It would seem to me that the money spent paying their lawyers might have been better spent building anti cheat methods. Or better had been spent doing it from the start in the first place...
I've played a lot of games in my time, and run their cheat protections. Epic games (Fortnite) is the only one to block PowerPro, makes a lot of sense to me.
I like Fortnite, it's very much like PUBG. I don't like cheaters. If this causes concern for others so be it, maybe they will stop.
That said I've not seen any cheats/cheating in Fortnite. I shoot someone and they kill me - I'm able to see the damage I inflicted as I become a spectator at that point. And always satisfied it being a good kill.
I hear ya. Company switched from Sophos to Cylance this year. A program one of the units has used for years suddenly won't work after install. I find out the folder is empty except for a few readme files. I monitor the folder as I'm installing and watch as the files appear and disappear. Cyber security claims Cylance isn't doing it but nothing else has changed. Six months and I still can't install the program and they refuse to help me troubleshoot.
This can also be a driver feature of Windows 10, Try this: Run: bcdedit/set TESTSIGNING ON > reboot > install program > see if it works
Test mode will be shown bottom right,
Disable Testmode Run: bcdedit/set TESTSIGNING OFF > reboot > and the program will be gone, but you will know for sure.
Google's next new feature will be to require users to raise their hand and ask permission before typing a URL in the address bar. If you aren't clicking a link in a Google search result page you're just asking for trouble!
I'd rather it ask permission than not allow a download. Comodo firewall deleted a keygenerator I use. Not put it in a safe place or recycle bin but removed it, without a word.
While in space most likely. The fact that we're even able to classify it bacteria rather than a foreign micro organism is telling.
There is no we.
While I beleive this find only a matter of time. This is from one Russian cosmonaut without any real cites.
Anton Shkaplerov Education: "Shkaplerov completed Yak-52 flight training at the Sevastopol Aviation Club in 1989. After graduation from Sevastopol High School in 1989, he entered the Kachinsk Air Force Pilot School graduating in 1994 as pilot-engineer. In 1997 he graduated from the N. E. Zukovskiy Air Force Engineering." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I find it ironic that it was released by The independent.
I assume all Google Store applications track and use the camera, after running an Application I'll go into settings > apps and force stop the application. The Front camera has electrical tape over it, fingernail polish keeps coming off.
Age of consent is irrelevant. There are plenty of jurisdictions where it is legal for a person to have sex, but illegal for the same person to take a nude selfie.
The difference is that the sex does not require technology.
Standing in line at the water park I'd taken my son to, a 13 year old girl starting chatting indicating she was fairly loose.
Figure I gave her my number as coming home from work one day a message on the answering machine was from her, she said she was looking for some fun by could get by with just eating her girlfriends junk. No return number given, and the last contact I had with them.
From Win3/NT I've run almost every version of windows in a dual boot manner. Many programs I use are an install once, move many. I created a separate directory for them off of the C: Drive, and installed them there.
Now with Linux Mint I can go to that programs directory, right click on the executable, and run with wine. It works very well for me.
My only loss is PowerPro http://powerpro.cresadu.com/ it's so integrated into Windows it's a waste of time trying to get it to work.
I had to disable my HOSTS file to view the page. Too much hassle to find the sites involved, but data collection most likely. While proporting to be a protection move for the under aged, it's but one step closer to taking away my parental rights of what I allow or block.
I'm also waiting to see if this logging in is to be a rule rather than an option. I don't log into Youtube unless I have a real need. If an inappropriate call on a video displays, I'm told I have to log in, at which point that video isn't that important to me; and I move on.
This was Microsoft's stand for the longest time, it cost too much for the extra time it took to test.
"It all comes back to one programmer being careless," Paller said. "You wrote a program, asked someone for input, gave them space for a certain amount of characters, and didn't check to see if the program could take more. You are incompetent, and you are the problem. One guy making that mistake is creating all the work for the rest of us." https://www.cnet.com/news/stud...
True but on the other hand logging in allows him to save favorite videos and it doesn't really address the issue.
It was a thought, I know you have no history when not logging in, but Google doesn't play stupid and the subject you last perfered is offered.
Another thought is too far out to suggest, but not to mention:) I have two grandkids. When the need to pacify them arrises, I pull out my cell phone that I've previously transfered cartoons to. It works very well for me, BooBa and Oddbods my buddies (sound not required).
So my is severely autistic and loves you tube. There are videos he finds related to elmo or what have you that start innocent and devolve into epilepsy inducing random loud music, screaming, and what not.
I will delete them from history but they get recommended again.
Can I just flag a video as 'Never show me this again', would that be so hard?
You don't log into youtube.com and you fare better.
I have a video that saw an influx of viewers (400K+) and have their demographics, much only available if they had logged in.
is very happy about this.
It would seem to me that the money spent paying their lawyers might have been better spent building anti cheat methods. Or better had been spent doing it from the start in the first place...
I run Windows and with it PowerPro http://powerpro.cresadu.com/ it's always been like that.
I've played a lot of games in my time, and run their cheat protections. Epic games (Fortnite) is the only one to block PowerPro, makes a lot of sense to me.
I like Fortnite, it's very much like PUBG. I don't like cheaters. If this causes concern for others so be it, maybe they will stop.
That said I've not seen any cheats/cheating in Fortnite. I shoot someone and they kill me - I'm able to see the damage I inflicted as I become a spectator at that point. And always satisfied it being a good kill.
I hear ya. Company switched from Sophos to Cylance this year. A program one of the units has used for years suddenly won't work after install. I find out the folder is empty except for a few readme files. I monitor the folder as I'm installing and watch as the files appear and disappear. Cyber security claims Cylance isn't doing it but nothing else has changed. Six months and I still can't install the program and they refuse to help me troubleshoot.
This can also be a driver feature of Windows 10, Try this: Run: bcdedit /set TESTSIGNING ON > reboot > install program > see if it works
Test mode will be shown bottom right,
Disable Testmode /set TESTSIGNING OFF > reboot > and the program will be gone, but you will know for sure.
Run: bcdedit
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-... says use - I use /
That's why you burn stuff to optical storage. At least, things you don't want to be disappeared by agents on your system without your permission.
Where it came from. Back into Linux Mint and ran it without a problem useing Wine. Chocked it up to lesson learned.
I have open home page on start-up, yet it apologizes it couldn't open the last open pages when loaded. Windows and Linux Mint every time.
This hasn't changed through the updates.
Google's next new feature will be to require users to raise their hand and ask permission before typing a URL in the address bar. If you aren't clicking a link in a Google search result page you're just asking for trouble!
I'd rather it ask permission than not allow a download. Comodo firewall deleted a keygenerator I use. Not put it in a safe place or recycle bin but removed it, without a word.
I can't think of any another reason for the weasel word justification other than they didn't.
It's called GNU/Linux. GNU/Linux. Why won't you fucking call it GNU/Linux.
- rms
Cause that's encryption and from the code provided by Phil Zimmermann's PGP.
Don't expect media and the markets to use the officially approved nerd dictionary.
Calling a police officer a cop was once a derogatory remark, you see how that one worked out.
While in space most likely. The fact that we're even able to classify it bacteria rather than a foreign micro organism is telling.
There is no we.
While I beleive this find only a matter of time. This is from one Russian cosmonaut without any real cites.
Anton Shkaplerov Education:
"Shkaplerov completed Yak-52 flight training at the Sevastopol Aviation Club in 1989. After graduation from Sevastopol High School in 1989, he entered the Kachinsk Air Force Pilot School graduating in 1994 as pilot-engineer. In 1997 he graduated from the N. E. Zukovskiy Air Force Engineering."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I find it ironic that it was released by The independent.
I'm also inputting the info from https://exodus-privacy.eu.org/ into my router.
I had to type it out for myself, so posted for others use. https://slashdot.org/journal/2...
I assume all Google Store applications track and use the camera, after running an Application I'll go into settings > apps and force stop the application. The Front camera has electrical tape over it, fingernail polish keeps coming off.
A game I'll switch to airplane mode as well.
I'm also inputting the info from https://exodus-privacy.eu.org/ into my router.
It's the best I can do...
Age of consent is irrelevant. There are plenty of jurisdictions where it is legal for a person to have sex, but illegal for the same person to take a nude selfie.
The difference is that the sex does not require technology.
"Indiana court rules that sex with 16-year-olds is fine, but sexting them is not" https://nypost.com/2017/10/04/...
Intent (mens rea) is always an issue in crime.
But yes, in reality it gets to be pretty bizarre.
Standing in line at the water park I'd taken my son to, a 13 year old girl starting chatting indicating she was fairly loose.
Figure I gave her my number as coming home from work one day a message on the answering machine was from her, she said she was looking for some fun by could get by with just eating her girlfriends junk. No return number given, and the last contact I had with them.
Now who's intent, and who would of burned.
I could of made short work on their research and findings.
From Win3/NT I've run almost every version of windows in a dual boot manner. Many programs I use are an install once, move many.
I created a separate directory for them off of the C: Drive, and installed them there.
Now with Linux Mint I can go to that programs directory, right click on the executable, and run with wine. It works very well for me.
My only loss is PowerPro http://powerpro.cresadu.com/ it's so integrated into Windows it's a waste of time trying to get it to work.
Won't someone think of the minors?
Ironically: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I had to disable my HOSTS file to view the page. Too much hassle to find the sites involved, but data collection most likely. While proporting to be a protection move for the under aged, it's but one step closer to taking away my parental rights of what I allow or block.
I'm also waiting to see if this logging in is to be a rule rather than an option. I don't log into Youtube unless I have a real need. If an inappropriate call on a video displays, I'm told I have to log in, at which point that video isn't that important to me; and I move on.
Exactly who's call is this? And will it be regionally implemented.
This was Microsoft's stand for the longest time, it cost too much for the extra time it took to test.
"It all comes back to one programmer being careless," Paller said. "You wrote a program, asked someone for input, gave them space for a certain amount of characters, and didn't check to see if the program could take more. You are incompetent, and you are the problem. One guy making that mistake is creating all the work for the rest of us." https://www.cnet.com/news/stud...
With a whistle out of a Captain Crunch cereal box he owned the phone system at the time.
True but on the other hand logging in allows him to save favorite videos and it doesn't really address the issue.
It was a thought, I know you have no history when not logging in, but Google doesn't play stupid and the subject you last perfered is offered.
Another thought is too far out to suggest, but not to mention :) I have two grandkids. When the need to pacify them arrises, I pull out my cell phone that I've previously transfered cartoons to. It works very well for me, BooBa and Oddbods my buddies (sound not required).
So my is severely autistic and loves you tube. There are videos he finds related to elmo or what have you that start innocent and devolve into epilepsy inducing random loud music, screaming, and what not.
I will delete them from history but they get recommended again.
Can I just flag a video as 'Never show me this again', would that be so hard?
You don't log into youtube.com and you fare better.
I have a video that saw an influx of viewers (400K+) and have their demographics, much only available if they had logged in.
I should add this was removed when I linked to it.