Slashdot Mirror


User: SCHecklerX

SCHecklerX's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,760
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,760

  1. Re:Solaris? HA! on Mozilla 1.2.1 Released · · Score: 2

    Yeah, and then there's that other dead OS, OS/2...Oh, wait

  2. The only reason win2k is a vialble solution on Win2k Cheaper than Linux · · Score: 2
    is that hardware is now so cheap. Companies who use w2k for DHCP/DNS functions, where a smaller machine can do the job with linux are quite foolish though.

    Also, remote administration on a windows box is still a major hassle, with many products *cough* webtrends *cough* demanding that they run on the console, even though they are scheduled jobs by nature. You are forced to use VNC to remotely administer these pieces of crap. Not that TS is much better. For GUI remote admin, X11 is still far beyond anything windows has to offer.

    Win2k itself is pretty decent (except for the hardware requirements). The problem is the way developers still write their apps as if they are for a single-user system with no concept of security. And, as shown above, they assume you like to walk out to your datacenter and actually sit at a machine to administer it. Dumb.

    That said, I still prefer linux solutions for most tasks. Hell, with the mod_ldap module we can even authenticate users on apache using active directory now. No more need for IIS!

  3. Re:With some limits on Mozilla 1.2 Unleashed · · Score: 2
    If you look at the themes on mozdev.org, you will see some of them support the new text/icon/both. Pinball, for example.

    Classic, afaik, is still the only theme that uses native GTK though, or has that changed?

  4. Re:With some limits on Mozilla 1.2 Unleashed · · Score: 2

    Actually, if you look on mozdev's theme site, you will see that there are themes that do support this. Pinball is one of them. I think native GTK only happens with classic, though?

  5. Re:Anyone still using Mozilla? on Mozilla 1.2 Unleashed · · Score: 2

    Same here. I use a toshiba libretto quite frequently (233 MHz, 64MB of ram), and decided to try phoenix on it. There was no noticeable speed advantage, and you lose all of the stuff that makes mozilla great. If it really were faster and lighter on resources, it would be a good thing, but I fail to see it.

  6. Ummm... on Cell Phones for the Deaf · · Score: 2

    wouldn't it be a lot more practical to just dump it to text???

  7. Re:The doubters will still doubt... on Conspiracy Theorists, Meet The Moon · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but '1' is a base-10 number. I always wonder about why all base-n is represented from base-10, other than the fact that we have 10 toes and 10 fingers...so why not base-20 as our standard through evolution? Hrm.

  8. Re:Bah on New EL Touchscreen Remote Control · · Score: 2
    People used to get called lazy because they didn't want to leave the couch to change the channel... What do you call a person who doesn't want to have to *look* at the remote?

    So, what do you think of gear shifts in cars? Gas/brake/clutch pedals? Steering wheel? Turn signal? Radio knobs? Are you saying that I should have to look at them to use them, when my attention is focused on the road?

    Why, then, do you think that an interface that distracts me from the tv is good?

    Just curious. (I do own the omniremote software for my Clie, however still use the regular remotes for simple channel flipping/etc for the tactile feedback).

  9. Re:You know what would be cool? on Mozilla Adding Spam Filters · · Score: 2

    Just use spamassassin at home. My annoying cousin gets sent to the 'likely spam' folder quite frequently. Anything higher than 12 hits, however is /dev/null'd

  10. Re:New spam... on The Economics of Spam · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Bad analogy. When a mechanic fixes somebody else's car, it doesn't typically break mine (filtering ports 80/25/22, for example).

    Likewise, most people have locks on their doors and windows. They don't leave their door open with a sign that says 'free stuff inside!' like people are doing by connecting their computers to the Internet without properly securing them.

  11. Re:New spam... on The Economics of Spam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, ISPs should NOT be blocking ANY ports. I pay them for a connection. Perhaps email, news, etc. Securing my machine is my responsibility. If there is a machine on their net causing a problem, then yes, they should kill THAT machine's connection. Filtering anything is not the right thing for them to be doing.

  12. fonts. for the web. on Open Fonts For The Web -- Harder Than It Sounds · · Score: 2
    IMNSHO, anybody who is using font tags in their HTML is wrong.

    A browser is for displaying information in an efficient way. It is not for page layout. You want a nicely-printed book, paper, etc, use a document processor. You want to look up information or view pr0n easily, use a web browser.

  13. Re:OpenOffice/StarOffice on Microsoft takes on PDF · · Score: 2

    oops. s/piped to lpr//

  14. Re:OpenOffice/StarOffice on Microsoft takes on PDF · · Score: 2
    Well, I don't know how to do this in windoze (I believe it is possible, though), but if your secretary were using a *nix box, you could just create a named pipe that she would print to, the back end being ps2pdf piped to lpr.

    End users shouldn't HAVE to be system administrators. Sysadmins should be able to give stuff like the above to their users so they can be *gasp* productive.

  15. Re:movie.* = comedy on Making A Videowall · · Score: 5, Funny
    Any movie watched on that wall will make it a funny comedy. I mean, just watch the head on this dude!

    So, basically it turns all actors into canadians.

    "What's wrong with their heads?? It's ok, their canadian." (or something like that :)

  16. Re:Complexity on Dynamic HTML The Definitive Reference (2nd edition) · · Score: 2

    Sounds like you should just write a client then. DHTML misses the whole point of using a web interface in the first place -- all clients being able to use the web. None of my pages depend on DHTML, but they may use it here and there, but it is never a requirement just to use the fscking site. It really pisses me off that places like the Pennsylvania government, of all entities, rely on client-side processing or don't work at all.

  17. Rox Filer on The Captains of Nautilus · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A much more elegant solution. It uses the filesystem to manage apps, etc. Very light. Very easy to use. Very powerful. Very FAST.

    http://rox.sourceforge.net

  18. Re:more sites not Mozilla accessible on Mozilla 1.2 Beta Released · · Score: 2

    if on linux, make sure your jre is a symlink, not a copy. This used to get me when copying my plugins from old moz version to new.

  19. Re:We need a good alternative to XFree86 on Killing Clutter With The Antidesktop · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    How do you explain 60+fps in quake3 on my Athlon at home then? KDE/Gnome == bloat. Windowmaker, otoh, is very snappy. Need drag/drop filemanager? Try out Rox-Filer. There is no reason for crap like nautilus to even exist. It's bloated useless crap.

  20. Re:As a programmer... on Slashback: Cinelerra, Dolphiname, Phoenix · · Score: 2

    Moving target? Why not just use autoconf and automake? ./configure && make && make install has worked on every linux system I've seen.

  21. 'smart' quotes in articles on Learning UNIX for Mac OS X · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Why is it that we get ?'s on the main page, but when you read the article, stuff displays properly on that page? Please either reject people who insist on submitting with this crap, or fix it consistently throughout slashdot.

  22. Affiliate program is flawed then on Stealware: Kazaa et al Stealing Link Commissions · · Score: 2
    If it is easy to 'steal' commission by replacing yourself as the affiliate, there seems to be an authentication issue in the way the affiliate program works in the first place, no?

    While sad that it takes something like this, and even sadder that someone would exploit it, it will force a better system into existence.

  23. Re:But is it any faster? on Mandrake 9.0 (Dolphin) Is Available [updated] · · Score: 2

    What's wrong with 'xset m speed threshold?'

  24. Re:But is it any faster? on Mandrake 9.0 (Dolphin) Is Available [updated] · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Mandrake is snappy on my 64MB libretto (P233). The thing is, you just have to customize a bit. Remove all the cruft, and use a lighter window manager (I use windowmaker). I do this no matter what distro I use anyway. That's the whole point of linux...being able to run what you want, only what you want, and how you want to run it. Right?

    Another thing I did was to remove many of the scripts in /etc/profile.d along with disabling medusa from running every time X starts. The scripts in profile.d by default run jobs that index all kinds of stuff that I really don't need indexed.

    The only thing I haven't figured out is what causes modprobe to be called on the first console login/logoff. Not much of an issue, as I never really log off, but put the system into hibernation mode.

    Here's my process list:

    PID TTY TIME CMD
    1 ? 00:00:07 init
    2 ? 00:00:10 keventd
    3 ? 00:00:06 kapmd
    4 ? 00:00:01 ksoftirqd_CPU0
    5 ? 00:01:22 kswapd
    6 ? 00:00:24 bdflush
    7 ? 00:01:08 kupdated
    8 ? 00:00:00 mdrecoveryd
    11 ? 00:00:00 kreiserfsd
    64 ? 00:00:01 devfsd
    516 ? 00:00:11 cardmgr
    739 ? 00:00:05 syslogd
    748 ? 00:00:01 klogd
    798 ? 00:00:00 atd
    873 ? 00:00:05 esd
    973 ? 00:00:00 crond
    998 ? 00:00:47 xfs
    1052 tty1 00:00:00 login
    1053 tty2 00:00:00 mingetty
    1054 tty3 00:00:00 mingetty
    1055 tty4 00:00:00 mingetty
    1058 tty5 00:00:00 mingetty
    1059 tty6 00:00:00 mingetty
    1315 vc/1 00:00:00 bash
    2082 ? 00:00:29 sshd
    15441 ? 00:00:00 xinetd
    25484 vc/1 00:00:00 startx
    25496 vc/1 00:00:00 xinit
    25497 ? 00:21:17 X
    25503 vc/1 00:00:00 sh
    25504 vc/1 00:00:40 wmaker
    25507 vc/1 00:00:02 wmcms
    25508 vc/1 00:00:00 wmCalClock
    25509 vc/1 00:18:20 wmtop
    25510 vc/1 00:00:09 wmifs
    25511 vc/1 00:00:05 wmwave
    25512 vc/1 00:00:01 wmtuxtime
    27676 ? 00:00:00 dhcpcd
    28096 vc/1 00:00:00 run-mozilla.sh
    28101 vc/1 00:04:38 mozilla-bin
    28103 vc/1 00:00:00 mozilla-bin
    28104 vc/1 00:00:00 mozilla-bin
    28105 vc/1 00:00:00 mozilla-bin
    28107 vc/1 00:00:01 mozilla-bin
    28115 vc/1 00:00:00 mozilla-bin
    28162 vc/1 00:00:00 aterm
    28163 pts/0 00:00:00 bash
    28184 pts/0 00:00:00 ps
  25. Re:You've got r00t! on LindowsOS Will Bundle AOL Client · · Score: 2
    Yes, but the target group of Lindows users doesn't care?

    Which is exactly the reason it should not be allowed.