and consequently after thi post, my router takes a big shit.
bah.
glad i have a week off from school, finally have some time to sort through a buncha ol' ISA nics and see which ones are good so I can get a decent (suse 8.2 laugh if you will) set up.
but nonetheless, yahoo's search page (html alone) weighs in at 6753 bytes, while google's page comes in at about half that at 3736 bytes
yahoo's graphics total up 5114 bytes, google at 8558 bytes.
totals: yahoo= 11,867 (11k) google=12294 (12k)
ok, so to all those argue about what page is bigger, think again.
Now, I'm all about google, and load times dont really bother me, being on dsl, and google's main page never leaving my cache.
Google's search definately feels fast and returns.
Yahoo's search actually doesn't even work for me. In fact, I've been getting a lot of bungled links lately from yahoo.com. Many of their pages have wrong, or extra info in the url links. I experience this in IE and Mozilla. Anyone else?
Slashdot Mirror
actually, check the "What's new or Updated" link
;oP
here for the lazy.
says the win2k guide updated next month
5-Mar-03
and yes, the cisco guide is a bit old at 10-feb-03 and the xp guide even older at 6-feb-03(my b-day!)
and i think a lot of people out there that have to maintain Microsoft servers, so this may be advantageous to someone...
please mod parent down.
he is grossly wrong.
amd speed ratings have nothing to do with intel.
not food for thought considering you don't know what you are talking about.
oh come on.
;o)
;oP
with an id that low, you should have a custom pvr, at least two!
you naysayer!
may your geek status be revoked, please turn over your password now.
just kidding
good to see someone use common sense
god, i hope they don't base anything off the UPS.
they've bunged up so many deliveries it's not even funny.
could you imagine if the were in charge of geting you from point A to B at light speed or greater?
chances are probably good that you would arrive, but not in your normal operating condition.
yes. this is sarcasm.
don't know if it was your intended point or not (i'm guessing it is) but that's what I was thinking.
Pretty much every trend or period of growth eventually hits its peak growth rate and starts to level off.
This isn't anything special...and not surprising at all.
so much for that high-speed line ;oP
actually...i've had a couple mirrors up the past week or two
most notably, the floppy enterprise article, which the original host had taken down.
only real downtime i've ad was when my router needed a reboot, and when i lost power to the house.
i have ot lost internet access at all.
and now, im kind of expecting too.
my machine should be able to take the load ok - 2xp3 933's.
if you havent seen it...
/. effect.
click here
i feel im about to suffer the
soeaking for intel
on my 2x933's with a radeon 9000, it plays absolutely great
i cant wait.
and consequently after thi post, my router takes a big shit.
bah.
glad i have a week off from school, finally have some time to sort through a buncha ol' ISA nics and see which ones are good so I can get a decent (suse 8.2 laugh if you will) set up.
thats funny, on my ADSL, i've had pretty much non-stop hits since the floppy enterprise article, and it's never seemed to slow my downstream rate.
/.'d"
and i have have some pictures on my site, as well as in some of the articles mirrored
Maybe he did it for bragging rights.
"Hey man, i got
the ladies love that.
ill mirror what you have ;o)
right here.
yea
;o)
;oP
there's some people that are always willing to host a mirror.
i'm one, i like to see just how much traffic i can take
my site addy is up there...lol, im going to go knock on wood now
at least tux isnt an intrusive, annoying lil motherfucker.
this from happening.
can they really be blamed?
yah know
not only does this post deserve to be modded as funny, but as insightfull as well
what the hell were they thinking with those huge pictures?
even the normal ones were quite easy to make out on my 19" @ 1600x1200
i was expecting to see some sample images or something...
lil late
but here is one anyways.
clicky
(and yes, i know it displays incorrectly...deal with it)
have it in their cache? ;o)
ill gladly put up a mirror...someone send me the files
another for good measure.
mirror
bah, cursed be the preview/submit buttons.
;o)
Google's search definately feels fast and returns.
was to finish...
Google's search definately feels fast, and reutrns results nice and quick. I love that they include the search time
(use preview this time
thats cause you probably loaded it 5 minutes ago.
but nonetheless, yahoo's search page (html alone)
weighs in at 6753 bytes, while google's page comes in at about half that at 3736 bytes
yahoo's graphics total up 5114 bytes, google at 8558 bytes.
totals: yahoo= 11,867 (11k) google=12294 (12k)
ok, so to all those argue about what page is bigger, think again.
Now, I'm all about google, and load times dont really bother me, being on dsl, and google's main page never leaving my cache.
Google's search definately feels fast and returns.
Yahoo's search actually doesn't even work for me. In fact, I've been getting a lot of bungled links lately from yahoo.com. Many of their pages have wrong, or extra info in the url links. I experience this in IE and Mozilla. Anyone else?
also yahoo's spam blocking works pretty well too, the provide you with a nice spam folder you get to empty every now and again.
and the ability to add emails that made it through the filter to their db is nice too...
good coders don't
;o)
we dint have a bavkspCE key.
something about this is just wrong.
yes somewhow, it seems to be sickly intriguing.
damn.
i must be a geek.
well, being a hotmail user, im sure you wont notice the minor flood, given what you probably already deal with...