Many times, may I suggest that you do some studying? Because the monopoly controls existing today weren't created because some dude named Marx speculated about it, they were created to avoid problems that actually existed at the time.
Monopolies still exist today but mostly in a different form - a few companies that willingly divide a market between them making it near impossible for new actors to enter. For consumers and corporations alike that is the same problem as a real monopoly but technically a market with two-three strong companies isn't one.
The problem isn't that rats exist - they fill a niche. The problem is that of uncontrolled populations of animals, not rats in particular. Cats and dogs (commonly seen near people) are also disease carrying vermin, often more dangerous to people than rats. If it was a wild dog that found the baby in your example it's been the head that was chewed on, if it were a wild cat the damage would be worse too. Wild dogs and cats shit everywhere, intrudes whenever they can and steal food by habit. They commonly spread diseases and parasites. Their mentality is generally very aggressive.
Pet cats, dogs _and_ rats aren't a problem. Uncontrolled populations of any animal is, some would say that includes people too.
Claiming a monopoly of education in the US just shows that you are a shitty liar or retarded. Even in Communist* Sweden parents have the right to select which school they want their children to attend, in the US it is "trivial" to arrange for home schooling if anything else doesn't fit. That is considerably harder in e.g. Sweden as children have the right to a good education and if one want to home school one also have to prove they will get a good education.
(* it is absolutely not communist however for the extremely skewed perspective of the USA it is often more left leaning than what is commonly called communism)
Thinking logically != being a Luddite. Endangering ones life is one thing (but is often selfish), endangering the lives of willing passengers another and endangering anybody near a road yet another. Unless the thingy is 98%+ safe it _is_ 100% crap for normal purposes.
You already showed how they do it: the parents/elder shows how to do it and the kids learn. That is also a form of communication but doesn't give evidence for any kind of conversations as such.
The shit material used in the manufacturing of low cost drivers are the same kind that was used in high end headphones for a while ago, or in other words it isn't shit at all. Even lower cost (not bargain basement shit whose only design requirement is to squeel out some kind of noise) headphones can have good drivers nowadays however quality control is generally lacking. What is often the problem is that the drivers aren't designed to sound good, they aren't done by experienced engineers and testing etc. is lacking.
The problems with bluetooth are several, one is that ordinary BT are relatively power hungry. It also have no (last time I looked which was some years ago) high quality _standard_ audio transfer with a few higher quality protocols available for $$$ - though they aren't exactly hi-fi either. A quality DAC can consume some power too and drivers capable to output high quality audio tend to be harder to drive -> requires more power to drive. BT devices are often designed to be small so the available battery capacity is often artificially reduced. All these things conspire to make the drivers bad, the DAC bad (though a bad low power DAC can be surprisingly capable nowadays), the battery small and the result shitty.
The latency for BT audio is digital audio -> encoding -> BT transfer -> decoding -> DAC/amp -> analog audio, that is considerable more than your stated 2ms. The aptX low latency codec claims 40ms end-to-end latency, other codecs have 100-150ms latency.
That is 20 times to 75 times longer latency than what you claim.
How is he making life better for anyone? He doesn't work in medicine, he doesn't work in providing technology to people in need, he doesn't improve technology. Bill Gates have done more for common people in all of those areas and more, even when accounting for the immoral/illegal actions of Microsoft. Just because you have a hard-on for space sci-fi and a hatred for M$ facts doesn't change...
I think you mean that IRONIC commercial (compare big brother to the Apple model)? I don't see how it is relevant to a severely misguided understanding of politics in general and communism in particular, a level of understanding that I'd measure close to a mental disease (absolute black and white understanding of the world + ignoring everything that shows that ones preferred model also contains parts of whatever one hates).
Until you begin understanding that nothing in this world is black or white there simply isn't something to discuss. BTW posting something that shows one knows about something isn't being apologetic - in the same way that pointing out that eating children isn't normal in a communist country doesn't make one an apologist!
No. But too tired to not making input errors - while I'm not too (!) bad at the keyboard I don't use normal touch-typing and so typing errors sneak in from time to (!) time. In most cases I try to catch them before posting however you found an example post where I didn't . -- Why did you bother making such an idiotic post? Does it make you feel powerful in some way? Are you the AC I replied to and felt insulted by my post causing this immature kind of retaliation? The intention of my post was to state my opinion and provide some hint, nothing more - nothing less.. Searching for good explanations is a better way to actually begin to understand this complex topic IF one actually want to try to.
They have measured x - and x show no indication of a preferred direction. They also have estimated that with the error marginals of x, with the known factors that can influence it there is a 1:121000 chance the measurement is sufficiently wrong that there may be a preferred direction after all.
Then either the machines or your headphones aren't done right. A 4 connector plug have the same critical dimensions as a 3 connector with the difference that the ground ring (closest to the cable) is split into two, one of those are the vbias/mic/input and the other the ground. Compatibility is ensured by tolerating grounding of the mic connector on the jack or plug, 4 connector plug -> 3 connector jack means that the microphone etc. are disabled as they get no power, 3 connector plug -> 4 connector jack will have the microphone input grounded (and the vbias voltage can either be powered down or be dissipated over a resistor - it is extremely low power). Your problem are with the other two connectors (the tip + the following ring connector) as headphones use ground + tip for the left speaker and ground + connector closest to tip for the right speaker. If you had problem related to the fourth connector you wouldn't get any sound at all.
It is possible that the machine actually outputs only mono sound using a 2 connector jack and that the tip connector is placed wrong (either by design or because of previous abuse of the machine) so that it doesn't make contact with the first two connectors of your headphone plug. Again the problem can't be related to you having a 4 pole plug to your headphones.
They have the same length (otherwise they wouldn't be compatible - which they are) but designed so that they work okay anyway. Vbias/mic/input will be grounded which is easily detected (not that it have to be to function correctly) -> plug and play.
Change for the sake of change is simply stupid. Change that 1) increases power consumption (it is impossible to decrease it with a dongle or the wireless solution) 2) removes compatibility with 99.999%+ of existing devices is simply fucking stupid.
NB that not even the water resistance is a valid excuse as it is trivial to create water _proof_ 3.5 mm jacks. Battery life increase? Ludicrous, do the calculation yourself.
No the application of Cannea drive theory didn't seem to make any difference in that test. - period.
That's all one can logically conclude, everything else is wrong. Did it not show up because NASA didn't do it correctly? Did it not show up because the measurement errors are large enough to hide the improvements from the internal structures? Is the measurement errors large due to other factors and none of the drives (or one of the drives) did actually produce any thrust?
I do not think the EM-drive (or the Cannea drive) will be found to work in the end _however_ the scientific method is to continue testing, not referring to "laws of nature" as something fixed and holy. That is scientific dogma, not science.
*SIGH* No that's not what they say nor what they meant. The null device in this case were identical to the other _except_ it didn't contain internal elements that the Cannea drive theory claimed was essential for functions. In other words what the test showed was that those internal elements weren't necessary for the function of the unit, nothing more - nothing less.
This "dummy drive measured thrust" idea is common among anti-Em drive people. Or in other words they doesn't even bother to read the report before reaching conclusions - does that sound like following the scientific method?
I have found that the majority of people using SJW are jackasses too. I have no problem with discussing and criticizing things that some use the SJW label for _however_ in most cases the use of SJW is an indication that they believe in some conspiracy theory that doesn't survive any evaluation.
Slashdot Mirror
Many times, may I suggest that you do some studying? Because the monopoly controls existing today weren't created because some dude named Marx speculated about it, they were created to avoid problems that actually existed at the time.
Monopolies still exist today but mostly in a different form - a few companies that willingly divide a market between them making it near impossible for new actors to enter. For consumers and corporations alike that is the same problem as a real monopoly but technically a market with two-three strong companies isn't one.
It's almost like you didn't read anything but the headline and then proceeded to post without thinking...
The problem isn't that rats exist - they fill a niche. The problem is that of uncontrolled populations of animals, not rats in particular. Cats and dogs (commonly seen near people) are also disease carrying vermin, often more dangerous to people than rats. If it was a wild dog that found the baby in your example it's been the head that was chewed on, if it were a wild cat the damage would be worse too. Wild dogs and cats shit everywhere, intrudes whenever they can and steal food by habit. They commonly spread diseases and parasites. Their mentality is generally very aggressive.
Pet cats, dogs _and_ rats aren't a problem. Uncontrolled populations of any animal is, some would say that includes people too.
Claiming a monopoly of education in the US just shows that you are a shitty liar or retarded. Even in Communist* Sweden parents have the right to select which school they want their children to attend, in the US it is "trivial" to arrange for home schooling if anything else doesn't fit. That is considerably harder in e.g. Sweden as children have the right to a good education and if one want to home school one also have to prove they will get a good education.
(* it is absolutely not communist however for the extremely skewed perspective of the USA it is often more left leaning than what is commonly called communism)
Thinking logically != being a Luddite. Endangering ones life is one thing (but is often selfish), endangering the lives of willing passengers another and endangering anybody near a road yet another. Unless the thingy is 98%+ safe it _is_ 100% crap for normal purposes.
I think you should seek professional help - seriously.
You already showed how they do it: the parents/elder shows how to do it and the kids learn. That is also a form of communication but doesn't give evidence for any kind of conversations as such.
There are good _wireless_ headphones but good _bluetooth_ headphones? The protocol isn't suited for high quality audio.
The shit material used in the manufacturing of low cost drivers are the same kind that was used in high end headphones for a while ago, or in other words it isn't shit at all. Even lower cost (not bargain basement shit whose only design requirement is to squeel out some kind of noise) headphones can have good drivers nowadays however quality control is generally lacking. What is often the problem is that the drivers aren't designed to sound good, they aren't done by experienced engineers and testing etc. is lacking.
The problems with bluetooth are several, one is that ordinary BT are relatively power hungry. It also have no (last time I looked which was some years ago) high quality _standard_ audio transfer with a few higher quality protocols available for $$$ - though they aren't exactly hi-fi either. A quality DAC can consume some power too and drivers capable to output high quality audio tend to be harder to drive -> requires more power to drive. BT devices are often designed to be small so the available battery capacity is often artificially reduced. All these things conspire to make the drivers bad, the DAC bad (though a bad low power DAC can be surprisingly capable nowadays), the battery small and the result shitty.
The latency for BT audio is digital audio -> encoding -> BT transfer -> decoding -> DAC/amp -> analog audio, that is considerable more than your stated 2ms. The aptX low latency codec claims 40ms end-to-end latency, other codecs have 100-150ms latency.
That is 20 times to 75 times longer latency than what you claim.
How is he making life better for anyone? He doesn't work in medicine, he doesn't work in providing technology to people in need, he doesn't improve technology. Bill Gates have done more for common people in all of those areas and more, even when accounting for the immoral/illegal actions of Microsoft. Just because you have a hard-on for space sci-fi and a hatred for M$ facts doesn't change...
Why would they? The US wasn't in that war after all, it was just a civil war in Vietnam... /s
I think you mean that IRONIC commercial (compare big brother to the Apple model)? I don't see how it is relevant to a severely misguided understanding of politics in general and communism in particular, a level of understanding that I'd measure close to a mental disease (absolute black and white understanding of the world + ignoring everything that shows that ones preferred model also contains parts of whatever one hates).
Until you begin understanding that nothing in this world is black or white there simply isn't something to discuss. BTW posting something that shows one knows about something isn't being apologetic - in the same way that pointing out that eating children isn't normal in a communist country doesn't make one an apologist!
That's a version of totalitarianism which isn't limited to communism.
No. But too tired to not making input errors - while I'm not too (!) bad at the keyboard I don't use normal touch-typing and so typing errors sneak in from time to (!) time. In most cases I try to catch them before posting however you found an example post where I didn't .
--
Why did you bother making such an idiotic post? Does it make you feel powerful in some way? Are you the AC I replied to and felt insulted by my post causing this immature kind of retaliation? The intention of my post was to state my opinion and provide some hint, nothing more - nothing less.. Searching for good explanations is a better way to actually begin to understand this complex topic IF one actually want to try to.
If you are just a common asshole then please FUAD
They have measured x - and x show no indication of a preferred direction.
They also have estimated that with the error marginals of x, with the known factors that can influence it there is a 1:121000 chance the measurement is sufficiently wrong that there may be a preferred direction after all.
Pretty simple really.
No. Yes. Do google when you are more alert, if you are to tired to search you are probably to tired to understand the explanation. :)
Hint: The Big Bang created everything, it didn't distribute material in an existing space.
Then either the machines or your headphones aren't done right. A 4 connector plug have the same critical dimensions as a 3 connector with the difference that the ground ring (closest to the cable) is split into two, one of those are the vbias/mic/input and the other the ground. Compatibility is ensured by tolerating grounding of the mic connector on the jack or plug, 4 connector plug -> 3 connector jack means that the microphone etc. are disabled as they get no power, 3 connector plug -> 4 connector jack will have the microphone input grounded (and the vbias voltage can either be powered down or be dissipated over a resistor - it is extremely low power).
Your problem are with the other two connectors (the tip + the following ring connector) as headphones use ground + tip for the left speaker and ground + connector closest to tip for the right speaker. If you had problem related to the fourth connector you wouldn't get any sound at all.
It is possible that the machine actually outputs only mono sound using a 2 connector jack and that the tip connector is placed wrong (either by design or because of previous abuse of the machine) so that it doesn't make contact with the first two connectors of your headphone plug. Again the problem can't be related to you having a 4 pole plug to your headphones.
They have the same length (otherwise they wouldn't be compatible - which they are) but designed so that they work okay anyway. Vbias/mic/input will be grounded which is easily detected (not that it have to be to function correctly) -> plug and play.
Change for the sake of change is simply stupid. Change that 1) increases power consumption (it is impossible to decrease it with a dongle or the wireless solution) 2) removes compatibility with 99.999%+ of existing devices is simply fucking stupid.
NB that not even the water resistance is a valid excuse as it is trivial to create water _proof_ 3.5 mm jacks. Battery life increase? Ludicrous, do the calculation yourself.
No the application of Cannea drive theory didn't seem to make any difference in that test. - period.
That's all one can logically conclude, everything else is wrong. Did it not show up because NASA didn't do it correctly? Did it not show up because the measurement errors are large enough to hide the improvements from the internal structures? Is the measurement errors large due to other factors and none of the drives (or one of the drives) did actually produce any thrust?
I do not think the EM-drive (or the Cannea drive) will be found to work in the end _however_ the scientific method is to continue testing, not referring to "laws of nature" as something fixed and holy. That is scientific dogma, not science.
*SIGH* No that's not what they say nor what they meant. The null device in this case were identical to the other _except_ it didn't contain internal elements that the Cannea drive theory claimed was essential for functions. In other words what the test showed was that those internal elements weren't necessary for the function of the unit, nothing more - nothing less.
This "dummy drive measured thrust" idea is common among anti-Em drive people. Or in other words they doesn't even bother to read the report before reaching conclusions - does that sound like following the scientific method?
But a good smelling one!
That comparison is only relevant if you think the sensors used have confirmation bias - and _that_ would be pseduo-science!
Of course they can, have you read their terms of service?
I have found that the majority of people using SJW are jackasses too. I have no problem with discussing and criticizing things that some use the SJW label for _however_ in most cases the use of SJW is an indication that they believe in some conspiracy theory that doesn't survive any evaluation.
The question is: are you one of the nuts?