In fact, the classic Unix design is very desktop unfriendly. Unix design has nothing to do with good/bad desktop. c.f. NeXT, OSX. The desktop apps could treat devices as raw block devices if they wanted, no file system mount semantics to worry about.
You may not work around any technical limitations in the software. Really? I'm going to have to go over my Windows EULA again. Does it contain that phrase? In which case it is clearly against the EULA to install ANY additional software beyond the basic operating system, clearly doing so would be working round technical limitations.
If you can have intellectual property, (and obviously the use of these words is to deliberately conflate the concept of owning ideas with the law on physical property ownership).
Shouldn't you be held liable for any damage (whatever it is) which that property causes? After all, ideas can be dangerous and, until now, they have not been thought to be ownable...
It's almost impossible not to occasionally catch sight of something sensitive when you work in IT; Employee databases, email folders/logs, web browser histories, chat logs etc etc.
More than any other reason, this is why your IT team should be well paid and why duties should be segregated.
Course there should be documented exit procedures for HR and IT when people leave.
f they can re-write the OS kernel for pervasive multithreading, then they can once again force users to upgrade all of their software...again. So basically, their economic model is going to require users to remain several years behind the state of the art in system architecture so that the can be constantly drip fed updates and "complete redesigns".
I'll also point out that the repeated use of "completely redesigned" by MS executives sets f*cking huge alarm bells ringing. Not what I want from an OS. I suspect that most businesses would be similarly alarmed. Wouldn't it be nice if they could just get it right...
You can buy 10Gb ethernet to run iSCSI for less than FC. Or, you can easily run quad Gb cards for much less. It makes huge sense to use the same technology for your LAN & SAN. In terms of reliability & performance it's fairly simple to design a system which is both fault tolerant and fast.
And if you don't mind the server being your single point of failure. HA Linux is pretty trivial to set up, but it does require an experienced admin, which isn't needed so much with your typical NAS.
Slashdot Mirror
for 1 month?
printing presses -> inflation -> interest rates -> bad times.
HTH.
Anyone recommend one?
If you can have intellectual property, (and obviously the use of these words is to deliberately conflate the concept of owning ideas with the law on physical property ownership).
Shouldn't you be held liable for any damage (whatever it is) which that property causes? After all, ideas can be dangerous and, until now, they have not been thought to be ownable...
A transputer which was around in the 80s?
... Wonders... 20 years later... Patents...?
Hmm has it really taken 20 years of research or
How are we to be expected to comment if we can't see the cat in the window?
It's almost impossible not to occasionally catch sight of something sensitive when you work in IT; Employee databases, email folders/logs, web browser histories, chat logs etc etc.
More than any other reason, this is why your IT team should be well paid and why duties should be segregated.
Course there should be documented exit procedures for HR and IT when people leave.
A competition where even the winners are losers.
http://www.police-information.co.uk/legislation/le gislationindexeng.html#G
It's the intent which matters. Doesn't matter what the tool is.
I'll also point out that the repeated use of "completely redesigned" by MS executives sets f*cking huge alarm bells ringing. Not what I want from an OS. I suspect that most businesses would be similarly alarmed. Wouldn't it be nice if they could just get it right...
HTH
Didn't they only just fundamentally rewrite Windows Vista?
If you want Ameritrade to take notice then dump them.
You can buy 10Gb ethernet to run iSCSI for less than FC. Or, you can easily run quad Gb cards for much less. It makes huge sense to use the same technology for your LAN & SAN. In terms of reliability & performance it's fairly simple to design a system which is both fault tolerant and fast.
NAS stuff tends to be plug and play. No admins required. Or at least, minimal admins.
No? Pfft...
Really, with tens of channels, never mind hundreds, I've long since given up trying to find stuff worth watching, that's what computers are for.
Tivo was great, but it's no longer available in the UK and my hardware's been disassembled and the big drives recycled.
http://www.warofthering.net/
As you point out his genes actually gain a survivability boost. It probably feels good in order to reinforce the behaviour.
And everything to do with protectionism. It is indeed the political favouring of the producer over the poor.
They tell you out in front what to expect from their software.....
You did read the EULA didn't you? No? Really?