"Some spin-off technologies is good, but how much more could we have achieved if our focus was different?"
I suppose you've devoted your life to these pursuits as well? Seriously, not everbody wants to research the same stuff, nor is everone capable of solving the world's overpopulation or energy problems.
Well, in theory they're only going to make money if they give you a way to "buy" their product. Find out what the machine is trying to sell and go from there...
Great news on this recent verdict. What I'm wondering is when users all stop buying CDs and switch over to the Apple Music Store, will the RIAA still try to claim that CD sales are down due to illegal music sharing?
Woah... What are we going to do with all of that? Seriously... a video editing machine with 128mb standard... upgradable to 256mb? That's a toy... not a machine designed to handle video editing.
"I can't see it being useful for cross-platform GUI apps because there's no guarantee that.NET really is cross-platform."
For many users and industries, they don't care if something is cross-platform. They invest their money in a single platform, and as long as their stuff runs on it, they're happy.
So let's see. That one lawsuit for MP3 distribution was estimated to be $97billion, charged at $150,000 per song... which equals about 646,667 songs. At $0.99 a song under Apple's new rate, maybe these kids just pony up the 640,200.33 and be on their way!
Re:This really ain't news but anyway
on
Micro-Helicopter Fun
·
· Score: 2, Funny
"If you look carefully, the site as seen its last update 2 years ago."
Yeah, sadly the site owner has been bleeding out on the floor for the past two years after being decapitated with one of his toy copters... I guess that explains why they're not available for sale.
Nah, not really. I wrote it as "heavier" for comparison's sake, but you can interpret it as "different". You're just isolating the ball from the grouping that doesn't balance things. It could be heavier or lighter, but you know it's not balanced, so it's the odd ball.
1) Put 6 balls on either side of the scale. One side will be heavier than the other. (weighing #1) 2) Take 3 balls off each side of the scale. The scale will either balance, or it will still be heavier on one side. If it's balanced, then one of the three that you took off the initial heavier side has the odd ball. If it's not balanced, then one of the three on that side is heavier. (weighing #2) 3) Take two of the three balls from the group of 3 you devised above and put them on the scale. (weighing #3)
If they balance, then the one ball you're not weighing is the odd ball. If they don't balance, then the heavier ball is the odd ball out.
Slashdot Mirror
Nah, I actually attended RPI. I'm happy to help him out.
Is there anywhere to donate to help pay for the penalty these kids paid? I'd be happy to throw in a few bucks.
Well, in theory they're only going to make money if they give you a way to "buy" their product. Find out what the machine is trying to sell and go from there...
Are these the top-secret photos of the nuclear arsenal North Korea claims to have?
Yeah, I used to turn off the lights, crank up the sound and scare the crap out of myself with that one...
Great news on this recent verdict. What I'm wondering is when users all stop buying CDs and switch over to the Apple Music Store, will the RIAA still try to claim that CD sales are down due to illegal music sharing?
Woah ... What are we going to do with all of that? ... a video editing machine with 128mb standard ... upgradable to 256mb? That's a toy ... not a machine designed to handle video editing.
Seriously
So let's see. That one lawsuit for MP3 distribution was estimated to be $97billion, charged at $150,000 per song ... which equals about 646,667 songs. At $0.99 a song under Apple's new rate, maybe these kids just pony up the 640,200.33 and be on their way!
I think we're all overlooking what's really important here. Did nobody else notice that the iPod now plays Soliatire?
AAC?
AAC == DOA
I just wish there was a way to get them to stop trying to sell me those damn Iraqi playing cards.
Is anyone else hesitant to click on a link about a toilet from the domain with the phrase "cox" in it.
The sure-fire way to make a website invisible is to put a link to it from Slashdot....
Wait, yeah, I see what you're saying ... screw it.
I guess that's why I don't work there...
Nah, not really. I wrote it as "heavier" for comparison's sake, but you can interpret it as "different". You're just isolating the ball from the grouping that doesn't balance things. It could be heavier or lighter, but you know it's not balanced, so it's the odd ball.
1) Put 6 balls on either side of the scale. One side will be heavier than the other. (weighing #1)
... 3 weighings ... Done and done...
2) Take 3 balls off each side of the scale. The scale will either balance, or it will still be heavier on one side. If it's balanced, then one of the three that you took off the initial heavier side has the odd ball. If it's not balanced, then one of the three on that side is heavier. (weighing #2)
3) Take two of the three balls from the group of 3 you devised above and put them on the scale. (weighing #3)
If they balance, then the one ball you're not weighing is the odd ball. If they don't balance, then the heavier ball is the odd ball out.
12 balls
It's the new perspective