You don't have the right to make that assumption for every ex-con, and every corporation considering hiring them. Maybe you don't think he'd make a good security professional, but someone else might. Don't push your beliefs on others.
I get 1.5mbps/320bkit for $39.95 CDN (that's $27.49 USD) plus taxes. I can run servers, have the same IP unless my MAC changes, and have no transfer limits....
I thing before my time people were much bigger fans of KISS, U2, Eagles, The Who and the like more than the teenie-booper followers of today's music listeners
Your partially right. All the bands you listed above were popular for a _long_ period of time. Long, that is, compared to 'pop sensations'. Sure Britney Spears is still around after 4 years, but there's been many replacements for her. (Lopez/Aguilera/Shakira/etc.)
I do agree that overplayed songs cause people not to buy stuff, which is true on all radios stations except ones that don't focus on modern music. (ie. 'New Rock', as well as Pop).
In regards to the last comment, that's referring strictly to pop music. The ones that don't write music, or dance routines, or lyrics, but are paid to learn them. (Which could explain why they don't last long.) There _is_ some good new music out there, Dream Theater is a good example. (Though good is subjective.)
The article states that "if application writers followed the guidelines provided by the LSB, you would not have dependency problems".
I don't see how any guidelines would change the fact that the non-RH RPMs are based on older libraries, (or newer, as the case may be). That is by far the biggest problem.
Example: I wanted Eterm on my RH8.0 install, couldn't find any RH packages for it, so I tried a generic one. It depended on some Perl modules, no big deal. I grab those -- one module depended on an old version of Perl (it would only accept that version).
The only solution to this is for the RH packages maintainers to make RPMs for _everything_, which of course isn't possible. But that's part of the reason Debian has less of a problem with that, sid has about 8500 packages last time I checked, a LOT more than any version of RH.
Which brings us to another problem. All the RPM distros I've seen have big version differences in all their 'releases'. Which makes it hard for developers to release packages for the distro. They need one for 7.x, 8.x, etc.
...You can't just tell people to drop these toolkits, or anything else for that matter. I know people that use fvwm because they like it better than everyone else. OSS isn't a democracy, people can use what they want. You can't make some people give up what they like for somebody else.
I don't understand what this fab is with bringing linux to the desktop. Let people use what they want. Your not going to force people to use it. If they feel like trying it, fine! If not, fine! I'm not going to give up good software, or control over my system (aRTs, gnome-control-center, nautilus), my favorite software (centericq, irssi), just because some prick wants a buncha people I don't know to use linux.
It will save people time as long as they only use apps that have RH packages. I tried getting Eterm. No official packages. I tried installing a non-distro specific package, RPM HELL. I ended up compiling it.
Update systems like that don't work unless you can either a) You can tell people what they want, or b) You can give people what they want.
Neither of which can be done all the time. And an RPM system is the most horrible thing to try and compile things on.
I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet, but about a year and half ago a big gaming/computer forum was running MySQL with vBulletin as the frontend. Horrible permorance. They had top-end Xeon servers dedicated completely to MySQL, and they still had about an hour of downtime everyday. I'm not sure if this true all the time, but in this case, MySQL could not handle heavy loads. They had to end up taking out there 'General Mayhem' forum, where more than half the traffic was.
"And then they graduate to those giant bongs where you have to start up a motorcyle...Kids driving their bongs down FDR Drive, 'comon' man! pull the bong over, i wanna take a hit'".
Slashdot Mirror
Do you happen to know the episode name or number of that paticular episode?
You don't have the right to make that assumption for every ex-con, and every corporation considering hiring them. Maybe you don't think he'd make a good security professional, but someone else might. Don't push your beliefs on others.
As stated above, they did contact the company when they first found the exploit and "were blown off".
I get 1.5mbps/320bkit for $39.95 CDN (that's $27.49 USD) plus taxes. I can run servers, have the same IP unless my MAC changes, and have no transfer limits....
EverQuest - Not Just For Geeks?
Anyone who's played Everquest already knew this to be true....
I thing before my time people were much bigger fans of KISS, U2, Eagles, The Who and the like more than the teenie-booper followers of today's music listeners
Your partially right. All the bands you listed above were popular for a _long_ period of time. Long, that is, compared to 'pop sensations'. Sure Britney Spears is still around after 4 years, but there's been many replacements for her. (Lopez/Aguilera/Shakira/etc.)
I do agree that overplayed songs cause people not to buy stuff, which is true on all radios stations except ones that don't focus on modern music. (ie. 'New Rock', as well as Pop).
In regards to the last comment, that's referring strictly to pop music. The ones that don't write music, or dance routines, or lyrics, but are paid to learn them. (Which could explain why they don't last long.) There _is_ some good new music out there, Dream Theater is a good example. (Though good is subjective.)
In other words, a philosopher? :o) (Espcially one who's main field of study in language)
A name is a name and just that...Your not going to get more important all of a sudden because you have a new title.
The article states that "if application writers followed the guidelines provided by the LSB, you would not have dependency problems".
I don't see how any guidelines would change the fact that the non-RH RPMs are based on older libraries, (or newer, as the case may be). That is by far the biggest problem.
Example:
I wanted Eterm on my RH8.0 install, couldn't find any RH packages for it, so I tried a generic one. It depended on some Perl modules, no big deal. I grab those -- one module depended on an old version of Perl (it would only accept that version).
The only solution to this is for the RH packages maintainers to make RPMs for _everything_, which of course isn't possible. But that's part of the reason Debian has less of a problem with that, sid has about 8500 packages last time I checked, a LOT more than any version of RH.
Which brings us to another problem. All the RPM distros I've seen have big version differences in all their 'releases'. Which makes it hard for developers to release packages for the distro. They need one for 7.x, 8.x, etc.
Keen.
Apogee made Keen, right?
I want Keen.
Redneck Rampage?
...right?
There's always screen :).
Motif, Tcl/Tk, wxWindows? Die!
...You can't just tell people to drop these toolkits, or anything else for that matter. I know people that use fvwm because they like it better than everyone else. OSS isn't a democracy, people can use what they want. You can't make some people give up what they like for somebody else.
I don't understand what this fab is with bringing linux to the desktop. Let people use what they want. Your not going to force people to use it. If they feel like trying it, fine! If not, fine! I'm not going to give up good software, or control over my system (aRTs, gnome-control-center, nautilus), my favorite software (centericq, irssi), just because some prick wants a buncha people I don't know to use linux.
It will save people time as long as they only use apps that have RH packages. I tried getting Eterm. No official packages. I tried installing a non-distro specific package, RPM HELL. I ended up compiling it.
Update systems like that don't work unless you can either a) You can tell people what they want, or b) You can give people what they want.
Neither of which can be done all the time. And an RPM system is the most horrible thing to try and compile things on.
Hedwig and the Angry Inch. Amazing movie, actually was a musical first. Beautiful film, I love it to death.
Oh, and I don't know how underappreciated it is, but Ghost World.
I'm curious, how do you prototype software? I really have no idea how this can be done....or did you mean a prototype of the interface?
I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet, but about a year and half ago a big gaming/computer forum was running MySQL with vBulletin as the frontend. Horrible permorance. They had top-end Xeon servers dedicated completely to MySQL, and they still had about an hour of downtime everyday. I'm not sure if this true all the time, but in this case, MySQL could not handle heavy loads. They had to end up taking out there 'General Mayhem' forum, where more than half the traffic was.
GTA Settings runs fine here. Winex 2.2.1.
GTA1 runs great with WineX.
I'm really reminded of GTK's callbacks. This paticular example makes me think of AOP as the same thing as Event Driven prorgramming.
Whoa, hold on a minute there. Mullets are the _greatest_ hairstyle ever.
Wow. Someone's got some hostility in them. Ever considered anger managment training?
LOL. You reminded me of a Denis Leary bit.
"And then they graduate to those giant bongs where you have to start up a motorcyle...Kids driving their bongs down FDR Drive, 'comon' man! pull the bong over, i wanna take a hit'".
Seperate keypads? I don't see them....