So, America should just follow Canada and do whatever it does?
No, all the OP said is that America should do one thing that Canada has done.
Where did that idea even come from?
It comes from it having been shown to be a good idea.
What do people say when Canada slavishly follows America? "Screw those foreigners, they have nothing to do with us, we will make our own decisions, and if those foreigners think we've made the wrong decision, then they can go screw themselves." What an interesting sentiment indeed.
When you say "people," do you mean Canadian people? Or American people? Or other people? Because I don't think it makes sense any way.
Perhaps the most obvious is flying tiny quadcopters (about 1 inch on each side) in your living room.
Wow. no way, I never would have figured that one out!
But they've missed a trick here, because, believe it or not, you can also fly larger drones in your living room! No, it's true! Two, three, even four inches on each side!
But for years, hobby groups have formed relationships with schools and churches to have meetups in their gymnasiums.
How many churches have gymnasiums?
It's not limited to propeller-aircraft; ultralight rubberband power fixed-wing is a popular indoor option.
Uh... how are those ultraight rubberband-powered fixed-wing powered, if not by propellers?
Did you mean "user agents"? If so, how is a browser supposed to determine which cookies are, or are not, strictly necessary for a particular action requested by the user?
In theory, this "flying companion," launched from a retractable hatch in the roof, could prove especially useful at scanning the road ahead for possible traffic jams.
Yes, jams caused by crashed drones littering the road ahead.
Give it time. It's only Tuesday.
but he's certainly not going to be doing anything "inspirational" with NASA.
I think it's a bit of a stretch to infer what a politician will do in future from what he has said in the past. I mean, c'mon.
Donald's just this guy, y'know?
So, America should just follow Canada and do whatever it does?
No, all the OP said is that America should do one thing that Canada has done.
Where did that idea even come from?
It comes from it having been shown to be a good idea.
What do people say when Canada slavishly follows America? "Screw those foreigners, they have nothing to do with us, we will make our own decisions, and if those foreigners think we've made the wrong decision, then they can go screw themselves." What an interesting sentiment indeed.
When you say "people," do you mean Canadian people? Or American people? Or other people? Because I don't think it makes sense any way.
Why don't they just
"Just"? That's a bit like asking why we don't "just" build a space elevator instead of all this farting around with rockets.
North Korea Expands Retaliatory Loudspeaker Propaganda
It's not so much retaliatory as mitigatory.
Maybe someone thought the label said "poisson."
GOTO hell!
perhaps unaware that the company reportedly struck a deal to kill BASIC on Macs in 1985 and stopped including BASIC on PCs after Windows 95.
Perhaps the author is unaware that those events were 30 and 20 years ago respectively.
Hi again. Looks like you’re still using an ad blocker.
Cheeky fuckers!
It's still a mystery as to how the missile reached Cuba
On a plane. Says so in the summary.
Why it went to Cuba is the mystery.
Perhaps the most obvious is flying tiny quadcopters (about 1 inch on each side) in your living room.
Wow. no way, I never would have figured that one out!
But they've missed a trick here, because, believe it or not, you can also fly larger drones in your living room! No, it's true! Two, three, even four inches on each side!
But for years, hobby groups have formed relationships with schools and churches to have meetups in their gymnasiums.
How many churches have gymnasiums?
It's not limited to propeller-aircraft; ultralight rubberband power fixed-wing is a popular indoor option.
Uh... how are those ultraight rubberband-powered fixed-wing powered, if not by propellers?
on the very few user against commonly used?
Huh?
Did you mean "user agents"? If so, how is a browser supposed to determine which cookies are, or are not, strictly necessary for a particular action requested by the user?
It's all a cover for their top secret fracking scheme.
Park's analysis pretty much destroy's the North Korean claim
Destroys.
Not that anyone will bother to fix it, I'm sure.
Frat party.
Typo.
Can't... tell... if still being... ironic. Gah!
There are a couple of things on your site you might want to change to make it more... better.
"more... better."
Should read:
"better."
"his companies website"
Should read:
"his company's website"
Let's just say, "Quality varies."
Or, instead, you can something which actually means something. Does it vary from good to excellent? Or from terrible to abysmal?
Is that some kind of quantum effect?
Ooh, I found a bug. Click here and your comment loses its bolded letters.
Couldn't figure out what point you were trying to make.
If I want to read CSO articles I'll just visit it.
You could say that about any Slashdot summary. So why come here at all?
I want this extra shit like I want shards of glass hammered in to the head of my dick.
Protip: don't buy it.
In theory, this "flying companion," launched from a retractable hatch in the roof, could prove especially useful at scanning the road ahead for possible traffic jams.
Yes, jams caused by crashed drones littering the road ahead.
I dunno. Coastguard?