Slashdot Mirror


Element 118 Created

BuzzSkyline writes, "The heaviest element yet, Element 118, has been created in Dubna, Russia by a collaboration of researchers from Russia's Joint Institute for Nuclear Research and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the US. They created the new element by fusing together Californium (element 98) and Calcium atoms. The achievement comes five years after the scandal-plagued retraction of an earlier claim, which was based on fabricated data, that three atoms of element 118 had been produced at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California. The achievement was reported on October 9 in the journal Physical Review C (subscription needed to read more than the abstract)."

244 comments

  1. Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny


    I have ten pounds of Element 119 right here...

    1. Re:Big deal by TobyRush · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have ten pounds of Element 119 right here...

      Dude, for the last time, that's not Element 119. They're called "CornNuts." And they don't give you, or anyone else, "special powers."

      --
      Sam! If you will let me be,
      I will try them.
      You will see.
    2. Re:Big deal by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think having 10 pounds of cornnuts is a special power in itself.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Big deal by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think having 10 pounds of cornnuts is a special power in itself.

      Anybody can get 10 pounds of cornnuts.

      It's eating the 10 pounds of cornnuts that requires superhuman abilities.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    4. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so heavy that 10 pounds of that weighs 30 pounds.

    5. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could have any special power it would be the ability to make people shit their pants

  2. Not Politically Correct by civman2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Guys, you can't just tell an element as young as element 118 it's heavy. You'll crush its self esteem. I think the proper term these days is "in danger of becoming overweight".

    1. Re:Not Politically Correct by Rahga · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think self esteem is in danger here... the Californium will just inject a more Calcium atoms here and there, and BAM! Instant confidence.

    2. Re:Not Politically Correct by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Funny

      The poor thing might come to pieces.

  3. A ways to go before element 137 by NoInfo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Element 137 should be the max element: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Untriseptium

    1. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Keep reading. The article says that a relativistic solution to that estimation indicates 138 is the heaviest.

      Beyond that, it's just an estimate. The universe is full of surprises.

    2. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Neutron stars are just big nuclei, and they contain billions of billions of moles of nucleons. Though they contain few protons per neutron I would imagine there are a few out there with more than a mere 137 protons.

    3. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by CUatTHEFINISH · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no... That entry is wrong. There's always ludicrous speed. "Oh no, the electron has just gone... plaid!"

    4. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by uolirod · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I think you must mean Ludacris speed.

    5. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by MadUndergrad · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. He didn't.

    6. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by QuantumPion · · Score: 3, Informative
      Neutron stars are just big nuclei, and they contain billions of billions of moles of nucleons.

      But neutron stars are held together by gravity, not the strong nuclear force (as far as we know).

    7. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by abbamouse · · Score: 1

      I thought neutron stars were composed of neutrons because gravity forced energy from protons, transforming them into neutrons. Am I wrong about this? No matter how many neutrons you have, you need protons to make a nucleus.

      --
      Make cheese not war 8:)
    8. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, that article gives some rather kooky looking webpages on the internet as references for its source material.

    9. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by coaxial · · Score: 5, Funny

      So would that make the atomic number of Unobtainium 139?

    10. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      "In fact, about the only thing that the number relates to at all is the room in which the great physicist Wolfgang Pauli died: room 137."

      Uh...Pauli Exclusion Principle? Uhh...yeah. Schroedinger must be having a cat.

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    11. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's to prevent the creation of an element without a 1s orbital electron?

    12. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by GeffDE · · Score: 1

      Physics. That's what.

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    13. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Am I wrong about this?"

      Yes.

    14. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by Tastycat · · Score: 1

      I'd still rather not have scientists in Russia creating tiny little neutron stars. I think that is one of those things that could spiral out of control quite quickly.

    15. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by LindseyJ · · Score: 1

      The power of the sun... in the PALM OF MY HAND!

    16. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by Patentmat · · Score: 1
      You both read it wrong, go read it just one more time, very carefully - - it states 138 is possible but certainly does not indicate it is the heaviest possible.

      >138 is certainly possible.

    17. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 1

      The gravitational collapse forces the electrons and protons together forming neutral neutrons. The process actually adds to the proton; it doesn't remove energy.

    18. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by smithmc · · Score: 1

        Keep reading. The article says that a relativistic solution to that estimation indicates 138 is the heaviest.

      It doesn't say that, either. It says that 138 would be the heaviest element that could have 1s electrons. So maybe all elements higher than 138 can exist only as positive ions...?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    19. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      So you're saying you can't drop more than 137 protons into a neutron star?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    20. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I wonder if its the same for Quark stars?

      --
      I don't get it.
    21. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by sjames · · Score: 1

      So maybe all elements higher than 138 can exist only as positive ions...?

      The problem is, if a theoretical atom of element 139 captures just one electron, it must occupy s1. That means it will combine w/ a proton and the atom becomes element 138.

    22. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Whoops, not any more!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    23. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by nova_ostrich · · Score: 1

      Is that the speed at which rappers are known to wear plaid?

      --
      It's scary being a Flash and Flex developer on Slashdot. You guys are unnaturally rabid.
    24. Re:A ways to go before element 137 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quark stars are held together by the strong force.

        Which is responsible for some rather interesting behavior. Their density profile is very flat up till the very edge of the star with a very sharp drop off over a distance on the scale of a nucleus.

      This different structure is how we know that we've observed neutron stars and not quark stars. Because of the uniform density of quark stars, they have virtually no internal structure, unlike neutron stars. Neutron stars can have multiple layers which result in starquakes, at least in "young" neutron stars. This causes observable "glitches" in the rotation of pulsars, where their rotation speeds up, thereby identifying them as neutron stars and not quark stars.

  4. Um... so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What's the significance of this? Is there any reason other than "cuz we could"?

    1. Re:Um... so? by belg4mit · · Score: 5, Informative

      118 Is supposed to be the first element of the Magic Island of Stability, doubly magic even.
      Most man-made elements (Plutonium+) are incredibly short-lived and make poor paper weights.
      Learn something http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3313/02.ht ml

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:Um... so? by belg4mit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Doh! Sorry, I mean 114. :-/

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    3. Re:Um... so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah really. The unintelligent masses at Digg await your shameful return.

    4. Re:Um... so? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      They have a big contract with an editor of periodic tables. Now that everybody has to update, they get 5% of the sales.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    5. Re:Um... so? by Klaidas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Was there any reason to create anything above 640K? I mean, wasn't it enough for everybody?!

    6. Re:Um... so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is this island, and are they allowing immigration? I want to move from this festering land of instability.

    7. Re:Um... so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We said that about C++, too, but it really took off.

  5. element by mkominek · · Score: 0, Troll

    that is a good element

  6. Just in time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quick, gate it through K'Tau's sun before it's too late!

    1. Re:Just in time by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      "Red Sky" was a great episode :)

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  7. Is it the same fraudster? by dorpus · · Score: 1

    The fraudulent "discovery" at LLNL was made by a visiting Russian scientist, too. The LLNL link is too polite to say so.

    1. Re:Is it the same fraudster? by LanceUppercut · · Score: 0, Troll

      Of course, of course... Now, when the actual success was achieved in Russia, America will quickly switch to a "damage control" mode. That Russian scamster defintely wanted to do it in America the first time. LOL.

      You gotta love those Americans and their inferiority complexes...

    2. Re:Is it the same fraudster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that he was a german-trained Bulgarian.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Ninov

    3. Re:Is it the same fraudster? by SillySnake · · Score: 1

      Hey! We love our inferiority complexes!

      http://www.wartsworld.com/patch.html My Diablo II Mod

    4. Re:Is it the same fraudster? by rtjohn · · Score: 5, Funny

      My inferiority complex isn't as good as your's

  8. I created 119 at home by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    but it was too fuckin heavy to drag to the lab so i let it decay.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  9. 118, eh? by vic.tz · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll believe it when I see it!

    1. Re:118, eh? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Don't blink.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  10. Truthiness. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny
    The achievement comes five years after the scandal-plagued retraction of an earlier claim, which was based on fabricated data, that three atoms of element 118 had been produced at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California.

    So I guess this announcement has an element of truth about it...

    [OK, shoot me now.]

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  11. And now the fun begins by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Any ideas as to what this one will be called? Probably something with pop culture appeal? My votes:
    • Googlium (now with proton-sized ads!)
    • Podcastium
    • Blogium
    • Britneyspearsium
    • Vistanium
    • Thisisthelastoneweswearium
    • Kimilsungium (dammit, is that radioactive!?)

    I sure hope they name it something nice though. "Ununoctium", "Kurchatovium" and "Hassium" don't exactly roll off the tongue. No pun intended...

    Okay... back to work.

    1. Re:And now the fun begins by bcjanes · · Score: 2, Funny

      The name has been around for a couple of years now... Unobtainium!! Haven't you seen The Core? In fact, we already know it's properties - Gets stronger when under pressure, and converts heat to electricity!

      --
      Linux is unix training wheels, while BSD *is* unix.
    2. Re:And now the fun begins by brian.glanz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ha, ha ... There was that long controversy with naming before, so the last time someone thought they'd created 118, they intended to name it Ghiorsium after Albert Ghiorso who "helped discover numerous chemical elements." I'd expect something similarly NOT controversial, while IUPAC will likely settle any disputes like they did for the long-disputed transfermiums in 1997. These are some of the same guys right? so maybe still "Ghiorsium," and maybe we'll find out tomorrow at the press conference. BG

    3. Re:And now the fun begins by AWeishaupt · · Score: 1

      I think it's about time we named one of these elements Feynmanium. But they might be holding off for Element 137...

    4. Re:And now the fun begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Feynmanium?! - surely you're joking...

    5. Re:And now the fun begins by RealGrouchy · · Score: 5, Funny

      If the name will be auctioned off, it will be named GoldenPalace.comium.

      If the name will be put to a vote, it will be named Stevium Colbertium.

      and finally, if it's left up to the Republicans, it will be named Reaganium

      (well, actually, it would be called Reaganium-VI, because by the time element 118 is named, five other elements will have already been renamed after Reagan. Including Oxygen.).

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    6. Re:And now the fun begins by nsomnac · · Score: 1

      How about Hasselhofium?

    7. Re:And now the fun begins by AWeishaupt · · Score: 1

      I'll pay that :)

    8. Re:And now the fun begins by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You mean carbon? Under pressure it changes from things like graphite to diamond. It can't pull the heat to electricity trick though. For that you need a couple of different metals.

      If that's the coolest unobtanium they could find I'm glad I didn't see the movie.

    9. Re:And now the fun begins by SloWave · · Score: 1

      Dubnatonium

    10. Re:And now the fun begins by osee · · Score: 1

      Suggestions:
      - Unobtainium
      - Fraudulentium
      - Unseenium
      - Suggestium

    11. Re:And now the fun begins by tao · · Score: 1

      Nucularium

    12. Re:And now the fun begins by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Well if it ever becomes a Slashdot poll, my vote's going to "CowboyNealium"...

    13. Re:And now the fun begins by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      It should be called DukeNukemForeverium. You hear about it every once in a while but you never get to see any of those 2.

    14. Re:And now the fun begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I sure hope they name it something nice though. "Ununoctium", "Kurchatovium" and "Hassium" don't exactly roll off the tongue. No pun intended...

      Okay... back to work.


      It's Tiberium, mister.. and our exalted Kane would rather you didn't forget it!
    15. Re:And now the fun begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they put a vote on Slashdot, it will be 'Cowboyneelium'.
      The FSF would name it 'GENOHE' (GNU Element Number One Hundred and Eighteen).
      Microsoft would call it 'Microsoft® Viewium®'.
      Apple would call it 'iElement'.
      If they ask Nintendo, they'll call it 'Waangiiuum'.

    16. Re:And now the fun begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bob.

    17. Re:And now the fun begins by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

      Hey, there we go.

      Let's have a Slashdot poll:

      What should Element 118 be called?

      * Ununoctium
      * Bob
      * Element 118
      * Unobtainium
      * Tiberium
      * Cowboynealium

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    18. Re:And now the fun begins by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      Tiberium is technically not an element, it's a combination of elements (according to a cutscene in the first C&C). If you're willing to infer enough, it may actually be a living organism.

    19. Re:And now the fun begins by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Googleplexium.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    20. Re:And now the fun begins by Modesitt · · Score: 1

      You're from Germany, aren't you?

      --
      Everyone on my foe's list is an evolution denier.
    21. Re:And now the fun begins by UglyTool · · Score: 1

      You should be glad for many reasons you didn't see the movie.

    22. Re:And now the fun begins by UglyTool · · Score: 1
      Bob.

      Not for any reason in particular. I just feel it's time for the elements to try and reach out to the common people. Enough -iums. They are too aloof, too standoffish, too..."ium"ey.

      With Element 118 named "Bob", the people can feel a bond with it, like it is part of them.

    23. Re:And now the fun begins by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      And many of the more geeky ones are listed here at the Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics page: http://intuitor.com/moviephysics/core.html

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    24. Re:And now the fun begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The survey is missing one option:

      Breasts!

    25. Re:And now the fun begins by jafac · · Score: 1

      The RNC plans to name it just "Bush".

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    26. Re:And now the fun begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasselhoffium?

    27. Re:And now the fun begins by Rinzai · · Score: 1

      I'm holding out for "Itaintsodium."

    28. Re:And now the fun begins by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      Linux is unix training wheels, while BSD *is* unix.
      Which is the reason it's called the "Unix Haters Handbook" and not the "Linux Haters Handbook". (I keed, I keed, I actually like BSD, and I know when the Handbook was written, I just don't like the elitism from BSDers)
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  12. Instantiated? by paulthomas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Would it be more appropriate to say that element 118 has been successfully instantiated in a laboratory for the first time?

    This is not a rhetorical question.

    1. Re:Instantiated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Alas, it seems the scientists failed to obtain any references to it, leading to immediate garbage collection.

    2. Re:Instantiated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So.... radioactive elements are causing kernel leaks? -jl

    3. Re:Instantiated? by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      First, a snark: Your second sentence isn't even a question, let alone rhetorical.

      Your first sentence is either mocking slashdot or a submitter or popular press for misstating something (thus earning a monumental 'Well, DUH!'), or is foolishly thinking that you're the first to realize maybe nature's been-there, done-that. Which earns a fat raspberry. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_element_na me and you'll see most researchers talk about synthesis of TRU elements. The word 'create' is like 'discover'... it creeps in unintentionally because most of humanity doesn't give a rat's ass about these nuances. Including me.

      Personally, I'm a bit annoyed that you got into high dudgeon about grammar when something this profoundly cool was available. After all, these researchers have just managed to accomplish something so damn hard that they're the first despite EVERY PHYSICIST ON THE PLANET understanding the ground rules:

      Bang big atoms together, create a fatty, win bragging rights forever.

      Like the Nobel, this is possibly as cool as nerd-cool ever gets. Heck, it can even get you *LAID!* Who the hell cares about lame slashdot editing in the face of THAT!?

      So... am I being rhetorical now?!

    4. Re:Instantiated? by paulthomas · · Score: 1

      Way to see the forest.

      Don't be too irritated by my semi-pedantic dig. It wasn't against the researchers.

  13. Stability by SniperClops · · Score: 1

    Is the element stable or does it decay right away?

    1. Re:Stability by newt0311 · · Score: 1

      something that heavy? (in molecular terms). no way. they probably just got a few nanoseconds worth or readings from the reaction before the element blew itself to smithereens. still a new element with maybe more interesting data attached to it.

    2. Re:Stability by AWeishaupt · · Score: 1

      No... it might not. 118 might be relatively stable, somewhere around the notable, predicted "island of stability".

    3. Re:Stability by Kuroji · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but not whatever isotope they created - if I read properly, they discovered they'd made it due to the resultant decay it left.

    4. Re:Stability by mako1138 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Table III in the paper quotes a half-life of 0.89 ms (+1.07, -0.31), based on observation of three decays.

      Some other values (leaving off the uncertainty):
      116 (A=291) 18 ms
          (A=290) 7.1 ms
      114 (A=287) 0.48 s
          (A=286) 0.13 s
      112 (A=283) 3.8 s
          (A=282) 0.82 ms
      110 (A=279) 0.20 s
      108 (A=275) 0.19 s
      106 (A=271) 1.9 min
      104 (A=267) 1.3 h
      No clear trend, I'd say.
    5. Re:Stability by Mahler · · Score: 2, Informative
      From TFA

      Element 118, the heaviest element yet found, was produced through collisions that fused together Californium and Calcium atoms. Although element 118 is too unstable to detect directly, the presence of daughter elements resulting from the decay of element 118 gave clues to its fleeting existence.
    6. Re:Stability by PPH · · Score: 1

      No. But then neither is Vista. That doesn't stop Microsoft from trying.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No clear trend

      Wha!?

      104 - hours
      106- minutes
      108-110 - seconds (plateau)
      112 - doesn't fit trend as well, but still in the right kind of place
      114 - fraction of a second
      116 - milliseconds
      118 - fraction of a millisecond

      On a log scale this is, although not spot-on, pretty close to a straight line, with a kink at the plateau marked. No clear trend? Pah.

  14. Wait. I thought... by elgee · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought the heaviest element was Spamium which is destroying Internetium.

    1. Re:Wait. I thought... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are correct, spamium and videoium are blocking the test tubes.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Wait. I thought... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      How about Administratium?

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  15. Subscription required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? You can get the full text in PDF or PS by just scrolling all the way to the bottom of the page.
    Or, this direct PDF link instead.

    1. Re:Subscription required? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Non-Subscribers
      If you are not a registered subscriber but would like to purchase this article, use:


      It'll be nice when open peer review finally makes its way around.

    2. Re:Subscription required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but you likely aren't a "peer" of the authors in this sense.

    3. Re:Subscription required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but in your rush to put the GP "in his place" you assumed he thought he was a peer. Here's a towel so you can wipe that egg off.

  16. * bang * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...thud.

  17. Er, what? by dysjunct · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The densest element so far was found in Dubya? Guess he's a member of the reality-based community after all!

  18. Island of stability by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1, Informative

    Perhaps you meant 214? Or something in that range? Last I heard, the island was in the 200-300 range ( but my memeory is fuzzy )

    1. Re:Island of stability by emurphy42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As usual, Wikipedia is your friend. :) The island covers atomic masses in the high 200s, atomic numbers in the low 100s.

  19. It is a BIG DEAL! by louzer · · Score: 0

    Actually... I think Element 118 is really a big deal considering the fact that we started of with just 5

    --
    Heroes die once, cowards live longer.
    1. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by Peet42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Earth, Air, Fire, Water... What's the fifth one?

    2. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by Bertie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Milla Jovovich.

    3. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Funny

      cornnuts.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Surprise (c.f. Terry Pratchett - Theif of Time)

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    5. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by am+2k · · Score: 3, Informative

      AFAIK in Asia, they have a 5th one: metal.

    6. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by jhjmonnee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heart. Then Captain Planet shows up to take care of the bad guys...duh.

      --
      hiphop-universe.com
    7. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by Nanpa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Captain Picard was the best IMHO

    8. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by lseltzer · · Score: 1

      snot

    9. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      According to Battle Beast, there is only Fire! Wood! or Water! I think 118 was codenamed Sunburst.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    10. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by Xyrus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mila Jovavich covered in hot cornuts.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    11. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Surprise, according to Terry Pratchett.

    12. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by ATMD · · Score: 1

      CowboyNeal.

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
    13. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      looking petrified.

      *runs*

    14. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by gkhan1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you really want to go by the movie, it's technically love. I guess most slashdoters, being linux-using, slightly unattractive über-geeks with little education in literature might have missed that because the mindnuming hotness of Ms. Jovovich's body was standing in the way.

    15. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by ral8158 · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Wood.

      (cringes at the thought of an asian adaptation of Captain Planet)

    16. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by fritsd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you're quintessentially right, but the film was really not THAT good.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    17. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother! :)

    18. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The point you're probably missing is that Ms. Jovovich's body is love.

    19. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by hador_nyc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you really want to go by the movie, it's technically love. I guess most slashdoters, being linux-using, slightly unattractive über-geeks with little education in literature might have missed that because the mindnuming hotness of Ms. Jovovich's body was standing in the way.
      No, we all get the love point, but that is not nearly as funny as a low-brow sexual reference.
      --
      - Mike
      Once you've lost your temper, you've lost the argument - Me
    20. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you see, that wouldn't have got a laugh.

    21. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Protect the planet...or I'll fucking kill you! CAPTAIN PLANET!!!"

    22. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      I think you're quintessentially right, but the film was really not THAT good.

      Consider the fact that the fifth element is actually Boron.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    23. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by smithmc · · Score: 1

        I think you're quintessentially right, but the film was really not THAT good.

      But Ms. Jovovich really is THAT hot.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    24. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by smithmc · · Score: 1

        Earth, Air, Fire, Water... What's the fifth one?

      Caffeine.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    25. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      Is someone about to stuff Element 118 down their pants?

    26. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I do hope the trolls pick up on this one.

      We need a relevant up to date troll topic.

      Trolls are so behind the times with their Natalie Portman fixation.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    27. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Earth, Air, Fire, Water... What's the fifth one?"

      Isn't that the one that forms Captain Planet's torso?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    28. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by no1nose · · Score: 1

      Turn in your geek membership card. The film is that good. The machine that rebuilds bodies and the taxi chase scene kick ass.

    29. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Oh God, don't get me started on fucking heart. I mean, what kind of shit power is that? Exactly what can that dude do, love his enemies to death?

      If I got heart as a power, I'd say fuck it, I'm moving to Mars.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    30. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      But where does the Spanish Inquisition fit into this?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    31. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Gold, actually. And they have wood instead of air.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    32. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by eggsome · · Score: 1

      And a new meme is born....

      --
      If they made a movie of your life, would anybody buy a ticket?
    33. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1
      In Japanese culture of old, I believe that 'void' was considered the fifth.

      I have no collaborative evidence for that claim.

    34. Re:It is a BIG DEAL! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Two good scenes don't make a good movie. I saw it once, wasn't really worth watching again

      --
      which is totally what she said
  20. Bob Lazar by Jehosephat2k · · Score: 0

    Do I get mod points for mentioning Bob Lazar?

    1. Re:Bob Lazar by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      His thing was element 115. So no. No cookie.

      --
      Sig for hire.
  21. I guess it's true... by borderpatrol · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    They created the new element by fusing together Californium (element 98) and Calcium atoms.

    Happy cows do come from California!

    --
    Yeah I've been starving them, teasing them, singing off key. Me may mah mo, me mo ma me.
  22. So What by xstaytruex · · Score: 1

    I droped a bigger element into the toilet.

  23. Element 118 Cracked by da.phreak · · Score: 1

    That's what I read. I guess that happens if you spend too much time on slashdot.

  24. In a lab in New Jersey.. by Channard · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Gentlemen! I have created element 118, the heaviest element on earth and' *crash* 'Doc? Where are you? Doc? Dammit, that's one big hole, we really need to get those floorboards fixed.'

  25. Re:i for one... by kdemetter · · Score: 1

    you seem to be deeply troubled with something . You don't like element 118 ?

  26. Self-esteem problem? by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Funny

    Self-esteem problem? Maybe it's time you try Nu-kleeas(R), the all new "proton enhancement" solution.

    Just take it 30 femtoseconds before any quantum coupling and you will see an all new you.

    Ask your PhD about it today to see if the little "quantum packet" is right for you.

    Warning: Side effects may include uncertainty, fission, fusion, photon emission, prolonged electron excitation, ionization, or other side effects. Tell your PhD if you are engaged in any antimatter collisions. Nu-kleeas(R) is not right for everybody.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Self-esteem problem? by elmCitySlim · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wheres the diarrhea warning? Any self-respecting perscription has that side effect.

    2. Re:Self-esteem problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo, m8: easily the best post on slashdot in some time!

    3. Re:Self-esteem problem? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1
      Self-esteem problem?
      Wheres the diarrhea warning? Any self-respecting perscription has that side effect.
      Clearly, for a self-esteem problem, one would not take a self-respecting prescription. If you had any self-respect, you wouldn't need the prescription in the first place. Ohhhh logic.... what do they teach them in these schools?
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    4. Re:Self-esteem problem? by elmCitySlim · · Score: 1

      ooooOOOO You snapped me like a turtle! by the way, logic was the only form of math i was good at in college (discrete). I honestly dont know why. My Discrete Mathmatics teacher told me it was "because you are comfterble with the possibility of only one solution, instead of that crap they teach in calc." (almost a direct quote).

  27. Woohoo, Elerium! by Kuroji · · Score: 1

    Looks like it's time once again to dust off my old copy of X-Com.

  28. patented process by walt-sjc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unfortunatly, the process for combining Californium and Calcium (which is called "Californication") has already been patented by the Red Hot Chili Peppers.

    1. Re:patented process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      And combining the chemical symbols...

      Unfortunatly, the process for combining Californium and Calcium (which is called "Californication") has already been patented by the Red Hot Chili Peppers.

      you end up with a lot of CaCa to flush.

    2. Re:patented process by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Calinobyllium?

      Chernofornium?

      Ahnobyllium (therminator-grade)?

      Collyfohnium?

      Must be early. I need to start my day with a breakfast of cinnamony, toasty ATOM jacks... wait... is that "Apple Jacks"...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    3. Re:patented process by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they, unlike other patentholders, let you dream of it. They also give you hard-core soft porn, although I don't understand how that works.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  29. do limitations on electrons count? by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not a particle physicist, but from what I can see, it's saying that the problem is that some of the electrons would have to be moving faster than the speed of light. But is that really an issue? Maybe you can only have positive ions of elements above that, but they'd still be atoms of those elements. Heck, even with no electrons at all, it would still just be an extremely positive ion! At least as I understand matters. Basically, unless I'm misunderstanding or misinterpreting, 137 or 138 is the heaviest element for which a neutral atom can exist, but there should be no limit to elements for which positive ions can exist up till you reach the point where gravity starts to become a larger factor than the strong nuclear force.

    1. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not a particle physicist, but from what I can see, it's saying that the problem is that some of the electrons would have to be moving faster than the speed of light.

      I also understand that if you take a specified ammount of one of those desnse artificial elements, you can exert a force upon it, and it is part of the aparatus that helps us travel (in a vehicle) faster than light.

      Not that I have any proof or anything, but this is what some of those alien conspiracy-thoerists believe. Here's a link to Billy Meier, one of the contactees. I think I actually have a copy of some of the analysis on the metal samples on a green DVD here.

      Also, I've been paying attention to Gravity Probe B and Gravity Probe B, which I think is a closer step -- noticing strange things about gravity.

      Yes, I do want to get off this planet as soon as possible.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    2. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe you can only have positive ions of elements above that, but they'd still be atoms of those elements.

      "Dr. Bill Riemers writes: classical physics tells us that electrons captured by element #137 (as yet undiscovered and unnamed) of the periodic table will move at the speed of light. [...] This is the electromagnetic equivalent of a black hole." (from that kooky page, my emphasis)
    3. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by Gilmoure · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I do want to get off this planet as soon as possible.

      Have you tried jumping UP?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    4. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by dobestpossible · · Score: 1

      Faster than light, you say? Most theories on time travel require speeds greater than speed of light. Maybe researchers can test the theories by Einstein and others, and possible rewrite the entire history or tell us what we can expect...for a reasonable fee, of course. Although they would or could own the Earth and will make us all their servants.

    5. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      In this wikipedia article, it gives a reference to this snippet of Feynman's text which "Describes why element 137 is the last classically stable element."

      So I guess the answer is that an ion is not a 'classically stable element'.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    6. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      Although they would or could own the Earth and will make us all their servants.
      What we really want to know is, would you for one welcome them or not?
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    7. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jumping down works too, but with more severe consequences.

    8. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Saying, "it can't be done because it would involve speeds faster than light" does not lead us to time travel! Sheesh! :)

    9. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by dobestpossible · · Score: 1

      Who are you quoting? I did not type "it can't be done because it would involve speeds faster than light", I said that most theories on time travel involve surpassing the speed of light. Now, possibly, researchers can test those theories.
        By the way, nothing any one "says" will lead you to anything (including time travel) except a fight. Actions speak louder than words when it comes to getting something done.
        No wonder your web site link is www.SPEAKeasy.net, all your about is talk I see...Flame me why don't you?

    10. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      > Who are you quoting?

      Myself.

      > I said that most theories on time travel involve surpassing the speed of light.

      Yes, and I don't disagree with that part, but it has nothing to do with the topic under discussion, which is electrons NOT going faster than the speed of light. (And thus, being unable to form electron shells around untrioctium nuclei.)

      > Now, possibly, researchers can test those theories.

      Researchers already have access to electrons NOT going faster than the speed of light. They're quite common, in fact. :)

      > No wonder your web site link is www.SPEAKeasy.net, all your about is talk I see.

      Tee-hee. You're silly. I like you. :)

    11. Re:do limitations on electrons count? by dobestpossible · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked, some one that actually handled a responsible, mature reply. Not a first, but seldom when dealing with stranger whom is anonymous.
        I actually (now) understand what your point is. Misunderstood original badly. Thanks for clarifying.

  30. Created or Discovered ? by Hatemben · · Score: 1

    Element 118 discovered not created, there is a big difference since it already exist.

    1. Re:Created or Discovered ? by Xiroth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, they created and discovered it, since they had to make it from smaller nuclei before it could be observed.

    2. Re:Created or Discovered ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "since it already exist."
      Whoops.
      It's time to start talking about subjects you actually HAVE a clue about.

  31. That would be old news by Noksagt · · Score: 1

    In the game, it was called "Elerium 115" (after the 115th element). This has been synthesized.

    1. Re:That would be old news by Kuroji · · Score: 1

      Bah, that's what I get for posting at work on the tail end of an overtime shift.

      I think I'll just play the game anyway. It's fun. :O

  32. Please mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As he corrected himself in a different child post (which you are free to mod up), the Island of stability doesn't start at element 118. As such, the parent post is dis-informative.

  33. Why 118? Well... by piphil · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of people seem to be dismissing this as without a practical use. However there is method to the seemed madness of making ever-bigger nuclei. Elements tend to be either stable or unstable - carbon is stable, uranium is not. This stability is caused by the arangement of protons/neutrons in the atoms' nucleii. I'm not exactly sure why this occurs - I'm a biologist, I'm not really meant to know - but whether or not a nulceus is stable or not follows a pattern determined by "shell-model" calculations (see here for the science bit).

    So although making 3 atoms of 118 doesn't seem to amount to much, especially as it instantly falls apart, it's another step on the way to making th first of the synthetic heavy elements in a "stability island". It's thought that such a material could have strange and useful properties. Or it could be a complete waste of money and be boring as hell. I don't know, but that's the point of research at the end of the day...

  34. The point? by k33l0r · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What, exactly, is the point?

  35. This must have been so easy... by benplaut · · Score: 1

    There are many possabilities! Elements 100 + 18... 99 + 19... 98 + 20...

  36. Uuo 118 by pyroflower · · Score: 1

    The fact that it is both the heaviest element and a noble gas is amazing. An atom's "stability" is derived not from the nucleus, but from the comdition of its outer orbital Uuo's electron shells look like this perhaps [Rn] 5f14 6d10 7s2 7p6. the 7th p shell...which would say it is stable (it is a noble gas after all), however this was actually detected by it's decay due to the fact that it is unstable...? Either way, it is interesting and hopefully it can be captured in a more stable form and utilized before we get too excited about it.

    --
    If you are not part of the solution then you are part of the precipitate
    1. Re:Uuo 118 by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't confuse chemical stability and nuclear stability. Noble gases win the first game, iron and lead the second one (while for instance Francium sucks at both).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:Uuo 118 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So thats why they named it after France!

    3. Re:Uuo 118 by Sique · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it was named after the most stable political entity of whole Europe, with a record setting 1500 years of continious history, founded by the Franconian Chlodwig in 507, an entity which also fought the most wars since the Middle Age (more than the two runners up United Kingdom and Austria combined) and has the oldest orthographic rules (not changed since about 400 years). You may have some issues with its existance, but most of them are caused by the fact, that this entity is so stable and seemingly undestroyable, even though it sometimes does the trick by weaseling out of consequences ;)

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:Uuo 118 by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't really call the French Revolution 'stable' considering what happened during it. But seriously it's probably named after France because that's where it was discovered.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    5. Re:Uuo 118 by Sique · · Score: 1

      The French Revolution was indeed a history changing event, but France as an political and cultural entity, and as an identity for its inhabitants was stable, even attempted cultural changes like the renaming of the months and the introduction of a new calendar were only temporary measures which never caught on and were dropped a few years later. The French Revolution was building intellectually on the works of Diderot, Rousseau, Montesquieu and Voltaire, and the leaders of the different fractions never doubted that they were acting in the best interest of France (and if others doubted that, they just got sent to the Guillotine). France has undergone several regime changes, the current republic for instance is called the "Fifth Republic". This means that France already had four other republic constitutions ;) and some royal dynasties as well, starting with the Merowingians, later one the Carolingians, Capetingians, Valois, Bourbons... But in the end it remained France.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  37. And they shall call it... by NeuroManson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nibblonium! And it shall double as spaceship fuel, as long as the Nibblonians continue to be prolific poopers.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  38. Element 115 by ajpr · · Score: 1
  39. futurama by eneville · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "so dense that 1 ton weighs exactly 1000 tons"

  40. yeah by sydres · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our first "stable" transuranic overlords, I just hope they don't fall to pieces

    1. Re:yeah by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Transuranic element #1: "Hey! I just lost an electron!"
      Transuranic element #2: "Are you sure?"
      Transuranic element #1: "Yep, I'm positive"

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  41. WOW...THIS was JUST on NOVA:PBS the other night. by furry_wookie · · Score: 1

    Interesting they were just doing a peice on US researchers trying to do this on NOVA:PBS the other night, it was quote interesting...one of the more interesting things I have seen in a while on NOVA.

    You can watch the 13minute video segment here:
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3313/02.ht ml

    --
    -- Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventualy invent UNIX.
  42. Transparrrrrent Aluminium, out There Somewhere by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

    Somewhere in the 160s they tell me. Or maybe Scotty was referring to some clever ceramic. But it would be inifinitely cooler if the unobtanium in question were on a line of its own in a periodic table.

    Now, apparently, and I have this on reliable inside information, stable transuranides are produced by "crossing the streams."

    "That would be bad." Oh, yeah?

    1. Re:Transparrrrrent Aluminium, out There Somewhere by logophage · · Score: 1

      But, it does exist; it's called Aluminum Oxide. That is, sapphire/ruby with no impurities. The problem to be solved is one of cheap manufacture and not creation.

  43. Element 118 created by Dubya? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is G.W.Bush responding to North Korea's nuclear program?

    Oh, wait... it says "in Dubna".

  44. You left out the Democratic angle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Al Gore will claim he invented it, Bill Clinton will deny he had sex with it's Momma, Air America will become involved in some corrupt scheme to swindle it from a charity, and Hillary will use it to power her broomstick. ;-)

  45. Stability is of order milliseconds by Angstroman · · Score: 1

    The stability is greater than the earlier superheavy atoms produced. This is an indication that one may be approaching the hypothesized "island of stability". I have not seen the lifetime published yet, but was told that it was "of order milliseconds".

  46. International Element Registry by Vreejack · · Score: 2, Funny
    The perfect gift for any occasion!

    Get our custom element naming kit and you will receive:
    • A beautiful 16" X 12" full color parchment certificate personalized with the element name, date and atomic number.

    • A Personalized 16" X 12" periodic table containing the element name, atomic number, atomic weight and hypothetical chemical properties with the location circled in red where the element is on the chart.

    • Choose a round or heart-shaped pendant that contains a real metal sample!(##)

    • "Your Place in the Periodic Table" (vol XVII), the official name listing of the Interntaional Element Registry!

      ## iron and/or aluminum, depending on dust conditions

    --
    "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
  47. No no: "Husky" by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

    As some Slashdot posters may already know, there's a whole section in Sears where element 118 can shop.

  48. Re:i for one... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Maybe not only deeply troubled, but triply doubled...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  49. Re:WOW...THIS was JUST on NOVA:PBS the other night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was element 114

  50. Unfortunately, once again by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it's not stable enough to detect except by its decay chain. It would be nice if they would work on getting over the hump to the next island of stability, so that we could bag these things in an ion trap, and measure their mass directly. OTOH, if this keeps physicists occupied and out of the bars, I'm all for it.

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  51. what about 126? by Kryptonian+Jor-El · · Score: 1

    What good is 118? We need to make some Unbihexium (126, Kryptonite) to defend ourselves against Zod!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unbihexium

    --
    All your 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 are belong to us
  52. I'm holding out for 121 by Sartak · · Score: 1

    When we get to 121, it'll require a restructuring of the Periodic Table (like what they have to do with the lanthanides and actinides (aka the two bars on the bottom)). Can't wait! :)

  53. I'm surprised by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe Honda sold 1 Element and now they're on their 118th sell. I guess people don't mind owning boxes as vehicles.

  54. No Laugh by ChiRaven · · Score: 1

    It not only wouldn't have gotten a laugh, it would not have been modded up to 5 for "funny" either.

    1. Re:No Laugh by gkhan1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, slashdot is so geeky we actually quantify humor.

  55. Tongue in Cheek - Does this matter? Not much to me by raalynthslair · · Score: 1

    I wonder where Twinkies fall in this list of "base elements." Let's face it, any food rumored to outlast the plastic wrapper it comes in if left alone for years on end has to be some pretty serious stuff. Could that be #120 (since I see "Corn-Nuts" (see above) is apparently #119). Heck even the Ghostbusters used a Twinkie as a representation for the whole of Manhattan, how many other foods can do that?

    --
    -- "You must be the change you desire to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi --
  56. Right you are. by hullabalucination · · Score: 1

    Dude, for the last time, that's not Element 119.

    That's right. Everybody knows that Element 119 is Oatmealium, which is now the heaviest element. Especially if you let it dry out and harden in the bowl for a couple of days.

    Little-known factoid: CornNuts is the Official Disease of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

    * * * * *

    Wanted: Used sig. Must be low mileage, in good condition. Will be used by my mother as an everyday "go to work" sig. Will pay top dollar for the right one.

  57. That's the Abstract?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The achievement was reported on October 9 in the journal Physical Review C (subscription needed to read more than the abstract).
    Also needed: an expensive and very dull education, along with an iron will/masochistic streak.
  58. PBS Nova - Island of Stability by copdk4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    this gives interesting insights - http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3313/02.ht ml

  59. Re:Why 118? Well... by niktemadur · · Score: 1

    It's thought that such a material could have strange and useful properties.

    Maybe a stable transuranic element will be one of the following examples, probably something more imaginative than what I could come up with:
    1. A super-thin exoskeleton sheet for interstellar craft, protecting the travelers from cosmic rays and the like.
    2. A superconducting medium at room temperature.
    3. The key to develop and achieve full nanotechnology capabilities.

    However, these elements are created through brute force (bombardment), a linear thing, and in these matters "X" never really marks the spot. Just a hunch, but I believe that future technological advances will continue to come from more subtle and practical avenues, such as ionization of elements readily accesible in nature, or alloys (exotic ceramics and the like).

    Even if it's a fruitless endeavour, it still has to be done and taken to the end. Why? Because it is there, and that's always been good enough for mankind, and will continue to be so. I'd love to still be around when Untriseptium (137) is next on the hit list, as we'll be on the very doorstep of a purported impossibility in nature. It's gonna get weird, folks!

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  60. Proposed name for new element by silvermorph · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty bad at names, so I'm starting a pettion to call the new element Wunnayteenium.
    It's an ancient greek word meaning "russian and american collaboration to create new element 118"
    The greeks had words for pretty much everything...

  61. Incredible! by someguyfromdenmark · · Score: 0
    From TFA:
    "... Each pound [of Element 118] weighs over ten thousand pounds!"
    (Please believe me, I'm so, so sorry)
    --
    I change my sig often.
  62. It's the innermost electrons that have the problem by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Informative

    Electrons fill out from the inside outward. If you try to take an electron out of an inner, lower energy orbital, then an outer electron will jump down into it. So in the long run you can't have any electrons at all.

    The secondary problem is that superheavy elements already have a decay mode in which a proton captures an all-too-close inner electron and becomes a neutron, at which point it's no longer the same element.

  63. Re:It's the innermost electrons that have the prob by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's the innermost electrons that have the problem? Are you sure about that? I would expect that the outermost electrons would have the farthest to travel, and would therefore need the greatest speed, so removing electrons from the outer shells would solve the problem. The outer electrons are higher energy, and I would assume that this is partly related to them having higher velocity. But I can see arguments for the other way around too, and I don't know which is correct.

    I agree that electron capture is another interesting issue here. And it is curious that 137 is the nearest whole number to the inverse of the fine structure constant.

  64. not quite so informative Wikipedia ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could equally well say that a particle cannot have more kinetic energy than m*c^2/2 because that's the classical kinetic energy at speed c (in reality, we are accelerating particles to an energy of more than 100000*m*c^2).

    If you get close to the speed of light you actually have to do your calculations relativistically, and then there will be no limit to the atomic number (with a simple Dirac equation & point charge model).

    I would care more about the mean lifetime of a heavy nucleus. Due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the product of the lifetime and the energy uncertainty cannot be below h/(4*PI) = 5.3 * 10^(-35). If you increase the atomic number, as the mean lifetime decreases, at some point the energy uncertainty will be of the same size as the decay energies. Then I think we should stop calling the thing nucleus or atom and instead call it simply a collision.

  65. Which one will be Naquada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the periodic spiral of elements (http://mardeg.sitesled.com/elementspiral.html) will Naquada be 119 - an alkali metal, or 120 - an alkaline earth metal?

  66. Nova Science Now Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this alter or affect anything recently said in a NOVA SCIENCE NOW episode?
    ("Island of Stability")
    <A HREF="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3313 /02.html">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/ 3313/02.html</A>

  67. "Stability Challenged"... by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It's not just that it has gravitas, it's that it has gravitas without having stability. Kind of like Rush Limbaugh when he's off his meds...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  68. Re:It's the innermost electrons that have the prob by jheath314 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're thinking of electrons as little planet-like objects orbiting the nucleus. Our current best understanding is that they don't follow orbits exactly, so much as they occupy orbitals (volumes of space where you have 90%+ confidence that the electron can be found inside.) The problem with the superlarge nucleii is that for electrons in the innermost shell to avoid absorption, they need to be moving quickly... in the case of elements higher than atomic number 137, faster than the speed of light.)

    --
    Procrastination Man strikes again!
  69. Stability by Xybot · · Score: 1

    Any physicists out there who can comment on how the synthesis of this new element affects the next island of stability for heavy elements??

    --
    God was my co-pilot, but then we crashed and I was forced to eat him.
  70. Ridiculous government expenses by Salvance · · Score: 1

    What's crazy is that the U.S. government is spending Billions funding research that after years creates 3 atoms of something that we'll never be able to use. I know, the intent is to keep our nuclear physicists employed so they can check out our stockpile every once in a while ... but seriously, why not put them to better use? Get them to find an alternative to middle eastern oil maybe? Oh yeah, then we'd have nobody to bomb.

    --
    Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    1. Re:Ridiculous government expenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I imagine Becquerel heard that one from his mother. "Why don't you get a real job, Henri? There's no future in those rocks you keep messing with."

  71. Next one by wolf369T · · Score: 0

    The next element will be 119 and will be place in the same group as Lithium. I'd call it dilithium...

  72. MEEEPPPTT!!!! for a new generation! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    Mila Jovovich stuffing hot element 119 down her pants! YES!

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  73. X-COM UFO rocks - have you played Aftershock? by sir_montag · · Score: 1

    X-COM UFO rocks. Have you seen UFO: Aftershock? It's quite possibly as good as X-COM UFO itself.

  74. Name for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about calling it "Nobelievium"? Chemical formula Bs.

  75. What's Next ... by NoSalt · · Score: 0

    What's next ... the Omega molecule???

    Better warn Starfleet!!!

  76. But the real question is.... by jmn2519 · · Score: 1

    What does the Govenator have to say about unions between Californium and Calcium?

  77. Re:It's the innermost electrons that have the prob by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    > "You're thinking of electrons as little planet-like objects orbiting the nucleus."

    No. I am a layman, but I do understand at least some of the implications of the double-slit experiments and the creation of Bose-Einstein condensates. My mental image of electrons around a nucleus is more like clouds blurring and spreading to form a fuzzy, translucent shell. Which is probably also a flawed model, but closer, I think, than the planet-model. I admit that it was some fairly Newtonian thinking that led me to speculate that higher-energy orbits might be related to higher velocity, but nothing quite as simple as you suggest. Anyway, thanks for the clarification. If I weren't already a participant in this thread, I'd give you some "informative" mod points.

    Of course, you've left me with some new questions, but I suspect that there are better places than slashdot for me to go for answers. :)

    cheers

  78. It is the naquadah by TomPP · · Score: 1

    NAQUADAH is the proper name ! Scentist, kree !

  79. I'm just waiting... by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

    ...for them to create naquadah. We need to be able to make stargates, naquadah reactors, and hyperdrives!

  80. Re:Why 118? Well... by frickendevil · · Score: 1

    Stability is relative. Just like everything else in science. Carbon 13 is relatively unstable compared to Carbon 12. Carbon 13 is however relatively stable compared to the vast majority of super heavy elements. The big fat number of neutrons has a whopping lot of importance to stability, and most researchers are just making a fruit punch of elements hoping for the best.

    The major reason why people study this is to get their PhD's. Lots of people will throw money at you if you say "I DISCOVERED SOMETHING BRAND NEW"