Thai food is known for its balance of flavours. It's a delicate balance of a minimum of 2 (but usualy 4) of spicy, sweet, bitter, salty and sour in a dish.
I have 10.9.5 and checked for software updates. None. Why do I have to click the link in the slashdot article and manually download the patch?!?!?
Because of many reasons.
First off, the patch isn't complete. Sure there was a patch last week, but did you know it didn't fix the problem? Yes, it fixed the obvious error, but there were still more (and new CVE was opened for Shellshock). Bash devs are still finding more holes related to this issue, and it goes down a deep rabbit hole. This hole may never be full patched for a long time.
Second, there aren't many OS X systems that are exploitable. Remote exploits require a server to take parameters, format them as environment variables and then call the shell (usually through system()). HTTP and CGI scripts are a common vector because that's exactly how they work. Most webservers out there run Linux and there really isn't a special reason to run OS X + httpd + CGI over running it on Linux especially on a public server. So for the scant few servers, those admins can update the shell.
And on OS X, the webserver is disabled by default and most users won't know how to turn it on. I don't think even OS X server has it on by default - given the server is really just a bunch of admin tools nowadays.
Third, well, I don't think many OS X apps actually bother using a call like system() to perform a task - there's probably a native Cocoa API that is supposed to be used instead.
So it's more of a hotpatch for those few machines that are potentially vulnerable. In fact, the patch that was provided last week wasn't fixing the issue, more working around the issue so it's harder to exploit (i.e., instead of an arbitrary variable containing a function, it has to be prefixed with _BASH_FUNC_ in order to be allowed as a definition).
There is currently no root-cause fix for the issue - it's actively being worked on by Bash developers and others. This isn't like heartbleed where the mistake was a little programming oversight - it's a full on design issue that dates back 20+ years. There are probably going to be dozens of patches to fix the issue in the end.
I'd love to see more people using Tor, but the experience has to change a lot before we can do that.
Being anonymous and secure on Tor is not easy. It's a major inconvenience to disabling browser features like Javascript, and it requires firm behavioral changes from the user.
Putting a mainstream user into the same environment is simply not going to work.
In fact, I'd wager most Tor users who were "discovered" were not taking basic precautions - they just plainly sent identifying information over it through an exit node. I mean, it's well known the NSA runs a pile of exit nodes for the purposes of monitoring Tor, and Tor isn't a magic bullet that magically makes you disappear. But it's been advertised that way (especially when the Snowden revelations came out and everyone said "Use Tor!"), and users will be users and use their Facebook, Twitter, and online shopping at Amazon and others over Tor assuming "they're magically protected".
Well, they are, sort of. It's just the whole anonymization thing doesn't work when the user sabotages it by being non-anonymous.
So no, even if every Firefox user used Tor by default, nothing would really happen. Just Tor would get slower from all the YouTube and other traffic sent by users who go forth and de-anonymize themselves by logging into the sites.
It depends on what the apps are. For example, the text message interface may be counted as one of the 20 "apps" but it is a requirement for a functional phone.
Well, that would be Hangouts now, replacing the AOSP Messages/SMS app with an all in one messaging system that combines Google Hangouts, SMS and other media.
But the other sare like Google Play, Google Play Store Music, Google Play Movies, Google Play Books (which really seem just duplicates of Google Play Store), then there are the likes go Google+, GMail (which doesn't replace the mail app), Google Search
Here is a great mumps tutorial for those of you that aren't familiar & for those of you who only know "modern" languages, it's a timely Halloween horror show...
The Daily WTF features a few MUMPs, uh... code. A shorthand overview and a collection of MUMPS articles. If it wasn't so specialized and used in so few areas, they'd probably have to institute a "no MUMPS stories" policy to avoid being flooded.
Well, the problem is it takes advantage of the educational system and gives a reward for donating.
The problem is in Asia, there is a strong fixation on "the big test". The one that determines your future - do you score high enough that you can CAN go to university, or are stuck doing a trade, or even worse, labourer?
(No, I don't think there's anything wrong with the trades, but in Asia, a plumber or electrician is seen as a lower level of prestige than an office worker).
It's why there is a high rate of teen suicide (the pressure imposed means many succumb, before AND after), and why many will literally study themselves to death (wake up, go to school, come home, do homework, study, study, study, study, study, go to bed). Students who "pass" (i.e., get university) often are rewarded handsomely for their hard work (luxury cars, condos, video game machines, etc). Students who fail, well, if the family is well off, they'll send them overseas to study at a UK or US university. If not, they get shamed and may even be disowned or kicked onto the street with little more than the clothes on their back.
Rewarding donations is not a new idea, but it has to be done VERY carefully because most of the time it results in the most desperate doing the most donations when they can least afford to do so (and at the detriment to themselves and the blood bank who may end up with substandard blood (e.g., infected, etc)).
Videos aren't easy things to produce, and properly producing them will take longer than writing them up.
That said, there is value in doing a video - it can be easier to show complex steps by doing it in a video that one can pause and rewind as well as show things like where you turn around the object rather than try to illustrate it.
However, that doesn't mean you shouldn't have a text description, and you shouldn't have long videos - no more than a couple of minutes. If it's a long procedure, then have multiple videos because the user may only need help in one area and having to sit through everything else gets old quick.
If the 6502 and Z80 waveforms for various instructions are examined, it quickly becomes apparent that the Z80 effectively divided its clock by 2 before using it. This is why, for the technology available in any particular year, they had comparable performance but the Z80 used twice as many clock cycles.
Actually, the problem was the ALU of the Z-80 was only 4 bits wide. So processing an 8 bit operand required two trips through the ALU, thus incurring twice the number of clocks or half the effective clock rate..
The 6502 and others had an 8-bit ALU which meant they could do an 8-bit operand in half the clocks.
The 80s and 90s were marked by a distinct downturn in the "maker" movement, or rather, hobbyists who would tinker for fun. You can see it in the magazines - former hobbyist mags started turning into consumer electronics extravaganzas as people cared less about soldering bits together and assembling PCs and doing all sorts of nifty software stuff with them. Interfacing things became a whole lot less interesting.
The 2000s changed all that when people started getting interested in making things for fun again (Arduino had a big hand here, but there was a revival).
And guess what? 3D printers are back because the maker movement has ready access to cheap computing (Arduino, rpi, etc) that talk to computers super-easy (back then, you needed to build an ISA card, deal with DOS, etc, now, you can do with Linux or Windows, talk using USB, etc) and subsequently parts like stepper motors and all that.
It was less patents, and more hobbyists. People were 3D printing in the 80s and 90s, but they were big companies who could afford the equipment, and hobbyists were pretty much left high and dry - either you talked to a PC using ISA or if you were skilled, PCI, because cheap microcontrollers that were very capable were hard to get and even harder to assemble. Then you needed the skills of a mechanical guy to help build the xyz platform. Something the internet made readily available.
So basically the revival of the maker movement or hobbyist tinkerer, coupled with the rapid availability of talent via the Internet (and the availability of parts and supplies - being able to order anything online without it taking 6-8 weeks is a real boon), plus cheap and easily accessible microcontroller platforms that interface to everything make the whole project doable.
Was it doable in the 80s? Yes. Was it easy? Not so much. When you're mail ordering parts because you can't find it locally, having to start, stop because you miss something etc., and then finding someone to help you with parts of it can be challenge.
Sure 3G for Vehicle-to-Vehicle communication might make sense since the yearly cost in a car is far higher than the cost of 3g connection and there's plenty of electricity to go around,
Actually, V2V communications is going less high-tech. There's no need for 3G or WiFi radio broadcasts for V2V because you don't need to transmit further than a few cars either way. So they're moving towards lights. Modulating the headlights (daytime running lights mean they're always on), brake lights, and other lights because well, light communication is short range anyways, and it's really only of importance to those around you (e.g., if you're braking, it's important to the guy behind you in the same lane and adjoining lanes (because why you braked may also be going into their lanes).
Using WiFi or other mechanisms mean the guy on the intersecting street gets the information too (useless, has to be filtered out), as well as opposing traffic (who probably know why you're stopping anyways by nature of coming the other way).
Anyhow, smart meters can use either 3G or WiFi (proprietary licensed band) already. Meters are limited by standards to draw at most 12W of power (which is a ton of power when multiplied by the number of meters out there - a million businesses and homes? That's 12MW, or roughly 12,000 homes by the old measurement). Given they only check in periodically, a 3G modem doesn't consume all that much power idling (otherwise your battery life would be much less than a day).
We've really gotten wrapped around the axle on this whole electronic devices on aircraft thing. The local oscillator of an ordinary FM radio receiver is 10.7mhz above the indicated frequency... which makes 100mhz on your FM dial 110.7mhz... which meant there was a carrier in the middle of the COM/NAV band that aircraft use. So we had to (understandably) prevent FM radios from operating on aircraft. But thru the years it has turned into all electronics. It's like the "five monkeys with bananas and water" experiment gone wrong. We've gotten so wrapped around no electronics we forgot WHY.
Actually, there are plenty of oscillators that happen between 108-122MHz.
In fact, the FCC allowable limits for equiment has a noticable dip around that region.
No, it's not because of a receiver, but all the other oscillators in the system. A big one is the pixel clock on things like cameras and LCD screens - they often do run smack right in the middle with a loud spike.
Then there are all the higher frequency devices. A certain model of cellphone was known to cause GPS unlocks on the aircraft GPS. This wasn't a problem because the only ones using GPS extensively was military and GA, but these days with RNP and GPS approaches, a GPS unlock could screw up everything.
Even to this day there are still incidences of suspected EMI causing havoc - usually things like unexplained instrument drift. My favorite was where my flight instructor had a phone call (we were taxiing back to the ramp) and I could hear both sides of the conversation through the avionics (my instructor had removed his headset to answer the phone - given the low power setting of taxiing, it wasn't necessary).
The only thing that may save this is if it's like if you try to use your phone on a cruise ship where you get "Cellular At Sea". Though I suspect in a couple of months we'll see people complaining about $1000 phone bills because they couldn't do anything but yak the whole way. Even worse, because these kind of guys make NO roaming agreements with anyone, your carrier won't be able to write off the bill because they have to pass on the full rate - a roaming agreement means their cost is far lower than what you're paying (down to cents a minute when you're paying tens or dollars a minute).
Yes, your phone will eventually roam onto it - because they are not a preferred carrier though, your phone will go through many anxious searching rounds before it'll reluctantly find service at the PMITA carrier. (It's non-preferred, because the carrier can't make much money off it).
Chips are designed for the max freq of the specification. If they fail that spec, they are retested at a lower spec, and if they pass that spec, they are sold at that frequency. Why else do you find many diffrent chips in the same family run at diffrent speeds?
Many times the chip is %100 capable of running at faster speeds, but they had too much of the higher bin, and not enough of the lower bin.
But yes, taking a chip that didn't pass a higher speed, flashing it to the firmware of its faster/more capable cousin, and then selling it as such is ripping people off.
Except in the world of GPUs, there are enough "crazy people" out there who want the best of the best. So much so that the top bin is almost always empty - so you'll never have top-end chips binned as lower spec ones.
At best, you'll find possibly the low end chips that could be mid-range chips, but given the low end generally isn't too popular when mid-range chips are the most common and most desired.
Shortages of the top-end cards isn't unheard of - either people who are still trying to make a go at it for bitcoins, or gamers. (And given the price of the high end, they could come down a bit before binning takes place - they're still big profit centers).
Considered that the article refers to him as a "worker" and not an "ex-employee" he may not have even been fired yet. If he wasn't fired before he definitely will be now and no unemployment benefits as it is termination for cause.
Well, he does have SOME benefits. He'd get free room and board and meals for a number of years now.
Why the hell did the industry move away from using red LEDs for power indicators?
Because people wanted to be "trendy" and "futuristic" and thus started putting blue LEDs (which only came out two decades ago) in their equipment. Red was dull and boring (being done way back in the 60s) as was yellow. Green as we know it today (rather than a sickly yellow-puke-green) was a mid-90's invention. Blue LEDs came out in the mid-late 90s.
So since they were so recent and popular, people stuck them on everything to show they were progressive.
Whats illegal is taping them without their knowledge. They could potentially make a call to their lawyer or doctor after they park it and you could unintentionally record privileged information. At some point such systems will be so common you wont have to mention it anymore.
While true, taking personal calls on the job is generally considered very poor form (and many service-oriented places do not allow it, like restaurants), especially where a motor vehicle is being operated. And given most valet driving trips last under a minute, it doesn't seem unreasonable to hold the call until the driving is done and the valet has exited the vehicle.
So practically speaking, I'd consider that scenario a non-issue.
Anyhow, the easy solution is since most cars have an LCD display for navigation as well as in the instrument cluster, when the valet key is used (which limits the car to certain abilities anyways) the displays could all say "This vehicle is under audio and video surveillance" constantly. After all, the LCD in the instrument cluster typically shows information valid for driving and irrelevant otherwise (e.g., fuel efficiency, trip routes, etc, none of which are needed to go between the entrance and the parking lot), and the radio/navigation screen isn't needed (I would hope the valet knows how to get to the parking lot!, and they shouldn't be touching your radio anyways - perhaps even have it be off if the valet key is used?).
Add in a notice on the valet keyfob as well and I think all possibilities are covered. Bonus is that there's no tacky stickers or signs for normal driving.
now we are saving the planet by putting crappy appliances in a landfill every few years.
If you're doing that, you're really doing it wrong, because appliances are generally highly recyclable - being made of mostly steel.
The real question is - is it cheaper to recycle steel versus the freshwater saved, or is it cheaper to use more freshwater to save the recycling.
It's not an easy question, but in general freshwater is a tiny part (under 1%) of the Earth's available water supply and something that is expected to be at the forefront for war because climate change is causing existing water supplies to dry up.
I suspect Intel spent $10M on chip R&D while my coffee was brewing.
And that's only part of it.
A set of basic masks for an IC costs around $1M. Very basic 2-metal process that is.
Each mask is around $100K to produce, which is why in semiconductor design, there are piles of unconnected transistors and gates that are fabbed into every IC so small revisions can be done by changing the metal layers of the mask only - minimizing the number of mask changes minimizes a huge expense.
A modern IC generally is at least a 10-metal process which eats up that $10M alarmingly quickly.
But because I know I didn't want to sit around patching my webserver continually, I disabled all CGI scripts and stick wi th static content. (Not being a web developer, I didn't do CGI scripting anyways.
And unless you run a small website, that can happen way too easily.
Every e-commerce site has database failures usually around peak shopping periods - it's usually the weakest point because no matter how many instances you run, it's the bottleneck as the database's view of the has to be consistent across all database servers.
And sometimes, well, the sheer crunch of users buying stuff topples that.
Even a good/.'ing in the past would return errors of the form "Could not connect to database".
Anyhow, I thought one point of the cloud was it was separated from hardware - if you need to reboot the host machine the servers were transparently moved to another machine while the host resets. The actual details or even which machine the cloud instance runs on is a detail that's not required in order to use it. As long as the guest OS is OK, it doesn't matter what piece of actual hardware it's running on.
Or maybe, just maybe, they innovated and solved key problems to make ti cheaper.
But we can't have that, can we? American steel is stronger than Indian steel.
Let's just give credit where it's due and learn from their success. We can't put our noses up and say our space program is a 2015 Cadillac Escalade whereas yours is a 1999 Honda Accord.
Or maybe India "played it safe". The relative success of Mars missions is quite low - there have been many, many, many more attempts at Mars than missions that actually got there.
It's a lot cheaper and lot easier to do things if you rely on the experience of others to help you along the way - basically they study all the scientific papers and everything else each mission generates and then apply it. And they study the failures so they don't repeat the same mistake, either.
Or, put another way, someone else did all the hard work and they just stuck to tried and true, and avoiding mistakes that caused other missions to fail.
From my understanding the update is fine. The problem is in installing the update.
I expect the actual cause isn't in the code, but a setting in their method of pushing software. They probably kept the iPhone 6 values secrete, until it was released and they didn't quite setup the update to automatically handle the 6s yet.
I bet in a few days we will get a working fix.
No, apparently the OTA update is broken (the update that is just a delta and can be downloaded to the device to update it. The OTA update is basically just a huge patch containing just the files that changed. Almost always it means Apple missed a file.
The iTunes update is fine because iTunes basically erases the entire partition and puts down a fresh copy of everything. It's why iTunes has to download a 1GB file to update, when your phone just gets a tiny update.
(if you want to really clean it, you do a factory restore which erases everything and then puts on a fresh copy of the OS and reformats the user partition, then you restore it from backup).
That's one of the core problems with wind and solar. It's great for shaving off peak demand but after a certain point it will be investments into useless overcapacity(it's also a great way to make renewables competitive with grid prices though as grid inefficiency costs are offloaded to end users)
Wind, on land is generally powered by the sun - winds pick up during the day and die at night (generally). Solar is the same.
And you know what? Peak power consumption is during the day as well, right when the renewables are producing the most power. (All those air conditioners have to run during the hottest parts of the day, after all). At night, when demand lessens, so does the output of solar and wind turbines.
Solar especially is valuable because it produces the most power right when most power is consumed by the grid. Sure, at home it's fairly "pointless" as household demand is low during the day (it peaks in early evening), but overall power consumption across all consumers has peak consumption during the day.
Institutional ownership of Apple shares has declined as funds question the companyâ(TM)s ability to increase revenue long term, Morgan Stanley said in a report this week. Appleâ(TM)s 30 largest shareholders own a record low 30 percent of shares outstanding, down from a peak of 40 percent in 2009, according to the report.
In other words, Apple has managed to get rid of investors who are in it for the money and instead get a bunch of investors who are investing because they believe in the company and its vision.
Remember, institutional investors are great for instant cash, but they demand things that can be quite harmful for the company like short term profits over long term growth.
Anyhow. Dell always had a higher end brand - they called it XPS and it was supposed to offer premium products (higher end products) and services - including technical support where they shunted you to special XPS reps who can get your issue resolved quicker. Of course, that was a few years ago and now it's just more of a marketing thing that offers nothing over the cheap PCs.
well yes, that works, but it's a two handed task that is hard to do on-the-sly. Also takes a couple seconds longer that is ideal when you have a knife to your chest or a tazer in your eye.
Actually, given you must use a passcode if you fail TouchID 3 times in a row, all you need to do is use the tip of your finger or palm of your hand 3 times.
Remember, the rules for TouchID:
1) Must use passcode on boot 2) Must use passcode if TouchID not used within previous 48 hours 3) Must use passcode if TouchID fails 3 times in a row.
The passcode is always the fallback and always good to make more secure than 4 digits because you aren't entering it all the time.
A lot of people don't have passcodes because it's inconvenient to enter it to unlock your phone to glance at information (studies have shown that interaction times for phones is generally on the order of 1 minute or less). With TouchID, you can have not only just a PIN, but a "complex passcode" that's full alphanumeric+special characters + longer than 4 characters. But that's even more of a pain to enter.
so just tap the sensor on the edge 3 times and you'll lockout TouchID.
ONE scientist can be right and every single other one on earth can be wrong. Science is not a popularity contest and it is not a democracy. YOU are thinking politically. Science is not politics.
Yeah, and think of all the money being channeled into funding anti-AGW theories. The fact that there's a LOT of special interests and few scientists to spend it on means they actually have a ton of money to throw around.
People are spending millions trying to find a sound scientific basis to deny AGW. If there are credible theories, then the incredible resources available to do those studies should find it. And it's unlikely such a theory would consume all the resources, so it's possible to repeat the tests over and over again and come up with results that are convincing.
Interests are such that if you're anti-AGW, grant money should be basically turning on a tap. And if the people really cared, it can be repeated over and over again for a number of years to prove the theory correct.
Money available for AGW - a lot, but spread over lots of people.
Money available for anti-AGW - a lot, but spread over less people and thus more resources to spend.
Slashdot Mirror
Thai food is known for its balance of flavours. It's a delicate balance of a minimum of 2 (but usualy 4) of spicy, sweet, bitter, salty and sour in a dish.
It's also VERY easy to screw up.
As an aside, Jet Tila was appointed the Culinary Ambassador to Thailand for his role as a guide to Thai cuisine. (People from LA and Food Network viewers will recognize the name for he's had numerous appearances on various shows).
I guess we'll have a new Food Network special - Jet Tila vs. this machine.
Because of many reasons.
First off, the patch isn't complete. Sure there was a patch last week, but did you know it didn't fix the problem? Yes, it fixed the obvious error, but there were still more (and new CVE was opened for Shellshock). Bash devs are still finding more holes related to this issue, and it goes down a deep rabbit hole. This hole may never be full patched for a long time.
Second, there aren't many OS X systems that are exploitable. Remote exploits require a server to take parameters, format them as environment variables and then call the shell (usually through system()). HTTP and CGI scripts are a common vector because that's exactly how they work. Most webservers out there run Linux and there really isn't a special reason to run OS X + httpd + CGI over running it on Linux especially on a public server. So for the scant few servers, those admins can update the shell.
And on OS X, the webserver is disabled by default and most users won't know how to turn it on. I don't think even OS X server has it on by default - given the server is really just a bunch of admin tools nowadays.
Third, well, I don't think many OS X apps actually bother using a call like system() to perform a task - there's probably a native Cocoa API that is supposed to be used instead.
So it's more of a hotpatch for those few machines that are potentially vulnerable. In fact, the patch that was provided last week wasn't fixing the issue, more working around the issue so it's harder to exploit (i.e., instead of an arbitrary variable containing a function, it has to be prefixed with _BASH_FUNC_ in order to be allowed as a definition).
There is currently no root-cause fix for the issue - it's actively being worked on by Bash developers and others. This isn't like heartbleed where the mistake was a little programming oversight - it's a full on design issue that dates back 20+ years. There are probably going to be dozens of patches to fix the issue in the end.
In fact, I'd wager most Tor users who were "discovered" were not taking basic precautions - they just plainly sent identifying information over it through an exit node. I mean, it's well known the NSA runs a pile of exit nodes for the purposes of monitoring Tor, and Tor isn't a magic bullet that magically makes you disappear. But it's been advertised that way (especially when the Snowden revelations came out and everyone said "Use Tor!"), and users will be users and use their Facebook, Twitter, and online shopping at Amazon and others over Tor assuming "they're magically protected".
Well, they are, sort of. It's just the whole anonymization thing doesn't work when the user sabotages it by being non-anonymous.
So no, even if every Firefox user used Tor by default, nothing would really happen. Just Tor would get slower from all the YouTube and other traffic sent by users who go forth and de-anonymize themselves by logging into the sites.
Well, that would be Hangouts now, replacing the AOSP Messages/SMS app with an all in one messaging system that combines Google Hangouts, SMS and other media.
But the other sare like Google Play, Google Play Store Music, Google Play Movies, Google Play Books (which really seem just duplicates of Google Play Store), then there are the likes go Google+, GMail (which doesn't replace the mail app), Google Search
The Daily WTF features a few MUMPs, uh... code. A shorthand overview and a collection of MUMPS articles. If it wasn't so specialized and used in so few areas, they'd probably have to institute a "no MUMPS stories" policy to avoid being flooded.
Well, the problem is it takes advantage of the educational system and gives a reward for donating.
The problem is in Asia, there is a strong fixation on "the big test". The one that determines your future - do you score high enough that you can CAN go to university, or are stuck doing a trade, or even worse, labourer?
(No, I don't think there's anything wrong with the trades, but in Asia, a plumber or electrician is seen as a lower level of prestige than an office worker).
It's why there is a high rate of teen suicide (the pressure imposed means many succumb, before AND after), and why many will literally study themselves to death (wake up, go to school, come home, do homework, study, study, study, study, study, go to bed). Students who "pass" (i.e., get university) often are rewarded handsomely for their hard work (luxury cars, condos, video game machines, etc). Students who fail, well, if the family is well off, they'll send them overseas to study at a UK or US university. If not, they get shamed and may even be disowned or kicked onto the street with little more than the clothes on their back.
Rewarding donations is not a new idea, but it has to be done VERY carefully because most of the time it results in the most desperate doing the most donations when they can least afford to do so (and at the detriment to themselves and the blood bank who may end up with substandard blood (e.g., infected, etc)).
Exactly.
Videos aren't easy things to produce, and properly producing them will take longer than writing them up.
That said, there is value in doing a video - it can be easier to show complex steps by doing it in a video that one can pause and rewind as well as show things like where you turn around the object rather than try to illustrate it.
However, that doesn't mean you shouldn't have a text description, and you shouldn't have long videos - no more than a couple of minutes. If it's a long procedure, then have multiple videos because the user may only need help in one area and having to sit through everything else gets old quick.
Actually, the problem was the ALU of the Z-80 was only 4 bits wide. So processing an 8 bit operand required two trips through the ALU, thus incurring twice the number of clocks or half the effective clock rate..
The 6502 and others had an 8-bit ALU which meant they could do an 8-bit operand in half the clocks.
No, the availability of cheap parts did.
The 80s and 90s were marked by a distinct downturn in the "maker" movement, or rather, hobbyists who would tinker for fun. You can see it in the magazines - former hobbyist mags started turning into consumer electronics extravaganzas as people cared less about soldering bits together and assembling PCs and doing all sorts of nifty software stuff with them. Interfacing things became a whole lot less interesting.
The 2000s changed all that when people started getting interested in making things for fun again (Arduino had a big hand here, but there was a revival).
And guess what? 3D printers are back because the maker movement has ready access to cheap computing (Arduino, rpi, etc) that talk to computers super-easy (back then, you needed to build an ISA card, deal with DOS, etc, now, you can do with Linux or Windows, talk using USB, etc) and subsequently parts like stepper motors and all that.
It was less patents, and more hobbyists. People were 3D printing in the 80s and 90s, but they were big companies who could afford the equipment, and hobbyists were pretty much left high and dry - either you talked to a PC using ISA or if you were skilled, PCI, because cheap microcontrollers that were very capable were hard to get and even harder to assemble. Then you needed the skills of a mechanical guy to help build the xyz platform. Something the internet made readily available.
So basically the revival of the maker movement or hobbyist tinkerer, coupled with the rapid availability of talent via the Internet (and the availability of parts and supplies - being able to order anything online without it taking 6-8 weeks is a real boon), plus cheap and easily accessible microcontroller platforms that interface to everything make the whole project doable.
Was it doable in the 80s? Yes. Was it easy? Not so much. When you're mail ordering parts because you can't find it locally, having to start, stop because you miss something etc., and then finding someone to help you with parts of it can be challenge.
Actually, V2V communications is going less high-tech. There's no need for 3G or WiFi radio broadcasts for V2V because you don't need to transmit further than a few cars either way. So they're moving towards lights. Modulating the headlights (daytime running lights mean they're always on), brake lights, and other lights because well, light communication is short range anyways, and it's really only of importance to those around you (e.g., if you're braking, it's important to the guy behind you in the same lane and adjoining lanes (because why you braked may also be going into their lanes).
Using WiFi or other mechanisms mean the guy on the intersecting street gets the information too (useless, has to be filtered out), as well as opposing traffic (who probably know why you're stopping anyways by nature of coming the other way).
Anyhow, smart meters can use either 3G or WiFi (proprietary licensed band) already. Meters are limited by standards to draw at most 12W of power (which is a ton of power when multiplied by the number of meters out there - a million businesses and homes? That's 12MW, or roughly 12,000 homes by the old measurement). Given they only check in periodically, a 3G modem doesn't consume all that much power idling (otherwise your battery life would be much less than a day).
Actually, there are plenty of oscillators that happen between 108-122MHz.
In fact, the FCC allowable limits for equiment has a noticable dip around that region.
No, it's not because of a receiver, but all the other oscillators in the system. A big one is the pixel clock on things like cameras and LCD screens - they often do run smack right in the middle with a loud spike.
Then there are all the higher frequency devices. A certain model of cellphone was known to cause GPS unlocks on the aircraft GPS. This wasn't a problem because the only ones using GPS extensively was military and GA, but these days with RNP and GPS approaches, a GPS unlock could screw up everything.
Even to this day there are still incidences of suspected EMI causing havoc - usually things like unexplained instrument drift. My favorite was where my flight instructor had a phone call (we were taxiing back to the ramp) and I could hear both sides of the conversation through the avionics (my instructor had removed his headset to answer the phone - given the low power setting of taxiing, it wasn't necessary).
The only thing that may save this is if it's like if you try to use your phone on a cruise ship where you get "Cellular At Sea". Though I suspect in a couple of months we'll see people complaining about $1000 phone bills because they couldn't do anything but yak the whole way. Even worse, because these kind of guys make NO roaming agreements with anyone, your carrier won't be able to write off the bill because they have to pass on the full rate - a roaming agreement means their cost is far lower than what you're paying (down to cents a minute when you're paying tens or dollars a minute).
Yes, your phone will eventually roam onto it - because they are not a preferred carrier though, your phone will go through many anxious searching rounds before it'll reluctantly find service at the PMITA carrier. (It's non-preferred, because the carrier can't make much money off it).
Except in the world of GPUs, there are enough "crazy people" out there who want the best of the best. So much so that the top bin is almost always empty - so you'll never have top-end chips binned as lower spec ones.
At best, you'll find possibly the low end chips that could be mid-range chips, but given the low end generally isn't too popular when mid-range chips are the most common and most desired.
Shortages of the top-end cards isn't unheard of - either people who are still trying to make a go at it for bitcoins, or gamers. (And given the price of the high end, they could come down a bit before binning takes place - they're still big profit centers).
Well, he does have SOME benefits. He'd get free room and board and meals for a number of years now.
Because people wanted to be "trendy" and "futuristic" and thus started putting blue LEDs (which only came out two decades ago) in their equipment. Red was dull and boring (being done way back in the 60s) as was yellow. Green as we know it today (rather than a sickly yellow-puke-green) was a mid-90's invention. Blue LEDs came out in the mid-late 90s.
So since they were so recent and popular, people stuck them on everything to show they were progressive.
While true, taking personal calls on the job is generally considered very poor form (and many service-oriented places do not allow it, like restaurants), especially where a motor vehicle is being operated. And given most valet driving trips last under a minute, it doesn't seem unreasonable to hold the call until the driving is done and the valet has exited the vehicle.
So practically speaking, I'd consider that scenario a non-issue.
Anyhow, the easy solution is since most cars have an LCD display for navigation as well as in the instrument cluster, when the valet key is used (which limits the car to certain abilities anyways) the displays could all say "This vehicle is under audio and video surveillance" constantly. After all, the LCD in the instrument cluster typically shows information valid for driving and irrelevant otherwise (e.g., fuel efficiency, trip routes, etc, none of which are needed to go between the entrance and the parking lot), and the radio/navigation screen isn't needed (I would hope the valet knows how to get to the parking lot!, and they shouldn't be touching your radio anyways - perhaps even have it be off if the valet key is used?).
Add in a notice on the valet keyfob as well and I think all possibilities are covered. Bonus is that there's no tacky stickers or signs for normal driving.
If you're doing that, you're really doing it wrong, because appliances are generally highly recyclable - being made of mostly steel.
The real question is - is it cheaper to recycle steel versus the freshwater saved, or is it cheaper to use more freshwater to save the recycling.
It's not an easy question, but in general freshwater is a tiny part (under 1%) of the Earth's available water supply and something that is expected to be at the forefront for war because climate change is causing existing water supplies to dry up.
And that's only part of it.
A set of basic masks for an IC costs around $1M. Very basic 2-metal process that is.
Each mask is around $100K to produce, which is why in semiconductor design, there are piles of unconnected transistors and gates that are fabbed into every IC so small revisions can be done by changing the metal layers of the mask only - minimizing the number of mask changes minimizes a huge expense.
A modern IC generally is at least a 10-metal process which eats up that $10M alarmingly quickly.
I too got scanned.
But because I know I didn't want to sit around patching my webserver continually, I disabled all CGI scripts and stick wi th static content. (Not being a web developer, I didn't do CGI scripting anyways.
Hrm. My index.html page is also static, too.
Or maybe India "played it safe". The relative success of Mars missions is quite low - there have been many, many, many more attempts at Mars than missions that actually got there.
It's a lot cheaper and lot easier to do things if you rely on the experience of others to help you along the way - basically they study all the scientific papers and everything else each mission generates and then apply it. And they study the failures so they don't repeat the same mistake, either.
Or, put another way, someone else did all the hard work and they just stuck to tried and true, and avoiding mistakes that caused other missions to fail.
No, apparently the OTA update is broken (the update that is just a delta and can be downloaded to the device to update it. The OTA update is basically just a huge patch containing just the files that changed. Almost always it means Apple missed a file.
The iTunes update is fine because iTunes basically erases the entire partition and puts down a fresh copy of everything. It's why iTunes has to download a 1GB file to update, when your phone just gets a tiny update.
(if you want to really clean it, you do a factory restore which erases everything and then puts on a fresh copy of the OS and reformats the user partition, then you restore it from backup).
Wind, on land is generally powered by the sun - winds pick up during the day and die at night (generally). Solar is the same.
And you know what? Peak power consumption is during the day as well, right when the renewables are producing the most power. (All those air conditioners have to run during the hottest parts of the day, after all). At night, when demand lessens, so does the output of solar and wind turbines.
Solar especially is valuable because it produces the most power right when most power is consumed by the grid. Sure, at home it's fairly "pointless" as household demand is low during the day (it peaks in early evening), but overall power consumption across all consumers has peak consumption during the day.
In other words, Apple has managed to get rid of investors who are in it for the money and instead get a bunch of investors who are investing because they believe in the company and its vision.
Remember, institutional investors are great for instant cash, but they demand things that can be quite harmful for the company like short term profits over long term growth.
Anyhow. Dell always had a higher end brand - they called it XPS and it was supposed to offer premium products (higher end products) and services - including technical support where they shunted you to special XPS reps who can get your issue resolved quicker. Of course, that was a few years ago and now it's just more of a marketing thing that offers nothing over the cheap PCs.
Actually, given you must use a passcode if you fail TouchID 3 times in a row, all you need to do is use the tip of your finger or palm of your hand 3 times.
Remember, the rules for TouchID:
1) Must use passcode on boot
2) Must use passcode if TouchID not used within previous 48 hours
3) Must use passcode if TouchID fails 3 times in a row.
The passcode is always the fallback and always good to make more secure than 4 digits because you aren't entering it all the time.
A lot of people don't have passcodes because it's inconvenient to enter it to unlock your phone to glance at information (studies have shown that interaction times for phones is generally on the order of 1 minute or less). With TouchID, you can have not only just a PIN, but a "complex passcode" that's full alphanumeric+special characters + longer than 4 characters. But that's even more of a pain to enter.
so just tap the sensor on the edge 3 times and you'll lockout TouchID.
Yeah, and think of all the money being channeled into funding anti-AGW theories. The fact that there's a LOT of special interests and few scientists to spend it on means they actually have a ton of money to throw around.
People are spending millions trying to find a sound scientific basis to deny AGW. If there are credible theories, then the incredible resources available to do those studies should find it. And it's unlikely such a theory would consume all the resources, so it's possible to repeat the tests over and over again and come up with results that are convincing.
Interests are such that if you're anti-AGW, grant money should be basically turning on a tap. And if the people really cared, it can be repeated over and over again for a number of years to prove the theory correct.
Money available for AGW - a lot, but spread over lots of people.
Money available for anti-AGW - a lot, but spread over less people and thus more resources to spend.