Slashdot Mirror


Half Mast

PCM2 writes "The Columbine tragedy planted the idea of a certain kind of 'bad kid' into the American consciousness. He isn't social, he doesn't play sports, doesn't dress right. Maybe he spends more time with his computer than with the other kids in his class. It makes sense that he'd be a threat to his classmates, because he's weird. The consequences of this stereotype for the geek culture have already gotten a lot of air time on Slashdot -- most notably Jon Katz's Hellmouth series. So I immediately thought of Slashdot when I read Christopher Null's novel, Half Mast." Read on for the rest of PCM2's review. Half Mast author Christopher Null pages 219 publisher Sutro Press rating 7 reviewer PCM2 ISBN 0972098100 summary An interesting novel of murder among high school outsiders.

Alex, the protagonist of the story, is a geeky kid. He gets picked on. And he kills somebody because of it. But that's pretty much where the similarities between Alex and Dylan Klebold end.

What's refreshing about Half Mast is how the author accurately captures the world of a high-school outsider. Writers can be pretty introverted types themselves, but few of them end up killing anybody. So when they try to imagine the type of character who would, a lot of them tend to fall into the trap of inventing someone even more unfathomably nerdy than themselves. Thankfully, Null avoids this.

Alex isn't a complete, pathetic loner. He has friends. And together, Alex, Travis and James aren't the typical cookie-cutter stereotypes of kids too terminally dorky to get with the program. They're not so trollish that they can't get within booger-flicking distance of a girl, or so chess-club square that they wouldn't touch a drop of alcohol at a party (in fact, they spend much of their summers doing just the opposite). Null gets it: that most geeks aren't necessarily "deprived," and being an outsider isn't always about being excluded. It's about being different -- and that, in and of itself, can have its consequences.

In Alex's case, his nemesis is Steve Williams: hometown hero, star athlete, the pride and joy of Fall Valley High -- if you care about that sort of thing, that is. Alex doesn't, particularly. He fails to kowtow to Steve the way the way Fall Valley's golden boy thinks he deserves -- and here's where his proverbial troubles begin. Steve subjects Alex to a series of humiliating tortures that should have even the most picked-on geek cringing.

When Alex does finally strike back, it isn't with a hail of gunfire, either. He's calculating about it. I must admit, I'm not really convinced that Alex's modus operandi would actually pan out the way it does in Half Mast. But it certainly makes for more interesting reading than your standard shoot-out, and in its way, it's much more sinister. Also, because Alex doesn't have the option of the Columbine killers' quick way out, he's forced to live with his actions and their impact on his own life.

That's the book's focus, and what saves it from being just another wannabe crime thriller. Christopher Null cares about his characters, and he's taken care to depict them in a way that geeks will find sympathetic and (mostly) believable.

While a lot of Null's characters and situations were amusingly familiar, others rang less true. The Steve Williams character was a little too prone to making speeches about the relationship between bullies and their victims, for example, instead of just knocking Alex into the dirt the way the kids at my school would have done. There were also a few too many end-of-chapter "zinger" one-liners for my taste, and the novel uses the awkward device of a present-day journal talking about events that took place several years in the past.

Still, it's an impressive debut novel about an uncommon subject matter, and one I think a lot of Slashdotters would get a kick out of. Half Mast is a fast read, and an enjoyable one. It's also notable because the author chose to self-publish rather than go the traditional route. (Or maybe the topic was too "troublesome" for mainstream publishers in a post-Columbine world?)

You can purchase Half Mast from bn.com as well as from Null's own Web site at sutropress.com, which also has some excerpts from the book. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

400 comments

  1. Just went you thought Hellmouth was over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's back, and with a vengence. Oh boy. Anyone else think this is Jon Katz in disguise?

  2. Alex should have just waited by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 5, Funny

    he could have gotten even years later, like I do. When I see those jocks that used to oppress and torture me years ago in high school, I undertip them, and call the pizza shop to tell them it was cold.

    1. Re:Alex should have just waited by hemp · · Score: 5, Funny

      I always tip them a little extra and inform them that mullets are no longer in style and that Poison never did *rock*.

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    2. Re:Alex should have just waited by tmark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's interesting how bullying by people who are geeks is funny, when the same sort of activity by jocks is decried. Methinks if you had been a jock, you would have been bullying the geeks yourself. As it is, you just had to wait until you were in a position of strength, possibly if only via your anonymity. I'd lay a bet you wouldn't dare to do it to their face.

      Mean behavior is mean behavior. If it really tortured and hurt you then, you ought not to participate in it now.

    3. Re:Alex should have just waited by Talisman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mullets were *never* in style, unless you live in 'Bama, and Poison *did* rock, make-up and all.

      And bayyyy-bay.... Talk dirty to me.

      Tal

      --

      "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
    4. Re:Alex should have just waited by (1337)+God · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's all about how you value things, e.g. how you value things.

      I'd rather have a hot girlfriend and live a happy life as a bartender or sport athlete/coach.

      Most of you prefer to be tired, over-worked, miserable computer geeks with carpal tunnel syndrome. I'm sorry, but I don't see the appeal to that.

      While you're working your 75 hour weeks, I'm at the Knicks game with a few friends and some seriously cute women. We have a few drinks, watch a great game, then go back to my place and party a bit more, collapse into ecstasy onto my L-shaped sofa, and crash for 10 hours.

      --

      Background: 28/M/Bi-Sexual; Owner of a Linux company; MBA Harvard 2003; B.S. Comp Sci MIT 2000
    5. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just wait for them to try to bully you again. Then you point out that you can buy and sell them. That way, you're not starting the bullying, you're ending it.

    6. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all funny until you meet up with your old jock bully who went to Harvard, got an MBA and is now your boss. I don't know about where you went, but many of our jocks were actually pretty intelligent. I don't know why they bothered throwing a ball around though.

    7. Re:Alex should have just waited by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      [grin]

      To be honest, most kids grow out of it before they get to college age. I've met a few of the "Jocks" since then, and they have been politely interested in what I'm doing.

    8. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      " It's all about how you value things, e.g. how you value things."

      Really?

      I didn't know that, e.g. didn't know that.

      by the way, that girl you're with has the clap.

    9. Re:Alex should have just waited by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

      So what, were most Slashdot reader's born with out a sense of humour or do you get it surgically removed later. The orignal poster is joking.

    10. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a pretty typical attitude in geekdom:
      "These guys were assholes back in the day, so, they're invariable stucky in shitty jobs, they aren't happy with their lives, and they're bad people."

      I don't know if I can agree with any of these points. The assholes of high school do have some qualities. They know how to lead, to a certain degree, and work the social system. (Obviously this applies more to the "jock asshole" than the "thug asshole".)

      And I don't think that the people who were stuck up and vindictive in high school never change. Granted, they're still not likely to be people you'd want to hang around with, but it is possible to have a civil conversation with them. People change and mature. And a lot of the social hatred in high school is causes by the circumstances. Once the conditions that allow bullies and assholes to thrive go away, they tend to socialize quickly or be left in the trailer park.

      All of this is probably different because I'm from a small town (sub 1000 people). Perhaps they have more of a chance to change/excel in a rural environment.

      Any thoughts? Am I totally wrong?

    11. Re:Alex should have just waited by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1

      It's interesting how bullying by people who are geeks is funny, when the same sort of activity by jocks is decried.


      Wait a second, who said it wasnt funny the first time?
    12. Re:Alex should have just waited by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's interesting how bullying by people who are geeks is funny, when the same sort of activity by jocks is decried.

      I think what he was implying was not that he would torture or bully jocks who he didn't know, but just the particular ones who bullied him in high school.

      In this case, it's more karma than anything else... he's just showing the people who bullied him what he went through. You reap what you sow.
    13. Re:Alex should have just waited by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      You just wait for them to try to bully you again. Then you point out that you can buy and sell them. That way, you're not starting the bullying, you're ending it.

      If being able to "Buy and Sell" them has become your criterion for superiority, then your victory came too late; the bullies already Own you.

    14. Re:Alex should have just waited by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      Dammit! Where are all my mod points!?

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    15. Re:Alex should have just waited by secolactico · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I undertip them, and call the pizza shop to tell them it was cold

      Bad, bad, bad idea. You fail to realize that he is the one that handles your food moments before you eat it. If you undertip and report them, you'll probably have a couple of extra "toppings" on your pizza next time, no charge.

      --
      No sig
    16. Re:Alex should have just waited by dildatron · · Score: 1

      You've got to love the anonymous coward's replies to God himself.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    17. Re:Alex should have just waited by p0d · · Score: 1
      Well, being a computer geek myself, I still do know when to say when. By day, I'm a digital imaging technician, by night, I'm out and about on best nightlife scene in the country. I bring a camera along, so check out the galleries on this website for evidence of my lifestyle.

      A 75 hour week is too much for me. I try my damndest never to work more than 50 or so. Grant it, there's the occasional "week from hell", but any job has that. I usually don't waste my time at sporting events because I believe they are too expensive, the only time I will go is if I'm comped, and usually on those times, I make money by showing up. I'm not sedentary either, I try to hit the gym a few times a week, and just doing what I do tends to keep me active to a point. Yeah I've got the early stages of CTS, but that comes from not following the rules of typing I guess, not overuse of a PC. As far as girls go...gee I live on South Beach, need I say more? I'm friends and more with girls who would make your seriously cute ones look like Rosie O'Donnell by comparison.

    18. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. Poison STILL rocks.

    19. Re:Alex should have just waited by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      I think the fact that he is delivering pizza to you says more to him than a lousy tip ever could.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    20. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll. You say it's all in how you value things and then go on to deride what other people value while exaggerating your own superficial ones. Again, nice work!

    21. Re:Alex should have just waited by theghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not Karma. Pretending that a base desire for revenge is cosmically due is just an excuse. Sure, some people treated us like shit when we were young and geeky and powerless, but treating anyone - even those same jerks - like shit now that we're older and geeky and not so powerless just compounds the problem.

      Ask yourself if your actions are making the net quality of life on Earth better or worse.

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    22. Re:Alex should have just waited by brmic · · Score: 1

      >Life is a sexually transmitted disease. ... and inevitably fatal.

    23. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how much saliva and booger you've swallowed since you stated your own bullying.

    24. Re:Alex should have just waited by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      In the immortal words of Clint Eastwood (from the movie "Unforgiven")

      "We've all got it coming kid".

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    25. Re:Alex should have just waited by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

      The difference being that the jocks were typically being assholes for the sake of being assholes. The geeks are do it for revenge.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    26. Re:Alex should have just waited by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Funny
      When I see those jocks that used to oppress and torture me years ago in high school, I undertip them, and call the pizza shop to tell them it was cold.

      That gives a new meaning to <voice style=ricardo-montalban> the Klingon proverb which tells us revenge is a dish that is best served cold... </voice>

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    27. Re:Alex should have just waited by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I agree in prinicipal, but sometimes you just gotta say sod it ;-) I would not lose any sleep about undertipping someone who bullied me for several years.

    28. Re:Alex should have just waited by rnws · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Some points to note:

      1. Dude, hookers don't count...

      2. I quit living my life in a bar when I looked around one day and saw the sagging, tired old men that had been doing that their whole lives and deciding that I for one wasn't going to die a slow death that way.

      3. Being athletic doesn't have to mean running around playing with your balls...
      A footballer might be able to run 100 yards faster than me but I can snap his limbs in a heartbeat, and I'll out-run him over a mile.

      4. Again, hookers don't count. Take it from the geek who's screwed his biology teacher, a cheerleader and a 19yo lingerie model (...and who's still kicking himself for leaving her...)

      5. Haven't you ever read Nietzsche? God is dead already.

      My aplogies to all those who would treat this a troll, but he pushed a button.

    29. Re:Alex should have just waited by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1
      It's all about how you value things


      Exactly right, though you go on to contradict yourself by saying that geeks can't be happy with their lifestyle.

      Everyone, do what makes you happy as long as it doesn't hurt other people. Blaze a j, play some games, work on the linux kernel, watch some sports, play some sports, read a book, write a book, play with your kids, who gives a fuck as long as you have fun? Anyone that judges someone elses lifestyle (assuming it doesn't hurt anybody, I'm not sticking up for murderers or anything :) is just elitist scum, whether they're a bartender or a CEO.

      Personally, I am not very social but I am also not the stereotypical geek at all (I am well groomed, I am reasonably attractive, I work a geek job but never more than 50 hours per week, I have non geeky hobbies, I have a girlfriend (more like a common-law wife), etc). In fact, I have never really met the stereotypical geek, and the older they are, the less they fit the stereotype.

      I don't look down on geeks for wanting to never go out and just write code, and I don't look down on people who just want to coast through life and party every weekend.

      All that really matters is that you can look at yourself and say "I had fun and I didn't hurt anybody." It's a bonus if you accomplish something great, but I don't see why it's a requirement for being a part of the human race.
      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    30. Re:Alex should have just waited by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      Whoa, hold on a minute there. Mullets are the _greatest_ hairstyle ever.

    31. Re:Alex should have just waited by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Anybody who's familiar with chaos theory should be able to quickly come to the conclusion that deciding whether your actions are a net positive for quality of life on the planet is basically impossible. Even deciding whether your actions are a net positive for your quality of life in the next sixty seconds is often impossible.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    32. Re:Alex should have just waited by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      hey! Mullets RULE!! Chicks DIG mullets.... they just happen to all be in denial.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    33. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos.

      Your job on this plane is to be nice to people. If they weren't nice to you a decade or two ago, ignore them. If you don't have better things to do with your time than exact revenge, they're still the boss of you.

      This is what happens when people see the Hollywood movie version of the Count of Monte Cristo instead of reading the book.

    34. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite untrue. The nerds are doing it because most of them are assholes. When they're in any position of power they'll exert the same sort of ruthlessness that the standard bully does. That's why I hate nerds. People who are mean & strong suck. People who are mean & weak really suck.
      A good example: This nerd kid in my school used to get bullied all the time. I kept defending him (and not in the way that makes him feel inferior to me, in the "we're all in the same boat sense"). Whenever I talked to him I made sure to never offend him and to treat him on the same level as me. Sure enough, after a little while he started trying to bully me.
      Another good example: in an academic setting where intelligence & achievement are valued, nerds are cutthroat sons of bitches who will use deciet, aggressive and passive-aggressive tactics to get just an inch above the competition.
      I wasn't popular in junior high, and fit many of the critera of being a nerd. The only thing I felt that didn't make me a nerd was that I treated the strong & the weak equally. Nerds and bullies are the same people. The only difference is the brief span of time where one group can dominate the other.
      Of course this all can be expanded on.

      Paraphrased:
      "I hate the weak. They're always worried about who's going to attack them next and they can't take decisive action"
      "Strong people make them that way!"
      - GundamW

    35. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it's all revenge. The jocks were doing it because of what their fathers did to them, and so on, and so on. Trying to find the needle at the bottom of the "but revenge is justified" haystack is just a case of wanting to justify things you know you ought not do, but you want to. Actually a hell of a lot of stuff is based on that simple conflict.

      Either that or watching too many crappy action movies with Hollywood Revenge endings.

    36. Re:Alex should have just waited by Forgotten · · Score: 0, Troll

      In fact, giving someone in that situation a good makes a lot more effective statement. I'm surprised people around here don't understand the "genial wage enslavement" principle of capitalism. You don't show your status and exert social control by being mean to people, but by making them think you're being nice (though never nice enough to actually improve their lives or the world as a whole).

      Not that I think any of this stuck-in-high-school stuff is worth a damn - if anything it's telling me why I really shouldn't read slashdot any more.

    37. Re:Alex should have just waited by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      Most of you prefer to be tired, over-worked, miserable computer geeks with carpal tunnel syndrome. I'm sorry, but I don't see the appeal to that.

      Sure. You're the one with "1337" and "God" in your nick. Tell me that doesn't ooze great globs of geek essence.

    38. Re:Alex should have just waited by ryochiji · · Score: 1
      >I'm at the Knicks game with a few friends and some seriously cute women. We have a few drinks, watch a great game, then go back to my place and party a bit more, collapse into ecstasy onto my L-shaped sofa, and crash for 10 hours.

      And that's.... fun?

      You must have an odd definition of "fun".

    39. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is very cold in space, Kirk.

    40. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was from a small town as well - we semed to have another asshole group - the hick asshole. They sometimes crossed-over with the jock asshole but despised the thug assholes. Actually the thugs weren't assholes as they took me under their wings. Not much for intelligent conversation or appreciation of a good D&D session but they showed me the glories of smoking weed and vandalizing things.

    41. Re:Alex should have just waited by artg · · Score: 1

      Yup. Give them a standard tip, then doubletake and give them more.

    42. Re:Alex should have just waited by avesti · · Score: 1

      CAnadians love mullets more than the Alabama people do.

    43. Re:Alex should have just waited by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Revenge is at least a reasonable motivation for agression, as opposed to pure sadism or some motivation even less interesting.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    44. Re:Alex should have just waited by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You are assuming facts not in evidence. You are also making weak excuses for petty cruelty.

      To harm with no real reason is far worse than any crime of passion no matter how pre-meditated.

      Acknowledging this does not require condoning vengance at all. It only requires recognizing what is the greater evil.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    45. Re:Alex should have just waited by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      revenge is a dish that is best served cold...

      The best revenge is to live well. By now you will be better paid, better dressed and probably better looking than them. Perhaps you're even stronger and faster too. Why waste your time bearing grudges? It's not as if they can hurt you now. Life's too short and there's too much else you could be doing with that energy.

    46. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, thanks for the object lesson in how to completely miss the point.

      Hint: don't confuse recognisable with reasonable.

    47. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, hookers do count. There's no difference in trading money for sex and trading seductive behaviors for sex, either way it costs you something.

    48. Re:Alex should have just waited by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 1

      Umm, right. And who's paying for it?

      --
      Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
    49. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it Jus Talionis or is it just unmoral behavior? Is it not mean and cruel to put someone in prison, yet we do just that when they commit a crime against us? Is it not true that when someone acts unjustly against us that we are authorized to act unjustly against them?


      I believe people get what they earn in life, if you earn my disrespect by treating me poorly in highschool, then that's exactly what you get when I see you later in life, just my thoughts.

    50. Re:Alex should have just waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously that strategy has to be combined with ordering from a different place next time...

      Although quite honestly, the people who are still into pizza delivery as adults are usually not jocks or bully-types, they are usually immigrants or just temporarily desperate people... YMMV

  3. Oh No ! by stud9920 · · Score: 1, Funny
    The Columbine tragedy planted the idea of a certain kind of 'bad kid' into the American consciousness
    JonKatz is back.
    1. Re:Oh No ! by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought we were done discussing Columbine. I'm one step closer to disabling Timothy's posts from my Slashdot preferences.

  4. psycho tests by sidvishus9 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's not really NORMAL. You have to have a predisposition to psychosis AND be a nerd in order to flip out with a gun. We need less people blaming parents and more people advocating psycho tests instead of standardized academic testing.

    1. Re:psycho tests by Anarren · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Psycho tests" have a tendancy to miss important things. They rarely give much insight into anything but a pre-defined tendancy or trait, and with a few exceptions (sociopathy, psychopathy) don't predict violent behavior. In fact, labelling kids based on that kind of test would isolate them even more, which is bad since isolation and ostracism seem to be the root of the problem.
      The key here is to go after the system which isolates and abuses kids in such a way that they feel the only escape is murder and/or suicide. How do we do this? Teachers and scool administrators need to take a more active role in their classrooms...not interfereing per se outside the classroom, but setting an example.
      In my high school (a distant and happily fading memory), teachers ignored teasing and bullying until (and often after) real fights broke out. If they'd simply said "enough" and stopped it (or at least tried) many of us would have had more positive, or at least less negative, experiences.
      And of course actually having and enforcing proper gun control wouldn't hurt. (had to get that in, eh?)

      --
      "Knowledge is of two kinds: we know a subject ourselves or we know where we can find information." -Samuel Johnson
    2. Re:psycho tests by Hellraisr · · Score: 1

      Actually we need less doctors prescribing mind altering drugs to children for their hyperactivity and ADD.

      What they probably need is less sugar in their diet and more love and attention from their parents.

      Any kid can become a psychotic on these mind altering drugs like Prozac, Ridalin, etc etc. It doesn't always happen, but it can happen.. is it worth the risk?

    3. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a predisposition to psychosis (bipolar disorder) and I was a badly bullied nerd in high school. I didn't flip out and shoot anyone because I have a fairly good grasp of cause and effect and because my parents made sure I knew there was a bright future ahead of me. I had too much to lose to waste my life blowing away bullies.

      And don't confuse psychotic and psychopathic--they're not the same. A psychotic person has delusions and hallucinations. A psychopath has no empathy for other people (kind of like a habitual bully). A psychotic person wouldn't take pleasure in another person's suffering like a psychopath or a bully would.

    4. Re:psycho tests by EEgopher · · Score: 1

      some forget that those Columbine kids were also on drugs, like cocaine -- not just buzzed up. Is that not a significant part of the problem? the media obsesses with Kurt Cobain buckling under whatever pressure you can pull out of the hat, but the drugs are always overlooked because the reporters either want to keep using drugs themselves, or don't want to convey anti-substance material in their articles in fear that they won't get published.
      It appears in almost every case. Cocaine, alchohol -- any substance -- gives you the "synthetic courage" (thanks S.King) to do what you normally never would. Look at the bank robbers who only do their heists when they're cooked up. Suicides, rapes, talking to the girl at the party, so often pushed from pondering to action by the substance. People with no guts when sober; monsters under their chemical surge.
      Where's the fine line between "predisposition to psychosis" and "cranked like a Model-T" ???

      --
      hi, I like pancakes -.-- -.-- --..
    5. Re:psycho tests by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      personally I despise all drugs given by psychiatrist, because they are nothing more than a crutch for the weak. But I don't think Ridalin had anything to do with these killings, I think slowly turning us into a nation of pussies has done this, you can't punch a kid without getting a two week suspension now. What happened to the days when a couple of guys would get in a fight and their parents would be called and nothing else, hell, now the school calls the cops. People have fighting and violence in their blood and if it doesn't come out in small doses it's liable to come out in explosions.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    6. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly. the last thing we need is parents taking personal responsibility for raising their kids.

    7. Re:psycho tests by rppp01 · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      More and more, the scientific community is learning that genetic attitude traits inherited have more to do with the temperment of a person than any other factor.

      Once it was thought that a person's character was a result of the way they were raised. This isn't the case, and I am glad science is finally starting to find data on this and publish it.

      --
      They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
    8. Re:psycho tests by gowen · · Score: 2, Informative
      Some forget that those Columbine kids were also on drugs, like cocaine
      Says who? Klebold's and Harris's medical records are sealed, and this hardly makes your assertion appear to be common knowledge.

      Stop talking bollocks.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    9. Re:psycho tests by domninus.DDR · · Score: 1

      Well the whole point in the change is that schools shifted their focus more to academics. The theory is people dont learn if they are threatened / anticipating physical violence between classes. I agree with you though: my parents tried to make me go to a phychiatrist to get me to quit everquest and I said fuck that quit on my own and got a job. I dont know if the raising a kid in the real world (tough kid) school and the ideal learning enviroment can meet anywhere in the middle. Although at my highschool everything gets punished severly and we do pretty well on standardized tests and such. I personally like my school but that may be because I dont do drugs drink that much or beat people up :)

    10. Re:psycho tests by brmic · · Score: 1

      >... the scientific community is learning that genetic attitude traits inherited have more to do with the temperment of a person than any other factor.

      erm, sorry, but doctors have been saying that all along, and though psychologists tend to disagree, the doctors rightly can point out that their profession was around well before BC (not sure whether this improves their arguments though)

      >Once it was thought that a person's character was a result of the way they were raised. This isn't the case, and I am glad science is finally starting to find data on this and publish it.

      sorry again, but this IS the case, and even the worst current estimates grant your experience around 40% of your makeup. the impression of gene dominance is merely produced by recent breakthroughs in genetic and neuroimaging and things like the "decade of the brain". At least for neuroimaging i can safely say that most of the stuff is utter crap (like substractive Donder's-style designs) which merely get's publicity because nobody speaks out and puts an end to the cash flow into expensive fMRI machines. (and please don't tell me you believed science was about truth and not money. that's too ridiculous to discuss)

    11. Re:psycho tests by tzanger · · Score: 1

      What happened to the days when a couple of guys would get in a fight and their parents would be called and nothing else, hell, now the school calls the cops.

      That's because the fuckers are bringing guns and other weapons into the fights these days. I'd call the cops too.

    12. Re:psycho tests by podperson · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't think you need to be a nerd, the predisposition to psychosis is sufficient (but possibly not necessary) to "flip out with a gun".

      Indeed, I would suspect the nerds are under-represented among folks who "flip out with a gun" because they are more likely to have other emotional outlets.

    13. Re:psycho tests by Matt+-+Duke+'05 · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll bite...

      How are prescription drugs a "crutch for the weak?" Granted, if there's a kid out there crushing up his Ritalin/Adderal and blowing lines of it off of his bathroom mirror I might follow your logic. However, what about all of the kids our there who are correctly prescribed these drugs to cure their problems? Are people who take Advil weak? How about AIDS patients who take numerous pills a day just to stay alive and ward it off? Are these drugs the "crutch" of the "weak" AIDS patients? Just because Ritalian and Adderal treat malfunctions of the mind, instead of the body, does not make them any different from any other prescription drug. These kids have different wiring in their brains - their brains do not function in the same manner as normal person's does. It is unbelievably naive of you to say that these drugs are crutches for the weak.

      Now onto for your next point, your ever-so-enlightening theory that these killings resulted from the fact that we have become a "nation of pussies." Clever. You ask, "what happened to the days when a couple of guys would get in a fight and their parents would be called and nothing else." Well sir, what happened was that crazy fuckers started bringing assault rifles and bombs to school and blowing away their classmates. I guess slaughtering kids with military-grade weaponry is somehow effeminate, or "pussy," in your mind.

      Now, with this in mind - the whole blowing the school up thing - if there is an incident the school has to do something about it. First and foremost, they need to make sure that further incidents don't happen and as such they need to have the mindset that any fight could potentially be an indication of future incidents (i.e. people critized many of the schools/parents/teachers involved with many of the school shootings for not recognizing the early signs of trouble). Next, I don't know if you've noticed this, but people are actually suing McDonald's for "making" them fat. Like it or not, we live in a Court TV society. With this in mind, what do you think would happen if a fight or something else happend at school and the "parents would be called and nothing else," and then 2 weeks later the kid blew up the cafeteria? You'd have the lawsuit of the century on your hands.

      So, to answer your question, these killings didn't result from the fact that we're a nation of "pussies". They happened because some kids got pissed off and exhibited some early signs of trouble, which were ignored (i.e. the whole "parents would be called and nothing else" that you speak so kindly of). These kids happened to get access to lots of weapons and killed people. Simple as that.

      --
      -Matt
      Duke '05
    14. Re:psycho tests by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can only assume that you're trolling, but just so that no one else puts any stock in the bullshit spewing forth from the parent post...

      There is NO relationship between sugar and hyperactivity.

      ADD is genetic, not a result of bad parenting (although bad parenting can exacerbate the symptoms).

      And as someone who is on medication to treat ADD, I can tell you that my life before and after starting the medication (both as a child and as an adult) is like night and day. Ritalin, the most common medication for ADD, is one of the most well-researched and longest-used (since the 1940s) drugs currently available. Like ANY medication, these is some risk involved in using it. The majority of the risk comes from not using the medication properly, overdosing, or allergic reaction.

      There is not one, single, documented case of Prozac (the most common anti-depressant) creating a "psychotic". Not one.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    15. Re:psycho tests by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Has the American gene pool become severely compromised and poluted over the last decade or two? Seeing how one generation is between 20 and 30 years, that's very unlikely. The levels of violence in society has increased orders of magnitude over a very short period of time -- much to short a period to be attributable to genetics. The only thing I can point to is a serious decline in "parenthood"; parents cannot be bothered to raise their children...

      20 to 30 years ago, we weren't a bunch of gun-toting, troll-like, social rejects snapping like dry twigs and blowing up malls. Back then, children were punished for misbehaving -- and I'm not talking about the lame, ineffectual "timeout". Parents actually took time to know what their children were doing. And they knew where we were -- if we weren't where we were supposed to be, out came the punishment.

      In the modern world, it's easier to make up some "disorder" to explain people's behavior than address the behavior. Part of it is the greed of doctors, clinics, and entire industries. But the other part is the parents clinging to an "it's not my fault" line -- there's no way their lack of parenting is to blame for their child's ADD/OCD/etc. It's bullshit. Bullshit I tell you! Most people sucked their thumb as a child. That's technically an OCD, but that habit is broken after a few years. (either by "old school" punishment or modern passive "shame" methods.)

    16. Re:psycho tests by TarPitt · · Score: 1
      A psychopath has no empathy for other people

      I would suggest that all psychopaths learn to control their violent tendencies. By doing so, they ensure themselves successful careers at the pinnacle of American business.

      --
      If your children ever found out how lame you are, they'd murder you in your sleep
    17. Re:psycho tests by Forgotten · · Score: 1

      Uh, even if you credit the notion of some testable state called "psychopathy" (or sociopathy, same thing, different POV), it demonstrably doesn't predict violent behaviour. People who score high on the PCL (say) aren't any more violent than those who don't - possibly less so as they tend to be pretty good at getting what they want through social engineering. They don't give a damn about anyone, but they're not dumb either (even if amazingly blind to many things).

      I don't actually believe in psychopathy as currently (ill-)defined, but your "with a few exceptions" comment rubbed me the wrong way. Same with DSM labels like "antisocial personality disorder" - even if they're useful, they're not useful to predict the sort of violence we're talking about here.

      In my opinion the people who do these mass murders aren't even disordered at all - they're pretty much pursuing what society told them to. There's a little bit of that in everyone growing up in the current media environment and using the impoverished social tools they're given. They were just the visible tip of a very large iceberg.

    18. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You refer to published data and yet you link us to none. You people never back up your arguments with legitamite research or scientific documents, if I am lucky people give us a link to a poorly made site on google claiming to be written by a professional scientist

    19. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats on booting EC (without other drugs) btw.

    20. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, yes, someone with AIDS is weakened - hence the "deficiency" in the name. If they weren't weak they wouldn't have a problem. So sure, drugs can help them.

      Everything you wrote is predicated on the assumption that ADHD is real, genetic (and/or prenatal), and can only be treated by drugs. This is the popular view, and it didn't happen by accident. It's very profitable for modern industrial psychopharmacology for you to believe that. It also not coincidentally allows other companies to keep promulgating a children's lifestyle rich in Chocolate Frosty Sugar Bombs followed by a half-hour of rapid-edit TV shows and toy ads, maybe a twitch video game, and off to school.

      Are modern psychoactive prescription drugs a crutch? Yes, but they're as much a crutch for an ailing society as any individual within it. But with children it's understandably more galling to see. Call it a crutch for their parents.

    21. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Quake, or Devil May Cry?

    22. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sincerely glad you're helped by your medication, but you cannot demonstrate a genetic cause. And that doesn't imply "bad parenting" either (though it may mean that the best people can offer isn't always enough in this nuclear-family society).

      Yes, I followed your links. You should be aware of the controversy surrounding twin studies before relying on them for your argument. There is no proof here of genetic causation (or even a meaningful genetic component), for all sorts of reasons.

      Again, I'm glad your life is turning out well - but it's only an anecdote. Lots of other people have been deeply harmed by the ADHD diagnosis and prescribed medication, and you should be aware of that before championing it so loudly.

    23. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You do realize that the "Pd" scale on an MMPI stands for "psychopathic deviation" right? I'm actually asking. They might be telling kids it's a Latin abbreviation for "incense and peppermints" these days, from what I'm hearing (left the field for greener pastures, sorry).

      Along the same lines, they DO still call the "K" scale the lying scale, don't they? Or does it mean and do exactly the same thing only they changed the name? Seems to be a lot of that going around.

    24. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The assumption that ADHD is real and genetic"?! Are we instead to assume that all these people (including thirtysomethings like me) actually have perfectly normal focus, serotonin levels, and SPECT blood flows during concentration and that the mountain of test results, twin studies, and subjective reports has been uniformly tampered with by the Breakfast Cereal Cabal?

    25. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harmed how? Was some other condition disregarded? Did they keep taking medication that didn't work instead of trying something else?

    26. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The misuses of the MMPI are legendary, and do include the scales you mention. Psychometrics are all pretty overblown, but the MMPI in particular is only valid for about 1% of the uses it's put to nowadays.

      Also, what does any of this have to do with the two parent posts??

    27. Re:psycho tests by brmic · · Score: 1

      the Pd scale is still psychopathic deviation (or Psychopathia in Latin).
      dunno what the K-Scale is these days, can't check on MMPI-2000 yet. probably won't matter what they call it anyway.
      btw. while being a smartass, i might as well at that the MMPI is constructed according to criterion, that is, almost theory free. they only chose items (questions) that seperate normal from clinic populations. hence its use to diagnose healthy individuals is wholly unjustified. (we'd have to argue about its use for the norm/clinic split)

    28. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, we're instead supposed to understand that brain function and brain chemistry and inextricably entangled. That means you can't look at any of those test results and know where the chemistry you observe came from. Even a simple idea changes the state of your brain, and obsessive ideation changes it a lot. That means that even if drugs worked perfectly you couldn't know whether the obsessive-compulsive behaviour caused the serotinin levels you see or vice-versa. Given that the vagaries of human experience and the flexibility of the brain greatly outweigh the actual genetic differences available, I tend to vote (heavily) for the former.

      Twin studies are actually evidence for that simple fact, not for genetic causation (or even strong diathesis).

      Sometimes the reason for a conclusion is people not being smart enough to see that their first inclination might not be right.

      Do you think you can raise someone with the focus of a Zen master in front of MTV with a bowl of white sugar and flour? For that matter, why do you think monks go for all that reduced stimulation and careful diet? This isn't exactly new information I'm giving you. Your world affects you. Hell, it makes you. Don't let the focus on Western individuality blind you to that.

    29. Re:psycho tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes, if the "condition" is fast-food culture.

      You need to step back from some of the "chemical disorder" dogma here. Even if not to change your views, at least to be able to better examine them. Just because a blunderbuss drug changes one thing in a way you like doesn't mean it's overall good, and it particularly doesn't imply any understanding of what's actually going on.

    30. Re:psycho tests by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Kids have been rebelling and killing each other for as long as there's been kids. It's just expressed in different ways. We have some kids who snap and kill people with assault rifles. 100 years ago they didn't have assault rifles, so they gang raped people at boarding school. There's NEVER been a generation that hasn't been portrayed as worse than the one that came before it. Violence and sex runs in cycles. Sure, there's more now than there was 50 years ago. There's a lot less than there was 200 years ago. In the 19th century there was a backlash and we had the Victorians and we've been steadily getting more sex and violence since then, in a couple generations we'll probably snap again.

    31. Re:psycho tests by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > 20 to 30 years ago, we weren't a bunch of
      > gun-toting, troll-like, social rejects snapping
      > like dry twigs and blowing up malls. Back then,
      > children were punished for misbehaving

      No they weren't. 20 years ago, a pre-teen could send 3 people to the ER on the same night and not even get a slap on the wrist. Children have known for some decades that they can litterally get away with murder. IMO, this has slowly emboldened the youth population of this country.

      They all know that there will be no real consequences of their actions.

      Also, most of the severe violent activity goes on in areas that are already low-income, high-violence areas where drug gang turf wars are commonplace.

      Much of the "perception" regarding guns in schools is skewed by this part of the society that has been under active attack during the "war on drugs". Disrupt the drug gangs and turf wars will ensue as other thugs get sucked into the power vacuum.

      Take Compton out of the picture and things aren't even as grim as the news media would have you believe.

      Also, kids went psycho with guns long before the current era. Such incidents happened in the 1920's. They just weren't overdiscussed to the point of abusrdity.

      Anyways: the tendency to look the other way when minors go amok can be traced back at least 20 years, if not 30. Infact, you can point to plenty of "hood movies" from the 70's like Bad News Bears, Bless the Beasts & Children, The Warriors or Candleshoe.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    32. Re:psycho tests by aminorex · · Score: 1

      "Psychosis" as you use the term is really a social
      category used to excercise power over others.
      While Klebold and Harris were certainly neurotic in
      the classical sense, they were not clinically psychotic.
      What they lacked was a reasonable value system,
      and an engaging community, not sanity.
      What they abounded in was testosterone and
      (justifiable) self-pity. It's a nasty combination.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    33. Re:psycho tests by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      Crutch for the weak? Like, if you are strong,
      but had broken legs, you wouldn't need no stinking crutches, eh?

      --

      Considered harmful.
  5. When I hear "Half Mast" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I think of erectile disfunction.

    Yay for Viagra!

  6. For a second there.... by gik · · Score: 5, Funny

    .... I thought this was about a book called "Half Mast" describing the sadness of living with impotence. .... No offence intended.

    --
    ZERO
    1. Re:For a second there.... by prof187 · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, i thought the same thing too

      --

      My other sig is an import.
    2. Re:For a second there.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I thought that too too too, but my comment that came first was moderated by mods on crack.

    3. Re:For a second there.... by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. I thought "Half Mast" was going to be yet another Half-Life mod.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    4. Re:For a second there.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, a case of impotent minds thinking alike?

    5. Re:For a second there.... by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      Gawd, I hope that does not qualify as "News for Nerds, Stuff that matters."

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  7. Who needs sports? by NeoFunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it's really sad that a young person is classified as an "outcast" or a "loser" if he doesn't choose to define his life through sports.

    1. Re:Who needs sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen... I hated sports as a kid and still do. It's sad that America sees sports as the Holy Grail of social interaction, particularly in the high school years. I was a member of the chess club in HS and got the shit kicked out of me on a number of occaisions by the asshole jocks. Some of them are now construction workers freezing their asses off while I sit, comfortably sipping a Starbucks latte managing firewalls...

    2. Re:Who needs sports? by saskboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sports are important. They just aren't as important as jocks and soccer moms like to think they are. People who play sports have a lot of fun, and have better opportunities for picking up very attractive members of the opposite sex. I think a loser is someone who wastes their athletic ability by smoking, or refusing to participate.
      Coordination can be learned. If someone is too clumbsy to catch or throw properly, someone else didn't teach them properly. Some parts of throwing are instinctual, but not all of them.
      Part of the problem is that city life doesn't lend itself naturally to sports. The places to play are crowded, and when you want to use the basketball court, you have to either be bigger than the people currently using it, or wait on the sidelines doing something else. Organized sports are an unnatural event. People should be able to just go outside with their buddies when ever the weather allows, and start playing.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Who needs sports? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sports are not more important than people.

      Sports can lead to people worrying about stuff that's not important whatsoever to their real lives, it can cause frustration, humiliation, and teach vengeance and reward cruelty if taught improperly.

      Health and exercise is important, but how one decides to have fun and/or attempt to attract the opposite sex should not have sway in their being a 'loser'.

      Finally, many atheletes do worse things than smoking in the form of drugs to improve performance because winning has become their lives.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    4. Re:Who needs sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coordination can be learned. If someone is too clumbsy to catch or throw properly, someone else didn't teach them properly.

      1. it's clumsy. This isn't a typo, it's a misspelling.

      2. Sometimes poor coordination is due to a neurological issue (fine motor control disabilities, for instance; which are interestingly common among geeks). All the teaching in the world won't make someone with an fmc disability better at catching a baseball than a kid with dyslexia is at reading PERL code.

    5. Re:Who needs sports? by NeoFunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I agree that sports are important. I think it's good for all children to have some exposure to them - they help build teamworking skills, they teach them healthy competitive skills, and they're good for the mind and body.

      I'm just disappointed that the children who choose to define their life through sports are considered "cooler" or "better adjusted" than the kid who takes more interest in, say, science or computers. In my opinion, our society has its prioities was screwed up. Realistically, most of us know that cognitive ability is going to be far more valuable in a person's life than the ability to kick a ball, but still the jocks get all the praise and admiration.

    6. Re:Who needs sports? by saskboy · · Score: 1

      You are right on all accounts.

      Notice how I critized ORGANIZED sports, and a lack of proper athletic training? People get all worked up over stuff that is supposed to be fun and healthy because some kids [parents] can't play nice [fair].

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    7. Re:Who needs sports? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Its also an excellent way to get a good scholarship and builds character(you dont need to play football either, there are tons of things like golf scholarships out there). Geeks need to open their horizons as much as anyone else.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    8. Re:Who needs sports? by NineNine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah, little do you know that the chicks athletes get are the boring blond bimbos that are just waiting for the boring house in the suburbs with the boring SUV full of boring kids. While those who "smoke and refuse to participate" are the ones that get the really cool chicks.

    9. Re:Who needs sports? by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      All the things you just said about sports can also be said about computers. Too much of anything will end up being detrimental to you as a person. People who think that sports are the end all be all of their lives are no worse than someone who sits in front of their computer 24/7.

    10. Re:Who needs sports? by urbazewski · · Score: 1
      I agree that sports are given too much emphasis --- for boys. But look at the other side of the coin, the long dark years before Title IX when girls didn't have the opportunity to play sports at all. I wrote a long screed about this in January after an 11 year old friend of mine (whose winter sports are/have been indoor soccer, ice hockey and downhill racing) asked me what I sports I did when I was her age. Answer: none.

      Here's my take on some important life lessons that can be learned from participating in team sports, even if, or maybe especially if, you suck:

      1) no matter how bad you are when you start, you get better with practice
      2) no matter how overmatched or behind you are, you play to the end of the game
      3) even if you happen to be winning, you still have to pay attention.

      --
      foldplay your photos won't know what hit them.
    11. Re:Who needs sports? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      I absolutely agree. The parent fanatics are probably the worst part of the whole thing. They turned my 8 year old completely off of indoor soccer because the point was Win! Win! Win!. Not plain old have fun. And remember folks we're talking 8 year olds, where the big draw is getting to run around with their friends and kick things every Saturday.

      So I throw the ball with both of our boys and just have fun with them. That is, I believe, the greatest value in sports.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    12. Re:Who needs sports? by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sports are only as important as you make it to be, no more, no less. You're not interested, well, the whole concept of athletic competition could be outlawed and you couldn't care less.

      Note that there is a fundamental difference between "sports" (ie. competitive atcletics) and "exercise". You do emphatically _not_ need to participate in a sport to get exercise. And it is exercise that is important for your health and well-being, not competition. A surprising number of geek friends that loathe the idea of sports (and that cut PE classes) are nevertheless avid exercisers; they just don't wish to compare performance with others.

      There are a number of athletic activities available that are not competitive but very beneficial - and that tends to appeal to geeks: Walking rather than riding a bus or car; rock climbing; cycling (as transport of enjoyment, not racing); weight lifting and gymnastics (good for your back); dancing - classical or ballroom; hiking. there are many others of course, all with the common denominator of not having to induce an unhealthy competitive element.

      If school gymknastics were to emphasize the joy of exercise rather than just ranking people on their ability to throw a ball then maybe there wouldn't be so much disdain towards it from the less talented.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    13. Re:Who needs sports? by iabervon · · Score: 1

      People who play sports have a lot of fun, because people who don't have a lot of fun playing sports quit doing so as soon as they possibly can. People who build stage sets have lots of fun, and so do people who play computer games (both of which also require coodination). Getting exercise is also important, and is best when you're enjoying it, but some people find sports boring or unpleasant and are happier walking or going to the gym or doing a martial art.

      Who needs sports? People who enjoy sports.

    14. Re:Who needs sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it sports-per-se, or is there a big difference depending on what sport you choose to do?

      Typical high school sports are along the lines of TEAM sports...football/baseball/basketball/hockey...wit h all the locker room and coach bullshit that goes with them. Has anybody really looked at the effects much of the quasi-military training and atmosphere can have on different people? Some of the stuff that goes on is anything but character building, and is really just a form of officially sanctioned bullying. Small wonder that many classic high school bullies are also the schoolyard jocks!

      I loathe any form of team sports, and won't even participate in things like softball games at work. But if there's a sports day involving, say, skiing or biking, I'm there. In the past few years, I have been taking part in triathlon, which involves the three disciplines of swimming, biking and running. It's a blast! And the best part is that many people who don't think they can ever do such a thing could, in fact, quite easily do the shorter ones!

      But anyway, it's not so much sports in general that causes much of the problems with bullying, it's the regimentation and the ultra-competitive atmosphere of typical high school team sports that is the cause. Sports ARE important, but much of the institutionalized BS involved at the high school level shouldn't be there.

    15. Re:Who needs sports? by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      Not to take away from your point, but there is something to be said for physical fitness, which is something that, when stretched out over a lifetime, rather than concentrated in someone's first 25 years, can extend someone's lifespan enormously. And that, as well, is extremely valuable.

      I'm betting the guy who simply runs every morning is going to last longer than the nerd and the guy who broke every major bone in his body playing football.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    16. Re:Who needs sports? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Coordination can be learned. If someone is too clumbsy to catch or throw properly, someone else didn't teach them properly. Some parts of throwing are instinctual, but not all of them.

      I dunno, I'm terrible at catching and throwing, always was. Can't play racquet sports worth a damn either, and it's not through lack of trying. But not all sports involve catching... at school I competed at district level in swimming and rifle, and these days my sport of choice is weightlifting.

      My problem with most sports is that they're too artificial. There's no inherent reason for most of the "rules", the sizes of the teams, the shape of the ball, the methods of scoring, and so on. With weightlifting, it's just you versus the the fundamental laws of physics. Doesn't get much more interesting than that!

    17. Re:Who needs sports? by Funksaw · · Score: 1

      Ha. Let's face it, sure, sports are healthy, benificial and fun. Sports *culture* is not. I don't play sports - never really did. But it's mostly because of two reasons: 1) While other kids were taught by their parents to please and to be popular and to be athletic, I was taught by my parents to get the answers right. 2) If you only treat sports as a "hobby," you can't be as good as those who treat it as an "obsession," and those with an obsession tend to belittle the "casual" sports player because they're not as good. As a result, the person who has a passing interest in sports gradually decides to throw it away. 3) Alot of sports parents - enough to make me uncomfortable - are loud, rude, and dangerous. I don't want to hang around them as a kid, and I wouldn't want my kid to hang around them as a parent.

    18. Re:Who needs sports? by Diamondback · · Score: 1

      I don't want to play sports. If I don't want to play them, and people think I'm uncool, that's the root of the issue. You don't ahve to play sports. There's no reason for someone to have to play sports. I work out and play racquetball with my roommate; that's enough athletic activity and coordination for me.

    19. Re:Who needs sports? by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      I agree; it's not really that sports are important, but that physical activity is important. Running, cycling, weightlifting, martial arts, hiking, even kicking around a beanbag...these aren't "sports" (unless you're competing with other people), but they are all hobbies that are common to many successful geeks.

      I also agree that city (and suburban) life doesn't lend itself well to just "going outside and playing" -- we're so used to driving everywhere, and playing video games, that going out to run or play soccer is just...foreign. Might be why most Americans are obese...

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    20. Re:Who needs sports? by jtheory · · Score: 1

      If someone is too clumbsy to catch or throw properly

      I like that, "clumbsy" -- part lumbering, part clumsy!

      Anyway, I would agree that sports *can* be a good thing, but not in many cases...

      I was an athletic kid. I ran track through high school and college, plus the occasional game of ultimate frisbee. I do get a high out of adrenaline and competition at an abstract level.

      But I hated the organized contact sports, and still don't think that kind of thing adds a useful element to a kid's psyche. You end up with adults who can only think about the world comfortably in terms of "us and them", and "the home team vs. the enemy"... especially because of the way some parents get involved. You know how many fights *between dads* have broken out at little league games? It's scary.

      The comradery is a good thing, but it shouldn't be "our hatred of the other team bonds us!" And it's always easy to define a group according to who's NOT in it.

      Pickup basketball games with your friends are a completely different thing from the state championship where it *seems* like something huge is on the line.

      --
      There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    21. Re:Who needs sports? by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1
      "People who play sports have a lot of fun, and have better opportunities for picking up very attractive members of the opposite sex."

      So are the people making millions of dollars a year, who can afford to go to the Bahamas every weekend. Remember folks, money will get you everything.

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    22. Re:Who needs sports? by Jester99 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm betting the guy who simply runs every morning is going to last longer than the nerd and the guy who broke every major bone in his body playing football.

      Ironically, it's been calculated that if you jog for 30 minutes every day, you will live two years longer than everyone else. You will also have spent two years of your life jogging. :)

    23. Re:Who needs sports? by Cyno · · Score: 1

      What's interesting is when you find out that those kids who study computers and science end up being "cooler" because they hang out with the "stoners" all day, doing "drugs" and other naughty things, while they basicly ignore pop culture.

      The rebelious kids are always the cool ones, when everyone else finally grows up and catches on to the funner side of life, like parties and stuff.

      I guess the irony hit me when I went to that party and saw that computer nerd spinning records while tripping on E. The light show was amazing.

    24. Re:Who needs sports? by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 1

      It was not the sports themselves it was that the vast majority of those playing the sports were such incredible assholes!

      I participated in one sport, swimming. I was rather good at it. I detested gym class but I enjoyed swimming.

      Especially, when we had swimming in gym class and I beat two football stars in a race. They were going on and on about how football was a harder sport than swimming. The gym teacher was also the wrestling coach so he know I was on the swim team. The wrestling team ran laps on the stadium in the pool area when the weather was bad. He knew that we swam 5 miles a day and he knew what kind of endurance test swimming really was. The football jocks started insulting me and I challenged them to a race. The coach got his stopwatch and a whistle. I was across the pool and back before they were half way! I then did another 2 laps before they made their first lap! That was fun! The entire gym class laughed at them. I was out of the pool with a towel around my neck laughing when they completed only 2 laps after my 4 laps.

      I was a geek who was an outcast for the most part. I smoked cigarettes and hung out with the motor heads and criminals because at least they weren't judgemental and abusive. This kept me from getting jumped or harassed because these metal heads would defend me because I was one of them.

    25. Re:Who needs sports? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I played soccer and hockey at school a bit, and found them both very dull. It's all just basic trig, and you don't get exercise if you play them well, you stand where the ball is going to be, then deflect it slightly so it goes past the keeper into the goal. Wow, wasn't that fun. Oh, and everybody labels you as 'flukey', since you seemed to put no effort into scoring (which rather seemed the point, I dislike inefficiency). Eventually at a hockey team practice I just said 'Enough, this game is dull' and got sent to do a lap of the pitch. 10 laps later the teacher noticed I was still running and told me I could come back and join in. I said thanked him, but said that the running was more fun (I think better when running / walking than when stationary). Conversations with PE teachers often went along these lines:

      PE Teacher: Would you rather do maths?
      Me: Yes.
      PE Teacher: *Confused expression* Would you rather go for a run?
      Me: Yes.
      PE Teacher: Oh...

      The thing that always irritated me was the assumption that because you disliked a sport, you must be bad at it. At one point during an RAF competition I was told by my other members of my flight, who knew of my dislike for football to 'just stay out of the way'. I did so, until we were two goals down, then I joined in, scored the next three goals, and sat back down. Even after this there was still a belief that 'doesn't like football' (soccer for American readers) implies 'is no good at football'. People are far more willing to believe stereotypes than actual evidence.

      At university I joined the Dark Ages Re-enactment group. The group coordinator (she doesn't like the term leader) describes it as a 'contact sport'. Hitting someone with a metal (EN45 spring steel) sword, while avoiding their blows and not actually injuring them is superb exercise, great for improving co-ordination, and a lot of fun. If only it had been offered at school (by the sixth form I'd chosen shooting as my games option).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:Who needs sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen my brother! "she may look good, but she just lies there..."

    27. Re:Who needs sports? by rirugrat · · Score: 1
      I think it's really sad that a young person is classified as an "outcast" or a "loser" if he doesn't choose to define his life through sports.

      You are right, they should define their lives by playing video games, surfing the 'Net, engaging in anti-social behavior, eating fatty foods, and sitting on their asses all day.

      Chris

    28. Re:Who needs sports? by Matt+-+Duke+'05 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you don't get any exercise at all playing sports, especially soccer and hockey. That's why all of those soccer players out there are all fat asses with love-handles and beer guts. And jesus, those hockey players, they're fucking FAT! Or even those basketball players. Man, they could really use some more exercise.

      --
      -Matt
      Duke '05
    29. Re:Who needs sports? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Sports are important. [...] Organized sports are an unnatural event.

      I have to agree, insofar as physical health is a prerequisite for full mental health, to say nothing of avoiding premature death. One firm we contract with consists entirely of severely obese network engineers. It's not their appearance I find shocking -- indeed, it's irrelevant since the quality of their work is good -- it's the fact that having a high probability of dying in their forties or fifties doesn't seem to faze them at all.

      When I was in high school, I eschewed team sports and still do. All the crap coaches spew about the valuable skills one learns from team sports -- teamwork, dedication, etc. -- are better learned elsewhere in areas that don't encourage pointless aggression, meathead elitism, and date rape. I learned teamwork on the job out in the real world. I learned dedication in the face of adversity from the wide variety of spontaneous sources of adversity that the world provides.

      There are plenty of ways to get exercise and enjoy the not inconsiderable drug-like rush that comes from sustained physical exertion without being a part of jock culture. Solitary sports like cycling and weight lifting were always my favorites. I have friends who speak highly of running, canoeing, climbing, and martial arts. It's a real shame that the abusive culture that goes with the popular team sports turns off so many people, geeks included, to other, more rewarding forms of athletics.

      To return to the original topic, though, it's frankly bizarre that geeks have acquired this strange reputation for random violence when participants in team sports, organized religion, and the armed forces are much, much likelier sources of random murder. But then, those are the people who are in charge.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    30. Re:Who needs sports? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Am I surrounded by teenagers? While I did find myself amongst the geek ranks while in high school I don't think classifying and stereotyping every athlete as destined for mediocrity is fair. If you intended that as tongue in cheek then I apologize.

      I just don't think I can devote much more of my brain power to this subject.

      <sarcasm>
      Yes people who are nerds are actually cool. Yes athletes are jerks straight out of a campy 80s film who get blonde bimbos and end up with an SUV with "boring" kids.
      </sarcaasm>

      I mean lets be real and realize that people are all individuals and you cannot judge someone by their cover. Is that not what we are saying when we oppose the stereotyping of the teenage "bad kid"? As if you can just categorize and predict the psyche of individuals by a predetermined set of circumstances (athletes get blonde bimbos, nerd don't get laid, rich people are assholes, etc).

      I will not contribute to the broad swiping of people no matter what side of the fence I am on or how others classify me. I am not a teenage geek anymore afraid of the world or what others think, lashing out at the status quo at every turn. I am a grown man now and I choose to think for myself and judge others by their actions not by labels.

    31. Re:Who needs sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to hear it.

    32. Re:Who needs sports? by coyote-san · · Score: 1

      You still come out ahead because of the improved quality of life from the regular exercise.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    33. Re:Who needs sports? by KjetilK · · Score: 1
      I think everybody can find a sport that suits you, if you just look around. I was bullied relatively mildly in school, it didn't really bother me too much, but I was clearly kind of an outcast.

      At age 11, some of my friends took me to play soccer. That was definately not my sport. Besides, I couldn't run. I was the worst runner in class, at any distance. I was not a talent for anything of that sort.

      The year thereafter, I started running orienteering. I still couldn't run, but they taught me. That winter, I trained a lot and when the spring came I was not anymore the worst runner in my class, but the best. At distances longer than half a mile, nobody could outpace me.

      Of course, I was still an outcast. Running around in the woods is not what most kids would spend their time doing. Besides, orienteering tends to attract the most intelligent ones, I heard one survey of US orienteers, that indicated 27% of them have master's or above. So I just went to the opposite extreme... :-) But I liked it a lot, still do, I had found home. Eventually, it did earn me some respect. I think they had a hard time dealing with it.

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    34. Re:Who needs sports? by CKW · · Score: 1

      You still come out ahead because of the improved quality of life from the regular exercise

      Yup. Also you need to look at it this way - when you're 68 and about to die, you'd happily agree to spend 2 more years alive jogging!

    35. Re:Who needs sports? by banzai51 · · Score: 1
      So your overall point is that competition is bad? How wrong you are. The greatest thing about athletics is the competition. That teaches you more than anything. Your problem is you are projecting competition in the extreme.

      It is not that your "geek" friends aren't interested comparing their performance with others, it is just that they know they're not good at it. The stereotypical geek hatred of sports is just another tired example of that human trait of whatever-I'm-bad-at-must-be-inferior.

    36. Re:Who needs sports? by JanneM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      *sigh*

      No. What it means is that a lot of people are just not interested in competition. I don't know why this concept seems to be so difficult for some people to assimilate. Competing in sports is not inferior in any way; not everybody is interested, however.

      It also means that when you put exercise on that footing, many of those people will shun the activity, even when they would otherwise enjoy it, and when it would really be beneficial to them.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    37. Re:Who needs sports? by nathanh · · Score: 1

      I've watched interviews with various professional runners (eg, olympic long-distance runners) and their advice has always been "don't do it". By the age of 50 their knees are ruined. They spend their twilight years hobbling around in pain. Though I suppose half an hour a day isn't quite the same league as the long-distance runners.

    38. Re:Who needs sports? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Participating in sports will likely enhance your health. Merely watching someone else will not. Thus, there is some value in intermural sports and little value in the bread+circus that is high school sports.

      Let us be clear on one thing. Quite often those "into sports" are little more than a subspecies of couch potato.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    39. Re:Who needs sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, Matt - Duke '05 obviously has not read the post he is replying to or is replying to the wrong post. Weird.

    40. Re:Who needs sports? by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
      Coordination can be learned. If someone is too clumbsy to catch or throw properly, someone else didn't teach them properly.

      Unless their bones, muscles, or nerves are damaged.

      Fucking ape jocks love to pick on cripples. Kill the fucking ape jocks. Every single last one of them. Every single sports fan who worship the fucking ape jocks too. Kill them fucking all!!!!

      Eric and Dylan are my HEROES!!!

    41. Re:Who needs sports? by bsartist · · Score: 1

      Am I surrounded by teenagers?

      This is slashdot. Of course you are...

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    42. Re:Who needs sports? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      During my stint (1969-72) at Great Falls High School (Great Falls, Montana), *geeks* were the in-crowd. People were proud of getting good grades, of other kids who did well, and that our school system was one of the highest-ranked in the country on various scholastic achievement tests. And everyone wanted to be friends with the top students -- our uber-geek was the most popular kid in the whole school (and he was no athlete by any stretch).

      Jocks were accepted as individuals, but widely considered a lower social class who had to earn their keep. And mind you, as one of the largest public schools in the state, we had some state champion teams and athletes, so it's not like sports was a non-program.

      Anyway, my point is that "defining one's life thru sports" is neither necessary to the system, nor an entirely uniform phenomenon. It can, and sometimes does swing the other way.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    43. Re:Who needs sports? by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      Even an HOUR a day isn't close to their league. These are guys who run several hours each and every day, in addition to hitting machines and stuff of that sort. Taking a brisk 5-block morning jog is better than sitting here slashdotting.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    44. Re:Who needs sports? by Ardias · · Score: 1

      > At one point during an RAF competition I was told by my other members
      > of my flight, who knew of my dislike for football to 'just stay out
      > of the way'

      Do you mean Royal Air Force? Must have been cool to have a high school flight team. Alas, my high school could not afford any fighter planes for the athletic department.

    45. Re:Who needs sports? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Do you mean Royal Air Force?

      Indeed it does. I was a cadet. I joined with the aim of becoming head of section and then being dishonourably discharged. I became head of section, but only managed to be demoted 3 ranks. It seems they don't dishonourably discharge cadets any more.

      Alas, my high school could not afford any fighter planes for the athletic department.

      Neither could we. We flew light aircraft from RAF bases, entirely MoD funded.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  8. A wide stereotype by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's certainly not just 'computer geeks' that must live as outsider's in mainstream society. Just about any group of behavior, tech related or not, that does not participate in norm behaviors are easy to ostracize. In lieu of a classic 'geek', there will always be someone different enough to take the fall.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:A wide stereotype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the choir fags, band nerds, and gay thespians were just as bad as the computer geeks!

    2. Re:A wide stereotype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, which pretty much left the sports jocks and there bimbo girlfriend followers as the 'normal' group. Even the girls that play sports are sometimes picked on if they are anything other than supeficial athletes.

    3. Re:A wide stereotype by Hentai · · Score: 1

      Yes. This is a function of our biological evolution from primates. Our biochemistry and genetic neurology have programmed us to vie for position by abusing those less healthy than ourselves. This will continue unabated until humanity learns to control its hormones and think with our forebrains, not with our midbrains.

      This is not possible for a normal, healthy, "sane" person without the use of serious psychotropics.

      Hence, the only people capable of 'tuning in' to alternate forms of behavior and 'dropping out' of the abuse-cycle rat race are druggies and the psychologically abberant. 90% of these people are dangerous; the other 10% are visionaries. Society's only hope is for the "normal" to gravitate towards the behavior model represented by that 10%, which will not happen so long as they remain frightened by the behavior of negatively aberrant 90%.

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  9. Aspergers Syndrome (mainly) by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 2, Interesting


    The Geek Syndrome where computer programmers get their charm from.

    aspergers syndrome information

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    1. Re:Aspergers Syndrome (mainly) by brmic · · Score: 1

      excellent link, great text, but fails to mention the effect of being educated by geeks. it's no ALL in the gene's.
      parents working 75 hours plus a mild strand of Asperger/Kanner in your/their genes can produce a really evil interaction effect.

  10. At the time it happened by phorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For a short while, I was actually left alone and not harrassed. Due to the previous frequency of harrassment, people kept whispering that I was the most likely to go on a rampage in the school (gee, doesn't that make me feel warm and tingly). Thankfully, I'm not crazy enough to persue that type of behavior (though I did chase somebody with a bat after they crap-kicked me once), and I didn't have access to firearms.

    At least for a while though, the events that occurred shocked everybody into realizing that
    a) Even geeky people do have a breaking point
    b) Bad things happen when you push them past it

    I don't sponsor what happened what happened in Columbine: some killings were also based on race and religion, etc, but for awhile its affects gave me a breather. However, now that harrassment in schools is picking up again I wouldn't be surprised to see more students "losing it"

    It's also worthy of note that when an event like this happens - all of N. America and possible the world cry "how could it happen," while suicides based on harrassment - which are more frequent often end up as a statistic except for local grief.
    Oh, and to this day I find that people tend to bother me less if I wear a nice, dark, long trenchcoat.

    1. Re:At the time it happened by NorthDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If only I had mod points for you...

      Where I come from, we have one of the highest (if no longer the highest) suicide rate in Canada (Abitibi, Quebec).
      From secondary 3 to Secondary 5, I had 4 direct friends of mine who commited suicide and a hell of a lot other people who I knew commited suicide also.
      You know in a 35K peoples city, 10 kids going to the same scool who commit suicide in a year is VERY disturbing.
      I tought about it myself but I finally got some help from external sources (my parents tried to help, but could not...) and got over it.
      But anyway, as you were saying, suicide can be a very dramatic social problem, but it really seems to always end up in statistics.

      Pretty sad state of affair when you realize that the happiness of our young people is so much less important to the population then their own self.
      People always start to worry about that after they had lost a relative.

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    2. Re:At the time it happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I lived in Quebec, I'd want to commit suicide, too. My wife's family is from Quebec.

    3. Re:At the time it happened by qoncept · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'm amazed school shootings have stopped for as long as they have. I think if they start again, there should be an anti-school shooting tv commercial with the catch phrase, "School shootings are so 20th century.

      --
      Whale
    4. Re:At the time it happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had a Canadian wife, I'd want to commit suicide.

    5. Re:At the time it happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your wife's familly is from Quebec,
      maybe you could tell about your suicidal ideas if you were comming from Quebec.
      I'm sure she would really appreciate it!

    6. Re:At the time it happened by dildatron · · Score: 0, Troll

      So why does every0ne kill themselves there?

      Oh, you live in Canada. nevermind.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    7. Re:At the time it happened by dildatron · · Score: 1

      Jesus, moderator, can't you take a joke? I am going to jave Joe Pesci find you and put your head in a vice for this moderation!

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    8. Re:At the time it happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but since you're obviously a fucked up Yank, you can sit and rot in your self-imposed prison!

    9. Re:At the time it happened by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and to this day I find that people tend to bother me less if I wear a nice, dark, long trenchcoat.

      Ah, the coat of power. If you get the walk just right (lightly sweeping, with a tinge of arrogance) then people will always respect you. The best example I recall of this was in a drinking establishment popular when I was at school, where the bouncers had a reputation for being bastards. With the coat and the walk they even opened the door for me. My classmates were shocked.

      If you act like you own the place, people will usually assume that you do.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:At the time it happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i cant even believe you are saying this, do you know how much worse it is ending someones life it is than the particular trauma someone kid is going through. We all went through hard times in school at some stage but you know being a bit older cant you see that it was just harmless fun in some accounts and immaturity?? kids should be taught self respect not hatred.

    11. Re:At the time it happened by qoncept · · Score: 1

      Whoa buddy, I didn't say they should happen. I can just imagine how many others seriously considered it and how hard it would be to prevent, and I'm surprised more didn't happen.

      --
      Whale
    12. Re:At the time it happened by radtea · · Score: 1
      I had 4 direct friends of mine who commited suicide and a hell of a lot other people who I knew commited suicide also.
      And they were all boys, right?

      Suicide amongst young people is dominated by suicide amongst boys.

      --Tom

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    13. Re:At the time it happened by NorthDude · · Score: 1

      Well, while it is true that most of the people there who commited suicide were boys, in my case it has been 2 boys and 2 girls...
      What was really disturbing at the time was that they
      were all friends, and it kind of degenarated after the first girl passed out.
      The others started to take drugs (and I'm not talking about smoking pot once in a while here),
      they all got REALLY depressed and finally they killed themself to...

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    14. Re:At the time it happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't sponsor what happened what happened in Columbine: some killings were also based on race and religion, etc, but for awhile its affects gave me a breather. However, now that harrassment in schools is picking up again I wouldn't be surprised to see more students "losing it"

      Whatever happened to personal responsibility? Your reaction to how people treat you is your responsibility. Same for me, and same for everyone else on the planet.

    15. Re:At the time it happened by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This applies equally well to bullies as it does to victims that suddenly snap.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:At the time it happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit, now that the Nordiques have left. ;)

    17. Re:At the time it happened by Tyreth · · Score: 1
      I think many people do not realise what they are capable of - I think everyone of us has the potential to kill, if pushed far enough, though most of us have the self-control to have that breaking point *very* far away. I used to have a really bad temper, would get angry at small things. Now it takes quite some time before I'm ready to rip someone's head off (ie, hit them).

      But some things make me really, really, angry. And it is quite often when it's other people. The thought of a racist fills me with rage - I can't stand the thought of someone deriding someone for being born looking different. It sickens me. So does the thought of people being made outcasts in school, being bullied like many here. I was picked on occasionally, but I was fairly self-secure, so I didn't feel bad about it - just angry because of their ignorance. I did stand up for myself once physically, and it paid off great dividends I think.

      I wish for every time someone made a racist insult, or mocked someone for being different or made an outcast, that I could be present to defend that person, verbally or physically. To let them know that they are not rejects, and that some people do love them. To anyone still in high school under these conditions, remember that slashdot - one of the most popular websites in the internet - has many people who empathise with you and accept you.

      "It's also worthy of note that when an event like this happens - all of N. America and possible the world cry 'how could it happen'"

      I feel the same way about 9/11 as many others do. I do not agree with what was done, but I think the vital question of "Why" was never answered by the Americans. And in the situation of bullying, these givers just do not understand the full extent of how bad they can make someone feel. Our tongue has the power to build nations and destroy cultures. Yet they are so ignorant and stupid to think that these people are weak and should just endure it. Stiff upper lip.

  11. It's the times by argmanah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why do we have things like Columbine nowadays when these things were unheard of 30 years ago? Because we didn't have people psychoanalyzing (read: witch doctoring) everyone's feelings and demanding parents use "quiet time" when the kid needed "hit with stick time". We had discipline and ethics that came from our parents and not from the government.

    --
    Overrated Moderation: This posts sucks... because.
    1. Re:It's the times by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why do we have things like Columbine nowadays when these things were unheard of 30 years ago?

      Notice that there *hasn't* been a major school rampage in a couple of years? For a while, multiple shootings were happening several times a year, with individual alleged bullies being shot by alleged outcasts much more frequently than that.

      Once they dropped off the front page of the paper for a while (as the attention of the media turned elsewhere), they stopped happening. The individual shootings may continue unreported for all I know, mass killings have stopped.

      Remember all the experts on TV telling us that it's too many guns, not enough guns, religion, atheism, video games, sex education? Well none of those things have changed and the Columbines have disappeared. What's the only thing that has changed?

    2. Re:It's the times by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Why do we have things like Columbine nowadays when these things were unheard of 30 years ago?

      Ever hear the Boomtown Rats' track "Tell Me Why (I don't like Mondays)"? If so, do you know what it's really about?

      It's about a girl, Brenda Spencer, who came into school one day and shot her classmates (I think nine, though I'm not entirely sure of the number). When asked why, she gave her reason as "I don't like Mondays".

      OK - it's not quite thirty years ago but it's not far off. These things have happened before. Sad, but true.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:It's the times by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1
      You're right...when kids are afraid of the parent's "hit with stick time", they wouldn't do this...they'd wait until they're bigger, and then become criminals after they're finished with school.

      Hitting a child is abuse, and for good reason. Criminals often blame their behaviors on childhood abuse, and while it doesn't excuse their behavior, it might explain something about how their minds got to where it is now. After all, if you're taught that you can hit a child that can't hit you back, then you just might become coward enough to threaten people with a gun, who have no way to defend themselves

      Will "quiet time" do it. No one thing will help. It's a combination of many things, which includes positive reinforcement. My parents never hit me in my life...I mean never. Today, I'm in my senior year in college, with academic honors, accepted to a Ph.D. program in electrical engineering. I'm a geek, but I never even considered going after my old school's tormenters with a gun...and part of why that idea sounds ridiculous to me, is because I was never exposed to any type of violence...why would I use it?

      So what did my parents do right to get me to become successful? Well...that positive reinforcement I talked about is one. As a kid, I never cared much about school, so my parents started paying me $5 per A in my report cards. Believe me, my grades went to all A's in no time.

      Ethics and discipline is all well and good, and you're right...it should come from your parents. But hitting a child only works while they're smaller than you. They'll do what you tell them right up until they realize they're stronger than you are. And then you see parents who are afraid of being hit by their children on your next Oprah. Ethics and discipline comes from example. My mom didn't want me to smoke, so she quit smoking...she didn't say, "I'm going to beat you senseless if I ever see you with one of these" while lighting a cigarette.

      So you turned out alright even though you went through "beat with a stick" time. Well, it's my guess that you learned a lot from the actions of your parents as well...they were probably good, ethical people. Heck, you learned so much from them, you're advertising "hit with stick time."

      There's no single answer to parenting...but hitting a kid doesn't solve problems. If you're lucky, it just may not get in the way in the rest of the parenting process.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    4. Re:It's the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ain't the times. As other posters have pointed out school shootings were definitely heard of 30 years ago. I just love Americans and their selective amnesia.

    5. Re:It's the times by argmanah · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There's no single answer to parenting...but hitting a kid doesn't solve problems. If you're lucky, it just may not get in the way in the rest of the parenting process.
      I think your first statement is a little contradictory. I agree completely that there's no single answer to parenting. Kids are different, each and every one. Some kids need to be nurtured and taught by positive example, but that doesn't work with all of them.

      I'm not saying "hit with stick time" is the first solution or the only solution. But there are kids where it is the only solution that works. In today's society, people like you dismiss it out of hand. That, I believe, is part of the problem.

      I have no problem with believing that many kids would respond well to offering them rewards for good grades and good behavior. And, I undestand it's important to set the example for them. But in the end, if you really love your child, you should be willing to go to any lengths to make sure they grow up right, even if it means hitting them.

      There's a big difference between "hitting with stick time" and "child abuse". I'm not suggesting you injure your child, but simply to have the option of using pain as negative reinforcement. Recognize the difference.
      --
      Overrated Moderation: This posts sucks... because.
    6. Re:It's the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stick to analyzing 20 year-old Star Trek episodes dude.

    7. Re:It's the times by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 1

      Funny how the "US turning against itself" was the big concern. We kept hearing about Militia groups, race violence, high school shootings, teen abductions.

      People are too busy worrying about potential "terrorists" and Iraq's "Weapons of Mass Destruction" now. Have these other problems gone away?

    8. Re:It's the times by Dukeofshadows · · Score: 1

      I thought it was hilarious when the CIA (Christians in Action) kept yelling about violence on TV after growing up with Tom and Jerry, Popeye, and Roadrunner/Coyote. Starsky and Hutch wasn't exactly pro-family values either. Their cartoons and TV shows were as violent as anything today, but solid family values and a few key asswhoopins kept most of the kids in check. Remember that most of those cases were copycat crimes inspired by the original one in Oregon or Arkansas or Kentucky. Also, the schools were allowed to discipline children instead of having to find a way around the myriad of potential lawsuits. Question for the board: do y'all think that the new terrorism laws could be used to try to prosecute the next kids who try something stupid like this?

      --
      As long as there is a Second Amendment, there will always be a First Amendment.
    9. Re:It's the times by MissMyNewton · · Score: 1, Funny


      Remember all the experts on TV telling us that it's too many guns, not enough guns, religion, atheism, video games, sex education? Well none of those things have changed and the Columbines have disappeared. What's the only thing that has changed?

      Dot coms.

      They're gone - no sprees. Must've been the dot-coms fault...

      --

      ---

      Information wants...you to shut your pie hole.

    10. Re:It's the times by Jasonv · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even in the last couple of months, there have been lots of school shootings.

      The only thing that's changed is you're not hearing about them.

    11. Re:It's the times by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Why do we have things like Columbine nowadays when these things were unheard of 30 years ago?"

      Because it took them that long to figure out that the gun could be pointed at somebody other than themselves.

    12. Re:It's the times by Otter · · Score: 1
      Well, some of those things (child abductions, murders of blacks by whites) are extremely rare events that were blown wildly out of proportion by media frenzies that have died down. Individual school shootings may still happen at the same rate as a few years ago.

      But I'm pretty sure that Columbine-style shootings have simply stopped happening in the US. It seems extremly unlikely that they are happening and being completely ignored nationally. If that's wrong, and someone knows of unreported cases recently, please provide some links.

    13. Re:It's the times by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Media coverage made school shootings the ultimate attention crime.

      Columbine was the last in a long string of school shootings beginning in Mississippi in Fall 1997. With around the clock media coverage of the shooter saying "people picked on me", mass murder suddenly became a viable option for those who were angry and outside of the mainstream.

      Anyone who blames it on guns/video games/movies/etc. is blind to the obvious.

      The Columbine killers said in their video that they wanted to be famous. For their efforts, they were "rewarded" by being on the cover of Time - twice!

    14. Re:It's the times by Otter · · Score: 1
      Well, first of all, your four links refer to: 1 and 2) a father who shot his teenage daughter's boyfriend after the BF attacked him with a bat*, 3) some mysterious shots fired in a school and 4) a robbery that has nothing to do with any school.

      But, I'll grant your point. Individual shootings may still occur at the same rate (or in the case of poor urban schools, have been declining all along) and only the coverage has changed.

      But Columbine-style multiple shootings in predominantly white schools aren't going unreported -- they've stopped.

      *As an aside, shooting someone in the arm when he attacks you with an aluminum bat isn't a clear-cut case of self-defense? In New freaking Mexico? What the hell?

    15. Re:It's the times by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      And I am truly amazed that there are still people who think that violence and pain are the best ways to deal with certain people, be it children, prisoners, or anyone else. Hell, I bet you don't believe it's moral to kick a disobedient dog, so why is it okay to inflict emotional and/or physical pain on another human being?

      Did you know there was a time when people thought that electroshock was the only way to deal with schizophrenic people? Well, more specifically, it was seizure treatment... electroshock, insulin shock... whatever. But guess what, that was wrong. Period. Yet, at the time, they figured, hey, there's just certain people who only respond to shock treatment... and, surprise, surprise, they were wrong about that, too. And now we have lithium and a host of other psychoactive drugs to treat the symptoms, and people look back on the days of shock treatment with disgust.

      Why do I bring this up? Well, I see physical/emotional abuse (yes, abuse... if you inflict pain on anyone, regardless of frequency or degree, it's abuse, the definition of which is "To hurt or injure by maltreatment") of... well, anyone, as being much the same. Why don't you?

    16. Re:It's the times by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Damnit, preview! s/moral to kick/immoral to kick/. But, you knew that. :)

    17. Re:It's the times by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Or not... I had it right the first time.

    18. Re:It's the times by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      Even in the last couple of months, there [krqe.com](#1) have [krqe.com](#2) been [cnn.com](#3) lots of [courier-journal.com](#4) school shootings.

      The only thing that's changed is you're not hearing about them.

      #1 is hardly a school shooting. It is merely a disgruntled kid attacking what was probably his girlfriend's parent. The gun was fired in a struggle. The kid was shot out of self defence. #2 s the exact same story.

      #3 may be considered a school shooting, but no one was hurt. A gun was fired. That's it.

      #4 was a robbery performed by teens that resulted in a murder. A teenager firing a gun does not make it a school shooting.

      I am sure there are plenty of kids getting a hold of guns and shooting people. They just aren't going to school and going on a murder spree. Now THAT is something we would be hearing about.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    19. Re:It's the times by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      Please someone with points mod this idiot down...advocating the htting and beating of children.

      Insightful my ass

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    20. Re:It's the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we have things like Columbine nowadays when these things were unheard of 30 years ago?

      Unheard of - probably, but actions of this kind (disturbed/distraught indiviual acting violently) probably did happen. In the 60s there was the Austin clock tower shooting that made national news. I am sure there are other examples - many of which did not make "national" news status.

      Remember the way information flows has changed a lot.. I seem to recall that the last battle of the civil war was fought months after the surrender as the parties involved were unaware of the war's status. I'd expect there are similarly significant gains in news/information technology since 30 years ago that could explain why we now know about these kinds of stories, instantly, with live video feeds, and interviews with people (who knew people involved) and experts that often aren't that expert. (Yeah... I find some of the news outlets fall down trying to cover a story.)

    21. Re:It's the times by Cyno · · Score: 1

      The media is too distracted with bombing Iraq among other national crisis, so we're not hearing about kids attacking eachother. In case you missed it, not too long ago a couple children decapitated their mother. And I'm sure a lot of other things have happened since. But that's not News worthy, says CNN, while it deletes sections of UN transcripts to help Americans decide to Attack!!!

    22. Re:It's the times by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Actually I think I read that decapitation store on CNN...

      What I would like to see is a News website that reports what the other News sites think about certain articles. Such as what statistics they report, what information they edit, or general tone/slant as well as all the facts. If someone made a website like that I'd read it. :)

    23. Re:It's the times by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to blame this on Clinton?

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    24. Re:It's the times by technomom · · Score: 1

      Thirty years ago. You mean around the time that
      this
      and this happened?

      Things like this may be happening a bit more today because of the availability of high-powered weapons and yes, a lack of hands-on parenting. But, school shootings (and lousy parenting) didn't just start in the 1990s. What DID start in the 1990s (or thereabouts) was 24 hour/7 days a week, instantaneous-as-it-happens round the word news coverage a la CNN/Fox News/MSNBC and of course, the Web.

      It isn't true that horrifying things didn't happen 30 years ago. They clearly did. It's is true that today you are hammered with news in ways that we didn't even dream of back then.

      JoAnn

    25. Re:It's the times by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting you injure your child, but simply to have the option of using pain as negative reinforcement. Recognize the difference.

      If I remember correctly from my human behaviour classes, negative reinforcement actually means removing something that is bad for the person. Positive reinforcement is adding something that will benefit the person. The point is that reinforcement is about making the person feel better (thus reinforcing the behaviour).

      The term you're looking for is punishment which is to discourage the behaviour by adding something they dislike (positive punishment e.g. adding pain) or taking away something they do like (negative punishment e.g. removing tv privileges).

      The difference is that reinforcement encourages behaviour, while punishment discourages it. While you may discourage a behaviour, what are you doing to encourage a better behaviour in its stead? If nothing, then the behaviour that takes its place might not be any better and possibly worse.

      This is only if you believe in behavourism though, which is the school of thought you're using.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    26. Re:It's the times by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1
      But in the end, if you really love your child, you should be willing to go to any lengths to make sure they grow up right, even if it means hitting them.

      It's really impossible for me to prove this, but in my opinion hitting them won't do anything. You're right, for some situations, positive reinforcement just won't cut it. Not everything I got from my parents involved that...some of the things that I did as a child, needed a type of punishment to mark the point. Most of them involved loss of privileges (which works surprisingly well).

      I once remember having this talk with a guy in 4th grade, when I told him that I wasn't allowed to have anybody over that week to play any video games, he told me..."dang...I actually prefer to take a beating...it's over in 2 minutes. Now you have to go an entire week suffering for this."

      Even assuming you don't consider pain inflicting abusing your child (I'd disagree with that as well, but again, I don't have strong enough arguments), if you don't hurt them enough to injure them, eventually they're just going to get used to it, and they'll learn to handle it.

      And I guess you could argue that since I'm not a parent, I don't know enough about the subject to argue. This is all based on how I was raised, and in my case, I'd say I turned out alright.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    27. Re:It's the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's the only thing that has changed?

      Oh! the suspense is killing me! I give up, what's the only thing that's changed?

    28. Re:It's the times by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Everyone is an individual. If you can't acknowledge that in any meaningful way then it is you that is doing the most to demean children and people in general.

      The point is to do whatever is in the child's ultimate best interests. Your fragile sensibilities really aren't relevant and should not be used as an excuse to short change someone that may genuinely benefit from a spanking.

      Also, your electro shock example is incorrect.

      Both leeches and electric shock have shown to be useful for treating certain conditions when used sensibly. The should be idea to determine how and when certain "extreme measures" can be put to good use.

      Results are what matters, not political correctness.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    29. Re:It's the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me tell you about my son. my son is about to turn six years old. he listens to me pretty much instantly. he listens to his mother almost never. my wife bitches and bitches and bitches at my son. she is always unhappy about every little thing he does. she is always screaming about how he never listens. i never bitch. i am a firm believer in spanking. my son listens to me instantly.

      i have spanked my son a total of three times in his entire life.

      our culture (world culture?) is one that tends to put 100 percent compliance to authority at the top of the importance list. i believe that requiring 100 percent compliance is outside the scope of human existance.

      everyone comments on how well behaved and happy my son is. they wish they had children who acted like my son. i firmly believe he is well behaved because i only require 100 percent compliance when it is important. (eating your dinner is important... but it NOT important in the scale of things.)

      spanking is an important and valuable tool. if it is overused, it will become ineffective. same with an other form of discipline, positive or negative.

    30. Re:It's the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There WERE no episodes of Star Trek 20 years ago, you dumbass. Original Series was over, and it's definitely before TNG.

    31. Re:It's the times by Tyreth · · Score: 1
      Absolutely right. Sometimes hitting the child can be the worst option, at other times it can be the only one. I was smacked as a child as many of us were, and though I hated it, I do not hate my parents for it. I still love them. Not everyone comes out the same, and they vow never to strike their children. I'll make no such vow - instead I will understand my children and react accordingly.

      I've heard stories of people who do acts of violence when they are older. No amount of reasoning could ever sway these people. Sometimes you feel like the best, only, solution is for these people to get a taste of their own medicine - so they can feel what they are dishing out.

      Each person is beautifully unique, and the best advice is to encourage the parents to be wise and understanding - listen to their children.

      As unpopular as religion is, I think this analogy is useful. Christians (protestant) see God as both a father and a judge. As a father He is loving and close to us, the best friend, must trustworthy guide. As a Judge He stand above us, punishing us and holding us under His thumb so we cannot err. We should see our parents that way too - respect our father, love him as a close friend and someone to be trusted. Yet never forget our place, that as our father his decision is to be final, and rebellion against him is a great evil. Parents should act in this way, dealing with their children according to each child.

      Of course, this advice only works if your father is good. For those with wicked parents, your troubles are of an entirely different calibre.

    32. Re:It's the times by gian · · Score: 1

      A lot of research has gone into the effects of physical acts of violence towards children and it has been shown to have a serious detrimental effect, no matter how mild it may be. Negative reinforcement should always be verbal.

    33. Re:It's the times by lukme · · Score: 1

      There are better ways of dealing with your kids than corporal punishment.

      Unfortunately, the sign of the times is that both parents work to barely provide for the family and we are getting latch key kids at an earlier age. With both parents working, there is no time for them to be involved with their kids education or activities. Furthermore, there is no time or creativity left to deal with their kids, so corporal punishment is the only way that these parents deal with their kids.

  12. won't work by brmic · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. you do not have to have a redisposition to psychosis AND be a nerd to filp out with a gun. actually some of those who filipped out are neither psychotic nor nerds. in fact they're pretty nice people.
    2. psycho tests will get you nowhere, they can all be cheated. (ALL, by ANYONE, forever)

    sorry, but as a psychologist who did an internship at a forensic mental hospital, i just had to correct that.

    --------
    "But i don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
    "Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here.
    I'm mad, You're mad."
    "How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
    "You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."

    Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
    --------

    1. Re:won't work by Hentai · · Score: 1

      Okay, given that some people who "flip out", grab a gun and kill somebody are "nice people", and end up in forensing mental hospitals, and others are "no-good shits", and end up in jail, what determines which way any one particular had-it-up-to-here victim-cum-perp will go? Which types of people TEND to wind up in prison, and which types TEND to wind up in a psych ward?

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    2. Re:won't work by brmic · · Score: 1

      >what determines?
      US (or THEM, depending what side your're on)

      no really, there are criteria set down in law (at least here in Germany) which basically states that you go to forensic mental hospital if you:
      a) suffer from some from some sort of disorder (actually it's more precise, but i don't want to translate it now)
      b) at the time of the crime you were either b1) unable to realize your doings were wrong or b2) unable to act according to that realisation BECAUSE of that disorder.
      both criteria are necessary to go free of punishment (and get locked up in an institution till pronounced cured)

      as to the kind of people tending to end up in either sort of instituion, the dividing line pretty much moves with current politics (and media coverage). basically those who turn psychopathic (hating/despising mankind, regarding others as mere means to their own ends) go to prison, those that develop some other disorder (maniacs, sexual perverts, psychosis) tend to go to the ward.
      this does not really make sense, but there it is.
      besides, the difference is small for heavy crimes, patients are just treated better.

    3. Re:won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2. psycho tests will get you nowhere, they can all be cheated. (ALL, by ANYONE, forever)
      No lie brother brmic, I'm still walking the streets. If there was an effective psycho test, I would have been locked up years ago.
  13. Re:Amateur by Bastian · · Score: 4, Funny

    I use my superior wit and lack of qualms about homosexuality to cause disorder within their ranks by seducing their frat brothers.

  14. As another note by phorm · · Score: 3, Funny

    As a computer geek, there are many other ways to settle the score without resorting to violence. It's always a shame when somebody who bothered me has all his work on the network drives corrupted, a spontaneous reboot just before saving... or floppy disks subject to magnetic disruption.

    Oh... and the year I was the lab admin was the best, many of these jokers were in my class and the prof left me deal with them according - or just assumed that various events were just regular/random PC happenings.

    Ah, the pleasant memories:
    "These computer SUCK, this is the third time it's crashed before I could finish this assignment"

    1. Re:As another note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are many other ways to settle the score without resorting to violence

      What you are talking about is intellectual violence. It is still violence.

  15. The truly sad thing is, by sawilson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The antagonist in this story is probably the one
    that has it right. I point to this post:

    Advice you would give your 12 year old Self

    and I suggest that the sooner you cast off the idea
    that you should be nice to everyone, have respect
    for other people, and just try to get along, the
    faster you'll wake up to the true nature of the
    world. Then you'll be able to succeed, and go even
    further because of your intelligence and general
    geekishness. It's sad, but it appear to be true.

    1. Re:The truly sad thing is, by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Actually it is possible to do the things in the slashdot post your reference without doing the things you mention. People that do this become very successful AND respected. You are misguided if you think they are inclusive.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:The truly sad thing is, by BitHive · · Score: 1

      Very true. What's important is to not have your identity tied up in the fact that not everyone likes you. While you don't have to go around being nice to everyone, you don't have to go around being a prick either. Respectful indifference. It's a hard battle, and I don't know how I accomplished it (so I can't give advice), but be comfortable with who you are, and the rest will follow. That perspective is hard to gain in high school especially, but I think those that manage are all the better for it.

    3. Re:The truly sad thing is, by SirLantos · · Score: 0

      I am going to have to disagree with you. I was considered the geekeist geek in highschool.

      I still believe that you should be nice to everyone, have respect for other people, and just try to get along

      I am now very successful, am liked by my co-workers, and even some of the people that used to pick on me in high-school now call me to hang out. If the person who hurt me the most in highschool called me today and wanted to hang out, I would do it in a hearbeat. Not because I want acceptance, but holding gruges is what truly holds one back from succeeding.

      Just my $0.02,
      SirLantos

      --
      The flying hamster of DOOM rains coconuts on your pitiful city.
    4. Re:The truly sad thing is, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could simply redefine success. But then you might not be able to buy trinkets for your wife and kids. My god, you'd be some kind of left-wing pinko commie bastard!

    5. Re:The truly sad thing is, by ledestin · · Score: 1

      Well, but do *you* like them?

  16. Real need by SirLanse · · Score: 0

    I was as geeky a nerd as any on /. I just learned to injury anyone who bothered me. Hurt them a little the first time and you get some respect. With a little respect, you do not have to KILL THEM! The high school quarterback is more likely to be the dim witted VP you take budget request to. If it werent for bad Karma I'd have no Karma at all.

    1. Re:Real need by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hurt them a little the first time and you get some respect.

      Very true, and having a slight frame is a huge advantage in this. Anyone who picks on someone half their size and gets hurt loses all respect from their peers very quickly.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. oh no! by mschoolbus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think I would be afraid to read this book... For how much my girlfriend has yelled at me for being "Half Mast" myself... =P

  18. Heh- by Omkar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm lucky. I get annoyed because people kowtow to me because I'm smart. They make fun of me in the same breath, because I'm not athletic, but that's cool. I've got more than enough respect. It's interesting how mere chance can influence your school experience - high SAT scores at my school are worth as much as (or even more than) athletic honors.

    1. Re:Heh- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, mine too. Our _public_ high school was extremely competitive academically. the smart kids were the cool ones. and i also knew someone who left the football team to be in the marching band. God i loved that school. My dental hygenist used to complain to me that my high school was way too academically oriented. I was laughing on the inside.

  19. Incidentally by phatlipmojo · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you like this book, you might check out The Body of Christopher Creed by Carol Plum-Ucci. It also paints a pretty realistic portrait of high school life within the context of a murder/suspense story (a pretty good device for for forcing characters into the sort of stress and introspection that really sets young good young adult fiction apart, if you ask me).
    As a librarian, I especially recommend it to those of you who are (or have little brothers/sisters/nieces/nephews/children) in high school.

    -phatty 2x4

    P.S. Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson and Hard Love by Ellen Wittlinger are also superb YA novels, just in case you find yourself liking that sort of thing.

    --

    Nice things are nicer than nasty ones.
    1. Re:Incidentally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that Hard Love was a porno flick.

    2. Re:Incidentally by blueminder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that book was a decent read. I read it back in 7th grade when I couldn't find anything else in the library. I was surprised it was even in my middle school library since so many books people read for book reports had to be 'positive'.
      It's strange, but I think the school system seems to have a role as well, not only those who bully. Teachers can see it being done, but do nothing about it. There's also the element of boredom school brings by introducing tedious work and repeated lessons that, coupled with the bullying, make it a place you wouldn't like to be in for long for moe than one reason.

  20. I don't get it by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean, who were these evil people that gave you such a hard time that you still care about them tens of years later? To tell the truth, I can barely remember the names of most of the people I went to school with, and the only people I keep in touch from high school are all close personal friends. I'm not saying elementary and high school were easy times for me, but I don't dwell on them. Things are good now! I have the respect and admiration of my peers, I do pretty much anything I want, etc.

    I mean, who cares about what some foolish child did years ago? Who cares about what those people are doing today? Personally, I couldn't care less.

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    1. Re:I don't get it by Hellraisr · · Score: 1

      The worst is remembering the kids that you did bully and tease, and having it also done to yourself, realizing how terrible a thing it really is.

      I've been teased and been the teaser, and as I look back, the names I remember are the ones of the people that I teased, and I regret it very much indeed.

    2. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it.

      The names are not important. The scars are. The ones that don't show, so they couldn't possibly be real, now could they? So the situation continued. Doing the "right thing" didn't work. Doing the "wrong thing" that folks now claim worked, didn't work either. That just meant you were the problem.

      Some of those wounds have yet to heal. Yes, really. Congratulations on not having those. You're damned lucky.

      Others aren't so lucky. "Time heals all wounds" might be true, but some wounds take a lot more time than others. Not everyone is happy now, even if they really ought to be.

      And the not caring what goes on now... just means the problem continues. So much for the nature to put things right, huh? So, the hell people went through is a feature and not a bug, is that it?

      To hell with that feature!

    3. Re:I don't get it by nick_davison · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I mean, who were these evil people that gave you such a hard time that you still care about them tens of years later?

      I absolutely remember who they are. Ten years on, they do still affect me and, if honest with ourselves, I think most people will admit the same...

      Sure there are negatives: I talk too much and make bad jokes out of the remainder of the social nervousness they instilled; I find it hard to believe that my wife finds me physically attractive. But those are just some of the legacy they left me with.

      My desire to work hard, get a good job, do the things I want to do - they all come from them. When I moved from London to California, part of what made the decision easier (and it is scary making a move like that) is the thought that, at reunions, I'll be able to go back and laud my exciting life over them.

      They told me, for years, that I wasn't cool, couldn't do anything cool. I play guitar now, can snowboard, fly power kites. Every time I find myself thinking, "Nah, I can't be bothered." a part of me remembers them and gives me that extra push to try something new and cool, to stick with it, to be everything they told me I couldn't be.

      They told me I wasn't attractive, that I could never get a girl as hot as the "models" they were dating, from another school, in the year below. Years later, I still smile when I remember, just before we left high school, aged 18, a friend telling them about the 21 year old nurse I was dating. Their telling me I couldn't gave me the impetus to try harder, to work out, change my look, whatever and find people who found me attractive.

      They told me I was fat and ugly. While I refuse to go down the overcompensating paths of eating disorders and all the rest of it, remembering their derrision is what pushes me to do that extra thirty two lengths in the pool or get out of bed and go to the gym when I really don't want to.

      To pretend that bullies don't have an affect on my life, years later, is to pretend that my personality didn't develop at all in highschool. Maybe a few people were lucky enough to never be bullied but I think most other people, if honest, will agree with me.

      The thing is... Sure, they gave me some issues, but they also gave me a lot of strengths. It's that old thing of the former geek tipping the former jock who delivers his pizza. I was lucky and managed to turn the abuse in to a desire to always be more than them. So, in my own, warped, over generous way, perhaps I should just try thanking them, rather than hating them any more.

    4. Re:I don't get it by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Right on the money. Indeed, one thing that is fascinating about most people is their failure to understand that the only ones that can emotionally harm them are themselves, and the one's they love: Some random jerk can only make you emotionally scar yourself (i.e. You only get hurt by those you let hurt you). I was a definite loner during my school days (largely due to being from a very poor family), took party in absolutely no sports, and derived very little enjoyment out of the whole school experience, yet there is literally no one "villain" who I can recall because they weren't worth paying attention to. I don't run to Classmates.com to find out what they're all up to because honestly I couldn't care less what they're up to: This isn't a spiteful comment, but rather simple reality.

      Perhaps my lack of animosity is due to the fact that I early on resigned myself to being an outsider, and that was, as Stuart Smiley would say, ok. The people who I think still go through life licking their wounds are those who really, really envied the people who they paradoxically belittle: They wish they could hang with the "cool" girls and be the football star, etc.

    5. Re:I don't get it by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      I remember every single person who has transgressed against me going back almost to grade school. I keep a list with regularly updated address information and some basic statistics like hair color, height, weight, and likelyhood to be wearing body armor.

      Ok, not really. Just kidding there (hiding list under keyboard) but I do remember some of the ones who were better at it. I'm not into revenge but to put it nicely I wouldn't piss in their mouths if their throats were on fire.

      Something about what I just wrote reminds me of an Adam Sandler movie. I think it was Billy Madison where he calls the guy he picked on and apologizes years later. The guy thanks him and then scratches his name off of a list of people he's planning to kill. Hilarious stuff.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    6. Re:I don't get it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      To tell the truth, I can barely remember the names of most of the people I went to school with,

      I've been accosted a few times in bars near universisty by people who claim to have been a year above or below me in school. I must have made some kind of impression on them, since they've known my name and they've known things about the school that only former pupils would have known, but I have no idea who they were. A couple of times I've had vague memories of people mentioning their names, but I couldn't put a face to it, even with the face in question in front of me. I remember people who were my friends well, and everyone else was largely irrelevant.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:I don't get it by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I can only remember one of them - Hint - If the same guy beats you to a pulp every week for 2.5 years, stabs you (yes, I was stabbed, needed a couple of stitches), steals your stuff, you'll remember his name

      I have NO idea where he is, nor do I care, but I remember his name, and I remember going through about 15 pairs of glasses that 2.5 year period.

      In todays day and age, he probably would have ended up in jail

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    8. Re:I don't get it by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      "I mean, who cares about what some foolish child did years ago? Who cares about what those people are doing today? Personally, I couldn't care less."

      I'm probably repeating someone else, but ignoring this whole thing isn't the solution. I'm not advocating holding a grudge (I'm very easy to forgive, myself), but if you have kids, it's a good problem to analyze.

      I hope I'm not reading your comment wrong.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    9. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said sir- hats off to you. You have pulled yourself up instead of wallowing in a mire of self pity. More victims of bullying should foolow your example.

    10. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't run to Classmates.com to find out what they're all up to because honestly I couldn't care less what they're up to
      Now if I could just get Classmates.com to stop spamming about those people I don't give a fuck about.
  21. john katz was read? by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 1

    Wow, somebody actually read katz stories. I blocked them in the options setup years ago!

    --

    nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

  22. Beware the viscious circle. by Niles_Stonne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you are the lab admin, and the systems keep "crashing" or losing other people's data - no matter if you like them or not - it will reflect poorly on you.

    The more problems that people have on systems that you are supposedly administering, the less they will like you.

    Try talking, or being friendly, or helping to try to recover their data. Let the "bully" see that perhaps you can be better allies than enemies.

    --
    Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but copyright will always protect me.
    1. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by dildatron · · Score: 1

      I worked in a lab for a year helping people, and I tried to help as much as possible, and I wasn't the one who corrupted their files (even people I didn't care for).

      They used floppy disks.

      I don't care what anyone says, floppy disks are made like pieces of shit now. They used to be made much better. Floppies were never a sure way to store any data, but they used to be much more durable and longer lasting than they are now. Not sure why the quality has dropped so much, but if anyone knows, I would be interested (other than the obvious price drop).

      Still, it was funny to watch people come and try to open a 20 page document on their floppy, then have it fail, and I would have to say there is nothing I can do.

      Then I would teach them about network storage... I figured once that had one major fuckup with a floppy, they were all ears to learn a little about what their network drive was for.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    2. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Informative
      Try talking, or being friendly, or helping to try to recover their data. Let the "bully" see that perhaps you can be better allies than enemies.
      I'm sick of this liberal shit. I was not only geeky throughout school, but short and not very strong as well. I was a *supreme* target for bullying. It started in grade-school. One of the older students would make fun of me, push me around, slap me in the face with wet-gloves (one fond memory of a rainy day). All your *talking* and *working things out* means shit to a 5th grader.

      One day I was crying (remember I was in about the 3rd grade) about having recently been beat up. My mother that day told me "the next time that bully hits you, you hit him with your lunchbox, and punch him in the nose." I did. I got about a three month reprieve from being harrased from it too. About every three months we would fight, but there were periods of nothing in between. This carried into higher grades (different bullies).

      Did the teasing and bullying stop? No. But I *did* keep my self-respect, and dignity. Talking to irrational people does *not* work. Ususally bullies are too stupid.
      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    3. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      I lived in a small town where jocks were kings...but a new karate place opened up. I was a big fan of Asian stuff, so of course I got signed up for Karate AND Kickboxing. Once word spread that I was in for both and they started seeing I was slimming up and knew how to stop them if they wanted to get physical...they stopped bugging me and wanted to be my friend. :) ::evil grin::

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    4. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by (trb001) · · Score: 1

      Amen brother. I was the fat kid in elementary school and got picked on accordingly, both insults and fights. My mother never tolerated violence, so even if I had had the crap kicked out of me, if I threw even one punch she would get mad. I think she was afraid of lawsuits, I dunno. Anyways, I didn't really care but got back at those guys by lifting weights and turning out way more attractive by the end of high school.

      My point here is that I whole heartedly agree with you. Talking does nothing for elementary school kids, unless you find that one random kid who was just 'going along with the group' and didn't really want to make fun/pick a fight with you anyways. For the most part, kids are just jerks and violence is the only thing they're going to understand.

      --trb

    5. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I agree - from 6th grade till the beginning of 9th, I got the crap beat out of me about once a week. I either didn't fight back (at the beginning) or tried to fight "clean"

      Then one day, Dad decided to teach me to fight dirty - and BOY did HE know how to fight dirty (something about being in the OSS and learning hand to hand there (grin)). Very soon after, the class bully tried again - and boy that little bit of training and practice made all the difference - the fight ended when _I_ decided to end it, and I was the one still standing - He KNEW I beat him, and the ONLY reason he wasn't in the hospital or worse was because I decided that I didn't want him there

      Never had much trouble after that

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    6. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by Unanimous+Howard · · Score: 0

      Liberal??????? It sounds damn Christian to me. Maybe not extremest "Kill the Gays" Christian, but still the Golden Rule is ususlly claimed by conservatives....

    7. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My answer to this was chainmail gloves and a rumkhorff coil. Zap someone once, claim that you can pump the juice up ten times as high, and the news get around.

    8. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      The guys in your town were smarter than the ones in mine. A couple of years after I started taking Martial Arts the bullies were still fucking around with me and one of them finally elevated a level of physicality that I couldn't let go (I let him hit me twice before I fought back), he ended up in the hospital with a ruptured kidney.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    9. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by Gallowglass · · Score: 1
      The problem with that strategy is that they really have no incentive to stop bullying you. In fact, you are rewarding them.

      The better strategy is "Tit for Tat" (see Douglas Hofstadter and "Prisoner's Dilemma"). Actually, if you watch the old Warner Brother's cartoons (post WWII), this is Bugs Bunny's winning strategy.

      Of course, you may wish to follow Jesus' precept, "If a man strike the on the right cheek turn unto him the left cheek." That's a moral standpoint, and if that's your morality, more power to you.

      Mind you, Jesus never said you had to be a punching bag.

    10. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I have never thought of applying to the Prisoner's Dilemma to this - but now that you mention it, I love it :)

    11. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by phorm · · Score: 1

      I *was* the lab assistant (as a student), and it was quite a long time ago. All calls went first to the teacher - but it was universally throughout the school that windows 95 would just happily crash, and there wasn't much anyone could do about it.

      Besides... if you didn't get the point, I had a hidden client which I could direct to "crash" the machine on demand - it was a point of satisfaction after 3 years or so of dealing with their crap.

    12. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sick of this liberal shit. I was not only geeky throughout school, but short and not very strong as well. I was a *supreme* target for bullying.

      That's strange. I suddenly became a LOT more popular when I decided to share the knowledge that made me nerdy.

      When folks realized that I was happy to explain what the teacher said in class, and how to think about problems - I got a lot more popular. Shallow? Perhaps -- but it worked!

      And, yes, this was in a rural high school. Not a magnet school. Not college. Just normal folks who happened to be going to school.

    13. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Floppies were never a sure way to store any data, but they used to be much more durable and longer lasting than they are now. Not sure why the quality has dropped so much, but if anyone knows, I would be interested (other than the obvious price drop).

      For a while I figured that we were being sold old stock from times of overproduction... but now I imagine the margins on them are so low that no-one bothers to do that last 5% of QC.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    14. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by mandolin · · Score: 1

      So, what is the OSS?

    15. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      What WAS the OSS? The Office Of Stratigic Services - Had 2 sections - "Operations Group" (where Dad was) and Intelligence

      After WWII - Intelligence became the CIA - "Operations" became the forerunner of all the US Special Forces. Ops Group was in France 90 days before D-Day and trained the Partisans among other things.

      So basically I was trained to fight by someone who was trained directly by Rex Applegate

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    16. Re:Beware the viscious circle. by mandolin · · Score: 1

      thanks for the info!

  23. Join us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. I Read The Title and Thought.... by Tha_Big_Guy23 · · Score: 1

    Geez, not another viagra user's story... Haven't we heard enough??

    --
    If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
  25. important != necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who don't like them should not be required to play them, in high school or otherwise. It is not the sports themselves, but the way the masses obsess over sports that has the geeks all miffed.

  26. Re:psycho tests are bunk by Bastian · · Score: 1

    For one, the kids you need to worry about are smart enough to know they are a bit 'off' as compared to everyone else and know how to pass these tests. (It's not hard to fool a psychologist if you're tenacious.)

    For two, tests tests are dumb.

    For three, maybe if even some teachers would pay attention to the students who try to avoid attention - in a good way, not a scrutinizing way - and actually care about something, and if schools were to actually provide a good example to kids about how to act maturely, maybe the problem would solve itself. Of course, middle-and-high-school teachers don't have much incentive to care when their spirit, which is already hard to maintain when you work with teachers all day, is systematically crushed by fuckhead administrators. It's hard for administrators to not be fuckheads when U.S. and state legislation forces them to be fuckheads. And it's hard to get a legislation that doesn't force anyone who comes into contact with the government to be a fuckhead when the American voting public seems to only like voting for intractable fuckheads who care more for self-aggrandizement, being in control, and having sex with women half their age than working towards getting people to be well taken care of and nice to each other. Not that the American voting public has much of a choice, given that the people the Republican and Democratic parties like to run for office invariably fit the above description.

    A gargantuan, ill-concieved, and overdesigned system that doesn't work won't improve by becoming even more gargantuan and overdesigned. American public schools are gargantuan, ill-concieved, and and overdesigned. So is the state of the art in psychological screening. It is also poorly aimed - the root of the problem lies somewhere else.

  27. lol funny...dick by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    With a nickname like God, I expected as much. ALl the little cliche things you just mentioned really points out who you are in real life. lol. I am a geek, always have been, I enjoy computers and cars, but I have never suffered for a cute girlfriend, and quite honestly I'd rather go skinny dipping with sharks before watching the Knicks lose a few more games.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    1. Re:lol funny...dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're butt-fucking ugly such as someone like yourself, attracting the opposite sex is never an issue to suffer over.

  28. Re:posting before coffee is bunk by Bastian · · Score: 1

    Erratum 1: "tests tests are dumb" -> "standardized tests are dumb"

    Erratum 2: "which is already hard to maintain when you work with teachers all day" -> "which is already hard to maintain when you work with teenagers all day"

    Erratum 3: "fuckhead" -> "FUCKHEAD"

  29. Kickin' it old skool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sending out a big STFU, KATZ! to my homies!

    errrrr... what? nevermind.

  30. The stereotype isn't all bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    It makes sense that he'd be a threat to his classmates, because he's weird.

    Having someone think that you're a threat isn't all bad. It gets you some respect when you might otherwise get none. Being a non-threat in some circles - on the street, in high-school - is far worse than being a threat.

  31. Seek solace in My love by (1337)+God · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyday of our lives we are taught the same lesson:
    Don't fight the system,
    Don't speak out,
    Don't dress differently.
    Be part of the crowd,
    But don't make a scene.
    Don't be a blip on the radar of humanity.
    Blend in.
    This message has been etched in stone
    And continues to repress and distress.
    The hatred multiplies
    As those "freaks", those cancer on the popular skin,
    Must comply.
    But it is this silence
    That feeds the violence.
    All of the Doom
    Brought forth by a volatile human Quake
    May seem Unreal
    But this is no game,
    And it was no game that caused this.
    It was the repression, the deception,
    The correction, the depression.
    If the undesirables make a stand,
    Raise their collective hand,
    If they even dare to breathe,
    Push them down; make them desirable.
    That's the American way.
    If something is wrong, just point blame
    On television or a video game.
    There's no shame in that.
    It's not the parents' fault:
    They are symbols of perfection,
    Models for the youth.
    To tell you the truth,
    Why am I even writing this poem?
    It's not about talent or scholarship,
    But conformity and censorship.
    1984 is not too far-fetched.
    Let's just hope that all the dreamers,
    All the geeks, all the freaks,
    Stay true to themselves
    Because they can emancipate the slaves
    Hopefully without filling up the graves.
    They are the key
    To making this nation what it claims to be:
    The land of the free.
    -- T.V.

    --

    Background: 28/M/Bi-Sexual; Owner of a Linux company; MBA Harvard 2003; B.S. Comp Sci MIT 2000
    1. Re:Seek solace in My love by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Tricky. Shouldn't you attribute it?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Seek solace in My love by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Rather than naming yourself "(1337) God", you should adopt the moniker "(1337) Vogon"...

      --
      That is all.
    3. Re:Seek solace in My love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice. Very well written.

  32. Crime and Punishment by ShelfWare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another good read would be Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. It certainly doesn't have anything to do with geek/nerd topics, but does delve deeply into the effects of committing a murder on the psyche.

  33. Hardly New by Tony · · Score: 1

    School Shootings are hardly a new phenomena. The oddity was the spat of shootings we had in just a few years in rural or suburban middle-class schools. Most shootings before happened in urban schools.

    Difference is, we never reported schools shootings over and over.

    Could be we're finally seeing the pressures that drive kids to kill; but chances are, we report it so boldly and incessantly on TV that it gives other kids ideas.

    But then again, I always look for the simple explainations.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  34. Where have I seen this guy before... by chinton · · Score: 1
    He isn't social, he doesn't play sports, doesn't dress right. Maybe he spends more time with his computer than with the other kids in his class. It makes sense that he'd be a threat to his classmates, because he's weird.

    Oh, yeah. 95% of /.ers fit (either now or at some point in the past) this description.

  35. Re:Who needs AC to challenge me? by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Oh my goodness, I'm clumsy at spelling! My reasoning isn't though.

    And your second "point" shows you how much you know about what you are talking about. Dyslexics CAN be helped by proper training.
    Unless you have a balance/motor control disability, or are BLIND, you CAN and will benefit from sports and some training. Side effects like not getting picked first, and having the ball thrown at your head just mean you are playing with the wrong people.
    Heck, even blind people can play sports like golf, and they do benefit from it in the form of exercise and having something else they can be proud of. And even people with motor disabilities need training/therapy so they can learn to move even with their defective body parts.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  36. Psycho, yes, but not from birth by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You don't have to be born with the psychosis. Enough constant abuse will give it to you. Everyone has a breaking point.. most kids find ways to cope or stop the abuse before they reach it. Some can't.

    Furthermore, it takes more than just peer abuse to cause a kid to snap. In all the situations of school shooting, there has been abuse or neglect from a majority of the adults in the kids' life, too.

  37. The problem may very well lie in your paragraph by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    Peoples complete lack of the ability to make a point. Which you seem to suffer from.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
  38. # of exceptions it takes to disprove a rule? by SolemnDragon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Or worse, a socially accepted stereotype? Yes, Asperger's Syndrome is an interesting subset of Autism. And yes, most people live somewhere on the spectrum of 2 + 2 = 4 and call that sanity. But I had a high school teacher who got this right.

    He said, two plus two equals four for the mainstream, and that's what we're going to call sanity. We need rules to keep society ordered and we need a common ground to talk from. But everybody has their places where they don't line up to the norm. For some peeople, that's everywhere. For some people, 2 + 2 = 22, or twelve, or bright green. And Some day, they're going to betalking you down from the top of a building (he was addressing the whole class) and they're going to ask you, gee, what the H* were you thinking? And you're going to say, well... i don't know. It seemed like the right thing to do at the time...

    And that's not the scary part. The scary part is, that it will be true: it really will have made sense at the time. You will have found the place where, for you, two plus two no longer matches the four that everyone else comes up with.

    I don't offer this to excuse anything that anyone has done. Murder is murder. But I offer this as thought-fodder against the prediliction that we have, as a society, for nice little categories and nice little diagnoses. There's a wide range of stuff out there in the human mind-spectrum, some of it dangerous and some of it good, and not all of it definable by our current terms.
    Yeah, and I hated high school, too. But I think a lot of social fringe elements are actually better prepared for the outside world, and tend to do better in it, than their high school tormentors, because they have been forced to face the world as an individual without backup. It isn't right and it isn't necessarily worth it, but let's not forget that if superman hadn't had those powers, he never would have made it through high school without being stuffed into a locker either- or else he would have been one more football captain.

    1. Re:# of exceptions it takes to disprove a rule? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "For some people, 2 + 2 = 22"

      So people who forget to declare 2 to be a number instead of a string are considered crazy?

  39. Where is Jon Katz? by Daimaou · · Score: 1

    most notably Jon Katz's Hellmouth series.

    Speaking of Jon Katz, where has he been lately? Either he doesn't post much any more, or I have become so imune to his articles that I can recall seeing one for quite a long time.

    1. Re:Where is Jon Katz? by dildatron · · Score: 1

      Did you disable him in your account settings? I know I did a long time ago, and I had almost forgotten about it, and then I wondered why I didn't see this hellmout series. Then I remembered that I disabled the viewing of his shitty articles. And I was happy.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    2. Re:Where is Jon Katz? by ctrimble · · Score: 1

      I just sent in a submission to Ask Slashdot a couple days ago asking what happened to Katz, but it was rejected. His last post was on April 23rd and his last article was posted on July 10th. Maybe this book review will bring him back from the dead.

    3. Re:Where is Jon Katz? by bricriu · · Score: 1

      Ah, but WHICH April 23rd, and WHICH July 10th? This is Slashdot-The-Yearless, which means that maybe, just maybe, he's posting in the FUTURE. Think about it.

      --

      AHHHHHHH! I'm burning with goodness again!
      - Reakk, Sluggy Freelance

  40. It Wasn't Columbine! It's Always Been Like This... by Myriad · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Columbine tragedy planted the idea of a certain kind of 'bad kid' into the American consciousness. He isn't social, he doesn't play sports, doesn't dress right.

    Columbine didn't do this, it's always been the case. Be it geeks & nerds with their computers or not.

    For the most part society has always viewed different as being bad.

    Look at racism and other ethinc discrimination: they're not my race/colour, so they must be bad!

    Sexual orientation: he's gay, so he doesn't get the same rights. He's also open season for a beating.

    Same with geeks and nerds: they don't play sports, they like computers, they must be screwed up.

    Frankly people I think that as geeks we've had to put up with a hell of a lot less than either one of the two groups I've mentioned! Ya it sucks sometimes, but we still get off easy. I haven't heard of geek-bashing (as in beating to the point of death, or near death), nor have I heard of a geek not being allowed to vote or made to use a back door. It's not right, but it isn't new either.

    The problem is societies general intolerance for anything different... not some very disturbed individuals who also happen to be nerdy going postal in a school.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  41. What goes around comes around ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You cannot see the difference between revenge and wanton acts of cruelty?

  42. Name one: by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    Me!

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  43. Re:posting before coffee is bunk by brmic · · Score: 1

    Erratum 1: standardized tests? you believe in what instead? Rorschach? Cattel's "objective tests"? skin conductance, EEG?
    or were you speaking out for proper diagnostics, which effectively amounts to someone really trying to understand what is going on with the kid (an initiation event to some (analysts and kids))

  44. look things up before speaking by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    We did have things like columbine 30 years ago, they just weren't as well covered by local news. And their may not have been as many big shootings, but the number of school aged homicides have declined drastically in the past 30 years.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
  45. Are you *sure* it never happened 30 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny how the current headlines always block out the older stuff.

    Brenda Spencer (16 years old) fired a volley of bullets from her house toward the Cleveland Elementary School playground Jan. 29, 1979. She told a reporter who called her during the 6 1/2 -hour siege that she opened fire because, "I don't like Mondays. This livens up the day."

    It inspired the song, "I don't like mondays":
    http://www.hereinmyhead.com/collect/str ange/slg9.h tml

    If you think that 24 years ago is the first time it happened, dream on. Violence has always been a part of our society. The key difference between now and then is that:
    * powerful quick firing guns are easier to get now
    * people congregate in larger groups so it's easier to kill more people just by shooting in random directions in a crowd.

    1. Re:Are you *sure* it never happened 30 years ago? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I would disagree.

      Powerful quick firing guns are actually HARDER to get now. In the 20's, genuine machine guns were unregulated and could be casually purchased through outlets like Sears.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  46. I've heard that name before... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

    Huh. Is this the same Christopher Null who does movie reviews for FilmCritic.com. If so, I'll definitely have to check it out; I've quite enjoyed reading some of his movie reviews and would probably enjoy seeing what he does with a longer form.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:I've heard that name before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah same guy

  47. God is having emotional problems by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    I considered myself a guru, want the pictures of the girls I dated in highschool. Football players had nothing on me. And quite honestly once I graduated and had the much better future, I had no trouble finding a beautiful wife, who was also extremely intelligent.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
  48. He isn't social ... by BESTouff · · Score: 1

    He isn't social, he doesn't play sports, doesn't dress right. He is paranoid and whines on /. whenever he feels loosers like him are attacked ...

  49. Nice advice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...too bad it doesn't work.

    Sounds just like the inefectual pablum spwewed by teachers and low rent psych workers.

    Been there. Done that. Have the scars to show the effectiveness.

    As effective as Kleenex is against bullets.

    1. Re:Nice advice... by Niles_Stonne · · Score: 1

      Sorry it didn't work for you, but in my personal experience it worked quite effectively.

      --
      Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but copyright will always protect me.
  50. Years pass and things change in weird ways by gordie · · Score: 1

    In High School, I was one of those that was pick on and bullied. Mostly it was because I almost fit in, but just not enough. One guy in particular seemed to have it in for me, all the usual mean crap from ridicule to an occasional beating. Years later (recently actually), I ran in to my former tormentor and to my surprise he went out of his way to come over and say hello and wanted to get together for dinner and talk about "back in the day". I was shocked to find out I was someone he had for some perverse reason, had always considered a friend! Maybe it was because I put up with all his shit, or maybe we all remember things differently as years pass, I know I'll never figure that one out.

  51. (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I couldn't care less.
    Thank you, thank you for not mangling this phrase!
    1. Re:(offtopic) by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

      LOL, thanks. I even googled for examples of that phrase to make certain I had it right.

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    2. Re:(offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no, that's actually the correct version for this situation. He cares so little now, he could not possibly care any less. Think about it.

  52. God I'm sick of the whining by endeitzslash · · Score: 1

    This will probably never be seen, but. . .

    I have to say that I'm sick of self-proclaimed "geeks" whining about the "jocks" who harassed them in HS or how they were "outcasts". There is no law that says everyone will be respected, popular and get laid in HS. Have you considered that if you have no friends whatsoever, that you might have a shitty personality? Or if you hang around with other "outcasts", then you are not really an "outcast"? Christ people, suck it up and deal! I didn't hang around with the "popular" people in HS, but who cares? They were assholes. And I was probably an asshole, too (maybe I still am), since the typical teenager has massive narcissistic tendencies.

    Some people have *real* problems growing up, like alcoholic/abusive parents, or drug addictions, or poverty, or a host of other things that make your martyr complex driven "oh I'm a poor downtrodden geek" shit look like the pathetic whining it is. Most of you are out of HS now. . .just let it go. All this talk about "all the jocks now work at the gas station" and shit is just petty. It was only 4 years (hopefully) of your life. . .let. . .it. . .go.

    1. Re:God I'm sick of the whining by voss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Im sick of a--holes, who tell me and others like me didnt suffer or "thats what everyone went through and stop whining."

      What the f--k is the difference between being physically abused by a peer or being physically abused by a parent? The difference is if your physically abused by a parent you can call family services and theyll act. You try reporting physical abuse by a peer the abuser wont even get arrested will get some minor slap on the wrist and then beat u up again for reporting them.

      This is not about "having no friends" . I would have been happy having no friends if the bullies would have just left me the h-ll alone!

      Some of us have emotional scars that have lasted years, and therapy bills going into the thousands of dollars, and we didnt suffer?

      Most of us didnt care if we didnt hang around with the popular people, or had only a few friends, or didnt get many dates. We just didnt think it was right to be tormented by others because didnt have those things.

    2. Re:God I'm sick of the whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like you were one of the side-liners. You were likely one of those people NOBODY noticed.

    3. Re:God I'm sick of the whining by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

      See .. im going to take a few shots here .. nothing personal mind you :

      "What the f--k is the difference between being physically abused by a peer or being physically abused by a parent? The difference is if your physically abused by a parent you can call family services and theyll act."

      two words for you 'Emotional Blackmale'

      Kids who are REALLY abused, don't call social services - because most of them grew UP with being abused and consider it normal. They don't KNOW that it doesnt happen to everyone, they assume it does.

      These children inturn .. treat other children how they learned to be treated. Slapping someone around might be what they understand as a show of affection. does the phrase "I'm doing this because I love you." hold and weight here ?

      The kids that call social services on their parents are trying to HURT their parents. If they are abused children, then there is some outside influence pressuring them to call social services. *VERY* few children will ever think to betray their parents without outside influence. Kids who do this are trying to get something out of their folks .. be it freedom, power, control, the car .. stuff like that. [especially when real abused children are operating under the assumption that the abuse is how ALL families work.]

      I was a sierious 'outsider' in middle & highschool (13 years ago i graduated) in the 80's. I was a goth when goth was described at punk, and it meant you were just as likley to hit someone in the head with your skateboard as mope around depressed. I had a bunch of friends, some outcasts .. some not.

      By the time i hit 16-17 .. I got over it. I learned that some people THRIVED on being rejected / outcast / picked on by other people. Because it gave them an excuse. I decided that I didn't want to give anyone that kind of control over my life. Some of my friends refused to talk to me .. Some of my enemies started thinking I wasnt so bad. I think that was one of the first steps for me becoming [more or less] an adult.[I realized that I couldn't hold onto dogged values just because I had held them at one point. And to constantly re-evaulate how I interact with the world. - but this is getting off topic.]

      Its my opinion that the people who don't do this are the ones who 10-15 years later .. still hate their protagonist from highschool.

      If you ever watch these folks, they are ALWAYS the victim, they thrive on it - it makes them feel comfortable. They are the 30 year olds who complain that their spleens are in bad shape, or their choloresteral is too high. They are always down on themselves, have no self confidence, no control over their lives because they dont *WANT* that control.

      Being the victim gives them a scapegoat to blame everything that they don't like in life on. 'Damn, I would be making more a year if Mr. Bourasa didn't pick on me so much in Algebra class, I might have learned it better.' or 'That Jimmy Stalwart, him and his football cronies made me too scared to go to the prom. I wish I had asked Shiela to go!'

      a 17 or 18 year old who still harbors these regrets / pains is acceptable - learning to dismiss them is after all , part of growing up. a 25-30 year old (especially one who continued school) who still has these regrets really DOES need to let go and stop living in the past.

      See a shrink, get some therapy, get on paxil or thoramine if you need it.

      But don't actually think, that events that happened to you in highschool REALLY have an effect on your life 15 years later. Your just letting shadows from your past take over your life.

      [And just as an aside .. I actually went to both my class reunions [I skipped 1/2 a grade - long story] And most of the folks that tortured me horribly in highschool were the most fun to talk to. Some didn't change - and were like a bad characture .. some grew up and totally forgot about it , one or two even appologized for being jerks. By the end of both reunions - I discovered that I had my own share of crow to eat - and that was pretty cool too.]

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    4. Re:God I'm sick of the whining by painehope · · Score: 1

      Emotional Blackmale

      hey, that was the big guy in the Green Mile, right?

      on a serious note, there's one thing that got me through the worst middle school in a crime-ridden city ( when people couldn't remember my name, they said, "yeah, the crazy white boy" ), and then a military academy where beatings ( and even the occasional rape ) were pretty common, and then the stereotypical elitist jock high school in the suburbs : a well-earned reputation for violent retaliation. It doesn't matter if you win or lose, just hurt whoever is messing with you as badly as you can. Then they leave you alone.
      Period.

      and before anyone goes crying about 'that's not the way the world should be', remember that we are animals with opposable thumbs and a higher number of dendritic branches ( I think that's the latest theory on what makes us smarter than most creatures...then again, mice in balls might run the universe, for all I know ), and most of us have aggressive instincts to one degree or another. These people have more than most, and neither the brain nor the conscience to apply rational thought to their actions. Like kicking an attacking dog in the nose, it's a matter of teaching them that it's probably easier just to find something else to do do, like chasing balls around grassy fields. Hmm, exactly like dogs...I'm going to reflect on this over a smoke...

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    5. Re:God I'm sick of the whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're wrong. Caste systems are unethical and immoral. Starving people in africa and abusive parents don't make Caste Systems acceptable. And in high school is the American caste system. OTOH, I took your advice. I certainly didn't mind, but then, I was taught to fight for myself. Geeks, express your fundamental confict oriented nature and there is no problem. Remember, even if they are bigger than you... who screws with a Bee, just because they are bigger than it? No, have a sting, they don't like that.

  53. Harassment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I look back at high school after only being out 3 years and realize how damn immature i was and people are. I was also one of the "Popular" kids. Football, Soccer, Basketball, Class President and sure i got the "hot girls"(im not trying to brag either). Though i had these "important high school characteristics" I tried as hard as i could to never make fun of someone no matter how cool or geeky they were. Im not saying i NEVER made fun of anyone because i did. I just tried hard not too and when my "friends" did sometimes i went along and sometimes i stood up for them and i invited them to go out drinking and what not with us. Now believe me, this did not go over well with certain individuals in our "group" and even i would sometimes make excuses up as to why they were here. The thing that many of my friends did not realize was that i was a geek at heart. I just had the qualities to not be viewed as one nor the BALLS to act like one. That is my biggest regret ever!! If i could redo anything it would have been to be TRUE to MYSELF rather than being FALSE to the people i was hanging around with. Now i have grown up a little bit and openly admit that i am a geek. I dont talk to the majority of the people i did stuff with in high school but rather tend to converse with geeks. Oh times have changed...Hang in there those who are being picked on. While im not going to try and understand what its like, just wait your time and it will get better, i promise..

  54. Re:Short Story by CFusion · · Score: 0

    I can see at least one person has failed to see the wisdom in my comments this morning... drink some coffee dude.

    --
    I used to be a MS fan but then I was brainwashed. Now I see the Light. Mac OS X pwns u.
  55. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  56. Null by Sinus0idal · · Score: 1

    He's leet! He has null for a name!

  57. Half Staff? by Andy_w715 · · Score: 1

    Does this take place on a boat? If so I can see why "Half Mast" would be appropriate, other wise a more suitable titile would be "Half Staff" for those of us currently on stable ground.

    1. Re:Half Staff? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "Half Staff" sounds like midget porn to me.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Half Staff? by payndz · · Score: 1
      In the UK, it's always 'half mast' when talking about flags. I'd never even known the US did it differently (and this from someone who's been there a lot, has family there and even did a degree in the subject) until the Columbia disaster and CNN kept going on about flags being at 'half staff'.

      Just another one of those things they did in the 19th Century to set themselves apart from Britain, like taking the 'u' out of words like 'colour' and holding the fork in the right hand, I guess...

      --
      You must think in Russian.
  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Whatever happened to Katz? by Augusto · · Score: 1

    I remember his rants a long time ago, they were annoying and persistent. Did he just give up on slashdot, get a real job?

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Whatever happened to Katz? by gowen · · Score: 1

      A real job, and one more suited to his skills. He's now a canine journalist (although, presumably, his bad experience with a C64 means he won't write about Afghans...)

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  60. OT: Fundamental Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Slashdot is important for a number of reasons. Hellmouth was NOT one of them. Having Jon Katz on Slashdot was a fundamental mistake (in contrast to the "Slashdot Cruiser", which was merely a embarrasment) made by people who either didn't understand Slashdot's domain or who were trying to make it something it could never be. I refrain from suggesting that it was self-aggrandizement, which many allege, and rather blame it on mis-directed advisors.

    It's a shame that Jon Katz, who is a respectable journalist with a significant carreer, had to suffer the indignity foisted upon him for his attempts at contributing to Slashdot. The draw of Slashdot was independent of any serious journalism -- except references to resources off the site through the "stories," which aren't stories, per se, but annotated hyperlinks -- and adding a journalist to Slashdot broke the pattern. "One of these things is not like the other" -- a good lesson from Sesame Street that applies here.

    Roblimo said somewhere that the poor grammar and abysmal misspelling of CmdrTaco, et al, add to the character that is Slashdot. I agree. Slashot is an informal medium. The content is mainly references to ecletic outside content and comments from readers. Bringing onboard a serious journalist to create indigenous content was a fundamental error. In many ways Slashdot is to Nerds what the Drudgereport is to political and pop culture newshounds, with the addition of comments. If the Drudgereport hired Sam Dondaldson, that would be akin to the mistake Slashdot made in hiring Jon Katz.

    This mention of Hellmouth brings back the bad taste that has been dormant since July 10, 2002. I feel pity for Katz--he never had a chance here. It would have been a different story, I believe, had Katz's articles been published elsewhere and linked to by Slashdot. That would have removed much of the vitrolic noise that accompanied Katz's stories.

    1. Re:OT: Fundamental Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Katz was original content. You could say that
      Slashdot leaches of the rest of the Internet.
      Just pointing to the New York Times -- then
      to the printer friendly version to avoid registration, etc. I thought Katz's writing was fine and it was Slashdot "giving back" a bit.

  61. An addendum by jtheory · · Score: 1

    I should add that I think it's very important for children to learn to be comfortable in their bodies. Self-confidence and happiness get a nice boost when you are healthy. It seems strange, but mental balance can be improved by developing good physical balance. We can also lead better lives if we are tuned into the needs of our bodies (like realizing that I'm about to insult someone simply because I'm starving hungry).

    Too many kids never learn to jump, climb, walk safely on ice, balance on one foot, etc. etc. and they become adverse to risks in other areas of their lives as well, and/or constantly distracted by shame about their awkwardness and maladroitness.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    1. Re:An addendum by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Exactly. People learn how NOT to be geeky - in the awkward movement sense. From watching me play baseball, someone might say I don't look coordinated, however I can catch and throw, and I self taught myself to juggle. Imagine the self confidence someone will have taking a cruise on the ocean, if they never were taught how to swim? We shouldn't allow are kids to be denied open spaces to play, and dedicated kind teachers to show them how if they have trouble.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  62. Re:Somehow, I doubt I'll see this on the DrudgeRep by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

    Phillip Greenspun of arstechnica and photo.net fame. Sure, he's a computer nerd, but he's also a photography nerd -- that's about as far away from the keyboard as you can get. We're talking real photography here -- no computer-enhancement, USB-linked digital cameras. Medium format film, tubs of chemicals, racks of drying negatives.

    I'm not a guru, but I'm also in the same category. Sure, I work as a Unix sysadmin and I program in my free time, but I'm also a photography nerd, cooking nerd, and physical activity nerd. I got picked on in high school, got over it, and I'm now having a lot more fun with my life than most of the "popular" crowd -- not because I make more money (I do), or because I'm better looking (I don't have a potbelly; most of them do), or because I've got more friends (Lost count and don't care). I'm happier because I've got tangible things that I enjoy devoting my life to -- my photography, my algorithms, and my tiramisu, whereas the "popular crowd" is still chasing "popularity" and "coolness" like they were in high school.

    --

    --
    I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  63. What phychosis? by iamacat · · Score: 1
    If you an adult, it's perfectly acceptable to defend yourself against mugging, even if pull out a gun and kill a couple of attackers. If your story is supported by the evidence, I don't think you will even go to trial.

    On the other hand, say you are severely abused at work AND you can't/don't know how to get another job AND you complain to managers or police many times and they just ignore what you say. Now if you bring a machine gun to work and go Rembo... well you have a good chance with an insanity plea. Only it's not really insanity. It's still self-defence, by someone who doesn't know of any other way to defend himself.

    Now, I am not suggesting a tempting option of letting nerds carry guns to protect themselves against bullies (not that most nerds would be able to shoot someone). But if a child/teenager is threatened by physical abuse in the hands of gang of overgrown potheads, surely he has a right to defend himself by any means available.

    And if a student goes to parents or teachers and complains about bullies, they better listen. You can not expect a child to talk directly to police or file court documents. If he is refused help by an adult, he may well think that the only way to stop bullies is shown in action movies.

    If a few bullies are killed and the nerds go free on self-defense or insanity (== desperation) plea, who knows, maybe bullies' parents will stop making excuses for their children being "normal boys" and bullies' teachers will start expelling students.

    FYI, my school (in Soviet Russia!) had some pretty liberal "playground rules". Like throwing darts made from a needle, rubber and paper until they are dozens stuck under your skin (you really get swollen after that!). Or taking your coat and hat and making you walk home wearing indoor cloth at -40C. Every day, I was trying to sneak out of the window and use some small back streets to avoid bullies on the way home. Every school break, I had to run out of class at the first bell ring and hide under shelves in the library or be beaten.

    Into amatuer chemistry at that time, I was thinking daily about somehow making cyanide from K Fe (CN)4 (rusty now, is that the formula? would sublimation with diluted sulphiric acid do it?) and adding some to bullies' meals in school cafeteria. Just a comforting dream, never likely to act on it. But I can relate to someone with less hope and under more pressure.

    1. Re:What phychosis? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      A job cannot be compared to school.

      You have at least the theoretical option of quitting your job and finding another job.

      No such option exists for a minor.

      They are prisoners of whatever bad situation may exist at their school.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:What phychosis? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Yes, so what I am saying is that going for the gun is not always "psychosis". It could be just self-defence if no other options exist or you can not see them because of your age and/or conditioning.

  64. Me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I read bait like this, all I can think is,

    "You're sick of the whining? But you do it so well!"

  65. Mod up! by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

    Damn straight! I'm in the same boat! Every time I think about not running that extra mile, or about not getting that bit of extra credit in a class, or not hitting on the hot chick reading T.S. Eliot at the cafe, I think about all the people that told me I would amount to nothing, could achieve nothing, and was worth nothing, and I prove them wrong.

    I also ran into one of my former torturers awhile ago; he's got a kid and a stomach now (at 22), and works as a salesman, making less than half my salary -- and he was very unhappy. I didn't need to demean or insult him -- he did that himself.

    --

    --
    I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  66. School shootings happen all the time by Animats · · Score: 1
    They're routine in high-crime areas, and they're usually for the usual crime reasons - robbery, drugs, dumb anger. Today's school shooting stories include: And that's the way it is, Friday, February 28, 2003.
  67. There was no Golden Age by Raedwald · · Score: 1
    Why do we have things like Columbine nowadays when these things were unheard of 30 years ago?

    What makes you think things like it didn't happen 30 years ago? Have you conducted an analysis of violence in schools? I guess not. The difference between then and now may simply be that you are much more aware of what is happening now, because of the are fresh in your mind and you were more than a baby at the time. There is a general law-and-order nostalgia effect: people say '30 years ago we didn't have violent problem X', but people have been say that for as far back as we have good records of popular opinion. See Pearson, C. (1983). Hooligan. A History of Respectable Fears. London, Macmillan.

    --
    Ne mæg werig mod wyrde wiðstondan, ne se hreo hyge helpe gefremman.
  68. I love my Trench Coat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started wearing a trenchcoat just after the Colombine shootings.. my way of letting the bastard moronic american public know that they were just that. (i was still in high school then..). Of course, shortly thereafter i got thrown out of a basketball game for telling some kids i had a shotgun under my coat. It was kinda funny actually.. a group of "jocks" at the game actually told the kids i had a gun.. after i warned them to back off when they made fun of the girls i was with.

    I'm sure it would have been a lot funnier if i did have a gun. I would of liked to see the look on their faces when they were staring down a shotgun barrel.

    That was years ago though.. now i wear a nice leather trencoat everywhere i go..

    1. Re:I love my Trench Coat by shirt-ripper!! · · Score: 1

      Been wearing nice trench coats myself for years. Nothing like walking into a place and having everyone turn around and look at you with a worried expression.

      --
      Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
    2. Re:I love my Trench Coat by anachattak · · Score: 1
      Using something like a trenchcoat to intimidate others doesn't sound a lot better than using your size and fists to instill fear. If people react that way just because you look different, it makes a statement about them and their prejudices. Drawing on that reaction as a source of self-satisfaction says something equally unpleasant about the wearer.

      Rebels object to the "social conversation." Sociopaths fail to recognize the conversation altogether. I choose the sociopaths.

    3. Re:I love my Trench Coat by shirt-ripper!! · · Score: 1

      Strange, for as long as I've been wandering around in a trench I've never really thought about that...guess we find something new to think about every day.

      --
      Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
    4. Re:I love my Trench Coat by actor_au · · Score: 1

      "I'm sure it would have been a lot funnier if i did have a gun. I would of liked to see the look on their faces when they were staring down a shotgun barrel."

      I think that the moderators are too scared to mod you down....sir.

      --
      Read Errant Story.
  69. Re:Just an opinion by dentar · · Score: 1

    For all the kids that are in school right now, there are probably 50% that don't want to be there,

    Where I went to school, about 80% didn't want to be there, and that was in the 80s.

    What I don't get is why these bullies are all glorified by the press and by the alumni of these schools, when the schools' purpose is to teach, not churn out steroid-infested jocks.

    Columbine's root cause was bullying gone out of control. People ALMOST "got it" right after it happened, but then their brains went back to sleep.

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  70. Garfield shooting forgotten by vm · · Score: 1

    Here's a recent article about a 1995 shooting at Garfield High in Seattle. The author actually tracks down the shooter (now out of jail) and interviews him on the phone. Here's a snippet that summarizes why this incident is forgotten when other school shootings are talked about in the media:

    ...the Secret Service, like most of the rest of the country, saw the shooting at Garfield as being primarily about drugs and gangs and random black-on-black crime, and therefore not worth including in a study aimed at keeping America's schools (read: suburban America's schools) safe. Interestingly, the study found that while there was no single profile that fit all school shooters, two common threads among all shooters were that they felt "bullied, persecuted or injured by others prior to the attack" and had access to weapons--both qualities that describe the Garfield shooter.

  71. That s because you enevr were tortured by aepervius · · Score: 1

    and by that I really mean psychologically and physically tortured. If you had been as some of us really were, you would recall their face a life long.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:That s because you enevr were tortured by BitHive · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean you have to tie your identity to it. In 7th grade, I was chased around campus being beaten with a stick while other people watched and cheered. The principal told me that the kid was 'just playing' and wondered why I was having her 'brow-beat' a fellow student. I was also told that it was one of the 'star students' that punched me in the chest at the bus stop in front of everyone, knocking the wind out of me. I could go on. The point I'm trying to make is, I can talk about these things without feeling sorry for myself. I don't know why that is but I'd like to suggest that as bad as I had it (or you had it), people can and do overcome much, much worse. There are holocaust survivors that came out of concentration camps and still manage to live happy fulfilled lives. No, they don't forget, but you owe it to yourself and those around you to move on, and ultimately, you'll respect yourself more for it.

    2. Re:That s because you enevr were tortured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as soon as someone figures a UNIVERSALLY WORKABLE METHOD for "moving on" then theings will be just dandy.

      It's not that people don't WANT to put that shit behind them. I'd love to! But doing it alone hasn't worked. Neither have counseling, therapy, and the like.

      Got any magic bullets?

      Or is just a matter of being forgetful?

  72. Re:unfortunately.. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

    what's a mullet?

  73. I don't think that columbine make geeks look bad by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what it and all subsiquet and prior attacks did was open the publics' eyes to just how damaging ostricizing and bullying a child can be if it is done to the wrong person. look at all the zero tolerence policies tehre are to bullying now. when I was a kid, I got beat up and I would tell a teacher...the teacher's responce was "stop whining".

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  74. Re:Somehow, I doubt I'll see this on the DrudgeRep by sdibb · · Score: 1

    I got picked on in high school, got over it, and I'm now having a lot more fun with my life than most of the "popular" crowd

    I agree, and I've done the same ... something that has helped a lot though was actually getting OUT of high school. The older I get, the more it's obvious that what was my world growing up, really isn't the world at all.

    It's easy to get away from those who give you flak and enjoy the things you really do enjoy in life, once youre out of an atmosphere where those things aren't so stereotyped.

  75. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rock on ye bastian!

  76. The really cool chicks: a retrospective by MourningBlade · · Score: 1, Troll

    For some reason I find it hilarious that a person who claims that those who "smoke and refuse to participate" are "the ones who get the really cool chicks" runs a site that collects porn from other sites.

    Now, with porn there are two options that imply that you can get chicks:

    • No porn: you're too busy with chicks to photograph them.
    • Original porn: you're busy with chicks, but you photograph them.

    Lots of porn, but none original? Not looking good.

    Perhaps you were referring to a class of person that you remember got a bunch of chicks, many of which you classified as cool.

    Or perhaps you learned, as I have observed, that the "smoke and refuse to participate" bunch pretty much sheds itself of interesting people about the sophomore year of high school, and were merely referring to what was then current.

    Of course, this could be my own personal biases at play, and I'm not exactly stocked up on my chick supplies, but as we both seem to be comparing observations here, I figured I'd weigh in.

    Oh, and yes: the chicks that go after the jocks are insipid beyond human understanding.

    1. Re:The really cool chicks: a retrospective by doggo · · Score: 1

      Then there's the "kids who play sports AND "smoke and refuse to participate"

      I thought the geek girl was pretty damn cute too. I liked Adam Goldberg's character better in Saving Private Ryan.

    2. Re:The really cool chicks: a retrospective by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Well, the porn site's a business. It has no bearing whatsoever on my real life. I'm actually a former geek with a hot, very cool wife.

  77. Re:It Wasn't Columbine! It's Always Been Like This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeks aren't allowed to vote because they're likely to write a script to do it for them, and skew the results!

    And gays are the ones that are forced to use the back door...

  78. Fall Valley? by zephc · · Score: 1

    "the pride and joy of Fall Valley High"

    That should instead read "Sweet Valley High"

    *grin*

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  79. Re:unfortunately.. by Brummund · · Score: 1
  80. Re:It Wasn't Columbine! It's Always Been Like This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    geeks we've had to put up with a hell of a lot less than either one of the two groups I've mentioned

    Indeed. And trying being both a geek and a racial minority in a small town.

  81. Re:unfortunately.. by t0qer · · Score: 2, Funny

    what's a mullet?
    http://ratemymullet.com/

  82. MOD PARENT UP by BitHive · · Score: 1

    Right on the money. I think people in that position won't or can't admit that part of the reason they can't let go is they feel snubbed from some group they idolized at some level, which is of course the ultimate cognitive dissonance. Once you do let go of the cool kids as the ideal, the heartache sort of falls out of the picture and you can start feeling sorry for them instead of yourself.

  83. Re:unfortunately.. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    what's a mullet?

    Business up front, party in the back.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  84. Lifestyle by SirLantos · · Score: 0

    To quote the great comedian, George Carlin, "If you want to know what a moronic word lifestyle is, just keep in mind that, in a technical sense, Atilla the Hun had an active outdoor lifestlye."
    All that really matters is that you can look at yourself and say "I had fun and I didn't hurt anybody."
    I think that it is more important to be able to say "I had fun and I didn't get any STD's" though, not hurting anybody is a close second.

    --
    The flying hamster of DOOM rains coconuts on your pitiful city.
  85. Re:It Wasn't Columbine! It's Always Been Like This by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

    To your point about adverse discrimination being bad in many of its colors and shapes, I would like to add that, currently, black geeks have it pretty damn hard. Some sub-cultures (I say sub because this refers to the American urban black culture that we run into. What particular flavor it is, I don't care) have it in even worse for certain forms of discrimination.

    Much has been made about why these kids beat the snot out of each other, and why they target the way they do (and each form of violence seems to have its own targets, now doesn't it?), but I remember crossing the fence when I was very young. I started out as a bully (much bigger than the rest of the kids, hated by the teacher for wanting to learn faster than she would teach, angry over many things, and not really close to anyone in the class), and I became a different kind of outcast: the bookish type.

    Two interesting things about that: first, the bullies really have no damn clue what they're doing. Most of it has to do with groupthink more than anything else.

    Second, the point of view from the bully and the bullied is much the same when the bully knows you'll fight back.

    This is one of the reasons why I got so damn pissed off at my high school policy of "if you defend yourself you will be suspended."

    In my opinion, it's a microcosm of what is going wrong with our administrative, justice, social, and ethical systems all wrapped up into one:

    • Administrative: we'll have a problem proving who did it, and don't want to take the time, so we'll punish everyone. Fighting is a social problem, therefore punishing the society for letting it happen will curb it, right?
    • Justice: we can catch pretty much anyone who's fighting at any time, and break them up before something serious happens. Anything that happens off campus is immaterial.
    • Social: the school knows what's best. My child lies and all administrators and teachers both tell the truth, and have all the information.
    • Ethical: acts are wrong or right based solely upon the action taken, not upon the reasons for it being taken and regardless of information present at the time.
  86. what we really need by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    the creation of a fund designed to get high school misfits laid.

    that'll keep them placated.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  87. Slashdot by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

    I immediately thought of Slashdot when I read Christopher Null's novel

    We all know that i was just the name Null that made you think of Slashdot. I could be like everyone else, and say that Null is the average number of newsworthy stories.... but I won't ;-)

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
  88. 1927 Bath Michigan: 39 killed by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These school rampages have been happening since there schools such as in Bath Michigan, 1927 . But they really picked up in the late 1990s.

  89. Not New! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Columbine tragedy planted the idea of a certain kind of 'bad kid' into the American consciousness."

    It did not. There has always been in-society and out-society, conformity versus everybody else.

    People who associate in a stylistic sense with the individuals responsible for Columbine want desperately to be a "differnt" out-class, but it just isn't so.

  90. Climate? by primenerd · · Score: 1

    I am not familiar with the economic/ social conditions in Abitibi, but looking on a map it seems to be quite high in latitude. My experience from growing up in Alaska is that climate has a serious impact on suicide rates as well as alcohol consumption.
    Something about long winters with little sunlight seems to make people go off the deep end.

    --
    AUGAUUUGCGCACAUAUCUCAGCGAAUGAAAGGGAUUAA
    1. Re:Climate? by NorthDude · · Score: 1

      Yep, it could probably be an issue.
      But even if it is pretty far, days there are not very shorter in winter then they are in Montreal.
      There is never much more then 10 minutes of daytime in Montreal then in Abitibi during the winter...

      And yes, Abitibi IS pretty high in latitude.
      Rouyn-Noranda is about 600 KM from Montreal.
      So basically, it takes the same time to go
      visit my parents then it is to go to Toronto.

      And god do I miss those canoe-camping trips miles away from any civilisation ;-)

      Cheers!

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
  91. Does the book even ask why bullies "bully"? by anachattak · · Score: 1

    While, given, some people just suck and live to abuse other people for no reason at all, there are also people who bully because they are themselves bullied, usually by someone at home. To be honest, the problem's not as simple as fascist bullies harrassing the smart kid. Some bullying, at least in part, can be attributed to retaliation by "victims" in an effort to rebuild self-image, which is kind of what I'm reading on some of the "pizza-tipping" posts. My $0.02.

  92. Re:unfortunately.. by IAmKarl · · Score: 0

    This is like... Disturbingly Evil.... Karl P

  93. What early signs of trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What early signs of trouble are you refering to when you say "these kids exhibited early signs of trouble that were ignored" ? Do you consider being a loner an early sign of trouble? I was a loner. Do you consider wearing black a long black coat an early sign of trouble? I consider paying 40$ for pants that look used from a designer name trouble. Do you consider their lack of school involvement an early sign of trouble? Sorry, I didn't like sports much either.

    Listen, everyone points a finger at the parents, or the school, why don't we point it where it belongs. At the kids who tortured these kids, mentally enough, to want to kill some people and commit suicide. You bitch because they shot kids, I bitch because of all the dicks they probably missed.

    If every bully,and jerk in the world thought he was going to get shot or killed for being a dick to people, I think we would be living in a better society.

    1. Re:What early signs of trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you consider wearing black a long black coat an early sign of trouble?

      Well I'm hoping so, in Spike's case. ;)

  94. drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't hear about their drug use. Please point me to the news article that made this statement. Or are you just going with your gut instinct.

    P.S.
    Did you ever consider that some people start doing drugs like that for a reason, like, I am going to die today might as well. Sane people don't wake up in the morning at the age of 16 and say, lets go get some cocaine, because my life is perfect.

  95. Interesting Perspective (Actually Freaky) by DaemonGem · · Score: 0

    This review came from Amazon.com:
    I know I've read a great book when it makes me change (or atleast try to change) some element(s) of my behavior. Afterreading Half Mast, I have made a solemn vow that I will never again let my child out of my sight, and, more importantly, that I will home-school him, so that he never, ever sets foot inside the halls of "learning".
    This book does for education what Psycho did for showers. The writing is as real and powerful as anything I have everread, and I will not soon forget it. I look forward to Mr. Null's next effort, and it is my hope the he'll begin working on it immediately.

    Is it just me, or is this frightening?

    -Dae

    --
    "Alle reden vom wetter. Wir nicht." - SDS Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund.
    j00 4r3 3n73r1ng l337 w0r1d.
    1. Re:Interesting Perspective (Actually Freaky) by DuBois · · Score: 1

      This is not frightening at all. It's what's happening. You need to know what's really going on in the public schools these days.

      --
      The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
  96. Don't forget about the Stephen King Classic "Rage" by zachjb · · Score: 1

    If you enjoy this book, you will most likely enjoy Stephen King's first novel, "Rage". He wrote it while in high school and deals with an outsider student who gets fed up with school and holds his class hostage.

    A very good novel that would make an awesome movie.

    --

    --If only there was a license required to use a computer.
  97. Value for value. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repay kindness with kindness.
    Repay respect with respect.
    Repay affection with affection.
    Repay pain with pain.
    Repay injustice with vengeance.

    Show no mercy.

  98. sorry people had to bite on this one by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    I do take Kenpo, but I was strong before martial arts and I am strong afterwards, I just did Kenpo for technique. The fact that you boys are referring to it as "Martial Arts" goes to show that you weren't really into it, or good at it. People who are into "Martial Arts" never would call it that, they would refer to their specific school of training; Kenpo, Karate, Judo, Kung Fu: schaolin or dragon style. They would not say, I trained in "martial arts" by definition even wrestling is a martial art. Please don't fantasize on my watch next time.

    and if you had ruptured his kidney with karate, jujitsu, or another form of training, then you weren't trained well. I could easilly put you on your back without causing permanent physical damage to you. A Kenpo student, is controlled not one to hurt a person of less strength simply because I did the stupid thing of allowing them to hit me.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    1. Re:sorry people had to bite on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I talk about my training in supreme hamster style nobody knows what I am talking about, so I just say "martial arts."

    2. Re:sorry people had to bite on this one by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      The fact that you boys are referring to it as "Martial Arts" goes to show that you weren't really into it, or good at it.

      Or that we were involved in more than one school of training. Did you consider that?

      Please don't fantasize on my watch next time.

      Sorry to have wasted your time, Bruce Lee.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    3. Re:sorry people had to bite on this one by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Did you ever stop to consider that this guy was a relative novice when the fight in question occured? One does not even advance to yellow belt overnight. Such skill requires time and practice.

      Serious injury is clearly foreseeable based on the scenario presented.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:sorry people had to bite on this one by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      Guess I should have told the ENTIRE story then. First of all, I do study Martial Arts. Wrestling, Taekwondo, Aikido, Jujitsu, Judo, and Wushu. So yes, I study Martial Arts. As many of them as I can get instruction in.
      The incident I mentioned happened VERY VERY early in my studies, I was a green belt in Taekwondo and had been wrestling for about 6 months. I had damn near 0 control, but I knew the places to hit someone to hurt them. Of COURSE I wasn't trained well, I was new to it. Now, or even a year later I would NEVER have made the mistake I made in that confrontation, but when you're 15 and can finally stop the guy who is twice your size for turning you into hamburger you maybe don't think so clearly, eh?

      And if you don't study "Martial Arts" as a whole then you're getting an incomplete education in self defense. Every art has something valuable to offer you.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  99. Observations from teaching high school for six yrs by Sparky9292 · · Score: 1

    Observations from teaching high school.

    There's about four people during junior high and high school that bullied me. I remember in Phys Ed constantly being terrified of getting pushed around, or coming to find urine in my locker, usually just by some looser. I think only one of the three was considered a popular jock.

    The bullying stopped when I decided to enroll in weight liftining.

    I later became a high school computer science teacher. One of my goals was to create a safe classroom and do my part to prevent bullying. I guess I wanted to be a hero in some ways.

    After six years of teaching, I noticed a few of things related to bullying.

    1. Lack of Maturity. A majority of the students I've seen bullied got involved because they carelessly mouthed off or insulted the bully in some way.

    2. Lack of confidence. Some students always act like victims. This relates to why women when walking alone should act strong and confident, rapists dont' like to go after those as much. Bully's like other criminals, prefer the easy route, they don't want to deal with someone who will fight back with confidence.

    3. Many school does not clarify anti-bullying plan. Some high schools don't have a clear plan for what students should do if they dont' feel safe. Bullying/Teasing isn't usually specified in the code of conduct -- my small part in my career was to get the teachers, principals, parents, and counselors to research and get a plan involved. This was ALOT easier to do after the columbine shootings.

    4. Teachers not in control of the classroom. Most of the time, I tried to keep my relationship professional but not military with the students, however I was vicious in going after any mean comments, verbal, or physical aggression towards other students. I talked about this quite a few times a year with my classes about code on conduct. The students knew my position on bullying.

    5. I ABSOLUTELY love Karate, Judo, and any self defense courses for high school students. The interesting thing is that students get into LESS fights after they go through a "self defense" oriented class, because they are taught maturity in those courses. I encourged parents to enroll students into self defense classes.

  100. "This isn't right. It isn't even wrong." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PDP-11's only run Windows 3.1 or above. To run OSX (the new Acorn word-processing OS) you need a 286.

    10 megabytes = 155 Mhz, and a "K" is fifty clock cycles.

    Compiling object files into source code is a waste of time. You can actually execute makefiles directly with no performance hit, unlike assembly which is slower than the so-called "miracle language" Linux.

    -- Just thought I'd give you guys a taste of how *absolutely clueless* the Slashdot collective is about psychology and neurochemistry. Yes, it really is that bad. In fact it's worse. I used old hardware names deliberately to give you an idea how out of date your lack of a clue is.

  101. Well, you can't be all that l33t by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    If you're still living in the same small-ish town?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Well, you can't be all that l33t by keramida · · Score: 1

      > Well, you can't be all that l33t
      > If you're still living in the same small-ish town

      Sort of.
      Workin' from home isn't such a bad idea :)

      --

      --
      My other computer runs FreeBSD too.
  102. Whats wrong with delivering pizza? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I think it would be a kick-ass job, and you get a ton of money in tips as well (from the non-assholes)

    I would probably try it as a in-collage job if my driving record wasn't so terrible.

    Your comment is especially ironic, given your username....

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Whats wrong with delivering pizza? by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      Points for the irony (I never even thought of that!), but delivering pizza is an all-around shitty job.

      I've never been a pizza-delivery driver, but I've had friends who were. Americans by-and-large tip horribly (non-assholes are rare, and yes, I'm one of them -- I tip well), and you get to pay for your own fuel, car repairs, and so on. You get yelled at for not bringing things the customer forgot to ask for, bitched at because the guy back at the oven got the toppings wrong, and complaints for not getting the pizza there fast enough, because you didn't feel that driving 80mph through residential neighborhoods was a good idea.

      So, lousy pay, extra expenses, even more-pissed-off-than-usual customers -- I'll pass.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    2. Re:Whats wrong with delivering pizza? by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      I work for Domino's Pizza Australia, and it's not all that bad. The driver doesn't get the brunt of the customer, the CSR who answers the phone gets it. People bitch about the price, even when it's less than $AU6 each (around $3.50 US) pickup. Standard menu price for delivery is $16.95 (~$10 US) for the first one and $7.00 (~$4 US) each after that, and people swear and carry on. I usually tell them to compare it to catching a taxi to the store and back.

      Customers are annoying though: it's been raining constantly for two weeks and I've only been getting maximum 5c tips! Even people who live in huge houses in the rich areas wait for me, standing in the rain, to dig out a 5c piece. With a 3 delivered for $19.95 voucher! TIGHTASSES! (Tipping is not common in Australia :P) But I have been known to get $10+ tips...

      We get paid by the hour (with a delivery allowance), so that doesn't encourage speeding, and we have money even on slow delivery nights. You can claim all car expenses on tax; I got almost $2k back last finincial year - pretty much all the tax that was taken out.

      It's rare that the customer forgot to ask for something and/or the driver forgot the coke or something, and they're usually pretty understanding. I have never been assaulted in 3 years, and only once someone refused to pay (it was an hour late anyway).

      But this job is really only while I'm at university, I have another job as well as government assistance. :)

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
  103. Geek Fu by WanChan · · Score: 1

    and BOY did HE know how to fight dirty (something about being in the OSS and learning hand to hand there (grin)).

    Open Source Software. Protects far more than just data, folks.

  104. I can never remember if I'm a lawyer or not either by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I think your username is funny. That is all.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  105. Not more common, more memorable. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    The reason people have this stereo-type of 'weird' kids is the same reason they have stereo-types for a lot of people (like blacks, Mexicans, etc)

    When someone does something bad, and they belong do a group you don't have a lot of experience with, you'll remember it. And so it will represent a large portion of the data about that group. If you only hear about and remember well, say, 10 black people in your life and 1 of them was involved in a robbery, you think 'P(black==criminal) = .1', even if the actual number of black people who are criminals are way less.

    It's the same with 'nerds/weirdoes'. If you avoid nerds you wont think about them much unless something happens involving them that really sticks out to you.

    An important mark of intelligence is the ability to weed out these extemporaneous associations and base your thoughts on the real data.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  106. Huh? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    actually some of those who flipped out are neither psychotic nor nerds. in fact they're pretty nice people.

    So, are you saying that it's impossible for nice people to be crazy?

    I would think that one could be both insane and polite.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Huh? by brmic · · Score: 1

      >So, are you saying that it's impossible for nice people to be crazy?
      I would think that one could be both insane and polite

      totally. there's just a difference between psychotic and crazy. in fact hebephrenic schizophrenics (hope this is the correct term in English) are among the nices people out there. they're like permanently stoned, nothing matters, everything is funny etc. Of course it's a terrible condition actually because they can't get out of it, but most staff can't help smiling occasionally. An then there's all those kind souls who struggle to keep their integrity while knowing that at times they can't control themselves. Moving, to say the least.

  107. The view from the past by X-Nc · · Score: 1
    In high school I was both a "Freak" and a "Jock". I played Football all four years & ran track the last three. My senior year I started in football (second team all-conference) and nearly made it to the regionals in track (I got very sick the week of the meet). Our school won the championship in both sports. That said, I was definitely on the outside. All through grade school I was one of the kids who was beat up and shoved in lockers nearly every day. This carried into high school but faded as I moved up in football and track. Not that I shifted my position; I was just as much an outsider as I ever was. But I earned the respect of the "in crowd" in that I could kick ass on the football field. This was back in the 70's. Things are different now but the feelings, the pain, the glory... They are the same as they ever were. Looking back now I can see how much different I was then. But that guy is still inside of me; still a part of me. I know how it feels to be different. Right now I'm still different (nothing makes you more different than being physically crippled). But it's not as bad as it used to be. The most difficult time in life in from 12 to 20. You will endure more in those few years than you will the rest of your life. I wish more effort was put into helping kids at this time. Because, if you look at it objectivly, every kid is an outsider during those years. There is no in crowd. Not even the in crowd is part of the in crowd.

    This has just been a stream of concious kinda thing. Maybe I'll take some time and make it into a real, intelligable op-ed thing. Probably just post it on my K5 diary.

    --
    --
    If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  108. Re:unfortunately.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    and in Ireland too, at least among the rugby team (if you're asking what's a mullet, click the link).

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  109. This never happened to me...is it a cultural thing by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering if its an 'accepted' part of American school culture that there are nerds and jocks, and the latter beat the crap out of the former.

    And thats about it. It doesn't seem to happen here in the UK.

    I class myself as a nerd; all the people I know class me as a nerd, but we all gelled. There were one or two people who would call me names, but for the most part, these sporty types have a certain respect for us geeks. They would often say 'how are you so clever' and stuff like that. Same goes for a lot of other very geeky people I know.

    Yeah, so kids get bullied in British schools, but its not always the Jock/Nerd thing. I remeber many times we'd be doing sports lessons, and some of the really sporty types were quite supportive of my somewhat lacking athletic skills. They'd egg me on, just kind of help me along. Same goes for when I'd point stuff out on the computer for them.

    Maybe the 'us and them' attitude just doesn't exist over here.

  110. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look here for info about negative reinforcement. http://www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/proj/nru/nr.html

    what the parent post is suggesting is not negative reinfocement. it is punishment. Punishment, if you haven't taken a psych course, is not very effective. What you get is escape behavior, that is, the kid acts very quickly to stop punishment. However, the effects do not last long, they are short term solutions only. Using reinforcement can extent the behavior changes in the child much longer than punishment. Basically, if you hit your kid, they'll wait a week, and start doing whatever it was they were doing again. thus, beating your kid is not an effective parenting technique.

  111. Re:In this Post-Columbine... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I can't help but think that if I didn't get a coincidental frosty-piss't, I wouldn't have gotten slapped with 'offtopic'. Maybe there's an automatic '-1, Offtopic' for any fr1sty ps0ts...

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  112. Re:It Wasn't Columbine! It's Always Been Like This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The problem is societies general intolerance for anything different
    This is why I can't tolerate society -- its mutual antipathy.
  113. Re:I can never remember if I'm a lawyer or not eit by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

    Every other nick I tried was taken. I was surprised that this one wasn't. Course, I was too "clever" for my own good - much like trying to explain the slashdot url to someone (verbally), it's a pain to say out loud.

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  114. Tribalism by Reziac · · Score: 1

    IOW, basic tribalism, which is hardwired human behaviour (and occurs in other animals too). Being part of the tribe (ie. conforming) is safe and accepted; being an outsider (ie. being different) is evidence that you should be cast out, ostracised, or even be done away with before you can pollute the gene pool. What "the tribe" IS isn't relevant, since it can be anything.

    It's not nice for the outsider, but neither are most wild-animal survival behaviours (if you don't run with the herd, the wolves get you). That's why we attempt to overcome this behaviour, and call the result "civilization" :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  115. Personal Response by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

    NineNine,

    Good to hear, I'm definitely a supporter of people getting married to hot, cool women. Me, for instance. Big supporter of that.

    Just thought the juxtaposition was hilarious.

    1. Re:Personal Response by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Well let me tell ya'... a woman who doesn't mind you running a porn site, looking at thousands of pictures and videos of gorgeous chicks (and guys) every day is a one sign that you've got a cool one.

  116. I hated this book! by rearl · · Score: 1

    I bought the stupid thing because someone (whose opinion about fiction I'll take with a much larger grain of salt from now on) recommended it.

    I kept trying to root for Alex (the main character) since I felt a bit of affinity with him. I ended up just hating him, and the book. Overall, it was a chore to read. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.

    If you want my copy for the price of shipping, let me know! (Even better if your name is Robert, since that is who Christopher Null signed it to).

  117. example (Volleyball) by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    Sport: Volleyball
    Reason for Rules: to be fun and competitive
    Reason for Game: an alternative to basketball to allow businessmen to compete indoors (they didn't have spiking at the time.)
    Reason for team sizes: Six players works out to 12 per game, with 3 up front and 3 in the back. China also uses 3 x 3 x 3 vs 3 x 3 x 3.
    Method of scoring: To stay fun
    Another reason for method of scoring: switched to rally point scoring to keep the game more predictable (rally means every play somebody gets a point, instead of two horrible teams serving into the net for 2 hours to remain at zero zero... thus easier to calculate times for Television.

    There's no inherent reason for most of the "rules", the sizes of the teams, the shape of the ball, the methods of scoring, and so on. With weightlifting, it's just you versus the the fundamental laws of physics. Doesn't get much more interesting than that!

    Weight lifting is great, but see if you can find a sport and have to learn it not be ashamed to suck at it at first (the reason why people don't try sports.) To be athletic and to be an animal like the monkeys we were, you need athleticism and to play a sport.

    Sport = meet other dedicated people. Sport = learn and help each other. Sport = teamwork. Sport = learning to win and learning to lose. Sport = working your butt off for success (best game ever played etc although loss of tournament, etc.) Sport = improvements motivating you. Sport = fun. Sport = you know every step of the way you're getting better

    Since we evolved from gorillas, sports/being active must have been good to humans.

  118. Nope by Wee · · Score: 1
    He's right. Bullies, in my experience, have responded to only one thing: being stood up to. I got bullied a lot in grade school and high school (I have a large birthmark in my head that makes me stand out somewhat; I was also resented because I was the guy that usually screwed up the grading curve). I was always catching crap, and pleading and cajoling and asking and being friendly never did anything but fan the flames.

    Bullies see *any* sign of weakness -- which usually includes trying to talk your way out of an altercation -- and they go for the throat. You can't convince a bully to be your friend (and who'd want them as a friend, anyway?). That's nonsense. They can see right through that. They can smell the blood in the water when you try to back them down.

    No, the only way I got rid of the bullies was to beat the living shit out of a few of them. Bullies use the threat of violence to their advantage and you have to call them on it in order to counter them. It helped that I was six foot two in eighth grade, so that may have had something to do with it. But word got around that if you picked on me, you were liable to have an insane person attacking you until one of you was not moving -- and it was likely you that would be left laying on the ground. Even when faced with people bigger than me, going completely berserk always worked. (I learned early on that most people can't take being kicked in the knee, and almost nobody sees it coming. You can take a much larger person down with one fast sideways kick. And once down, you can continue to beat on them or just walk away depending on the example which needs to be set. They wouldn't be walking for a couple months at least, and the fight was over before it started.) Bullies can't stand up to a fight, and always back down. At least in my experience.

    I always thought that name calling and pettiness and immaturity would go away once I left school and got to college. I could hardly wait to get out of school. I thought once people became adults, they'd start acting like adults, and I really wanted to be around adults and not children. Not the case. Most people are assholes, and will never grown up.

    Oddly enough, I'm one of the most non-violent people I know. I hate getting into fights (I haven't in a long time, thankfully, and if my last stays my last then I'll die a happy man). And I've never ever started a fight. Problem is, there's only one way to stop one: get the other guy to not hit you. If you've been able to accomplish that with words, then more power to you. I was never able to, and always had to resort to violence.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.