Killing zombies in real life (yes, I realize how absurd that was) is no crime
Obviously it is a crime to kill a real-life zombie. In fact, killing someone solely because of their ethnicity or medical condition (depending on your definition of zombie) is a hate crime.
This is the key. There's nothing inherently bad about Twitter, it simply is not a mass medium and can never have more than a limited role. And the less the platform is used the more individual tweets have value.
Back in the '80s Canada learned the hard way that "free" "trade" was just a slogan. It's never had anything to do with free trade the economic philosophy.
It's surprisingly effective to use a term as an Orwellian euphemism for its opposite; all these decades later people are still being fooled by it.
Or, maybe there is more than one objection to the EU approach (or rather lack thereof) to cross-border migration.
Not wanting to compete for jobs with people who have lived their entire lives with a vastly different standard of living is not racism or any other bigotry. The difference is bigots are able to clearly articulate their objections. Others who feel something is wrong can't quite put their finger on what the underlying problem is.
Or, he is both lying and incompetent, and he's showing off how powerful he is in comparison to mere citizens by the fact that he will face none of those consequences.
I'm confused - is Microsoft reinventing C++ or reinventing Java? I can't tell which decade from the last millennium they're trying to drag us back to. (Maybe as far back as when they were considered a reputable software company?)
Slashdot Mirror
Killing zombies in real life (yes, I realize how absurd that was) is no crime
Obviously it is a crime to kill a real-life zombie. In fact, killing someone solely because of their ethnicity or medical condition (depending on your definition of zombie) is a hate crime.
Their problem is that their market is quite small
This is the key. There's nothing inherently bad about Twitter, it simply is not a mass medium and can never have more than a limited role. And the less the platform is used the more individual tweets have value.
Unless.... the aether was dark matter all along!
To be fair, Microsoft has very little insight into what customers want.
Long live English Montreal!
English Montreal deserves to be its own separate province.
They have vast insight into what actual humans do, and deliberately write something different.
The news used to be about reality but even that not so much any more.
Or, you're in denial that someone is challenging your personal notion of 'obvious'.
There are a number of obvious contributing factors to Brexit. Nationalism and selfishness are two of the most obvious.
You can't be a nation without some degree of nationalism. Too much and too little are both harmful.
You can't have enlightened self interest without selfishness. Again, either too much or too little can be bad.
Back in the '80s Canada learned the hard way that "free" "trade" was just a slogan. It's never had anything to do with free trade the economic philosophy.
It's surprisingly effective to use a term as an Orwellian euphemism for its opposite; all these decades later people are still being fooled by it.
Or, maybe there is more than one objection to the EU approach (or rather lack thereof) to cross-border migration.
Not wanting to compete for jobs with people who have lived their entire lives with a vastly different standard of living is not racism or any other bigotry. The difference is bigots are able to clearly articulate their objections. Others who feel something is wrong can't quite put their finger on what the underlying problem is.
It's trickier because health is also a function of age, so everyone's health is constantly changing.
No, they're using 'purpose' in the sense of an adaptive function.
Just like they always have. It's never caused confusion before, at least not for people acting in good faith.
They are not 'giving' you money by not taking as much.
We've had money for thousands of years and people are still getting the fundamentals wrong.
Or, he is both lying and incompetent, and he's showing off how powerful he is in comparison to mere citizens by the fact that he will face none of those consequences.
Stevie McQueenface? Doesn't quite have the right ring to it.
I'm confused - is Microsoft reinventing C++ or reinventing Java? I can't tell which decade from the last millennium they're trying to drag us back to. (Maybe as far back as when they were considered a reputable software company?)
ATT's use of the "thanks" and "ATT thanks" trademarks is likely to cause consumer confusion
It's true, people are surprised and confused to hear the word "thanks" coming from either of those corporations.
An anti-Betteridge headline. It was bound to happen sooner or later.
Statistically, there are no examples of gun owners who do not own guns killing anyone. Or existing.
Why does what they're calling the "future" sounds suspiciously like the dot-com/Y2k bubble, which is now over 15 years old?
Ignoring Thiel's motives for a moment, was the outcome actually an injustice?
So it's not about computers that have had Microsoft malware forced on them.
This is not about Gawker anymore, this is about a billionaire using his money and influence to destroy someone using the legal system as a proxy.
It can be both.
Provoking laughter is not the same as being funny or entertaining.