Slashdot Mirror


How to Make a Starship Enterprise out of a 3.5" Floppy

Wow, there is absolutely nothing good to post in the bin today, so you get to enjoy this little gem: Here are some simple instructions for making an Enterpris from a 3.5" floppy disk. Remember those? Before CDRWs cost next to nothing? Thanks to Ant for digging this one up. Update Removed the link when the original content was removed.

491 comments

  1. Haha by captainclever · · Score: 4, Funny

    An honest post if ever i saw one.

    That's about all floppy disks are good for anyway :)

    --
    Last.fm - join the social music revolution
    1. Re:Haha by websaber · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mayby the reason there's nothing to post is because people have stopped submitting stories. What's the use, they are always rejected anyway? 90% of posted stories are from the editorial staff. It's their right for creating such a amazing site but don't be suprised if people stop submitting/

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    2. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not true! Floppies contain little pieces of soft paper that are *great* for wiping glasses (and you just know you are not a real nerd if you don't wear glasses!).

  2. umm... by caino59 · · Score: 4, Funny

    something about this is just wrong.

    yes somewhow, it seems to be sickly intriguing.

    damn.

    i must be a geek.

    1. Re:umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      something about this is just wrong.

      Not only is it wrong, it's downright illegal and violates the DMCA to do this. You're circumventing a copy write-protection device (the plastic case and tab). Nyuk nyuk nyuk. I'm here all week, try the veal.

  3. Light and sound... by Crasoum · · Score: 4, Funny

    The enterprise may go at light speed.

    But the grinding of the server's harddrives as we slashdot them only travels at the speed of sound
    Cheers

    1. Re:Light and sound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Enterprise went much faster than the speed of light.

    2. Re:Light and sound... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      Here is what is currently up on site: "Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to..."

      Heh.....

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    3. Re:Light and sound... by roseblood · · Score: 1

      You know the instant a mirror is set up a lawyer will begin writing the letter about violating the author's IP. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    4. Re:Light and sound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slahshdot could and should simply contact the author of a site, explaining that they would like to link to it, particularly when it's probably a personal web page, or the like. Being on the recieving end of a Slashdot linking is a little like being on the recieving end of a DDoS.

      Authors could would have essentially three options:

      1. Ask slashdot not link at all.
      2. Ask slashdot to mirror the site for a limited amount of time, then link to it for the archives.
      3. Give slashdot the ok to link.

      Some of the articles would take longer to appear that way, but at least slashdot wouldn't be putting out a DDoS on people for no other reason than they have something interesting on their web page.

      As the slashdot editors know full well that it the slashdot effect is a distinct possibility, it could easily be argued that even linking from slashdot's main page constitutes (at a minimum) an act of neglegence. At a maximum, a lawyer could possibly argue that there was malice aforethought.

      Slashdot, could easily be responsible for lost revenue for the two to three days that the server gets hammered. I know that if I were on the jury, I would have a hard time being convinced that the editors had no way of predicting what would happen, particularly given this

      The excuses in the faq are IMNSHO lame, and would be further evidence that there was direct knowledge of the potential for problems, solutions were discussed, and rejected.

      The slashdot crew needs to take a good long look at what they are doing, then count themselves lucky that they haven't been sued out of existence.

  4. Coasters? by pacc · · Score: 0

    My CD-R produces a lot of coasters,
    can they be used for some thing less useful than coasters...

    1. Re:Coasters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that a question? Questions usually end with a question mark.

    2. Re:Coasters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pop one in the microwave for about 10-15sec. You'll get a cool lightshow AND a much more attracive coaster.

    3. Re:Coasters? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this harm the Microwave oven though?

    4. Re:Coasters? by gmack · · Score: 1

      I have yet to have a microwaved harmed by tossing a cd into it. I've done it a lot since it makes some cool sparks and a sweet looking pattern on the cd though.

      It's also a good way of freaking out coworkers.

    5. Re:Coasters? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      Set the oven for 'warp' factor 9.

  5. Mirror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hey you two people who actually got to see the page, rip that thing out of your web cache and share it please.

    1. Re:Mirror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 minutes for the ./ing ... oh my, what has the world come to.

    2. Re:Mirror! by manonthespoon · · Score: 2

      This is what you see when you visit there site...

      "Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to..."

      I feel so awful, since I didn't link to the site...

      Oh wait...

    3. Re:Mirror! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Troll

      THEIR

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:Mirror! by pboulang · · Score: 1

      He meant "that there" ;)

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    5. Re:Mirror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no no THERE as in
      dat der site... duuuuuuuuh.

  6. Meh.. by fadeaway · · Score: 5, Funny

    Call me when we can make a Death Star out of a roll of CAT 5.

    1. Re:Meh.. by Fulkkari · · Score: 5, Funny
      Call me when we can make a Death Star out of a roll of CAT 5.

      You should have told earlier. I already used all of my CAT 5 when building C-3PO.

      --
      I demand the Cone of Silence!
    2. Re:Meh.. by Lost+Dragon · · Score: 1

      My router closet has had the 'death star' hanging out of the ceiling for years.

    3. Re:Meh.. by b0bd0bbs · · Score: 1

      My coworker came into work today with a cat-o-nine tails whip made out of CAT5 cables. Sweetness...

  7. Just in case... by c_g_hills · · Score: 5, Informative

    the site is slashdotted, I have put up a mirror at

    chaz6.com/enterprise/

    1. Re:Just in case... by brejc8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And I collected these mirrors.

    2. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheers :D

    3. Re:Just in case... by Otter · · Score: 4, Informative

      ..and the original page now says, in its entirety, "SLASHDOT SUCKS" so you may want to rely on the mirrors!

    4. Re:Just in case... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      yeah, THAT makes a lot of sense - everything that's connected to the internet should now be capable of handling the typical load of news.bbc.co.uk?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:Just in case... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Thanks. All I got from the original like was this snippy little tirade:

      "Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to..."

      Dang, exactly how much does a slashdotting punish a server these days?

    6. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there goes that site.

    7. Re:Just in case... by greggish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering the steady decline in the quality and quantity of posts here, the answer is probably... Alot less than it used to.

    8. Re:Just in case... by duckpoopy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What a bunch of babies. Perhaps they don't want google to link to them either.

      --
      word.
    9. Re:Just in case... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well it's not our fault that they don't know to use 16-color GIFs instead of JPGs when it's all a bunch of flood-filled line art! I mean, FURRFU!

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    10. Re:Just in case... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Don't you love it when a website gets traffic and says
      "DON'T LOOK AT US! STEAL OUR STUFF INSTEAD!"

    11. Re:Just in case... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 5, Insightful
      WHY DID THEY PUT IT ON THE INTERNET IF THEY ONLY WANTED A FEW PEOPLE TO SEE IT?

      This is just idiotic. You have to realize that not everyone who puts up a website expects to have that kind of traffic. Nor should they. The other aspect to this is the folks who put up a website that may have some appeal on Slashdot, but don't really realize that. Maybe they are hosting it on an NT4 Workstation running Personal Web Services. Should they be expected to be able to withstand the onslaught of a Slashdotting? Do we ask the people who put flyers on cars in parking lots to publish on four color glossies? Would we expect them to? No. This is no different. Slashdot needs to consider these things. They should first ASK a site if it's OK to post their URL. Slashdot should then offer sites that WANT Slashdot exposure, but may not have the bandwidth or hardware to support a Slashdotting, the option of caching their site. All of this could be done very easily if the folks at Slashdot were to create an internal Slashdot site for themselves where they just point and click for this to be an automatic process.

      And for all you idiots who keep ripping on CmdrTaco for not being a "journalist"... get a fucking clue. Slashdot has NOTHING to do with journalism. It's basically a very advanced blog. That's it. They can't be held to any journalistic standards or accountability ebcause they are not a news source. That would be like asking a company who puts out a newsletter to fact check everything before it goes out to the staff. NO COMPANY truly does this. So to all you people who cry about journalistic integrity: get fucked.

    12. Re:Just in case... by eht · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't dump 500,000 people onto them all on one day.

      Rough estimate based on you being user number 585203 I think it's not too unreasonable to assume a number of people who preceded you no longer go to slashdot but a number of people who don't have account will either visit or be told by friends.

    13. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe they are hosting it on an NT4 Workstation running Personal Web Services.

      Ohhh, so they wanted to be cracked not /.'d. It's all suddenly so clear! ;)

    14. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GIFs??? Good god man, don't you know that this is Slashdot? Burn your GIFs and use PNG!!!

    15. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't be held to any journalistic standards or accountability ebcause they are not a news source.
      /me looks at the upper left-hand corner of his screen. /me reads the slogan: "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters."

      Hmmm

    16. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you look like a retard when you type "/me". It's not funny. It says news because that is what the blog is about, news that may intrest nerds.

    17. Re:Just in case... by btlzu2 · · Score: 1

      Oh praise all that's holy. If one more IRC fuck-stick uses /me again I'm gonna hunt them down and bitch-slap them. Also, total agreeance (Fred Durst-ism) on the whole Slashdot experience. People need to learn to appreciate Slashdot for what it's for: a cool web site to discuss interesting topics for geeky type folks. Nothing more, nothing less. It's still a valuable site, just in a different way.

      --
      Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
    18. Re:Just in case... by rhaig · · Score: 1

      the guy didn't have to be such an ass about it.

      He might have put up a page that said "woah, too much traffic. find mirrors at......

      but no....

      --
      "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
    19. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't forget -- most web hosting services have a download BW restriction -- and start chaging quite a bit more after the first GB or so per month. I doubt everyone who puts a web page up expects a $500 hosting bill as a result of slashdotting, when the base rate if $25/month.

    20. Re:Just in case... by Ponty · · Score: 1

      GIFs rule! If my image is over a K, I don't want it!

      When IE supports PNGs properly, I'll go all-PNG (which would tickle my turtle.)

    21. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is just idiotic. You have to realize that not everyone who puts up a website expects to have that kind of traffic. Nor should they.

      Hey, if they don't want their site to be linked to, then they can take it offline.

    22. Re:Just in case... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you advertise a garge sale, and I write about in in my column, and 10,000 people show up, is it my fault? no.

      If you can't have enough sense to create a webpage that detects a spike in visits, and handles it approprietly, then tough tits.

      Should CNN mirrors sites it talks about?

      what happens to reporting if people have to ask before they can report something. If you are driving a hot pink cadilac, do I have to ask you before I point and laugh at you with my friends?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:Just in case... by ankleteeth · · Score: 1

      luckily i am not on one of those evil monthly traffic bandwidth limited deals, feel free to /. my ass, but my server will probably still die nonetheless

    24. Re:Just in case... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "create a webpage that detects a spike..."

      mod_tribble?

    25. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you're not on a bandwidth limited deal, why does the website you link to have as the first article a post about 200MB per month only?

    26. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you won't use PNG because IE doesn't support some of the more esoteric features like transparency? Grow up. IE would load these images fine if they were PNG.

    27. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, the guy's an ass, but the slashdot crowd are just saints in blue jeans.

    28. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for all you idiots who keep ripping on CmdrTaco for not being a "journalist"... get a fucking clue. Slashdot has NOTHING to do with journalism.

      Yeah, except these retards consider THEMSELVES journalists, when they don't even understand simple concepts like 'spell-checking', 'fact-checking' or 'integrity'.

      Rob Malda even sees Slashdot as "a superset of journalism"

      What we really have is a couple of guys who thought to themselves "Boy, I'd like to be called a journalist, but I don't want to do any actual work and English was too damn hard in the first grade, so lets start our own version of 'journalism' without any of that pesky 'ethics' or 'intelligence' crap".

    29. Re:Just in case... by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      IE doesn't support PNGs properly, but it's just missing some of the more advanced features. As a replacement for GIFs, IE supports PNGs fine, they just don't support things like Alpha Channels or 16 bit transparencies (thought 256 color transparencies seem to work fine, so it's no loss over GIFs).

      Yeah, there's bits of the standard IE doesn't support, which sucks, but with the exception of animation, there's nothing GIFs can do in IE that PNGs can't.

    30. Re:Just in case... by ankleteeth · · Score: 1

      If you read a bit more carefully you will notice that the 200MB limitation is a service my website offers for its free subdomains, not the actuall sites limitation itself

    31. Re:Just in case... by delstar+dotstar · · Score: 1

      For an idea of the Slashdot effect, check out these stats for a site linked to by this article last December. Scroll down to Week 49.

      The stats probably aren't overly accurate because they're generated by a web-based tracker, but you get the idea.

    32. Re:Just in case... by jemartin · · Score: 1

      The site owners deserve a slashdotting for dissing /.

      Oh, wait...

      It was a preemptive strike!

    33. Re:Just in case... by Ouroboro · · Score: 1

      If you can't have enough sense to create a webpage that detects a spike in visits, and handles it approprietly, then tough tits.

      OK. I'll bite. Would you mind expounding on how one might go about creating a webpage that detects a spike in visits and handles it appropriatly? I mean I've been doing web development for a while now, and I don't think I've heard of any way of making a person's piddly little vanity web page immune to the slashdot effect. Oh I'm sure that you could do a lot of things to make the server robust, and you could buy more bandwidth from your isp, or you could purchase a colo'd server to host the page on, but do you really think that is a reasonable thing for a person to do?

      --
      When I want your opinion I will beat it out of you.
    34. Re:Just in case... by Ponty · · Score: 1

      Actually, the reason I don't use PNGs isn't because of transparency (that would be nice, but can be approximated.) The reason I don't use it is because the color matching is shit. I can define a color that's the same as my background and it just won't match if it's a PNG. Fine in most browsers, not IE. So I have to have _either_ transparency _or_ reasonable background color matching.

      Check out this page: (http://paralytic.buyclamsonline.com/comparison.ht ml)

      The background color is #555577 and there are two square images filled with the same color (as per Photoshop.) They were saved as a 2 bit GIF and a 24 bit PNG with all the normal settings using the "Save For Web" function.

      In Safari on the Mac, the images can't be seen. Same with OmniWeb. IE on the Mac has the PNG is slightly darker (and is obvious). With IE on the PC, the PNG is slightly lighter than the background and is still obvious.

      Like I said, give me transparency or make it so I can make the PNG the same color as the background, but give me one of them!

    35. Re:Just in case... by Ponty · · Score: 1

      See my response to the previous responder. GIFs can present their colors reliably in IE. I can work around anything as long as I can know for sure that the colors in the picture are going to match the colors I specify in the HTML.

    36. Re:Just in case... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      And /. is blameless? Fuck no. His statement got discussion going on /. which is a hell of a lot more effective than your idea. He would prefer /. never do this to anyone again without permission. He is not interested in diverting the /. effect, he wants it controlled.

    37. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be a case of the pot calling the kettle black.. but guess what?? the goddamn kettle is black!!

    38. Re:Just in case... by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but I think what ever app was used to create the PNG is just broken. The PNG is just as visible to me in Mozilla (worse, actually). I'm running WinXP. I use Paint Shop Pro for my graphics, instead of Photoshop.When I open the existing files in PSP, they match the background of the HTML page, and PSP even reports that the hex values are 555577.

      But when I create a NEW file from PSP using the same color (555577), and insert it into HTML, it just works. In both IE and Mozilla. Very strange. This sounds more like a problem with Photoshop than IE or PNG, but I think it's clear that something, somewhere is very worng here. But I don't think it's something that can't be fixed by just checking to make sure things work in the real world.

      If you'd like to see an example, click here.

    39. Re:Just in case... by Ponty · · Score: 1

      Is the center one the new file from PSP?

      That is fascinating. Being a progressive guy I trued to use PNG, but when I started doing web design where such things as colors matching each other mattered, it just didn't work out between us. If the implementation in Photoshop is broken, that really sucks. (A quick google search for "photoshop png implementation produces a replacement for Photoshop's PNG library [http://www.fnordware.com/] downloading now. Success report at the end of the post.)

      The unfortunate thing is that if the problem really does lie with Photoshop, most people will probably not go to PNG until it's fixed. As I do all my art preparation in Photoshop (even my vector art is rasterized and prepared for output/posting there), I don't really want to add another step to my workflow just to accomodate PNG. I'm comfortable enough with a combination of GIF and JPEG until there is a reliable Photoshop implementation of the standard. That plus I don't fully trust IE to do transparency until I see it a lot on other people's sites :-)

      Plugin installed.

      Strangely, the PNG that I made that you re-saved with PHP is broken in Safari for me where the one that I created only breaks IE. It works fine in Safari and Gecko-based browsers and OmniWeb.

      Strangely (http://paralytic.buyclamsonline.com/comparison.ht ml), it's even worse with the plugin. It's late, I'm tired, I give up. Maybe more of this tomorrow.

    40. Re:Just in case... by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      Your problem is with PNG gamma. I sent an email to you explaining the problem. Hope you received it.

    41. Re:Just in case... by Dahan · · Score: 1
      The reason http://paralytic.buyclamsonline.com/image.png doesn't match the background properly is because it claims to have a gamma value of 0.55, whereas the file created in PSP doesn't specify any gamma value at all. I don't use Photoshop, so I have no idea what options it has when saving PNGs--do you see any way to have it not put in a gamma value?

      BTW, I couldn't get the PNG on your page to match the background no matter which browser I used... I tried Mozilla, Safari, OmniWeb, and IE under MacOS X; and Mozilla and IE under Windows XP. Whereas PyroMosh's PNG matches the background on all the above except for Safari (which points to a bug in Safari's gamma handling... it's still beta, after all).

      Since you mention Safari, you're running MacOS (X), which has its own gamma setting... Go to the Displays prefs panel, Color tab. What do you have your monitor's gamma set to?

    42. Re:Just in case... by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1
      Wow. That page is just sick.

      although they do play my favorite song ever:

      Xploding Plastix - Treat me mean, I need the reputation.

      And I just attended their concert on saturday. Now that was cool in an obscure way.

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
    43. Re:Just in case... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It's based on referrer information. Pasting the URL into a blank window gets the old page.

    44. Re:Just in case... by eyeye · · Score: 1

      Hey, you are one of those cutting edge web guys who looks after porn sites!

      I'd heard it said porn sites lead as far as the web goes and I'm starting to believe it. /awestruck mode off.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    45. Re:Just in case... by dcsmith · · Score: 1
      If you advertise a garge sale, and I write about in in my column, and 10,000 people show up, is it my fault? no.

      Well of course its your fault. They wouldn't have come if you hadn't built it. The REAL question is "Do you have a right to complain about it?" The answer's still yes, but only because you can complain (or sue) about nearly anything. We can just choose to ignore you.

      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
  8. Nothing good to post??? by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, there is absolutely nothing good to post in the bin today

    It's not like that's ever stopped them before. Heck, they could always post a dupe.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Nothing good to post??? by sebi · · Score: 1
      It's not like that's ever stopped them before. Heck, they could always post a dupe.

      Thanks to a glimpse into the mysterious future I know that he nearly did. This story was about to give a repeat performance. Someone must have warned him...

    2. Re:Nothing good to post??? by sqlrob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why post a dupe? There's lot's of good stuff out there, like the new evil bit in TCP/IP.

    3. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but when the main story is located at "asciipr0n.com" things have hit a new low.

      --

      "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    4. Re:Nothing good to post??? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, there is absolutely nothing good to post in the bin today

      It's not like that's ever stopped them before. Heck, they could always post a dupe.

    5. Re:Nothing good to post??? by nullard · · Score: 5, Interesting
      From the submit story page: grousing about rejected submissions is Offtopic and usually gets moderated that way.

      From the story: Wow, there is absolutely nothing good to post in the bin today

      It can't be offtopic now.

      There was something good in the bin:
      * 2003-04-04 17:19:21 Oregon Law Would Jail War Protesters as Terrorists (yro,usa) (rejected)

      Since it's a slow news day, you might want to read that article in my journal:

      Oregon is considering a law that would label protestors who disrupt traffic as terrorists. They would face 25 to life. So much for freedom of assembly. According to the article even the police union is opposed to this one.

      read more
      --


      t'nera semordnilap
    6. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Pii · · Score: 1
      I didn't read the story, but I'd heard about it elsewhere...

      People can protest all they want, but when they disrupt traffic, and potentially disrupt emergency services, such as Police, Fire Department, or Ambulance traffic, they've definately crossed the line.

      25 to life? Harsh perhaps, but if their actions cost someone their life, because a house burned down, or Paramedics couldn't get to the scene to help someone, maybe 25 years is reasonable.

      You still have the right of assembly... Just don't try to assemble in the middle of a busy intersection. Most people wouldn't need to be told that.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    7. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Com2Kid · · Score: 0
      From the article

      • "Right now a group of people can get together and go downtown and block a freeway," Larson said. "You need a tool to deal with that."


      Tool: LISTEN TO THE DAMN PEOPLE YOU FUCKTARD.

    8. Re:Nothing good to post??? by ceejayoz · · Score: 0

      Well, how does a law to jail war protesters who are interfering with public services have anything to do with "Your Rights Online" or "News for Nerds"?

      Maybe that's why it got rejected, eh?

    9. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • You still have the right of assembly... Just don't try to assemble in the middle of a busy intersection.
      • Most people wouldn't need to be told that.


      Yes, because assembling in the middle of a SIDE STREET where NOBODY CAN SEE YOU just SOOO effectively gets the message across. /sarcasm

    10. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • Well, how does a law to jail war protesters who are interfering with public services have anything to do with "Your Rights Online" or "News for Nerds"?


      News for Nerds. Our rights being fucked in the ass.

      I like being aware.
    11. Re:Nothing good to post??? by nullard · · Score: 1

      I don't know what it has to do with YRO, but that is where many other articles about freedom in general have gone. PolSci nerds are no less nerds than CompSci nerds. I'm proud to be both. Don't descriminate in nerddom. In any case, this is definately "Stuff that matters."

      --


      t'nera semordnilap
    12. Re:Nothing good to post??? by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      Why do you consider assembling in the street your only option?

      After all, pissing off people is a GREAT way to turn them to your cause.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    13. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're a tool.

      You're going to cave in to every bunch of oingo boingos who takes your roads hostage?

      Fine, I'm going downtown in your city - between your home and your office - to sit in traffic with my friends. WE're protesting being poor. We want a million dollars and a new iBook. Each. And until we get it, we'll block traffic. We're assembling peacefully. We're protesting government policies that maintain social inequality.

      So you better listen to the damn people. You fucktard.

    14. Re:Nothing good to post??? by perljon · · Score: 1

      That's right. any time some 'fucktard' blocks traffic, vandalizes property, or causes complete maham, we should turn around and do what they say.

      Only in a military dominated dictatorship does the minority make the rules. The United States is a Democratic Republic. We have a process in which to 'listen to the damn people.' It's called elections. That's different from shutting down a city or country until the government does what you want. As long as their is a process in which the majority's voice gets heard, the minority's attempt to change things through violence and disruption is along the same lines of a military enfourcing the rules of a dictator. (less severe granted, but definately in the same direction.)

      The majority rules, and the minority has the right to try and change the mines of people. However, it does not have the right to cause mass violence or economic hardship. We the people have already formed a government in which our voices can be heard in non-violent ways. Attempts to undermine this organization with with ways other than voting, working through your representatives, or peaceful non-disruptive protest is an assult on democracy, the will of the people, and the American way and should be dealt with accordingly.

      --
      This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
    15. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Even so, the majority is sometimes WRONG. Especially when there's information that the leaders have that they can't release to the general public. (and even if they did, "oh they're just making it up! they're lying! no one has weapons! no one wants to hurt me! lalalalala! ooh, look, a butterfly!")

      Imagine three kids and two parents voting on a trip to the dentist.

    16. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but think this through.

      Blocking an intersection already *is* a crime (although police are usually somewhat lenient during protests). Throwing acid in the face of a cop is a crime. Slashing tires on cars is a crime. Breaking windows is a crime. acid-etching a store window is a crime. Spray painting/vandalism is a crime.

      So why the need to label them as terrorists? JUST ENFORCE THE LAWS THAT ALREADY EXIST.

      Trust me, I hate those whiney fucking little granola eating protest mother fuckers as much as the next guy, but I don't want to live in a police state where you are given more severe penalties for crimes just because you perform them as a political act of protest.

    17. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Ponty · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard about this. Has it been on any news services?

    18. Re:Nothing good to post??? by ChadN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are existing laws to deal with the trespass and obstruction, and existing civil and probably criminal penalties to deal with the damages caused to others by your actions. I don't support people shutting down freeways (I think it is generally counter-productive for any cause seeking to win people over), but those people are not necessarily terrorists. Whoever introduced this bill should be bitch-slapped, and not re-elected.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    19. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Ponty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is way offtopic, but I'll bite.

      We're going on and on as a country about just how crappy it is to live in other countries, with just cause.

      But when did we get so damned coddled as a country that stopping our SUVs from getting through a street is the worst thing that can happen to us? I've been listening to some of the counter-protestors on my campus, and they seem to be the most thin-skinned reactionaries I have ever met. I'm not an avid anti-war person (though I oppose it), but I'd be embarrassed to be associated with group of people who can't think of anything more threatening to their daily lives than the possibility of blocked traffic.

      The notion that the blocking of traffic endangers people through the blocking of emergency services is specious. Plenty of things block traffic a lot more often than protests do -- road work, parades, weather. Are those terrorism?

    20. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you've never heard of a sidewalk...

    21. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • Why do you consider assembling in the street your only option?


      The idea is to let the GOVERNMENT know your position. Sitting in front of town hall: Good. Sitting in front of your lawn: Stupid.
    22. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rephrase. Why do you consider assembling in the ROAD, where the CARS ARE, the only opinion.

    23. Re:Nothing good to post??? by rossifer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, it's pretty much strawman central at your place isn't it?

      Only in a military dominated dictatorship does the minority make the rules. The United States is a Democratic Republic.

      Actually, we're not. As you may or may not have learned in 9th grade civics, the US is a Constitutionally Limited Republic, precisely to prevent the majority from making rules that screw over an unpopular minority.

      We have a process in which to 'listen to the damn people.' It's called elections.

      In your little world, I'm sure that's how change always happens. However, that's only one way in which the populace can effect change. Remember little things like the Boston Tea Party? That involved disrupting the operations of a major shipping port. Perhaps another tiny little non-electon event called the American Revolution? At some point, the populace may wake up and find that their "representatives" are not. The votes in the houses of government already bought and paid for by corporate interests successfully buying legislation to keep money exactly where it is and out of your pockets.

      When the choice presented at election time is between two individuals who have already sold their integrity to the highest bidder, other means of expressing dissatisfaction are needed.

      That's different from shutting down a city or country until the government does what you want.

      Your inability to get a super double latte caffiene injection at the Starbucks of your choice and having to go around three blocks does not constitute "shutting down a city". Hyperbole won't help your argument any more than the strawmen you've been erecting.

      However, it [the minority] does not have the right to cause mass violence or economic hardship.

      That's a couple of rather disparate items to be throwing into the same list. I mean, it's almost as if you're equating your personal inconvenience with violence. Do you know anything about the protests you're objecting to? The only time I've heard of there being violence is when some group of your "correct thinking" friends picks a fight with them. You'd do better to object to the cost of those lattes that you're unable to get from your favorite chain shop than the protestors preventing you from getting there.

      The "American Way" that you so jingoistically claim to defend *is* the first amendment, where protest, including protests that block traffic and shut down freeways is very much a part of. At some point, my only remaining observation to a nimrod like yourself is that if you really want a police state where those annoying people complaining about things below your radar don't get to interfere with your day-to-day life, why don't you move to China where they've already got all of that?

      Personally, I'd prefer the US moved the other way, i.e. get rid of Tom Ridge and his neo-police state Homeland Defense organization. Put more limitations on the police in reaction to new technologies instead of less. But there isn't anyone on the ballot who represents that view, is there? So I guess that exhausts all of my options according to you...

      Regards,
      Ross

    24. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > police are usually somewhat lenient during potests

      > I don't want to live in a police state where you are given more severe penalties for crimes just because you perform them as a political act of protest.

      I don't want to live in a state where crimes are ignored because they're performed as an act of protest.

    25. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't support people shutting down freeways... but those people are not necessarily terrorists.

      They're interfering with a public service for the purpose of a political/ideological agenda. That's fairly close to terrorism according to dictionary.com.

    26. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • Only in a military dominated dictatorship does the minority make the rules.


      Of course. But how do you KNOW the majorities opinions? What if it is a time critical matter that cannot WAIT until the next election period? Protesting is one assured way to make the full force of public opposition to something heard. 10,000 letters can be dismissed, but ten thousand people gathering in every major city in a country is a DARNED effective way to get a message across.

      • The United States is a Democratic Republic. We have a process in which to 'listen to the damn people.' It's called elections.


      Which, as stated, is ONLY effective on a every so many year basis. Protests are a GREAT way to get the point across that this ONE PARTICULAR issue is one that is NOT going to be forgotten when the next election session rolls around.

      • That's different from shutting down a city or country until the government does what you want.


      Going out in the streets for a day shouting out slogans is HARDLY the same thing.

      Rallies and Protests have been used in the United States since almost the beginning of our nation, and who the hell are we to go about saying that just because they INCONVENIENCE us that they should not be allowed?

      Medical Services should be rerouted around the problem. Now if some dick heads stand in the WAY of an ambulance, then yah, charge them, but as a terrorist? What the hell? MOTIVE here people MOTIVE. They may be a dumb ass, but they aren't spraying us with anthrax.

      Hell the very fact that they are OUT THERE PROTESTING shows that they CARE about the nation. GOOD FREAKING IDEA, jail the LAST FEW CITIZENS WHO CARE ABOUT THIS NATION.

      Briliant, really smart idea there. . . .

      • However, it does not have the right to cause mass violence or economic hardship.


      Of course not, and there are ALREADY EXISTING laws against that.

      Why the HELL should somebody get 25 to life for BLOCKING TRAFFIC when they can get less than that for MURDER or BRUTAL ASSAULT.

      Is joe-freaking-shmoes commute time going to be given MORE importance than cases like this here?

      • We the people have already formed a government in which our voices can be heard in non-violent ways. Attempts to undermine this organization with ways other than voting, working through your representatives, or peaceful non-disruptive protest is an assault on democracy,


      What about peaceful protests that then spill over into the streets? Under possible abuses of this Oregon law, I can easily imagine an overzealous police force arresting literally HUNDREDS of protestors.

      Hell, I'll shout, swear, and heckle the protestors while they ARE protesting, but I ain't gonna lock them up.

      Now once they DO start breaking stuff, I do believe there are CURRENT laws to deal with that sort of thing. Should some of those laws be strengthened? Maybe a wider range of sentences for the judge to choose from, but 25 to life is essentially equivalent with murder 1. Unless it can be SHOWN that PEOPLE DIED and that the defendant KNEW IN ADVANCE for SURE that SOMEBODY would DIE, such as say erecting barricades around a hospital ambulance entrance,

      then this crime is NOT equivalent of murder 1 and either way it is NOT terrorism under 99.99% of the circumstances. (I could imagine some terrorist group using blockade tactics but that is a completely separate issue from a loyal American citizen holding a protest)

    27. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's different from shutting down a city or country until the government does what you want.

      Your inability to get a super double latte caffiene injection at the Starbucks of your choice and having to go around three blocks does not constitute "shutting down a city". Hyperbole won't help your argument any more than the strawmen you've been erecting.


      And hypocrisy won't help yours. You just strawmanned his argument by belitting it into "going to Starbucks". What if he was going to an office? To a hospital? To pull your child out of a burning building?

      Do you know anything about the protests you're objecting to? The only time I've heard of there being violence is when some group of your "correct thinking" friends picks a fight with them.


      Did you hear about the splinter group in SF who broke off and started breaking things? The backpack full of Molotov cocktails they found? And there's more definitions of violence than hitting someone.

      The "American Way" that you so jingoistically claim to defend *is* the first amendment, where protest, including protests that block traffic and shut down freeways is very much a part of.


      First Amendment rights are not absolute. You can't scream fire in a crowded theatre.

      At some point, my only remaining observation to a nimrod like yourself is that if you really want a police state where those annoying people complaining about things below your radar don't get to interfere with your day-to-day life, why don't you move to China where they've already got all of that?


      Man, this discussion is just full of strawmen. Did you miss where parent said peaceful non-disruptive protest? Or is it just easier for you to restate his argument as "annoying people complaining don't get to interfere" and hope no one checks? And name calling on top of it all. Tsk tsk tsk.

    28. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't Oregon consider a law that would label people who drop bombs on women and children terrorists?

      If Herr Bush insists on this illegal invasion, we'll damn sure make it as painful as possible. Maybe when the costs of war include that people across the country get to work three hours late, more people will see the light and vote Mr Cunt... oops, Mr Bush out of office. Bring in someone who'll actually want peace. Fighting for peace like fucking for virginity.

      I may be anonymous, but you'll know where to find me. I'll be laying in the street as the Gestapo stormtroopers drag me off to the concentration camps. HEIL BUSH!

      "Under a government which imprisons unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison." - Thoreau.

    29. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The definition specifically states "use of violence or force", not "interference".

    30. Re:Nothing good to post??? by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      > Gestapo stormtroopers drag me off to the concentration camps.

      Godwin's. You lose. Thread over.

      (Please GOD, thread over.)

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    31. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      25 to life for obstructing traffic almost sounds reasonable considering you can already get slapped for a one hundred BILLION dollars for running P2P.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    32. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't call blocking roads (forcing traffic to halt) a use of force?

      What planet are you from?

    33. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I'd be embarrassed to be associated with group of people who can't think of anything more threatening to their daily lives than the possibility of blocked traffic.

      Heay, don't you realize that stopping short in traffic might cause me to spill my coffee? Hell, I might even smear the butter from my croissant on my suit!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    34. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It can't be offtopic now.

      Yea, right. That has a whole lot to do with making a starship enterprise out of a 3.5" floppy.

    35. Re:Nothing good to post??? by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've also heard there's a story floating about concerning the new "evil bit" in TCP/IP! ;-)

    36. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hell, I might even smear the butter from my croissant on my suit!"

      He eats croissant -how unpatriotic!

      Burn the witch!

    37. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      >>I don't want to live in a police state where
      >>you are given more severe penalties for crimes
      >>just because you perform them as a political
      >>act of protest.

      >I don't want to live in a state where crimes
      >are ignored because they're performed as an act
      >of protest.


      You should re-read what was said.

      It was not said that illegal actions should be ignored. What was said is that there are ALREADY laws that make those actions illegal. If those laws are not being enforced, then how are *more* laws which simply increase the penalty on the false basis of "terrorism" going to change the situation?

      If existing laws were simply enforced, the problem would be moot.

    38. Re:Nothing good to post??? by pyite · · Score: 1

      They can protest all they want, it's their right. However, they cannot, in doing so, infringe on MY RIGHTS. And getting in my way is infringing on my rights. Stupid penalty? Possibly. Stupid premise? Not neccesarily.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    39. Re:Nothing good to post??? by detect · · Score: 1

      American elections = Democracy? ha!

      --
      // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
    40. Re:Nothing good to post??? by kryptobiotic · · Score: 1

      The other things that you mention blocking traffic are either unavoidable (weather) or planned (road work/parades). In the case of planned blockages, it would be simple to have alternative routes planned and to move a couple of firetruck/ambulances out of the firehouse/garage to make sure that they are available if needed.

      Also the main purpose of parades and road work is not disruption, although they both cause plenty. With a protest, the main goal is distruption and I think that the protesters might be a little slower in getting out of the way.

    41. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. If they infringe on your rights to drive on a public right of way, they should be moved and/or arrested.

      However, they should be charged with obstructing a public right of way (what they were doing) and not terrorism (what they were not doing).

    42. Re:Nothing good to post??? by puddpunk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've also heard there's a story floating about concerning the new "evil bit" in TCP/IP! ;-)

      Not just _one_ story, but around about _5_ stories. In the same day!

    43. Re:Nothing good to post??? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Whoever said traffic was forced to halt? Why do you think bullbars were invented?

    44. Re:Nothing good to post??? by svyyn · · Score: 1

      We have a process in which to 'listen to the damn people.' It's called elections. That's different from shutting down a city or country until the government does what you want

      If there are enough protesters to shut down a city or country, then the people of that place are clearly making their voices heard, and in a much more politically effective way than elections.

    45. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Heh.

      An AC actually made me laugh. Must be a cold day in hell.

    46. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Ponty · · Score: 1

      Protests are usually planned, too. I'm not going to get in the argument, but "emergency services blockage," while a problem, just doesn't do it for me. Sorry.

    47. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      The issue is that the law is unreasonably broad. An intelligent person could quite easily interpret it to mean that, for example, picketing strikers are interfering with the commerce of the great state of Oregon and thus must be jailed.

    48. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But there isn't anyone on the ballot who represents that view, is there?"

      Vote LaRouche.

    49. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      He eats croissant -how unpatriotic!

      But it's a FREEDOM croissant! Honestly!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    50. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Greg+W. · · Score: 1

      when they disrupt traffic, and potentially disrupt emergency services, such as Police, Fire Department, or Ambulance traffic, they've definately crossed the line.

      Don't you think that the protestors would step out of the way to let an ambulance through? These are human beings. They can think.

      In fact, there was a traffic-disruption protest in downtown Cleveland last Friday. If I didn't have a wife and kids waiting for me at home, I probably would have been in it.

    51. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Pii · · Score: 1
      There have been reports of protesters that have failed to clear a path for emergency vehicles.

      These are the people I'm referring to.

      Personally, I don't think they should block any streets at any time. Urban traffic is bad enough, and as other people have mentioned, if you're trying to generate sympathy for your cause du jour, maybe a good start would be not pissing off the people that are on the fence.

      Clogging up traffic only serves to make things worse, and it costs ordinary people time and money.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    52. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      PolSci nerds are no less nerds than CompSci nerds.

      No, they're politicians. And politicians are evil.

      I'm so sick and tired of everyone who's interested in something, calling themself a "basketweaving" nerd, or "sports" nerd or any number of totally *normal* activities.

      SPORTS NERD?!?!

      I *actually* heard this one once. How can someone who is interested in SPORTS of all things classify themselves as a nerd? I don't remember anyone being ridiculed for being interested in sports when I was a kid. What, as soon as nerds and geeks started to get rich off the dot-com boom, everyone wants to be one? I hope that now that is over, everything will go back to normal.

      In any case, this is definately "Stuff that matters."

      No, it's just news. Normal, everyday news. If I want regular normal news, then I'll go to CNN.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    53. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1
      "We have a process in which to 'listen to the damn people.' It's called elections."

      And how many people do you think were 'heard' wrong in the 2000 elections? Because Florida couldn't get their shit together, we had one fucked election. Even those can't be totally trusted.

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    54. Re:Nothing good to post??? by perljon · · Score: 1

      This presumes that the American public are children minded, and there is some clear thinking adult minded person who should make all the rulte and decisions. That's the theory behind a Monarchy or Dictatorship. That is not the case in America.
      A better example would be a car full of adults deciding where to eat lunch, which when there is disagreement, usually results in a discussion, compromise, and final vote, with the driver having veto power.
      That's how it happens in our government as well. There is a discussion to see where everyone stands, some compromises are made, and there is a final vote. The President has veto power.

      --
      This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
    55. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "including protests that block traffic and shut down freeways is very much a part of"

      1) People who are protesting do not have the right to violate laws that otherwise apply. Just because they are "protesting" or "peacably assembling" does not mean that laws for the safety and coherence of society no longer apply. Most cities have ordinances that prohibit blocking a street without a permit. Almost every municipal authority still has jay-walking laws in place. Also keep in mind that blocking traffic can HURT people; you know the thing that all these peacenicks supposedly want to prevent. Just imagine an ambulance trying to get someone to a hospital...

      2) Acting like a complete moron in public by making yourself throw up on the sidewalk, shutting down streets, and starting fights with bystanders and police (yes the anti-war protestors have done all of these) does not make people want to listen to you, much less help you. It's just like the way that debaucherous hedonists view self-righteous hypocrytical religious types. They say: "if that is what it is to be "good" I really don't mind being bad!" Same thing here: If that is what an anti-war protestor does, I will NEVER be one!

      Sure, I respect the rights of all people to "protest" or to make their voices heard. I would rather have them do it from a position of humility, so that if there is someone who, like myself, has reservations about the war in Iraq, they aren't scared to walk up to one of these hate-sign toting, sidewalk cookie-tossing, street blocking, pugilist agitators and ask them to intelligently express their reasons for opposing the war.

      Maybe if they were not so arrogant and offensive they would see their numbers and support grow.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    56. Re:Nothing good to post??? by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Nah, the word "cr**ssant" belongs to les Grenouilles. "Crescent roll" I'll accept. *g*

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    57. Re:Nothing good to post??? by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      He sounds like a grenouille to me. *g*

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    58. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This presumes that the American public are children minded, and there is some clear thinking adult minded person who should make all the [rules] and decisions.

      Not children minded, necessarily. But underinformed, certainly. Do you or I sit in on GWB's intelligence briefings? What makes people so sure that this war is not justified? Even if Iraq has no NBC weapons, this is still a man who invaded Kuwait, gassed ethnic minorities, and lives off the money from Oil for Food while his people starve.

    59. Re:Nothing good to post??? by perljon · · Score: 1

      Okay, a better scenario then is having 20 people elect someone to go get food for the entire group. Even though 2 people said they wanted McDonald's, it's closed for tonight. That's a better scenario.

      --
      This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
    60. Re:Nothing good to post??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anything that involves food is flawed

      because people are usually fully informed about the kind of food they like.

  9. You've reached the end of the internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    And it is an USS Enterprise from reusable media. Nothing else to see, go on now...

    Really, go outside or read a book.

    1. Re:You've reached the end of the internet... by waveclaw · · Score: 1
      ...read a book


      But...all my books are online now...


      (Reaches for ascii-pr0n^H^H^H^H^Hebook-filled PDA)

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
  10. DVDs? by maukdaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, what in the hell could be made from a DVD? Borg ship perhaps?

    With some duct tape and an old towel MacGyver could make a gun!

    1. Re:DVDs? by Benm78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A 10-pack of CDR's in jewel cases resebles a cube quite well.. Finish the surfaces with some scrap PCB's and you'll have a fine desktop cube ;)

    2. Re:DVDs? by BeemerBoy · · Score: 1

      And the professor could make a programmable microwave oven. If only he could figure out how to use all of those trees to make something they could use to get off that island. Hmmmmmmmmm...

      --
      Buzzing the information Superhighway at Warp speed
    3. Re:DVDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MacGyver doesn't use guns

    4. Re:DVDs? by madstork2000 · · Score: 1

      MacGyver didn't use guns.

    5. Re:DVDs? by dcsmith · · Score: 1
      Now, what in the hell could be made from a DVD?

      A shiver cruises up and down my spine lead by the phrase "AOL for Broadband"...

      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
  11. Wait a minute by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just saw this on a message board, before it actually got to Slashdot. This is odd. Well once you get good at that then try this

    1. Re:Wait a minute by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      That one's hilarious. I can only imagine watching that plane bouncing around the house.

    2. Re:Wait a minute by JanneM · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course, it won't work the way it is described. The fly won't flap its wings as long as the feet have contact with something. You need to glue it on its stomach, with enough free space below to allow the legs to hang freely.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Wait a minute by copper22 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jeff Goldblum still has nightmares about this kind of thing.

    4. Re:Wait a minute by tinrobot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Someone who's actually done research on housefly powered airplanes... Welcome to Slashdot.

    5. Re:Wait a minute by Deanasc · · Score: 1

      What if you pulled the legs off?

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    6. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait 'till the military gets their hands on that.

    7. Re:Wait a minute by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone who's actually done research on housefly powered airplanes

      No wonder slashdotters never get real dates :-)

    8. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The fly won't flap its wings as long as the feet have contact with something.

      You mean like the ground just before it tries to take off? Odd, so how do they fly around without first taking off?
    9. Re:Wait a minute by JanneM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They jump.

      I'm serious. The wings are hardwired to work only when there is no touch sensing on the feet, so to get up in the air, they do a small jump. Once they clear the surface, the wings start. Conversely, to land, they need only touch a surface with the feet, and the wings stop.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    10. Re:Wait a minute by jcorgan · · Score: 1

      Heh, we use to tie a couple feet of thread to one of the frozen fly legs, revive him, and walk around for a couple of hours with a pet fly!

      --
      Babies are cute because they have to be.
    11. Re:Wait a minute by pingflood · · Score: 1
      From what I recall reading, their landings are more or less crashing into a surface, at which point the wings stop...

      Sounds like me and my r/c plane. :-)

    12. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then there is www.afrotech.com

  12. Lovely! by trublaha · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wicked. No longer will my flatmate's tape-reel millenium falcon and punchcard x-wing dominate the living room.

  13. What are Mac useers supposed to do? by FosterKanig · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the first ever, I am mad that my Macs don't have floppy drives. Now how am I supposed to waste five minutes of my day?
    Oh, right. I forgot.
    Masturbate!

    1. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by webmaker · · Score: 1, Troll

      If your a mac looser you have much bigger problems anyway buddy! =)

    2. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by hexdcml · · Score: 3, Funny

      man, 5 minutes? my mac can do it in 2 ;)

      --
      Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    3. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is masturbating wasting time?

    4. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by Marc2k · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's not that funny and you spelled "loser" wrong, captain.

      --
      --- What
    5. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      masturbate then when the boss comes in, tell him, "i'm being very productive! *continues*"

    6. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't spell, you use bad asci art, and you have a lame nick. To top it off your making fun of a mac user. Who's the real loser webwaker?

    7. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      Hehe! As I was reading your post, I was still processing on that one... wondering if there was some practice of setting macs free into the wild or something like that. I hadn't yet refined the comprehension down to a typo of loser.

    8. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can't spell, you use bad asci art, and you have a lame nick. To top it off your making fun of a mac user. Who's the real loser webwaker?"

      Looks like you're in the same boat though. Should've used "YOU'RE", dumbass.

    9. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      that's:-

      YOU'RE

      and

      LOSER

      fucknut

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You find yourself in the same boat. If you are going to be anal, then you should not utilize contractions either.

      You all need to stop being uptight assholes.

    11. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by DASHSL0T · · Score: 1

      You missed you're as well. You could have hit him with a nice one-two. ;-) C'mon people, stay sharp!

      --
      Freedom Is Universal
      Linux-Universe
    12. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by webmaker · · Score: 1

      *cough* Anal *cough* LOL lighten up

    13. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by mister_jpeg · · Score: 2, Funny


      stupid useers.

      --
      -jpeg
    14. Re:What are Mac useers supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention "asci" should have been ASCII.

      And what's a webwaker? Someone who wakes up sleeping webs? Was that supposed to be an insult?

  14. Re: (1) balsawood aircraft + (8) bumblebees = B52? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd put radio control on the rudder and flaps...

  15. Be honest now... by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many of you grabbed a floppy and ripped it apart within 1 minute of reading that page? Admit it. You know you did.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:Be honest now... by ChaosMagic · · Score: 1

      That would be just be sad, but I do have an uh, friend, who tried it within thirty seconds of reading the page. He desperately seeked one of the dozens of floppy disks that didn't work and promptly set about freeing the disk from its prison.

      And for anyone else attempting to make this, a little warning. You only really have one chance at bending the metal parts, if you need to bend them back again they will generally fall off. As such, I am missing the little wing tips from the model.

      Sad, sad, sad. I immediately disowned my friend after seeing this.

      --
      ... I guess
    2. Re:Be honest now... by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen a floppy with a metal slider in years. Can you even still buy them? On that point, is there some secret supplier of floppies who makes them so that they work like they did in the 90's (more than once)?

    3. Re:Be honest now... by cap'n+foolsy · · Score: 1

      i did, and actually made 2 versions - one for the original series, and one for TNG :P
      i'd make voyager, if only i didn't dislike the series so much. *sigh*

      --
      It might look like I'm standing motionless, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away
    4. Re:Be honest now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen a floppy with a metal slider in years.

      Gee, I still use 3.5" floppies for taking work to/from school. But everyone on slashdot says they're not cool anymore. Does that mean there's something wrong with me?

    5. Re:Be honest now... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1


      I don't know where you're from, but I don't remember floppies in the 90s that worked more than once either.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    6. Re:Be honest now... by mlh1996 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I didn't, but only because I'm a mac guy.

      I did rummage around a bit to make sure I didn't have one somewhere, though.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    7. Re:Be honest now... by Steven+Blanchley · · Score: 1
      No, of course not! I, for one, believe that floppies are still cool. They have their uses.

      And what's this business about floppies not working more than once? I've been using some of the same floppies for nearly 10 years without any trouble.

    8. Re:Be honest now... by Griim · · Score: 2, Funny

      As such, I am missing the little wing tips from the model

      "Captain, the nacells have been sheerd off from the force of the [TECH]!"

    9. Re:Be honest now... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      And what's this business about floppies not working more than once? I've been using some of the same floppies for nearly 10 years without any trouble.

      Note that they're 10 years old. Try this:

      1. Go to the store. Buy a box of floppies.
      2. Take a disk out of the box. Write a file to it.
      3. Put the disk away for a week.
      4. Try reading what you wrote on it.

      Half of the time, you won't be able to do that with what passes for floppy disks today.

      (By comparison, I have some disks that are nearly 18 years old that my Apple IIs can still read without problems.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    10. Re:Be honest now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (By comparison, I have some disks that are nearly 18 years old that my Apple IIs can still read without problems.)

      I've got original disks from my Commodore 64 that still work (I've still got the C64 too). Sometimes it's a lot of fun to pull out those (really) old games.

    11. Re:Be honest now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should have spent the 90's somewhat more sober then. I distinctly remember there being good floppy's back then. Ofcourse, there are still good floppy's now, you just have to look a bit. (sony's aren't bad, but they're a bitch to find)

  16. Truly... by jptxs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this is "stuff that matters"!

    It's exactly the antidote to a morning of reading the news from around the world...

    --
    we speak the way we breathe --Fugazi
  17. A copy of it by Fulkkari · · Score: 1

    Now I have a copy of this 3.5" floppy disk Enterprise...

    The only problem is how to get it fit in the floppy station so I can post a copy of it to the /. crowd.

    Damn it. Didn't solve that one. Move along.

    --
    I demand the Cone of Silence!
  18. Yea rite by KoolDude · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Wow, there is absolutely nothing good to post in the bin today...

    How exactly is it different from other days at /. ?

    --
    getSexySig(); /* returns sexy signature */
    1. Re:Yea rite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      fprintf(stdout,"-- \n%s\n",getSexySig()); /* prints sig to stdout */

  19. woohoo by croddy · · Score: 5, Funny
  20. You know it's a really slow day when... by xintegerx · · Score: 1


    You KNOW it's a really slow /. day when a user with a 600,000 plus ID is taking shots at slashdot's reputation.........

    Grandparent: Wow, there is absolutely nothing good to post in the bin today...
    Parent: How exactly is it different from other days at /. ?

    1. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      Or when one above 550K is found taunting him for it.

    2. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by LMariachi · · Score: 1
      You six digit kids and your petty squabbles...

    3. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by Mytho-X · · Score: 1

      sheesh, exactly what are they complaining about?

    4. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Ha, you 80Kers think you're old-timers.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    5. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by JanneM · · Score: 5, Funny

      yep. It was different in our day. We had no fancy networking; we'd _walk_ through a snowstorm to hand over floppies with the new slashdot content to each other. We had no shoes and it was always a head wind both ways. Just try telling the youngsters here; they refuse to believe you.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    6. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by mog · · Score: 1

      damned whippersnappers..

    7. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by timerider · · Score: 1

      .... and what do we do now instead... play NWN on linux, that is what we do...

      clear skies!

    8. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by verbatim · · Score: 1

      You are not your User ID.
      You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.
      You are a geek.
      Welcome to the club; Geek Club.

      The first rule of geek club is you do not talk about geek club.
      The second rule of geek club is that you do not talk about geek club.
      There is no third rule
      The fourth rule of geek club is that you find all Monty Python references funny beyond belief
      The fifth rule of geek club is noo poofdahs.
      the sixth rule of geek club is you do not whine about your user id

      --
      Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
    9. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by wesmills · · Score: 1

      Move over for the old farts...

    10. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by KevCo · · Score: 1

      You know it! 4-digit old school!

    11. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by Colin+Walsh · · Score: 1

      Bah! You had floppies? You young'uns had it easy! Why, in my day we had to trek across the glacial icepacks with TCP/IP packets printed out on punched cards. Let me tell you, in a net game of Quake, which was text based at the time, you'd be a LPB if you got a ping of around 24 hours!

      -Colin

    12. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by pboulang · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    13. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by eht · · Score: 1

      Dang five digit kids...

    14. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Man, I'm so sad I read Slashdot for months before I bothered to get an ID. By the time I finally got one, they had already moved from punched cards to reel-to-reel magnetic tapes, so I don't have any good stories.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    15. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      Heck I rember the real old days on the Internet when we used our floppies to transfer IP packets to each other. (yes someone once actually wrote a driver for floppies to do that. I think it was an Amiga hacker with way too much time on his hands.)

    16. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Or when one above 550K is found taunting him for it.

      ...and top-posting in his reply, too. Isn't it bad enough that clueless Lookout (l)users do that in email and on Usenet?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    17. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      There is no third rule

      Yes, there is: No Poofters!

      the sixth rule of geek club is you do not whine about your user id

      There is NO rule six!

      Maybe you meant to swap these around...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    18. Re:You know it's a really slow day when... by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      Who left the door to the old people's home unlocked? Come on kids, you'd better help me round them all up and get them back to the home.

  21. URL by KoolDude · · Score: 1


    Thanks to Ant for digging this one up.

    Did anyone else notice the url starts with www.asciipr0n.com ? Imagine a colony of ants transfering ASCII pr0n, char by char ;)

    Oh, shut up!

    --
    getSexySig(); /* returns sexy signature */
  22. Re:Hmm by Queuetue · · Score: 1

    Are you afraid of the magnetism or the plastic?

    Your answer is: Anytime you don't know if you should wash you hands or not, wash them. Teach your kids this, too.

  23. News for Nerds ... by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Stuff that matters.

    Uh...

  24. It doesn't work on all floppys by f0x+0f+y0rk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I made one as soon as I read the post... only to discover that the top didn't fit. If anyone else encounters this problem, just try folding the thin end of the floppy cover thingy (does it have a name?) in half.

    --

    - m4. f0x
    "Don't let your schooling interfere with your education." -Mark Twain
    1. Re:It doesn't work on all floppys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should rotate the central disk and bring it down to the notch you made halfway down the thin column. It will fit.

    2. Re:It doesn't work on all floppys by mwdib · · Score: 1

      It's called a shutter.

      --
      "When I grow up, I'll be stable."
    3. Re:It doesn't work on all floppys by f0x+0f+y0rk · · Score: 1

      I never thought I'd be telling myself RTFM....

      --

      - m4. f0x
      "Don't let your schooling interfere with your education." -Mark Twain
  25. Yeah, we guessed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, there is absolutely nothing good to post in the bin today

    I think we got suspicious after the story with the bloke complaining about getting free software

  26. Bonus points by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    And for Bonus Points, after building your Enterprise, re-assemble the floppy disk into working condition!

  27. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The information superhighway tought us, what some nerd thinks about Star Trek"

    -- Homer Simpson

  28. Truly... by skookum · · Score: 1

    It's times like this that I keep slashdot around to remind me that there's always someone out there nerdier than I. Thank you, slashdot.

  29. back info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ant (go through his website, i easily get lost there often) is a regular link submitter to bluesnews, where this was posted yesterday.

    it was submitted by frag.machine back then.

  30. Taken down by MrSpock'sBrain · · Score: 1

    /.:ing is a nasty thing... :)
    Oh well they survived for an hour. Not too lousy. Apperantly dangerous to post this stuff on a site where >75% of the visitors love StarTrek ;)

  31. Slashdotted? Retaliation! by BlackHawk · · Score: 4, Funny


    <body>
    <center><h6>SLASHDOT SUCKS</h6></center>
    </body>
    </html>

    OK, this was an amusing method of dealing with the Slashdot Effect.

    --

    Believe nothing, not even if I say it, if it violates your sense of reason -- Buddha

    1. Re:Slashdotted? Retaliation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, they changed the content once more... a strange way of dealing with a badly configured web server:-)

      <html>
      <body>
      <center><h3>Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...</h3></center>
      </body>
      </html>

    2. Re:Slashdotted? Retaliation! by drone2113622 · · Score: 1

      Badly configured? The server was fine, the load was 0.09, it's the link that went a bit tits up.

    3. Re:Slashdotted? Retaliation! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you can't really counter the fact that they have limited bandwith with 'good' server configuration.

      anybody managed to make a mirror of it?

      i would really like to see this thing..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  32. Great! by mivok · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now make 3 of these, and with the remaining plastic bit, you can make a borg cube to annoy your nice little fleet.
    Its still not a patch on putting cd's in the microwave and making pieces of art out of the interestingly patterned results.

    (I would make a comment about shoving the enterprise in the microwave and ion storms here, but thats going a bit too far)

  33. Warp 3.5! by Asterax · · Score: 1

    http://www.rasher.dk/cam/ -- Look some loser already did it.

    1. Re:Warp 3.5! by JonasH · · Score: 1

      Stop that!

    2. Re:Warp 3.5! by Asterax · · Score: 1

      I was able to save it before the image was updated: http://ikaribox.dyndns.org/~asterax/amusing/floppy .jpg rasher looks ugly.

  34. Main asciipr0n.com site... by Vengie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now reads "Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to..."
    Ouch!
    And the link from the article just reads "Slashdot Sucks"
    Thats what i get for reading articles i guess.

    --
    When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    1. Re:Main asciipr0n.com site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, I think it's a valid point. It would be nice if Slashdot started thinking about the problem of slashdotting. When a site is posted on the slashdot frontpage, it can be very expensive for the person hosting the site. Plus, if slashdot mirrored these sites, it would ensure that everybody could view the original content. Have any of the slashdot admins thought about this? Any plans?

    2. Re:Main asciipr0n.com site... by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      I think what's more sad is not that yet another website is slashdotted, but it's one that describes how to make Enterprise's out of floppy disks.

      People...it's a Sunday. Go outside, meet some new people, GET A LIFE!!!

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    3. Re:Main asciipr0n.com site... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      People...it's a Sunday. Go outside, meet some new people, GET A LIFE!!!



      Why would you wanna meet new people?

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    4. Re:Main asciipr0n.com site... by malIgna · · Score: 1

      What about the sites that get money via advertising? Wouldn't they want the traffic so they get the advertising?

      --
      Nothing to see here, move along.
    5. Re:Main asciipr0n.com site... by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      I believe there's an HTTP "do not cache" header. (PHP, etc., IIRC, set this, as caching, say, someone's shopping cart would be a Bad Thing (tm).)

      Therefore, the whole "What if they don't want to be cached" thing is moot. Slashdot could easily write a little script that looks to see if that header is set, and if not, makes a mirror.

      The problem is that you *can* make a case for mirroring being illegal: you're taking potentially copyrighted material and sharing it. Granted, in most cases the intent is to help the copyright owners, and you make no claim it's yours, but it's not *too* farfetched to say that they might have a valid lawsuit.

      A while ago someone here suggested the concept of setting up a proxy server -- Slashdot could run a proxy server caching recently posted sites. The problem would be if people kept Slashdot as a 'permanent' cache, causing them to use a *TON* of bandwidth completely unnecessarily.

      It's an interesting issue, though. The Slashdot editors are fully aware that they can cause insane bandwidth usage for a *lot* of the sites they link to, often either killing servers, or causing enormous bandwidth charges. In a sense, they could almost be sued for 'knowingly' causing it.

      On the other hand, the Internet would fall apart with a "It's illegal to link to another site without permission" precedent. It goes completely against the entire purpose of the Internet.

      The entire issue could be avoided (at least temporarily) if the Slashdot editors would act a little more responsibly. All it would take is a simple e-mail, offering them three choices:
      - Post the story without the link
      - Post the story with a link to a mirror on Slashdot
      - Post the story with the link

      If they don't reply within a reasonable amount of time, I don't think it's entirely unethical to post a link to the site, but they really ought to ask first. Not only is it polite, but it could cover them legally, and help to defer a possible "Linking to sites is illegal" verdict.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    6. Re:Main asciipr0n.com site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, what does meeting people have to do with a life?

    7. Re:Main asciipr0n.com site... by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      Damn, his site is just text. How much bandwidth could we be costing him, even if it is slashdot? I could have displayed that shit on my C-64 with my 1200 baud. What the hell!?

  35. Home Page says ... by ManyLostPackets · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to..."

    Same time next week guys?

    1. Re:Home Page says ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they have mirrored the site for us. http://www.asciipr0n.org/archive/0013/bonnie/craft / /. away

  36. current page by sehryan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    this is what that page currently says:

    "Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to..."

    haha, i think that is great.

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
  37. Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by sQuEeDeN · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Taken from the site:
    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

    You guys, asciipr0n.com is a small site. I'm aware you can link to whoever you want, but don't you think you should show some courtesy and warn a person before you eat up their bandwidth bill in a a matter of minutes?
    It's just a nice thing to do.

    --

    Recursive (adj.): see 'Recursive'
    1. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by drone2113622 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, would have been nice if I (the hoster of asciipr0n.com) would have gotten some notice before being effectively DDoSed.

    2. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I too find it woefully irresponsable that small websites that can't handle traffic don't inform slashdot when they are shutting down right after slashdot links to them. It harms slashdot and all of their users. A little warning would be nice.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    3. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by Steven+Blanchley · · Score: 1

      When you make such nice web sites, full of such valuable and unique information, you have to anticipate getting linked from major news sites. When the editors get something as good as this, they just have to post it, and who can blame them for that?

    4. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by drone2113622 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I have two words for you, screw 'em.

    5. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by gthug · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      slashdot can suck a fat cock. stupid punk ass bitches.

    6. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by Fastolfe · · Score: 3, Informative

      you have to anticipate getting linked from major news sites.

      Most major news sites will ask you before posting an article with a link to your site. I know this, because I've gotten asked by major news sites several times. (The exception to this rule was MSNBC, but go figure.)

      Site owners budget their hardware and network capacity to handle the traffic they expect (or empirically determine). If they can afford to budget for a traffic spike of three orders of magnitude, they may do that. But the "little guys" obviously do not necessarily have the funds to do that.

      With sufficient warning, the site owners might have been able to make arrangements in advance of the posting so their site could have survived.

      A mirror sounds like a perfect idea, and wouldn't even suffer the artificial problems presented in the FAQ if you did it right. All you need is Apache configured to be a caching HTTP proxy and a regular web server at the same time. Using the ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse directives, it would appear to users like any other mirror, except it'd be using HTTP caching rules to specify what can and cannot be mirrored/cached. So long as sites are using good cache-control policies, they'd never get Slashdotted...

      Slashdot editors are just lazy.

    7. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by peterprior · · Score: 1

      Entry in the /. FAQ for this one:

      http://slashdot.org/faq/suggestions.shtml#su900

    8. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by sQuEeDeN · · Score: 1

      "I could try asking permission, but do you want to wait 6 hours for a cool breaking story while we wait for permission to link someone?" This does _not_ qualify as a breaking story, sorry. I just can't see slashdot's position on this one.

      --

      Recursive (adj.): see 'Recursive'
    9. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google cache sites. Why not just link to their cache?

    10. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by Kombat · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this. This is the web, buddy. People will visit your site. Suck it up. Get a decent hosting solution. How hard is it? My site's been semi-slashdotted once, but my hosting provider didn't even flinch. Served over 12,000 files in a few hours. And if I hit my bandwidth limit (6 gigs), they don't just start charging me more, they stop serving until either the end of the month, or I buy more bandwidth. And I'm hosting photographs!

      Hyperlinks are the reason the web works. Nobody needs anybody's "permission" to link to your page! If you put it up on the web, it's fair game. That's your implied consent - nay, invitation - for people to come visit your site. Why would you put something on the web if you didn't want people to see it? And even then, that's what a .htaccess file is for.

      Cripes.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    11. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google caches load pictures from the original site (or not at all if the original site is down).

    12. Re:Slashdot uses it's power unresponsibly by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Because the text is a small percentage of the bandwidth of the page. This case is like 1k. The real bogging down comes from the image links, making up over 50k. Lots and lots of hits will make that a real problem.

  38. Competely offline now.... by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...


    I think they really, really, really didn't like finding out about the ./ effect completely unannounced. Can't say I blame them either. Smaller sites can end up with huge bandwidth bills in just a day and people have been asking for story mirrors for years now.
    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Competely offline now.... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1
      We could combine this with a way to make money, too!

      You see, Mr. AsciiPr0n.com, there are people out there, people like us, who would link you and that would lead to your server melting. For a small fee, we could mirror your site. Don't think of it as extortion, think of it as....insurance

  39. OT: Complaining about getting Slashdotted by mikosullivan · · Score: 1
    The site currently has this to say:
    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...
    Now, I can understand that a site would get brought down if it were serving out huge files (like music or movies) but I'm perplexed by all these sites that are brought down just by serving out small static pages. My site was slashdotted once, and the web host had no problem. That site was done with PHP served by Apache.

    So I guess I'm wondering, what have been your experiences getting slashdotted... did your site go down? What server software were you using, and what kind of bandwidth did you have?

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
    1. Re:OT: Complaining about getting Slashdotted by Steven+Blanchley · · Score: 1

      Submit this to Ask /., why don't you? Then everyone will see it and it won't be off-topic.

    2. Re:OT: Complaining about getting Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumbfuck, they aren't upset because their processor had to work a little harder, they are upset because of the money they will have to pay in BANDWIDTH. Contrary to what most slashdotters think, BANDWIDTH is NOT free.

    3. Re:OT: Complaining about getting Slashdotted by drone2113622 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, like I said before, the system load was 0.09, the only problem was the bandwidth.

    4. Re:OT: Complaining about getting Slashdotted by mikosullivan · · Score: 1
      Hm, why didn't I think of that? The coffee is slow kicking in this morning...

      Yeah, I'll do that. Thanks for the reminder. :-)

      --
      Miko O'Sullivan
    5. Re:OT: Complaining about getting Slashdotted by Sebby · · Score: 1

      Maybe bandwidth costs would be an issue for them, maybe?

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  40. Missing a Step by telly333 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Important!

    Shouldnt the first step should be "back up your data"? Be forewarned - I lost a year of important financial statements by trying this stupid little "trick".....

    Seriously though, looks like all the Mac and (soon)Dell users are SOL on this one.

    Escape Pod out of a USB Pen Drive anyone?

    1. Re:Missing a Step by AllMightyPaul · · Score: 1

      Just because your computer doesn't have a floppy drive doesn't mean you don't have thirty billion floppies lying around.

  41. Excellent job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

    Way to go!

  42. HEY! by gspr · · Score: 1

    You didn't say it could possibly render the floppy unusable! I'm gonna sue you now! :-\

  43. Linked without permission? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters...

    What, do these guys work for the Dallas Morning News?

    1. Re:Linked without permission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, likely they pay for their bandwidth, or
      their provider does. Their little site was a
      cool place for a few folks who used it.

      Slashdot.org KNOWS that what it links to gets
      slammed with a large amount of traffic. They
      should take more care not to hurt people who
      put up a few cool pages for their friends and
      a small number of people.

      Before you object that "hey, it's all open to
      the public anyway", consider this. There's a
      road to your house, and it's open to the public.
      That means a few people can visit you at a time,
      and that's kinda cool. But if 1,000,000 hit
      the road at the exact same time, it's not so
      cool anymore. Particularly if you are charged
      for any use of the road above N people/hour.

      Just because the HTTP protocol was not designed
      to have distributed rate limiting does NOT
      mean it's ok to be an abusive asshole about
      slamming servers.

      Now, keep in mind the asciipr0n owners are not
      raising ownership or copyright issues. (That's
      what the Dallas Morning News website did.)
      Instead, they merely said that they did not
      appreciate the lack of warning, and lack of
      courtesy about setting up a mirror before
      running out their budget.

      Ok, with that in mind, answer this question:
      if you have a little website up, how would you
      feel about getting a bill next month for $1,500
      worth of 'over limit' access? You sure would
      like a little warning first, no?

  44. Fun For A Lazy Sunday by Griim · · Score: 1

    These things actually fly pretty straight, if you throw 'em.

    These instructions could probably use improvement (for instance I was thinking snipping the neck where the saucer section attaches at the front might make it fit on better). Anyone feel like reworking the design a little, or providing more clarity?

    Also, if anyone has ideas as to how one would make a Bird of Prey from the same parts, that would be appreciated. :)

  45. Wow...guess I don't need a floppy drive by Ledge · · Score: 1

    Here I sit in a room with 6 PC's surrounding me. I figured I'd reach in to my desk and grab an old floppy and do this. None there. Look in the closet behind me....none there. When's the last time I actually used one? Musta been building a tomsrtbt disk about 8 months ago. Now i've got to really scavenge so I can build this useless little puppy.

    --
    If it ain't a Model M, it's a piece of crap.
  46. Nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to go... slashdotting a site just because there's nothing better out there. I mean I can understand watching Survivor or Seinfeld just because there's nothing else on, but they don't get yanked off the air if too many people watch...

    This is NOT responsible use of power guys...

  47. slashdot cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we mneed to have one .. yes I read the faq .. the fact is when a site is slashdotted nobody sees the ads .. so a cache can be activated if enpough people request the cache ... so ./ can cache a site prior to posting it .. and then if the site is slashdotted the cache version can be made available .. someone suggest it to slashdot via email cause I doubt anyone at slashdot bothers to read these comments.

    1. Re:slashdot cache by Fastolfe · · Score: 4, Informative

      the fact is when a site is slashdotted nobody sees the ads

      The "we don't wanna cache" reasons given in the FAQ are mostly artificial. There's no technological reason behind their decision not to mirror sites.

      HTTP is designed such that resources can be cached. If they were to exploit that HTTP caching functionality and stick a mirror-like front-end on it, they could effectively cache most of the content and even preserve the ad-serving functionality of the target. (Assuming they had their cache-control headers set up properly.) To the site owner, they'd see a handful of their pages requested by the proxy, and a bazillion requests for their advertising (since that probably wouldn't be marked as cacheable). This is HTTP at work.

      Something like this has been suggested for a while, and nobody's ever really explained why this isn't workable. IMO, the Slashdot editors are just lazy/insufficiently staffed. (For the record, most major news sites will inform you when they're about to link to you.)

    2. Re:slashdot cache by dagard · · Score: 1

      Sure, and what happens the first time that someone complains about mirroring their site without permission (or, more precisely, has their lawyers do it)?

      As for asking permission, um, sure, as long as you want the stories to be days old, they could, I suppose, get permission first from every single place they link to.

    3. Re:slashdot cache by E1v!$ · · Score: 1

      Ok, so, wait, the hosters of the original site DON'T have to use any bandwidth AND they get the ad revenue? B.S.

      Why put the Onus on Slashdot to fix the problem? If you can't fork up the bandwidth, you shouldn't get the $$$. If they let slashdot mirror Without ads maybe.....

    4. Re:slashdot cache by Guppy06 · · Score: 1
      "IMO, the Slashdot editors are just lazy/insufficiently staffed. (For the record, most major news sites will inform you when they're about to link to you.)"

      Yeah, we all complain about so-called "link nazis," jumping up and down about seemingly superfluous complaints about "deep linking," but we hop to the other side of the fence when Slashdot is involved.

      Sure, it's technically possible to mirror a site easily enough, but your post doesn't even touch upon three other issues:
      1. Legal. As we've seen over and over again, mirroring a site qualifies as republishing that site, which is generally considered a violation of copyright law. Just ask the Scientologists what they think about that. Hell, they put legal pressure on Slashdot just for hosting an AC post.

        Sure, the author may say "yes," but he may also change his mind to "no" five minutes after you publish the mirror. And Slashdot would then be legally obligated to take down the mirror as of five minutes ago. If that's nto a bureaucratic clusterfuck in the making I don't know what is.
      2. Philosophical. I'm sorry, but if you don't want anybody to see your website, what the heck are you doing publishing a website to begin with? People publish on the world wide web with both the knowledge that anybody could see your page at any time and the intent to take advantage of that. If you want to limit the people seeing your site, put a password on it. Or put a EULA on it. Better yet, put it on a VPN subnet. Hell, maybe you shouldn't be using HTTP to begin with.

        The world wide web is a pull media, meaning that the users decide what they want to see, when, and how much. If you want to have some sort of control over the user's experience that extends beyond your own servers, you're foolishly using the wrong media and in my opinion deserve what ever you get. I fail to see why Slashdot should be held responsible for the domain admin's foolish choices.
      3. Economic. Guess what: Hosting a website costs money. I'm sure the admins at asciipr0n are well aware of that. Mirroring a page also costs money. Why should Slashdot (apparently barely able to keep their heads above water to begin with) take on the financial onus of re-publishing your material when you already implicitly agreed to handle that yourself when you published to begin with?
      You want to publish freely on multiple servers without having to worry about administrative overhead? Post on a newsgroup. Want to control who has access to what files? Use FTP. Want to have a say in the order that pages on your site are viewed? Use gopher. If you decide to use the world wide web, you and only you are responsible for what happens because of it, no matter how much you whine.

      (Oh, wait, I just linked to their site without their permission! Should I have set up a mirror before I composed this post?)
    5. Re:slashdot cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > As for asking permission, um, sure, as long as you want the stories to be days old, they could, I suppose, get permission first from every single place they link to.

      Sure you couldn't wait for this "How to Make a Starship Enterprise out of a 3.5" Floppy" story.

    6. Re:slashdot cache by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      mirroring their site without permission

      This is a non-issue. If your site is expressing HTTP headers that indicate a willingness to be cached, HTTP proxies should be free to cache! The fact that a proxy can have a web front-end (making it look and act like a mirror) doesn't make it any less of a caching proxy.

      If they're that anal about their content and want to prevent it from being cached by HTTP proxies, they're more than welcome to do that by expressing a "no-cache" flag in their cache-control headers, which would make a mirroring solution based off of HTTP caching technologies impossible for them, which means they'd get Slashdotted, and they'd deserve it.

    7. Re:slashdot cache by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      Why put the Onus on Slashdot to fix the problem?

      Because Slashdot is causing the problem. Because Slashdot readers are unable to view the articles that Slashdot is posting. Because comments about pages that are now offline are invariably less interesting than comments about pages that the posters can read.

      hosters of the original site DON'T have to use any bandwidth AND they get the ad revenue?

      HTTP was always envisioned to work like this. Every ISP could have a set of HTTP proxies for both inbound and outbound HTTP requests. The proxy would cache in either direction, honoring HTTP's cache-control headers while doing so. Static content would invariably be cached at one or more proxies between the origin server and the end user, while more dynamic content would be passed through.

      As unfair as it may sound to you, HTTP was meant to work this way. It's a shame that the real world hasn't implemented things that way. All I'm really talking about here is a non-conventional HTTP proxy.

    8. Re:slashdot cache by Fastolfe · · Score: 2, Informative

      mirroring a site qualifies as republishing that site, which is generally considered a violation of copyright law.

      If you're publishing a document through HTTP, you are implicitly agreeing to allow your document to be redistributed as the HTTP specification designed. If your web site is providing a document, and providing cache-control headers that indicate that document will not change in the next 5 minutes, you are implicitly allowing for servers acting as caching HTTP proxies to cache that document and serve it up to clients that request it, until that 5 minutes expires and the proxy has to re-request (or just re-validate) it.

      If your "mirror" acts as a caching HTTP proxy, in that it's following the HTTP caching specifications, there are no legal issues whatsoever.

      If someone wishes to defeat the mechanism, all they have to do is express a "no-cache" cache-control header, and the "mirror" ceases to function as a caching proxy.

      if you don't want anybody to see your website, what the heck are you doing publishing a website to begin with?

      They do want people to see their site. When Slashdot readers bring it down due to the large volume of requests, nobody can see their site. In order to restore service, they have to somehow mitigate the damage, which I believe these guys did by taking the page down. Their site recovered.

      I fail to see why Slashdot should be held responsible

      I look at the situation differently than you do. I'm not holding Slashdot "responsible" so much as I'd like to see Slashdot be a little more courteous towards those that they link to, and towards the readership who might like to read the articles Slashdot is linking to.

      The mirror/cache idea is meant to combat the availability issue. I'm not trying to save the site owner so much as I'm pushing for a way that Slashdot readers can still have access to the articles. The result is the same, but my motive is a little more selfish.

    9. Re:slashdot cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot isn't causing the problem.

      Slashdot readers are causing the problem.

      It's not as though Slashdot forces anyone to click the links that are posted...

    10. Re:slashdot cache by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between who is "at fault" for an event, and the primary cause of the event. The mere act of one person clicking on a link is insignificant. The primary cause is the posting on Slashdot.

  48. NCC-1701-D out of a floppy by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some additional instructions so you can make the U.S.S Enterprise 1701-D.

    Well first don't remove the media from the medal disk thingie.

    When the ship is assembled the media will cover the nacelles so just trim the saucer into an off-center oval with the metal disk thingie to one side.

    If done somewhat correctly the saucer section will now be in somewhat accurate proportions to the hull.

    As soon as I remeber where I put my camera, I will post some pics.

    --
    >
    1. Re:NCC-1701-D out of a floppy by booyaka · · Score: 1

      Goddam it, if I could moderate you +1 Dork I would

    2. Re:NCC-1701-D out of a floppy by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 1

      and i would wear it as a badge of honor thank you.

      --
      >
  49. Uh-oh by PoorCoder · · Score: 1

    I hope that they formatted the disks first!

    1. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why?

  50. LOL by AssFace · · Score: 0

    They have a notice up bitching about getting slashdotted.

    I really don't get why people complain about people coming to their site - even en mass.
    You put something up publically, and the whole point is that people come and see it.
    If you don't want many people coming - put up a password site and only let in those that you want in.

    People always bitch that slashdot should mirror the pages - but that in itself is nearly as retarded as the first complaint.

    Ugh, I hate people.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:LOL by drone2113622 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a difference in people coming to a site and people swamping somebody's bandwidth for what really amounts to nothing. If slashdot wants to mirror it, I don't care, just don't rape my bandwidth.

    2. Re:LOL by Fastolfe · · Score: 4, Informative

      and the whole point is that people come and see it.

      Yes, and when the level of traffic spikes one day because of a Slashdot posting, and it makes your server and/or network link unable to service those requests, people will be unable to come and see it.

      put up a password site and only let in those that you want in.

      Or use an Apache::Throttle-type technique and limit the traffic to what your server and bandwidth is capable of. In this situation, they more or less did that (by hand), just by blocking the content that was being requested by the Slashdot readers. The rest of the site is up to service requests for "real" visitors.

      slashdot should mirror the pages - but that in itself is nearly as retarded as the first complaint.

      How is that retarded? It allows their article to remain available to Slashdot readers in the event the origin server is no longer able to serve it. Do you want an article with lots of interesting comments about a topic, or do you want an article with a bunch of comments saying "slashdotted!" A mirror would solve this problem. (A mirror can be created that doesn't suffer from the artificial problems discussed in the FAQ by combining a caching HTTP proxy with a web site front-end. To users it would appear as a mirror, but the server would treat it as a proxy, so it'd always be following HTTP caching rules and the site owner couldn't/wouldn't ever have grounds to complain.)

    3. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you haven't figured it out, the excuses in the FAQ about why /. doesn't mirror are mostly just BS. They really don't want to mirror because they know how much it costs in bandwidth and they don't want to take that upon themselves. The FAQ should have the answer "We don't want to pay for a mirror".

    4. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, I hate people.

      Go kill yourself.

  51. Go CD-RW's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CD-RW's, not zip disks are the real floppy replacements.

  52. Aww by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    You caught me.

  53. Quoth the website: by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1, Troll

    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

    Methinks they don't appreciate the attention.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:Quoth the website: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What stupid fucking gay shit modded this as a "troll"?

    2. Re:Quoth the website: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the moderators are sensitive today. They labeled you a troll.

    3. Re:Quoth the website: by HeavensTrash · · Score: 1

      Uhhh, moderators - How was this post a troll? He was just posting what it said on the website. At this point if anything it should just be redundant.

  54. Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone have a mirror of this content? My school censors Internet content, and so I cannot view the page that the article links to (it's URL has ``pr0n'' in its name). Thanks!

  55. WHAAAAA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice.

    WHAAA!!

    Mommy, thomeone winked to my thite!!!!

    Grow up, morons. If you put up a publically accessible site, pe prepared to deal with people actually looking at it.

    1. Re:WHAAAAA! by drone2113622 · · Score: 2

      Ok, I'll go lease some rackspace in a nice multi-homed colo house and pay out the ass for bandwidth just so I can throw money away because of being put on slashdot. That sounds like a jolly time, jackass.

    2. Re:WHAAAAA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't worry about it, as I doubt you'll ever come up with anything that anyone gives a damn about again. Jackass.

  56. Angry joke by riqnevala · · Score: 1

    Has anyone posted instructions how to make a mirror-site out of a 3.5" floppy?

    Hey, I'm inviting you all slashdot-readers to CommanderTaco's house, everyone is invited, and please take all your friends with you. Let's try to visit him together next sunday at noon, and ask if it might be possible to mirror those sites.. ;)

    --
    love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
  57. What disk? by localghost · · Score: 1

    So what disk did people make their Enterprises out of? Blank one? Windows boot disk?

    I found a Redhat 3.0.3 root disk to make it out of. I don't think I'll be needing that anymore.

  58. From the "It's no longer funny" department by MrWa · · Score: 1
    /. is made up of various populations - that is why oen post will say the MPAA is bad while the next will praise the new geek movie coming out. One thing we all have in common is the Internet.

    Being part of a community involves give and take. /. has done its fair of giving, so far as links to news and a place to comment is concerned. This has also involved more than a fair share of taking.

    As a responsible net-citizen, though, the editors need to be far more considerate of other people. This is a clear case of inproper net behavior, something I would expect the newest AOL-newbie, spam producing, weenie to do.

    Instead of complaining about how much spam you get everyday, Taco, why don't you do the community something useful and mirror the websites that you link to. We whine and complain about bad patents, spam, copyright abuse, monopolies, and then treat the net community with disrespect by effectively dos'ing random servers? It isn't funny anymore.

    1. Re:From the "It's no longer funny" department by malIgna · · Score: 1

      And what do they do when they are sued for copywright infringement?

      --
      Nothing to see here, move along.
    2. Re:From the "It's no longer funny" department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Taco, why don't you do the community something useful and mirror the websites that you link to."

      Because, sooner or later, some asshole would come out and sue him for caching thier web site. Just think Google and the Church of Scientology.

    3. Re:From the "It's no longer funny" department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google dont have this problem.

    4. Re:From the "It's no longer funny" department by lessbianinman · · Score: 1

      Well I guess those net wimps should not post a site and then expect it to not ever get any hits. Not to mention it is not like it is a mission critical situation. Oops forgot you got to have something to do while your xp box decided to infinatly reboot itself because it can't handle the real world usages that the real world users try to put it through! ;>

      --
      Activity can create the wonderful illusion of productivity! ---Me
  59. ERm? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    What are CAT 5's?

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:ERm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CAT-5 == CATegory 5 [Un]Shielded Twisted Pair,
      a kind of cable typically used in a variety of different types of networks...

    2. Re:ERm? by polin8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      A significantly improved model of Cat.

      The new CAT-5 never claws your drapes, and eats DOG-1 for breakfast.

    3. Re:ERm? by digitalmuse · · Score: 1

      bwaaaah! funny +1

      --
      "If I wanted your input on my pet project, I'd stick my hand up your ass and use you like a sock-puppet." - Muse
    4. Re:ERm? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Not really. And it doesn't answer the question.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    5. Re:ERm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What are CAT 5's

      Sheesh. There oughta be a test that has to be passed before being able to post. And you're not even new.

    6. Re:ERm? by tijnbraun · · Score: 2, Informative
    7. Re:ERm? by Smurf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What are CAT 5's?
      A few of the non-assholes here already answered your question. But in the future, you may want to have TechWeb's TechEncyclopedia handy for simple definitions related to basic technology/computers/communications concepts.
    8. Re:ERm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CAT5 question a Troll? Or is that wishful thinking?

    9. Re:ERm? by transient · · Score: 1

      Google's experimental glossary is also quite good.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    10. Re:ERm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CAT5 question a Troll? Or is that wishful thinking?

      Whats a troll?

    11. Re:ERm? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Not sure how you could make a death star out of that stuff, but thanks anyway :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    12. Re:ERm? by bluephone · · Score: 2

      How can you have a userID number below 150k and not know what Cat5 is? :)

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    13. Re:ERm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They hide under bridges and eat goats... Definition of Goats.....here







      If you fell for that you are sooooo stoopid

    14. Re:ERm? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      How can you have a userID number below 150k and not know what Cat5 is? :)

      Just lucky i guess :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    15. Re:ERm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's be blunt, you are in the disproportionately small minorty (google it yourself.)
      simply because you do not understand the joke does not make it any less funny, or appropriate, to the rest of us. or perhaps you're just an uninspired troll.

  60. Well by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Its tough if they run a server on a 486, but its a very bad president if you have to ASK permission to link to websites... of course if someone were to make a bit torrent webserver..

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude... ...it's a very bad precident...

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, dude. It's a very bad PRECEDENT. The root word is precede, asshole.

  61. This page cannot be viewed without written consent by AntiGenX · · Score: 1
    The site has this message up that says, "Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

    Excuse me, but I thought the point of putting up a webpage was so people could find it and view it. If you don't want it viewed without permission, shouldn't you password protect it? What is the differnce between slashdot handing out the link versus say... Google? Maybe they should have a disclamer on all their pages, "If you are reading this, please stop and send a message to the our webmaster and CC: our hosters to make sure you have permission. If you do not agree to these terms, please close this page now and flush your cache."

  62. Some words of Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just ripped apart 2 perfectly good floppies before succeeding in my mission...some words of advice from Science Officer Spock:

    Exercise extreme caution while making "make little snips halfway through the metal". A slightly careless snip there and I managed to lob off half the neck. A kitchen knife's a better choice than scissors here.

    \\// Live long and prosper

    Also, some saucers have a thicker rim, in which case a slightly wider cut helps make sure the rim fits snugly in the snip. Otherwise you'll end up with a lopsided bridge.

  63. There's blood all over the place. by ksph2 · · Score: 1
    Did anyone else cut themselves rather nastily with the sharp metal involved in this?

    I'm currently in severe pain... :-(

    1. Re:There's blood all over the place. by Artemis · · Score: 1

      You're the reason they had to make Duplo blocks and "safety scissors" huh?

  64. Asciipr0n lives! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    On Google!

    Wow.. what a loss to the world (sensitive people avert your eyes before clicking)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  65. Re:This page cannot be viewed without written cons by drone2113622 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The difference is two or three hundred views per day versus twenty thousand views in half an hour.

  66. Further Hardware Destruction by Skatters · · Score: 0

    Well, guess you won't be needing that floppy drive anymore. So turn it into a ROBOT!

  67. Re:This page cannot be viewed without written cons by AntiGenX · · Score: 1
    If you have a point, I don't get it. Yes it sucks that sometimes a sever gets bogged down, but if you put the content up, you obviously hoped people would read it. I can't think of a time when someone at /. INTENTIONALLY took aim at a server to /. it. We are simply curious, we're not a bunch of F!*$ing locusts! We are not mindless minions of CmdrTaco chomping at the bit to take down servers. If you put up a page, you expect traffic. Plain and simple. Again, if you want to limit who sees it, try making it private.

    If I had something interesting enough on a webpage to drive massive amounts of traffic to it, I'd be happy, pround even, not whinny.

  68. Oh yeah, well I made something better by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I just made a flat black flying saucer out of a floppy diskette. It is really cool. Here are the detailed instructions:

    1. Take the square covering off
    2. Done!

    1. Re:Oh yeah, well I made something better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too funny by far!

  69. Re:This page cannot be viewed without written cons by drone2113622 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You'd be proud until you saw the bandwidth bill. I don't give a shit if people look at it, I'd just like some common decency when sites that have a very very high readership, like slashdot, post a link to a site that's on a machine of mine. I highly doubt cnn.com would just blindly link to an external site knowing that the link would hit that site with boatloads of unexpected traffic. You're crazy to suggest that everybody that's ever put anything on the internet has taken into consideration getting a hundred thousand hits in one day, and that they should just smile and foot the bill for the bandwidth, happy as a damn lark.

  70. Sites slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

    1. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

      Which raises an interesting question: Should /. 'ask' permission to link? That seems to be what they are implying. I undertstand their frustration, but since when does any news agency (or quazi-news) ever ASK to point toward content? Anyone have an example?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by circusnews · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless I am linking to another news site, or one I otherwise know can handle the load I do ask before I post a news link, and I have only a small fraction of the traffic ./ has. What good does it do my news site if the story I link to dies after 20 people click on it?

      Any slashcode people reading this, think about adding an automatic mirror, or at least a link to the google catch if avalible.

    3. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Which raises an interesting question: Should /. 'ask' permission to link?

      I think they most definately should.
      With broadband connections in New Zealand, traffic in excess of your allocated traffic cap costs around 20 cents per megabyte (depending on the ISP). Given that a 2mbps downstream / 256kbps upstream connection from paradise.net.nz only comes with a 1 gigabyte international traffic allowance, someone running a site off their home cable connection that gets slashdotted is going to be in for a big bill.

      Kuro5hin has a great writeup on the subject here.

    4. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You are right, its an interesting read. I did notice that the author disagrees completely with you tho...

      I don't belive that people should have to get permission to link to another site, in general. If you put something on the Web without putting a password on it or whatever, you're explicitly allowing others to link to it -- at least in my opinion.

      ...but not to worry. It is the proverbial 'Does the tree make a sound in the woods' question, every answer is right and wrong :) good read, wish you hadnt posted as AC so more would see it linked here.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by UrGeek · · Score: 0, Troll

      What a bunch of whiney little fuzzie bunnies! I can understand if there server can only do so much bandwidth, but sheesh, don't blame Slashdot for shining a light on your nice little site. If you do not want people linking to your site, do not put it on the Internet!

      FREEDOM!

    6. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

      Wine, wine, wine. What a buncha fuckin' crybabies! If they didn't want people to see their site, why did they create a site in the first place? Maybe their servers are overloaded due to the well known slashdot effect. But you can be sure that once the story goes off of the main page, a number of people will still be curious enough to check it out when it's no longer slashdotted. What kind of a site wines about receiving some noteriety? Next time these folks feel like creating a website, maybe they'll just save themselves the time and effort and spank the monkey. Yeesh! People sure love to complain, don't they!

    7. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by captainclever · · Score: 1

      I guess if you run a website and are concerned about getting /.'ed you could just stick a couple of lines of code in that redirects any traffic from slashdot.org to another site.. (*cough* goatse *cough*) or just deny any traffic from slashdot.

      Slashdot can't mirror sites - that opens up a nasty can of legal worms

      --
      Last.fm - join the social music revolution
    8. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can of legal worms..
      why does this image brings up lawyers?

    9. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? The page was being run for free and the site's makers weren't exactly "cool" anyway.

    10. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by PlazMatiC · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't belive that people should have to get permission to link to another site, in general. If you put something on the Web without putting a password on it or whatever, you're explicitly allowing others to link to it -- at least in my opinion.

      To an extent, I agree with him.
      However, Slashdot linking to someone in an article is far different to an average netzien linking from their blog. I think that given the amount of power Slashdot and similar sites wield, courtesy would suggest that they make sure they're not going to majorly inconvenience the owner of the site they're planning on linking to.

      wish you hadnt posted as AC

      Likewise .. I posted from my work PC, and didn't realise I hadn't logged in first. ;)

    11. Re:Sites slashdotted.. by JJahn · · Score: 1

      Now thats plain silly, mirroring without permission is probably illegal, besides being a major pain in the ass. However no one is under any obligation whatsoever to ask before linking. In case you didn't realize, by providing a public resource, you accept that the public just might come visit it (what a concept)

  71. Not shown by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

    How to summon the Borg with an old tampon.

  72. CmdrTaco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CmdrTaco - you are an idiot.

    U didn't ask for permission before linking to the site?

    U should have known it wiuld have been ./ed becuase these nerds here are Star trek fans. They have nothing else to do.

    1. Re:CmdrTaco by anubi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ummm. Its Sunday Morning. Who's around to talk to?

      So CmdrTaco picks a sleepy Sunday Morning to /. a site. Well, it is disseminating information to individuals; each had to click on it to get it. All CmdrTaco did was to bring the link into public view. Kinda the same thing businesses pay advertising agencies big bux for. If the site admin does not want the publicity, no biggie, but blame CmdrTaco for it?? nah. Not in my book. Not at all.

      Its well known in the /. community that /. is extremely current; that is that things often get on the system within hours, if not minutes, of its occurrence, often beating out other well-known news agencies, as the very people involved in making the news are often /.'ers themselves.

      Well, its a public site. The sysadmin has the option of closing his site if he's getting far more traffic than he wants. No biggie. Just bookmark the site and visit later when the hordes are gone. Sports venues do this all the time when traffic exceeds capacity. Its called "sold out".

      You usually put stuff on the net if you want to expose it publically. I think CmdrTaco did them a service by exposing it to /.'ers. I can not find /.'ing a site any more offensive than storming a Burger King with several busloads of kids during a summer outing. ( Yes, I've done that. )

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  73. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plastic of course. Maybe there's a film on it to keep it moving easily? Maybe it contains trace amounts of asbestos or some chemical? ::shrug::

  74. Interesting when I click on link.. by huckda · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I got this:

    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

    silly idiots...why would someone need permission..it's the WORLD WIDE FREAK'N WEB!

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    1. Re:Interesting when I click on link.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > why would someone need permission...

      People who know they are harmful when they link should, if they had common sense.

    2. Re:Interesting when I click on link.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common curtosey. If you are having a party and the guy holding the party says "Bring friends if you want", would you bring 600 people that you happen to know? I doubt if your host would appreciate that.

      When you are paying the bandwidth bill for a small website, you can be the one saying "Oh well, its the WWW!!" when you get a $100 higher than normal charge for the extra bandwidth of a slashdotting.

  75. I saw this a day or so ago. by Kymermosst · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It was on a gaming site.

    I thought it was far too lame to submit to slashdot.

    I guess I need to rethink slashdot's lameness level.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:I saw this a day or so ago. by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Ouch! Hit with the -1 by a rabid Trekkie. :)

      I could comment on how that reinforces my argument...

      But, sheesh, can't anyone take a joke?

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  76. used a floppy yesterday. by twitter · · Score: 1
    With all available CDs dedicated to ogging, a rescue floppy was hany to fix a screwed up wireless node box. It was the first time in months I made use of a floppy.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  77. Slashdotted already. Damn. I wanted to see this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahahahaha! We took the fuckers out! This is what their site says now:

    "Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to..."

    I didn't realize you needed permission to link so someone's site. That's what you get for signing up for the "Cheap Ass" package from your web host.

  78. Because it's not that simple... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    There was this company that did EXACTLY what you are describing- and for the reasons of sites being Slashdotted. They burned some 70 million dollars in one year's time partly because they couldn't figure out how to sell the service (They kept trying to sell the dynamic content handling features when they should have been going directly after Akamai's business and then some...) and partly because the whole system was kind-of pricey to implement.

    Why do I know about all of this? I used to work for this comany in question (epicRealm) and they laid off most of thier staff so they could change business plans from a content delivery network to an app accelerator (which the idea in question DOES work well at).

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Because it's not that simple... by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      partly because the whole system was kind-of pricey to implement.

      I don't understand how it would be pricey. I've done something like this in the past and could probably re-implement it in Apache within a day (add a few more if you want a fancy interface to add sites to the system). It's not like we're talking about writing entirely new software here. Apache has this functionality built in (mod_proxy, taking advantage of its caching features and ProxyPass directives, and/or mod_rewrite and its P RewriteRule flag).

  79. Thansk stupid Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

    When are you guys going to take a fucking hint?

    1. Re:Thansk stupid Slashdot. by SScorpio · · Score: 1
      This issue is stated in the FAQ.

      http://slashdot.org/faq/suggestions.shtml#su900

    2. Re:Thansk stupid Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > http://slashdot.org/faq/suggestions.shtml#su900

      A particularly stupid answer. Sure people couldn't wait 6 hours to discover this "Starship Enterprise out of a 3.5" Floppy" thing.

    3. Re:Thansk stupid Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think everyone should have to ask permission in order to link to a site? Deep link to a site? Include a URL in a printed article?

      It's best not to try to draw that line. Especially because it would probably end up being drawn by the Walt Disney Co.

    4. Re:Thansk stupid Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I draw the line when it comes to my bandwidth bill. If Slashdot links to my site, then its going offline until it gets off the frontpage. Period. I can't afford to pay a beefy bandwidth bill just to please the idiots who think they have a right to DDOS my server just to access content.

      Obviously there is no perfect solution, but the editors of Slashdot aren't even trying. They could have asked for mirrioring permission, or they could have linked to a Google cache, or they could have added links to the many sites that carry the same page (in effect, its pre-mirrored!)

    5. Re:Thansk stupid Slashdot. by piku · · Score: 1

      And on top of that, what is the point of immediately hearing about something if it takes 6 hours for the page to load?

  80. No..... Peacefire. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You my friend need Peacefire

  81. Sigh...Slashdot Editors strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet it happens again that brainless editors at /. do not care about whether a server can take up on a DDoS coming from a /. post, but they just go and take another site down.
    So how does that help us, readers of /. when we cant reach that site and see what's the post about. It's time someone puts some brains into empty heads of /. editors and kick them in the butt too. And /. should offer mirroring service for those sites who can't take the /. effect out of professional courtesy.

    my $0.02

    1. Re:Sigh...Slashdot Editors strike again by RumpledElf · · Score: 2, Funny

      This happens all the time. While slashdot itself doesn't mirror, ever noticed that several readers may mirror the article/whatever so *we* still get to read it while the original site owner is off trying to sell their children to pay for the bandwidth bill. Mirroring by proxy, basically.

      --
      An Australian MMORPG under development - http://restlessworld.hidden-waters.com
  82. That's crap by Wee · · Score: 1
    I think they really, really, really didn't like finding out about the ./ effect completely unannounced.

    Oh bull. A group of (image-laden) pages on my site got posted to Slashdot last year and it wasn't that big of a deal. Yeah, I had a few hundred thousand visitors, but that's why I have a hosting company that doesn't suck. So that people can actually -- gasp! -- get to what I put online.

    If you don't want people to access their content, either don't put it on the Net or restrict access to it.

    Buncha friggin' whiners...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:That's crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you'll be feel fine if we DDoS attack your web server, right?

      Because that's exactly that the "Slashdot effect" is.

    2. Re:That's crap by Wee · · Score: 1
      So you'll be feel fine if we DDoS attack your web server, right? Because that's exactly that the "Slashdot effect" is.

      That's idiotic. A traffic spike is not necessarily an attack. Attack implies malicious intent. Making resources publicly available and then whining that those resources were fetched legitimately is lame.

      Yet one more reason not to bother with ACs...

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    3. Re:That's crap by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      If I throw a party and tell people to bring a few friends, I'm not expecting them to buy a billboard advertizing the party and then have a thousand people show up. Content on the net has an expected sized audience. When /. fucks up a site, it's just mean because so few ever see the site before it gets fucked, then stays fucked for a week.

      If a site knew it could be slashdotted from the start it might redirect anyone from /. to goatse. The party analogy is that I have to tell the 1000 unexpected people showing up to leave, and that takes up my time. In the virtual world, that means bandwidth is taken up telling the slashdotters to leave.

  83. Slashdot so naughty. by IIOIOOIOO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot. Slashdot will never provide mirrors of the sites that they crush though. Why? Certainly not because of all of the technical issues listed in the FAQ... not even because of laziness. The simple reason is money. With a single post on slashdot being able to rapidly crush the allotted bandwidth of a midsize site, can you imagine the cost if Slashdot had to pay for all that bandwidth themselves? Furthermore, Slashdot can ONLY make money by collecting ad revenues for content links, without ever having to generate/host any content themselves. I.E. 1) Some guy put's a funny thing on the internet for his small loyal band of friends/admirers to laugh at. 2) Slashdot posts it, in order to generate more pageloads on their site for viewing the story and comments on the story. 3) The burden/cost of serving the content is born by the third party, who is often times noncommercial, and in some cases bears an EXTREME cost for exceeding his allotted bandwidth. 4) Slashdot makes money, the person who provides the content to allow them to do so loses out. 5) I imagine it's only a matter of time before the first person decides to do the research and find an approach which would allow suit for damages. In summary, Slashdot's business model as a .COM instead of a .ORG is grossly abusive. Think of it as a grand version of those people who build a porn site entirely from offsite image links. Were I a webmaster with anything accessible to the public, I would definitely reconfigure my server to redirect anyone with a referer from Slashdot to a very tiny ascii picture of my wang. Of course, this doesn't mean I'll stop reading :)

    1. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I would definitely reconfigure my server to redirect anyone with a referer from Slashdot to a very tiny ascii picture of my wang.

      That would be actual size, right?

    2. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by mcspock · · Score: 1

      thank you for this post.

      i've posted in the past about how silly it is for slashdot to link to sites that can't handle the load, and to link without permission. but i dont think anybody cares - i think the assumption is that if it is on the web it can handle 100,000 hits per hour, and why would anybody need to ask.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
    3. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The other reason is legal. If /. started mirroring sites you're bound to have some guy saying 'site down since /. is mirroring without permission, followed by the cease and disist'.

      You can't please everyone. BTW no body expects to be /.ed, but nor should the expect that it won't be.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    4. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would definitely reconfigure my server to redirect anyone with a referer from Slashdot to a very tiny ascii picture of my wang.

      So, life-size then.

    5. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by Hard_Code · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I would definitely reconfigure my server to redirect anyone with a referer from Slashdot to a very tiny ascii picture of my wang."

      You mean, like this?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    6. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by darthtuttle · · Score: 1

      If you don't want the public viewing your site, or linking to it, secure it. If you put up a public website, expect the public to view it and link to it. That was kind of the point of html and httpd. Don't blame your lack of thought on security on slashdot.

      --
      Darthtuttle
      Thought Architect
    7. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, thats it. Its a conspiracy. Slashdot is trying to put every non profit organization out of business, one at a time, by causing them fees for over use of bandwidth. Sounds a bit paranoid to me. You wearing a tin foil hat too?

    8. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by gonzoboy · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, I've got a web site. Just a family thing. 150MB a month bandwidth limitation. Mainly used for sharing baby pictures, email, etc.

      Somehow, through the extreme sleep deprivation, I manage to find the time to make something worthy of /.ing. One of my buddies submits its and, lo and behold, 1 million hits later, my bandwidth is gone.

      Now, the geek part of me thinks this would be cool. I can now say I've been /.ed for the rest of my life.

      The responsible father part of me (think ward cleaver with a pony tail) thinks this would be inappropriate behavior that could lead to significant unintended consequences. Depending on the day, I could be without email for a month (yep, that's bandwidth) without forking out hard earned cash. Now me, I'm flush with cash from all of my .com stock options. For some people, hello blood bank.

      Now, I think to myself, "What did I do to deserve this?" Well, I took the time to create something cool enough to be /.ed and for that, I have no email for a month. There's got to be a better way to reward people that create cool stuff...

      But wait, there is substance to this post. /. makes money from advertising. Wouldn't it be nice if, before linking to me, /. contacted me and offered me the option of mirroring my site? They could have an agreement with the "marketer of the month" who sponsors this bandwidth. Nice little frame on top from the marketer, my content in the bottom.

      I get my content /.ed. Cool. I still have email. More cool. /. makes some cash. Even more cool.

      Of course, I could take the tact of putting my own SuperPornPopUp up on the page and make a mint! Wow, I think I have a .com idea. Monitor who's been /.ed and sell porn advertising on their sites.

    9. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by spot35 · · Score: 1

      *Nobody* expects the Spanish inquisition!!!

    10. Re:Slashdot so naughty. by Merk · · Score: 1

      Oh, c'mon. People are only human. How often do you see buildings built in earthquake zones that are demolished when they're hit? The possibility of an earthquake was well known, and they could have built the house to handle earthquakes, as well as buy shelving and cupboards with latches, etc. The fact is, while Earthquakes and the Slashdot Effect are devastating to the unprepared, they're also very rare.

      The difference is that nobody can predict earthquakes, whereas Slashdot editors can predict the Slashdot effect with 100% accuracy. I could go in and tweak my web server so that requests with a Slashdot referer were completely ignored, or so more than X requests a minute were ignored, or all kinds of things, but that's a lot of work for a very unlikely event. Can you really blame people for being pissed at getting slashdotted?

      It would be courteous for Slashdot editors to send a quick "heads up" if a small-looking site is about to hit the front page. They're under no obligation to do it, but it would be nice.

  84. I used by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 1

    a set of Appple OS 7.5.2 disks. The best part is minus disk tools there are thirteen disks.

    Thirteen disks , thirteen Constitution Class Starships from the original show.

    Damn I am such a dork.

    --
    >
    1. Re:I used by darien · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is, that actually is the best part.

  85. Re:This page cannot be viewed without written cons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they can't pay the bill, guess that means they don't need a webserver.

  86. mod_slashdotsucks: An idea... by Karpe · · Score: 1

    Isn't there any module to apache that would look up the HTTP referrer header of the request and if it comes from slashdot, display a minimum bandwidth ("slashdot sucks") version of the page?

  87. i did heheh :D by zzottt · · Score: 1

    i did heheh :D

  88. Instead of whining... by eMartin · · Score: 1

    ...they could have been smart about it, and quickly changed it to a page of advertisements. That would probably have helped with their bandwidth bill.

    1. Re:Instead of whining... by riqnevala · · Score: 1
      mod_slashdotsucks wishlist:
      • automatic slashdot-referer-recognition
      • minimum bandwidth messages
      • automatic web-ad-subscription abusing incoming traffic
      • panic-mirror activation
      • client-side slashdot-hacking javascripts
      • CowboyNeal is food for the masses
      --
      love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
  89. The anatomy of a Slashdotting by Leeji · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thanks for this mirror. When I saw how light the page was, I wondered how the site could have been slashdotted. Well, this is how:

    1. Page weight (HTML + Graphics): 43kb = 0.043 Mb)
    2. Slashdot serves 50,000,000 pages per month according to the Slashdot FAQ
    3. 50,000,000 pages per month = 138,888 pages per hour (assuming peak hours get 1/12 of the the daily traffic.)
    4. This page got slashdotted in about 1 hour.
    5. If every /. page view during that hour clicked through, this site served 0.043Mb * 138,888 = 5972 Mb.

    This is still waaay under the bandwidth caps of most hosting accounts, but is probably more than anybody wants to serve in an hour. You've still got the rest of the month to go!

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
    1. Re:The anatomy of a Slashdotting by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • Page weight (HTML + Graphics): 43kb = 0.043 Mb)

      • Slashdot serves 50,000,000 pages per month according to the Slashdot FAQ [slashdot.org]
        50,000,000 pages per month = 138,888 pages per hour (assuming peak hours get 1/12 of the the daily traffic.)
        This page got slashdotted in about 1 hour.
        If every /. page view during that hour clicked through, this site served 0.043Mb * 138,888 = 5972 Mb.


      Not likely. . . . Not even a close approximation.

      You are also assuming that everybody who saw the link clicked on it.
    2. Re:The anatomy of a Slashdotting by cakoose · · Score: 1
      You are also assuming that everybody who saw the link clicked on it.

      To be fair, he wasn't really assuming that. He statement is clearly a conditional one.

    3. Re:The anatomy of a Slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be more accurate, he was assuming it was an upper maximum. I think he's quite right too.

  90. MacGyver didn't use guns... by iainmcphersn · · Score: 1
    In fact, one episode found MacGyver locked in a cargo container filled with firearms and munitions. Rather than use one of the existing weapons platforms to blast his way out, he stripped a couple down and MacGyver'd them into (surprise) a BOMB!

    Amazing but true...

    John

    1. Re:MacGyver didn't use guns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha!

      There was the other episode where we was being chased through a warehouse-- he mixed ammonia with bleach to create a toxic fog - what fun!

      Also, I wonder if you'd have any hearing left after setting off a bomb inside a cargo container. They were considering rear-seat airbags (not rear-seat side airbags, but big bags behind the driver & passenger seats), and found that if all 4 bags went off when the windows were closed, the pressure pretty much just blew out all the passengers' eardrums.

  91. Re: Slashdot isn't journalism, but still..... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I think anyone posting web pages/sites should be aware of the potential for the site attracting large numbers of viewers.

    To think any other way is incredibly short-sighted!

    Whether it's a surge in traffic brought about by one's "2 minutes of fame" on Slashdot, or simply because your new business starts catching on and everyone wants more info on your latest product - it's always a situation to consider.

    I understand some people might simply be hosting their site off a home DSL connection, using personal web server or whatnot. Still, I'd expect these people to simply take the site down completely if it was innundated with traffic the bandwidth couldn't handle - and perhaps to seek out folks to kindly mirror it for them. Swapping your original pages with a page attacking Slashdot (or anyone else) for linking to it is in bad taste.

  92. From the site: by Irvu · · Score: 1
    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...


    Apppently some people do see Slashdotting as a DOS attack.
  93. Re:This page cannot be viewed without written cons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If you don't want it viewed without permission, shouldn't you password protect it?

    That's not what they asked. Maybe you should *read* what you have quoted.

    > What is the differnce between slashdot handing out the link versus say... Google?

    Google people know they will not put down a site just by linking to it, because the links they provide depend on (ramdom) requests. Slashdot people do know they link to sites unable to handle the load *Slashdot* is going to create. (a link from Google is *nothing* in comparison)

  94. Doesn't Look Like Enterprise by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't look like the Enterprise to me, the warp nacelle pylons, warp nacelle, and engineering hull are all wrong. But I'm a picky ship critic.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  95. What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by smoondog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't get it. These guys put up a site, /. links to it, the site goes down do to heavy traffic. Perhaps they shouldn't have put the site up in the first place? The web is a *public* place folks. If they wanted to prevent it, they should've password protected it.

    Anyways, I think it is funny that these guys act like /. has prevented viewing of important stuff.

    -Sean

    1. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by mcspock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, it's a public place. Like a public park. It's nice to walk down to a public park, play on the swings, etc.

      Imagine going down to your neighborhood park and finding 500,000 people jumping up and down. Sure, it's a public place, but it wasn't designed for that. It was designed for 50 or 100 people to hang out for a bit, and move on.

      If you think about it a bit more though, this is like someone's back yard. This guy has to pay for bandwidth. He's got a sign saying "sure, come in, sit down for a bit". It's not public, it's private, and he's being generous in letting people use it, but that generocity is abused when slashdot decides to pour people all over his site.

      Last example. Think of public marches. The roads are owned by the people, and it's perfectly acceptable for 50,000 people to march through downtown seattle, with streets closed down. BUT, before they can do that, they have to ask permission and obtain a permit from the city. It's simple consideration for others before taking for yourself.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
    2. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't get it. These guys put up a site, /. links to it, the site goes down do to heavy traffic. Perhaps they shouldn't have put the site up in the first place?

      Ok, so let's remove all the projects that use mirrors (including Linux and GNU of course), they shouldn't have put the site up in the first place, since they're not able to handle heavy traffic.

    3. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by smoondog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you think about it a bit more though, this is like someone's back yard. This guy has to pay for bandwidth.

      The problem is that the web isn't someone's backyard. It is something quite different. 1) It takes very little effort for someone to visit the site and 2) the concept of linking is very different and enables this activity so easily a website should expect this.

      I do think however, that there could be a way to opt out. Perhaps something equivalent to the robots.txt file? Either the linking body or the web server could control how clients connect, particularly with respect to linked referrals.

      -Sean

    4. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by blueroo · · Score: 1

      Because it costs money to host stuff. I know this is a unique concept to you, the ignorant end-surfer, but all these "free, public" websites are paid for by somebody, and it certainly ain't you. Can you really be so stupid as to suggest that somebody not do something unless it can handle an extreme load? Lets see how you feel about it when you pay $50/mo for 1.5mbit in a colo, and slashdot comes along and drives your usage up to 3mbit sustained for 8 hours. Do you know what the penalties are for that kind of overusage? Are you willing to give the owner a few thousand dollars to cover it? I wish you fecks could get in touch with reality already.

    5. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people end up with large bills when /. links to them. Heck, for all I know, for some people it could be a week's, a month's, or more's worth of wages. I can easily understand how some people could be annoyed, especially if they got an unexpected bill for dispersing non-important stuff.

    6. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by smoondog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know this is a unique concept to you, the ignorant end-surfer

      (Looks like the social skills of /. are pretty much the same as they always were) Anyways, my point stands. You put something online, you get lots of traffic, you better be able to deal with the consequences.

      There is a responsibility associated with putting something online. You should be able to deal with such issues as lots of traffic, being sued, slander, etc. If you can't, don't put it online. Some people seem to think that because they are in high school, their entire world should function like they are in high school. The internet is the real world, and webmasters should treat it as such.

      -Sean

    7. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by c4thy · · Score: 0

      funny you took the guys most vague analogy to retort on. try retorting on the street marching analogy.

      --

      i am convinced that "/.ers" are homosexuals and imma make that my "sig"
    8. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by Nkwe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reality is that it's the Internet. Unless you put controls on your site, you don't have any control or say over who can access it when, or how often. If you choose to host on a metered service and you don't have a budget for spikes, then it is your responsibility to meter your website. Have your web server stop serving pages after you have meet your budget. You signed the contract with your ISP, it is your responsibility. If your web site isn't really public, then put a password on it.

    9. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by Grimster · · Score: 1

      $50 for 1.5 mbit? good lord I'd commit murder to get 1.5 mbit for $50 per month!

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    10. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by PhxBlue · · Score: 0

      Not only that--but because Slashdot sells advertising space on the pages that contain a link to the site, Slashdot actually makes money from what is effectively a denial-of-service attack.

      One of these days, someone's going to do more than post a webpage saying, "Slashdot sucks." They're going to hire a lawyer. Then we'll see story caches, I'm sure!

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    11. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by shovey · · Score: 1

      If you think about it everybody pays for bandwidth, don't people have to pay for the bandwidth to view your site? If you want to protect yourself from overusage, throttle your user limit and your bandwith. You are responsible for those cost and you control the cost, not the people who visit your site.

    12. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by blueroo · · Score: 1

      You're right. I'm going to release a dam full of water at your house. Here's a bucket. It's your responsibility to keep your house clean, dry, and in one piece. Have fun! =)

    13. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by shovey · · Score: 1

      That's a great point. If I choose to build a house downstream from a dam and it breaks, whatever the reason, am I supposed to blame someone else for the dam breaking and flooding my house? Most likely, I will have thought ahead and purchased insurance to cover the damages. So where I may not have fun per say, at least I'll know I did what I could to limit my liability for making a risky decison in the first place.

    14. Re:What is up with /.'ed webmasters? by blueroo · · Score: 1

      Everyone lives downstream from the damn. You get no choice. Stop stretching the analogy further than it can go.

  96. Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google dont have a problem with legal issues when caching web pages.

  97. Links are what the internet is about by nano-second · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry but thems the breaks. You don't have to ask to link to someone's page. If you put up something in public space, people are free to link to it. I thought most services just refused access to your page if you went over your bandwidth anyways.

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    1. Re:Links are what the internet is about by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I thought most services just refused access to your page if you went over your bandwidth anyways.

      It depends on how your site is hosted. Some of us just throw a Linux box up on a cable-modem or DSL connection at home. In that case, there's usually just bandwidth throttling done at the headend. If your upstream bandwidth is 128 kbps and you get /.'d, you basically have no upstream bandwidth for your own use for the next 24 hours or so.

      (Implementing some sort of rate limiting at your server or firewall would fix that. I've never looked into doing that. I've been /.'d on a couple of occasions, though, so I probably should do something about it. Maybe after I get the new firewall up and running...)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:Links are what the internet is about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Following that logic since your IP is publicly available you don't have any grounds to complain if people begin to DoS you. The result is the same.

    3. Re:Links are what the internet is about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's find out what happens if I post your IP in an IRC chat room! DDoS ATTACK!!! YAY!

      After all, I'm just linking to you.

    4. Re:Links are what the internet is about by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Following that logic since your IP is publicly available you don't have any grounds to complain if people begin to DoS you. The result is the same.

      Close but no cigar. In any legal action, intent matters. Accidently killing someone is manslaughter, not murder, for instance. Sometimes its not a crime at all.

      In order to prove a criminal act, you have to demonstrate either 1) malice of forethought or a desire to cause damage (like a DDOS attack) or 2) Negligence. Negligence is hard to prove here, since it is not negligent to LINK, its the entire purpose OF the WWW.

      I mean, if you don't want to be linked, put a password up or take some steps to warn/ask to not be linked. Irresponsible doesn't equal criminal, and I don't see where this is irresponsible. Unfortunate, but not negligent, IMHO.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:Links are what the internet is about by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Just because the /. editors can't be forced to warn sites before linking to them doesn't make it good practice. Just because they can't make a law against being an ass doesn't mean that it should be something to aspire to.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  98. Re:Slashdotted already. Damn. I wanted to see this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, its called not everyone is a rich fucker who can afford the bandwidth. Slashdot could be costing this guy hundreds of extra dollars because of Slashdot's subbron refusal to mirror

  99. you are SO asking for it... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 5, Funny

    If one more IRC fuck-stick uses /me again I'm gonna hunt them down and bitch-slap them.

    /me hands btlzu2 a trout

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  100. Not work safe by babbage · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you're tempted to do something like this at work, be aware that your cow-orkers may make fun of you over this. Be ready to defend your Trekliness if fighting breaks out. And by all means, if you do respond to any teasing for your devotion to all things Trek, please make sure that your cow-orkers know who to forward the mail to. The world will thank you :-)

  101. Re:Slashdotted already. Damn. I wanted to see this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I didn't realize you needed permission to link so someone's site.

    You don't need permission to link. You're juste not allowed to DOS someone else's site. And Slashdot editors *knew* they would DOS the site.

    They really should be sued for this.

  102. How about removing the link? by omega9 · · Score: 0

    Once /. realizes they've completely creamed the feckfeck out of someones page, what's the harm in removing <a href=""></a> from the link? The story will remain posted, but not generate that ton of traffic from people who click links "because they're there". /. was smart enough to write slashcode, I'm sure they could come up with a bit of perl that only activated the link after it was moved off the front page. Hell, come up with a little superscript (2) like everything2 uses to signify it's a time delayed link.

    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  103. Re:This page cannot be viewed without written cons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what would you have done if /. had contacted you first?

    Take the page away?
    Take the machine offline?
    Bitch?
    Moan?
    Ask them to pay your bandwidth bill or not link?

    I'm not buying your "common decency" debate. Tell me how you'd have handled it. Bonus points will be awarded for a really creative tall tale.

  104. A pissy bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, they sure are whiny about being linked to.

    I'm sure it sucked.

  105. I see, I see, I get the picture... by btlzu2 · · Score: 1

    ...so, why does people replying to your sig annoy you?

    --
    Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
    1. Re:I see, I see, I get the picture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HE NEVER CHANGES IT.. ERGO IT DOESNT ANNOY HIM ERGO YOUR QUESTION IS STUPID..

      --
      ome primal termite knocked on wood. And tasted it, and found it good. And that is why your Cousin May Fell through the parlor floor today. -- Ogden Nash

  106. mirror by Monkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a link to how to make it on this Geoshitties page.

  107. lame by Kynde · · Score: 1, Troll

    "Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to..."

    Now, how lame is that? "Without asking the owners", oh please...

    --
    1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
  108. hate mail by misterbonnie · · Score: 1

    Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 17:55:40 +0000 From: Bob To: bonnie@asciipr0n.com Subject: No link?? Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to... Maybe you should stay away from the internet you stupid fuck! Wait.. Maybe you got something there... Let's remove all links and pull the fucking plug on your weak ass host, bitch! Stick to making shit with floppies and forget about posting anything to the web you fucking retard. yeah thanks bonnie i made the site, it got slashdotted, the host got whiny

  109. Sad, yet amusing. by flatface · · Score: 1

    http://sloth.flatface.net:441/~flatface/ent.jpg

    This is the most useful thing I've done with a floppy for the past 3 years.

  110. Irresponsible = print to pdf and use bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    print to pdf and use bit torrent instead assh0les

  111. Duhhhhhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...we're a bunch of star trek nerds and we will eat up anything having to do with startrek"

    visit this site to see how to turn your arse into a klingon wormhole: HERE!!!

  112. Slashdot Effect is named that for a reason. by MisterSquid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The difference between CNN linking to a site and /. linking to a site is that there is no such thing as the "CNN Effect" while the "Slashdot Effect" is such a well-known phenomenon it has been written up by a university physicist.

    We're not talking an occasional spike in traffic: everytime /. links to an article, that site is hit and hit hard. With the current linking policy (i.e. none), /. inadvertently becomes a DoS portal with us slashdrones the zombified clients.

    /. should have taken care of this a long time ago.

    --
    blog
  113. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  114. We need a "post to journal" feature by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've suggested this but Taco Shot it down.
    I personally think every story posted should go into a users journal.

    That way people can develop fan clubs and post good info all day long instead of being shot down by the editors.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:We need a "post to journal" feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be great, but I don't want to check forty thousand individual journals for good stories.

      I guess I'll just have to put up with the 'editor approved dross' :(

  115. Try mirroring the site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take the authors advice and try mirroring the sites you link to. Or at least chip in for the bandwidth costs, Since you did link to his site with no warning.

    Slashdot's irresponsible linking must stop. Having Slashdot link to your site is like getting a huge DDoS attack.

  116. asciipr0n: 1, Slashdot: 0 by xihr · · Score: 1

    Yep! asciipr0n.com sure showed Slashdot! Now the Slashdot readers will never get to know the true pleasure of boring digitized images of Playboy models circa 1970. What a blow to boredom and lameness everywhere!

  117. Slashdotted? Punchline! by xihr · · Score: 1

    But there's an additional, ultimate irony about this. They're complaining that Slashdot linked to them without permission, asciipr0n.com has a link to ASCII Art Farts but never asked for permission themselves! Um, a little hypocritical, maybe?

  118. COAX terminators by H3g3m0n · · Score: 1

    You should try making things out of those old coaxual terminators (like these ones http://www.d-m.com/images/coaxcon.gif ) You can make heaps of cool things like robots out of them and lots of places have them left over as they have moved onto cat-5.

    --
    cat /dev/urandom > .sig
  119. Re: Slashdot isn't journalism, but still..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >To think any other way is incredibly short-sighted!

    That's incredibly oversimplified. Everyone knows that nothing is simply black and white.

    If I wanted to host a small text file that said "Hello Slashdot viewers," would I look for the best server/provider I can find?

    Maybe if I'm stupid. I'm not.

    >Swapping your original pages with a page attacking Slashdot (or anyone else) for linking to it is in bad taste.

    So if Slashdot causes you to pay extra fees for extra bandwidth usage, you wouldn't be a little pissed off?

    Just the fact that you are forced to take your website down should piss you off to some degree.

  120. Slashdotted! by QuietYou · · Score: 1

    "Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to..."

    That would be the polite thing to do. You wouldn't have to mirror the entire site, just the first page that is linked to would be fine (including images of course). The mirror should stay up as long as the original page is linked from the front page of slashdot.org. After the story moves off the front page the mirror could be deleted and the link would point to the original site.

    I know this could be expensive for slashdot.org, but maybe it would lead to some Quality over Quantity for stories that actually get posted here.

  121. Told ya so by nnet · · Score: 1
    Due to the people at slashdot.org linking to this site without asking the owners or the hosters, asciipr0n.com is offline until further notice. Maybe you guys should start mirroring the sites you link to...

    Sounds familiar, matter of fact, I said the very same thing :)

  122. touchy bastards by bozojoe · · Score: 1

    damn these guys guys are touchy .....crap about mirroring sites and permission to link.

    Whats the world coming to?....repsonilbility?(sp)

    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
    1. Re:touchy bastards by Iain+Bagnall · · Score: 1

      perhaps they're not touchy about being linked to in general, just by slashdot, where we so often clog up people's websites that the term 'slashdotted' means that something gets posted here, then goes down from too many hits.

  123. Stupid webmasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate websites who reckon that all sites should ask them before linking to them, it goes against the whole philosophy of the internet.

  124. Dang! Auto-Slashdot mirroring a sweet idea! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    It's not as though Slashdot isn't set up to deal with the bandwidth. Just the relevent news pages. I'm sure the smart guys who run this joint could automate something with relatively little effort.

    And that would solve the 5000 pound gorilla problem. --People getting hammered with unexpected $500 over-run fees? That'd screw some people pretty badly. (Does this still happen? Do Hosting companies still nail people like that?)

    Either way, the Gods Of Slashdot should look into it. It think it's a solid idea. It's responsible.

    And anyway, I sooo wanted to see a starship made out of junk. It is a slow day. . .


    -Fantastic Lad

  125. Slashdot should embrace P2P by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone's griping about the whole mirroring situation and lack of a policy.

    This story presented a good way for ISOs to be distributed.

    Everyone and their grandma is looking for a way to "legitimize" P2P sharing without involving music.

    Why doesn't slashdot start a P2P mirror. Simple gzip the page that's cool to look at, and host it via bittorrent or kazaa. Bandwidth gets shared among the slashdot community, and no site gets hit too hard (except google, which will invaribly be linked to by people who insist on posting google cache links in nearly every discussion ;) Sound good?

  126. Re:Dang! Auto-Slashdot mirroring a sweet idea! by Fritzed · · Score: 1

    The problem with mirroring sites is the whole copyright issue. In order to mirror the site, slashdot would have to make sure they were not displaying any copyrighted information without permission. So they would have to not only obtain permission from the site author to copy his information, but to be safe, they would have to make sure they weren't displaying any copyrighted information themselves.

    By the time the process was done it wouldn't be news anymore.

    -> Fritz

    --
    Spooooon!!!!!
  127. Pfft. That's nothing... by ilumits · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just made a Klingon battle cruiser out of an old Zip® disk. Picture below:

















    Woops. I guess it's cloaked.

  128. Reusable media? by dabootsie · · Score: 1

    Not anymore it's not!

  129. history by zogger · · Score: 1

    --civil disobedience has an honored and checkered past, both of those things. The civil rights movement as a recent example. Under these new laws, you would have needed to put millions of people into "camps". Would that have been correct? Which was truly the larger crime, millions of people victimized for generations by government, or some of the protests they did? The beginnings AND the end of liquid drugs-alcohol-prohibition were accompanied by mass protests that at times "blocked the streets". Arrested those millions, 25 to life? Women's suffrage for the vote, so they actually could be represented in a representative republic (it's not a democracy in the US in theory). US veterans after ww1 camping out in washington DC, "blocking" this or that as they strove for anything, any scraps, to ease them through the depression. Lots of examples, would we put all those people in camps from 25 years to a life sentence? You would, because they blocked your street in a protest? Or breaking a window? Hmm, I am thinking, say i was some black guy way back then, I am told I can't vote, even though the law says I can, I know i can be caught in the white side of town and beat up or lynched, even by members of the government, and no one will care. personally, I would have thought stronger things than just marrching and breaking glass were in order, thnakfully millions more just took it, kept it to a more civil manner, and shamed millions of other americans into finally admitting that perhaps they had a point or two to make. Was it really all that wrong?

    Now , conversely, why is it "legal" that 50,000 people are "allowed" to completely "block traffic" and generally screw it up at all the surrounding streets at professional sports stadiums? Because there's money involved? Suppose you don't like that sport or team, suppose that you have business, need to get someplace, and just wish to get from point A to B across town, but the roads are hoplessly blocked artifically? I happen to like individual sports of some kinds, but I detest team sports, professional or (ha ha) non professional college team sports. Can't tell ya how many times I have been blocked by those yahoos. Oh, the diofference is they never get drunk and stupid and violent and trash cars and stores over a freaking ball game? Hmm, well, yes they do a lot of times. How exactly then is that different? Under this new law, 25 to life for the entire crowd at the stadium under the oregon law, re-read the fine print in that thing again, it's in there. Or some concert, pick any genre, just the big crowds, again, artifically blocking somone's "way", and definetly planned and organized in advance,a "conspiracy" if you will, but still, a hassle if you don't want to participate and just be on your way? What gives them the right to do that, to subvert government, impede others business and travel, and get away with it? Oh ya, "money", the organizers pay bribes or "permits" to the government so that they can infringe on my rights, but see, with the bribe it's "legal" then, and a lot of people think it's cool, but a lot more DON'T, but the blocking still occurs, yes? How about when some bogus fatcat VIP and his equally bogus entourage have the roads blocked so they can cruise by in their Limos? Is that "legal" to do? It happens, why is that not "blocking the normal traffic"?

    The reason why mass "civil" disobedience needs to be tolerated occassionally is, even if that particular action is not one of anyone "yours" pet peeves, is quite simple, it's usually about the last straw for redress of grievences that some x-huge numbers of people have after exhausting all other normal legal avenues to be heard,when "the vote" and letters to the editor and haranguing their reps and yada yada just plain hasn't worked, and them desiring to become "unvictimized" or for some other reason of serious import. This "civil disobedience" comes as the last step before before mass "uncivil" disobedience occurs, as a general historical note of data. Look around the world, places tha

    1. Re:history by perljon · · Score: 1

      But what we are really talking about here is all the protestors of the last year that think we shouldn't be attacking Iraq. And they think that just because they are protesting in the streets, and the policy hasn't changed, they are being dealt some great injustice.

      So... they start breaking the law, laying in the busy downtown streets of New York with the intention of causing economic hardship to New York. These people are the minority, were allowed to vote in the National elections, and are being dealt no injustice at all. We have an all voluntary military force, where objectors to the war can be relieved of duty after filling out a simple form. And just because 25 people protest somewhere against the war doesn't mean they are representing some underlying unrepresented majority.

      The facts remain:
      As far as rallys and protests go, those against the war are far less attended than those who support the war.
      Poll after poll after poll has shown an overwhelming support for the President and the war.
      The war protestors are in a clear minority, are being dealt no injustice, and want to circumvent the political process with violence and economic disruption. This should be very illegal. All of these protests you mentioned were heald because there was no other way of correcting an injustice. The law-breaking done by anti-war protestors is the result of a minority wanting to write foreign policy, undermine the current elected government, and force the will of the minority on the rest of the people. That's the difference.

      --
      This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
  130. Re: Slashdot isn't journalism, but still..... by pennsol · · Score: 1

    Accually your very correct.. The site didn't crash, everyone got to see his little tirad about "not asking Permission" If the guy get's a bill for going over his Bandwidth limit it's the price he pays for not just pulling the plug... :)

    --

    Just Limin' Mon

  131. slashdotting by prockcore · · Score: 1

    On April 1st, two DJs were arrested after announcing that eminem would be appearing at a local biglots, causing a huge number of people to show up at biglots.

    The DJs were charged with both fraud (because it was an april fools joke) and deprevation of business (because they effectively shut down biglots)

    It's only a matter of time before slashdot gets sued for slashdotting a website.

    If anything, slashdot is repeatedly guilty of orchestrating DoS attacks.

  132. how many have to die!?!?! by unclefungus · · Score: 1

    i bet hundreds of floppy disks are now dead because of you people! how would you like if come one came and turned you into an Enterprise! I my self would like it very much. :P

  133. Simple solution by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >can you imagine the cost if Slashdot had to pay for all that bandwidth themselves?

    Yes and no. Slashdot has already posted bittorrent files before. If the editor thinks the site might fail he could zip it and torrent it. Put it up on a some server and let the slashdot community swarm.

    Slashdot could do a lot to raise awareness for the bittorrent project.

  134. LINKING != DDOS by nano-second · · Score: 1

    Read this comment A ddos attack is just that, an attack. Linking is perfectly legal and it's part of the framework of the internet.

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
  135. Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That page is back up, you have to copy the link and open it in a new browser though. If you follow the link directly from the article you get a pretty amusing alternative. ;)

  136. and revisionist history and manufactured history by zogger · · Score: 1

    The facts remain:
    As far as rallys and protests go, those against the war are far less attended than those who support the war. [glennbeck.com]
    Poll after poll after poll [washingtonpost.com] has shown an overwhelming support for the President and the war.
    The war protestors are in a clear minority, are being dealt no injustice, and want to circumvent the political process with violence and economic disruption. This should be very illegal. All of these protests you mentioned were heald because there was no other way of correcting an injustice. The law-breaking done by anti-war protestors is the result of a minority wanting to write foreign policy, undermine the current elected government, and force the will of the minority on the rest of the people. That's the difference.


    Facts? Propaganda pushed by a small cabal of high ranking public and private people to distort, deny and obfuscate some of the origins of the 9-11 attacks, to keep some of the high level involvement by white guys in suits out of the US consciousness as much as possible? We are supposed to ignore the evidence that exists that show this? Facts like both saddam and osama are creations of and funded by these same people? That the KLA we armed, trained and supported was just another example of a narco terrorist gang being used as mercenaries, and that these people were in fact "al queda bad guys"? We are supposed to reward the people and shadowy political/military/industrial groups who armed and supported and trained the various "terrorists" we are fighting now? We are supposed to ignore the fact of trillions of dollars and mass political command and control as being part of the over-all big picture? Past overwhelming evidence of high level scams and lies being used to nudge nations into actions?

    The hegelian dialectic is alive and well, and is part of the new "war on everything" which means the very rights we are supposedly "protecting" in the middle east are now seriously being trampled on and denied to the US people. Exactly how dumbed down are some of us supposed to go? Is there a bottom cut off limit anyplace?

    Yes, the polls do indeed indicate a majority of the US people are not aware of any of that reality and awreness and information, and that they can be easily swayed with jingoism and advanced and sophisticated advertising. I am not lauding that as some sort of proof or something to be proud of, in fact, I am seriously embarrased over my own nations over-all level of awareness and sophistication.

    Yes, osama and saddam are some serious badguys, no argument there. I think first we should prosecute the white guys in suits who armed and supplied them for years, to expose all the evidence, not just bits and pieces of the evidence that "they" want us to be focused on, then we can show the world the US is both honest and righteous again. Go to war then if needs be, do it legally and according to our real laws, but not before then.

    Do that, and do it honestly, you'll see "the polls" reflect a slightly different set of "beliefs".

    The URLs for all I have said and allude to have been posted repeatedly on slashdot, no need to repost them. Even a simple google search on "government prior knowledge, 9-11" or similar will take you to any number of places that have the evidence, said evidence not being shown to the US public in any meaningful way. There are deliberate lies, and lying by omission, those "polls" show what happens when both those techniques are used on a mass scale against a targeted audience.

    You want a war against the "badguys", I can agree. Before that war though let's do a bit more "uncovering" of some basic truths, and not go off half cocked in reichstagg induced mania version 2.0. Let's not stop looking at just people who speak arabic and farsi, let's keep looking at people who speak american english, british english, russian, chinese, hebrew and yiddish, german, french, spanish and so on, at whatever level it takes, and let the chips fall

  137. Re:and revisionist history and manufactured histor by perljon · · Score: 1

    Everythings a conspiracy, isn't it? Sounds like the mind confusing tactics of a Dictator hell bent on denying the facts and explaining them away with fuzzy logic and conspiracy theories.

    Also, where do you get off calling everyone stupid. This country was founded on the principle that the public could be trusted to rule themselves. Your comments are proof of the fact that you hate democracy and you hate America.

    Whenever you see pro-war rallies, you see Americans wrapped in American flags singing American songs. Whenever you see anti-war protestors you see foreign flags, and hatred for our American leader.

    Excuse me for believing in the American vision that a people could rule themselves. Will you please be my dictator?

    --
    This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
  138. I Cannot believe I don't have by balbord · · Score: 1

    ONE friking diskette in the hole office!

    hmmm... what's that?
    "HP Laserjet Drivers"?

    hmmmmmmmmmmm

    --
    "If I have been able to see so far, It is because I went out and bought a damn binoculars" - Ze da Esquina
  139. Yup by darqchild · · Score: 1

    This certainly is "News for Nerds"

    now, how about some "Stuff that matters" ?

    --
    What? Me? Worry?
  140. Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All web sites should pay a million dollars a month for unlimited t-1000 bandwith in case /. ever links to them so no one has to go without learning how to make a spaceship out of a floppy disk!

  141. it can be done WITHOUT scissors by mozkill · · Score: 1

    you can turn the floppy into a starship WITHOUT using scissors if you wrap the head mast supports "wrapped around the top from the bottom and putting the 'very thin' strips through the center hole in the ship bridge/head"

    --

    -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
  142. Re:and revisionist history and manufactured histor by zogger · · Score: 1

    --I don't deal in theory, I deal in data. Data. Facts. Not reactionary and racist jingoism. Insults gain you nothing, and I have no desire to rule you, but the contrary is true, don't even think about trying to rule me, even if they give you a nice new brownshirt uniform.

    Basically, take your political ludditism and shove it, now go play with the other "good germans" in your "neighborhood watch group". And by all means keep waving those plastic flags made in china, that's just so patriotic.

    You want civility, offer it, you offer a closed fist and demand I kowtow to some absurd 6th grade level drunken political analysis, wrapped in a flag that you claim as your own but deny to anyone not a lock stepper with your own points of view, well, you can have it. I don't support dictators, especially dictators in my own nation. You can support them all you want to, and stay ignorant of verifiable data. Rah rah rah go team, nuke those filthy ay-rabs, right?

    Oh, that doesn't apply to you, but "my kind" are..whatever you think? Like how dare anyone expend an effort to go beyond a surface level understanding of events?

    I dare, too bad.

    Go ahead and get your "das fatherland security" last word. I'm done on this thread, keep on trolling, hey, maybe a job will come up you can become an interrogator, get to use those nifty "stress and duress" techniques, just like saddam's bully boys and the bully boys at gitmo use? Right up your alley, good luck in your new career!

  143. Re:and revisionist history and manufactured histor by usotsuki · · Score: 1

    This country was founded with checks and balances on the populace itself, hence the electoral college. Sorry, but we were *not* "founded on the principle that the public could be trusted to rule themselves".

    -uso.

    --
    Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  144. archive by persicom · · Score: 1

    http://hellspawn.no-ip.com:85/slash/enterprise.htm

    which, BTW, I got from a link posted at the ./'ed site. Most ./'ed folks wouldn't ahve bothered.

  145. Mirror by koogunmo · · Score: 1

    Mirror: http://students.washington.edu/koogunmo/starship/

  146. Don't forget your shuttle. by t-maxx+cowboy · · Score: 1

    The black write protect tab can double as a shuttle pod.

    --
    Regards,

    Ryan Pritchard
    Fun Extends All Basic Life Expectancies
  147. Whoops. I forgot about human stupidity. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Yeah. That sounds about right.

    I think copyright lawers were sent here to put a stop to all the good things humanity might do if left to its own devices. --I think they were the ones who, as Douglas Adams once put it, nailed to a piece of wood the guy who suggested that everybody be nice to everybody else for a change.


    -Fantastic Lad

  148. Re:Link or copy by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    I think it would also lower the number of dupes, which is one of the reasons it won't happen.

  149. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Dear Emily, what about test messages?
    -- Concerned

    Dear Concerned:
    It is important, when testing, to test the entire net. Never test
    merely a subnet distribution when the whole net can be done. Also put "please
    ignore" on your test messages, since we all know that everybody always skips
    a message with a line like that. Don't use a subject like "My sex is female
    but I demand to be addressed as male." because such articles are read in depth
    by all USEnauts.
    -- Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...