"The question is 'Is there a possibility that an astronaut on a very long mission could arrive at the end of that mission unable to see, or be so visual compromised that he'd be non-functional?' The possibility is real enough that they need to look into this,"
I like how the concern is not that the astronauts will have to live the rest of their lives blind after getting home but that they migh not be able to do research.
I have a relative who breeds pigeons. They are not even close to those infected zombies you see in a city. In fact, they are much closer to a chicken in size. And they are delicious.
1. Those parents will always find something to complain about.
2. This is a matter of discipline. Yes, it's easy for incompetent teachers to blame the phones for the lack of order, but it doesn't make it true.
3. Bullying and fights existed before phones, again this is a disciplinary issue. Recording bullying is a good thing those assholes effectively incriminate themselves, now they can't deny it and get kicked out of school fast. You already mentioned theft, yes it's hard to prevent and requires additional effort from the school, but if a kid uses an old worthless phone noone will steal it.
I hate assembling IKEA stuff but it's is still much easier than trying to move a prebuilt furniture to the room. First you have to pay extra for delivery as it doesn't fit into a car. Then you need to rearrange your home to make way for it. After that you need two people, who, in perfect unison, try to move it through the house without hitting any lamps or mirrors, painfully forcing it through every door. And if one of your doors is too small, when then you are out of luck.
What most likely happened is that these guys were arrested by IP because of a DoS attack they participated in after wich investigators found proof of other hacks on their computer.
A major advantage of non-browser games is that they don't require an internet connection and with always-on DRM this barrier is, in fact, disappearing.
It doesn't necessarily have to be about points. It could about given certain primary objectives from your paper to document, and the challenge is getting there without being shot. Or it could have an investigative part where you have to get information out of reluctant soldiers and frightened/hostile civilians about places where interesting stuff happens than getting in and out of there without being seen, adding a sneaking element. But I too, am sceptical.
Well I was speaking on a bit more global scale. There wasn't a big war since WW2 and this is primarily due to nukes. Yes, they have nasty sideeffects but they don't actually have to be used. Also, terrorism is more of a police/domestic security issue than military. If you can't fight terrorists it's not because you don't have strong enough weapons but because you don't know who they are. Also, most terrorist tend to be badly equipped and trained, and operating alone or in small groups, you don't need an army against them. Korea and Vietnam are also bad examples, the reason America didn't use nukes was that Russia and China also had them, it was mutual deterrence that kept it from using them. That doesn't mean that because both parties are afraid to use nukes, their effects can be neglected. In fact, it was the fear of a nuclear weapons that prevented Korea and Vietnam to escalate into full-scale wars. It didn't really matter how good technology the opponents had because both parties knew that they can not use their full strength. Korea and Vietnam were just a flexing of muscles.
Now that's true that some of the new weapons do have a limited use, that's why I tried to put it cautiously. What I was referring to is that the global robotic war that some here had envisioned has no chance of happening.
I wasn't speaking of the tone of his comments but that he didn't disclose any specific feature at all. What he said could be true to any other smartphone.
Slashdot Mirror
This algorithm might be more optimal but is also slower than the alternatives. Electricity is cheap, time is not.
I'm not American.
I like how the concern is not that the astronauts will have to live the rest of their lives blind after getting home but that they migh not be able to do research.
I have a relative who breeds pigeons. They are not even close to those infected zombies you see in a city. In fact, they are much closer to a chicken in size. And they are delicious.
What's really interesting is that this theoretically also could be used to view memories.
They will just hide behind their parliamentary immunity .
A lot of schools ban them by default even if it's not used in class.
I hate assembling IKEA stuff but it's is still much easier than trying to move a prebuilt furniture to the room. First you have to pay extra for delivery as it doesn't fit into a car. Then you need to rearrange your home to make way for it. After that you need two people, who, in perfect unison, try to move it through the house without hitting any lamps or mirrors, painfully forcing it through every door. And if one of your doors is too small, when then you are out of luck.
What most likely happened is that these guys were arrested by IP because of a DoS attack they participated in after wich investigators found proof of other hacks on their computer.
I did not debate that just pointed out that in this specific case the rice only affects the way genes are read, not the genes themselves.
The biggest problem of copper is latency not bandwith.
A major advantage of non-browser games is that they don't require an internet connection and with always-on DRM this barrier is, in fact, disappearing.
If you play as a pacifist Tourist then it has some similarities.
It doesn't necessarily have to be about points. It could about given certain primary objectives from your paper to document, and the challenge is getting there without being shot. Or it could have an investigative part where you have to get information out of reluctant soldiers and frightened/hostile civilians about places where interesting stuff happens than getting in and out of there without being seen, adding a sneaking element. But I too, am sceptical.
While it's nice that they have banned this the fact that certain financial/legal strategies are still patentable in America is ridiculos.
This only affects the way genes are read not the way they are copied. Rice has little to do with reproduction.
Not if it's used only in small quantities. We are talking about nanoscale here. Like the gold in chips doesn't make them expensive.
Indeed, I am a supporter of nuclear power but i do think that boiling water reactors should be closed and replaced with safer modern ones.
Only Catholics and Orthodoxes do it, Protestants don't. And the problem is not really with the image itself but with praising it as God.
Well I was speaking on a bit more global scale. There wasn't a big war since WW2 and this is primarily due to nukes. Yes, they have nasty sideeffects but they don't actually have to be used. Also, terrorism is more of a police/domestic security issue than military. If you can't fight terrorists it's not because you don't have strong enough weapons but because you don't know who they are. Also, most terrorist tend to be badly equipped and trained, and operating alone or in small groups, you don't need an army against them. Korea and Vietnam are also bad examples, the reason America didn't use nukes was that Russia and China also had them, it was mutual deterrence that kept it from using them. That doesn't mean that because both parties are afraid to use nukes, their effects can be neglected. In fact, it was the fear of a nuclear weapons that prevented Korea and Vietnam to escalate into full-scale wars. It didn't really matter how good technology the opponents had because both parties knew that they can not use their full strength. Korea and Vietnam were just a flexing of muscles. Now that's true that some of the new weapons do have a limited use, that's why I tried to put it cautiously. What I was referring to is that the global robotic war that some here had envisioned has no chance of happening.
I wasn't speaking of the tone of his comments but that he didn't disclose any specific feature at all. What he said could be true to any other smartphone.
Well WP7 will not necessarily be like Windows Mobile so let's just save the bashing until it comes out.
No, the tweets mentioned in the article are still there but that is all.
I couldn't find any specific thing in his tweets that would justify firing the man.