Seriously, he will ask you if he is interested. Also programming is just a tool, so rather teach him how (and why) to create (in whatever way) than one specific way of creating things without a purpose.
* awesome mechanical cherry keys * no crap like glowy keycaps and macro-keys * great price point (60€ or so) compared to any other keyboard with switches
I dont need the robot to pick up my laundry, I am perfectly happy with dropping the dirty stuff into a chute to the cellar where it gets processed. That alone eliminates steps 1-6. 7 gets drastically simplified (because your machine could just use a directly-attached big tank).
The only non-trivial things remaining are: 1) I do not like dryers -> air-drying is supperior, ideally, summer this should happen outside depending on weather... so this means picking the clothes apart and figuring out how they should be hung on a line, and possibly transferring them outside (though this party could be quite simple if you put your lines on a sort of movable rack) 2) Folding laundry afterwards (or putting it on hangers) 3) Ideally, putting it back into my wardrobe
Only if your view of MS is stuck in the aera of Halloween-Documents. They are doing pretty great work regarding openness and interoperability esp. since Satya took over.
Having a simple modules base that can be combined gives you the best of both worlds. You can quickly test your candidates (as they are simple) and write the code that glues them together yourself.
In spotify's case we know the artists get scrap because they have shit deals with their labels and the labels keep all the money. So how does this compare to Pandora?
"Bla bla... Google not interested in investors... bla bla... not sustainable... bla bla... too little monetarization... bla bla... I'm a money-hungry creep."
Slashdot Mirror
just as an FYI for the rest of the world ...
and I was already thinking of the robot "mutating" and thus transforming :D
but I don't have to land at kennedy ... I can just aim for any corn field which I can rent ;)
and who says they have to land east of florida?
I would assume landing on land would be easier considering your platform does not move even if there is bad weather...
Seriously, he will ask you if he is interested. Also programming is just a tool, so rather teach him how (and why) to create (in whatever way) than one specific way of creating things without a purpose.
because seriously, thats like putting the US in based on separate states ...
"wow, writing the whole program as a sequence of XORs is actually pretty impressive" :D
* awesome mechanical cherry keys
* no crap like glowy keycaps and macro-keys
* great price point (60€ or so) compared to any other keyboard with switches
i would upvote you, but you already have 5 points
Consider that in 2007, neither C++1 nor C++14 were out.
I dont need the robot to pick up my laundry, I am perfectly happy with dropping the dirty stuff into a chute to the cellar where it gets processed.
That alone eliminates steps 1-6. 7 gets drastically simplified (because your machine could just use a directly-attached big tank).
The only non-trivial things remaining are: ... so this means picking the clothes apart and figuring out how they should be hung on a line, and possibly transferring them outside (though this party could be quite simple if you put your lines on a sort of movable rack)
1) I do not like dryers -> air-drying is supperior, ideally, summer this should happen outside depending on weather
2) Folding laundry afterwards (or putting it on hangers)
3) Ideally, putting it back into my wardrobe
Only if your view of MS is stuck in the aera of Halloween-Documents. They are doing pretty great work regarding openness and interoperability esp. since Satya took over.
Having a simple modules base that can be combined gives you the best of both worlds. You can quickly test your candidates (as they are simple) and write the code that glues them together yourself.
was seriously disappointed when opening the article
No. Does he do it? Yes. So in practice, where's your problem?
uuuhm, not sure about you, but I consider armed drones and gps-guided bombs killer robots ...
> they're just the performer
that highly depends on whom you are listening to ... for mainstream music it is true enough though.
In spotify's case we know the artists get scrap because they have shit deals with their labels and the labels keep all the money. So how does this compare to Pandora?
there is techniques to read pulished-out stamped numbers (eg. on car frames) since ages.
"Granted, it's not a very frequent need"
change "DB" to "Microservice" and its an extremely common use case.
well, maybe in the numbers, but def. not in the ease-of-installation ... having package managers by default is just awesome
"Bla bla ... Google not interested in investors ... bla bla ... not sustainable ... bla bla ... too little monetarization ... bla bla ... I'm a money-hungry creep."
no text
in many rooms light goes on and off automatically because I have movement sensors, which is super convenient.