Slashdot Mirror


Apple Cites 'Courage' As Reason To Remove 3.5mm Headphone Jack (arstechnica.com)

It didn't come as much of a surprise when Apple Senior VP Phil Schiller revealed that the iPhone 7 doesn't feature a headphone jack, since rumors have mentioned this possibility months before the announcement. In fact, what some may find more surprising is Apple's justification. The company cited three reasons why they decided to eighty-six the port, as well as one word: "courage." Ars Technica reports: "[Schiller said] the company can't justify the continued use of an 'ancient' single-use port. He described the amount of technology packed into the iPhone, saying each element in Apple's phones is fighting for space, and it's at a premium. Schiller explained that no company has tried to deliver a wireless experience between your devices and your headphones that fixes the things that are currently difficult to do -- and since there's only one major industry-wide wireless-audio standard, it's easy to assume that he's talking about Bluetooth there (though he didn't say the B-word out loud). To promote Apple's wireless-audio push, Schiller announced the new AirPods, which look mostly identical to the last official Apple earbud model, only with a small piece of plastic replacing the full cord. While Schiller and Apple designer Jonny Ive talked a lot about wireless being 'the future' of audio devices -- and thus being the reason for Apple's 'courage' to move on from the 3.5mm standard -- Apple is curiously not packing those AirPods into new iPhone 7 and 7 Plus boxes. Instead, those devices will ship with the updated Lightning EarPods by default. AirPods will begin shipping in late October and will cost $159."

761 comments

  1. Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Speakers, microphone and volume control are all the same thing.

    1. Re: Single use? by corychristison · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the various devices designed to encode or decode data over that port.

      Square being the first thing to come to mind.

    2. Re: Single use? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You left out antenna for the FM radio. Oops, the iPhone never had an FM radio, something even cheap flip phones have had pretty much forever. Apple is no longer a leader in innovation, which is why their market share continues to drop. Looks like Tim Cook cooked their goose.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:Single use? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Apple's power connector.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Single use? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Actually, as far as I remember it, apple added the volume control. The standard really already is two standards - three segment and four element connectors. You get some connector mismatch if you plug in a 4 element new style headphones into a 3 element jack.

      You could have said non audio things - I think the first iteration of Square used the audio jack, talking to the card reader like a modem.

    5. Re: Single use? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, Nexus phones don't support FM either.

      I guess Californian hipsters designing these things don't have any decent radio stations or have enormous data plans. FM is built into every Qualcomm SoC, iirc.

      LG recently released a phone with DAB+ digital radio; maybe that will catch on instead.

    6. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most handsets have the capability baked into the radios - whether or not fm radio is actually enabled and supported, however, is up to the handset manufacturer, software provider, and/or carrier.

    7. Re: Single use? by macs4all · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the various devices designed to encode or decode data over that port.

      Square being the first thing to come to mind.

      So either they hook up through the analog adapter or they design a Lightning version. Probably in testing now.

    8. Re:Single use? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      You mean that magnet thing that drops out every time you try to move your laptop somewhere? Most annoying thing in the world!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re: Single use? by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As long as they close the analog hole - Riaa will be happy!

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    10. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then where's my fucking flying car?!!

    11. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's amusing. AM radio is simple and can be received with an earpiece, a razor blade, and a long wire. Today's radio experience is an incredibly complicated dance among very many sophisticated parts (each using energy). I'm not saying AM radio is better than internet radio, I'm just amused by their contrast. (I do however prefer broadcast analog TV over digital, broadcast or cable -- it's free and it degrades gracefully.)

    12. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FM radio has ads, why would I listen to it?

    13. Re: Single use? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are some other little niche devices that used the headphone jack as well, for example some company made a diabetes tester that did so, which meant it could be compatible with other smartphones. But now they're making a lightning port version to replace it.

      Though based on my own experience on logging health stats from another (non diabetes) chronic condition, I have to say that I've found smartphone based devices to be overall less convenient than using traditional devices combined with my own custom Google Sheets based logging system.

    14. Re: Single use? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      FM is definitely not the feature i've been looking for. The DJ on the radio ad wants it, but then he doesn't show up to work and hands the radio over to the short playlist from his publisher sponsor, so it falls on deaf ears. Literally, since I don't listen to it anymore.

    15. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's the 21st century, dear; do try to keep up...

      You brainless fucking douche. The FM radio incurs no data charges.

    16. Re: Single use? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      So either they hook up through the analog adapter or they design a Lightning version.

      ...and pay royalties to Apple.

      Ka-ching!

    17. Re:Single use? by quenda · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean that magnet thing that drops out every time you try to move your laptop somewhere? Most annoying thing in the world!

      You think that is annoying!?
      Try using a Mac Mini. The magnetic power connector gets knocked out easily when you bump the cord or unplug the ethernet cable, and there is no battery backup!

    18. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i would have gone with "pretentious brainless apple worship fucking douche"

    19. Re:Single use? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Oh the battery has been gone in the macbook for a long time, I didn't feel it was worth the replacement cost.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    20. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To a lot of people the main point of radio isn't music, it's reliability. I know I can tune in to the radio during natural disasters and get up to date information about what's going on. In many of those situations phone, data, and cable will all be knocked out. Radio's very robust.

    21. Re:Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong

    22. Re: Single use? by DaHat · · Score: 2

      Because unlike Apple Music, Spotify, Pandora and other online streaming services... FM is free with adds?

    23. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to post your sexual preferences on slashdot.

    24. Re:Single use? by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Try using a Mac Mini. The magnetic power connector gets knocked out easily when you bump the cord or unplug the ethernet cable, and there is no battery backup!

      The Mac Mini does not have and has never had a magnetic power cord. And if yours is loose, that either means you didn't shove it in hard enough or the cord is defective. Fortunately, I'm pretty sure it is a standard two-prong AC cord, and that they cost about a buck and a half from your nearest Radio Shack, Fry's, Best Buy, etc.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    25. Re:Single use? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a mac mini with a magnetic power connector. When did they start shipping those?

    26. Re: Single use? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      There are some other little niche devices that used the headphone jack as well, for example some company made a diabetes tester that did so, which meant it could be compatible with other smartphones. But now they're making a lightning port version to replace it.

      Though based on my own experience on logging health stats from another (non diabetes) chronic condition, I have to say that I've found smartphone based devices to be overall less convenient than using traditional devices combined with my own custom Google Sheets based logging system.

      The issue isn't the interfaces for those devices; it's the fact that they all contract the App Development out to the lowest bidder Chinese coders. I have a OneTouch USB Glucometer and a top-of-the-line Bluetooth Omron BP meter. The software for both of them sucks balls.

    27. Re: Single use? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      So either they hook up through the analog adapter or they design a Lightning version.

      ...and pay royalties to Apple.

      Ka-ching!

      Or go Bluetooth, and pay royalties to someone else.

    28. Re:Single use? by quenda · · Score: 0

      The Mac Mini does not have and has never had a magnetic power cord.

      Beg pardon, you are right. But the early Mac-Minis used the same connector as the laptops, which was designed to come out easily, rather than pull the laptop off the table when you tripped on the cord. Benefit for laptop, bad for the Mini.

      Newer Mac Minis have a built-in AC adapter, and the DIN connector is much more secure.

    29. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and gets bonus white noise when you enter a tunnel.

    30. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're both right. This imbecile would be lost at sea trying to find an internet connection and forfeit using the actual radio to call for help.

    31. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even your grandpa would call you a dumb fuck.

    32. Re: Single use? by stooo · · Score: 1

      >>FM radio is old fashioned grandpa technology.

      That's probably why AM is still widely in use in the US.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    33. Re:Single use? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the same as the laptops, but I know the one you're talking about—on the pre-unibody Minis. It looked like a FireWire connector that was round on both ends. And yes, I do remember knocking them loose on occasion. The unibody design, for all its serviceability headaches, did at least manage to rid us of external power bricks and flimsy connectors. (Then again, the pre-unibody Minis were also a pain in the backside to service, so I guess I shouldn't complain....)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    34. Re: Single use? by stooo · · Score: 1

      Not all. I listen to an ad free station.
      it's state financed

      --
      aaaaaaa
    35. Re: Single use? by SumDog · · Score: 2

      Square couldn't exist in a world of pure USB-2-Go because drivers and device representation varied widely from phone to phone. A simple HID device in the phone world is not so simple.

      The audio jack was the ultimate bridge for card readers that didn't require special permissions, drivers and was actually universal (more universal than USB!)

    36. Re: Single use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      And who would that be? When I use a BLE Microchip processor, I'm not paying license fees. Likewise with most $2 Bluetooth modules - no licenses. But for Apple dongles - I have to buy an MFi chip even if I want nothing more than just pulling power from the phone.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    37. Re: Single use? by Nocturna81 · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree. In theory yes, but in practise I've had mismatched because just past was not just past enough. Blame mismatched tolerances I guess

    38. Re: Single use? by Pentium100 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because unlike Apple Music, Spotify, Pandora and other online streaming services... FM does not require the use of an internet connection. A lot of cellphone service providers charge for the service based on data transferred (unlike wired internet connections where you usually pay for the connection bandwidth (like 300mbps or whatever), but then can use it 100% and will not need to pay more).

      Also, FM radio receiver can use very little power, compared to the cellphone transmitter which needs to be active to use the internet connection.

    39. Re:Single use? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Speakers, microphone and volume control are all the same thing.

      Maybe they just meant audio? So good luck to you if you want to listen and charge or transfer data or another thing, unless you spend an $159 of course.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    40. Re: Single use? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      So either they hook up through the analog adapter or they design a Lightning version.

      ...and pay royalties to Apple.

      Ka-ching!

      Or go Bluetooth, and pay royalties to someone else.

      Until they decide to stop supporting bluetooth.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    41. Re:Single use? by quenda · · Score: 1

      Then again, the pre-unibody Minis were also a pain in the backside to service, so I guess I shouldn't complain....)

      Ain't that the truth! It's like a European car - 2 minutes to swap a part, plus an hour to disassemble and reassemble the mac to get to it. (and open it up again because the wifi antenna stopped working)
      I now have a "small form factor" PC. Ten times the size of the Mini, but a pleasure to poke inside.

    42. Re: Single use? by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      Square's mag-stripe card reader is obsolete - it can't read chip & PIN cards, or contactless. They already have a bluetooth connected reader.

    43. Re:Single use? by Megol · · Score: 1

      They have the same length (otherwise they wouldn't be compatible - which they are) but designed so that they work okay anyway. Vbias/mic/input will be grounded which is easily detected (not that it have to be to function correctly) -> plug and play.

    44. Re: Single use? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Customer won't. Don't gimme what I want? I won't buy.

      I somehow predict that we'll soon see a development akin to how it was in the East Bloc, where you'd pay more for a used, old model than a new one simply because the new variants are inferior.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    45. Re: Single use? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Was going to post the same. I have the square card reader which uses the audio port to transmit data. I guess Apple are content to let Android have these markets all to themselves

    46. Re: Single use? by Gussington · · Score: 3, Informative

      Square's mag-stripe card reader is obsolete - it can't read chip & PIN cards, or contactless.

      I have a Square card reader that does chip & PIN using the headphone jack: https://squareup.com/au/reader

    47. Re: Single use? by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      i get tacos at a great local place and they have a square reader, it reads the mag stripe on my chip and pin without complaint.

      as such, i continue to get tacos.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    48. Re: Single use? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the need for any of this stuff. Just put a 64 GB card in your phone and load it up with whatever music you want. No ads, no monthly payments, and you only hear the music you want to hear.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    49. Re: Single use? by Pentium100 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I sometimes want to hear new music (or rather, old music I haven't heard before), I also like the lack of control with radio and the occasional traffic announcements or news segments.

      I listen to radio at work (I use an actual radio and not my phone though). The radio station even announces each hour, so I do not have to keep looking at the clock.

      If I play music on my PC (say, I am at home), I always feel the urge to choose the next song, so, I end up spending more time choosing and playing music (and skipping songs) than I was planning to do while listening to music. If I listen to radio or play a tape, I do not get that urge, so I spend more time doing whatever I was planning to do. Listening to radio I do not get the urge to skip a song even if I do not particularly like it (there is some music that would make me tune to another station - thankfully my favorite station does not play it).

      And radio has the advantage over tapes in that it sometimes plays a song I haven't heard before, but like.

    50. Re: Single use? by PianoComp81 · · Score: 1

      And viewers like you! (Assuming you're in the U.S. that is)

    51. Re: Single use? by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why on earth would Apple want you to listen to free FM radio?

      iTunes is a big part of their business and selling bigger data plans makes their carriers happy. FM radio is lose-lose from their point of view.

      --
      No sig today...
    52. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people who care about this stuff (features, flexibility and value for money) already have an android phone

    53. Re: Single use? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      And power. I have a device that charges over the 35mm jack. Its basically just a mini usb port that is far easier to use.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    54. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DJ tells the station what to play? Oh how 1960s of you! Not for a long time

    55. Re: Single use? by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      They get free wifi at all the shops they hang out in.

    56. Re: Single use? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Who cares what Tim Cook thinks? :) From my point of view, the customer, it's a missing feature.

    57. Re: Single use? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      And drive everywhere. I listen to the radio on urban walks or public transport.

      Radio is great when travelling. New city, scan for stations and find about local gigs and events happening tonight.

    58. Re:Single use? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      depending on the port and tolerances, the electrical connections may or may not hook up correctly.

      If i go to the gym, and i plug my 4 segment headphones into the machines, i get audio in one ear only. I can wiggle it, and it will change which ear i get it in (until my workout wiggles it again) but i almost never get audio in both .

    59. Re: Single use? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      Customer won't. Don't gimme what I want? I won't buy.

      I somehow predict that we'll soon see a development akin to how it was in the East Bloc, where you'd pay more for a used, old model than a new one simply because the new variants are inferior.

      And on my families iPhone's our earbuds are still in their nice little plastic cases. Got four of them now, never used, not once.

      If an earphone jack is an overriding factor, then by all means get a different phone. Your deciding that the lack of it is turning the iPhone into an inferior product is just silly.

      But maybe I'll hang onto them so I can sell them to people on the black market, make boo-coo bucks.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    60. Re: Single use? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So either they hook up through the analog adapter or they design a Lightning version.

      ...and pay royalties to Apple.

      Ka-ching!

      Or go Bluetooth, and pay royalties to someone else.

      Paying for things is bad.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    61. Re: Single use? by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Why not just go Bluetooth? It' would work cross platform.

    62. Re: Single use? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You left out antenna for the FM radio. Oops, the iPhone never had an FM radio, something even cheap flip phones have had pretty much forever. Apple is no longer a leader in innovation, which is why their market share continues to drop. Looks like Tim Cook cooked their goose.

      No 'Murrican phones do FM even though all of them have the ability. 'Murrican manufacturers didn't want FM.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    63. Re: Single use? by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All my family's iPhone earbuds are still unopened as well, even going back to the older ones wrapped in a plastic band instead of a case. Never used, not once.

      The reason for that is the quality is so crappy they're unusable. You can get some pretty amazing quality wired headphones for under $100 on black friday. Last year I got an amazing deal on some SoundSports at $50 each. Compared to cheap headphones, you can actually hear so much more detail in the music it's like a whole different song.

      Besides using my phone with multiple different sets of headphones, there's 2 cars I regularly listen in. I am not carrying an adapter every where with me and I am not buying 6 more adapters to leave them on every 3.5" pin I use often.

      On the bright side, this got me to try a Note 7. Wow is Apple ever living in the stone age. Just have the "courage" to spend a few days seriously giving it a go. I will never go back to Apple. The edge panels alone are worth the courage to switch. And the display on the Note is simply amazing.

    64. Re: Single use? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      To me it was more the lack of additional storage that meant I have to look elsewhere for a portable computer with a telephone option.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    65. Re: Single use? by stripes · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth would require a power source. Many headphone jack peripherals use the jack for power. So adopting BT needs the addition of a power source (probably a battery plus a way to charge it), a way to pair, and maybe an antenna. Oh and a power button. All that may cost more then the MFi license.

    66. Re: Single use? by halfEvilTech · · Score: 2

      My Nexus 5 supports FM just fine by using the headphone as part of the antenna and using the NextRadio app - http://nextradioapp.com/

    67. Re: Single use? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I have a Square EMV reader. Bluetooth.

      You will get the NFC version, of course.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    68. Re: Single use? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And let's not forget that radio uses less battery juice than streaming music.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    69. Re: Single use? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "I can listen to Radio stations from virtually any part of the globe."

      Like Clayton Lake, Maine?

      Or much of the Sahara?

      Yeah, I know. Those are places no one goes. And you did say 'virtual'. And you didn't tackle the problem of incompatible radio bands.

      Not so simple. The FM Chip in your phone might not serve you well in Germany. And you may not be streaming your fave indi station there either.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    70. Re: Single use? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You're both right. This imbecile would be lost at sea trying to find an internet connection and forfeit using the actual radio to call for help.

      Let me know how calling for help using an FM receiver works for you, will you?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    71. Re: Single use? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You left out the safety pin that you have to move along the razor blade edge until you heard a radio station. For skeptics, it's the same as people who receive radio signals in their fillings. And if you don't know what a safety pin or a safety razor blade are, you missed some of the fun of simple experiments as a kid.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    72. Re: Single use? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      FM radio is old fashioned grandpa technology.

      So is microwaving food. So is TV. So is pasteurized milk. So are condoms, birth control pills, toothpaste, pens and pencils, gasoline, diesel, atomic energy, wind and water power, farming, chemical warfare (WW1 mustard gas), antibiotics, soap, clothing, ovens, baking and cookbooks, baking powder as a leavening agent, sliced bread, sliced bacon (mmm ... bacon!), saran wrap, mylar, communications satellites (anyone remember the echo communications satellites made from mylar?), transatlantic cables, electricity, toasters, movies, paper and cardboard, plywood, nails made from rods (instead of the hand cut nails shaved from a chunk of iron), screws, nuts, needles and thread, false teeth, glasses, etc.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    73. Re:Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you get for sticking your connector into strange ports used by many random people. ;)

    74. Re:Single use? by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

      I've had several minis within the last decade and a half, and none of them used the laptop connector at any point. As far as I remember they always had internal AC. Can you cite any actual proof?

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    75. Re:Single use? by Megol · · Score: 1

      Then either the machines or your headphones aren't done right. A 4 connector plug have the same critical dimensions as a 3 connector with the difference that the ground ring (closest to the cable) is split into two, one of those are the vbias/mic/input and the other the ground. Compatibility is ensured by tolerating grounding of the mic connector on the jack or plug, 4 connector plug -> 3 connector jack means that the microphone etc. are disabled as they get no power, 3 connector plug -> 4 connector jack will have the microphone input grounded (and the vbias voltage can either be powered down or be dissipated over a resistor - it is extremely low power).
      Your problem are with the other two connectors (the tip + the following ring connector) as headphones use ground + tip for the left speaker and ground + connector closest to tip for the right speaker. If you had problem related to the fourth connector you wouldn't get any sound at all.

      It is possible that the machine actually outputs only mono sound using a 2 connector jack and that the tip connector is placed wrong (either by design or because of previous abuse of the machine) so that it doesn't make contact with the first two connectors of your headphone plug. Again the problem can't be related to you having a 4 pole plug to your headphones.

    76. Re: Single use? by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      With all the music streaming options available, and all most of the radio stations offering free apps, there's no need for FM radio. There's also no static with streaming and apps.

    77. Re: Single use? by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      Your favorite radio station very likely has a free app that will allow you to listen in.

    78. Re: Single use? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I can't wait until we get a tacos truck on every corner. I hope Trump's paid shill is right on that one. :D

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    79. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your cell towers don't work anymore because of some natural disaster, have fun trying to figure out what's going on without radio. I have been in the middle of a day-long blackout in Italy some years ago and there was no cell coverage anywhere. The only source of info ended up being the car's radio. Technoweenies wouldn't last a couple of hours in a real emergency.

    80. Re: Single use? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I can listen to it over the internet, but if I used my cell phone connection, the provider would send me a bill for the data transferred.

    81. Re: Single use? by Compumyst · · Score: 1

      And on my families iPhone's our earbuds are still in their nice little plastic cases. Got four of them now, never used, not once.

      To the earbuds that come with the iPhone, I, too, would leave them in their original packaging. ... And then pull out my Sennheiser headphones, or tape adapter (for the car) or otherwise. Apple's earbuds are far too uncomfortable for me, personally, but I still use the headphone port every day.

      I hate the idea of paying another $100 on top of the base cost of a pair of headphones just to add wireless. I hate the idea of having to constantly be aware of the battery level in the headphones. (At Apple's new, proprietary implementation) I hate the idea of being locked to a single platform.

      I don't mind having a wire dangle, and rather enjoy having in-line controls. I like having an in-line microphone that I can either let dangle or bring right up to my mouth if I want to talk quietly and still be heard or just be heard better in a loud place.

      There's a reason the headphone port has lasted as long as it has. It is useful. It is universal. Give me a headphone jack, or I won't buy it. As an Android user, I'm glaring at Motorola and their Moto Z with distaste because they're going the same route. Not everyone prefers wireless. And no one likes dongles.

      --
      What's done's in the past, forever shall last.
      Work is work; life is life; fair is not!
    82. Re: Single use? by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      There's also no static with streaming and apps.

      Yeah, well, radio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HV3zWSawJiw

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    83. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less courage and more fear of RIAA

    84. Re: Single use? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And on my families iPhone's our earbuds are still in their nice little plastic cases. Got four of them now, never used, not once.

      To the earbuds that come with the iPhone, I, too, would leave them in their original packaging. ... And then pull out my Sennheiser headphones, or tape adapter (for the car) or otherwise.

      Point is, at least for me, I use my iPhone as a telephone. I know that's screwed up, but hey, as an Apple product user, most of slashdot would agree with that, amiright?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    85. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. Streaming doesn't have static. Just degraded audio or buffering pauses when the cell signal falls anywhere under optimal.

    86. Re: Single use? by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Why should you be allowed to breathe free air, when they can sell you competitively priced iAir(tm)

    87. Re: Single use? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      There is no 'closing the analog hole', not so long as human beings have ears to hear sounds with. At some point the digital signal must be converted to baseband audio that can be connected to some sort of amplifier connected to a speaker, to create sound waves that the human ear can hear. From the output of the DAC forward, it's all analog, and the RIAA can suck it because there's nothing they can do to prevent that. If anything moving to all-digital will likely make it easier to pirate audio, because now someone will just create a purely digital device that masquerades as an 'approved' device, and copies digital audio directly. Even without that, which is a less-trivial work-around, all anyone has to do is tap into the baseband audio output of whatever device Apple supplies you with. It'll almost have to have the same headphone port they're trying so hard to get rid of, because they'll lose customers if they can't use whatever headphones they want, and if they can't connect their iPhone to a stereo amplifier for room-filling music. So one way or another there will always be baseband audio, and nothing Apple or the RIAA or anyone else can do will prevent that, short of re-engineering human beings so they're born without ears to hear with. So, everyone needs to stop worrying about this. When they decide to not provide any audio of any kind, or (in some distant, extremely dystopian future) manage to require licensing of all audio equipment, then you can worry and be upset about it. Having to use a dongle of some sort isn't anywhere near as bad as some things they could have decided to do.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    88. Re: Single use? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Because you don't rely on the security of the transport - you build another layer of security on top of that. The same way that you build https (secure) on top of TCP (not secure at all). I assume that's what they do anyway. I'd certainly hope so.

    89. Re: Single use? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      That depends on the station you listen to. In the US, you're probably right. In the UK, they still have proper radio, with shows that are curated by the DJ, and no-one tells them what to play. Similarly in New Zealand, where local radio stations have complete autonomy over what they broadcast. Rotten Radio, that broadcasts out of Lyttleton, for instance, plays whatever the hell they feel like.

    90. Re:Single use? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Never. He's just wrong.

    91. Re:Single use? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      You mean that magnet thing that drops out every time you try to move your laptop somewhere? Most annoying thing in the world!

      Huh, I was assuming (what with Apples awesome innovation) that every time the magnet fell out and got plugged in it was generating current which helped charge the laptop...

      (wheres that backward question mark when you need it, Apple can you put that on the iphone?)

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    92. Re: Single use? by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      It's not really "free"...

      1) It'll probably insist on ridiculous access permissions to your phone contacts and GPS, to constantly track you.

      2) I don't know about you, but cellphone bandwidth is not "free" where I live.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    93. Re: Single use? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You could use an unlimited data plan, or have your phone automatically join the wifi networks for places you frequently visit. (home, work, gym, etc)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    94. Re: Single use? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      no, really?!

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    95. Re: Single use? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Unlimited (or rather, increased limit) data plan costs more. Wifi takes a lot of power.

    96. Re:Single use? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I have a G4 mini kicking around someplace, purchased less than a year before the transition to x86. It used an external power supply, but had a normal (non-MagSafe) connector where it plugged into the computer.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    97. Re: Single use? by boristdog · · Score: 1

      "It took us a LOT of courage to remove the inferior 'Bluetooth' technology from the iPhone 9, but we did it, because we have courage.
      Now you can connect with AppleTooth© technology! which is 15% faster than the original Bluetooth spec"

      "AppleTooth headsets start at $379 for the base model."

    98. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your deciding that the lack of it is turning the iPhone into an inferior product is just silly.

      But maybe I'll hang onto them so I can sell them to people on the black market, make boo-coo bucks.

      ...beaucoup? Nobody will be interested in buying your stock of cheap made-in-china-for-pennies headphones.

      The iPhone has always been an inferior product for the technically minded (which is a tiny percentage of the market). Every audio device ought to have (at least) a mini audio jack. Why? Because it is an easy way to get a signal out to other devices. Interoperability with the countless, already-existing, and perfectly functional audio equipment is far more valuable to the customer than what Apple is offering (whose benefits to the customer are dubious or downright anti-customer). Ask a musician/audio engineer if their mixing boards or amplifiers have thunderbolt inputs. Bluetooth input?

    99. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ear buds should not be expected to be shining example of quality. These are for use 'in place of' nice quality (bigger) headphones that people will not jog or sleep with. Such poor performance that you speak of from inherently small-crappy earbuds is not Apple's fault - merely the reality that mass production of tiny electronics is always going to be of 'modest quality' despite users fantasies of 'impeccable quality'. On the other hand 100$ for wired headphones? You've really drank the marketing/demographics Kool-Aid. Surely there is acceptable middle ground ;)

    100. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > All my family's iPhone earbuds are still unopened as well, even going back to the older ones wrapped in a plastic band instead of a case

      Feel free to send me your unused earbuds. I want them.

    101. Re: Single use? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Your deciding that the lack of it is turning the iPhone into an inferior product is just silly.

      But maybe I'll hang onto them so I can sell them to people on the black market, make boo-coo bucks.

      ...beaucoup? Nobody will be interested in buying your stock of cheap made-in-china-for-pennies headphones.

      Whatever you do, don't pay attention to the conversation. It makes you sound intelligent.

      The iPhone has always been an inferior product for the technically minded (which is a tiny percentage of the market).

      Let old Uncle Olsoc sit ya down for a little chat.

      It's a fucking phone. The best fucking phone in the world isn't day old dogshit to a lowly computer. So your bloviating about one or another's technical merits if like going on about being the world's tallest midget. It might be the tallest midget, but its still a gaddamned midget. But hey, if you get wood because you have the ultimate techically advanced phone, will then okay. We're sooooooo impressed!

      Otherwise yer jus talkin' shit. BooCoo impressed. annymise cewerwd. Bawd fermenting on pourpoize.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    102. Re: Single use? by lsllll · · Score: 1

      Let me know how calling for help using an FM receiver works for you, will you?

      You actually CAN! Every FM radio (that I've dealt with) is also a transmitter. Don't believe me? Try putting two FM radios near each other. Tune one to the middle of the band on static, and then run across the band on the other one. At some point the static on the first one cuts out. Connect a line level output to the right place on the second radio and voila! You have your own radio station. I did this at my dorm in college. Freaked the shit out of everyone on the floor!

      --
      Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
    103. Re: Single use? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I spend $56/month for three phones (I'm in the US), I'm not on an unlimited plan but the data tiers are pretty generous. I stream music while I'm driving for about 20-30 minutes every day (Amazon and Bandcamp).

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    104. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm voting Hillary because doubling the amount of taco trucks already in the country may lead up to triple job growth.

    105. Re:Single use? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Same with the first x86 Minis. They only changed to the internal power supply when they went to the unibody design in 2010. Note however that although the G4 Mini and early Intel Mini power supplies look alike, they have different wattage (85W vs. 110W), so the early Intel Minis will not function correctly with a G4 Mini power supply.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    106. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your last sentence is very disturbing.

    107. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kids today know dick all about things.

    108. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not at all sure condoms and birth control can be considered grandpa technology. Seems like the opposite to me.

    109. Re: Single use? by houghi · · Score: 1

      If you live in an area where natural disasters are so frequent that you need to depend on radio, I would go with a phone that can resist a drop on the floor and is a LOT more resilient than the current line of phones. I would look at one of these or similar. Also unlocked, because you might need to switch SIM cards when your provider doesn't work, but another does.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    110. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kids today know dick all about things.

      Well, they do know all about dicks and where to put them. The Media make sure of that. But everything else? Nope.

      Darwin will prove all and people who know STEM will be Kings. ~

    111. Re: Single use? by JustBoo · · Score: 1

      FM radio is old fashioned grandpa technology.

      Says a guy with this below as his .sig.

      "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." -- Benjamin Franklin

      Uh, you may want to look in a mirror. (Wow.) And you are clearly a hard 'worker.'

    112. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not at all sure condoms and birth control can be considered grandpa technology. Seems like the opposite to me.

      Seems like you're an Idiot as well. You know, if only there was a way to look up the history of these items Damn! If only! ~

    113. Re: Single use? by K10W · · Score: 1

      All my family's iPhone earbuds are still unopened as well, even going back to the older ones wrapped in a plastic band instead of a case. Never used, not once. The reason for that is the quality is so crappy they're unusable.

      apple uses average DACs even in dedicated DAP/PMP not just phones, not great but they are not the worst. They tend to use below average headphone amps in anything capable of audio output though. Hooking them into analytical gear you'll see that apple is mediocre for audio with pretty much all their products so the stock buds being awful is no surprise. Problem is even with my average headphones (vsonic gr07) apple stuff sucks compare dto what I can get for similar money elsewhere.

    114. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing i thought of too.

    115. Re: Single use? by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      That's why when the shit hits the fans there are amateur radio operators around... To save your life.
      The fire department, and the police department, are also using grandpa's technology.
      Because... it just works.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    116. Re: Single use? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      There's no staic with FM radio either. It's not AM.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    117. Re: Single use? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      *whooosh*

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    118. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you get a bonus fire starter in the package!

      Be sure you don't use it on an airplane.

      (Seriously, compared to iOS, Android is crap.)

    119. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spent that on my sennheisers, 9 years ago and they still have superior quality over the most recent shit headphones Apple pass off. Anyone know what the compression is like on the wireless?

    120. Re: Single use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that whoosh is the sound of your tiny 'brain' flying out of your ass.

    121. Re: Single use? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I have one of those. It's called a laptop.

    122. Re: Single use? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Same goes for most retailers in the US. But even on chip cards the stripe still works.

    123. Re: Single use? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      It's in the hardware. Just not accessible. Given that FM radio has for years been limited to country, religious, jazz, and top-40 content I don't miss it. My RZR flip phone had no accessible radio function.

    124. Re: Single use? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      http://appleinsider.com/articl...

      4 dollars.

      that's the fee.

      Which granted, over millions and millions of devices, is NOT chump change.

      But remember that Apple makes a ton of revenue, 233 billion in 2015. So much so they lost 5 billion dollars last year on fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange market(which might be an outlier here, because 2015 was a fucked up year but with Brexit, 2016 might still also be a weirder fluctuation).

      So if you look at the raw numbers, in order to even make their revenues push up by 1%, they'd have to sell something like over half a billion headphones and charger docks and whatever else uses lightning. That's one lightning device for every two or three people in the US, Canada, Mexico and Europe. Every adult, every child, everyone young, everyone old, and everyone in between.

      It's not revenue. They're also giving you a 3.5mm adapter for anything that you have laying around that isn't lightning enabled already, with replacements costing 9 dollars.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    125. Re: Single use? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      My old Motorola flip phones all had radio, same as my old LG flip phone, same as my Moto smartphone. With 28 local FM stations, there's something for everyone.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  2. Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to tell their customers they need a $50 dongle to use their headphones.

    1. Re:Courage by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      The dongle comes with the phone.

      I still think the idea is stupid, though... but I'm not in the market for a new phone, in any case.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good news is, once you're in the market for a new phone, you will be able to put it in a case.

    3. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dongle comes with the phone.

      But it's one more thing to carry around, and one more thing to break or lose someday, necessitating a costly replacement. No thanks! I have a 6S, I guess my next phone will be an Android, it's not going to be an iPhone 7 :(

    4. Re:Courage by adamstew · · Score: 1

      actually, they include the dongle with the phone. If you lose it, or want more than one, they are $9.

    5. Re:Courage by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also they did that with Thunderbolt, and look at the plethora of peripherals available toda.. oh, wait..

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:Courage by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      replying to this using my one button mouse. some changes makes sense, this one doesnt

    8. Re:Courage by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is different than merely changing a connector or protocol. Now headphones have gone from a passive device to an active device that needs its own power source. How long does the battery last on these earpods? Can it easily be changed?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    9. Re:Courage by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      With a corresponding 4-port USB hub, since machines don't come with enough ports for the 'power user'.

      Hubs exist for Android phones with USB-OTG and MHL/Slimport passthrough. So I'd expect 3rd parties to oblige for Apple's connector, perhaps even with Lightning USB OTG support for existing USB audio solutions.

    10. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $159 buys a lot of courage.

    11. Re:Courage by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a site specifically for mac compatible stuff, and even they only have 4 categories under 'Thunderbolt'. There is only one hub to choose from, and it is $218.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    12. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OMFG!!! For a supposed Geek site, Slashdot has some of the biggest Luddites around! Change requires CHANGE, FFS! You don't have ANYTHING to gripe about unless you are using $100+ earbuds!!! Either use the Apple-supplied Lightning headset while you look around for a better-sounding one, or suffer with the Apple-supplied adapter and tape the adapter to the headphone cable so you won't "lose" it.

      Fanboi much?

      When you break your iPhone 7-specific Lightning earbuds, are you going to enjoy spending $30 to replace them instead of the $10 it currently costs for a cheapo pair of earbuds with a 3.5mm jack?

      My inner electrical engineer is boggled at the colossal stupidity of that decision. Almost any other decision would have been better, including keeping the connector analog and shrinking it to 2.5mm or 2.0mm and shortening the plug. That way in about 6 months every phone would have that connector and any set of earbuds would work with it. Earbuds requiring a Lightning connector just scream "PS/2 MCA expansion slot" and we all know how well that turned out for IBM - and IBM had the advantage that MCA was light-years beyond ISA connectors at the time.

    13. Re:Courage by markdavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >The dongle comes with the phone.

      So what?
      You will never have it when you need it unexpectedly.
      The thing is going to stick out, interfering with carrying the phone, making it bulky and unruly.
      It is likely to break or get lost.
      It is just plain irritating.

      It is a good thing I have no interest in "iphones", I just hope the other phone makers reject this stupid idea.

    14. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS, change doesn't mean better, it normally just means change. And separating your money from your wallet. Oh wait, you probably don't have a wallet.

    15. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in about $15000-$20000 on my audio, amps, DACs, and headphones... I just bought $4000 Focal Utopia headphones that are not wireless in any way shape or form. There's going to be adapters for wired headphones and they already exist etc. But I'll miss the days when I could just have headphones and plug them into whatever.

      I don't know if I should be upset or not. I'm sure Apple will never back pedal on this. I'm not in need of a phone upgrade anytime soon. I'll probably wait-and-see for the next 6 months at least. I might go to Android just to get a device with a port. I don't use my phone for much anyways. Mostly it was for music. I've already been going farther and farther away from using iTunes and all their stuff. The updates seem to be worse and worse. Frustration mounting. Bought a portable music player with embedded linux (Cowon). Nice little player sounds fantastic for what it is...

      Anyways... Change is happening. I think the people who care the most about this in a worrisome way will not get counted and maybe Apple is right. IMO at least, too soon Apple. We need a solid HiFi lossless bluetooth option. Dongles suck. Period. I hate the MacBook because of no ports. Oh well. We'll all live through this, there's going to be plenty of ways to find connectivity or others trying to fill in the gap and take Apple's business...

    16. Re:Courage by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I read on Slashdot only a few days ago of some utopian hamlet in New Hampshire where one can pay for everything in bitcoin. :)

    17. Re: Courage by Mike · · Score: 1

      But the fucking supplied dongle is worthless since it doesn't have a lightning passthrough so I can charge my phone.

    18. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dongle is simply a "security blanket" for people like you that whine and gnash your teeth at change. In a year or two, they'll drop the dongle completely because people that use headphones with their iPhone will all be using the wireless ear buds.

      Other phone manufacturers will follow suit and the headphone jack will be gone from all new phones by 2020.

    19. Re:Courage by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      Eh, that's not the real issue. To listen to my existing headphones and charge the phone at the same time, I'd have to buy a Lightning splitter. Neither the earbuds nor the adapter has an extra Lightning port, and they take up the only Lightning port on the device.

      So now I'm out more money, and have to keep up with two additional things (the adapter and the splitter).

      That doesn't necessarily make the 7 worthless, but I doubt most people would buy it if given the option to have an identical 7 or 7 Plus containing a traditional headphone jack. They do have the option of the 6S with that jack.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    20. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change requires CHANGE, FFS!

      Maybe I don't want change? The iPhone 7 removes a feature I happen to like and don't want to lose, so as stated, that won't be my next phone.

      Sincerely,

      Someone who still buys desktop PCs with floppy drives in them even though I don't recall the last time I used a floppy

    21. Re:Courage by quenda · · Score: 1

      The dongle comes with the phone.

      This is all familiar - NOKIA did it back in the twenty-zeros!
      Remember the N-Series Symbian phones? No audio jack! You could use bluetooth (on some models) or a headphone with proprietary connector.
      But the phone came with a dongle to let you use standard headphones.

      Remember all the fuss back then? All the media attention on Nokia?
      Neither do I. But eventually, Nokia came to their senses and reinstated the 3.5mm socket.
      Nothing is new under the sun. Innovation? Ha.

    22. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus I thought this was satire for the first two paragraphs.

      You're a fucking moron.

    23. Re:Courage by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 0

      Fine since your google appears to be broken, newegg has similar offerings. NewEgg

      only have 4 categories under

      How many categories of things do you have that need the bandwith of Thunderbolt? Just because you don't have a need for a tool doesn't mean others don't.

    24. Re:Courage by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do realize how completely unalike those two examples are, right?

      Removing the floppy drive wasn't a big deal because USB floppy drives provided a viable alternative, and internal floppy drives were still available for portable devices for three or four years after Apple removed them from the desktop (all the way through the Pismo).

      Adapters for portable devices suck. Adapters for ultraportable devices like phones suck absolutely.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    25. Re:Courage by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yes I checked other sites, they all seem to have the same hub at a similar price. My point is that the market isn't working if you only have one to pick from at one price level. Sounds like you might enjoy communism.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    26. Re:Courage by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      There are multiple to pick from from multiple price levels. Just because it's not a price level YOU spend money in doesn't mean others don't.

      I'd hate to see your incessant whining with what embedded development tools cost. $300 and even $1000 is a drop in the bucket.

    27. Re:Courage by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I just don't see any selection anywhere. That's all I'm saying. I'm accustomed to a lot more selection.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    28. Re:Courage by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Since your google seems to still be broken.

      http://thewirecutter.com/revie...

      That's the CalDigit’s Thunderbolt Station 2, StarTech’s Thunderbolt Laptop Station, Elgato’s Thunderbolt 2 Dock, Kanex’s Thunderbolt 2 Express Dock, StarTech’s Thunderbolt 2 Docking Station, and OWC’s Thunderbolt 2 Dock.

      6 by my count.

      And these guys reviewed 7: http://www.omnicoreagency.com/...

    29. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be silly. The appleists will just go and buy whatever crap the company produces. They buy because they want to be part of that cult, actual products do not matter. "Ooh, shiny logo, must buy and take selfies with it."

    30. Re:Courage by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      And they all look the same to me. Same number of ports, same use pattern. No variance. Like they're all copying one another.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    31. Re:Courage by aXis100 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only that, but everyone hated floppy's. They were slow, had poor capacity, and were unreliable. When USB storage came on the scene it was a massive improvement and has only continued to get better.

      By comparison I dont know many people who have a problem with wired headphones. I've had a few wireless sets over the year and for portable applications they've mostly sucked due to having two batteries to worry about.

    32. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter. iPhone people are used to ask for power sources everywhere they go.

    33. Re:Courage by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I've been using bluetooth headsets (for voice, as well as listening) for over 7 years but sometimes the battery goes and.. I just take the audio cable out of the headset case and attach it to the headset and the phone.

      All the convenience of both solutions, although it means I have to carry an audio cable around with me. But I'd have to do that if I didn't use bluetooth anyway.

    34. Re:Courage by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      On at least two occasions, I ended up saving people's work by copying and pasting data from a floppy disk to a new file using a raw block editor. The floppy disk absolutely sucked immeasurably if used for anything more permanent than carrying a file from your hard disk at work to home or vice versa, and the emergence of the Internet largely relegated it to the dustbin of history.

      USB sticks, unfortunately, are misused in the same way that floppies were, often with similarly unhappy endings. Worse, they are largely unserviceable when they do fail. Honestly, I almost think we'd be better off if those had never been invented at all, but maybe that's just me being cynical.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    35. Re:Courage by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Annnd those are all ugly pieces of junk that I wouldn't want sharing desk space with my mixer board and dual monitors.

      Also, they're clones of each other. Internally it's almost identical hardware, minus ports and shell, on four of those units.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    36. Re:Courage by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'll wait quite a while for that adapter. Per the Apple Accessory Interface Specifcation (R25) you cannot make splitter cables. Ever. One connection on each end of the cable, and only certain combinations at that. IF you find such a cable, it's using grey-market chips from some random Chinese vendor - and who knows how well or how long it will work. But as it exists today (and at least for the next 2 months), splitter cables are forbidden. So it's going to be cables and hub, not just a cable.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    37. Re:Courage by M8e · · Score: 1

      6 is nothing.

    38. Re:Courage by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      How many USB Mice were there in 1998? Keyboards? Printers?

    39. Re:Courage by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Given the iMac was released in 1998, and the lightning connector in 2012 (4 years ago), the correct question would be: "How many USB Mice were there in 2002?" and the answer to that is: quite a few! Windows XP came out in 2001, and I distinctly remember new computers being delivered with USB mice and USB keyboards. For the record, USB 2.0 was released in 2000, and it's really with USB 2.0, that USB took off.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    40. Re:Courage by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      The dongle comes with the phone.

      I still think the idea is stupid, though... but I'm not in the market for a new phone, in any case.

      I doubt it, they'll expect to you use the shitty lighting ones they package. Using non approved/standard bits cost you extra.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    41. Re:Courage by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      But if you want a phone with a 3.5mm Jack, don't look to Android to save you. There won't be 3 Android phones with a 3.5mm Jack by this time next year, and none of them will be Flagship phones.

      The fuck are you smoking? Can I have some? You think every manufacturer is going to blindly follow whatever apple do? They all going to switch to lightning and airbuds too or all conspire to push usb headphones? Just no.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    42. Re:Courage by paulatz · · Score: 2

      A smaller version of the headphone jack already exist, I had it in my Nokia phone 6 years ago. And guess what an adapter for that cost 3$ instead of 30$

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    43. Re:Courage by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      You have to be pretty courageous to call yourself "courageous" in the first place.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    44. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many categories of things do you have that need the bandwith of Thunderbolt? Just because you don't have a need for a tool doesn't mean others don't.

      Very few.

      But according to Apple, you'll have to use Thunderbolt for everything, so the answer is "A lot".

    45. Re:Courage by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      But I'd have to do that if I didn't use bluetooth anyway.

      But then you didn't have to carry the bluetooth headset with you.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    46. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So uou connect the phone to power. You get wireless headphones and connect those to power as well.

      Great. Wired wireless headphones. That takes courage.

    47. Re:Courage by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      There are already Android phones without headphone jacks. Apple is not the leader in this field.

      All it will take is for the iPhone 7 to sell reasonably well and all manufacturers will be ditching the headphone jack as a way to cut costs.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    48. Re:Courage by houghi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps there is a way to build the dongle into the phone itself

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    49. Re:Courage by Maritz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That way in about 6 months every phone would have that connector and any set of earbuds would work with it.

      "Any set of earbuds" working with iPhone was clearly killing Apple. That's precisely the 'problem' they set out to solve - how do we stop people using headphones with our phones that they didn't buy from us?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    50. Re:Courage by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Yeah there are, but as they're out they're obviously not following apple. Some more might ditch it sure, but all of them? Within a year? Not a chance.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    51. Re:Courage by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I frequently have to bring large files (ISOs and the like) to sites that have no internet (yet) or shit internet. In those instances a USB (on a key ring) is a lifesaver. Don't use them a whole lot the rest of the time.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    52. Re:Courage by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I'll probably just stick with phones that let me use whatever headphones I like. Charge phone at same time if need be. Nice option to have. Oh no, my phone isn't sightly thinner. Guess I'll cope.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    53. Re:Courage by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      The dongle is simply a "security blanket" for people like you that whine and gnash your teeth at change. In a year or two, they'll drop the dongle completely because people that use headphones with their iPhone will all be using the wireless ear buds.

      Other phone manufacturers will follow suit and the headphone jack will be gone from all new phones by 2020.

      So in a year or two you expect everyone to have spent another $150 for the headphones? And you also expect every other manufacturer to copy them because that's what already happens....oh wait, no it doesn't especially when apple try to sue you for having a device that looks kind of similar. No doubt they'll patent a one connection design. Next year after that they'll drop that in favour of wireless charging and wireless file transfer and have no holes at all! All the ifans will gush like its the best thing ever and put up with it because the love getting ifucked by apple.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    54. Re:Courage by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      And they all look the same to me. Same number of ports, same use pattern. No variance. Like they're all copying one another.

      As is the apple way.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    55. Re:Courage by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      The mac on the other desk at work has a wireless mouse (apple built) that has the charge port on the bottom of it! What genius though of that? Gave us a good laugh that did when it came in.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    56. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That site may advertise only one Thunderbolt hub (I haven't checked), but there are several Thunderbolt hubs on the market.

      Also keep in mind that for many users, Thunderbolt ports act as MiniDisplayPorts that just happen to provide the option for other types of high-speed expansion, if needed. There are lots of DisplayPort, MiniDisplayPort, HDMI, and single-link DVI monitors that you can drive off a Thunderbolt port using either a cable or a very simple MiniDisplayPort adapter.

    57. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the space nutter chump is an apple fanboi. suppose that's not such a huge surprise.

    58. Re:Courage by Entrope · · Score: 2

      Apple said the batteries in the headphones last about 5 hours -- not a full workday, and often less time than you can expect to spend getting from one state to another (even by airplane, once you factor in time on the ground at both ends of a trip). And replaceable batteries? This is Apple -- if you want to listen longer, just pay another $160 for a second pair.

    59. Re:Courage by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Didn't a bunch of libertarians move up there as a mass movement to change the state?

    60. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, right now you don't need a dongle. You can't lose it and therefore it's free.

    61. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh bullshit. Macs had about a 50% chance of mounting any brand new formatted high quality floppy.

      Panasonic floppy drives on PCs i built had no such problem. Highly reliable.

      Apple dropped the floppy drive because they could not do it right, and for no other reason.

    62. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or just use http://www.apple.com/shop/product/MGRM2AM/A/iphone-lightning-dock-white

    63. Re:Courage by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I believe so.

      The discussion was on Apple bothering to whitelist cryptocurrencies. A point was stated that bitcoin was a scam only used by money laundering criminals on the dark web. But apparently in Keene, NH *everyone* uses it for real world transactions!

    64. Re:Courage by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

      Courage and stupidity are often correlated.

    65. Re:Courage by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Maybe I don't understand the place that Thunderbolt is supposed to fill. I thought it was supposed to be a faster USB. So I would expect the number of USB devices available multiplied by four or so. As I see here, it has just become a niche to connect a large disk to a laptop. For a tower you could just use eSATA or network anyway.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    66. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that Apple was never big on USB and in that era was making the big push for firewire. And we all know how widely adopted that was, right?

    67. Re:Courage by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Has anybody seen my AirPod? One of them dropped out of my ear and I didn't even know it! $160 for those things, and now I've lost one. If you seen my AirPod, please send them to me. Thanks!

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    68. Re:Courage by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      They don't supply a lightning headset. They supply a headset with a 3.5mm jack.

    69. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amusingly, we got new Dell laptops at work recently. People who got the bigger "engineering" laptop were supposed to get Dell's Thunderbolt dock to go with it. Only problem was, it never really worked. We've had to return them all and go with a normal dock.

    70. Re:Courage by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time they got rid of two proprietary* standards (ADB and their mini-DIN8 RS-422 serial port) with a cross-platform standard. Now they're removing a standard port and offering two proprietary standards instead (Lightning and W1 wireless). Not quite parallel.

      * Neither RS-422 signalling nor the mini-DIN8 connector are proprietary in and of themselves, but that particular configuration was, to my knowledge, exclusive to Apple. Sun also used mini-DIN8 on machines like the IPC, but the pinout was completely different.)

    71. Re:Courage by avandesande · · Score: 1

      That's awful... who wants to have to recharge their phone, watch and earbuds...

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    72. Re:Courage by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      That's why Apple has to keep reminding everyone they're different.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    73. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they price the phone for profit with the cost of the dongle in the package.

    74. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, they're all copying the Intel reference design.

    75. Re:Courage by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      The dongle comes with the phone.

      I still think the idea is stupid, though... but I'm not in the market for a new phone, in any case.

      So just use the SUPPLIED Lightnng headset, or buy a third party set. There are already several, and sure to be more in 3...2...1

      With it being more complex than a simple analog connection the problem with 3rd party sets is that Apple will be able to change the protocol behind the scenes and lock out 3rd parties they don't like. Something I'm sure has never ever happened before...

        https://apple.slashdot.org/sto...

      never.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    76. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you don't know the difference between courage and foolhardiness. Neither do I, really. I think it has to do with whether the outcomes are positive or negative. So you can only properly label an act after the dust has settled. In which case, Apple calling themselves courageous is premature, or they're attempting to create a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    77. Re:Courage by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Nokia is not specifically an exemple to follow...

    78. Re:Courage by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I still remember when Sony Ericsson used their own special connector (kinda like the old iPhone connector) headphones in the K series phones. Of course could have the privilege of paying an extra $100 or more to get the same exact hardware with an audio jack on a W series phone...

    79. Re:Courage by ffejie · · Score: 1

      I mean, it wasn't quite 5 seconds, but I think that Belkin has you covered here, per this Engadget post.

      --
      Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
    80. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm they made the best selling phones by far

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_mobile_phones#Top-selling_mobile_phones

    81. Re:Courage by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The dongle comes with the phone.

      I still think the idea is stupid, though... but I'm not in the market for a new phone, in any case.

      So just use the SUPPLIED Lightnng headset, or buy a third party set. There are already several, and sure to be more in 3...2...1

      You know, mods, "Disagree" is NOT a reason moderate something "Troll".

    82. Re:Courage by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Eh, that's not the real issue. To listen to my existing headphones and charge the phone at the same time, I'd have to buy a Lightning splitter. Neither the earbuds nor the adapter has an extra Lightning port, and they take up the only Lightning port on the device.

      That's the only semi-legit reason for disliking the Lightning solution; however, I think that it will be about 5 nanoseconds before someone comes up with an adaptor/splitter combo cable. And quite frankly, the iPhone lasts long enough on batteries (my 6+ typically lasts about 4 days), that I could deal with the occasional inconvenience. It just means you have to be a little more diligent about not going out of the house with 20% of battery left. Meh.

      You know, mods, "Disagree" is NOT a reason to mark something as "-1 Troll".

  3. Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We can't justify an ancient single use port... Not unlike our proprietary power connectors

    1. Re:Ancient single use port by ArtemaOne · · Score: 2

      Power connector that does audio, data, charging, etc. Single use, like the A-10 and its 6+ mission type capability!

    2. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Their proprietary power connectors that break easily and frequently.

      If Apple had true courage, they'd announce that they were dumping Lightning for USB C. That would have been courage.

      If Apple had true courage, they'd have announced a new open Bluetooth protocol for dealing with higher bitrate audio. That would have been courage.

      Replacing a set of $30 earbuds (or $3 if you avoid the Apple Tax) with a $160 one? That's not courage. That's a cash-grab.

    3. Re:Ancient single use port by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Real courage would've been changing the iPhone connector to USB-C.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previously phones tried this before. They put lipstick on a dead pig and are trying to fuck it.

    5. Re:Ancient single use port by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds great, now how do I charge my iPhone 7 while it's plugged into the aux port of my car? There were a few options to do that with the old interface, not so today.

    6. Re:Ancient single use port by inflex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Courage would be USB spec ditching their obsession with fragile tongue-on-equipment configuration and going with lightning type design. Not keen on everything Apple does but the lightning connector is good engineering against human incompetence. Empirically* micro / USB-C are a lot more prone to user-damage, hell people manage to break USB-A sockets.. how the hell!?

      (*Phone & PC repair shop)

    7. Re:Ancient single use port by sims+2 · · Score: 0

      What I want to see from apple is a propriatry wireless keyboard setup that has no standby delay so you can actually get a wireless keyboard as good as the android wired keyboards or any of the millions of 2.4ghz keyboards made in the last several years.

      bluetooth sucks for quality audio and it sucks for keyboards too.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    8. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All problems can be solved by shoving more money at them. If you're willing to pay 160 bucks for headphones, a new receiver for your car stereo shouldn't really be a major issue.

    9. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "courage" thing is doing nothing for Apple whatsoever:

      1: A headphone jack is universal. We have had almost a century of audio equipment which works with it.
      2: Bluetooth sucks balls when it comes to audio quality on it. Yes, it might be OK to listen to Coldplay at a coffee shop, but you are not going to be using a set of Bluetooth monitors (as in speakers) for high-end mixing, other than perhaps testing your mix on what people play it on.
      3: Apple is going for cheap. Not full featured. Look at the iPhone 7's specs. A new ARM processor isn't something to write home about. Nor are stereo speakers or two lenses. Hell, my HTC One M8 had all of that.

      Like the parent said, if Apple actually wanted to show "courage", they would have designed a BT protocol for real audio quality and low latency. But Apple's "courage" is just dropping stuff to maximize their incoming ka-ching, and nothing else.

    10. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't even be a problem for those small, USB headphone amplifiers because of the typical use an extension cables/adapters between the phone and the the 3.5mm jack equipped DAC/amplifier.

    11. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell? Numbers. You're not accounting for how much more USB there is compared to lightning. Also the USB C != micro B.

    12. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't do audio. Audio is analog. It has a digital only connection that handles power.

    13. Re:Ancient single use port by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that Apple themselves use USB-C rather than Lightning for their Macbook.

      Is there any reason to prefer one port for macOS hardware and another for iOS?

    14. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposedly you will need to upgrade to a car with CarPlay (cars with production year 2014 or later may have it) and plug into the USB, or use the bluetooth headset/stereo headphone profile.

      It seems to me whoever approved removing the 3.5mm jack, doesn't actually use an iPhone or iPod at all, otherwise it would have made sense to either add a usb-c for power/headphones or to add a second lightning connector on the other side of the phone.

      Appologists for this say "well it's obsolete like the 3.5" disk and optical disk" to which they are wrong. Those were obsolete because nobody was using them unless they had to. The 3.5mm is the ONLY way to make your device work with virtually everything without buying dongles and more power supply bricks for bluetooth converters that all add latency and sync issues.

      Apple could have just made it an optical connector and thus solved the water ingress issue and use induction on the barrel for power. Conventional headphones? switch back to analog mode. As it is, the iPhone 6S was already essentially water-proof and it has the 3.5mm jack, so this is a bullshit argument.

    15. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, because one came before the other.

      USB-C has 4 lanes, lightning has 2. USB-C devices started coming out in 2014, but USB3.1 wasn't standardized until 2013, yet motherboards didn't start coming out with them until this year because INTEL. Motherboards have to add chips to support USB 3.1, which takes lanes away from PCIe until Intel integrates a controller for it.

      Lightning (and Thunderbolt) are basically extensions of the PCIe bus. Lightning came out in 2012. So, basically it was Apple's move to Lightning that lit a fire under USB-IF's ass to come out with a better engineered connector and the "alternate mode" system that Lightning/Thunderbolt have.

      To add insult to injury, the micro USB-B connector was selected as the European charging standard. WHOOPS. To which nearly every device still uses their own proprietary cable and power supply for quick charging. So much for that idea.

      What I expect, is by 2020 we will have two USB standards. USB-C for "compact" devices that provide all the services that a "docking port" would have in 1996. So you plug your laptop or iPhone into a USB-C monitor or television and it will switch to the Super MHL 8K profile, while providing 10G-ethernet and 24bit/192khz 22.2 surround sound. None of this is going over wireless, and anyone who thinks so needs their head examined. The second standard which I'll just call "USB-D" for Desktop will be a larger connector that extends 20 PCIe bus lanes. So a laptop or desktop connected to this will shut down it's internal GPU/Audio and connect to the external PCIe bus where an external GPU, Audio processor and USB input hub will be present. The desktop/laptop will still use it's own CPU, RAM and hard drive. This allows the maximum flexibility. If a laptop doesn't have a USB-D port, then it doesn't have 20 PCIe lanes, and may only have 4 (over USB-C, thunderbolt 3 profile)

      As for what such ports would look like, a USB-D port would be a USB-C port (which connects the first 4 lanes) with a small cutout and adds 16 lanes by extending the connector.

    16. Re:Ancient single use port by houghi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Their proprietary power connectors are also not wanted in the EU. I see this going the same way.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    17. Re:Ancient single use port by should_be_linear · · Score: 2

      With Lightning it is so true, Apple is repeating situation with early Windows OS days: their incompatible stuff doesn't bring anything substantial to the table, just incompatibility itself. There is nothing wrong with USB-C standard. Audio jack situation is laughable. You often don't have headphones or earbuds around when you need it, so you go to nearby shop and buy one for few $. Whats wrong with that?

      --
      839*929
    18. Re:Ancient single use port by jabuzz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sony have been doing waterproof phones with a 3.5mm jack that needs no cover for several years now, so claims that they needed to get rid of it to make the phone waterproof are complete and total lies.

      Heck the Z5 even comes with a waterproof microUSB socket that needs no cover. Add in some MicFlip cables and bingo the issue of microUSB not being reversible is also solved.

    19. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple will need lots of "courage" to pay 14.5 billion € to the EU in taxes.
      Users needs lots of "courage" to pay 160$ for a bluetooth headphone.
      You see, lots of "courage" ;).

    20. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple started using Lightning in iOS devices before they came out with the Retina MacBook. So it wasn't as if they were using USB-C and then changed over to Lightning. Another thing to consider is that Macs have USB host functionality while iOS devices, for the most part, do not. Placing a USB-C port on an iOS device might encourage people to think that they could plug in all sorts of USB devices, rather than just power or the Camera Connection Kit adapters.

    21. Re:Ancient single use port by Maritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're not going to see the kind of 'courage' from Apple that involves allowing people to buy their headphones/connectors elsewhere. Make 'em proprietary and make 'em expensive.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    22. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "they'd announce that they were dumping Lightning for USB C"

      Didn't they? http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/03/25/why-apple-is-banking-on-usb-c-for-its-all-new-12-inch-macbook-and-beyond

      Ah, maybe I'm confused: Thunderbolt, Lightning... How many of these have they invented before USB-C came out?

    23. Re:Ancient single use port by Entrope · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shhh, Apple doesn't expect its fans to know anything about competitors. "An uneducated consumer is our best customer", as their motto should say.

    24. Re:Ancient single use port by Entrope · · Score: 2

      A lot of old-school EEs have a hate for any design where a power conductor is exposed to easy contact. (Sometimes they'll relent if no power return is exposed, but ground tends to find a way...) How does Apple mitigate the risk of shorting the Lightning connector?

    25. Re:Ancient single use port by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Macs have USB host functionality while iOS devices, for the most part, do not. Placing a USB-C port on an iOS device might encourage people to think that they could plug in all sorts of USB devices

      Yes well that's a selling point of Android, I guess - with USB On-The-Go. Whereas iOS seems to have settled on the Bluetooth paradigm.

    26. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't justify an ancient single use port... Not unlike our proprietary power connectors

      I recently bought a Hewlett Packard Spectre 13 which features three USB-C ports, two of them supporting Thunderbolt. I learned the only USB-C port supporting bootable USB thumbdrive and presumably USB CD/DVD reader/writer is the right-most port. I like the unified thin connector for power and peripherals. This weekend my project is to install Xubuntu Linux on the HP Spectre 13 after spending last evening creating a full recovery media set on DVD. If I buy an Apple computer it will only be the Apple Mac Pro and install GNU/Linux.

    27. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than $160, because people will lose those little things and have to replace them. Apple was always the BMW brand but now wants to be a Ferrari in a 10 year old Ford Focus world economy. Almost $800 for a phone and another $160 for earbuds is outrageous. Only a bunch of millionaires could consider that price point as being reasonable.

    28. Re:Ancient single use port by inflex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AFAIK, the controller/management chip in the plug portion will not let full power through until it's confirmed the connection itself, part of the orientation smarts.

      Similar to their magsafe as well (Macbook has to validate things before charger is told to deliver full power ).

      *** I could be completely wrong *** ;)

    29. Re: Ancient single use port by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Sure, and USB has a similar power (current) negotiation scheme, but there still some base/default power level. Does the controller cut power entirely if negotiation didn't complete within X milliseconds? Or could a short drain power at 100 mA (or whatever) indefinitely?

    30. Re: Ancient single use port by inflex · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, it's only signal level power ( under 1mA) until the lanes are selected and switched for power. It may even be 1-wire (like Magsafe).

      Sadly I cannot find any documents at this point to backup my statements.

    31. Re: Ancient single use port by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that prohibit bus-powered devices? If they can't pull a little power during link negotiation, they'd need their own battery or some equivalent.

    32. Re: Ancient single use port by inflex · · Score: 1

      If it's using some sort of handshake likely it shouldn't need more than 100nA to get things started, a dedicated chip on the socket/device side, size clearly isn't an issue since they cram a couple in to the plug itself.

      I'm speculating now too much.

    33. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a car with Bluetooth and charge it like normal....

    34. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The desktop/laptop will still use it's own CPU, RAM and hard drive.

      Hopefully in addition to the faster CPUs, RAM and anything else that's found in the "dock". I'm looking forward to ccNUMA over "USB" and OSes that support hot-pluggable CPUs.

    35. Re:Ancient single use port by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      2: Bluetooth sucks balls when it comes to audio quality on it. Yes, it might be OK to listen to Coldplay at a coffee shop, but you are not going to be using a set of Bluetooth monitors (as in speakers) for high-end mixing, other than perhaps testing your mix on what people play it on.

      But this is your phone. People doing high-end mixing also aren't using their phones as head units - or if they were they'd be using external an DAC since those already exist and are far superior to the ones inside your phone.

      Today, with their phones, many people use Bluetooth. Many more use the free headphones that came with the phone. The new iPhone will work for all of those people. Then there are people who'll happily use headphones with a small adapter (either the free one that comes with the phone, or the dock that has had a built-in lightning->headphone adapter for years if they're at their desk). The phone will work for all of those people too.

      There are a very few people for whom the phone won't actually work, but not that many.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    36. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not going to see the kind of 'courage' from Apple that involves allowing people to buy their headphones/connectors elsewhere. Make 'em proprietary and make 'em expensive.

      You must have missed the part where they still support BlueTooth headphones, which as far as I know run the gamut of prices and are not proprietary.

    37. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touch a lightning connector to the sensitive skin on the inside of your arm and let me know if you still think that power is disabled unless it has confirmed the connection. Apple chargers might do that, but none of my chargers apparently do and I've learned to be careful with the exposed lightning connectors.

    38. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe my first sony sport walkman had a rubber cap to put in.

    39. Re:Ancient single use port by suutar · · Score: 1

      I expect to see third party widgets that split one lightning-male into a 3.5-female and a lightning-female for just such a situation.

    40. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, what happened to the dozens of posts that came before this one? And why does the "Load all comments" button only work sometimes?

      Slashspin. It is transparent.

    41. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are not going to be using a set of Bluetooth monitors (as in speakers) for high-end mixing,

      Well you are not going to be using a headphone jack type connector (not even the big one) for high-end mixing either.

      That said, I'm not in favor of this move, but i might potentially have bought it (the reason behind it, not the actual thing) had they cited the utterly poor design of the headphone-jack kind of connector instead of "courage".

      THAT said, actually I couldn't care less. I'm not going to buy any Apple stuff anyway.

    42. Re:Ancient single use port by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Okay, Apple. Can't justify a single use port. I get that. Are you now providing two Lightning ports? One for charging and one for audio? It's still a money grab for accessories, but at least you'd have two multi use ports to replace that single use port.

    43. Re:Ancient single use port by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      The idea of having a digital to analog converter and amp crammed next to a wireless transmitter and powered by a tiny battery probably makes the concept of truly decent, cheap, wireless audio devices a far out technology. Bluetooth AptX is already available for lossless 24bit 96kHz streaming.

      As far as Bluetooth keyboard lag, perhaps you need a better keyboard setup... one that does not sleep as often. I had this old Microsoft Bluetooth keyboard that only seemed to sleep after about 2 hours and it still managed to get decent battery life. Coming out of sleep it seemed to buffer and replay the keystrokes. The keyboard worked from BIOS thanks to some weird HID mode of the Bluetooth dongle where it would cache the keys.

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    44. Re:Ancient single use port by 605dave · · Score: 1

      Well they are including an adaptor with every phone that should make any headphones work. So they are not exactly locking you into their system.

      --
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
    45. Re:Ancient single use port by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      That's not courage. That's a cash-grab.

      Those 2 things are not mutually exclusive. Who is apple fighting for? They are a private company, so the answer is shareholders. The cash grab is for it's shareholders. Now the question is whether it a cowardly cash grab or a courageous cash grab. Considering the shitstorm, I would say it was certainly bold.

    46. Re:Ancient single use port by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      No, that would have been out of character. It's like saying that "real courage would have been the shark deciding to become a vegetarian rather than eating the baby seal". Private corporations exist to make money for their shareholders. If they feel they can get away with this cash grab (i.e. people will actually buy it), it would be irresponsible (and against their fiduciary duty to their shareholders) for them not to do it.

    47. Re:Ancient single use port by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Then you have to deal with all the problems that naturally come with bluetooth.

    48. Re:Ancient single use port by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      As far as Bluetooth keyboard lag, perhaps you need a better keyboard setup... one that does not sleep as often.

      The battery life of wireless keyboards is bad enough. I suppose I've never understood the "I don't ever want to have wires or cables or anything. Wireless is better!" It's like they think if you just cut the cord everything will work exactly the same. But it doesn't. That's not true.

      Battery issues, charging issues, increased weight because you need a battery. Syncing issues. Having to have a keyboard "sleep" in the first place. Slow wake-up times.

    49. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My car has 2 USB ports and 1 aux . . . try the USB port you twat.

    50. Re:Ancient single use port by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Shhh, Apple doesn't expect its fans to know anything about competitors. "An uneducated consumer is our best customer", as their motto should say.

      That's why their actual address is One Infinite Loop

    51. Re:Ancient single use port by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      My current wireless keyboard - Logitech K750 - has been great. It is "solar powered" and despite the terrible ambient lighting in my basement it's been perfect.
      It doesn't seem to ever sleep or have noticeable lag. It has never had a sync issue. The marathon mouse it came with might be on the original battery from a year ago. The cool thing about the wireless keyboard is that I can just move it wherever on my desk and there is no cord getting in the way of my wacom tablet

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    52. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their proprietary power connectors that break easily and frequently.

      If Apple had true courage, they'd announce that they were dumping Lightning for USB C. That would have been courage.

      If Apple had true courage, they'd have announced a new open Bluetooth protocol for dealing with higher bitrate audio. That would have been courage.

      Replacing a set of $30 earbuds (or $3 if you avoid the Apple Tax) with a $160 one? That's not courage. That's a cash-grab.

      I've never heard of this, and I must have four or five five different lightening cables regularly used between a wireless trackpad, three iphones, and an ipad. At least one of those is as old as the first lightning iphone.

      The google results look like something gnawed on them or they got snagged somewhere.

      I've never heard of ANY cables "going bad" like that. Either the jacket seperates from the connector, the connector splits in two, or the jacket abrades away, these are the only ways I've seen ANY type of modern cable fail in a way that can be attributed to the way it was made.

    53. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which are what? I guess I've been pretty lucky the past 10 years and two cars with Bluetooth.

    54. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll need a splitter.

      I guarantee a 3rd party will make a Y cable with headphone port and lightning port.

    55. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might as well remove the single-use microphone, too.

    56. Re:Ancient single use port by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Depends on the car. My 2011 has Bluetooth, it just doesn't have A2DP, so either I spend a good chunk of change on a newer car, a smaller chunk of change on a new deck with which I lose the integration I have today with the car, or I go without an iPhone 7 and stick with my trusty aux port.

    57. Re:Ancient single use port by DaHat · · Score: 1

      USB only gives me MTP access to the files, not exactly useful when trying to resume a podcast I was listening to.

    58. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's just not true, if apple hasn't invented it, like the tablet and the mp3 player - it can't be done.

    59. Re:Ancient single use port by djcopi · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with that? Apple doesn't make a pile of money from it, that's what. They cash in on every sale with a proprietary connection. That's why it's "better". Plus they know that the Apple faithful might grumble but will eventually shell out the money. Ipad profits are down, the piles of cash have to come from somewhere!

    60. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technology you are "forecasting" is already there and likely better than you describe. The new Apple displays will have integrated GPU and will talk over USB-C or lightning. 20-pin connectors are not going to happen especially for external connectors, the direction is towards fewer pins (see SATA vs IDE, etc).

    61. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who really needs a paper thin disposable phone. If you buy a phone, you should expect a 5 year life span, if not longer. I would say that you should not be like sheep, buying a $600 doorstop for yourself, the wife and each of the kids.

      A phone should have a replacable battery, or a battery good for 10 years of use.

      My ideal phone is a dicttracy watch with encrypted bluetooth connection to a phone somewhere on my body. I should be able to answer and make calls, and do web browsing / searching and whatever without taking the phone out from it's location.

      When I need to, the phone can be removed from my jacket or pants pocket for manual manipulation (games, agenda, browsing, etc).
      Lets have the return of the phone with the replaceable battery with extended battery life.

      Dont let Apple polute our world with it's super expensive, heavily marketed and locked-in phones.

    62. Re:Ancient single use port by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      They can have as proprietary a power connector as they like, with built in gold-plated FleshLight if they like. As long as, in the retail box they also have something with a female micro-USB receptacle through which the device can be re-charged.

      If the end-user then leaves this at home, tough shit.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    63. Re:Ancient single use port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are fucking retards

    64. Re:Ancient single use port by secretsquirel · · Score: 1

      buy a new car with bluetooth, obv

      apple car coming soon!

    65. Re:Ancient single use port by jseale · · Score: 1

      Not much USB-C usage in what I've been using these days, save for a recent model Western Digital portable external hard drive in which USB-C is being used for both data transfer and power. USB-C, as far as I'm concerned, is a forgotten and forlorn standard.

  4. LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by ChodaBoyUSA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Courage" would be to stop making the phone thinner with less battery life and forcing owners to purchase overpriced items. Of course, Apple gets paid by any company that licenses their "Lightning Port" design. Courage? NO, more like GREED.

    1. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They didn't make the phone thinner, they increased the battery size and life, the adapter is not particularly overpriced at $9, and they include one with the phone.

      So... you're saying they do have courage?

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Courage is a strange way to spell profit. I'll assume that these $159 wireless earplugs don't have replaceable batteries, and it seems they're proprietary, so it's just another recurring profit stream. Since users aren't as willing to upgrade their phones every 2 years (although thinner phones might make them break more easilly, which helps), Apple is searching for a way to get them to upgrade the accessories on a regular basis. There's no benefit to the user, unless they'd like a lighter wallet.

      To quote Jobs: that's brain-dead.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      1) apple has popularized the GUI, the touch screen, the smart phone, the form factor for pretty much every laptop sold today (look at the first PowerBook, then look at all Windows laptops before it). Apple has given us volume controls on the headphone line - yes, the same tech that people bitch that apple will pull, Apple finally made super useful with volume and logic controls. I go nuts with headphones that don't have these controls - a non-ironic Thanks Apple here.

      2) apple has given us the 3.5 inch floppy, then removed it. It gave us the first easy to use networking (Appletalk over LocalTalk, or more likely PhoneNet) then removed it for TCP/IP Rendezvous/Bonjour. It has essentially removed all CDs from it's devices, so it gave us iTunes to rip CDs, now no CD player to rip from. It dropped the Motorola 68000, then dropped PowerPC.

      3) It's not even the first jack free phone - motorola beat them to it, with a phone that (sadly - Motorola was once a Lion) no one will buy so Apple will be seen as the first.

      So, Apple regularly adds and/or removes tech. It's part of their DNA. They've radically moved computing forward and sometimes they're the first to cut ties to an old past. Whether you like them removing it or not, doesn't mean it's a "hey they're GREEDY" everytime they change something. Remember that soon, your iOS9 phone will become an iOS10 phone and do more things. They're not charging you for that. For free, your mac will do more new things. The headphone jack is long, the headphone jack is thick, and the headphone jack makes it harder to waterproof. Why is everyone complaining? because bluetooth headphones suck. Well, here's Apple designing a future to make them suck less.

    4. Re: LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I caught cancer at 'itunes to rip CDs'

    5. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Required+Snark · · Score: 0

      Does that mean you are going to give everyone on Slashdot $150 for the new EarBuds? If you are that convinced that there is no greed in the decision, why don't you put you're money where your mouth is? Or is your mouth too busy kissing the ass of Apple to do anything else?

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    6. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by adamstew · · Score: 2

      how is it greed? The wired headphones are still included in the box. They include the adapter for normal headphones that you already own or wish to purchase in the future. They sell the adapter, should you lose it or want more than one, for $9.

      The earpods are basically just fancy bluetooth headphones. Which you can also still connect to the phone.

    7. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can't believe people are still trotting out this pack of rubbish. It has been proven time and time again that Apple didn't Pioneer things like the GUI or the touch screen, et cetera. They stole them and claimed them as their own and their PR convinced us that they're the brave little selfless people that develops all the new tech. If Apple pioneered anything it's the destructive and oppressive business methods that has now spread like cancer. Theft, misinformation and greed have been spread thanks to Apple. And hissy fits.

    8. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by gweilo8888 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh goodie, it's only $9 to have a clumsy unnecessary extra box in my pocket, all so Apple could shave a tenth of a millimeter off the case and boost their accessory and patent licensing profits. What a WIN for the Apple customer!

    9. Re: LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has also given us the Newton, the iTunes phone, and a myraid of other failures. They take risks, and they take lumps along with their accolades.

      Removing the headphone jack is a lump, not at accolade, a Newton, not an iPhone.

    10. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gave us the first easy to use networking (Appletalk over LocalTalk, or more likely PhoneNet)

      You know that IPX/SPX (Netware), TCP/IP, and Ethernet were around well before Appletalk was, right? Most of the rest of your post is full of revisionist history, but this networking comment is especially nonsense.

    11. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by msauve · · Score: 5, Informative

      Drank the Kool-aid, eh? Sure, Apple pushed the keyboard back on laptops. Inline headset control wasn't new with Apple. HP created the 3.5" floppy. Ethernet, which is preponderant, pre-dated LocalTalk, which is long gone. Bonjour isn't significantly different than SSDP. People were ripping CDs long before iTunes (which itself originated outside of Apple).

      There was once a time when Apple sucked less. Now they just suck.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    12. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they weren't motivated purely by profit, but instead by "courage" and a dislike for outdated things, they would've made this open for free or minimal-fee licensing.

      Kinda like how Bluetooth is. You know, that thing that already does this and is already in basically every smartphone ever made?

    13. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Look at all the wonderful things Hewlett Packard brought us in the 80s. And look at them now, post-Fiorina.

    14. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LOL. You give 4 examples to support a claim for lack of "vendor lock-in", but 3 of them are proprietary, and none have the quality of a simple analog jack. What flavor Kool-aid did you get?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    15. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...build it and maybe somebody else will build the bits they haven't?

    16. Re: LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      typical apple worshipper

    17. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention, how are you to use the port to charge your device while listening to music through the aux port of your stereo (for those of us who do not have A2DP)?

    18. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      I would agree with all of your examples, but I'd point out an issue or two.

      In many of those cases, Apple went from their proprietary solution to something more open. AppleTalk ran over LocalTalk--Apple's proprietary networking (which was basically twisted pair). Another company--I don't remember their name--came alone and just used cheaper wires (PhoneNet). Apple developed EtherTalk--AppleTalk over Ethernet--before going to TCP/IP.

      One analogy that sort of works is the move to ADB. The Apple Desktop Bus was designed for keyboards, mice, and other low-bandwidth device (I think someone did an ADB modem, I remember using ADB colorimeters, etc.) The reason for ADB was to save Apple money--rather than having a bunch of different connectors, one would do the job. There wasn't a whole lot of benefit--you'd have to throw out your old modem and buy a new one. That said, they kept the serial ports around for quite awhile.

    19. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just keep that *clumsy unnecessary* dongle attached to the earphones, so you don't have to carry it along with the phone when not using it.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    20. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      2) apple has given us the 3.5 inch floppy, then removed it.

      Floppy disks always sucked.

      It gave us the first easy to use networking (Appletalk over LocalTalk, or more likely PhoneNet) then removed it

      Your history is wrong but more importantly all of these things sucked ass compared with IP.

      It has essentially removed all CDs from it's devices, so it gave us iTunes to rip CDs, now no CD player to rip from.

      The problem with removing CDs nothing better came along to replace them. If you want to give someone a hard copy they can physically keep optical media is still king even though flash memory is cheap.

      It dropped the Motorola 68000, then dropped PowerPC.

      Because they sucked/couldn't keep up with the rest of the industry (e.g. Intel/AMD)

      The headphone jack is long, the headphone jack is thick, and the headphone jack makes it harder to waterproof. Why is everyone complaining?

      I'm a fan of change even extremely disruptive change when and only when it correlates with useful benefit commensurate with the change. For example new phones with USB-C connectors rather than micro usb provide value to bumbling idiots like myself who always manage to end up with USB cables with no discernible marking telling me which way to plug the shit in... so buying an adaptor if it means never having to screw with it... I don't care.

      What headphone jacks are is something different. Conformational changes by themselves don't mean anything to the user. Whining about engineering challenges doesn't mean anything to the end user. People don't give a flying fuck how hard something was to design they only care about results. There is no additional value provisioned to the user by taking away headphone jacks. In fact it can only make life more difficult by having to manage/lose/break one more breakout box that didn't previously need to exist. It doesn't enhance anyone's life in any way it just makes things more difficult for them with nothing ... no BENEFIT in return to show for it. It is a step backwards in every way that matters and in my opinion no way representative of the examples you previous provided to justify change.

    21. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      2) apple has given us the 3.5 inch floppy, then removed it.

      Floppy disks always sucked.

      5.25" floppy disks sucked more.

      It gave us the first easy to use networking (Appletalk over LocalTalk, or more likely PhoneNet) then removed it

      Your history is wrong but more importantly all of these things sucked ass compared with IP.

      Actually, no. Aside from being "chatty" (which was mostly fixed with Phase 2) AppleTalk and the various layers on top of it (AFP, NBP, ADSP) were a godsend for automated network setup and service discovery. LocalTalk transfer speeds were par for the day, and EtherTalk was acceptable as long as you had a decent AppleTalk network setup. Farallon deserves the credit for PhoneNet over the original cables, but dirt-cheap network cabling, often using your existing wiring, was phenomenal for its time.

      Frankly, if you want to talk networking, talk about Open Transport. STREAMS was too complicated, and foreign to the sockets that eventually won out (programmers coming over from various other *nixes), but it was powerful and deserved more exposure and support than beleagured, mid-90s Apple could give it.

      It has essentially removed all CDs from it's devices, so it gave us iTunes to rip CDs, now no CD player to rip from.

      The problem with removing CDs nothing better came along to replace them. If you want to give someone a hard copy they can physically keep optical media is still king even though flash memory is cheap.

      Apple really screwed up their 2000's optical media strategy... I remember it being something like 4-5 years after CD-R/RW was everywhere before they finally added it as an option on the iMacs. And yes, stamped optical is still the way to go unless you need solid state access and transfer times.

      It dropped the Motorola 68000, then dropped PowerPC.

      Because they sucked/couldn't keep up with the rest of the industry (e.g. Intel/AMD)

      The 68K was amazing for the CISC era, but RISC writing was on the wall. The PowerPC was complex... it didn't suck. The problem was that IBM/Moto had plenty of customers looking for different features in the PPC silicon, and Apple's needs (high performance desktop; power-frugal laptops) weren't going to get the attention they needed. The G5 was a beast of a machine, and my old beige G3 ran circles around PII's of the day.

      The headphone jack is long, the headphone jack is thick, and the headphone jack makes it harder to waterproof. Why is everyone complaining?

      Because of the "problems" you mention, only waterproofing is a valid one. No one would complain if there was a "sport" model intended to be water resistant as opposed to just thinner. (Good marketing decision for Apple, BTW. They must have focus-grouped the sh*t out of this.) Otherwise, it's a standard port being tossed aside for cosmetic purposes.

      There was holy hell raised when Apple ditched the legacy ports on the Bondi Blue iMac. Imagine what would have been said if Apple was getting a license fee on every USB product sold.

    22. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      Apple has given us volume controls on the headphone line - yes, the same tech that people bitch that apple will pull, Apple finally made super useful with volume and logic controls. I go nuts with headphones that don't have these controls - a non-ironic Thanks Apple here.

      Holy shit, that's innovative! It's not as though anyone made headphones with media controls on them now after all!

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    23. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Cederic · · Score: 2

      erm. The word used was 'popularised' not 'pioneered'.

      On the GUI front that's very debatable, but market penetration of mobile devices with no keyboard prior to the iPhone was very low.

      Apple do enough shit and nasty things to get upset about, you are allowed to acknowledge the good stuff they do too.

    24. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by MonkeyTrial · · Score: 2

      "Courage" is what you have when you run into a burning building to save people, not what you have when you make a decision about whether to abandon a microphone plug. I hate how corporations in particular degrade the real meaning of words.

    25. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Khyber · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "that no longer counts as "proprietary""

      You have no fucking clue what proprietary means. Proprietary means that if I wanted to sell a Lightning adapter of any sorts, I need to pay a licensing fee. Courage would be using an open standard that is unencumbered by PATENTS and thus motivated only for PROFIT.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    26. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you've not been paying attention:
      - Lightning, proprietary, thus lightning-to-3.5mm is proprietary
      - W-1 proprietary
      - Bluetooth (which A2DP only supports MP3 or AAC, no "lossless")

      So there is no way to listen to it losslessly and charge the device.

    27. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. meh. it doesn't seem much if you compare it to the cost of the iphone plus today. but you'll need one when they are 300 bucks too. 9 dollahs seems cheap only because you compare it to the device cost now.

      but let's compare it to the average price of headphones. THE ADAPTER IS MORE FUCKING EXPENSIVE THAN AVERAGE HEADPHONES that people use happily. headphone plug prices start at half a dollar and 9 bucks gets you a pretty decent headphones. the adapter is more expensive than what 95% use for headphones. however there is the another reason to not include the port: apple was always shit bad at making them last. and then there's yet another reason: it was not a single use port: it provided manufacturers of 3rd party devices to interface with the iphone without license costs of the data port.

      when a company has financial reasons, especially apple, and walled garden reasons, again especially apple, then you can forget it being a practical decision. it's not.

      now they just raised the cost of headphones by 9 bucks. but that's not even the worst. you're going to need the jack converter to provide a power-in as well, because people who use headphones on their phones need to charge them while using headphones with them. this is just how it is. the primary use for the headphones is not while jogging, the primary use is to watch soap operas, movies, youtube and such - where you need to charge at the same time sooner or later. ..anyways... apple has really fucked it up this time, and I don't mean with the port connector but pricing themselves out way too fucking high. the price for iphone 7 and especially the plus is that they will be selling iphone 6 for 2 years more, so app developers have fun with that(iphone 5s was for sale new in box by carriers in asia at least 2 months ago still. why? because they're cheap enough that people can actually buy them. never mind that apple is going to drop sw support pretty soon). now you could get something like explodey note7 and s6/7 for the price of the fully loaded iphone 7 plus. you can buy a good gaming laptop for the price of the iphone 7 plus AND a quadcore 7" tablet.

    28. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sony created the 3.5" floppy."

      There, fixed that mistake for you.

    29. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adaptors are for allowing depricated technology to work with modern technology. The 3.5mm jack has not been one-upped in over half a century despite the explosion in technological capability over the last 10 years.

      I'm betting they were told to include it by their lawyers.

    30. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Required+Snark · · Score: 0

      You left out Mac OS.They used to have their own operating system, now they sponge off BSD. As far as I know, they don't contribute anything to the BSD community. The last time I looked there was no sponsorship by Apple of any BSD activity. If I remember correcty they did some work when OSX was new, but that ended a long time ago.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    31. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by msauve · · Score: 1

      Audio quality can't improve by replacing 3 feet of wire with a digitized stream of bits, wired or wireless. It can only get worse. So yeah, Apple's complex, expensive, proprietary, user hostile solution doesn't have the quality of a standard headphone jack.

      You are clueless about what "proprietary" means, and seem to be confusing it with "exclusive." Good thing you put "open" in quotes, though, because it's anything but.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    32. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      Sony have been doing waterproof phones with normal 3.5mm jack sockets that don't require a cover for some time now. They have been out since before the iPhone 6 hit the market. So removing the 3.5mm jack for waterproofing is *NOT* a valid reason for it's removal.

    33. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have their uses though. Put your phone down on the kitchen bench while you freely move around without wires making dinner. Throw your phone in your car glove box and listen to music without getting tangled in wires. There are benefits.

    34. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      $9 for a tiny bit of wire with a 3.5mm in on one end and a lightning out on the other? And you think that's reasonable? Do you think the airbuds are about the right price too? You're the kind of sucker apple relies on.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    35. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      They didn't make the phone thinner, they increased the battery size and life,

      Also how much extra battery/life can you get from the size of a 3.5mm port?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    36. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Corbets · · Score: 2

      http://www.apple.com/opensourc...

      That wasn't hard to Google - it's a list of projects they use and contribute back to.

    37. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by swb · · Score: 2

      In many of those cases, Apple went from their proprietary solution to something more open. AppleTalk ran over LocalTalk--Apple's proprietary networking (which was basically twisted pair). Another company--I don't remember their name--came alone and just used cheaper wires (PhoneNet). Apple developed EtherTalk--AppleTalk over Ethernet--before going to TCP/IP.

      Farallon developed PhoneNet which ran LocalTalk over telephone patch cords via dongle connected to the serial port. They even made a LocalTalk/Ethernert bridge device to allow internetworking as was as the StarController hub-like connector for non-daisy chain setups.

      I'm not sure Apple's transition from LocalTalk to Ethernet was driven by a desire to adopt a more open technology than it was to escape a clearly dead end solution that was non-scalable, limited to RS-422 speeds and often daisy chained.

      Apple were also at the time actually interested in business computing markets as well as larger educational institutions and LocalTalk was a monster pain in the ass due to scaling problems. The switch to LocalTalk-over-Ethernet aka EtherTalk was pretty much mandatory for Mac networking in any large topology or internetwork.

      Regardless of EtherTalk's use of a standard layer 2 transport, it was still highly proprietary. And you could also argue that they hung onto it for too long, way past the point at which TCP/IP was the obvious future. Transport performance with AppleTalk was god-awful and when AppleShare/IP finally began emerging it was obvious how much faster it was than AppleShare on EtherTalk.

    38. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Not to get sidetracked (I agree with your post) but "run into a burning building to save people" is more stupid than courage. If you do not have a full face mask and respirator then entering a burning building will most likely get you killed. The toxic fumes from a modern house fire will overpower you and you will collapse and die. The only exception would be if you are entering a building at a lower level than the fire, but even then, it is possible for the lower levels to be filled with smoke and fumes. Stay safe, and don't always act on what you once saw in a movie. Fire and smoke kills.

    39. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they do have a lightning dock that allows you to do that. Of course, you have to buy it :)

    40. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Jesus christ I got brain damage reading that. You should have just listed the achievements in tech that don't belong to Apple, it would have saved you time (maybe you wouldn't have bothered posting at all?).

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    41. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by RatPh!nk · · Score: 1

      The adapter is free in the box with the phone.

      --
      Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
    42. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      None, generally. Batteries don't generally come in non-rectilinear shapes, and the headphone jack is situated in a "dead corner" which is bounded by the lightning port.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    43. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which pair? My work pair? Home pair? Exercise pair? The backup pair I keep in my car?

    44. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at all the wonderful things Hewlett Packard brought us in the 80s. And look at them now, post-Fiorina.

      Hewlett Packard certainly lost their way for a few decades but the company appears to be getting back to engineering solidly-designed, high-quality computer systems. While it is too early to know whether this refocus will be long-lived or axed as soon as the short-term thinking MBAs lay-off the engineering team.

    45. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      5.25" floppy disks sucked more.

      The 360k floppy may have held little, but it had amazing data retention because it was using very little of its potential. You could format them all the way up to 800k with about the same reliability as 3.5" 1.44MB floppies, as long as you used quality media. I've lost track of how many 1.44MB floppies I've had lose data just sitting around in their fancy-pants little hinged boxes.

      Aside from being "chatty" (which was mostly fixed with Phase 2) AppleTalk and the various layers on top of it (AFP, NBP, ADSP) were a godsend for automated network setup and service discovery.

      We really didn't have any trouble with IPX over 10b2 over in PC-land, and you could buy NICs for around thirty bucks... similar to the price of a brand-name PhoneNet dongle. And it was dramatically faster, to boot. AppleTalk was pretty cool, but it didn't take off until PhoneNet; PhoneNet was pretty cool, but the hardware was unaccountably expensive and the speeds were very low. It was fine for a bunch of people to share a printer, but agony for anything else. A NIC for a Mac started around $100 and went up from there. And while we're on the subject, if you installed one, you could wind up with an AUI port on the bac of your Mac which looked basically identical to your graphics port, because Apple cheaped out and used the DB15 for video. Scum. Even goddamned Commodore was good enough to use a DB23 for video so that it wasn't identical to another port on the back of the machine. Of course, now Apple just creates proprietary connectors and charges excessive licensing fees. Even IEEE1394 was harmed by fees; sure, it was more expensive to implement, but Apple also wanted too much per device when devices were getting cheaper and cheaper. Apple does not have a monopoly on short-sightedness, but they do have an ample supply.

      The G5 was a beast of a machine

      It was astoundingly expensive, and they had an endemic problem with the liquid cooling on the liquid-cooled models. And then they cut off support at what, 10.5? Because Apple.

      my old beige G3 ran circles around PII's of the day.

      So did a K6, if you compiled for K6. So what?

      There was holy hell raised when Apple ditched the legacy ports on the Bondi Blue iMac.

      They also used a crap CMD IDE chip (to save money) and then botched the implementation and then told customers to either buy FWB toolkit and disable UDMA on new HDDs or buy a PCI IDE card (with the literally 400% apple tax on such a device) to avoid data corruption. Either way, spend money to fix Apple's problem. Fuck Apple sideways twice.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The earpods/airpods don't use standard Bluetooth but some proprietary format. So don't expect to be able to use your $160 earpods/airpods with any other devices.

    47. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by netsavior · · Score: 1

      My wife has an iPhone, and she goes through about 1 cable per month, apple brand, "premium" 3rd party, or cheapie cables, it doesn't matter, they all break quickly.

      I have had the same $3 USB Micro B cable for my last 3 phones... About 6 years

    48. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, where is the BSD page thanking apple for or acknowledging what they've given back? I don't think it exists. It's easy to blow your own trumpet.

    49. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      1) apple has popularized the GUI, the touch screen, the smart phone

      Debatable, but sure. The technology was clearly coming. Apple did what they do best which was to find some realtively early tech with a poorly implemented user experience and polish it heavily.

      Apple has given us volume controls on the headphone line

      WTF? I had a portable casette player in 1995 or 6 which had headphones with volume and controls for play, pause, fast forward, skip track and change direction. This is old old old tech, and no thanks to Apple.

      I go nuts with headphones that don't have these controls - a non-ironic Thanks Apple here.

      Typical apple fanboi. You have no idea who invented it so you ascribe it to Apple.

      2) apple has given us the 3.5 inch floppy, then removed it.

      If by "Apple", you mean a consortium based on a Sony design, the sure, Apple gave it to us, a good two years after it was introduced.

      It gave us the first easy to use networking

      I remember ECONET being pretty easy to use. That predated AppleTalk by a year. My school had all its BBCs wired up that way and I remember the staff there were a bunch of numpties.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    50. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Audio quality can't improve by replacing 3 feet of wire with a digitized stream of bits, wired or wireless. It can only get worse. So yeah, Apple's complex, expensive, proprietary, user hostile solution doesn't have the quality of a standard headphone jack.

      "Doesn't have the quality"? Where do you think the audio stream came from in the first place? There are already existing lightning-port headphones that outperform the same versions with analog connections because they provide their own DACs, a notorious weak-point in non-audiophile gadgets in the first place. I'm assuming that the adapter simply contains similar-quality circuitry to their existing device too, so you're just extending the digital side of the chain by a tiny amount which will do - oh - absolutely nothing to the signal.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    51. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      So now its Apple's fault that other people haven't thanked themenough? SMH...

      Remember what UNIX printing was like pre-Apple? Or how about Webkit?

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    52. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh goodie, it's only $9 to have a clumsy unnecessary extra box in my pocket, all so Apple could shave a tenth of a millimeter off the case and boost their accessory and patent licensing profits. What a WIN for the Apple customer!

      Insightful? Really? What box does the 9$ adaptor come in that is filling up your pocket? Are you instead talking about the box for the AirPods (which cost closer to $160 BUT are entirely unnecessary since the phone still supports the same bluetooth standard it always has, and you can pair any bluetooth headset with it)

      The $9 adaptor for your current wired headset is a 2" wire. You must have VERY small pockets if that fills one.

    53. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just keep that *clumsy unnecessary* dongle attached to the earphones, so you don't have to carry it along with the phone when not using it.

      Some of us use earphones for more than one device.

    54. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by msauve · · Score: 1

      ""Doesn't have the quality"? Where do you think the audio stream came from in the first place?"

      The vast majority comes from analog signals.

      I've learned to ignore any argument which uses "audiophile" as a reason. Perhaps Enid Lumley will listen from the grave (Apple should really make those earbuds in black, so the light doesn't get through and effect the sound).

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    55. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by suutar · · Score: 1

      I dunno, 9 might not be totally insane. How much are the D-A chips?

    56. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming that the adapter simply contains similar-quality circuitry to their existing device too, so you're just extending the digital side of the chain by a tiny amount which will do - oh - absolutely nothing to the signal.

      The $9 adapter contains a better DAC+Amp than the $700 phone? Really?

    57. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I suppose you should get some credit for sticking to your argument, but you probably need to head back to the mothership to get the new talking points. That's probably a better idea than describing a proprietary connector with an adapter as an "open system".

      it would be senseless for Apple to make it any other way.

      A lot of people thought it was senseless to remove the audio jack, but that didn't stop Apple from trying to sell you a pair of $160 ear phones which they claim will "change the way you listen to music". I'm pretty sure you still listen to music when it goes in your ear holes, but apparently $160 buys you a completely new way to consume sound waves.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    58. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by TwentyCharsIsNotEnou · · Score: 1

      What about when those earphones are plugged into something else?

    59. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by TwentyCharsIsNotEnou · · Score: 1

      It's included, it's not free! The box itself probably costs about as much as that adapter to produce!

    60. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by TwentyCharsIsNotEnou · · Score: 1

      Thing is, someone with courage will just act and do it with no regard for themselves. That's precisely what it means.

      I've no problem with you making a calculated decision, but calling that other guy stupid and not courageous displays insecurity about your own courage. Just accept that guy is braver than you and give him credit for it.

    61. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Yes, again I agree, but it's really difficult because ultimately that disregard for one's own life can actually make the net situation worse. You read about drownings in the paper all the time. Often some bystander or one of the parent's tries to save a drowning child and either they both perish, or the child is saved and the adult dies. Yes, the adult was being extremely brave and made the ultimate sacrifice. But what if that adult had other children who are now without their parent? One could argue that the net loss in such a case is worse than if the drowning child had been left to die.

      The extreme outcome of this way of thinking is absolute tragedy such as this, which sickens me to even think about. How could that "rescue team" live with themselves after letting that happen?

      Where's the balance? I don't think I'm wise enough to know....

    62. Re: LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Eh the Newton was actually an interesting device for its time. Now if we were talking about Pippin on the other hand...

    63. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Webkit? You mean KHTML?

    64. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Courage is a strange way to spell profit. I'll assume that these $159 wireless earplugs don't have replaceable batteries, and it seems they're proprietary, so it's just another recurring profit stream. Since users aren't as willing to upgrade their phones every 2 years (although thinner phones might make them break more easilly, which helps), Apple is searching for a way to get them to upgrade the accessories on a regular basis. There's no benefit to the user, unless they'd like a lighter wallet. To quote Jobs: that's brain-dead.

      If you don't like the $160 AirPods, then don't buy them! You can now get audio out (and in) to the iPhone in any one of FOUR ways (5 if you count WiFi): Lightning; Lightning with supplied 3.5mm adapter; W1-format Wireless; Standard Bluetooth Wireless. I don't know about how you figure it; but that SURE doesn't spell "vendor lock-in" to me!

      You know, mods, "Disagree" is NOT a reason to mark something "-1 Troll".

    65. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      LOL. You give 4 examples to support a claim for lack of "vendor lock-in", but 3 of them are proprietary, and none have the quality of a simple analog jack. What flavor Kool-aid did you get?

      Since unless you were at the "Event" today, you haven't even heard the W1 wireless phones OR the Lightning ones, you're so full of shit it's running out of your mouth and onto the keyboard. And only 2 of the methods are proprietary; since Apple "opened" the system with the SUPPLIED Lightning to 3.5mm adapter, that no longer counts as "proprietary", since you can hook any old headphones/earbuds to that, and it would be senseless for Apple to make it any other way.

      You know, mods, systematically marking ALL of my posts as "-1 Troll" is NOT in the spirit of the mod purpose. I don't do it to others. But look at EVERY post of mine to this Article. They have ALL been marked "Troll", NO MATTER WHAT.

      STOP IT!

    66. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      So, Apple regularly adds and/or removes tech. It's part of their DNA. They've radically moved computing forward and sometimes they're the first to cut ties to an old past. Whether you like them removing it or not, doesn't mean it's a "hey they're GREEDY" everytime they change something. Remember that soon, your iOS9 phone will become an iOS10 phone and do more things. They're not charging you for that. For free, your mac will do more new things. The headphone jack is long, the headphone jack is thick, and the headphone jack makes it harder to waterproof. Why is everyone complaining? because bluetooth headphones suck. Well, here's Apple designing a future to make them suck less.

      THIS, THIS; a thousand times THIS!

      REALLY?!? Is THIS REALLY WORTH A DOWNMOD?!? Someone has gone and DOWNVOTED EVERY ONE OF MY POSTS.

      Good job.

    67. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neato, now I need to keep track of which earphones I have in my pocket, and can't use another if I don't have mine with me.

    68. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by samwichse · · Score: 1

      The aux cable in my car? The one at my desk at work? The one at my bench in the lab? The one to the crappy computer speakers in the greenhouse?

      How about the one to my all analog input sound system in my living room?

      And of course, my headphones and earplug-buds (ANSI rated!).

    69. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      The vast majority comes from analog signals.

      But this is coming from your phone. Where that analog signal has been digitized.

      Look, moving to a Bluetooth connection for your turntable would be stupid, agreed, but you have to look at the source which in this case is a (probably MP3 or AAC) file on a cellphone, which regardless of the bitrate is unquestionably digital in nature.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    70. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Yup, isn't open source grand? Of course, prior to Webkit KHTML was weird and buggy as hell, then became a very strong contender, so much so that Google used it for Chrome. Kinda like CUPS - a good idea with a poor implementation that Apple really helped make work.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    71. Re:LOL, "Courage"? More like GREED... by anerki · · Score: 1

      The point is not that the connector is cheap, an extra piece, ...

      Imagine you board the plane, you forgot your earbuds or worse, lost your expensive headphones. It happened to me, just as a flight attendant to give you those cheap ones they have and quality will be horrible, but I'll have something to listen to.

      Or rather, I _had_ something to listen to, since my connector was taped to my headphone jack of headphones (I would just leave it there) and I can't connect those freebies now. How this is consumer oriented I don't get.

      --
      Life is great! (as told by Lady Susan)
  5. Whatta they got that I ain't got? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    Courage!.... Cowardly Lion: You can say that again.

    1. Re:Whatta they got that I ain't got? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Courage!....

      Cowardly Lion: You can say that again.

      I don't think Apple is using a funny "Courage!", the way the Cowardly Lion would.

      I think this case is more of a strange "Courage!", like Dan Rather signing off.

    2. Re:Whatta they got that I ain't got? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Courage! What makes a king out of a slave? Courage!
      What makes the flag on the mast to wave? Courage!
      What makes the elephant charge his tusk in the misty mist, or the dusky dusk?
      What makes the muskrat guard his musk? Courage!
      What makes the sphinx the seventh wonder? Courage!
      What makes the dawn come up like thunder? Courage!
      What makes the Hottentot so hot? What puts the "ape" in apricot? What have they got that I ain't got?

      A headphone jack?

      You can say that again.

  6. Courage vs Ego by gavron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Courage is what others can judge you to have shown.

    Ego is when you call your own decision "courage".

    If they had a good reason they should have said it. Self-claiming courage is a coward move.

    E

    1. Re:Courage vs Ego by Burz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apple are the Knights Who Say NIH -- Not Invented Here!

    2. Re:Courage vs Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're really delusional...get help.

    3. Re:Courage vs Ego by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple is rather unique in that people forget their failures while remembering their successes, or even incorrectly attribute other people's innovations to Apple. For other companies, it's usually the other way around. That's why people joked that Jobs projected a Reality Distortion Field.

    4. Re:Courage vs Ego by HBI · · Score: 1

      Jobs is dead. They came close to bankruptcy without him in the 90s and are headed right to the shitter again with these crap decisions. Besides, no one gives a shit what you did yesterday - it's what you do tomorrow that matters.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    5. Re:Courage vs Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Courage is what others can judge you to have shown.

      Ego is when you call your own decision "courage".

      If they had a good reason they should have said it. Self-claiming courage is a coward move.

      E

      It's not egotistical when you have a multi-decade PROVABLE record of being a trend-setter in the industries of interest. It's called "bragging rights".

      So they have the "bragging right" to label themselves "courageous" for removing the headphone jack? You're the worst kind of rabid fanboy, Apple could serve you their board of directors' buttholes on a plate and you'd thank them for it, then vigorously defend them against anybody who criticised them for it.

    6. Re:Courage vs Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't kill the messenger.

    7. Re:Courage vs Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commodore Business Machines pre-dated and outsold Apple at every occasion. Now Apple is regarded the 'inventor of the home computer' since CBM is dead. History revisionism in it's pure commercial form.

    8. Re:Courage vs Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a dedicated troll, or do you really treat Apple like a religion? Even if you were a major shareholder - which I doubt - you would still offer criticism where needed. But it's like you have this kneejerk need to defend a corporation's every move, showing your fealty right down to the "macs4all" nick.

      My curiosity makes me want to understand people like you. You're part of the complex tapestry of humanity, but a part that doesn't really make sense.

    9. Re:Courage vs Ego by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      That's why people joked that Jobs projected a Reality Distortion Field.

      That wasn't a joke.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    10. Re:Courage vs Ego by Scot+Seese · · Score: 1

      Ego drives Apple.

      You'd never guess from their slick video presentations at the yearly press conference that everything in their phone is made by, was invented by, and was assembled by dozens of other companies. Their processors are fabbed by other people, the camera module was created by other people, batteries, wifi & bluetooth radios, batteries, dozens of other parts other people. it's really unclear exactly WHAT Apple makes aside from software and advertising.

      The brilliant Israeli engineer behind the A series mobile processor designs? Worked at Intel and IBM before Apple poached him. All three parties were sued by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation over significant processor design patent violations - All of which WARF won, or were hastily settled before trial.

      I take that back. It's clear what Apple makes. Apple makes desire. They manufacture wanting.

      The passage from Walter Isaacson's Steve Jobs biography where he explains how Jobs spent a few weeks in Paris, walking the streets in the luxury goods district, carefully examining the store interiors, signage, display hardware, merchandise, and speaking with employees - At luxury brands like Gucci, Prada, Burberry, Cartier and others - All companies that take inexpensive materials and through the magic of design, advertising and strategic marketing create luxury products costing huge multiples of their material costs - That passage was extremely telling and greatly helps explain how Apple turns ~$200 worth of components into $650-1000+ devices that people shit themselves over.

      --
      THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
    11. Re:Courage vs Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Unique: Edison came before them in this regard, also in regards to making inventions of others usable. Light bulb comes to mind.

    12. Re:Courage vs Ego by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Even if, hypothetically, the act of removing the 3.5mm headphone jack was actually considered "courageous" the fact remains that they didn't even do that. As multiple people have pointed out they are including it in the box and have a fully-supported path for it going forward. Exactly what is the act here that you think is courageous? Making it slightly more of a pain in the ass to use by moving it from built-in to accessible and supported via an extra accessory?

    13. Re:Courage vs Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when APK's mum remembers to make him take his meds.

    14. Re:Courage vs Ego by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Even if, hypothetically, the act of removing the 3.5mm headphone jack was actually considered "courageous" the fact remains that they didn't even do that. As multiple people have pointed out they are including it in the box and have a fully-supported path for it going forward. Exactly what is the act here that you think is courageous? Making it slightly more of a pain in the ass to use by moving it from built-in to accessible and supported via an extra accessory?

      So, you have exactly pointed-out what Apple's dilemma was: They were damned if they did, and damned if they didn't. But they're kind of used to that whining, and know from experience of removing BOTH the Floppy AND the Serial Ports from the original iMac (and that at a time when they didn't DARE "get it wrong"), and releasing a smartphone without a physical keyboard (at the height of Blackberry's success), and releasing a laptop without an Optical Drive (the original Air), and releasing a Tablet computer when market analysis would have predicted that the entire category was a non-starter, and then seeing ALL of those COURAGEOUS decisions not only "work out", but actually change the way that ALL their competitors ALSO designed their products and become "the new normal", They decided that "now" was a good time to "take another leap of faith" on the headphone jack.

      And all YOU can do is whine that they made it as painless as possible for YOU to transition to the new method as easy as possible. After all, Apple never included a USB to Serial converter with the original iMac, and ya know what? People not only "got over it", but in about two short years, you would have been hard-pressed to find ANY peripheral that still used "legacy" ports exclusively.

      So yeah, "Courageous".

    15. Re:Courage vs Ego by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Courage is what others can judge you to have shown.

      Ego is when you call your own decision "courage".

      If they had a good reason they should have said it. Self-claiming courage is a coward move.

      E

      It's not egotistical when you have a multi-decade PROVABLE record of being a trend-setter in the industries of interest. It's called "bragging rights".

      REALLY?!? Is THIS REALLY WORTH A DOWNMOD?!? Someone has gone and DOWNVOTED EVERY ONE OF MY POSTS.

      Good job.

    16. Re:Courage vs Ego by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You're really delusional...get help.

      So sez the ANONYMOUS COWARD.

      REALLY?!? Is THIS REALLY WORTH A DOWNMOD?!? Someone has gone and DOWNVOTED EVERY ONE OF MY POSTS.

      Good job.

    17. Re:Courage vs Ego by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Are you a dedicated troll, or do you really treat Apple like a religion? Even if you were a major shareholder - which I doubt - you would still offer criticism where needed. But it's like you have this kneejerk need to defend a corporation's every move, showing your fealty right down to the "macs4all" nick.

      My curiosity makes me want to understand people like you. You're part of the complex tapestry of humanity, but a part that doesn't really make sense.

      No, I just happen to agree with Apple on this point, and am willing to defend them on it. Too bad if you can't stand dissent.

    18. Re:Courage vs Ego by exomondo · · Score: 1

      So, you have exactly pointed-out what Apple's dilemma was: They were damned if they did, and damned if they didn't.

      No they weren't. They could leave it where it is, include an adapter or remove it with no compatibility at all (like they have done in the past), any of those is fine. I use bluetooth for headphones and car connections so I don't have a problem with any of those choices.

      Oh, so courageous of them! Just so courageous, praise Apple.

  7. Liars Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This move is to get $$$ of every lightening(R) connected peripheral sold, and to eventually force DRM down our throats good and hard.

    Courage my ass. IS is courage to sell a pair of crappy headphones for $159, that ONLY get 5 freakin hours of use per charge? My wired headphones can last years with ZERO charge.

    Liars!

    1. Re:Liars Lie by macs4all · · Score: 1

      This move is to get $$$ of every lightening(R) connected peripheral sold, and to eventually force DRM down our throats good and hard.

      Courage my ass. IS is courage to sell a pair of crappy headphones for $159, that ONLY get 5 freakin hours of use per charge? My wired headphones can last years with ZERO charge.

      Liars!

      That's why Apple supports at least two different methods of audio transfer (3.5 mm adapter and regular Bluetooth) that are absolutely NOT Apple -controlled. And before you go off on some tinfoil-hat rant about the 3.5mm adapter, think about what you are about to say, and how unbelievably paranoid it will make you sound; even by Slashdot standards...

    2. Re:Liars Lie by Entrope · · Score: 2

      Why is it "unbelievably paranoid" to point out that nobody anywhere has ever once (seriously) said "the thing my phone needs is a single-purpose adapter dongle that prevents me from charging it while I listen to headphones"?

  8. Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Subject says it all. Pure, unadulterated greed with the chutzpah to convince the fanbois that it's worth it...

    1. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Umm, no. The EPI pen is life and death. This is a phone. The EPI pen was marketed to schools in what may be illegal dealings. This is a phone. The EPI pen forces you to buy a 2 pack, and has a very short shelf life. This is a phone - apple sells others, other companies sell others. This is a phone.

      And Apple has sold roughly a billion phones. Are you saying that there are that many fanbois out there? If so, maybe you're the odd one - the fanboys are the normals.

      And, this is a phone. Its a great camera in your pocket, but it's a phone.

    2. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by GNious · · Score: 1

      And Apple has sold roughly a billion phones. Are you saying that there are that many fanbois out there?

      Just a math thing ... did _no-one_ buy more than 1 iPhone? As in, are there 1 billion iPhone owners out there?

    3. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I think it's clever marketing. It's stupid, but justifiable if you convince yourself to believe their bullshit. They get people to buy into the idea and then justify it to themselves.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI (and believe me, I realize how tiny a nitpick this is), it's the FDA who requires the Epi-Pen to be sold in 2-packs, since something like 8% of children require a second dose. It's one of the few things that's not a pure profit-grab my Mylan. Look it up if you don't believe me, but it's not fair to blame it on money and greed.

    5. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many fallacies in that post I don't know where to start, so I'll just leave it alone.

    6. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Point taken. I'd edit my comment if Slashdot permitted. Thanks.

    7. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's alternatives to the epipen which are functionally identical at 1/10th the price.

      You know, just like there's alternatives to the iPhone that are functionally identical at 1/10th the price.

      >Are you saying that there are that many fanbois out there?

      Yes.

      >If so, maybe you're the odd one - the fanboys are the normals.

      Perhaps. Some people like to spend to have the brand name. Others buy "epinephrine autoinjectors".

      >This is a phone.
      >The EPI pen is life and death.

      Never called 911, huh?

    8. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Apple has sold roughly a billion phones.

      Yup. Year after year regardless of whether their existing device was at the end of its life or not, into the trash heap or electronic waste. Its pretty abhorrent.

    9. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has sold roughly a billion phones

      Because they break so often?

    10. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by segedunum · · Score: 1

      Most people have bought iPhones who don't live in a reality distortion field and are not going to be impressed by any of this.

      If you think people who've bought iPhones in the past are going to continue to buy them once they realise they can't connect a lot of their audio equipment to it, and get some seriously impractical headphones everyone can see apart from Apple, because they are Apple fanboys, then you're in for a shock. Apple already won't release figures sales figures for the opening weekend and the market is looking rather saturated. There isn't going to be too much more room for a very overpriced 'phone' developed by a company with a mental disease who is getting further and further away from practical reality.

    11. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Last I checked: People didn't die from not having an iPhone on hand.

    12. Re:Apple is the EpiPen of smart phones by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      The true fanboys will buy back their own turds if they have a shiny Apple logo put on them.

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  9. Or the actual reason(s) by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Per a Buzzfeed interview, summarized by MacRumors:

    The idea for the removal of the headphone jack was raised during the development of the iPhone 7. In a nutshell, the "driver ledge" for the display and backlight, traditionally placed near the camera, was interfering with the new camera systems in the iPhone 7 and the iPhone 7 Plus, leading Apple to explore other placement options. It was moved near the audio jack, but it also caused interference with various components, including the audio jack itself, so Apple engineers toyed with the elimination of the jack altogether.

    When the headphone jack was removed, Apple realized it was easier to install the new Taptic Engine for the pressure-sensitive Home button, implement a bigger battery, and reach an IP7 water resistance rating, so the elimination of the headphone jack became essential for all of the other features in the iPhone 7.

    Apple executives also believe the headphone jack is outdated technology that needed to go to make room for new advancements. According to Dan Riccio, it was holding Apple back "from a number of things" the company wanted to add to the iPhone, taking up space that could be used for camera improvements, battery, and processors.
    "The audio connector is more than 100 years old," Joswiak says. "It had its last big innovation about 50 years ago. You know what that was? They made it smaller. It hasn't been touched since then. It's a dinosaur. It's time to move on." [...]

    For Dan Riccio, Apple's senior vice president of hardware engineering, the iPhone's 3.5-millimeter audio jack has felt something like the last months of an ill-fated if amicable relationship: familiar and comfortable, but ultimately an impediment to a better life ahead. "We've got this 50-year-old connector -- just a hole filled with air -- and it's just sitting there taking up space, really valuable space," he says.
    According to Apple's Phil Schiller, there's no ulterior motive behind the move away from the 3.5mm headphone jack. "We are removing the audio jack because we have developed a better way to deliver audio. It has nothing to do with content management or DRM -- that's pure, paranoid conspiracy theory," he said.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > It has nothing to do with content management or DRM -- that's pure, paranoid conspiracy theory," he said.

      Yeah, that's just a nice, completely unexpected side benefit.

      > "The audio connector is more than 100 years old," Joswiak says. "It had its last big innovation about 50 years ago. You know what that was? They made it smaller. It hasn't been touched since then. It's a dinosaur. It's time to move on." [...]

      Also, it still works. With any pair of headphones or any gear, purchased from any store. That's why we like it.

      This is just Apple ensuring that everyone (at least, all Apple fans) must pay the Apple tax on every bit of hardware.

    2. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot if you believe a word of that.

    3. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better way to deliver the same quality of audio but wirelessly without draining the batteries dry in a short time....

      And you aren't licensing this tech to literally everyone yet? I mean, sure you can cram it in your only remaining flagship product and take an extra 50 bucks on the sale price, then another 160 bucks per unit for the earbuds... well, okay per unit sold only through you, its less through others who you will be allowing to sell official products since they need their cut of course. So that 210 bucks per customer times a few million....

      or like, 3 bucks per unit for nearly every single electronic device on the entire planet. Every cell phone. All 3.5 billion of them. Every mp3 player. Every laptop and PC. Every game console. Every television on the planet, all 7+ billion of them. Every car, every radio, every movie theater. And far more I can't even think of right now. And yet you want to just put this in your cell phones, and maybe next years laptops that still run 5+ year old hardware, and turn down what would be an insane amount of profit for the next decade?

      I smell bullshit. Beware Apple fans, your new audio experience is gonna suck.

    4. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My needs for a phone do not include being water-proof. That is a lame, oh so lame, justification.

      "Apple executives also believe the headphone jack is outdated technology ..."

      I do not care what Apple executives think I need. They never asked me.

    5. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Kohath · · Score: 2

      But keeping everything the same is better than changing things. Internet people told me that. Strangely though, they didn't tell me me that by sending me a handwritten letter in the mail.

    6. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "It had its last big innovation about 50 years ago. You know what that was? They made it smaller. It hasn't been touched since then. It's a dinosaur. It's time to move on."

      You know, fine. I don't disagree with this idea. It's an old port that takes up a lot of space, and it's time to move on by replacing it with something better. What's the replacement here?

      You can use Bluetooth, which I haven't found to be a very good solution. Someone's going to say that I'm crazy, but I've had problems with various devices where the connection drops or is unreliable. I've had experiences where I've had problems with pairing, and the process of unpairing and repairing every time you want to connect to a different device is unwieldy. Plus, I just don't like having another battery that I need to keep charged. I want a simple and reliable wired solution. Bluetooth is out.

      Apple's other offering seems to be the lightning connector. You know, I wouldn't mind, but then they need to make it an open standard and get others to adopt it. Make it USB type-D micro, or something. Convince everyone to make it a standard connector for peripherals where you want a smaller connector than USB type-C. Make it the new universal standard for headphone ports, and get it installed everywhere. But they haven't done that. They don't even have lightning ports on their computers. Lightning isn't a standard, and no one else is using it. So Lightning is out.

      So come up with something else that replaces the existing port, but is better, more convenient, easier to use, and able to provide even better audio quality. Then convince every manufacturer of audio equipment to use this new standard. *Then* get rid of the old port.

    7. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bullshit to the waterproofing. There's a slew of other water proof/resistant phones with audio jacks.

    8. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be singing a different tune when the industry decides that you are too old and it's time to move on.

    9. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MAKE IT SMALLER AGAIN,.

      Problem fucking solved without the need for massive shifts in adaption, huge personal cost to the consumer and the mountain of bullshit that they somehow think people will fall for.

      I solved a problem that a multi billion dollar company couldn't apparently figure out. Where's my fucking check for patent royalties.

      I have NO faith in business anymore.

    10. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The path to hell is paved with good intentions. It does not matter what their intentions are for removing the jack. What matters are the unintended consequences. if it leads to become a huge standard, and also ends up being DRM laden making it much more difficult to pirate audio through the 'analog hole', then that may not be something Apple intends, but it *could* still happen without them. This is the concern that people are raising.

    11. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except apps/the phone could refuse to play back certain "rights managed" media if it detects the adapter, or even worse, a non-beats/apple manufactured headset is connected.

      "Sorry, this media is exclusive to Beats(tm) headphone users only."

      For as scummy as Microsoft is with their business tactics, and is a has-been filthy whore that sleeps with the RIAA for DRM, this brings Apple uncomfortably close to that level. Windows 10 has shown us the depths of scum that MS crawls in so that's pretty bad company.

    12. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the headphone jack was removed, Apple realized it was easier to install the new Taptic Engine for the pressure-sensitive Home button, implement a bigger battery, and reach an IP7 water resistance rating, so the elimination of the headphone jack became essential for all of the other features in the iPhone 7.

      IP7 water resistance rating? Bullshit. Water will still come streaming in through the nano-SIM port and speakers.

    13. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by slimjim8094 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't doubt that those are the actual reasons, but that's not really the point. All it means is that they're pushing off their (engineering) problems on their users. Apple has a long history of deprecating stuff that (at the time) people thought was premature - but in essentially all the other cases it turns out that the new thing really is better. Serial ports, the floppy drive, non-USB connectors, CD drives in laptops, even replaceable batteries - there are tangible benefits to switching to the new thing, and they usually relate to speed, capacity, or physical size.

      The headphone jack is slightly thicker than a Lightning connector (the only remaining jack) - but they didn't make the phone thinner to take advantage of the extra depth. And other than the connector itself a Lightning headphone is worse in every way, because headphones are driven by your ear technology, not the phone's. The newest fanciest Lightning headphones in 5 years (assuming this decision sticks) will never be more than today's headphones plus a built-in Lightning dongle.

      What does this decision get me as a user? Let's go through. Headphones are headphones; there's two channels of audio that are the result of a varying electrical signal. I don't really care what the cord to the device looks like and considerations like "do these phones work with other things? do other phones work with this?" easily dominate that area. I guess this lets them use a little extra power but there was already more than enough output to damage your ears. If there were wild battery life improvements... maybe? But someone on the other thread did the math and a headphone jack's volume of battery is good for ~12 minutes. Meh. What about water resistance? Other phones have no problems with the IP67 rating and a headphone jack - I have no doubt that it was easier for Apple's engineers, but Apple used to not push their problems on their users.

      So what does that leave? They wouldn't be able to have a force-sensitive home button? Honestly I'd rather have the headphone jack. Or just get rid of the home button - it works just fine for Android - or at least make it oblate or rectangular rather than round.

      I have had every non-S model iPhone since the 3G, so I'm "due" to buy this one. In addition I have apps that I rely on that only work on iOS. It should be a slam dunk. But... honestly? I knew someday I'd lose the reason to buy an iPhone, and this might be that day. Not just the headphone jack, but the whole package. It doesn't look like a bad phone as such, but the only thing I'm really interested in is the waterproofing. And I'm not careless enough with my phone that getting it ruined is a big risk. The headphone jack thing isn't a dealbreaker, mostly because I don't listen to music much on my phone, but it's damn close.

      Honestly Apple is just out of ideas. I bought a new MBP last year and it was the first hardware purchase I made in my entire life that I wasn't excited about. Roughly as functional as the 5-year-old one it replaced, more in some ways and less in others, but the same price. I needed a new one because the older one wasn't really working but boy did they manage to turn something I used to enjoy into something kind of boring and depressing. I'm still annoyed about the large size of the smallest iPhone still available - I was in London a few months ago and had to use my (out of contract and unlocked) iPhone 5, and it was sooooo nice. I assumed I'd gotten used to the wider width, but nope - and I didn't miss the extra screen at all.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    14. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by kencurry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... Lightning isn't a standard, and no one else is using it. So Lightning is out.

      So come up with something else that replaces the existing port, but is better, more convenient, easier to use, and able to provide even better audio quality. Then convince every manufacturer of audio equipment to use this new standard. *Then* get rid of the old port.

      In the keynote, they showed a pair of JBL wired noise-cancelling headphones that used lightning. so, there are some third parties chipping in now. Not saying I love this decision, but you have to admit Apple's track record on these changes is decent enough to give it a chance.

      --
      sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    15. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by macs4all · · Score: 2

      And you aren't licensing this tech to literally everyone yet? I mean, sure you can cram it in your only remaining flagship product and take an extra 50 bucks on the sale price, then another 160 bucks per unit for the earbuds... well, okay per unit sold only through you, its less through others who you will be allowing to sell official products since they need their cut of course. So that 210 bucks per customer times a few million....

      What extra 50 bucks? Not only has the price remained the same as the last model; but they doubled the storage at the same price point; and then went back to that previous model (which they have now reduced the price for) and doubled its storage, too!

      What extra $160 bucks? I won't pay $160 for a pair of earbuds, and if you don't want to, then neither should you. After all, it's not like that's the only thing that will work with the iPhone 7. It's called "freedom of choice"; something that almost all Slashdotters profess to cherish above all. And besides, you conveniently forgot to mention the several Beats headphones and earbuds announced at the same time, one set boasting a gargantuan 40 HOURS of battery life, that also take advantage of the W1 wireless chip. And from what I have read, the Beats products are going to be much less expensive than the flagship AirPods.

      So, it sounds like your math is quite a ways off; since it is likely that almost no one will buy the AirPods for their phone that costs exactly the same as last year's model.

    16. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple also pushed Firewire over USB. How did that turn out? lol, and that was a Jobs idea. Where are they without him? Dead, just like the last time.

    17. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like the 5... get the SE... most of the 6S tech... in the 5S package!

    18. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, Apple's been 'out of ideas' since the iphone 4 series.

    19. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Dog-Cow · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple is the one company who pushed for, and got, major studios to release non-DRM media. This whole slashdot meme where Apple lives on DRM is just a delusion. It's the slashdot RDF. Apple doesn't even protect their OS, and only go after people trying to sell hackintoshes.

    20. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      Slashdot has been living inside its own RDF for so long, they barely realize that Jobs is dead.

    21. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

      They don't care what you think. And no one else in the Universe cares what you think, either. Which is why you're reduced to posing anonymous shit on slashdot.

    22. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firewire much?

    23. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty easy to find a DVD drive on a laptop. It's the low-end netbook types and combo tablets that don't have them.

      Some of Apples decisions have been good, others not so much:
      *I was still using floppies to bring files to university in the mid-2000s.
      *They put a single USB-C port on one of their laptop models. Even cheap Dell ones have multiple USB ports! Users are paying premium prices for sub-par equipment.
      *Their routers use a program for management rather than an HTML page. This makes managing a nightmare on multiple platforms (say, an Android phone).

      Their attitude is to drop old tech quickly and that's a problem with legacy users. Using Apple stuff for a while actually made me appreciate Windows.

    24. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > "The audio connector is more than 100 years old," Joswiak says. "It had its last big innovation about 50 years ago. You know what that was? They made it smaller. It hasn't been touched since then. It's a dinosaur. It's time to move on." [...]

      "The tire is almost 200 years old. It had its last big innovation about 70 years ago (radial tires). It's time to move on," Joswiak said, when asked why the new Apple car uses spider legs.

      I mean seriously, what does the age of a technology have to do with whether it is the best choice for its particular purpose? I've never read a more mind-blowingly ignorant comment from a major corporate exec in my entire life.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    25. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by msevior · · Score: 1

      I actually have a set of bluetooth ear phones (Jaybird X2) that I really like. They connect perfectly, sound great and have an 8 hour battery life. They're much easier to use than wired connection since I can carry my phone in a bum-bag while running or leave on the counter when cooking stuff in the kitchen. It's a much better experience.

    26. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have had too much apple crack. apple didnt "doubled the storage at the same price point " today, they have been gouging people for half the storage for years now. this just proves it.

    27. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      In the keynote, they showed a pair of JBL wired noise-cancelling headphones that used lightning. so, there are some third parties chipping in now. Not saying I love this decision, but you have to admit Apple's track record on these changes is decent enough to give it a chance.

      By "every audio manufacturer", the GP didn't mean every headphone manufacturer, or even many headphone manufacturers. When I buy a pair of headphones that costs $200, I expect to be able to easily use it with my laptop, with my phone, with my tablet, with my home stereo system, etc. All of those devices have a 3.5,, mini plug. That means that any headphones that I will buy within the next 20-30 years will have a 3.5mm mini plug. In theory, it might also have a Lightning cord.

      But the thing is, carrying around an adapter in your pocket all day sucks. Having to remember to bring a different cable if you plan to hook your headphones up to your phone sucks. So having a different connector on that one device inherently makes the cell phone a poorer user experience for anyone who owns more than one device. Unfortunately, for Apple, approximately 100% of all the users who spend more than $10 on headphones own more than one device.

      This can't end well unless the case manufacturers save Apple yet again by building a case with a built-in headphone jack. Of course, if they do that, then it will be the best of both worlds, in which case this probably won't hurt Apple much at all. We'll find out soon whether Apple was foresighted enough to think of that solution or not.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    28. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hasn't been touched since then

      When they first combined audio, mic and "control channel" connectors on the audio jack? I doubt it was 50 years ago and I'm certain it wasn't really standardized until quite recently (less than 10 years ago), different phones had different arrangements for pins until that point.

    29. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by djrobxx · · Score: 2

      > And from what I have read, the Beats products are going to be much less expensive than the flagship AirPods.

      The new PowerBeats3 are MORE than the AirPods at $199.

    30. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is wrong with you?

      Obviously not being a militant Apple fanboy is a serious mental disorder.

      When was the last time Apple added DRM to anything they weren't mandated to by law?

      What law mandates use of DRM?

    31. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has nothing to do with content management or DRM -- that's pure, paranoid conspiracy theory," he said.

      Bullshit, bullshit, and bullshit.

    32. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i find it rather ridiculous to claim that they have the space for a clicky button but not for a force sensitive strip of material and thus had to take it out.

      really the price should be the dealbreaker more than anything else. they'll be selling the iphone se(5 style) for at least 1.5 years still though, because that's how they do things. 5s was still sold a few months back and probably still is- they produced it at least to this year( apple wants budget sales but doesn't want to design budget phones so they just keep producing their models now for years and lower the price - majority of iphone sales are not current gen..).

    33. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluetooth also doesn't do lossless. So that is a non-starter. A propietary wireless standard, is also a non-starter.

      The only "correct" option was to add another lightning connector or a USB-C connector. Since they only put one connector on it, this is going to backfire harshly.

      Now, there are two ways to fix this too.

      - Release a lightning earpod with a USB-C "charger-only" cable end, so you have what is basically a Y connector, where the audio goes to the earpods, and the charger can be plugged into it without removing it from the phone.

      - Let a third party release a Y-cable (like Nintendo's clamshell GBA) that provides it's own 3.5mm jack and a USB-C connector for charging.

      I don't actually know if lightning can be made to charge and "be headphones" at the same time other carplay mode. But it seems like any headphones connected via the lightning port should be able to emulate the "carplay" feature anyhow.

    34. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the most part Apple was right about depreciating ports, but let's not get ahead of ourselves

      3.5" drive = nobody was using it for anything but boot disks by that time, having been succeeded by CD-R's
      Optical drive = Apple basically decided that blueray wasn't going to be a thing and was a little premature outside the US, but people did start buying movies online and don't really cry about it. Basically if you bought the movies from Apple you were fine, if you used anyone elses store (especially Microsoft's) you got burned pretty badly.

      PS2/AT keyboard/mouse, Serial and Parallel ports being replaced by USB - This was going to happen anyway, you can STILL buy motherboards with PS/2 ports, but these are often only used by gamers who need "rollover" (NKRO) which aren't that many except by hardcore MMORPG players. It's also possible to develop a high-end USB 3.1 keyboard, but nobody has bothered to.

      At no point has anyone removed the headphone jack and lived to tell about how great a success that was. Nokia did it, Motorola did it, Nintendo did it. All of them failed. Apple will fail too. The right answer here is USB-C headphones. However because of how utterly shitty companies like to cut corners, you will not be getting away with $10 headphones, no the minimum investment will now be in the $150 range because the DAC and amp circuits must now be in the headphones. Only a total idiot would think this is a good idea.

      If Samsung drops the 3.5mm jack, you can kiss goodbye smartphones being used as music devices. It's an utterly boneheaded move, since the 3.5mm jack ensured a certain level of minimum fideleity that any cheap or expensive headphones could reach. But if you must use digital usb-c or lightning headphones, you now have to pay an extreme premium, otherwise you will get shitty parts.

    35. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by toejam13 · · Score: 2

      "The audio connector is more than 100 years old," Joswiak says. "It had its last big innovation about 50 years ago. You know what that was? They made it smaller. It hasn't been touched since then.

      Not true. The 2.5mm plug was released, as were the OMTP and CTIA 4-ring jack standards.

      I would have been fine with Apple moving from a 3.5mm to 2.5mm plug. Adapters are cheap and the plug is an industry standard.

    36. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they were different purposes. The USB 1.1 port was meant to replace the serial and parallel port host-driven processing (eg remember "Winmodem") so your modem, printer and document scanner all had a standard profile. 12Mbits.

      Firewire was peer-to-peer and operated at 400Mbits. Even later versions. However Firewire hard drives were never very good, and the most use firewire got was from consumer camcorders. HDTV pretty much put a nail in the coffin of firewire because USB2.0 was good enough and camcorders switched from tapes to hard drives. See my previous statement about firewire hard drives. Firewire was used by professional audio as well, but more or less USB 2.0 succeeded those as well.

      USB3.0 and 3.1 try to address the SSD storage bottleneck. By pretty much extending the PCIe bus. This is what Thunderbolt does (and why it replaced firewire)

      Ultimately we're going to see USB-C 3.1 with Displayport/MHL/Thunderbolt profiles replace everything including HDMI.

      However this is not the end. We still do not have a high-bandwidth connector for extending the GPU outside of the laptop/smartphone. A 4x PCIe which is what Thunderbolt offers is rather insulting, as it's only useful for SSD hard drives. Short-sightedness is what USB is all about. So it's up to Apple and such to push out their proprietary standards first and then challenge USB-IF to come up with something better.

    37. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
      What's the battery life on a wired headphone? The only reason for power in a headphone is noise cancellation, which is an added feature.

      So your claim is that having to charge headphones along with your phone to get an equivalent listening experience is unimportant. In my book you just defined yourself as being really stupid.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    38. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Interesting.
      It reminds me when I was a kid : I was given an assignment, couldn't do it properly, so I pushed for an incomplete solution with plenty of made up reasons why it is better. Of course, the person in charge could see right through me and I was usually told to get back to work and stop making excuses.
      Look like the Apple engineering team is a like bunch of kids without adult supervision.

    39. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the 3-point seatbelt (Volvo, 1959), the cooker (Ug the Caveman with wolf pelt, unknown date), the radio (Various people around 1900), the gun (China, 13th Century), and the printed book (Holy Roman empire, 1440). These are used on a daily basis by billions of people within an hour of waking up on a monday morning.

    40. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You seem to have forgotten about the walled garden that is iOS. They go as far as bricking unauthorised third party hardware. And where are the DRM free audio books and movies and TV shows?

      Music was just because they wanted their lossy downloads to be seen to be as good as CDs which have no DRM. DVDs are protected, even if it is ineffective.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth is 2.4ghz, so anywhere that 2.4ghz is saturated or interfered with (apartments, public spaces, near microwave ovens etc) it's going to struggle. Apple just made it worse too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    42. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Also, using the headphone cable as an antenna was a major innovation. Microphones and control buttons on the cable are pretty common these days too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    43. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by houghi · · Score: 1

      Please tell me what 'better' is. Also what 'more convenient' and 'easier to use' is.
      Some will say that a better connection is XLR + Phone Jack and also that it is easier to use and more convenient.
      Obviously YMMV and it most definitely will.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    44. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We are removing the audio jack because we have developed a better way to deliver audio.".

      Better how? Only for 5 hours while the battery lasts? When it doesn't connect? When it glitches and lags like BT? When you lose one and have to buy 2 new ones entirely? When you can't play your music from your phone on your own stereo system because you lost the adapter? When you can't play music (or anything else) at someone elses house because they don't need an adapter for their own phones or music systems?

      You need to get out of your little techworld media Apple hipster bubble, my friend.

    45. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But changing things for changes sake is automatically better than keeping tried, tested and ubiquitous technology. Internet people who only live in their moms basement told me that. Strangely though, when they told me, the guy who delivered the letter wasn't listening to music as his Airpods had run out of juice whilst travelling.

    46. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So essentially, Samsung worked it out whilst Apple could not?

      That's pretty sad.

    47. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in London a few months ago and had to use my (out of contract and unlocked) iPhone 5, and it was sooooo nice. I assumed I'd gotten used to the wider width, but nope - and I didn't miss the extra screen at all.

      Consider the iPhone SE when purchasing your next iPhone. It includes many features of the iPhone 6s - A9 processor, TouchID, Apple Pay, decent camera even though lacking optical image stabilisation, headphone jack - but in the iPhone 5/5s form factor. The 64GB model costs £429. My fiancée bought one a few months ago and we are both very impressed with it. (I use a four year old iPhone 5, she previously used an iPhone 4.)

      It also comes in Rose Gold if you're, uh, into that sort of thing...

    48. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by AllyGreen · · Score: 1

      Just on your last comment about liking the iPhone5, you can buy the iPhoneSE which is the 6S internals within an iPhone5 case. My wife has it and it's a pretty decent bit of kit, sort of prefer it to my 6!

    49. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its just that the royalties on lightning are so high, any device having that port is double the price!

    50. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the great post. When Dan Riccio said "just a hole filled with air" it cemented my opinion that he's completely full of crap.

      None of these design decisions really make sense. The obvious solution was to properly shield, and/or redesign their "driver ledge" components. I bet it was decided that would be too costly, or maybe no one is at the the helm and the "group think" of the engineering group simply jumped the shark on this one...

    51. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Most of Apple's justifications -- size, layout, RF interference -- would also reject just about any other connector, which is probably why they're pushing the wireless idea so hard. You could do surface contacts with magnets for alignment and attachment, but that locks in a flatness/curvature spec for the contact area, which is probably a non-starter.

    52. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Entrope · · Score: 1

      "W1-format audio"? The Lightning connector? If you don't think that counts as DRM, iTunes for sure. There is probably some newer example, but I don't follow what Apple does, so I don't know. When was the last time they added DRM, and what law mandated it?

    53. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Xest · · Score: 4, Funny

      I shudder to think what the iPhone 8 will be like when they find out that the capacitor is nearly 275 years old.

    54. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't disagree with many of his points, but he seems to have forgotten what the word "improvement" means.

      I don't object to the replacement of the 3.5mm/2.5mm jack with something that's really ACTUALLY an improvement, perhaps:
      - make the jack a side-edge clip in, instead of a 360-degree inserted plug (if it could reliably hold)
      - go with the already-recognized 2.5mm jack and make that better (for whatever reason it hasn't already been adopted)
      - DON'T replace it with something that obviates all current hardware at a sweep, and requires products 10x the price to replace them

      --
      -Styopa
    55. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      You've clearly never used iTunes.

      Unless a specific song has been specifically downloaded in a non-DRM format, it's nearly impossible to get a song/show/movie off of an i-Device. iTunes will merrily prompt you to overwrite your phone if it doesn't recognize your DRM authentication (limit 5 per account). The whole scheme is based around keeping you inside the DRM walled garden. Granted, it's a nice garden, but that wall makes it really tough to move things in & out.

      The whole non-DRM music thing was an experiment to see if the market wanted it. Most people didn't care. It's not an active thing anymore.

    56. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      >Apple has a long history of deprecating stuff that (at the time) people thought was premature - but in essentially all the other cases it turns out that the new thing really is better

      I'll grant the examples you cite, but Apple also has a history of that strategy failing miserably. Firewire to kill off SCSI and USB, The Newton to kill off small keyboards (I type on my iPhone keyboard constantly). There are more, but people just don't remember them.

      My money is on Apple returning the headphone jack in the iPhone. It's that bad a decision. Stand you ground people & make some noise. We don't have to take this sitting down.

    57. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know your memory is probably faded a bit, but go back and look at the articles of the time. You'll see them saying "Apple finally removes DRM". The finally comes out because there were several other places that sold music without DRM long before Apple did. I seem to recall Amazon was one of the first. And if you think they don't protect their OS, you're oddly naive. They literally put a lockout chip in their hardware to try to ensure that their OS only runs on their hardware. If you go the hackintosh route, you have to patch the OS to remove the check. (Apologies if this is no longer true, but when I tried a few years ago it definitely was true.)

    58. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by jitterman · · Score: 1

      "The audio connector is more than 100 years old," Joswiak says.

      The wheel a very old invention. It seems to still be pretty useful, if simple. Old age doesn't imply end of life.

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
    59. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the thing is, carrying around an adapter in your pocket all day sucks. Having to remember to bring a different cable if you plan to hook your headphones up to your phone sucks.

      Until someone thinks up a Lightning connector with a retractable 3.5mm plug.

    60. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It had its last big innovation about 50 years ago. You know what that was? They made it smaller. It hasn't been touched since then. It's a dinosaur. It's time to move on."

      Oh, that's rich! The WHEEL was invented thousands of years ago. Better get rid of that piece of shit, too!

    61. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by jitterman · · Score: 1

      Amen brother / sister.

      If I want $200+ earphones, I'll buy them. But if I want/need $7 cheapies that I can risk losing or destroying without worry, I have that option today - WITHOUT the need for some stupid add-on adapter to use them.

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
    62. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by jitterman · · Score: 1

      Wow. Most assholes post AC; mad props to you for just putting yourself right out there. You could have stopped at the third sentence.

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
    63. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rip. Mix. Burn.

      Apple used to live on piracy. You should have seen the number of college students snagging copies of Photoshop or whathaveyou off of college lab Macs years ago.

    64. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that there are no (or won't be any) Lightning headphones. I'm pointing out that those headphones will only work with Apple iOS devices. There aren't Lightning ports on Sony consumer equipment, Dell desktop machines, or even Apple laptops. So if I buy a pair of nice Lightning headphones, I'm severely limited in how and where I can use them.

    65. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well honestly, I don't know. There might be any number of improvements that engineers could make on an audio connector. Can they improve audio quality? Reduce interference? Can they make it less likely to break? Cheaper to manufacture? Make it take up less space so that it can be built into smaller/thinner devices? Can they include a power source so that features like active-noise-cancellation don't require additional batteries?

      Those are just some ideas off the top of my head. Obviously some of these things might run counter to each other, but yes, I feel like improvements could probably be made. And here we have someone saying that it's old technology, and improvements should be made, so I'm saying, "Great! Release an improved standard, and get other companies onboard. Until then, let me use the existing standard."

    66. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Most of Apple's justifications -- size, layout, RF interference -- would also reject just about any other connector

      Apparently not the Lightning connector.

    67. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Atticka · · Score: 2

      It has nothing to do with media DRM, but accessory DRM.

      If you make a set of earbuds and want them to be compatible with IOS devices you have to pay a licensing fee to Apple for the pleasure based on their connector (patented) and now their proprietary (and patented) wireless technology.

      Any device or accessory where you see a "Works with IOS" or "Compatible with iPhone" had to pay a fee to Apple, this is their major source in income.

      --
      No sig here...
    68. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by flu1d · · Score: 1

      the new Apple car uses spider legs.

      I'm no Apple fanboy but where do send my check for this.

    69. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      I don't actually know if lightning can be made to charge and "be headphones" at the same time other carplay mode. But it seems like any headphones connected via the lightning port should be able to emulate the "carplay" feature anyhow.

      Well, the old Apple dock has had both lightning and headphone connections for a while now, so the answer is probably yes.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    70. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      you will not be getting away with $10 headphones, no the minimum investment will now be in the $150 range because the DAC and amp circuits must now be in the headphones.

      The Apple branded adapter dongle is $9 when sold in retail packaging. Pretty sure that they won't cost you $150 from 3rd parties...

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    71. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by wbo · · Score: 2
      Apple doesn't even protect their OS, and only go after people trying to sell hackintoshes.

      While Apple does push for DRM-free audio that does not extend to other forms of media. Most of the video content in the iTunes store is protected with DRM and apps for iOS devices are also protected with DRM,

      It is also worth pointing out that OS X does attempt to identify the hardware it is running on and will halt during boot if it detects a non Apple motherboard. In fact, a bug in the hardware detecting routines of the initial releases of OX X 10.10 would cause certain models of Mac Mini to halt when booting the impacted versions via netboot because the hardware was detected as being non Apple.

      The hackintosh community has found several ways to either bypass or fool the checks but the fact remains that Apple does actively try to prevent OS X from being run on non Apple hardware.

    72. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, as others have said, the iPhone COMES WITH THE ADAPTER. So when you buy the phone, YOU DO NOT NEED TO BUY ANYTHING TO MAKE YOUR HEADPHONES WORK.

      Stop being an asshole for 5 seconds. Please.

    73. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by dgood · · Score: 1

      And other than the connector itself a Lightning headphone is worse in every way, because headphones are driven by your ear technology, not the phone's. The newest fanciest Lightning headphones in 5 years (assuming this decision sticks) will never be more than today's headphones plus a built-in Lightning dongle.

      Well, for one thing, Lightning headphones allow you to have a better DAC than might otherwise be included in an iPhone. Probably not a big deal for most people, but if you're going to pay big money for fancy headphones maybe that'll be important?

    74. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      radial tires came out (for consumers) in the 70's, that is not 50 years ago. Tire Companies are continuously improving their designs, both tread and compounds used to make tires 'better' (able to handle wet surfaces/ice/snow).

      So, educate yourself before you pull this crap out of your ass.

    75. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. What almost everyone on this comment thread seems to have forgotten is that USB came out in 1996 and NO ONE USED IT. Hell in 1999 M$ did not even have an OS that addressed that port. But in 1998, Apple decided to axe a bunch of proprietary connectors and use USB instead, then there was a great hue and cry (much like this one actually!) and castigation of Apple execs over that decision. But Apple did it and suddenly when Win 2K came out it had support for USB.

      This is how progress works. You have to give up your old things in some instances to move forward. You want digital TV at 4K resolution? It wouldn't work without a box on old TV's. You want to use your old headphones, Apple GIVES YOU A BOX to let you use them.

      Thank you KenCurry for saying the correct thing.

    76. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by avandesande · · Score: 1

      They could come up with some new standard with the same form factor 'Lightning Audio' that uses a subset of the pins and make it an open and free.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    77. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a car with spider legs! But only if it can run/drive at 80mph and climb hilltops with no road! I'll wait her for you to build it. Thanks in advance.

            Signed
                Spider Man

    78. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by kimvette · · Score: 1

      ...with inferior sound quality, having to charge additional devices (with more li-ion cells the airlines are starting to really hate and possible restrictions during ascent/descent), etc.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    79. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, using the headphone cable as an antenna was a major innovation.

      Not very recent, either. Pocket FM radios started doing that... about 40 years ago.

    80. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by kimvette · · Score: 1

      But.. even simpler: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Sometimes the simplest solution really is the best, and in the case of headphone jacks, that's pretty much true; both the jacks and plugs are awful rugged. (now the PCB mounting is another matter, but that's just due to poor implementation in some cases, and not poor design)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    81. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because the handwritten letter in the mail poses more limitations and less benefit. It's the exact opposite of what's going on here.

    82. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every bit of wired hardware. There are still nearly countless bluetooth headphones not made or licensed by Apple that will work just fine. Though the problem with EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM is that they don't last all day and need to be recharged.

    83. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a handwritten letter in the mail."

      Don't you mean a hand scratched picture on a rock carried a great distance by an animal?

    84. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, DWS 06 just came out last year dipshit.

    85. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'll grant the examples you cite, but Apple also has a history of that strategy failing miserably. Firewire to kill off SCSI and USB

      Firewire was never meant to replace USB, but it did successfully kill off SCSI.

    86. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is completely untrue. If you were more than a troll, a quick google search would show you that tires have had extreme upgrades, just even within the past 15 years!

      The headphone port IS inferior. It is analog! It is subject to interference! Especially when enclosed so tightly next to so many radios, screens, and power sources, etc.

      Completely digital connections is the future, everywhere. Sure, Samsung will market that their next phone has a headphone port and that that is the advantage over iphone, but one day nobody will include analog headphone jacks...

      They will include a digital port, with an optional adapter... which is what apple did....

    87. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iphone 7 is compatible with old analog headphones, just use the included free adapter! Not only that, but it will be higher quality as it won't be subject to as much interference.

      Win win win!

    88. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good news! You can buy an iPhone SE, brand new, latest internals, old shitty headphone port, old shitty screen size.

    89. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1
      And to charge and listen at the same time do Belkin have a product for you at only $39.99.

      Lightning Audio + Charge RockStar

      I hear you like dongles, so with the belkin dongle attached to your analog dongle, you can dongle while you dongle.

    90. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't own an eyephone, but am understanding of the change.

      However, your comment did make me LOL mein sidez! So full marks, zir!

    91. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, Michelin made some of the first commercially available radial tires available to consumers in 1948 as standard equipment on the Citroën 2CV. But it was designed two years earlier, in 1946, which is... wait for it... 70 years ago this year. So educate yourself before you pull crap out of yours.

      There have been minor incremental improvements to tires over the past several decades, but the emphasis is on the word incremental. I can take pretty much any car that takes radial tires, and I can usually buy off-the-shelf tires for them today, because tire sizes haven't changed significantly since before I was born. In much the same way, I can take a Walkman built in the 1970s and buy a pair of headphones for it today, and they will work together, and vice versa.

      For that matter, I can still buy tires for much older cars, though I might need new rims, much as I can take a 70-year-old radio and with a 1/4" to 3.5mm adapter, plug in a set of headphones made in China last week, and they will work together.

      So as you can see, that example was very carefully chosen as a prime example of why we have standards, and why if you're going to break something that has been standardized since before 95% of Apple employees were born, you'd darn well have a much better reason than "we wanted to put in a better speaker that nobody uses anyway."

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    92. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      That is completely untrue. If you were more than a troll, a quick google search would show you that tires have had extreme upgrades, just even within the past 15 years!

      You fundamentally misunderstood the analogy. Sure, they've made lots of incremental improvements in traction. However, electronics engineers have also made huge improvements in headphone design over the past 40 years. The drivers today are light years ahead of the drivers that they built in the 1970s. If you don't believe me, get yourself a set of state-of-the-art Hi-Fi cans from the early 1970s and see how they sound today. Your $2 earbuds sound better.

      But the fundamental design of the interface has not changed at all since the last time that the standard sidewall height changed back in 1972, and arguably it didn't change in any meaningful way for decades before that. You can still go down to Goodyear and buy off-the-shelf tires for pretty much any automobile built since 1972 (and back to the dawn of the automobile if you don't mind having a slight odometer/speedometer error, and in some cases, changing the rims), because fundamentally, tires haven't changed in any way that actually changes whether it looks and acts like a tire.

      The headphone port IS inferior. It is analog! It is subject to interference! Especially when enclosed so tightly next to so many radios, screens, and power sources, etc.

      Uh... no. You obviously don't know how electrical interference works if you're saying that. At some point, the audio must be converted from digital to analog to make the speaker cone move. In extremely low-power situations like microphones, the distance between the analog signal source and where it is converter matters a great deal because the voltages are so low. However, in speakers, that is not the case. Folks routinely run speaker cables many hundreds of feet without worrying about any sort of interference, because the levels of RF out there in the world are so many orders of magnitude lower than the speaker signal levels that no detectable interference is realistically possible. Headphones aren't quite that extreme power-wise, but even still, you'll never hear external interference in headphones (at least passive headphones), because you'd have to have an electrical field so powerful that merely carrying a pair of headphones through that field would cause them to make noise on their own. That's a powerful enough field to cause actual physiological damage.

      So from an interference perspective, it makes essentially zero difference whether the DAC and amplifier is inside the headphones or is inside the phone.

      Now there are some slight exceptions when you start dealing with external amplifiers. For example, if your car's sound system isn't designed properly, it can pick up interference from your phone via the headphone cable in interesting waysparticularly if your phone is plugged into a cheap charger with a noisy ground. However, that problem is equally likely if the DAC is inside the car (or powered headphones or whatever). Either the power to the phone is filtered well enough and the device on the other end rejects noise properly or it doesn't. And if it doesn't, it is going to fail in exactly the same way no matter where the DAC is physically located.

      But there's also one other critical difference. When you're passing audio through an analog path, you can actually solve ground loop interference problems fairly easily when they crop up. With an all-digital path, you're pretty much screwed, because the flaw is baked into the DAC and amplifier circuitry on the other end.

      So no, digital paths to headphones are not superior. The longer the signal remains in the digital domain, the more of a pain in the backside it is when (not if) things go wrong. Simpler is almost invariably better when you're dealing with audio, and analog signal paths are far simpler.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    93. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what do you know. They still fit on automobiles built before you were born, kid.

    94. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you're so trusting.

    95. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Firewire much?

      Firewire is a spectacular interface. Just ask the pro audio and video people. Do you know how many channels of audio you can carry over even a 400 mb/s Firewire connection? It's truly astounding.

      And BTW, Thunderbolt is even better in that regard. LOTS better; because it has stuff in it to take care of timestamping issues, and because it is MUCH faster.

    96. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by macs4all · · Score: 1

      But the thing is, carrying around an adapter in your pocket all day sucks. Having to remember to bring a different cable if you plan to hook your headphones up to your phone sucks.

      You know what every professional sound engineer has in abundance? Adapters. I don't even do it for a living anymore, and I still have a little tacklebox FULL of RCA ,-> 3.5mm, 1/4" 1/8" (3.5mm), Stereo "Y" cords of several types, Male - Male, Female - Female, Female - Male Adapters, Balanced XLR Unbalanced XLR, XLR 1/4" TRS, etc. et FUCKING cetera. And you know what? MANY times it would take MORE THAN ONE Adapter to get from "here" to "there".

      And we liked it. Well, not really; but we didn't Fucking WHINE about it incessantly, like someone snatched their firstborn or something, sheesh!!!

      So seriously, having to hook up a little 2" adapter cable (that is honestly not much larger than the cable itself) to convert your coveted $10 analog earbuds to the lightning connector on your phone for the next couple of years (after which Lightning earbuds will be nearly as ubiquitous as 3.5mm earbuds are now) or just using the SUPPLIED Lightning headset for the time being, IS NOT WORTH ALL THIS HATE.

      God DAMN, but you people are such insufferable spoiled brats! Oh, I've got to remember an ADAPTER! FFS...

      Get over yourselves. Seriously. This SUPPOSED to be a "tech" site; and yet, when someone tries to move "tech" forward, they get PILLORIED for it, along with anyone who DARES to support them.

    97. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Its just that the royalties on lightning are so high, any device having that port is double the price!

      It's now something like $4 per connector. I agree that that is kind of high; but it's been going down steadily; so hopefully it will go down even more now.

      BTW, there are Royalties (Licensing Fees) on Bluetooth and Aptx (including having a proprietary chipset for Aptx), too; yet no one seems to whine about that. Why?

    98. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that there are no (or won't be any) Lightning headphones. I'm pointing out that those headphones will only work with Apple iOS devices. There aren't Lightning ports on Sony consumer equipment, Dell desktop machines, or even Apple laptops. So if I buy a pair of nice Lightning headphones, I'm severely limited in how and where I can use them.

      1. l don't think that there is a proscription by Apple on putting a Lightning Port on ANYTHING, as long as you are a member of the MFi Program as a Developer or Manufacturer. So, it is Dell, Sony, etc. that are the problem there; not Apple. Let's put the blame where it belongs, shall we?

      2. Any of those hypothetical Lightning headphones would work FINE with anything with a 3.5mm jack, if the manufacturer simply included a Lightning adapter. Not practical on a $10 set of earbuds; but on a $50 set, certainly. And how many headphones STILL come with a 3.5mm 1/4" adapter to this very day? Almost all. So don't tell me it isn't practical.

    99. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Thank you KenCurry for saying the correct thing.

      I pointed that out, too.

    100. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Sure, that seems vaguely reasonable to me. Mostly, though, I just wish they'd have sorted this out a bit more before dropping the port. Maybe talked to other major vendors and found a solution that had some consensus behind it.

      Of course, maybe they did approach other vendors, and the other vendors were completely uncooperative.

    101. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      The DAC argument is a good one, in particular because Apple has always had "pretty good" DACs. Now, non-Apple phones will be expensive or sound like shit (or both). Before, the $5 earbuds would simply be mediocre.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    102. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumbass fanboi! I was also a sound engineer at a TV station for 4 years, but that doesn't mean I wanted to carry around patch cables and adapters at all times! All that shit was in the studio or in a remote van. It's also a job, so there's an entirely different tolerance there. If you have the iShit 7 and you want a decent pair of headphones that haven't paid the Apple Lighting Tax that means you gotta carry around that little buttplug everywhere! It's purposely inconvenient because Apple wants you to pay for the convenience of either using Lightning headphones or wireless headphones that use their proprietary W1 shit.

      It's different for you because you're a fanboi. You'll bow down and pay for ANYTHING that has the Apple logo on it because, as part of the cult, you unquestionably believe everything Apple does is divine. You don't see the big picture. You don't see how Apple has ALWAYS moved to push their customers into paying the Apple tax in ways Microsoft can only dream they could. Or, maybe you actually believe being Apple's buttboy is worth it, because you mistakenly believe they always provide the "best technology." Except, they often don't and anything remotely useful they come up with is quickly surpassed by their competitors for a better price.

    103. Re:Or the actual reason(s) by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      And other than the connector itself a Lightning headphone is worse in every way, [...] I guess this lets them use a little extra power but there was already more than enough output to damage your ears.

      Noise cancelling headphones/earphones need power and have their own batteries. Some for those with mics in for making calls without removing them, or where they use a DSP to, hopefully, improve the sound of imperfect drivers. With lightning they can use the phone's battery.

      That said, they could have done the same over a backward-compatible 3.5mm jack if they'd wanted to.

      "do these phones work with other things? do other phones work with this?" easily dominate that area.

      When they started talking about "courage" in the keynote, I got a little excited that maybe, just maybe, they meant they were couragously opening up Lightning for their competitors to use and make it a universal standard.. But no. That would have been courage, imho.

  10. Nope, it's $hitty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see title

  11. sociopathy redefined as bravery by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Microsoft, Oracle, SCO, and Comcast have the courage to screw over customers and society and not let anger, complaints, and societal degradation distract or discourage them.

    1. Re:sociopathy redefined as bravery by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      100% correct. These tech companies are run by money hungry sociopaths.

    2. Re: sociopathy redefined as bravery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Single-minded and laser-focused on the objective.

    3. Re: sociopathy redefined as bravery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By ignoring their customers - and thus all failed or are failing.

    4. Re:sociopathy redefined as bravery by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the courage of the makers of the Epipen to raise the cost of their life saving unit by only 600% ($50 to $300), rather then 1200% ($50 to $600). Really, they deserve some sort of medal for their bravery.

      File under: Failures of Capitalism

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
  12. Re:Damn right it's courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much of AAPL do you own?

  13. Less than switching to Intel processors by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Switching from PowerPC to Intel was a bigger deal. Fortunately, Rosetta made it work. Now, sadly, that's gone so a handful of still useful yet defunct programs are relegated to old machines.

    1. Re:Less than switching to Intel processors by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Switching from PowerPC to Intel was a bigger deal. Fortunately, Rosetta made it work. Now, sadly, that's gone so a handful of still useful yet defunct programs are relegated to old machines.

      That was a DECADE ago; let it go, FFS! There's a lot of useful PDP-11 programs, too; but most people can't run them, either.

    2. Re:Less than switching to Intel processors by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of useful PDP-11 programs, too; but most people can't run them, either.

      Really? You might even be able to run them in your browser...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  14. Dan Rather is going to sue.... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    What's the frequency, Kenneth?

    1. Re:Dan Rather is going to sue.... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Not unless Schiller said "courage" in a weird, vaguely French accent...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  15. Game changer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, that Apple has invented the Bluetooth technology, when are they going to sue all the copy cats?

    1. Re:Game changer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think it's Bluetooth? Sure, the iPhone 7's have Bluetooth, but there's no mention of Bluetooth anywhere to do with AirPods. REF: http://www.apple.com/airpods/ Given its multiple-device connectivity dollars to donuts the W1 chip will be using a proprietary protocol to carry the audio, accelerometer and light sensor data as well. I am looking forward to the funny with everyone double-tapping their ears to activate Siri, though, when the stupid looking things fall out.

      Still, I don't know what all the fuss is about... the iPhone 7's still come with wired headphones in the box, now they're just called EarPods and go through the Lightning connector. Oh, and they give you a Lightning dongle for your existing 3.5mm headphones as well. REF: http://www.apple.com/iphone-7/...

  16. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decided I was not buying any more Apple hardware a while ago, they lost their way with Jobs.

  17. Courage? More like liquid courage. by tgibson · · Score: 1

    The hangover always follows.

  18. Re:Damn right it's courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are getting the hate for the Bullshit explanation. It takes Arrogance not courage to do something like that and not provide an explanation why you are screwing everyone over.

  19. For those of us who don't speak American by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    When did 86 become a verb?

    1. Re: For those of us who don't speak American by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      It's always been a verb - to 86 something is to consign it to the round file. It's not just Americans who use it, btw.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:For those of us who don't speak American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the 1930s.

    3. Re: For those of us who don't speak American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The term to 86 something comes from Warner Bros in the 1930's. Stage 86 was a unused studio at the far end of Warner's lot. It was used to store old bits of scenery and props.

    4. Re:For those of us who don't speak American by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      The server at lmgtfy.com is taking too long to respond. https://www.bing.com/search?q=...

    5. Re: For those of us who don't speak American by hackwrench · · Score: 3, Informative

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... suggests several sources.

    6. Re:For those of us who don't speak American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It comes from a bar in New York during prohibition with and address number of 86. It had tilting shelves that could be used to instantly dump all the booze if the police showed up.

    7. Re:For those of us who don't speak American by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Okay, well it only just reached my corner of Oceania.

      I presumed it was some kind of Get Smart reference - or maybe the producers of the show chose that number due to Max's predilection for cocking up things.

    8. Re:For those of us who don't speak American by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Okay, well it only just reached my corner of Oceania.

      I presumed it was some kind of Get Smart reference - or maybe the producers of the show chose that number due to Max's predilection for cocking up things.

      And maybe Agent 99 should've been agent 69...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re: For those of us who don't speak American by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, why did Wikipedia 86 the stage number anecdote?

    10. Re: For those of us who don't speak American by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The term to 86 something comes from Warner Bros in the 1930's. Stage 86 was a unused studio at the far end of Warner's lot. It was used to store old bits of scenery and props.

      Thanks for the trivia bit!

    11. Re:For those of us who don't speak American by Kohath · · Score: 1

      I think it was during the Teapot Dome Scandal.

    12. Re: For those of us who don't speak American by RatPh!nk · · Score: 1

      My familiarity with 86 come from the restaurant industry - if something is unavailable (special, menu item etc... it is 86'd or 86 the quiche etc...)

      --
      Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
    13. Re: For those of us who don't speak American by macs4all · · Score: 1

      My familiarity with 86 come from the restaurant industry - if something is unavailable (special, menu item etc... it is 86'd or 86 the quiche etc...)

      I knew the restaurant reference; just not the etymology of the term.

  20. Never a shortage of Apple hate by zerofoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Geez people - if a 3.5mm analog jack built into the phone is so important, buy any one of the many, many, Android devices on the market - or any other iPhone that Apple still sells, or just use the stupid adapter that comes with the phone.

    This phony outrage is ridiculous.

    1. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you fucking idiot.

    2. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's official, Slashdot has an infiltration and infestation of Apple shills.
      There's isn't an ounce of phoneyness about the outrage, it's entirely legitimate intelligent criticism. You aren't fooling a single person here.

    3. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm annoyed that the adapter has the same Lightning connector without sufficient strain relief that you'd expect from a cheap 3.5" mm plug.

    4. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Flentil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The concern is that all the other manufacturers will do the same, and everyone's earbuds/headsets will be useless or need adapters.

    5. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Geez people - if a 3.5mm analog jack built into the phone is so important, buy any one of the many, many, Android devices on the market

      Yeah, that's my plan.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      phoneyness

      phone-yness, I see what you did there! :)

    7. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Geez people - if a 3.5mm analog jack built into the phone is so important, buy any one of the many, many, Android devices on the market - or any other iPhone that Apple still sells, or just use the stupid adapter that comes with the phone.

      This phony outrage is ridiculous.

      No shit.

    8. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My heart bleeds for your Android device. And I think I am afraid to take the stage. So, um no, Android is not an option. Me and Kim K are just gonna buy replacement BB's! I spend $6 a year on a new battery and the thing is amazing. Friends with iPhones can't even drive around in their car w/o charging. No thanks.

    9. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having seen and helped a friend with his iPhone 6. I am not impressed at all. It is an easily broken, poorly designed and manufactured hunk of trash. The last quality (Cr)apple product was the IIe! Everything since has been vastly overpriced, cheaply made junk that (Cr)apple managed to make iDiots think made them cool!

    10. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The concern is that all the other manufacturers will do the same, and everyone's earbuds/headsets will be useless or need adapters.

      I'm not concerned at all. Apple is a luxury brand that sells opinionated products. They don't cater to the value conscious customers who actually comprise the majority of the market for mobile phones. For every iPhone there are a dozen or more cheap Android devices. The cheap Android devices will never screw around with proprietary charging cables or non-standard ports and as the smartphone becomes ever more comoditized, those android phones will offer a "good enough" alternative to most users. I myself have a low cost (sub $100) windows phone and couldn't be happier with the excellent value, not to mention all of the extra money in my pocket. People who pay $700 for a phone are just being silly.

    11. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez people - if a 3.5mm analog jack built into the phone is so important, buy any one of the many, many, Android devices on the market

      Guess what? I bet most Apple haters complaining about the iPhone 7 already did that long ago. Pick any post above complaining the lack of headphone jack, 90% of the case, the poster doesn't even have, and had never thought of, buying an iPhone.

      People who actually uses iPhone aren't complaining. The headphone jack of my iPhone have been plugged with plastic dust plug ever since I got a nice bluetooth headset, and I never had the need to unplug it even though I have kept a pair of wired headset on my backpack for "just in case" for over a year now.

    12. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the other manufacturers have already done the same for some of their phones. But yes, Apple jumping on board doesn't help matters.

    13. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better: earbuds that only work with music downloaded from iTunes and refuse to play anything else. Skype-approved earbuds that won't work with Hangouts.

    14. Re:Never a shortage of Apple hate by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. There are still plenty of other audio applications, consumer and professional, that will use the old-style analog connectors. Nearly all of them, really. And there will be people with more money than sense who will continue to pay the Apple tax. Their phones are going to use some functionality, but those people typically don't use it anyway. People who buy a phone for pragmatic, functional reasons are already buying Androids, and those manufacturers will continue to cater to the power users.

  21. what a crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of crap apple comes up with

  22. Does the W1 chip support a new codec? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Something like aptX (but sadly, likely to be proprietary)?

    1. Re:Does the W1 chip support a new codec? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Something like aptX (but sadly, likely to be proprietary)?

      Not hardly. More like what's supposedly coming with BT 5, but not for at least another year.

    2. Re:Does the W1 chip support a new codec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a new codec if the bandwidth increases to accommodate uncompressed PCM

    3. Re:Does the W1 chip support a new codec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uncompressed PCM: 44100 samples/second * 16 bits/sample * 2 [for two channels] = 1411.2 kbps

      Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR practical transmission rate = 2.1 Mbit/s

      Bluetooth 3.0 + HS allows 24Mbit/s (which effectively uses wifi for transport and therefore has power tradeoffs)

      Bluetooth 5.0 is supposed to quadruple range and double the data rate.

  23. The real explanation . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real explanation for why Apple killed the headphone jack: profits.

    1. Re:The real explanation . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a used Casio keyboard that has a USB port, but no standard MIDI ports.

      Once I got it home I plugged it into my Mac. GarageBand doesn't recognize it - not class compliant. Casio does not offer a driver that works with El Capitan.

      Now I'm just looking to get rid of the damn thing.

      Proprietary solutions suck!

    2. Re:The real explanation . . . by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      At least that's just proprietary software. Grab yourself a Windows PC, download a USB bus dumper app, install the Windows drivers, send a few MIDI commands to it, figure out how the commands correspond with the original MIDI commands, and write an OS X driver that initializes the device and sends and receives messages. It is probably not much more than a week's work. Then sell the driver for $25 a copy.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:The real explanation . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a lot of work for a 12-year-old, $50 keyboard that is not in demand anymore.

      I just bought it 'cause it was cheap and had good drawbar organ sounds.

      I should have checked for MIDI ports before slapping down the cash. :-P

  24. Can't we go back to the 4s? by dfn5 · · Score: 1

    IMHO the 4s was the best iphone and it has been going downhill ever since. They made the phone more difficult to hold and got rid of a perfectly good connector. I never had the old style connector wear out but I have thrown out more lightning cables then I can count. Now I need to plugin my headphones into it? I've always felt locked into apple because of the investment in apps and music, but now with this latest move I believe iphone won't be my next phone. Looking forward to Xiaomi.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Can't we go back to the 4s? by macs4all · · Score: 1, Insightful

      IMHO the 4s was the best iphone and it has been going downhill ever since. They made the phone more difficult to hold and got rid of a perfectly good connector. I never had the old style connector wear out but I have thrown out more lightning cables then I can count. Now I need to plugin my headphones into it? I've always felt locked into apple because of the investment in apps and music, but now with this latest move I believe iphone won't be my next phone. Looking forward to Xiaomi.

      I have a 4s and a 6 Plus. You are delusional if you think the 4s is a better phone of the two. And as for 30-pin vs Lightning, again you're delusional. I have never broken either, and very much enjoy the agnostic orientation feature of the Lightning connector. But perhaps you will enjoy the Micro USB connector of an Android phone better. I for one would have been LIVID if Apple had adopted that POS connector. Both orientation sensitive AND fragile?!? That's micro USB's great legacy.

    2. Re:Can't we go back to the 4s? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Experimentally, Apple's 30-pin cords survive a vacuum cleaner encounter. Apple's lightning cables do not. Ask me how I know. :-D

      IMO, the 4s was a disaster of design, with twice as much glass as was reasonably necessary, leading to fragility purely for show. And the result was that all the beautiful design inevitably ended up inside a plastic and rubber case.

      At some point, Apple's hardware people forgot that although elegant form is important, if the function isn't there, it doesn't matter how shiny the turd is. Frankly, I think it started when they put a recessed headphone jack in the original iPhone, and it has been downhill since then. Each consecutive generation has fixed some things, but made others considerably worse:

      • Original: recessed audio jack, no front-facing camera, slow CPU, woefully insufficient RAM, only marginally adequate flash capacity.
      • 3G series: rounded backs made cases problematic, still woefully insufficient RAM until the 3GS, still no front-facing camera.
      • 4 series: made of unnecessary glass and stopped receiving signals if you held it wrong.
      • 5 series: power button failures (at least on the original), expando-batteries that bent the screen, headphone jack on the wrong end (making it hard to design holsters that expose both the audio jack and the charge connector).
      • 6 series: digitizer failures, plus the misplaced headphone jack, plus power button on the side, making it hard to press without also pressing the volume controls and negating the power button press.
      • 7 series: can't even plug it into your friend's stereo system without driving home to get the adapter that of course your Android-using friends don't have.

      Every iPhone model has had at least one thing that I consider to be a significant design flaw. Most had more than one. Maybe I'm more critical than most consumers, but where some see genius, I see half-assery. Things that should have been immediately obvious—not putting buttons directly across from one another on opposite sides of a device, for example—seem to constantly escape Apple's notice. It is as though they have forgotten many of the most basic lessons of human-computer interaction, and they're having to learn them all over again.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Can't we go back to the 4s? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Both orientation sensitive AND fragile?!? That's micro USB's great legacy."

      Orientation sensitivity is actually a good thing for dealing with possible electrical interference allowed by essentially untwisting a twisted pair over a distance greater than an inch. The fragility is only because of manufacturers cutting corners with how the port was soldered to the board, usually surface mounting the casing instead of utilizing the through-hole solution that was also available. All my micro USBs mounted using thru hole work. All of the surface-mounted ones are dead. Ditto Mini-USB.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  25. Re:Damn right it's courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think "Hate" is the right word, more like "Mockery".

    -AC

  26. Bluetooth headsets by nitehawk214 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not that I care, as I do not own any apple stuff, but I have not seen a bluetooth headset that was not absolute shit.

    I had a phone earpeice thing from plantronics that was worse than simply using the speakerphone in the car. When the thing would actually stay connected the speaker was inaudible. When I could hear the other side, my mic would not pick up.

    Bought some LG headphones, failed within 2 months. And in those 2 months it was nearly impossible to get the things to stay connected. Press the connect button, beeps loudly, searches for phone, gives up. Bought earbuds, returned the next day. Worthless.

    Bluetooth audio is complete garbage.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best Bluetooth headset I ever had was the one that came with my Treo 650. Alas it's dead now and all the current ones I've tried, as you say, are complete crap.

    2. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's because you buy branded crap instead of using the power of the reviews. I have a pair of cheap Chinese junk headphones (actually, a 'brand') which have excellent sound and have lasted for over a year now. Before them I had a pair from the same maker (before it 'brandified'), and they lasted 3 before I broke them. Got both sets on advice from a Chinese junk review site. Pretty good sound, too. Of course, not quite the same as my expensive 6.35 mm jack headphones at home, but totally adequate for any daily use I can think of, listening to music included.

    3. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Bose OE SoundLink headphone. I'm very pleased with it. Bluetooth support is flawless. Switching between devices is very easy as well. Quality is great. Battery is great. Only downside: it's expensive.

    4. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      There are decent bluetooth headphones, but there still is no low-latency BT audio transmission. The best out there is 30-60ms for aptX (which iOS does not support), which is still too long for any critical work. Normal bluetooth latency is measured in hundreds of milliseconds, making all non-compensated video noticeably out of sync. The head unit in my van was nearly a second out of sync with my iPhone 5 (the last iPhone I owned). Obviously that's not a huge deal for the driver, but if you happen to be watching the video as a passenger while listening, it's down right infuriating.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a shill, but I picked up some Creative bluetooth headphones after I broke my headphone jack and was desperate. I was flying in a few days and needed something, anything. They pair and stay connected well. The audio quality is mediocre (I think it's a bluetooth bitrate limit) and they aren't very loud but they work.

    6. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with your general point, but my hope is that there will now be some effort in a better Bluetooth. Something like this maybe http://www.digitaltrends.com/c... Wires suck. I like canal phones because you can get excellent sound quality and brilliant noise isolation. Nothing better for a long business flight and drowning out the sounds of the plane and kids. But the cable and the jack on these things is the weak point and the more you use them the sooner they break. They get tangled up, they get caught on things. I would love to be able to ditch the wire! Apple is a big enough chunk of the market that alternatives to the ubiquitous wire might have a chance to get returns for some R&D.

    7. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have crap luck with crap devices and state that the overarching system is crap.... hooooookay!

      That's like saying "I've had bad luck with a Kia Soul, Chevy Malibu, and Ford Focus, so I'm certain I'll have bad luck with Subaru's, Dodge's, Aston Martins, etc etc...."

      Or, "I've had bad luck with grocery store sushi, I'm certain I'll have bad luck with quality sushi made by a trained person."

      Suck on your bottle you whiny little baby.

    8. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though I think Apple is retarded for making this move, in their (VERY slight) defense, bluetooth audio is complete shit except for when you're in your car and it's connected to your stereo - I don't know that I've ever had problems with mine.

    9. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I agree. Bluetooth headphones are infuriating shite.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    10. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like your devices are garbage.

      Nobody cares about great antenna technology or great compression technology anymore. Well, almost nobody, based on BlackBerry's market share. But I assure you, I get fantastic, reliable sound from Bluetooth.

    11. Re:Bluetooth headsets by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Was it really that good if it died? Or did it have a long life (by electronics standards)?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    12. Re:Bluetooth headsets by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I was not even aware Creative Labs still existed. Or did someone buy them to slap the Creative label on existing products?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    13. Re:Bluetooth headsets by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I notice you did not actually suggest any bluetooth products you have experience with and are not shit.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    14. Re:Bluetooth headsets by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Actually I do get good sound and reliability from my car, perhaps it is just battery powered devices with quirky interfaces that have the problem.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    15. Re:Bluetooth headsets by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      As one who is on Skype calls five, six hours a day I would LOVE to know what you consider a "decent bluetooth headphone" as I have spent hundreds of dollars buying different ones and having them die within 90 days. I returned one particular brand to Best Buy ten times under warranty and got a new one - and then they stopped carrying them altogether. I now use a Logitech Web Cam/integrated microphone and Creative Studio Speakers which is great except for when I am working early and the house wants to sleep, or I want to have a private call. The Plantronics wired headset - assuming you tie-wrap the cord to the microphone as the cords pull out of the headsets in less than 3 months - is the best unit at some $60 but you look like an idiot wearing it as it's huge, and it's heavy. And it has a cord that gets caught on everything.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    16. Re:Bluetooth headsets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluetooth audio to this point has been garbage, and I haven't seen anything that would suggest that Apple has improved it.

      And you know what might be worse than Bluetooth audio? Audio delivered by a combo DAC and amplifier built into a $9 adapter cable.

  27. "better way to deliver audio" my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are no issues of fidelity with an analog connector, no batteries, no sync, no wireless interference, and no extra money involved to have a need for the most ubiquitous interface in electronics worldwide to disappear.

    1. Re:"better way to deliver audio" my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I take it you've never had a flakey headphone jack on a device, where your headphones had to be plugged in just so, and turned in just the right way to get full audio?

  28. False Dichotomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "[Schiller said] the company can't justify the continued use of an 'ancient' single-use port."

    There is nothing at all that would prevent the simultaneous use of the head phone check and of bluetooth.

    1. Re:False Dichotomy by macs4all · · Score: 1

      "[Schiller said] the company can't justify the continued use of an 'ancient' single-use port."

      There is nothing at all that would prevent the simultaneous use of the head phone check and of bluetooth.

      Except SPACE, which, in a device where every square mm counts, is a pretty compelling reason. They were able to repurpose a jack that every iPhone was carrying around all day; but which was going completely unused 99% of the time, while simultaneously eliminating a relatively huge connector, which not only gave them more space to move stuff around so they could do things that weren't possible without making the "Pkus" versions too large to fit comfortably in A shirt pocket (which they surprisingly do). And along the way, then also picked up an easy way to get to IPx7 water resistance, which is undeniably a very nice thing to offer.

    2. Re:False Dichotomy by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
      "which was going completely unused 99% of the time"

      In the universe I live in, I can't leave my house without seeing a kid using wired ear buds. They're ubiquitous. Current market statistics say that almost half of those people are using iPhones.

      What universe do you live in? I've never been there.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    3. Re:False Dichotomy by macs4all · · Score: 1

      "which was going completely unused 99% of the time"

      In the universe I live in, I can't leave my house without seeing a kid using wired ear buds. They're ubiquitous. Current market statistics say that almost half of those people are using iPhones.

      What universe do you live in? I've never been there.

      Sorry if I was unclear: I meant the Lightning connector is unused most of the time. They just decided to make it "more used" an simultaneously got more room and better water-resistance as part of the bargain.

      As far as "Costs" go, right now it is a LOSS, because Apple had to redesign the Ear Pods to be Lightning (when they COUL have just said "Use the Adapter", AND include an Adapter. And they are selling that Adapter as a separate piece for only NINE DOLLARS; so no one should be able to accuse them of a money-grab here.

      They truly ARE trying to push everyone forward. And they will succeed.

  29. Encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this standard have encryption? Or will it be trivial for anyone to eavesdrop on what you are listening to?

    1. Re:Encryption? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      That's going to be fun when you're sitting between two other guys on a plane with iPhone 7s as well. Even if you can't hear what they're listening to, there is bound to be interference.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Encryption? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      How come nobody ever brings up EM spectrum pollution when companies push for wireless everything? Or the old-fashioned pollution that comes from all these peripherals suddenly needing to have batteries? Particularly stuff like headphones where there is a negligible benefit to going wireless. (I'd consider it the opposite of a benefit, but I seem to be outside the reality distortion field. Or maybe i'm just not "courageous" enough.)

  30. Courage ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... was also a major factor in the TV series Jackass.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  31. Re:It's a... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    It's a computer. Can't say for the Apple, but the Android phones do computer things even better for me sometimes than a laptop or desktop. I can have 90 tabs open on the things. My one without what they are now calling RAM doesn't keep track of what's in textareas too well so avoid those. My Huawei Valient was a bit... okay very sketchy and its first battery stopped working fast and after I stopped using it, the second battery decided to swell up, but that was about three years ago. The Alcatel OneTouch Fierce XL had power button issues. LG makes them so thin they decided to put the power and volume buttons on the back. I have more of an issue with my fingers accidentally brushing the screen because of the thinness rather than battery life. I forget which phone my mom has, but it developed dialing program problems. You want a phone with 8GB of storage, "RAM", and preferably support for MicroSDXC cards, but those things can be very capable computers.

  32. Profiles in Courage by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Building the iPhone 7 is almost exactly like storming the beach at Normandy, except with a lot more butt sex.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  33. increased attack surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sorta see this as an increase in the attack surface, and just something more to exploit.

  34. BlueTooth to 3.5mm converter by xbytor · · Score: 1

    You can buy a $4 BlueTooth to 3.5mm converter and a $4 for a 3.5 F/F coupler. Why spend $150 on AirPods when you can use what you already have with an $8 fix? Not ideal, but at least I'd have my analog out that I can plug in to whatever I want.

    1. Re:BlueTooth to 3.5mm converter by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Not ideal

      I think you gave the reason right there. Why spend $900 on a device if only leads you into configurations that aren't ideal?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:BlueTooth to 3.5mm converter by djrobxx · · Score: 1

      The AirPods are a product similar to the PowerBeats bluetooth earbuds, which are not cheap either. They have little to do with the removal of the 3.5mm jack. "Regular" earpods with a lightning connector are included. A 3.5mm to lightning adapter is also included.

      I'm hoping this "W1" chip has better sound quality and lower audio latency than Bluetooth audio. You cannot play games with the PowerBeats earbuds, and the standard bluetooth audio codecs have atrocious quality.

    3. Re:BlueTooth to 3.5mm converter by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      Link?

    4. Re:BlueTooth to 3.5mm converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But their Bluetooth is a propriety version that breaks the standard, it won't work with your converter.

  35. Ye gads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My eyes are ancient single use ports. Does this mean Phil hopes to do away with them too?

    The headphone jack has long since been a misnomer, it actually has much more capability than just the "headphones" associated with it.

    Apple just want to restrict the port with DRM so devices cannot transceive audio signals such as gaming device hacks, bank readers et al

    Screw you apple. This 6 is my last iphone. The competition will be fierce over this one. Legacy does not always need replacing, only for profit; no more royalty payments on that one is more why they did it.

    1. Re:Ye gads by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      My chronometer plugs into my iPhone via the headphone jack so I don't need record each and every reading. Single-use-port my ass.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  36. One by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another problem is that there is only ONE single use port. I usually listen to music while my phone is plugged in, and to my knowledge there is no way to both listen with the headphone dongle and have the device plugged in.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.apple.com/shop/product/MNN62/iphone-lightning-dock

    2. Re:One by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      So $US49, using your phone's Lightning USB cable (included but otherwise $29)

      That's one dock for iOS (Lightning) and another dock for attaching peripherals to macOS (USB-C).

      Heaven forbid they pick a common hardware standard for all devices!

    3. Re:One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.apple.com/shop/product/MGRM2AM/A/iphone-lightning-dock-white

    4. Re:One by suutar · · Score: 1

      well, that shows it can be done, but I don't think it's gonna work well as a dash mount in my car. We'll see what the third party market comes up with.

  37. If... by nightfire-unique · · Score: 2

    If this leads to the abandonment of a2dp, I am all for it.

    It's actually quite embarrassing that a2dp is still a standard in widespread use. The very fact you can't bidirectionally stream audio at a high bitrate is so 90s.

    If this move brings on 6ch, 320kbit bidirectional audio, I'm all for it (even as an Android user).

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    1. Re:If... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, it won't. This is practically dead with apple share of smartphone market hovering around 10%.

    2. Re:If... by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      I want this new wireless audio standard (which is not BT, if reports are correct) to be a near-zero latency. Right now BT aptX is 60ms, and regular BT is 300+ ms. If 3rd parties start making transmitters and receivers on the standard with 2-6ms latency, and price them at consumer levels ($100), that will mean I can skip buying half a dozen $1000 Sennheiser IEM (in ear monitors) for my band and just pick up some AppleSound(TM) packs instead.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re: If... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's standard aptx. Aptx low latency is 32ms end to end, which is good enough for consumer. Aptx lossless can be down to 1ms, but you have tradeoffs.

    4. Re:If... by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      And do you want some golden flying pigs with that? :)

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  38. Re:Damn right it's courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expect a higher standard of brainwashing posts from shills. They're either paying you too much or they're not getting their moneys worth because that was a pathetic counter argument.

  39. here's why bluetooth sux by strstr · · Score: 0

    this is gunna kill audiophile quality stuff. Bluetooth uses crappy lossy compression, the signals are being transcoded over and over, more and more signals and bits are lost, and some signals like HD can't be represented at all. in this case, Bluetooth wireless signals use compression algorithms that are like mp3, so as the audio data is already stripped in the default iTunes format of AAC, it will now go through a second stripping process when the hardware sends it over the Bluetooth link.

    wireless signals also cause bio-health effects, and are killing and damaging our DNA and cells. we don't need more wireless tech, we need less as a result.

    lightning connectors are fine but the reason for those sucking is the iPhone and iPod's will have only one connector: the fucking flipping lightning port. you're going to need a splitter that allows both connections simultaneously for it to work and not be annoying. users will likely want to listen to their audio, while charging at the same time, or doing a data link.

    many modern high-end headphones already allow for swapping cords so luckily most headphones are upgradeable to the lightning port, or the splitter can have a 3.5" headphone jack, and a port for lightning connections.

    many high end headphones like those from Sennheiser, Shure, Westone and the like already have removable replaceable cords and multiple cords to choose from, including custom made ones like super high end grade silver, gold, and platinum ones. Westone W60 for example have a custom cord for iPhone, and another specific for Android devices.

    the USB C and micro USB ports on Android phones however are not as suitable for this because the ports and connectors are way larger than the lightning connector on Apple products. using USB C, I hypothesize would actually feel like a downgrade. :)

    obamasweapon.com
    drrobertduncan.com

    1. Re:here's why bluetooth sux by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      many high end headphones like those from Sennheiser, Shure, Westone and the like already have removable replaceable cords and multiple cords to choose from, including custom made ones like super high end grade silver, gold, and platinum ones.

      The high grade silver/gold/platinum is only plating on the connector. You've got crappy copper and lead-free tin solder the rest of the way.

    2. Re:here's why bluetooth sux by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 1

      Copper is not 'crappy', it is a better conductor than gold.
      You only use gold on the contacts because it does not corrode. If copper was precious metal, you'd use it all the way through.

  40. Re:Damn right it's courage by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

    It takes Courage when you are asking your customers to bend over again.

  41. AirPod battery life ? by thygate · · Score: 2

    yet another device to charge, what will the autonomy be on these $160 suckers ?

    1. Re:AirPod battery life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      24 hours idle, 5 hours use.

  42. Re:Damn right it's courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no tech company in history is more deserving of hate than apple. its almost like they enjoy it

  43. Airbutts by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there are a lot of idiots that will stand in line for the chance of paying $160 for some airbutts.

  44. That thing that makes the muskrat guard his musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes the elephant charge his tusk in the misty mist or the dusky dusk? What makes the muskrat guard his musk? What makes Apple remove the 3.5 mm headphone jack?

    COURAGE!

  45. airpods are bad design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy to lose, low battery capacity and most seriously, they have poor ergonomic design.
    They have a long stem hanging down from your ear containing the battery, which is most of the weight.
    When you move about this extension combined with the weight balance causes them to work loose.
    Might be OK if you listen stationary, bad for walking, useless for jogging/running.

  46. That's nice but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bluetooth simply doesn't have the bandwidth for standard stereo, which means they'll have to encode and decode the signals - which means reduced sound quality no matter how hard they wriggle.

    Given the set of people who buy Apple hardware have a big intersection with people who buy expensive audio systems I can see Apple having some unhappy customers here.

    1. Re:That's nice but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 Mbps half duplex is about all you can get out of BlueTooth before it switched over to high speed (HS) mode where it has to use a different radio (802.11/WiFi-based). The turn around between master and salve requires at least one slot, so you'd really only be able to use 4/5th of that bandwidth in one direction under a best case scenario.

      48 KHz * 16-bits/sample * 2 channels = 1.54 Mbps for raw audio.
      4/5ths of 3 Mbps is 2.4 Mbps.

      Once you start throwing in more devices on a bluetooth piconet, you soon run out of space for doing raw audio. But there are multiple compression codecs (SBC, aptX) for trading in some quality for a significant reduction in bandwidth. The reason BlueTooth usually sounds horrible is that devices chose to only support a poor codec (SBC) or have better codecs but your software couldn't detect it properly in the A2DP profile and fell back to an inferior (but universal) codec.

  47. Courage is not defined as deleting 20 years of tec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has single-handedly made it possible to slice off one of the last bastions of personal freedom... audio (headphones). I can only guess that they have reasons for this as the new I-Obey is now too slim to utilize a headphone jack (nope). A headphone jack makes it less waterproof than its competitors (nope). This is another 2 or 3 layers of blocks that make Apple owners admire the very pretty walled garden containing them. It is another step that is defined by content providers and content deliverers. Many years from now.. in a new future following this latest revelation... Apple will remove the microphone and speaker from their phones.. and replace them with a digital filter that meets the needs of their content constricting overlords or they could face the possibility of a minute decrease in their profit margin.

    After all under their policies they have pretty much squeezed the supply chain so hard that it might be able to make a diamond out of a charcoal briquette at a theater near you.

    Peace out.

  48. Courage to let my battery drain by Mike · · Score: 1

    Apparently if I want the new iPhone I'll need the courage to let my battery drain while I listen through headphones.

  49. Re:Damn right it's courage by macs4all · · Score: 1

    they are getting the hate for the Bullshit explanation. It takes Arrogance not courage to do something like that and not provide an explanation why you are screwing everyone over.

    They did; you just weren't listening.

  50. Apple: Set Spin Machine to Full by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 2

    It is spelled GREED not courage. Courage would be releasing their custom bluetooth standard along with open sourcing the head phone design so that it can be easily copied by other manufacturers and become the industry standard. Nice try though Apple...

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  51. Re: Damn right it's courage by Mike · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of Microsoft?

  52. Apple's got ways to go yet: EOMA68 does just USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EOMA68 is a standard of standards. It basically strips out all non-general purposes ports. It's intended to be a 10-year standard. The only thing it has is USB and MicroHDMI. There are two other general purpose components, but if you are talking elimination of everything that is truly unnecessary, this is it. And surprisingly you can do a lot with it. Laptops, desktops, and so on. Basically any EOMA68 compliant device will enable users to replace the computer without replacing the housing. So you can take your EOMA68 compliant laptop and replace the CPU, graphics, memory, etc just by popping out the EOMA68 computer card and replacing it with a new EOMA68 compliant computer card.

  53. I Love it! by networkzombie · · Score: 1

    Hey, don't get me wrong. I use my wired headphones/earbuds exclusively and I feel sorry for anyone that has to charge their headphones and drain their battery on their phone just to use them, but hey, someone has to make the leap into the future, and this is it! Now that Apple, the leader in innovation (cough) has done away with the headphone cables, everyone else will follow. We will soon see Bluetooth headsets that are better than even I can imagine. They will power themselves over Bluetooth soon so no charging. Once all the bugs are worked out and the competitors realize people hate wires as much as Steve Job's ghost, we will have this fantastic technology in our cars, our alarm clocks, and our intercom systems (don't you have one?). Someone has to take the leap to show people just how great it can be. I think it should be Apple. On the other hand... Why the fuck don't wireless repeaters work well with different brands? Why is upload speed so shitty when I pay $60 a month? Why does VoIP have such problems with different firewalls? Does everyone set UDP timeouts so fucking low? Why are hotels so obviously throttling bandwidth? Why can't I get a goddamn USB jack on the airplane to charge my Kindle? And why does my Kindle suck at managing shows on the SD card? WHAT THE FUCK! Well, I can say one thing. My wired headphones always work, even with that little button that answers and hangs up calls. I love it.

  54. Fighting for space? iPhones are getting bigger by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    The original iPhone had a 3.5" screen, and it had a 3.5mm audio connector. So why can't it fit in the iPhone 7 which has a 4.7 or 5.5 inch screen?

  55. The real reasons by BlackSabbath · · Score: 2
    1. Re:The real reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent article. Seems entirely plausible that trading off space for the audio jack to make room for better camera hardware and increased battery capacity will please more people than it will anger. Apple fanboys won't abandon the i-Phone because they need an adapter or need to buy more "cool" Apple hardware.

      I hate the idea because I like my audio and don't care about documenting my life through better quality "selfies", but I'm not an Apple customer anyway. Maybe they lose a few determined audiophiles but more than offset the lost revenue by sales of the Apple headphones?

      In the end, the market will judge the wisdom of this decision.

  56. Another Apple Ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's Lightning cable does the same thing as a USB cable, but costs twenty times the price. This is another Apple ripoff. My iPhone headphones work fine thank you very much. There is no need to do this except greed in Apple squeezing blood from a declining customer base. Apple Senior VP Phil Schiller, I won't buy an iAnything with your "COURAGE" jack. How stupid do you think we are? Try some real innovation, num nuts.

  57. 2.5 mm wasn't small enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2.5 mm jacks are standard and there are plenty of already available products using that size connector.

  58. Courage? This is Tim Cook we're talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gay people love abusing the word courage ad nauseam right down to Tim Cook's "I'm proud to be gay" article that was featured here on slashdot back in 2014. /yawn

  59. Re:Damn right it's courage by Toonol · · Score: 1

    Courage to proceed in the face of condemnation and disdain... courage which your slashdot posts so bravely exemplify.

  60. Courage, Pippin, Courage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the Rohirrim charged at Pelennor Fields, they did it to remove 3.5 mm jacks from phones. Orcs, being the crude and unshapely beasts they are, wanted to keep the jack in their vile Anorc phones.

    And then Apple made a console called Pippin in honor of the battle.

  61. HAHAHAHAHA!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Schiller says that AirPod users can expect five hours of playtime http://arstechnica.com/gadgets...


    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Oh Schiller you stupid dumb fuck. I hope your greed backfires and this kills the iPhone and your name and resignation letter are forever attached to this debacle.

    > Android remained the world's most widely used smartphone operating system with 80.7 percent market share, while iOS recorded 17.7 percent market share. http://www.macrumors.com/2016/...

    Do you really think $159 earbuds are going to lift your market share? Yeah Hipsters are stupid but they are not that stupid.

  62. The courage to charge for a proprietary standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must take courage to make anyone using their assortment of cheap headphones (all they can afford!) to expensive headphones (vastly superior to anything Apple has ever offered!) switch to an entirely new standard, one that bravely will only work with just this one device. Very brave. Wow.

  63. Re:Damn right it's courage by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

    If you hate Apple, you deserve to have every bad thing possible happen to you and your family. Your mother, after all, was obviously a brain-damaged asshole for even carrying you to term.

    Seriously. Apple has done nothing to deserve hate. If you don't like their products, don't fucking use them. It's only a concept that's difficult for shits like you to understand. Real people with normal minds don't have an issue with it.

  64. "Courage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ their shit makes me want to vomit.

    1. Re:"Courage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, I'd also imagine it takes courage to publicly be a White Supremacist these days.

      Nah, just a single red pill can do the trick.

  65. Courage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Courage would be porting SystemD to the iOS

  66. Re:Damn right it's courage by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, they provided a copout. It came down to a choice between slightly better speakers that most people will never use anyway (because it is usually rude) or a headphone jack that lots of people use every day, and they made the wrong call. I've already (since the announcement) heard three people who have used iOS for years say that they're seriously considering switching to Android because of this. That number represents about 50% of the iPhone users in my team at work, and 100% of the iPhone users who were present at the time. I know that anecdotes aren't data, but if Apple's upper management isn't absolutely scared sh**less right now, then they don't deserve to be there.

    From where I'm sitting, if the case manufacturers don't save Apple from themselves by building cases with built-in headphone jacks, this will probably mark a turning point where Apple rapidly accelerated their descent into niche-playerdom. There's a very small chance I'm wrong, and that the iOS users that I know are all just the 1% of power users that Apple doesn't care about anymore. For the sake of my Apple stock, I hope so, but I'm not holding my breath.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  67. Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It really does take a lot of courage to fuck your fans over that hard!

  68. Everything sounds better with Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Courage to remove the 3.5mm headphone jack

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bISNmzp4GVg

  69. Aux Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use my iPhone on a car stereo with 1/8inch(3.5mm) aux input only AND charge it at the same time? Not 'hating'. I still love my 'old school', 'i7', quadcore, upgradable (RAM and HD/SSD) macmini for running VM's. (You can't buy those anymore)

  70. How do I charge and use the headset? by crbowman · · Score: 2

    OK, I've converted to a cell phone. No landline any more. So when I'm on a long conference call using my headset so people on the other end can hear me, how do I charge my phone for the long call?

    1. Re:How do I charge and use the headset? by PmanAce · · Score: 1

      You use an android.

      --
      Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    2. Re:How do I charge and use the headset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You buy one of those large, 3rd market replacement batteries that take up twice the space and deliver 3 times the use time. Wait a second...

    3. Re:How do I charge and use the headset? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Well, you could always use a dock that you can leave your headset attached to that already exists and does both charging and audio conversion...

      Will the new phone please everybody? No, of course not. But the vast majority of consumers (even the vast majority of complainers) won't have to change a thing. Its like the number of people who complained that there wasn't a removable battery being far greater than the number of people who had traditionally ever purchased a single second cellphone battery.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    4. Re:How do I charge and use the headset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I've converted to a cell phone. No landline any more. So when I'm on a long conference call using my headset so people on the other end can hear me, how do I charge my phone for the long call?

      They invented this thing last year called bluetooth headset. People have been using them in cars and such.

  71. Wrong word by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    It's not courage. It's gall.

  72. Apple is being foolish and arrogant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple just wants to make more money to create more dumb things that's why they are changing the standard headphone jack another problem is that everybody uses these headphones so changing it is dumb, foolish and arrogant. It's a standard for a reason now Apple changes the standard now what we have to buy new headphones or dongle just to use Apple what if they have this in their future devices it would be terrible

  73. Android costs less by stooo · · Score: 1

    Or you Buy an Android phone, which costs less than the Apple Earbuds.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  74. More like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greed and stupidity.

  75. Re:Damn right it's courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your stupid troll ass wouldn't know a thing about normal.

  76. Stupidity on its finest by lapm · · Score: 1

    Stupidity more like it... I do understand apples drive to maximize profits by moving to proprietary custom BT chips, with added bonus of tieing customers even more to apple products, etc... but i dont undestand why remve good reliable connector. It can be water proofed if wanted, so thats just xcuse of bad manufacturing and engineering..

  77. Re:It's a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have yet to see an Android phone support WebGL and HTML5 audio or video properly, or at all. All the hand-wringing over patents regarding mp3 and aac results in content either never working on Android, or WebGL just straight up not working.

    In the "RPG Maker" community, we all discovered that Android phones are absolute pieces of rubbish unless they had 4.4.4 on them (which switched the webview from Android's webview to Chromium's) Yet, the only phone powerful enough to run it was the Samsung Galaxy G5. Meanwhile people with iPhone 4S's and later had no problem getting any of the games to work.

    It's that kind of Android fragmentation (and piracy) which makes all good things come to iOS first, and maybe a bone will be thrown to Android once all the money has been made on iOS, because Android users don't like to spend money, and they hack their games to get "freemium" items.

  78. Re:Or the actual reason(s)-OT by fred911 · · Score: 1

    "The tire is almost 200 years old. It had its last big innovation about 70 years ago (radial tires)."

    I guess you forgot about run-flat tires and the countless innovations in compound and tread design. Whereas it's not a NASCAR type thing, watch F1 to see how tires are constantly bring improved.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  79. Hey Apple lawyers by flyingsofaking · · Score: 1

    Hey Apple lawyers, what happens when Apple discovers Bluetooth bud users get brain cancer?

    1. Re:Hey Apple lawyers by Misagon · · Score: 2

      I would not be too worried. Bluetooth radiates about one thousandth of what a cell phone radio does.
      I would be more worried about those who talk on the phone all day without using a headset, text constantly or stream music over the Internet.
      Cell phone radios don't usually shut off between each data packet. This means that they will continue to radiate for a while even after you have e.g. received or sent a text, albeit at progressively lower levels. The shut-off delays are in the radio protocols and defined by the cell phone operator - not Apple.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  80. Milk That Cash Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remove that ancient headphones port now!
    $160 dollar headphones sound much better.
    Yeah right.

  81. Faux-ami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So "courage" is what we call in France a "faux-ami" (false friend) : a english word that looks like a french word but does not have the same meaning.
    Courage is a synonym for stupidity. Good to know.

  82. Courage eh? by DrXym · · Score: 1

    It's simply a way to force people onto their own proprietary connectors, standards and peripherals. There is absolutely no sound technical reason to eliminate a head phone jack.

  83. Why suddenly do we need water-proof phones? by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    What's this new trend of water-proof phones? Are we preparing for a post-global-warming world where we live in water, like that Kevin Costner's movie?

    1. Re:Why suddenly do we need water-proof phones? by ledow · · Score: 1

      They're running out of gimmicks.

      The phones are already compasses, spirit levels, sat-navs, cameras, gaming machines, VR displays, heartbeat sensors, fingerprint sensors, etc. etc. etc.

      They are literally grasping for anything practical and waterproofing doesn't take up battery life, much space, or much cost (rubber seal, tight case, done).

      Remember that kid in class that had the calculator-watch, which was also a stopwatch, and an alarm, and a countdown timer, etc. etc. etc.? Same thing. Nobody really used those extra bits much but they are all there because they don't cost much to add and you can sell them as a feature.

      Gorilla Glass was another. Now they all have that.
      Curved edges. Now they all have that.
      Waterproofing. Now they all have that.
      Wireless charging. Now they all have that.
      NFC. Now they all have that.

      You'll start to see even more junk now that it's getting harder. Integrated stands into the phone case itself. Miniature projector (or have I seen that in the market already?). Gesture control. God knows what else.

      Basically any tacky gimmick that one company can claim is a one-up on the competition. And next devices from all companies will all have it.

    2. Re:Why suddenly do we need water-proof phones? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      The 'water proof' aspect comes with so many fucking disclaimers that it's essentially meaningless. They'll still fuck your phone back at you for 'water damage' in a repair.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    3. Re:Why suddenly do we need water-proof phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Why suddenly do we need water-proof phones?]

      We don't, except for some people who do. And if it didn't involve a tradeoff, it'd be worthless at worst, with most people agreeing it's good.

      The real problem here, isn't that they made a tradeoff. Tradeoffs are a fact of life. It's that there are many tradeoffs, and their relative values are all subjective, and no manufacturer has the product diversity to be able to make the best-fit product for more than a small fraction of the market.

      Taking away the ability to use headphones isn't necessarily stupid, because some people don't use headphones anyway. Taking away the ability to last a long time on a battery charge isn't stupid, because some (most, it seems; I never even knew I would become one of them) people are ok with plugging in often. Taking away the ability to change batteries isn't stupid, because some people just throw their computers away after 2-3 years. Taking away the ability to be part of a software free market isn't stupid, because most people need little more than a web browser. Having the OS not be auditable isn't stupid, because some people don't care about security. Having it be expensive isn't stupid, because some people are fine with spending lots of money. Taking away the ability to use USB cables isn't stupid, because .. well, I gotta admit, I'm simply unable to adopt a viewpoint where that isn't hilariously over-the-top astoundingly stupid, but maybe that's just me.

      There's lots of not-stupid things happening, but if you add them all up, then from the perspective of nearly any particular user, there's something about it which is going to seem stupid.

      Now, this isn't an Apple-only problem. Samsung has only so many products too, and the chances that any particular one of them is right for you, are just as small as the possibility that the iPhone 7 is right for you. Samsung might have a little more diversity, but even if you add up everything they have, they all have certain things in common.

      But that's not a big problem either, because if you don't like Samsung's products, then just try LG, or Huawei, or Asus, or ... (Pretty much the only thing we're missing is are standard form factors (analogous to ATX, mini-ITX, etc) so that we advance to the build-from-parts stage, where everyone can get exactly what they want. That's something I'd love to see, but we're still not there yet.)

      But if you're locked into iOS, you only have one option: change yourself and your expectations. Not everyone is cut out for that, but to be fair to Apple's eggheads, the fraction is a lot higher that I would have estimated. Maybe that's why they're at a multi-billion dollar company and I'm not.

  84. Have The Courge To Avoid This Product. by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    There is a morality issue here: a company is trying to sell a product with the purpose of limiting and removing a traditional method that people use it.

    This also is the first step in closing the analogue loop, as a proof of concept, which may inhibit fair use, not just Apple fans, but for everyone.

    Human beings do not need to use natural resources to make new heaphones just because a marketing person decides to do something different.

    I know there are a lot of Apple fans out there. If you are not a fan boy, have the courage to skip this product.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  85. New wireless audio standard? by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 2

    Even though I do not care about the phone at all, if all of this excitement over one port somehow leads to a new standard for wireless audio, that would be awesome.

    Bluetooth sucks for anything above skype calls.
    Bluetooth hifi-headphones are a joke. The better the headphone, the more you realize how horribly bluetooth compression mangles the sound quality.

    Because of this, every manufacturer is running their own wireless audio format. Your typical audio sources (phone, pc, hi-fi system) do not support any of them. Adapters everywhere...
    I guess now we have yet another standard with Apple's... But maybe they can push theirs to more devices than just their phones? Any chance of something Apple to ever become an open standard?

    1. Re:New wireless audio standard? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Any chance of something Apple to ever become an open standard?

      Price-gouging isn't compatible with having an open standard, so I would expect a "no" there.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:New wireless audio standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... Apple essentially owns BEATS... so their Wireless Bluetooth protocol will probably show up as the standard on those now... and probably nothing else.... as an attempt to make more money from their BEATS devices. Which is great if you love to listen to your music with all the High end Stripped out.

      " But maybe they can push theirs to more devices than just their phones? Any chance of something Apple to ever become an open standard?"
      [lol... sidenote... the captcha I was just given was "fasc ism"]

  86. You can explain it like you want... by OpenSourced · · Score: 2

    You can give it the spin you want, but what you cannot say is that the earphones plug has fallen into disuse. I think it's the single most used phone accessory nowadays, with no second competitor in sight.

    So you remove a widely used feature, and you provide a worse alternative, or rather, you simply point out that an alternative has always existed. The glaring fact that practically nobody used that existing alternative is gloriously lost on you. Or rather, you don't care.

    So basically you are doing something to screw your users, thinking that it will improve your company. Again the glaring fact that your company is nothing without your clients, is lost in the glare of your new shiny state-of-the-art office.

    Let's see how it plays out. People can be really dumb that way, and certainly that's not a deal breaker. Also, there is always the possibility of backtracking. Never underestimate the marketing department ingenuity of selling an Apple 7 Super Plus "With earphones plug!!!", only for 100$ more. But IMHO, Apple is accumulating small mistakes with a sore lack of the former big hits that could ,in past times, have covered them.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  87. I get the move ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... away from the audio jack. It makes sense in quite a few ways and I trust that Apple knows what it's doing when it intruduces a new wireless audio standard.

    However, I do the potential of this failing if they don't open up the standard for everybody to implement for free. ... I'm curious to where this is headed.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:I get the move ... by ledow · · Score: 1

      Can one company really create a standard on its own?

      I'm not at all sure about that. It doesn't encompass many of the things that I take "standard" to mean, and if we substitute what we really mean ("industry standard") then it certainly doesn't.

      It's not a standard if nobody else uses it. And it's certainly not a standard if it doesn't actually exist yet.

      Maybe it's the IT guy in me, but I really see "Corporation-specific, patented, bespoke proprietary protocol to replicate functionality already present in established standards, and used to justify the removal of another standard for a different type of hardware entirely". That doesn't speak the word "standard" to me.

      It's like Microsoft XPS. A bad copy of PDF done wrong and then enforced on parts of the market not bright enough to know better.

      Hopefully it will go as well. I've never once received an XPS file in an email, from a website, or via a file-sharing service, for instance.

  88. One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Morons...

  89. Sigh by ledow · · Score: 1

    Slashdot Commentor Cites 'Stupidity' As Reason To Remove 3.5mm Headphone Jack

    But then, I honestly don't care as I don't use their products. I just hope nobody is stupid enough to follow suit like they did with the no-expansion-card thing and then had to backtrack.

    To be honest, if I was Samsung, I'd now release a phone with TWO headphone sockets. Because almost every kid I know has a headphone doubler or does the "one-earbud-for-you, one-for-your-friend" thing. And then let the market decide.

  90. Yes Minister by taylorius · · Score: 1

    "A most courageous decision, if I may say so Minister"

    "Oh god no - it's not is it?"

  91. There will be a time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will be a time when armies of dumbass beardy, barefoot hipsters, who enjoy being caressed, hypnotized then robbed and controlled like sheep led to a butchery.. ... will open their eyes! and wake up from the appalling, arrogant, greedy tyranny of "spaceship office" "tax dodging" monster.

    They will then go and try some of the alternatives:
    - A privacy violating, forced updates, dull OS delivered by OEMs on any sort of hardware, together with a big bunch of malware and bloatware to which is subject
    - A permanently unfinished OS for nerds with 1.000.000.000+ different souls, hardware and software incompatibility or lack of support, all dependent on the fading good will of a starving OSS community increasingly growing older and giving up to inconclusive arrogant young DEVs who just care about attracting Venture Capitalists then run to the next Venture and hot hype word...

    It's not just Apple. It's an entire world and ideals that have long gone.

  92. Wireless charging. by DrYak · · Score: 1

    To listen to my existing headphones and charge the phone at the same time, I'd have to buy a Lightning splitter. Neither the earbuds nor the adapter has an extra Lightning port, and they take up the only Lightning port on the device.

    Apple missed a HUGE opportunity to bank on the Wireless charging craze.
    They could have even not needed to go with Qi like everybody else, but invent their own peculiar standard as usual (as Palm did with TouchStone back when Qi wasn't a thing yet).
    Call-it "iCharge", require an Apple-cryptographically signed NFC chip inside (à la MFI) and bingo, they got a reason for their fan to yet again rebuy all of their accessories (new docks).

    Also, I don't understand at all this craze of making smartphone so thin that you can cut cheese with them... the things got screen wider than a paperback book, and users who don't want to break them within 1 month after buying will put them in a cover/case any way.

    Keeping smartphone a couple of milimeters thicker would allow not only for extremely useful legacy connectors like the analog audio port, but would even increase space for bigger battery (and add a LED at the bottom of the audio connector so it can double as a digital-out, like some minidisc players used to do).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  93. So close but... by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    So close to the truth, but more accurately NPH: Not Patented Here.

  94. REAL reason for dropping the stereo jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone with 2 braincells knows this is a move of apple not from courage, but to lock you up further in their walled garden.

    As Iphones can no longer use standardised stereo jacks, only companies paying apple for the right to work with their SHITSTORM of a "lighting" connector can make equipment that'll work. So in that way this is a pure money grab.

    On the other hand, look at the rights issue. Apple cannot block you from recording from your stereo out jack, I bet ya they'll have put something in place to stop you from recording the output on their "lightning" connector. So in that way it's apple saying to the MAFFIAA look how well we are protecting your rights, please lower the apple store price of all your songs as they are now so well protected. Of course our customers will see no drop in the end price.

    So using the word courage as a reason to stop having a stereo jack is about as real as a politicians trustworthiness, about -235 K

  95. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  96. Balls by seoras · · Score: 1

    Balls of milled aluminium....

  97. Thicker phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd much rather have a thicker phone with a better camera, huge battery, microSD, FM radio, and a 3.5mm jack than a thin phone with crap or non-existent features.
    A decent case makes the phone twice as thick anyway, so what's another 1-2mm on thickness?

  98. Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not courage, greed. The one and only connector the iPhone now has is Apple proprietary. Judging from past history Apple will either:

    1. Refuse to license it to other parties and make buckets of money forcing people to buy headphones from Apple or Apple-owned Beats.

    2. License that connector to other companies for a heafy fee.

    In either case, the motive is greed, pure, unmitegated greed.

    And no, the fact that Bluetooth headphones will still work with the iPhone 7 means nothing. Their limited life makes them a pain to use in comparison to those that plug in.

  99. Long term studies of radio waves in the ear please by SadButResolved · · Score: 1

    where are the Long term studies of radio waves in the ear please? Do we know what bluetooth does to the brain with a radio strapped to the back of your head for years? I'm sure this will be all fine.
    Hmm, perhaps this will turn out like the movie "The Jerk". Glasses anyone? Apple should follow Monsanto's lead and bribe congress for a personal protection rider.

  100. Courageously abandoning audio connectivity? by sabbede · · Score: 2

    The phono jack, in it's 3.5mm, 2.5mm and 1/4" incarnations, is the standard for analog audio connectivity for a good reason. It's the oldest electrical connector still in use for a good reason. It works fantastically well! They're cutting themselves out of the audio market, and it's a dumb move. That jack could, with a $5 adapter, connect a phone to virtually any other audio device as input or output. You could plug a guitar into it, you could plug it into a mixing board, a car, a microphone, an instrument amp, a stereo amp, anything. A DJ could entertain a crowd with just a phone and a sound system, any sound system.

    1. Re:Courageously abandoning audio connectivity? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      And now the adapter is $9 instead of $5 - if you want the Apple-branded one in retail packaging.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:Courageously abandoning audio connectivity? by sabbede · · Score: 1
      $9? From Apple? Well, that's unexpected.

      Are you sure you didn't mean $90? I didn't think Apple knew things could cost less than $20,

  101. Re:Or the actual reason(s)-OT by Entrope · · Score: 1

    Sure, and Apple ignored innovation by companies like Square -- using the 3.5mm jack for data transfer. It's all about the semantics of what counts as a "big" innovation. Apple doesn't want to admit anyone else has innovated since it was founded, so it makes silly claims like the last "big innovation" in the audio jack being 50 years ago.

  102. They will last as long as your phone battery by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    They'll sell a special tethering cord for them if you need more than 5 hours. It's a slim cable that is shaped like a Y, and connects to the end of each airpod. the third end plugs into the bottom of the phone, making the whole thing powered by the iPhone. Wireless *and* infinite battery life*. I realize that this is a radical departure from normal wireless headphone usage, but that's what makes Apple such an innovator in the space.

    *life limited to the endurance of the transmirting device

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  103. "How can we make more money?" -- Tim Cook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Easy, lets take away the 3.5mm jack and replace it with a lightning adapter that is sure to snap in a few pockets! We will see so many more phones that way because we can deny them warranty over physical damage!"
    --Jonathan Ive

  104. WTF!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not courage.... It is stupidity and greed for higher profit by lowering the manufacturing cost by $.50 a unit.

  105. "Progress"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember last time when I had to use a special adapter to use my headphones... 2004, on my UIQ phone. The adoption of 3.5mm among smartphones was the progress. Yay, courage to regress!

  106. Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AirPods will begin shipping in late October and will cost $159.
     
    Gotta be out of your mind. I paid $3 for my (wired) headphones and have been using them about 6 years now (even I am surprised they have lasted that long). They still work fine, and sound good enough to me. Will probably cost me $6-$10 to replace them, with inflation and all.

  107. Proprietary Bluetooth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how do they expect people to connect their new iPhones to their car stereos or whatever else they have that uses standard Bluetooth?

  108. Ship With Adapter = Who Cares? by Jack+Kolesar · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why do people get so upset over this? The new phones come WITH a 3.5mm adapter. So who really cares? Use the adapter if you really want a stereo mini TRS. They wanted to make it smaller so they did. I really don't see the big deal. It's their choice. It cuts down on a connector. That's good engineering in my book. Buy another phone if you are really that concerned. And seriously, if Apple still had that big ass flat connector wouldn't you think it looked "ancient". Lightning cables aren't very expensive and there are plenty of third party ones out there. Bottom line, you can use a FREE adapter if you want, or you buy another phone. Stop bitching about it. This is a stupid argument.

    1. Re:Ship With Adapter = Who Cares? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      One of the problems with this notion is that using wireless phones chews up the battery in your wireless device and using the adapter cuts off any ability to charge the device while using it. In addition to this being fucking annoying, to say the least, it even has accessibility implications.

      Another issue here is that they are deciding replacing a truly ubiquitous connector that could connect seamlessly with virtually every piece of audio equipment made in the past several decades with an entirely proprietary one.... if they had opened up lightning to be a standard that anyone could freely (or cheaply) adopt and use, then while there'd be a transition phase during which it could be seen as an annoyance, in the long run this probably wouldn't be as bad either.

      While it might seem like all it should mean for most people who dislike this is that they won't be getting an iPhone 7, the reason some people are upset is because they already have an iPhone and getting a different brand of phone when their current one wears out means that one is throwing away any financial investment they have made in applications they might use on the iPhone and they will have to purchase everything again for the new platform.

    2. Re:Ship With Adapter = Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An adapter can easily be lost. An adapter prevents the phone from charging while listening to music. An adapter is not an equivalent solution, and has been shown to be consumer unfriendly many times in the past. This is why phones are not sold with 2.5mm plugs and an adapter anymore. You are correct that it is any companies choice to sell whatever they want, customers be damned, but that still doesn't mean this isn't a stupid choice.
      Discarding a universal, time-tested, common and efficient port that has billions of devices that will connect to it for a proprietary port with known flaws is not good engineering. This was a financial decision, not an engineering one. They don't currently get any money from people who buy cheap headphones, and want that to change.

      Lightning cables are far more expensive than cheap earbuds.

      Your post was neatly summarized by your last sentence.

  109. Do you really need a new one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far, the big enhancements I have heard announced are (1) no headphone jack (an inconvenience, if you ask me), and (2) a better camera. Is this a good enough reason to spend over $600 to upgrade to a new iPhone?

  110. Despite all the whinging on here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict it won't be missed by anyone except the geeky people on here. I think I've used the headphone jack about a dozen times on my iPhone 5S, preferring to opt for a bluetooth headset while running. The damn cords! I hate 'em! I say good riddance.

  111. Not coursge but spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes it so much easier for the government to spy on your machine thru the wireless connection even if you are off the internet.

  112. "Courage" by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

    They aren't wrong. They're going to get a lot of crap for this, and if they brought it on themselves knowingly but did it anyway, that does indeed take courage.

    However, I'd also imagine it takes courage to publicly be a White Supremacist these days. Those public-area preachers who call random passing women "whores" while their husbands/fathers/sons are with them are being pretty courageous too. Just because you are showing "courage" doesn't mean you doing the right thing, or that you aren't also being a total asshole.

  113. courage is one step closer to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coming out of the closet

    one day apple fans will parade in the cities in the middle of the gay parade with iphones attached to their peepees while doing the helicopter spining cock trick

    god damm it, we all KNOW its going to happen, its their DESTINY

  114. This is like the interview question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..What is your greatest weakness?

    I'm too courageous

  115. Greed Is Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Courage is for wussies.

  116. Dongle by phorm · · Score: 1

    Also, if the dongle is taking up the port, does that mean you cannot charge the phone (say with a USB battery in your pocket) while listening to music?

  117. A fine line by phorm · · Score: 1

    It sounds like they are equating courage with bravery...

    Wasn't there an expression about bravery... something about a "fine line" and "stupidity"

    hmmm...

  118. Re:Apple Fanboys by ElectricHellKnight · · Score: 1

    And of course I get modded "Troll" for that one. Great job guys, keep it up. Anyone who disagrees must be a troll.

  119. Re:Or the actual reason(s)-OT by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the addition of the short ground to add an extra pin for a microphone, the addition of short detection on the mic line to detect plug/unplug and clicking of the button, the addition of sideband data on the microphone to provide more complex controls, The advent of low-removal-force jacks that minimize damage, the advent of jacks that use the case as part of the jack to make the jack thinner....

    Incidentally, run-flat tires have existed in one form or another since the 1930s; technically, the concept predates radial tires, if not the specific modern implementation.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  120. Who cares, we are all fucked by Archons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    “In the year 22, of the third month of winter, sixth hour of the day [] among the scribes of the House of Life it was found that a strange Fiery Disk was coming in the sky. It had no head. The breath of its mouth emitted a foul odor.

              Its body was one rod in length and one rod in width. It had no voice. It came toward His Majesty’s house. Their heart became confused through it, and they fell upon their bellies. They [went] to the king, to report it. His Majesty [ordered that] the scrolls [located] in the House of Life be consulted. His Majesty meditated on all these events which were now going on.

            After several days had passed, they became more numerous in the sky than ever. They shined in the sky more than the brightness of the sun, and extended to the limits of the four supports of heaven [] Powerful was the position of the Fiery Disks.

            The army of the King looked on, with His Majesty in their midst. It was after the evening meal when the Disks ascended even higher in the sky to the south. Fish and other volatiles rained down from the sky: a marvel never before known since the foundation of the country. And His Majesty caused incense to be brought to appease the heart of Amun-Re, the god of the Two Lands. And it was [ordered] that the event [be recorded for] His Majesty in the Annals of the House of Life [to be remembered] for ever.”

  121. Antenna by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

    Most, if not all, phones use the wire for your earbuds/headphones wire as the antenna for the FM radio. Usually can't use the FM radio with bluetooth because no
      antenna wire.

    1. Re: Antenna by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      There is no significant middle tower market.

    2. Re: Antenna by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Not without a middle tower, there isn't.

      Since there is clearly such a market in the Windows and Linux realms, there's no reasonable way to assume there isn't one in the OS X realm until or unless actual marketing of a middle tower were to prove that was the (entirely exceptional) case. No pun intended. But I'm just that good. :)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  122. "courage" didn't go well for Dan Rather, either. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    hearing is still analog. I don't want that analog output removed.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  123. Single Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "[Schiller said] the company can't justify the continued use of an 'ancient' single-use port

    What makes that asshole thinks I can afford a pair of single use headphones?

  124. Re:Damn right it's courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh yes thank you apple for trying to price fix ebooks. i wish you would have gotten away with it for the sake of me and my family

  125. You really don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think Apple is greedy, then control them with your wallet. The words you type on /. will have no affect on their profit margin. Otherwise, it looks like a bunch of whiners who, if they put the shoe on the other foot, would probably also take every dollar. Admit it.

    BTW - I would say it's greed if you had no other option. However, you've got plenty of other options. You're not being forced to buy those headphones by Apple.

  126. Antenna by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    My Galaxy S7 also uses the headphone as its radio antenna (FM radio, etc.)

    Hopefully, Samsung won't follow Apple into this particular stupidity zone. However, even if they do, it'll be at least few years before I have to deal with such idiocy.

    You know, as an owner of lots of Macs, it's been painful to watch them fumble the Mac Pro and Mac Mini lines so badly, while ignoring the middle tower market completely; now the iPhone sings a little louder in this symphony of screw-ups with its latest really serious dysfunctional hardware choice...

    Be a trip if they managed to get someone to the head of the company who understood hardware better.

    Oh well. Lots of other things to do than worry about Apple these days.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  127. Re:Courage - you do realize he's a troll right? by gosand · · Score: 1

    AC signs his post as someone who "still buys desktop PCs with floppy drives"... which isn't likely and almost impossible.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  128. Hinting at another unwanted album delivery... by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

    "There's no simple explanation
    For anything important any of us do.
    And, yeah, the human tragedy consists in the necessity of living with the consequences.
    Under pressure
    Courage, my word. It didn't come. It doesn't matter."

    (Yeah that's right just buy the device and deal with it. If you're lucky enough we'll shove some Tragically Hip down your throats this time.)

    --
    120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  129. Quid Pro Quo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wondering if there's been a deal made between Big Content and Apple for better/exclusive access, if they'd just deep-six the 3.5mm jack. Look for announcements in coming months for music/video content on iTunes store.

  130. Re:Fighting for space? iPhones are getting bigger by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Welcome to 3D.

  131. Cowardly Lion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Apple Senior VP Phil Schiller is the Cowardly Lion? Or is it CEO Tim Cook?

    But +1 for Courage!

  132. Re:Damn right it's courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you're just a stupid motherfucker who's dug so deep into the Cult of Apple that if Tim Cook showed up at your doorstep and whipped out his cock you'd instantly drop to your knees and suck it purely out of instinct. The number one goal at Apple is to fuck the customer as hard as they possibly can, more so than any other company on Earth, particularly by using proprietary connectors that require their sheep to pay the Apple Tax. It's been that way since the Apple II. By removing the headphone jack, yes, they can make the phone just a cunt-hair thinner, but that was never really necessary to begin with. Waterproofing? Other phones and equipment have achieved better waterproofing without removing the jack, so that claim is bullshit too. It's just another way to milk their customers. Granted, their customers are clueless dumbfucks like you, but that doesn't excuse their unethical behavior.

    Now. You've also been astroturfing this bullshit claim that all other phone manufacturers will follow Apple and also ditch their headphone jacks. While a few companies have released such models, they aren't selling well at all and an overwhelming majority of phones sold the next 5 years from now will still have headphone jacks. Fact is, Apple does a lot of idiotic, stupid shit that no one else does. SD card slots? Nearly all Android phones still got em! Removable batteries? Yup. Overpriced, proprietary ringtones? Nope. User accessible file system? As accessible as ever. Forcing people to use the aborted fetus known as iTunes to upload media? Not in a million years. I could go on and on. And it doesn't just stop at the phone. See a one button mouse lately? Nope. Another idiotic idea from Apple that sits rightfully in their graveyard of failure.

    And, by the way, Macs for all? You'll NEVER force your fucking obsolete garbage on me. If you gave me a Mac for free, I'd smash it into little pieces with a sledgehammer and jam every single last shard directly into your asshole. But, I'm sure you'd like that, you faggot. FUCK YOU, your whore mother, loser father, and any women desperate and drunk enough to get within 20 meters of you.

  133. Space is at a premium? by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    Have you ever taken a phone apart? Most of it is battery. Will removing the headphone jack really make a significant difference in the battery life?

  134. Re:Or the actual reason(s)-OT by amorsen · · Score: 1

    F1 is a funny example. F1 tires are deliberately crap; it's part of the contract that the manufacturer isn't allowed to deliver good tires.

    If Formula 1 teams could buy any tires they want, the tires would have better grip, work over a wider range of temperatures, and there would be no tire changes during a race. But that would be boring.

    For quality tires, look at endurance racing.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  135. ONLY COST SAVINGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twasn't courage, it was cost-savings. One less mechanical object to be inside the phone.
    Soon there will be no buttons or interactions at all with the device, it will all be wireless to our brain (or so they'd hope).

  136. Jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing Jobs always hated that audio port. Therefore they had to remove it.

  137. Apple should learn from Microsoft by raxtich · · Score: 1

    Microsoft paid dearly with Windows 8 when their arrogance made them ignore all pleas and protests over their decision to remove the Start Menu and replace it with the godawful Start Screen. I think Apple is about to learn a similar lesson.

  138. Connector size not the issue it's made out to be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who has opened a phone can tell you, there's usually enough room for the connector. It's not as if the motherboard takes up the entire space in the device. Frankly, based on the hardware I've had in my LG G3/G4 (IR blasters, audio jack, usb connector, camera, laser rangefinder, etc) and Nexus 4, and the lack of equivalent hardware in the iPhone, I call BS.

  139. Easily corrected with standard OSX command line by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    Proof.

    echo Courage | tr 'aeCougr' 'ntInsia' | sed -e "s/t/ty/"

    --
    John_Chalisque
  140. I haven't see this much angst since... by boley1 · · Score: 1

    (1) ... Apple made a phone with no mechanical keyboard.

    (2) ... Apple gave up trying to get Flash to run on iPhone.

    (3) ... Microsoft killed off XP.

    (4) ... Oracle bought Sun and took over Java.

    (add your own thoughts)

  141. Re:Damn right it's courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > slightly better speakers that most people will never use anyway (because it is usually rude)

    You have clearly never ridden a NYC subway.

  142. Hasn't been changed for 50 years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is incorrect. When they made it smaller... the connector had 2 bands. Left Band, Right Band.
    Since then... they've added a 3rd Band... a Mic band. This Apple engineer should know this... the 3rd Band has been on every pair of their ear buds since they started including Vol Controlls and Mic.

    "The audio connector is more than 100 years old," Joswiak says. "It had its last big innovation about 50 years ago. You know what that was? They made it smaller. It hasn't been touched since then. It's a dinosaur. It's time to move on." [...]

  143. Re:Or the actual reason(s)-OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think they even make waterproof ones now

  144. History repeats itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't going to work. I remember when they were gonna ditch the keyboard on the Macbook for a wheel. It never caught on, so they must have abandoned it. I never saw it at the Apple store after this announcement:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA

  145. Re:Or the actual reason(s)-OT by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    "The tire is almost 200 years old. It had its last big innovation about 70 years ago (radial tires)."

    I guess you forgot about run-flat tires and the countless innovations in compound and tread design. Whereas it's not a NASCAR type thing, watch F1 to see how tires are constantly bring improved.

    Stupid argument - all those innovations you list don't prevent compatibility between 70 year old cars and new cars. The Apple "innovation" (and I use that word very loosely when talking about Apple products) does remove compatibility.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  146. Water resistance by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    One of the stated reasons for the removal of the headphone jack is to improve water resistance.
    Yet "Liquid damage not covered under warranty" (quote from the official site).

    It seems that Apple used up all its courage, there is none left to back up its claims.

  147. Similar to switching to USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was hew and cry about switching to USB and dumping legacy analog connectors for serial and parallel ports plus keyboards and mice. Those people were fools. The people making a to-do now are the same kind of fool!

  148. Re:Damn right it's courage by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Look at the sheer volume of hate Apple has received today, on Slashdot alone...

    Hey man, that's NOTHING!

    In ONE DAY, have been Punish-Modded from "Excellent" to "Positive" Karma ON MODS FROM COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE ALONE.

    And BTW, that is now the FOURTH time in my Slashdot History that that has happened when I went to bat for Apple. I've dug myself back up from "Poor" to "Excellent" three times now.

    And yet, you know what? When I get mod points, I ALMOST NEVER downvote ANYONE, and I NEVER post Anonymously.

    But I think that might change...

  149. Re:Damn right it's courage by macs4all · · Score: 1

    And, by the way, Macs for all? You'll NEVER force your fucking obsolete garbage on me. If you gave me a Mac for free, I'd smash it into little pieces with a sledgehammer and jam every single last shard directly into your asshole. But, I'm sure you'd like that, you faggot. FUCK YOU, your whore mother, loser father, and any women desperate and drunk enough to get within 20 meters of you.

    Wow. Just. Wow.

    Slashdot: THIS is why AC Posting MUST END!!!

    Seriously; is that anything even APPROACHING "rational discourse"? Does that add ANYTHING WHATSOEVER to the Conversation?

    And yet, that post is "left alone" (surprised it wasn't upmodded to "+5 Insightful"), while post after post of MINE were SYSTEMATICALLY marked either "Flamebait" or "Troll", NO MATTER WHAT.

    Slashdot's Moderation system only works if people use it REASONABLY. It has LONG SINCE jumped that particular Shark, and it is HIGH TIME FOR AC POSTING TO GO. These COWARDS would NEVER Post that INSANE SHIT if they had to "sign their name" to it. NEV-ER. Because, afterall, THEY ARE COWARDS, JUST LIKE ALL BULLIES...

  150. Translation by Reziac · · Score: 1

    "Buy our wireless headphones, which of course will be the only ones that really work well with it."

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  151. Courage = chutzpah by JonStewartMill · · Score: 1

    n/t

  152. Sheesh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    Meanwhile, I'd wager that 99 percent of the people and their fake outrage over the phone jack can't name another thing about the iPhone 7.

    Its looking like a pretty good phone. But of course, the whole outrage thing is more about the ford versus chevy arguments over Android versus iPhone. The most outraged arn't going to buy one anyhow.

    Its such a pity that there are absolutely no options that don't depend on that little phone jack.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  153. Apple Cited as "Foolhardy" for reasons by memebrain · · Score: 1

    I'll buy another 6 before a 7. This time the glass spaceship rolled snake eyes in their innovation quest. The sales will tell the story.

  154. Peace Prize is Calling Apple's Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In light of this courageous act of courage on the part of Apple, the Nobel committee isn't even considering other contenders for this year's peace prize.

    Apple, you truly are a gift to humankind.

  155. Force to Proprietary Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical for Apple. Apple has always wanted to limit customer choices to things made by Apple. That started with the Apple IIc and continues to date.
          The last time I seriously considered an IPhone was, I think, the iPhone 3. No user changeable SIM card. No SD card slot. Sorry, I'm not interested in being locked into a vanilla mediocre system with no user customization.
            Does Apple even subscribe to standard Bluetooth any more?

  156. I f'n love Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you people resisting change fo go yourself

  157. it's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it takes a lot of courage to tell your whole customer base they should go jack off.

  158. Apple by potailinc · · Score: 1

    Real courage would've been changing the iPhone connector to USB-C.