Slashdot Mirror


How Cities Are Using Dry Ice To Kill Rats (usatoday.com)

Some of the United States' biggest cities have resorted to using dry ice to kill rats. Since dry ice (frozen carbon dioxide) turns into a gas, sanitation officials simply need to drop chunks of it into rat infested burrows and let science do the rest. Longtime Slashdot reader mi writes: USA Today reports: "Earlier this week, USA TODAY observed Chicago sanitation department workers at one of the city's oldest parks scoop chunks of smoking dry ice into a burrow before quickly covering the entry and exit holes with dirt and newspaper to stop any rats from escaping as the -109.3-degree Fahrenheit gas dissipated. Sanitation workers say they treat burrows during morning hours, when rats are less active and most likely to be huddled inside the burrows. The asphyxiated dead rats then decompose in place and out-of-sight of city denizens who count the disease-carrying vermin among the vilest of indignities of urban living. 'We are seeing 60% fewer burrows in areas where we are using the dry ice,' said Charles Williams, Chicago's streets and sanitation commissioner. 'It's more environmentally friendly, and it's very humane on the rodents as well.'" Humane or not, what is so especially "undignified" about rats? What makes them worse, than, for example, cats, deer or wild horses?

429 comments

  1. Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Asphyxiation via C02 is an absolutely HORRIBLE way to die, regardless of the creature. There's a reason Carbogen (C02/Oxygen mix) is used to induce anxiety to test out anxiolytics. I mean I get that they need to solve the infestation problem but can't we choose a method that isn't also a completely inhumane method?

    1. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      who fuckin cares. They're rats.

    2. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well they tried C4 and the neighbors bitched about the noise. you just can't make anyone happy these days.

    3. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually asphyxiation by breathing near pure CO2 isn't bad. It's remarkably swift. It's the non-pure-C02 situation where there's still enough O2 to sustain life that's bad.

      I'm not sure why they are using dry ice rather than just a tank of compressed CO2. Or pure N2 for that matter, which eliminates the stress response entirely, and it's pissingly cheap, too.

    4. Re: Not a nice way to die by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's Chicago. How much more damage can some C4 do?

      It's like a tornado sweeping through and doing $10 million of improvements.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? They're rats.

    6. Re:Not a nice way to die by PvtVoid · · Score: 2

      Asphyxiation via C02 is an absolutely HORRIBLE way to die, regardless of the creature. There's a reason Carbogen (C02/Oxygen mix) is used to induce anxiety to test out anxiolytics. I mean I get that they need to solve the infestation problem but can't we choose a method that isn't also a completely inhumane method?

      Not only that, but have you ever stuck your nose into a pure CO2 environment? It burns, because of the carbonic acid formed when the CO2 hits your mucus membranes. It would be a truly nasty way to die.

      But, yeah, they're rats.

    7. Re: Not a nice way to die by PvtVoid · · Score: 1

      Well they tried C4 and the neighbors bitched about the noise. you just can't make anyone happy these days.

      OB: Caddyshack

    8. Re:Not a nice way to die by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But, yeah, they're rats.

      The normal way is to make them eat a lot of warfarin until internal bleeding kills them.

      If you want to kill stuff than is not neatly lined up in the stockyards it's generally going to be messy and horrible.

    9. Re:Not a nice way to die by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We better hope we don't encounter aliens that feel the same way about us and see us as pests on "their" new planet.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    10. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen people shove lit highway flares down gopher holes. I'll bet it works faster than C02.

    11. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      A gas tank with pumps, motors and hose pipes would make a hissing noise and ground vibrations which would alert the rats. Throwing a lump of CO2 down will fill a volume of air 1000x that of the solid lump as well as sound more natural.

    12. Re:Not a nice way to die by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      We routinely kill pigs using CO2 as well. (I guess nitrogen is too expensive.)

    13. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yeah, cuz as we all know rats can't suffer horrible pain

      Right, but who cares, THEY ARE RATS!

    14. Re:Not a nice way to die by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If technologically superior aliens come here wanting earth (or whatever), I don't particularly care about how humane their human-extermination methods are. I'm more concerned about if our alien-extermination methods are effective enough to stop them, and perhaps whether or not our methods of alien-extermination are MORE effective than their methods of human-extermination.

    15. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Asphyxiation via C02 is an absolutely HORRIBLE way to die, regardless of the creature. There's a reason Carbogen (C02/Oxygen mix) is used to induce anxiety to test out anxiolytics. I mean I get that they need to solve the infestation problem but can't we choose a method that isn't also a completely inhumane method?

      Until you have to live with them. At first you try to be humane and then they just keep coming back in greater numbers. They chew through cables and destroy houses. It won't be a horrible way for the rats to die either compared to some of the other methods used. Rat intelligence also means that those humane methods are often, easily, bypassed by the rat.

      Personally, I found they also have some sort of affect on my psyche and make you feel really down - if you are close proximity to them and you don't know. After spending a little time with rats you rapidly loose patience with trying to be humane and are just desperate to get rid of them any way you can.

      As for why they are different to any other animal, when they are in your house they attract fleas which bite the rats and you - that attracts disease to you, the smell of the piss leaves you a permanent state of nausea and their droppings are also full of disease - all of which accumulate. The other animals don't pose a significant human health problem in greater numbers the way rats do.

    16. Re:Not a nice way to die by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      If you want to kill stuff than is not neatly lined up in the stockyards it's generally going to be messy and horrible.

      And even if it is, it doesn't exactly measure up to your appendectomy.

    17. Re:Not a nice way to die by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually asphyxiation by breathing near pure CO2 isn't bad. It's remarkably swift.

      Likely better than thallium or anticoagulants like warfarin. There isn't a perfect way to kill rats, but this seems like an improvement.

      I'm not sure why they are using dry ice rather than just a tank of compressed CO2.

      Likely because the dry ice is cheaper, easier, and more effective. It also requires less equipment and training.

      Or pure N2 for that matter

      N2 is lighter than air, and you need enough of it to completely displace the air. CO2 is dense, and even denser when it is at -109F, so it will flow into the burrows. It is toxic at about 7%.

      which eliminates the stress response entirely

      I doubt if most people with a rat infestation consider this to be a critical criteria.

    18. Re:Not a nice way to die by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We better hope we don't encounter aliens that feel the same way about us and see us as pests on "their" new planet.

      What is your point? That aliens will treat us better if we are nice to rats?

      Real life is not like Star Trek.

    19. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lemme see...
      The leave trails of urine and shit everywhere they go
      They have historically carried plague, which wiped out a significant portion of the human race
      They have wiped out hundreds of native species as they arrived along with cargo ships
      And... they just plain suck

      So yeah, kill them and I really do not care how humane you happen to think that it is

    20. Re:Not a nice way to die by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, You are 100% correct. That is the most sane way to think of it. Tip of my hat to you!

    21. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I'm with you, don't give two shits about rats. Good riddance.

      Anyone who wants to defend the rats, then surely must feel the same about roaches, so lets just fill their houses with roaches and rats and we'll call it the roach and rat reserve.

    22. Re:Not a nice way to die by blue+trane · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Rats are sensitive, curious, intelligent. Rats are our ancestors. The real problem in cities is the stupid fucking humans. Here's hoping an asteroid wipes out all the humans and rats survive us as they did the dinosaurs.

    23. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Nitrogen is WAY more humane.

      I once had groundhogs in my garden. Dumped a quart of ammonia down the hole and covered it. Excess ammonia became fertilizer (so did the groundhog).

    24. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them live in your house then. Diseases and all.

    25. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on now. We're not Detroit!

    26. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Why are you waiting?

    27. Re:Not a nice way to die by AaronW · · Score: 1

      After having dealt with rats in my attic, CO2 is a better alternative than the baits, which can poison other animals and make the rats bleed to death internally.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    28. Re:Not a nice way to die by sjames · · Score: 1

      OP wasn't suggesting not killing them, just finding a nicer effective way to do it. For example, pour liquid nitrogen down the hole instead. Similar all around except that excess N2 causes an easy death starting with a dreamlike state rather than a sensation of suffocating and burning like CO2 does.

    29. Re:Not a nice way to die by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Only if the aliens are giant rats instead of giant cats.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    30. Re:Not a nice way to die by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Nope, the moment you get rid of humans the tasty refuse rats thrive on in cities stops coming.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    31. Re:Not a nice way to die by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Although it's an old technology, older than the 3.5 mm audio jack even, the ordinary mousetrap is humane, effective, reusable, and available in multiple sizes. They kill instantly; you'll never find a mousetrap with a live rodent wiggling around in it.

      The glue boards, on the other hand, are pretty gross. The rat sticks to them and then you toss the thing into the trash, which always struck me as somewhat psycho. Sometimes people buy them without it dawning on them they're going to end up throwing a live mammal into the garbage. I knew one guy who came across a starving mouse wiggling in the glue, was overcome by an unexpected burst of empathy, and spent the next half hour making a mess outside with rubbing alcohol trying to pry it off without tearing any limbs.

    32. Re:Not a nice way to die by irving47 · · Score: 1

      They will be. We'll have practiced on non-lab rats.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    33. Re: Not a nice way to die by Lenny369 · · Score: 0

      CO2 is toxic? No. You're talking MONOXIDE. CO2 only deprives the air of usual ratio of oxygen, and is not notice in itself. Moron

    34. Re: Not a nice way to die by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      CO2 is toxic?

      Yes. CO2 forms carbonic acid when it is dissolved in water, and acidifies the blood to lethal levels when above about 7%. With conditioning you can tolerate slightly higher levels.

      No. You're talking MONOXIDE.

      CO is much more toxic than CO2, but either can kill you.

      CO2 only deprives the air of usual ratio of oxygen, and is not notice in itself.

      No. This is wrong. If you add 7% CO2, you still have about 18% O2, which is more than enough for a healthy person. It is the CO2 that kills you, not the absence of oxygen.

    35. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      lets just fill their houses with roaches and rats and we'll call it the roach and rat reserve.

      I'd call it congress...

    36. Re:Not a nice way to die by Beeftopia · · Score: 5, Informative

      Asphyxiation via C02 is an absolutely HORRIBLE way to die, regardless of the creature. There's a reason Carbogen (C02/Oxygen mix) is used to induce anxiety to test out anxiolytics. I mean I get that they need to solve the infestation problem but can't we choose a method that isn't also a completely inhumane method?

      This is just not true. Low concentrations of CO2 can cause distress. High concentrations are fast and painless.

      There have been lake and volcanic outgassing events which release massive amounts of CO2 and it kills people and animals where they stand, in seconds.

      See the Lake Nyos incident to see how CO2 kills.

      And here's the final report on the incident from the USGS (PDF): "In this incident, asphyxia resulted from the displacement of normal atmosphere (approximately 21 percent oxygen) by a cloud of carbon dioxide gas. Under such circumstances, victims will literally "drop in their tracks" after taking a few breaths and experience no feeling of suffocation. The actual mechanism of death is believed to be a paralysis of the respiratory centers in the brain by very high concentrations of carbon dioxide. Lethal levels of carbon dioxide are in the range of 8 to 10 percent (Sittig, 1985)." - pp. 18-19

      Also: "Additionally, many victims were found in their beds still covered by bed clothing. Victims found outside appeared to have collapsed suddenly without substantial movement. Animals were described as "dead in their tracks" in herds rather than dispersed." - page 17

      An accepted humane way to kill lab animals is with high concentrations of CO2. The key is "high concentrations."

      This concept, of dry ice generating carbon dioxide which flows down into holes at high concentrations, is actually brilliant and humane.

    37. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any aliens capable of crossing interstellar distances are almost certainly quite capable of exterminating humanity without getting anywhere near close enough for us to strike back. Heck, just lob a few largish asteroids at our major cities and wait for a year or two for the resulting "nuclear" winter and general chaos to starve most of the population, and probably cause the near total collapse of civilization in the process. The survivors would then be in no position to fight the hordes of von-neuman kill-bots that had been replicating while they waited.

      And that's assuming technology scarcely more advanced than what we already have. Given the age of the galaxy, any aliens we encounter here are as likely to be thousands or millions of years more advanced than us.

      The entire "humanity overthrowing alien conquest" meme is a storyteller's fantasy with no rational basis in reality.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    38. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 1

      You do realize rats thrive in the wild too, right? Only a few species have specialized to cohabit with humans.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    39. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >They kill instantly; you'll never find a mousetrap with a live rodent wiggling around in it.

      Bullshit. I've had many a mousetrap go off when I was nearby, that left the mouse screaming for several minutes before it died. Yes, my squeamishness exceeds my compassion, and I failed to finish them off more promptly by other means. Not my proudest self-realization.

      Totally agree about the glue traps though, those things are just evil. If you're going to murder something, you should at least aim for doing so humanely.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    40. Re:Not a nice way to die by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      We better hope we don't encounter aliens that feel the same way about us and see us as pests on "their" new planet.

      If they're trying to exterminate us, whether their methods are "humane" or not isn't something I'll be too concerned with. Extermination is extermination and dead is dead. As someone else pointed out, my *only* concern will be whether or not we can stop them.

      If not, does it really matter whether you die in some horribly awful way or painlessly?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    41. Re:Not a nice way to die by Strider- · · Score: 1

      the ordinary mousetrap is humane, effective, reusable, and available in multiple sizes. They kill instantly; you'll never find a mousetrap with a live rodent wiggling around in it.

      Not true, in my years of dealing with mice out at the cabin, I've managed to trap one mouse in two traps (it got it's rear end caught in one, and head in the other), and have found more than one trap where the mouse was maimed, but still alive (usually when they trip it with their rear ends).

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    42. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does, given the choice any rational person excusing masochists would prefer the painless death... you twit.

    43. Re:Not a nice way to die by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously, you've never used a MacBook in defense of your home planet.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    44. Re:Not a nice way to die by Boronx · · Score: 1

      You have to use a trap that particular mouse is not familiar with.

    45. Re:Not a nice way to die by c-A-d · · Score: 1

      > They have historically carried plague, which wiped out a significant portion of the human race

      Ehhhh, I'm not seeing a problem here.

      --
      some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
    46. Re:Not a nice way to die by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I've had many a mousetrap go off when I was nearby, that left the mouse screaming for several minutes before it died. Yes, my squeamishness exceeds my compassion, and I failed to finish them off more promptly by other means. Not my proudest self-realization.

      Likewise, I've often had to finish what the trap started, usually by breaking their necks. Not fun, but I can't leave the little beggars suffering like that. My experience is that about a quarter are clean instant kills, half get their neck broken and die within a few seconds, and the remaining 25% require intervention. The worst one was when the mouse tripped it, and it took his snout off.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    47. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP wasn't suggesting not killing them, just finding a nicer effective way to do it.

      It would probably pose more danger to people using large volumes of N2 to kill rats. A cold burn from dry ice is bad enough.

      Rats have been with us a long time. It would probably make a more humane death if we started to design or structures with rats in mind - maybe there is a way to make them useful by controlling them - or making it easier to kill them humanely.

      I'm all for killing rats humanely, however this is a public health issue and there is no way around it. If we can't kill them humanely, then efficiently is the next best option.

    48. Re:Not a nice way to die by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Err no. You pretty much pass out instantly and that's it. It's amazing at displacing oxygen.

    49. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They kill instantly; you'll never find a mousetrap with a live rodent wiggling around in it.

      I have, but a block of wood and a newspaper are excellent in that situation.

      The glue boards, on the other hand, are pretty gross.

      I've never used them until now on a current rat infection - thanks for the tip. I suspect that the newspaper and block of wood will be required.

    50. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to use a trap that particular mouse is not familiar with.

      Exactly - and more. They're an extremely intelligent and adaptable adversary. Anyone who has had to deal with them will realise it is hard enough to kill them - let alone do it humanely - even when you would prefer to do so.

    51. Re:Not a nice way to die by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      But the corpses ...

    52. Re:Not a nice way to die by Hylandr · · Score: 0

      just lob a few largish asteroids at our major cities and wait for a year or two

      That's the one sure thing to guarantee our survival. Get rid of all the armchair generals that insist that we combat the enemy according to the Geneva convention and take prisoners etc.

      Fuck all that. War is total. Without most city dwellers the people that are doing the heavy lifting in the fields and the mines will get the job done. As usual.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    53. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Why don't we do executions this way?

    54. Re:Not a nice way to die by Visarga · · Score: 1

      > We better hope we don't encounter aliens that feel the same way about us and see us as pests on "their" new planet.

      We'll probably not encounter aliens soon, but the probability of developing AGI is much higher. I hope it sees us as cute pets, not rats.

    55. Re:Not a nice way to die by Chas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Honestly, dry ice is probably a LOT more humane than rat poison.

      The whole reason rat poison functions is because rats don't have a gag reflex. Once they "acquire" something by eating it, the only way to get rid of it is via full digestion and pooping it out.
      So they can't puke up rat poison. This gives the toxin plenty of time to kill the rat, especially with their high burning metabolism.

      Dry ice evaporates into CO2 and knocks the rats out. Then, as the CO2 levels climb, kills them.

      If you've ever seen the "Crazy Russian Hacker" video where he builds a work bucket-based "air conditioner" and uses dry ice instead of regular ice? DUMB.

      This explains it in excruciating detail. https://youtu.be/YIgV2Q8Leh0

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    56. Re:Not a nice way to die by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Wiping out humans that way would be the simplest, but it would also do a lot of damage to the ecosystems. If you've gone to all the trouble of travelling interstellar, you probably do so because there's a really sweet planet here ready for exploration or colonisation.

      Just land their scout ship in the middle of nowhere, abduct some redneck farmers to take blood and tissue samples, figure out earth-biology and go bio-warfare. Concoct some really nasty viruses, distribute, and keep the viruses coming. Then kill-bot anyone who was isolated enough to survive that. Keep a few alive for the zoo.

      The 'humanity overthrowing alien conquest' story does give humans one advantage: Logistics. Humans have a whole resource collection and manufacturing base. Alien invaders have only what they can bring with them. If they aren't willing to bring out the WMDs, they might eventually lose through attrition, especially if they make a mistake in preparation. See the Worldwar stories for an example: Alien invaders send a scout ship to earth and discover knights riding into battle on horseback, and fit their invasion fleet accordingly. But the aliens are a very conservative species, and their history of technological advance is very slow - they do not believe that much can change in only three hundred years, the time it takes to ready and send an invasion fleet. When their fleet arrives in the middle of World War Two, they are not equipped to fight against an enemy with a manufacturing base and eventually have to surrender just because they run out of ammunition and fighting vehicles. They didn't even bring nuclear weapons, thinking such things wouldn't be needed.

    57. Re:Not a nice way to die by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      The first Murinae fossils are from 14 million years ago. The only dinosaurs they survived are the ones with sharp beaks and a lot of feathers.

    58. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the hissing noise can be 40 meters away. it wouldn't need pumps.

      however, dry ice is remarkably "compressed" as if it were when it is solid and easy to handle. liquid nitrogen is much more dangerous. transferring it as a gas would take much more space.

    59. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is an absolutely stupid premise, even if they had slow technological progress who would try to match their opponents level?

      Sorry guys, we projected them to be in the industrial age but they got stuck in the feudal era, guess we will have to wait.

      If you can travel between solar systems and your opponent is able to put stuff in orbit of their planet and sometimes get stuff around their solar system you will be able to wipe the floor with them.

      Brute force planetary bombardment.
      Solar heating.
      Solar shade.
      Biological weapons seeded in high atmosphere.
      Nanobots.
      EMP pulse.
      Subvert the political process to get the worst leaders elected.

    60. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glue traps are effective. You can also kill the rat instantly with a pellet gun or other device once it is stuck, instead of just throwing it away in the trash to die.

    61. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Me neither, assuming they start with you and your family this time.

    62. Re: Not a nice way to die by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Compared to death by burning it's not bad.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    63. Re:Not a nice way to die by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Why don't we do executions this way?

      Doesn't look as satisfying for the spectators I guess. Remember the entire idea of the death penalty is not justice, but revenge and thus the feeling of satisfacting in the audience watching.

    64. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There was one company that used a modified drain cleaning truck to extract gophers. The high pressure hose would create a strong negative pressure that sucked all the gophers out into a padded cage.

      In China they would put food trays out beside drain pipes on the top floor of an apartment block and then grease the pipes. The rats would smell the food, climb the pipes, eat the food, become heavy, try and climb down, then fall off.

    65. Re:Not a nice way to die by phayes · · Score: 1

      Not as densely as they do in cities. and cities sans humans would naturally produce very little food. There would be a rat genocide. Not a total rat genocide but genocide still.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    66. Re: Not a nice way to die by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      The last option is already succeeding very well.

    67. Re: Not a nice way to die by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah the little shits will hit you with a frying pan first chance they get

    68. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liquid Nitrogen is mostly waste when were producing other gasses and compress air and distill it in different temps so we get gasses separated.

    69. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember asking my mother this very question as a small-ish child (6 or 7, I think) while she was watching some detective show on TV. She couldn't answer and now I think about it, looked faintly disturbed. Didn't turn me over to a shrink though. Innocent times.

    70. Re:Not a nice way to die by phayes · · Score: 1

      A bucket or even a dish of water is sufficient to end it quickly which is better than letting them suffer if you hear that. If killing them isn't your objective, you should be using live traps. I trapped & skinned muskrats to earn gas money as a teenager. Killing rats by drowning them doesn't bother me.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    71. Re:Not a nice way to die by phayes · · Score: 1

      Says you (I hear an axe grinding).

      As some say that CO2 poisoning is painful there is no consensus that it is not cruel and inhumane.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    72. Re:Not a nice way to die by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They do bring nuclear weapons. Right at the start they use one to fry all the Tosevites' transistors ... except they're still using valves.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    73. Re: Not a nice way to die by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      It gets worse. Any species smart enough to cross interstellar distance is a species that can propel an object to very close to C. At that speed you don't need a weapon , you just point your rocket at earth and let insane amounts of kinetic energy turn it into a molten hellworld.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    74. Re: Not a nice way to die by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      even if they had slow technological progress who would try to match their opponents level?

      They don't, and I don't know why you think that. They're still far more advanced - just not very numerous.

      It wasn't the first time they'd done it, and it had always worked before.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    75. Re:Not a nice way to die by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      just lob a few largish asteroids at our major cities and wait for a year or two

      That's the one sure thing to guarantee our survival. Get rid of all the armchair generals that insist that we combat the enemy according to the Geneva convention and take prisoners etc.

      +5 I think he's actually serious....hilarious. All hail the pitchfork wielding hordes defending freedom everywhere!

      ....the people that are doing the heavy lifting in the fields and the mines will get the job done. As usual.

      It's probably because they're unburdened by all that knowledge of, you know, actual history.

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    76. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of N2, not CO2. Air consists of a mixture of gasses, and CO2 is the one that you perceive most strongly. In fact, the entire sensation of "needing to breath" that drives involuntary respiration is caused by the fact that even a fairly small concentration of CO2 in the lungs reacts with the water there to form H2CO3 (carbonic acid) which your lungs can't tolerate, forcing you to breath to clear it.

    77. Re: Not a nice way to die by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      However (if I recall correctly), CO_2 (and CO) is heavier than O_2, so it displaces the O_2 and causes oxygen deprivation for oxygen-breathers in suitably low positions in suitably enclosed spaces.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    78. Re:Not a nice way to die by RPGonAS400 · · Score: 1

      I had a house where I had to take off a metal return vent cover in order to put a temporary cupboard base in. I put a mouse trap near it and a mouse got caught by just one arm and fell into the long metal return duct. It kept flipping around in there making an awful racket! I had to take the end cap off the duct and reach in about 15 feet with kids toys hooked together (I had to put them together in pieces since the end cap was near a wall) to pull out this mouse & trap. It took quite a while and the entire time it was like someone banging on the duct work all through the house.

    79. Re:Not a nice way to die by c · · Score: 1

      ... the ordinary mousetrap is humane, effective, reusable, and available in multiple sizes. They kill instantly; you'll never find a mousetrap with a live rodent wiggling around in it.

      Just don't try to use mouse traps on rats. In my last house I discovered we had rats when the mouse traps started to disappear. I had to anchor the things and then add some rat traps.

      It would've saved a lot of grief if I could have allowed my cats into the basement of that place.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    80. Re:Not a nice way to die by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they use to have a lot more ports. Let's hope the aliens use USB-C or Apple makes the right adaptor.

    81. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh...ammonia is not the same as nitrogen. Ammonia is just as bad a way to go as CO2, maybe even worse. Unless I missed some sarcasm.

    82. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire "humanity overthrowing alien conquest" meme is a storyteller's fantasy with no rational basis in reality.

      The entire "alien conquest" meme is as well.

    83. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it's an old technology, older than the 3.5 mm audio jack even, the ordinary mousetrap is humane, effective, reusable, and available in multiple sizes. They kill instantly; you'll never find a mousetrap with a live rodent wiggling around in it.

      Mousetraps are horrible if you catch the wrong kind of animals. I have had a hedgehog being trapped in a trap, which catches rats alive. I could just open the trap and get the hedgehog out unharmed. The pest exterminator gave me a gigantic rant about catching a rat alive though since that would be inhumane. Apparently it would be better to kill the endangered hedgehog. The choice for not using a deadly trap was precisely because of the hedgehogs in the area.

      Besides a normal mousetrap isn't strong enough. Rats can survive them. You need a much stronger one called a rat trap. Even then death isn't instant and I have seen one being trapped, then run off with the trap on the head and getting stuck because the trap was too big to get through the hole in the wall. It was dead when I found it, but it had run to the other end of the room, which clearly indicates that it was alive for a while.

    84. Re:Not a nice way to die by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      Really, the only thing I like about cats is that they kill rats. I can't think of any other reason to keep one.

    85. Re: Not a nice way to die by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Not yet.

    86. Re:Not a nice way to die by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      I remember taking a rat stuck to a glue trap outside and putting it in the field behind my shed. I figured something could eat it so why not. The next morning when I walked out there I saw shredded pieces of trap everywhere with cat fur stuck on it. Man, I wished I had set up a camera to video tape that. I imagine it was hysterical.

    87. Re:Not a nice way to die by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      A very informative video here.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    88. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for saying this. Glue boards typically catch mice, which are much less worrisome as a disease vector and an agent of destruction.

      I work in food service, so pest management is part of the job. Coming into the shop in the morning and hearing these squeaks from behind tables and shelves is just heart-wrenching. The animals will wriggle and pull until they literally tear their own limbs off trying to get free. Can you imagine being in any similar situation?

      Euthanizing small rodents was never mentioned when I went to school for being a chef, who knew?

      Anyhow - don't use alcohol on glue traps. Use oil, but try not to cover the whole animal as they'll likely die from the cold if you saturate them. Throw the trap in a bucket with some tongs, put a little bit of oil on the bottom and wiggle it a little. They'll be able to get free in a minute or two without doing any damage.

      I used to tag these little fuckers with spraypaint before putting them outside in the bushes (with a handful of my breakfast trailmix). Only once did I see a little red-assed mouse a second time. Strangely, it seemed like the catch and release thing that I was doing led to less mice getting into the shop. We joked that they would go and tell the others what the strange giant did.

    89. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the rats we're talking about are among those few specialized species.

    90. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 1

      The cities are just convenient targets to destroy major infrastructure and organization hubs as long as you're already throwing rocks. It's the nuclear winter that's the real threat - a few years without a growing season will starve out pretty much everything else on Earth. Not much call for farm workers if there's no sun to grow crops.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    91. Re:Not a nice way to die by sjames · · Score: 1

      Dry ice sticks to exposed skin, liquid N2 bounces off from the leidenfrost effect.

    92. Re: Not a nice way to die by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      It gets a little better, though -- any species with resources to cross interstellar distances probably has better things to do than gratuitously turn a small-but-biologically active planet into (yet another) molten hellworld.

      If the aliens are stopping by to refuel, they'll probably head to Jupiter or some other larger planet with more raw materials.

      If they're here as scientists, collectors, or tourists, they'll probably want to leave Earth more or less as it is (modulo some sample collecting), since it wouldn't make much sense to destroy the things they came to look at.

      If they're here for the delicious human-steaks they heard about on the Intergalactic Home Shopping Channel, they're doing it wrong -- rather than traveling light years to round people up, it's much quicker and cheaper to just download the recipe and assemble the ideal human-steak locally in their in-home matter assemblers.

      If they're here for other inscrutable alien reasons, they may not bother with Earth at all, or even notice that there is anything unusual or interesting about it.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    93. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 1

      If you're engaging in biowarfare with a completely alien ecosystem, there's probably a fair chance you'll wipe out the ecosystem anyway. And probably that's your plan - who wants a bunch of inedible, potentially toxic life clogging up your planet with incompatible amino acids and proteins?

      As for logistics - since we're not a space-faring species yet, most of the resources of the solar system are readily available for invaders to use - release the von neuman(self replicating) autofactories in the asteroid belt and you'll have more infrastructure than you know what to do with in very short order.

      As for not bringing nuclear weapons, why would they bother? They have far more destructive and less messy weapons at their fingertips in the form of rocks dropped from orbit.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    94. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    95. Re:Not a nice way to die by v1 · · Score: 1

      Most of the time they basically just stop the rodent and it starves or dehydrates (or you throw it in the garvage can, buried alive)

      But then there's the few that, while squirming around, have their nose come in contact with the glue. Then it's over pretty quick.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    96. Re:Not a nice way to die by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Any culture advanced enough to conquer a planet of people will have the technology and maturity to understand that dust isn't an issue.

      If we lose we can hope our new overlords will allow us to live. If not, it won't matter.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    97. Re:Not a nice way to die by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Wiping out humans that way would be the simplest, but it would also do a lot of damage to the ecosystems.

      Is that a problem if you're intending to install your own, with the chemistry the right way round?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    98. Re:Not a nice way to die by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      I see you assume anyone not living in a city as being ignorant or stupid. Not true.

      There's skills learned in the woods and fields that lend themselves very well to combat. Like knowing how to shoot and *hit* your target. It's not just point and pull like in the movies. We won WWII because of these farm-boys.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    99. Re:Not a nice way to die by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 1

      I see you assume anyone not living in a city as being ignorant or stupid. Not true.

      The only one making assumptions here is you. Stupid generalisations are just that; stupid.

      There's skills learned in the woods and fields that lend themselves very well to combat. Like knowing how to shoot and *hit* your target. It's not just point and pull like in the movies. We won WWII because of these farm-boys.

      Right, that and old Caleb rustling up some radar and an atomic bomb or two in the back yard.

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    100. Re:Not a nice way to die by HBI · · Score: 1

      I recommend using a cat. They are also intelligent and adaptable...

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    101. Re:Not a nice way to die by HBI · · Score: 0

      The reason why they don't care about how unborn humans die is that they already know they are pieces of shit for killing off a baby. "Humane" methods of doing it wouldn't make them feel any better.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    102. Re:Not a nice way to die by bidule · · Score: 1

      Not really. If there's only 10 invaders, theirs could be a million times more effective and not do a dent on world population.

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    103. Re: Not a nice way to die by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      However (if I recall correctly), CO_2 (and CO) is heavier than O_2

      No. CO is lighter than O2. Here is the math: (12 + 16) < (16 + 16). CO2 is, of course, heavier than O2: (12 + 12 + 16) > (16 + 16).

      so it displaces the O_2 and causes oxygen deprivation for oxygen-breathers in suitably low positions in suitably enclosed spaces.

      No. This is wrong. Either CO or CO2 will kill you long before they displace enough O2 to matter.

    104. Re:Not a nice way to die by fox171171 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the folks that say the CO2 increase is not human caused are correct after all. Aliens are getting rid of us by pumping CO2 into our atmosphere. ;p

    105. Re:Not a nice way to die by swalve · · Score: 0

      You are right. Imprison those murdering women who have miscarriages!

    106. Re:Not a nice way to die by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Doesn't look as satisfying for the spectators I guess. Remember the entire idea of the death penalty is not justice, but revenge and thus the feeling of satisfacting in the audience watching.

      No, that's bullshit. Current society cannot tolerate violent deaths, which is why they stopped hanging, shooting, the electric chair, and the gas chamber, and instead went to injections that knock the condemned unconscious and then poison them.

    107. Re:Not a nice way to die by Alypius · · Score: 2

      Aliens just need to have a headphone jack to thwart Apple.

    108. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Make rat sized cage with iron mesh, open in one side
      2) Place insulated wire sticking inside, with a piece of bread in it
      3) Attach 400v transformer to cage and wire
      4) ???
      5) Profit

    109. Re:Not a nice way to die by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Liquid Nitrogen might work as well, and would have better penetration ability, but it might be a bit harder to apply.

      My suspicion is that CO2 poisoning isn't that horrible. Submarine crews during WWI and WWII frequently had to live in high CO2 concentrations, and while they were frequently fearful, their fear was usually of depth-charges...which was quite reasonable. I never heard reports that the CO2 itself was horrible, though it certainly wasn't described as pleasant. Headaches, etc. during the experience, e.g.

      OTOH, liquid Nitrogen would probably induce hypo-oxygenation, which is commonly described as some sort of rapture.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    110. Re:Not a nice way to die by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Warfarin is painless. What warfarin dies is cause your blood refuse to coagulate, so you are likely to bleed to death from even small scratches. People are often prescribed it for tachycardia to keep their blood from clotting, but they use carefully controlled amounts and they still bruise easily and must be wary of cuts.

      Warfarin is also quite bitter, but rats don't taste bitter, so that's not a problem. The problem is that it's been used for so long that some rats are starting to become resistant to it, and they'll often die in inconvenient places.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    111. Re:Not a nice way to die by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Bleeding to death internally isn't a problem. It's effective and not painful. Your objection about it being passed on to other animals that eat the dead rats if much more valid. But dead rats stink terribly after awhile, and CO2 is heavier than air, so I don't think it's a good solution for your attic.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    112. Re:Not a nice way to die by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That's not an approach if being humane is your goal. But some cats are quite efficient.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    113. Re:Not a nice way to die by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention there's literally no reason for "them" to conquer Earth. Pretty much everything any conquering species in scifi has wanted already exists outside our gravity well in easy to acquire form for an interstellar travelling race. Independence Day they wanted resources and minerals, there's way more of that in the asteroid belt than you'll ever round up on Earth. ID2 they wanted "heat from the core of Earth"? What the hell man? You guys somehow miss the massive nuclear furnace in the center of the star system? Old school V lizards wanted water and food? Go round up a couple of nice sized comets and if us lowly humans can figure out cloning I'm pretty sure they can too.

    114. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We won WWII because of those Russian farm-boys.

      Ftfy, though they probably hunted with matchlocks.

    115. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cats kill mice. You must be thinking of dogs.

    116. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have historically carried plague, which wiped out a significant portion of the human race.

      More precisely, they carried fleas which carried plague bacteria. And humans carried rats to Europe. And airplanes carried people carrying SARS, Zika, etc. Should we track down and asphyxiate pilots? Those bastards sure have it coming.

    117. Re: Not a nice way to die by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I've seen my neighbor's half feral cat kill some pretty big mice.

    118. Re:Not a nice way to die by A+Pressbutton · · Score: 1

      I have always wondered why aliens capable of crossing interstellar distances would be interested in living on planets.

      I am sure they are nice to visit for a holiday or something like that..

      But what civilised person would really choose to live at the bottom of a gravity well?

    119. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They have wiped out hundreds of native species as they arrived along with cargo ships
      And... they just plain suck"

      Are we talking about humans, or rats?

    120. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From personal experience dogs are better ratters than cats, but cats are better for smaller pest rodents like mice, shrews and moles.

    121. Re:Not a nice way to die by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Heck, just lob a few largish asteroids at our major cities and wait for a year or two for the resulting "nuclear" winter and general chaos to starve most of the population, and probably cause the near total collapse of civilization in the process.

      Or perhaps raise the temperature on the planet. Maybe aliens like a warmer planet. I mean, did any of these "Anthropogenic Global Warming" people ever check to see if it wasn't being caused by aliens?

      Just sayin'...

      (And, yes, I'm being facetious.)

    122. Re:Not a nice way to die by HBI · · Score: 1

      True, they like to play their prey to death.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    123. Re: Not a nice way to die by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      This issue was addressed. Due to their natural conservative (by our standards) ways, their culture and technology always had advanced with extreme slowness. It took them hundreds of years to go from first powered aircraft to first pilot in orbit. They'd invaded two planets in the past with a similar slow pace. Once they get to meet humans - all they had before was video from an unmanned scout ship - they quickly discover that humans are, by their standards, reckless to the point of insanity. They just can't imagine that any sane species could ever, say, introduce mechanised vehicles without first spending decades in testing, refinement and political debate and academic consideration of the long-term impact.

      They didn't bring superweapons because they just didn't feel the need. They thought it would be a simple, routine invasion: Drop bombs, kill a few kings, and the puny humans will bow before the display of force.

    124. Re:Not a nice way to die by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That toxic life can also stabilise the climate and maintain a usable oxygen level in the atmosphere. Even if you're planning biosphere replacement, you don't want to just wipe everything out - it'll have to be a slow transition process, managed over centuries.

    125. Re:Not a nice way to die by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I forgot about that one. Well, they don't bring many nuclear weapons. Or combat aircraft, or tanks, or even simple things like bullets. Interstellar shipping is expensive.

      It was a botched invasion, but the aim was always occupation rather than extermination, and they did have only very limited intel from an unmanned probe to base their invasion plans on.

    126. Re: Not a nice way to die by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Yes it does, given the choice any rational person excusing masochists would prefer the painless death

      The thing is that I'm not rational when it comes to the extermination of the human race.

      And apparently you can't distinguish between what I said, which is "not too concerned", and "not concerned at all", you dumbfuck.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    127. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 1

      None except a preference for living on planets - be that for the innate ecological stability and catastrophe resistance it offers, or the aesthetics of walking under open sky.

      For a humanesque species that would admittedly be largely a cultural thing, but something like a tool-using horse, dolphin, or bird designed for crossing expansive areas on a regular basis might find artificial habitats of any reasonable size far too claustrophobic for comfort (or health). Sure, they might well be able to "redesign" themselves to better suite the environment, but there's no guarantee that all of them would they would choose to do so.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    128. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 1

      >But what civilised person would really choose to live at the bottom of a gravity well?

      Those who think that living in tin cans with comparatively tiny, rigidly controlled artificial ecosystems isn't civilized?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    129. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not, does it really matter whether you die in some horribly awful way or painlessly?

      You are NOT that foolish, are you? Painless injection > piranna

    130. Re: Not a nice way to die by caladine · · Score: 1

      CO is specifically bad because it bonds to hemoglobin better (far, far better) than O2 does.

    131. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CO2 reacts with water in the lungs to form carbolic acid, which will make the rats last seconds of life pretty horrific. Nitrogen, Argon, or Helium would be much more humane as they are chemically inert non-life supporting gasses. They would be more difficult to deliver and more costly, which probably explains why they are not used.

    132. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and instead went to injections that knock the condemned unconscious and then poison them.

      Lol, you should do more research.
      The first dose (thiopental) just paralyses them, keeping them fully aware but unable to react to the pain. The concentrations used are too low for full narcose.
      The second dose (pancuronium bromide) causes painful suffocation, and the third dose (potassium chloride) causes an intense burning sensation.
      If all goes to plan, death follows within minutes. But it frequently doesn't, and people sometimes suffer for half an hour before finally dying (often after a second dose).

      If the goal really was a painless death, they would just fill the room with nitrogen gas. Extremely cheap and absolutely painless (even slightly pleasant).
      Given all the technical problems and the cost and difficulty of obtaining the drugs (big pharma is refusing to sell them for this purpose), it seems they're going out of their way to chose this method of execution, primarily because they don't want it to be painless.

    133. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few large asteroids won't kill us all, Society may not, but we are more than just our current from of government and infrastructure. Unless you get to the entire surface melted. We will out survive anything on this planet.

    134. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to kill a gopher?

    135. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Sure, scattered pockets of humanity would survive, but probably not civilization - between the initial infrastructure damage and the wars/riots/raiding over the limited remaining food supplies, the vast majority of the species would be wiped out. If we were left alone we could no doubt rebuild in a few decades or at worst centuries. But not if it was followed up by an organized high-tech campaign of extermination or subjugation backed by orbital weapons.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    136. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the terriers kill them. Why the fuck do we need to be humane toward them?

    137. Re:Not a nice way to die by Raenex · · Score: 1

      They at least want the appearance of a painless death. As for your nitrogen suggestion, it's coming into play.

    138. Re:Not a nice way to die by K10W · · Score: 1

      I'm with you, don't give two shits about rats. Good riddance.

      Anyone who wants to defend the rats, then surely must feel the same about roaches, so lets just fill their houses with roaches and rats and we'll call it the roach and rat reserve.

      wtf are you on about talk about missing the point, they didn't say something like don't kill them and infestations make lovely house pets, they claimed there are more humane ways to kill them cheaply. What don't use understand about that, you response is relevant to a completely different conversation. It is called civilisation. If you start drawing lines between what does and doesn't deserve humane death and what circumstanced that species qualifies for it things get messy compared to blanket respect for anything you cull. Sure some thing need culling we GET that, but doing it in a humane manner is not an unreasonable request in educated civilised societies. If you're gonna argue back, play devils advocate or whatever at least make sure you're making fucking sense first.

    139. Re:Not a nice way to die by doccus · · Score: 1

      What makes it so horrible, and how would anyone even know that since firsthand experience would, by definition, kill you? Wouldn't it be the same as drowning? Which is, by all accounts, a very pleasant experience. And I get that rats are kind of cute (to some people) when you've got ONE in a cage, and that they domesticate well, (amazingly enough, they really do!) , but if you've got a rat problem , like I have, the cuteness thing wears a little thin. They will completely destroy your place, chew up your plumbing trying to get water, and chew up all your electrical wiring , creating a terrible fire hazard. If rats don't chew ALL the time their teeth grow at a fantastic rate, so they have to chew, And they will chew ANYTHING even tubes of toxic ointment, with impunity. And NOTHING kills them, They eat rat poison for breakfast and ask for seconds. The dry ice method is one I'd try if I could get at them, but they're in the walls of my trailer. I've been using lysol spray so they can't smell the tracks to get asround, and certain members of the mint family are supposed to be very effective at repelling them. Any one know a GOOD repellant that always works? No, ultrasound doesn't, unfortunately. I need them GONE!

    140. Re: Not a nice way to die by K10W · · Score: 1

      CO2 is toxic?

      Yes. CO2 forms carbonic acid when it is dissolved in water, and acidifies the blood to lethal levels when above about 7%. With conditioning you can tolerate slightly higher levels.

      No. You're talking MONOXIDE.

      CO is much more toxic than CO2, but either can kill you.

      CO2 only deprives the air of usual ratio of oxygen, and is not notice in itself.

      No. This is wrong. If you add 7% CO2, you still have about 18% O2, which is more than enough for a healthy person. It is the CO2 that kills you, not the absence of oxygen.

      CO2 is taken in by the body despite what highschool ed may say. It is how the blood acidity is regulated as well as important in some other ways. We actually have receptors for that and breathing too much throws things due to that not just mere O2 displacement. You can look up the full process in something like Stryer if you're interested, mine is an old 4th edition (isbn 0716720094) as long time since I used it for study (BSc Biochem) but you can probably find a digital version or more recent edition cheap enough if it interests you.

    141. Re: Not a nice way to die by wolf12886 · · Score: 1

      This is not true at all. If applied correctly co2 quickly causes animals to loose conciousness. Just look at videos online of people accidentally walking into co2 flooded areas, they don't scream, they just collapse.

    142. Re:Not a nice way to die by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There's skills learned in the woods and fields that lend themselves very well to combat. Like knowing how to shoot and *hit* your target. It's not just point and pull like in the movies. We won WWII because of these farm-boys.

      The last war decided by farm boys was WWI. WWII was decided by tanks, planes and boats. Those since, mostly planes, but also mostly politics. The farm boy is irrelevant, and has been for many years.

      What does a "farm boy" bring to a war fought by drones?

    143. Re:Not a nice way to die by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just a few EMPs, and their kill-bots to wipe up the confused meatsacks left behind. No nukes, that'd spoil their conquest. Unless they mastered anti-matter bombs. Though radioactive, the radiation from those is quite short lived.

      Though, I want to see the aliens with an orbital drill. Drill to the core, heat it up 10,000 degrees, watch the continents melt, while they reform the planet in our image. When the construction workers make a house, they don't exterminate the ants first. They leave that to the bulldozers.

    144. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is is possible to commit suicide with CO2 from dry ice?

      E.g. get a bunch of dry ice, put it in a bag, and put it over your head and tie the bag?

      Just curious.

    145. Re:Not a nice way to die by therealbev · · Score: 1

      Although it's an old technology, older than the 3.5 mm audio jack even, the ordinary mousetrap is humane, effective, reusable, and available in multiple sizes. They kill instantly; you'll never find a mousetrap with a live rodent wiggling around in it.

      WRONG! I once caught a mouse by the snout -- when I tried to pick up the trap the mouse JUMPED at me. If I was thinking clearly I would have taken it outside and hit it with a shovel, but what I did do was put the whole thing, trap and all, in a plastic bag and throw it into the trash. I'm still ashamed.

    146. Re:Not a nice way to die by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They didn't bring many because either they didn't think they'd need them based on prior experience (they'd invaded other species - two, both reptilian IIRC - and it worked then) or because of resource constraints. Oh, and they kept most of them in one landship that the Germans twatted with a railway gun, für deh lülzenmittelstoff.

      One day I'll acquire all the books in the series and read them in sequence, along with his alternate WW1 set.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    147. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. If we have to be barbaric, let's at least do it in a humane way.

    148. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      N2 is much better, but probably harder to do. Maybe they can just pour liquid nitrogen into the holes. They won't even know anything is wrong and just pass out, no feeling like you can't breath. But CO2 is still better than poison that burns a hole in your stomach.

    149. Re: Not a nice way to die by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Well, the bond strength is much the same. But the CO doesn't release from the haemoglobin anything like as rapidly or easily as O2 does.

      A standard figure from diver training is that if you have a cigarette (with say 20ppm, 0.002% of CO) before you dive, you'll start your dive with about 5% of your blood's haemoglobin content inactivated by being bound to CO. If you're a regular smoker (more than a couple of fags a day) then you'll typically have 5-10% of your haemoglobin bound by CO and it'll take several days of non-smoking to clear that binding.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    150. Re:Not a nice way to die by Meski · · Score: 1

      If you could do biosphere replacement in a reasonable timeframe, there'd be a lot of other candidate planets you wouldn't need to fight for.

    151. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warfarin is a common active ingredient in rat bait.
      The carbon dioxide bit is good if you worry about residual.
      Now for a good old rural "rat killin'" you use sulfur candles. The down side is that it leaves a smell in the residue. The upside is the residue prevents mold growth.

    152. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This method is ROUTINELY used in slaughter houses - basically CO2 puts the animal to sleep painlessly and then they asphyxiate. It's likely more "humane" than Halal/Kosher slaughter (cutting the jugulars and bleeding the animal to death).

    153. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. N2 doesn't anesthetize/soothe like CO2.

    154. Re:Not a nice way to die by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you've never used a MacBook in defense of your home planet.

      I tried but Apple removed the port needed to interface with alien systems.

    155. Re:Not a nice way to die by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Rats are our ancestors.

      Rats are no more our ancestors than any living primate; they are 88 million year old cousins.

    156. Re:Not a nice way to die by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why they are using dry ice rather than just a tank of compressed CO2.

      Likely because the dry ice is cheaper, easier, and more effective. It also requires less equipment and training.

      It is also safer and easier to transport making it cheaper.

    157. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a chance. To a species with Interstellar FTL technology nuclear bombs would be about as effective as bows and arrows. The FTL environment is far harsher than the centre of any human nuclear explosion. Their power source is likely to be something based on miniature black holes or antimatter. Their weapons would obviously be far more powerful than ours, and their shields capable of stopping anything we are anywhere near.
      As well as all that FTL technology would give them a limited ability to detect future threats before they happen, and even worse the ability to manipulate 'fate' in their own favour. How do you fight someone who can make your soldiers fall over and shoot themselves? or your missiles and guns misfire?
      It would be like humans fighting sheep, a slaughter.
      Your best hope is probably to try to side with the aliens and hope they decide not to eat you..

    158. Re:Not a nice way to die by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      ".. I'm more concerned about if our alien-extermination methods are effective enough to stop them, and .."

      Not a chance. To a species with Interstellar FTL technology nuclear bombs would be about as effective as bows and arrows. The FTL environment is far harsher than the centre of any human nuclear explosion. Their power source is likely to be something based on miniature black holes or antimatter. Their weapons would obviously be far more powerful than ours, and their shields capable of stopping anything we are anywhere near.
      As well as all that FTL technology would give them a limited ability to detect future threats before they happen, and even worse the ability to manipulate 'fate' in their own favour. How do you fight someone who can make your soldiers fall over and shoot themselves? or your missiles and guns misfire?
      It would be like humans fighting sheep, a slaughter.
      Your best hope is probably to try to side with the aliens and hope they decide not to eat you..

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    159. Re: Not a nice way to die by dywolf · · Score: 1

      not sure if troll or really that stupid

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    160. Re: Not a nice way to die by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Hunter cats definitely kill rats.

      Mine bring me a half rat about twice a year (fruit trees and a drainage ditch).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    161. Re:Not a nice way to die by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The secret service will be along shortly to discuss your plan of locking the doors of congress and dropping a couple of metric tons of dry ice in the rotunda.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    162. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we know how Sanitation, an African enclave in cities, got the idea. The Az page you pointed at is unbelievable: total incoherence, it is impossible to understand what happened nor who was doing what when and why and much less when was all people killed, if after or before scientifically wasting into the atmosphere the treasure of economic development or if they wasted the treasure in the atmosphere after all people were killed in the place by the gas... IN any case one reply here is clear:; rats BITE. They are very STUPID, they do not have fine control to take the pizza off your hand, they ll catch the finger. And they do throw themselves at you if they are hungry, that is why we do not want rats around, even if they have hands too. Why is there doubt as to how CO2 kills? Cant anyone do an experiment with... rats?

    163. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent point and post.

    164. Re:Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it's an old technology, older than the 3.5 mm audio jack even, the ordinary mousetrap is humane, effective, reusable, and available in multiple sizes. They kill instantly; you'll never find a mousetrap with a live rodent wiggling around in it.

      Here are two examples of "never" for you:

      One morning a mousetrap was missing. I found it at the far end of the kitchen against the stove. When I tried to pick it up it was curiously difficult to pull away from the stove. The mouse had just one rear foot caught in the trap and was trying to hide/escape under the stove. As I pulled the trap out it was gripping the floor in an attempt to crawl away.

      Another time a trap I left in the basement was missing. I found it hidden in a corner where the mouse it caught had crawled. I have no idea how many days it was trapped before it died.

    165. Re: Not a nice way to die by MensaMoron · · Score: 1

      I prefer to use gasoline. Pour a cup into one end of the burrow. Cover and wait 30 minutes. Throw a match into the other end. Whoooosh. No rats. Gas is easy to get and no worse environmentally than my car. It kills ground hornets too.

    166. Re:Not a nice way to die by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      Depends on the scenario -- In Niven & Pournelle's "Footfall", the aliens were not much advanced over us; the success they had was mostly due to "holding the high ground". Their interstellar trip was kind of an act of desperation, as I recall.

    167. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gas is easy to get and no worse environmentally than my car.

      If pouring gas in the ground and burning i is no worse environmentally than your car, you need to get your shitty car fixed.

    168. Re: Not a nice way to die by caladine · · Score: 1

      I should have said "bonds far more readily" than O2. I didn't know about the bond duration though - thanks for that tidbit.

    169. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 1

      True, but given the timescales involved in planetary development, any two civilizations are more likely to be thousands or millions of years "out of phase" than decades or centuries (and even centuries would likely give an insurmountable advantage), and anyone less advanced than us couldn't even be detected with our current technology, much less be able to cross between stars.

      Presuming the aliens are not much more advanced than us though is a necessary conceit if the story being told involves us plausibly overthrowing them. I the case of Footfall the small difference was made slightly more plausible by the fact that the Fithp would naturally have been considerably less advanced than us, but had access to the poorly-understood records of a much more advanced race.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    170. Re:Not a nice way to die by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Any aliens capable of crossing interstellar distances would have no reason to exterminate us. It would be just as easy to "terra"form Mars or Venus, or even one of the watery moons.

      For Mars to be temporarily (on the millions of years time scale) terraformed, you just need to drop some icy comets/asteroids on the planet to increase the level of water available. For Venus, use those amazing atmospheric scrubbers from the ship to process the atmosphere into usable components and remove the Carbon from the atmosphere into carbonates, or other carbon based forms (diamonds? graphite/ene?).

      If they have the technology to travel the distances, settling another planet would be easier than exterminating the life, and dealing with any pathogens that might actually be able to take you out.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    171. Re:Not a nice way to die by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      They are not our ancestors. This is not how genetics/evolution works.

      They are our siblings, they are as advanced genetically (for their niche) as we are.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    172. Re:Not a nice way to die by Immerman · · Score: 1

      How exactly is dust not an issue? Unless the target population has a vast supply of small, distributed atmosphere-scrubbers (aka poor targets), or several years worth of stored food supplies, dust is going to be a *huge* problem. Witness the widespread food shortages caused by the comparatively mild volcanic dust cloud that caused the 1816 "year without a summer".

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    173. Re: Not a nice way to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Vietnam War was decided by farm boys. All the planes and bombs were ineffective against them.

    174. Re: Not a nice way to die by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The Vietnam War was decided by politics. The farm boys for the North won because the South was under unequal rules of engagement.

    175. Re: Not a nice way to die by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      It's a more complex subject than most people give it credit for. Divers have to pay more attention to the physiology of breathing than the man on the Clapham omnibus, but that is nothing compared to the real complexities of the situation.

      With university level chemistry, you'd think that the bond energies and the concentrations of reactants would determine the rates of the reactions in either direction. That they don't indicates that there is some non-equiibrium chemistry going on there - different enzymes catalysing each direction of the equilibrium being a good guess. But enzymes are involved everywhere in biochemistry, so that's still not a very useful answer!

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Liquid nitrogen would be more humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excessive carbon dioxide is detectable by animals and makes them feel like they are suffocating. Pretty torturous way to go out.

    Something like liquid nitrogen would be a lot more humane because animals can't detect it so would just pass out and die quickly and painlessly. Probably more expensive, I don't know.

    1. Re:Liquid nitrogen would be more humane by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Maybe someone should get them to watch Apollo 13.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re: Liquid nitrogen would be more humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The beauty of CO2 is that it's heavier than air and will fill the entire burrow. Nitrogen is about as dense as the air itself (which is 79% nitrogen anyway), so the effect won't be there.

    3. Re: Liquid nitrogen would be more humane by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      The beauty of CO2 is that it's heavier than air and will fill the entire burrow. Nitrogen is about as dense as the air itself (which is 79% nitrogen anyway), so the effect won't be there.

      Liquid nitrogen is liquid and much heavier than air. It will seek low spots.

      Freshly evaporated gassious nitrogen is cold. Cold gasses are more dense than warmer ones and thus also seek low places.

      So liquid nitrogen will produce cold nitrogen gas which will also remain in the burrow and displace the oxygen, much like the (heavier) carbon dioxide, though it's only heavier due to its lower temperature. This will produce humane suffocation by lack of oxygen without a corresponding increase in the (detectable by the respiratory system) carbon dioxide that provides the sensation of suffocation. The rats will just go to sleep and die in their sleep.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re: Liquid nitrogen would be more humane by Boronx · · Score: 1

      It takes a lot more Nitrogen, since Nitrogen isn't poisonous.

    5. Re: Liquid nitrogen would be more humane by phayes · · Score: 1

      If I could be a fly on the wall of the meeting where you tried to explain why you used liquid nitrogen to kill rats, I wish you would attempt it.

      They do this in parks -- you know those areas with grass and trees...

      As you would need much more nitrogen to displace the oxygen instead of using CO2 which is toxic at low levels, you'd also need a lot more liquid nitrogen. The purchase and transport of sufficient amounts of CO2 to treat a park is going to be much more expensive than cheap CO2.

      Using that much liquid N2 would also freeze the soil -- and the root systems of the grass and trees.

      You: "The rats in park xyz are all dead and it only cost a few thousand dollars"
      Mayor: "So is all the plant life in the park around your treatments, you could have killed off only the rats for a few hundred and now replanting the park is going to take over a hundred grand!!!"
      You: "ehhhh..."

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    6. Re: Liquid nitrogen would be more humane by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Liquid nitrogen is, by definition, a liquid. Liquids would be more difficult to handle than a solid. It's also colder, very much so, than dry ice which makes it a greater freezing hazard. If someone drops some dry ice then it's not going to flow all over the ground where it can damage property or injure people. A spill of dry ice can be managed with a shovel or gloved hand. Spill some liquid nitrogen and you are not getting it back and you are just going to have to deal with the mess.

      Also, the suffocation sensation of elevated CO2 levels is a feature, not a bug. In the case of a N2 leak or spill the workers can pass out and die without knowing anything is wrong. With CO2 the people working with it have a natural aversion to its presence and therefore can leave the area before it can cause harm.

      Let the rats suffer, I don't care. It's people I care about. CO2 is cheaper and safer to handle, so I say we use that.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    7. Re: Liquid nitrogen would be more humane by FishTankX · · Score: 1

      Nitrogen is a weak lifting gas. If you inject it into a burrow it will just float out.

  3. Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have pet rats and I think this is extremely cruel. Rats are highly intelligent and make super companions to humans - equally as affectionate as dogs in every way, and yes, you can train rats in much the same way.

    1. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes... the -cute- species deserve special rights theory.

      You are, I assume, vegetarian then with respect to all the non-cute species?

    2. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gas the rats sanitation war now

      death to traitorous rat sympathizers

    3. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So don't do it your pets, everyone wins.

    4. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am vegan and I don't even exterminate in my apartment. If there's a bug, I catch it and release it outside. And yes, I understand living on planet Earth as a functional human means I kill millions of stuff a day and can't avoid various animal-derived products.

      It's not about being perfect, it's about making a best effort to choose the path of least harm when these choices present themselves.

    5. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens if you see a hungry fox trying to eat a chicken?

    6. Re:Very cruel by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No one is trying to kill your pets. Rats are filthy and violent. They destroy food, spread disease, and even hurt the animals we WANT to keep around and well cared for. Varmints are going to be killed, if you don't do that you don't even have a civilization.

      You definitely speak like someone who has never had to deal with an actual infestation, or thought much about that situation much.

    7. Re:Very cruel by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > If there's a bug, I catch it and release it outside

      What if there's fifty bugs? What if there's a hundred bugs and a dozen mice? Someone is keeping your apartment free of bullshit parasitic creatures that spread disease and filth. It's not you, apparently, but someone is doing the fucking job out of your sight.

    8. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If dogs or cats were living feral in a city like rats, they'd be behaving the same way, eating trash and being generally unsanitary and a nuisance.

    9. Re:Very cruel by somenickname · · Score: 4, Funny

      What if there's fifty bugs? What if there's a hundred bugs and a dozen mice? Someone is keeping your apartment free of bullshit parasitic creatures that spread disease and filth. It's not you, apparently, but someone is doing the fucking job out of your sight.

      And, it's probably a cat. Which directly answers one of the questions posed in the summary.

    10. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Live for a while in a place where feral dogs and cats are a health and safety problem. Regular baiting and killing is a normal civic government function.

    11. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am vegan and I don't even exterminate in my apartment. If there's a bug, I catch it and release it outside. And yes, I understand living on planet Earth as a functional human means I kill millions of stuff a day and can't avoid various animal-derived products.

      It's not about being perfect, it's about making a best effort to choose the path of least harm when these choices present themselves.

      I've been in houses with people like you. You walk in and the fleas start jumping out of the carpet onto your legs as soon as you enter. One of my fruit-loop Earth-First friends had a huge yellow jacket nest wrapped all the way around her front porch column large enough to kill a small child if they were riled. There were literally hundreds and hundreds of them hanging on it. The problem was that she had two small children at the time. I don't know how they survived that one. She lived on a five acre hobby farm and the century-old barn was a death trap from the termite infestation.

      Yeah... Fuck that noise. I'd drop Zyklon-B on a rat nest and lose no sleep over it.

    12. Re:Very cruel by AaronW · · Score: 2

      I have had pet rats too, but there's a big difference between a pet rat and a wild rat. I've had wild rats in my attic. They'll chew up wires, start fires and destroy everything with urine and poop. Currently I use a trap that electrocutes them. All the insulation under a low roof in part of my house was destroyed by them and their urine got into everything.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    13. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Live for a while in a place where feral dogs and cats are a health and safety problem. Regular baiting and killing is a normal civic government function.

      It's unfortunate that we can't do that for feral humans as well. Particularly the ones with guns.

    14. Re:Very cruel by QA · · Score: 1

      Ben, is that you?

    15. Re:Very cruel by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are better ways. When I had some yellow jackets move in, I blasted their nesting area with cinnamon powder. Apparently, they like the smell about as much as humans like a garbage dump.

      As for termites, yeah, sometimes you have to resort to poison. It's about a measured response, not no response.

    16. Re:Very cruel by KiloByte · · Score: 0

      Try getting a gun yourself.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    17. Re:Very cruel by Panoptes · · Score: 1

      Wild rats are pests and a blight on much of the developing world. They breed rapidly, consume huge amounts of farm produce, and spread disease. Perhaps your pets are not rats, but Siberian hamsters.

    18. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you put your food in mason jars mice can't get into it.

    19. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for termites, yeah, sometimes you have to resort to poison. It's about a measured response, not no response.

      When it comes to vermin that are dangerous or destructive to life or property (i.e. yellow jackets & termites) The only correct response is total annihilation with no survivors, not encouragement to move on to more welcoming environments. Survivors and refugees inevitably return. Yellow jackets are dangerous and anaphylaxis can kill a susceptible person. Large nests are dangerous to anyone. Wasps of any kind are given a summary death sentence for trespassing on my property.

    20. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe in guns.

    21. Re:Very cruel by Immerman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      House centipedes. The grey-brown kind with lots of long thin legs.

      They're completely harmless to humans, even kinda cute for a bug, and are voracious predators against virtually all the home-infesting insects that we dislike, including termites, cockroaches and nigh-indestructible bedbugs. They can even become kind of friendly as they mature through their seven-year lifespan, if you're into befriending your "guard dogs".

      I'm not above squishing particularly annoying bugs, but fostering a population of human-benign predators is far more effective, and controls potential infestations long before you even notice you've been invaded.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    22. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us have pet cats and your attitude reeks of intolerance of ratters. Please,think of the predators.

    23. Re:Very cruel by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps they're just tame rats. Most feral animals are dangerous, destructive, and disease-ridden in the wild, even domesticated animals and humans. Rats are a problem in large part because they are so intelligent, and fill a very similar ecological niche to humans, size notwithstanding.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    24. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's OK, guns believe in you.

    25. Re:Very cruel by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      What ecological niche do humans fill?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    26. Re:Very cruel by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Is that because they don't have thumbs?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    27. Re:Very cruel by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 0

      Because the NRA manual says they do.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    28. Re:Very cruel by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Macroscopic virus, according to Agent Smith.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    29. Re:Very cruel by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I'm curious: do they kill rats in India?

    30. Re:Very cruel by KiloByte · · Score: 0

      Ban guns, and an organized criminal will have them anyway, while Tyrone in the US needing a fix or Seba in Poland needing the next flask will use a knife. Ban knives and he will use a baseball bat. Ban baseball and he'll use a brick. You'll be dead or in hospital just the same, your phone and wallet in his pocket and your girl raped. With guns, you would be able to defend yourself, but where brawn matters you're no match for an angry steroid user with no sense of self-preservation.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    31. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious: do they kill rats in India?

      Of course they do. Roasted rat is Indian specialty. They love it.

    32. Re:Very cruel by sjames · · Score: 2

      Funny thing then that it's years later and the yellow jackets never returned.

      Interestingly, it seems that fear causes us to give off a scent that infuriates bees and wasps. If you are personally sensitive, it's understandable, but of not, try to overcome your fear and you'll find that they ignore you.

    33. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is trying to kill your pets. Rats are filthy and violent. They destroy food, spread disease, and even hurt the animals we WANT to keep around and well cared for. Varmints are going to be killed, if you don't do that you don't even have a civilization.

      You definitely speak like someone who has never had to deal with an actual infestation, or thought much about that situation much.

      I don't know, man - I've heard stories about those sewer horses.

    34. Re:Very cruel by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Ees hamster!

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    35. Re:Very cruel by dwywit · · Score: 1

      I'll have to try that next time I see a paper-wasp nest. I've tried ti-tree oil, eucalyptus oil, lavender oil, all in an attempt to interfere with their own sense of smell, but they didn't work for long. I finally took a can of carb cleaner and a lighter and incinerated the little bastards.

      Mud wasps and hornets I'm OK with. They're just not aggressive like the paper wasps. I leave them alone, they leave me alone. Look sideways at a paper wasp, and he calls all his mates to come and attack.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    36. Re:Very cruel by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Keystone species. We convert one type of habitat into another, one more suited for our own survival.

    37. Re:Very cruel by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I feel like sewer rats just kind of fit in a niche.....where they can hide from human presence.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    38. Re:Very cruel by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No, they employ them as editors.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    39. Re:Very cruel by fred911 · · Score: 1

      You either let the fox kill the chicken, then take it from him. Or you kill it yourself for a healthy dinner and a delicious soup!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    40. Re:Very cruel by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Like my local population of urban foxes, there is great potential for nocturnal scavengers in urban environments. Vast amounts of easily-accessible food combined with comparatively few predator species.

    41. Re:Very cruel by phayes · · Score: 1

      House centipedes. The grey-brown kind with lots of long thin legs.

      They're completely harmless to humans, even kinda cute for a bug, and are voracious predators against virtually all the home-infesting insects that we dislike, including termites

      Snort! Termites?!? You're really trying to tell us that you believe centipedes will invade and destroy termite infestations!?!

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    42. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because of the holes they make in you. Wanna come see for yourself?

    43. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us watch the genocide being perpetrated on native songbirds by domestic and feral cats and would prefer eliminating the felines

    44. Re:Very cruel by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Do you mean this species?. I must confess to have never seen them, although the article mentions sightings in my country, at least.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    45. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing then that it's years later and the yellow jackets never returned.

      Oh, that's quite easy. They went away and became someone else's problem. Said someone else probably handled them exactly like they deserve to be handled, and solved the problem for real, for both himself and for you.

      You get to have warm fuzzy feelings, and that's more important than whether or not they stung some allergic person in the meantime, eh?

    46. Re:Very cruel by sjames · · Score: 1

      They probably moved into the more wooded area outside the neighborhood.

      It must be unpleasant to live in fear of everything, how sad for you.

    47. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but rats can.

    48. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the time of the season. Around here, it is just the scent of humans which infuriates some of the wasps. They'll fly over to you, land on you, then sting you. All this without any fear reaction being needed in advance.

    49. Re:Very cruel by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I don't know about destroying an established termite colony, you'd need an awful lot of them. But a healthy population will make short work of any colony attempting to move in.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    50. Re:Very cruel by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Yep, those are the ones. One of the few bugs I'll actually rescue from my cat. One they mature they (mostly) get pretty good about avoiding cats and getting trapped in sinks and bathtubs.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    51. Re:Very cruel by sjames · · Score: 1

      Some really are that touchy, but it isn't as common as people assume. Even those tend to maintain a small sphere of defense and not sting outside of it. The ones I chased off were like that and unfortunately, that sphere included our side door.

    52. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Rats are filthy and violent. They destroy food, spread disease, and even hurt the animals"

      Just like humans.

    53. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rats in most areas of the world are an invasive species. There is no native american rat.

    54. Re:Very cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have to try that next time I see a paper-wasp nest.

      Try a 10' piece of pvc pipe, a bit of duct tape, a switch timer and a vacuum. Assemble it and bang the pipe on the nest a few times. Repeat in an hour and again the next day to get stragglers.

      For assembly, the timer is so that if you F up and they swarm, you can leave the vacuum safely knowing it will auto-off after a bit.

      Put a bit of water and dish soap in the canister (to drown those that survive), plug it in on the timer then bang the pipe on the entrance to the nest. Get them good and riled up then turn on the vacuum. Thunk a thunk thunk.

    55. Re:Very cruel by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      If you put your food in mason jars mice can't get into it.

      or put it in the fridge. if you keep your flour, etc. in the freezer, the bug eggs in it never hatch and you can pretend there aren't really any.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    56. Re:Very cruel by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      If you put your food in mason jars mice can't get into it.

      because so few mice are freemasons.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    57. Re:Very cruel by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      House centipedes. The grey-brown kind with lots of long thin legs.

      They're completely harmless to humans, even kinda cute for a bug, and are voracious predators against virtually all the home-infesting insects that we dislike, including termites, cockroaches and nigh-indestructible bedbugs. They can even become kind of friendly as they mature through their seven-year lifespan, if you're into befriending your "guard dogs".

      I'm not above squishing particularly annoying bugs, but fostering a population of human-benign predators is far more effective, and controls potential infestations long before you even notice you've been invaded.

      spiders too. i don't know why they and snakes get such bad press. i do take care to avoid the poisonous ones, though.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    58. Re:Very cruel by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Ban guns, and an organized criminal will have them anyway,

      Ban murder and criminals will do it anyway, so better to make murder legal.

      Nope, that logic doesn't hold up to any basic tests. Organized crime gets their guns legally. If they were illegal, then they would get caught and thrown in jail more often. So by all means, take the guns from criminals, most of them got them legally anyway.

    59. Re:Very cruel by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I found a small lizard in my apartment once. I just looked at him as he stared terrified at me. I politely stepped well away from him and went into the living room and sat down.

      I ran across him from time to time over a year or two but I think he finally left or died.

      I never had any bug problems while he was there. :)

      I moved out shortly thereafter.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    60. Re:Very cruel by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Organized crime gets their guns legally.

      Nope, in a recent study of guns used in attacks on police officers, out of 160 cases only one involved a legally purchased gun (ie, with background checks and all the paperwork). All the rest were either sold on the street or stolen.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    61. Re:Very cruel by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Criminals usually use stolen guns. This makes them "untraceable". It also means that if you stop regular people from getting guns, you cut off the #1 source of guns for criminals.

      And "organized crime" is shooting cops? I thought cops were shot by Black thugs, and that's why cops need to shoot all Black people first, for self defense.

      organized crime is different than unorganized crime. Organized crime does things differently. The bodyguards for mob bosses are all "clean". They pass background checks, they buy legal guns, and they would survive police scrutiny if the police harassed them while driving around with Mob Boss in the back seat.

  4. easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The are much more of a threat to humans than cat, deer or wild horses. Getting grossed out by rodents is not a taught behavior. Its biological.

    1. Re:easy by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I assume you're grossed out by squirrels as well, right? They're basically cute, stupid rats after all.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:easy by serbanp · · Score: 1

      I am not. They make good tree fertilizer.

    3. Re:easy by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Squirrel=Treerat.
      Pigeon=Skyrat.

    4. Re:easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Squirrels are actually pretty intelligent and able to solve complex problems.

    5. Re:easy by msi · · Score: 1

      Rat = Rat
      Pigeon = Flying Rat
      Squirrel = Rat with good PR

  5. Definitely not humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Carbon Dioxide asphyxiation is inhumane because it's painful and traumatic. Lungs burn. Head hurts, etc.
    Nitrogen asphyxiation is humane because it puts you to sleep without any pain or trauma. You just peacefully go to sleep and never wake up.

    Watch the videos where they experimented on pigs. Pig eating at nitrogen feeding chamber passes out and falls back into normal air, wakes back up, and immediately goes back to munching in the nitrogen like nothing happened.

    1. Re: Definitely not humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who didn't?

    2. Re:Definitely not humane by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      > falls back into normal air

      They need a gas that sinks, though.

    3. Re:Definitely not humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not quite that simple. What works will for pigs does not work well for all animals. I use a number of animal models, including mice and rats, in research studies. CO2 asphyxiation is the currently preferred method for mice and rats for humane euthanasia, provided the exposure concentration is kept low. Argon has been shown to induce aversion in rats (as an indicator of pain), while N2 exposure has had mixed results in varied studies. It's possible N2 is more humane, if the mix was correct, but that is far from clear to me, and I am roughly familiar with current best practices and research (yes, there is research on the most humane way to kill animals).

      Of course, what is done in a controlled lab environment is distinct from dropping a brick of CO2 into a warren. Extremely high concentrations (>40% or so if I recall correctly) of CO2 can induce burning sensation, while lower concentrations induce unconsciousness without apparent aversion in rodents. I'm really not clear on exactly it would happen in an uncontrolled environment, but it is far from clear to me the N2 would be a better option.

    4. Re:Definitely not humane by sjames · · Score: 1

      If it comes from just boiled N2, it will sink.

    5. Re: Definitely not humane by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      I didn't. You don't even see the damn deer get shot. Just the kid inexplicably meeting his dad.

      Seriously... some venison would be nice for tomorrow's dinner, I think.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:Definitely not humane by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      citation?

      I don't disagree or agree, but would like to know if that's factual.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    7. Re:Definitely not humane by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I shot Bambi's mother.

      If I had gotten an any deer tag, I would have shot Bambi and had his head mounted.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:Definitely not humane by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Probably because of the temperature, it is denser than normal air is.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    9. Re:Definitely not humane by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I can understand you wanting to be anonymous on this topic. But can you point us at specific reports/experiments that show what you are saying?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    10. Re:Definitely not humane by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      The ground is also colder.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    11. Re:Definitely not humane by sjames · · Score: 1

      The ground isn't hundreds of degrees below zero, even in Chicago.

    12. Re:Definitely not humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A paywalled source, but the abstract pretty much sums it up:
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16542038
      N2 exposure (obviously) leads to hypoxic death, but on the way to it (in rats), there was evidence of spasms and hyperreflexia, which could be coupled to stress/discomfort/pain.
      Obviously, none of this stuff is easy to quantify. Researchers (at least, the conscientious ones) do their best.

      A very good summary of available literature on rodent euthanasia is here: http://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Standards/Guidelines/Euthanasia.pdf

      At the end of the day, sadly, you are killing an animal. Perfect euthanasia isn't feasible, and the goal tends to focus more on pain/discomfort *minimization*, rather than elimination.

    13. Re:Definitely not humane by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    14. Re:Definitely not humane by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      > falls back into normal air

      They need a gas that sinks, though.

      radon will do it.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    15. Re:Definitely not humane by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I shot Bambi's mother.

      If I had gotten an any deer tag, I would have shot Bambi and had his head mounted.

      did you mount bambi's mother? kinky.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  6. What's undignified about rats? by fredrated · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They carry disease, eat infrastructure, chew holes in your house, shit and pee on your stuff, chew holes in your stuff, eat and contaminate your food, and many more things I can't fit into the margin of this book.

    1. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you let them wander around your house? I don't think rats are the problem here...

    2. Re: What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      urban environments are destructive...

    3. Re:What's undignified about rats? by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 5, Funny

      They carry disease, eat infrastructure, chew holes in your house, shit and pee on your stuff, chew holes in your stuff, eat and contaminate your food, and many more things I can't fit into the margin of this book.

      Yes, children are unpleasant little monsters, aren't they?

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    4. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't fit into the margin of this book.

      Q.E.D. Another way to state the elephant in the headlights is to yell Super-Resistant PLAGUE!!

    5. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not much worse than children.

    6. Re:What's undignified about rats? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Useful clue for whoever wrote TFS: indignity is not the same as undignified. Yes, they both have "digni" in the middle. doesn't give them the same meaning.

      Bad enough when the commenters are semiliterate, now the editors are semiliterate too?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    7. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Informative

      During World War 2 when the Dutch were near starvation late in the Nazi occupation, my grandmother - a young woman at the time, obviously - heard her baby sister suddenly start screaming from her crib in the next room. She rushed in to discover a rat chewing on the baby's chest.

      They're nasty, disease-carrying vermin, and anyone who feels sorry for them (or, idiotically, asks how they're worse than cats, deer, or wild horses) simply hasn't had a close encounter with them. I specifically keep cats around as nature's own anti-vermin patrol. My cats are well worth their value in purchased cat food and vet visits just for that function alone, and as a bonus, every once in a while they deign to permit me to pet them for a while.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    8. Re:What's undignified about rats? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Well, my kitteh brought a live mouse to my (mouse-free) house and set it free, without incapacitating first.

      On the other hand, once he kept, over the course of two days, bringing a lot of tiny mice and one big. Family reunion in the belly of a Master Race predator :)

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    9. Re: What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      take a bath, hippie

    10. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have discovered a truly marvellous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain

    11. Re: What's undignified about rats? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      urban environments are destructive...

      Yes, because they tend to host rats.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    12. Re:What's undignified about rats? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      You should see them when they grow up and start posting on the internet.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    13. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Children? I thought they were talking about humans. Nasty disease-ridden varmits - once they've infested an area you may as well leave, they're only going to keep multiplying and contaminating the area until it's unfit for anything but rats and cockroaches.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    14. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Immerman · · Score: 0

      Almost as bad as humans...

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    15. Re:What's undignified about rats? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Fucking Norwegians...

    16. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "unfit for anything but rats and cockroaches" You say it like its a bad thing.

    17. Re:What's undignified about rats? by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Bad enough when the commenters are semiliterate, now the editors are semiliterate too?

      You're giving the editors way too much credit.

    18. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot the worst of all... they don't pay taxes

    19. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Megol · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't that rats exist - they fill a niche. The problem is that of uncontrolled populations of animals, not rats in particular. Cats and dogs (commonly seen near people) are also disease carrying vermin, often more dangerous to people than rats. If it was a wild dog that found the baby in your example it's been the head that was chewed on, if it were a wild cat the damage would be worse too. Wild dogs and cats shit everywhere, intrudes whenever they can and steal food by habit. They commonly spread diseases and parasites. Their mentality is generally very aggressive.

      Pet cats, dogs _and_ rats aren't a problem. Uncontrolled populations of any animal is, some would say that includes people too.

    20. Re: What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me you are not so much of an idiot as to believe that old wives' tale. Then again, I do have several Korean friends who swear ip and down that sleeping under a fan will kill you...

    21. Re:What's undignified about rats? by gtall · · Score: 1

      Children are worse, they'll eat holes in your bank account as well, rats cannot type or drive to the ATM.

    22. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rats are fine, there are two that have a burrow under our chicken hutch but they generally sleep with the chickens, they don't seem to do much harm as far as I can tell. I prefer the horse because he's much more intelligent, aware and friendly and is generally fine with being ridden. Unfortunately I don't have cats anymore but there are many around and they are fine with me, I'd prefer it if they didn't eat so much of the wildlife but que sera.

    23. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you kitteh brought you a live mouse, your house wasn't mouse-free. Or did you mean, you let your small-animal-murder-machine roam free outside? I like cats, but here they can't go outside without getting eaten by foxes and coyotes.

    24. Re:What's undignified about rats? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      I'd say confining a cat to four walls is animal abuse. Cats are intelligent creatures, and sitting caged with nothing to do but a rubber toy and a minute of petting per day would make them dull. You don't want a member of the Master Race^WSpecies to have the wits of a factory farm cow, do you? And fences mean dogs are confined in, coyotes are confined out while cats consider the fences to be mere decoration.

      And the proper term for "small-animal-murder-machine" is "natural predator". Sure, a suburban ecosystem is not exactly natural or even self-sustaining, but with humans sitting on 80% of land area, that's the new norm.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    25. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that it's pretty much impossible to make a place unfit for them...

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    26. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The destructive urban rats are an invasive species, not native to North America"

      Just like humans.

    27. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      Perhaps your cat wants to teach you hunting.

    28. Re:What's undignified about rats? by HBI · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking, that is why they do that.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    29. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's illegal to kill kids

    30. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Wild dogs and cats shit everywhere

      Cats tend to bury their feces. DOGS shit anywhere. But *neither* of those animals are likely to infest your house, chew through your walls, eat your food, and shit in your pantry. That's why rats are a unique problem - they tend to infest human habitations a bit more voraciously than other animals.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    31. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chew holes in your house

      Really? I have a hard time imagining a rat chewing through concrete or bricks. If they manage to enter a house, they probably went through ventilation openings and ducts.

    32. Re:What's undignified about rats? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Also, in most of the world they're an invasive species, not native. People bitch about feral cats, but the real destroyers of native birds are rats (because they eat eggs and fledglings in the nest).

      Having lived where the cats got killed off and the rats took over... the only good rat is a dead rat.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    33. Re:What's undignified about rats? by EricTheO · · Score: 0

      Yes cats are grand, they pee where ever they want, the stench from the urine is next only to a skunk, which can cause you to loose a security deposit. If you have a litter box they will track the kitty litter all over you house then jump up on your food preparation areas. If your pregnant don't change or get near the kitty litter. They will sharpen their claws on any nice fabrics they find. They leave cat hair every where. If you allow your cat to roam outside it will bring disgusting "gifts" home, hopefully already dead. During the plague, cats where a vector for bring fleas from hunting rats and mice into homes sickening or killing their masters.

      Yeah cats are great!

      --
      -Eric
    34. Re:What's undignified about rats? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      They carry disease, eat infrastructure, chew holes in your house, shit and pee on your stuff, chew holes in your stuff, eat and contaminate your food, and many more things I can't fit into the margin of this book.

      wait, are we talking about babies now?

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    35. Re:What's undignified about rats? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Support legalizing 75th trimester abortions!

      In my plan it would fall to the school guidance counselors. Parents make the call and the little shit just doesn't come home.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  7. What makes them worse by jrumney · · Score: 2

    They still haven't shaken off the stigma of the bubonic plague. But somehow cats have gotten away with schizophrenia for all these years.

    1. Re:What makes them worse by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Do cats cause schizophrenia? I thought it was the other way around.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re:What makes them worse by slickwillie · · Score: 1

      Do cats cause schizophrenia? I thought it was the other way around.

      Schizophrenia causes cats?

      Who knew?

    3. Re: What makes them worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schizophrenics cause cats?

    4. Re:What makes them worse by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Ahaha I missed the joke I get it now You were talking about cats being schizophrenics because they are all crazy and I was talking about crazy people that end up with 20+ cats.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    5. Re: What makes them worse by stephencrane · · Score: 1

      They do, when they feed them and let them grow feral in their backyards.

    6. Re:What makes them worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to figure out why every dog on the planet has reactive attachment disorder! At least schizophrenia is easier to manage.

    7. Re:What makes them worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Specifically, it is the toxoplasmosis. It causes various neurological phenomena in various mammals, including humans and other primates.

    8. Re:What makes them worse by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not directly, but they are the carrier for a very common parasite, T.gondii. It's endemic just about everywhere domestic cats can be found. It infects humans too, though it can't reproduce in them. In humans it concentrates in the brain, usually to symptoms so mild they go unnoticed - the victim just feels tired and slightly feverish for a short time - but the presence of the parasite has been linked to a number of mental health conditions.

      T.gondii is notable for influencing host behavior - it causes rats to become less fearful, increasing the chance of getting caught by a cat and consumed so the parasite can continue it's life cycle in a cat. The same mechanism of altering brain chemistry that causes rats to become less fearful is also active when it infects humans, but as it evolved to mess with rat brains the effect on humans is different.

      As a matter of public health, it would be wise to place restrictions on domestic cats - at the very least to deny them access to outdoors areas where they may have contact with wild animals. But cats are cute and everyone loves them, so such measures are politically non-viable.

    9. Re:What makes them worse by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Where I live (aka Scotland) domestic cats have take the Scottish Wild Cat to the brink of extinction by interbreeding with them.

      They are also in the UK killing somewhere in the region of 330 million small mammals, birds and reptiles, and are a leading cause of the decline in garden birds in the UK.

      Nasty horrible things domestic cats

    10. Re:What makes them worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes cats apparently do cause schizophrenia, albeit indirectly.
      Search for: toxoplasma gondii schizophrenia

    11. Re:What makes them worse by gtall · · Score: 2

      Cats are only crazy at night, they wait for us to go to sleep and then let loose.

    12. Re:What makes them worse by v1 · · Score: 1

      T.gondii. It's endemic just about everywhere domestic cats can be found. It infects humans too, though it can't reproduce in them. In humans it concentrates in the brain, usually to symptoms so mild they go unnoticed - the victim just feels tired and slightly feverish for a short time - but the presence of the parasite has been linked to a number of mental health conditions.

      sounds like "cat scratch fever" ?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    13. Re:What makes them worse by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The critical stage in their life cycle is cat feces. I've been saying for over a decade now that cats should have the same outdoor restrictions we impose onto dogs - need to be leashed when outdoors, and owner has to pick up and bag all feces.

    14. Re:What makes them worse by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      But it wasn't the rats! It was the fleas!

    15. Re:What makes them worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a pile of rat shit. You may want to check your pathology. Oh and i am sure organ juice causes Autism and MS is from Gluten. Fucking internet.

    16. Re:What makes them worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, you mention the theme only if YOU have schizophrenia. And very few cats have a wandering eye for a while, though now that there is new theory...

  8. Was the bubonic plague started by cats, deer or .. by bodog · · Score: 2

    Was the bubonic plague started by cats, deer or wild horses? Silly Op...

  9. just like every other form of media by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 0

    "More and more of the internet is sitting behind fewer and fewer players, and there are benefits of that, but there are also real risks..."

    Every form of media is being centralized so that greater control as well as consistency of message is possible. This is why the nation was better off when one person couldn't own too many media outlets. Deregulation of that was as disastrous as banking deregulation but, as the media will not turn itself in, was not reported on. The noose tightens...

    1. Re:just like every other form of media by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I think you just butt-posted on Slashdot.

      You are going to be soooo embarrassed when your friends hear about this.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    2. Re:just like every other form of media by gtall · · Score: 1

      And here we were only discussing rats and their plagues. I think if they are going to control the media, we will need some new dry ice factories for the revolution.

  10. Moles too? by aklinux · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid, I used to help my grandfather try to control moles around his cattle. Cattle, horses, etc. would step into the entrance to the mole's burrow and break a leg.

    1. Re:Moles too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I was a kid, I used to help my grandfather try to control moles around his cattle. Cattle, horses, etc. would step into the entrance to the mole's burrow and break a leg.

      Were you able to help all those moles with their tiny broken legs?

    2. Re:Moles too? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      By the same token, farmers shoot squirrels. There is a whole class of firearm just for shooting squirrels, rats, moles and the like: the Varmint Rifle. Mine is a semi-automatic .22LR which holds 15+1, which is legal even in California because it is tube fed. Some people prefer an air rifle, but those just don't have the killing power I'm looking for. An errant strand of grass can ruin your kill shot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Moles too? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Get a shotgun. Then you can shoot squirrels without having to worry about where the round will land.

      Squirrels will also strangle themselves on loops (big enough for their heads but too small for their shoulders) of strong chord nailed to trees. They never backup and always turn in the same direction. Once their head is caught in the loop, they are done.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Moles too? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Get a shotgun. Then you can shoot squirrels without having to worry about where the round will land.

      Since I live in hill country, I can already do that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Moles too? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Nobody for a mile? Nice, plenty of room for Bond villain stuff...Bandwidth costs must suck.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  11. Biofuels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I guess some of the scientists I've worked with in the past could blame their failed biofuel experiments on people dumping dry ice into their monitoring stations too. I worked on a project in the past where we installed monitoring stations in the soil for CO2, O2, and temperature at varying depths in various biofuel crops, and probably some others I can't recall. I mentioned my concerns about CO2 pooling up in the holes required for the sensors and was quickly dismissed as a stupid engineer who didn't understand soil physics. ok. Sure enough, the sensors would saturate except for days where the wind was strong enough to remove the CO2. I suggested that we install pumps to remove the CO2 and monitor flow rates instead. I was greeted by all scientists on the team blaming the hardware which they had previously validated with expensive gas chromatograph instruments which I'm pretty sure none of them understood from a design perspective. I left after my supervisor failed to back me up. I no longer work for a university. Too much crap for an EE to deal with. Soil scientists are a special breed that do better when they only have to look after themselves I guess. I still believe in science, but more from an engineering point of view. If you don't know how your instruments work, then I don't think you should be qualified to write papers on a subject that utilizes them.

  12. What's undignified about rats? by TheCycoONE · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Humane or not, what is so especially "undignified" about rats? What makes them worse, than, for example, cats, deer or wild horses?"

    The author of the summary has obviously never had a rat infestation. They can swim, dig several feet down, chew through concrete, plastic, wood, drywall, and otherwise go to amazing destructive measures to get to a heat or food source. Unlike mice, keeping your food in the cupboard or Tupperware containers is useless as they chew right through them, and destroy your home's foundation while they are at it. No, rats are not at all like wild horses, cats, or deer. Rats are a special kind of hell.

    If you need an ecological reason. The destructive urban rats are an invasive species, not native to North America. We brought them here - and I for one applaud every effort to get rid of them.

  13. Worse by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cats, deer, and wild horses generally won't climb walls and crawl into your house. And they don't share rats' long history of spreading disease and eating grain from storage containers. Deer are food. Horses can be tamed and used to do valuable work. Cats can be tamed and used to protect grain from rodents.

    1. Re:Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horses are good eating too, tamed or not, cats less so.

    2. Re:Worse by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Horses are good eating too

      Too bad in a lot of countries superstitious bastards banned their slaughter.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:Worse by dcooper_db9 · · Score: 2

      I'm with you on the deer and wild horses but let me introduce you to an Indonesian feral cat. My childhood nightmares were filled with these filthy creatures. They had mange, fleas and ticks. They were often deranged from rabies and would scream and fight at all hours. Oh, and they have a habit of pouncing on people. Get bitten or scratched and you had to get vaccinated for rabies. That required multiple injections in your belly. I have never understood my fellow American's tolerance for feline vermin.

      On the other hand, the rats in Indonesia can reach 16 inches or about twice the size of an American city rat. But I don't really mind them. Just drop a python under the house and it's taken care of.

      --
      I do not block ads. I do block third party scripts.
    4. Re:Worse by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Just drop a python under the house and it's taken care of."

      Good fix for a lot of things.

      Roommate takes your snacks? Python in the cupboard.
      Girl Scouts selling cookies door-to-door? Python on the porch.
      Phone solicitors? Python on the ph...no, that did not work.

    5. Re:Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too many curlies in your code? Python on the computer.

    6. Re:Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Phone solicitors? Python on the ph...no, that did not work."

      That's because you used a real python. All it is going to do is to hang around your house and try to snack on you. To deal with telemarketers, you need to use a virtual python network (VPN). That takes care of the "remote" problem. There is still a chance that the "remote" python will refuse to constrict the telemarketing scum, on the grounds that there are some forms of prey that are too disgusting for even a python to eat...

    7. Re:Worse by blindseer · · Score: 1

      The guy sitting next to you on the plane is getting on your nerves? SNAKES ON A PLANE!

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    8. Re:Worse by gtall · · Score: 1

      Cats? Tamed? Are thinking of the same little furry creatures who wait until you go to bed to throw a party? You should set up a web cam sometime. Cats swinging from the chandelier, cats with lampshades over their heads, etc. They are certainly not tame.

    9. Re:Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send the phone spiders!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLaQnrJSp9g

    10. Re:Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      City people and liberals are so disconnected from reality.

    11. Re:Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instructions unclear: my python is now ringing.

    12. Re:Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cats can be tamed!? Yeah, sure, once they manage to stand up from the couch...

  14. The main difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wild horses are hardly ever in burrows and even when they are, lazy city workers would never shovel that much dry ice in one shift.

  15. Re:Was the bubonic plague started by cats, deer or by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Fleas.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  16. Rats are very clean animals. by tlambert · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Rats are very clean animals.

    Except, you know, for:

    lymphocytic choriomeningitis
    bubonic plague
    typhus
    hantavirus
    leptospirosis
    rat-bite fever (it's a real thing; look it up)
    salmonellosis
    Colorado tick fever
    cutaneous leishmaniasis ...but except for those, VERY CLEAN!

    1. Re:Rats are very clean animals. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rats are very clean animals. Except, you know, for: ...

      They're also very friendly and cuddly. They tend to get into cribs with human infants and treat them like fellow rats: Cuddle up, clean their ears, etc.

      Unfortunately, rats react to a dead rat in the burrow by eating it. Humans, when they first fall asleep, tend to be in a deep sleep for something like 25ish minutes, from which it is very hard to rouse them - even by a rat bite. 25ish minutes is long enough for rats to decide a baby or child might be dead, test it by nibbling, then start chewing...

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:Rats are very clean animals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "....rat-bite fever..."
      Isn't that a Ted Nugent song?

      Seriously though, while all that might apply to sewer rats, domesticated rats tend to be better pets than other small furry critters (especially mice or hamsters); they bite less, they're more friendly with their handlers (personal anecdote: my sister had a vampire hamster. It loved the taste of human blood, at least), they don't smell so bad, etc.

      Their feral cousins though? I'd prefer there to be significantly less of them using as humane a method of extermination as possible. While I don't generally agree with exterminating creatures that serve seemingly no purpose (that is a long, dangerously-slippery slope), those little buggers multiply at ridiculous rates if left unchecked. Worse than Catholics.

    3. Re:Rats are very clean animals. by eionmac · · Score: 1

      Delete Bubonic plague, that is insect borne, e.g cloth can transmit with insects in them

      --
      Regards Eion MacDonald
    4. Re:Rats are very clean animals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget ticks and all the diseases that they carry to us.

  17. treat the the disease not the symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop leaving garbage around

  18. Too bad they're not up on the current studies by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    ... like how killing city rats may cause diseases to spread faster:

    http://nautil.us/issue/38/nois...

    Now, it's possible that this technique manages to kill every rat in the colony, so they don't scatter ... but as rats that weren't in the burrow would realize that something is up when they come back, this could be a problem.

    I'd think they'd want to use carbon monoxide, not dioxide, at the very least ... assuming that rats have the same problems w/ humans in detecting it.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Too bad they're not up on the current studies by wisnoskij · · Score: 3, Informative

      I really do not think there is a solution that involves not killing them. If you stopped killing rats for 4 months there would literally be something like a hundred times as many rats as there were before. They would explode out of the sewers and eat small children and babies in their cribs. Their ability to reproduce exponentially would mean that every edible morsel of food in the area, whether human, pet, or more generic foodstuff, would necessarily be converted into more rats within a few years time.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    2. Re:Too bad they're not up on the current studies by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      And they are mean sons of bitches. The people championing them here seem to think they're like lab rats, docile. Sewer rats are anything but. They will attack human infants and adults. I've been bitten by one in my sleep and seen a rat kill a cat.

      Mean sons of bitches.

    3. Re:Too bad they're not up on the current studies by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Too bad they're not up on the current studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brown rats are not r-selected species. They stop reproducing when resources are scarce. Google for videos of the Australian mice plagues: that's not something rats do. But they are fucking insistent about unlocking and accessing potentially available resources, destroying buildings (particularly removing insulation and other material) and containers. That's why you don't have brown rat plagues as much as infestations: colonies usually consist of one adult pair and their offspring, and mainly the adult pair is reproducing while it heads the colony.

      A colony shares knowledge, so rooting out a whole colony using traps is rather hard: traps are avoided and actively sabotaged (triggered by throwing stuff at it or just blocked with rocks and other material to prevent less experienced rats from getting caught) after a few isolated successes.

    5. Re:Too bad they're not up on the current studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean female dogs give birth to rats? Maybe we should poison dogs.

    6. Re:Too bad they're not up on the current studies by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Animals, like humans, require shelter. If a rat has lost their shelter then they are at greater risk of predators, exposure to elements, etc. They'd also likely lose their breeding partners.

      The article you linked to talked about how ineffective trapping is since it can cause them to scatter, which is quite different than dry ice exposure. Dry ice exposure might cause some scattering but if the use of dry ice is done systematically, and consistently, then they can stay ahead of the scattering. At least that's my theory.

      Also, presumably this dry ice use is in addition to traps, not to replace it. Use the dry ice to deny the use of the burrow and put out traps to catch those that scatter. No doubt some will get away but we're not necessarily trying to eradicate them, only control them. Those that get past the dry ice and traps will now be more likely to be caught by dogs, cats, etc.

      What the problem seems to be with trapping causing the spread of disease is that too many of the rats get away. In other words it may be that they just didn't put out enough traps.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  19. logic on Slashdot or just another Onion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problems with rats same as with mice, tell us what to do Dr. White.

    http://www.theonion.com/article/worlds-scientists-admit-they-just-dont-like-mice-1256

  20. Re:Was the bubonic plague started by cats, deer or by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Fleas.

    No, rats. The fleas are just a vector to get it from rats to people. The fleas come with the rats.

  21. Re:People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy answer, we have a bigger penis, so we're more important than rats.

  22. Having had an infestation of rats.... by GerryGilmore · · Score: 2

    ...I agree with nuking them. Living (voluntarily) in the country (North Georgia USA) I've come to very much appreciate the variety of life and their interactions, and I very much try to not screw with that to the degree possible. However...when the rats chew through my AC duct work and invade my living space, I kill the fuckers. I've drowned them, stomped them with boots and never felt an iota of the guilt of an errant daddy-longlegs caught in a bad spot.

  23. Not "exactly" humane by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Carbon Dioxide suffocation is pretty bad. It's basically the only form of suffocation your body is designed to violently react to. When killing rodents industrially for reptile feed, nitrogen suffocation is generally considered humane because they just fall asleep.

    1. Re:Not "exactly" humane by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      (CO2 painful, N2 just go to sleep forever. Lattter much more humane.)

      I agree completely.

      I've had occasion to have to euthanize animals (notably skunks) and have used the Dry Ice in the Garbage Can method, as recommended by animal control.

      I've wanted to switch to nitrogen. Unfortunately, liquid nitrogen is not as readily available (dry ice is available at most grocery stores around here). I looked into getting a nitrogen bottle and the equipment needed to use it (regulator, hose). Unfortunately it was very expensive by comparison - like several hundred bux.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:Not "exactly" humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carbon Dioxide suffocation is pretty bad. It's basically the only form of suffocation your body is designed to violently react to.

      When killing rodents industrially for reptile feed, nitrogen suffocation is generally considered humane because they just fall asleep.

      Instead of whining about the solution ... suggest a better one that is humane and of similar cost & simplicity to implement.

    3. Re:Not "exactly" humane by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Try a welding supply store. They sell inert gasses.

      What would be the effect of hydrocarbons? A canister of propane is really cheap, and will displace oxygen as well as any other gas, so long as you keep it away from any source of ignition.

    4. Re:Not "exactly" humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easiest method is car exhaust into a closed container via some tube. Cheap and readily available, and quick. CO2 is a horrible death.

    5. Re:Not "exactly" humane by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Easiest method is car exhaust into a closed container via some tube.

      Not since emission controls got good. There's essentially no CO (or NOx) in exhaust these days (unless, sometimes, if the car is in the sealed room and also breathing its own exhaust.) It's just a hotter and wetter version of the CO2 suffocation method.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    6. Re:Not "exactly" humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree rat populations need to be controlled, but I'm horrified at the method they are using. It would be more humane to catch the rats and torture them to death. The primal panic you feel when not able to breath is not triggered by lack of oxygen, it is caused by carbon dioxide build up in the blood. Literally, using any other inert gas would be humane. Nitrogen is cheap and easily purchased, especially by a government agency. Its just not as cheap as dry ice.

    7. Re:Not "exactly" humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try 1080 then.

  24. LN2 is more fun and more humane by Dr.+Scatterplot · · Score: 1

    If rats have the same asphyxiation response as humans to CO2, this is a very painful way for them to die. The same effect could be had with liquid nitrogen.

  25. Rodents and Primates are cousins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and carry each others' diseases.

  26. Re:Was the bubonic plague started by cats, deer or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair the term "two dog night" exists for a reason. Dogs also carry fleas that jumped from rats.

  27. Humane? by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

    'We are seeing 60% fewer burrows in areas where we are using the dry ice,' said Charles Williams, Chicago's streets and sanitation commissioner. 'It's more environmentally friendly, and it's very humane on the rodents as well.'"

    There is ongoing discussion over whether or not CO2 is humane for euthanizing rodents. It is not lack of oxygen that causes distress when holding your breath, but excess CO2. It is thought by some that lab and feeder rodents are put through unnecessary stress by using CO2 instead of an alternative gas/method.

    1. Re:Humane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discussion... it's not discussion it's perverse way of mispresenting facts...
      ANYONE with basic knowledge of mammalian biology knows that Every mammalian animal except extremely rare exceptions like dolphin,
      react to CO2 levels in brain and due involuntary control of breathing of mamalians it causes EXTREMELY high distress.

        just try killing your self with holding breath....
      its the same that all mammals feel and that's basic biological fact...

    2. Re:Humane? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There is ongoing discussion over whether or not CO2 is humane for euthanizing rodents.

      It's more humane than poisons which give them internal bleeding. At least CO2 is only going to make them freak out for a few seconds.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Humane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CO2 has the benefit of being heavier than the air around it. This makes it a better solution for burrows.

  28. Rats are OG by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Their ability to reproduce exponentially would mean that every edible morsel of food in the area, whether human, pet, or more generic foodstuff, would necessarily be converted into more rats within a few years time.

    Rats are nature's version of Grey Goo.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  29. Re:Was the bubonic plague started by cats, deer or by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    I posit that the term "two dog night" doesn't even exist at all. I have never heard anyone say it. I *HAVE* however, heard of a band called "Three Dog Night". Perhaps you were just missing a dog.

  30. Can't we just by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    nuke them from orbit or send in laser equipped alligators into the sewers?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  31. Re:People by Immerman · · Score: 1

    I'd be careful of that metric - human penises are among the smallest in the animal kingdom, relative to body size, and there's a LOT of animals as large or larger than us.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  32. CATS! by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

    Cats kill rats!
    they are not vermin, they control them.

    1. Re:CATS! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Goodbye, plague!
      Hello, toxoplasmosis!

    2. Re:CATS! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Cats kill rats!

      they are not vermin, they control them.

      No, they kill mice and injured birds. Rats are too much of a bother and can fight back. Not that cats won't try from time to time, but it only really works if the cat is wild and not regularly fed.

  33. Think of the contractors by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why is big government doing the job of the private sector?
    Who invested in vans, trucks, equipment and had to tender, bid for rat control work.
    Governments that set standards are using cheap science to alter the natural balance of capitalism.
    Think of the chemical sales, support jobs, local businesses that are all working to keep trucks stocked and chemicals flowing with the long term aim to stabilise rat populations.
    A large self supporting rat population can provide decades of control work, with very few of the larger rats noticed out during the day.
    If the rat populations are allowed to drop so dramatically in one generation thanks to big gov meddling, think of the local jobs lost.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Think of the contractors by swb · · Score: 2

      The government does that job because the last time we used a private contractor, he stole all the children.

  34. Re:Was the bubonic plague started by cats, deer or by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    Maybe the rats ate it.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  35. Specifically: Black rats. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Fleas.

    No, rats. The fleas are just a vector to get it from rats to people.

    Specifically, it was the black rat, which is migratory and wandered around, spreading the plague.

    One of the reasons we don't have all that much plague these days is that the Norwegian Brown Rat, which tends to hang around in a small territory, displaced the Black Rat.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  36. Re:Was the bubonic plague started by cats, deer or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sure it's not the people giving it to the rats and squirrels? Time for some vector control.

  37. We're really discussing this? by engineerErrant · · Score: 1

    Remember that one time when rats killed off half of Europe? And we're now discussing how best to hug them until they go night-night?

    I do believe in compassion for animals. That means we take no pleasure in their deaths, and protect them from suffering beyond what's necessary for our civilization. I buy cage-free eggs, for example. But humanity must have two aspects - a hand of love, and a fist of justice. Rats are up there with mosquitoes in terms of existential threats to us, so isn't it obvious which side of us they should see?

    I am lucky enough to have never seen a rat, in person, in my 37 years, and I realize they are probably important in natural ecosystems. But even still, inside of our settlements, no method of dealing with them would feel off-limits to me. When I first read the headline of this story, I assumed the rats were somehow being tricked into eating the dry ice, and later exploding. I thought, "oh, that's clever! I guess that's why it's on Slashdot."

    1. Re:We're really discussing this? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Remember that one time when rats killed off half of Europe?

      In hindsight, providing rats with guns, knives, and ammunition wasn't the brightet idea Europeans ever came up with...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:We're really discussing this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was talking about actual rats, not the Germans.

    3. Re:We're really discussing this? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Remember when Jews were considered like witches because they washed hands before eating and survived epidemic diseases?
      Between hygiene, high quality water supply, sanitation and strong immunity thanks to very high levels of nutrition it's been a while since the last huge black plague.

    4. Re:We're really discussing this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that one time when rats killed off half of Europe?

      One cannot remember something that hever happened.

  38. Rats? What could be wrong with them by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    "Humane or not, what is so especially "undignified" about rats? What makes them worse, than, for example, cats, deer or wild horses?"

    Well, there's the fact that cats, deer and wild horses rarely gnaw wires inside walls or leave feces in suspended ceilings. Oh, and they don't usually carry the Black Death.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Rats? What could be wrong with them by ledow · · Score: 1

      Because they breed like fuck and therefore are classified as pests (the rest of the list isn't).

      It makes them extremely prevalent, very hard to eliminate, and they can adapt to the traps and poisons quicker than we can make them.

      This means that animals that are able to penetrate households are able to become real pests, contaminate all the food and surfaces, shit everywhere, bite children and become almost impossible to stop doing that. Again, I don't have wild deer running through my house.

      Foxes are the same. I have nothing against foxes. But they are pests that cause damage, injury, disease and nuisance and are not afraid of wandering into people's houses in search of food. They are also so prevalent and elusive that they are hard to eliminate.

      There's no way we'll kill all the rats. It won't happen. But they are classified as pests for a reason. Even cats - which can go feral, breed in the wild, etc. - aren't classified as pests because they rarely invade homes and certainly not in enough numbers to warrant the classification.

      But get rats in your neighbourhood and you can be sure they'll keep turning up for years.

      My cats have killed several dozen rats from neighbouring gardens over the last few months. I'm quite glad as my previous cat did nothing. But if there are rats around, you're going to want to kill them before they start getting into your house.

    2. Re:Rats? What could be wrong with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's more of a problem of how poorly american houses are built. wood, paper, gypsum, plastic and the occasional ornamental brickwork. you will not find a house like that in europe. in my house, there are simply no cavities for rats/insect to hide in, nothing to bite through (unless they evolve the ability to bite through aerated concrete blocks (ytong) and/or bricks).

    3. Re:Rats? What could be wrong with them by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      You're so right about the way they move into a neighbourhood and just keep coming back.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  39. Rat-shit by phorm · · Score: 1

    Yeah. I just helped somebody doing a kitchen reno and trust me, an old rodent nest full of insulation, fur, and shit is *not* something you want run into in your home. Aside from being fucking gross, there's also the issue of the multitude of illnesses you can get from inhaling the dust etc.

    For the record, I've had rats as pets (they make good pets, too), and they're cute+smart. Verminous rats are a big nope though.

  40. Don't read this if you're squeamish by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    I've dealt with rodents more often than I'd like. I've used quite a few different methods to catch them.

    - Poisons are horrible. Plus you sometimes end up with decomposing animals in places you can't easily get to. Don't do this.

    - Old-fashioned classic snap traps work, mostly. Occasionally I've had mice go for the bait at an odd angle and get pinned alive, though. And rat snap traps are just too dangerous if you have kids or pets. Also, once I had a rat set a mouse trap off. I heard this horrible squeal and went out there to find a rat sitting stunned, next to the trap. At that point your only option is to club the thing to death.

    - The so-called "better mouse traps" (plastic re imaginings of the classic mouse trap) aren't better. I've had rodents manage to extricate themselves from those things. They do work well on smaller mice or smaller rats.

    My current preferred method is using live traps - the ones which are open at both ends. Then, once I've caught something, I drop the entire trap into a large plastic basin filled with water.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Don't read this if you're squeamish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had good results with DCON mouse traps. Mice go in and don't come out. I took out two mice with these. I'm kind of surprised at the reviews. 50% rate it 5/5, and 50% rate it 1/5.

  41. Re:People by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    But they are very large by primate standards.

  42. We need a better pest trap by zorkmid · · Score: 1

    I think the company that comes up with a robotic pest hunter first will make a mint. A roomba or Dyson that murders mice and rats. In NYC if it just wanders around a room at night stabbing bedbugs in the head it'll be worth a king's ransom.

  43. /|\ DeVry chemistry grad by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Elements are only allowed to have one toxic oxide, are they? Better get a warrant for sulphur, then.

    I suppose they put CO2 scrubbers on submarines and spacecraft for decoration.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  44. Don't forget their food by amias · · Score: 1

    All these rats eat stuff and poo it in the burrows. That will not happen anymore if you kill the rats. Hope they factored in the cost of moving all that stuff. I'll bet it will get more disgusting than the rats fairly soon.

    --
    [site]
  45. That's Swell by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Way to solve that problem. Do they also have a solution to the problem of all those dead rats decomposing under Chicago that they're going to have in a couple of months?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:That's Swell by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Do they also have a solution to the problem of all those dead rats decomposing under Chicago that they're going to have in a couple of months?

      I didn't do anything crazy like RTFA, but according to the summary they are just going to leave them there and ignore them.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:That's Swell by lgw · · Score: 1

      AH, so basically just like they handle the poor areas, then?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  46. Rat == VB6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or even worse, VB.NET!

  47. "Humane"? by sjbe · · Score: 2

    'It's more environmentally friendly, and it's very humane on the rodents as well.'"

    "Very humane"? Seriously? I don't have a problem with them taking measures to kill pests but suffocation isn't exactly what I would call humane. Necessary maybe but let's not pretend that they're doing something nice or pleasant to the rats.

  48. Is BeauHD a furry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When he's not posting stories praising drug abuse, now he's defending rats? Is BeauHD a furry?

    Hasn't centuries of rat-related health issues made the status of a rat abundantly clear even to a marijuana addict like BeauHD?

  49. Pompeii by HBI · · Score: 1

    I believe this was the theorized process whereby the Pompeiians died post-Vesuvius but pre-buried in ash.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  50. This is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is awesome! Its a great idea!

  51. Rats, gophers, Moles, and Squirrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use it for rats, gophers, moles, and ground squirrels. No secondary poisonings of bobcat, coyotes, mountain lions, or birds. The gas settles to the lowest points of the burrows, while expanding 800 times its solid volume 800 times as it transitions to a gas.

  52. capture them by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Why not capture them and sell them to zoos for food too the big cats?

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  53. rats and humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What makes them worse, than, for example, cats, deer or wild horses?"

    Or other humans for that matter.

  54. Re:Was the bubonic plague started by cats, deer or by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Fleas.

    you're felcome.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.