Slashdot Mirror


Tinder Announces New 'Height Verification' Feature. But They May Be Lying (gotinder.com)

"The Tinder dating app will soon be asking men to submit photos in order to verify their height," writes long-time Slashdot reader SonicSpike, sharing a post made Friday (March 29th) on the official Tinder blog. Let's be real, when it comes to online dating -- honesty is the best policy. Yes, your height matters as long as every other shallow aspect of physical attraction does. Please try not to take it to heart...

Height-lying ends here. To require everyone under 6' to own up to their real height, we're bringing truthfulness back into the world of online dating. Introducing Tinder's Height Verification Badge (HVB), because yes -- sometimes it matters. It's the tool we've had in our back-pockets for years, but we were hoping your honesty would allow us to keep it there... Simply input your true, accurate height with a screenshot of you standing next to any commercial building. We'll do some state-of-the-art verifying and you'll receive your badge directly on your profile.

Oh, and by the way? Only 14.5% of the U.S. male population is actually 6' and beyond. So, we're expecting to see a huge decline in the 80% of males on Tinder who are claiming that they are well over 6 feet.

The post concludes that "Tinder's HVB is coming soon to a phone near you," and Tinder's official Twitter account described the feature as "the thing you never asked for, but definitely always wanted," with a short video showing their app displaying errors for incorrect heights. (The second error message reads "Seriously... Please enter your correct height.") The video has been viewed 2.78 million times. Its tagline? "Let's bring honesty back to dating."

"It's unknown at this point if this is a real feature that the company is adding to its dating app," reported one local news site, "or an early April Fool's joke."

323 comments

  1. Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Looks like the men have been violating the number one qualification for women on Tinder.

    Honesty is the best policy? How about you clean up the ladies bios and pictures? Oh - the picture looks like you weigh 100 pounds less? Must be the camera angle.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tinder is pretty garbage for men. You're far better off using traditional dating methods than dealing with that hyper competitive world of ultra ridiculous expectations in men where women receive hundreds of responses a day. No thanks, unless you're looking exclusively for hookups, then it's somewhat ok.

    2. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they check women weight they'll have to check men length...

    3. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Tinder is pretty garbage for men. You're far better off using traditional dating methods than dealing with that hyper competitive world of ultra ridiculous expectations in men where women receive hundreds of responses a day. No thanks, unless you're looking exclusively for hookups, then it's somewhat ok.

      https://www.mrctv.org/blog/tin...

      Seriously, mere rejection isn't enough, apparently there is a need to actively abuse men. One of the problems with Tinder is that if a woman is looking for an intelligent male, mere use of Tinder disqualifies him.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Hilarious by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's just a shitty marketing campaign. Tinder has a reputation for being full of people exaggerating their physical attributes. They pretend to be taller, to have bigger boobs, to have more money and a better car.

      Obviously what they claim is impossible, there is no way to determine a person's height from one or two photos that only show the guy from the waist up.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe HVB is not the best acronym. Just saying.

    6. Re:Hilarious by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Looks like the men have been violating the number one qualification for women on Tinder.

      Honesty is the best policy? How about you clean up the ladies bios and pictures? Oh - the picture looks like you weigh 100 pounds less? Must be the camera angle.

      You are presupposing that the women actually exist in the first place. During the data breach a few years ago Ashley Madison was exposed as having a ton of fake profiles (one site even suggested 90-95% of female profiles were fake) I presume that any site that requires men to pay real money to connect women most like has a huge number of fake profiles on their books.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    7. Re:Hilarious by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Definitely -- they need a weight verification tool for women as well. Maybe some combination of advanced image analysis utilizing gravitational lensing and/or bathroom scale selfies.

      Calling out the double standard is hilarious as well.
      height? women can be picky/shitty about this one -- men can't do anything but chant "grow, grow, grow" and hope c'thulu hears their prayer
      weight? men asking women their weight is a bit taboo for some reason, despite it being 100% under their control.

    8. Re:Hilarious by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I met the love of my life on Tinder. Anecdotal, of course, but hey... it worked for one guy at least :)

      Strictly ontopic, I did a quick conversion and I am 5.97113 feet tall. Bummer :P

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    9. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Be fair now, Tinder is garbage for everyone.

      Women may get responses, but the vast majority of them aren't exactly winners. People get really weird and fetishy all the time, and you start wondering how much of a stalker they are. There's also the endless wave of dick pics.

    10. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on anecdotal hook-ups of my younger roomate (who loves all the appz) - plenty of the ladies are real.

    11. Re:Hilarious by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tinder has a reputation for being full of people exaggerating their physical attributes. They pretend to be taller, to have bigger boobs, to have more money and a better car.

      Uh, Tinder has a reputation?

      Humans have a reputation for exaggerating their physical attributes. A bullshit artist doesn't need Tinder, and that tool is doing nothing more than representing human behavior. Destroy it today, and the same damn thing will pop up in its place tomorrow. With all the same problems.

    12. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tinder is definitely okay for that. I'm not saying I'm a Tinder pro, but it works for a recently divorced guy. Would like a weight verification feature, though. Not that I mind a little junk in the trunk.

    13. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely -- they need a weight verification tool for women as well. Maybe some combination of advanced image analysis utilizing gravitational lensing and/or bathroom scale selfies.

      Calling out the double standard is hilarious as well. height? women can be picky/shitty about this one -- men can't do anything but chant "grow, grow, grow" and hope c'thulu hears their prayer weight? men asking women their weight is a bit taboo for some reason, despite it being 100% under their control.

      Every study on the subject of female attractiveness has demonstrated that the vast and overwhelming majority of men care mostly about the proportions of a woman's figure. You guys are the first two statistical anomalies I have ever come accords that obsess over a woman's weight. Is there like a certain fixed amount of female body mass where you experience abrupt erectile failure or is it more of a gradient where you slowly move into the realm of impotence as a function of the mass of the female?

    14. Re:Hilarious by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      When are they going to deploy a Weight Verification Badge for the "ladies"?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    15. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, remove from searches all n1ggers and shitty minorities.

      Why? It would be simpler to just remove you.

    16. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      If they check women weight they'll have to check men length...

      I'll wager that not only won't they check women's weight, they will eventually demand proof of the men's penis length. Maybe circumfrence as well.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This lady is real

    18. Re: Hilarious by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      If they are going to do the height thing for men as a requirement....

      Let's be fair....and require women to verify their current WEIGHT, lets get an honest measure of how fat they are, and how big their ass is.

      Also, can we get a truthful metric on how firm or saggy their tits are?

      That would save a LOT of headaches and awkward moments ahead of time on the guys' side.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:Hilarious by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Obviously what they claim is impossible, there is no way to determine a person's height from one or two photos that only show the guy from the waist up."

      +1

      There is a relation between "torso length" and "limb length" but it is far from reliable. I know people who appear quite tall sitting, but have short legs/arms, and the reverse- short torso, long legs/arms. You have to get a full photo of someone first.... and even then, you can only estimate height.

      Anyway, it is pretty sad that something so shallow as height will drive people's dating decisions.

    20. Re: Hilarious by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Like someone said elsewhere - we need a concrete definition of "curvy"...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    21. Re: Hilarious by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Fat girls try harder?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    22. Re: Hilarious by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      Makes no difference except at each extreme end of the spectrum. Don't be so insecure. Size or girth does not create instant orgasms.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    23. Re:Hilarious by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I would consider it a gradient. I've been out with chubby girls, that's no problem. But at some point it just becomes gross if the skin flaps are bigger than the boobs...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    24. Re:Hilarious by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      How about you clean up the ladies bios and pictures? Oh - the picture looks like you weigh 100 pounds less? Must be the camera angle.

      Their goal is to get more women on their website. Not going to happen.

      Beyond just being on the Internet, Tinder is a hookup site. There have always been more men available for hookups than women, for rational biological reasons. Hooking up is higher-risk for women, and if women want a family, they need to start earlier. There's less time for curiosity. Unfair, but true.

      Society also pushes it for men, who are higher status if they hookup, and women are lower status if they hookup. Of course, the risk of disease is high even for just kissing.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    25. Re: Hilarious by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I'll wager that not only won't they check women's weight, they will eventually demand proof of the men's penis length.

      Well, they could kill two birds with one stone here - I mean, the guys are going to be standing next to buildings and getting photographed already so...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    26. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      queen did 'fat bottomed girls' in an era long gone. I wonder if they were around - would they dare do such a blasphemy? I mean there is no trigger warning that can help here.

    27. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that linty waxy goo that collects in the folds under the various mud flaps. Delicious!

      Damn that's good.

    28. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The later factor is important especially by less standard courtship practice.

    29. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's what they tell you...

    30. Re:Hilarious by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Eh. Women did exist I tinder, plenty of them. Mate of mine is a regular there and seems to have no problems. He's not tall either, maybe 5'7".

      I don't really see how fake profiles would work on it. So presumably you swipe right(?) And the fake profile auto swipes right. Then you message and... Nothing? Then what?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    31. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the era of the Kardashians. Having a large ass is way, way, waaaaaaaay more acceptable among women (and fetishized by men) now than it was in 1978, the era of cocaine and skin tight designer jeans.

    32. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's just a shitty marketing campaign..

      We're into understatement today! 8^)

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    33. Re: Hilarious by jiriw · · Score: 1

      Do you really want to see it all shriveled up? You'll be measuring the size that won't matter with your suggestion. April 1st it will definitely be too cold to have an erection in those cir...cum...stances...

    34. Re:Hilarious by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      How much is 5.97113 feet in real measures ... and how is your size relevant?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    35. Re:Hilarious by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      I understand your grief.
      Woman are not to heavy for their height.
      They are just to small for their weight.

      Obviously you could argue the same way for men :P

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    36. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat Chicks Suck Dicks!

      Words to live and grow up by...

    37. Re:Hilarious by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      You are presupposing that the women actually exist in the first place

      Plenty of real women there. Take my word for it.

    38. Re: Hilarious by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no definition for curvy.

      Go to http://okcupid.com/ and set your preferences to "curvy" girls.

      American curvy girls are fat

      European curvy girls have "big tits/big ass" and are either normal weight or just slightly above average .. as in "curvy".

      How a fat girl can think she has curves is beyond me :P

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    39. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Anyway, it is pretty sad that something so shallow as height will drive people's dating decisions.

      Women in general prefer taller men, and the taller the better. https://www.lovepanky.com/men/... And for an actual study, Rice University: http://news.rice.edu/2014/02/1...

      I was watching a woman reporter interviewing James Comey, who is pretty tall. She was a pretty liberal person, and would normally be pretty antagonistic toward some damage he might have done. But she was entranced - even giddy around him.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    40. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Definitely -- they need a weight verification tool for women as well. Maybe some combination of advanced image analysis utilizing gravitational lensing and/or bathroom scale selfies.

      Calling out the double standard is hilarious as well. height? women can be picky/shitty about this one -- men can't do anything but chant "grow, grow, grow" and hope c'thulu hears their prayer weight? men asking women their weight is a bit taboo for some reason, despite it being 100% under their control.

      It is rather an odd thing, because men are always called out for all of us being shallow. But looking at the bucket lists that so many women have, it becomes obvious real quickly that they will have to lower their standards, or get pets to keep them company.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    41. Re: Hilarious by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is the era of the Kardashians. Having a large ass is way, way, waaaaaaaay more acceptable among women

      Well, like you said fetishized by SOME men, but ugh...I think she looks like a freak with that thing, and I dare say most normal men don't like it ultra-wide.

      But everyone has their preferences.

      I think there is a problem with 'normalizing' being overweight for women and men. It is not healthy and we already have a problem with obesity.

      If you are overweight, it should be pointed out, so that a person can get help and try to get to a more healthy weight.

      We've got enough of a load on the healthcare system as it is, and obesity and the associated spread of type II diabetes is going to bankrupt us in the future if we don't try to stop the health problem.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    42. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid n1ggers like you belong to your homeland africa. Get out of my country, you piece of shit.

    43. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Every study on the subject of female attractiveness has demonstrated that the vast and overwhelming majority of men care mostly about the proportions of a woman's figure. You guys are the first two statistical anomalies I have ever come accords that obsess over a woman's weight.

      Oh really? I don't care if a woman is "curvy", but Weight is often interchangeable with obese. And no sir, I do not find fat chicks attractive at all. Show me where the overwhelming majority of men prefer fat chicks.

      Is there like a certain fixed amount of female body mass where you experience abrupt erectile failure or is it more of a gradient where you slowly move into the realm of impotence as a function of the mass of the female?

      Is there like a certain levelof disruption of your narrative that makes you resort to silly male shaming like accusations of impotence?

      With that - good day, and Jezabel called - they like the way you think.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    44. Re: Hilarious by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      How a fat girl can think she has curves is beyond me

      Well, I guess being in the shape of a large sphere does qualify in some way as having a curve somewhere.....maybe just one BIG continuous curve?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    45. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      182cm

    46. Re: Hilarious by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      Fat girls try harder?

      Actually, they don't. They, for the most part, have the same queen-like opinion of themselves that more attractive women have, and it makes them perpetually angry that reality won't conform to their personal set of standards.

      The way it works is that they can have preferences for tall, handsome guys, but guys are wrong if they prefer slim women. "It's so exclusionary!!" I saw this completely bonkers double standard all the time back when I was dating. Echh. Thank fucking god I'm done with that shit.

      With that said, being married isn't always perfectly smooth sailing (ha ha) but it beats the shit out of dating.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    47. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Makes no difference except at each extreme end of the spectrum. Don't be so insecure. Size or girth does not create instant orgasms.

      Can't imagine why you would think I'm insecure. I don't care at all whet some woman on Tinder thinks of my package. I only point out different expectations and rules.

      If they demand men's height, they might demand anything.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    48. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Beyond just being on the Internet, Tinder is a hookup site. There have always been more men available for hookups than women, for rational biological reasons. Hooking up is higher-risk for women, and if women want a family, they need to start earlier. There's less time for curiosity. Unfair, but true.

      Oh gawd - the let's wait until the fertility window is closing aspect of so many. There are gioong to be a lot of sad ladies about. Tinder? It's a great way to get free food and drinks though.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    49. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I'll wager that not only won't they check women's weight, they will eventually demand proof of the men's penis length.

      Well, they could kill two birds with one stone here - I mean, the guys are going to be standing next to buildings and getting photographed already so...

      This is going to take two rulers now.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    50. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Do you really want to see it all shriveled up?

      Actually, I don't want to see it at all.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    51. Re:Hilarious by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Really, there is only one qualification for men on most of these sites: the size of your bank account.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    52. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat girls are the low hanging fruit, that's all. All girls suck dicks. If you find one that don't, just skip her and try the next.

    53. Re: Hilarious by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A good solution would be user reviews.

      After the date, you can leave a review, rating the other person on a scale of 1 to 5 stars for different criteria, as well as a text description.

      This can prevent others from being mislead, and encourage more truth in advertising.

    54. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck weight verification. I can eye ball that on my own. I want age verification. "It says here you're twenty-seven
      But that's impossible ... You look like you could be forty-five."

    55. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do have one. Curvy=fat.

    56. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat girls try harder?

      Except at losing weight.

    57. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good solution would be user reviews.

      After the date, you can leave a review, rating the other person on a scale of 1 to 5 stars for different criteria, as well as a text description.

      This can prevent others from being mislead, and encourage more truth in advertising.

      The potential for abuse when you attach an Amazon style ratings system to an app where peoples real-world faces are attached to their profile is simply staggering. I think reporting users for abusive behaviour or fraud is more than enough.

    58. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the era of the Kardashians. Having a large ass is way, way, waaaaaaaay more acceptable among women

      Well, like you said fetishized by SOME men, but ugh...I think she looks like a freak with that thing, and I dare say most normal men don't like it ultra-wide.

      But everyone has their preferences.

      Indeed, even men who like big butts still have upper limits on what they prefer.

    59. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat girls are the low hanging fruit, that's all. All girls suck dicks. If you find one that don't, just skip her and try the next.

      You talk like somebody who's girlfriends have all been inflatable.

    60. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: stay away from sluts.

    61. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you can't expect women to be truthful in a feminist world. It is men that are the problem - always and only!

    62. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying it is under their control implies modern Western women have any self control. They do not and that is why our civilization is spiraling out of control.

    63. Re: Hilarious by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Curves are easy to quantify, just count the number of zero second derivatives, or maybe give the spherical harmonic spectrum.

      Rolls are curves after all.

    64. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is rather an odd thing, because men are always called out for all of us being shallow. But looking at the bucket lists that so many women have, it becomes obvious real quickly that they will have to lower their standards, or get pets to keep them company.

      Women both live longer than men and choose younger partners. They also are the partner who files for divorce 70% of the time. Only the lucky few among women don't wallow in loneliness for the last decade or two of their lives, relying on strangers to take care of them or are burdens to their family instead of having a mutually beneficial relationship with the man they chose so long ago.

      Shallow, short-term thinking with horrific consequence is the norm.

    65. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, there is always the possibility that your wife of 7 years turns into a cheating whore and you have to start all over, but what do I know.

    66. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a simple measurement. If their boobs are smaller then their belly it is a no go. Oddly, weights in women seem to be very polarized... not much middle ground.

    67. Re: Hilarious by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      In addition, the sepia tint could be indicative of an older, less accurate photo...

    68. Re: Hilarious by Type44Q · · Score: 1
      Salma Hayek.

      Any more questions?

    69. Re: Hilarious by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      No fucking shit.

    70. Re: Hilarious by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      being married isn't always perfectly smooth sailing (ha ha) but it beats the shit out of dating.

      Disclaimer: YMMV. ;)

    71. Re: Hilarious by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ... especially not if there isn't enough friction. Solution: gojo hand cleaner...

    72. Re: Hilarious by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'm not one for the "full diaper" look either. I believe it attracts a very limited demographic.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    73. Re: Hilarious by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      The "cottage cheese in a trashbag" effect is also less than desirable.

    74. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1820mm

    75. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's racist.
      Somehow.
      Oh yes of course. It's objectifying the female body. So there, racist.

    76. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is 5.97113 feet in real measures ... and how is your size relevant?

      Five feet, eleven and 5/8 inches.
      It's relevant because being under six feet means that no woman wants him.
      Unless he's a millionaire, because all women want a millionaire.

    77. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, I talk like someone that dated mature women. Mature women don't see a problem with oral sex, and actually likes it enough to not be considered a favor in any level.

    78. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      Really, there is only one qualification for men on most of these sites: the size of your bank account.

      Well..... yeah.

      Women are very likely to have had evolutionary pressure to seek out the fittest mate. It isn't unreasonable for a female to seek out security. Now generally speaking.

      Today, one of the best markers for security is a male that has wealth. This brings up some conflicts though.

      At one time, the best mate for a female was likely the strongest and boldest male she could find. Tallness was related to strength and health.

      Today however, the qualities that made for a desireable male are often quite different. The stable and mild mannered male, while usually making wealth that is seen as stability, often is not sexually desirable to many women. And the bold guy - perhaps the musician or barkeep at the club, arouses many, but isn't much of a catch. And there aren't nearly enough wealthy alpha males to go around.

      So women are in an evolutionary bind. The men they want to mate with are not the men who can support them in a secure lifestyle. So very often they compromise. They mate with the bad boy, and have the stable guy raise the bad boy's children.

      Sounds crazy, but DNA tests argue otherwise. Except in France, where a man can be incarcerated for DNA testing his children. https://www.ibdna.com/paternit... You have to have a Judge order a test, ant they are not likely to do that.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    79. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is rather an odd thing, because men are always called out for all of us being shallow. But looking at the bucket lists that so many women have, it becomes obvious real quickly that they will have to lower their standards, or get pets to keep them company.

      Women both live longer

      Men die before their wives beacuse they want to.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    80. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's just a shitty marketing campaign. Tinder has a reputation for being full of people exaggerating their physical attributes. They pretend to be taller, to have bigger boobs, to have more money and a better car."

      And that never happened on other services, or the cheezy 976 lines back in the day, or want ads. Sure

      Lying to make ones self look better is as old as human history.

      "Gee I wonder if this hologram of Jazesil Balazoron from the Alpha-5 colony on planet Zorlox is legit?"
      - Some dude in the year 2675

    81. Re: Hilarious by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      When they're demanding my dick, that usually bodes well, then again I don't use Tinder.

    82. Re: Hilarious by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Then they'll have to check women's tightness and lubrication. Fucking a subway tunnel or a woman so dry it feels like sandpaper is not fun.

    83. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      In addition, the sepia tint could be indicative of an older, less accurate photo...

      Or even her mother......

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    84. Re:Hilarious by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    85. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      When they're demanding my dick, that usually bodes well, then again I don't use Tinder.

      That's a good move. Personally, I think that while many women use it for a meal, perhaps sex, I think that it's a fun way for them to reject more men.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    86. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Hot Crazy matrix for guys...

      Have you checked out Terrance Popp on YT? Here's one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... He's pretty brutal. Funny too!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    87. Re:Hilarious by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that Tinder is about to require proof of all reported female dimensions, weight included.

      Yeah, right...

    88. Re:Hilarious by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      So it should all, just like work out. You know, like the bloke lies about being tall and well built and the shiela lies about being tall and well built and when they actually get together, they both turn out to be short, fat, liars, see something in common right from the get go, obviously the match making works out well and they both have the same tastes, not them, meh, they'll make do.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    89. Re:Hilarious by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Now THAT was funny! Thanks!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    90. Re: Hilarious by jaa101 · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess being in the shape of a large sphere does qualify in some way as having a curve somewhere

      Actually a sphere is the least curvy way to enclose volume, at least if you go by minimum or average radius of curvature.

    91. Re:Hilarious by Charstor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll throw a different wrinkle in for everyone. There are ladies like myself (transgender) who are perfectly upfront and honest on their Tinder profile. Then Tinder decides honesty is not always the best policy and bans your account.

      --
      Lottie Dottie...I do like to party....
    92. Re:Hilarious by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      By "weight" I think most people, including, I bet, the two statistical anomalies, actually mean proportions of a woman's figure.

      People (not just guys) like to assess themselves and others with something akin to body mass index, which depends on height and weight. What they *mean* by that clumsy metric is waist to hip ratio. Waist to hip ratio also works better than BMI for predicting health. Which is exactly why it correlates with our subjective judgement of attractiveness.

    93. Re:Hilarious by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It's true. A LOT of women put a height requirement in their dating profile. I doubt most guys would dare put a weight requirement in.

      On the other hand, I've been told by a lot of female friends that a surprising number of guys have strong height preferences for women too.

    94. Re:Hilarious by fermion · · Score: 1
      What is next. Mandatory dick pics with a ruler proving length. To make things fai how about mandatory topless women with two tape measures.

      I get that people don’t want to waste time hooking up with a guy that is not within technical specs. It is just that I would think there might others concerns, like not getting raped.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    95. Re: Hilarious by illiac_1962 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in modern social media it benefits that platform to only show positive information. Hence...no reviews. Why doesn't Facebook use a star rating on content? Because it would reduce engagement to show what most people really think. When we let the normies on the internet turned into a sewer. Is there a place for smart people to congregate where we don't have to suffer the gaze of all the simpletons?

    96. Re:Hilarious by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Looks like an early April Fools joke.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    97. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5.97113 feet.

    98. Re: Hilarious by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      Both your comment and the comment you are replying to are confusing. Why would you be using a hookup app for anything but hookups? People only call it a dating app so women can pretend they aren't using it for hookups. Nobody actually buys it do they?

    99. Re: Hilarious by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      A well defined shape on ass that doesn't really jiggle is the ideal, not a flat ass and not a cellulite float.

    100. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really depends on the girl. Some women donâ(TM)t really care much about penetration and prefer more attention on the outside of their vagina. Some women care a whole lot about the size and shape of what goes inside them, bigger is not always better, but for some it is. Really, there are a lot of women that prefer a normal sized dick and a guy with good oral and fingering skills. In every single case, women want a man who will care about her pleasure and who is willing to take their time to listen to her make sure she is satisfied. It's stupid that a guy with a normal sized dick would want to sleep with a woman who wants a big dick. Just sleep with the majority of women who like normal dicks instead.

    101. Re: Hilarious by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      The currently fashionable beauty standard for women isn't attractive anyway. It's sad really, you start with a beautiful girl and emaciate her to the point she looks like a boy.

      Women should be fit but should never have less than 23% body fat which means no matter how strong, they should look soft and not muscular. Having low body fat without muscle results in girls with no shape, no breasts, no butt, nothing and that is what is popular combined with being overly tall. Why? Because gay designers aren't jealous of their non-breasts and their shape doesn't interfere with any style of clothing.

    102. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While tightness canâ(TM)t be fixed overnight (though kegels can work wonders), lubrication can be fixed by being a good lover and taking your time, worst case buy a bottle of lube dude.

    103. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fairness, my understanding of coupling stats and transmission of STDs says that itâ(TM)s the desireable males that spread the STDs. (Because (a) female->male transmission is more unlikely, yet STD rates are much higher in women (canâ(TM)t catch what the dude doesnâ(TM)t have)). So maybe HVB is an appropriate name.

    104. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like Russian roulette!

    105. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of double standards.
      Obese people usually do not find other fat people attractive. They'd still prefer to get with a super model type.
      However if they're part of that misguided *body-acceptance movement other people must find them attractive. Otherwise it's discrimination.

      *Body-acceptance is a very valid idea as long as it is about people who didn't inflict their imperfection on themselves. It's meant for people who even if they really wanted to change can't really do anything about it. However It's not meant for people who are either too lazy to work out on a regular basis and or can't stop eating junk all the time.

    106. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they're unlikely to be lying about their height, and we know men that like big butts cannot lie...

    107. Re: Hilarious by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      After the date, you can leave a review, rating the other person on a scale of 1 to 5 stars for different criteria, as well as a text description.

      Would not work.
      a) why would anyone post whom he actually dated on a mere "dating side" ? (I mean if it was a sex club and only sex was the goal to be on the site, perhaps some exhibitionists would do it)
      b) how you get some reasonable feedback from both parties?
      c) if she is not my "taste" for what ever reason, why should I give her a bad review?
      d) if she is my taste and I like to hook up, I sure as hell don't make a positive review - because I want her for me
          d1) so if I made a bad one, to scare other boys away and she realizes, I would be in trouble
          d2) if she asks, why I make none, I know she is not interested in me (perhaps I should look if she already made one about me?)
      e) and so on ...

      I don't know tinder, but if you look for someone go to okcupid.com (before they ruin the site completely - got bought by match.com a few years ago, it is most likely still the best dating site on the planet)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    108. Re:Hilarious by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Five feet, eleven and 5/8 inches.
      The only correct answer :D

      The rest of your post shows how ridiculous women are, right?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    109. Re:Hilarious by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I see you've not used Tinder. I've had my fair share of Tinder hookups. I can't remember coming across a fake profile. A few taking poetic license on their descriptions yes, and plenty of fake... Well synthetically and surgically augmented people, but no fake profiles.

        Though I didn't meet my wife on their a good portion of my friends did.

    110. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You often get what you put in it!

    111. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, I talk like someone that dated mature women. Mature women don't see a problem with oral sex, and actually likes it enough to not be considered a favor in any level.

      Mature? They must have been disappointed then because your comment marks you out as an immature jerk.

    112. Re:Hilarious by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      The problem with such standards is manyfold.

      People who don't meet that standard are striving for it (but most likely never reach it)
      Some even go for operations, my GF wants her "nose fixed". But I like her nose.
      My ex GF wanted her labiums fixed. And wanted me to pay for it. I left her ... not because of the money, but I found the idea horrifying ... and she insisted (and her lower parts looked extremely nice and sexy anyway).

      I find people who lived a while and arranged with their body and their live, aka being confident, having fun, smile a lot, look back on achievements and look forward for more/other achievements etc. are usually very pleasant and happy and hence: look good! And that means woman around 40 - 50, or 60 depending on way of living, are actually much more attractive than a 20 year old cheer leader.

      The way to go is to do a little bit of sports, Yoga would be a start. A martial art or dancing would be better. (Because they are mixed courses, men + women). Or some other work, like gardening.

      Point is, you don't need to be super slim to look attractive. You should be in a state, mental state, that you don't worry about your "looks". E.g. about men in the gym. You find any kind of man with muscles like this or more muscles or even more muscles. If I was a girl I would prefer guys who look like ballet dancers. Defined muscles, but not super heavy build up (most likely because that is how I looked from 25 - 30, but it was always my goal to look like that.) I still look like that, but my muscles are less defined (just in case you wondered).

      Martial arts as well as dancing automatically bring you together ... no dating site needed it the club is big enough. And obviously you pair up with the other sex automatically often enough. (Well, martial arts as in traditional martial arts ... or Tai Chi/Chi Gong etc. If you only do Muay Thai or kick boxing and only spar with same sex partners ... bad luck)

      Both ways of doing sports, build up a basic body constitution ... obviously gardening or farming goes same direction. If you have a basic body constitution, the exact shape does not matter. The grace comes from moving and body posture. A cheer leader who looks good on a photo simply looks ugly if she can not dance, same for a football player. They look ugly if they can not walk, not stand appropriated for a photo etc. The face is irrelevant. You smile: you look good. Obviously YMMV if you have no front teeth.

      Point is: it does not matter if you have a bit of a belly, if you have esprie and attitude (insert french pronounciation) you look great. Look at this video: https://www.facebook.com/briti... the guy in question would not look attractive to most people. But in his club and amoung his friends (that includes girls) he is well reputated. (Sorry, can not find the relevant youtube video)

      My GF finds herself ugly. I don't know why. She wants the nose changed (from an asian nose with a deep ditch at the brow, to an european one). She has some (few) grey hair and paints it black (that is ok, but with the little bit grey she would look just awesome).
      She is very tiny, as in only 5 feet (less actually, 150cm) tall. But besides a little bit of belly, the only fat she has, she is pure muscles. Legs like a weight lifter, broad shoulders, strong arms. I guess she even could beet me at arm wrestling :D I find that extremely attractive ... and she is heavy. I guess about 60kg ...

      Slim girls are not automatically attractive. Thin legs which are thin because of hunger are not sexy. Well formed legs of a person who runs, dances, does anything using them, that is sexy. The worst are thin girls with big titts, they are at the edge to be ugly in my eyes, but that is just me.

      Anyway, what I want to say: beauty

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    113. Re: Hilarious by Lanthanide · · Score: 2

      I would have thought a triangular prism would be the least curvy way to enclose a volume.

    114. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if these responses are serious or not, I mean it's April 1st after all.

    115. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll throw a different wrinkle in for everyone. There are ladies like myself (transgender) who are perfectly upfront and honest on their Tinder profile. Then Tinder decides honesty is not always the best policy and bans your account.

      Not surprising. I think that Tinder is a monument to dishonesty myself. Did they give any reason?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    116. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, almost certainly they try harder at that too. It is a safe bet that most, not all, but most skinny people have better genetics/gut biome that either allow them to eat more without gaining weight, or be less hungry.

      Most of the overweight people I know (and I admit this is anecdotal) are more active than many of the skinny people I know.

      Even ignoring that, a large person is STARVING. Take the most fit person you know, have them fast for a day. Give them half a Snickers bar(blood sugar Spike to activate hunger), see how hungry they are? That's how hungry an overweight person is ALL THE TIME.

    117. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is hilarious.
      I am expecting next feature/badge
      Certified natural breast size :-D
      and certified botox free face ...
      and of course certified penis length

    118. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      It's true. A LOT of women put a height requirement in their dating profile. I doubt most guys would dare put a weight requirement in.

      On the other hand, I've been told by a lot of female friends that a surprising number of guys have strong height preferences for women too.

      Well, there are preferences, and there are requirements. I like tall women, long legs and long hair.

      But I've dated and been involved with shorties in my younger years.

      For the requirements, I was watching a YT video, one of the "Where have all the good men gone" ones. I think it was a Network show like Dateline (calendar type dates).

      They had a group of single woman and an interviewer sitting around what looked like a nice bar or restaurant. These were very physically attractive women. They were all in their mid-late 30's, and in professional careers. None could find a man that lived up to their requirements. And since the biological clock was ticking, they were getting desperate, like egg freezing desperate.

      They went down their requirement list. The man's height was at or near the top of each.

      Other requirements were to make as much money as they are, to be physically fit and handsome, and to be within a specific age range, and it was not stated, but pretty implicit they would be amenable to start fertility treatments immediately.

      When looking at their lists, and talking about what to drop in order to make it easier to find a man - trying to give up the height requirement was tough for these ladies - the drive is that strong.

      But what they are looking for is a bit of a unicorn anyhow. Finding a man that has all of their requirements is hard. A tall handsome, wealthy, single man in his late 30's early 40's who wants to get married and have children ASAP is a vanishingly small part of the population. It's like every man expecting to marry Sophia Vergara, and refusing to settle for anything less.

      One of the first problems that is so often overlooked, is that in the quest for women to hold many high paying careers, is some rock bottom simple math.

      There are just so many high paying jobs available. Simple math tells us that if we reach parity of something over 50 percent of women in those careers, that means that there will be less wealthy men available. So welcome to a part of equality they didn't think about. Men "marry down" all the time. The natural inclination of women is to "marry up" due to that security drive. But you can't have equal representation by sex and have women marry up all the time. The pool of men considered acceptable is being reduced by that equality. This is that simple math, and the only way to counteract that is to create many more lucrative careers, or women to fight against that basic drive.

      So yeah, the woman who is making 6 or more figures in a lucrative career and racing her biological clock might just need to lower her standards. Or stay single.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    119. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because your feminist master won't let you make direct eye contact without her consent doesn't mean the rest of us have such dysfunctional relationships as you.

    120. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I get that people don’t want to waste time hooking up with a guy that is not within technical specs. It is just that I would think there might others concerns, like not getting raped.

      It is a very shallow place, inhabited by very shallow people.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    121. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is, with certain camera lenses, this system of automation is easily hackable. You just need the right adjustment of fish eye effect on the lens, like some ultra wide lenses will do it for you.

    122. Re:Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Looks like an early April Fools joke.

      Sort of, Don't forget though, that Tinder launched a "menprovement initiative" to allow women to attack men that they found offensive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Yes, this reads like an April fools joke. And it very well might be. But given Tinder's history, it is Onion level satire that rings true if it is a joke.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    123. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      That's racist. Somehow. Oh yes of course. It's objectifying the female body. So there, racist.

      A couple of points here: Racism is a form of prejudice based on an imaginary social construct known as race that has been thoroughly debunked by modern genetic science..

      If you catch AC's drift he's actually agreeing with you in a backhanded way.

      Otherwise, you are spot on. How humans came up with the idea that things like skin pigmentation, epicanthal folds, and other simple variations make a human belong to one "race" or another is pathetically stupid.

      But remembering there are a lot of stupid people out there, and having personally seen people referring to mockery of religion as racist, AC is right. Someone will try to make overweight into a racial issue. Look what they did with gender.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    124. Re: Hilarious by mjwx · · Score: 1
      Real men have curves...

      There is no definition for curvy.

      Go to http://okcupid.com/ and set your preferences to "curvy" girls.

      American curvy girls are fat

      European curvy girls have "big tits/big ass" and are either normal weight or just slightly above average .. as in "curvy".

      How a fat girl can think she has curves is beyond me :P

      A minor point of order sir, "curvy" European girls are also fat. Americans are of European stock.

      You must be thinking of Latinas, sadly a place where butt implants are a serious thing.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    125. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      Your description is literally 100 percent accurate.

      These kind of apps have leaned heavily into "we made this for you ladies, it's do you can find the right man"

      To have sex with. That's the part they can't say BC women are still afraid of what their other women friends will think

    126. Re:Hilarious by Megane · · Score: 1

      I'm sure China will be happy to produce "mis-calibrated" rulers.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    127. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean #2 qualification. The #1 is being wealthy. Women are incredibly hypocritical. They don't like being judged superficially, but they're perfectly fine refusing to date anybody but the top couple percent of the male population because they're all entitled to Prince Charming or Mr. Right. No wonder Prince Charming is married to Mr. Right, probably gets old being used and treated like a toy.

    128. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago after my divorce I used a couple of sites. I have a character flaw in that I am overly honest. Iâ(TM)m not to the point of being anti-social, but I canâ(TM)t rave about a cup of coffee thatâ(TM)s just good. So everything I put on the dating site was pretty much exactly on point. I am 5â(TM)6 I weigh ~215, my picture was about a week old when posted.
      The several people I met through the site were all shocked when I met them. Omg you look just like your picture. They all also said you look skinnier and taller then I thought. Which basically meant they were adding 20 lbs and taking away a few inches just because everyone was lieing so much. They were as well, just not about height. Their pics were often years old, and their weight was always off by a minimum of 30 lbs.

    129. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ex GF wanted her labiums fixed. And wanted me to pay for it. I left her ...

      Hopefully you left her on an active railway bound with ropes. What a shallow and lazy cunt, wanting you to pay to fix what you don't even see as broken. What's her excuse, did she say your giant dick blasted out her meat curtains and it's somehow your fault?

    130. Re: Hilarious by Millennium · · Score: 1

      Seriously, mere rejection isn't enough, apparently there is a need to actively abuse men.

      The creeps? Sure. They were supposed to learn this stuff years ago, but refused to then and still refuse now.

      Like all living things, people do not grow except in response to pressure of some kind. The relatively gentle pressures of the schoolyard are sufficient for most, but some people dig in their heels, and then sterner measures must be taken.

    131. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fake profiles wouldn't swipe. The point of fake profiles is that most people assume that there's a woman there that's not interested or is getting too many swipes to respond to all of them.

      It's not until you've been on for a while and gotten nowhere with any of them that you tend to suspect that something is up.

      Companies that charge money for people to find love, but aren't actually contributing much to the process are scum. It's one thing if you're actually going through and vetting the information and setting people up, but having a website where it's all done via compuer algorithm and there's no actual work going into it should be extremely cheap.

    132. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women either don't care about having their own kids or are too delusional to manage it. I've been dating women in their 30s and if anything they're even more deluded than the women in their 20s are. They have no idea how tight they're cutting it by not having a man in their life that's committed to at least having kids.

      A woman that's 30 and meets her future husband, spends 1 year dating, 1 year engaged another year before getting pregnant nearly a year before having her first child will be 33, and if she wants to have another kid a couple years later, she'll be 35 and if she happens to want a 3rd she'll likely be at least 38.

      Now, the couple can speed bits of that up a bit, but as a woman gets closer and closer to 40 the likelihood of her having any children at all with or without extreme measures decreases markedly.

      This is something that typical women are either too stupid or too delusional to understand. They just don't have the luxury of sleeping around through their 20s and then being super picky during most of their 30s if they are serious about having their own biological children. It just doesn't work.

    133. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TBH, I'm tempted to join, just to reject as many women as possible. Considering they don't think men are actual people, it seems fair to treat them like pieces of meat and reject all but the best looking ones.

    134. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News flash Lisa.

      Women like dicks.

    135. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanna bet it's the new height thing? Hormones and surgery can turn a man into a woman, but they can't turn a tall person into a short one.

      Sex: Female
      Height: 6'1"

      Nope, that don't sound right! Banned!

      Could have been solved by another field, I guess:

      Reason Why So Damn Tall: Formerly Male

    136. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are overweight, it should be pointed out, so that a person can get help and try to get to a more healthy weight.

      Most fat people don't need YOU to point out that they are fat. Give me a break, what a stupid thing to say.

    137. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be true in some areas, but around here it's generally not. A lot of guys have given up on getting a woman that takes care of herself, now they've moved onto women that are charitably 6s and behave like 10s. Sure, they won't be caught dead in a gym, but that doesn't mean they don't expect their guy to not be loaded and in great shape for them.

      Fucking hippocrites

    138. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, so expecting enjoyable oral sex from non fat gals marks someone as an immature jerk? Man, what is this? Some kind of self inflicted dorky puritanism?

      Beautiful slim girls may enjoy sucking dicks. No, it's not an absurdity. Deal with it!

    139. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid n1ggers like you belong to your homeland africa. Get out of my country, you piece of shit.

      I'm in Antarctica you lobotomised racist pig.

    140. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "curvy".

      How a fat girl can think she has curves is beyond me :P

      And thus Curvy joins rubenesque, queen sized, plus sized, juicy, plump, jiggly, thick, voluptuous, big boned, etc on the giant pile of words that have had their meaning changed and then were abandoned once the world figured out they now mean "Fat".

      Lets kill "sexy" next because destroying a word is so much easier than going to the gym.

      Now if you will excuse me I will take my "sexy" self down to the couch for another day of Netflix and ice cream.

      Hey, no unkind words. I have renamed my couch "genetics", so I can honestly tell you my obesity is due to "genetics".

    141. Re:Hilarious by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Obviously what they claim is impossible, there is no way to determine a person's height from one or two photos that only show the guy from the waist up.

      Depends on what they're wearing, I am thinking.

      As an example, buttons on men's shirts tend to be a set distance apart for a given style (polo shirts aren't the same as dress shirts, but pretty much all polo shirts (or all dress shirts) are alike.

      While I doubt seriously you could get a really accurate height using button spacing, you should be able to get close enough to say "no, this guy isn't really 6'3", more like 5'9" to 5'11"..."

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    142. Re:Hilarious by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Meh. I didn't really get any better responses when I mentioned a six-figure salary and a corner-penthouse condo than when I omitted those details.

      I had much better luck with an honest profile about myself even though I knew it would turn a lot of women off. I ended up hearing from women who said they saw a lot of themselves in what I posted.

      Just be yourself. Online dating is even more of a numbers game than it is in real life. You have to be persistent and you can't let rejection, or bots, get you down.

    143. Re: Hilarious by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Definitely tongue-in-cheek. Prejudice against obese people, while based on the quantifiable physical property of mass, can only be genuinely associated with the physical property of volume, so GP is definitely kidding.

    144. Re: Hilarious by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Not yours. And not as an introduction.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    145. Re: Hilarious by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      If she agreed to either sex or a second date, she's a 5 in all categories. Otherwise, she was a cold, pretentious catfish that showed late.

      Nothing could possibly go wrong with that.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    146. Re: Hilarious by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      If it's dry, you're doing it wrong.

      Try writing the alphabet with your tongue. Which alphabet doesn't really matter.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    147. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Years ago after my divorce I used a couple of sites. I have a character flaw in that I am overly honest. Iâ(TM)m not to the point of being anti-social, but I canâ(TM)t rave about a cup of coffee thatâ(TM)s just good. So everything I put on the dating site was pretty much exactly on point. I am 5â(TM)6 I weigh ~215, my picture was about a week old when posted.

      Hard to imagine that posting actual timely data is being overly honest though.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    148. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Seriously, mere rejection isn't enough, apparently there is a need to actively abuse men.

      The creeps? Sure. They were supposed to learn this stuff years ago, but refused to then and still refuse now.

      Like all living things, people do not grow except in response to pressure of some kind. The relatively gentle pressures of the schoolyard are sufficient for most, but some people dig in their heels, and then sterner measures must be taken.

      You know, this is an example of a double standard, like active and encouraged abuse by women is somehow a good thing. It's like ignoring a person is somehow bad or something. The MenProvement or douchebag initiative was aimed specifically and only at men.

      Women are incapable of being jerks it would seem.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    149. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are overweight, it should be pointed out, so that a person can get help and try to get to a more healthy weight.

      Because I'm sure overweight people just aren't aware that they're overweight, until someone helpfully points it out. Oh, and shame certainly has slimming effects.~

    150. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      TBH, I'm tempted to join, just to reject as many women as possible. Considering they don't think men are actual people, it seems fair to treat them like pieces of meat and reject all but the best looking ones.

      Funny - my wife has said the same thing. Sounds like a bit of fun.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    151. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beauty standards can be pretty silly. I won't deny that.
      Getting plastic surgery for one's labia does sound weird to me. It's more or less something she was born with. These are the things body-acceptance was made for. If you don't care who cares? Who urges your GF to care? I mean she isn't a prostitute or something like that, where this might have affect the money she makes?
      In that line of work (which is perfectly legal where I live) I could understand to some degree if they wanted to alter their body to please their customers.

      A bit of body fat is alright in my book. I also neither find anorexic nor human cloud people (body builder) attractive.
      Also overweight people do get a lot of crap that they do not deserve, I also agree on that. For example my doctor, who also quite ironically specialized in psychotherapy, dismissed a lot of my personal issues because I was fat. An attitude that isn't really that helpful for many people with an already low self esteem.
      However I still find that body-acceptance has taken a wrong turn somewhere in the recent decade.

      Take it from a former fatty with type 2 diabetes, who has to work his ass off, exercising on top of a low carb diet, to keep blood sugar levels low enough without having to rely on diarrhoea kidney killer pills (Metformin).
      It took two painful years to get there, which also cost me a non-supportive girlfriend. But eventually I managed it. While I'm certainly not cured, I'm relatively healthy again. And this can only work if I keep this up. So this is my life now.
      Yes, I realize that the situation with my GF may make me biased here. But from my observation most of these body acceptance obese people are just lazy and don't want to venture out of their comfort zone. And them calling people with a healthy body weigh privileged does devalue all the hard work people like myself have to put into staying healthy.

    152. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hormones and surgery can turn a man into a woman

      No, they really can't...any more than getting a lot of piercings turns you into a collander.

      Gender is fluid because cultural, but sex is a biological reality. Those with genetically ambiguous sex are still people, but they are really a tiny minority compared to the deluded souls who think their brains are a different sex than their genitals (miss ya, BarbaraHudson).

      I have yet to find anyone who can explain why it's ok to change your sex but not your race.

    153. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Though I didn't meet my wife on their a good portion of my friends did.

      A good portion of your friends met your wife on Tinder?? Dude!

    154. Re: Hilarious by Millennium · · Score: 1

      You know, this is an example of a double standard, like active and encouraged abuse by women is somehow a good thing.

      Abuse? Of course not. Rejection is not abuse. Not even en masse.

      It's like ignoring a person is somehow bad or something.

      When ignoring fails, one needs sterner measures.

      The MenProvement or douchebag initiative was aimed specifically and only at men.

      Sounds like they hit a nerve. Maybe you should listen harder.

      Women are incapable of being jerks it would seem.

      Certainly they are capable of being jerks. That does not absolve you of being creepy.

    155. Re: Hilarious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Certainly they are capable of being jerks. That does not absolve you of being creepy.

      Ahhhh, good old manshaming. A woman on Tinder would never consider me as creepy, because I would not interact with one. Because Tinder itself is inherently pretty creepy. I'd no more go there for hookups than I would go to look for dates at a stripper bar.

      The very idea of arranging a "date" with a person you have never met, only through a photo and self- description is pretty weird, and smacks of terrible and sad desperation.

      Let me try your shaming tactic here...... If your standards are that low, then have at it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  2. It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's face it, thousands of women on that platform are surely lying about their weight. They use "Myspace angles" to hide in pictures in order to deceive potential matches.

    So, let's be fair and make sure women tell the truth.

    1. Re: It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When it comes to women and rights/expectations, the world of double standards is the norm, not the exception.

    2. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, let's just require the women to be honest what they are willing to deliver and for what costs.

      I can stand a girl who will use me for my money if she is willing to put out, but if she's going to be a frigid bitch, we should at least be able to have a conversation about something other than how all the idiots at work take advantage of her.

    3. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More cushion for the pushin. Don't be afraid of the BBW and PAWG set. They will do anything.

    4. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would tell you to go hire a whore, since that's what you really want...but you deserve to be alone for the rest of your life!

    5. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either people are lying to themselves or they've never had sex with someone in great shape (which also excludes skin and bones people).
      It's right along the lines of that "size doesn't matter" garbage. Of course with the difference that people can do little about their "size".

    6. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't understand. The whole "more cushion" thing is about being able to get laid easily and with little need to care about what kind of human being you are after the deed. For the most part the larger members of society are abandoned and are easily used and abused because even small amounts of positive attention goes a long way with them. Low self-esteems mean easy pray.

      You may hate it for what it is but most people treat them a little bit better than the raccoons that break into your garbage at night. It's not just a handful either, it's the bulk (no pun intended) of society. Their willingness to put up with being damaged by the people around them feed into a vicious cycle of self worth issues that lead to a willingness to be further degraded.

      It sucks but it's true. So while fit people are better at sex, fat people are easier to get at and degrade. There's a lot of people who aren't interested in real relationships so these easy targets fit the bill.

    7. Re:It also needs weight verification. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Of course with the difference that people can do little about their "size".

      I have an inbox full of ads that claim otherwise...

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do have to agree on that.

    9. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course with the difference that people can do little about their "size".

      I have an inbox full of ads that claim otherwise...

      Suction devices and 'herbal viagra' ???

    10. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Height doesn't change but weight does. What happens if a lady has 5kg difference? Does she need to constantly update her profile? Of course, it's another thing if the discrepancy is 30kg difference.

    11. Re: It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to women and rights/expectations, the world of double standards is the norm, not the exception.

      All I have to say for all you double-standard ladies out there is, enjoy your cats.

    12. Re: It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you a gold digger yourself, or a beta defender?

    13. Re: It also needs weight verification. by _merlin · · Score: 1

      I agree with him - if you want a simple transaction where you know upfront what you'll be paying and what you'll get for it, you should look at escorts, compensated dating, or prostitutes.

    14. Re: It also needs weight verification. by haliburns · · Score: 0

      I suppose it has escaped you that this is illegal in our supposedly free country.

    15. Re: It also needs weight verification. by illiac_1962 · · Score: 1

      Found the Russian

    16. Re: It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw just film it and call it porn

    17. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I would tell you to go hire a whore
      He's already handing money to girls on tindr, pay attention.

    18. Re: It also needs weight verification. by _merlin · · Score: 2

      And what are you doing about this way your government is curtailing your freedom? I can go to a legal brothel across the road if I want to.

    19. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has sex with a lot of types of women (I'm an active swinger), for my *personal* experience, I enjoy fat women more than skinny or fit women.

      Skinny women can be painful at times. Ever had a pelvic bone dig into you during sex? Not fun. I'm always afraid I'm going to break them.

      Fit women are a lot of fun, but that muscle can be surprisingly heavy, even heavier than the fat on big women! When a fit woman gets on top of you, it's like being pinned down by a wrestler. You ain't going NOWHERE. Which can be fun, but takes a lot of endurance as well.

      Fat women are just the right feel for me. I like what the extra fat does for them, too. Naturally soft skin without the need for caking on moisturizer. Impact-absorbing cushioning around the bones. Seeing all that body moving back and forth like waves in the ocean is a visually stimulating component that most other women lack in every part of their body, the only exceptions being their tits and ass. Fat women have sweat that smells and tastes sweeter as a result of the difference in their body chemistry -- sort of like how Indian girls (and guys!) taste a little "spicier", but that's another subject.

      Of course, everyone's got their preferences, and this is simply where mine ended up, even after enough personal experience to know what all of these body types feel like. I'm living proof that it's incorrect to assume that you'll only enjoy fat women just because you haven't had sex with anyone else.

      Then again, I'm also a curler and a Linux user, so don't take my preferences on women or sports or computers or anything to represent the majority of the population's wishes and desires. I'm just saying we exist. :)

    20. Re: It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legit porn requires miles of paperwork to produce legally. If you're going to take that legal defense route, at least make sure your hooker has signed an 18 U.S.C. 2257 release form and that you've got a scan of her driver's license before you start fucking.

    21. Re:It also needs weight verification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, Notch.

  3. Damn April Fools Day by NeilAtWhartonSquare · · Score: 1

    It's April 1st in Australia

  4. Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    where the company wants to float an idea that might be offensive but wants plausible deniability in case it is.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Tinder is offensive, let's be honest. In general, people on that site are not looking for out for the best interest of others, they are extremely selfishly trying to get what they want.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I despise the height thing in particular myself, and I AM over 6'.

    3. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Like life, then?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    4. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're not talking about your pant waist size.

    5. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds honest and truthful to me. Why do you find that offensive? Do you like lying about your agenda?

    6. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that people who don't want to be involved with other people in a "real" relationship are offensive? Why is that?

    7. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I despise the height thing in particular myself, and I AM over 6'.

      Understandably. Height is a status symbol that is visible immediately when the girl walks down the street with her guy. For a lot of people, Status is more important than being happy, or anything else. As Tom Wolfe puts it (in I Am Charlotte Simmons), the most important thing is "being a person recognized as special, regardless of the reason."

      If you can get over your need for status, there is a lot of power that comes with it. First, you gain the ability to attain what makes you happy (instead of chasing what makes other people happy). Then once you have that, if you learn how to make other people happy, then you can use that power to influence others, if you want to.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Tinder is offensive

      You're not forced to download it and use it. Let other people do what they want instead of getting "offended" over stuff that has nothing to do with you.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Let other people do what they want instead of getting "offended" over stuff that has nothing to do with you.

      I can do both: let people do what they want, and get offended. That is my right, as is theirs.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what makes you a bitchtard.

    11. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then do like every other cuck and take it to twitter

    12. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I can't help how you feel, but usually the next step after being offended is calling for it to stop with censorship or a ban - you do NOT have that right.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    13. Re:Ah joy, the phony April fools stories by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I absolutely have the right to call for a ban. I'm not going to, because I passed 4th grade civics class and know the problems that can be caused by censorship, but I have the right to.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  5. Penis size? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm you know what they say, tall man, tall penis. Your results may vary ;)

    1. Re: Penis size? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People come in all sorts of shapes and sizes. However, there is still a correlation between hight and penis length. Just as there are between large women and large breasts.

  6. Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For sure...

  7. I hate 1st April by TheNinjaCoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I should stay offline until 2nd.

    1. Re:I hate 1st April by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would have been a bit more plausible if they'd have gotten their story straight.

      First they say "To require everyone under 6' to own up to their real height" , but then go on to finish with "So, we're expecting to see a huge decline in the 80% of males on Tinder who are claiming that they are well over 6 feet".

      TBH, I think the biggest joke is Tinder calling themselves a dating app.

    2. Re:I hate 1st April by DogDude · · Score: 0

      Jeez, I bet you're fun at parties.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  8. Stuff like this is silly ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    People faking stuff about their body might get an more easy date.
    But get kicked instantly in the ass when they actually have a date.

    So what is the point?

    The funny thing is, you fake something to impress someone you don't know who is actually interested into the opposite ... fail.

    What you think how many people I know who like tiny woman, but they add 10cm on their profile? Or woman who try to impress with breasts, but the guy actually likes small sizes?

    Same for men, just don't find a good example, probably coloured hair. Grey hair does not look bad in the right context ... same with no hair.

    Running around faking something you are not, trying to impress someone you like, but might be interested in just the opposite you fake, plain stupid.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Stuff like this is silly ... by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Obtaining a date is easy if you lie - look forward to being downrated, commented on, blocked, etc. though. That's why there are trends for "date reviews" nowadays, to ward off others from the creeps and work on a reputation-based system (whether that's "he was a really good shag" or "he's a wonderful guy, we're really good friends, but we just aren't quite right for each other).

      But if 80% of men are saying they're over 6 foot, there's no way that those 80% of men aren't getting repeat dates, hence the only people actually fooling themselves are the women who think they have to have someone over 6 foot and would notice, and men know that and so know they can lie about it and get away with it.

      Maybe if we were all a bit less shallow, these things wouldn't matter. Maybe if they opened up their "essential" criteria a bit, it would help everyone. But women get swamped with guys so they can literally afford to filter to what they think is the "perfect" guy. Guys can't be as picky, fact of life. They might all clamber for the young leggy blonde but fact is that they have to await acceptance from the women on such platforms, not the other way around, hence they will lie to pass that filter.

      It's one of the reasons that whenever I'm dating online I ignore absolutely any statistic and go entirely by the chat. I don't care if they're 4 feet or 20, what their cup size is, what they claim their age to be, and so on. It literally means nothing because virtually everyone lies about those things and the people who think it's important enough to actually put on their profile are the type of people I don't want to date (sometimes you can't avoid putting it on, but you can make it clear whether you give a shit about matching on that or not).

      Even for a one-nighter, if you're that vain that you'll only sleep with people over 6-foot, then I don't really want to know you, whether I'm 6-foot or not.

      Now there are some attributes that are worth knowing for elimination purposes - smokers, for instance. But I have to say that all the vital statistics in the world are useless in gauging how much you enjoy someone's company.

      Honestly, there's a lot to be said for "online blind dates". Just chatting to someone who you know absolutely nothing about.

      But lying about a vital statistic is dumb, and this kind of "verification" will just be photoshopped into oblivion.

    2. Re:Stuff like this is silly ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What the world needs in online blind dates that take place in total and complete darkness.

      Beware that the 'girl' doesn't need a shave.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Stuff like this is silly ... by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      Running around faking something you are not, trying to impress someone you like, but might be interested in just the opposite you fake, plain stupid.

      You assume that everyone using the service is looking for a long term relationship. I have a feeling most are just looking for a quick fuck. I that case, why would you look for anything other than some shallow, vapid person that is also looking for the same thing?

    4. Re:Stuff like this is silly ... by WalrusSlayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Having jumped into this world recently, I have some observations...

      At least in my age-bracket (early 50-something, but trolling for 40-somethings and even 30-somethings that are interesting), nearly all the women on Tinder want to replace their lost soul-mate and they want to do it yesterday. This seems to be true of most of the dating sites I'm on. And if you are not existentially clamoring for the same thing then you must be just a serial-dater or a hookup guy and are a waste of their time.

      The notion that a soulmate is a difficult thing to find, and that sometimes it needs to develop organically, is just lost on them. Seems they'd rather sit at home alone rather than entertain the notion that perhaps getting out and about with a less-than-ideal match might be a better use of their time. They might even learn something about how other people work/think/behave, and maybe learn something about themselves in the process. And if that less-than-ideal match is physically attractive, not the end of the world to let off some steam in the pent-up-hormones dept.

      Personally I try to go in with an open mind, and if the date goes nowhere, I got an evening out at the very least. Or it might cultivate a beneficial platonic relationship, which has happened more than once for me. If it's a good fit and grows into something more, then I'm open to that too. You know, just like how real dating works. But the "ya-gotta-be-looking-to-get-married-and-yesterday" filter is a huge obstacle for everyone involved.

      I *am* puzzled at the blatant dishonesty on physical attributes. Lying on your height? Really? And I've gotten really good at reading between the pixels, as it were, on the women's photos. Or at the very least, figure they will be one or two notches less attractive in person. But I'm open to the notion that after a couple of hours, if a person's personality is attractive, the physical appearance truly does go down in importance. Which is one of the biggest limitations in online dating, which is that it's a rare photograph that also conveys a person's soul (to be a bit melodramatic).

      My pictures are representative of how I look. And of course I pick ones that make me look good, but not deceptively so. The only fudging I do is with age. And I'm unapologetic about it. There are a statistically unlikely distributions of 39 and 49y/o women on the site. Sorry, no way. The only explanation is they are trying to game the age filter. In my case, losing 25lbs and hitting the gym regularly means an age filter would unfairly bias me out of searches. *Every* time I've come clean on my age after meeting someone, I always get surprised reactions that I really do look mid-40's (I usually advertise upper 40's), and a few times people have commented that my upbeat demeanor is more of a upper-30/lower-40's person.

      So I won't be happy if they somehow implement age verification, as I truly believe that people put more importance on it than they should. But I imagine that the women will be even less happy, based on the number of 9's I see in the ages.

    5. Re:Stuff like this is silly ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real reason all of those women demand a guy over 6 feet is because they are sluts and their loose worn pussy can't feel a cock smaller than 10 inches.

    6. Re:Stuff like this is silly ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. It's the same as younger ones all going for the top 666ers and then most of them are left with nothing.

      Deception starts with makeup anyway.

    7. Re:Stuff like this is silly ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, depending on my shaving status, I look like 35. But I'm 52.
      As I live in Asia mostly now, my age does not matter anyway.
      About 5 years ago and from there 5 years back I mostly lived in Paris, and my 10 year younger GF at that time was congratulated that she got a guy who was younger than her ... rofl.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:Stuff like this is silly ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The notion that a soulmate is a difficult thing to find, and that sometimes it needs to develop organically, is just lost on them. Seems they'd rather sit at home alone rather than entertain the notion that perhaps getting out and about with a less-than-ideal match might be a better use of their time. They might even learn something about how other people work/think/behave, and maybe learn something about themselves in the process. And if that less-than-ideal match is physically attractive, not the end of the world to let off some steam in the pent-up-hormones dept.

      People always talk about how porn changes men's expectations, but this right here is why we maybe need to talk about the damaging effects of romance novels on women!

    9. Re:Stuff like this is silly ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I met my wife through an online dating site, and I know something of what you describe. We were both around 30 when we met, so it wasn't exactly the same, but even in that bracket there was rampant age-ism and other assorted bits of shallowness.

      Honestly, the biggest complaint we both had about the profiles we'd viewed and people we'd met was unrealistic expectations. People kept expecting to find the person who was the perfect match for them to the detriment paying attention to anyone who would be a good (and potentially very good) match for them. And everyone who wasn't just looking for a hookup seemed to think that if it wasn't immediately obvious that they should be spending 5+ years with the person they'd just had one or two dates with, they must be wasting their time.

      The most important piece of advice that my wife and I came up with is this: Figure out what you need to be happy without someone else in your life before you get serious about looking for long term relationships. If you're only dating someone because you're lonely or looking for someone who can *make* you happy or make your life "complete", it will never last and you'll never address the root of the problem. And if you're fine with being alone, it makes being patient and honest about courtship so much easier and gives you something to build on that survives the inevitable end of the "honeymoon phase" of any relationship. Find someone you can just be your natural self around and whose company you genuinely enjoy.

  9. Length verification by peterofoz · · Score: 1
    Next up will be length verification as many men exaggerate on this point also.

    To keep it safe and friendly, male patrols will be required to show a ruler placed on their hand as the length of the hand is also an indication of the length of the penis.

    Similarly the arm span from from finger tip to finger tip is another DaVinca human proportion used in the art world.

    How many of you are currently measuring your hand?

    1. Re:Length verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm looking forward to female *depth* verification. With the right tool, they'll be too busy to swipe right on any Tinder candidates.

    2. Re:Length verification by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Grip...rated by the size and weight of the ball she can 'hold' through a jumping jack.

      Most will claim pachinko, but deliver pingpong.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Length verification by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Standing next to any commercial building. Perhaps a bowling alley.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Length verification by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Hm... 3d scan of the relevant anatomies, and matching based on topological compatibility. It's even more fun for the woman, so attracts the right demographic.

    5. Re:Length verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Female *tightness* is much more important than depth.

  10. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tinder takes themselves too seriously...
    Are they going to certify dick size too?
    Just wondering?

  11. Just use your mug shot by david.emery · · Score: 2

    Many mug shots are taken with a height scale behind the perp.

  12. It's not only the height that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, they should implement a htodog(no hotdog algorithm.

  13. End the height discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Being below average in height is not a character flaw!

  14. FGAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they ban the FGAS too?

  15. "honesty is the best policy"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "honesty is the best policy"? Then why am I still sitting here, all alone, in front of a computer, at an age where literally every single person in every school class I've ever been to is now married and have kids and their own places to live and fancy cars and all kinds of careers?

    Because I was honest. It does NOT pay off in this world.

  16. The Equality of Misrepresentation by geekmux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since it appears that there's a significant problem with men misrepresenting themselves in their online profiles, I don't mind men being targeted for some brutal honestly.

    Of course, this also means I FULLY expect a new Tinder policy that requires every woman's profile to include a full body shot (to include whatever algorithmic hashes are necessary to disprove image manipulation), as well as a makeup-free selfie. There's ZERO reason we should allow the women to get away with misrepresentation.

    I think I've also pointed out the obvious differences between the genders. Careful what you wish for ladies. We men might end up demanding you provide the same, in the name of equity.

    1. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      5-footer spotted.

    2. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Of course, this also means I FULLY expect a new Tinder policy that requires every woman's profile to include a full body shot (to include whatever algorithmic hashes are necessary to disprove image manipulation), as well as a makeup-free selfie. There's ZERO reason we should allow the women to get away with misrepresentation.

      To be fair....MOST women need a little makeup.

      I wanna see how well they do it....when you take them out in public, you do want them to look their best you know.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's false equivalence actually. Would you require men to not style their hair, color their hair, cut their beard, don't wear good clothes etc for the picture? Then why would want a make-up free selfie for women?

    4. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by geekmux · · Score: 1

      That's false equivalence actually. Would you require men to not style their hair, color their hair, cut their beard, don't wear good clothes etc for the picture? Then why would want a make-up free selfie for women?

      Style and clothing can improve a person's appearance, but the transformative power of make-up has been proven time and time again, both in real life and on the big screen.

      And no, I don't "want" or need any of this (I don't even use Tinder), but if one gender is going to sit back and demand that men be accurate, then I say enforce brutal honesty and equality for ALL on dating apps. Make-up free selfies, weight verification, medical history validation. Yes, I'm certain that's the cure to the divorce rate; let's make dating even more impersonal than it has already become. Might as well start developing the bluetooth powered lie detector Tinder accessory.

      Man, am I glad I don't have to deal with that shit.

    5. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Style and clothing is equally transformative.

      As is shaving.

      I mean you wouldn't go on in stained sweatpants and a 6 month hobo beard.

      If you want really brutal honesty, you'd advocate for that too.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by geekmux · · Score: 0

      5-footer spotted.

      There's a minimum height to be able to see over the wave of bullshit and identify those perpetuating double standards.

      It's considerably higher than five feet.

    7. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, this also means I FULLY expect a new Tinder policy that requires every woman's profile to include a full body shot (to include whatever algorithmic hashes are necessary to disprove image manipulation), as well as a makeup-free selfie. There's ZERO reason we should allow the women to get away with misrepresentation.

      To be fair....MOST women need a little makeup.

      I wanna see how well they do it....when you take them out in public, you do want them to look their best you know.

      Women get incredibly sensitive about their appearance when other women are present, not men.

      Ironically, it is the jealously and competitive nature of their own gender that creates that self-serving feedback loop, although you'll never get a women to admit it.

    8. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Style and clothing is equally transformative.

      As is shaving.

      I mean you wouldn't go on in stained sweatpants and a 6 month hobo beard.

      If you want really brutal honesty, you'd advocate for that too.

      I don't advocate for stained sweatpants and hobo beards because I wouldn't sport that look regardless of my relationship status. Hell, I wouldn't sport that look to change the oil in my car. If you enjoy sitting around wearing stained sweatpants sporting hobo beards, fine. Just be honest about it. Find that special soulmate that you can match stains with.

      I can hardly believe we're even having this conversation anyway. Not sure why men would be dumb enough to lie about their height on a dating app. It's only one of our most obvious physical characteristics that you can't exactly exaggerate with the ease of a push-up bra.

    9. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Also, a notarized IQ test

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    10. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You (and everybody else) seem to have missed the biggest and most expensive lie.

      "I don't want children."

    11. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a push-up bra folded up and placed under a wig could add an inch...

    12. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep digging.

      Actually it might not help - I'm thinking every possible mudsling you could throw at men will look worse on women.

      Exceptions exist of course. I'm sure there's women out there who can pull off a mustache.

    13. Re:The Equality of Misrepresentation by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Your lack of self awareness is staggering.

      It's like I lead you to water and then you turn around and hell at me how there's no water.

      So you don't enjoy hanging around in stained sweatpants? Why not? They're comfortable and I assume you don't actually enjoy doing laundry.

      And you don't like it because you don't like the look? It's almost like you are not being (to use your bizarrely aggrieved reasoning) honest with your appearance after all time putting effort into it.

      At this point you should realise that both men and women put effort into their appearance.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  17. Manlets better yeet before they get naynayed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *DABS*

  18. Women with no makeup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looking forward to women being required to upload unretouched photos of makeup-free faces, also Weight Verification Badges.

    1. Re:Women with no makeup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking forward to ... Weight Verification Badges.

      Indeed, Tinder should require women to upload bikini photos so that their weight can be verified!

    2. Re: Women with no makeup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only we could outlaw those stupid filters that put stupid cat ears, anime eyes, and other cheezy childish things onto self portraits.

      Wait about 30 years when they want to show their grandkids their old photos and they cringe at the idiocy of ruining their pictures in the name of being 'cool' or 'trendy'.

  19. Wheelchair-using Tinder users by tepples · · Score: 1

    Particularly when narrowing a search by height might violate Americans with Disabilities Act and foreign counterparts. Does the height of a wheelchair's seat count toward the height of a wheelchair-using Tinder user? Would the system correctly recognize the height of someone like photographer Kevin Michael Connolly or aerialist Jen Bricker?

    1. Re:Wheelchair-using Tinder users by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Americans with Disabilities Act

      I don't think the Act contemplates getting laid with an internet app.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  20. Make-up and boob size by esperto · · Score: 1

    To be fare to both sexes they should introduce a feature to validade photos with no make-up and push-up bras.

    If this is actually a april fool's joke, I look forward to see they do it next year with weight verification for women, including the same corny video showing them puting their weight as 95lb, then 110lb, then 140lb and getting a verification icon. No chance of rabid comments at all, no sir.

    1. Re:Make-up and boob size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is a joke, they won't do what you said next year. Remember, men are the joke. Women are serious business.

  21. Oh...oops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, and by the way? Only 14.5% of the U.S. male population is actually 6' and beyond. So, we're expecting to see a huge decline in the 80% of males on Tinder who are claiming that they are well over 6 feet.

    Oh...you wanted height. I thought you meant length. And I always get my feet and inches signs mixed up. Seriously, who chose 7" to mean feet and 7' to mean inches.

    1. Re:Oh...oops... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Nigel? Is that you?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  22. "reasonable accommodation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You should look up what the ADA actually does.

  23. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verifying that both men and women aren't deranged serial killers, or mentally unbalanced, or unrehabilitated ex-cons, or members of a cult?

    I think this is much more important than how tall they are.

  24. I know that feel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (((They))) have you right where (((they))) want you.
    Don't let (((them))) win. Don't let (((them))) end your life.
    Lift, learn game, and protect your mind from (((talmudic infiltration))).
    I'm cheering for you. Your new journey starts today.

  25. You know exactly that we mean fatasses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And aren't attracted by "thinspiration"

    Yet you *chose* to go off on this stupid strawman rant!

    And you know the best indicator for fatness? If she weighs over 9000 tons!

    Also, excuse me, but I like my girls a bit androgenous! Those badonkadonk ballon tit overstyled plastic women can't even kiss my ass. Totally unattractive. Styling is only another word for LYING!

    But I'm German. And I can see tits just by going to the next park/lake/beach in the summer. So maybe it's a Murican thing.

    1. Re:You know exactly that we mean fatasses! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      And aren't attracted by "thinspiration"

      Yet you *chose* to go off on this stupid strawman rant!

      Exactly. whoever it was didn't appear to have a problem with women demanding men's heights, and even stooped so low as to make weird veiled accusations of impotence.

      Those badonkadonk ballon tit overstyled plastic women can't even kiss my ass. Totally unattractive. Styling is only another word for LYING!

      But I'm German. And I can see tits just by going to the next park/lake/beach in the summer. So maybe it's a Murican thing.

      I know a lot of people, and almost none of them like the bolted on Grapefruit half look - fake boobs women. Only a couple I know like that. And you can spot silicone a mile away. Just some insecure women who thiink they know what men like. And lest we grow too complacent, some are enlarging their buttocks now. Time will not be kind to these ladies.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  26. Weird by Teun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Weird, only 14.5% of US males being over 6'.
    I'm born in 1952 and when I was drafted (1970) the average height of my age was 6'2"...
    (I'm from the Netherlands)
    Still weird because in my youth I was always told about these tall US soldiers that in 1945 came to liberate us.
    What happened between say 1935 and 2019?

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm born in 1952 and when I was drafted (1970) the average height of my age was 6'2"...

      (I'm from the Netherlands)

      The Dutch people are the tallest in the world. . .

    2. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Americans shrank. Our cocks shrank as well, from 10" to 8".

    3. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not weird at all.

      The Netherlands has the highest average height of any country in the world, and is much more genetically homogeneous (77% Dutch/Frisian) than the U.S. It also has had good nutrition with loads of dairy in the diet since the end of WWII. And those tall G.I.s were by and large young, Euro-American farm boys raised on diets of cheap beef, milk, and corn, basically the tallest subset of the American population, whereas the Netherlands went through 7 years of war and poverty, during which its typically shorter Jewish population was annihilated.

      The U.S. now is much more genetically diverse with much larger populations form East Asia and Central America, where heights tend to be lower, and it has a much larger proportion of first generation immigrants who grew up in poverty than the Netherlands. The U.S. also consumes a lot less beef and dairy per capita than it did before the war.

    4. Re: Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Latinos, Filipinos and Asians of all sorts.

    5. Re:Weird by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      What happened between say 1935 and 2019?
      They shrinked.
      Shrunk?
      Shronked?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Weird by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm born in 1952 and when I was drafted (1970) the average height of my age was 6'2"...
      (I'm from the Netherlands)
      Still weird because in my youth I was always told about these tall US soldiers that in 1945 came to liberate us.

      You are quite off, I suspect you did a conversion error: 6'2" is 1.87 cm, when the average height of Dutch men in 1970 was about 1.76 (5'9" - 5'10"). The average height of the Dutch men has been increasing steadily and fast until around 2000, slower now but it is at its highest ever at 1.84m (just over 6ft). They started as the shortest men in the late 19th century (1.60 average), but I cannot find a 1940s figure to quote.
      US men on the other hand seems to have pretty much plateaued in height around 1970 and they were considered among the tallest in the world the further back you go in time. In 1943 specifically the average height of US recruits was 174cm. As I can't tell how that graph goes from the late 19th century's 160cm to the 1970 176cm, I am not sure if the US soldiers would be noticeably taller during WW 2. But I suspect the difference might have been more "psychological" rather than physical.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    7. Re: Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diet changes. Sugar, carbs, vs protein.

    8. Re:Weird by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia says 5' 11" self-reported. Self-reported.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re:Weird by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The stagnant height of US men was likely caused by the lack of universal health care.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    10. Re:Weird by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Well, and poor nutrition, somewhat the same sort of thing as poor health care.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    11. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Influx of short ass immigrants.
      I should know because I'm 2nd gen half white half Indian. I'm 5'9 so not too bad. But damn why are us browns so short?

    12. Re:Weird by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Mexicans.
      The average height of a Mexican woman is under 5'1".

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    13. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is currently like 15% Hispanic and 5% Asian, so of course height is going to be less than the Netherlands where everybody is basically related.

    14. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "6'2" is 1.87 cm"

      No, it's absolutely not...

      Check your units and your notation, you're sloppily confusing/transposing meters and centimeters.

    15. Re: Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We imported millions of Inca and Maya descendents.

    16. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened between say 1935 and 2019?

      A large decline in the proportion of the population that is of white european stock on account of mass immigration of ethnicities with shorter average heights like latinos and asians.

    17. Re: Weird by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      The Dutch in particular are taller than Americans now.
      What happened from 1940 to now?
      1) Europe got actual nutrition
      2) Americans got junk food

      --
      -Styopa
    18. Re:Weird by Teun · · Score: 1

      You have a point, the number I gave might have been for those actually drafted which was only 10% of those available.
      I remember he number of 1.86 m. very well as we had great discomfort fitting in the armoured cars designed in 1956 for the average men of that year.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    19. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, plus poor health and nutrition, and there you go, a nation of stunted losers. Elected Trump, what more do you need to know.

    20. Re:Weird by vrt3 · · Score: 1

      I'm born in 1952 and when I was drafted (1970) the average height of my age was 6'2"...
      (I'm from the Netherlands)

      You are quite off, I suspect you did a conversion error: 6'2" is 1.87 cm, when the average height of Dutch men in 1970 was about 1.76 (5'9" - 5'10")

      He said "the average height of my age", i.e. around 18 years old. Since the average height was (and is) increasing, it is to be expected that the average size of young men is larger than the average size of all men.

      (nitpicking: you mean 1.87 m instead of 1.87 cm)

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
    21. Re:Weird by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well your entire country is below sea level. Your height is nothing more than evolution of a doing mechanism in case the dikes break. ;-)

    22. Re: Weird by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

      Of course OP meant 'drafted' into the National Basketball team!

    23. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.87cm is not a lot. Even smurfs are taller than that!

    24. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a fun disconnect in 'average' and 'median' in the Netherlands. Like officially the average height of men is 1.84 right now. But Dutch life tends to put a lot of us in situations where everyone is pretty much the same height and 1.84 is the lower end of that spectrum. Hence we see our own height as being an average. Basically there's a small group of men bringing the average down significantly. At least that's my working theory.

    25. Re:Weird by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      The US has always lacked universal health care, even when the average height was increasing, so a complete argument needs to include additional factors.

    26. Re:Weird by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Clearly, those tall US soldiers spent the next seven years fucking Dutch women,

    27. Re:Weird by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      However, we are comparing height increase of US to Netherlands. Netherlands has had universal health since 1941. Of course there are other factors, but health care and nutrition are huge ones.

      Not only are Americans getting relatively shorter compared to other developed countries, they are dying younger too. Time to quit the denial.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re:Weird by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      You joke, but there might be some truth to this.

    29. Re:Weird by hawk · · Score: 1

      >You are quite off, I suspect you did a conversion error: 6'2" is 1.87 cm,

      Oh, dear--I'm going to stay *far* away from metric people.

      I'm 6'2", but if I'm turned metric, I'll be turned to the size of a moderate snack for my cats!

      hawk, trembling

    30. Re: Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the figures discussed, e.g. the current 1.84m are all for 18y old men - it's from army statistics.

    31. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's one thing I can say for the 'Imperial' system...I've never gotten inches confused with feet!

      Unlike some people...

  27. just verify penis size and get it over with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should all know by now that height and penis are not related. Look at mushroom dick... (oh if only we had the technology to help insecure men get larger before they became mental cases...)

    It wouldn't be hard (pun intended) to round them to the inch since the bell curve is quite broad 85% would fit within the 6-7 range.

  28. Early April Fool's joke? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    What with it being March 31st I'd say it's just an April Fool's joke that jumped the gun, but from what little I know of Tinder I wouldn't be surprised if it was true.

    If they do this with men, will they also make women post a pic so their weight could be determined? Or would that be atrociously shallow and sexist of me?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Early April Fool's joke? by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      Anyone that goes live with their joke before April 1, UTC should be blacklisted from the news. And judging by the devuan news just posted to slashdot, slashdot itself should be included :(

  29. one day early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one thinking this announcement comes one day early?

  30. But I really am more than 6' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  31. Only 14.5% of the U.S. male population by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Only 14.5% of the U.S. male population is actually 6' and beyond."
    I'm 5' 11" and I know a lot of guys taller than me. Where are all these shorties? Are they including males under 18? Are they including species other than human?

    1. Re: Only 14.5% of the U.S. male population by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Only 14.5% of the U.S. male population is actually 6' and beyond." I'm 5' 11" and I know a lot of guys taller than me. Where are all these shorties? Are they including males under 18? Are they including species other than human?

      Ah, so you struggle to peer over the crowd every time you're stuck in one? Can't see the performer on stage? Missed part of the game because that tall guy in front?

      Oh, that never happens to you? Hope I cleared up your delusions...

  32. Hight you say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dam I thought they ment length. Ah who cares they will figure it out them selves from my pics.

  33. I'm 6 feet long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And she's 6 feet wide.

  34. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    ,CLEANSE `UNI `CLEANSE . GELID us are `CLEANSE `GYPPED .
      . J ; `^ J ; `^ J tot J tot J us are J tot J `J tot J `
      . J ; `^ J ; `^ J tot J us are ; `^ `J tot J `J tot J `
      . J ; `^ J ; `^ J ; `^ GELID us are `J tot J `GYPPED .
      . J ; `^ J ; `^ J us are on J us are J tot J `J . J on
      . J ; `^ J ; `^ J tot J tot J us are J tot J `J on J .
      . J tot UNI tot J ; `^ GELID us are `CLEANSE `J tot J `




    OASES . GERMANE `GERMANE `GERMANE `
    O tot O tot O tot O us are O tot O `
    O us are on O tot O us are O tot O `
    O `KIRI tot O tot OASES on O tot O `
    O tot O tot O tot O us are O tot O `
    O tot O tot O tot O us are O tot O `
    OASES ; `^ O tot O us are GERMANE `


    Like shakespear said, expose thy mammaries or get ye hence. Fie upon tboth they houzes, wanton strumpet!

  35. Height? Try weight by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    They didn’t do weight because women would have thought they were serious and protested in front of their offices.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  36. Woo-hoo! Passed that. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    I really hope they don't require pics or proof of other ..... claimed physical attributes.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  37. Man, that's, like, heightism! by temcat · · Score: 1

    n/t

    1. Re:Man, that's, like, heightism! by Ronin441 · · Score: 1

      It's almost apart-height.

  38. Men lie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently I was talking with a woman I know professionally and she asked me my height. I told her 6'5". She said I must be taller than that as her husband is 6'5".
    I leaned in and let her know her husband is lying. I know my height, and an honest about it.

  39. Seriously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If i have to verify my height, they have to verify breast size. It's only fair.

    Feminism is a response to technology.

    First wave Feminism was a response to rampant alcoholism resulting from gas compression technology that was used in distillery to generate hard alcohol that men used as an escape from hard work and rough living conditions; we got universal sufferage, prohibition, and equal rights from that.

    Second wave feminism was a response to the obsolescance of muscle in manufacturing which was necessitated by the need to make war material for World War Two. We ended up bringing tons of women into the work force over the next few decades under equal pay for equal work regimes, and got for better or worse, the EEOC and Protected Worker classes.

    Third wave feminism is a response to effective contraceptives and social media. Contraceptives take away the risk of having sex, and social media opens up the dating pool which combined with "sexual freedom" produces a situation where women, instead of building up men in a monogamous relationship or working to build a family, decide instead to objectify them through various means and "shop around"; the reality of the situation is they don't know what they want because if they did, whole industries would evaporate overnight. When their sexual capital is exhausted by their late 20's to early 30's they stop looking for Mr Perfect (who never existed anyway) and start looking for Mr Acceptable, who at that point, given he has much to lose and has been burned a few times in epic ways, has a sea of questions. Then they can't "Find a man".

    The only way to win the dating game is to not put yourself on a social media site to be trotted around like cattle. Paid dating services are a better investment.

  40. Re: dating profile translations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    skinny = anorexic
    athletic = normal weight
    overweight = obese
    curvy = morbidly obese

  41. Weight verification feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just stand on your phone so we can measure your weight...

  42. great but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If men required to verify height, women should be forced to remove photo filters and provide full body photos

  43. Obvious Scam For More Data by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    This is an impossible-to-implement feature. They're just trying to get their user base to submit photos of buildings for the sake of selling them off as a source of data for image recognition.

  44. Well yes, but ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... I'm taller lying down.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Well yes, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking forward to the day where Tinder will ask for visual proof that men aren't lying on their... Um... Lying height?

  45. How fake profiles work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've come across a lot of fake profiles. The way they work (for the ones I've seen) is they say they would love to hook up with you, but only if you subscribe to some kind of cam service they are running... thing is I am pretty sure it's not really them, and if you signed up the money would just be gone (never tried to see). Basically there are a lot of ways to scam guys out of money using pictures oft women and all of those scammers are on Tinder, as they are any other dating or hookup medium.

    That's different than women that have profiles on tinder that are not technically fake, it is them, but they are just trying to get instagram followers.

  46. length by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    everyone under 6" to own up to their real length

    --
    Go well
  47. hilarious joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should require strict no makeup policy with verified measurements for women too.

    Only fair.

  48. good 'joke' women. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a bit on the nose eh? This is something only women will find funny... because it's actually not funny unless you're one of the women who are like 'O M G so true lol plz do this k thx lol'

    The thing is there are men who already are automatically left behind because of their height...why is that funny?

  49. Body shape (Check one) by Snufu · · Score: 1

    __ Skinny
    __ Normal
    __ Overweight
    __ Obese
    __ Mobius strip

  50. w00t I am tall by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

    I like being 6 feet tall.

    --
    http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
  51. Bots galore! by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    In my experience the bots match and message you first. Usually with something short and generic like, "hey, how are you?"

    Once you're aware of them, they're pretty easy to spot. There will be a few messages that don't mention anything from your profile and will quickly try to get you to visit some other paid site to view their "real" profile. On sites like OKCupid that let people create detailed profiles you'll notice the bot accounts have only answered the minimum number of questions needed to complete a profile. On sites like Tinder that only allow superficial profiles I'd expect the problem to be much greater.

    1. Re: Bots galore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These bots are very easy to break if you feed them stuff that is unexpected, such as nonsense:

      You: "Are you blinsking at the brouch?"
      Bot: "Yes, I love to blinsking at the brouch"

        I spent quite a bit of time back in the day seeing just how much I can 'break' Eliza-type programs, and I bet these bots are no more advanced than the crap I messed around with decades ago.

    2. Re: Bots galore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Please tell me more about blinsking at the brouch."

  52. "Your Looks and Your Inbox" by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    There's a famous article from an employee at OKCupid about how men and women rank peoples' attractiveness. I'm linking to archive.org, since it seems there's been an attempt to scrub the article from the Internet.

    Your Looks and Your Inbox

    To summarize, mens' attractiveness ratings were found to be distributed according to a normal curve, while womens' ratings skewed to the right; women found 80% of men to be less attractive than average. There is also some data presented showing attractiveness versus messaging rates which help to explain why average looking guys don't hear from many women.

    1. Re:"Your Looks and Your Inbox" by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      There's a famous article from an employee at OKCupid about how men and women rank peoples' attractiveness. I'm linking to archive.org, since it seems there's been an attempt to scrub the article from the Internet.

      Thanks, I had heard about the study, good to finally see it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  53. ADA contemplates public accommodations by tepples · · Score: 1

    The ADA contemplates public accommodations. If an application's publisher fails to make the application accessible to a little person or a congenital amputee, said publisher could be held liable.

    1. Re:ADA contemplates public accommodations by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Dude, you can install a wheelchair ramp at a discotheque but good luck suing the joint because you didn't get laid. I think you are confusing the application with the people who are swiping.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:ADA contemplates public accommodations by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's not about not getting laid. It's about a user not being able to verify the user's height at all when the app tells the user that the photo does not indicate a valid height.

  54. Fine by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    I'll agree to height verification soon as there's weight verification for women. They'll say it's unfair, and it is. Simple solution is to do height and weight verification for everyone or no one.

  55. Fuck your smoker shaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you and your smoker shaming bullshit. Fucking hypocrites, the lot of ya! You just went on why height shaming anf fat shaming are bad and should be done by no one and then proceed to make an exemption for the thing YOU don't like. Die alone, choking on a your cock shaped pillow, you judgmental prick.