As a backup solution we always have a dial-up connection ready... Coupled with scripts which automate the switch from Cable Dial-Up Internet Access, the perfect solution to still have at least communication going at all times.
Look at it this way. The fundamentals of a car haven't changed since the model T. It still has wheels, an engine, and a transmission to link them. But I would hardly say the best of cars is behind us. Nowdays, we have 200k miles reliability, 30mpg fuel consumption, from cars that can run 11's on the strip with a little work. Computers/Software industry is much the same way. The easy bang for the buck software is written(word processing, etc). These won't change.
Quite. But software doesn't age or get broken like cars do when they reach the end of their life time. Well, yes, software perhaps gets outdated, but look at Word. All Joe Doe needs for typing up letters was already available in the early versions of Word 9x.
So, in the car industry you're going to have a need for new cars simply because cars can't be used forever. But with software...
Okay, the aging could be applied to hardware I guess.
He said "patch", not "workaround". There's a difference, you know. In my eyes, a patch actually fixes something whereas a workaround merely does a temporary fix that could also be considered a "hack" or something ugly and dirty.
Slashdot Mirror
As a backup solution we always have a dial-up connection ready ... Coupled with scripts which automate the switch from Cable Dial-Up Internet Access, the perfect solution to still have at least communication going at all times.
It's funny how both Sky News and BBC say the speed reached is 220 mph and how CNN says it's 200 km/h. Hmm... someone's obviously got it wrong. ;-)
;-) It'd require READING ALL THREE ARTICLES.
But then again, who (here) is to notice this discrepancy.
Oh yeah, just check my mailbox!
Obviously SCO has caused some inspiration! ;-)
Perhaps /. could implement a bayesian filtering for killing all the dupes!
This is obviously totally irresponsible on the part of those responsible for the tech being used for the operation. This really *is* scary!
... the drive letters team is (still) working this one out.
Reboot? What reboot? :)
Now, when was the last time you tested those init scripts?
How about changing run levels?
Introducing... delayed messaging!
... or emails.
I think it's been around for a while. We call them letters.
Look at it this way. The fundamentals of a car haven't changed since the model T. It still has wheels, an engine, and a transmission to link them. But I would hardly say the best of cars is behind us. Nowdays, we have 200k miles reliability, 30mpg fuel consumption, from cars that can run 11's on the strip with a little work. Computers/Software industry is much the same way. The easy bang for the buck software is written(word processing, etc). These won't change.
...
Quite. But software doesn't age or get broken like cars do when they reach the end of their life time. Well, yes, software perhaps gets outdated, but look at Word. All Joe Doe needs for typing up letters was already available in the early versions of Word 9x.
So, in the car industry you're going to have a need for new cars simply because cars can't be used forever. But with software
Okay, the aging could be applied to hardware I guess.
Geee, thats almost as bad as the file:///C|/con/con thing that crashed the whole of Win9x.
So much for editors reading and understanding past stories before submitting new ones. ;-)
... I can see how it would be a benefit to those who have already deployed or decided to deploy WebSphere.
Or for those who have started deploying and are still waiting for it to finish.
Duh.
He said "patch", not "workaround". There's a difference, you know. In my eyes, a patch actually fixes something whereas a workaround merely does a temporary fix that could also be considered a "hack" or something ugly and dirty.
No. Why?
By firewalling, you merely hide the problem, you don't fix it.
An architecture that doesn't allow a bug/vulnerability to be fixed??? Come on, that clearly shows that its flawed by design. ;-)
8,609 Mbps ought to be enough for everyone!
You definitely need to get out more.
Interesting.
Could you provide any specific links that elaborate a bit more on that concept? It certainly sounds promising.
I just hope that nice things such as a pop-up blocking whitelist will be backported to Mozilla ...
one thing is sure: if this were played with blue screens, the evening would be much funnier. ;-)