Just be thankful they didn't use middle-endian as one would assume, since this is the perverse way to order bytes. And even worse still, they could have said we use middle-endian and then not tell us the byte ordering.
As I understand it British Law can be used as precedence in a civil law case here in Australia (may even have wider validity than just civil law). That is what it means when it says that it is valid throughout the Commonwealth.
My guess is that while the law in the US would be based on English law, that does not mean that English law is valid in the US.
So Bush puts a country like North Korea in the 'Axis of Evil' for developing weapons of mass desctruction and then, as if having his own nukes weren't enough, he goes ahead with a real laser weapon.
Did you try reading the article of did you just make up your mind based on the misinformation in the header? They spying had nothing to do with 'constant surveillance' or anything, it was simply part of an election campaign.
The Howard government used border protection and refugees as an election winner in the wake of Sept 11 and managed to retain most of the party faithful and also totally squashed Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party by stealing all their voters.
Next time may I suggest you at least read the story in full before posting. Thanks
Yep I've seen this evolution vs. creation debate thousands of times. They usually end up going round and round in circles since there is no 'rock hard' evidence for either. Evolution is still a theory despite it's seemingly widespread acceptance as a fact.
But to debate these two theories on scientific terms is useless since only evolution exists wholy within the scientific realm. Creationism on the other hand is based upon one idea, that there is a Creator God, a God who has always been and always will, a God who is all powerful and all knowledgable. So where evolution must play within the bounds of scientific rules, creationism can play anywhere since it relies on a Creator who also created the rules. So when a evolutionist says, "But what about...." or "But how can..." the creationist answer can and will always be God.
As a creationist all I require to believe in creation is to believe in a Creator God. To argue for or against creation without taking into account a Creator God is useless. Naturally, most evolutionist do not believe in God so he is pushed out of the debate rendering the debate useless.
Could you just imagine if one half of NASA wanted to stick with the good 'ol US measurement standards and the other half wanted to switch to SI Units. You'd probably get a mars probe that wouldn't work properly.
Just to clear up a couple of points. It is the ACT not federal elections so it is a state/territory government not a national one. And down here we don't save a dime, we save a couple of bob:)
Slashdot Mirror
"A water tank is placed at back of the display panel and a pump resides in the main body of the machine, she says."
Look if I have to lug around a water tank and pump then what's the use of having a laptop.
Just be thankful they didn't use middle-endian as one would assume, since this is the perverse way to order bytes. And even worse still, they could have said we use middle-endian and then not tell us the byte ordering.
Parent would almost be funny if:
1). Australia had been discovered by the British by the 17th Century
2). If the criminal was not already in Australia as the article eludes to
I believe back then punishment would probably be deportation to America.
As I understand it British Law can be used as precedence in a civil law case here in Australia (may even have wider validity than just civil law). That is what it means when it says that it is valid throughout the Commonwealth.
My guess is that while the law in the US would be based on English law, that does not mean that English law is valid in the US.
So Bush puts a country like North Korea in the 'Axis of Evil' for developing weapons of mass desctruction and then, as if having his own nukes weren't enough, he goes ahead with a real laser weapon.
Did you try reading the article of did you just make up your mind based on the misinformation in the header? They spying had nothing to do with 'constant surveillance' or anything, it was simply part of an election campaign.
The Howard government used border protection and refugees as an election winner in the wake of Sept 11 and managed to retain most of the party faithful and also totally squashed Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party by stealing all their voters.
Next time may I suggest you at least read the story in full before posting. Thanks
That all depends on what you're looking at.
Yep I've seen this evolution vs. creation debate thousands of times. They usually end up going round and round in circles since there is no 'rock hard' evidence for either. Evolution is still a theory despite it's seemingly widespread acceptance as a fact.
...." or "But how can ..." the creationist answer can and will always be God.
But to debate these two theories on scientific terms is useless since only evolution exists wholy within the scientific realm. Creationism on the other hand is based upon one idea, that there is a Creator God, a God who has always been and always will, a God who is all powerful and all knowledgable. So where evolution must play within the bounds of scientific rules, creationism can play anywhere since it relies on a Creator who also created the rules. So when a evolutionist says, "But what about
As a creationist all I require to believe in creation is to believe in a Creator God. To argue for or against creation without taking into account a Creator God is useless. Naturally, most evolutionist do not believe in God so he is pushed out of the debate rendering the debate useless.
Well if we want a response we should answer our own message with the planetary equivalent of:
"barely 18/female/in my bed - Anyone want my webcam address?"
Could you just imagine if one half of NASA wanted to stick with the good 'ol US measurement standards and the other half wanted to switch to SI Units. You'd probably get a mars probe that wouldn't work properly.
Just to clear up a couple of points. It is the ACT not federal elections so it is a state/territory government not a national one. And down here we don't save a dime, we save a couple of bob :)
Never mind using a different browser, www.microsoft.com doesn't even work properly with some versions of IE.