There's also nothing patriotic about being an ungrateful ignoramus denying her own role in society. The coal was burned to create electricity that you wanted and society demanded. Your hands are as dirty as the roughest coal miner.
Huh? What are you even talking about? Hillary is still on her lame excuse tour, and every article on the Democrats constant string of screw-ups is a new "Republicans Pounce". I'm sure you will be one of the first propagandist to go when the revolution happens.
If there weren't all these poor brown people like me, the rich white men wouldn't burn the coal to make the electricity that we're both using to run these computers to have a discussion about how evil these rich white men are for providing us with the privilege.
Quit trying to put the blame for your own actions off on somebody else. The coal plants were built and operated, because WE, as a society, WANTED them built and operated. I bet you're even using electric to heat your home and cook your food. What do you think the world would look like if we were all still using wood stoves for the same?
I agree. Not being sarcastic when I say that the local governments should have total control of any network that requires imminent domain to implement. That would include roads, railways, and communication networks. If it is important enough to the community for government to forcefully take someones property for it, it should be important enough for the government to retain control of it.
Considering that they consistently have worked against your interests for the last 50 years, how do you motivate still calling yourself a Republican?
Against my interest? How is having the federal government take over every aspect of my life so that I can be as equally poor as you in my interest? How do you even know what my interests are? How is guaranteeing a living wage to people who can't work, or don't want to work in my interests? How in ruining the greatest healthcare system and the greatest economy in the world in my interests?
You are a willfully blind idiot that can not see how great the country you live in truly is. Please leave at your earliest convenience and take all the rest of the self-hating, racist democrats with you.
A) If the Democrats bill goes into any sort of details like this I will be both surprised and excited. I fully expect it to be more along the lines of their Green New Deal (ie, a ridiculous wishlist of unrealistic fluff). If the bill mentions "packet" I'll be happy.
B) Blocking marketing agreements may not be desirable. What happens when Spectrum negotiates to get Netflix and Hulu to build co-lo centers within their network areas. Netflix agrees, but Hulu resists. Spectrum will now have a lower cost for delivering Netflix vs Hulu. What if, to save money, Spectrum cuts back on (or decides not to upgrade) their peering connection with the partner that DOES have the Hulu co-lo?
Again, I fully expect any bill put forth to gloss over these sort of technical issues.
You don't open an investigation to see if a crime was committed. You take note that a crime was committed, then you open an investigation to see what happened.
We still don't have a "Paragraph 1" for any of the Trump investigations. For those that don't know, "Paragraph 1" is the beginning of the opening report of any investigation. It would read along the lines of "On , material evidence was found that a crime was committed at...."
Sometimes these are several layers deep - there are a ton of "aggregation" companies that do nothing but merge "advertising" data from multiple sources. So you'll get a "market research" company that correlates Google and Facebook and Twitter data into a single consumer profile, which can be used to target advertising... or for the NSA to track people.
Just want to tack on that one of the biggest trackers is the credit card in your wallet. That 3 pages of 4pt text that was your credit agreement has a paragraph about them "from time to time" sharing your purchase information with "partners". In reality, they will sell the info on everything you've purchase to anybody with a cashier's check.
I wouldn't trust anything from lawfareblog.com. What I would trust is the documentation covering the Woods Procedure.
That's a procedure, invented by one Bob Mueller, that outlines how evidence is to be validated before being used for a FISA warrant. You keep believing in your lawfareblog fantasies. I want to see how the professionals verified the dossier that looks exactly like an article that Glen Simpson wrote for the Washington Post years ealier with just a few name changes.
Are you really that dim? You can't necessarily shout everything you know. That's called being stupid.
Instead, each side is playing both internal and external politics. Trump has to take a "I won't take in shit off of that Kim, guy" stance internally, while being agreeable to Kim externally. Kim has to take a "I'm standing up to the evil America" stance internally, while being agreeable to Trump externally. What they both do is negotiate a stance that allow both leaders to save face internally, while dialing back the threat of nuclear war externally.
Not being able to see and understand how this works with actual humans illustrates a lack of maturity.
"Facebook threatened to pull investment projects from Europe and Canada if lobbying demands from COO Sheryl Sandberg were not met," reports Business Insider, adding "Canada buckled immediately."
If I had the means, I'd have asked FaceBook to take a hike.
Then you would have lost the means. These politicians got elected by claiming they gave people "stuff", which happened to be Facebook projects of different sorts. The politician that doesn't get "the jobs" doesn't get "the job". I'll go out on a limb here and make the prediction that AOC won't be re-elected, and the deciding factor, regardless of its merits, will be her stance on the Amazon deal.
Every single company that decides that "services are more profitable than productivity" eventually fails big and has to correct.
You'll need to define "fails big" in this instance.
Every year around where I live, farmers go out with these big machines and DESTROY THEIR OWN CROPS. They call it "harvesting", but the end result is that they completely ravage and destroy every single one of the plants they just spent all year to grow.
From the C-level view of the world, these are businesses, not religions. If there is more short-term money to be made in finances, that is clearly the path to go. Build it up, then harvest it.
They could have had both. If they had built a trencher instead of a driller, they could have used the trencher to pull the lander to a slightly different spot. It couldn't go as deep, but a drill gets to look at exactly the one spot that is directly under the semi-random landing spot.
Slashdot Mirror
There's also nothing patriotic about being an ungrateful ignoramus denying her own role in society. The coal was burned to create electricity that you wanted and society demanded. Your hands are as dirty as the roughest coal miner.
The "owners" mostly consist of retired people in the form of shareholders. You may get some pushback from that plan when you go to cuff Granny.
Huh? What are you even talking about? Hillary is still on her lame excuse tour, and every article on the Democrats constant string of screw-ups is a new "Republicans Pounce". I'm sure you will be one of the first propagandist to go when the revolution happens.
If there weren't all these poor brown people like me, the rich white men wouldn't burn the coal to make the electricity that we're both using to run these computers to have a discussion about how evil these rich white men are for providing us with the privilege.
Quit trying to put the blame for your own actions off on somebody else. The coal plants were built and operated, because WE, as a society, WANTED them built and operated. I bet you're even using electric to heat your home and cook your food. What do you think the world would look like if we were all still using wood stoves for the same?
Fucking ingrates.
History? Trump has a history of supporting authoritarian autocratic murderous dictatorships.
FTS: Putin is touting the initiative as a defensive response to the Trump Administration's new cyber strategy,
You have a strange definition of "support".
I agree. Not being sarcastic when I say that the local governments should have total control of any network that requires imminent domain to implement. That would include roads, railways, and communication networks. If it is important enough to the community for government to forcefully take someones property for it, it should be important enough for the government to retain control of it.
So, what you've just told all of us is that you don't understand tax witholdings and returns.
I don't think I would have told that.
Then, why did you respond? So that we could all see how advanced your TDS is?
Considering that they consistently have worked against your interests for the last 50 years, how do you motivate still calling yourself a Republican?
Against my interest? How is having the federal government take over every aspect of my life so that I can be as equally poor as you in my interest? How do you even know what my interests are? How is guaranteeing a living wage to people who can't work, or don't want to work in my interests? How in ruining the greatest healthcare system and the greatest economy in the world in my interests?
You are a willfully blind idiot that can not see how great the country you live in truly is. Please leave at your earliest convenience and take all the rest of the self-hating, racist democrats with you.
Cohen!? Why are they letting you post on Slashdot?
I say fighting is bad, but you punch me in the face anyway. Is it hypocrisy when I fight back and beat you down?
You set the rules. You started this war. Stop the whining.
Did you think Trump would support prison sentence reform? Did you think Trump would be so strong about pulling our troops from foreign territories?
Will Trump sign this? Wait while I flip this coin.
A) If the Democrats bill goes into any sort of details like this I will be both surprised and excited. I fully expect it to be more along the lines of their Green New Deal (ie, a ridiculous wishlist of unrealistic fluff). If the bill mentions "packet" I'll be happy.
B) Blocking marketing agreements may not be desirable. What happens when Spectrum negotiates to get Netflix and Hulu to build co-lo centers within their network areas. Netflix agrees, but Hulu resists. Spectrum will now have a lower cost for delivering Netflix vs Hulu. What if, to save money, Spectrum cuts back on (or decides not to upgrade) their peering connection with the partner that DOES have the Hulu co-lo?
Again, I fully expect any bill put forth to gloss over these sort of technical issues.
I don't think you said what you meant.
You don't open an investigation to see if a crime was committed. You take note that a crime was committed, then you open an investigation to see what happened.
We still don't have a "Paragraph 1" for any of the Trump investigations. For those that don't know, "Paragraph 1" is the beginning of the opening report of any investigation. It would read along the lines of "On , material evidence was found that a crime was committed at ...."
Screw the AI. How much blockchain technology are they investing in?
Having worked with metal a LOT, the article would not be able to live in both the cold of winter and the heat of summer without shattering the glass.
Unless it is a ruse.
"That old thing! Nobody is using that. Go ahead. Use the phone. Nobody is listening anymore."
Sometimes these are several layers deep - there are a ton of "aggregation" companies that do nothing but merge "advertising" data from multiple sources. So you'll get a "market research" company that correlates Google and Facebook and Twitter data into a single consumer profile, which can be used to target advertising ... or for the NSA to track people.
Just want to tack on that one of the biggest trackers is the credit card in your wallet. That 3 pages of 4pt text that was your credit agreement has a paragraph about them "from time to time" sharing your purchase information with "partners". In reality, they will sell the info on everything you've purchase to anybody with a cashier's check.
I wouldn't trust anything from lawfareblog.com. What I would trust is the documentation covering the Woods Procedure.
That's a procedure, invented by one Bob Mueller, that outlines how evidence is to be validated before being used for a FISA warrant. You keep believing in your lawfareblog fantasies. I want to see how the professionals verified the dossier that looks exactly like an article that Glen Simpson wrote for the Washington Post years ealier with just a few name changes.
Are you really that dim? You can't necessarily shout everything you know. That's called being stupid.
Instead, each side is playing both internal and external politics. Trump has to take a "I won't take in shit off of that Kim, guy" stance internally, while being agreeable to Kim externally. Kim has to take a "I'm standing up to the evil America" stance internally, while being agreeable to Trump externally. What they both do is negotiate a stance that allow both leaders to save face internally, while dialing back the threat of nuclear war externally.
Not being able to see and understand how this works with actual humans illustrates a lack of maturity.
"Facebook threatened to pull investment projects from Europe and Canada if lobbying demands from COO Sheryl Sandberg were not met," reports Business Insider, adding "Canada buckled immediately."
If I had the means, I'd have asked FaceBook to take a hike.
Then you would have lost the means. These politicians got elected by claiming they gave people "stuff", which happened to be Facebook projects of different sorts. The politician that doesn't get "the jobs" doesn't get "the job". I'll go out on a limb here and make the prediction that AOC won't be re-elected, and the deciding factor, regardless of its merits, will be her stance on the Amazon deal.
Every single company that decides that "services are more profitable than productivity" eventually fails big and has to correct.
You'll need to define "fails big" in this instance.
Every year around where I live, farmers go out with these big machines and DESTROY THEIR OWN CROPS. They call it "harvesting", but the end result is that they completely ravage and destroy every single one of the plants they just spent all year to grow.
From the C-level view of the world, these are businesses, not religions. If there is more short-term money to be made in finances, that is clearly the path to go. Build it up, then harvest it.
Just one nit. How do American consumers differ from all other nationalities along this axis?
They could have had both. If they had built a trencher instead of a driller, they could have used the trencher to pull the lander to a slightly different spot. It couldn't go as deep, but a drill gets to look at exactly the one spot that is directly under the semi-random landing spot.
That's what they WANT us to believe. The truth is that they are on the other side of the moon riding dinosaurs. Didn't you watch the documentary?