Americans don't think their paychecks will get mooched from so people can have freebie health insurance to the same extent the Swedish do.
Cuba supposedly has free health care (although no one can access it). Pay for public health care is the reason why the nation is so poor. Same thing in Fiji where the unemployment rate is twice as high as the US.
Very pleased TFA does NOT tell us who to give credit for on this.
I think Mr. average reader will figure it out.
Bothered me a lot when I went to news.yahoo.com during a major stock dip and the headline was "This isn't Obama's fault." So I only learned what the news was after reading past the editorial headline. I'm kind of pleased to see these opinion pushers disguised as news companies sink and fail.
It's a good thing we have you to explain this to us otherwise people may have missed all of these completely undeniable hegemonies, subjegations, and dominations.
Just like global warming and over population, crying "FIRE" is not a real problem in the actual world.
Also, there's a difference between protected speech and legal speech. You're saying if the government doesn't weed out the swearing it is protecting haters. What is really going on is the government/media silence of the opposition for political purposes.
Twitter has an extended well-known practice of silencing content in favor of limiting government, so I find it weird you labeled them as a "do nothing" company.
Fair enough. I didn't put it in terms that would readily make sense outside the US.
Basically any party that wants to grow government has lead the way to spikes in economic inequality. That sums up all my examples.
I realize you're a little closer to the autocrats like Hitler and Stalin who killed millions for frivilous reasons (and expanded government), but to me Trump is moving more in the direction of Thatcher or Reagan... people who lifted major economic roadblocks and brought opportunity to millions. Hopefully he will slow the growth of the government, but even that could be wishful thinking.
I think you're right about Trump winning as an anti-establishment candidate. There are a lot of cases both in the US and Europe where those candidates just end up as the next establishment (e.g. Merkel, Thomas Jefferson, George W Bush, etc), but not all the time (Coolidge, Churchill, and others). A lot of it was base turn out (which Rove and Axelrod both showed to be successful in the last 4 election cycles).
I can see how theoretically some balloon type structures could float on Venus... but on a brown dwarf those structures would get quickly yanked down into the high pressure death zone.
You just aren't following this closely. Let me bring you up to speed.
You are right that income inequality happens during GOP presidencies, but it happens a LOT more during democrat presidencies. The reason why the GOP doesn't flaunt this is they aren't trying to get everyone the same salary.
Income inequality in the US INCREASED under Obama -even though he retired tax cuts for the rich. Which place in the US has the highest concentration of millionaires? Washington DC. In other words, government HQ.
The US isn't the only country where planned economies lead to HUGE income gaps. Hugo Chavez died with $2 billion in his wallet. Look at the government elite in places like China, Russia, etc.
Ohio State: Middle Eastern demographic
Orlando Shooter: Middle Eastern demographic
Boston Marathon... Christmas bomber... 9/11... these are not a bunch or crazy people from Montreal.
Am I lying here?
Slashdot Mirror
"has to know this will get them sacked"?
Oh, really?
How many government workers that you've heard of have gotten sacked?
Jimmy Carter is the only one I can think of. Lois Lerner retired.
Has anyone heard anything from Lockheed lately?
You think the money belongs to the politicians, huh?
Completely free means you are perfectly oblivious about who is paying for it.
I'll give you a hint: there's a reason why the US far out paces Sweden's economy in every per capita metric:
http://www.nationmaster.com/co...
Americans don't think their paychecks will get mooched from so people can have freebie health insurance to the same extent the Swedish do.
Cuba supposedly has free health care (although no one can access it). Pay for public health care is the reason why the nation is so poor. Same thing in Fiji where the unemployment rate is twice as high as the US.
Very pleased TFA does NOT tell us who to give credit for on this.
I think Mr. average reader will figure it out.
Bothered me a lot when I went to news.yahoo.com during a major stock dip and the headline was "This isn't Obama's fault." So I only learned what the news was after reading past the editorial headline. I'm kind of pleased to see these opinion pushers disguised as news companies sink and fail.
It's a good thing we have you to explain this to us otherwise people may have missed all of these completely undeniable hegemonies, subjegations, and dominations.
Ah, ok. Got it.
Just like global warming and over population, crying "FIRE" is not a real problem in the actual world.
Also, there's a difference between protected speech and legal speech. You're saying if the government doesn't weed out the swearing it is protecting haters. What is really going on is the government/media silence of the opposition for political purposes.
Twitter has an extended well-known practice of silencing content in favor of limiting government, so I find it weird you labeled them as a "do nothing" company.
I would like to see a reactive removal of legislation controlling what people can post online.
Fair enough. I didn't put it in terms that would readily make sense outside the US.
... people who lifted major economic roadblocks and brought opportunity to millions. Hopefully he will slow the growth of the government, but even that could be wishful thinking.
Basically any party that wants to grow government has lead the way to spikes in economic inequality. That sums up all my examples.
I realize you're a little closer to the autocrats like Hitler and Stalin who killed millions for frivilous reasons (and expanded government), but to me Trump is moving more in the direction of Thatcher or Reagan
I think you're right about Trump winning as an anti-establishment candidate. There are a lot of cases both in the US and Europe where those candidates just end up as the next establishment (e.g. Merkel, Thomas Jefferson, George W Bush, etc), but not all the time (Coolidge, Churchill, and others). A lot of it was base turn out (which Rove and Axelrod both showed to be successful in the last 4 election cycles).
Right. And we just need Anderson Cooper to tell us what is actual.
Or overpaid beltway beurocrats.
Or bloviating professors.
No one said all Mexicans are racists.
But try telling the people whose family members are killed by the cartels in New Mexico we have nothing to be afraid of.
I can see how theoretically some balloon type structures could float on Venus ... but on a brown dwarf those structures would get quickly yanked down into the high pressure death zone.
"which widened the income gaps"
You just aren't following this closely. Let me bring you up to speed.
You are right that income inequality happens during GOP presidencies, but it happens a LOT more during democrat presidencies. The reason why the GOP doesn't flaunt this is they aren't trying to get everyone the same salary.
Income inequality in the US INCREASED under Obama -even though he retired tax cuts for the rich. Which place in the US has the highest concentration of millionaires? Washington DC. In other words, government HQ.
The US isn't the only country where planned economies lead to HUGE income gaps. Hugo Chavez died with $2 billion in his wallet. Look at the government elite in places like China, Russia, etc.
What? What ??
Are you suggesting other people aren't trying to de-legitimize Trump's speech?
When Anderson Cooper goes on air and starts shouting "[INSERT REPUBLICAN] is LYING!!" is he denying other people's speech?
You seem to be very one sided here, to say the least.
Wow ... you really nailed it. Wish I had mod points.
Lots of jumping to conclusions here.
Are you saying people should be nice to Mexicans, blacks, and Latinos just because they're Mexicans, blacks, and Latinos?
I'll pass on that.
What ???
Trump kept accusing HRC of going months and months (3?) without having a press conference. He gave a lot of them.
You need to take your head up out of the sand.
"Goodbye Twitter" implies it is still around.
No one will buy the company. Just a bunch of hyped, trend-ware for thet Claire McKaskills of the world
... including the trait of disagreeing with Nancy Pelosi
Ohio State: Middle Eastern demographic ... Christmas bomber ... 9/11 ... these are not a bunch or crazy people from Montreal.
Orlando Shooter: Middle Eastern demographic
Boston Marathon
Am I lying here?
hate speech == talk from people who disagree with me
Has it occurred to you that maybe you hate people who disagree with you?
Mark Twain defined bigotry as "someone else's opinion". That's about right.
"I should have sovereignty over my own body."
Cuz reasons?
Did you bring your body into existence?
The weird thing is the Republicans are in favor of this.
I like EIPs. If I got one, I'd have time to re-certify and switch jobs for a nice pay raise.
If they just fired me I'd have a nasty stain on my resume.