This is how it's supposed to work. Whether he can make a functioning team or not is an open question, but at least he can see if a more polite environment gets better results.
If the tests are too easy, the kids aren't "gifted."
If they don't pass the test, then they aren't "gifted."
If the test uses words they don't understand, then what words would the researcher suggest the tests use that aren't "culturally biased?" Using three letter words well isn't a sign of ability.
Customer: build this Developer: OK, it should take X Customer: great
Customer: why is it late? Developer: oh, I used a bunch of new technologies and techniques. Now it does all this crap you never asked for, but I was able to pad my resume. Customer: but it doesn't even do what I asked for Developer: you idiot, you didn't spec it correctly.
Why wouldn't an ET leave a big message that was hard to miss, like, say, a moon? Or even better, a big pyramid in the middle of nowhere? That would be kind of hard to miss, wouldn't it?
Instead of ranking relevancy by hits of a word inside the document, which was how it was done before, google ranked relevancy by references to the content.
Note that most in-house wikis still rank things the old way, which is why most search results from your internal wiki suck. Even google's custom search on your internet page sucks...because without humans performing relevancy ranking via links google is just as bad as the old stuff.
To capture anything good in low light you need a fast lens. A fast lens is one where the aperture number is small, like 1.8 or 1.4. A fast lens means that you don't have to wait for a flash to warm up and you don't have to carry it around.
The downside to a large aperture is that focusing will be hard, even with autofocus, and the exposure will get all weird. The exposure will be weird because your focus area is small, but the exposure logic generally is set to measure the entire picture. You don't really care about the rest of the frame because it'll be blurry due to your huge aperture. Also, autofocus will hunt all over the place because the depth-of-field is short.
So, be sure to set the autofocus on your center point only and exposure should also be spot (right there) until you get used to it.
Luckily, you'll have time to practice.
You'll also have to stash all your pictures somewhere. You can use Apple's photos or some other Windows/Linux solution. However, you should also put them offsite. Flickr has like 1TB free, and google pictures (or whatever it's called now) should be the equivalent. Also, your photo library is prone to corruption, so be sure to use Time Machine or the platform equivalent to back up your metadata etc.
You can capture JPEGs, they're fine. You might want to consider JPEG + RAW or RAW too, since space really isn't an issue these days.
Clinton: "I was so busy dealing with the world's problems that instead of using my work email that I get for free I got some guy I knew to build a server for me, my associates, and my husband's foundation."
Does anyone actually believe this line of bullshit?
I work with an application where the VP of engineering burned 6 man-years on dynamically loadable plugins, a feature nobody IRL actually gives a shit about. It made the code unreadable, caused all kinds of work due to the total refactoring of the application, and caused performance to degrade tremendously.
In addition, it is practically impossible to tell what version of a plugin is correct or if it's loaded.
Why? Because he thought it was cool.
So, when developers tee off on upper management decisions that kill companies, I can swing right back on dumb engineering decisions that kill companies.
Slashdot Mirror
Clinton hired a buddy to do it. This wasn't a government server, this was her own.
This is how it's supposed to work. Whether he can make a functioning team or not is an open question, but at least he can see if a more polite environment gets better results.
How well does it work relative to TIFF files?
If the tests are too easy, the kids aren't "gifted."
If they don't pass the test, then they aren't "gifted."
If the test uses words they don't understand, then what words would the researcher suggest the tests use that aren't "culturally biased?" Using three letter words well isn't a sign of ability.
Customer: build this
Developer: OK, it should take X
Customer: great
Customer: why is it late?
Developer: oh, I used a bunch of new technologies and techniques. Now it does all this crap you never asked for, but I was able to pad my resume.
Customer: but it doesn't even do what I asked for
Developer: you idiot, you didn't spec it correctly.
I totally forgot about them, which is kinda sad.
That's exactly what Moto, Microsoft, and Nokia said about the iPhone. Where are they now?
Problem is DNS during split tunneling, which isn't the same as "breaks VPN."
I guess the editors are either click-baiting, are technically illiterate, or both.
Note that the violation is subject to a fine. The administration has no authority to order a recall.
Turn off javascript, and ads go away.
Why can non-users review an app? That seems to be a play store fail.
Why wouldn't an ET leave a big message that was hard to miss, like, say, a moon? Or even better, a big pyramid in the middle of nowhere? That would be kind of hard to miss, wouldn't it?
If you have nothing to hide, why would you be afraid of the authorities?
- the authorities
Did you know that criminals can use their brains to come up with crimes! The public should be lobotomized so criminality will be impossible!
Just checked, and the iPhone 4s and iPad 2 are still supported on 9. How annoying for devs, how great for everyone else.
We'll pay $1, because fuck you.
Instead of ranking relevancy by hits of a word inside the document, which was how it was done before, google ranked relevancy by references to the content.
Note that most in-house wikis still rank things the old way, which is why most search results from your internal wiki suck. Even google's custom search on your internet page sucks...because without humans performing relevancy ranking via links google is just as bad as the old stuff.
To capture anything good in low light you need a fast lens. A fast lens is one where the aperture number is small, like 1.8 or 1.4. A fast lens means that you don't have to wait for a flash to warm up and you don't have to carry it around.
The downside to a large aperture is that focusing will be hard, even with autofocus, and the exposure will get all weird. The exposure will be weird because your focus area is small, but the exposure logic generally is set to measure the entire picture. You don't really care about the rest of the frame because it'll be blurry due to your huge aperture. Also, autofocus will hunt all over the place because the depth-of-field is short.
So, be sure to set the autofocus on your center point only and exposure should also be spot (right there) until you get used to it.
Luckily, you'll have time to practice.
You'll also have to stash all your pictures somewhere. You can use Apple's photos or some other Windows/Linux solution. However, you should also put them offsite. Flickr has like 1TB free, and google pictures (or whatever it's called now) should be the equivalent. Also, your photo library is prone to corruption, so be sure to use Time Machine or the platform equivalent to back up your metadata etc.
You can capture JPEGs, they're fine. You might want to consider JPEG + RAW or RAW too, since space really isn't an issue these days.
Clinton: "I was so busy dealing with the world's problems that instead of using my work email that I get for free I got some guy I knew to build a server for me, my associates, and my husband's foundation."
Does anyone actually believe this line of bullshit?
If you care enough to compromise the upstream WAN the router is fucked anyway.
This is why you make a tinfoil hat: to keep the radio waves out of your head. It's simple to do, and as a bonus the voices stop.
You can get a better performing, more resilient environment for less than your enterprise-class hardware. Plus you get free monitoring via Newrelic.
Save your business tens of thousands of dollars and get up to Aws.
Your idea of the new york times is a few years behind the curve.
Gen 1 was always unencrypted. They didn't hack the gen2 or gen3 hardware to unencrypt it.
I can't tell from the slides whether they used a gen1, gen2, or gen3 reader to do their playback attack.
Even before Square, you could buy card readers on eBay. This doesn't really bring anything to the table.
I work with an application where the VP of engineering burned 6 man-years on dynamically loadable plugins, a feature nobody IRL actually gives a shit about. It made the code unreadable, caused all kinds of work due to the total refactoring of the application, and caused performance to degrade tremendously.
In addition, it is practically impossible to tell what version of a plugin is correct or if it's loaded.
Why? Because he thought it was cool.
So, when developers tee off on upper management decisions that kill companies, I can swing right back on dumb engineering decisions that kill companies.