i have no problem with popriety tags *in addition* to core standards compliance. it is when these are in place of standards that there is a problem. propriety tags are marketing, and they will likely always be a part of a browser that is part of a for-profit company.
i have digital cable here, and the complete lack of digital-ready tuner cards made having a home theatre pc a huge pain. since the card can't change channels, tivo-alike features are mostly useless. plus the annoyance of having to use two remotes or one of those big OneBox remotes to have IR and RF in one remote.
compounding this, there seems to be an annoying leak in firefox 0.9... leaving it open overnight resulted in usage reporting as 160+ megs for me, personally. this is in addition to previous reports of leaks on all platforms, though admittedly some were regarding the javascript console which wouldn't be a factor in most installations. firefox will eventually replace the browser in the mozilla suite.
because everything that goes into an off-world nasa project has to be practically battle tested for a number of years. nasa doesn't use "old" technology, per say, they use technology that "won't likely break, explode, or otherwise be a waste of the billion dollars we spent putting it in space":)
the dropdown the grandparent wants exists in outlook 2003 already. it's right next to the "options" dropdown. it's a list box with HTML, Rich Text, and Plain Text options.
as for your request, are you asking to be able to have only a portion of an email be html or do you want to be able to turn a while email into html in the middle of typing it? this dropdown will do the latter.
in outlook 2003, i have my composition settings set to always convert to plaintext. at the top of each email it converts, it has a little notify pane that tells me it's converted from html. if i click that, it forms a dropdown from where i can select "convert back to HTML."
might be time to give it another look?
i too switched to thunderbird for a while. that is, up until it started folding in on itself. one day i'd load it up, and it had decided to duplicate every email in my store. a week later, it corrupted the entire store and rendered every email blank. the files themselves were blank. there was no real reason for this to happen, it just goes to point - thunderbird is not a release-ready application and is still very much beta software.
are you ready for it to break? just judging by personal experience and the experience of everyone i know who's had one, your sidekick is past due for a catastrophy.
one of my friends has had his sidekick replaced *four* times already. i'm going to wait for 2.0 before i try one again.
that's just it, economics. for a spammer to send out 1mil emails, the cost is trivial (for the spammer). if they get a response of just 1%, that's 10,000 customers,.1% gives 1,000 customers. that's not a bad haul for a fly-by-night pharmacy with likely very little overhead. they likely have no warehouse, no real store or property outside of the home of the person running it and postage is paid by the consumer.
if you don't want to fiddle with the config files too much, try JD5000's filter sets. they're some of the best you can get, as well as do a good job at anticipating the annoyances of the future.
i was also wondering if the concise directory names had anything to do with the smaller hard drives of the past. if so, then it would seem only natural to deobfuscate the file system now that we actually can.
and yet, somehow, people living in the countries whose foodstuff bears the majority of the substances you listed are living well into old age, far beyond what their ancestors did.
and stop sitting on the various actual cures which have been experimented with
which? are you sure you didn't get that info from Art Bell?
i can attest to the durability of the 300D body. i do concert photography and am frequently smashed by flying boots and crowd surfers coming over the barrier on top of me, as well as having dropped the camera a few times:) it's held up to abuse so well i'm honestly very surprised, pleasantly so.
of course you can also rely on the very catty nature of the OSS community. post to usenet the problem, how to repeat it, that the maintainers refuse to acknowledge it, and if it's at all important it'll make headlines on every geek blog around.
i have no problem with popriety tags *in addition* to core standards compliance. it is when these are in place of standards that there is a problem. propriety tags are marketing, and they will likely always be a part of a browser that is part of a for-profit company.
sooner or later, i knew they'd find a way to make computers run on gasoline too.
damn oil barrons!
i have digital cable here, and the complete lack of digital-ready tuner cards made having a home theatre pc a huge pain. since the card can't change channels, tivo-alike features are mostly useless. plus the annoyance of having to use two remotes or one of those big OneBox remotes to have IR and RF in one remote.
compounding this, there seems to be an annoying leak in firefox 0.9... leaving it open overnight resulted in usage reporting as 160+ megs for me, personally. this is in addition to previous reports of leaks on all platforms, though admittedly some were regarding the javascript console which wouldn't be a factor in most installations. firefox will eventually replace the browser in the mozilla suite.
because everything that goes into an off-world nasa project has to be practically battle tested for a number of years. nasa doesn't use "old" technology, per say, they use technology that "won't likely break, explode, or otherwise be a waste of the billion dollars we spent putting it in space" :)
the dropdown the grandparent wants exists in outlook 2003 already. it's right next to the "options" dropdown. it's a list box with HTML, Rich Text, and Plain Text options.
as for your request, are you asking to be able to have only a portion of an email be html or do you want to be able to turn a while email into html in the middle of typing it? this dropdown will do the latter.
in outlook 2003, i have my composition settings set to always convert to plaintext. at the top of each email it converts, it has a little notify pane that tells me it's converted from html. if i click that, it forms a dropdown from where i can select "convert back to HTML."
might be time to give it another look?
i too switched to thunderbird for a while. that is, up until it started folding in on itself. one day i'd load it up, and it had decided to duplicate every email in my store. a week later, it corrupted the entire store and rendered every email blank. the files themselves were blank. there was no real reason for this to happen, it just goes to point - thunderbird is not a release-ready application and is still very much beta software.
http://www.majcher.com/nytview.html
that has the functionality you're looking for, i think...
their inspiration of a false sense of security? :P
from other articles on the subject, the person initiating the conference is the one who pays, not the other participants.
the sidekick can't be used with any other service. problem... solved?
are you ready for it to break? just judging by personal experience and the experience of everyone i know who's had one, your sidekick is past due for a catastrophy.
one of my friends has had his sidekick replaced *four* times already. i'm going to wait for 2.0 before i try one again.
that's just it, economics. for a spammer to send out 1mil emails, the cost is trivial (for the spammer). if they get a response of just 1%, that's 10,000 customers, .1% gives 1,000 customers. that's not a bad haul for a fly-by-night pharmacy with likely very little overhead. they likely have no warehouse, no real store or property outside of the home of the person running it and postage is paid by the consumer.
like, say for instance they had a lysine dependancy!
sure, it may make great sense - if you read the LFS standard.
if you don't want to fiddle with the config files too much, try JD5000's filter sets. they're some of the best you can get, as well as do a good job at anticipating the annoyances of the future.
i was also wondering if the concise directory names had anything to do with the smaller hard drives of the past. if so, then it would seem only natural to deobfuscate the file system now that we actually can.
i think people that consider deobfuscation "dumbing down" may have undiagnosed social problems :)
and yet, somehow, people living in the countries whose foodstuff bears the majority of the substances you listed are living well into old age, far beyond what their ancestors did.
and stop sitting on the various actual cures which have been experimented with
which? are you sure you didn't get that info from Art Bell?
i can attest to the durability of the 300D body. i do concert photography and am frequently smashed by flying boots and crowd surfers coming over the barrier on top of me, as well as having dropped the camera a few times :) it's held up to abuse so well i'm honestly very surprised, pleasantly so.
Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code...
:)
by some miracle of chance, your sig works perfectly with your post
Just because you might think a car is over expensive doesnt mean you just jack it and ride, do you?
nope, but you can carpool.
What's the diff in having 3 friends that swap movies off HBO or 3 Billion friends swapping some AC/DC albums?
2,999,999,997 people.
*snicker*
of course you can also rely on the very catty nature of the OSS community. post to usenet the problem, how to repeat it, that the maintainers refuse to acknowledge it, and if it's at all important it'll make headlines on every geek blog around.
don't they know robots slaughter the elderly for their medication?!