You can't simply stop replying to copyright notices. That was comcast's mistake.
You could, however, route all 10,000 claims to a single queue, where the intern while initiate a thorough investigation to determine the validity of each claim. Individually. Your claims aren't being ignored. They're simple being handled in the order in which they were received.
We need the content creators to switch. And for that, we need an alternate site to provide a comparable wage to those who have made a career out of creating content.
As strange as it may seem to some people, there are rank amateurs who make a good living spouting their opinions into a microphone (and no, I'm not just talking about Rush Limbaugh.)
If a true competitor to youtube were to emerge, with the ad revenue and sponsorship deals, we might get somewhere. But for now, cheap dime-a-dozen video hosting sites won't be able to compare with youtube.
Until false claims carry some penalty, false claims will continue.
The penalty doesn't need to be particularly harsh. I'd say 3-strikes and you can no longer submit automated take down. After you've falsely accused 3 videos, all further accusations will go into a queue for human review
It would allow a company to police its trademark and take down any flagrant violators, but dissuade automated scripts that flags dozens of videos on flimsy grounds.
That's just my suggestion, there are certainly more options to punish false accusers. Until some punishment is in place though, youtube's words are hollow.
Bernie. He seems to be the only one with the genuine goal of improving the country. Everyone else seems to be more interested in the power, money, prestige, money, and money that come with a successful campaign.
Case in point: this article. Dollars to donuts says Cruz and Rubio don't sincerely hold the beliefs espoused in the proposed bill. Hell, I'd be honestly surprised if either of them could explain the basic concepts of net neutrality and the ramifications of gaining/losing it.
That's not to say that I fully agree with Sanders' plan. Not even remotely. But I'll vote for sincere optimism instead of cynical money-grabbing any day. And twice on Tuesday.
Are we still blaming Katrina on the gays? Is 9/11 still illuminati and/or lizard people.
If nothing else, I applaud the FUD spreaders for picking a vector that sounds somewhat within the realm of possibility. It's wrong, of course, but they are getting better.
... not the software "firewall" built into windows. And actual firewall. Or even just a router, though those can be a bit feature bare in the consumer level models. But consumers have the option to stick with an older version, so...
You'll never want any custom settings in a Linux build? You'd never want anything different than exactly what someone else tells you that you need?
Windows isn't perfect by any stretch. Far from it. But trying to paint the vast customization options inherent in the system as some sort of negative is just FUD.
Yes, being a stupid rebellious little shit is an integral part of maturing. It shouldn't be taken as a sign of poor parenting, but it should be allowed to exist.
How different would you be, now an adult, if you were monitored 24/7 by the average helicopter parent of today with this level of surveillance? Do you believe it would have improved the result?
It will be a COTS version. Probably enterprise, though maybe not.
The real difference is that the DoD (and any major corporation) will have at least a couple people who know what they're doing. Those select few can setup firewall restrictions and windows GPOs to diminish and/or eliminate all the telemetry garbage.
One thing I see missing from all of these Global Warming articles is any semblance of actual science.
Where are the sensors physically located? How many are there? Have they ever moved? Been replaced? Are the temperatures an aggregate? Mean? Median? What raw data are they gathering? Are these the same sensors that spawned the last 10 "hottest day ever" stories? Or was that a different set? How often are they recording? Etc. Etc. Etc. I'm sorry but a single number does not adequately convey the wildly varied data across nearly 200 million square miles of land and sea over a 31 day period. You just can't tell me that this impossibly massive amount of data filters down to "113," and that's supposed to scare me?
I'm not trying to debunk climate change or AGW here. But I can only see so many of these "hottest month/year/day ever," in short succession before I start to question the validity of the science behind it all.
There are other reasons, but really, it's all population count. 20,000 people moving to California with a united voting bloc wouldn't make a dent in that state's policies, amid the 39 million other residents. New Hampshire is just over 1 mil total population. Assuming 20,000 people displace 20,000 current residents (moving in as others move out), they'd comprise nearly 2% of the entire state.
Given the average turn out of ~50%, and assuming all of these people are active voters, within a few districts... they could throw a serious wrench into the political gears.
Did he also speculate that water is wet? Or that fire is hot?
Nothing against Steve here, but his observation is obvious knowledge. The more we progress in tech, science, etc. the more new and creative ways we'll find to kill each other. It's been that way since cavemen first discovered that you can sharpen a stick, and I don't expect it to change anytime soon either.
That said, we're finding equally new and creative ways to survive as well. From advances in medicine to sanitation and energy production, we're increasing our own survivability at a frankly alarming pace. And the numbers bear this out; birth rates are cratering in most civilized countries, but population continues to grow.
#1 (and this absolutely is number one) people must be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, to include both the physical and the digital realms.
#2 Law enforcement and the intelligence community must be able to do their jobs. Cops need to execute warrants when they've been properly issued. The three-letter-acronyms in DC need to keep tabs on organizations, both foreign and domestic, who wish us ill.
The second item must never infringe upon the first. For example, having rubber-stamp warrants being granted in secret is an absolute sham and clearly demonstrates the second rule running over the first.
Everything else is simply deciding the best way to execute those two tasks.
Step 1: kickstarter needs to limit the money. Put a hard cap at (just as an example) 2x the original goal.
Many kick starters end up making so much money, that they are compelled to create a matching product on a scale for which they did not plan. Instead of building a couple hundred drones on a £125,000 budget, they were forced to increase production by an order of magnitude. They simply weren't prepared for production on that scale.
I'd wager that some feature creep found it's way into the project too. "Now that we have all this money, we can afford better rotor bearings and buggy whips..."
Slashdot Mirror
You can't simply stop replying to copyright notices. That was comcast's mistake.
You could, however, route all 10,000 claims to a single queue, where the intern while initiate a thorough investigation to determine the validity of each claim. Individually. Your claims aren't being ignored. They're simple being handled in the order in which they were received.
We need the content creators to switch. And for that, we need an alternate site to provide a comparable wage to those who have made a career out of creating content.
As strange as it may seem to some people, there are rank amateurs who make a good living spouting their opinions into a microphone (and no, I'm not just talking about Rush Limbaugh.)
If a true competitor to youtube were to emerge, with the ad revenue and sponsorship deals, we might get somewhere. But for now, cheap dime-a-dozen video hosting sites won't be able to compare with youtube.
Until false claims carry some penalty, false claims will continue.
The penalty doesn't need to be particularly harsh. I'd say 3-strikes and you can no longer submit automated take down. After you've falsely accused 3 videos, all further accusations will go into a queue for human review
It would allow a company to police its trademark and take down any flagrant violators, but dissuade automated scripts that flags dozens of videos on flimsy grounds.
That's just my suggestion, there are certainly more options to punish false accusers. Until some punishment is in place though, youtube's words are hollow.
Bernie. He seems to be the only one with the genuine goal of improving the country. Everyone else seems to be more interested in the power, money, prestige, money, and money that come with a successful campaign.
Case in point: this article. Dollars to donuts says Cruz and Rubio don't sincerely hold the beliefs espoused in the proposed bill. Hell, I'd be honestly surprised if either of them could explain the basic concepts of net neutrality and the ramifications of gaining/losing it.
That's not to say that I fully agree with Sanders' plan. Not even remotely. But I'll vote for sincere optimism instead of cynical money-grabbing any day. And twice on Tuesday.
iPhones are only secure within themselves. If I send you a text, that's open and easily interceptable.
Military needs secure comms, not secure storage.
(Well okay, they need both... But the storage is cheap and easily handled)
So we're blaming Paris on crypto?
Are we still blaming Katrina on the gays? Is 9/11 still illuminati and/or lizard people.
If nothing else, I applaud the FUD spreaders for picking a vector that sounds somewhat within the realm of possibility. It's wrong, of course, but they are getting better.
... not the software "firewall" built into windows. And actual firewall. Or even just a router, though those can be a bit feature bare in the consumer level models. But consumers have the option to stick with an older version, so ...
You'll never want any custom settings in a Linux build? You'd never want anything different than exactly what someone else tells you that you need?
Windows isn't perfect by any stretch. Far from it. But trying to paint the vast customization options inherent in the system as some sort of negative is just FUD.
Yes, being a stupid rebellious little shit is an integral part of maturing. It shouldn't be taken as a sign of poor parenting, but it should be allowed to exist.
How different would you be, now an adult, if you were monitored 24/7 by the average helicopter parent of today with this level of surveillance? Do you believe it would have improved the result?
That's just what the illuminati want you to believe.
All telemetry is blockable with proper firewall settings
It will be a COTS version. Probably enterprise, though maybe not.
The real difference is that the DoD (and any major corporation) will have at least a couple people who know what they're doing. Those select few can setup firewall restrictions and windows GPOs to diminish and/or eliminate all the telemetry garbage.
One thing I see missing from all of these Global Warming articles is any semblance of actual science.
Where are the sensors physically located? How many are there? Have they ever moved? Been replaced? Are the temperatures an aggregate? Mean? Median? What raw data are they gathering? Are these the same sensors that spawned the last 10 "hottest day ever" stories? Or was that a different set? How often are they recording? Etc. Etc. Etc. I'm sorry but a single number does not adequately convey the wildly varied data across nearly 200 million square miles of land and sea over a 31 day period. You just can't tell me that this impossibly massive amount of data filters down to "113," and that's supposed to scare me?
I'm not trying to debunk climate change or AGW here. But I can only see so many of these "hottest month/year/day ever," in short succession before I start to question the validity of the science behind it all.
Site*
Hey new ownership ... How about a preview function for mobile.
Have you been to that sure recently? Conveniently forgetting to link it is an act if kindness.
Less people, mostly
There are other reasons, but really, it's all population count. 20,000 people moving to California with a united voting bloc wouldn't make a dent in that state's policies, amid the 39 million other residents. New Hampshire is just over 1 mil total population. Assuming 20,000 people displace 20,000 current residents (moving in as others move out), they'd comprise nearly 2% of the entire state.
Given the average turn out of ~50%, and assuming all of these people are active voters, within a few districts ... they could throw a serious wrench into the political gears.
"If you were being a dick, apologize. But other than that, ehh, go fuck yourself."
Did he also speculate that water is wet? Or that fire is hot?
Nothing against Steve here, but his observation is obvious knowledge. The more we progress in tech, science, etc. the more new and creative ways we'll find to kill each other. It's been that way since cavemen first discovered that you can sharpen a stick, and I don't expect it to change anytime soon either.
That said, we're finding equally new and creative ways to survive as well. From advances in medicine to sanitation and energy production, we're increasing our own survivability at a frankly alarming pace. And the numbers bear this out; birth rates are cratering in most civilized countries, but population continues to grow.
There are exactly two germane points:
#1 (and this absolutely is number one) people must be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, to include both the physical and the digital realms.
#2 Law enforcement and the intelligence community must be able to do their jobs. Cops need to execute warrants when they've been properly issued. The three-letter-acronyms in DC need to keep tabs on organizations, both foreign and domestic, who wish us ill.
The second item must never infringe upon the first. For example, having rubber-stamp warrants being granted in secret is an absolute sham and clearly demonstrates the second rule running over the first.
Everything else is simply deciding the best way to execute those two tasks.
You could cut out 2/3 of the title and be perfectly accurate
"Smart TVs aren't smart." Full stop.
They're the bastard children of TVs and Computers that do not accomplish either task as well as their dedicated parents.
He's allowed to play because he's massively profitable for the league. Full stop.
The P*triots make buckets and buckets of money for the NFL. As long as he continues to do so, they'll turn a blind eye to the cheating.
You live at horse.battery.staple, correct?
Just FYI, it wasn't a hard hit.
He steadily tapped the side while applying pressure towards opening it. The repeated hits caused the mechanism to rattle loose and the lock opened.
Unsure if the lock could be closed again to disguise the break-in
Step 1: kickstarter needs to limit the money. Put a hard cap at (just as an example) 2x the original goal.
Many kick starters end up making so much money, that they are compelled to create a matching product on a scale for which they did not plan. Instead of building a couple hundred drones on a £125,000 budget, they were forced to increase production by an order of magnitude. They simply weren't prepared for production on that scale.
I'd wager that some feature creep found it's way into the project too. "Now that we have all this money, we can afford better rotor bearings and buggy whips..."
Lab techs aren't police officers. I can distrust the former and still answer your question however I like.