Slashdot Mirror


User: mqduck

mqduck's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,631
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,631

  1. Re:Remember when... on Nintendo Blocks Homebrew Installation · · Score: 1

    There are always people on Slashdot who confuse legality and/or property rights with right and wrong.

    Just because you have the ability to take hardware out of spec does not mean the original manufacturer *has* to continue to interact with your modded hardware.

    No, it just makes them complete assholes. Why should we be any less upset?

  2. Re:what vision? on Bill Gates Founds New "Think Tank" Company · · Score: 1

    Clippy!

  3. Re:Considering the last 8 years... on ACLU Creates Map of US "Constitution-Free Zone" · · Score: 1
  4. Re:How can it be both effective and invisible? on Open-Source DRM Ready To Take On Big Guns · · Score: 1

    What's the benefit of it being open source? For the sake of my humanity-faith, I sure hope the project isn't attracting any volunteer developers.

  5. Balin on Anatomy of the First Video Game, Born 1958 · · Score: 1

    Look, I have no idea how it happened - I'm just really sleepy and can barely keep my eyes open - but when I first read the story title, I thought it said it was a "Vice President Game". Which I assume would consist of starting up the game and waiting upwards of four years for a dialog box to pop up letting you choose between "Yea" and "Nay".

  6. Re: I think we should be able to on Economic Crisis Will Eliminate Open Source · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slashdot posts it because it's worth knowing what people are saying out there. It's irritating how everyone complains when Slashdot links to something people disagree with, as though it should never be done.

    Just because it's dead wrong, that doesn't mean it isn't worth noting.

  7. Re:Useless on Microsoft Patents the Censoring of Speech · · Score: 1

    I fail to see how curse words stifle creativity. You could say the same thing about the word "cool". You could say the same thing about the words "good" or "bad".

    Don't blame words for non-"creative" expression. And don't forget the involvement of tone and context in communication.

  8. Re:BTRFS? on Ext4 Advances As Interim Step To Btrfs · · Score: 1

    They also omitted the double T. So you should have said "brlnt!"

  9. Sites on Al-Qaeda Web Sites Go Offline · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anybody know where to *find* these sites? Even Wikipedia won't supply links.

  10. Re:So what are the URLs? on Al-Qaeda Web Sites Go Offline · · Score: 1

    I find it rather terrifying that enough people who happened to have mod points decided to bring this up to +5 Insightful. I'm sorry, this bullshit is unacceptable (though he's right about the bin Laden family).

  11. Re:fp on Al-Qaeda Web Sites Go Offline · · Score: 1

    Yeah, does anyone know the actual origin of that story? It sounds to me like something that was originally written seriously - that it really was the author's fantasy.

  12. Re:fp on Al-Qaeda Web Sites Go Offline · · Score: 1

    Ha. That's one of the funniest things I've heard all day. (no sarcasm)

  13. Re:WTF?! on Nation-Wide Internet Censorship Proposed For Australia · · Score: 1

    I want answers, damnit! I'm Aussie, and not used to fighting these sort of things - Americans, what's the best way forward to make my voice heard?!

    You are asking the absolutely last group you should ask for advice on this. We had an election blatantly stolen and fought back by making hanging chad jokes.

  14. Re:Always remember: on Nation-Wide Internet Censorship Proposed For Australia · · Score: 1

    Although I'm glad for many reasons that we finally got rid of little Bush Jr. (John Howard) and replaced him Kevin Rudd, it's a disaster that they now want to impose this crap on everyone.

    I'm not an Australian, but I was glad for you guys when that happened. John Howard seemed to me to be less Bush Jr. and more like Australia's belated answer to Reagan and Thatcher.

    And you seem to still be belatedly following our narrative: Reagan/Thatcher being replaced by a liberal-talking Democrat/Labour politician who in reality is hardly any different.

    Just wait for Obama to prove that all over again. You guys at least got rid of WorkChoices, didn't you?

  15. Re:STOP SLASHDOT CENSORSHIP FIRST!! on China To Photograph All Internet Cafe Customers · · Score: 1

    You may have a case, but crying "censorship" is going a bit too far. It's bias, something Slashdot has never claimed to be free of.

  16. Supposed on China To Photograph All Internet Cafe Customers · · Score: 1

    So much for the new levels of openness and transparency that the Olympics were supposed to usher in.

    I'm sorry, who exactly was saying this would happen? I don't recall anything like that.

  17. Re:This is becoming pointless on Slashdot's Disagree Mail · · Score: 1

    It was always pointless. Just chill dude and stop taking it so seriously.

  18. Re:Well then on Slashdot's Disagree Mail · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess this answers the question, " Do inadequate fat men dream of inflatable sheep?"

    Good. Now I can finally rest.

  19. Re:Overdrive on Watching Tonight's Presidential Debate Online · · Score: 1

    As I said in another post: if there was any justice in the world, everyone everywhere would have a vote for the next American Emperor of Earth.

    On the other hand, you're almost entirely wrong that there are real differences between "the two" candidates. On every fundamental issue, they're practically two mirrors facing each other. I suppose Obama's mildly better than John Kerry, who quietly ran on a platform of increasing the number of troops in Iraq, but only by that little bit. He is in no way, shape or form an antiwar candidate. Economy? He's as bought off as any presidential candidate. There has in fact been more corporate funding of him than McCain.

    I understand that the world cares, and that it has every reason to. But both Americans and the rest of the world shouldn't be fooled by the differing rhetoric of these two twin candidates.

  20. Expansion on Spore Expansion Announced, Another Coming In 2009 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been thinking that a good (though completely unlikely) thing to do would be to release an expansion pack for each stage, turning each into more of a game in their own right.

    Start with Cell. Turn it into a Cell/Fish stage (or just add a Fish stage instead).

    Add something more to the Creature stage than just fighting or making friends with other species. I don't have any suggestions off the top of my head, but the possibilities are limitless.

    I'm not sure what they were going for with the Tribal stage. It seems to be a simplified version of the Civilization stage, with some elements of the Creature stage. But perhaps it can be improved by making it not just about winning over (in either fashion) other tribes, but about building up culture and technology in order to unwittingly prepare for civilization.

    Civilization stage. Bares little in common with the game of the same name. It's basically a really simple RTS. Easy solution: make it more complex and strategic. Oh, and make making religious units actually practical.

    Space stage. Well, they're already working on expanding this one.

    Allow players to choose to play the original or expanded version of each stage (or maybe make the expanded version something you "unlock" after beating the original version). After all, we already have the ability to skip stages already beaten.

    Spore is a game with so many brilliant elements (generated music by Brian Freaking Eno, for fuck's sake!) and yet it's very mediocre at best on the actual gameplay. As it stands, it's a game for people who love the concept, not people looking for gameplay. But it could be so much more. Do it!

  21. Re:beware! on Machines Almost Pass Mass Turing Test · · Score: 1

    That brings up an interesting question. Have you ever wondered that maybe you're a lesbian trapped in a man's body?

    (Granted, I've never considered that you might actually be female.)

  22. Re:beware! on Machines Almost Pass Mass Turing Test · · Score: 1

    What about men?

  23. Re:Source on Google's Chrome Declining In Popularity · · Score: 1

    Fine, I'm wrong. It is open source. I take but what I said, but it still makes me uneasy that it's the product of a for-profit company

  24. Source on Google's Chrome Declining In Popularity · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one left who still cares that Chrome is closed-source? Towards a Free future! Remember that?

    Remember? Hello? Anybody there?

  25. Re:Linux Support? on Starcraft 2 To Be a Trilogy · · Score: 1

    With WOW, Blizzard has a history of working with the WINE (well, Cedega) people to make it more or less "compatible" with GNU/Linux (perhaps we can call it WINE/GNU/Linux). Probably due to Blizzard's working with Cedega, the game is such that it runs well on WINE anyway. From from a guarantee for SC2 though.

    Also, I agree about not wanting to pay for Cedega. It's a matter of principal. Me, I hope they go out of business.