Slashdot Mirror


User: NicknameAvailable

NicknameAvailable's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
70
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 70

  1. Re: And here it comes... on Peter Thiel Is Interested In Harvesting The Blood Of The Young (gawker.com) · · Score: -1

    A human body is not a cellphone. It is not a understood technology.

    That's why research is good.

    In fact we know that cell reproduction in a human body is limited to a certain number of cell divisions before this cannot be done again. Therefore, all these tricks will not work in the end.

    There is already a cure for the Hayflick limit (that thing you are describing poorly) in Humans, it's called TA-65 and has been around for years. Currently it costs about $600/month per person but the cost will plummet in 2024 when the patent expires. Given the extraordinarily wide-scale potential application and the absurdly cheap cost of production (it is a highly refined root extract) it will likely be around the cost of vitamin supplements.

    This isn't to say there aren't other issues to overcome but 3 of the 7 issues in aging already have cures (TA-65 corresponding to the first one on the Wikipedia list.)

    But this story perfectly suits Thiel as he thinks in himself as a better or the best human and all other are lesser subjects.

    Aside from the fact the story is written by Gawker (they despise Thiel because after years of targeting their political adversaries with smear campaigns they targeted him, then he backed Hulk Hogan's legal campaign against Gawker and Gawker is in the process of going bankrupt as a result,) they don't even comprehend what is being studied - not entirely unexpected from a political propaganda machine organized by haughty idiots lacking a grasp of even basic scientific methods.

    What Thiel is studying is the ability to delay aging by cloning youthful cell lines after splicing in DNA from the target recipient to get around some of the SENS issues linked above which things like TA-65 don't handle (intracellular junk, etc.) This is a method which has been proven in every animal trial it has been attempted in and is based on solid scientific foundations.

    TL;DR: The people at Gawker are among the slimiest of Human beings in existence who would gladly sacrifice progress for their own egos, political and financial gain. Taking them seriously is a very dumb thing to do.

  2. Re:Seriously? on AT&T To Unlock Out-of-Contract iPhones · · Score: -1

    This seems less about a forced court order they didn't want to comply with and more about the tyrannical douche-bag Steve Jobs no longer being around to control them.

    Now as to why the article is meant to make them bad when they are in fact bad, but not in this case - I welcome even the craziest of black helicopter touting tin foil hat wearing people to comment on.

  3. Crypto Flow on Scientists Release Working Prototype Of CAPTCHA-Based Password Assistant · · Score: -1

    I haven't checked how this works (don't see a direct link to it anywhere) - but from using the demo it looks like the crypto piping is: Data --> Encrypt by CAPTCHA --> Encrypt by password --> Decrypt by password --> Decrypt by CAPTCHA --> Data Seems like a cool idea to prevent brute forcing.

  4. This just in... on NOAA Study: Radiation From Fukushima Very Dilluted, Seafood Safe · · Score: -1

    Hippies are still worthless fear mongering pieces of crap that would all be just like Charles Manson - if they were that talented in controlling people.

  5. Re:Haha, good one. on DHS Will Now Vet UK Air Passengers To Mexico, Canada, Cuba · · Score: -1

    If I was an evil dictator, I would implement all of my worst schemes on April first and no-one would bat a fucking eye.

    Well apparently this April 1st is all about political garbage meant to poke fun at the idea of taking away people's rights - little in the way of tech jokes in comparison.

  6. Re:I'm I in the wrong Blog? on Army Reviews Controversial Drug After Afghan Massacre · · Score: -1

    I have it on good authority that researchers in the labs that developed this drug were using Windows on some of their computers!

    Well yeah, but only because you can't call anything Apple makes a "computer".

  7. Re:How convenient on Conservatives' Trust In Science Has Fallen Dramatically Since Mid-1970s · · Score: -1

    It's not about conservatives disliking homosexuals - most of us in fact do not give a damn one way or another who wants to stick what where and with whom, it's not our business. The issue is more with the trend in global warming to falsify information and base results on faulty models - typically to support liberal political philosophies. Science isn't suppose to be capable of corruption, it has increasingly become more so over the past several decades.

  8. Re:Hell of a summary on Poo-Powered Rickshaw Unveiled At the Denver Zoo · · Score: -1

    Welcome to the future - the cars might not be flying, but they run on shit!

  9. Re:Richard Feynman on Particle-Wave Duality Demonstrated With Largest Molecules Yet · · Score: -1

    I was making a joke meant to play on the analogy, not a serious statement or argument of any kind - lol.

  10. Re:Richard Feynman on Particle-Wave Duality Demonstrated With Largest Molecules Yet · · Score: 0

    So if the many-worlds interpretation makes it easier to think about the research you’re doing in April, and the Copenhagen interpretation makes it easier to think about the research you’re doing in June, the Copenhagen interpretation is not going to smite you for praying to the many-worlds interpretation.

    Well of course not, the many-worlds interpretation will smite you for praying to the copenhagen interpretation - April --> June. I can't stand people that play on semantics to make an argument.

  11. Re:Astronomers are so funny on 13-Billion-Year-Old Alien Worlds Discovered · · Score: -1

    You are so god damn ignorant I want to kick puppies now.

  12. Re:Finally there is proof! on Censorship of Chinese Social Media Is Real, Comprehensive · · Score: -1

    Just watch the "myth busters" episode it is OBVIOUS they were paid off...

    Well, yeah, but only to save Americans the day-to-day stress of knowing the spider-rocks on Apollo 18 were real.

  13. Re:Who Cares, Its None of Your Business on Censorship of Chinese Social Media Is Real, Comprehensive · · Score: -1

    ...said the underpaid, overworked Chinese web sensor as he enters his 13th consecutive hour of erasing individual thought from his cubicle in smoky, windowless Beijing office.

    I agree - it is absurd these fucking liberals have taken the right to smoke in public buildings away from us - even the Chinese can do that.

  14. Re:Attacking the soul of France... on French President Proposes Jail For Terrorist Website Visitors · · Score: -1

    Believe me, there is nothing nice or effeminate about that.

    Except the fact it's written in French.

  15. Re:Attacking the soul of France... on French President Proposes Jail For Terrorist Website Visitors · · Score: -1

    The French should remind themselves that their motto is Liberté, égalité, fraternité, and that all three bits are important.

    I'm sorry, but anything said in french is too effeminate to look up too.

  16. Re:Completely inexplicable... on Historic Heat In North America Turns Winter To Summer · · Score: -1

    I'm sure it would also explain the brutally cold winter that Europe experienced this year. http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/02/03/cold-weather-kills-more-than-220-in-europe-danube-freezes-over-france-set-to-break-power-consumption-records/

    What I remember from thermodynamics when I took it with Newton: pumping energy (heat) into system making it go all kaflooey. Hotter and colder and then even colder to outrageously hot.

    Nope, obviously a conspiracy on the part on those people who wrote the laws of thermodynamics in order to eventually tax us and hand over our God given sovereignty to the UN!

    Or a conspiracy in your head - aside from taking physics with someone called "Newton" - having no person of note by the name _alive_ before now in the span of the oldest living Human's life - and somehow taking an interpretation from him which lies on the assumption of a read maxwell's demon - I'd go with "it's in your head, hippy" in conjunction with "they compared March this year to April of previous years for a reason and your dumb ass ignored the month chosen entirely"

  17. Re:Garden Gnome Tests Earth's Gravity? on Garden Gnome Tests Earth's Gravity · · Score: 5, Funny
  18. Re:This is why on Garden Gnome Tests Earth's Gravity · · Score: 4, Funny

    But if you bought them at the equator, you'd get a .6% discount! It's pay by weight, you know.

    He's clearly high.

  19. Re:Scrabble on Physicists Discover Evolutionary Laws of Language · · Score: -1

    Grammar, which in many ways is more important, was not even mentioned. I'm seeing more grammatical errors and incorrect usage every day on television and the Internet news media, such as "I seen", "he don't" and "I have went", by supposedly educated news reporters.

    Proper grammar isn't a sign of education - language exists to communicate, when the message is understood it is valid - if a grammatical error can even impact the message there are bigger issues at play than the grammar (vocabulary, mental retardation, etc).

  20. Re:How did they collect this data?! on One Sci-Fi Author Wrote 29 of the Kindle's 100 Most-Highlighted Passages · · Score: -1

    The grammar nazi: queen troll of the interwebs.

  21. Re:Alchemy? on Scientists Build Graphene From Scratch, Atom By Atom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the bigger question is, "how would you move this process to a FAB"? I don't think it will happen soon, but it seems to me we would need robotic STMs? Research is continuing... I assume.

    Nice generic smaller technology quip, but I think you missed the point of TFA and what the posters you were responding to (hint, they read and understood it). You should actually read it, its more about a change in the understanding of physics than new chips.

  22. First Post on Scientists Build Graphene From Scratch, Atom By Atom · · Score: -1, Troll

    I'm already in Karma hell, -5 Troll me!

  23. Re:How did they collect this data?! on One Sci-Fi Author Wrote 29 of the Kindle's 100 Most-Highlighted Passages · · Score: 1, Informative

    What is going on here? Amazon is collecting data on what passages we highlight? What other data are they collecting? I am going to re-read their end user agreement again before I buy any more books from them.

    It's stored on their cloud you dumb shit, of course their collecting it.

  24. Re:Post it on Ask Slashdot: Getting Feedback On Programming? · · Score: 1, Funny

    So, when you're programming without an experienced manager above you, how do you go about improving?

    More easily.

  25. Re:Who is responsible? Irrelevant... on Misleading Robocalls Went To Voters ID'd As Non-Tories · · Score: 0

    Yes, they are words that have specific meanings, and that was the basis of my comment. For instance to say "By definition, liberals spy on government and conservatives spy on people, so really, your argument falls flat on its face" is not only incorrect, it flies in the face of conservative ideologies. You cannot have a government _capable_ of spying on people if you have a conservative government, the whole fucking ideology is based around limited (ie: CONSERVATIVE) government.