Obama administration I mean. Gwb gave them a strong start...but they are continuing all of this. As a rule of thumb under gwb illegal atrocitied were perpatrated....under obama they are nice n legal.
A) Call it what you want specifically targetting innocents is terrorism. What exactly excludes them from the general framework of "terrorist"? If the terrorist organization attacking is an international organization (read point B) why would the context simply be domestic terrorists? Also I don't think there IS a such thing as "typical" when you're talking about terrorist threats. Brown guy with black beard is statistically atypical.
They've all used entirely different tactics from each other. Timothy Mcveigh used an ANFO bomb, the boston bombers used an improvised pressure cooker "explosive," al-queda used planes. How about malware: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/04/put-nsa-in-char/
How about the beltway sniping incident? One would create a distraction, so the other could get a better shot. Not with bombs, but still the same principle. How about the daschal anthrax incident, or the molotov cocktails in 2000 at NYC?
The point is there IS NOT a "typical" terrorist. If they think of an idea, they think it will cause damage, and can execute it...they will. You can't simply "eliminate" a "smoke alarm bell" style attack because it would be atypical.
B) The terrorists you speak of attacking us domestically...do you know where the bulk of their victims are located? In their own countries. C) Do you think that a sympathetic base doesn't exist for these terrorists as well? There are radical (also non-radical) muslims in all countries of the world. There are radicals in other aspects as well. Pro-life terrorists, environmental liberation groups, black power groups, anarchists, and people with agenda we wouldn't even imagine or think of. Maybe radical right-wing anti-obama rednecks? I'm somewhat conservative, but I can't think of the left-wing equivelant. The environmentalism terrorists I suppose.
That's not even touching on good ol' fashion crazy.
I've never heard of this "Thai highland haze," but I'm only a casual connoisseur. Tese sounds like the buds they would grow in heaven. These sounds like the buds from cheech and chong nice dreams that were supposed to be "ridiculous."
Strains with a bit of ruderalis in them have a very distinct taste. A taste I happen to like quite a bit! I know by all rights it should just taste the same as indica, but it does not. This is why I do not smoke through water (despite it being so much easier on the lungs)...I like that "freshly hewn greens" flavor. That's a rather poor way to describe it, but as a smoker knowing as much as you do, I'm sure you know what I mean. You are obviously a fount of knowledge...a bong of knowledge even.
I use the herb as a way to relax after a long day, as my job is rather stressful. So I go home, get my household crap done, make dinner, etc, and smoke a bowl. So the afghan is perfect for me because it "slows things down" internally. This usually leads to an incredibly relaxed state, and eventually restful sleep.
If I was the type to smoke and go to work I would smoke sativa most likely. The body high from heavy-indo is a bit much to do anything but sit at a computer.
PS: You seem to know a lot. Why is it that know matter what GOOD strain whether sativa or indo dominant doesn't do what schwag does. When I smoked schwag/reggie I would giggle and giggle, and get into all kinds of shenanigans. I have recently re-experienced this phenomenon. When I buy good indica I just feel extremely relaxed. A very nice heavy body high. With sativa I get a head high with minor visual changes. I feel more focused, sharper, and oddly enough much more serious.
Why does schwag (in general) have wildly different effects? Or is this just me and a few of my friends who have this experience.
Terrorists don't use false alarm attacks to cause more dmg later? Research the IRA sometime...they would set one bomb off, wait until people took shelter, and blow the shelter up. They aren't the only ones....there is more than just domestic terrorism in history.
I'm essentially of the belief that the universe is a quantum computer of infinite complexity (sounds like divinity to me). As insane as my religious beliefs are...I know compassion ought transcend the "isms." There is no good way to make that decision, so I think we just need modification of the current system
Except for emphysema treatment...and cancer treatment. Cancer treated with the specially grown proteins at a grand a pill. His death is more expensive than your life.
My problem with socialized medicine: it gives them legitimate claim to regulate our lives. At least what we put into our bodies. "Trans fats are illegal because we foot the bill for your healthcare...we shouldn't have to pay for your obesity. Or your alcohol, or any number of unhealthy things. Even without that they've done ridiculous things (eg illegalization of pot.) Don't worry the healthcare lobby will destroy anything beneficial in the ada anyways
Sometimes running isn't an option if you can't exceed thousands of fps. Lets say you're in an alley, and a guy across it gets blown away by someone around the corner. The criminal rounds the corner and starts to bring his weapon to bear.
A firearm would at least giveyou a chance....albeit not a good one per say.
Slightly different scenario on a residential street....not that different.
Am I missing something or are these guys a bunch of douchebags w entitlement issues? Court over not responding "personally" to emails? How do these people use the internet without cornholing themselves on rage?
Also I bet these guys get bottle service at clubs..dbags.
Someone was watching neil degrasse tyso lol...al-ghazali destroyed the middle east as an intellectual bastion.
Who knows what nobel prize discoveries we could have had.
Slashdot Mirror
Writing up a patent now...
Wow that actually seems fair
That is pretty goddamn funny no lie.
If I didn't have bad karma for saying the same thing and being voted down I'd +1 you.
Obama administration I mean. Gwb gave them a strong start...but they are continuing all of this. As a rule of thumb under gwb illegal atrocitied were perpatrated....under obama they are nice n legal.
Some of us are angry over both. The patriot act started the slippery slope....obama greased the slide.
A) Call it what you want specifically targetting innocents is terrorism. What exactly excludes them from the general framework of "terrorist"? If the terrorist organization attacking is an international organization (read point B) why would the context simply be domestic terrorists? Also I don't think there IS a such thing as "typical" when you're talking about terrorist threats. Brown guy with black beard is statistically atypical.
They've all used entirely different tactics from each other. Timothy Mcveigh used an ANFO bomb, the boston bombers used an improvised pressure cooker "explosive," al-queda used planes. How about malware: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/04/put-nsa-in-char/
How about the beltway sniping incident? One would create a distraction, so the other could get a better shot. Not with bombs, but still the same principle. How about the daschal anthrax incident, or the molotov cocktails in 2000 at NYC?
The point is there IS NOT a "typical" terrorist. If they think of an idea, they think it will cause damage, and can execute it...they will. You can't simply "eliminate" a "smoke alarm bell" style attack because it would be atypical.
B) The terrorists you speak of attacking us domestically...do you know where the bulk of their victims are located? In their own countries.
C) Do you think that a sympathetic base doesn't exist for these terrorists as well? There are radical (also non-radical) muslims in all countries of the world. There are radicals in other aspects as well. Pro-life terrorists, environmental liberation groups, black power groups, anarchists, and people with agenda we wouldn't even imagine or think of. Maybe radical right-wing anti-obama rednecks? I'm somewhat conservative, but I can't think of the left-wing equivelant. The environmentalism terrorists I suppose.
That's not even touching on good ol' fashion crazy.
I've never heard of this "Thai highland haze," but I'm only a casual connoisseur. Tese sounds like the buds they would grow in heaven. These sounds like the buds from cheech and chong nice dreams that were supposed to be "ridiculous."
Strains with a bit of ruderalis in them have a very distinct taste. A taste I happen to like quite a bit! I know by all rights it should just taste the same as indica, but it does not. This is why I do not smoke through water (despite it being so much easier on the lungs)...I like that "freshly hewn greens" flavor. That's a rather poor way to describe it, but as a smoker knowing as much as you do, I'm sure you know what I mean. You are obviously a fount of knowledge...a bong of knowledge even.
I use the herb as a way to relax after a long day, as my job is rather stressful. So I go home, get my household crap done, make dinner, etc, and smoke a bowl. So the afghan is perfect for me because it "slows things down" internally. This usually leads to an incredibly relaxed state, and eventually restful sleep.
If I was the type to smoke and go to work I would smoke sativa most likely. The body high from heavy-indo is a bit much to do anything but sit at a computer.
PS: You seem to know a lot. Why is it that know matter what GOOD strain whether sativa or indo dominant doesn't do what schwag does. When I smoked schwag/reggie I would giggle and giggle, and get into all kinds of shenanigans. I have recently re-experienced this phenomenon.
When I buy good indica I just feel extremely relaxed. A very nice heavy body high. With sativa I get a head high with minor visual changes. I feel more focused, sharper, and oddly enough much more serious.
Why does schwag (in general) have wildly different effects? Or is this just me and a few of my friends who have this experience.
This. So much this. The idea of a "well rounded" education is garbage past about 10th grade.
"Public revenue" I think if that's in the law there is nothing you couldn't make a case for.
Terrorists don't use false alarm attacks to cause more dmg later? Research the IRA sometime...they would set one bomb off, wait until people took shelter, and blow the shelter up. They aren't the only ones....there is more than just domestic terrorism in history.
I'm essentially of the belief that the universe is a quantum computer of infinite complexity (sounds like divinity to me). As insane as my religious beliefs are...I know compassion ought transcend the "isms." There is no good way to make that decision, so I think we just need modification of the current system
Except for emphysema treatment...and cancer treatment. Cancer treated with the specially grown proteins at a grand a pill. His death is more expensive than your life. My problem with socialized medicine: it gives them legitimate claim to regulate our lives. At least what we put into our bodies. "Trans fats are illegal because we foot the bill for your healthcare...we shouldn't have to pay for your obesity. Or your alcohol, or any number of unhealthy things. Even without that they've done ridiculous things (eg illegalization of pot.) Don't worry the healthcare lobby will destroy anything beneficial in the ada anyways
Ill take ruderalis hybrids ty. Russian bud combine w afghan ftw
Why was this connected to the dam internet? (couldn't help it, and I hadn't seen anyone making that joke) But seriously dafuq?
I have a smartPAC opened up as I type this going to a wintriss clutch control.... the wiring is not a fun task
Why aren't these posts deleted?
Sometimes running isn't an option if you can't exceed thousands of fps. Lets say you're in an alley, and a guy across it gets blown away by someone around the corner. The criminal rounds the corner and starts to bring his weapon to bear. A firearm would at least giveyou a chance....albeit not a good one per say. Slightly different scenario on a residential street....not that different.
Well me too but this is bullying in extortion territory. Sue them for what? This reads like an email from an 8 year old.l
Am I missing something or are these guys a bunch of douchebags w entitlement issues? Court over not responding "personally" to emails? How do these people use the internet without cornholing themselves on rage? Also I bet these guys get bottle service at clubs..dbags.
Isn't half of it his signature?
Fuck I've already posted in thus thread. But that was good
I bet lemon-juice boarding would suck. Also firing squads are still technically legal in areas of the us...
Someone was watching neil degrasse tyso lol...al-ghazali destroyed the middle east as an intellectual bastion. Who knows what nobel prize discoveries we could have had.