Slashdot Mirror


Syncing Music Players In Linux?

Daengbo writes "I recently sold my old laptop to a friend, and she asked me to keep Ubuntu on it rather than installing Windows for her. To help her with the transition, I wrote two intro lessons for her, but we've hit a stumbling block. The iRivier Clix (4GB) she's been using syncs with Windows Media Player. My research shows that the model has both an MTP for the sync and a UMS mode which acts as a mass storage device. Rhythmbox's 'Scan Removable Media' doesn't pick up anything from the USB mass storage device, and although Syncropated claims to support these types of devices, it doesn't find any supported devices. Unless you use an iPod, this appears to be a real weak point in the Linux desktop. Do you sync your mass storage devices and music players? What do you use?"

278 comments

  1. What do you use? by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:What do you use? by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is one of the more polished Linux apps I have found in terms of UI and it works quite well but the resource requirements are brutal. It eats memory, is painfully slow to startup and regularly spikes the processor at 100% even when it's doing nothing.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:What do you use? by beckerist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True that. I had a computer with P4 1.7gHz, 768 megs of RAM and kubuntu 6.06. Amarok WAS one of the cleaner programs I'd used on that PC, though I had to regularly close it. If I left it open (like I do with Winamp now) it would use all my computer's resources within a week, causing me to restart more often than I'd wanted to!

      I think the problem lay in the fact that I would just "pause" my music as I'm leaving (and not fully stop it)...it would sit in memory while I was gone...not sure why there was a leak but yeah, very resource intensive but a very good looking program!

      Oh, and my Sansa m250 worked just fine with it!

    3. Re:What do you use? by Stocktonian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, just use Amarok.

      That's why we sell our linux laptops with Kubuntu. The Gnome defaults just don't measure up.

      ---
      http://www.linuxlaptops.eu/ Guaranteed Linux comapatbility

      --
      XePhi Computers sell really cheap Linux CDs! http://www.xephi.co.uk
    4. Re:What do you use? by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Listen is a good Amarok clone that is GTK (and a believe less of a resource hog). http://www.listen-project.org/

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
    5. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amarok is a perfect example of why so many people want to try Linux, try Linux, and flee back to Windows or Macs.

      The guy doing the main dev for it is a prick when dealing with users.
      It has the usual open source "more features is better than a smaller but useful and coherent set of rock solid ones"
      The UI is clunky.
      The UI is ugly.

      The lack of anything remotely close to the seamless and elegant package of iPod/iTunes has kept me away from being able to switch to Linux for good finally.

      And if you feel like firing back with the usual Linux fanboy "I think Amarok is better..." BS don't bother. You are wrong.

    6. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If I left it open (like I do with Winamp now) it would use all my computer's resources within a week, causing me to restart more often than I'd wanted to!

      Why should you restart your computer to clear the resources -- this is Linux we're talking about, not Windows.

    7. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont understand your problem with Amarok. I love it, the UI is nice and smooth, its got tons of nice, subtle features, and best of all, it organizes my entire music library and fetches all my album art for me. its amazing. So maybe the dev guy is a dick, thats better than a closed source app. the only beef I have with it is its occasional memory leaks. That, and i wish it was Gnome as opposed to KDE. It also can sync with many, many devices and supports irivers iFP and MTP devices quite well. I would recommend it for her, even if she is in Gnome.

    8. Re:What do you use? by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with the UI point, I tried it and went back to XMMS. Small, simple, too the point. The main and equilizer interface buttons look like what you'd find on a sterio, making it rather intuitive. The buttons on the playlist have text, making them fairly obvious also. Right click for more options, as most guis do. All of this functionality, without taking up much realestate.

      but, I don't know if it has a sync plugin.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    9. Re:What do you use? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      It eats memory, is painfully slow to startup and regularly spikes the processor at 100% even when it's doing nothing.
      I think it's actually browsing your collection to make sure it has it all indexed, wven when it appears to be doing nothing.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    10. Re:What do you use? by ak3ldama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if you feel like firing back with the usual Linux fanboy "I think Amarok is better..." BS don't bother. You are wrong.
      Actually, mr anonymous, you are wrong. Amarok is clearly not going for your average section of the user base.
      It has the usual open source "more features is better than a smaller but useful and coherent set of rock solid ones"
      It's a very elegant program with many features, and is not meant to just be iTunes. If you think iTunes is all anyone needs your are as blinded as any of the Linux fanboys. (Disclaimer: I have used iTunes and Amarok and I personally don't use either.)

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    11. Re:What do you use? by Swizec · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I keep amarok running all the time on my 1.8GHz AMD with a gig of RAM and there are never any problems with it. The CPU usage is decently low, usually at around 2% and RAM is usually used up to about 150MB when I'm not doing anything. That may be a bit high but my amarok playlist is quite large and there are usually around 100 processess running even when I'm not doing anything.

      Bottom line is, amarok beats everything in usability. As for syncing, I just use all my players as a mass storage device and do away with any weird problems.

    12. Re:What do you use? by Elsan · · Score: 1

      amaroK is the answer for all your music woes. Hell, I'm nearly wondering why the parent is not the only comment on this page.

    13. Re:What do you use? by zip_000 · · Score: 1

      I use gtkpod for my ipods - I tried a variety of other options, but gtkpod works the best for me.

    14. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Amarok in Kubuntu, but there is an excelent Gnome clone called Exaile http://www.exaile.org/

    15. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He described the alternative as smaller, more elegant, and rock solid...

      and you thought he was talking about iTunes????

      iTunes probably isn't "smaller" in any comparison, even when compared to Rosie O'Donald
      Not sure I'd call the interface elegant - it looks more like a bunch of packing slips.
      Rock Solid... Not on any Windows machine I've seen. It uses too many resources, and tends to bring the machine to the speed of... well, a rock.

    16. Re:What do you use? by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1

      I have used Exaile as well, and think Listen is a little more on point. Personal preference.

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
    17. Re:What do you use? by drew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wasn't too impressed with amarok last time I tried it. Besides being a slower, uglier clone of an already slow and ugly application, it would downright refuse to play about half of my files, despite them being a type that was supported by the backend that I was using. I spend a while poking around in the code, and basically, amarok would drop any file that it couldn't figure out how to parse the tags for. I brought it up on the forums, and one of the developers asked what I thought the expected behavior should be when I asked it to play a file that it couldn't read the metainfo for. Hello?!? The expected behavior when I ask it to play a file would be to play the file! I don't load up an audio file in my music player to find out who the singer is, I load an audio file in a music player to listen to it.

      Maybe it has improved drastically since then (this would have been a little over 6 months ago, I suppose), but the whole experience left a really bad taste. These days I mostly use xfmedia, which is small, clean, and uses the xine backend, so it can play just about anything (works better than anything I've tried so far on windows, anyway). It doesn't support syncing that I am aware of, but I sync my iPod to my work computer, so I really don't care too much about that.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    18. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the Sansa Sandisk E250. It plays video and has a MicroSD slot for extra, removable storage. I have it set as a USB storage drive and it works easily with Ubuntu.

    19. Re:What do you use? by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Odd, Amarok may well be my single favorite Linux app. There are certainly other merits to Linux, but as far as apps go, Amarok is quite good and is one of the few things I would put up against non-OSS.

      "And if you feel like firing back with the usual Linux fanboy 'I think Amarok is better...' BS don't bother. You are wrong."

      No, You're wrong! So there!

      --
      I love my sig.
    20. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a tentative plugin for Rhythmbox that enables transfer to/from and playback from all MTP devices supported by libmtp. You can take a look at the bug report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345006 . From the bug report:

      What works:

      *Copy podcasts now works.
      * Play music from the device works.
      * Copy music from the device works.
      * The plugin actually checks if the device can handle the mime-type of a file
      before transferring it.
      * The gui-actions works now.
      * Renaming the device works.
      * Ejecting the device works.

      What still doesn't work.
      * The hotplug code is broken. It worked well when I wrote it originally. If
      someone with more experience with hal could take a look at this I would
      appreciate it very much. The problem is that the callbacks I register never
      gets called.
      * I tried to add suport for transcoding files if the mimetype isn't supported,
      but since the RBEncoder is threaded and libmtp and the plugin is very
      non-threadsafe it's no hit.
      * When transferring files to the device all files ends up in the root
      directory. It probably should use the rhythmbox setting on how to organize
      files copied to the library. Is there a function to get this path from a entry?
      * Sometimes when on tries to play music from the device the magnatune plugin
      crashes and make rhythmbox jump to the next song. I think this is a bug in the
      magnatune source.

      I have been using this plugin for months now and it works flawlessly. We are in need of additional developers to finish the work though! There is also a HOWTO in the ubuntu forum with step-by-step instructions to set it up.

    21. Re:What do you use? by Columcille · · Score: 1

      I like some of the things iTunes can do, its browse features are pretty nifty within my music collection, though there are some glitchy points. But I am often puzzled why the developers worked so hard to make it all so ugly. Personal opinion, I know, but for whatever good it may offer, iTunes is not appealing to the eyes.

      --
      I love my sig.
    22. Re:What do you use? by beckerist · · Score: 1

      Well you know, I will admit I'm still a bit of a newbie with the Linux world. I could clearly see that my RAM was being KILLED by Amarok, and pretty much guessed from there. Closing the application never fully did it either. If it were using 600MB when I closed it, it would unload to about 400MB before the process was finally terminated, but when I reloaded the application, it would jump right back to 400MB (where originally, after restart it would use MAYBE 10MB.)

      Maybe I was completely mistaken in my prognosis, though I do know that Amarok was the problem, not the OS (as XMMS worked fine too!) Anyone else with some insight?

    23. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IRiver doesn't make the iPod. So, I don't think you were of any help to him.

    24. Re:What do you use? by miscz · · Score: 1

      Care to back this up? From what I've seen developers are very helpful, feature request are always considered. UI is far more elegant and powerful than those found in iTunes and its clones.

    25. Re:What do you use? by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      My c250 was less than optimal.

      Read this review:

      http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home? O=NavBar&A=getItemDetail&Q=&sku=459166&is=REG&si=r ev#anchorToReadReviews

    26. Re:What do you use? by archen · · Score: 1

      There typically isn't a good way to meter RAM usage in Linux. Linux continues to "claim" RAM even when it's not really using it for anything - not using RAM is wasting RAM. If you're having memory issues, that aren't going away - usually just logging off and on is enough to clear the messiest stuff, assuming your not having driver issues.

      The real thing to watch is typically swap. If your computer is swapping a lot, you don't have enough memory. If you're not swapping, then what's to worry about?

    27. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE? Well that explains what's wrong with it and why the main developer is a dick.

    28. Re:What do you use? by xXenXx · · Score: 0

      Exaile is basically Amarok for Gnome, no need to use KDE.

    29. Re:What do you use? by boteeka · · Score: 1

      Listen is a good Amarok clone that is GTK (and a believe less of a resource hog)

      Yes, it is GTK, it eats up less resources, and lacks the majority of Amarok's functions.

      Sorry for the Listen guys, nice try (and it has potential), but although I am a Gnome guy I prefer Amarok over all other GTK/Gnome alternatives.

    30. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      k1ss[~]$ sudo mount /dev/sda1

    31. Re:What do you use? by NightFears · · Score: 1

      Not being a Windows fan myself, which on practice means I use Ubuntu 95% of the time, I cannot help regretting the fact that foobar2000 player doesn't run on Linux. So the next time you find yourself wandering these frozen lands and start thinking of a calefactory monkey dance, just launch it up.

    32. Re:What do you use? by idonthack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know what any of you guys are talking about. My instance of Amarok has been running for days now, and processor usage rarely reaches 10%. The only time I ever had CPU issues with it was when I was running badly written extension scripts. Memory usage is around 100MB, which is not totally unexpected considering its complexity, and the fact that I'm playing FLAC files.

      So either you're running it under adverse conditions (read: Gnome desktop) or something is wrong with your installation.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    33. Re:What do you use? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Didn't you know? CTRL-ALT-BS is the new CTRL-ALT-DEL...

      Restart X instead of the whole OS... If it's a WM app like Amarok consuming obscene amounts of RAM, that new and improved three finger salute is the key :)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    34. Re:What do you use? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Exaile is basically Amarok for Gnome, no need to use KDE.

      Exaile! doesn't yet sync up to portable devices like AmaroK does...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    35. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had memory leaks that have required restarting X to get my memory back, perhaps that was what was needed in this case and if you didn't know that restarting X will get your memory back you might reboot instead.

    36. Re:What do you use? by paol · · Score: 1

      While I like and use Listen, it's most definitely a resource hog. It doesn't seem to have memory leaks though, it stabilizes at about 300Mb of ram usage. Good thing I have 2 gigs :)
      It's under active development and I hope it will improve in that respect. In the meantime, if you can spare the ram, it's the closest thing to a good music player on linux right now IMHO.

    37. Re:What do you use? by xXenXx · · Score: 1, Informative

      It works with iPods apparently. I know the topic was on syncing music, but if you use a filemanager to manually copy songs over then you really don't have any need for that feature.

      For anyone that doesn't sync music, and wants what is basically a GTK clone of Amarok, Exaile is a great player.

    38. Re:What do you use? by gsking1 · · Score: 1

      Amarok and Digikam are the reason I completely switched over to Linux. Both have undergone significant improvements in the last 6 months, so if you tried it a while back you might want to give it another shot.

    39. Re:What do you use? by FutureDomain · · Score: 1

      Agreed!

      My friends don't understand why I like KDE better, but I like the applications, interface, and configurability better than GNOME. It's got a clean, crisp interface whereas GNOME tends to go for the earth tones and weathered icons. The applications also tend to be more complete (like Amarok) and intuitive (like the combination of file and internet browsing in Konqueror).

      Not to start the dreaded KDE vs. GNOME fight, just my 2 cents.

      --
      Hydraulic pizza oven!! Guided missile! Herring sandwich! Styrofoam! Jayne Mansfield! Aluminum siding! Borax!
    40. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ctrl-alt-bachelor's of science?

    41. Re:What do you use? by numbski · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amarok is good, but I think he's overlooking the obvious here (well...obvious to anyone who's worked with UMS devices at all....)

      What's happening with his player is that it is either - 1, not recognized by the OS as a UMS (doesn't sound like this...he's able to put files on it and mount it, etc), or 2, the application doesn't recognize the device. If the latter, then what he needs to do is get the USB Vendor ID and Product ID of the player, and send it to the devs so that they can add support for it. If he doesn't mind recompiling from source, he can probably locate the file where the USB identifiers are kept, add them locally, and recompile.

      That said, there are a bunch of devices out there that misrepresent themselves as UMS, but in reality are not. I had a camera like this. It took SmartMedia flash, and had a USB cable that was suppose to allow me to plug the camera in and use it as a card reader. Linux, FreeBSD, and MacOSX immediately attempted to load the UMS driver, as the device claimed this, but then failed miserably. The camera came with a driver disk for Windows, which should have tipped me off right away what was happening. Essentially whomever wrote the firmware for the camera had it identify with that class, even though it wasn't true. It triggers the OS to load the wrong driver, and somehow they worked around that for the Windows driver. If he has that going on, he's pretty much SOL. If he can mount the player and copy files, it's just a matter of getting those two ID's into the hands of the developers, and temporarily modifying his own build until the next version comes out.

      This is why Open Source stuff is cool. Your device isn't supported, but is standards compliant? Add it to the sources and recompile. :)

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    42. Re:What do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have used Amarok on Ubuntu with the Iriver Clix

      And it does work but is not as stable as I would like.
      Sometimes Amarok locks up while transferring to the device.

      Also deleting files off the device does not seem to work.

      The firmware upgrade sounds like the way to go.

    43. Re:What do you use? by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      Amarok has its flaws, but with Moodbar enabled, it is seriously sweeeet.

    44. Re:What do you use? by twistedcubic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, Ctrl-alt-bullshit

    45. Re:What do you use? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I used to have a lot of problems with Amarok when it was much newer, especially with it crashing. It turned out to be some problem with Taglib, and was eventually fixed. Lately, like in the last year, I haven't had any problems with it at all.

  2. Please -- Mount Man by fishdan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the obvious thing is you can tell her she's going have to do 'man mount' to find out how to get her music synced. No -- really!

    That joke never gets old...

    Seriously though -- in UMS mode you should be able to mount it as a drive. You'll abviously have to make a script for her, but that's easy enough.

    I love that I know how hot this girl is based on the detail in your help pages for her....

    --
    Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
    1. Re:Please -- Mount Man by grev · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mounting won't do it for a lot of players. I have a Samsung YH-925 and although it functions as a UMS, when files are copied to the player they are not indexed, meaning you can't play any music without syncing it through a program like Windows Media Player.

    2. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love that I know how hot this girl is based on the detail in your help pages for her....

      Sounds like you have written your own help pages for hot girls....

    3. Re:Please -- Mount Man by wiggles · · Score: 5, Funny

      My thoughts exactly.

      It's obvious that this girl is interested -- otherwise, why else would she switch to Ubuntu?

      Advice to the geek who posted this: This is not about the OS or her mp3 player or whatever. This is about her wanting to get with you. That's why she kept Ubuntu, because she wants to show you she's open to the things you like. She could give a rat's ass what OS she uses otherwise.

      Go get some.

    4. Re:Please -- Mount Man by michrech · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Reading through his blogs, he either doesn't have good proofreading skills, or the blogs were made in a hurry. Lots of spelling errors (that *would* have been caught by a spell checker), several sentences that look like the thought train derailed, etc.

      If he's a TRUE geek, he'll probably ignore that she's most likely interested in him (or be too shy to ask her, or further still, be gay and not care).

      --
      bork bork bork!
    5. Re:Please -- Mount Man by sYkSh0n3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Advice to the geek who posted this: This is not about the OS or her mp3 player or whatever. This is about her wanting to get with you. That's why she kept Ubuntu, because she wants to show you she's open to the things you like. She could give a rat's ass what OS she uses otherwise.

      Slashdot: Relationship advice from my mother's basement, next caller please.

    6. Re:Please -- Mount Man by mcpkaaos · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only thing scarier than getting dating advice on Slashdot is that it's actually good advice.

      Listen to Wiggles. Go get some.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    7. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1

      I've had two Archos Gmini players and with both, your music is stored in a directory called 'music' on the HDD which is accessible via UMS. There's no reason to do anything else really.

      The Gmini 440 even supports WMA-DRM apparently so it appears they can share the same space with user files.

    8. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is an obvious mount joke in their somewhere - i just can't put my finger on it.

    9. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Assassin_for_Atari · · Score: 1
      No kidding! And in the off shoot she is just intersted in linux, you need to be presuing that cause a woman that WANTS to learn linux is like finding s pre-cut flawless gem in chocolate pudding, AKA damn near impossible

      I agree "GO GET SOME"

      Now, for the player, amarok is a great application and supports tons of players. If its UMD, then like others said you might be able to script something up in essense, if your using ubuntu, it should be plug in play and there ya go. Unless its one of those whacked out players where you get UMD funcationality thats seperate from the player due to the embeded db they might use. Then that sir, is another fiasco all together.

    10. Re:Please -- Mount Man by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      FitFiles.com

      Help pages for hot girls.

      cantthinkofanything.com

      Hot girls with linux laptops.

      J1M.

      (PS, sorry, I don't actually have an answer for the poster though. She should probably use Amarok though. As a windows user she will be used to slow, bloated and obtuse software.)

      (PPS, to the guy moaning about iTunes/Amarok, have you noticed just how polluted the iTunes interface is now it's moved to Windows? My ex-girlfriend and noted technophobe was able to use MacOS X from the get go with no instruction including iTunes but was no longer able to do so with Windows iTunes!)

      (PPPS, Hey, there's more content in my Ss than in my post)

    11. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      It's obvious that this girl is interested -- otherwise, why else would she switch to Ubuntu?...Go get some.

      Maybe one of us should write a nice graphical lesson for him on blogspot.

    12. Re:Please -- Mount Man by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also have a Samsung. It's a Samsung Yepp (YP-U2J I think-- I know the 'U' is in there and think 'U' stands for US). I got it because that was the only one I could find locally that can do Ogg Vorbis. And that only after flashing the player with a European ROM. (Details on how to flash the Yepp are here.) The flash was also necessary to get it to behave like a USB memory stick. Without that ROM update, I could not move files (Ogg Vorbis or MP3 or whatever) on and off it just like it was a plain old flash drive.

      The problem is the politics in the music player, not the music player per se, and not Linux. Most of them won't play nice with USB. They're programmed to support only this Windows protocol, MTP. Don't know enough about MTP itself to know for sure if it's good, or free, but MTP comes from MS and supports DRM, and that's enough for me. Also, I read a rumor at the link I gave above that MS has done much to make Ogg Vorbis unavailable in the US.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    13. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's my girlfriend, asshole!

    14. Re:Please -- Mount Man by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jesus, you people are ridiculous.

      Lesson: If someone is interested, they will do overt, flirty things, unless they're a shy and insecure mess, which you want nothing to do with even if you're one too. Ordering the same type of soft drink is not a declaration of love.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    15. Re:Please -- Mount Man by scribblej · · Score: 1

      So when my ex and I parted ways, and she asked me to leave her a PC with Linux on it... that meant she wanted us to get back together? Doubtful.

      Could it be that some girls actually prefer linux for the same reasons we guys do?

      I've never switched operating systems to bag a girl.

    16. Re:Please -- Mount Man by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I bet if that was all it took to seal the deal you would be installing a new OS right now. ;-)

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    17. Re:Please -- Mount Man by iampiti · · Score: 1

      I don't know how old is that samsung but the yp-z5 does exactly that. You can use it in MTP (the protocol Windows Media Player uses) in USB Mass storage device mode (Works just like a usb memory key). Either way, it updates its database once you disconnect it from the computer and all the files show up just right.
      (No, I don't work for samsung but man this is a really nice player)

    18. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is perhaps the most random, irrelevant slashdot comment I have ever read, and that includes goatse trolls!

    19. Re:Please -- Mount Man by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I have an old MM jukebox by Archos. I'd still use it except the battery is toast.
      I really liked their way of doing it, just use a folder tree, simple, easy.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    20. Re:Please -- Mount Man by QCompson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's obvious that this girl is interested -- otherwise, why else would she switch to Ubuntu?

      Is this an admission that linux is so bad that someone must have an ulterior motive to want to use it?

    21. Re:Please -- Mount Man by sYkSh0n3 · · Score: 1

      But girls are strange creatures. I once had one tell me she LOVED Army of Darkness just because she wanted to hook up. So a girl (woman? that makes me feel old) saying she wanted to use Linux for the same reason wouldn't surprise me in the least.

      but i'm a sexy bastard.

      (by some woman's standard anyway...I hope)

    22. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      The Sansa players I've tried out are able (more or less) to update their internal database.

      Connect the device to the computer, it is mounted automatically and Nautilus pops up a file browser window.

      Drag your directories containing your MP3 files over to the window representing the device's Music or Audio (or whatever it's called) directory.

      Unmount the device and unplug it; the device displays some message like "rebuilding database" and if you're lucky everything works.

      Beef

    23. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Howserx · · Score: 1

      No, it's an admission that Linux is (finally) ready for the bedroom.

      --
      I support the troops. I pay f'ing taxes.
    24. Re:Please -- Mount Man by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Mounting won't do it for a lot of players. Huh. I've got to keep up with the slang. I thought that basically defined players....
    25. Re:Please -- Mount Man by martinlp · · Score: 1

      Only on ./ would parent be modded "informative" instead of "funny"

    26. Re:Please -- Mount Man by michrech · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How the hell is my comment flamebait? It is a factual observation of his blog entries. If whatever coward decided to mod me down instead of reply to me did so 'cause of the gay comment, then you apparently don't know about the rules where only gay people can talk about such things and not get in trouble...

      --
      bork bork bork!
    27. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That joke never gets old...
      ...if you never grew up.

      Meanwhile, the CAPTCHA for this post was "herpes". Seriously, who set these up to sync?
    28. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Thatto · · Score: 1

      --Lesson: If someone is interested, they will do overt, flirty things, unless they're a shy and insecure mess, which you want nothing to do with even if you're one too. Ordering the same type of soft drink is not a declaration of love.--

      Your analogy is off. this isnt soda.

      When women are attracted to someone, the will generally put themselves in situations that require a lot of contact with the object of their attraction, and wait for him to make the move. Usually, I clued into that fact, just as she was giving up on me :-(

    29. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Hooya · · Score: 1

      > Mounting won't do it for a lot of players

      Yeah, some playas go for that plutonic shit.

    30. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but I bet if that was all it took to seal the deal you would be installing a new OS right now. ;-)
      That depends. Are we talking Windows Me ?

    31. Re:Please -- Mount Man by gacl · · Score: 1

      "Plutonic"? I've never tried that! Is it some kind of extraterrestrial sexual position?

    32. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      You obviously never read my journal. I have the hottest gf you could imagine, and we swing. She's been voted "Best Ass" at some of our lifestyle parties. I don't think the woman wants to "get with me," but if she does, she only need to ask. She's got no guile in her, so she would. She's just tired of fucking around with Korean Windows and my gal talks about not worrying about viruses with her.

    33. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Yes they were made in a hurry in between interruptions at work. The spell checker was Firefox.

    34. Re:Please -- Mount Man by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Right, but they were (hopefully) using that time to flirt with you, not just hang around like a stump. You don't have to, and shouldn't, pay attention to much of anything else.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    35. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1

      Hmm, my battery got fried too. I bet the Archos charging logic is faulty when the device is constantly plugged in.

      To replace it I bought a Freecom Mediaplayer which is ok except the firmware is the worst imaginable! VBR files mis-report their length, it even distorts if you increase the volume past 50%

    36. Re:Please -- Mount Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I have the hottest gf you could imagine, and we swing. She's been voted "Best Ass" at some of our lifestyle parties... She's just tired of fucking around with Korean Windows and my gal talks about not worrying about viruses with her.

      Slashdot needs a o_0 moderation tag...

  3. I never liked the iRiver by bssteph · · Score: 5, Informative

    My experience with iRivers is a bit old (it's before there was a libmtp), but here goes.

    libmtp should work, in the normal "well, it's supposed to work" sense, (as listed at http://libmtp.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=compa tibility) but note I've never used that model. The sparse Syncropated page doesn't say if it actually *uses* libmtp, and in fact, I can't see any mention of MTP on their website; it only mentions mass storage.

    My iRiver required some incantation when turning on the device to put it into mass storage mode, I would assume this is still the case. I think you had to hold stop while turning it on, but it's been so long and it was so immediately frustrating that I've purged that experience from my brain. It could have been anything.

    Since this is an Ask article... I use an iAudio X5 (http://www.cowonglobal.com/product/product_X5_fea ture.php). The mother company is Korean, so the website and docs can be a bit funny with the English at times, but otherwise it's a great product. Rockbox (http://www.rockbox.org/) is a safe firmware replacement, and it also, well, rocks. In either firmware, the device is a simple mass storage device (with no funny business other than an obnoxious adapter necessary for USB), and KDE ([insert dig on Gnome]) picks it up immediately.

    For actually syncing, I'm a junkie for simplicity: I use rsync and a directory full of symlinks to the music I want.

    1. Re:I never liked the iRiver by bssteph · · Score: 1

      Yay mangled links.

      Anyway, as people are mentioning, Amarok is popular, and for very good reason. It uses libmtp to do its syncing, so that advice should carry over.

    2. Re:I never liked the iRiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iRiver Clix does not support UMS - that is the issue...

    3. Re:I never liked the iRiver by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Since this is an Ask article... I use an iAudio X5 (http://www.cowonglobal.com/product/product_X5_fea ture.php). The mother company is Korean, so the website and docs can be a bit funny with the English at times, but otherwise it's a great product. Rockbox (http://www.rockbox.org/) is a safe firmware replacement, and it also, well, rocks. In either firmware, the device is a simple mass storage device (with no funny business other than an obnoxious adapter necessary for USB), and KDE ([insert dig on Gnome]) picks it up immediately.
      (emphasis mine)

      Just for clarification, I have an X5 as well, and Gnome recognizes it as soon as I plug it in -- some people might have thought that it doesn't from your "dig" at gnome. =) Hey I'm ok with that to each their own. I've used Rockbox, but that doesn't let me use it as a USB host on the go with my little dongle - Cowon also has an american site with some well translated information. http://www.cowonamerica.com
       
      Also, the D2 looks pretty slick.
      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    4. Re:I never liked the iRiver by funkmasterbillis · · Score: 1

      I too have an x5. i'll second using rsync, only I used a big exclude list of everything I didn't want on the player, as opposed to the symlinks. I'll add in that euxneks should search for the dual boot rockbox/cowon firmware if he wants to use the USB host features, or for anyone who might want to watch video or play wma's. plus I think you get extra nerd points for having an mp3 player that dual boots and runs doom.

      --
      This adspace for sale! Inquire within!
  4. It's the Linux (tm) way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Write your own Driver you n00b!
    Seriously though.

    1. Re:It's the Linux (tm) way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNU/Linux (tm) according to RMS

    2. Re:It's the Linux (tm) way by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe if the girl says GNo

      ouch
       

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  5. AmaroK. by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use AmaroK. It works with my 4g iPod and my Blackberry Pearl. It will sync any generic mass storage device also. I'd give it a try.

    1. Re:AmaroK. by GrueMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also use Amarok, and the one irritating feature is that every storage device I plug in to the usb port gets picked up by Amarok (it pops up a screen asking if it should sync music). I have 3 iRirver IFP-79x series mp3/ogg players, two are using their IFP firmware, the third is using a UMS firmware. All three work perfectly with Amarok.

    2. Re:AmaroK. by saibot834 · · Score: 1

      I don't want to be a quibbler, but it's actually Amarok instead of amaroK. It was renamed in June 2006. Source

    3. Re:AmaroK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quibbler.

  6. I haven't tried it but ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative
    ... this doesn't work?

    From that project:

    Unless otherwise noted, projects support all iRiver iFP devices. Users have reported successfully accessing models iFP-1xx,3xx,5xx,7xx,8xx,9xx and N10. We don't anticipate difficulty supporting future models.

    (Note: iRiver offers 'UMS' firmware for some iFP models. Devices running UMS firmware are compatible with generic USB Mass Storage drivers, and do not need any of the drivers mentioned here.)
    Personally, (most) MP3 players I've hooked up to Linux through a USB have been recognized as just plain old drives. You put the MP3 in the right folder (sometimes takes testing) and there it is, ready to play.
    --
    My work here is dung.
  7. For mass storage devices by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    Use rsync.

    1. Re:For mass storage devices by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes.  Here's how I configured my laptop to automatically synchronize my mp3 player with my linux laptop.  I just plug the player to the laptop usb port, and viola, moments later it's done.  I already know this is going to bring heckles from the gui-only crowd, but it really is extremely convenient for me and it might be useful to some of you.  You'll have to change the "model" to match your own player, and the music directories on your computer and mp3 player.

      # /etc/udev/rules.d/99-IAUDIO.rules:
      KERNEL=="sd?1" , SYSFS{model} == "iAUDIO G3", GROUP="users", MODE="660", SYMLINK+="iaudio", RUN+="/bin/sh -c '(/bin/echo; /bin/date; /root/bin/iaudio) >> /tmp/udevlog 2>&1'"

      # /root/bin/iaudio:
      #!/bin/sh

      /bin/mount -v -t vfat -o gid=users,umask=007 /dev/iaudio /mnt/iaudio &&
      /usr/bin/rsync --verbose --update --recursive --delete /mnt/media/byartist/NPR/atc /mnt/iaudio/music
      /bin/umount /mnt/iaudio

    2. Re:For mass storage devices by treeves · · Score: 1
      I just plug the player to the laptop usb port, and viola, moments later it's done.

      Well that explains it. If you're only listening to viola music, it's not going to take very long. There's just not much music in the viola repertoire. ;-)

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:For mass storage devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why oh why doesn't he just store all the music in a Subversion repository? That way it's easy to set up incremental backups and the device can be updated with a simple svn update. Sure all these gimmicky GNOME apps might look snazzy, but they're functionally inferior to command line tools.

      If she wants to learn Linux, he should teach her Linux, starting with useradd and ending with shutdown. If his tutorials include anything like "click here...", he's doing it all wrong.

      Desktop environments are for wusses who don't know how to use computers. That's why I'm typing this in Lynx, why I only code in Vi, and why I have to take medication three times a day.

    4. Re:For mass storage devices by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
      rsync is a far cry from setting up a versioning system. And WTF would you want versioning on music unless you are the one creating it?

      Is an icon that points to a script that does this so difficult? (mine is a symlink in ~/.config/rox.sourceforge.net/SendTo/.inode_mount- point, so I have a "backup USB drive" menu item when I right click the mount point). No, it wasn't difficult to figure those paths out, it is handled by the gui in the filer. Imagine that. You can have your GUI *AND* the convenience of a script!

      exec aterm -e rsync --delete -rtv $src $dst
      Computers should be useful and serve us, not the other way around. Set up a little script once, and it is then forever convenient. GUIs have their place, but there is absolutely no use to bring them into this simple repetitive task that requires no input from the user.

  8. Re:Failure to see problem by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    The problem seems to be that the music player in question isn't really implementing UMS mode as Linux implements it, and is thus not recognized.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  9. Syncropated! problems by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Syncroprated! is listed as 'pre-Alpha' on garage.maemo.org. So I would imagine that it might have problems. But, it is written Python, so it should be fairly easy to debug the problem if you're a developer. If not, well, you'll have to wait for the app to become a bit more mature. Since I'm a Python developer, I think I'll download it and have a look at the code. It looks like a neat program to spend some time with.

    BTW--Personally, I just use Nautilus to sync up my Creative Labs Zen Nano player.

  10. iRiver H320 by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

    My iRiver H320 is seen by Linux distros as a MSC, but if I recall correctly, later models like your Clix dropped that functionality when iRiver got in bed with Microsoft and their DRM. You'll probably find more info on http://www.misticriver.net/ .

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    1. Re:iRiver H320 by bodgit · · Score: 1

      My iRiver H320 is seen by Linux distros as a MSC

      And if you want to maintain that database of audio metadata in the root of the filesystem, I wrote a small utility for my H340.

  11. Try looking on... by Zwack · · Score: 4, Informative
    Anything but Ipod The forums are very helpful...

    Some people in the Sandisk Sansa E200 Linux forum have run MTP Mode on Linux...

    Z.

    --
    -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
  12. Using the irivier Clix on Linux by GRW · · Score: 3, Informative

    A quick Google search got me this: Using the irivier Clix on Linux

    1. Re:Using the irivier Clix on Linux by MrCreosote · · Score: 1
      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
    2. Re:Using the irivier Clix on Linux by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Great link. Thanks. I googled around for a couple of hours and couldn't find anything except the MTP/UMS information.

  13. SuperSync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use SuperSync to sync all my music libraries over the net and locally.. it was written in java and eclipse SWT, so a linux version may be possible.

    http://supersync.com/

    Might work.. might not..

  14. mount, rsync? by proxima · · Score: 1

    Sounds like your device may not be connecting correctly. My iAudio X5 shows up the same as a USB flash drive does, and KDE asks me whether I want to mount it automatically. From there, I can use a GUI like konqueror (or, as others will mention, Amarok). Typically, though, I just use the command line.

    For a while I synced podcasts with rsync in a small script which I linked from a KDE menu:

    SOURCE=/path/to/podcasts/
    DEST=/path/to/player/podcasts/
    rsync -av $SOURCE $TARGET

    The same could easily be done for a directory of music small enough to fit on the player. If space is a concern, you could also (very carefully) use the --delete option, but I don't know if I've tested that.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:mount, rsync? by proxima · · Score: 1

      Whoops: s/TARGET/DEST/

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  15. Sansa by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    I use a Sansa m240 (or 230 - I forget). Anyway, it has the really nice quality that you can just dump a bunch of MP3 files onto it, and it will look at the id3 tags (artist, album, etc.) to automatically organize the songs. This is nice because any Linux software can just treat it as a plain old USB Mass Storage device, but I still get nicely categorized MP3s when I use the Sansa.

    So the Sansa works pretty well, but there's one annoying problem. I use Amarok to get podcasts and to transfer them to the Sansa. Amarok tries to put the items on to the Sansa using a directory tree with levels based on artist, album, etc. The problem is that for some reason Amarok's transfer to the Sansa fails unless the corresponding directory already exists on the Sansa. So when I subscribe to a new podcast, my first transfer always fails. I have to look at the name of the directory path Amarok was planning to use on the Sansa, create it myself on the Sansa's file system, and then restart the transfer. My guess is that this is Amarok's fault, not the Sansa's.

    1. Re:Sansa by Count_Froggy · · Score: 1

      I have a similar situation and use a Sansa 512mb player that show up in PCLinuxOS2007 as a USB stick. I think the above user is having problems creating new folders/directories due to user permissions.

      --
      If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?
    2. Re:Sansa by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken (I'm primarily a Banshee user, but used Amarok in the past), there should be an option somewhere in Amarok to tell it where to put your music and podcasts. Just make sure that's set (for the Sansa, it's /media/Sansa c250*/MUSIC) and you should be good.

      *Where it mounts depends on your desktop. In GNOME, it's /media/volume_name (Sansa c250 in my case, probably Sansa m2x0 in yours), and in KDE it's usually /media/sdx1, x being a letter a thru z

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  16. can't blame you for trying by flynt · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the bottom of the first tutorial...

    Cassandra said...

            this is awesome Dan thanks!! you OBVIOUSLY have way too much time on your hands...lol but i'm glad to benefit from it!

    In other words, DENIED! Sorry, man, we've all been there.

    1. Re:can't blame you for trying by danpsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cassandra said... this is awesome Dan thanks!! you OBVIOUSLY have way too much time on your hands...lol but i'm glad to benefit from it! In other words, DENIED! Sorry, man, we've all been there.

      Yep, it's good that you have time on your hands, cuz you are gonna both need that time and your hands, most importantly.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    2. Re:can't blame you for trying by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words, DENIED! Sorry, man, we've all been there.

      My thoughts exactly.

      As a woman, the initial feeling I got from the story is that this guy somehow persuaded this girl (who's level of friendship is probably not reciprocal) to use Ubuntu instead of Windows. That gives him an opportunity to continue the (somewhat desperate) interaction past the point of sale. A hint to geeks out there: Girls get scared when you start going out of your way to be "friendly" or "nice". Guys think the girl will be swept off her feet; girls think the guys are sacrificing their own time (and happiness) just to make them happy.

    3. Re:can't blame you for trying by flynt · · Score: 1

      Well said. It seems the desire to interact is now so great that he's resorted to "Ask Slashdot", a sure sign of "going too far" if there ever was one! I personally think the best thing she said was "I'm glad to benefit from it".

    4. Re:can't blame you for trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I speak for most of us when I say, too little, too late!

      Buhuhuhu..

    5. Re:can't blame you for trying by BigBadRich · · Score: 1
      I love how people are giving this dude relationship advice when all he cares about is getting an iRiver to work under ubuntu...

      Hah, no seriously. Dude, here's the situation as I see it. Granted not knowing either of you I may or may not hit the mark, but this is slashdot, and that obviously isn't a problem here.

      So.

      There's this girl, Cass. For whatever reason, as her 'friend' you've decided that in order to place yourself at the forefront of her mind the best approach is to do what you feel you do best, and demonstrate your skills. You do this by showing her not only that you have knowledge of this wicked cool operating system for a computer, but that you can write nifty tutorials complete with graphics and so forth.

      FWIW, you're clearly talented in this area. Now let's be honest, you wouldn't go to this length for a male friend, right? You could care less if they're running linux or not. Perhaps your male friends already run linux, perhaps they dont. Either way you could give a shit. SO, your attempt to demonstrate your skills for this lass is clearly designed to improve her opinion of you. BUT! You've hit a snag. Her iRiver doesn't work. This means that despite your best efforts to demonstrate your ability to make her world a better place, you're fucked. So strong is your desire to demonstrate your ability to control the universe that you resort to slashdot in a desperate attempt to save face.

      If I'm right (and perhaps I'm not, granted) let me offer this as advice:

      Women don't care if you can make their computer work. Trust me, despite my explanations, my wife's eyes glaze over no matter how hard I try to explain the virtues of ubuntu, HD-TV or anything technical. What she wants is a man who can take charge, who can control his universe (this does not mean just make a computer work!) to protect her and make her feel as though she doesn't have to go through life fending for herself. She wants a guy to show up make her feel as though she can relax because he's in control.

      When women are "swept off their feet" it means that they can surrender their own will because they trust that the man in question (a) Knows who he he and what he wants (b) Is in charge of his own world and (c) She finds that exciting. In the grand scheme of things how her computer works isn't something she gives a shit about. You are either a guy who is in charge of his destiny and CAN demonstrate it for her, or you'll always be her friend. I'd hate for you to be the guy who goes around saying stuff like 'chicks dig jerks'. They don't, but it's the 'jerks' who are usually so arrogant and self-assured that women find it exciting.

      You, my friend, need to scale up. Get out of your comfort zone and take her somewhere. Show her something else you can do (you can do stuff besides run linux, right?) Take her to dinner, take her dancing. Impress her with your intellect if you must, but here's a tip. If either of you are looking at a screen, you're not looking at each other. If you're not looking at each other, neither of you is getting the most out of your time together.

    6. Re:can't blame you for trying by Daengbo · · Score: 1
      Sorry.
      • Offered to install Windows for her when I sold it, but she said she wants to try this first, since it was already installed,
      • In a loving relationship with the same, sexy woman for five years,
      • that relationship is open, and
      • Not really interested in this woman.
    7. Re:can't blame you for trying by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I'm going to write a journal entry about this, my first ever, /. story. Wow! Executive summary: you're wrong. Everyone's wrong. I'm not interested in this woman. I not only have a sexy gal of my own (five years now), but she would even let me play around with the woman for whom I wrote the tutorial (if I wanted to).

      As for the "Let's be honest..." part, I wrote another blog in response to another (male) friend's request for advice. I think that was on Monday, only a day or two before the one for the female friend. Wow. So much relationship advice for someone who doesn't even need it.

    8. Re:can't blame you for trying by Zwack · · Score: 1

      Hey... Less of the stereotyping (all around) please... I'm not wrong. I never claimed that you wanted a relationship with this girl, nor did I assume that.

      Personally I find it hilarious that a fair number of people on Slashdot (and in real life) assume that because a guy talks to a girl, the guy wants to have a relationship with the girl. Back in the dim and distant past, on the first day of College, everyone from my new Applied Physics class was milling around in the corridor. Little groups of people started to congregate, but the one girl in the class was left standing on her own. As I was painfully shy, and couldn't think of anything better to do, I walked over and said "Hi, I'm Zwack and the rest of the class probably thinks that I'm hitting on you. What's your name, and why did you choose Physics?" Needless to say, with an opening line like that we didn't even become friends. However it did have the desired effect, in that she laughed, and a couple of other people joined the group, thus breaking the ice.

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    9. Re:can't blame you for trying by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Apologies to you for the "Everbody's wrong" comment. You (plural) didn't deserve that.

    10. Re:can't blame you for trying by Zwack · · Score: 1

      LOL!
      Thanks, apology accepted...

      At one point you seemed to be getting a bit upset about all of the unwanted advice that you were getting...

      It's not worth it. Laugh it off and be glad that you don't need it.

      It's amazing (to me at least) how some people rail against being stereotyped, and then blindly stereotype everyone else... You are a geek therefore you are living in your mother's basement, have no social skills, and dream of being able to go out with girls...

      I know of geeks who clearly don't fit that description at all... In fact I don't know of any exact matches for that stereotype...

      Anyway, smile, laugh if you can and get your problem solved without worrying about what people might imply about the relationship between you and your friend.

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
  17. Even iPod ain't great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPod support isn't that great either. I love how when I eject the iPod it immediately automatically reconnects. LOL. I have to go to a command line and manually unmount it to get it to stick.

  18. What I use by DVega · · Score: 1

    Of course Amarok. It supports many portable devices. Including UMS and MTP

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!
    1. Re:What I use by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      What about the ability to directly add Samba shares to Amarok's Collection? Requiring root access to mount a Samba share in order to play music from it is ri-goddamn-diculous. So, while Amarok may be pretty to look at, it's completely useless for me. This is why I currently use either Rhythmbox or XMMS2. Neither has a problem with having a Samba share as my media library location, and they don't require me to mount it first.

      (No, the Samba share is not on a Windows machine. It's on a Maxtor Shared Storage drive.)

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    2. Re:What I use by NetNifty · · Score: 1

      Just open the "files" tab and enter "smb://SERVERNAME" for the path. Then just drag the files into your playlist.

  19. Palm Tungsten T and SD Card by mw13068 · · Score: 1

    I use my Palm Tungsten T and a non-free player called pTunes and a 1GB SD Card to store my music. I love it because I use my PDA heavily still *and* it plays my music. I'd hate to have a separate music player that only did that one thing.

    And since the music is stored as regular ol' .ogg files on the SD card, getting them on and off is easy with GNU/Linux.

    1. Re:Palm Tungsten T and SD Card by canistel · · Score: 1

      Somewhat offtopic, but how exactly do you get linux to drop ogg files onto the sd card in your palm? Or, do you just dump them on the card directly using an sd reader? I have a treo but haven't had a whole lot of success syncing with it (except for Gnome Pilot in Ubuntu 7.04)

    2. Re:Palm Tungsten T and SD Card by mw13068 · · Score: 1

      I use a USB SD card reader/writer.

      I wrote an article about this on my site, complete with some shell scripts I use to determine playlist size and copy the playlist files to the SD card. I use XMMS as my music player and playlist manager. http://ithacafreesoftware.org/forum/viewtopic.php? t=227

  20. To sync? by JCWDenton · · Score: 1

    I use Gnomad2 with my Creative JukeBox Zen Xtra 30Gb. Works a charm. (Even better than the software Creative ships with it which integrates with your explorer).

    Also, have you looked at whether there are any SDK's available for the problematic device?

    1. Re:To sync? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. I use gnomad2 all the time with my Creative Micro Photo. It's awesome and much better than the windows software that comes with it.

  21. iRiver Howto by NullProg · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
    1. Re:iRiver Howto by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Great. Thanks man #1 for the great link and #2 for not giving me relationship advice. ;)

  22. My solution by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I buy players wisely first. I make a point of researching beforehand and only buy players that:

    1) Appear as a generic storage device when plugged into USB and doesn't require drivers or other software to be installed on your PC.
    ( this gets around any Windows-only and most DRM limitations, and also means I can use it as portable storage for other files).

    2) Supports ogg ( and FLAC if possible )

    3) Doesn't contain DRM

    1. Re:My solution by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      So that narrows your list down to zero. Makes it easy to pick.

    2. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know where she can rent a Time Machine so she can go back in time and make a "wise" purchase? If not, then your comment is hardly helpful to her.

    3. Re:My solution by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      You just described an IRiver.

      Sure the IRiver may need to be flashed to get the right storage type. Almost all of them support Ogg/Vorbis except for a few models introduced before the judge smacked MS down over their plays for sure forbidding support of non-MS supported file types.

      With the exception of their cowering in the corner when MS said do it this way, I respect IRiver products for that reason. Only the Neuros ranks higher in feel good penguin points.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    4. Re:My solution by interval1066 · · Score: 0

      I'm with this guy. If Linux automounts as any other removable drive, I'm happy. I could care less about syncing it with some mp3 library gizmo. I find syncing with media librarians a little tedious. Drag and drop, is all I need. A playlist generator is nice, but I can live without. If they don't do .m3u I don't need them anyway. And there seems to be as many formats for something is stupid as a playlist as there are players. We just need ONE FORMAT people.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    5. Re:My solution by genji256 · · Score: 1

      Well, the iAudio players pretty much fulfills all the requirements. Mine (G3) is a UMS device, plays OGG, has a radio and does not contain any DRM that I know of. My only concern is that the joystick is pretty fragile. As someone else noted, the iRiver (not with the original firmware, though, or at least in Europe) do too (at least those that I know of).

    6. Re:My solution by Boreras · · Score: 1

      And this is were he was wrong.
      For in fact my current MP3 player, the Cowon iAudio X5L "officially" supports Linux (from kernel 2.2+). It plays both ogg Vorbis and FLAC (besides things like MP3 etc.). The sound quality is good (as in comparison, I'd say iPod's is bad, but that's just my non-audiophile opinion).

    7. Re:My solution by ErroneousBee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ditto that.

      I view ogg support as a clue that the designers of the device have given some thought to what the device should be capable of, and arnt just ticking the boxes that marketing want ticked.

      Other clues are:

      • Battery life. In particular, lying about it. A sign that the company is dishonest, and have lied about other features.
      • No products in the lineup that take AAA or AA batteries. A sign that designers only develop features suggested by marketing.
      • Proprietary connectors. Unless theres some good reason for it, like Apples dock.
      • Sudden changes in technical direction from the company. Archos and iRiver did this, and their product suite turned to shit overnight.
      • Flash ridden website with no device specifications. A sign that the company are selling an image and do not understand the product.

      I go for UMS devices because then I can manage my player from anywhere without having to use special software. I can drop a podcast onto my player at work, or when I'm away.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    8. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And have you actually found such a device?

    9. Re:My solution by Kronos. · · Score: 1

      A lot of the Samsung players play OGG, not sure about FLAC but certainly there are Samsungs that play OGG.

    10. Re:My solution by teal_ · · Score: 1

      There 'ya go, just blame the user for his choice of players.

    11. Re:My solution by _14k4 · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article and realize that the person got the laptop _after_ they had the music player already? And rather than install windows on it, they are trying to keep using a Linux variant. ...has nothing to do with a "new" music player...

    12. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The list is pretty small if you want a player with at least 60gb space. Only two players seem to even have this much space: iRiver Zen Vision M and IPod 80GB.

      At the moment, only the IPod 80gb with Rockbox seems to fit the bill, but Rockbox cuts the battery life in half.

      Any other options? I'm about to buy a music player to listen to audiobooks (and I don't want to mix my audiobooks with my music the way iRiver does) and there doesn't seem to be any other alternative.

    13. Re:My solution by mlts · · Score: 1

      That is the absolute best (IMHO) way to find a player. I wish someone could make a list of players that could function 100% driverless, where the player just mounts as a USB drive.

      My choice in MP3 players is similar. #1 is exactly what you specified -- the player should be able to mount as a generic hard disk, requiring zero specialized software.

      #2 would be nice. Some sort of lossless audio compression helps a lot.

      #3 is less of an issue for me, if they have the option to play DRM files. For example I have a cheap Flash MP3 player which is PlaysForSure compatible, but yet allows for mounting as a USB hard disk, and requires no specific software to copy normal music onto it. However, a player forces DRM on me (one player I remember transcodes all music copied to it to encrypted WMA, and another encrypted all music copied to it), it will not be a choice, period.

      Adding a couple entries:

      #4: I would like to see the player be specifically for audio. I'm not intending to watch movies on it, nor show people slideshows of my cat. I am going to be using it for playing music and storing files. So the player needs to have a high quality DAC, and be able to have a decent battery life even when playing uncompressed WAV files.

      #5: A hard disk over 20-30 gigs if possible. Archos has a form factor which is small and perfect for audio playing with their 200 series players. However, for a large music collection, 20GB is fairly cramped, and there are larger hard disks that can fit in that form factor.

    14. Re:My solution by treeves · · Score: 1

      iRiver doesn't make Zen Vision M. Creative does.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  23. Damn... by jbdaem · · Score: 1

    What perfect timing.. This quite corresponds to the other article the other day about getting the oldskool players put in the graveyard by the ipod... I think someone even predicted this.. :) Kismet strikes again...

  24. Forget it. by I.+C.+Wiener · · Score: 1

    Even if you get to synchronize her tunes, she won't let you synchronize with her.

  25. Need a HAL Update by Joe+Tennies · · Score: 1

    Seeing it appears you are using Ubuntu, I'll give you instructions for that.

    Open a bug in Launchpad (http://launchpad.net). Place the name of the device and output from lsusb and lshw when the device is plugged in.

    Most likely the device did not declare itself as a DAP (Digital Audio Player) in HAL. It's a simple configuration file change if you want to make it yourself as well.

    I had to get a similar change in for my Samsung DAP.

    1. Re:Need a HAL Update by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Do you have a Samsung YP-T9? Mine says "Connected", immediately followed by a "Not Connected", then a power cycle.

      IIRC, there was an error in syslog about the device not accepting a USB ID, though it works fine when I connect it to either of my roommate's Windows PCs.

      (Though once I do get it connected, I'm unsure how I'll copy videos over; they're supposed to be SVI files with some pretty specific audio and video codec requirements.)

    2. Re:Need a HAL Update by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      I have a Samsung as well, YP-1F if I recall correctly. The player had an issue with the ehci_hcd kernel module.

      One symptom of my problem: with the player plugged in, a simple "cat /proc/bus/usb/devices" would hang until the player was removed.

      Try rmmod ehci_hcd as root and then see if the player is detected correctly.

      Good Luck!

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    3. Re:Need a HAL Update by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Are you running the MTP or UMS firmware on your YP-T9? There's no easy way to tell on the device, it just shows the firmware rev number, but if you bought it in North America or Europe, and haven't updated the firmware, odds are it's the MTP firmware. Either way, you probably want to be running 1.60 or better (my wife's T9 is on 1.67, mine's on 1.68). You can use libmtp (or Windows) to load new firmware (download from Samsung - the UMS version works fine in place of the MTP version -- see the discussion on the xiph wiki for details).

      SVI files are (as far as I can tell) just AVI files with specific settings: 208 x 176 at 15 fps, XviD codec, 44.1kHz MP3 audio. Mplayer plays SVI files just fine. I haven't yet transcoded anything to SVI format, I've only had my T9 about a week. (And figuring out all the arguments to get mplayer/mencoder to do the transcoding is no small task!)

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Need a HAL Update by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Are you running the MTP or UMS firmware on your YP-T9? MTP. At least, that's how it shows up when I connect it to my roommate's Windows boxen. I'll have to try updating the firmware.

      I haven't yet transcoded anything to SVI format, I've only had my T9 about a week. (And figuring out all the arguments to get mplayer/mencoder to do the transcoding is no small task!) Try avidemux. I use it for all of my transcoding needs. It'll do scaling just fine, though I sometimes have to jump through hoops to get the audio codec I want. Never tried messing with framerates, though; that might be a problem.
    5. Re:Need a HAL Update by Joe+Tennies · · Score: 1

      As I said, I got it working.

      It used UMS (USB Mass Storage). The problem is that Syncropated queries HAL to determine if a drive is a DAP. In my case, the player was NOT considered a DAP. I modified the database that HAL uses to say it WAS a DAP, and it worked like a charm.

    6. Re:Need a HAL Update by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I looked over the python modules to Syncropated, but it looked like they only wanted a 770 and no other model. I'm not a python person, so I didn't go too deep into it. When she gives me the player for a weekend, I'll look into the ID/HAL issue.

  26. Sandisk Sansa & Amarok by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

    I've been using a Sandisk Sansa e260 for a number of months now, and it's working very well with Linux. It's in mass-storage mode, so it gets picked up by the usb-storage module. I then use KDE's Amarok music player to sync over new MP3s. The thing also has Rockbox support underway, though I think it's not yet complete...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  27. Sansa e200 Series by ztynzo · · Score: 1

    My Sansa shows up just like any other USB Flashdrive in Ubuntu (Provided it's in MSC mode)...

    There may be a setting to switch from MTP to MSC as there is on the Sansa, this would account for failure of Ubuntu to see it... it works beautifully with linux (at least for music, videos and photos are a pain to convert I hear)

  28. sad days are upon us by spongebobsquarepants · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh boo hoo, the world will end because you can't sync your mp3 player...or at least your particular model. If this is a real weak point in the Linux Desktop, then we've come a long way. Instead of whining to the community, write an app or complain to the makers of iRiver that they are not supporting their customer base by refusing to write a quick and dirty, yet shiny and neat-o, application to sync your player under Linux. Beeya!

  29. doing it myself by noldrin · · Score: 1

    I hook it up to the computer and let it auto mount. If I need to do a full resync I delete the info on the usb drive, and drag my music onto drive. Usually I just drag the music to it and let it only add what is new. I manage my 30GB IAudio this way.

  30. 5G iPod Stinks, Too by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    5G iPod support stinks for me in Linux as well. I love my ability to rip any MP3s from an iPod with KDE by typing "ipod:/" and having everything sorted nicely. On the other hand, synching is terribly broken. Last night I tried using both the ipod:/ kioslave AND Amarok (which probably uses the ipod kioslave) with mostly poor results. 16GB of music was copied to my device, but only 350 of my 2500 songs "registered" on the iPod. The rest were in the appropriate folders, but the iPod stated 15GB of its data were "Other" files and could not play them.

    I have finally reached the point where I regret buying my iPod Video. I loved my old 30GB Photo but iTunes has become more bloated and buggy instead of getting better like I always thought it would. They've obscured the internal iPod library beyond usability, I really wish my player appeared as a "USB Mass Storage" device and simply played the files I dropped to it.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:5G iPod Stinks, Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seems to me like you need rockbox

    2. Re:5G iPod Stinks, Too by bodgit · · Score: 1

      5G iPod support stinks for me in Linux as well. I love my ability to rip any MP3s from an iPod with KDE by typing "ipod:/" and having everything sorted nicely. On the other hand, synching is terribly broken. Last night I tried using both the ipod:/ kioslave AND Amarok (which probably uses the ipod kioslave) with mostly poor results. 16GB of music was copied to my device, but only 350 of my 2500 songs "registered" on the iPod. The rest were in the appropriate folders, but the iPod stated 15GB of its data were "Other" files and could not play them.

      I've found a lot of these problems are often down to a combination of wonky ID3 tags on the files and/or the libraries that read/write them, and their interpretation of the ID3 specifications. I needed to be able to both write Unicode ID3 tags containing japanese characters onto MP3 files, and have a C library capable of reading them back in. In my quest for finding both bits of software I got quite used to opening MP3 files in hex editors to examine the ID3 tags and I can tell you a lot of software falls over and does the wrong thing past the simple ASCII artist/album/trackname/... fields.

      I'm pleased to say eyeD3 and libid3tag seemed to work well together.

    3. Re:5G iPod Stinks, Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loved my old 30GB Photo but iTunes has become more bloated and buggy instead of getting better like I always thought it would.


      Wait, you're on Linux, you use kioslave and Amarok, but you're complaining about iTunes because some of your files aren't showing up on the iPod?

      Are you serious? You're blaming a program which won't even run on your computer for something not syncing right with your iPod (being used under an unsupported OS)?

      Sounds like you've lost your mind. Tell the Amarok devs something is screwed up. This isn't an iTunes issue.
    4. Re:5G iPod Stinks, Too by supe · · Score: 1

      My 60gig 5G works perfectly fine with gtkpod.
      I have never used iTunes so can't compare.
      ciao

    5. Re:5G iPod Stinks, Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like YOU'VE lost your mind. GP doesn't blame Amarok for the fact iTunes sucks, nor does it blame iTunes for the fact Amarok won't sync the iPod properly.

    6. Re:5G iPod Stinks, Too by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      Thank you sir! Somebody give this man some +1 Informative please!

      Last time I checked about a year ago, Rockbox did not or would barely run on the 5G iPods. Now it appears they've got something usable for it, Rockbox looks like it will work for my USB Mass Storage demands. I think it will even go one step further by scanning and "importing" all of the music already loaded on it.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
  31. How do you sync your mass storage device? by SevenHands · · Score: 1

    I find that a manual sync via RCA out from my 8-Track player into my soundcard and recording via Jack Audio/Ardour most effective for my every day needs. You never know when you'll get a box full of these old tapes. However, once I'm finished this batch of tapes, I'm gonna miss that clickety click sound between tracks.

    1. Re:How do you sync your mass storage device? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      You could probably write a plugin for Rhythmbox to insert the "clickclack" between sets of tracks. There's already a way to pause for three seconds between tracks so Minidisc recorders can pick up the gap.

  32. Amarok again by Apreche · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't use KDE, but I use Amarok. Honestly, it is the only media player on Linux worth anything. Banshee and others look fine at first, but you will realize they are unstable pieces of junk if you try to add more than 50 songs to the library. Also, if you use an iPod, you can get it to work with Amarok or other Linux apps quite easily. However, the experience will never be as smooth as iTunes. This is a serious problem. This is why even though I run Linux on all my machines, I still use an iPod with a Mac mini for podcast listening. There simply isn't any other solution that works as smoothly.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Amarok again by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 1

      How large of a music library are you working with? I've got ~54,000 songs (around 350gb), and Amarok is a pain in the ass. Every time I exit Amarok or restart my computer, every time I load it back up it needs to rebuild it's playlist, which takes 7-8 minutes with a library that big (and this is a 500gb SATA drive on an Athlon 64 3200 with 1.5gb RAM). While it's playing, every few minutes the computer will slow to a crawl for about 10 seconds, presumably while Amarok finds and caches the next song to play, which is kind of irritating after a while.

      When it works, it works well, and I love the features of Amarok, but for large quantities of music, it seems there's either some work to be done to improve performance/stability, or I've just got too much music for it's database to handle.

      For now, I'm just using XMMS. It takes around a minute to load the full library into it's playlist, and I get no slowdown at all while playing.

    2. Re:Amarok again by dr+bacardi · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't rescan every time you start it... try this:

      Settings -> Configure Amarok -> Collection -> [ ] Watch folders for changes.

      With that cleared it shouldn't try to rescan each time - if you do add/delete/change some songs, you can hit Tools -> Rescan Collection (which does take a while).

    3. Re:Amarok again by Goeland86 · · Score: 1

      Even if you do that, Amarok's got serious speed issues with too large libraries. I've got around 30k songs (~50 GB), and it does exactly as said above, and then some. I lose keyboard focus occasionally while using the win+x win+b shortcuts, and Amarok doesn't act upon them. Then I have to quit amarok to be able to type anything.
      I switched from the SQListe db to mysql, and that helped with the playlist/library load times, but not the other issues. Instead of adding new featuresI don't use any from scripts), can't we just fix the ones there and speed them up? Please?
      I use amarok because I like the search feature it offers, as opposed to xmms. Rhythmbox is even slower than amarok for some reason. And I have everything on SATA-II disks, with dual opteron and 4 gigs of ram... Not normal!

      --
      ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
  33. It seems to me.... by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that this is a weakness in your hardware device (not properly supporting the mass-storage device standards) more so than that of Linux. Not that that functionally helps -you- all that much, but blame where blame is due.

  34. creative/dell players by neersign · · Score: 1

    use libnjb or some use libmtp. Just stating it for the record. You can then use Gnomad2 or Amarok to manage songs, or use it as a usb drive.

    1. Re:creative/dell players by Stormx2 · · Score: 1

      For the record, gnomad2 is perhaps the most awful piece of software ever. For those of us who actually organise our music into folders, it is unusable. I use kzenexplorer (on my GNOME desktop). You just drag & drop mp3s, and the interface for viewing your hardware player's library is superior.

      6gb Creative Zen Micro by the way.

  35. old tech does better by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    PCI fm transmitter. $5 stereo at a yardsale. Central music for your whole house. Google "PCI-MAX 2005".

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:old tech does better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll see how great your FM transmitter idea works when I drive across the US this summer.

  36. Sansa m200 series with Rockbox by joedoc · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife gifted me with a 4 GB Sansa m200 this Christmas. It has both modes (MTP and whatever the other one is called), video, radio, recording, etc. Up to 8 GB storage. I have no interest in video (bad eyes), radio or anything other than it's music capabilities. And whether or not it worked with Linux.

    As expected, it's mounted as a storage drive when plugged into the USB port. I'm not so anal that I have to sync stuff (I have too much music and am rarely home these days), so I just drag and drop whatever I want to hear onto the player. My only gripe with it up to this point was no open formats (ogg, flac).

    However, Rockbox has made firmware available for this model and it's incredible. (Warning: this will not work with the m200R Rhapsody models). Not only does the unit sound better, it now supports all open formats and adds a ton of configuration features not available with the stock firmware.

    The other great thing is that you can dual boot between Rockbox and Sansa firmware, and update the Rockbox firmware but just plugging in to a computer and copying the open downloaded firmware archive to the device. Deleting and going back to Sansa control is very easy as well.

    Great devices, those Sansas.

    --
    Joe Dougherty, Florida, USA
    The words I thought I brought, I left behind. So, never mind.
    1. Re:Sansa m200 series with Rockbox by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      Rockbox is the answer to all music player questions... it's greatly extended the life of my iRiver iHP120, and I won't buy a replacement player if Rockbox doesn't run on it.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  37. HAL workaround by magicrobotmonkey · · Score: 1

    I had a similar problem with a Cowon D2 and rhythmbox. I'd plug it in, it would mount, but rhythmbox never saw it. I found this: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=312196 basically just create an empty file .is_audio_player on the root of the device and rhythmbox will recognize it when you plug it in. I believe this only works in mass storage mode.

    1. Re:HAL workaround by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Thanks. I'll try that when I borrow it from her.

  38. Re:Failure to see problem by pizpot · · Score: 1

    iRiver ifp799 works fine when formatted to ums mode in ubuntu.

  39. Banshee by cheap.computer · · Score: 0

    http://banshee-project.org/Main_Page I use banshee with my ipod works great!

  40. MTP Device and FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used GNomad2 for my creative Nomad Zen for years. Recently I switched to a Creative Vision W (a MTP device ) and noticed that GNomad2 has been expanded to include all devices via libMTP. It might be working a look for you.

  41. Verify that you are using the correct firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the Wikipedia article on iRiver Clix, there are two versions of the firmware available: One supports MTP (Windows only) and the other supports UMS (generic mass storage and OS agnostic). If your friend's Clix has the former installed, just download the firmware for which UMS is supported and flash the device. (You may need to find a Windows box for that step. Annoyingly, some hardware manufacturers require the use of Windows software for loading their firmware.) After that, Ubuntu should automatically mount the player immediately when the device is connected and using it with Ubuntu should be quite easy.

  42. Sansa e130 - Shortcomings by vhogemann · · Score: 1

    I have a Sansa e130... it has only 521MB, and shows as USB storage, so I don't really had much trouble copying my music to it using nothing but the file manager...

    But, I do miss some features that both iTunes and WMP have... Such as the option to downsample the music as it syncs with the device, and the iTunes' "AutoFill" feature that just fills the iPod with a random selection from your highest rated songs.

    Also, I'd like to be able to create playlists with a size limit... so I know it will always fit inside my player.

    --
    ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    1. Re:Sansa e130 - Shortcomings by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      What you need to do is use your favorite text editor (if you don't have a favorite, use "Text Editor" in GNOME, or "Kate" in KDE) to make a file called .is_audio_player . Since you have a Sansa, you'll be able to use the same file I have, which is below for your cut-and-pasting pleasure

      audio_folders=MUSIC/,RECORDINGS/
      folder_depth=2
      output_formats=audio/x-ms-wma,audio/mpeg

      Just put those three lines in the file, save it to the root of your player. When you pull it up in Banshee (and probably Amarok), it will handle it as an audio player, along with all the fun options you normally get from iTunes (automagic ogg->mp3 transcoding is a godsend for me)

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  43. WMP under WINE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a doable?

    1. Re:WMP under WINE? by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I dunno about you, but I don't like WiMPy Wine. Just doesn't have that kick.

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
  44. Amarok + iRiver T30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I use an iRiver T30 with the standard MTP firmware, and Amarok works quite well with it.

    In fact, it works a bit better with Amarok than with WMP11, since WMP11 will occasionally decide that it is a new device and demand that I set up syncing again. And of course Amarok has additional benefits, such as podcatching and better library management. As far as I'm concerned, the only drawback is that you can't do an Audible.com device activation with Amarok.

  45. Automount, libmtp by AJWM · · Score: 1

    If you've got automount running, UMS devices should just magically appear as storage when plugged in. Works fine in Suse 10.1, anyway. For MTP devices, libmtp works fine. I just got a Samsung YP-T9 and replaced the MTP firmware with UMS firmware by transferring it with mtp-sendfile from libmtp. (There's also mtpfs which is supposed to make an MTP device look like a file system. I haven't tried it, it uses FUSE (user-space filesystem) which I haven't got installed at the moment and libmtp did the job.)

    On the YP-T9 after transferring, I can play the files directly from the file viewer menu, but I need to run the "update library" to get them to show up under the music menu. (The player also plays Ogg Vorbis files just fine, but the current firmware doesn't seem to recognize Ogg metadata the way it does MP3 metadata. Sigh.) The same seems to be true if I transfer files from Windows in UMS mode.

    --
    -- Alastair
    1. Re:Automount, libmtp by codeDr · · Score: 1

      I had to temporarily disable the UMS subsystem on linux in order for libmtp to work. Something in the UMS subsystem prevented libmtp from accessing the device.
      I used the mtp tools to copy all of the music off and erased them.
      I exclusively use UMS to connect to my MP3 players without a problem.
      In researching how to get to the MTP files, I found the specious comment that 'MTP' was 'invented' for robustness. I know that one cannot draw conclusions from one sample, but my observation was it offers no more protection than DOS.

  46. Re:Failure to see problem by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

    And my iRiver T10 just works. I plug it in, it shows on desktop and rhytmbox is able to see it without problem. So the problem is NOT with linux, but just with some players.

    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  47. rsync by reub2000 · · Score: 1

    I use rsync to sync my iRiver H120 to my computer's music collection.

  48. You are positively batshit insane. by mrsbrisby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless you use an iPod, this appears to be a real weak point in the Linux desktop.
    iRiver doesn't work very well on a Macintosh either, so I bet you consider it a weak point in the Macintosh desktop as well.

    How about this: if iRiver doesn't work in Linux, complain to iRiver.

    With Linux, you could also fix the problem yourself. You could also pay someone to fix the problem. If the iRiver is popular enough, you could also wait and someone else will fix it for you.

    With Windows, you don't have those options, so I consider that a weak point in the Windows desktop.
    1. Re:You are positively batshit insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they're claiming that more devices need Linux support. Don't shoot off your mouth telling them they should go write drivers. That's the wrong attitude. Linux needs to support more devices than it does, and this article brings that fact to light.

      Don't take it so personally.

      Btw, iRiver works great on Mac OS X. Simply use a program like XNJB and you're off to the races.

    2. Re:You are positively batshit insane. by mrsbrisby · · Score: 1

      Don't shoot off your mouth telling them they should go write drivers. That's the wrong attitude.
      Re-read what I said:

      How about this: if iRiver doesn't work in Linux, complain to iRiver.
      Linux supports every piece of hardware I own. It wasn't an accident: I buy hardware from companies that make compatible quality hardware. I suggest others do the same.

      Linux needs to support more devices than it does,
      So what?

      and this article brings that fact to light.
      No, it shits on the hard work of thousands of people, and tells people to be happy with what they've got. Instead, it should be telling people not to buy iRiver because iRiver doesn't care about them. iRiver doesn't care about Macintosh users, and they don't care that much about Windows users either.

      Fact is, iRiver doesn't care about me, and they don't care about you, and furthermore, I think it's positively the stupidest thing I ever heard to buy their hardware in spite of that.

      Btw, iRiver works great on Mac OS X. Simply use a program like XNJB and you're off to the races.
      No, iRiver works great with XNJB which uses libmtp- written by and for Linux users. If the original poster had installed an LIBMTP-based application, they would be able to use their iRiver but because they said this is a Linux problem and because you obviously agree, you are not allowed to install XNJB to reverse my claim: iRiver does not work with Mac OS X because you have to install third party (although Free) software to give Mac OS X support.
  49. Dodgy cable? by DaveCar · · Score: 1


    My GF was trying to get use her X5 under Ubuntu unsuccessfully. I took out a short USB extension cable which she used to access a spare USB port on the back of the machine - suddenly it worked fine.

    Make sure you are using only the cable that came with the device.

  50. Why Linux won't happen on the desktop by Animats · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you've got automount running, UMS devices should just magically appear as storage when plugged in. Works fine in Suse 10.1, anyway. For MTP devices, libmtp [sourceforge.net] works fine. I just got a Samsung YP-T9 and replaced the MTP firmware with UMS firmware by transferring it with mtp-sendfile from libmtp. (There's also mtpfs [adebenham.com] which is supposed to make an MTP device look like a file system. I haven't tried it, it uses FUSE (user-space filesystem) which I haven't got installed at the moment and libmtp did the job.)

    On the YP-T9 after transferring, I can play the files directly from the file viewer menu, but I need to run the "update library" to get them to show up under the music menu. (The player also plays Ogg Vorbis files just fine, but the current firmware doesn't seem to recognize Ogg metadata the way it does MP3 metadata. Sigh.) The same seems to be true if I transfer files from Windows in UMS mode.

    That's why Linux on the desktop isn't going anywhere. The end user, not the developer, gets stuck with integration. Any questions?

    1. Re:Why Linux won't happen on the desktop by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I have a question. Are you an astroturfer, or just a regular troll?

      End users don't have to do integration unless they're using bleeding-edge software. On a modern distro, all this stuff is installed and set up automatically. Install the latest (k)Ubuntu, for instance, and this will all "just work": just start up Amarok, plug in your DAP, and it'll work.

  51. Copying files around is not really "syncing" by jopet · · Score: 1

    OK, I am using a Creative Zen with Ubuntu and it mounts like an USB stick just fine.
    However, I'd not call this syncing. Usually, I have a growing collection of music or podcasts on my harddisk and I want to e.g. copy the new ones to the mp3 player and remove the ones I have already listened to on my player or even in my collection.

    Tracking what I have already listened to and using this information for archiving, deleting, copying etc. of tracks seems like the obvious and natural thing to do, but I havent figured out any way how to do this under Ubuntu.

    So -- is this because I missed something or because it cannot be done?

    1. Re:Copying files around is not really "syncing" by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      Ok, use the GNOME text editor, paste the following three lines in:

      audio_folders=MUSIC/,RECORDINGS/
      folder_depth=2
      output_formats=audio/x-ms-wma,audio/mpeg

      Save as .is_audio_player in the root of your Zen. Start up Banshee (and use Add/Remove Programs to install it if you don't have it), and it should recognize it.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  52. Creative by phrostie · · Score: 1

    my little creative has never given me a problem with linux (debian etch)

  53. Re:Failure to see problem by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

    So... You may have bought an iRiver!

    They can play MP3, and with the manufacturers firmware updates, many can play ogg or flag (I forget which, or if both are possible).

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  54. rsync by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    HTH

    --
    Deleted
  55. Please let's ask the devs to fix it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, you are so painfully right.

    Apparently it all began when some Amarok developers started trying to leverage Amarok's success to popularize the Ruby language, of which they are vocal advocates, by making it a mandatory dependency of Amarok.

    Nowadays when you install Amarok it also installs parts of Ruby on Rails!! (Check it for yourself, I am not making this up.) This is non-optional.

    These days I no longer use Amarok, it had become too slow. :( I got in touch with the developers to ask if perhaps they could make the dependency optional, but they didn't seem to want to. But perhaps if more of us contacted them and asked nicely they'd change their mind?

    1. Re:Please let's ask the devs to fix it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just looks like Mongrel to me, which is about as much a "part of Ruby on Rails" as Apache is part of PHP.

      Not that you're wrong about Amarok being too bulky, just that it's not because of "zomfg rails!"

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. K750 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I use a SonyEricsson K750 phone as my music player - it's a Flash walkman, with 1GB MemoryStick, Bluetooth and USB connection to my Ubuntu (GNOME) PC.

    How do I sync not just the K750's music/image/video folders (which appear as USB drives), but also its calendar, contacts and email with desktop Evolution?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  58. Banshee has mtp support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  59. Yet again by Tharkban · · Score: 1

    Yet again someone has realized that if everyone used linux, then no one would want to switch to windows.

    --
    Tharkban (It is a signature after all)
  60. What I use by ajs318 · · Score: 1
    I just use MySQL and mpg321 to deal with all my music cataloguing and playing needs. Sort of like

    $ mpg321 `echo "SELECT filename FROM songs WHERE artist LIKE 'kylie%' ORDER BY date" | mysql songs`
    Or, for syncing,

    $ mount /mp3player
    $ rm -f /mp3player/*mp3
    $ cp `echo "SELECT filename FROM songs WHERE artist LIKE 'kylie%' ORDER BY date" | mysql songs` /mp3player/
    $ sync && umount /mp3player
    But then again, I 'm well 'ard :)
    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  61. OS politics... by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    Unless you use an iPod, this appears to be a real weak point in the Linux desktop.
    iRiver doesn't work very well on a Macintosh either, so I bet you consider it a weak point in the Macintosh desktop as well.

    How about this: if iRiver doesn't work in Linux, complain to iRiver. The difference is that none of these manufacturers of music players are seeking to support Linux as they do other OSes - we as a community have taken on that yoke ourselves for now - and so, as a result, if a particular player doesn't play well with Linux, it is a failure of those who have been trying to improve support for the players on Linux. It's fine to say that companies should provide Linux support for their hardware - but generally that just doesn't happen. If you want to use Linux you need to accept that and deal with it.

    If you don't care who you "blame" - if you only care about the practical results you can achieve, then this situation is not necessarily a failure of any particular set of developers (since we're not laying blame) but nevertheless, the set of software that makes up the "Linux Desktop" can't do what you want, so it has failed.

    With Windows, you don't have those options... How so?
    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
    1. Re: OS politics... by mrsbrisby · · Score: 1

      The difference is that none of these manufacturers of music players are seeking to support Linux as they do other OSes - we as a community have taken on that yoke ourselves for now - and so, as a result, if a particular player doesn't play well with Linux, it is a failure of those who have been trying to improve support for the players on Linux. It's fine to say that companies should provide Linux support for their hardware - but generally that just doesn't happen. If you want to use Linux you need to accept that and deal with it.
      That might've been true ten years ago, but these days its completely bogus. Linux has overall better hardware and software support than any other platform. If companies go out of their way to make their products incompatible with Free Software, I tell people to not buy from those companies. I don't say, it's Free Software's fault, try again in a few years, and I am thoroughly disgusted with anyone who would seriously suggest that.

      but nevertheless, the set of software that makes up the "Linux Desktop" can't do what you want, so it has failed.
      That's a terribly useless definition that makes the Linux Desktop fail because Windows and Macintosh fail just as equally.

      There is no reason to use Windows anymore: The fact that "iRiver" doesn't have particularly good drivers on Linux is a good reason to not use iRiver and not a good reason to use Windows.

      With Windows, you don't have those options...
      How so?
      There are no NT or Vista drivers for some STB-based cards. People who bought them cannot use them unless they use Linux. ATI won't make drivers for them because they're old, and Microsoft won't let you make drivers for them because if you could make drivers for them, you might also be tempted to circumvent Digital Restrictions Management software.

      Microsoft is completely irrelevant anymore: Free software means that companies have to make their customers happy instead of just making sure that nobody else can make them happier. Since I'm not using them in the workplace, I don't have to use them at home.
  62. USBsink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe no one's mentioned USBsink.

    http://usbsink.sourceforge.net/
    A program for automatic file synchronization over USB.

    USBSink is a GNOME program for automatic file synchronization over USB. It is designed for users of removable drives, such as flash drives or external hard disks. In USBSink you define a task associated to a particular USB drive, and then have a complete automation of data trasfers. With file monitoring and hardware detection features, the program is able to respond and act according to relevant events on the desktop.

    1. Re:USBsink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this works great. Version .3 allow the use of drives which have not been classified by HAL as removable drives. Instead, it works with any drive in a USB port. If you can mount it, it will work. Fixed the problem with my iriver.

    2. Re:USBsink by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Perfect recommendation. I'll put together a .deb for her and e-mail it. It's exactly what I was looking for.

  63. Well by Disharmony2012 · · Score: 1

    I have a MP3 device, that acts as either MTP or USB Mass Storage device. Either option works fine, as it comes up under Debian Testing just fine. Banshee nor Rhythmbox detect it(though I've never tried.). When plugged in the folder pops up in Nautilus and I simply drag all the songs I want to the USB Mass Storage device.

  64. I have a u10 by rleibman · · Score: 1

    I have a U10 (512K), I think it's the predecessor of yours. Originally we were screwed and there was only an MTP version in the U.S. they've since (due to many complaints) added a USB version of the firmware. Once installed you still have to go through the pain of running a program called easypmp after you copy files to it in order to get the indexing to work correctly. I have no idea if your model has a USB version of the firmware.

    I bought mine originally because it was one of the few players that can play ogg (plus it looks really cool) but I'm still a bit disapointed that another important feature for me is still missing: proper gapless playback. It is hard to listen to classical music (or Pink Floyd) with gaps in between the tracks).

  65. Entertaining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Unless you use an iPod, this appears to be a real weak point in the Linux desktop."

    So the only things that exist out there are the iPod and the iriver?

    My daughters sandisk 6 gig mp3/mp4/photo player works perfectly with linux. Same as the archos unit my wife has as well as every other mp3 player that is not designed to screw with the customer by using a non standard transfer setup.

    iriver is neat, but their engineers need to have the crap beat out of them for not using a standard USB memory design and ignore any stupid management software.

    Solution, tell your girlfriend to get a decent mp3 player.

  66. try Banshee by illogic · · Score: 1

    Banshee has an interface very similar to Rhythmbox, but Guide/DAPs/MTP">uses libmtp to support many more digital audio players. I find the Amarok interface a bit cluttered, and it's a KDE app anyway. Something like Gnomad2 would not be as well-integrated with your music library as Banshee. Give it a try.

  67. I've got a similar model by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Several of the devices in the Clix line, including the U10 (which I have), can be upgraded to use alternate firmware - to use it as a mass storage device. (But to rebuild the playlists, you'll need EasyPMP.)

    Barring that, I have to confess I did run into trouble syncing using MTP through amaroK. It worked, but it was horribly unreliable. The whole setup reeks.

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  68. Why do I have to fill in a subject? by bradavon · · Score: 1

    As it supports UMS just copy the music manually or is that too difficult? Personally I can't stand syncing rubbish.

  69. Yeah by photomonkey · · Score: 1

    I have Ubuntu installed on a few machines around here, and have tried various software packages with various music players, and I can honestly say that while I love linux, stuff like this doesn't work as well as it could if the hardware companies started supporting their devices in Linux.

    Although Linux is getting there in terms of usability as a corporate or power-user's desktop, it's still a little out of reach of the common man.

    I'm sure in a couple more years, it'll be there.

    --
    Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
  70. What can I say? by fwarren · · Score: 1

    This seems to be pretty much personal peference.

    I think most mac apps look like chit. Can't stand quicktime or iTunes.

    Wheras I fell in love with Amarok the first time I ran it. The only reason my wife ever goes back to windows is to play games. Amarok has her hooked on Linux.

    --
    vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  71. gtkpod by djfake · · Score: 1

    Been using http://www.gtkpod.org/ for a few years now with my 4G iPod, now with Fedora Core 6. Works flawlessly, but the dekstop program has weird sorting. You could also use udev rules to back up anything: http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/9311/

    --
    www.itjerk.com
  72. WTF is MTP? Clarity... by Envy+Life · · Score: 2, Informative

    Use rsync. I had the same thought going into this. I have an iRiver H320 that works like a mass storage device and the simplicity of that makes this whole thread dumbfounding. A quick search brought up this informative article Liberate Portable Music Players: UMS, MTP, and Platform-Agnostic Drag-and-Drop Music Listening
  73. hardware supports still sucks in Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've got a lot of the basic stuff but the less super popular a gadget like that is the less likely it will be easily supported in Linux.

    Ubuntu's PDF reader doesn't even work right out of the box, how much can you expect from the the OS that's packaged with broken software.

    Point is if she doesn't know much about Linux and likes things like mp3 players then you two are kidding yourself by thinking Linux will provide her with a good computing experience. If you like to be LOCKED into your hardware purchases then LINUX IS FOR YOU. Otherwise it's still not there as a reasonable desktop offering. As a limited desktop it's pretty good, but even when hardware is supported it still usually lacking in the options it had in windows. That's always going to happen in Linux because they are so scared of proprietary drivers which leaves the open source community with the retarded goal of re-writting a half ass version of the driver and/or software to go with your hardware.

    No matter how you spin it you almost always wind up with less control and functionality out of your non standard hardware in Linux. Game pads, video cards, sound cards, dvd burning, printing.. and the list goes on for the headaches of running Linux.
    I've seen a lot of people at first love linux but when they actually have to live with it on their own for a couple months it becomes very limiting.

    In many cases the people learn to adapt to having less functionality simply because they can't install a new OS on it themselves, but you are giving the average user a downgrade by putting them in Linux and you can't reasonable expect them to be able to do a lot of things they can do easily on XP or Vista. The lack of desktop functionality is an obvious fact that Linux zealots may pathetically deny, but when you give a common user a Linux desktop it becomes painfully apparent as they have to ask you how to do anything beyond surfing or plugging in a thumb drive or burning simplistic DVDs. Like I said they will get used to it probably, but your guys are kidding yourself thinking ubuntu is even remotely as easy to use as XP or Vista. It's not really faster either, so .. WHY. Your just going to wind up walking this person through things they used to do by themselves with windows and it's not going to end. If that's your goal then a Linux laptop will be great, but otherwise you are letting her downgrade her and her laptops full potential.

    I mean, maybe I'm wrong, maybe she wants to run her laptop as a server in which case linux will be a great choice. Nothing like

  74. Actually... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

    Ordering the same type of soft drink is not a declaration of love.

    You'd be surprised. You'd be surprised. The phrase "Orange Soda" just never will sound the same after that one fateful night...

  75. Typo by Scaba · · Score: 1

    I recently sold my old laptop to a friend, and she asked me to keep Ubuntu on it rather than installing Windows for her.

    You misspelled "I talked her into."

  76. I use by TheShadowzero · · Score: 1

    gtkpod for my brother's iPod, and I haven't used it myself, but am aware that Amarok has syncing capabilities.

    --
    If history repeats itself, why can't we study the future?
  77. Something is wrong with your installation. by twitter · · Score: 1

    [Amarok] resource requirements are brutal. It eats memory, is painfully slow to startup and regularly spikes the processor at 100% even when it's doing nothing.

    It's a little slow on a 400 MHz K6/2, but that's only because the IDE on that ancient machine blows. Amarok is snappy on any 1GHz class CPU or better.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Something is wrong with your installation. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Amarok is snappy on any 1GHz class CPU or better.

      I really hate to say it, but I'm with you on this one. I've always found Amarok to be very snappy and a nice piece of software, if a little buggy at times (and I found that even that's due to underlying code like taglib and such).

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  78. Update kills ogg? Use Rockbox instead. by twitter · · Score: 1

    iRiver devices come with PlayForSure DRM. You need to update the firmware on the device to get rid of it. Use the UMS version of the firmware. You won't be able to buy music with the device on WMP but you will be able to mount it as a SCSI drive in linux

    Most cheap players have M$'s crappy and now abandoned DRM but it's harmless and updating it won't remove it. I have heard that the update will remove your ability to play OGG. Because of this, most iRiver players will do either ogg or USBFS but not both and I won't own one. If you have one of the first iRivers, you should use RockBox, which is much better than any iRiver firmware.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  79. M$ pissed on Ogg, and all players. by twitter · · Score: 1

    I read a rumor at the link I gave above that MS has done much to make Ogg Vorbis unavailable in the US.

    It's not a rumor, it's a court admitted fact. See The Register story. Microsoft "deals" are always like that.

    MTP is another wonderful thing they pushed. It's slower and less reliable than USBFS which better players use.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  80. huh? was that supposed to make sense? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    Please elaborate. My transmitter has a 2-mile range, when properly amped (Which it is not; I actually can only get mono signal across the other side of my house; must buy better antenna), and can be set to whatever frequency I want - including an even-decimal frequency (unlike all radio stations, which use odd-decimal frequency).

    I actually have problems with the card not working all the time due to IRQ conflict, but I live within the D.C. beltway in a populated area off of a main road and have never had any interference whatsoever.

    What I have had, strangely enough, is CB-radio interference ON MY STEREO SPEAKERS. Mind you, the stereo is set to an OPTICAL DIGITAL connection to my computer. No FM antenna is attached to the receiver, which receives 0 radio stations when I try to tune into the the local stations. No antenna exists in my house. Yet, every now and then, I hear truckers coming out of my speakers. It's weird as fuck.

    But not quite as weird as the time I picked up radio cuba by hooking my guitar to the microphone jack of my old stereo, and cranking the stereo volume up while keeping the guitar pickups turned off. THAT one REALLY confused me.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  81. Win-Win Situation for Linux Community by blurfus · · Score: 1

    The way I see it is:
    a) He gets the lady, becomes one more happy Linux user ;o)
    b) He doesn't but she likes Ubuntu, becomes one more happy Linux user

    Either way, the community has one more happy member.

    We all win :)

    PS
    You can't blame a guy for trying can you?

    --
    will work for Karma
  82. Samsung YP-Z5F by E.R. · · Score: 1
    I have a Samsung YP-Z5F that works perfectly with Linux (Ubuntu in my case).
    • Pure plug and play, automatically popping up in rhythmbox.
    • Plays ogg files. (And because ogg has a better compression than mp3 at the same bit rate, you either get better quality or more music on your 4GB.)
    • Long battery life.
    But using Linux and preferring open formats for my music, I do need to look a bit closer at the players than a windows user has to. The upside to this is that I won't end up depending on some weird proprietary software to be able to use the device.
  83. or your reality distortion field by dedazo · · Score: 0, Troll
    ROFL, that's certainly not true. Amarok positively blows on my 1.0GHz PIII (Ubuntu). And for some reason it consumes more and more memory over time, never releasing it until closed. There might be some sort of tweak that can be done (maybe the real-time Wikipedia lookups or something) but in the default config it's not very usable.

    On a 3.4MHz P4 it's acceptable, but I still see the memory thing.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  84. iriver FTW! by b00fhead · · Score: 1

    I just got my girlfriend a 12GB iriver X20 for her birthday. There's a menu setting which allows you to select the connection behaviour - whether it acts like a USB drive, or be compatible with WMP. Then, just drag & drop the mp3s/oggs. It even has a microSD slot, which I haven't played with yet.

    I have a 20GB iriver H10, which requires me to hold a button in while switching it on to put it into "Emergency Mode" so it appears as a USB drive. Prior to installing Rockbox, I then had to run easyH10 to build the database. Now, I just drag and drop - Rockbox builds the DB for me.

    Back in the day, I had an iriver iFP-120. iriver provided a firmware on their website which, when installed, caused the player to act like a USB drive.

    So, the H10 is the least Linux-friendly, and even that's not so bad! They're functional, durable, cheap & attractive little players.

  85. Re:Drag and drop MP3's by Technician · · Score: 1

    Personally, (most) MP3 players I've hooked up to Linux through a USB have been recognized as just plain old drives. You put the MP3 in the right folder (sometimes takes testing) and there it is, ready to play.

    Many MTP devices (newer version of plays for sure) has 2 modes of operation. 1 is the music mode requiring MTP for transfers. Having the MTP library and a proper player to handle sync is essential. I went through that for a newer version of the Zen V video player. The other mode is mass USB storage mode. The device usualy has to be partitioned to set aside some space for mass storage. The player won't tough anything stuffed in that partition with a 10 foot pole. It is storage space and nothing else. It is one of the evils of MTP devices to prevent casusal copying of the music library. Fortunately on Linux, the Banchee and other players which sync to MTP devices through the MTP library, are perfectly able to copy both ways unlike the software that ships with the player which will happly delete removed songs on the next sync.

    Me personaly, I prefer a driverless MP3 player. The cheaper the better. My under $40 Coby player includes mic and FM recording to MP3 file, SD slot for expansion, backlit LCD display, driverless USB connection for drag and drop file maitenance, and runs on a rechargable AAA battery. It's easy to use at home, or on work PC's where we are not allowed to install software. I often will find an MP3 podcast which I directly DL to the player at work. Most DRM players will not function that way. It is important to find a player which meets your needs.

    The only thing I haven't figured out how to do without it's driver software is build playlists. Someday I'll find a Windows PC to load the software on to build a playlist to use as an editable template.

    Without a playlist the player still functions well just navigating the directories instead.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  86. easy by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

    Plug in device, window opens that asks if I want to open the device, open the device. Konqueror opens and I drag and drop files.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  87. MTP library by brother.sand · · Score: 1

    I had a similar problem with the Creative Zen V (4GB). I grabbed the libmtp stuff from http://libmtp.sourceforge.net/ and can copy files over via the command line. mtp-sendtr works to send a track over to the player. I haven't had much luck getting Amarok to work with libmtp though. I recompiled it with what I thought were the proper options but no luck. My wife has an iPod and either Amarok or Rhythmbox works great for it. A little trouble with playlists in Rhythmbox, but otherwise it's fine. D.

  88. Archos players by joneil · · Score: 1

    The Archos 404, 504 & 604 series of music & video players use a Linux O/S. I find under Ubuntu and Amarok, my Archos syncs just perfectly. Worth a look

  89. reality distortion field by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Amarok positively blows on my 1.0GHz PIII (Ubuntu).

    and you think "Microsoft Office is lighting fast on just about any hardware, and that has been true for every release cycle the site has had so far after Office 95." That's rich.

    You must be bored with your Slashdot troll job and want to be fired to write such transparently false nonsense.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:reality distortion field by dedazo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually, let me reiterate that - Office is fucking lighting fast on most normal business hardware. The Office 2003 apps are actually faster to load than the 2000 ones were, and I can't tell the difference between 2003 and 2007 though I've noticed Word 2007 is actually slightly faster at loading larger documents, probably because it's doing more in the background. I haven't played much with the others.

      With the possible exception of Outlook, I've never seen an Office app take more than 2-3 seconds to load. We're not talking prefetch or cache or the Office accelerator, which I always disable anyway. Go ahead and prove me wrong.

      Anyone with half a brain that has ever used Office can tell you all this - unlike you I don't feel the need to make shit up about things I've never used. Your FUD doesn't actually change reality, no matter how much you want that to be the case.

      That Amarok is slow might be irrelevant given the functionality it provides (I use XMMS mostly anyway), much like Firefox vs IE. But that doesn't mean it's not slow or that it doesn't leak memory for some reason.

      Other than having to install xine to have it play MP3s, on my Ubuntu box Amarok is in pristine post-Synaptic install state. I cannot believe I did anything to make it slow, so I must conclude that it needs a beefier box to work well. That's OK, I don't have a problem with that at all. It just invalidates your bullshit fanboy claim that it works fantabulously on a 1GHz processor. Maybe you should stop using that "let me tell you how it is" tone in your posts, and no one would feel the need to constantly call you out on them.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  90. Rsync by ultramkancool · · Score: 0

    rsync the thing. Problem solved.

  91. Amarok + libmtp by homebrandcola · · Score: 1

    I use Amarok + libmtp with my MP3 player and it works great for syncing.

  92. Oh, if only that were true. by twitter · · Score: 1

    ... unlike you I don't feel the need to make shit up about things I've never used.

    I do wish I could claim I never had to use M$ Office. I was happy enough without it, then I took a job with a Fortune 100 company, where Office was considered a "standard". Opening more than one or two M$ documents would bring their desktops to a disk thrashing crawl. People would literally drum their fingers on their desks waiting for the shit to work. They considered floppies more reliable than their desktops or the servers. They made us boot daily, so every morning I'd go get coffee while the poor thing booted. That kind of performance was the best money could buy.

    Windoze and Office are pigs. They always were and they always will be.

    Years later, I own one of those very machines and my wife uses it daily. It's an 800 MHz PIII and guess what, Mepis out of the box runs it very well. It does Amarok just fine too.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Oh, if only that were true. by dedazo · · Score: 0, Troll

      (some bullshit exaggeration and FUD, etc) Windoze and Office are pigs. They always were and they always will be.

      I don't know at what "Fortune 500" you worked, but I see two possibilities here. 1) Your "Fortune 500" friends that forced you to boot daily and all that jazz were complete and utter retarded morons; or 2) You are just lying. Whichever it is, rest assured that your imagined hell on earth is nowhere near the reality I've been accustomed since I started working in this industry many years ago.

      As for Amarok working "just fine" on your 486DX2, more power to you. Maybe one day I'll be a Linux expert and be able to tweak my box so it doesn't suck so much, but in the meantime I'll stick to what I know and enjoy. I don't really use Linux enough to care much about whether or not some bloated MP3 player works well on it or not.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  93. HOWTO: Syncing by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    create an empty file in the player's root directory named .is_audio_player and enjoy with programs like Rhythmbox. This was the piece I couldn't find for a long time when trying to get my Sansa e260 to work nicely. Oh yeah, also make sure it's in UMS mode. source

  94. How to get Rhythmbox to recognize your UMS player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This works on my UMS audio player(Zen Nano) that I use with Rhythmbox

    cd /media/usbdisk
    touch .is_audio_player

    That flags your UMS device as an audio player. It should then show up in Rhythmbox

  95. Update the firmware, perhaps? by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how the Clix works, but my iRiver T30 had a firmware that only supported MTP, not UMS; I had to download another firmware that does UMS (which ment losing MTP support, but since I'm a linux user, and I only listen to stuff I rip myself and steer clear of DRM, that's hardly an issue for me). Then I used iRiver's firmware updater to install the new firmware; you need a Windows machine for this to work.

    According to a post on this page, the older firmwares only did MTP; if you want UMS as well, you need a newer firmware.

    Does the player mount as a thumbdrive when you plug it in? If not, your player only does MTP, not UMS.

    As to what software to use to synch the player; heck, I just use a file browser, or "cp" on the commandline.

    --
    Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
  96. amarok by tater_3001 · · Score: 0

    i use amarok to hook up my sansa e250R i dont kno what mode it is in it says rhapsody.. the other is plays for sure.. idk.. but ya amarok works good

  97. Re:WTF is MTP? Clarity... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    The point of the discussion was looking for a nice, graphical way for her to do it and, hopefully, see what's going on while it does. She has no concept what MTP or UMS are. I COULD write a script for her, which is what I'll do if I need to (I'd originally just planned to put an entry in the menu, but the udev rule looks like an elegant way to do it). Manually scripting the thing won't be nearly as reassuring for her as telling her to install X (probably Amarok at this point).

  98. Change to the UMS firmware by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    Link to the latest CLIX UMS firmware.
    http://www.iriverplus.com/tools/UMS/U/U20CLIX/U20_ ENG_UM_OK.ZIP

    Some iRiver players have one firmware for MTP, one for UMS

    This page maintains a list of updates for iRiver players.
    http://nyaochi.sakura.ne.jp/iriverupdate/

    1. Re:Change to the UMS firmware by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      To clarify, the hex images for that firmware are identical in both packages, so it looks like it is a mode switch (in the .inf file the installer uses) for the CLIX. With a 10MB software image, I'm not surprised the CLIX can fit support for both in.

      You still need a different firmware for some of the smaller flash-based players to support UMS.

  99. Re:Update kills ogg? Use Rockbox instead. by mjtg · · Score: 1
    I've heard that iRiver sells devices in North America with MTP-based firmware. In most of the rest of the world, their firmware is UMS-based. I don't believe iRiver put out firmware that supports both. You can flash from one firmware type to the other, but you void your warranty.

    I live in Australia, OGGs play fine on my UMS-based E10. I have had problems running some AVI's (although most work ok).

    I bought my E10 mainly because it was about the most Linux-friendly device I could find that had the features I wanted at a reasonable price and reputation for quality. PMPlib allows you to rebuild the device's media index, iriverter (a gui front-end for Mencoder) produces the appropriate video format for the device. Being UMS-based, it doubles as a USB drive for copying files around. I even store scripts on it that I run to rsync files to it, call PMPlib/Mencoder, etc. I'm very happy with my little E10.

    Rockbox doesn't support the E10, so that's not an option for me (yet).

    Disclaimer: I have no links whatsoever with iRiver, other than being a satisfied customer.

  100. gnomad by ico2 · · Score: 1

    I use the program gnomad2 to transfer tracks to my Creative Zen which also uses MTP.
    You need the libmtp library from here: http://libmtp.sourceforge.net/
    And gnomad2 from here: http://gnomad2.sourceforge.net/

    Gnomad2 isnt the greatest app ever written but it seems to do the job and is relatively easy to use.

    I believe there is also a kio slave for mtp out there somewhere which might be easier, but I haven't used it myself.

  101. Linux Compatibility Survey for Media Players by wehe · · Score: 1

    The TuxMobil Linux Compatibility Survey for Media Players lists more than 100 compatibility reports for many audio and video players. There is also a survey of useful Linux software to organize, convert and sync your MP3, Ogg and MPEG files.

  102. Re:Update kills ogg? Use Rockbox instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an iRiver recently. It was defective by design out of the box, but the firmware flasher fixed it and vorbis was still available.

  103. unison by JThundley · · Score: 1

    If it's a USB mass storage device, you could use the unison file synchronizer. It has a simple graphical interface.

  104. heh, you should try Gin ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... and end up somewhere you don't want to be, that one fateful night ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  105. Simple. by webmonkey44 · · Score: 1

    Tell her to copy the songs directly the player. This is quite easy.

  106. mount by bastardblaster · · Score: 1

    # lsusb # mkdir / # mount /dev/usb / if it truly does have mass removable storege capabilities, this will work. use lsusb to find the devid of the device, the create a directory to mount it to and then mount the appropriate /dev/usb device. it may take a few tries to get the correct usb device, but this is how i got my Motorola i880 to show as a 1G removable drive.

  107. Re:Update kills ogg? Use Rockbox instead. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    The iRiver H320/H340 support both MTP and UMS, in the US versions. There's two USB ports, one for each standard. On the device they're labeled "DATA" and "MEDIA", where DATA is the UMS port for upgrading firmware, putting MP3s on, using as a USB hard drive, etc., and MEDIA is for loading PlaysForSure crap.

    On the international version, the "MEDIA" port is used for USB Host functionality (and is labeled accordingly). One popular mod to the H320 is to load the international firmware (usually the Korean version), which forever removes the ability to play DRMed music (oh no!), and changes the port to a USB host port. Unfortunately, the hardware inside the player which generates the 5V power supply for the USB Host port was left out of the US players, so your device must be self-powered, and also not require 5V on the USB bus as a power-on signal as many devices do. Many people have hacked USB cables together to splice in the 5V, or hacked up self-powered standalone USB hubs, or even hacked the player itself to get power from somewhere else (except that it isn't a true 5V then). I'd like to add the appropriate missing components to my player, but I haven't found a good enough close-up photo of the international version's circuit board to discern what these are.