops. Just thought I'd try to ward off the spelling nazis.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  258. Can you help me Internet my web page :-) by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 2
    An actual quote from someone who wanted me to set up a commerce site for them. Eeek. Never heard Internet used as a verb before.

    If you want to do balls-to-the-wall hosting on Linux it doesn't get much better than Dreamhost. All sorts of goodies including PHP, MySQL, dedicated hosting available. These dudes know what the crap they're doing and are bloody fast, responsive, and funny. Don't recall their rates offhand, so check out the site. There's a plan for everything and last I checked they're competitive. I'm grandfathered in at low rates, so I'm happy.

    If you're an ASP/.Net M$Slave you can't do much better than MaximumASP. They've got tons of components and despite the fact it's shared hosting it's fast and responsive. Support is top-tier as well and it's cheap at $199, 1GB space, 40GB traffic, etc.

  259. Tier 1 hosting in Montreal by AlexCV · · Score: 1

    I've had a half rack with 24/7 access at Worldcom Canada in Montreal. Nice data center with everything routed through ceiling railings

    Dual-redundant, UPS and Gen-set backed up electrical outlet pairs at every rack (and a third non-backed-up pair for screens, kvm, etc.) They provide you with a Puzzlini failover power bar (near instant switch from primary power cable to secondary, using it, they moved my rack physically by about 40 feets without cutting power or noticeable network outage. That covers electricity.

    Bandwidth was a 100 mbps full-duplex linked terminated at a cisco 2640 (I think, the biggest 2600 anyway) in the rack. We had 3 mbps burstable to 7.5 (the limit was so we didn't blow our cap, Worldcom measures bandwidth use every minute or so from the router, throws out the top 5% and bill you for the highest value left over.)

    You get the IP block you need. We had 16, but that's what we had asked for.

    We had biometric access to the datacenter, then check-in with the 24 hours security guard and we had an electronic locking device for the cabinet (Nice touch, Worldcom staff cannot open cabinet, -24DC on the contacts of the device would... (They were phasing that out I believe for end-to-end biometrics.)

    FM-200 (or was it CO2 displacement?) Fire suppression system.

    50 feet from the MCI OC-192, 40 feet from the trans-canadian OC-48 backbone...

    Multiple redundant massive liebert HVAC units, Power Distribution units and battery banks, 300kw, 700kw and 4mw gen-set (First two worldcom and last one the building.)

    We paid about 2100$ in 2000 for it. I don't know their current pricing. It's steep but you can save some by shaving on customer-access (24 hours notice access was 700$ per full rack, versus 700$ per half-rack for 24/7 customer access.)

    Please remember these are 2 years old prices in Canadian dollars (USD$1 for CDN$1.56 last I checked)

    The system had 500 days uptime until about 57 days ago (Except one, but with 2 blown disks on 3 disks RAID-5 it's not going anywhere). Also, if you don't pay your bill in a timely fashion, they will cut your route quickly. Don't expect them to wait more then 90 days for payment.... I don't know if they take credit card, but they do make quarterly payment arrangements.

    Alex, Ex-statisfied customer.

  260. rackshack $99 by FSK · · Score: 1

    I've been using Rack Shack and have been very happy with the service. They have a very interesting way of selling hosting, they build a bunch of servers, post what they have to their site and you can order and be up and running that day.
    The only weird/bad thing I've found is that by default they enable telnet by default. Obviously it's easy enough to turn off but IMHO it shouldn't even be an option.

    --
    When punk rock is outlawed, only outlaws will have punk rock.
  261. Never paid for hosting actually... by ArmedGeek · · Score: 1

    Up until the time I got broadband, I always bounced from 'free host' to 'free host'. Now, I simply host it myself. A broadband connection, an extra pc and a copy of RH 7.3.

    Honestly, I don't require much bandwidth for the sites hosted on my server. However, I prefer the freedom (and yes, i'm a geek, it's fun too) of running my own server. If my bandwidth requirements were to get to be more than my little cable connection could handle, I would spend the money to get more bandwidth. I even host a handfull of sites for my co-workers (for a small fee).

    --
    Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
  262. Re: Rackspace? by rawg · · Score: 1

    I called them for a quote once. They told me that FreeBSD is insecure and if I run it I will be hacked. They never did give me that quote....

    --
    The above is not worth reading.
  263. T1: A Slow Beast? by suwain_2 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A lot of people seem to be of the mind that they can run a T1 to their house and start a massive hosting company, serving countless websites.

    While 1.5 Mbps is a substantial amount of bandwidth, DSL/cable modems are becoming increasingly common. I maintain a server hosted on a T1 that's mainly used for web browsing during the day, and when I do bandwidth-intensive file transfer from my cable modem, I'm able to come very close to filling the T1. While serving normal webpages does work flawlessly, I just wanted to point out that if you offer downloads -- or even just use lots of images/Flash -- your bandwidth will disappear surprisingly quickly. A single user with a cable modem can be eating up all your bandwidth. (Again, I'm not suggesting that a T1 is now worthless, just advising people -- if the T1 is shared with numerous other sites, if a single one is somewhat active, you may have precious little bandwidth.)

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  264. Cheap Multiple Domain Hosting by tangledweb · · Score: 1

    I have a related question.

    I have a bunch of hobby/unfinished sites lying around on different cheap and free hosts all over the place. All have low traffic and space requirements, but need PHP and a database.

    Does anybody know any cheap hosts that allow you to run multiple domains from the one account?

  265. phpwebhosting.com by stinkyelf · · Score: 1

    I've had very good experiences with phpwebhosting.com and highly recommend them.

    basically whatever you want in terms of disk space, data transfer, subdomains, domain aliases, databases etc. for ~$10/mth, they only host 125 (from memory) sites on each box and update to latest version of php regularly.

    other people I have recommended them to have also had no problems with them...

    I'm planning to get a box at serverbeach (someone has already posted about serverbeach), mainly because I need a dedicated box...

    1. Re:phpwebhosting.com by jonr · · Score: 2

      I can totally recomend them. Prompt service, simple billing, (basically $10/month for everything), and everything you need: unlimited mails, space, transfers for small sites. They only need IMAP support, I have been begging them for months now... :)

  266. Re:Pull the HDD! by rawg · · Score: 1

    Thats a lot of work. I would just boot from floppy, run my script to zero the passwd, reboot the box, login and put the old root pw back, search the system while its on and running like nothing's wrong.

    --
    The above is not worth reading.
  267. Virtual Server accounts by tetranz · · Score: 1

    I've recently found that 'Virtual Server' Linux accounts are a good compromise between standard shared hosting and a dedicated machine. You get all the appearance of having your own machine with root access at a much lower price (and obviously less resources) than a dedicated machine. I'm paying $29.95 US per month for 2 Gb disk space and 15 Gb traffic. It avoids the usual shared hosting issues of all web scripts needing to be world readable for Apache to read them. Email me if anyone wants to know where. My only connection with them is as a happy customer. tetranz (at) yahoo.com

  268. Incremental by Tablizer · · Score: 1


    I don't like the way they have hierarchical tiers. Why not pay for individual levels of features?

    For example X dollars a month for a gig of bandwidth, Y dollars per hard-drive space, etc. Even nicer would to be billed for actual usage rather than pre-selected amounts.

    However, I suppose keeping track of all this might raise the cost. But if you are a hoster, please keep this in mind.

    BTW, what does everybody do with *dedicated* servers and huge bandwidth? Are they actually running dot-coms that survived? interactive remote games? T-shirts? Porn? What the hell requires that much resources?

  269. you have been brainwashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ridiculous how wrong you are over 1 million Palestinians were FORCED out following 1948, and after the 1967 war another half million were. Want evidence the UN has plenty of info @ http://www.un.org/Depts/dpa/ngo/history.html . Also, why can the Zionists not seem to address any of the issues and questions addressed to them? Is it possible that they are simply speaking from the years of brainwashing they have likely encountered in the US and are unable to back up any of their racist claims with evidence?

  270. cheap & excellent hosting services by somekool · · Score: 1

    hosting start at 8$can for professional and commercial hosting.

    www.mytradecenter.com

    excellent service

  271. Cheap Co-Location in Socorro, New Mexico by npsimons · · Score: 2
    I have my server (hardcorehackers.com) co-located in Socorro, New Mexico. I live 800 miles away in Ridgecrest, California.


    Why, you might ask? Two very good reasons:

    • It's cheap - On the order of $80/month for 5GB/month to co-locate a single machine in an air-conditioned, alarmed and locked room. You provide your own UPS. Everywhere else I've looked is at least $150/month.
    • The service - The owner is a small town businessman. Despite having a family, he responds amazingly quickly to technical problems, which rarely occur in the first place. I think I called him once to add a domain to my server's IP (he manages DNS for you if you want).


    For more details see http://www.sdc.org.

  272. I go with this little company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    called MTInteractive. They aren't bad, pretty decent prices, but their design skills aren't top notch, but the hosting is pretty good.

    Peace

    Twitch

  273. Virtrual private servers are the way to go for me by jbohumil · · Score: 1

    I'm paying less than 15.00 a month for a virtual private server with hostmania.net. There are some oddities, like you can't upgrade the kernel since it is a shared kernel environment. I love the fact that I have root access and can install just about anything. I'm running a qmail virtual domain set up which I really like, but isn't usually available on shared cpanel type hosting. With 3GB of disc space and 30GB of transfer per month, I'm pretty happy. I think the virtual server environments are going to become more and more popular options and definitely give you more flexibility than you get in a typical shared hosting environment. Plus the costs are coming down to the point where it isn't even that much of a premium.

  274. 40 grand a year... by BillLeeLee · · Score: 1

    I only came to college to host a server...

    --
    www.google.com
  275. Huge forum specifically for web hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.webhostingtalk.com

  276. Sevaa.com by UnKillable+Roach · · Score: 1

    Hello, I've been a Sevaa(www.sevaa.com) user for about a year now. I've had no problem, that wasn't solved within an hour. Currently, they are in the process of buying an additional server, to help balance the load. I currently get 150k+ dls on a DSL line. As soon as they get the new server, I expect them to be back to normal. Excellent price, excellent service, all around great. You guys/girls should really check them out. Their plans start at $2.50, and include anything you could possibly need. Or, if you need something that you don't see. Send them an email; I'm sure that they'd accommodate you. :) Randy AlltheWrongStuff.com

  277. Re:Rackspace Ex Verio Employee Here by puto · · Score: 2

    The hosting is separate from the bandwidth offerings.

    Verio bought a company called HIWAY.com and that become thier main hosting division. From shared to dedicated.

    The rest of Verio is just bought up ISP's around the country. Lotta shop owners got rich in the mid to late 90's selling out to verio, and a lotta people got laid off.

    Verio pays the money for the good equipment and they have very good uptimes. But they do cater to spammers. Hell they host most of the websites in the world. When I was there they cut a deal to let Bell South sell Bell South branded hosting on verio Boxes.

    You might want to try rackshack.net. I have had great expereince with them

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  278. free works for us. by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Yeah, someone at HomeLan decided we needed a server. well, now, The Junkyard is hosted on 5 multiple-redundant web servers with a separate MySQL database server. we're sharing some of this with a few other guys, but add to this that we're on a dedicated OC3.... yeah, we don't complain. at all.

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  279. Level(3) Pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rack is about $1k/mo.
    30A power $100/mo.
    Fast Ethernet connection $250/mo.
    Bandwidth starts @ $250/Mbps. (minimum 10Mbps)

  280. savvis.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was able to obtain a full T1 as many justifiable IPs as needed for $675/month. I also received the same quote from a guy at www.bandwidth.com That was back in April. Just a note, Savvis is a Tier 1 provider. Their service is rock solid. Awesome, proactive tech support. They let me know I'm down before I even realize that I'm down. I found savvis at: http://www.boardwatch.com/isp/bb/n_america.htm

  281. UK hosts - 'free' bandwidth! by M4verick · · Score: 1

    I'm using a shared uk web host with zero bandwidth restriction. It's not the fastest in the world, but I can successfully stream video off it. Details here.

    --
    - Hosting Guide http://www.mirical.co.uk -
    Children in the back cause accidents. Accidents in the back cause childr
  282. No add for a hosting company on this story ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story does not have and advertisment for
    a hosting company?

    What?

    Either
    (a) slashdot is not yet comercialized to death (hope that is the case)
    (b) slashdot does not understand marketing.

  283. 34sp by Understudy · · Score: 1

    About a year ago a similar question came up on /. in the replies was a post about this company. 34sp is a British based host provider. They incredibly inexpensive. About $21.00 a year for the minimum package. You can of course upgrade and pay more. Their email support has been good enough that I have never had to call them.

  284. We host slash sites. by Vladinator · · Score: 0
    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

    1. Re:We host slash sites. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thoughout history, many names have been used to describe those who are on the wrong moral path in life: coward, criminal, fiend, monster, vagrant, lunatic. It's without question that William Scott Lockwood III is all of these things, but these are things that can be forgiven. William Scott Lockwood III's sins run deeper.

      In many cultures, the greatest moral offense a man can commit isn't murder, robbery, rape, arson, or even blasphemy. In these cultures, there's a word for someone who is even lower than the murderers and rapists, because he has demonstrated with clear finality his lack of moral character. This one word, never used carelessly, reserved only for the lowest of the low is oathbreaker.

      Many societies value personal honor, honesty, and integrity above anything else. People can make mistaks, and still maintain their honor if they take accountability for their actions. But the oathbreaker is the lowest of the low, never to be forgiven, and never to be trusted. This is because he has voluntarily sacrified the only thing that every man brings with him into the world, and the only thing that every man (hopefully) takes with him into the grave: his honor.

      When a man's honor is gone, he has nothing.

      Ladies and gentlemen, William Scott Lockwood III has nothing. If our society were still built on the concept that a man's word is sacred and that honoring others with the truth is a noble goal, William Scott Lockwood III would be dead right now.

      A man's word is his bond, and when he breaks his word, he's no longer a man at all. He's worse than a coward, worse than a liar, and worse than a thief, but he's all these things and more. He's an oathbreaker.

      In the past, oathbreakers become nonpersons. They stand below even murderers and thieves. Even beggars would not give or recieve comfort from an oathbreaker. Quite often, they were simply killed outright. Sometimes, they were merely cut off from honest society, trusted by no one, alienated until the day they died. After their death, their families were shunned and distrusted forever, because a man holds in his hand no only his own honor, but the honor of his family as well.

      The Lockwood family has no honor left. The Lockwood family has no place in honest society, among civilized humans, because they have no honor, and they are not a part of civilization.

      Killing an oathbreaker was considered to be an act of mercy, sending a tortured soul on to final judgement instead of forcing him to live an empty, hollow life.

      Maybe it's time that we bring back the practice of killing oathbreakers, and ensuring that their bloodline does not propogate. Maybe a lack of honesty is what's wrong with our society. Maybe that's why everything is falling into chaos around us. When you can't trust a man's word, what basis is there for civilization?

      I think upon consideration that you will agree: William Scott Lockwood III is less than a gentlemen, less even than a man, less even than a human, less even than an animal. William Scott Lockwood III is an oathbreaker.

  285. "terribly egocentric" by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2

    I can see how you got your slashdot username. Seeing a phrase like that in a comment making an essentially ungrounded editorial interrogation of somebody excercising the one fundamental power consumers have (warning other consumers about shitty companies like Speakeasy.net), well. "Pot calls kettle black. Film at 11."

    1. Re:"terribly egocentric" by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      "essentially ungrounded"

      Then why did you post another reply where you addressed my concerns? This certainly suggests that there was some actual content to my post. Not only did I counter your link to the main dslreports.com page with a more informative link to their leader board, but I also pointed out several potential problems with your complaints about SpeakEasy. "Ungrounded?" Hardly.

      As for the egocentrism issue, you posted several complaints in this thread, and every one described your experiences specifically. Based on that, I don't apologize for thinking that you're acting egocentric. Although I did mention my own experiences briefly, I spent the majority of my post on other arguments. I think that qualifies as "less egocentric".

      If you have the right to "warn consumers", then I have the right to inform consumers as well. If that involves pointing out that you've said little more than what your own experiences were, then so be it.

  286. Re:ServerBeach (OT) by nakaduct · · Score: 2
    Perhaps it's time to call it a day.


    Sounds like you have some "unfinished business" to address, first.
  287. Cable & Wireless - Netherlands by MudDude · · Score: 1
    I have my little server hosted in the Netherlands (where I live) at Cable&Wireless or WideXS (www.widexs.nl), I never know which o'the two it's called.
    I am very satisfied with them and they do not appear to be very expensive.
    • 20 Gb/month data traffic
    • 1 IP Address
    • 100 Mb/s, kinda cool to install Linux over the internet via a site@University of Amsterdam with 35 Mb/s.
    • Traffic statistics+network+server monitoring
    • UPS connected
    • Climate controlled
    • Secure premises
    • 90 per 20 gig extra bandwith per month
    • I can visit on site during working hours for free to troubleshoot if necessary
    • they are situated in Hoofddorp which is close to Shiphol Airport and the Internet HUB in Amsterdam that goes straight to New York.
    • I pay 1065.95 euros per year (I get a discount that way) so that would make it about 89 Euros/month
    So, any comments/questions?
    --
    You don't need to see my .sig. This isn't the .sig you're looking for...
  288. pair.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $30/month gives me 200 GB of disk space and 12 GB of traffic

    no problems during my 6 years of being a customer

  289. pair.com by matthew_gream · · Score: 2

    try Pair Networks. i've had good experiences, good value, good service. their operation is very diligent, and very much engineering based. they offer sign up and transfer bonuses, an associated NIC, variety of hosting plans from simple FTP only to high volume dedicated (prices are very competitive for the level/quality of service offered). you only need to look around their site at the support, notices, and various other parts of the operation to get a feel for their approach - and there is a distinct community feel.

    --
    -- Matthew - matthew.gream@pobox.com, http://matthewgream.net
  290. Infomaniak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any experiences with Infomaniak?

  291. hah! what-me-pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a real cheapskate and all I "pay" is the internet connection, some PC time and some work. I pay nothing, although I get a lot done. The (free) hosters hopefully can get ad revenue because of the focussed and very heavy traffic my sites get.

  292. Colo in sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have colocation in sweden, 800 USD for 100 mbit. No restrictions on upload/download/ISPs. UPS lasting 30 days and dual internet (redundant) internet connections. The price is for 10 U of rackspace. 40 U is avaliable @ 2100 USD.

    Gigabit internet is also avaliable for a small fee.

  293. Re:ServePath has been GREAT! - EARTHQUAKE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you like earthquakes .. hosting in Texas is much safer. There hasn't been a tremor in Texas in a few millenia, but it seems like every time you turn around, California is getting shaken up.

  294. Hosting Provider? by Puppet+Master · · Score: 1
    I just run my own server :)

    FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE connected to a SW Bell DSL service with 5 IP Addresses.
    That, plus my regular phone, costs me about $89.00 per month.
    And my uptime has been over 130 days.

    --
    The day Microsoft creates a product that doesn't suck, it will be known as the Microsoft Vaccuum Cleaner!
  295. masfl.net / hostingfreaks.com by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 2
    For shared hosting, nothing really beats MASFL.net; no setup fees, and SSH access for a little under 10/month.

    For Dedicated hosting, I use HostingFreaks. Their support is wonderful, people are friendly, and if you do things right, they end up paying you for using their support! Yup...kinda interesting.

    --

    I disable sigs...do you?
  296. Shared vs Dedicated ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you have the support staff, a high end shared hosting solution may be better value for money. I currently host my company's web site on www.novawebhosting.net because they offer firewalled and clustered solaris web servers as a shared hosting platform ... which means I get a reliable service and a good UNIX environment for under $20 per month!

  297. Re:Virtrual private servers are the way to go for by rixster · · Score: 2

    I just looked at hostmania and they look like a purely MS shop. Where's the BSD option ??

    --
    Two wrongs may not make a right, but three ....
  298. Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Forced"? No. When Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, and friends invaded Israel, many Arab civilians fled the fighting -- as civilians often do. The Jewish civilians could not flee, because they had nowhere to go. If they'd gone to Arab countries, they'd have been massacred. As it was, the Arab armies killed every civilian Jew they could get their hands on (as they've done ever since). The Arab civilians who stayed behind, and their descendants, have more rights (they vote, hold office, etc.) than Arabs in any Arab nation on Earth have ever head. Notice that it's fantastically rare for Arab Israelis to participate in terrorism: They're in a much better position than Black Americans were in, say, 1950, and the solution to that problem was not terrorism. The solution was to convince the majority that everybody deserved the same rights. Most Israeli Jews agree on that point (read the polls, kid, read the polls), and over time the few remaining inequalities will be fixed, as they always are in any free democracy.

    Other facts: "Over a million"? Nope. The highest estimate I've heard is eight hundred thousand. The usual estimate for Jews forced to flee Arab countries in the 1950s is about 850,000, and they really were forced: Everything they owned was confiscated, many were killed, the rest had to run for their lives. Since all those Arab nations created two roughly equal refugee problems, one of which Israel solved for them, you might think they could do something for the Palestinian refugees, eh? But they haven't done shit. Fifty-four years, and they haven't done a damn thing. The lion's share of funding for services to Palestinian refugees has come from the United States, a big chunk from Israel, and another big chunk from Europe. The Arab nations occasionally pledge donations, but they never pay in full. It's shameful: They issue a press release, but they never finish writing all the checks they promise. And the amounts they promise aren't that big to begin with.

    Neither side has behaved perfectly, but a reasonable acquaintance with the history involved looks nothing like the paranoid fantasy you're describing. Every nation in the Arab League rejected UN 194 and UN 242, did you know that? Rejected 'em flatly. Most of them are not interested in any reasonable peaceful settlement, and never were. Every time one of them does offer to make peace, Israel makes real concessions and honors its obligations (see Jordan, Egypt). God bless Anwar Sadat; he had balls. The Islamists murdered him, of course.

  299. Poll says: by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

    -- It's free

    -- Up to $5/month

    -- $5 to $20/month

    -- $20 to $100/month

    -- $100/month and up

    -- Depends on whether I get Slashdotted

    -- I don't have a website, you insensitive clod!

    -- CowboyNeal is my webhost

  300. Re:ServePath has been GREAT! - EARTHQUAKE by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    Texas had more than 100 earthquakes since 1847.
    The Alpine quake of '95 (a 5.8!) did some real damage. A 4.2 in '93 could have been deadly, had it been just a few miles closer to San Antonio.

    "The Big One" for Texas would have to be a 9 on the New Madrid fault, but that could level Dallas.

    So Quakes aren't at anything like the same level of risk as, say, the Bay Area or Pasadena or Tokyo.

    The thing to be afraid of in Texas is a Tornado.

    Among all the natural forces available, I'd have to say there's NOTHING scarier than ground zero of a tornado. If you haven't experienced this, believe me, you don't want to.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  301. Mikro-Data by Sturm · · Score: 2

    Check out: We have been using them for a couple of years and are very pleased.

  302. Canadian provider are cheap and reliable! by phorm · · Score: 2

    I use SilverServers (www.SilverServers.com) for my commercial clients. Their primary business is shared and dedicated server hosting, however Co-location services are available. Since they're situated in Canada, the pricing reflects is significantly lower than US providers I've seen offering similar service.

    Quality is provided through redundant power to the rack (2 separate feeds) both with UPS and Generator backups. There are 2 ~100mbps (BGP4) fibre connections through competing providers, backed up by another (smaller) tertiary connection. The standard ~40U racks are in a climate controlled environment in a seismically stable location. (for those non-tech, the temperature is regulated and it's not near any areas known for earthquakes, flooding or other natural problems).

    For dedicated servers, their low-end (advertised) product consists of custom-built system running RedHat Linux, Solaris x86 (being phased out last time I checked), and W2K. They offer custom installs, IDE/SCSI RAID (hardware and/or software depending on budget). For a single P3 machine the price starts at $169/month.

    Remember, I'm Canadian so the prices I mention are in CAD. They're a solid provider whom I'd definately recommend, especially for dedicated servers.

    I've found that most comparable American providers are most expensive, and the really cheap ones who advertise comparable service often run servers in other countries with cheap service and virtually no support. These guys hosted a major soccer server during the European soccer season, the hits they were getting were huge but the (dedicated) server survived nicely, which leads me to believe that they would also survive similarly in a slashdotting.

    p.s. I think they also provide domain name registration, which I found was cheaper than elsewhere (they also host my domain).

  303. Full FreeBSD Filesystem? by samf · · Score: 1

    A Full FreeBSD Filesystem? What good is that? It would be better if it had some free space in it, to store your own data.

    Sorry, I couldn't resist. :-)

  304. Re:Hurricane Electric, my Baby's ass!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, this is how HE works. I hosted an account with them for two years with no problems. I used them from the days when they still had $5 accounts. One day someone sent some spam with a large attachment. The server timed-out while downloading the file. Then locked the email account. I immediately contacted support and within a day they said they fixed it. When I then tried to download my email, the same thing happened. After a couple of rounds they finally fixed it. Which was all fine.

    But when my bill for that month came, they charged me $1345!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To make a long story short, all they said was that they weren't responsible for me when I change my password. Eventually they just stopped answering my emails when I pointed out that I hadn't changed my password and that that wasn't the issue. My advice:

    DON'T USE HE unless you live close enough to take them to COURT.

  305. Coloco by khyron4eva · · Score: 1

    http://www.coloco.com

    I plan to go with them. 40 GB/month transfer.
    You provide the box. $50/month is the quote I
    got. They're in Laurel, MD and founded by
    Doug Humphrey of Digex fame. I plan to stick a
    1U Sun box in there and call it a day. Towers
    are a little more.

  306. Get Caffinated by signingis · · Score: 1

    Go with Caffinated Networks. Outstanding service and support. Saying anything more is pointless, you just have to check it out.

    http://caffinated.net/about.html

    http://caffinated.net/faq.html

    --

    I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
  307. I can't believe people pay more than $1/GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $1/GB per month is equivalent to $316/Mbps with 50th-percentile (average) pricing on bandwidth. This is equivalent to about $450/Mbps (95th-percentile) for typical daytime-peak and nighttime-lull sites. 95th percentile rates from several large ISPs have fallen below $200/Mbps, and this doesn't even include the Cogent wasteland. Some high bandwidth websites (40Mbps+) get their bandwidth at less than $100/Mbps now.

    Someone in this discussion thought $2/GB was "cheap"? They need to look around.

    (Disclaimer: I help run an ISP that offers $1/GB/mo as standard bandwidth pricing. To be fair and not look like I'm plugging my service, I'm posting anonymously.)

  308. Re:Rackspace Ex Verio Employee Here by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    Verio bought a company called HIWAY.com and that become thier main hosting division. From shared to dedicated.

    If you're hosting in their Florida location (one of the major ones), you're in a heck of a facility. It's a section of IBM's big R&D campus in Boca Raton Florida (a small section, but then, the entire facility was *huge*). The buildings are poured concrete (they built big wooden frames, a rebar skeleteton and then filled the frames with concrete - each building section is a single slab of concrete!), and located on the 'inside of 95', meaning they don't have to worry about storm surges from hurricanes. I was hosting in Cybear, another company in the same campus, and my so at the time worked at Hiway.

    Nifty facility.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  309. Re:Rackspace Ex Verio Employee Here by puto · · Score: 2

    Yeah man, I worked at the Verio in New Orleans and had the privelige of seeing what they do there. Althouh I left Verio for greener pastures, the company does spend the money on its redundancy and protecting its equipment.

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  310. Fitzzzzzzz by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

    ... two minutes later Darth Maul gets an email saying that his server rebooted for no apparent reason. Guess he shouldn't have jinxed it. ;-)