You can log into webmail to make changes, but this doesn't restrict you to using webmail to read mail. Look for "Spamblocker" on the left. This will let you toggle between off, medium, and high (which is actually their challenge-response/whitelist system).
But they recently stopped their server-side spam filtering (Spaminator(tm)) and replaced it with client-side plugins.
Umm, great except that the above is 100% untrue.
The only thing that's changed about Earthlink's server-side spam filtering is the name, which was changed from "Spaminator" to "Spam Blocker" for some reason probably known only by their marketing department. Spam Blocker on its 'medium' setting is exactly the same service as the old Spaminator. Further, when they changed this, my Spam Blocker was switched to the medium level by default and I saw no difference in service.
Exactly. Open source project contributions, for example, wouldn't be considered relevant by these standards. Sure, the applicant's minor contribution to yet-another-php-based-web-site-thingy might not be the most impressive experience, but what about the person contributing code in his free time to larger, more complex projects?
The point is, judge non-professional work on its own merits, don't disregard it completely because your applican't didn't collect a paycheck for it.
That may be useful for someone who wants to look up old content on one of the weblogs in question (provided they know about the Wayback Machine), but it doesn't help the web site authors let people know what their new URLs are. A simple redirection would completely eliminate this problem, as would have a little advance warning so the authors could post their new URLs before the change.
But you've been able to do that all along with USB or, god forbid, serial connections.
I don't mean to say that Bluetooth isn't a hundred times better than either of those -- it is, and my next phone will definitely be Bluetooth-enabled -- but Bluetooth is hardly responsible for this capability.
Some of the things people are whining about may also affect anyone who so much as sends a message to a Gmail user.
I have yet to hear a good explanation of how exactly this affects the sender of the e-mail. Because their mail is scanned by some software? That already happens on any mail server running spam or virus filters. The fact that it's for the purpose of targeting ads is irrelevant here, as the sender doesn't see them.
I prefer to be proud of my accomplishments, not something as entirely inconsequential as what piece of land I happened to be born on.
I think the Farrelly Brothers would have put more consistency and thought into this wretched trilogy than the Wachowski Brothers did.
Personally, I'd like to see it remade by the Coen brothers.
"I did not have sex with that woman."
I think that goes without saying if you're posting to Slashdot.
And you just had to bring Admiral Akbar into it, didn't you?
Try it without the Slashcode-inserted space in the URL.
Awesome picture, and more than a bit creepy. Anyone want to translate the text on the page?
Yes, that's it. You may also see it as round hole (from a hole punch) in the cover, usually in the middle of the UPC label.
Better still, a single Merzbow track, looped. Who needs variety?
You can log into webmail to make changes, but this doesn't restrict you to using webmail to read mail. Look for "Spamblocker" on the left. This will let you toggle between off, medium, and high (which is actually their challenge-response/whitelist system).
But they recently stopped their server-side spam filtering (Spaminator(tm)) and replaced it with client-side plugins.
Umm, great except that the above is 100% untrue.
The only thing that's changed about Earthlink's server-side spam filtering is the name, which was changed from "Spaminator" to "Spam Blocker" for some reason probably known only by their marketing department. Spam Blocker on its 'medium' setting is exactly the same service as the old Spaminator. Further, when they changed this, my Spam Blocker was switched to the medium level by default and I saw no difference in service.
Exactly. Open source project contributions, for example, wouldn't be considered relevant by these standards. Sure, the applicant's minor contribution to yet-another-php-based-web-site-thingy might not be the most impressive experience, but what about the person contributing code in his free time to larger, more complex projects?
The point is, judge non-professional work on its own merits, don't disregard it completely because your applican't didn't collect a paycheck for it.
Damn. I was reading RAID 1 but was thinking RAID 0. Mea culpa.
Also, a correction would have been sufficient, no need for insults. Thanks.
Which is why we'd be a lot better off with the Constitutional Party.
You're joking, right?[0][1][2][3][4]
[0] The pre-born child, whose life begins at fertilization, is a human being created in God's image.
[1] Under no circumstances should the federal government continue to subsidize activities which have the effect of encouraging perverted or promiscuous sexual conduct.
[2] We favor the right of states and localities to execute criminals
[3] The Constitution Party will uphold the right of states and localities to restrict access to drugs and to enforce such restrictions in appropriate cases with application of the death penalty.
[4] All teaching is related to basic assumptions about God and man. Education as a whole, therefore, cannot be separated from religious faith.
All that and I'm barely into the 'E's on their alphabetical list of issues. I could go on but my copy/paste fingers are cramping up.
And you call the Libertarian party over-the-top?
Just s/English/American/ then. It's more accurate anyway.
> At a different site.
In a galaxy far, far away..
That might make data resoration kind of tricky.
You don't lose "a full drive worth" of capacity- you lose half capacity.
If you have two drives, you get one.
Exactly. You lose the full capacity of one of the drives.
The rooms at the New Orleans Marriot have the Book of Mormon as well as a Bible.
That may be useful for someone who wants to look up old content on one of the weblogs in question (provided they know about the Wayback Machine), but it doesn't help the web site authors let people know what their new URLs are. A simple redirection would completely eliminate this problem, as would have a little advance warning so the authors could post their new URLs before the change.
Yeah, but then you have to remember how to spell She^H^H^HSchan^H^H^H^H^HSchenectady.
It's not that cats don't understand you, it's just that they choose to ignore you.
But you've been able to do that all along with USB or, god forbid, serial connections.
I don't mean to say that Bluetooth isn't a hundred times better than either of those -- it is, and my next phone will definitely be Bluetooth-enabled -- but Bluetooth is hardly responsible for this capability.
Just to add to the list, Debian installs Exim by default, not sendmail.
s/left/wrong/
kthx
Because they would like to survive as a hardware company?
Just a guess.
Some of the things people are whining about may also affect anyone who so much as sends a message to a Gmail user.
I have yet to hear a good explanation of how exactly this affects the sender of the e-mail. Because their mail is scanned by some software? That already happens on any mail server running spam or virus filters. The fact that it's for the purpose of targeting ads is irrelevant here, as the sender doesn't see them.
The drawbacks that I have come up with, however, would be attaching "riders" to bills
Another practice that needs to be banned. So many bullshit laws and pork spending gets passed exactly this way, it's ridiculous.