I saw it more as "*rocking back and forth with head in hands* this is not happening. this is not happening. this is not happening. this is not happening."
another alternative is MailScanner with any of these AV programs
Sophos, McAfee, F-Prot, Command, Kaspersky, Inoculate, Inoculan, Nod32, F-Secure, Panda, RAV, Antivir, ClamAV, Vscan.
Installs basically as a drop in for exim, Postfix, sendmail and ZMailer.
I've been using this with sendmail and the free for personal use version of F-Prot.
it keeps the (possibly multiple) attached AV scanners updated and has internal support for SpamAssassin.
They've actually saying that the machine decides on win/loss in advance, rather then values
look at this for an example
With this RAM file, the machine is about to spin in a jackpot. If you attempt to gamble the jackpot for the "streak", you will lose. (The number reel will show a 10. If you gamble "Low" it'll spin a 12, if you gamble "High" it'll spin a 9.) Again, this is clearly NOT a gamble, since you have no chance of winning, hence it is fraudulent and illegal.
They never said that, I was assuming they'd use Hydrogen, though.
and there's nothing stopping them from making a trick refill system, stating safety (which'll probably get broken quickly, like the printer refills, but still...)
There's no need to open holes in your relays,
use authentication, either SMTP-AUTH or POP-before-SMTP(nicely transparent to most mail clients).
anyway, is there a real reason not to use the corporate servers?
tail recursion only, IIRC. this has a nice list of optimizations.
and this is just plain interesting. (go look at CiteSeer anyway, lots of interesting CS stuff)
Just checked this, I'm using flash 6 r79 (if anyone cares).
went to Homestar, works perfectly.
I had a problem with the last beta where the animation would stop, though sound kept working, the only way to get rid of it would be to close the tab (which it did slowly).
if Earthlink responds to this legal challenge, they'd be in violation of this Mailblocks patent? A nice merry-go-round.
actually, I think this will only happen if they respond electronically.
well, I'm running it on linux now,
took it about 10 secs to load (I had 21 tabs open:),
seems to be doing anti-aliasing out of the box (I may have set up qt for this sometime in the past).
I think it's actually running faster then on windows, but YMMV.
Re:reverse checking on senders address
on
Spam, Milord
·
· Score: 1
bah, that won't work.
most servers (hopefully, mine at least) don't disclose whether or not a user actually exists.
and it does nothing for joe jobs either.
Re:Puzzles = Waste of CPU cycles?
on
Spam, Milord
·
· Score: 1
why not make human solvable ones?
force the spammers to do a bit of work:)
Slashdot Mirror
I saw it more as "*rocking back and forth with head in hands* this is not happening. this is not happening. this is not happening. this is not happening."
So what the hell is the mace for?
Silly coward, It's for hitting llamas on the head with.
Try not to mix those, tho.
something like this?
another alternative is MailScanner with any of these AV programs
Sophos, McAfee, F-Prot, Command, Kaspersky, Inoculate, Inoculan, Nod32, F-Secure, Panda, RAV, Antivir, ClamAV, Vscan.
Installs basically as a drop in for exim, Postfix, sendmail and ZMailer.
I've been using this with sendmail and the free for personal use version of F-Prot.
it keeps the (possibly multiple) attached AV scanners updated and has internal support for SpamAssassin.
I thought they'd call it "W"...
look at this for an example
they did that, look at the evidence
They never said that, I was assuming they'd use Hydrogen, though.
and there's nothing stopping them from making a trick refill system, stating safety (which'll probably get broken quickly, like the printer refills, but still...)
I'm hoping you don't usually pay your cell company for electricity.
You do pay for both, but they'd prefer you pay them, right?
which is probably what you would go in for, too :)
Obviously the exhaust will go into the safest place possible, in this case the user's pants. :)
Another benefit is that the consumer now needs to regulary pay for the fuel,
thus creating a constant source of income for the companies
Shouldn't that be arcticle? :)
There's no need to open holes in your relays,
use authentication, either SMTP-AUTH or POP-before-SMTP(nicely transparent to most mail clients).
anyway, is there a real reason not to use the corporate servers?
tail recursion only, IIRC.
this has a nice list of optimizations.
and this is just plain interesting. (go look at CiteSeer anyway, lots of interesting CS stuff)
misspelled, goes to some porn site, bah. should be this
Also mirrored, please don't kill me :)
PDF, zip and bzip2
Just checked this, I'm using flash 6 r79 (if anyone cares).
went to Homestar, works perfectly.
I had a problem with the last beta where the animation would stop, though sound kept working,
the only way to get rid of it would be to close the tab (which it did slowly).
if Earthlink responds to this legal challenge, they'd be in violation of this Mailblocks patent? A nice merry-go-round.
actually, I think this will only happen if they respond electronically.
*gets sued*
well, I'm running it on linux now, :),
took it about 10 secs to load (I had 21 tabs open
seems to be doing anti-aliasing out of the box (I may have set up qt for this sometime in the past).
I think it's actually running faster then on windows, but YMMV.
bah, that won't work. most servers (hopefully, mine at least) don't disclose whether or not a user actually exists.
and it does nothing for joe jobs either.
why not make human solvable ones? :)
force the spammers to do a bit of work