What's it to you if I think I can hear the difference when you think I can't. Maybe I can hear the difference, maybe I can't. It's a personal thing and if I preffer listening to flac or 'pure' music or iof I want to hear crap played from out of a tin can, it really shouldn't make diddly squate difference to you! SO GET OUT OF MY EAR SPACE!
On another train of thought...
If you want to manipulate the music and say put it in another format, up the bass whatever and save it again, you really need to work with the lossless formats. Then if you must lower it to MP3 to save space, cheep hard drives makes that need a little less. Of course, on your IPOD or other little device with your cheasy headphones, you might as well go to some quality 4 bit recording format and really spave space. You won't hear the difference once the earbuds are done with it.
SSL at least in the context of web browser is not only to secure our communication, but authenticate that the web site is the web site we really want to be at.
If you want what looks like a promissing web interface you might try http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt. Life's beautiful when you can do web stuff in just one language
Don't tell the sugar farmers in Florida and Southern Texas (not to mention all of the sugar beet farmers) that their crops don't exist. It will just ruin their fantasy! Nobody likes a killer of a good fantasy!
Wait, just last week it was those pesky conservatives waging war against science. I guess all of science is doomed since both sides are now aligned against it!
Sheesh a hacker who is afraid of 170V at low current, is a wimp. If the PS is properly designed to NOT be a bug zapper, then it may tingle, but it will hardly hurt you. Under the best circumstances if it can put out more than 50MA it is way overkill for a nixie clock. Even 20MA gives plenty of headroom.
You want to see a real neat clock, checkout http://www.nixieneon.com./ I haven't touted it as Opensource, but the code is GPL. It does come with complete schematics and a good assy manual.
In other headlines, researhers have learned more cumbersome coding techniques taking the CS community one step closer to having chimpanzees writing code which will work good enuf at a low cost of just 1 banana per 1000 lines of code.
Yep, the first thing I thought to my self when the housing bubble burst and the stock market crashed was "Well that's it, no more writing opensource software for me!".
Yea right! Some companies will quit contributing. Those that were doing it just to make a buck. Folks who do it because they feal it's the right thing to do will continue on through thick and thin.
Actually, I have not needed his site for real, but it does have advantages over most. First and foremost, he has a link to the actual website and does not just run you around his site (though he does have plenty of possible loops for you to choose from).
He also gives pretty decent descriptions of the companies.
Granted, you only know how useful his site is when you are looking for something you need, and with my check that was not the case.
I've tried the several times. Each time 100 to 300 dollars poorer and I got no sales as a result.
They're making my good link placement less relevent as well. Not they're are effectively 6 ads before you get to look at the first real search result. Now my number seven rank is 13!
yep, that does sound like the solution to the problem Re-write the code in PHP or Java. They can't be written poorly due to their supperior design. NOT!
Sheesh... Perl a good language, I like it. I dread writting another web page in it myself.
Php is no better. It is just the cat gutted from the other direction.
Java is maybe, if it wasn't such a anal language.
I've been playing with WT (http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt) which is C++ based. With it I get to write almost entirely in C++, it generates the Javascript, HTML and CSS. I need to only know a little HTLM, CSS and Javascript (if any) to make a nice AJAX page.
Spiff, but the first two examples, from what I can tell don't solve the RPC issues. The 3rd is questionable, it may.
What Qt and Wt both offer in the RPC arena is SIMPLICITY. GWT does not offer this out of the box.
Also, do any of these allow me write a single app which splits the functionality of the server and browser for my without me having to do the work? I know GWT out of the box does not. Write your java code for the Browser, compile to javascript, Write your code for the server, put it on there using Tomcat or whatever. Hope you have your RPC calls handled proper...
Sadly, unlike WT (http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/), the google web toolkit forces me to write java on the server and the client and does not make it easy to have the serverside actions happen on button clicks etc.
What I really want to do it write an application like a gui where I write in a single language (c++/Java/whatever) and it deals with the browser and the server and I don't have to think about it, when a button is clicked this function is called, if it's on the server, great, if it's on the browser fine. Wt is very close. What it is missing is the graphical designer that Qt has. Add that and it will be quite the tool!
When I think configuration I thing/etc/* resolv.conf rc.d scripts,/etc/sysconfig stuff, nfs nis blah blah blah... For true hackers always fun. To teach programming to a teenager, BORING!
Like I said, always good to know. I use it almost regularly as a programmer (have to get the system to start your program somehow). To pique ones interest in programming, NOT!
Slashdot Mirror
What's it to you if I think I can hear the difference when you think I can't. Maybe I can hear the difference, maybe I can't. It's a personal thing and if I preffer listening to flac or 'pure' music or iof I want to hear crap played from out of a tin can, it really shouldn't make diddly squate difference to you! SO GET OUT OF MY EAR SPACE!
On another train of thought...
If you want to manipulate the music and say put it in another format, up the bass whatever and save it again, you really need to work with the lossless formats. Then if you must lower it to MP3 to save space, cheep hard drives makes that need a little less. Of course, on your IPOD or other little device with your cheasy headphones, you might as well go to some quality 4 bit recording format and really spave space. You won't hear the difference once the earbuds are done with it.
Dude, I'm sorry, I didn't realize I had to speel it out.
I. W.A.S. M.A.K.I.N.G. A. J.O.K.E.
or at least an attempt at
S.A.R.C.A.S.M.
I hope this helps
According to an earlier article, Windows 7 looks and smells like a mac but is way more stable than a Mac.
SSL at least in the context of web browser is not only to secure our communication, but authenticate that the web site is the web site we really want to be at.
PANIC and Irrational fear!!! Run for your lives!
If you want what looks like a promissing web interface you might try http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt. Life's beautiful when you can do web stuff in just one language
Don't tell the sugar farmers in Florida and Southern Texas (not to mention all of the sugar beet farmers) that their crops don't exist. It will just ruin their fantasy! Nobody likes a killer of a good fantasy!
Wait, just last week it was those pesky conservatives waging war against science. I guess all of science is doomed since both sides are now aligned against it!
As long as the President didn't come up with it!
Sheesh a hacker who is afraid of 170V at low current, is a wimp. If the PS is properly designed to NOT be a bug zapper, then it may tingle, but it will hardly hurt you. Under the best circumstances if it can put out more than 50MA it is way overkill for a nixie clock. Even 20MA gives plenty of headroom.
You want to see a real neat clock, checkout http://www.nixieneon.com./ I haven't touted it as Opensource, but the code is GPL. It does come with complete schematics and a good assy manual.
sucks less on Ubuntu than on Windows!
In other headlines, researhers have learned more cumbersome coding techniques taking the CS community one step closer to having chimpanzees writing code which will work good enuf at a low cost of just 1 banana per 1000 lines of code.
Yep, the first thing I thought to my self when the housing bubble burst and the stock market crashed was "Well that's it, no more writing opensource software for me!".
Yea right! Some companies will quit contributing. Those that were doing it just to make a buck. Folks who do it because they feal it's the right thing to do will continue on through thick and thin.
Actually, I have not needed his site for real, but it does have advantages over most. First and foremost, he has a link to the actual website and does not just run you around his site (though he does have plenty of possible loops for you to choose from).
He also gives pretty decent descriptions of the companies.
Granted, you only know how useful his site is when you are looking for something you need, and with my check that was not the case.
I've tried the several times. Each time 100 to 300 dollars poorer and I got no sales as a result.
They're making my good link placement less relevent as well. Not they're are effectively 6 ads before you get to look at the first real search result. Now my number seven rank is 13!
That or a really big nail file!
yep, that does sound like the solution to the problem Re-write the code in PHP or Java. They can't be written poorly due to their supperior design. NOT!
Sheesh... Perl a good language, I like it. I dread writting another web page in it myself.
Php is no better. It is just the cat gutted from the other direction.
Java is maybe, if it wasn't such a anal language.
I've been playing with WT (http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt) which is C++ based. With it I get to write almost entirely in C++, it generates the Javascript, HTML and CSS. I need to only know a little HTLM, CSS and Javascript (if any) to make a nice AJAX page.
Or maybe refried beans
given as much money as they, I could've accomplished just as much. Probably would've have, but that's not the point.
It costs even more to ship S/W from the US to Europe when you send it through China!
Personally, I would think most companies would settle for just having it cross the Atlantic.
It costs a lot to ship boxes of bits across the Atlantic Ocean.
Sheesh... I can get better grief from my kids!
Spiff, but the first two examples, from what I can tell don't solve the RPC issues. The 3rd is questionable, it may.
What Qt and Wt both offer in the RPC arena is SIMPLICITY. GWT does not offer this out of the box.
Also, do any of these allow me write a single app which splits the functionality of the server and browser for my without me having to do the work? I know GWT out of the box does not. Write your java code for the Browser, compile to javascript, Write your code for the server, put it on there using Tomcat or whatever. Hope you have your RPC calls handled proper...
Sadly, unlike WT (http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/), the google web toolkit forces me to write java on the server and the client and does not make it easy to have the serverside actions happen on button clicks etc.
What I really want to do it write an application like a gui where I write in a single language (c++/Java/whatever) and it deals with the browser and the server and I don't have to think about it, when a button is clicked this function is called, if it's on the server, great, if it's on the browser fine. Wt is very close. What it is missing is the graphical designer that Qt has. Add that and it will be quite the tool!
When I think configuration I thing /etc/* resolv.conf rc.d scripts, /etc/sysconfig stuff, nfs nis blah blah blah... For true hackers always fun. To teach programming to a teenager, BORING!
Like I said, always good to know. I use it almost regularly as a programmer (have to get the system to start your program somehow). To pique ones interest in programming, NOT!
You know what they say about presumptions...