Slashdot Mirror


Suing Telemarketers Made Simple

Lord of the Distinctive Rings writes "Telemarketer calls victim in wee hours. Victim is lawyer. Victim sues telemarketer. Hilarity ensues, as recounted in narrative replete with links and information on how you too can sue up the wazoo." Well, one's certainly not ever going to get rich or anything going after telemarketers on a one-off basis, but every bit helps, I think.

342 comments

  1. I can't wait... by stev3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't wait for the National Do Not Call List to take effect.

    HURRY UP!!

    1. Re:I can't wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's taking forever, because the peeps in charge of it keep answering the damn phone!

    2. Re:I can't wait... by Neophytus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Previously covered when it was signed into law on March 11.

    3. Re:I can't wait... by ccnull · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just a reminder: Californians can pre-register for the Do Not Call list at http://caag.state.ca.us/donotcall/ (effective October 2003). Other states can simple Google "statename do not call" for the relevant linkage. YMMV.

    4. Re:I can't wait... by JonnyElvis42 · · Score: 1

      Hold on now, it's not ready yet! It doesn't have more than a few gaping loopholes and could still be used to actually deter telemarketers from waking you up or callind during dinner. You need to wait until our noble legislators have completely defanged it before you're allowed to try it out.

  2. Keep em on the phone. by amembrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've had friends who have had to do this to make ends meet. The key to this business is speed, so if you really want to make it ineffective, keep them on the phone as long as possible. Doesn't matter to me, I haven't had a land line since the last millenium. =P

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    1. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Kierthos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hrm... unsolicited telephone calls using an automated voice that doesn't clearly identify the business or person?

      Shit... I should have stayed on the line those last 12 time whoever the prerecorded hell it was called and tried to offer me a Disney vacation... I could have afforded to go by now...

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pet peeve.. it's millennium.. two b's! thanks.

    3. Re:Keep em on the phone. by L1Trauma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your strategy for dealing with the intrusive and obnoxious is to listen longer? More power to you, buddy. Also, see earlier /. Cell-e-marketers are on the way.

    4. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha, two n's even. damn alcohol.

    5. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 5, Funny

      I once did this with an automated recording. I discovered by chance that hitting '7' on my phone caused the recording to start over, so I spent a bored afternoon hitting 7 and tying up their system for a little over an hour. I was watching TV at the time, so pressing a button on the phone every minute or two wasn't that much of an inconvenience.

    6. Re:Keep em on the phone. by WWE-TicK · · Score: 0

      Erm ... I think the idea is to get them to give thier big selling pitch, then walk away from the phone. And if it's a prerecorded message, even better.

    7. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Gopher · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter how long you keep an autodialer on the phone, as the author was called by one?

    8. Re:Keep em on the phone. by hipster_doofus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whenever a telemarketer calls me, I always keep them on the phone and use this fun script against them! It's generally a great time for me and everyone in my vicinity.

      --
      Five Dolla Moddy-Moddy? ;->
    9. Re:Keep em on the phone. by shachart · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ohhhh.... This is soooo much more than just keeping one of them busy. In fact, you screw up their ENTIRE operation, even if they have 100's of telemarketers. Why? Explanation below:

      In order to raise the productivity of their employees, they save them the time dialing, recognizing answering machine, ringing-and-ringing, busy signals, tone waiting etc.

      How? The use these machines which are called predictive dialers. Why predictive, you ask? because they predict when the next agent will end her call, and based upon lots of parameters (call duration, busy signal rate by time of day, time to recognize voicemails etc.) - will place a call BEFORE that agent hangs up, so the moment she hangs up - she has the next call ready for her, with an actual person on the line.

      Now, it is rather clear that if you hold just one agent on the line for a LONG time, then you screw every statistics the predictive dialer has, and so the agents lose sync with the dialer, and as a result - their productivity dives....

      Which is what we wanted.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
    10. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had friends who have had to do this to make ends meet.

      To make ends meet? All my friends who became lawyers did it for the gobs and gobs of dough.

    11. Re:Keep em on the phone. by PhipleTroenix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While you're keeping them on the phone, try to talk them into another career.

      For "charities" (police benevolence society or whatever), ask them how much goes to the "cause", and how much is used for admin and overhead. They'll offer an 800 number, try to get THEM to call the number. I try to convice them they are working for crooks. Quote GWB's "you're either on the side of good, or the side of evil".

      I don't know if it does any good, but it always makes me feel better.

      --
      When VPNs are outlawed, only outlaws have VPNs.
    12. Re:Keep em on the phone. by jsupreston · · Score: 3, Funny
      I tied up a telemarketer one time for about 10 minutes when they called during supper. I have a high pitched voice for a man, so when they asked for "Mr. L," I handed the phone to my 1 1/2 year old son who was just learning to talk. My wife and I nearly wet our pants watching our son talk on the phone to this telemarkter. Needless to say, we had a very entertaining dinner.

      --
      "It's a dog eat dog world out there, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear."- Norm (from Cheers)
    13. Re:Keep em on the phone. by realdpk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it has 1 line, certainly. If it has 4 or so like the author states, you'd probably have to coordinate the "defensive attack" Operation Telephony Freedom.

    14. Re:Keep em on the phone. by chrysrobyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      That reminds me of the time my parent's answering machine got into an infinite loop with an autodialler. Somehow, the answering machine beep caused the spiel to restart and that spiel ended with a beep. That beep, I guess, was misinterpreted as an attempt to access the remote "check my messages" feature of the answering machine. The password failure resulted in the same beep. Which, if you see above, caused the spiel to restart -- and end with a beep.

      The 60 minute tape was filled with the same spiel 60 times in a row with two beeps to seperate.

    15. Re:Keep em on the phone. by tekunokurato · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's absolutely true- I interned at a credit card company last summer running the dialer program. It's like being an air traffic controller- everything runs smoothly as long as the calls are predictable, but the dialer algorithms run really poorly and inconsistently when calls go on for long periods of time.

      It's not just while the call is goin, either- the dialer uses that call as part of its statistics for the entire calling job, so for several hours it's running on poor data.

      It was a fun couple of summers (I never did outward calling, but I took inward, angry, card-cancellation calls the first summer I worked there), but I'll never do that again!

    16. Re:Keep em on the phone. by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Instead of hanging on a long time, could it screw everything up by keeping the conversation too short?

      For example, when you recognize the automated message, just hold down a number key for about a minute. If they hadn't answered after a minute, keep it on another minute. When they answer to the high volume tone, they'll hang up immediately, thus making the call TOO short.

      Now, the autodialer should start making the next calls too soon and have people hang up while waiting. That should help screw things up, plus annoy the calling party

    17. Re:Keep em on the phone. by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      My favorite is when I get a call from a long distance company, and they ask "Is the person who is responsible for the long distance service available?".

      I am always like, yeah hold on a second, and I put the phone down come back 5 minutes later and hang it up (usually they have alrady hung up by then).

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    18. Re:Keep em on the phone. by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but isn't the point of their calls to eventually find some idiot who is actually interested in their product/service? Presumably, that call will last much longer than the standard "Not interested, FOAD! *click*". So, when they get a "live one" to place an order, that messes up the predictive dialer? That makes no sense.

      Perhaps there is a way to signal the dialer when they get a sucker on the line, so as not to mess up the stats?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    19. Re:Keep em on the phone. by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      That's great! I have to use that the next time I get a call from them on my unlisted phone number!

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    20. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      I've had friends who have had to [telemarket] to make ends meet.

      Are there no prisons? And the Union workhouses? Are they still in operation?

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    21. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Blue+Stone · · Score: 3, Funny
      No No No....

      What you do, if the caller is real, anyway, is say, "Just a sec'... I'm just going to get a pen..." put the phone down (without hanging up) and... well... go back to watching the tv/scratching your balls or whatever.

      >:o)

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    22. Re:Keep em on the phone. by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      i do that often, but once i forgot to put the phone back on the hook when i was expecting a call. i actually put the caller on speaker and just walked off. it was hilarious to hear them saying over and over for a couple minutes "hello.... hello ...."

    23. Re:Keep em on the phone. by sehryan · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's a little incorrect.

      The dialer is dialing a certain number of calls based upon how quickly the agents are coming available. If you keep an agent on the phone for longer than a few seconds, the dialer recognizes this and drops them from the number of agents that will be available.

      After all, they are trying to sell you something. The dialer has to be able to compensate for long calls, because I doubt any agent can sell you something in the time it takes someone else to hang up.

      And just so you know I am not talking out of my ass, I used to be an admin on a dialer, so I do have some experience with this.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    24. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was bored washing dishes one day and the phone rang, so I just let the guy do his speel. I notice it had a rhythm. He would talk for a minute or two, pause for an "Uh hum" from me, then start talking. So I quitely hung up right after saying "Uh hum". A few minutes later he'd call back. I'd apologize saying me must have been cut off. After a few more "Um hum"s, I hang up again. He called three times in all before he figured it out.

      No, I don't feel sorry for these people. You can't say "it's just my job" when you know what you do is wrong.

    25. Re:Keep em on the phone. by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How's it feel to be an impotent, angry dork ? You are telling me that it is not inconvenient but I am thinking that it does not sound convenient at all.

      Alone, watching TV, angrily trying to 'get back' at a machine. This moment brought to you by NERDS.

    26. Re:Keep em on the phone. by coke_dite · · Score: 3, Informative
      Unlisted phone numbers mean nothing. Some companies print out large sheets that start with just the exchange and the first digit of the rest of the phone number, and work their way up by hundreds from there (for example, the TM's first sheet of the evening would start with 555-1000 and work its way up to 555-1099, second sheet would start with 555-1100 and wor its way up to 555-1199) That way, regardless of whether the number is out of service, a business, or even unlisted, the TM will get through. Sad to say, but that's how some of the smaller companies do it.

      Some other small companies just rip pages out of a phone book, distribute photocopies of the pages to their staff, and their "DO NOT CALL" list consists of a black line through that name and number on the phone book page.

      Only larger companies which contract out to several clients use automated dialers... Our local newspaper's contracter has four large ADs with twenty lines each, and then in the back, they have a room for manual dialers who handle rural accounts.

      Of course, here in Canada, use of AD's is not as common as in the US. You can't just pick one up at the corner store. I'm not sure if it's regulated, but the larger telemarketing companies are VERY careful to follow the rules (Do Not Call lists are updated daily, no calling before 9am or after 9pm, no calling on Sundays, etc.)

      It's a sad business tho - most of the employees quit after a month or two - they can't take the constant rejection. It takes a very special breed of person to stay in telemarketing over the long term. Hopefully that breed will become extinct soon :)

      --
      Visit us at http://www.iblist.com!
    27. Re:Keep em on the phone. by jhoffoss · · Score: 1

      This works best if you ask a few questions first and sound really interested in the product dujour. They'll be much more apprehensive to hang up on a possible sale.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    28. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Capsaicin · · Score: 1
      Your strategy for dealing with the intrusive and obnoxious is to listen longer?

      Strange as it may sound, this is the best way to 'hurt' the marketer. Even better is if you play along and feign interest in what they are selling, not only wasting their time, but making them think they are closing a sale, then suddenly snatching it away from them. That is if you really want to be nasty. On the other hand you might just stop to think that this is someone who is trying, like everyone else, to make a living, and that while you are not interested in their product, someone else might be. In that case simply say "I'm sorry, I'm not interested, you are wasting your time here," and they'll get out of your face quicksmart.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    29. Re:Keep em on the phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All my friends who became lawyers did it for the gobs and gobs of dough.

      Suing people at $500 a pop, ain't gonna get you gobs and gobs of dough. Besides which, since I graduated from Law School, I'm making less money than I while I was driving Taxis to get through Law School ... It's like when the plumber came 'round the other day, charged my $110 bucks for 10 mins work! Shit, I said, I don't get paid at that rate, and I'm a lawyer! Neither did I when I was a lawyer, said the plumber ...

  3. Sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Another reason for me to sit by the phone on a saturday night. I mean..... to bad I'll be out hanging with the ladies.

    Ring....Please Ring..

    1. Re:Sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hanging out with the ladies?? Who are you trying to kid? You're a slasdotter, you don't hang out with ladies, unless you were referring to your mother and sister!

    2. Re:Sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What if he's hanging out with YOUR mother and sister?

  4. To keep 'em along ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When harrased by telemarketers, I just make up the weirdest stories ever (I just bought that penis enlargement gizmo!! - or - I'm sorry, my religion regards it as infidel, unless I get a free massage), and if they really piss me off, I just make up a credit card number and expiration date, and give them the white house's address for mailing me that penis-enlargement thingie. Perhaps someone in there will put it to use?

    1. Re:To keep 'em along ... by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      um, thats called fraud dude. and since they already have your phone number...

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  5. Finally? by jonjohnson · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's about time people do something. Let me recall two funny incidents: Brother in-law: "Yes, Oh? I get something free? What's that? Oh that sounds great... What else can you guys offer me?"... (Ten minutes later)... "Well, can I talk to your supervisor? Thank you. .... Yes, I hear you have some great offers, but you see, Colorado has a no-call list and if you don't honor that ..." The hilarity of the situation was the fact that i'm sure they thought they had another sale, then it turns into another 20 minute lecture. The best transaction was from my stepfather, while my friends and I were watching a movie in the living room. "Hello? Umm... let me check. IS MR. HIND-ER-LITER HERE (pronounced incorrectly of course)?" (In another yelling voice, somewhat feminized this time, he replies to himself) "NO, HE'S NOT BACK FROM HIS PAROLE MEETING FOR KILLING THAT SALESMAN." (back to his voice) "OH, THAT'S RIGHT. No, I'm sorry, he can't come to the phone right now. Bye." Makes me wonder how much of these funny things do go on...

    1. Re:Finally? by Mr.+Fusion · · Score: 1
      Makes me wonder how much of these funny things do go on...

      Telemarketer: "Hi, may I speak with the man of the house?"
      Mom: "NO."

      -click-

      -Mr. Fusion

    2. Re:Finally? by arkanes · · Score: 1
      They don't say that anymore :( It really confused me when I was 10 or so, since I was living with my single mom...

      Now they ask for "the decision maker". Stupid PCness.

    3. Re:Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw. In March I was getting some calls asking for the man of the house. I strung 'em along for a few weeks saying that they just missed him, or he was traveling, or whatever. I'm easily entertained.

    4. Re:Finally? by CDS · · Score: 2, Funny

      My grandmother used to get a persistant telemarketer who kept calling and asked for the man of the house. My grandfather was a rancher and was never in the house during the day, so my grandmother would always say he isn't in...

      Finally one rainy day my grandpa WAS in the house and happened to answer the phone.

      "Is the man of the house in?"
      "This is..."
      <telemarketer begins sales pitch>
      "I'm sorry, my wife makes all the financial decisions" <CLICK>

    5. Re:Finally? by coke_dite · · Score: 1
      Oh I don't know about that. Telemarketers, when I answer the phone, will often ask if my husband is at home. The funniest thing is when they ask for Mr. (my maiden name) - I just tell them I've recently had a sex change operation and can't speak with them because the pain medication is making me woozy :)

      --
      Visit us at http://www.iblist.com!
    6. Re:Finally? by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think the favorite one I've heard lately is what a friend of mine does:

      telemarketer: Can I speak to Mrs. Jones please?
      her: There's a Mrs. Jones!!! He never told me he was married!

      She says the telemarkets always promptly hang up without saying anything.

  6. This is cool by rf0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This gives a nice HOWTO on suing people who abuse the system. Here in the UK there is a opt-out system in the form of the TPS (Telecomunication Protection System) to stop people doing this sort of thing. Failure to comply get at £10,000 fine. Haven't had one call since signing up :)

    Rus

    1. Re:This is cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the UK there is a opt-out system in the form of the TPS (Telecomunication Protection System) to stop people doing this sort of thing.

      Actually, to be pedantic, it's called the Telephone Preference Service.

    2. Re:This is cool by roryh · · Score: 1

      There's also the Mailing Preference Service, which does the same for junk mail. I rate this very highly!

    3. Re:This is cool by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      in the UK there is a opt-out system in the form of the TPS (Telecomunication Protection System) to stop people doing this sort of thing.

      You can sign up online, here.

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    4. Re:This is cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here in the UK there is a opt-out system

      Typical English restriction of free speech! You guys really need to change your laws and bring in democracy!

  7. Yes! YES!!!! by Shoten · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, like the person who wrote the article, live in DC, and have been bothered by a pre-recorded telemarketer...in this case, a "non profit" that seems not to exist except as a front to accept donations. I'd elaborate more, but I'm off to the courthouse now...:)

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  8. Andy Rooney sez... by TheArmageddonMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Three Little Words That Work !! (1)The three little words are: "Hold On, Please..." Saying this, while putting down your phone and walking off (instead of hanging-up immediately) would make each telemarketing call so much more time-consuming that boiler room sales would grind to a halt. Then when you eventually hear the phone company's "beep-beep-beep" tone, you know it's time to go back and hang up your handset, which has efficiently completed its task. These three little words will help eliminate telephone soliciting. (2) Do you ever get those annoying phone calls with no one on the other end? This is a telemarketing technique where a machine makes phone calls and records the time of day when a person answers the phone. This technique is used to determine the best time of day for a "real" sales person to call back and get someone at home. What you can do after answering, if you notice there is no one there, is to immediately start hitting your # button on the phone, 6 or 7 times, as quickly as possible. This confuses the machine that dialed the call and it kicks your number out of their system. Since doing this, my phone calls have decreased dramatically. (3) Another Good Idea: When you get "ads" enclosed with your phone or utility bill, return these "ads" with your payment. Let the sending companies throw their own junk mail away. When you get those "pre-approved" letters in the mail for everything from credit cards to 2nd mortgages and similar type junk, do not throw away the return envelope. Most of these come with postage-paid return envelopes, right? It costs them more than the regular 37cents postage "IF" and when they receive them back. It costs them nothing if you throw them away! The postage was around 50 cents before! the last increase and it is according to the weight. In that case, why not get rid of some of your other junk mail and put it in these cool little, postage-paid return envelopes. One of Andy Rooney's (60 minutes) ideas. Send an ad for your local chimney cleaner to American Express. Send a pizza coupon to Citibank. If you didn't get anything else that day, then just send them their blank application back! If you want to remain anonymous, just make sure your name isn't on anything you send them. You can even send the envelope back empty if you want to just to keep them guessing! Eventually, the banks and credit card companies will begin getting their own junk back in the mail. Let's let them know what it's like to get lots of junk mail, and best of all they're paying for it...Twice! Let's help keep our postal service busy since they are saying that e-mail is cutting into their business profits, and that's why they need to increase postage costs again. You get the idea ! If enough people follow these tips, it will work---- I have been doing this for years, and I get very little junk mail anymore.

    --
    I never got laid back in gradeschool, but now that my plates full, these ladies ain't actin' so hatefull..
    1. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by ergonal · · Score: 5, Informative
      If you want to remain anonymous, just make sure your name isn't on anything you send them.

      I don't know how the system works where you live, but here a lot of "Reply Paid" stuff is barcoded and they could (theoretically) find out who you are by scanning that barcode.

    2. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 1

      And so, what are they going to pursue you for 37 cents. If your worried, send it back empty, then you can claim it was a mistake.

      --

      nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

    3. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by TheArmageddonMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good point! Not a prob for me, though. I like to think they tear up the junk apon getting it back and scream my name, like in Wrath of Khan. Good point, still.

      --
      I never got laid back in gradeschool, but now that my plates full, these ladies ain't actin' so hatefull..
    4. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by hbackert · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wouldn't that be even better? This way they know what to expect from you and (hopefully) that will result in less spam from them. Simple calculation: this potential customer costs us more maney than we can possible earn from this him/her.

      And since you do nothing illegal, no need for fear! In the easiest case send them their empty envelope back. You can always say that you forgot to put something in.

    5. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by tmark · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Hold On, Please..." Saying this, while putting down your phone and walking off (instead of hanging-up immediately)

      Actually, the *people* (as opposed to the companies) who make the telemarketing calls often *love* when people do this. It gets their talk time up; it shows their superiors that they're can keep someone on the phone for a long time, presumably talking about their product. I'd even bet the telemarketing companies (assuming they're hired by whoever is selling the product) like it too. The only party who doesn't like this is the company paying for telemarketing, but the telemarketers themselves often love it.

    6. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by LotusNailo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe so but talk time is up while sales are down. I don't think the company likes that very much.

    7. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Schnapple · · Score: 4, Informative
      start hitting your # button on the phone, 6 or 7 times, as quickly as possible. This confuses the machine that dialed the call and it kicks your number out of their system
      This sounds a lot like the TeleZapper, the $30 brick that plays the little "doo-dah-dee" sound that means the line is disconnected. Of course, from what I've heard, the telemarketing computer systems are getting wise to this sort of thing and before long (if not already) the TeleZapper will be useless. As a result, I can't help but think this technique Rooney mentioned is obselete already.

      More specifically, my information says that when you don't hear anyone on the other line what has happened is that the system they use which automatically calls people based on the average call time of their employees, has misestimated when to call (or all the employees are unavailable), so there's a silent pause. If the pause is long enough, the computer simply hangs up. Consequently, anyone who calls me from an unlisted number and gives me silence for three seconds or so I hang up on. If it's someone important, they'll call right back.

    8. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in norway, and sometimes get these envelopes too.. What I sometimes do, is just blanking out the pre-written adress, and use it as a regular envelope(with prepaid postage :)). Works great. every time I've done this, my letters have reached their destination

    9. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Elvisisdead · · Score: 1

      Sounds like one of my Granddad's plans. He used to wrap up bricks and tape the postage paid subscription cards in magazines to the outside and drop it in the mail. He knew it wouldn't make them stop putting them in his magazines, but I guess he figured that they would pay for it.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    10. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, they record the calls to find out how effective the employee is. Ya think management's gonna be happy when they listen to an employee's tape that contains 10 minutes of silence?

    11. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you know, I've got nothing against the *person* calling me. I feel sorry for the schmuck. If by saying "hold on..." I can give the poor sob 10 minutes of peace in an otherwise completely hectic day of sullen, angry and/or sarcastic phonecalls then *GREAT*.

      The important part is that if enough people do this stuff, the real culprit -- the companies PAYING for the advertising service -- will stop because it ceases to be profitable.

      Telemarketing wouldn't happen if it didn't make money. We shouldn't punish those calling us but those paying them to call us.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    12. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by stilwebm · · Score: 2, Informative

      With the U.S. Postal service, this would be returned to the sender. If no return address is on the envelope, the mail would be held and a notice sent to the recipient saying "You have received underpaid mail. Pay $0.37 and we'll give you the mail, or will keep it. Efforts to return the mail were unsuccessful."

      With other prepaid mail, senders usually prepay base on the number of responses they expect to get back. When the balence reaches zero, the mail gets withheld until they pay for the remaining. Unfortunately for the recpient, the notices of reply mail being withheld sometimes take several months to arrive and be processed.

    13. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by christopherfinke · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Actually, the *people* (as opposed to the companies) who make the telemarketing calls often *love* when people do this.
      I worked as a telemarketer for a fairly large newspaper in southern Wisconsin during high school, and yes, I did love it when people would set the phone down and leave. It gave me more time to do my crossword puzzle, and I didn't even have to try selling a thirteen week subscription at our new low, low rate. Strangely enough, with this nose-to-the-grindstone work ethic, I was "let go" after about a month...

      But seriously, telemarketers get paid a base rate per hour ($7.00 in my case), plus an hourly bonus based on how many sales he/she made. For example, if you made three sales in the 4pm-5pm hour, you would make $9.00 in that hour. If you consistently made six sales an hour, you would be making about $12.00 an hour. In my case, I wasn't bothered by people putting me on hold because I was still making over minimum wage, but without the hassle. I imagine people who do this full time wouldn't be pleased when people, such as me, play stupid games to keep them on the phone. I've been on the other side of the games, so I feel it's my duty to return the favor.
    14. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by stonedCoder · · Score: 1

      Are there no [black marker pens/scissors/digits to tear with] where you live also? ;)

      --
      ermmm... don't take any notice of me... I'm too old...
    15. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by ebh · · Score: 4, Funny
      You can even send the envelope back empty if you want to just to keep them guessing!

      If you really want to keep them guessing, throw in a pinch of cornstarch.

    16. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      Actually, the *people* (as opposed to the companies) who make the telemarketing calls often *love* when people do this.

      I believe this is what's known as a 'win-win scenario'.

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    17. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The only party who doesn't like this is the company paying for telemarketing, but the telemarketers themselves often love it.

      Not quite. I don't know where you're getting this information, but I have exper- er, a friend with experience working as a telemarketer (back in college, blah, blah). Anyway, back to my point which is that at the place I worked and I happen to know quite a few others, there is no emphasis on how long you can keep the person on the other end of the line.

      Why do you think these people often race through their scripts when they call you? Their pay and their very employment is based on how many sales they can push through per hour!

      Also, I know a number of telemarketing shops have people whose only job is to listen in on the sales staff and make sure they're getting on to the next call ASAP. If they tap in on you and you're sitting there to dead silence for twenty minutes, it is not going to go well for you.

      In any case, they're either all or mostly commision-based so to think that they want you wasting their time is absurd.

    18. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by aws910 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last week, I mailed one of theose postage paid envelopes back to the people and did this: I took one square of toilet paper, dipped my finger in a jar of nutella(yummy brown chocolate peanut-butter stuff) and wiped my finger on the square of toilet paper. Stuffed it into the postage-paid envelope and sent their tasty little pacgake off to them! In case you didn't get it, I mailed what appeared to be used toilet paper. Still makes me laugh to this day.

    19. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by sehryan · · Score: 1

      (2) Do you ever get those annoying phone calls with no one on the other end? This is a telemarketing technique where a machine makes phone calls and records the time of day when a person answers the phone. This technique is used to determine the best time of day for a "real" sales person to call back and get someone at home.

      Good try, but wrong. That's a dropped call. The dialer is dialing a certain number of numbers based on a lot of math, knowing that when it connects it should have an agent available. Machines are not perfect however, so sometimes it makes a connection with a human but doesn't have an agent to put the call to. So it just sits there for a moment, then hangs up. The percentage of these calls on any good dialer is usually 5% of the total connections made, and most dialers are able to change that setting to higher or lower, depending on how much you want your agents to be idle (lower % dropped calls = more idle time between calls for agents, because the dialer is dialing less numbers to prevent drops).

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    20. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I imagine people who do this full time wouldn't be pleased when people, such as me, play stupid games to keep them on the phone.

      You mean stupid games like telling me something's free and then asking for my credit card number?

    21. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can give the poor sob 10 minutes of peace in an otherwise completely hectic day of sullen, angry and/or sarcastic phonecalls then *GREAT*.

      The only time I've ever done this (my wife gets angry at me when I screw with telemarketers,) I came back after 10 minutes, and he was still there, so I hung up..

      He called me back and screamed at me, then hung up.

      I have no sympathy for telemarketers.

    22. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      you ripped that idea off of maddox! And everything he says is so much funnier than the way you say it!!!

      no offence mate, its just true. Can't believe you got modded +5 for that!!!!

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    23. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Informative

      " but here a lot of "Reply Paid" stuff is barcoded and they could (theoretically) find out who you are by scanning that barcode."

      The barcode you refer to (a long one just above the delivery address or in the bottom right-hand corner, right?) is simply their mailing address in barcode format. It's to speed up the delivery process somewhat.

    24. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by rifter · · Score: 1

      It should also be noted that because people had been doing what the grandparent norwegian was suggesting, in the US it is illegal to do this. Every business reply envelope has the message "penalty for misuse" which means the envelope is only supposed to be used to send stuff back to the originating company.
      IANAL

    25. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Alidar · · Score: 1

      Actually wouldn't they call and say "We got your application, you forgot to fill it out. Lets take care of that right now?"

      --
      HTTP Status 418
    26. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what if they know who you are if you constantly mail back an empty envelope? I love that idea!

    27. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the TeleZapper emits the "too-dah-dii" tones which are in front of telephone company recordings which tell you things such as your dialing a nonexistent number. Not surprisingly, smart dialers listen for those tones to avoid calling bad numbers again. Yes, the makers of smart dialers are of course always trying to work around counter-dialer technologies.

    28. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      I believe this kind of prank has been made against the law, since it covers up potential real danger.

    29. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Elvisisdead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just like saying b-o-m-b in the airport. Please don't do this. It's one thing to send back ads in the envelope. It's entirely another to force the building to be evacuated and put people through the distress caused by thinking that they may have been exposed to a potentially deadly virus. I know. My girlfriend was in the Hart Senate Office Building when it was evacuated due to Anthrax.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    30. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      The telezapper coming out kind of pissed me off. I had a functional equivilant on my line for a couple of years b4 the zapper came out. It had reduced our spamcalls to about 1 a week. Once a mass market product like the zapper came out, the dialers must have some sort of work around, as our spamcalls have increased to around 1 a day in the last few months.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    31. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by rleibman · · Score: 1

      Me? I just stuff the envelopes with political brochures for the Libertarian Party. Because the LP doesn't have that much $ to mass mail these.

    32. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    33. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by tmark · · Score: 1

      Not quite. I don't know where you're getting this information,

      The first time, I got the information from a telemarketer. In this case, I didn't hear anyone on the other end, I thought my cell phone had dropped the other party so I put the phone down thinking I was disconnected. When I picked it up 25 minutes later to make a call I could hear her singing and laughing to herself. She explained to me how happy she was that I had left her on the line, and proceeded to explain how she is graded by talk-time. Since then, i sometimes ask the telemarketer how they get compensated.

    34. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by CycleMan · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't those black markers violate the DMCA [Direct Mail Copyright Act]?

    35. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He called me back and screamed at me, then hung up.


      i'm pretty sure they're not allowed to do that. you should have got the name of the company and sued...

    36. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by MasterofVoid · · Score: 1

      Why not send em a printout of coatse.cx? They should suffer too..

      --
      *You are not allowed to read this*
    37. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by MasterofVoid · · Score: 1

      -c+g

      --
      *You are not allowed to read this*
    38. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      throw in a pinch of cornstarch.

      and when the man throws you in the "pound you in the ass" detainment center for being a terrorist, for an idefinate amount of time you just keep thinking about how you really got them guessing, it might take you mind of teh bright lights, the stick in you ass, and electrodes attached to you nads.

    39. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1
      The percentage of these calls on any good dialer is usually 5% of the total connections made

      Well, then most must be using some pretty crappy systems. My wife honestly gets around 5 calls during the day like this, where no one is on the other line.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    40. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a different device I saw advertised recently, called the Phone Zap, which is supposed to eliminate the Telezapper's problems. Every call not on your "whitelist" (based on caller ID info) gets a recording saying "We don't take telemarketing calls," etc. Real people press a number and are rung through to you.

      It costs a little more than Telezapper, but might be worth it...
      http://www.phonezap.com/

    41. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by len_harms · · Score: 1

      Least they have to ask for it. The scarry ones are the ones that already HAVE it. 'Want me to put this on your account?'

    42. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i'm pretty sure they're not allowed to do that. you should have got the name of the company and sued...

      Hasn't the ancient tort of aggravated screaming been repealed where you live?

    43. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by mi · · Score: 1
      "penalty for misuse"

      I think, you are confusing the "BUSINESS REPLY MAIL" with the official government envelopes... The warnings on the latter are intended to prevent the government employees from using them for their own correspondence...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    44. Re:Andy Rooney sez... by rifter · · Score: 1

      No, business reply mail also says "penalty for misuse." If you somehow managed to mail a BRE to a friend you are stealing at best, and probably tampering with the mail system. Besides I have also seen language on such mail quite often which should indicate to the PO that the mail must only go back to the original business.

  9. How to identify 'Out of Area' on called id? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I get like 2 of these calls a week, none of which announce the business name, some of which arrive after 9 p.m. However, these scumbag telemarketers have their numbers show up as 'Out of Area' on my caller id. How do you identify the offending company then?

    1. Re:How to identify 'Out of Area' on called id? by Zigg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can't, but the telco can. Unfortunately, they don't seem to be required to give you that information. At one point, before I started insisting on DNCs and saw the dropoff, I actually opened a case with the cops and had traces on my line -- of course, I got a form letter from the telco saying they couldn't "find enough information to generate a complaint". BS.

    2. Re:How to identify 'Out of Area' on called id? by telstar · · Score: 1

      Well, in theory they're only going to make money if they give you a way to "buy" their product. Find out what the machine is trying to sell and go from there...

    3. Re:How to identify 'Out of Area' on called id? by Sounder40 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Absolutely, positively, answer these calls! Talk nicely to the poor dweeb on the other end of the line, and find out the name of the company. Politely refuse the offer. Then report them to the Federal Trade Commision (assuming you're in the states.) It is illegal. This will not necesarily produce an actionable case, but if you and your fellow pissed-off citizens do it enough, then they will get swatted.

      --
      A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
    4. Re:How to identify 'Out of Area' on called id? by jcostom · · Score: 1
      I pay something like $5 a month for the "Call Intercept" service from Verizon. Basically, if you block your number, or have one of those "Out of Area" messages pop up, you get intercepted, and offerred to either allow the system to disclose your number, or record a message stating who you are.

      If they disclose the number, I see it on caller id. If they record, I get told by the disembodied voice of Verizon (DVoV) that I have a call from (insert recorded name here). At that point, i can choose whether or not to take the call.

      Bottom line? I haven't had a telemarketer call for 6 months.

      --

      The unsig!
    5. Re:How to identify 'Out of Area' on called id? by cyberman11 · · Score: 1

      'Out of Area' IS the tipoff. I've had caller ID for three years and in that three years, every 'Out of Area' call was a telemarketer!

  10. ARS? by arvindn · · Score: 4, Funny
    Anywho gave me the caller's name - I'll call him "ARS"

    Did you leave out the 'E' at the end?

    1. Re:ARS? by dangermurphy · · Score: 0

      Or possibly an 'S' at the beginning....

    2. Re:ARS? by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Anywho gave me the caller's name - I'll call him "ARS"
      Did you leave out the 'E' at the end?

      And the "H", the "O", the "L", and another "E".

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    3. Re:ARS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.

      But the government doesn't give a shit whether you respect the law or not. They only want to use public office to pad out their private fortunes, of course they aren't going to respect the law.

  11. Re:Don't make them stop calling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if it's a guy with a high-pitched voice and you just can't be sure? Is that okay too?

  12. I know telemarketers suck, but... by Mononoke · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This sounds like some poor schmo who was sold an autodialer and forced his (now unemployed) secretary to program it. Sucks that the lawyer had to go after a legit business owner that actually works hard for that $500.

    Too bad he couldn't just extort the name of the phone number list seller out of the guy, and go after "the dealer."

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    1. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by nuggz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes he is likely a legit business owner.
      But he did at least 2 things wrong.

      #1 He is calling people in the middle of the night, this is not acceptable.

      #2 He didn't identify himself when he called, this is also a violation.

      Both of these are wrong, you take away #1, and you're left with #2, which at the very least meant that he didn't properly look into what he was doing.

      Also I hate telemarketers, and door to door soliciters, I just tell them no I won't support their cause because I hate people calling/coming to my door.

    2. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Funny
      #3 PROFI... Sorry, I mean he considered telemarketing a legitimate activity to begin with.

      Telemarketing is the perfect example of "Just because it's legal doesn't make it alright". Why we go after pot smokers but consider telemarketers off-limits is a question that's yet to be answered.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by !Freeky2BGeeky · · Score: 1
      Are you saying that the telemarketer/business owner is not responsible for his/her actions?

      That's like saying let's all charge Smith and Wesson for murder because some guy bought one of their guns and shot someone (not knowing it was against the law, so it's OK).

      Please, ignorance of the law doesn't hold up in any court.

      --

      Visualize Whirled Peas

    4. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the guy had several phone lines in use for this autodialer. That's a somewhat significant investment above and beyond just buying an auto-dialing program. Perhaps the timing wasn't, but the rest of it was quite deliberate.

      Anyways, sometimes, lessons are hard-learned. $500 isn't going to put anyone out of business, but it's enough to make the law worth its while.

    5. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      Mod him up!

    6. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      Greetings, friends. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So, use it, and send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay, eternal happiness is just a dollar away.

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    7. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      go after a legit business owner

      Legit business owners obey the law against using robo-telemarketers and calling in the wee hours of the morning.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    8. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because there is freedom of speech, but not freedom of smoke.

    9. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why we go after pot smokers but consider telemarketers off-limits is a question that's yet to be answered.

      Or gamblers, for that matter. :)

    10. Re:I know telemarketers suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why we go after pot smokers but consider telemarketers off-limits is a question that's yet to be answered.

      That' easy ... because pot smokers support terrorism, while telemarketers support capitalism.

  13. Just kill your local land line. by disc-chord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At this point most people use their cell for everything. Especially with the competing providers offering more and more free minutes, you may actually find it's a lot cheaper to go cell only. I'm personally saving $15 a month.

    But here's the sweet bit... You never get telemarketed at! (Obviously you shouldn't be doing stupid stuff like giving it out to businesses.) And you don't have to worry about annoying late-night calls, as most providers give you free voice mail, so you can just turn off the phone or put it in silent mode.

    1. Re:Just kill your local land line. by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You never get telemarketed at!
      Care to share the secret with us? My wife and I both changed our cell phone numbers recently and within days we were recieving telemarketing calls. I had mine for less than a day or so and I got an automated computer voice trying to sell me a way to avoid calls like this in the future!

      Of course in my case it may have been different - I got a call from someone trying to track down someone else, so I probably had someone's old phone number, but I can't explain my wife's as anything but "let's dial all the phone numbers and see who picks up!"

    2. Re:Just kill your local land line. by SnowDog_2112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This might not be an attractive option for some people. For example, dialing 911 from a cell phone doesn't always do what you'd expect. In many areas, it connects you to the state police, or even the highway patrol (the assumption being that you're probably on the road, I guess).

      Likewise, dialing 911 from a landline and leaving the phone off the hook will usually result in somebody coming to investigate, as they can figure out where you are. Not always so with a cell phone.

      In a medical emergency, those minor differences could turn into life-or-death differences. Some folks just aren't willing to take that risk.

      We're not quite at the point where the majority of people are comfortable with losing their normal phone service. In my home, for example, I get lousy reception on my mobile phone -- if I'm talking on the mobile phone, I'm usually confined to finding the "right spot" in the house and not moving much. Even then, the difference in quality is clear (no pun intended).

      --
      Not representing or approved by my company or anybody else.
    3. Re:Just kill your local land line. by disc-chord · · Score: 1

      I'm not 100% sure on this, but... Isn't it usually pretty easy to triangulate the position of a cell phone? I would hope that if I dial 911 and cannot speak for whatever reason and the operator hears something odd in the background they would try to find me...

      Somewhat on the subject, the promotional guy for The Russ Martin Show (a big talk show in the Dallas area) was mugged and while the mugging was occuring his girl-friend who was with him dialed 911. The recording of all the stuff going on in the background (because obviously she couldn't talk at the time) is now being used as evidence.

      I know what you're saying about quality, my neighbors have Sprint and cannot get a decent connection unless they stand out in the parking lot of our apt building ("Can you hear me now?"). But I've got AT&T's Digital mLife and haven't had a problem, and I'm really pleased with the quality.

    4. Re:Just kill your local land line. by SuperQ · · Score: 2, Informative

      as far as I know, it's illegal for telemarketers in the US to call cell phones. This is because it is the person reciving the calls that pays for the call.

      I have only recived one telemarketing call on my cell phone over the last 2 years i've had it. and that was AT&T Broadband (who i use for cable modem, and cable TV) who has the number listed as contact for my current service. They were trying to sell me an upgrade to digital cable. I said, "This is a cell phone, it is illegal to call cell phones, I am going to report this to the PUC".

      "Oh, sorry" *CLICK*

      Havn't had a problem since :)

    5. Re:Just kill your local land line. by disc-chord · · Score: 1

      Yippie for War-Dialers. :(

      I'm affraid I don't have a secret. I just never give my number out to businesses (unless in a professional context).

    6. Re:Just kill your local land line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a bad idea, but not everyone lives in an area where cell phone reception is good enough to replace a landline.

    7. Re:Just kill your local land line. by arkanes · · Score: 1

      If you're somewhere with lots of antennas that are set up with the equipment to do a triangualtion, sure it's easy. Not so much in the other 80% of the US.

    8. Re:Just kill your local land line. by SnowDog_2112 · · Score: 1
      While it might be technically possible to do that kind of triangulation, I doubt the infrustracture exists for this in most of the US.

      A quick google search turns up this page for Santa Clara County in California where it explains the following:
      Cellular phones are different and present a new challenge to 9-1-1 systems. In the San Francisco Bay Area, all 9-1-1 calls from cellular phones are presently routed to the California Highway Patrol Communications Center in Vallejo. Additionally, the information packet that they receive contains only the cellular telephone number. This also means the "location information" cannot be relayed automatically, since a cell phone is mobile. CHP dispatchers must determine the location of the emergency from information the caller provides, and if appropriate, transfer the caller to the proper local jurisdiction.

      The only reason I know this is my grandparents (for whom a medical emergency is a real possibility) have a land-line just for that reason.

      --
      Not representing or approved by my company or anybody else.
    9. Re:Just kill your local land line. by Jarnis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm. And this is the great U S of A? I knew you were in the Mobile Phone Stone Age, but having also a broken emergency call system regarding mobile phones?

      Oh my.

      In Finland, when calling to 112 (our version of 911) the call is routed to closest center based on the link station your phone is using. Naturally if you cannot then speak anything to the phone, they may not take the step to find you based on cellphone location data (there are sadly too many misdials from pocketed phones with no keypad lock on), but if you can speak out a plea for help, they have system in place to get the (rough) location of the mobile phone and police/ambulance will be searching for you. If you can speak out an address or general idea where you are and what kinda emergency you have, the closest police/firestation/ambulance station gets alerted no matter where it is. Considering that you are not tied to a landline when placing the call, this is obiviously superior to placing the call from a landline which may or may not be next to you when you have the emergency.

      Of course Finland is a lot smaller place than USA, but one would imagine that such basic things would be in order in any civilized country.

      Ah, but there is little money to be made with such system. There is little to no corporate lobbying to get the system fixed, and nothing proceeds in the US without corporate interests paying the lawmakers off first... your great system at work...

      Oh and 'lousy reception'.. dunno bout USA, but in Finland you have to be pretty far in the woods, many kilometers from nearest road or house, and next to a blocking hill or something to end up in a place where one of the two national major carriers doesn't have GSM signal up. Only places where GSM may not be suitable as only communications tool is outer islands on the coast (there ya can end up outside reception range or get randomly switched between finnish and estonian/swedish carriers depending on which cell is closer) and some rather remote wilderness in northern finland, where nobody lives anyway. And even there the old analog NMT system works (or it at least used to work - I think they are about to discontinue it as nobody is using it anymore...)

      Also don't know about US systems, but using GSM you can always make an emergency call if there is any kind of network signal up. Even without a SIM card, and even using otherwise blocked phone. Emergency number Always Works - assuming of course that you have power in the phone and any kind of network is in the area.

    10. Re:Just kill your local land line. by DiveX · · Score: 2, Informative

      You were wrong. It is not illegal to place calls to a cellular phone when you use that number as a contact method. Since you provided your number to the company for the knowing purpose of having them use that method to contact you, then you have provided prior express permission. I use my cell number for Columbia House memberships because, and they have contacted me. On the first call, I simply said I wasn't interested and hung up. My fault, I know, since I did not asked to be placed on the Do-Not-Call list...I was in a hurry. The second call I got was a few days later, same pitch. I then asked to be placed on the DNC list and a copy of the company's policy (as required by the TCPA). A few days later, I got a call at 9:03PM. I again damanded placement on the DNC list. The thing is, next time they call me, I will sue them in court for multiple violations, including the call past the allowed time..easy to prove by my cell bill. Remember, you may terminate a business relationship for the purposes of telemarketing, yet still do business with them. They may, of course, contact you in regards to your account (e.g. bill adjustments, debt collection [within bounds as allowed by other laws], etc) but not to try to sell more services.

      The problem of thinking you know the law and getting it completely worng is worse than not knowing the law exists at all.

      --
      Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
    11. Re:Just kill your local land line. by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      In California, the phone company is required by law to activate a landline for 911 dialing in any occupied residence at no charge, so you can still have 911 capability without paying for service.

    12. Re:Just kill your local land line. by Ktulu_03 · · Score: 0

      You might only want to do this too, if you don't plan on getting DSL. in my area, DSL is much better than cable (cable company sucks), so I can't do that. However, I have had an answering machine answer every "Out of Area" call since I moved, 9 months ago. I was getting 6 or 7 each day, now I only get one a night. I guess they finally realize that I won't pick up the phone.

    13. Re:Just kill your local land line. by Zaphod+B · · Score: 1

      The law has just been changed, and newly made cell phones must have GPS units and be able to transmit them to emergency authorities.

      GSM telephones do not have analog capability. Almost all other telephones sold in the US do. As in Finland, in the US, any telephone, if it is able to receive a usable signal, must make 911 calls free of charge regardless of the network it is on.

      The US is covered very well with analog AMPS systems. That's why I take my old tri-mode Sprint phone with me when I go out into the wilderness... my GSM phone is a brick.

      --
      Zaphod B
      When duplication is outlawed, only outlaws will have /bin/cp
    14. Re:Just kill your local land line. by werfele · · Score: 1

      The infrastructure may not exist yet, but it's mandated to be completed by December 31, 2005. So the idea is just slightly ahead of its time.

    15. Re:Just kill your local land line. by ChemicalSpider · · Score: 1

      Triangulation is difficult with cell-phones and generally isn't done. This article points out the difficulty in locating the origination of a cell phone call. (scroll to the end of the article).

      However, I believe newer phones have GPS chips and so are much easier to locate. So if you were to get rid of your land line and were worried about being located, then make sure the cell phone you buy has a GPS chip.

    16. Re:Just kill your local land line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be done and is done, but in very few places. Rhode Island was the first to implement this (The state's so small there was only one call center to upgrade.). And that was only about 2 years ago. Saved a couple of lucky fisherman stranded ofshore in a little dingy though.

    17. Re:Just kill your local land line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have gps 911 on my cell phone so calling and leaving phone off the hook will work just fine...until my batteries run out

    18. Re:Just kill your local land line. by rifter · · Score: 1

      It used to be that any number you got for a cell phone was only ever sed for a cell phone (and may even have been in a cell-only exchange). But as we run out of numbers in various areas, and people ditch land-lines for cell phones, many numbers which once were for land lines are being given to cell phones. Of course every land line (even unlisted ones is in some directory (often ancient) which telemarketers use to bug people at random.

      Then there is the possibility that the number was given to a business at one time and their sales drones are calling back to get more business from their client, who has since got another phone and not told the sales drones. It happens.

    19. Re:Just kill your local land line. by willfe · · Score: 1

      There's a few unfortunate blocks in the way stopping this being a useful solution for a great many people:

      1. Basic phone service is usually less expensive (sometimes much less expensive) than even the cheapest cellular phone plans, both on a monthly and per-minute basis. Even with all these wonderful service fees and taxes that get tacked onto everything these days, a local phone line will cost, on average, about $15 to $20 per month depending on municipality. I'm talking basic service here, not Caller ID, three-way calling, voice mail, etc. I mean a dialtone that lets you place calls to anyone in your local area or to toll-free numbers. You'll also never exceed any minutes allotment on a land line either on local calls. Accidentally placing a call by mashing buttons or by having a child present (they're good for this kind of thing :) won't normally send a three or four-digit invoice your way each month, and you can talk as much as you want without worrying about minutes.
      2. Basic land line service can be used with any phone made by any manufacturer (provided the device has passed the governing body's testing processes). This means if your phone breaks, a replacement can be purchased for less than twenty dollars. For a family that can barely afford phone service in the first place, it's important that replacement equipment be available inexpensively. If a cell phone breaks, good luck finding a replacement cheaply. Cellular phones are routinely priced at over one hundred dollars each, with attractive rebates available to new signups. These rebates are not available when it comes time to order a replacement. Additionally, replacing a cellular phone, even on the same service account, requires coordination between the buyer and the provider, since the provider must authorize and activate the new unit, while disabling the old. Replacing a land line phone is a simple matter of unplugging the old one and plugging in the new one.
      3. Modems and fax machines cannot make use of cellular phones (with very few, expensive, and limited exceptions -- the few cell phone to standard device couplers I've seen are specific to one model and brand of phone, and were a hundred bucks each). This means if you liked your land line phone (perhaps a good multiple-handset line sharing headset compatible system with an all-digital answering machine) or have a TiVo, satellite receiver, or anything else that dials home every once in awhile, you're stuck with a land line anyway.
      4. Telemarketers do not play by the rules. This is part of why most people hate them so much, but is also another reason why abandoning your land line to avoid telemarketing doesn't work. As others have mentioned, telemarketers still call cell phones anyway. Sure, it might be illegal where you live, but that doesn't usually stop them.
      5. As others have mentioned, emergency service (911) is not as reliable or accurate on cellular phones as it is on land line phones.

      Some of these reasons are mutually exclusive (if you can afford something with a modem in it, cost is not likely a major factor), but they're still valid. Besides, just because you can afford something doesn't mean you should buy it.

      The bottom line is essentially that cellular phones cannot yet replace land lines entirely.

      If you can't afford a cell phone, it's not an option to dealing with telemarketers. If you have devices that require a land line for even occasional use, and you expect to continue using them, you cannot eliminate the land line. If you're just doing it to dodge telemarketers, it won't work anyway.

      In my case, given that I do not currently have a cellular phone, the financials break down like this: switching from a land line ($25 per month) to a cellular phone ($30 per month, at least) means spending five more dollars per month, stopping my DirecTiVo calling home when needed for updates (or spending another $70 and some time shovelling TivoNet into it), losing my ability t

      --
      Read my stuff.
  14. Australia by ergonal · · Score: 1

    Every time one of these telemarketer articles comes up, I wonder "what are they talking about?". Here in Australia there is VERY little telemarketer calls. Anyone know why this is? Is it just me, or do other Australians receive a lot of telemarketer calls? I don't think my phone home has received one in a few years. What's Australia doing right, or telemarketer companies doing wrong? Is our population too small?

    1. Re:Australia by Hellraisr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We have the same thing here in Canada. We rarely get telemarketing calls.. probably once or twice a month. I have heard that in some parts of the USA, a person can potentially get up to 9 calls per day from telemarketers.

      That's just crazy.. But of course, they wouldn't be doing it if they didn't make money off of it, so the best solution is to have no-one ever buy anything over the phone from a telemarketer. This would be the same reason that spam is still going strong. Enough people actually buy the crap to support their continued spamming.

    2. Re:Australia by DangerousDan666! · · Score: 1

      I do not know about the laws and stuff, but in my time in Sydney and Canberra - about 1 call a year from charity. Maybe one of the things that Aus has not completely stuffed up legally recently?

      Dan

    3. Re:Australia by james+b · · Score: 1

      I live in Australia, and at my old number I used to get `junk' calls maybe once or twice a month, normally in the evenings. These were normally `market research' (surveys about products and the like) rather than direct sales pitches, although I got those too.

      However, my new phone number used to belong to a business, and now I get more calls - one every day or two - from companies selling inkjet refills and other businessy services.
      So maybe there are different rules for calls to businesses and private numbers?

      james.

    4. Re:Australia by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Maybe you get lucky. I get about 3 a week here in Perth - and I have an unlisted number.

      Doesn't stop me putting them on hold, though :-)

    5. Re:Australia by bernywork · · Score: 1

      I think its because of a different culture.

      Americans are a lot more used to buying things from catalogues, (Sears for example) and from the internet. Australians are not as likely to buy something over the internet.

      The same goes for Telemarketing. Basically, the people aren't there to buy the stuff as what they are in the US. The people just aren't interested.

      I have had a few phone calls for people doing survey's and the like, and the couple of calls that I have had from call centres are namely people trying to get me in the door to sell me time share (Yes it's starting out over here)

      Berny

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    6. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a wild guess, maybe it's Telstra's $0.25 AUD/call connection fee. Local calls in the U.S. have no connection fee or time fee (completely
      free). Even a little cost (which I didn't think $0.25 was - cell calls were often cheaper for short durations) makes it a lot less effective to abuse the system, but I'm sure Telstra also likes the extra cash.

    7. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      so the best solution is to have no-one ever buy anything over the phone from a telemarketer. This would be the same reason that spam is still going strong. Enough people actually buy the crap to support their continued spamming.

      You are so right! And the best way to cure global hunger is to make sure everybody has enough food. Why didn't we think of this before?Solving problems is EASY!

    8. Re:Australia by Skater · · Score: 1

      I got two from Discover the other day in the space of half an hour. It's pretty bad here in the USA.

      --RJ

    9. Re:Australia by coke_dite · · Score: 1
      We have the same thing here in Canada. We rarely get telemarketing calls..

      Where in Canada do YOU live? I get anywhere between 2-5 telemarketing calls per week! My in-laws get at least 2 per day (they've been marked as Stay-at-home seniors with money). I imagine if I had caller ID on my phone, the totals would be a tad higher. I *wish* I wasn't getting so many.

      --
      Visit us at http://www.iblist.com!
    10. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And the best way to cure global hunger is to make sure everybody has enough food.

      Well yeah, but who actually wants to cure global hunger? (Apart from the hungry and a few bleeding-heart liberals.)

    11. Re:Australia by Capsaicin · · Score: 1
      So maybe there are different rules for calls to businesses and private numbers?

      More likely there are different 'economies'.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  15. There is always a work around by kjfitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Spamming already exists on the gray fringes of legality/ethicality (is that a word?) I can't imagine that charging a penny a letter would slow down a dedicated spammer at all. They'd simply send them without paying and continue to spoof / hide / relocate as required.

    This, like many laws aimed at criminals, would make things marginally more inconvenient for honest people while ignoring the criminals.

    1. Re:There is always a work around by 26199 · · Score: 1

      Er. I think you meant to post that to the last article. This one is about telemarketers and how to sue them.

  16. that's illegal too by krog · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I believe that telemarketers are prohibited by law from blocking their phone number, so add that to the list of infractions.

    (IANAL etc)

    1. Re:that's illegal too by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      That might be out of bounds in the US, but it isn't here in Australia.

      We don't have to pay to receive calls, though :-)

    2. Re:that's illegal too by skarmor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While it is illegal for a telemarketer to intentionally block their phone number it is still possible that the CallerID (CLID) information will not be sent due to system limitations. Digital Exchange Access (DEA) Line-side and V-Net Service, which do not support the transmission of calling party number comprise a large percentage of line-side connections.

    3. Re:that's illegal too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither do people in the USA.

  17. Still get calls? by g(zerofunk.org) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was having a problem with calls at all hours of the day. I finally added the 'disconnected' tones to the first part of my answering machine message, which you can find from a google.com search, and since then I get maybe 2 calls a week rather then the 10 a day I used to get.
    For anyone who wants to cut down on calls, without trying the approach of using the courts, I would higly suggest this method.
    g

    1. Re:Still get calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use the DMA no call list. It works far better than this method. My calls went to one a month after signing up. It's free by mail, too.

  18. Devil's Advocate by Alan+Livingston · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok... This might be a bit trollish, but...


    Someone needs to explain to me why "hilarity ensues" when an attorney sues a telemarketer, but it doesn't ensue when an attorney sends a cease and desist order?


    Shouldn't the attorney have just called this poor landscaper up and asked him to stop making calls first?

    1. Re:Devil's Advocate by Capt_Troy · · Score: 1

      And really, it wasn't all that hilarious either...

    2. Re:Devil's Advocate by mattite · · Score: 0, Funny

      Simple: a lot of people hate lawyers (they can be terribly devious and expensive), but EVERYONE hates telemarketing calls. Put them together with a nice bit of vengeance and it's called entertainment.

    3. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Shouldn't the attorney have just called this poor landscaper up and asked him to stop making calls first?

      Telemarketing is evil and annoying, even if they follow the letter of the law. If that 'poor' landscaper decides to annoy other people, he should face the consequences if he screws up. No sympathy there, sorry.

    4. Re:Devil's Advocate by curtisk · · Score: 1
      Shouldn't the attorney have just called this poor landscaper up and asked him to stop making calls first?

      Yes, a rational person would probably try that, but as a lawyer, hell, he didn't even have to chase an ambulance for this job, it came to him!!

      You can't give a lawyer a potential, direct, personal lawsuit and expect them to "turn the other cheek" LOL

      Telemarketers are a pain in the ass.....I've been playing modem handshakes at the automated calls recently, in hope that it'll think its a data/fax line. And with automated calls....anyone else notice that it seems you have to say "Hello?" twice before it starts? When I answer I say Hello once clearly, then if "dead-air" for more than 2-3 seconds *click* hang it up, if its a friend of ours, they'll call back....and I've yet to have an accidental hangup yet.

      --

      Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    5. Re:Devil's Advocate by doublem · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two reasons:

      1. /. stole the phrase from fark.com, who puts in on just about every other article.

      2. It's "funny" when someone you hate suffers. For example: If Bill Gates was diagnosed with a terminal cancer, the /. crowd would LOVE it. If Torvalds came down with the same cancer, it would be the biggest tragedy in geek history.

      It would be a geek tragedy.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    6. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't the attorney have just called this poor landscaper up and asked him to stop making calls first?

      How about you go read the article? He did try to call him, in fact he tried four different numbers, all of which were always tied up with the autodialers.

    7. Re:Devil's Advocate by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1

      Congratulations sir, on the worst/funniest pun I've ever read in my life.

    8. Re:Devil's Advocate by lostboy2 · · Score: 1
      Shouldn't the attorney have just called this poor landscaper up and asked him to stop making calls first?

      According to the article, he tried several times:
      When I tried calling that number (240-453-XXXX), I got repeated busy signals; eventually, my call went through to what was obviously an autodialer trying to make outgoing calls.
      And also,
      Doing a forward lookup on the name turned up 4 more lines serving the same address; calls to those numbers resulted in busy signals all day long.

      It is unfortunate that the telemarketer in this case was probably some guy who didn't know what he was doing, but the fact is that the telemarketer was breaking the law (whether that was his intent or not).

    9. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He did try to call the landscaper back, but couldn't get through...

      Too bad for the telemarketing scum.

    10. Re:Devil's Advocate by Alan+Livingston · · Score: 1
      It is unfortunate that the telemarketer in this case was probably some guy who didn't know what he was doing, but the fact is that the telemarketer was breaking the law (whether that was his intent or not).

      Right. Isn't that exactly the point, though? It's OK for a lawyer proceed right to formal legal communications when he's planning on suing a telemarketer (or any other SlashCrowd hatee), but it's not OK for a lawyer to sue a student that's sharing files on his/her school's network.


      Why are these two cases so different? In this case, the attorney did try and contact the defendant, but he clearly implied that he already planned to sue when he was looking for contact numbers and that this search was part of his being "over-prepared".

    11. Re:Devil's Advocate by GroundWire · · Score: 1

      I got into the habit of answering my phone "This is Joel".. Don't ask me why, but I have.. Anyway - I NEVER, EVER have had to talk to a telemarketer, when they were using a predictive dialer. I'm guessing it's because the system isn't hearing the "Hello", and is just passively listening for it.. That's when I hang up. :) - Joel

    12. Re:Devil's Advocate by rifter · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the attorney have just called this poor landscaper up and asked him to stop making calls first?

      If you had RTFA, you would know that the attorney did indeed make many attempts to contact the landscaper in question before taking the step of suing him. Unfortunately every line was too busy telemarketing people to be useful for an inbound phone call, and the guy did not respond to snail mail.

  19. Re:Don't make them stop calling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or maybe an ICQ handle with a chick's name. Is it OK to cyber then?

  20. Must've been an AT-5000 by horati0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Greetings friend. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So use it. And send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay! Eternal happiness is just a dollar away."

    --
    The neutrality of this sig is disputed.
    1. Re:Must've been an AT-5000 by marcop · · Score: 2, Funny


      Hmmm, eternal happiness for a dollar, you say? I think I would be much happier with the dollar.

    2. Re:Must've been an AT-5000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, this is Homer Simpson, a.k.a. Happy Dude. The court has ordered me to call every person in town to apologize for my telemarketing scam. I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, send one dollar to Sorry Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the power.

    3. Re:Must've been an AT-5000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was so sad to see the poor thing have its legs ripped off by Homer, I always feel sorry for it when i see it.

    4. Re:Must've been an AT-5000 by waferbuster · · Score: 1

      I'd buy that for a dollar!!!

      --
      I'm an individual! Just like everyone else!
    5. Re:Must've been an AT-5000 by CompuGlobalHyperMega · · Score: 1

      "Why it's the AT5000 Autodialer, my very first patent! Aww, would ya listen to the gibberish they've got you saying it's sad and alarming. You were designed to alert school childern about snow days and such."

  21. The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Back in college, we were on the A-list for credit card bills. Hardly a day would go by when I wouldn't get a fat envelope of "You've Been Pre-Approved" nonsense, or a phone call at around 7 in the evening. Anyway, eventually, a simple "I'm not interested" *click* wouldn't do. So, we got creative, and decided to have some fun.

    Eventually, one of my roomates, Matt, discovered the best solution. Once, a telemarketer called, and asked, "Are you Matthew *****"? His reply: "I don't know". Yes, that's right. "I don't know". As in, "I don't even know my own name, I'm definitely not responsible enough to own my own credit card. You must have dialed into a Home by mistake. Try this number again and Big Nurse will open up a can of tele-whoopass on you". Needless to say, he wasn't bothered for another three months. Before that, it was about twice a week. And that, my fellow readers, is how to get rid of telemarketers.

    1. Re:The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by mr3038 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Other nice ways to handle telemarketers:
      • Pretend to be the slowest talking person in the world...
      • Say "beep" each time the telemarketer says some often repeated word (like "the"). If the telemarketer asks you what's going on, say "nothing, why?" (Variation: say "me" every time the telemarketer says "you")
      • If they want to loan you money, tell them you just filed for bankruptcy and you could sure use some money.
      • Reply with a real husky voice: "What are you wearing?"
      • Say "Could you repeat that?" Repeat.
      • "I'm sorry, but I consider insurance a form of gambling, and my religion forbids it."
      • "Newspaper? Is this a crude joke?? I'm blind!"

      You'll be on their black list in no time.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
    2. Re:The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by mengel · · Score: 3, Funny
      Don't forget:
      • Have you accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as your personal Saviour?
      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    3. Re:The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by schon · · Score: 1

      My Favoutite:

      "Can you hold on for a moment?" - then put the phone down, and continue whatever you were doing.

      You can check every 10 - 15 minutes (if I'm watching TV, I'll check during the commercials) to see if they're still there..

    4. Re:The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by icebattle · · Score: 5, Funny

      i give the phone to my three year-old. he can talk the hind leg off a donkey.

    5. Re:The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      When they pause for breath, ask, "Hi! Is Mike there?"

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    6. Re:The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by bpfinn · · Score: 2, Funny
      Don't forget: "Have you accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as your personal Saviour?"

      I heard this backfired on someone once. The telemarketer was excited to find another Christian and the callee got into a 10 minute conversation about religion.

    7. Re:The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That didn't work for me. As soon as I told him that I was incompetent, he was even more eager to do business with me. "Your nurse doesn't need to know"

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which still is a win (kinda) since the telemarketer is not annoying ten other people
      in that time span and learn how not to crack up
      laughing when winding someone up ;)

    9. Re:The best way to get rid of telemarketers. by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 1

      My favorite:

      "Hello?" *pause* "911, what is your emergency?"

      "Uh...uh..."

      "911, do you have an emergency?"

      "Uh...this is...uh...[name] with [company]...uh...we thought this was a house."

      "No, you've just called 911. Take this number out of the list."

      "Uh...yeah...okay. Sorry."

      --
      Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
  22. every drop helps by John_Renne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Allthough an individual might not get rich out of these practices, the power of the mass counts. By sharing this information with the rest of the world more people can sue. Maybe $500 won't hurt the telemarketeer but I bet 1 million people all suing for the $500 will...

    --
    /(bb|[^b]{2})/
    1. Re:every drop helps by tmark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe $500 won't hurt the telemarketeer but I bet 1 million people all suing for the $500 will...

      And how much will 1 million x (costs of conducting a trial) hurt our legal system ? Are there even 1 million lawsuits filed in the entire U.S. each year ?

    2. Re:every drop helps by Deagol · · Score: 1
      Are there even 1 million lawsuits filed in the entire U.S. each year?

      I think the MPAA and RIAA cover that many just by themselves.

  23. I guess I missed it... by mr.nobody · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Exactly where was the "hilarity?" This is just a short article on how he tracked down the guy with some simple online tools and then sued him under a law he was familiar with. There isn't even any wackiness or insanity here. It's just, well, kinda boring.

    --
    mr.nobody
    --Don't you wanna go where nobody knows your name?
    1. Re:I guess I missed it... by rawshark · · Score: 1

      "Hilarity ensues" is a cliche/meme, much like "First!" and "3) Profit!" here. I believe it originated on fark.com but cannot be certain.

  24. Business Owner Too Dumb to Deserve $500 by nounderscores · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about getting the list. With an autodialer, the list might be simply "The Telephone Directory." After all, simply stomping through the numbers is a lot cheaper than buying a fully qualified list of customers. Some legit direct mail companies pay in excess of one or two million dollars for a list of a thousand names. (Eg, 1000 Rich professionals who have just gotten married. 1000 Rich professionals who have just bought a house etc...)

    A landscaper who is too clueless to know that an autodialer is illegal in his area would probably NOT be able to afford a list.

    I say sue the telemarketer. That way you have low court costs and better chance of winning.

  25. Re:Keep em on the phone - good idea! by PHPee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Keeping them on the phone is a good idea!

    While reading these comments (at 9:15am), I got a call from an obvious telemarketer (couldn't pronounce my dad's name right...) so I decided to keep them on the phone, just to see how long they would actually wait (I'm unemployed, and living at home, so I've got nothing but time on my hands). I told her to hold on while I got my dad, and proceeded to just sit there listening. I didn't say another word for the entire 13 minutes and 42 seconds that the telemarketer actually waited for me to come back! I almost burst out laughing several times when I heard her sigh or start humming a little tune.

    It brought a smile to my face on an otherwise boring, unemployed day of my life...

  26. Only if the telemarketer is stupid.. by MikeFM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am pretty sure that many - if not most- small claims judgements are never paid off. It's usually recommended that you not even bother if you're going to need to pay for a lawyer or collection agency. It might be worth $20 if you could spare it - just to hassle the telemarketing folks, but I certainly wouldn't count on a pay off of even $500. Sure you'd probably win your judgement but would they ever actually pay you?

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Only if the telemarketer is stupid.. by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      they may not pay you true.

      but the judgement doesn't just disappear either.

      IOt leaves when payment is made and it is fully discharged. Re-read the article paying specific attention to how it was discharged and whan terms were there (21 days if no further action is brought forth)

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    2. Re:Only if the telemarketer is stupid.. by TeddyR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah... but a judgement in court (even small claims court) goes on the persons credit history... (and stays there even after it is paid) and a few unpaid judements dont look good at all when trying to apply for credit....

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
    3. Re:Only if the telemarketer is stupid.. by sebmol · · Score: 1

      Judgments can be enforeced differently in different states. The court could order a garnishment of wages or seize some of the defendant's assets.

      Or in Germany, you just go to jail until you pay up. If you can't, you go to jail, work there and pay with that.

      --
      "Light is faster than sound." - "Is that why people tend to look bright until you hear them speak?"
    4. Re:Only if the telemarketer is stupid.. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      Most do not. But this call went through in the early hours of the morning. That is much more of a slam dunk win than anything else. The judge is likely to be pissed off at the LEGAL telemarketers, and this is an easy case.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    5. Re:Only if the telemarketer is stupid.. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Effectively getting a garnishment or seizing assets in the US is almost impossible if the debter feels like avoiding them. Last time I checked they had to leave alone important "things to live" like your vcr and tv. It's full of loopholes.

      Going to jail isn't really effective if the subject of the lawsuit is a business. Are you going to jail everyone there?

      That's laughable though really. Hell the government can't find me a job now so maybe if I can do some bad shit they'll suddenly be able to find something they can pay me for. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    6. Re:Only if the telemarketer is stupid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you can identify some real estate of the telemarketer then (at least in some juristicions) you can put a lien against the property.

      My dad had a deadbeat client in his small business, took him to small claims and won. The other party didn't even show up. It took a few years, but the guy got a rude shock when he tried to sell his house and didn't have a clean title. My Dad had practically forgotten about it when the check arrived.

    7. Re:Only if the telemarketer is stupid.. by Darby · · Score: 1

      It took a few years, but the guy got a rude shock when he tried to sell his house and didn't have a clean title. My Dad had practically forgotten about it when the check arrived.

      I hope your dad took his sweet time cashing the check. It would also have been cool if he "lost" it assuming it wasn't for that much or he had no need for the money right then ;-)

    8. Re:Only if the telemarketer is stupid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but bear in mind what happened in this particular case...

      The plaintiff (who happened to be an attorney, although that's frankly just an amusing sidebar) was able to deduce the caller's full name and address, and not just of the individual proprietor, but also the business.

      IANAL, but if it were me, I'd have gone after the telemarketer as "John Doe d/b/a John's Weedwhacking Service" or whatever the appropriate names would be.

      That way, there'd be a lien against John's house as well as his personal credit rating AND his business' credit records would reflect that, too. I'd be sure, for example, that Dun & Bradstreet became rapidly aware of the situation, not to mention the local BBB.

      The particular situation is almost trivial in that the plaintiff/victim was in DC, and the defendant/asshole was in nearby Maryland. But, I am giggling at the prospect of filing complaints against some tofu-laden yuppie establishment in The California Republic in my own local court system here in The Granite State. Ayuh, love to see them Birkies get waterlogged with our snow!!

  27. Useful resources for suing telemarketers. by Seth+Finklestein · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    I'm not Seth Finkelstein. I still speak the truth.
    1. Re:Useful resources for suing telemarketers. by tuxedo-steve · · Score: 1
      As a crusader for freedom on the internet, I believe strongly that unwanted calls are an avoidable nuisance.
      As a fellow basement-dwelling geek with a superhero complex, I'd like to note that your description of yourself as a 'crusader for freedom' is the funniest thing I've heard all day!

      Na-na-na-na-na-na-na-SethFinklestein!
      --
      - SMJ - (It's not just a name: it's a bad aftertaste.)
    2. Re:Useful resources for suing telemarketers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remove.org for $10 a year.

      Why didn't you mention DMA remove. It's free and works. Oh, what's that funny link for remove.org? Hmm.

  28. Does the fine seem a little high by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, sure $500 is a reasonable amount for a single violation. Most businesses could afford that. But if a lot of people decide to sue, then it strikes me that this would be like the RIAA's recent claim of the GDP of several countries.

    This is irritating, but do we really thin kthe crime is bad enough to charge an individual a potential $5 000 000 (assuming 10 000 irate victims)?

    1. Re:Does the fine seem a little high by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      It's to send a clear message that they have violated the law and to not do it again. If the cost was much less, many of the larger telemarketing firms wouldn't bother to follow the law, because they could just pay the fine for the rare person who actually bothers to sue.

      I think that $94 was too much for my 78 in a 55, but I sure as hell am not gonna speed again...

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    2. Re:Does the fine seem a little high by cloak42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the idea. If the fine adds up to a large amount when lots of people do it, it then acts as a deterrent. That's kind of the whole idea of fines. If it becomes dangerous for a business to keep paying fines of $500, then they need to stop their illegal behavior. It's that simple.

    3. Re:Does the fine seem a little high by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the death penalty for jaywalking would also be a deterrent. It doesn't mean it's right. The penalty sould fit the crime.

    4. Re:Does the fine seem a little high by cloak42 · · Score: 1

      Isn't your example a little bit extreme? I mean, we're not talking about taking away anybody's life here. If you really wanted it to fit, say that a $500 fine for jaywalking would be a deterrent. And it might be. In fact, I was once threatened with $124 for jaywalking because I made a comment to a cop that he didn't like (I wasn't being disrespectful to him or anything, but he didn't like the fact that I could think and speak for myself).

      Anyway, implementing a $500 for jaywalking--or even better, killing them for jaywalking--is ridiculous for more reasons than for the obvious overkill (pardon the pun). Namely, the biggest reason is that jaywalking doesn't impinge on others' free time, privacy, and way of life, whereas telemarketing is sleazy at best and deviously insidious at its worst. Nobody should have to deal with a company that deliberately tries to get you to give away personal information so that it can be sold later on. That's just wrong.

    5. Re:Does the fine seem a little high by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Reductio ad adsurdum. Yes it was extreme. I went for the most trivial crime and most extreme penalty, to be sure that everyone would agree that it was excessive. It would also be a little extreme for telemarketing.

      The point is, there is a point with all crimes where the penalty will be too extreme. Anything other than being told off seems like an excessive penalty for jay walking. Several million dollars seems a little excessive for telemarketing, and if everyone could be bothered, this is what the penalty would be.

      So, the question is, when does a fine become so high that it ceases to be a deterrent, and starts to become brutality?

    6. Re:Does the fine seem a little high by rifter · · Score: 1

      The assumption being made here is that if you have 10,000 irate non-customers you have an appropriately higher number of customers who are paying you for something. If not, you do not have a legitemate business model and deserve to fail.

    7. Re:Does the fine seem a little high by Slurpee · · Score: 1

      It doesn't make sense. At all. But we are not talking about death, but money.

      Also, there is a fine for jaywalking. It depends on where you are, but $100 is not unusual.

      If I jaywalk 1 million times (and get caught each time), I will get 1 million fines for a total of $100,000,000. Do you think that is fair?

      If you do the crime, you should pay the fine. Of course, a judge can rule that I should only pay $1000, as I have learnt my lesson. But thats a different story.

  29. Whatever ,troll by mekkab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I live in Rockville, and I constantly get calls from that handyman service.

    Guess who I DON'T call when I need my gutters cleaned?!

    Just because you run a business doesn't mean you are gauranteed to make money and not have honest efforts to plug your business backfire in your face. And if you ignore the laws governing your conduct don't be surprised when you get slapped.

    Now I know your retort will be "well! The law code is so hard that the average person can't understand it and can't afford a lawyer to double check the legality of every action! WAAAAAAAA!"

    My response? He just got a lesson in the law. And it only cost him $500.

    Life isn't fair. Get a helmet and an unlisted number.

    P.S.- The Washington Post had a great article on all the scam handymen in the region. So while you say actually works hard for that $500 I say he ripped off some old lady while cleaning her gutters and "reshingled" her roof. Both of our conjectures have one thing in common: there is no proof of either of them.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Whatever ,troll by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Now I know your retort will be "well! The law code is so hard that the average person can't understand it and can't afford a lawyer to double check the legality of every action! WAAAAAAAA!"

      This would be a legitimate argument if this guy were accused of violating some obscure regulation that says his advertising sign is three inches too long, or something. However, it is a matter of common knowledge and common sense that making automated calls to people in the predawn hours is a public nuisance, so ignorance of the exact point of illegality is neither a defense nor a cause for sympathy.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    2. Re:Whatever ,troll by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      First off, I wasn't trolling, just pointing out something that wasn't so obvious unless the article was read: This was not some 200-minimum-wage-lackies-in-a-smoky-room-telemarke ter, it was a normal human being who made a mistake.
      Now I know your retort will be "well! The law code is so hard that the average person can't understand it and can't afford a lawyer to double check the legality of every action! WAAAAAAAA!"
      Wrong. I'm sure that whatever honest firm that sold him the autodialer told him everything there is to know about telemarketing law, explaining it in plain English.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    3. Re:Whatever ,troll by mekkab · · Score: 1

      was not some 200-minimum-wage-lackies-in-a-smoky-room-telemarke ter, it was a normal human being who made a mistake.

      I can't make that distinction. Maybe i'm just not as compassionate as I should be, but I cannot.

      When I'm curt on the phone to someone from a huge telemart-firm and they end the call by cursing at me I will deal with them in the same way as a "small guy" who mis-programs his machine.

      Why? Because there are those who's scruples go so low that they have no problems saying "oh, it was just a simple mistake. We mis-programmed our machines."

      Given the number of people who will just shrug it off, its nice that one or two will fire back.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    4. Re:Whatever ,troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignorance of a law is not a defense...

  30. Do we need MORE lawsuits? by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Seriously, which is worse in this country, the annoying-ass advertisers/marketers or the legal system?

    At first I was all for this attorney, but then I read his comment about filing in small claims court being "addictive". You know what? Instead of enacting revenge, and passing on all of the bad feelings that you accumulate, why not try to change things by starting with yourself?

    Ironically, people who are angry all the time piss me off! Hey, the marketer had it coming, but do you think the $500 the lawyer got really did anything? If the guy is cold calling people, he doesn't have many scruples, and will get that $500 back somehow. He didn't learn any lesson. Now you might think that the solution is that EVERYONE should sue him, but it isn't. We've created this money driven society ourselves, so who can blame the people who try to capitalize on it. What, you think you are above it? Have you ever cheated on your tax returns, tried to screw some company because of a pricing error, voided a warranty on a product and tried to return it? Even if you have never been taken in by greed, now is not the time to start. Hey, it's tough, I know. But I have finally just become so sick of it that I am trying not to be like that. But in the U.S. it is very hard, because we are all about money money money, consume consume consume.

    We are ALL part of this society, and the only way to change it is by starting with yourself. I am not about to cheer a lawyer for suing a telemarketer, any more than I would cheer Hilary Rosen for kicking Bill Gates in the nuts.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      But in the U.S. it is very hard, because we are all about money money money, consume consume consume.

      As long as the U.S. exists as the U.S., this will be the case. To be anything other than a culture of consumers would require such incredible social changes that the result wouldn't be the same country anymore. Take comfort that the entire world isn't all like this.

      People are allowed to sue each other because otherwise they'd settle their arguments by beating each other with sticks. Which mode of settlement seems more reasonable to you?

    2. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      "There is nothing more satisfying than a morally justified act of violence." - some guy, I forgot.

      Laying up the smack-down on those that deserve it is a legitimate way to improve a society. Ignoring the problem points will not make any improvement. Try your philosophy with the next pre-cancerous lump you get please, that will illustrate the futility of your arguments.

      Some stuff does not stop simply by wishing it will.

    3. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Seriously, which is worse in this country, the annoying-ass advertisers/marketers or the legal system?

      The annoying-ass advertisers/marketers.

      If the guy is cold calling people, he doesn't have many scruples, and will get that $500 back somehow.

      Nonsense. If the guy can "get that $500 back somehow," he would have gotten it regardless of whether or not he was sued.

      We are ALL part of this society, and the only way to change it is by starting with yourself.

      OK, now that I've started with myself, let me continue, with others.

      If all you can change is yourself, why are you bothering to tell us all about it? Just change yourself.

    4. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by gosand · · Score: 1
      Laying up the smack-down on those that deserve it is a legitimate way to improve a society. Ignoring the problem points will not make any improvement.

      OK, who determines "who deserves it"? Why are the prisons in this country so full? We imprison the largest percentage of our population, compared to everyone else on the planet. Are our streets safer? No. Have we improved our society through these actions? Superficially, yes, because you could argue that all those big bad criminals are off the street. But we, as a society, created those criminals. It is only getting worse. We have a society of the haves and have-nots, and we perpetuate it daily.

      Some stuff does not stop simply by wishing it will.

      And things don't stop by perpetuating and repeating the same mistakes! That lawyer implied that suing people was addictive because he got some money and a little perceived justice. Do you think by more lawsuits, our legal system has gotten better in this country? Maybe for the wealthy, and for companies. That is why laws like the DMCA exist, because the people don't have the power to stop them. The guy with the most money wins. You know all those lawsuits against the tobacco companies? They are in appeals, and probably will be until the people who are suing them die.

      To your "point", of course nothing changes by wishing it so. That is why people should change their own ways instead of trying to "get theirs", and they should do it for the good of our society. You can't change all of society, you can only change yourself.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Seriously, which is worse in this country, the annoying-ass advertisers/marketers or the legal system?"

      There's no real reason to have a lawyer involved in a small claims case. In fact, using small claims courts to complain about "the legal system" is quite a bit of a stretch. Only rarely do small claims courts settle matters of law (that's what criminal courts are for), and you don't make a lot of money in the judgements because it's a small claims court.

      Besides, being a lawyer in and of itself doesn't make one evil.

    6. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by gosand · · Score: 1
      People are allowed to sue each other because otherwise they'd settle their arguments by beating each other with sticks. Which mode of settlement seems more reasonable to you?

      This is an ignorant and very uncivilized statement, assuming that these are the only two ways to settle arguments.

      Of course, that is really how things are in the US, the "haves" choose one method, the "have nots" choose the other.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    7. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by gosand · · Score: 1
      Me: We are ALL part of this society, and the only way to change it is by starting with yourself.

      You; OK, now that I've started with myself, let me continue, with others.
      If all you can change is yourself, why are you bothering to tell us all about it? Just change yourself.

      I can't change anyone else, it is up to them to do it. I can relate my experiences, and hopefully make people think about things that they normally don't consider. I can only START with myself, and once I am comfortable with myself I can try to get other people to change. (but they have to do it themselves) Why am I bothering to tell you about it? Because this is a big forum. Because I was commenting on a story that seemed to me to be the battle of two evils, and one side was being cheered. IMO, neither side deserved that.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    8. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by HopeOS · · Score: 1

      You seem to be reading more into this situation than it actually warrants. The laws, as written, give him one and only one immediate recourse to being solicited illegally- to sue. He did that. End of story. If he was suing people as a matter of harrasement, different story. He did not, nor did he indicate that he would consider it. His point was that the barrier to small claims court was lower than he expected and given that, he could see how it could be further used and probably even abused.

      How else would you prefer that the situation have been resolved? Call the District Attorney? Drive over and disconnect their equipment? Harrass the telemarketers? I would say that his reaction to the situation was entire proportionate.

      9 out of 10 calls on my land line are solicitors, and I don't give the number out to anyone but family. My office phone rings and disconnects continuously from 5PM to 9PM whenever I work late. I'd prefer to give the CEO of Telemarketers Inc. a swift kick in the nuts for every call I receive, but I think that $500 is a reasonable compromise. Plus it keeps me out of jail.

      I am seriously looking forward to the National Do Not Call List. If I start getting calls after registering, I will be a frequent visitor of small claims court.

      -Hope

    9. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by CaffeineKills · · Score: 1

      "...any more than I would cheer Hilary Rosen for kicking Bill Gates in the nuts." Hell, I know I would.

      --
      "Guns don't kill people, bullets do."
    10. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I can only START with myself, and once I am comfortable with myself I can try to get other people to change.

      And one way to try to get others to change is to sue them.

    11. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
      any more than I would cheer Hilary Rosen for kicking Bill Gates in the nuts.

      I don't think I would cheer her either but I would certainly download the mpg file of it from p2p!

    12. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by mandolin · · Score: 1
      You have no idea if this lawyer is good or evil during his "day job". I fully support his behavior during this specific incident, because he refused to let somebody else stomp all over his rights.

      Cheating on your tax returns etc. is completely different because in that case you are cause of the problem.

    13. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by rifter · · Score: 1

      Of course, that is really how things are in the US, the "haves" choose one method, the "have nots" choose the other.

      More like the uneducated choose one and the educated another. If you don't have $20 for court fees, you probbaly don't have a phone, either. Besides, last I checked every court in the US will optionally waive all up-front fees if you can sucessfully plead indigence, and you can always sue for court fees.

    14. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by rifter · · Score: 1

      OK, who determines "who deserves it"?

      Self-righteous assholes, of course. And you did post in slashdot, so you can pretty much throw a rock in any random direction and hit one.

      But seriously, it is called an opinion. In my opinion, and in the opinion of many slashdotters, telemarketers are bottom-feeding scum who deserve whatever happens to them. But college kids wanting to listen to music of bands whose concerts they visit and tshirts and cds they buy are innocent victims of scum-sucking lawyers.

      IMNSHO, the spammers and telemarketers cause harm and have many victims, and so do the RIAA. The RIAA is not helping the artists, they steal from the artists, and then try to claim the *fans* who are actually the base from which all their revenue is generated are the true thieves. This is why I agree with suing spammers and disagree with suing college students for mp3 trading. I do agree with dismantling and suing into nonexistence the RIAA, the real pirates.

    15. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by gosand · · Score: 1
      And one way to try to get others to change is to sue them.

      I seriously hope this was meant as a joke, but sadly enough, it probably wasn't.

      And the fact that you and others don't see why this is a sad statement, is the reason the US is the way it is.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    16. Re:Do we need MORE lawsuits? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      And the fact that you and others don't see why this is a sad statement, is the reason the US is the way it is.

      Why don't you explain it to us stupid Americans? The purpose of the law is to get people to do something they wouldn't ordinarily do. That's true in the United States or in any other country.

  31. Re:Yes! YES!!!! by TheViffer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The bad thing is that "non-profits" do not have the same restrictions as a business.

    Do not need to use do not call lists, can call you over and over, can use pre recoreded messages.

    I think 75% of the Tele calls I receive to day from from such "non-profit organizations".

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  32. Honest bidnezmens by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sorry, but I don't buy the "but he was just an honest businessman who made a mistake" line.

    He bought an autodialer with the expressed intent of telemarketing his business. He knew that what he was doing is held in very low regard by the general population, and he did it anyway.

    The arguement you often hear of "but I was just trying to make a living" applies equally well to crack dealers as to telemarketers.

    In fact:

    Wowbagger's top 5 reasons why crack dealers are better than telemarketers
    5) Some people actually WANT what the crack dealer sells.
    4) Crack dealers don't knock on my door while I'm having dinner and say "You want to buy some crack?"
    3) When you tell them you aren't interested, crack dealers leave you alone.
    2) Crack dealers don't give your name and number to other people (except, perhaps, to law enforcement).
    1) Crack dealers AREN'T TELEMARKETERS!

    1. Re:Honest bidnezmens by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      He bought an autodialer with the expressed intent of telemarketing his business.
      Or, possibly, he was sold an autodialer. We'll never know.
      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    2. Re:Honest bidnezmens by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Or, possibly, he was sold an autodialer.

      Yes, of course - the eeeevile telemarketers cracked into his checking account, debited it for this instrument, and shipped it to him, whereupon it used its eeeevile marketing mindcontrol powers to make him tell his secretary to plug it in and set it up.

      Obviously, this poor man is blameless - it's not like he had any free will in this deal.

      Or did he? We'll never know...

    3. Re:Honest bidnezmens by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Yes, of course - the eeeevile telemarketers cracked into his checking account, debited it for this instrument, and shipped it to him, whereupon it used its eeeevile marketing mindcontrol powers to make him tell his secretary to plug it in and set it up.
      Considering he's having to cold-call people just for handyman work, I'll bet his IQ isn't on the higher side of the bell curve. Of course, no salesman would ever take advantage of the customer's lack of intelligence just to make a sale.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    4. Re:Honest bidnezmens by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      > Or, possibly, he was sold an autodialer. We'll never know.

      what?!?! Of course it was sold to him (unless he stole it). What does that have to do with anything? I guess that the concept of personal responsibility isn't the "in" thing these days.
      He used it, he pays the price.

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
    5. Re:Honest bidnezmens by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Possibly he was sold an autodialer by a telemarketer who called him during dinner!

    6. Re:Honest bidnezmens by old7 · · Score: 1
      Considering he's having to cold-call people just for handyman work, I'll bet his IQ isn't on the higher side of the bell curve.
      Of course he could be the front guy for 20 -50 "handymen" and he takes 40% off the top. I guess then his IQ might be on the higher side of the old bell curve.

      Old7
    7. Re:Honest bidnezmens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I guess that the concept of personal responsibility isn't the "in" thing these days.

      Au contraire, it's just that this 'personal responsibility' thingo gets bandied about so much that we are all getting heartily sick of it. I mean, its not as if a person is totally responsible for everything they do, for chrissakes. For every small business person who has bought an autodialer, there is an autodialer salesperson who has sold it to them. So let's drop all that tired old 'personal responsiblity' guff, it's just too damn boring, and let's start spreading the blame around, please!

  33. The heavy end of the hammer just dropped... by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe not a sledgehammer, but perhaps a 16 ounce framing hammer. But, in the end, he got a idiot telemerketer to cough up his due.

    That's what counts, don't it?

    Let's end this thread and get on with bigger fish, like RIAA and their stunting that they are trying to implement here shortly.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  34. There is an easier way by grundie · · Score: 1

    Just report them to the police as a nuisance callers. To be fair only do this with persistent callers, you don't want to be annoying the police.

    I once had one company call me on a regular basis trying to get me to join some weird racehorse owning syndicate. They certainly did not have my permission to call, I made it very clear they were not to call me again and they kept making repeat calls. In my book that classified them as a nusiance caller. I went to the police and reported them as such and the calls stopped soon after.

    Think about it, unsolicited telemarketing calls do fit in to the definition of being a nuisance call. They are unwanted, they don't have permission to call you, they can cause distress (especially when they call when you are doing something important) and most importantly they have a nasty habit of keeping making repeat calls despite being told not to. If you are really being bothered by such calls, just report them to the police as nusiance callers its cheaper than taking them to court. Plus police action takes the form of a crminal complaint, as opposed to court action which is a civil action, criminal action is more likely to scare the telemarketers.

    1. Re:There is an easier way by Zaphod+B · · Score: 1

      It's plain to see that you live in a mid-size or smaller city. Here where I live, if you call and make a complaint like that, they'll laugh at you. I'd rather sue the telemarketers myself and let the LAPD deal with gangbangers, drug dealers, and murderers.

      --
      Zaphod B
      When duplication is outlawed, only outlaws will have /bin/cp
  35. claim you're "recording" them by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to work for a telemarketing firm (yes, I'm still filled with self-loathing over it, thank you very much--you know, the scent never leaves?) and routinely we would record our calls (for verification)--standard procedure. If we ever called anyone and they said that they were going to record the conversation, we were under orders to terminate the call immediately and remove them from the calling list.

    Worth a try, I've never used it because I only get calls that are just dead air...must be the Illuminati or something.

    1. Re:claim you're "recording" them by DiveX · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you're saying you may have routinely violated state laws in regards to recording? Multiple states have 'all-party' recording laws. All parties to a conversation must be aware of the recording.

      The dead air calls are caused by automated dialers. A telemarketer will typically have more lines than sales people. Say you have 20 lines and 10 reps, the lines would all be dialed..some get busy signals, so are not in service, and some get answered. The first 10 people that pick up instantly get transferred to a rep. You information pops up on their screen before you finish saying 'hello?'. A delay before they pick up can be a result of their not getting the information fast enough or starting the speech too late, though typically only a 2-3 second lag. The dead air you get is a result of 10 other people getting to the phone before you. Once all the telemarketers are busy, then the system is supposed to hang up, but they typically means your phone rings once more, and even if you pick up, the system may already be hanging up. The problem, however, is that the identification requirements are not met. Persons or entities placing a call are supposed to identify themselves (by full name) and provide and address or phone number. Once the call is placed, the solicitation has begun, whether you ever hear a single word or not. Unfortunately, telemarketers hide their Caller ID info, though this should end in 2004 when FTC regulations come into effect.

      I have had several suits and settlements regarding telemarketing myself and am about to file several more. Exercise your rights.

      Unfortunately, like in this case, it is easier for the person to break the law and just pay off a few people clued in while raking in money from the ignorant.

      "Plainly, it ought not to be cheaper to violate the Act and be sued than to comply with the statutory requirements." Bueno v. MATTNER, 633 F. Supp. 1446, 1467 (1986) quoting Beliz v. W.H. McLeod & Sons Packing Co., 765 F.2d 1317, 1332 (5th Cir. 1985)

      --
      Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
    2. Re:claim you're "recording" them by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I never thought of this one..... I like it!

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    3. Re:claim you're "recording" them by TotallyUseless · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1st off, all he said was that he told them it was being recorded, he never said he actually recorded them.

      2nd, wouldnt telling them *that they are being recorded* satisfy the requirement that they know *they are being recorded*?!?!

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    4. Re:claim you're "recording" them by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Informative

      A recent court case showed why: some telemarketing firm used recordings as 'proof' of some heinous sales agreement. Turns out the tapes were doctored.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    5. Re:claim you're "recording" them by DiveX · · Score: 1

      What message are you referring to. The one to which I replied stated "routinely we would record our calls". How do you possibly construe "he told them it was being recorded"? Telling them it was being recorded would mee tthe requirement, but there was no indicitation that they did this.

      The reason they hung up if others told them it was being recorded is that telemarketers will routinely doctor their tapes, but figure that anyone recording is smart enough to know the law and thus not likely to get a sale.

      --
      Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
    6. Re:claim you're "recording" them by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

      Allow me to clarify the "So you're saying you may have routinely violated state laws in regards to recording?" statement a bit.

      Where I live, in Iowa, at that time, there was only the one law that needed to be obeyed, that being only one member of the call needed to be aware of the recording (i.e.: us). Since the call was placed in our state (Iowa) only Iowa law at that time was relevent, now we have TCPA and all sorts of other messes that makes that sort of thing illegal, but at that time TCPA hadn't even been drafted (this was a long time ago.)

      And on the topic of dead-air calls: yes, I know how that system works, but I can't prosecute them since I never get transferred to a rep...after about 4 seconds the call is auto-terminated on their end. I have talked to the phone company numerous times and they can't/will not give me any info on who the last caller was and *69 doesn't work. Personally, I'm of the opinion that caller ID blocker is a violation of DCMA--it obfuscates the origin of a communication, does it not? But that's neither here nor there.

  36. TPS acronym correction, plus link by SteveDob · · Score: 1

    TPS, for the UK, is the Telephone Preference Service.

    1. Re:TPS acronym correction, plus link by christopherfinke · · Score: 2, Funny
      TPS, for the UK, is the Telephone Preference Service.
      Insert joke here involving words "cover sheet", "memo", and "yeeeeeeaaaaahhhhh."
  37. Win-Win by Michael_Burton · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, good. There aren't enough lawsuits.

    Telemarketers vs. Lawyers in an epic Battle to the Death!

    I know a lot of people who would consider that a win-win situation.

    --
    When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
    1. Re:Win-Win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hope the telemarketers win

    2. Re:Win-Win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Then we could feed them to Bun-bun -- and there'd be no-one left to prosecute us for it!

    3. Re:Win-Win by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Add spammers to the mix, and have it in THUNDERDOME. Everything's better in THUNDERDOME!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  38. Farkisms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LoL "Hilarity ensues"

  39. Agreed, also for Fax and Junk Mail by T-Kir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I signed my parents Pub up on this list and the Fax Preference System (and the Mail P S), and within two months the amount of sales calls and reams of wasted fax paper went down to zero... a customer of ours was lamenting to us about the same problems with his phone and fax line, and he wouldn't believe us that it worked (one month later though he was most impressed).

    Ever since signing up to this opt out scheme, we've only ever had ONE sales phone call, and fortunately I was there to 'casually' inform them that if we were not removed from their (and any company shared) contact list, that they were liable for a very big fine, and that they were in violation of the opt-out list to which they are meant to adhere to and risked criminal prosecution for violation of (not sure if it was true, but it added significant weight to our argument)... it's a call that left me feeling very empowered for a change!

    TPS Online - with links to the sister sites for FaxPS, MailPS and even e-mailPS... although I never bothered with the latter, considering the amount of e-mail sources that is way out of their control.

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:Agreed, also for Fax and Junk Mail by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      If the opt-out list is so wonderful, why hasn't anyone thought of making it an opt-in list?

      Think about it a minute - if telemarketing irritates enough people that the government legislates ways for people to hit back, why don't they simply issue an outright ban of telemarketing except for people that opt-in? Make that opt-in for a particular type of product too, and not just for whatever random products the various "affliates" are marketing...

      I realize that I'm replying to a UK poster, and that US "freedom of speech" is likely to be the counter-argument. In order to head that off, perhaps the US audience should consider that "freedom of speech" doesn't equal "guaranteed audience". If someone is speaking on a street corner, you are free to take a different route or simply pass by. The speaker has no right to force you to walk past him or to stop you in the street and make you listen. This is the equivalent of the telemarketing "opt-in" list.

      In a nutshell, I'm saying, "Why on earth should I have to opt out? I'll opt in if I feel like it."

  40. whoa, they screwed the pooch on that one! by mekkab · · Score: 3, Funny

    IS MR. HIND-ER-LITER HERE (pronounced incorrectly of course)?"

    Considering your screen name of jonJOHNSON I'd say that is QUITE a mis-pronounciation!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:whoa, they screwed the pooch on that one! by jonjohnson · · Score: 1

      Stepfather :)

    2. Re:whoa, they screwed the pooch on that one! by mekkab · · Score: 1

      Shhhhhh! Its funnier the other way! ;)

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    3. Re:whoa, they screwed the pooch on that one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Son!

  41. Pretend you're a business by transient · · Score: 2, Interesting
    AT&T once called me at work to sell me long distance service. When I answered the phone by stating my name (which I'm sure most people do at the office) the telemarketer asked if she'd called a business. When I said yes, she simply apologized and hung up. I can only assume that my work number has been permanently erased from their records.

    So now I answer my home phone as if I were at work. Mwahaha!

    --

    irb(main):001:0>
  42. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! by mekkab · · Score: 1

    Ironically, people who are angry all the time piss me off!

    That was PRICELESS. D00d, the funniest thing I've seen all day. Thanks.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  43. Please send $1 to... by BTWR · · Score: 2, Funny

    Greetings sir! Please send $1 to Happy Dude!
    Evergreen Terrace, Springfield

  44. Telemarketers are easily confused. by Ayandia · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although he passed away six years ago, my home phone is still in my grandfather's name.

    I frequently get marketing calls for my grandfather, and I've found that the BEST response is:
    "I'm sorry, he's dead. Can I take a message?"

    They very rarely leave messages, although one or two have asked when would be a better time call back.

    1. Re:Telemarketers are easily confused. by AlgUSF · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I lived at home, my brother recieved calls from debt collectors, and I told them he was serving 5 years in prison. I told another collector that he was dead, and started acting like I was all broken up after they said his name. :-)

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    2. Re:Telemarketers are easily confused. by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

      the BEST response is: "I'm sorry, he's dead. Can I take a message?"

      This is, indeed, the best response..

      In the late 80's, I started getting phone calls for "Leanne" - they came at all hours of the day and night, and from different people.. Since I'd had the phone number for 3 years, I could only assume that this "Leanne" person couldn't remember her own phone number.

      After a couple of weeks of this, I was woken up at 3:30 in the morning by one of these calls.. when they asked for Leanne, I told them "No, I'm sorry - she's dead."

      The response was shock - "what happened"

      So I told them that Leanne was hit by a bus on the way home..

      The (of course) asked if there was anything they could do.. and I said - "Yes, can you call all of her friends and let them know?"

      And that was the last call for "Leanne" I ever got.

    3. Re:Telemarketers are easily confused. by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1

      That had me rolling on the floor!

      +5 FUNNY

  45. Get rid of telemarketers easy by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I've gotten telemarketing calls, instead of saying the typical "I'm not interested" I'll say the first ridiculous excuse that comes off the top of my head and it seems to work. I used to be called at least 2 to 3 times a week (and no I did not buy their products) and now I rarely get a call during a given month.

    For example:
    1) Lawn care companies? Tell them you have a turf lawn or similar. Or tell them the overspray from the company spraying your neighbors lawn is taking care of your lawn as well. Its worked quite well.
    2) Newpapers? I tell them I'm illiterate.
    3) Alarm Systems? This is the best of all! I acutally convinced the guy I live on a military base in a nuclear bunker and he bought it! Funny thing was, he tried selling me fire and theft insurance. Of course, I explaied these are theft and fire proof as they housed nuclear weapons.

    Who needs lawsuits? I have fun with them and I get rid of their calls. I've had to threaten the repeat callers w/ small claims court suits and it works. However, we need stronger/clearer laws against telemarketing and spammers.

    Please don't mod this as funny. I'm quite serious even with the Alarm system thing. The idiot bought it but they also stopped calling.

    1. Re:Get rid of telemarketers easy by Zaphod+B · · Score: 1

      I've done this too... but with weirder excuses, esp. given that I'm male, not female.

      "Is $MY_NAME home?"
      "I'm sorry, I'm having sex with him right now."

      "I'd like to offer you $PRODUCT!"
      "I'm sorry, I'm a lesbian."

      "Are you interested in $NEWSPAPER?"
      "No, I'm sorry, my religion forbids me to consume hot dog buns, and it's well known that your paper contains recycled hot dog buns."

      --
      Zaphod B
      When duplication is outlawed, only outlaws will have /bin/cp
  46. No sympathy for the mercenary! by Sabu+mark · · Score: 1

    The only thing worse than a person who calls me up and harasses me - is a person who ACCEPTS MONEY to call me up and harass me.

    I know most of them don't like their jobs, but that doesn't change the fact that they are ABUSING PEOPLE FOR HIRE, which is despicable. At all times they have the opportunity to quit and find a job which doesn't involve abusing people, and which might even be more rewarding. But instead they have weighed the ethics of harassing people against the allure of money, and they have come down on the side of evil. I don't feel sorry for them at all. I'll make them pay.

    --

    What Would Jesus Do
    (for a Klondike bar)?
  47. the next bugaboo: intntl telemarketers! by rjnagle · · Score: 2

    I hate to deliver the bad news to you guys, but with the advent of cheap international telephone calls, the next logical step is for telemarketing calls to move overseas. Companies that make this move will no longer have to worry about TCPA and can literally call anytime. Perhaps the check to this lies in the companies that telemarketers promote; if they are big and international, they might be subject to TCPA, but it's doubtful whether Bangalore telemarketers for ATT put ATT at any risk of liability. I have been gathering evidence for some small claim TCPA actions. If you want to cost these companies money, demand that they send a written copy of this policy. (Although most telemarketers don't know this, TCPA requires it! If they don't, they are subject to a $500 penalty). And even if they do send it, it imposes a cost on telemarketing calls. More info at junkbusters .

    --
    Robert Nagle, Idiotprogrammer, Houston
    1. Re:the next bugaboo: intntl telemarketers! by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I'm an engineer, and I constantly get calls from people with thick, usually Jamaican-sounding, accents, asking to "verify" my information for a free subscription that I supposedly asked for.

      I immediately ask them "Who are you calling?" (because I don't answer the phone with my name) and they are never able to tell me. Unfortunately, they do not have to maintain a do-not-call list because they are not required to. They can call me right back after I hang up on them if they want to.

      I can always hear hundreds of voices in the background, because these are telemarketing sweatshops. These people probably get paid in food or something like that, to annoy the crap out of people.

      Last week was pitiful. The phones rang around my office for days on end. After conducting a brief non-scientific survey, I found out that the engineers I work with, on average, received 4 "magazine calls" per day last week. Adjusting that number for exaggeration gives at least twice per day.

      The saddest thing is that it's cheaper to call the U.S. from some third world country than it is to call across the river from here to New Jersey.

    2. Re:the next bugaboo: intntl telemarketers! by pben · · Score: 1

      There was a story on 60 Minutes about telemarketers using labor from India. They put the Indians through a two week boot camp where they worked on their accents and picked a fake American name and a fake American city to be calling from. They all liked the jobs because they were well paid for India.

      If I remember right Dell was one of the companies doing this. It puts their TV ads about the college kids just starting at Dell in a new light.

  48. Just make sure... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    There is some way around the blockage.

    Some telcos have a system that blocks all calls without caller ID info, PERIOD, with no way around it.

    Problem is that some PBX systems don't provide caller ID info to the outside world. This is the case at Cornell University - Caller ID info is not present for calls originating inside their system and going outside. This was a problem for someone who special-ordered from the Campus Store and only left a phone number as a contact. But his number blocked our "Your item is in!" (human, not automatic) calls, resulting in an irate customer coming in two weeks later.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Just make sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can be a problem for other people who don't want their number disclosed for perfectly valid reasons. For example, my father is a physician and often makes calls to patients after hours or on the weekends if he is on call. Many of these calls are made from his home. He found out the hard way when caller-ID came out, that if his patients have his home number, they call him there all the time.

  49. I live in rockville also. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    This is the gutter guy?!? I hate him. Fucker leaves me a message about onece every two weeks. PLus, i get all these call with dead air that ill bet are him also.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  50. As to that being illegal... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Since you gave that number as the contact info for their service, I believe that they were legally within their rights to call you there.

    But that is an exception. Most telemarketers are people you have had no prior business dealings with.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:As to that being illegal... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      They're allowed to call you once. Then, when you tell them you have a cell phone and don't want to receive any more calls, they can't call you any more. Of course, you can do this with a land-line, but then you're just going to show up on a new list a day or two later. With cell phones, only the small number of people you have an existing business relationship with can call once.

      In practice I've gotten two calls, from credit card companies, in the 3 years I've had my phone. Of course I've gotten two bank accounts rejected because they wouldn't accept a cell phone without a copy of my bill, and wouldn't accept a copy I printed myself (since I receive electronic-only bills).

  51. Do Not Call lists by iamweezman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Keeping a telemarketer on the phone playing games with them, lecturing them pressing a button or whatever else has been suggested really doesn't work well.


    Having worked on the phones way too much in a college infested town, I realize that even though these techniques may hurt the company and cause the telemarketer to hate his job even more it doesn't usually reduce the calls you get. In fact the ruder that you are the more likely that a telemarketer will get his only form of revenge on you by dispositioning the call as a no answer or not avaliable. This can cause the dialer to call you back within minutes with an unsuspecting new telemarketer on the line ready to give his pitch and annoy you again. Sure this makes the telemarketing company lose money, but you will not beat the odds in the end.


    Besides suing the company that calls you, the only way to gaurantee that you don't get called again is to ask to be put on the do not call list. This actually blocks the number on the dialer, and telemarketers would be much more likely to do this to a sensible and nice person who asks for them to please not call them. The average telemarketer hates his job and understands that people hate their calls. They hate getting calls too, so they will empathize with the one person that is actually decent and nice.


    As long as there are broke college students that will do anything to pay for their pizza, tuition, and books these marketing companies will always have cheap labor.

    1. Re:Do Not Call lists by skybozo · · Score: 1

      Amen to that! My standard response to telemarketers became "Put me on your Do Not Call list." In six weeks I stopped receiving telemarketing calls, and I haven't received any for two years.

  52. Formatting. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe that back in the day when WP and MSOffice were approximately even, WP had some formatting features that made it slightly better for legal documents.

    Apparently, over the years, MS has made Word more and more generic and LESS suited to legal use than it was in the past. Meanwhile, Corel realized that they have a good hold on the niche market of law firms, and began specifically catering to law firms.

    As a result, WP evolved into a vastly superior application for law firms. It's a niche market for Corel, but a VERY solid niche.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Formatting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should mention this, because I was involved with some legal action recently, and I noticed that both my lawyer and the opposition's lawyer both used WordPerfect.

      However, AbiWord had problems with the "1/2" character, which it substituted with a blank. My pleas to have them use decimal numbers went unheeded.

      It was interesting to get the WP doc via e-mail from an attorney, then use AbiWord to read it, and then use AbiWord to make a MicroSoft Word version of it, and to them pump it out to the others involved. I'm glad I run Linux exclusively!

  53. "OUT OF AREA" Explained by p.rican · · Score: 5, Informative

    The telco is not blocking the caller ID information. Caller ID is not guaranteed to work out of what is called your 'LATA' (Local Access Transport Area) If you live in NY, your LATA number is 132 which covers all 5 boros of NYC, Westchester County(?), Long Island and a little piece of Greenwich CT. The caller ID information is stored in a database that's part of a separate packet network called SS7. Your telco provider makes a 'dip' or databse query into a CNAM database to get caller ID info based on the number that is calling/called. This SS7 network is used in setting up calls and tearing them down as well as a myriad of other features it can provide. If Caller ID was guaranteed to work across the country between every carrier in the US, the length of time it would take to setup a phone call would be prohibitively long...That's just the basic jist of it. You don't realize how much goes on from the time you pick up your handset, dial some digits and get audible ringing.. Hope that clarifies the situation for you. Please don't mod me down as GEEK

    --

    /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

    1. Re:"OUT OF AREA" Explained by rwoodford · · Score: 1

      The Caller-ID with Name feature works on that database dip...not the Caller-ID itself. The return result from the dip is the name, etc. If they'd just link their databases, the Caller-ID with name would work over expanded areas and would not add any measurable amount to the call delivery time.

      The SS7 messaging carries the calling number from originating phone to terminating phone. Every switch and trunk in every carrier along the way must support SS7 for this to work. If there is a change in the signalling type on a trunk/switch, the calling number is invalidated as 'caller-id' and not displayed as such. It is still passed on to the next switch and used in the billing records.

      PBX switches originating calls will sometimes send a trunk number as caller id for all calls. It may or may not show up as caller id, but it will show up in the billing records.

    2. Re:"OUT OF AREA" Explained by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      BS

      Complete BS. The reason this happens is simply so that the telco's can charge you for another service to take care of the problem. They sell the telemarketers a service to block your Caller ID and then sell you a service to take care of the block.

      It's called double dipping pure and simple.

      I get calls all of the time clear across the country, and my ID box shows it except for some cell phones. Out of area calls are generally telemarketers.

      The poster saying there is some sort of technical reason for this, must work for a telco. Anyhow it is complete BS.

    3. Re:"OUT OF AREA" Explained by p.rican · · Score: 1

      You also have to keep in mind that the database dip is performed by the CALLED party ie: Caller A in New York calls Party B in California. Party B has Caller Id w/name on their phone. Party B's telco provider will perform the dip because the caller ID feature acts as a trigger telling the switch that it needs to check the CNAM database so it has something to display on Party B's caller ID box. That database dip will have to get Caller A's name info from Caller A's SS7 provider's SCP that contains their name info. This is assuming that the call path was SS7 the entire way between NY and California. That is why this service is not guaranteed out of your LATA. The chances that the call will pass over a non-SS7 segment may be small but the chance is still there. You may still have issues where these calling name databases are linked together correctly but the STP/SCP's may not be screening the SS7 messages properly. Moral: There are way too many variables that affect the SS7 messaging that can be set where any telco/SS7 provider can guarantee calling party info 100% of the time. If your carrier is guaranteeing this, they're most likely full of shit

      --

      /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

    4. Re:"OUT OF AREA" Explained by terraformer · · Score: 1
      Please don't mod me down as GEEK

      What, did you think you were posting to the message boards for GQ or Vouge?

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
  54. No awe, just shock. by raoulotoole · · Score: 4, Funny

    Like others, I have used otherwise unproductive time to play with these people.
    Instead of asking them to hold on or following a script I enjoy the opportunity of letting my imagination run wild. I find the funniest exchanges take place with plain old phone sex. If you're good you can keep them on the line for more than 15 minutes. The object is to keep them on the line until YOU decide to end the call.

    Start with-
    Are you wearing underwear? What color?
    Ask if they're touching themself during the call. Tell them you are.

    Ask if they are over 18. If they say yes, ask if they would like to meet in person. Tell them you will send them a plane ticket. Or tell them you'll meet them at the side door at the end of their shift.

    They either won't know what to say or will tell you the call is being recorded. Say "I know... I listen to my tapes late at night..."

    You get the idea.

  55. Is telemarketing wrong by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Service vs harrassment.

    If my ??? agent comes across a real "great deal" he should call me and tell me about it. Particularly if I opted in, this telemarketing should be permitted.

    Unsolicited, or great deals that aren't bother me.

    I have saved money from offers from existing business contacts.

  56. Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *too* much. Your version requires "to much" to be the infinitive of a verb and even then you'd need hows to make it strictly correct.

  57. Method to deal with Junk Faxes. by slappy_guru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait until Friday afternoon:

    1] If the return fax is an 800 # great!
    2] If not make sure your fax # is on an unlimited long distance plan
    3] Tape 3-4... 8.5 by 11 sheets together
    4] Write on them "UNSOLICITED FAXING IS AGAINST FEDRAL LAW!!!!"
    5] Feed into fax machine and tape the first sheet to the last sheet.
    6] Program the return fax # into your fax.
    7] Hit send key !!!
    8] If you feel like it stop the call on Monday, unless you have already run the junk faxer out of paper and the call is already stopped!

    --
    "Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it" Richard Feynman
    1. Re:Method to deal with Junk Faxes. by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      >>

      Because it's important for them to know that they've antagonized an illiterate!

    2. Re:Method to deal with Junk Faxes. by sid+crimson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or... find black paper and write your message in white ink. :-D

      -sid

  58. The New Mass Do Not Call List works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We finally got a do not call list here in Mass. It went into effect April 1st and I have had ZERO telemarketing calls since then. That's right, over one full month without any telemarketing calls! Non-profit groups and politicians can still call because they are not affected by the law, but I very rarely got any calls from them in the past. If I get any calls from them in the future, I will inform them that I will NEVER donate to any charity or group that uses telemarketing, and I mean FOREVER. I will also refuse to vote for any politician POS who calls me trying to get my vote.
    I will be keeping a list of all the non profit groups and politicians who call me, so that they never receive any money or any votes from me.

    I had been telling every single telemarketer who called me to put me on their do not call list for the last 10 years and it never did shit. I still got at least two to three telemarketing calls almost every single day. Most of the companies would add me to their do not call list, but of course there are thousands of companies who call, so the number of calls always averaged about the same amount per day no matter how many times I said "Please add this number to your do not call list". I'm really happy so far with the results of the new Mass do not call list. I just hope we don't get some weaker National do not call list that overrides the Mass do not call list.

  59. Isn't it ironic? by coke_dite · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When I was a telemarketer (don't shoot me please, I was starving!), we sold magazine subscriptions to people in Mississippi-Alabama-Louisiana from a little office in Ottawa, Canada. I find it amusing that telemarketers will now be required to transmit Caller ID information :) Back then, we were ORDERED to dial *67 (or whatever the ID Block thing is) before EACH call, so that the calls couldn't be traced easily. Never mind the fact that we were calling from outside the country in an attempt to circumvent US laws (didn't work tho, the company that we were contracted to was US-based, so the owner got screwed that way). Funny things, those laws. Most people running call centres here haven't got the slightest clue. I'm sure the owners of the companies are a little more aware, but the people actually working the floors don't know squat.

    I'd be interested to see what the laws are in Canada.

    --
    Visit us at http://www.iblist.com!
  60. My point is... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    My point is that this guy made the decision, he bears responsiblity for it.

    Trying to excuse this by blaming the scum that sold him the equipment is wrong - Mr. HandyMoron wrote the check, Mr. HandyMoron caused the equipment to be set up, Mr. HandyMoron is to blame.

    I am SO damn tired of this "It's not my fault!" society we found ourselves in - and I am trying, in my own way, to DO something about it. So every time I see somebody saying "It's not my fault - blame somebody else" I point out the STUPIDITY of that position.

  61. *Sniff* That's the most beautiful thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I've ever read.

  62. us laws wont stop them. by bani · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the worst telemarketer fraud is from companies operating in canada, in order to avoid US law. canadianus telco rates are low enough that its economical enough for them to operate like this.

  63. That's good, not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta remember: the telemarketing folks are usually poorly paid, and worked hard.

    If it's good for them, don't begrudge them of it.

    Your grudge is against the company that hires junk mass marketing.

  64. Business Reply Envelopes by phriedom · · Score: 1

    I was all set to start sending junk mail back to the senders, as heavy as possible. I had a whole stack ready for the mailbox. But then I stopped and thought about it: of all the kinds of advertising, telemarketing, commercial email, television, radio, newspapers, magazines, flyers, billboards, etc. Magaines, newspapers and junk mail bother me the least.

    I bought a shredder and shred any junk mail with my name on it, then all the shredded and unshredded mail go into curbside recycling. It probably costs me a couple minutes a month. Sure, some trees were harmed in the making of these ads, but if I minimize that by recycling, there isn't much of a downside to junk mail. So I don't really want to make junk mail more expensive for businesses and drive them to some other form of more annoying advertising.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  65. Suing Prerecorded Telemarketers? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Kewl, I've been getting phone calls from someone claiming to be calling from the Police Benevolence Association, which started off with a prerecorded message telling me all their representatives were busy and that I should wait for one of them to talk to me. Next time that happens, I'm gonna follow the lawyer's procedure and make me some bling bling! Woot!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  66. Ob. M.P. quote... by jpetts · · Score: 1

    Considering your screen name of jonJOHNSON I'd say that is QUITE a mis-pronounciation!

    No, it's spelt "Raymond Luxury-Yacht", but it's pronounced "Throatwobbler Mangrove"...

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  67. 911 is free. by michaelhood · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your local ILEC telco is required by law to provide you with a dialtone for 911 usage, so if you cancelled your landline, you should still have a dialtone on the line, which can only be used to call 911.

  68. Ever get those Chimney sweeper calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good friend's father got a call from a chimney sweeper, it went something like this:

    father: Hello
    Telemarker: Hello, Mr.X this is Acme chimney cleaning, we cleaned your chimney last year and we're calling you to....
    father: Did you do a good job?
    Telemarker: Yes of course we always.....
    father: Well then i guess i don't need it done this year. *click*

    He never had the chimney cleaned which makes it even better.

  69. how to not get any more telemarketing calls. by herrd0kt0r · · Score: 1

    see, whatchoo gotta do is, like, just baffle them. and tie up as much of their time as possible.

    for example, several months ago, while a friend and i were in the middle of a drunken jam, this telemarketer kept calling. i refused to answer, until finally i had had enough.

    we had a minidisc recorder going at the time, to capture the drunken jam session LIVE! you know, to offer bootlegs to all 2 of our fans. and i had a small little intercom/speakerphone button on my cordless phone. spiffy, no?

    so click here if you wanna hear what happens when a telemarketer calls a couple of drunks trying to make crappy music.

    if you listen closely, you can hear the telemarketer try to do her job without laughing. you can hear me, toyotally blitzed, trying to answer her questions but getting them wrong ("NO!" she says! POW!) anyway, i have no idea why i said shoney's, as i've never eaten in a shoney's.

    anyway, i think we defeated her by the end. i hope you enjoy.

    1. Re:how to not get any more telemarketing calls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad your link doesn't work

    2. Re:how to not get any more telemarketing calls. by herrd0kt0r · · Score: 1

      odd. i tried it in preview, tried it just now, and it works fine. dunno.

  70. Yes! by jefu · · Score: 1
    I've used this now a number of times. There's something just so much fun about keeping them talking and then finishing with "OK, thanks, been good talking to you..." and hanging up before they have the chance to launch into their spiel.

    A couple times I've heard the person on the other end make comments to someone else that it sounds like I'm using a script like he/she has.

    I've also experimented with moving off this script and trying to get personal information about the person at the other end (name, home address....). They get seriously disturbed for some odd reason.

  71. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screen your calls. Do you really HAVE to pick up the phone on the second ring? No. If someone can't wait until your machine picks up then you probably don't want to talk to them anyhow. If I recognize the number on callerID then I'll pick it up early. If it's unlisted I walk away and forget about the call. If it's a number I don't recognize, I'll let the machine get it. I clearly state in my message that I don't pick up unlisted calls or numbers I don't recognize and that they should leave a message or talk to my machine to see if I'm there. That works well enough for me. My folks and I use Sam's Club calling cards *about 3 cents a minute) for our long distance. Usually our calls appear to come from 770 and callerID won't see a name for the call (just the number). This method works very well for me. If I do for some reason accidentally pick up the phone, as soon as I realize it's a sales call I place the computer on the TV and flip on a porno I have queued up for just such an occasion. I don't really know how long the average person listens. I just walk away. :)

  72. Huh? by ripewithdecay · · Score: 1

    What hell kinda lawyer puts a link to a goat on his webpage? ...

    Oh, I just answered my own question.

  73. Best answer to telemarketers by alphorn · · Score: 1

    When you get a call from a telemarketer, just tell them "Oh, this sounds intriguing, but I have to go right now. I could call back in the evening tough, what's your home number?" They will of course reply that they don't want to get calls at home, to which you reply "Gee, that's funny, neither do I" and hang up.

  74. Technical measures by Thyrsus · · Score: 1

    My favorite part is the page generating fake e-mail addresses for the spam bots to consume. If you missed it, you can go straight there.

  75. don't hate me but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a telemarketer to avoid sleeping in the streets, and when I placed calls to people WHO HAD PREVIOUSLY DONATED TO THE LOCAL POLICE UNION one said the person had died, I told them what the paper slip in front of me said about what they had donated previously and asked if if they cared to donate a similar amout IN THE NAME OF THE DECEASED. They doubled the amount.
    True story. By the way, I'm now on disability due to health problems incurred when I WAS homeless due to being illegally evicted by police by a landowner's son who forged papers to steal his eccentric grandmother's property. My lawsuit is proceding unbelievably slowly.

  76. Telemarketers are FUN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you use a soundboard like one of these:

    http://www.ebaumsworld.com/soundboards.shtml

    I wait for them to call every night so they can talk to Arnold.

  77. not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last I heard, the laws governing not for profit telephone calls are different in that the free speach ammendment applies.

    No U.S. government may make a law preventing me from calling you to donate to a religion, political cause, not for profit group, etc.

    Police Benevolent groups are definitly not for profit as defined by law.

  78. no call list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I put my list on Wisconsin's no call list - i have had almost no telemarketing calls.

    I still get a call from a 614 area code saying "Please return this call regarding a business matter." They give no name of the company or a name of a person.

    I got a call once from some company Pizaa Hut hired to ask customers about their visit. Calls like this are still legal.

    A national no call list will really help. Some telemarketers may try to still call - but the penalities in Wisconsin are actually pretty stiff - so most telemarketers make sure they don't call someone who doesn't want to be bothered.

  79. grammar libertarian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I immediately ask them "Who are you calling?" (because I don't answer the phone with my name) and they are never able to tell me.

    Perhaps if you asked 'Whom are you calling,' they would understand the question? That is what you were trying to say, no?

  80. SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jji14fbk02@sneakemail.com

  81. Re:Keep em on the phone - good idea! by epsalon · · Score: 1

    But think: She was actually being paid for these 13:42 minutes.

  82. Jeez, dude by fm6 · · Score: 1

    This is Slashdot, fer crisakes. If you're not a geek, you don't belong here!