Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Outage Update

Obviously Slashdot has had some issues the past couple days. For those wondering, we inherited an aging hardware setup in the acquisition that was located physically far away from us. We made a big investment in a new hardware set up, and ran into sizable issues including a massive DDOS during the migration process. Going forward we expect much better uptime. If we inconvenienced anyone, we're sorry. If it's any consolation, it wasn't fun for us either, and our team worked non-stop for days to get Slashdot back online. With our new infrastructure in place, we will be dedicating a lot of time and resources this year to improving Slashdot.

513 comments

  1. Also by whipslash · · Score: 5, Funny

    I appreciate the concern, conspiracy theories, and even the anger and vitriol. It's nice to see people care.

    1. Re:Also by ls671 · · Score: 3, Informative

      whipslash for editor role please!

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    2. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be perfectly honest we need to fix slashdot. You might as well mod this +20 now.

      Incrementize and Deputize people. Evaluate what they do.

      Meritocratize.

    3. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was weird.

      I went for a walk outside. I think I got a bit sunburned.

      But now things are back to normal. Whew.

    4. Re:Also by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      It's nice to see people care.

      We care. Thank you for the effort.

      Also, Unicode!

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    5. Re:Also by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Same for me!

      I even took my first bicycle ride of the year since it is amazingly warm up here in Alaska for this time of the year.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    6. Re:Also by ls671 · · Score: 1

      I don`t trust Unicode to run natively on any systems that I manage. Of course, those systems support Unicode at the application level if needed although.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    7. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in:

      If you walk around outside for two days you get a sunburn! We'll keep you up to date with more coverage of this discovery later on News For 8 Year Olds.

    8. Re:Also by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      It was weird.

      I went for a walk outside. I think I got a bit sunburned.

      You should sue. I would, but it was snowing so I just bought a dog.

    9. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just tested for posting a poem in Unicode. The system responded with “ looks like ASCII art” and will not post. :(
      UNICODE DOES NOT WORK!

    10. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we can expect more baseless accusations against Russia and bashing of Trump?

    11. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the truth, yeh traitor Trump and you Trumpers will not avoid the inevitable.

    12. Re:Also by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      A nice warm weather break during the winter is always appreciated. Just wait. You'll get the nasty cold-ass weather back soon enough. Summer will be here soon enough. Cheers.

    13. Re:Also by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      It was weird.

      I went for a walk outside. I think I got a bit sunburned.

      You should sue. I would, but it was snowing so I just bought a dog.

      Is that what you kids are calling it nowadays? What was wrong with 'the monkey'?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    14. Re:Also by jishak · · Score: 1

      I care as well. Not a fan of trolling or me-too posts but need you guys to know that you are appreciated and thought of. Also, I am glad someone finally responded on twitter after I sent you guys a message. I hope you guys don't go down again but if it does happen can you proactively post something like a twitter update of an outage?

    15. Re:Also by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      No, I literally got so bored I bought a dog. That's how much of a lifeless nerd I am. A /. outage is an actual crisis.

    16. Re:Also by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Glad your'e back up after getting slashdotted. Thanks

      --
      Nullius in verba
    17. Re:Also by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm a big fan of Whiplash (the movie) and Slash (the guitarist) ; so Whipslash is an happy agglomerate of the two + editor... nice!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    18. Re:Also by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I was getting withdrawal symptoms. Got so much work done. It was awful...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Also by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Thanks for all the hard work you guys do providing this service!

      To the complainers about Slashdot, I always say:

      "Slashdot is free . . . and worth every penny I pay for it!"

      Slashdot is as good as we, the participants and contributors, make it!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    20. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best improvement would be to filter off all the Russian trolls and bots. Nerds know you can do that from traffic trends, so letting them stay is just tacit endorsement that kills slashdot more and more each day.

    21. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right wing snowflakes never miss an opportunity to whine randomly about people from which they feel 'threatened'. When anyone calls you out on your bullshit, you label them and pound out with all the fury of a St Petersburg winter. Sad really, I've been around since before numbered UIDs, but the number of Russian/GOP trolls has become remarkably distracting, but I guess killing slashdot with noise is your agenda.

    22. Re:Also by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don`t trust Unicode to run natively on any systems that I manage. Of course, those systems support Unicode at the application level if needed although.

      What does that even mean? You don't have unicode, but you do?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    23. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DDoS is a convenient excuse to cover up technical incompetence which is amusing considering the arrogant group think here regarding the technical abilities of anyone not in the gnu/foss fan club.

    24. Re:Also by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Frustration was probably the most common thing. Not about the outage itself, but the lack of communication during it. Couldn't find a word about what was going on anywhere, nor could the small groups of us users who found eachother elsewhere. That's really not cool for an outage that exceeds 24 hours, and had updates been provided during, I'm sure there would have been a lot less of the conspiracy theories, anger, and vitriol too.

    25. Re:Also by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I don`t trust Unicode to run natively on any systems that I manage. Of course, those systems support Unicode at the application level if needed although.

      Uh, what? Unicode is a data format, it's not something you can run. Because it tries to be everything for everyone it's unfortunately a very big and complex standard, but it essentially boils down to:

      1. Variable-length encoding (most commonly utf-8)
      2. Fixed-length encoding (most commonly ucs-2)

      The characters break down into:

      1. Graphic characters (136,537)
      2. Format characters (153)
      3. Control characters (65)
      4. Private use areas

      The graphic characters are basically a very big version of your ABC's. Yes, it's all languages living and dead and symbols and emojis and whatever but the worst you can do with those are create better ASCII art or rather non-ASCII art. Format and control characters are the only ones you need to really care about and honestly all you need is a simple filter to strip all except those you want. For example if you strip all of them you can't do line breaks, that one is nice to have in the comment box but maybe not in the subject. This is also where you have the infamous right-to-left indicators and everything else "dangerous".

      And strip everything else that's private or unassigned, obviously. Seriously, the way /. fumbled the ball on this many, many years was a rookie mistake in input validation and it was like once bitten, twice shy ever since. Sure, that could invite more trash posts but that's more the job of the lameness filter & moderation. And then maybe /. could move out of the 90s and we could actually write delta-v with an actual delta. Or abbreviate micrometers. Or paste a quote with a long dash or those curly quotes and not have them show up as trash. Seriously, the code is a relic.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    26. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shh the grownups are talking...I don't think snowflake means what you think it means.

    27. Re: Also by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Here's an interesting perspective from the man who coined the word meritocracy.

      https://www.theguardian.com/po...

    28. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He seems more concerned about the "baseless [sic] accusations against Russia".

    29. Re:Also by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      That's racist, you bigot.

      Slashdot needs to be rewritten entirely in Rust, because CPAN is filled entirely with Perl code.

      Yes, but half of CPAN was written by A. Tang, which should make you at least conflicted about a rewrite, if not outright convinced. At least Tang isn't a pasty white Rust brogrammer dudebro, right? ;)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    30. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I posted some Unicode here a few days ago and the site disppeared.

    31. Re:Also by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Well, there goes my attempt at the 2^8 days read in a row achievement...

    32. Re:Also by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      That's ok, I was so lost I actually did work while I was at work. And then spent time with my wife.. She didn't know what to think, I'm pretty sure she thinks I'm dying..

    33. Re: Also by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You just thought the site disappeared, but because you were using an Apple device to post the unicode, the site did disappear for you.

    34. Re: Also by micahharwell · · Score: 1

      Thank you for getting things operational. If Slashdot's architecture is anything like the systems I've seen, well, I hope you guys got plenty of rest afterwards. I've seen a lot of comments that a total rewrite is in order yet others demand not changing anything. A large distance between you and your servers is most certainly a problem unless you're using a cloud-native approach, but this isn't suitable for all applications. I am sure that you see the /. community is strongly opinionated, and largely focused on things that don't actually matter to the successful operation of the site. That is what makes /. an amazing place to be, the news and freedom to post and read differing views is what keeps us coming back. As with any good system, there are blemishes and things that should be addressed. The architecture, DR plan, and other items should be reviewed, and perhaps changed if it makes sense. One thing that you should be very careful about is the UI. There are fine-tuning opportunities, but this is the interface we know and love, and drastic changes may not be the right thing. Thanks again for the hard work to get us our /. fix!

    35. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She probably thought you ran out of smoke. ;)

    36. Re:Also by ls671 · · Score: 1

      It means that the system can do UTF-8 but it uses LANG=en_US by default and it expects its configuration files to be en_US.

      See here for further details:
      https://docs.slackware.com/sla...

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    37. Re:Also by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Hehe, of course, unicode doesn't "run" strictly speaking, please read what I just replied above.

      Furthermore, the systems I was talking about happily run UTF-8 compatible web application like Slashdot could be. There is no need to run my root shell with UTF-8 support although for my use cases so why should I enable UTF-8 support for my root shell and daemons? Why should I make UTF-8 system wide default?

      It means that the system can do UTF-8 but it uses LANG=en_US by default and it expects its configuration files to be en_US.

      See here for further details:
      https://docs.slackware.com/sla...

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    38. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have ended with you insensitive clods.

    39. Re:Also by Keith+Henson · · Score: 1

      Please be careful in "improving." Most of the so-called "improvements" in user interfaces have made them harder to use and even understand. My bank is perhaps the worst, what they have done to make it usable on mobiles have made it much harder to use on a desktop. Skype has become so hard to use that even the people who work the help desk are having the users load an older version. I could go on with more examples, but please don't make Slashdot one of them.

      --
      End MGM. Get prospective parents of boys to Google: Men do complain
    40. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by definition, "snowflake" is a derogatory aimed at the left. there is no such thing as a rightist snowflake.

    41. Re:Also by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's all languages living and dead and symbols

      That's the aspiration. It gets a bit zen for languages that never had a native written form (probably most of them), but that's zen for you.

      and emojis

      And that's the down side.

      I occasionally try posting in Russian, needing Cyrillic characters. More often, I try to include technical symbols (the micro- symbol ; deltas ; therefore and because). It's really frustrating to come across Slashdot's inadequacies.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    42. Re: Also by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      by definition, "snowflake" is a derogatory aimed at the left. there is no such thing as a rightist snowflake.

      Well, the original definition was an insult hurled at someone who thought he was precious and special, but was not. The term was most visibly popularized by Fight Club. It's pretty much used as a put-down for any complainer.

    43. Re:Also by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I am highly aware of the point you're making. By "improvements" I mean to continue doing stuff people want. Like when we took Slashdot over and got rid of the videos and the jobs stuff, which nobody wanted anyway. No fundamental UI changes are necessary, but i think there are still places we can improve

  2. Crysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what happens why you try to run Crysis on the web servers.

    1. Re: Crysis by danomac · · Score: 1

      I actually thought they might have installed some software from SourceForge on their servers.

    2. Re:Crysis by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Imagine if they installed it on a beowulf cluster.

      We'sd probably end up with grits in our pants.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:Crysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it kind of is- they've moved to AmazonS3...

    4. Re:Crysis by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      Half Life 2 is as far as I am willing to push it.

  3. Welcome back by mcclungsr · · Score: 5

    It's nice to have /. back.

    1. Re: Welcome back by whipslash · · Score: 2

      Nobody's blacklisting you. Why are you so angry? Take it out on me if you'd like, I can handle it

    2. Re: Welcome back by ls671 · · Score: 1

      fuck you creimer!

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re: Welcome back by ls671 · · Score: 1

      way to show those creimertards how to behave whipslash!

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    4. Re: Welcome back by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      ... downvoting my comments.

      Maybe I downvoted your comment(s), I don't know.

      I don't look at names, hell I don't even look to see if there is a name.

      I look to mod UP , not down, except in rare occasions. I want to boost the comments that are thoughtful and I just ignore your kind of bullshit.

      On those rare occasions where I mod Flamebait or Troll, I'll be goddam if the fucking comments don't just stay right there.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    5. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might actually be the only ./ thread where negatively-rated comments are worth reading :)

    6. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, the Internet Tough Guy, a rare specimen these days... You even fall into all the typical stereotypes associated:

      - randomly EMPHASIZING your own nonsense to highlight just how mind-bogglingly important it isn't,

      - throwing in the few childish bits of swearing like a Tourette's sufferer... Ooh, look out everybody, the badass said FUCKING and "goddam" in the SAME SENTENCE!

      - asserting just how much you don't care and then immediately proving the opposite with your dick-waving attitude,

      Let me guess, you probably have a nice collection of hand guns or knives as well maybe? Live in a basement with a neckbeard that looks like a handful of pubic hair and had your hands certified as a lethal weapon in some backwater shithead country?

      Fuck you and fuck your narcissistic bullshit. Something that you probably should have been told a lot earlier in your self-entitled development.

    7. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your comment reads just like the person you are trying to describe

    8. Re: Welcome back by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      You beat me to it.

      Thanks.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    9. Re: Welcome back by BcNexus · · Score: 0

      Iâ(TM)m glad theyâ(TM)re back, too!

    10. Re:Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices... were suddenly silenced.

    11. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sort of reply makes me wonder if you are also your trolls. Seriously.

    12. Re: Welcome back by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Thanks for engaging with us, Whipslash. The majority of us appreciate it.

      While I have your attention, though, can I ask that you come up with some sort of plan to stop the haemorrhaging of projects on Sourceforge? I host a single open-source project on Sourceforge and have been considering moving it out due to the declining relevance.

      I don't really know what you can do to make it relevant again - maybe do a survey to find all the pain-points of current users (for retention), and if possible a survey of the competition's usres to find out what they like about the competition.

      For a start, at least>

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    13. Re: Welcome back by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      can I ask that you come up with some sort of plan to stop the haemorrhaging of projects on Sourceforge?

      Barrier troops?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    14. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are projecting. I suggest CGT with some mindfulness therapy sprinkled in (and a tranq or two).

    15. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you're an 'ex-user' and now a full time AC.

      I bet if you logged in you're at 2 or 1 because people call you troll or flamebait, am i right? And I guess at work your ideas are routinely ignored, you're passed up for promotion, the cute girl from accounting thinks you're creepy, and your mom won't return your phone call? You find bugs in software but your questions on stackexchange are voted to -5 and marked as 'not appropriate'. You keep getting the worst tasks at work and your boss tends to ignore you.

      Look, thats not a conspiracy. Thats because you're an asshole, or maybe an idiot, and no one likes you. Showering won't help you find a partner its not your smell - its the attitude written across your face.

    16. Re: Welcome back by Whibla · · Score: 1

      The Art of the Artful Troll...

    17. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Chris! How are you? I missed you, you lovable goofball.

    18. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the guy who boasted about his 11000 posts, his valuable contributions, and created 12 sockpockets to post more would suddenly not find the time to shitpost while he's "out of town".

      Where did you go? Who paid for it?

    19. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, you were out of town, reinventing yourself as a fatter, more annoying nuisance?

    20. Re: Welcome back by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Nobody's blacklisting you."

      https://i.imgur.com/bFqctCh.pn...

      Except that screencap is taken with ALL COMMENTS LOADED and with me signed in. Where is the comment you're replying to?

      I'll be waiting for the answer that will never come because you always run when you get your ass busted with something as simple as ALT+PRTSCR.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    21. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's actually, sincerely, really that annoying and childish in real life.

    22. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, so how did you find the time to post on March 1st, three days ago?

      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      You obese lying sack of shit.

    23. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you tolerate Chris Reimer's behavior here?

    24. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job editing out the bar that shows at what level you're browsing at, you disingenuous lying mentally-ill schizophrenic lunatic fuck.

    25. Re: Welcome back by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Uhh, yea, you're a complete fucking moron considering that bar is way, way, WAY up at the top, whereas the conversation in question is so far below that screencapping wouldn't show it. You dipshit.

      But *YOU* keep being a disingenuous useless COWARDLY fuck. Meanwhile, those of us with an education are speaking, and children like you are meant to be seen and not heard.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    26. Re: Welcome back by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Yeah, his feet stink and he don't love Jesus.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    27. Re: Welcome back by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      AÃ(TM)re yÃ(TM)ou reÃ(TM)ally?

    28. Re: Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we can add "inability to use MS Paint" to your ever-growing list of achievements.

    29. Re: Welcome back by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      Nobody's blacklisting you. Why are you so angry? Take it out on me if you'd like, I can handle it

      Don't bother. Slashdot attracts a number of hokey conspiracy theorists who think that if their shit doesn't get modded up to +2 at the minimum, it must be some editor conspiracy to deny their free speech rights.

    30. Re:Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not back yet, mobile still doesn’t work. Blank page.

    31. Re: Welcome back by Khyber · · Score: 1

      At which point your deflecting ass would go "You took the screenshots separately" and you would STILL deny any evidence given. You're a Republican, after all.

      You can keep running around in circles. Meanwhile, I'll continue to own you.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  4. Keep up the good work. by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    You are appreciated.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Keep up the good work. by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

    2. Re:Keep up the good work. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's right. We need you. Plus, no other sites will have us.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Keep up the good work. by whipslash · · Score: 2

      Haha. Wow I think that was my first smile in 2 days

    4. Re:Keep up the good work. by richardtoohey · · Score: 1

      Good to see /. back (been a visitor for 18 or so years.) Didn't see the site down recently, but the stories were definitely on the stale side - stuck for a day or two with the same headlines.

      Thank you for your work.

    5. Re:Keep up the good work. by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Good to be back

    6. Re:Keep up the good work. by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      Been there.

      I've sweated blood during downtime, so I feel for you.

      I was in Dallas at Mobil Place and my direct report said in conference that my site had no down time.

      I coughed and said, "Excuse me sir. We've had downtime. I can give you the numbers, if you like."

      He said, "Your site has no report of downtime."

      I said, "I know. That's because you get those incident reports from my coworkers. I've been down some, but they didn't rat me out."

      He was puzzled and asked. "Why in hell wouldn't they report an outage?"

      I said, "For the same reason you don't know about some of their systems violations."

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    7. Re:Keep up the good work. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Plus, no other sites will have us.

      Who needs those stupid other sites with their holier-than-thou “be nice to people” and “you should bathe occasionally” attitudes...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:Keep up the good work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have asked for advice a lot earlier!
      --
      Silvia Bunge
      Psychology Department
      University of California, Berkeley

    9. Re:Keep up the good work. by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Nice to know someone understands the pain

    10. Re:Keep up the good work. by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      He's right. We need you. Plus, no other sites will have us.

      This is not quite true, there are plenty of sites willing and able to charge Slashdot members an arm and a leg for hooking them up with Russian supermodels who like nerdy misfits with no social skills who dwell in the basement of their parents' house.

    11. Re:Keep up the good work. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Who needs those stupid other sites with their holier-than-thou "be nice to people" and "you should bathe occasionally" attitudes...

      Plus most other sites have some left-right bias of a basic sort. Here is the only place I know of where both sides think it's controlled by a conspiracy of the other side.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:Keep up the good work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's very true. --AC

    13. Re:Keep up the good work. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      This is not quite true, there are plenty of sites willing and able to charge Slashdot members an arm and a leg for hooking them up with Russian supermodels who like nerdy misfits with no social skills who dwell in the basement of their parents' house.

      You could have at least shared a link with us.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    14. Re:Keep up the good work. by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      Also this was good for those complaining slashdot this slashdot that to see what it looks like without slashdot! If I had to pick only one news feed site to use it would be this.

    15. Re:Keep up the good work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. Good to be back

      Maybe one day you guys will acquire the slightest sign of competence. After that, your editors can actually learn what "copy editing" means!

    16. Re:Keep up the good work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are my hero, Captain. I don't think I've found a shirt with that nick on it; I'm afraid this unicorn onesie will have to do =) I'll have a friend go skiing with it.

    17. Re:Keep up the good work. by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Dukakis also had the incredibly bad judgment to be videotaped riding in an army tank with his head poking up out of the hatch, wearing a helmet that made him look like Captain Dork of the Weenie Patrol . If this tank had ever gone into battle, it would have rolled right over the enemy, which would have been lying helplessly on the ground, wetting its pants.

      ~ Dave Barry Hits below the Beltway

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    18. Re:Keep up the good work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't all you fuckers in this kiss-ass subthread get a room.

      Being happy about incompetence is simply sad anywhere, but is just a sign that /. is dead.

      numbnuts

    19. Re:Keep up the good work. by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Another AC waster proving why the AC tag shouldn't even exist.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    20. Re:Keep up the good work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay Mr. Shock if that is your real name.

      numbnuts.

    21. Re:Keep up the good work. by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And you're an AC despite being able to get a logged though still anonymous tag. Go figure.

      But please, prove yet again the social and psychological effects of that letting people comment without even using a screen name.

      We have 4chan and people like you here.

      Data is pretty consistent.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  5. 11211 by iPv4depletion · · Score: 1

    11211 that is all I have to say

  6. No problem, and thanks by surfdaddy · · Score: 2

    I've been coming here for over 12 years. Always interesting, always insightful. We appreciate you. It's a rough world out there, sorry about the DDOS.

    1. Re:No problem, and thanks by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thank you

    2. Re:No problem, and thanks by caseih · · Score: 2

      Been coming here for 20 years now (hard to believe how the time has gone). Likewise, thank you, keep up the good work. Although I must say the last couple of days have been a bit more productive! ;)

    3. Re:No problem, and thanks by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Glad to have you around

    4. Re:No problem, and thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you so much for all you do. I've been coming here for 20 years and it's a bit sobering to realize I'm a bit like a lost puppy the few times /. has been down. Glad you're back.

      Speaking of 20 years, I have a login, lost the pw long ago, many times have written trying to reconnect. My attempts have occasionally been rebuffed but mostly ignored. Does anyone care? I have a login on a sister site and at the risk of bragging, I tend to get all good mod points. IE, I'm a contributor, and I'd love to be that again here...

      Since my attempts at directly writing to you (all) have failed, I'm asking right here: how do I get some kind of human interaction with someone at /. regarding recovering my userid?

      Thanks!

    5. Re:No problem, and thanks by whipslash · · Score: 1

      email feedback at slashdot dot org and ill see what i can do

    6. Re:No problem, and thanks by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's always insightful.

      Sometimes, it's informative. Othertimes it's underrated. Occasionally it's funny.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re: No problem, and thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The username is cmdrtaco. Please email my password to cmdrtaco7652@gmail.com

    8. Re:No problem, and thanks by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've been coming to /. from even more than that - and even had a 6 dig id ... unfortunately, gave out the domain to which the email was attached, and the password doesn't seem to work anymore.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    9. Re: No problem, and thanks by jalet · · Score: 1

      You made my day, thanks !

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    10. Re:No problem, and thanks by tjones · · Score: 1

      Nice to see an old-timer around here.

    11. Re:No problem, and thanks by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      ...a 6-digit ID, you say...? Whoa.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  7. Display down-voter ids by myid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Whipslash and Slashdot, welcome back.

    Can I make a request? If someone down-votes a post, I'd like the down-voter's user id to be added to a list of down-voters for that post. Then if you move your mouse over the post's score (ex: "Score:0"), I'd like the list of that post's down-voters to appear in a small pop-up window.

    Hopefully listing the down-voters for a post would discourage people from down-voting it because they don't agree with it (vs. because the down-voter thought the post was useless or harmful).

    1. Re:Display down-voter ids by whipslash · · Score: 1

      That's a possibility- thanks for the suggestion. Anyone else have an opinion on this?

    2. Re:Display down-voter ids by BlacKSacrificE · · Score: 2

      It would also allow tit-for-tat moderation by the psychopaths of the board. What a perfectly horrible idea.

      --
      [Sorry, this signature is unavailable in your country/region]
    3. Re:Display down-voter ids by burtosis · · Score: 2

      Yes, if an account consistently downvotes far more than upvotes they should receive even less mod points. We need to mod up what is good or important, not downvote what we don't like. This promotes more discussion instead of burying comments.

    4. Re:Display down-voter ids by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      There should be enough data to run some statistical analysis on how a moderator moderates.

      If someone is consistently labeling a certain user or marks posts as "Troll" when it's eventually a +3 then give less weight to their moderation ability.

      or "Slashdot uses AI to moderate comments".

    5. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a shitty idea. That only encourages tit-for-tat moderation and the creation of separate accounts dedicated solely for moderation

      If you want to experience unlimited downmods, fuck off back to Reddit.

    6. Re:Display down-voter ids by EzInKy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seems to me that such a system would discourage honest moderation and only serve to create "mod" wars. There is a reason why voting is a private matter and does not subject to voters to public criticism.

      Besides, if everyone with mod points browsed at -1 as recommended most abuses would be corrected for. Slashdot has been part of my daily life for over 20 years and I would hate to see it devolve into petty popularity contests.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    7. Re:Display down-voter ids by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful!

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    8. Re:Display down-voter ids by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Also not a bad idea.

    9. Re:Display down-voter ids by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Isn't there already meta-moderation? Isn't that already what it is there for?

    10. Re:Display down-voter ids by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      Sorry but that sounds like a witch-hunt.

      Moderation is supposed to be anonymous.

    11. Re:Display down-voter ids by burtosis · · Score: 2

      Afaik meta moderation only affects that post; not future moderation points.

    12. Re:Display down-voter ids by burtosis · · Score: 1

      The data could be used to determine how many negative mod points you get. Perfect karma long time user 15 mod points? Full downvote potential (for first time). Newer account, less karma 5 mod points limit to 1-2 downvotes. Not so great karma, 5 mod points, history of over negatives - sorry no downvotes for you.

    13. Re:Display down-voter ids by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      Can I make a request? If someone down-votes a post, I'd like the down-voter's user id to be added to a list of down-voters for that post. Then if you move your mouse over the post's score (ex: "Score:0"), I'd like the list of that post's down-voters to appear in a small pop-up window.

      That's a possibility- thanks for the suggestion. Anyone else have an opinion on this?

      Yeah. Bad idea. It would breed retaliation.

      Better to keep the moderators anonymous, and let meta-moderating take care of abusive moderators.

      Also, the algorithm that awards mod-points can be adjusted to reflect someone's ratio of down-mods to up-mods.

      No matter what kind of system you set up, there will be users who figure out how to "game" it. Maybe some sentiment analysis and machine learning could be used to find such users, and reduce their chance of moderating.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    14. Re:Display down-voter ids by thomst · · Score: 5, Insightful

      whipslash inquired:

      Anyone else have an opinion on this?

      I do. It's a terrible idea.

      Revealing the identities of moderators will merely give the trolls specific targets on which to concentrate their venom, without providing the community with any benefit in compensation. The current system, which prevents moderators from posting in a thread they moderate sort of works. De-anonymizing those mods, in addition to preventing the moderator from posting under his/her actual identity, will simply further discourage those of us who get mod points from using them at all. It's just Not A Good Idea.

      If you want to do something actually useful about the moderation system, try revisiting the existing categories, instead. For instance, why do we need both Troll and Flamebait? They're essentially synonyms, after all. And why isn't there a -1 Misinformed or -1 Stupid, instead? Those would actually be useful additions to the mod categories for posts that are neither Trollish nor Flamebait-y, but are, instead simply, genuinely idiotic or factually wrong, but not inflammatory or critical in nature - and they'd be a lot more on-target for those kinds of posts than -1 Overrated, n'est ce pas?

      Anyway, that's my fiftieth of a dollar. Thanks for asking ...

      --
      Check out my novel.
    15. Re:Display down-voter ids by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Well, speaking of down modding, would it be possible to mod those repetitive racist crap posts to -2, so we never even see them while browsing at -1? I'm not talking about the usual flamebait posts among normal users, just those that have cropped up lately that take advantage of the system knowing most of us browse at -1.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    16. Re:Display down-voter ids by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Knowing that someone sees I downvoted ridiculous crap from "those guys" wouldn't stop me from honestly downvoting ridiculous crap.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    17. Re: Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a terrific idea and will encourage editorial accountability.

    18. Re: Display down-voter ids by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Hey I'm all for mocking slashdot. However now is maybe not the time to troll them into implementing changes which will wreck the site given they seem to be circling the plughole.

      Don't kick 'em when they're down!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    19. Re: Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for DDOSing you guys. I thought it was fun.

    20. Re:Display down-voter ids by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I like that idea, but in the mean time (because it's not trivial to develop and test) I'll propose something even simpler.

      Limit people to 1 down mod per day. There are occasional needs for down-mods, but most of the time they are simply abused. I'd rather see a bigoted or trolling post rise up and get shredded in the replies than see an unpopular argument modded down.

      Another longer term fix would be to spot when someone moderates the same person's posts multiple times. That would prevent people mass-down-voting people they don't like and fix a lot of the sock puppetry going on.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re:Display down-voter ids by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And why isn't there a -1 Misinformed or -1 Stupid, instead?

      That would just encourage people to down-mod things they disagree with. There are plenty of examples of where facts are disputed too, e.g. climate change and Trump.

      Down modding should be reserved for spam and pretty much nothing else. Better to have some bigoted asshat modded up and then ripped apart by insightful replies than have some unpopular opinion labelled trolling.

      Soylent News has a -1 Disagree and it doesn't work.

      Limit people to 1 down mod per day, and spot when people are modding the same person multiple times (i.e. stalking and sock-puppetry). That's all that needs to change.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re: Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why not adding a "0: stupid"mod

      If lots of moderation can label a +4 insightful then we should be able to +4 stupid, or +5 narcissist without down rating

      We should have some set of moderation labels that don't affect score and need no points

    23. Re:Display down-voter ids by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      [list of down-voters] is a possibility- thanks for the suggestion. Anyone else have an opinion on this?

      Yes. Absolutely do it. Although "list of who voted how" would be even better.

      While you're at it, please lose the "can't post in same story" malfeature.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    24. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I would hate to see it devolve into petty popularity contests.

      That ship sailed a long time ago.

      I refuse to register because then you can be banned by other users for saying something they do not agree with.

    25. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      repetitive racist crap posts...that have cropped up lately

      You must be new around here :D

    26. Re:Display down-voter ids by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      I sometimes upvote stuff I disagree with. Usually after hovering on the downvote for a while. Then I think "No, I want everyone to see how stupid this person is."

      I would be interested to hear ways to reduce sock puppetry and people with multiple accounts boosting their own posts. It should stick out like a sore thumb.

      I like to hope it's a bunch of nerds in a hacklab "Hey this guy posted this thing, OMFG, I'm going to reply!" "dude, I have modpoints, I'll +1 you!"

    27. Re:Display down-voter ids by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Yes, if an account consistently downvotes far more than upvotes they should receive even less mod points. We need to mod up what is good or important, not downvote what we don't like. This promotes more discussion instead of burying comments.

      I almost exclusively vote down. That's because I generally want to get back to posting while moderating I feel is more janitor duty, your time to take out the trash. It's quick and easy to pick a discussion you want to sit out, find a bunch of shit posts that undoubtedly belong at -1 and mod them to oblivion. It's a valid use of mod points and you'd definitely notice if we stopped doing it. I might mod up some good posts in the process, but that's more incidental. I don't want to mod things as insightful, informative or interesting just because they're not a GNAA troll or goatse link. I think it's more important that you can read posts at +2/+1/0 without a steaming pile of garbage than whether it's at +3 or +5 or at least that modding up and down is complementary.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    28. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this would actually encourage fewer discussions and enforce an echo chamber because people with an unpopular opinion would be penalized.

      Then again maybe that's the point. There has been a fairly obvious bias in submissions that make it to the frontpage in recent years and regular commenters are having none of it. Purging those that disagree on what's "important" is not a way to promote discussions.

    29. Re:Display down-voter ids by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      Besides, if everyone with mod points browsed at -1 as recommended most abuses would be corrected for.

      Yeah, that would be nice.

      People sometimes (IMHO) abuse their mod points by modding an AC down to -1 despite no clear reason why the post should be -1.

      -1 should be reserved for the GNAA spam and other disgusting things.

      Just leave the things be at +0 even if you don't agree with them. Getting visibility as an AC is difficult thing: most people browse at +1 so the AC posts are hidden already. A negative score makes them even more hidden.

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
    30. Re:Display down-voter ids by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      It might stop you if those guys are crazy enough to spend the rest of their lives stalking and harassing you for it.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    31. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderation points, and frequency definitely increase relative to meta-moderation.

      When I've moderated on contentious issues for a while my mod points decrease, so say for example, someone posts something clearly incorrect and over-modded up, like a clearly demonstrable outright lie on a political topic, and I mod it down, or similarly even something on a scientific topic that's over-modded up, but is again actually scientifically and demonstrably wrong and mod it down then that's when I see my mod points decrease.

      If I moderate posts that are "obvious" i.e. an AC saying "You're a faggot" for a while I see my mod points and frequency go up. The system is weird, I don't know the rules, but there's definitely something that goes on there, you can basically moderate more if you stick to the easy and obvious stuff, and avoid moderating contentious issues. That's kind of good in that it helps breed debate, but it does mean that if the zeitgeist currently has something wrong, and you're in a minority that knows it's wrong, perhaps because it's your area of scientific expertise, then you get unfairly punished. If for example you're a professional physicist working at CERN, you might find you get penalised for moderating down posts that are incorrect but based on popular sci-fi so a majority believe it's true.

      I don't have a solution though, I think this type of problem is hard- you can only fix that by recognising subject matter experts and giving them more freedom to moderate than others, but as soon as you do that you open the door for bias to creep in and legitimate opposing discussion to be drowned out, so as frustrating as it is seeing flagrantly incorrect posts being modded to +5 and accurate, interesting, and correct posts modded down to -1, or just left ignored and largely unseen at 1 and 2, I think it's just the price of reading Slashdot sadly.

    32. Re:Display down-voter ids by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      On the pro side, it would allow us to see the networks of mutually supporting sockpuppets that keep the creimer trolls and AmiMoScope high enough to post.

      The downside is, like others have suggested, that it would set off a retaliation war.

      The best thing to do is reintroduce proper metamoderation, where the moderation is judged and not the post.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    33. Re:Display down-voter ids by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      -1 should be reserved for the GNAA spam and other disgusting things.

      And for retarded shit like that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Display down-voter ids by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It would be better to do some monitoring to give you some visibility into what is happening. Maybe there are people who frequently moderate against the crowd. It seems likely those people should have their moderation points removed, but until you look at the data, you can't be sure.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    35. Re:Display down-voter ids by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      Just my opinion. You don't have to call it retarded just because you disagree with it.

      I like most ACs and would like them to be a bit more visible when worthwhile.

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
    36. Re:Display down-voter ids by tsuliga · · Score: 1

      Get rid of Overrated.

      Some moderators will use Overrated to down-vote posts they disagree with even though the post is intelligently written and is adding something to the discussion.

    37. Re:Display down-voter ids by thomst · · Score: 1

      Dr. Evil confessed:

      I sometimes upvote stuff I disagree with. Usually after hovering on the downvote for a while. Then I think "No, I want everyone to see how stupid this person is."

      I often upmod stuff I disagree with (although never when it's factually incorrect). If someone posts a comment that conflicts with my philosophical or political views, but that comment is thoughtfully presented, well-argued, or - and this happens a lot - it cites sources that are credible and on-point, I'll happily award +1 Insightful or +1 Informative mod points. Ad hominems, by contrast, I downmod on a regular basis.

      I do make it a policy not to award mod points (up or down) to AC's - and, even so, I sometimes break that rule, when it's clear that the AC in question is well-informed or even an expert on the subject under discussion, and is posting anonymously only to avoid implying that his comment is endorsed by his employer, or he is whistleblowing. Or she is or does - let's face it, using his/her, she/him gets way too awkward way too quickly to be a useful construction ...

      --
      Check out my novel.
    38. Re: Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If something is factually wrong, you're better off replying in comment to discredit it. Otherwise the conspiracy nuts will think you're hiding the facts and moderate it even higher

    39. Re: Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to spend the rest of your time on Slashdot having apk "calling you out"?

    40. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a reason voting booths hide your vote.

      Its not because your vote is 'sacred' or like a birthday wish, if someone sees it it won't come true. :)

      Its because of exactly this - retaliation against those who voted against the 'winnder'.

    41. Re:Display down-voter ids by Whibla · · Score: 1

      From memory, there are 3(?) options for down-voting. Depending on the moderation used I can envisage issues:

      The main issue would be with the "Overrated" mod. Whilst I rarely down-mod (off the top of my head 3% of my mod points) this is the negative mod I use most frequently. I tend to use it on posts that are rated 4 or, more often, 5*, not because I disagree, per se, with the content of the post but because I don't think it warrants scoring that highly. Now, because of the way I, and possibly others, load stories from the main page this can result in posts receiving moderation from multiple people far in excess of what's deserved - either positive or negative. If the excess moderation is positive this in itself is not problematic because this is one of the situations that Overrated was intended to address. If the excess is negative this in itself is not problematic as this can be corrected by additional positive moderation. If however, having down-rated a post from what appeared to be a 5, my nym comes to be associated with down-rating a relatively interesting / insightful / informative post to, for example, a 1 or 2, depending on how other people have also moderated it, I, along with the author of the post no doubt, would feel misrepresented.

      As for the other negative moderation options, although I've read the moderator guidelines a couple of times over the ~20 years I've been visiting /. I'm still frequently unsure where the line lies between Troll & Flamebait, so I generally don't use them, or use them almost interchangeably for down-rating the egregious crap that sometimes gets posted. Either way, I'd have absolutely no issues with my nym being associated with a negative moderation of this type. In a sense this 'waste' of mod points is just a community service.

      Which unfortunately then creates a system that can be abused when it comes to down-rating posts by a particular person or on a particular subject or from a particular ideological viewpoint. Sigh!

      How fortunate I am not to have to worry about how to make the system fair and representative, yet encourage people to post, participate, and moderate. Good luck!

      *Somewhat interestingly, on a couple of occasions I can recall, I have moderated a Score: 5 post as -1 Overrated the net result of which has been a Score: 5 post. While I can imagine possible reasons for this behaviour I'm slightly curious as to whether it's intended...

    42. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean we need -99 moron and -999 fuckwit ?

    43. Re: Display down-voter ids by Whibla · · Score: 0

      Actually, this, combined with suggestions further up the thread, makes perfect sense.

      Get rid of:

      -1 Flamebait

      Add:

      -1 Spam
      +0 Disinformation / Contested

      Of course I'd still rather, if a post, especially one rated Informative, contains something that is factually incorrect, that someone post a reply pointing out the error and presenting the 'actual facts'. Moderation can only go so far, especially as none of us can be knowledgeable about everything.

    44. Re:Display down-voter ids by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      On the topic of the overrated mod, I'd like to mention why I have more than once asked for it to go away permanently.

      Back when metamoderation served a function here (several years ago it lost its function and became just a time-waster for those who wanted to know about random comments that had been moderated in the past couple weeks), people discovered that the overrated mod was never subjected to metamoderation. Hence it always stuck. This allowed mod-bombers to make their bombing runs more effective by using only this moderation against people they disliked, giving them a better chance of knocking down that person's karma. I myself had times when I would see mod bombers unleash 20 or more "overrated" mods on me in under 24 hours if I stepped on the wrong person's toes.

      You do describe a place where overrated makes sense, however. Perhaps it should be a moderation that can only be applied to a comment with a score of at least +3 or so; mod bombers would throw it at un-moderated comments with scores of 1.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    45. Re:Display down-voter ids by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Maybe a percentage indicator - Username 123456789 overall downvotes = 97%

      Username 123456789 downvotes/upvotes Username 987654321 frequently

      Username 123456789 frequently downvotes in this subject matter

    46. Re:Display down-voter ids by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Don't do it. Sure there's some bias in the downvotes, but comment quality and karma awards generally prevent abuse by the truly bad actors. If you want a twitter like situation where people pile up on opinions they disagree on and hound future posts by those on their black lists... then go ahead. Don't forget we already have meta-moderation to handle mod abuse. Yeah sure I'd love to get +5 every time I think something witty crosses my keyboard, and I know I'll get an occasional downvote, so what? Not everyone wants to get into an argument when someone is in their opinion totally wrong, the anonymous moderation system allows judging the overall consensus. Remember it's not just the facts you speak, it's also the tone and respect you show for those you debate with, a caustic reply may be factually correct but gain downvotes. This helps people learn how to engage with those they disagree with. Civil discourse is encouraged without outright exiling and pillorying those who use offensive language. There's a reason this site hasn't turned into 4chan.

      I believe over time people generally learn the moderation system and realize that negative mods are a waste of their time and positive mods bringing up ideas they agree with are more healthy and productive.

      So that's a no vote from me on moderation exposure. Being able to read through well reasoned arguments from both sides helped me radically change my perspective on the recent Damore memo fiasco, focusing on who supported what would have just further balkanized the users and encouraged polarization of opinions. No need to White Feather people here.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    47. Re:Display down-voter ids by bioteq · · Score: 1

      This is precisely what I do as well. Garbage collection is a requirement. I do always triple read the comment before making a decision, though, to not moderate incorrectly.

      I absolutely -always- upmod to comments that are just fantastic, though.

    48. Re:Display down-voter ids by swell · · Score: 1

      Time has value. Cruising a topic at +4 takes less time than +2 and provides most of the good stuff available. If most people are up-voting, there are more +4s and the benefit is lost.

      It is a kindness to the reader to remove irrelevant, illiterate, uninformed and angry comments. While it may hurt someone's feelings, the masses of readers will benefit. Those posters who are downmodded should consider why and find ways to improve their contributions.

      Some suggestions: Stay on topic. Review your post for readability before submitting. Don't be smartass/sarcastic to others. Use your spelling checker. If you provide a link, please tell why- don't expect others to click it blindly. Don't expect anyone to see your AC comments.

      My personal peeve: +1 funny. Fortunately that shit can be filtered, but very little of it interests me. It should be -1.

      --
      ...omphaloskepsis often...
    49. Re:Display down-voter ids by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      The Funny mod needs to give a point. I have seen Funny mods on a post that wasn't funny and I'm convinced it was a way to downmod it and discourage further moderation.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    50. Re:Display down-voter ids by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      Please don't ever do this. Slashdot's moderation system is one of the few that actually works. There's no reason to make public the sources of a comment's moderation. If people are unhappy with a comment's moderation they can meta-moderate. That's why meta-moderation exists. All identifying moderators will do is provide targets for trolls.

      If you want to improve moderation add some additional moderation tags or replace some as another poster suggested. There's no good moderation option for comments that are just pants on head stupid. Poe's law applies in those cases, it's not obvious if a stupid comment is simply ignorant or just trolling.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    51. Re: Display down-voter ids by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Also fix the meta moderation!

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    52. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Soylent News has a -1 Disagree and it doesn't work."

      Soylent news ever worked? That's a pure laugh. It took one of their early users threatening to exploit ten year old bugs to get them off their asses to fix even a tiny part of the version of slashcode they were using. Even then, that was done poorly and it shows in any competent audit of that site.

    53. Re:Display down-voter ids by Khyber · · Score: 1

      That's fine, because then it allows us to see who the tit-for-tat assholes are, then we figure out who they are, dox them, and start making their real life a living hell.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    54. Re:Display down-voter ids by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      There is a reason why voting is a private matter and does not subject to voters to public criticism.

      Well, that's how it used to work. Brendan Eich might disagree with you that that's how it works now. But that is a good example that does make your point.

    55. Re: Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just join Reddit then. Because that's what slashdot would turn into. All of us nerds doxing each other for the LuLz.

    56. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original reason that we didn't have a -1 Wrong was for disagreement not to be hidden. The best way to flag something as factually wrong is to post a rebuttal, not to moderate it, as you cannot give an explanation if you mod without undoing your moderation. Knowing why something is wrong is more important than just flagging it as such.

    57. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why this is a terrible idea, because some people such as yourself are so utterly sad and pathetic that you're willing to actually try and ruin people's lives just for the sake of a fucking internet forum dispute.

      Jesus christ, I know you're a pothead failure at life, but you don't need to inflict your own inability to function as a useful human being on others you hopeless childish fuck.

    58. Re:Display down-voter ids by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      That's a possibility- thanks for the suggestion. Anyone else have an opinion on this?

      It's a good idea, mod trolls are basically censorship in the politically correct way. It's bad enough dealing with sockpuppets, one person's opinions doesn't stand a chance against organized groups with an agenda.

      Thanks for your efforts upgrading the site. Anyone with any experience upgrading a high uptime, highly visible piece of infrastructure will know it's difficult so no complaints here. From my experiences 7, 30, 90 days is when you will be ironing out issues with your gear, it's normal.

      The haters are just complaining because they didn't get their dopamine hit, they're sladdicts.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    59. Re:Display down-voter ids by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      For instance, why do we need both Troll and Flamebait? They're essentially synonyms, after all. And why isn't there a -1 Misinformed or -1 Stupid, instead?

      SoylentNews style, you mean?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    60. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original reason that we didn't have a -1 Wrong was for disagreement not to be hidden. The best way to flag something as factually wrong is to post a rebuttal, not to moderate it, as you cannot give an explanation if you mod without undoing your moderation. Knowing why something is wrong is more important than just flagging it as such.

      Everything that isn’t moderated UP is practically invisible to anyone reading with default settings. It’s why the quote parent button is so important, because context is easily lost with the default filter settings.

      It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that down modding with an anonymous rebuttal is the best strategy for a correction.

    61. Re:Display down-voter ids by kubajz · · Score: 1

      +1 for -1 Misinformed (or Facts wrong, or Unsubstantiated). I believe many Slashdot readers consider facts to be rather important in a discussion and yet, this mod is missing. And yes, I often don't know whether to choose Troll or Flamebait.

    62. Re:Display down-voter ids by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      Someone mod this up.

    63. Re:Display down-voter ids by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      I always thought that was a conscious decision so people could mod without fear of retaliation although if it leads to less abuse by moderators.that would be good.

      --

      as an aside and perhaps a little off-topic I see something odd on this page.

      Out of 65 full posts I have a moderator-box on only 4 of them. Maybe I got mod points as the page was loading. It doesn't say I have any on this page, but opening a new one I see I do.

      Unfortunately I already commented "Someone mod this up" in a reply to another post in this thread before I noticed that. Not a big deal just strange.

    64. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this.

      I don't want to know and I don't want other people to know who modded who.

      I've recently been the victim of a concerted effort to mod me down and bust my Karma based on political views that was only partially successful and I don't care who did it but I sure don't want them to have yet another reason to dump on me had I had an occasion to mod them down.

    65. Re:Display down-voter ids by rickyslashdot · · Score: 1

      I really hate "ME2" posts, but I have to bite the bullet and do it here.
      Please, do NOT expose moderator's ID, as it will definitely set off retaliatory mod'ing from the original poster - - - not in every case, but often enough to cause concern about stalking issues.

      Thank you for your OPEN and 'wild west' attitude toward posts and your continuing efforts to allow for the readers to police themselves.

      The one item I have seen in this thread that I DO like is to screen for targeted down-mod'ers, and use a sliding scale penalty on the award of their mod points - exclusively (or over 90%) target down-mod'ers are permanently removed from mod point awards, while minimally targeted (less than 10%) aimed at a specific poster - business as usual.

      Keep up the good work.

      --
      redneck geek
    66. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metamoderation is supposed to remove bad moderators from the pool that's eligible to receive mod points. Part of your problem is that the link to M2 used to be conspicuously displayed on the front page whenever a user was eligible to participate. While I haven't logged in for a long time, my recollection is that the link no longer appears there. You likely have fewer people participating in M2 and, as a result, fewer bad moderators get removed.

      The intent of moderation is to sort high-quality posts from the low-quality posts. It's not intended to be an agree/disagree vote. Certain topics in particular seem to end up being moderated in that manner, though. It particularly seems to be the case for articles about political and social topics. Unfortunately, M2 might not actually fix that, either, since users will probably metamoderate in the same way they moderate.

      Editors do have unlimited mod points. When Rob Malda ran the site, he actively modded down offtopic spam posts, such as the racist posts others are complaining about in this story. Because editors have unlimited mod points, fewer users need to mod down the blatant garbage posts. Instead, they can use their mod points to promote good posts, which is how Malda intended moderation to primarily work. You've stated that editors rarely moderate, and that may be a mistake. I also know that Slashdot does occasionally delete racist spam, because I've seen it happen. Unfortunately, it's so inconsistent that many of those posts don't get deleted and there's no clear policy about that.

      There needs to be accountability for bad moderators, and that's the intent of showing who mods posts down. The accountability is necessary, and you need to get rid of the moderators who use it as an agree/disagree vote. I'm not convinced that exposing the names of moderators who mod posts down really accomplishes what needs to happen. Instead, you need a better way of determining which moderators are moderating poorly, and then remove them from the system. I don't know for sure how I'd do this, but I don't think exposing the usernames of those moderators is the right choice. We've seen targeted harassment against specific users like creimer. If you expose the usernames, that's likely to increase.

      By the way, the anti-creimer trolls have claimed that they have bots scraping M2 and voting against any creimer posts. Their goal is to stop anyone from getting mod points if they mod creimer up. You probably need some accountability for M2 abuse just like for M1 abuse.

    67. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your sock puppet accounts should be banned from upvoting at all XD

    68. Re: Display down-voter ids by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      If something is factually wrong, you're better off replying in comment to discredit it. Otherwise the conspiracy nuts will think you're hiding the facts and moderate it even higher

      But then you lose all of your moderations from that story unless you go full AC.

      Unfortunately, I think we also live in a post-facts world when it comes to online discussions. Very few people either on the left or the right are willing to challenge their own conceptions of the truth, especially when it comes to dogma that their echo-chamber news sources have indoctrinated.

    69. Re:Display down-voter ids by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I always read at threshold 0 because I think ACs can sometimes come up with good points that deserve modding up as well, and how could expect someone else to do that job if I don't as well? But in the last... I don't know, the last five years, the amount of shit-posting, the sheer volume of nonsensical vitriol has gone through the roof, and I'm finding ACs and nearly all discussions they're involved with to be pointless. It's like someone dumping in the community pool -- I SHOULD be able to swim them there, but someone's fouled it up, and my wants aren't going to make it better. Over time, I think I've gotten browbeaten to the point where I want to browse at +1 or even +2 to escape the hordes that have no interest in actual discussion, who just want to see the place burned down.

      So I think you're doing a valuable service as well.

    70. Re:Display down-voter ids by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I think this would actually encourage fewer discussions and enforce an echo chamber because people with an unpopular opinion would be penalized.

      As someone who moderates as often as I get points and mods posts both up and down, I have no problems finding tons of posts which are not simply "unpopular opinions," but are truly trying to poison the well. If they're flames and personal attacks, I mod those down no matter who the target is. If you're (general 'you') here to be extremely hostile and 'stick it' to someone who disagrees with you, then you deserve the -1, Troll/Flamebait. Otherwise I'll usually leave the topic alone except for the really Insightful/Informative/Funny opinion.

      Occasionally I'll find a post that's factually incorrect (and obviously so) and I'll give it an overrated mod (especially if it's been highly modded), but that is far, far more rare. If someone posts a correction that is, in fact, factual, then I prefer instead to mod that up as Informative.

    71. Re:Display down-voter ids by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      It might stop you if those guys are crazy enough to spend the rest of their lives stalking and harassing you for it.

      I've been on the receiving end of an APK stalking. I didn't really mind that much, but I imagine quite a few people could be put out if they were looking for replies to their comments and all they saw were his comment spam. I think having that type of response might result in a "chilling effect" to valid moderation, just like having people know how you voted would affect your votes (And is one reason why polling can be so volatile).

    72. Re:Display down-voter ids by Khopesh · · Score: 1

      Like others here, I strongly disagree with this on the grounds of anonymity and flamewar prevention.

      However, the idea itself has merits if it's kept hidden. Slashdot-internal metrics (unavailable to users) could track users that down-vote too much, especially when such votes disagree with the majority of other votes on the same post. These users could then be penalized in some way, e.g. lowered likelihood of being selected as a moderator, fewer mod points, and/or negative Achievements (which might become a badge of honor among trolls, and that's okay so long as it also negatively affects the user's moderation capabilities).

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    73. Re:Display down-voter ids by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Heh. Sorry. I've just got an odd sense of humor.

      Either that or maybe sometimes people mis-click?

    74. Re:Display down-voter ids by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. I usually get the mix of mod-boxes partially present and partially missing if either I get the points before expanding threads, or the points expire while I'm reading/expanding.

    75. Re:Display down-voter ids by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      The main issue would be with the "Overrated" mod. Whilst I rarely down-mod (off the top of my head 3% of my mod points) this is the negative mod I use most frequently. I tend to use it on posts that are rated 4 or, more often, 5*, not because I disagree, per se, with the content of the post but because I don't think it warrants scoring that highly.

      Is that a useful thing to do, pulling down a 5 when you think it only merits a 3? Does that help the community, or improve the shape of the discussion? That just seems odd to me.

      Then again, I don't really know what it's for, either. My guess would have been really tired old jokes, except that seems to be most of what keeps the community going. The only very rare occasion I can think I've used Overrated is maybe in a case where somebody posts something factually wrong that got boosted to 5, before a bunch of other people replied with a correction.

    76. Re:Display down-voter ids by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      I would like to nominate "-1 Citation Required". Or perhaps even a "-0" so the score/karma won't change, but it will be pointed out.

      I've seen a lot of posts rated "informative" that completely lack any evidence for what they are claiming, and in a few rare cases I know are completely wrong. I try to focus on up-modding replies that correct the record and leave the original alone, but I usually arrive to threads late so they haven't always been responded to.

    77. Re:Display down-voter ids by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      Revealing the identities of moderators is probably a bad idea.

      Whatever happened to metamoderation? I haven't see the "Have you meta-moderated today" link in quite a while. Or did it turn out to be not that useful?

    78. Re:Display down-voter ids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: -1: Pathetic SJW nonsense.

      Stop being an autistic sped and grow up. There is nothing wrong with the word retarded. You SJW fuckstains are the flip-side of the cowardly alt-right. Everything is the same except for what you sperg about, they are both equally worthless and vile.

      numbnuts

    79. Re:Display down-voter ids by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      -1 Not Even Wrong

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  8. DDOS or Cisco Hardware by Phylter · · Score: 2

    Was it a genuine DDOS or just bugs in Cisco firmware. I worked at a place that installed a few large pieces of Cisco hardware and within weeks though they had become under a massive DDOS attack. Come to find out it was a bug that regressed in the Cisco firmware. It seems like it would make sense to me that, with new hardware, a similar issue might have occurred.

    1. Re:DDOS or Cisco Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DDOS was just us hitting refresh; I think somebody already apologized further down.

    2. Re:DDOS or Cisco Hardware by Megane · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does DDOSing Slashdot seem like the internet equivalent of kicking a puppy?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:DDOS or Cisco Hardware by BranMan · · Score: 1

      "Is it just me, or does DDOSing Slashdot seem like the internet equivalent of kicking a puppy?"

      This is Slashdot - you NEED to use a car analogy. Ahem...

            DDOSing Slashdot is like pouring sugar in the gas tank of the old land yacht the little old lady down the street uses to drive back and forth to church every Sunday.

  9. Nice to have it back by ElectraFlarefire · · Score: 2

    Just leave the UI alone during your improvements? :)
    It's good having a site that doesn't peg CPUs, consume vast amounts of bandwidth or require modern graphics cards just to render the page. :)

    1. Re:Nice to have it back by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Beta isn't coming back don't worry

    2. Re:Nice to have it back by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Funny, I haven`t seen that so called "beta" ever once in my life, Maybe I am on some kind of whitelist or something.

      Anyway, what did it look like?

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re:Nice to have it back by whipslash · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Nice to have it back by antdude · · Score: 1

      Well, it has annoying ads. /. should have a free ad version for those who (donate/pay)s?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:Nice to have it back by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Y'know, I was starting to feel such withdrawal that I would have welcomed beta, just to have my slashdot back.

      (No, not really.)

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    6. Re:Nice to have it back by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The UI needs fixing for mobile though. The page isn't wide enough due to the ad. Could probably be fixed with some CSS that detects mobile screens.

      I hope subscriptions come back too, I'm more than happy to pay for this.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Nice to have it back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's good having a site that doesn't peg CPUs, consume vast amounts of bandwidth or require modern graphics cards just to render the page. :)

      ...It doesn't?

      I have to wait quite a bit when I click 'load all comments' on a heavily-commented story. Worse, if we're past 600 comments I have to click on it multiple times, waiting after each click.

    8. Re:Nice to have it back by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You could fix the asshat(TM) quotes bug though.

      And the one where if you post a reply or follow a link it takes you to the top of the page when you come back. Does any other site do it? There might be a reason for that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Nice to have it back by tepples · · Score: 1

      Slashdot used to offer subscriptions years ago, but the option to purchase one has been broken for years.

    10. Re:Nice to have it back by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      I hope subscriptions come back too, I'm more than happy to pay for this.

      +1 for this. I reject and block advertising, but give me a way to pay a fair amount for something I enjoy and I'm more than happy to. I'm not sure the per-page-view subscription model is still relevant, but a flat monthly charge to support the site would be most welcome.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    11. Re:Nice to have it back by Rakarra · · Score: 3

      One of my head-desk moments back in the Beta days was a discussion I had with a Slashdot dev -- or someone who claimed to be, and I had no reason to disbelieve him since he seemed to know what he was talking about. The Ars Technica sub-headline of "change for change's sake" was pretty accurate, as this fellow was saying that websites absolutely had to go through redesigns regularly, otherwise users would get "bored" and leave. Creating something better wasn't the primary requirement as much as making something 'different' was. Honestly, that attitude was a stunning indictment of the users and UX development attitudes as well.

  10. Re:"We inheritied" by whipslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're not blaming anyone. It's just a fact that the previous setup was located across the country from us, and wasn't built by us, so it was not an optimal situation for us. Does it suck that we were down for a while? Hell yeah. Could we have done some things differently and perhaps better? Most definitely. Not sure what your objective with your comment is though.

  11. Do what I'd do by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Just put a bunch of electrician's tape over the circuit breaker so it can't pop out. Works every ti

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Do what I'd do by burtosis · · Score: 1

      You whippersnappers and your new fangled breakers. Why back in my day I had to put a 1 inch bolt in the fuse holder.

    2. Re:Do what I'd do by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Lets not be too modern about this. How about a roofing nail in the fuse holder? Its good for 200A slow blow.

    3. Re:Do what I'd do by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      One inch bolt?! That’s why God created pennies...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Do what I'd do by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      Just put a bunch of electrician's tape over the circuit breaker so it can't pop out. Works every ti

      Just for old-time's sake (all those cute little Millenials won't get this):

      [NO CARRIER]

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    5. Re:Do what I'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bolt? bah. We used to go with the "stick a fork in it" method - remove fuse, insert fork or equivalent. Kept them persky energy hogs in the dorm room alive ... longer :-D

    6. Re:Do what I'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO!!

    7. Re:Do what I'd do by BranMan · · Score: 1

      Nice one!

      I laughed so hard I dropped my punch card deck. [No, Millenials won't get that either]

    8. Re:Do what I'd do by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Poor Millennials. Punch card made the best roach material. And those metal foil ATM cards were great for lining up your coke.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  12. Make 2.0 by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

    You inherited what you did.

    Why not take this opportunity for a new code base? It's time for a "new" website to discuss on. Reddit's going through a redesign that people hate. People are fed up with Facebook and Twitter.

    Slashdot's moderation system is still hands down the best I've come across. It's even managed to handle something 4Chan and Twitter couldn't, completely anonymous posts. It's capped to prevent bandwagoning to oblivion, it gives taxonomy to a post's quality. +5 Funny is different than +5 Interesting and I wish I could sort by moderation classification as well. The random distribution means that you can't just make sockpuppets (not that it doesn't happen).

    And if you're looking for funding, I'd pay money to be a part of a website if it meant good discussion. Officially branch out away from technology.

    Let us use markdown, add unicode support, add markdown support, give it a good API.

    1. Re:Make 2.0 by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      A simple, "Hang tight, we got hardware issues" would have worked wonders.

      .
      With all the ownership changes, I thought you may have been shut down.

      .
      We are a community, please treat us as such.

    2. Re:Make 2.0 by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Reddit's going through a redesign that people hate.f

      So why have slashdot go through a redesign that people will hate? Beta was a total failure, leave well enough alone.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    3. Re:Make 2.0 by burtosis · · Score: 2

      I was silently hoping slashdot wasn't dying also. Been viewing stuff here about 17 years now.

    4. Re:Make 2.0 by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      > So why have slashdot go through a redesign that people will hate? Beta was a total failure, leave well enough alone.

      Leave Slashdot and "News for Nerds" the way it is.

      Take what you've learned from Slashdot, Reddit, Digg, Fark, Facebook and make a new discussion site for Politics, etc. I'd like to see a moderated news feed and a place for discussion that isn't a newspaper's website.

    5. Re:Make 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can improve it by making it +/-20, and that's just one thought of thousands I have to improve things. There is no way to easily collect my genius for their own distinction. Not the Borg.

    6. Re:Make 2.0 by helpfulcorn · · Score: 0

      I'm honestly surprised you didn't put your copy/paste comment you put on, seemingly, all other front page posts prior to this one.

    7. Re:Make 2.0 by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Of all the sites out there, /. is one that should give us maximum transparency. Many of us have dealt with the exact same kind of problems the site has been running into.

    8. Re:Make 2.0 by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      > all other front

      Twice. I see it twice.

      https://slashdot.org/~01000100...

        And based on my experience the last month no clue if one would actually go through.

    9. Re:Make 2.0 by shanen · · Score: 1

      One of the features I'd like to see would be logarithmic scaling of the moderation. Base e, naturally.

      Another feature would be symmetric dimensions that are all more clearly orthogonal to each other. Much of the problem with Slashdot is that some of the dimensions are too subjective. One man's troll is another's provocateur of thought, but it would be easier to agree on negative politeness (and then let the people decide how important that dimension is to them).

      (No, I am NOT saying that politeness is the only dimension of such behavior, but I might value politeness too greatly after so many years of living among polite people...)

      A third high priority feature I'd like would be EPR (Earned Public Reputation) as a multidimensional replacement for excessively simplistic karma. I actually think EPR should be symmetric in the sense that public reactions to your comments should be directly reflected into the same dimensions of your reputation...

      Many other improvements, but we come back to the question of paying for such... Would you be willing to put down $10 at a time towards each of the features you really want? Then the feature would only be implemented AFTER enough people had agreed to put a bit of money where their mouths (or typing fingers?) are. (Ongoing costs to be handled on a similar basis...)

      AtAJG, DSAuPR.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    10. Re:Make 2.0 by shanen · · Score: 1

      I've spent several years trying to figure out what anyone likes about Reddit. I've long since lost interest in Digg and Fark, and I regard any time spent on Facebook as a waste--but sometimes I sort of want to waste a bit of time.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    11. Re:Make 2.0 by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I mainly use Reddit for discussions about games I'm playing, getting help in the comments etc. It's a bit like Slashdot that way - it's not the article that's interesting, it's the comments.

      It's useful for that, at least.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    12. Re:Make 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You truly are an epic sped.

      First you talk about a new code base(why? It needs updating, only clueless jackasses start all over) and then discuss UI changes.

      derpy numbnut

    13. Re:Make 2.0 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The random distribution means that you can't just make sockpuppets (not that it doesn't happen).

      Unfortunately it's not really random at all, and people have found ways to consistently create sockpuppet moderation accounts. I've been doing some research into this and it's occasionally discussed on IRC and Discord when they think no-one is looking.

      Basically there are two factors that vastly increase the chances of getting mod points. The first is if an account is in good standing karma and meta-moderation wise, and the way to do that is create multiple sockpuppets who meta-mod each other up. Just doing meta-moderation increases the chances of getting mod points it seems.

      Newer accounts also seem to be more likely to get mod points, suggesting that there is some weighting going on. So basically keep creating new accounts, keep them meta-modding each other up and you will get mod points.

      There is also a bit of a feedback loop that helps sockpuppeteers. Once a post gets a single moderation applied to it then it is much more likely to appear for meta moderation, and much more likely to be noticed by other people with mod points. There is a probably a bit of crowd mentality going on too where people follow the prevailing trend, so that very first +1 is actually worth a hell of a lot.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Make 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, well that explains a lot. I had wondered why those nutbag right-wing opinions always get mysteriously modded up, while reasonable fact-based opinions get modded to -1. Good job infiltrating them, by the way.

    15. Re:Make 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up you fat retard.

    16. Re:Make 2.0 by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Actually me too. Slashdot format (including the geeky gray design) and the tone (comments) contribute to make the site a closed club that keeps providing insightful comments that would not appear somewhere else - or anyway would not stand out the way it does here - from more "mature" people. Of course a bunch of ACs bring a few trolls here and there - which usually don't live (show) long - but this is the price to pay to allow anonymous comments (which are necessary!). And, that's hard to admit (for some reasons), but slashdot is (still) unique!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    17. Re:Make 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you fat retard.

    18. Re:Make 2.0 by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Of all the sites out there, /. is one that should give us maximum transparency.

      Woah, let's back up for a second. I know you can easily do transparency via CSS, but could we at least get unicode support first?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    19. Re:Make 2.0 by Nkwe · · Score: 1

      Let us use markdown, add unicode support, add markdown support, give it a good API.

      Maybe limited unicode support (as in allowing a few select characters), but not full unicode support. While it would be nice if when people pasted in an apostrophe we wouldn't get the weird (TM) thing, it would really suck if emojis started showing up everywhere. Please, please, please keep slashdot a text only based communication system. I really don't want the discussion distracted by dancing hamburgers and piles of poo.

    20. Re:Make 2.0 by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Why not take this opportunity for a new code base?"

      Did you get too wasted and forget the horrible wreck that was Beta, or was Beta just so traumatic to you that your brain tucked the memory of it away as a defense mechanism?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    21. Re:Make 2.0 by helpfulcorn · · Score: 1

      Why more than once at all? I wasn't sure if some of my posts went through either, but I waited a second and looked at my user page and they showed up. I didn't post them repeatedly on multiple articles.

    22. Re:Make 2.0 by waveclaw · · Score: 1

      Don't overlook the fact that comments are HTML formatted.

      • No funky BB code or markdown-flavor-of-the-day.
      • Just straight, sanitized hypertext markup language.
      • Acts as small difficulty bump to raise that submission bar.
      • All the bold and fancy font variations you want.
      • No blink but lynx compatible links

      At least keeps one in practice for writing real web sites.

      Slashdot's moderation system is still hands down the best I've come across.

      And for April first implement radio controls so you can toggle categories.

      But lock it so that you can only turn on Funny. Or enable only Troll when set for +5 only.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    23. Re:Make 2.0 by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I haven't had to write HTML in ages. It's overly verbose and a waste of characters.

      Especially links.

    24. Re:Make 2.0 by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      A simple, "Hang tight, we got hardware issues" would have worked wonders.

      .
      With all the ownership changes, I thought you may have been shut down.

      .

      I mean, just a Twitter post would have helped too. Slashdot's official Twitter just had an automated feed of the most recent (now two days old) Slashdot stories.

  13. Re:"We inheritied" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're not blaming anyone.

    Oh, we get it. *wink*

    You're not saying it was the Russians, but it was totally the Russians.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Now back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we can all go back to reading regular daily Chrome, Firefox and IE slashvertisement posts now how awesome each 3 of those browsers are.

    Really - they're not.

  15. Re: from a Russian standpoint by ls671 · · Score: 1

    ISO-8859-1 (latin charset) won`t help you much with Russian specific chars

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  16. Re:"We inheritied" by Ly4 · · Score: 2

    and I take responsibility for my actions
    Says the anonymous coward.

  17. Not for long, comrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did notice that the site turned goofy almost immediately after this story was posted.

    Things the Russians are good at:

    1. Offensive hacking
    2. Cheating in sports
    3. Drinking vodka
    4. Hot female tennis players (but see #2)
    5. Chess

    The above list is comprehensive.

    1. Re:Not for long, comrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you will find all the hot tennis players are from former Russian satellite states.

    2. Re: Not for long, comrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The large number of stories involving Russia were consuming excessive sock-puppet hours at the Internet Research Agency.

      "We could be using these puppets elsewhere", came the call from the 5th floor.
      "Shut Slashdot down".

      And a DDoS was ordered.

    3. Re:Not for long, comrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would add:
      6. Creating irritating "sputnik moments" https://youtu.be/GhJnt3xW2Fc

  18. Thanks but by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 2

    Was it so hard to tell us that? You couldn't have said told us what was going on before now? Still, thanks for bringing it back.

    1. Re:Thanks but by sheramil · · Score: 3, Funny

      Was it so hard to tell us that?

      ... yeah, it was. The site was down.

    2. Re: Thanks but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, twitter was out too you abject moron.

    3. Re:Thanks but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The front page was up.

  19. Thank You by JimSadler · · Score: 2

    I am very glad that slashdot exists and thank all for their wonderful work at slashdot.

    1. Re:Thank You by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I am glad you exist too

    2. Re:Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent job, ass kisser!

  20. Keep up the good work by howlingmad · · Score: 2

    Hope you will recover soon.

  21. Re: from a Russian standpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not true. It is called transliteration and Russian BBS users of last century effortlessly used it to chat in their native language without using Cyrillic characters.

  22. For those wondering, ... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... For those wondering, we inherited an aging hardware ...

    I know i do not speak for anyone but myself, but WTF!?!? I was not wondering about the cause. I was wondering about the non-existence of /.

    .
    No status updates? Does /. think so little of the community they have strived to build to leave that community in complete darkness about the status of a site we want to participate in, to contribute to?

    Are we now just site hits? Or are we a community?

    Unfortunately, because of the complete lack of any status updates, I can only presume that the /. overlords think of us peons as merely page hit statistics, and not a community.

    That is so discouraging....

    1. Re:For those wondering, ... by whipslash · · Score: 1

      We tweeted, but the site wasn't in a state where we could update it without spending significant time that we felt was better spent getting the site back up and running. Also didn't expect the outage to last as long as it did. Going forward we'll be better about updating on status if something like this ever happens again, which we hope it doesn't.

    2. Re:For those wondering, ... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      I checked the twitter feed (and the facebook feed), but all I saw were article postings. No status updates. I don't want my comments to be taken as just plain grief thrown at y'all. There's a problem that needs to be solved. How can /. disseminate site status when the site is down. Obviously, twitter didn't work here. Why, I don't know at the moment. You have my email address, if you want to chat about my experience offline. My bottom line: /. needs to do better. They can do better.

    3. Re:For those wondering, ... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      +1for not keeping other social media updated. Why not have a 12h, 24h update on the other social media?
      Something above the article postings to actually tell people what slashdot was doing.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:For those wondering, ... by Whibla · · Score: 1

      I would just like to echo his comment.

      Albeit, I'll add that, we're only upset because we missed 'you' so much.

      So, we're glad you're back, we're sorry you had such a crap couple of days, but, please, a bit more consideration would not go amiss in future.

      & thanks :-)

    5. Re:For those wondering, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bitztream the custom EpiPen-hating, autism-hating, Musk-hating, Qualcomm-hating, Firefox tabs-hating, Slashdot editors-hating Slashdot troll!

    6. Re:For those wondering, ... by bioteq · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they were not tweeting on the Slashdot twitter. They were using the Sourceforge twitter. Took me a while to figure that one out, but they definitely -were- updating people...just the wrong people. (or only some of the people)

      So props to updating, either way. Just would have been easier if people knew where.

    7. Re:For those wondering, ... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "We tweeted"

      Not on your Slashdot account, you sure as hell were not. You know, the one people would LOGICALLY assume would have status updates, and such.

      Should I take another quick screenshot to bust open your misdirection?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:For those wondering, ... by bioteq · · Score: 1

      As I said earlier, they posted it on their SOURCEFORGE twitter.

      Again, not the best of places, but sourceforge was having the same issues. I guess they assumed people who used slashdot also followed sourceforge (not true for me) Alas, after finding the tweets there, I was able to sit back and enjoy freedom (and blue sky) without slashdot leeching my brain and begging for more.

    9. Re: For those wondering, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is he wrong? No he isn't? Ok,
      Post something useful, stop trying to hate on someone else.

    10. Re:For those wondering, ... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      If fucking IGN is down, I'm not going to look at the Digg Twitter feed to see why.

      Why the fuck would I go to the Sourceforge Twitter feed (a property I don't even use) to find out about Slashdot being down?

      It's like logic escapes the people running this site and related properties.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:For those wondering, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like they did tweet https://twitter.com/slashdot/s... - what are you so fired up about?

    12. Re:For those wondering, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:For those wondering, ... by BitztreamNotARealNam · · Score: 1

      How's life in the hypocrite lane?

    14. Re:For those wondering, ... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Two fucking days too late, is what it is, oh white-knighting coward.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    15. Re:For those wondering, ... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Again, not the best of places, but sourceforge was having the same issues. I guess they assumed people who used slashdot also followed sourceforge (not true for me)

      Most of us don't follow either and have little interest (I have no interest in following anyone on Twitter). But we do know that when a site is down and they have an official Twitter, then that's the place to go to get news that can't go onto the site itself.

    16. Re:For those wondering, ... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      What's this? https://twitter.com/slashdot/s...

      That is closing the barn doors AFTER the horses have run off.

  23. Days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like WEEKS if not months since this site has been stable. Only in the past week can I get more than one page to load, I can't post anything even to comment on the issue. Then finally it starts working again last week and then bam, back to shitsville.

  24. Wait a second! by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

    With all of the "Cloud Rules All!" mentality prevalent, it's interesting to note this quote from TFS: "...located physically far away from us." OK, got it! Cloud rules!

  25. Retirement Home for Aged /. Servers by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

    Been coming here for 20 years now (hard to believe how the time has gone). Likewise, thank you, keep up the good work. Although I must say the last couple of days have been a bit more productive! ;)

    Tell me about it....And I'm in the 20+ years club, too.

    Hey, never mind that "As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable advertising" box; I'm happy to give /. the impression revenues. But would you mind sending me a few of the old servers? They'd have great retirements as historically-significant World Community Grid space heaters!

    BigBlockMopar, aka. 71911
    515 Somerset Street West
    Ottawa, ON
    Canada
    K1R 5J9

    I'm glad you're back up, guys. Missed you.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Retirement Home for Aged /. Servers by max99ted · · Score: 1

      They'd have great retirements as historically-significant World Community Grid space heaters!

      515 Somerset Street West

      You heating the beer?

      (Vanier resident here)

      --

      Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

    2. Re:Retirement Home for Aged /. Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are truly a dumbass for giving out your mailing address. I hope the trolls and griefers make you regret this HARD. You will then learn a valuable lesson.

    3. Re:Retirement Home for Aged /. Servers by bioteq · · Score: 1

      Did you even bother to check the address on Google maps or anything, first, before making that comment?

      Pfft. What has slashdot become these days.

  26. With Slashdot down by fredrated · · Score: 2

    I actually had to work yesterday! Oh the horrors!

    1. Re:With Slashdot down by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ha. I am unemployed! Oh, the horrors! :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  27. DDOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or was it all 13 dedicated slashdoters hitting F5?

    1. Re: DDOS? by johnsnails · · Score: 1

      Wowowow haha mod up. This totally tracks!!

    2. Re:DDOS? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      That would have been a DLINUX, right?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  28. Zeta Reticuli by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2

    I'm not saying it was aliens, but....

  29. Nice it's back but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have been nice to have some status update while the site was down and not days after it was all fixed. The site was obviously up enough to serve the static home page. Could someone have not gone in and edited the html in that static page to have provided some status update of what was going on. Or I dont know slap a basic install with apache on another box to serve up some kind of static sorry we are down, this is whats wrong, this is what were doing to fix it. We expect to be back up by x time/date.

  30. Re: "We inheritied" by ScentCone · · Score: 2

    I call utter BS here. It is not 1990s when people needed to be in close proximity to their garages to run reliable websites.

    Gee, it's almost like they just TOLD you that they migrated away from the older platform specifically so it wouldn't be such a hands-on administrative burden like the older platform.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  31. Re: "We inheritied" by whipslash · · Score: 1

    nailed it. amazing.

  32. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I say something I put my name on it.
    --anonymous

  33. more to the point.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Admit it, you pissed some one off..
    While the name is just a name /. is not slashdot any more :(

    Hope you all pull ur heads out, learn from your mistakes. Publish better stuff, true to the name you inherited.
     

    1. Re:more to the point.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ps. congrats on being up.

    2. Re:more to the point.. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Hope you all pull ur heads out, learn from your mistakes. Publish better stuff, true to the name you inherited.

      They have a done a lot better recently, my guess is someone playing a game on the /. network, pissing off some 1337 teenage h@x0r and getting DDoS'd via paid botnet when the person didn't even realize what they were targeting, then got the bill after a week and got grounded by his parents for running up their credit card bill.

      Source: I've gotten several companies DDoS'd by shittalking in multiplayer games while at work.

  34. Re: from a Russian standpoint by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    I expected you to say "In Soviet Russia, slashdot crashed on you!" or something.

  35. Re: from a Russian standpoint by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    ISO-8859-15 will, though.

  36. Re:"We inheritied" by pz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's just a fact that the previous setup was located across the country from us

    Allow me to pile on here: I've been part of the dev team for a site that was, at the time, substantially larger than Slashdot in terms of global traffic (we peaked at Alexa global 103, if memory serves). We couldn't have given one hoot where the servers were located because we never, ever had to physically go to the machines. We had paid lackeys at each of the colo sites to do that. Need to reboot a server? Shoot an email or make a call to on-site support. Need to reconfigure a load balancer? Then ssh is your friend. Blaming your problems on the locations of the servers really doesn't hold water.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  37. Hey, I know by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    2.0 is boring. How about Beta?

    1. Re:Hey, I know by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Beta 2.0 seems like the next logical step. I'll sign up for the alpha.

      Seriously though, no.

  38. Rather unnecessary, though by raymorris · · Score: 2

    I've been active on Slashdot for many years. This is my second account, my new account only five years old or so. I have an affection for this site.

    I've been managing servers far longer, since 1997 or so.
    I've owned two hosting companies and consulted for several others. I've had the opportunity to contribute code to the Apache server, the Linux kernel, and a lot of the other software we all use. I've been writing code in Perl, like Slashdot uses, the whole time. I was once the only person allowed to touch the GirlsGoneWild servers because I was the only one trusted to not break something. So in other words, I've been around a while.

    In all that time, I've never seen a site move cause a week of down time unless people just kept making mistake after mistake after mistake. It's just not necessary to have more than a few minutes down time *even when things go very wrong*. When things go right, switching to a new server in a new location has no down time, or on a highly dynamic site you can use 60 seconds to expire DNS caches (with the the TTL previously lowered). When unexpected problems come up and people don't know the best way to handle them, you can have a few hours of down time.

    Evidence suggests that the planning and execution of the new hosting and the move was very poor. Shit happened, I know. Maybe a hard drive failed. That's why your new server uses RAID 10, so hard drive failures don't take the site down. Maybe you thought the new server was ready, but it wasn't. That's when you flip the switch to revert back to the old server for a day while you fix the new one. Unfortunate things happened, they do happen. And your technical team didn't know how to handle them properly.

    May I suggest you have an outside, independent, expert have a look at your new server setup and make some suggestions on how to make it robust? It's clear the people who handled this don't know how to do servers in a robust way. Heck I'd *volunteer* to give you an hour of my time discussing it and looking it over, without charge, just because I have an affection for Slashdot and this community. [ Not audience ;) ]

    1. Re: Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't be the only one who wondered where you were going with "I was once the only person allowed to touch the GirlsGoneWild" only to be disappointed to scan left to the start of the next line and see the word "server."

    2. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there was a DDOS in the middle of it. It's hard to work when someone is constantly poking you in the arm.

    3. Re: Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, nerd. With your "servers" and your "Perls".

    4. Re: Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't be the only one who wondered where you were going with "I was once the only person allowed to touch the GirlsGoneWild" only to be disappointed to scan left to the start of the next line and see the word "server."

      He was the only one they trusted to stay focused on the server....

    5. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I nominate raymorris for the task.

      I'm in a similar position myself but I refuse to make an account and my comments always end up getting deleted so I don't think it's a good idea to nominate myself.

      Never thought I'd see this kind of downtime. It's not like slashdotting even means anything anymore :/

    6. Re: Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubernerd! I looked at a girl once but I think I got away with it.

    7. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by swb · · Score: 1

      I have this sneaking suspicion that Slashdot still runs on a ton of legacy code and systems that make migrating it far more complex than we think of for other systems. Based on my experience with the site, I don't think it's ever been owned by a particularly deep-pocketed outfit or one that has thought it's worth investing major money in for an overhaul. There was "beta", but as it turned out, fuck beta, as they said.

      Still, I would kind of expect it to at least be modular enough (or made modular via virtualization) for the migration to be done in advance and tested thoroughly before final migration. It's not like there aren't many ways to do this pretty simply that are used every day, even for clunky, old applications systems that are "hard to migrate".

    8. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be APK.

      Please don't be APK.

    9. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

      Good point in the parent comment, it seems:

      "I have this sneaking suspicion that Slashdot still runs on a ton of legacy code and systems that make migrating it far more complex than we think of for other systems. Based on my experience with the site, I don't think it's ever been owned by a particularly deep-pocketed outfit or one that has thought it's worth investing major money in for an overhaul."

      Slashdot manager "whipslash", Logan Abbott, posted this explanation as a comment on another story, 'Java EE' Has Been Renamed 'Jakarta EE':

      "Sorry we inconvenienced you and interrupted your normal routine. It wasn't a fun time for us either, I can assure you. We inherited an aging setup in the acquisition that was located physically far away from us. We made a big investment in a new hardware set up, and ran into sizable issues including a massive DDOS during the process. Going forward we expect much better uptime. We will be dedicating a lot of time and resources this year to improving Slashdot."

      We seeing an example of inadequate communication. A very limited explanation was posted as a comment to an unrelated story.

    10. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Wait, what's a rollback plan? You mean that you shouldn't have a script that switches DNS to the new servers, and auto-terminates the old servers with zero delay in between? And erases any backups, wipes databases, and sets fire to the data center?

      YOLO, we'll do it live, other applicable Internet memes.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    11. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP post does not read like a borderline illiterate narcissist.

      No bold. Sentences scan and make sense the first time.

      No mention of hosts files, misquote/out-of-context quotes of people saying that he's right.

      No weird name calling, victory claiming or wrestling-level smack talk.

      Probably not APK. Even compared to APKs more lucid and less paranoid/amphetamine-comedown ramblings

    12. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by swb · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm still missing out how something like virtualization doesn't make this a lot simpler for them, even if the whole site is running on non-virtualized hardware.

      Usually we wouldn't P2V a very large bare metal system (ie, many TB of local disk), we would migrate apps and data to a newer platform running on thevirtualized platform, but I have seen a handful of those kinds of systems P2V'd first because of dubious source hardware or because the client wants to kick the rest of the upgrade down the road a while and just wants the source system in the VM environment.

      Anyway, why not virtualize whatever it was they had?

    13. Re: Rather unnecessary, though by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Are you assuming that uptime was the top priority? There are many other variables that could have been maximized for. I'm not saying things went according to plan but maybe they went as well as possible given other constraints.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    14. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by ChristophWeber · · Score: 1

      You make it sound as if Slashdot is running on a very simple setup, like a mom-and-pop shop site. That's of course not the case, so before you play armchair quarterback, maybe think this through a little bit? For the record, no hardware broke, no critical systems were overlooked, and planning was extensive and through. Shit still happened, and the crew stuck it out and fixed it, with outside consultant help.

    15. Re: Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful, just a glance can set off a chain reaction of hormones that can disable large areas of your brain and lead to less than optimal outcomes

    16. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      When you acquire a large complex software project, running on a server, with next to no real documentation, mistake after mistake after mistake is to be expected.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    17. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's ever been owned by a particularly deep-pocketed outfit or one that has thought it's worth investing major money in for an overhaul. There was "beta", but as it turned out, fuck beta, as they said.

      I think a lot of money went into the beta. It was probably supposed to modernize Slashdot's innards. But the big problem there was that not only was the code base being modernized, but an entire redesign of the interface was also rolled into the project, as well as a change to Slashdot's core mission. That last change produced most of the Fuck Beta hostility.. But I suspect that when beta crashed and burned, those code rewrites went away as well since they were all rolled up together.

    18. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I don't think APK uses emojis either. At least, I can't remember a time when he used one.

    19. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by swb · · Score: 1

      Don't you think it's weird that they would dive into a rewrite and not manage to separate out the UI display into its own modules? I'm not even a developer and this is almost the first thing that comes to mind -- classic display, new display, mobile option, and so on.

      I suppose they just couldn't resist a bunch of new features, er, monetization options, which weren't compatible with classic interface, either.

    20. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why you do it offline first and make sure you know how to do it.

      You must be a PHP tard to think this is excusable.

      At this point /. needs to be burnt to the ground since inept 'programming for dummies' morons seems to now be the rule, not the exception.

      numbnuts.

    21. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Don't you think it's weird that they would dive into a rewrite and not manage to separate out the UI display into its own modules? I'm not even a developer and this is almost the first thing that comes to mind -- classic display, new display, mobile option, and so on.

      Weird, sure, but it's possible that when they saw the Beta reaction, that they let go of the entire team.

      I work for a company where something like that happened over a decade ago. The project was scrapped, and the old project code survived. I'm sure by this point all that code was gone, but it was slowly replaced rather than all-at-once replaced with a flashy new rebranded product.
      The problem was that the newer code, while newer, was also appreciably slower in an application where execution speed was one of the selling points. Eventually it was decided that they would, when they could, migrate some of the newer features they really wanted into the existing codebase.

    22. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I did not say it was excusable. I said it was to be expected. Two entirely different things.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    23. Re:Rather unnecessary, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you don't take down a working production server until the new server works.

      These guys are clowns.

      numbnuts

  39. Re:"We inheritied" by whipslash · · Score: 1

    We're a small company with no paid "lackeys" across the country. Sorry that we weren't up to your standards. Anything else?

  40. If we inconvenienced anyone, we're sorry. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    You're SORRY? Are you fucking kidding me? I had to go outside to alleviate the boredom from not being able to shitpost on /. This is a fucking outrage!

    1. Re:If we inconvenienced anyone, we're sorry. by shanen · · Score: 1

      I'd give you the funny mod if I ever saw a mod point to give... Maybe someone else can help you out?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  41. Re:"We inheritied" by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    /. has been bought and sold so many times I don't even know who runs it these days.

  42. Re:"We inheritied" by ls671 · · Score: 2

    Blaming your problems on the locations of the servers really doesn't hold water.

    Holding water raises the chances of sinking a lot.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  43. Fixed that for you... by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

    Dear Slashdot Regulars, We will be doing some upgrades in the next few days. Expect various kinds of service interruptions. We expect things to be back to normal in a week.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    1. Re: Fixed that for you... by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      You want to tie that to a time estimation. We will be back in.....
      6 mins....
      5 hrs....
      2 mins... Post heat death... 2 days...
      30 sec....

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
  44. Slashdot is extremely important. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "whipslash" is Logan Abbott, President of SourceForge, Slashdot, and others. He said, "I appreciate the concern, conspiracy theories, and even the anger and vitriol. It's nice to see people care."

    Slashdot is extremely important to the technology community.

    What Ray Morris said in the parent comment seems reasonable to me.

    1. Re:Slashdot is extremely important. by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      What Ray Morris said in the parent comment seems reasonable to me.

      Well not to me. He claims to know exactly what went wrong whilst stating a few obvious facts on DNS, TTL and raid. I seriously doubt the /. engineers don't know about these things.
      He's been managing servers for years, I've been managing migrations such as these and high priority incidents for years. I have very little faith in engineers that come to the table claiming to know it all without any investigation into what really went wrong.
      I agree that on the surface it doesn't look very good. But we really don't know enough.

      And frankly, most likely they worked their asses of the last few days and deserve better than a baseless claim that the technical team didn't know how to handle the issues properly without us knowing what went wrong in the first place.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Slashdot is extremely important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see reading comprehension isn't a thing for you.

      numbnuts

  45. That financial model I suggested would avert such by shanen · · Score: 1

    Part of that cost-recovery-based financial model that I recommended Slashdot consider (a couple of years ago) would help minimize the impact of whatever the problems were. Because the ongoing costs of features would be divided up on a per-feature basis, the system would be naturally designed to lose functionality in a gradual way. Unfunded features would always need to be ready to be turned off...

    So for I haven't found any details about the apparently ongoing problems, or I missed such a story, but it appears that there is basically a binary switch. The offline mode appears to offer a quite low level of functionality, but that's the only step down that Slashdot seems to have.

    Anyway, I can hope the latest problem has been correctly diagnosed and repaired now.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  46. The peanut gallery... by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Sad to see what a corporate owner can do or fail to do. Back in the day mountains would have been moved, the peanut gallery would have found hardware, rack space, network facilities, you name it and /. would have been back online in 8 hours. The difference between a labor of love and a job is very much evident...
    I hope things get back on track soon but the days of wine and roses, and the significance of the Slashdot effect have long since passed us by. Either way nice to see the place functioning again and good luck in the future.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:The peanut gallery... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I mean I'm sure there's a few of us here that could lend some hand if they would allow. Maybe something like failover mirrors and such. Might slow the site during times like that but not 504 and 500 errors

  47. Re:The peanut gallery.. Slashdot now SPEZ/deleting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These were deleted - i have screen shots and more links to prove it as well.

    https://meta.slashdot.org/comm...

    https://meta.slashdot.org/comm...

    slashdot is now SPEZing and deleting comments.

    SAD!

  48. Re:"We inheritied" by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    The Ukrainians.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  49. Outage over? by mauriceh · · Score: 1

    Welcome back. We missed you.

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
  50. I'm just annoyed about the cellphone article by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I wanted to have a whinge, that I totally agree and want to hang on to my old cell phone.

    Unfortunately the topic is now like 6 days old.

    1. Re:I'm just annoyed about the cellphone article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whine*

  51. Would have been nice if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could've had the smoking ruins serving up a basic "Slashdot is down for maintenance" page when it was [poorly] serving. As it was, when not returning a gateway error, it served a broken version of a normal-looking page (days old though) and behaved very oddly (line serving the same old page when a user asked for older pages) while showing no sign that the operators knew something was amiss. Net result was bizarre and a tad baffling and the sort of thing that leads people to wonder if the site is headed for the great internet beyond where things like pets.com went.

    Nice to see you back up and running and get an explanation.

  52. Thank you. by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 1

    Thanks for bringing /. back. All the best in the future. I, and many others, will be there for it.

  53. The basic dev question by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Will the new version be a complete rewrite - or are you sticking to Perl?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  54. Re:How to fix Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think you know what an editor's job is. Much of what you are asking for would be done by moderators, not editors.

  55. I panicked by satan666 · · Score: 1

    Until I found out what happened, I panicked thinking that Slashdot went down for good. I agree with the other poster that Slashdot is my goto source for proper news reporting. Not to mention an excellent moderation system that does not ban content. I have been a Slashdot supporter for many many years. I cannot imagine the internet without it. Keep up the great work guys. Also, I hope you realize I had to do actual work for the past few days. This is just unacceptable!

  56. Just a Suggestion by ytene · · Score: 1

    Firstly, good to see Slashdot is back.

    Secondly, the one thing that surprised me during the technical outage was that no acknowledgement message was posted. The site remained up and previous posts remained visible, but there was a long window in which it looked as though nothing was happening. That was, of course, not the case.

    So my suggestion would be to take a leaf out of any good DR (Disaster Recovery) playbook: "Communicate early and often". Obviously we hope that you don't experience another outage like this again, but perhaps one thing you might like to consider would be to put in place some form of mechanism that would let you redirect your visitors to a "status update page" that you could periodically amend to let people know what is happening.

    Obviously the need to do so is less than a retail web shop, but at the same time, the revenue you generate from on-screen advertising depends on visitors. You likely wouldn't want your regulars to give up...

  57. Please Don't by ytene · · Score: 1

    As others have identified, this will simply generate tit-for-tat trolling.

    A much better idea would be to select, from the existing sub-set of moderators, a group who can then monitor moderator activity, with a view to looking for any abuses.

    Finally, Slashdot staff could then moderate the super-moderators, just to be sure.

    And for what it's worth, the moderation system here on Slashdot is already orders of magnitude better than, say, Ars Technica, where anyone can vote on every post, and you end up with exactly the sort of down-vote trolling that others have raised as a concern to the original suggestion that started this thread.

  58. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes ineptitude of epic proportions to not know how to change servers(distance is completely irrelevant here) with minimal downtime. i.e. The time it takes to copy the database over and turn on the new DNS entries. AKA a few minutes.

    The "DDOS" is just a BS lie to cover said ineptitude. It is amazing, the DDOS covered the exact amount of time it took you to move the server over. LOL

    This is worse than beta incompetence. I guess it is true that subsequent owners are always worse.

    numbnuts

  59. It's awesomely fast now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the tor browser was awfully slow, network wise and also the javascript execution speed. So it's dumbfounding to see things work fast enough now.

    Well I'm CPU bound like before crisis when loading 500 comments at once (this freezes Firefox XUL GUI) but I'm fine with it.
    e.g. there's a "this day on slashdot" link to a story with 976 comments (threaded, collapsible and with the best scoring system known). There's hardly anything comparable on the web. Most stuff will give you 50 pages or infinite scrolling.

  60. Welcome back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but slashdot.com is still marked as unsafe because of the certificate, slashdot.org is working though.

  61. Re: How to fix Slashdot by schure · · Score: 1

    Plot twist: Slashdot reveals it hasn't had editors for four years and had instead been using an older version of Facebook's algorithm stolen by a Gollum-like character that runs the entire operation.

  62. WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn how to computer... :-D

  63. It was not a DDOS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was just people refreshing often and clients retrying constantly.
    Trust me, I found myself doing it too, until I noticed.

    1. Re:It was not a DDOS!! by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      You're probably mostly correct. I did the same for a bit, but then also quickly noticed it was down, only checked every few hours or so. There was probably a mild DDoS that just pushed it over the limit, and it seemed for a little while the devs just blocked any port 80/443 connections to get some work done as the offline landing pages were also down. At least that's how I could imagine it playing out. Hopefully they learned a valuable lesson and are working on a failsafe for something in the future. I vote to slashsource some servers from people here willing to help foot the community with some minimal failover state that still allows new posts and comments that can be merged into the database once the main site is back up and running correctly, could probably do it in an almost seamless matter like how we used to spread releases on the old FTP servers across multiple servers in multiple regions. Just a suggestion. And I'm sure there are a few well qualified admins here that would be willing to oversee the failover portion to keep it maintained and secure while not in use.

  64. Bitch please! I have a client-side Unicode decoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, not updating to Unicode is *pure* unprofessional incompetence.

    Like it is soo hard to implement a whitelist â¦

    The whole statement about evil characters is nonsense anyway, since even ASCII contains only control characters for the first 31 code points.

  65. Slashdot was dead a loong time ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regarding your reaction to our reaction: Slashdot was already dead when CmdrTaco and cowboyneal left. Donâ(TM)t overinflate your importance. You are not the vultures. That was Dice. You are the ones that get what the vultures left over!

    Besides, Slashdot's system of not only allowing modding without commenting, but enforcing it, makes its enforced groupthinking circle-jerk even worse that that of Reddit!
    People don't even have to explain themselves when they knee-jerk mod, but can't, even if they wanted! So nobody has to try to form any arguments which could make him realize he was merely triggered and should start reconsidering, using his brain!

    1. Re:Slashdot was dead a loong time ago. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Sure you can, You can comment AC and sign your username. I do it sometimes because good mods are valuable, and sometimes I just burn the points and comment anyways. I guess that in the millennial definition of the word is considered "hacking" but fortunately the majority of the people that comment here should know the real meaning of the word.

    2. Re:Slashdot was dead a loong time ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it still removes your mods unless you clear cookies or post anon from another browser, it just doesn't warn you.

      Logging out MIGHT allow it, not sure. But if your logged in but just posting anon it blanks the mod.

      Go ahead and test it if you don't believe me. Mod me, and then reply anon from the same browser w/o logging off. .

  66. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Arristocrats!

  67. Re:"We inheritied" by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    but distance no longer makes any difference in an internet-based service

    This comment is brought to you by the same thought process which comes up with: Trump was right to fire weather forecasters because we can just get the weather forecast through an app.

  68. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL

    You don't even need paid lackeys really, unless there is a hardware issue and even then you numbnuts have shown a totally inability to handle that.

  69. Missed you 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    / . is back !

    Do you guys have a public secondary forum where we loyal readers can get updates on issues such as this?

    1. Re: Missed you 3 by johnsnails · · Score: 1
  70. Thank you for clearly illustrating to me ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... the graveness of my slashdot addiction. Very much appreciated.

    And thanks for finaly coming back online. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  71. Like anyone with a life ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... bothers to make an account here ...

    i had two. One of them a five digit one. The secondone was nearly a decade ago. Anyone with any sense left with CmdrTaco.

    1. Re:Like anyone with a life ... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Anyone with any sense left with CmdrTaco.

      And yet you're still here..

  72. i forgive you slashdot by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    because i love you too much :)

    peace

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  73. Not funny! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    You made me leave my mom's basement, I hate you!

    1. Re:Not funny! by AndyKron · · Score: 1

      I hope you didn't let the sunlight touch you!

  74. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  75. Re:"We inheritied" by tramp · · Score: 1

    Which make me wonder if you did not inherited the ssl certificate for slashdot.com? I get a warning from my browser that slashdot.com is not on the current certificate.

  76. Re:"We inheritied" by Calydor · · Score: 2

    So your argument is that you worked for a much bigger company with a much bigger staff, and therefore Slashdot should be able to do even better?

    What?

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  77. Huh? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Huh? I never noticed any problem.

  78. Past couple days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? This has been going on since the beginning. Past couple days my ass.

  79. Re: Bitch please! I have a client-side Unicode dec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, if you work in any serious capacity on a site with moderately useful data, you need to go grab a book on Unicode security, ASAP. And then start looking at your logs. You've probably already been hacked.

  80. What about structural racism on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will you be improving on that as well?

    We both see an enormous amount of racial slurs and attacks in the comment section, and the clear pattern that no matter how many times they are reported, /. staff seems to happily let them stand.

    This is the very definition of structural racism. Do you realize how this makes you look?

    1. Re: What about structural racism on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, n1gg4r.

      Fuck you and the horse you rode into town on.

    2. Re: What about structural racism on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the white women at?

  81. Late-Breaking News from the Council by rsmith-mac · · Score: 2

    In an extensive and unprecedented news briefing this evening, the Council of Elders announced that they have begun a new defensive campaign against the blue world that is the third body from our local star.

    K'Nord, speaker for the Council of Elders' Planetary Land Defense Forces, elaborated:

    "For many years the blue worlders have launched probes and other devices at our glorious home world, with little success. Even when they can land their pitiful machines we have engaged in a subtle subterfuge campaign to further hobble their ability to collect information on our planet. None the less, the Council has grown tired of the annoyance posed by the blue worlders' continued attempts to reach our sweet red soil, and the undue alarm among the populace that it has created. As a result, the Council has approved a new plan to disrupt the communications of the invaders at the source, in order to render them unable to send future probes."

    Detailing the plan, K'Nord revealed that the signals intelligence arm of the Defensive Forces had successfully accessed the exceptionally primitive data networks of the blue worlders, using their own equipment against them to block communications and disrupt the ongoing functionality of the tribals' society. Several communications nodes were rendered inert in this fashion, including those identified with the codenames SourceForge and Slashdot. Defensive analysts believe that these nodes are among the most important to the invaders' society, and that with their failure, the invaders will be unable to complete even the most basic of calculations to reach the planet.

    "The pathetic blue worlders have proven time and time again that they are entirely reliant on machines for even the most basic of functions. Without these they are as helpless as an infant chirocican; their natural cognitive abilities pale in comparison to even our least extraordinary younglings."

    When a junior reporter noted that taking a proactive stance against the third planet could attract further undesirable attention from the invaders, K'Nord quickly isolated the traitor and had their gelsacs carefully eviscerated, for use as wetware in the construction of further communication disruption devices.

  82. Re:"We inheritied" by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It's debatable whether anybody does.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  83. What Ray Morris said seems correct to me. Quote: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    This is what Ray Morris said: "In all that time, I've never seen a site move cause a week of down time unless people just kept making mistake after mistake after mistake."

    This is what you said: "He claims to know exactly what went wrong..."

    Ray Morris was NOT claiming to "know exactly what went wrong".

  84. root cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey slashdot IT folks. How bout y'all publish a RCA, lessons learned, etc. You can drop names, locations and IP addresses , and even manufacturers. But it'd be insightful for y'all to share.

    1. Re:root cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As of this moment, not all is well. SourceForge is throwing 500 errors all over the place. Basically, my take is, BizX running the sites on the cheap is the RCA.

  85. Whipslash by johnsnails · · Score: 1

    Glad your back up!! Side comment. Not sure if you will see this but I'd like to see how many points a comment has attracted. Was it straight up to +5 or were there people with different views modding down (and vice versa). Any way that would ever happen?

  86. Sarcasm by johnsnails · · Score: 1

    As per usual slashdot articles are like 5 days old ;) ;)
    Actually really glad you guys are back!!!

  87. Re: How to fix Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My precious...

  88. Communication strategy? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Maybe it is because I have working for not for anything profit for a few years. And not a commercial entity like slashdot.org. But if I had a downtime position that world take more then a minute I would had posted a downtime message banner. Letting people know the summary of its status.
    Time it went down, expected outage window, brief explanation of the outage. It’s 2018 there shouldn’t be any shame in saying you got hacked, or DDOS. It happens just as long after it does you make sure it doesn’t happen again.
    Otherwise people are not sure of the issue. Is slashdot going out of business? Was it’s problem the last straw. We don’t know because there wasn’t any communication.
    For a internet news site, you would think communication was important

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  89. The better solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The better solution would have been to document on the front page that the migration was going to happen between day x and day y and any service outages or frozen pages are a result of that.

    I was actually starting to wonder if Slashdot was coming back up after 2.5 days away. Honestly SoylentNews filled in the gap just fine, as did Reddit for more specific topical content.

    I've been coming to Slashdot since summer of 1999 (Thanks Phil Smith!) and I appreciate it still being here almost 20 years later. However, the lack of certain types of communication surrounding maintenance, service outages, and changes of ownership really could use some improvement. SN has managed to pull most of this off with a volunteer staff and like 10k a year in donations and had their outages after the first year or two counted in the realm of *HOURS*, including when they migrated their servers between datacenters states away from each other. I want to see Slashdot *IMPROVE*. After 20 years it shouldn't be getting beaten on the technical side by its red upstart counterpart.

    Oh yeah, and bring back datestamped rather than page numbered 'older' pages. It makes it a lot easier to hunt down old articles when you know the relative day it was on, but not the article title. Hackaday doesn't have that either, although both old /. did and SoylentNews does.

  90. Re: from a Russian standpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does? I thought it was supposed to be a small upgrade of ISO-8859-1

    Addition of the € character plus a few characters that make its coverage of the French and Finnish alphabets complete.

  91. Should use Hosts file of APK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. won't experience outage if they uses the hosts file generator of APK.
    Hosts file is kernel level. /s

    On a serious note, I was actively clicking articles in split seconds and suddenly it stopped after I clicked about that PDF Conversion into MS Word that's related to some Trump close ally. Hmmmm, i think I know who was responsible.

  92. Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have diarrhea and farted.

  93. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine migration to new servers to work like this:
    1. you clone everything to the new servers
    2. you test that it runs on the new servers
    3. you make changes to the new servers until it works
    4. you put the old servers into read-only mode
    5. you migrate everything that changed between step 1 and step 4 on the old servers
    6. you change the DNS entries to point to the new servers

    Can you point out where you deviated from these steps or where you had problems that caused the site to stop working for days?

  94. that's ok by Hugh+Jorgen · · Score: 0

    Yahoo carries more current news anymore. /. Yesterdays news today! Let the domain expire and go away with a little dignity left.

  95. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should stop responding to these...This crowd probably knows DC migration better than anyone there does...

    But that's the problem with Slashdot as Slashdot.

    We tend to keep commenting and talking to each other, wondering when the next purchase will be the last and we'll have to go find refuge at Ars or Reddit or wherever else others go to comment and chat.

    You don't understand that we understand - no need to overexplain. "We fucked up our DC move because a DDOS happened and we had inadequate planning, expertise, and resources to deal with the chaos of both events in an expedited manner."

    Rember.... we've all been there and we're not your stock holders. We're contributors. Some of us even pay or used to anyway...We get it. So please just don't talk down to us. I was on your side until I saw you making petty insults at people who were insulting you.

  96. Awesome! by Kid+CUDA · · Score: 0

    So glad to see it back!

    Do you think maybe next time you could tweet about it a bit earlier, so we know what's happening?

  97. "we" Has /. been sold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First I have heard of it. BTW. "The old guys fault" defence is for losers.

  98. Welcome back /. by CyberRacer · · Score: 1

    I missed you. Good to have you home again.

  99. Thank You by cooper6 · · Score: 1

    You are much appreciated.

  100. Still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you could let know on Twitter sooner. I just saying! You were missed.

  101. Combo breaker ): by gerf · · Score: 1

    There goes my 2^11 days read in a row record.

  102. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read the parent to the comment I'm replying to, but most everyone reading slashdot inherited some crap setup located geographically far away and had to deal with the same thing.

  103. Thanks by biggaijin · · Score: 1

    Thanks for all your hard work. I appreciate it. It was surprisingly painful to discover that Slashdot was out during the past few days.

  104. Re:"We inheritied" by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I assumed you moved to a systemd based distro and there was a missing unit file.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  105. fwiw, things still aren't quite right on sf.net by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you guys have been through a lot, would be great to get a real war story, likely after you have slept. for now: I can't update my project's static web site because group permissions seem to be hosed since the DC move (and the owner is a guy who left the team a year ago.) chown doesn't work (though it claims to.) submitted a ticket... but I think the ticketing system down also. sigh...

  106. Obligatory by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    We apologise for the fault in the outages. Those responsible have been sacked.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  107. Re: Bitch please! I have a client-side Unicode dec by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I just checked my logs. I'm not sure if I've been hacked or not. Is there a new "Unicorn Poop" browser out there that I'm not aware of? They're already at version 42!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  108. Glad to have you back.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We appreciate the hard work

  109. Mea Culpa by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Sorry, it was me.

    My penguin died and fell on the F5 key while I was away last week.

  110. Can we get better downtime communication? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Even sourceforge does a better job of communicating its issues with users when they are having downtime (and they're on the same network). Here all we saw was a mostly broken front page and the inability to log in (which then gave an error message about offline status when we tried to log in). Even if the cause is unknown it would be nice to see something posted front and center saying "yeah, we're down, we know it - we're working on it". The attempt to present a business as usual appearance only adds to frustration.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  111. I thought the internet was broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TSIA

  112. Re:Arrogance and pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's bitztream the autism-hating, custom EpiPen-hating, Musk-hating, Qualcomm-hating, Firefox tabs-hating, Slashdot editors-hating Slashdot troll!

  113. Re: Arrogance and pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All of this over 2 days?

    Quit being a fag.

  114. I didn't say I know exactly what went wrong by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I didn't say I know exactly what went wrong.

    I said I'm sure they ran into some bad luck with a drive failing or something. On a well-run server migration drive failure doesn't result in a week down time, or any down time - drives are redundant in raid. During a properly- managed server migration, you can always switch back to the old server, which has been working for years, by updates the A record. That takes no more than five minutes for roll back, because you lower the TTL ahead of time.

    Worst case would be two simultaneous data center fires, in which both the old and new data center burn to the ground. Since the first step of any major change is to pull a backup, the worst case means restoring that backup, which could take several hours. Hours, not a week. If both datacenters burn.

    > most likely they worked their asses of the last few days

    I'm sure they did. The hardest work most people ever do is trying to handle something that they don't what to do with.

    > deserve better than a baseless claim that the technical team didn't know how to handle the issues properly

    We know the results were terrible. They did a migration and either wiped out the old working server before they had the new one up, or decided rather than taking 30 seconds to switch the A record back they'd just be down for a week. They didn't do the job at all. So either they weren't trying or they didn't really know what they were doing. Never heard of a tar pipe, TTL, and run chown -R during a migration. They didn't do a decent job, total failure. So either they didn't know how, or they were slacking. I highly doubt they were slacking.

    1. Re:I didn't say I know exactly what went wrong by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was wrong saying that you claimed to know exactly what went wrong, but you (again) make a lot of assumptions that I see no proof of.
      I am fully aware of doing a roll back by reverting the DNS record, after you made sure in advance that the TTL was at 1 minute. We had to do one recently. And it was a bit more complex than that, as we also had to replay the transactions that did come in during the short period that we were on the new system. Fortunately we had planned for that so we were actually able.
      The hardest part is often to take that decision, especially if you think you know the cause of the issue but have to go back to avoid the situation that the roll back takes too long in the agreed upon maintenance window. We've had that: rolling back, thinking you know how to fix it but also know to stick to the plan.

      There are however migrations where 'just flipping back' is not always an option. This can be technical, it can also be financial (if we roll back we have to pay two data centers for another month or even a year). We don't know why they didn't just flip back the DNS. Claiming based on what we know that they never heard of tar pipes, TTL etc. in my view is baseless. It is possible, but I sincerely doubt it. I at least won't say so easily that they did a bad job without knowing a lot more on what really happened, why did couldn't or wouldn't roll back. Too often the engineers get blamed for decisions made elsewhere.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:I didn't say I know exactly what went wrong by raymorris · · Score: 1

      > This can be technical, it can also be financial (if we roll back we have to pay two data centers for another month or even a year).

      That's why you do the migration a week before the billing period ends. That's part of my checklist. What do you want to bet these guys didn't have that on their checklist, if they had a checklist at all?

      Shit happens. Good engineers *know* that shit happens. So they have roll back plans, backups, etc. So that even when shit happens, you don't have the site down for a week.

      It CAN be hard to decide when to roll back (or switch over to the warm/hot spare). Sometimes you make a mistake in that decision. I've made a mistake in not switching over sooner. (Yet 've never regretted switching over too soon - lesson learned). Available evidence strongly suggests the Slashdot team made just such a mistake. I didn't say they are idiots, I said they made mistakes.

      I'm about to go fly my RC plane. The altitude rule with RC planes is "fly three mistakes high". That means you're high enough to make an error, recover from it, make another error and have time to recover from it, and make a third error in that recovery before you hit the ground. It definitely looks like either the person running this migration wasn't three mistakes high before starting (which would itself be a mistake), or they made more than three mistakes. They definitely crashed, hard.

      I don't know exactly what happened, and even the boss may not know because techs may be trying to cover their ass. (In fact trying to cover your ass during an incident is a VERY common mistake.). That's why I suggested he may want to have a third party look into what happened and how robust the set up is now. Because evidence suggests there is little reason to be confident.

    3. Re:I didn't say I know exactly what went wrong by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      I don't know exactly what happened, and even the boss may not know because techs may be trying to cover their ass. (In fact trying to cover your ass during an incident is a VERY common mistake.). That's why I suggested he may want to have a third party look into what happened and how robust the set up is now. Because evidence suggests there is little reason to be confident.

      I'd certainly not rule out that the mistakes predate the current owners, too--or issues outside of their control, which may overlap if it's something along the lines of "Previous data center has alleged backups" or "Somebody failed to make sure code was properly documented, and also failed to notice that among the badly-documented parts of code there was a 'clever' trick that depended on the old server's hardware configuration and would break if run on different hardware." (I leave how much fault you attribute where in such situations, but I suspect some of this might reasonably not be noticed until you're in the process of the move, though I would note that it would have been polite to stick a notice on the front page itself.)

    4. Re:I didn't say I know exactly what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd certainly not rule out that the mistakes predate the current owners, too--or issues outside of their control, which may overlap if it's something along the lines of "Previous data center has alleged backups" or

      You don't have a working backup until you have tested a restore to an offline/virtualized setup.

      "Somebody failed to make sure code was properly documented, and also failed to notice that among the badly-documented parts of code there was a 'clever' trick that depended on the old server's hardware configuration and would break if run on different hardware." (I leave how much fault you attribute where in such situations, but I suspect some of this might reasonably not be noticed until you're in the process of the move, though I would note that it would have been polite to stick a notice on the front page itself.)

      This is the same as the above. You don't know how to fix your system until you can restore it from a backup and test that it actually works.

      Slashdot isn't a bank and it's not even a high traffic site. The current month/year can fit and be served off a $1000 laptop with an SSD. The fact that it wasn't means the IT crew running it are shit and unable to find a non-shit job where this is allowed continue/come about.

    5. Re:I didn't say I know exactly what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a 6 digit UID and don't know Raymorris is a know-it-all deplorable? You can safely disregard practically everything he says unless you want the solution that helps him the most while fucking over the maximum amount of liberals/poor.

  115. Re:Arrogance and pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised your mommy let you use the computer again.

  116. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong.

    Comment abuse (like racism or random trash without any relevance to the topic) and controlling story posts are an editor's job.

    Moderation is meant for rating the flow of the actual discussion.

    Read the FAQ.

  117. Re: How to fix Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zuck relies on Snopes. Let's see how well that worked out:

    http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/02/facebook-apologizes-for-threatening-to-censor-the-babylon-bee/

    Hmm, well done, Zuck. Maybe it isn't a good idea to let some old progressive in a living room with his cat (that literally is who is behind Snopes; it's easily available information) determine the fact checking for Facebook.

    Slashdot's current editors are about on par with Zuck's operation. That sounds like a compliment st first; it isn't.

  118. You purchased new hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why in gods name did you purchase new Hardware? are we back in 1999? from my understanding Slashdot is having financial issues making a profit witch is why it's been sold several times yet your going to waist money on hardware? so much for this being a tech site for techies by techies...next time you want to do an upgrade do yourself a favor and move a native serverless solution a site like Slashdot will benefit greatly from it.

    1. Re:You purchased new hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I can tell, many projects have departed SourceForge for other places over the years. All the while, Slashdot traffic continuing to slide. In light of that, new hardware makes sense and, presumably, allowed BizX to consolidate servers to save money on administration, hosting, etc. Moving hosts was likely another cost savings measure. Speculation of course, but that's all one has to go on, since it's crickets from BizX as to what really happened with the move and extended outage.

  119. Re: "We inheritied" by bioteq · · Score: 1

    I think we can all agree that you should, in fact, just skip December and go ahead and leave Slashdot. You obviously don't like it; why stay and ferment hate over it? Oh. That's right. Trolls.

  120. Re:Bitch please! I have a client-side Unicode deco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only you and 6 other people here give a shit about unicode. The rest of us can manage to convey our thoughts just fine with ASCII.

  121. Re:BizX Milking What's Left of Slashdot and SF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting to see this specifically modded down to -1. Sure, it could have been any random user with points, but my hunch is was a Slashdot mod or the owner of BizX himself. Shame to see no reply to the post, which included various constructive suggestions. Ignoring reality won't make it go away.

  122. Re: Slashdot Outrage Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trolls will continue until morale improves.

  123. Re: from a Russian standpoint by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Which matters, because you totally can't write Leningrad, glasnost or chernozem without them.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  124. Re:Arrogance and pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember, 99% of the people who read slashdot before you took over were WAY smarter than you, and the other 1% is still learning to read. You're bullshit will be called.

    Ironic.

  125. Re:"We inheritied" by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    So what's the new infrastructure?

  126. Re:What Ray Morris said seems correct to me. Quote by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    He's technically correct. We all know that's the best kind of correct.

    This is what Ray Morris said: "In all that time, I've never seen a site move cause a week of down time unless people just kept making mistake after mistake after mistake."
    This is what you said: "He claims to know exactly what went wrong..."

    From my outside observation of the situation, the migration team had to have made mistake after mistake to have the site down for close to 4 days? So, technically he was correct in the fact that there was mistakes rolling around. Or else we would not be having this conversation. Anybody who has worked with servers for any length of time knows that there is more than one way to kill an angry cat. The hard part is killing the angry cat.

  127. YAY! by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    My nipples are back to full hardness! Thank you!

  128. Up again by PedroReina · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see you up again. Long time reader here. I review main page a couple of times a day. Thank you very much for your work.

  129. Cheers!! by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

    Thanks for sorting it out - it really is appreciated! In future though, it might be worth having some kind of "service status" message somewhere; ideally on the site itself, but if not, Twitter would've done.

    As it was, I was wondering if /. was down for good.

  130. Re:The peanut gallery.. Slashdot now SPEZ/deleting by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Pics or it didn't happen.

  131. Sympathy goes with the observation. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I am sympathetic to the troubles Slashdot managers had. However, it does seem as though there was a lack of detailed planning.

    It would be interesting if someone at Slashdot wrote a comprehensive story.

    1. Re:Sympathy goes with the observation. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      As long as its not one of the current editors I would like to see that also.

    2. Re:Sympathy goes with the observation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to throw some more mud at the wall...

      There have been some huge personnel changes at slashdot, that could affect the ability to migrate

      The "original" slashdot lived through many upgrades, with the original crew. There were some problems, mostly doing with growth, and the corresponding stories from one admin or another about spending nights in the data center getting everything set up. These sort of "grown in place" solutions always have unexpected dependencies, and are very difficult to diagnose without the original admins in place.

      Under Dice, slashdot was upgraded to a newer tech stack, but a huge blowback by the community to the changes resulted in many changes being rolled back. Whatever team Dice put together from these changes probable did not hang around when they were sold off to the most recent owner.

      And now we have Bizx as the new owner, with an unknown set of Admin skills, understanding of the environment or the different generations of fixes.

      Recipe for fun, regardless of the expertise of the admins doing the move

  132. Thanks by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I thought you guys were all going through hell, I am glad to see the site back up. There are not many other sites I'd be back to after a multi-day outage but Slashdot is one of them...

    Really odd that someone would DDOS Slashdot though. What's even the point?

    Glad to hear you've overcome some significant technical debt, even though it took great pains to do so...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  133. Re: from a Russian standpoint by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia internet slashdot you

    --
    Nullius in verba
  134. /. reader since the 90s by bigmacx · · Score: 1

    Been there almost from the start. Bummed I didn't make an account right away and got a really, really lower number than I have. I was reading back then, I think before there were public user comments and just people like Rob and Taco posting. But heck, I also remember MTV when the commercials had no sound...so

    Don't ever get Reddit, FB, Twatter -like. Don't ever get huge. Don't ever change. We need these obscure, yet extremely relevant tech posts.

    We invented the Slashdot Effect because we were running corp networks with 100Mbs Internet connections while most home users were on dial up.

    1. Re:/. reader since the 90s by Arkus · · Score: 1

      Right there with you, I had read /. for a year before I finally created an account. Could have had at least one fewer digit.

      --
      -- Just my $0.02 worth...
  135. PS my nose fell off by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I made an analogy to flying a plane "three mistakes high"; let me expand on that. Yesterday I finally got to fly my new plane for a minute after waiting two weeks due to all the rain. Like most RC planes, mine has the battery almost all the way at the tip of the nose to achieve proper balance.

        On climb out before I could got to altitude, the nose fell off and hung down, throwing the balance way out of whack. A tail-heavy plane is VERY hard to fly. So I had a mechanical failure at exactly the wrong time. Not my fault it crashed, right? I could say that.

    The nose came off because I made the mistake of forgetting to bring the part which secures the nose. Mistake number 1.
      Further, I was so anxious to try out the new plane that when I realized I forgot the part, I decided to go ahead and fly "for a minute" without the nose properly secured. Mistake number 2.. When I saw it came off, I knew the CG would be much too far back and I tried to turn the plane around back toward me. What I should have done instead is apply down elevator to compensate for the rearward CG. Mistake 3. I saw that the plane wasn't turning as expected. I thought "gee I wonder why?" A better pilot would immediately recognize that being unresponsive to control input is an indication of a stall, and would apply down elevator. Mistake 4. Because I didn't recover from the stall, the plane ended up nose diving into the ground.

    When I designed and built the plane, I knew that nose dives are the most common crash, so I designed and built it to survive a nose-down crash with little damage. I had it fixed in 5 minutes.

    I could blame mechanical failure - the nose fell off. I could point out it fell off before I had a chance to gain altitude. The fact is, it took FOUR mistakes from me to allow the crash to happen yesterday. Still because I didn't make design mistakes that would cause catastrophic damage in a nose-down crash, it was no big deal. It would have required five mistakes in my part to really damage the plane.

    I'm obviously not a great RC pilot. Yet getting even one thing right was enough to avoid a big issue.

  136. Re:"We inheritied" by PPH · · Score: 1

    We had paid lackeys

    Sometimes, paid lackeys aren't even enough.

    Anecdote: Many years ago, I was the admin, chief cook and bottlewasher for a small but production critical system inside Boeing. One day, the network drop ceased to work for an important piece of shop floor equipment. I was called out and diagnosed a network drop that was probably unplugged inside a locked closet. I called in an IT ticket and they said, "24 hour turn around time". Nope, that won't do. This is production critical. Airplanes are just sitting here and work is piling up. "Sorry. That's out policy." Evidently, the IT trouble ticket queue took precedence over actually building airplanes.

    While I was on the phone with the trouble desk, getting hot under the collar, a high level factory manager was listening to my end of the conversation. "Give me the phone," he says. "So, my guy PPH can fix this is we could just get into the network closet. But you can't get here for a day, right? No problem. The Boeing fire department is in this building. I'll just have them bring up a fire axe to open the door."

    An IT guy showed up in 15 minutes.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  137. I'm a Sysadmin since 1997 and you don't ask people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to pity your hard existence because you botch a disaster recovery scenario or major migration. "Oh woe is us, we didn't perform." And here's another excuse you don't use to illicit sympathy, "it was the aging infrastructure's fault".

    There are countless aging infrastructures that people like us inherit every single day. Previous engineers and designers build, leave, retire, die, etc. It happens everyday and yet successful competent teams of people all around the world complete migrations and retools with zero downtime.

    You FAILED, MISERABLY. Learn from it, move on.

    Here's parting bit of advice, don't include "was a pivotal member of the February 2018 /. mitigation team" on your resume. Your likely to fail miserable with that one, again.

  138. Change by __aakfbi4919 · · Score: 1

    Don't change, please.

  139. A better failure mode? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Maybe a better failure mode would be nice?

    It's up! Oh, wait, it's down. Or it's only down when you try to log in. Or something.

    Good thing there's a banner telling me what's going on ... oh wait.

  140. Shit happens, live with it... by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    Geez, folks, lighten up. Some of you clearly need to get lives, if a couple of days without /. cause such emotional upheavals.

    As for the huge number of people telling Whipslash that you would never have had so much downtime in a migration: Shit happens, and you weren't there, so you don't know what went wrong. Even if you could have done better, guess what, you weren't there and your holy wisdom was unavailable. What, precisely, do you hope to gain by crapping on the people who just had a sleepless weekend?

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re: Shit happens, live with it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop white knighting for slashdot. They don't need your putty.

      The people who complained had valid complaints. Slashdot was down for 3+ days but didn't post 1 outage update to their slashdot twitter or the front page of slashdot.

      The people were offering advice, you know, something professionals do. Obviously they need some help because this proves they have no idea what they were doing while upgrading.

      Again, stop acting like a child when someone gives you advice, that's how grown ups work and learn. So if advice makes you all delicate(then please leave and let the grown ups discuss).

      It is apparent that you need some type of safe space so you don't get triggered. Maybe you should move back in to your moms womb. ;)

  141. No worries! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just good to see y'all back up and running! âïðY'ðY'

  142. Hey, it's *us* (Welcome back! We missed you) by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    You can tell us,

    You can tell us what really happened. DDOS, indeed. Russian submarines in the sewers, karma ate your dogma, KHAAAAAAN! probiotic bacteria in your morning coffee, the Danmoore memo, sunspots, whatevs.
    We can handle the truth. It's us, FFS.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  143. from the foo dept? by VanessaE · · Score: 1

    Please, fix this irritating layout glitch: http://i.imgur.com/BqgmROM.png

    ("from the see-attachments"... what? dept.?)

  144. Worst Practice Apologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This recent change in apology practice is really quite offensive:

    If we inconvenienced anyone, we're sorry.

    Bullshit. The correct way to apologize is this:

    We sincerely apologize for all of the inconvenience we've caused.

    None of this "if X" crap.

  145. New style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No comments / explanation for the new style that briefly appeared during the migration-ddos-recovery period?

  146. Re:same as 12000 years ago, your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No stretch of the imagination will make this true, unless by "Alaska" you mean only Juneau. What exactly are you smoking?

  147. DDos Issues by muphin · · Score: 1

    "ran into sizable issues including a massive DDOS during the migration process"
    you mean you didnt take into account all those nerds hitting refresh trying to see if its fixed!

    --
    It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
  148. first sign of the internet apocalypse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is when slashdot goes down

  149. Shit happen. Thanks for an awesome site! by fuzzyf · · Score: 1

    Shit happens and provides an opportunity to learn.
    I've been reading slashdot for quite some time (years before signing up for an account).

    When I started reading slashdot I was genuinely suprised reading comments that I agreed with, and then reading a reply that changed my thoughts on the matter. Maybe just for a different perspective, understanding arguments from otther point of views. But sometimes actually changing my opinion, or making me go out and search for more information.

    That is gold. I love that. Especially with todays polarized media discussions (can't really call them discussions even).

    It's great that you guys are back! Thank you for an awesome site!

  150. Re:I'm a Sysadmin since 1997 and you don't ask peo by bigmacx · · Score: 1

    You'd think in 20+ years, you'd make an account or at least own your words by using the one you have. Maybe it's time to grow up. Tell me the last time you gave /. money or clicked on their ads and bought something. I bet your self-righteous ass has an ad blocker running and no exception for this site.

  151. Re:Also Slashdot, BACK AND DELETING COMMENTS. by another_twilight · · Score: 1

    There have been some absolutely elegant trolls. Trolls with style and wit. The majority that just try to score points as quickly as possible by being as obnoxious as possible are ... disappointing. I hate wading through all the democrat v conservative name calling, but the only reason I see it is that I choose to browse at -1 (often to mod).

    I love that Slashdot never used to delete anything. Even things I loathed. There are mechanisms to reduce the visibility of such comments and I think the process of letting them be made, then having them moderated is more important than simply deleting them. Deleting just tells the user that their comment is unacceptable, but the rest of the community doesn't get to see that, or to participate in the process. There's no discussion (if necessary) on why the comment is inappropriate.

    Letting people post things we don't like or agree with is the test of free speech. Deletion is not the answer. Public repudiation is. Vigorous discussion is. I'd rather be challenged than comforted. I'd rather any amount of crass, foul, low-level trolling than having same censored out of some misguided attempt to 'improve' discussion.

    I can find echo chambers and moderated forums just about anywhere else. I can find cesspits of unregulated comments and posting nearly as easily. Slashdot, IMHO, has (had?) an odd and precious mix of editorial-hands-off and community moderation. If this is true, it's sad to see that go.

  152. Re: from a Russian standpoint by Monster_user · · Score: 1

    That is exactly what I thought when I read DDoS. Would my guess be accurate in assuming that Slashdot is now hosted in Russia?

  153. Re: "We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you should have migrated to a Windows 2003 server box and rebooted it a few hundred times.

  154. Re: Slashdot effect! by Monster_user · · Score: 1

    Just call it the "Slashdot Effect", sheesh.

  155. I'm concerned about the DDoS allegation by kriston · · Score: 1

    I'm concerned about the DDoS allegation. To my eyes, it's too much of a coincidence that /. would experience a DDoS attack during the very same period of time a rehost is being done.

    --

    Kriston

    1. Re:I'm concerned about the DDoS allegation by Darkling-MHCN · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing.

    2. Re:I'm concerned about the DDoS allegation by kriston · · Score: 1

      I only mention it because I have personally witnessed outages being blamed on nonexistent DDoS attacks.

      It has been the new excuse for screwing up a rehost/migration for years.

      --

      Kriston

  156. Re:"We inheritied" by kriston · · Score: 1

    Whipslash, I'm more concerned about the DDoS allegation. To my eyes, it's too much of a coincidence that /. would experience a DDoS attack during the very same period of time a rehost is being done.

    --

    Kriston

  157. Put up a notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you have issues like this, could you please put up a notice on the page? The CMS is obviously down, but when things are this bad, just go and edit an HTML file or template. I got the impression that people the owners had just left /. to run in a corner somewhere, and it finally crashed (maybe ran out of space) and nobody cared. Was pretty close to leaving it. Thanks for acknowledging it on this post, makes it feel like there's humans running it after all.

  158. First..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the fuck is the Unicode support? Itâ(TM)s 2018 now.

    Second.. they donâ(TM)t have any plans for what youâ(TM)re going to do when you get hosed by a ddos? This is whatâ(TM)s so sad for me. I remember when slashdot was like drudge.....it drove internet traffic and broke sites that had linked articles. Now slashdot has to go under on and off for a week bc of a ddos. Jesus Christ. Just close this place already. Not flame bait. Just sad and disgusted.

    This happens a lot, whenever original owners sell out. Anandtech has gone the same way.

  159. Re:"We inheritied" by supremebob · · Score: 1

    On a site this old, I wouldn't be surprised if they had some old PHP code with a hardcoded IP address in there that messed up the works during the migration. I see that stuff all the time when moving legacy crap to a newer platform.

    That wouldn't explain why the migration took days, though. An outage that bad usually involves database corruption and/or a full restore from a backup.

  160. Re:same as 12000 years ago, your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hes talking about the fact that you can often find the same temperature in anchorage as somewhere in the lower 48. It certainly doesnt make it warmer.

    I used to live there and it was always fun to talk to someone in the continental US about the weather while they were having a cold snap.

    For example currently its 14 f in anchorage, while its in the thirties for most of the country. It wasn't uncommon to see someplace like new york have below zero temps while you in anchorage are in the thirties and forties.

    To be honest that has more to do with warm winds coming in from the coast, central and northern Alaska often gets much colder.

  161. Geez I hope not by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I moved sites to new servers enough times that my checklist was detailed enough to turn into a set of Perl modules and scripts. Our system literally copied sites to new hardware in a different data center fully automated every night (for warm spares). It did that with no prior knowledge of the site configuration. Just parse config files and figure it out - ServerAlias gives a name, that means they'll be a DNS to match which we have to handle. Zero down time server moves without even any human intervention.

    > no hardware broke

    Geez I sure hope that's not right. If you're down for a week trying to move to a new server and you didn't even have to deal with any hardware issues, a week of down time just because you don't know what you're doing, that's REALLY bad.

  162. Re: How to fix Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow. your fix would turn this site into a mass groupthink circle jerk like soylent news. fuckoff hater of first amendment.

  163. Improving /. - really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fear when I hear shit like this.

    Whenever it's been 'improved' in the past, it has actually been properly fucked-up imho.

  164. Re:Arrogance and pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    thats just awesome right there

    " that's "

    slashdot is nothing more

    " Slashdot "

    but for fucks sake,

    " fuck's sake "

    stop pretending its anything more.

    " it's "

    Remember, 99% of the people who read Slashdot before you took over were WAY smarter than you, and the other 1% is still learning to read.

    And the more arrogant among us are still learning proper spelling and grammar, apparently.

    ....And finally:

    You're bullshit will be called.

    " Your "

  165. re program next? by Chaunte · · Score: 1

    Ya'll need Jesus-- also known as bootstrap and jQuery. There is WAY to much javascript on this page... I can't imagine it's needed. UI reworks in the mix?

  166. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most colo's have "remote hands," which is what I expect pz is referring to, and not their own employees.

  167. Re: "We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dislike incompetence and hate seeing /. being run into the ground by derpy numbnuts. It is fine that you accept incompetence, the rest of us don't not.

    moron

  168. Re: from a Russian standpoint by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    ...well, except that it does also contain some Russian characters - I guess just a few that you can't easily substitute western ones for. But you're right, I was actually thinking of ISO-8859-2, I guess.

  169. Re:"We inheritied" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was written in Perl numbnuts.

    smh

  170. Puzzled by von+Stalhein · · Score: 1

    Sorry, who's this?

  171. Refund please by eweneb · · Score: 1

    Like I tell people that complain about Facebook changes or [fill in your free service here], you should ask for your money back!

  172. This is probably a little late but... by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has HTTPS implemented, finally!