"We'd never do anything bad with this, we promise. Though you may want to put a piece of tape over your webcam when visiting 'NaughtyBabysitters.com'. It just makes us feel... icky watching you Make popcorn! Yeah, that's it! Popcorn."
None of this technical mumbo-jumbo is going on. The gov is hiring 'roos to track shoppers to lure them to secluded spots where the drop bears can mug them. And they haven't even gotten around to placing the eucalyptus tree bombs yet. Don't even mention the Commando Platypus Squads... shudder.
What the fuck are you on about? Are you just making shit up out of your ass for to be annoying? The fact that you are AC'ing and complaining about stuff that maybe 2 people a year have to worry about tells me that you don't have enough skills to worry about this.
And people say tea baggers are bad? Well, they are, too. Both sides are idiots.
So go start your own company instead of whining how you need a union to protect you. While you are at it, learn capitalization and grammar (this may also have something to due with your "being abused").
Penn State has several Master's level courses that are online. Not totally online, there are still in-class meetings, and "normal" class time still had real-time online interaction with the students & prof. I don't know what kind of online this article is talking about (nicely horrible article), but if they are looking at minimal to no prof interaction, then that is just sad.
OK, fair argument. I was thinking more on an individual customer basis, but I see how having local companies via for territory can get dicey (organized crime pops to mind... which, dang, the story is about). I think I'm just going to set up a lemonade stand out front.
Yeah, except you didn't have to listen to anything Jobs said. Obama says you have to buy insurance, better buy insurance or you get fined. But I do see you underlying point, the difference being between a toddler whining "Give me cookies" and a 6'10" thug with a gun saying "Give me your money."
Didn't Clinton sign the Kyoto thing, but the Senate never passed it? (Please excuse my memory) At this point, I really have no clue what is law anymore since all 3 branches change it on a whim anymore.
Here- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4942 2nd question down. I think you need iWork to do it (maybe?) Dang help piece is all over the place. Don't you just love new stuff?
And basically it says van der Waals' theory is wrong, and here is a new equation. That's pretty much it. Anyone who knows about this stuff want to take a look at the equation, and see if it makes any sense? Not my area.
E(D)= -2i(a-a)e^(D-D) where: E = energy D = distance a = area of molecule
Exactly. There is nothing inherently wrong or immoral about reshipping something. There is nothing wrong or immoral about owning a bar. Now if you are reshipping things to get around laws and/or taxes, or holding an illegal gambling saloon in the back room of your bar, well then there is a problem.
I think a while back UPS, FedEx, and DHA didn't cover all areas, and would need to have one of the companies (or even a local company) "reship" the package. Don't know if that is still true or not.
Well the price discrimination may have something to do with tariffs and the like. Free trade restrictions tend to be a government thing. No comment on the re-selling thing. But you really didn't answer why a vendor should not be able to refuse to do business with you. If a known drug dealer, but with no criminal record, wants to buy some guns off of you, does that mean you HAVE TO sell him the guns?
I see your idea. This thing is that there really few (if any) major encounters that are not near land, somewhere. There is no (hostile) nation that could take on an US naval group at sea, especially since they tend to move as carrier groups (except subs). I guess they could move it somewhere else, but as TFA said, this was done in April with no complaints.
Subs also have fairly good (probably awesome) inertial devices that may (probably do) rival GPS signals. The military also tends to frown upon single-path failure. Also, at this point, we're not talking ICBMs, we're talking Tomahawks.
Slashdot Mirror
Um, my comment is 'flamebait' while the poster I'm responding to is invoking slavery? /. has indeed fallen to a sad depth.
Anybody know any sites that actually talk about tech anymore, rather than BS politics and fanboy rantings?
"We'd never do anything bad with this, we promise. Though you may want to put a piece of tape over your webcam when visiting 'NaughtyBabysitters.com'. It just makes us feel... icky watching you Make popcorn! Yeah, that's it! Popcorn."
None of this technical mumbo-jumbo is going on. The gov is hiring 'roos to track shoppers to lure them to secluded spots where the drop bears can mug them. And they haven't even gotten around to placing the eucalyptus tree bombs yet. Don't even mention the Commando Platypus Squads... shudder.
Gotta love the Woz.
Um... sorry, that's all I got.
What the fuck are you on about? Are you just making shit up out of your ass for to be annoying?
The fact that you are AC'ing and complaining about stuff that maybe 2 people a year have to worry about tells me that you don't have enough skills to worry about this.
And people say tea baggers are bad? Well, they are, too. Both sides are idiots.
So go start your own company instead of whining how you need a union to protect you. While you are at it, learn capitalization and grammar (this may also have something to due with your "being abused").
Why would the teachers start now?
This has to be a joke comment.
Penn State has several Master's level courses that are online. Not totally online, there are still in-class meetings, and "normal" class time still had real-time online interaction with the students & prof. I don't know what kind of online this article is talking about (nicely horrible article), but if they are looking at minimal to no prof interaction, then that is just sad.
As opposed to making sweet, sweet love to it? I think the idea of a phone is to 'talk.'
Yeah, I remember reading about that a while ago. I have no dinosaur heroes left. :(
Someone could get a doctorate just studying my psychological profile. :D
You could always rig a drop bear right outside of the exit....
OK, fair argument. I was thinking more on an individual customer basis, but I see how having local companies via for territory can get dicey (organized crime pops to mind... which, dang, the story is about). I think I'm just going to set up a lemonade stand out front.
Yeah, except you didn't have to listen to anything Jobs said. Obama says you have to buy insurance, better buy insurance or you get fined. But I do see you underlying point, the difference being between a toddler whining "Give me cookies" and a 6'10" thug with a gun saying "Give me your money."
(oh, can't wait to feel the heat on this one)
Didn't Clinton sign the Kyoto thing, but the Senate never passed it? (Please excuse my memory) At this point, I really have no clue what is law anymore since all 3 branches change it on a whim anymore.
Here-
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4942
2nd question down. I think you need iWork to do it (maybe?) Dang help piece is all over the place.
Don't you just love new stuff?
Oops /. doesn't like weird characters.
-2y[sub i](a-a[sub 0])e^(D-D[sub 0])
Forgot
And basically it says van der Waals' theory is wrong, and here is a new equation. That's pretty much it.
Anyone who knows about this stuff want to take a look at the equation, and see if it makes any sense? Not my area.
E(D)= -2i(a-a)e^(D-D)
where:
E = energy
D = distance
a = area of molecule
Exactly. There is nothing inherently wrong or immoral about reshipping something. There is nothing wrong or immoral about owning a bar. Now if you are reshipping things to get around laws and/or taxes, or holding an illegal gambling saloon in the back room of your bar, well then there is a problem.
I think a while back UPS, FedEx, and DHA didn't cover all areas, and would need to have one of the companies (or even a local company) "reship" the package. Don't know if that is still true or not.
Well the price discrimination may have something to do with tariffs and the like. Free trade restrictions tend to be a government thing. No comment on the re-selling thing.
But you really didn't answer why a vendor should not be able to refuse to do business with you. If a known drug dealer, but with no criminal record, wants to buy some guns off of you, does that mean you HAVE TO sell him the guns?
I see your idea. This thing is that there really few (if any) major encounters that are not near land, somewhere. There is no (hostile) nation that could take on an US naval group at sea, especially since they tend to move as carrier groups (except subs). I guess they could move it somewhere else, but as TFA said, this was done in April with no complaints.
Subs also have fairly good (probably awesome) inertial devices that may (probably do) rival GPS signals. The military also tends to frown upon single-path failure. Also, at this point, we're not talking ICBMs, we're talking Tomahawks.
Probably, but it will make the results better.