Sun - or rather Oracle these days - provide an autoupdater with every version of Java 6 for Windows that I've seen. It even seems to work.
Adobe also provide an auto-updater with recent versions of Flash Player for Windows. There might also be a periodic update check for Reader, although I suspect this kicks in only oce you launch it (which for many people might be very rarely, so a malfile might still open in an unpatched version anyway).
Ubuntu also auto-updates Flash Player and Reader if you installed them through the package system. It's just a piggy-back on an existing mechanism that works.
Of course, if people are still coasting along on versions prior to the introduction of auto-pdate, or have turned it off, or habitually hit Cancel when a prompt-to-update appears "because it's too much trouble right now", they have only themselves to blame.
I'm not so sure. Consider a system like Alpha Centauri, which is technically a trinary system (two sunlike stars and a red dwarf). The red dwarf is irrelevant as it orbits the primary pair at a great distance. The sunlike pair orbit each other at about 50 AU, and the habitable zone for each of them would be around 1 AU, which should be a stable near-circular orbit. At 49AU or 51AU distances, the heat contribution from the other primary star would be negligible.
Easy. They need to come and look at the hole to determine how to repair it anyway. So if they find a squashed mess at the site instead of a hole in the road, they know it was an old person instead of a pothole.
If you make everyone work 10-11 hours a day, you will get LESS useful work out of them than you did at 7-8 hours a day.
There are several reasons for this. The most important ones are:
- Working longer hours makes people tired. Tired people make mistakes. These mistakes take more time to be found and fixed.
- Working longer hours makes people tired. Tired people slow down. Thus any given feature will take longer to implement.
- Working longer hours gives people less time at home with their families, hobbies, sleep time and general de-stressing. This tends to make people depressed. Depressed people are more likely to slow down and make mistakes (see above), and might even quit on you.
- People who work longer hours will demand overtime pay, in some form or other. It is cheaper to hire more people at normal working hours.
...when these "haptic" keyboards can reliably provide tactile feedback *before* registering a keypress. Y'know, like every €5 special supplied with no-name whitebox computers everywhere. I like to know that my finger is actually on a key, and preferably the correct one, before I press it.
Until that happens, professional touch-typists will not touch them with a bargepole, even if they don't know the difference between the keyboard that came with their Dell and a Cherry G80. (Which, for the uninitiated, is akin to the difference between a Peugeot 308 and a Volvo 760 GLE wagon^Westate.) Those of us who already have Cherry or IBM keyboards - or close derivatives of them - will not give them up for all the tea in China.
Trackpads have virtually replaced the mouse for laptop use, because they actually work. Okay, you don't want to use one 24/7, and it's a really good idea to disable the tap-to-click functionality that most have, but you can point to pixel accuracy with roughly the same amount of care as with a mouse, and it takes up less space. The main application which doesn't work well with a trackpad is FPS games.
That's still ignoring the problem (mentioned by other commenters) of the keyboard being in the same plane as the display, and occupying valuable real estate on it. On a phone, that's fine. On a tablet, it comes with the territory - though I'm not a fan of tablets. On a laptop, the problem is very deliberately avoided, though the position restriction imposed by the hinge is still a minor problem for extended use. On a desktop computer, it would be totally unacceptable.
For my own part, I'm actively supporting the manufacturers of decent physical keyboards - I've got two Cherrys on order right now. One is a full-size USB G80, replacing a PS/2 G84 and an AT G80 that dates from 1996 (and still works perfectly). The other is a miniature G84 which will go well with a barebones machine I'm experimenting with. At work I use a Model M, which I'm seriously considering upgrading to USB - which will involve hand-building a new controller board.
One last thing: why on earth are people so unwilling to spend €70 on a decent keyboard which will last 20 years, when they will happy spend more than that on a graphics card which will last 3 at best before becoming hopelessly obsolete? An argument against consumer rationality if I ever saw one.
...had more to do with the *cost* of transistors than the quantity or speed of them. The increasing quantities per device are, however, simultaneously a cause (economy of scale) and effect (your dollar goes further) of this reducing cost.
We can now buy a device with a billion transistors in it for a couple of hundred dollars. That's about 50K transistors per cent. It follows that about 30 years ago, it would have been about 1 transistor per cent, or in other words the original 68000 would have cost about $680 in about 1980. Since it is described as originally being "quite expensive", this seems to fit. I don't have any data on the cost of transistors in 1965, though.
In Britain, almost all railways define location using miles and chains from a defined starting point. Sometimes the distance is from a starting point that no longer exists, or is partially over a route that no longer exists, but correction factors are defined for these cases. Only the newest light railways, such as the Manchester Metrolink and the Docklands Light Railway, use kilometres - even though Metrolink is partly built on an old railway.
By the way, there are 22 yards in a chain and 80 chains in a mile. A chain is also, conveniently, very close to 20 metres.
Just be glad we don't use Wizard currency. "Seventeen silver Sickles to a Galleon and twenty-nine Knuts to a Sickle, it's easy enough." Those multiples are *prime numbers*, although they might be reasonable estimates of the relative rarity of gold, silver and copper. Of course it was a parody of real pre-decimal British currency - 12d to the shilling and 20s to £1.
I wouldn't call it "potential for extra efficiency" so much as "robustness in the face of hardware failures". If the cooling remains adequate when a pump or a fan fails or a blockage occurs in an air path, then the increased coolant temperature provides a signal for admins to react to, and the servers don't suffer any downtime.
Which is a very good thing for a cooling system. How many stories are there about overheated and dead servers due to an aircon unit failure?
That's easy - he's good at qualitative analysis but not quantitative analysis. Numbers and by-rote facts mean nothing to him, but if he can see a pattern, it makes perfect sense. A formula is a by-rote fact into which you plug numbers...
If you cannot get your problem resolved during the first call to an outsourced call centre... Stop Calling.
Write a letter to your branch manager (if a bank) or local head office (for any other organisation) instead. It gets much quicker attention from a native English-speaker, and they take written communications much more seriously than phone conversations because it is easier to legally prove that such communication took place.
If your writing skills are not up to producing a business letter by yourself, ask someone who can do it for you. In the UK, Citizens Advice Bureaux should be able to help with this.
That's right, inflation has no effect on subsistence farmers and wage-slaves, who spend all their money pretty much as soon as they get it - assuming that pay rates keep step with the cost of living, which is not always the case.
But inflation has a very negative effect on people with savings and investments, because the real value of these is diluted over time. It strongly exaggerates the "time value of money" concept, and indeed amplifies it.
Historically, when Britain and other major countries used a precious-metal standard, mild and controlled deflation resulted, because population growth exceeded that of stocks of metals. Deflation is usually cited as a Bad Thing because capital owners can just let their money sit around instead of investing it, and it's value will go up anyway. But this ignores the fact that investment is always a sound rational choice if the expected return is higher than unity, regardless of inflation or deflation, and that most people now save using banks, which are in a position to invest those deposits wholesale.
Because people are irrational, people with significant amounts of capital are now tempted to speculate on the market by the possibility of greater-than-inflation returns. These people feel that they are losing out if they get anything less than the inflation rate, and would often be quite happy to leave it in a bank if deflation existed. But speculators are what cause bubbles, and bubbles always burst and crash.
There is one advantage of a fiat currency: governments can borrow money from the people, without asking, in a time of emergency (such as war), simply by having the Treasury print more money. It will be paid for automatically in the medium term, by inflation. But this only works, as we see from Greece's sorry example, if that government directly controls the issue of currency.
It is not possible to just "produce a load of extra gold". You'd better believe that gold mines are already working at or near capacity, and that gold is one of the most thoroughly recycled metals on the planet. That is why it is such a good store of value - even if an unusually large nugget were to be found unexpectedly, it would only have a small and temporary effect on the price. Silver also makes a good store of value (mind you, it is currently undervalued), though it takes up a lot more space for that purpose than gold does. Even copper has been used as an effective store of small amounts of value - if pennies were still made of solid copper, the metal would be inherently worth considerably more than face value - and still has a high enough scrap price that thieves often steal both live and abandoned electric cables.
Most of the Nordic countries have been merged and separated at various times in the past few centuries. For example, Finland was once part of Sweden, then the Russians invaded in the early 1800s, then the Finns declared independence while the Russians were otherwise occupied with their revolution (so as such, Finland is a very young country). Norway, Sweden and Denmark have been parts of each other in a very complicated manner, and have dependencies and ex-dependencies all over the North Atlantic, dating back to the Viking era. The Åland islands logically belong to Sweden, technically belong to Finland, are Swedish-speaking and are a demilitarised zone...
But the short answer is that a lot of concepts and ideals are indeed shared between the Nordic countries.
In Finland at least, both national and municipal income taxes are witheld by your employer based on the instruction given by the "tax card", which is automatically generated by the government based on the information given to the tax office. The most an ordinary employee needs to do is to take their evidence of income to the tax office when it changes significantly, and return the tax card to their employer. The result is not ideal - the amount witheld by the employer is an estimate, so there may be an excess or a refund at the end of the year - but it's a lot less hassle than the US system, not least because the employer reports your actual income at the end of the year, and the government does the calculations.
I should point out that the PAYE scheme in the UK has the same general effect, so it's not solely a Nordic phenomenon. If your taxes are "normal" - ie. you are a waged or salaried employee - your employer is responsible for paying your income taxes, your bank is responsible for paying your interest taxes, and your supermarket (well, any shop) is responsible for paying your sales taxes (that is, VAT). But you still have to pay council tax yourself.
Personally, I think the ideal is that ordinary citizens should not even have to think about taxation. But at the moment, checks and balances do still involve the citizen moving a small amount of paperwork around - this means that both the employer and the employee have to collude to avoid tax, rather than the employer being able to do so alone. But it still happens, usually when the employee is in a disadvantageous position, eg. an illegal immigrant being paid under the table. The advantage over the US system is that the ordinary citizen does not have to understand the tax system to a professional standard (or pay someone to do so) in order to fulfil unavoidable legal requirements.
There are basically two classes of fixed-wing aircraft: those where the controls are physically connected to the flight surfaces, and those that are controlled entirely by hydraulic pressure and/or electronics. The latter is increasingly common in large airliners, but has been around for decades (a DC-10 was infamously controllable only by the wing-engine throttles after the tail engine shattered and took all the hydraulics with it - roughly half the people on board survived the "landing").
Both of them are easily capable of landing after all engines fail at cruising altitude. Electric power, where necessary, is generated by a small windmill which extends from the body of the plane when needed.
Only the directly-connected type - which (conservatively) includes pretty much anything up to about corporate-jet size or built before 1970 - will be able to continue flying in a controlled fashion if the electronics are destroyed by a large EMP. Some of the hydraulic indirect types will probably fly too, depending on how independent the controls are of EMP-sensitive electronics and whether a source of hydraulic pressure remains. You do *not* want to be on board *any* Airbus if an EMP goes off within range - they are entirely computer-controlled, and the pilot's joystick inputs are merely suggestions.
Whether the navigation equipment will still work is, frankly, unlikely. The pilot will have to find his way to an airport the hard way.
Going back to the original subject, all cars certified for road use have a physical link for steering (usually with power assistance these days, but this does nothing at highway speeds), and two braking systems that can be applied by human effort alone (both hand and foot brakes, though the footbrake is usually power-assisted too). That's enough to easily retain control in the face of total electrical failure and engine cutout.
But it is worth noting that a lot of old cars have engines, with carburettors and distributors, that would not be affected by any kind of EMP. At worst, it would induce a momentary misfire and fry the radio. If you look in the right scrapyards, you can find Renault and Volvo engines that have outlived their vehicles and are robust enough to withstand quite a lot of boring and boosting... so serious criminals who put some thought and effort into preparing their crime can avoid being stopped by the EMP and still have a fast enough car to keep ahead of the chase. But high-speed chases are usually the result of insufficient planning anyway...
Unfortunately Cringely has overlooked the principle of conservation of momentum.
Once each piece of junk lodges permanently in the net - assuming for the moment that the net is a good solution - the whole ensemble will by definition have the total momentum vector that the spacecraft+junk had beforehand. No amount of clever angling will help that.
Now, if he instead said that he was going to bounce off each piece of junk so that the junk was sent into the atmosphere and the spacecraft was also redirected usefully, then that would have been more plausible - except of course that he would then need to make the spacecraft itself pretty damn robust.
No, I'm much more inclined to consider small drones which can drift around with a little ion drive and attach to a few bits of junk each (at near-zero dV), and then deorbit themselves.
Funnily enough, that bag was released in LEO... and will therefore eventually decay of it's own accord. He'll have to be quick if he wants to snatch that up.
The most obvious place to start is Suomenlinna, the Fortress of Finland, which is built on an island complex just outside Helsinki. There's a regular ferry between there and the mainland, and it's big enough to be worth spending at least an entire day there.
The museums there cover everything from pre-1800 (when Finland was part of Sweden rather than Russia) to at least WW2, and many of the 19th-century Russian howitzers are still in position, though unusable.
VNC development will continue, and here's how and why:
1) AT&T Labs has not released a significant version of VNC for a little while now, yet VNC development continues on many fronts. These efforts will therefore not cease just because the AT&T Lab goes away. Examples of non-AT&T projects involving VNC:
ChromiVNC (MacOS 7.5/9.x server) - maintained by myself, Jonathan Morton.
VNCThing (MacOS Carbon viewer) - maintained by Dair Grant.
TightVNC (ultra-efficient Win32 and UNIX servers and viewers) - maintained by Constantin Kaplinsky.
TridiaVNC (semi-commercial Win32 and UNIX servers and viewers) - maintained by Tridia Corporation.
A large number of independent viewers, as well as a few servers, for minority and hand-held platforms are also available.
Each of the above is independent of the AT&T Labs, although most use at least some of the AT&T code.
2) Most people who use VNC seriously, use the independent versions because they are noticeably further advanced than the AT&T versions. In fact, generally progress on the AT&T versions has been limited to occasional bugfixes for some years.
3) Support for most versions of VNC (but not normally TridiaVNC, for which commercial support from Tridia is available) is primarily conducted on a central mailing list, currently operated from an AT&T server. The posting rate from AT&T representatives or developers is very low. As a group, VNC developers are currently discussing where to move the support list to ensure it's continued operation.
Here's some acronyms for you, which should clear up the mess:
POWER == Performance Optimised With Enhanced RISC
PowerPC == POWER for Personal Computers
The PowerPC was developed as a cut-down (32-bit instead of 64-bit and lacking a few rarely-used and complex instructions), largely binary-compatible version of the POWER.
PowerPC isn't really any particular processor, but a specification, which was first implemented as the PowerPC 601 back in 1994 (remember how it totally wiped out the Pentium-75?). Subsequently, embedded versions have been made, along with more powerful desktop versions of the PowerPC - the 603, 604, 750 (G3), 7400 (G4) and now the 7450 (G4+).
Meanwhile, the POWER has been developed as well, remaining a high-end 64-bit monster for the enterprise-level RS/6000 machines. The PowerPC 601 was based more on the POWER1 than anything else, the chip shown in the log is a POWER3, and the current hot topic is the POWER4 with all these nice new features (one or two of which have reportedly already made it into the 7450...).
The bottom line is that the POWER and the PowerPC are different but surprisingly similar beasts. They are nearly binary-compatible, which is why the kernel reports it as a PowerPC-class processor.
The syntax is very similar. However the behaviour of iptables is very different to ipchains. For example, packets now go through more than one "table" on their way to, from or through the machine, instead of just the INPUT, OUTPUT or FORWARD chains. I got very confused when my firewall started doing "interesting" things I wasn't expecting - because I'd expected it to be very siilar to ipchains in functionality as well as syntax.
Most (l)users use the DNS servers supplied by their ISP, which generally cache root-nameserver data for long enough that an outage of all 12 for up to a week might not matter. In any case, the 12 are distributed both globally and topologically, so the chances of an outage or series thereof making all 12 inaccessible is minimised.
The same goes for the GTLD servers, although there are too many domains hanging off the GTLD's for caching to be totally effective. Most good DNS hosters have at least three geographically and topologically separated servers, and allow you to choose your own timeouts, for similar reasons.
The point here is that DNS will likely survive so long as the sites it allows you to access are still reachable. The only exception to this would be an international attack specifically on the root and GTLD nameservers, at which point DNS service to (l)users and 133+ H4x0r3s alike would decay as caching became ineffective. Popular sites are more likely to be in the caches, and would thus last longer in this scenario.
Photoshop (by Adobe) works in much that manner - it has a simple(ish) core, tons of plugins, and is used by professional graphic artists all over. Shame it isn't availble for *IX...
Slashdot Mirror
Sun - or rather Oracle these days - provide an autoupdater with every version of Java 6 for Windows that I've seen. It even seems to work.
Adobe also provide an auto-updater with recent versions of Flash Player for Windows. There might also be a periodic update check for Reader, although I suspect this kicks in only oce you launch it (which for many people might be very rarely, so a malfile might still open in an unpatched version anyway).
Ubuntu also auto-updates Flash Player and Reader if you installed them through the package system. It's just a piggy-back on an existing mechanism that works.
Of course, if people are still coasting along on versions prior to the introduction of auto-pdate, or have turned it off, or habitually hit Cancel when a prompt-to-update appears "because it's too much trouble right now", they have only themselves to blame.
I'm not so sure. Consider a system like Alpha Centauri, which is technically a trinary system (two sunlike stars and a red dwarf). The red dwarf is irrelevant as it orbits the primary pair at a great distance. The sunlike pair orbit each other at about 50 AU, and the habitable zone for each of them would be around 1 AU, which should be a stable near-circular orbit. At 49AU or 51AU distances, the heat contribution from the other primary star would be negligible.
Certainly the cable from Telia's US backbone to Asia is broken. That one *didn't* change it's route for at least the first several hours.
Easy. They need to come and look at the hole to determine how to repair it anyway. So if they find a squashed mess at the site instead of a hole in the road, they know it was an old person instead of a pothole.
Never mind that - try an 8-hour transcontinental flight with that going on.
Or an 8-hour intercontinental with people complaining loudly about the lack of signal in the middle of the ocean.
If you make everyone work 10-11 hours a day, you will get LESS useful work out of them than you did at 7-8 hours a day.
There are several reasons for this. The most important ones are:
- Working longer hours makes people tired. Tired people make mistakes. These mistakes take more time to be found and fixed.
- Working longer hours makes people tired. Tired people slow down. Thus any given feature will take longer to implement.
- Working longer hours gives people less time at home with their families, hobbies, sleep time and general de-stressing. This tends to make people depressed. Depressed people are more likely to slow down and make mistakes (see above), and might even quit on you.
- People who work longer hours will demand overtime pay, in some form or other. It is cheaper to hire more people at normal working hours.
...when these "haptic" keyboards can reliably provide tactile feedback *before* registering a keypress. Y'know, like every €5 special supplied with no-name whitebox computers everywhere. I like to know that my finger is actually on a key, and preferably the correct one, before I press it.
Until that happens, professional touch-typists will not touch them with a bargepole, even if they don't know the difference between the keyboard that came with their Dell and a Cherry G80. (Which, for the uninitiated, is akin to the difference between a Peugeot 308 and a Volvo 760 GLE wagon^Westate.) Those of us who already have Cherry or IBM keyboards - or close derivatives of them - will not give them up for all the tea in China.
Trackpads have virtually replaced the mouse for laptop use, because they actually work. Okay, you don't want to use one 24/7, and it's a really good idea to disable the tap-to-click functionality that most have, but you can point to pixel accuracy with roughly the same amount of care as with a mouse, and it takes up less space. The main application which doesn't work well with a trackpad is FPS games.
That's still ignoring the problem (mentioned by other commenters) of the keyboard being in the same plane as the display, and occupying valuable real estate on it. On a phone, that's fine. On a tablet, it comes with the territory - though I'm not a fan of tablets. On a laptop, the problem is very deliberately avoided, though the position restriction imposed by the hinge is still a minor problem for extended use. On a desktop computer, it would be totally unacceptable.
For my own part, I'm actively supporting the manufacturers of decent physical keyboards - I've got two Cherrys on order right now. One is a full-size USB G80, replacing a PS/2 G84 and an AT G80 that dates from 1996 (and still works perfectly). The other is a miniature G84 which will go well with a barebones machine I'm experimenting with. At work I use a Model M, which I'm seriously considering upgrading to USB - which will involve hand-building a new controller board.
One last thing: why on earth are people so unwilling to spend €70 on a decent keyboard which will last 20 years, when they will happy spend more than that on a graphics card which will last 3 at best before becoming hopelessly obsolete? An argument against consumer rationality if I ever saw one.
...had more to do with the *cost* of transistors than the quantity or speed of them. The increasing quantities per device are, however, simultaneously a cause (economy of scale) and effect (your dollar goes further) of this reducing cost.
We can now buy a device with a billion transistors in it for a couple of hundred dollars. That's about 50K transistors per cent. It follows that about 30 years ago, it would have been about 1 transistor per cent, or in other words the original 68000 would have cost about $680 in about 1980. Since it is described as originally being "quite expensive", this seems to fit. I don't have any data on the cost of transistors in 1965, though.
In Britain, almost all railways define location using miles and chains from a defined starting point. Sometimes the distance is from a starting point that no longer exists, or is partially over a route that no longer exists, but correction factors are defined for these cases. Only the newest light railways, such as the Manchester Metrolink and the Docklands Light Railway, use kilometres - even though Metrolink is partly built on an old railway.
By the way, there are 22 yards in a chain and 80 chains in a mile. A chain is also, conveniently, very close to 20 metres.
Just be glad we don't use Wizard currency. "Seventeen silver Sickles to a Galleon and twenty-nine Knuts to a Sickle, it's easy enough." Those multiples are *prime numbers*, although they might be reasonable estimates of the relative rarity of gold, silver and copper. Of course it was a parody of real pre-decimal British currency - 12d to the shilling and 20s to £1.
I wouldn't call it "potential for extra efficiency" so much as "robustness in the face of hardware failures". If the cooling remains adequate when a pump or a fan fails or a blockage occurs in an air path, then the increased coolant temperature provides a signal for admins to react to, and the servers don't suffer any downtime.
Which is a very good thing for a cooling system. How many stories are there about overheated and dead servers due to an aircon unit failure?
An important point is that anyone *can* sue anyone for anything.
Whether they have a snowball's chance of winning is entirely another matter.
That's easy - he's good at qualitative analysis but not quantitative analysis. Numbers and by-rote facts mean nothing to him, but if he can see a pattern, it makes perfect sense. A formula is a by-rote fact into which you plug numbers...
If you cannot get your problem resolved during the first call to an outsourced call centre... Stop Calling.
Write a letter to your branch manager (if a bank) or local head office (for any other organisation) instead. It gets much quicker attention from a native English-speaker, and they take written communications much more seriously than phone conversations because it is easier to legally prove that such communication took place.
If your writing skills are not up to producing a business letter by yourself, ask someone who can do it for you. In the UK, Citizens Advice Bureaux should be able to help with this.
That's right, inflation has no effect on subsistence farmers and wage-slaves, who spend all their money pretty much as soon as they get it - assuming that pay rates keep step with the cost of living, which is not always the case.
But inflation has a very negative effect on people with savings and investments, because the real value of these is diluted over time. It strongly exaggerates the "time value of money" concept, and indeed amplifies it.
Historically, when Britain and other major countries used a precious-metal standard, mild and controlled deflation resulted, because population growth exceeded that of stocks of metals. Deflation is usually cited as a Bad Thing because capital owners can just let their money sit around instead of investing it, and it's value will go up anyway. But this ignores the fact that investment is always a sound rational choice if the expected return is higher than unity, regardless of inflation or deflation, and that most people now save using banks, which are in a position to invest those deposits wholesale.
Because people are irrational, people with significant amounts of capital are now tempted to speculate on the market by the possibility of greater-than-inflation returns. These people feel that they are losing out if they get anything less than the inflation rate, and would often be quite happy to leave it in a bank if deflation existed. But speculators are what cause bubbles, and bubbles always burst and crash.
There is one advantage of a fiat currency: governments can borrow money from the people, without asking, in a time of emergency (such as war), simply by having the Treasury print more money. It will be paid for automatically in the medium term, by inflation. But this only works, as we see from Greece's sorry example, if that government directly controls the issue of currency.
It is not possible to just "produce a load of extra gold". You'd better believe that gold mines are already working at or near capacity, and that gold is one of the most thoroughly recycled metals on the planet. That is why it is such a good store of value - even if an unusually large nugget were to be found unexpectedly, it would only have a small and temporary effect on the price. Silver also makes a good store of value (mind you, it is currently undervalued), though it takes up a lot more space for that purpose than gold does. Even copper has been used as an effective store of small amounts of value - if pennies were still made of solid copper, the metal would be inherently worth considerably more than face value - and still has a high enough scrap price that thieves often steal both live and abandoned electric cables.
There's some fun political history there...
Most of the Nordic countries have been merged and separated at various times in the past few centuries. For example, Finland was once part of Sweden, then the Russians invaded in the early 1800s, then the Finns declared independence while the Russians were otherwise occupied with their revolution (so as such, Finland is a very young country). Norway, Sweden and Denmark have been parts of each other in a very complicated manner, and have dependencies and ex-dependencies all over the North Atlantic, dating back to the Viking era. The Åland islands logically belong to Sweden, technically belong to Finland, are Swedish-speaking and are a demilitarised zone...
But the short answer is that a lot of concepts and ideals are indeed shared between the Nordic countries.
In Finland at least, both national and municipal income taxes are witheld by your employer based on the instruction given by the "tax card", which is automatically generated by the government based on the information given to the tax office. The most an ordinary employee needs to do is to take their evidence of income to the tax office when it changes significantly, and return the tax card to their employer. The result is not ideal - the amount witheld by the employer is an estimate, so there may be an excess or a refund at the end of the year - but it's a lot less hassle than the US system, not least because the employer reports your actual income at the end of the year, and the government does the calculations.
I should point out that the PAYE scheme in the UK has the same general effect, so it's not solely a Nordic phenomenon. If your taxes are "normal" - ie. you are a waged or salaried employee - your employer is responsible for paying your income taxes, your bank is responsible for paying your interest taxes, and your supermarket (well, any shop) is responsible for paying your sales taxes (that is, VAT). But you still have to pay council tax yourself.
Personally, I think the ideal is that ordinary citizens should not even have to think about taxation. But at the moment, checks and balances do still involve the citizen moving a small amount of paperwork around - this means that both the employer and the employee have to collude to avoid tax, rather than the employer being able to do so alone. But it still happens, usually when the employee is in a disadvantageous position, eg. an illegal immigrant being paid under the table. The advantage over the US system is that the ordinary citizen does not have to understand the tax system to a professional standard (or pay someone to do so) in order to fulfil unavoidable legal requirements.
There are basically two classes of fixed-wing aircraft: those where the controls are physically connected to the flight surfaces, and those that are controlled entirely by hydraulic pressure and/or electronics. The latter is increasingly common in large airliners, but has been around for decades (a DC-10 was infamously controllable only by the wing-engine throttles after the tail engine shattered and took all the hydraulics with it - roughly half the people on board survived the "landing").
Both of them are easily capable of landing after all engines fail at cruising altitude. Electric power, where necessary, is generated by a small windmill which extends from the body of the plane when needed.
Only the directly-connected type - which (conservatively) includes pretty much anything up to about corporate-jet size or built before 1970 - will be able to continue flying in a controlled fashion if the electronics are destroyed by a large EMP. Some of the hydraulic indirect types will probably fly too, depending on how independent the controls are of EMP-sensitive electronics and whether a source of hydraulic pressure remains. You do *not* want to be on board *any* Airbus if an EMP goes off within range - they are entirely computer-controlled, and the pilot's joystick inputs are merely suggestions.
Whether the navigation equipment will still work is, frankly, unlikely. The pilot will have to find his way to an airport the hard way.
Going back to the original subject, all cars certified for road use have a physical link for steering (usually with power assistance these days, but this does nothing at highway speeds), and two braking systems that can be applied by human effort alone (both hand and foot brakes, though the footbrake is usually power-assisted too). That's enough to easily retain control in the face of total electrical failure and engine cutout.
But it is worth noting that a lot of old cars have engines, with carburettors and distributors, that would not be affected by any kind of EMP. At worst, it would induce a momentary misfire and fry the radio. If you look in the right scrapyards, you can find Renault and Volvo engines that have outlived their vehicles and are robust enough to withstand quite a lot of boring and boosting... so serious criminals who put some thought and effort into preparing their crime can avoid being stopped by the EMP and still have a fast enough car to keep ahead of the chase. But high-speed chases are usually the result of insufficient planning anyway...
Unfortunately Cringely has overlooked the principle of conservation of momentum.
Once each piece of junk lodges permanently in the net - assuming for the moment that the net is a good solution - the whole ensemble will by definition have the total momentum vector that the spacecraft+junk had beforehand. No amount of clever angling will help that.
Now, if he instead said that he was going to bounce off each piece of junk so that the junk was sent into the atmosphere and the spacecraft was also redirected usefully, then that would have been more plausible - except of course that he would then need to make the spacecraft itself pretty damn robust.
No, I'm much more inclined to consider small drones which can drift around with a little ion drive and attach to a few bits of junk each (at near-zero dV), and then deorbit themselves.
Funnily enough, that bag was released in LEO... and will therefore eventually decay of it's own accord. He'll have to be quick if he wants to snatch that up.
The most obvious place to start is Suomenlinna, the Fortress of Finland, which is built on an island complex just outside Helsinki. There's a regular ferry between there and the mainland, and it's big enough to be worth spending at least an entire day there.
The museums there cover everything from pre-1800 (when Finland was part of Sweden rather than Russia) to at least WW2, and many of the 19th-century Russian howitzers are still in position, though unusable.
1) AT&T Labs has not released a significant version of VNC for a little while now, yet VNC development continues on many fronts. These efforts will therefore not cease just because the AT&T Lab goes away. Examples of non-AT&T projects involving VNC:
ChromiVNC (MacOS 7.5/9.x server) - maintained by myself, Jonathan Morton.
VNCThing (MacOS Carbon viewer) - maintained by Dair Grant.
OSXVNC (MacOS X server)
TightVNC (ultra-efficient Win32 and UNIX servers and viewers) - maintained by Constantin Kaplinsky.
TridiaVNC (semi-commercial Win32 and UNIX servers and viewers) - maintained by Tridia Corporation.
A large number of independent viewers, as well as a few servers, for minority and hand-held platforms are also available.
Each of the above is independent of the AT&T Labs, although most use at least some of the AT&T code.
2) Most people who use VNC seriously, use the independent versions because they are noticeably further advanced than the AT&T versions. In fact, generally progress on the AT&T versions has been limited to occasional bugfixes for some years.
3) Support for most versions of VNC (but not normally TridiaVNC, for which commercial support from Tridia is available) is primarily conducted on a central mailing list, currently operated from an AT&T server. The posting rate from AT&T representatives or developers is very low. As a group, VNC developers are currently discussing where to move the support list to ensure it's continued operation.
This is all made possible by the GPL.
Eudora Light 3.x.x can use plugins, at least on the Macintosh edition. I use PGP with 3.1.3 all the time.
Here's some acronyms for you, which should clear up the mess:
POWER == Performance Optimised With Enhanced RISC
PowerPC == POWER for Personal Computers
The PowerPC was developed as a cut-down (32-bit instead of 64-bit and lacking a few rarely-used and complex instructions), largely binary-compatible version of the POWER.
PowerPC isn't really any particular processor, but a specification, which was first implemented as the PowerPC 601 back in 1994 (remember how it totally wiped out the Pentium-75?). Subsequently, embedded versions have been made, along with more powerful desktop versions of the PowerPC - the 603, 604, 750 (G3), 7400 (G4) and now the 7450 (G4+).
Meanwhile, the POWER has been developed as well, remaining a high-end 64-bit monster for the enterprise-level RS/6000 machines. The PowerPC 601 was based more on the POWER1 than anything else, the chip shown in the log is a POWER3, and the current hot topic is the POWER4 with all these nice new features (one or two of which have reportedly already made it into the 7450...).
The bottom line is that the POWER and the PowerPC are different but surprisingly similar beasts. They are nearly binary-compatible, which is why the kernel reports it as a PowerPC-class processor.
The syntax is very similar. However the behaviour of iptables is very different to ipchains. For example, packets now go through more than one "table" on their way to, from or through the machine, instead of just the INPUT, OUTPUT or FORWARD chains. I got very confused when my firewall started doing "interesting" things I wasn't expecting - because I'd expected it to be very siilar to ipchains in functionality as well as syntax.
The same goes for the GTLD servers, although there are too many domains hanging off the GTLD's for caching to be totally effective. Most good DNS hosters have at least three geographically and topologically separated servers, and allow you to choose your own timeouts, for similar reasons.
The point here is that DNS will likely survive so long as the sites it allows you to access are still reachable. The only exception to this would be an international attack specifically on the root and GTLD nameservers, at which point DNS service to (l)users and 133+ H4x0r3s alike would decay as caching became ineffective. Popular sites are more likely to be in the caches, and would thus last longer in this scenario.
Photoshop (by Adobe) works in much that manner - it has a simple(ish) core, tons of plugins, and is used by professional graphic artists all over. Shame it isn't availble for *IX...