You might just as easily say that only the Mac version doesn't use an MDI interface
The original argument was that Photoshop on Linux couldn't happen if MDI wasn't supported. Pointing out that the Mac version does not was done to counter that argument.
since Photoshop was designed with MDI in mind, then adapted to fit the Mac idea of what's "usable."
Photoshop was first developed for the Mac, so it seems more likely that it was the other way around.
Then, one of the fools got greedy and decided to print up a forged ticket for a practically impossible series of bets, which paid off in the millions.
Makes no sense. They were only duplicating tickets for winning bets which have already been made. So how could they then forge a ticket worth millions? I think maybe you're not quite remembering it correctly.
Another is that theft is taking something you don't have permission or legal rights to.
But that way does not fit the definition. It is one part of it, but not the complete definition. If theft doesn't mean what you want it to, you can't just pretend that it does. You have to find another word.
"Harmed", maybe, if his business model depended on charging high prices for something easily copied.
If he's charging too much, your legitimate choices are A) pay it anyway, or B) do without. Option C, "fuck him, I'm gonna have it anyway" is not a legitimate choice.
If something is stolen from you then by definition you no longer have it. With copyright violation, you still have your work. Therefore it is not theft. I'm not saying you haven't been harmed, or wronged in some way, but it is not by theft.
Don't tell me to "Google" something that you can't explain yourself.
I agree one hundred percent! And I'm not just spouting off, there's actually a very good reason why he shouldn't. But it's complex and difficult for me to put in words. I'm sure you can find it online somewhere, though.
UNfortunately, your reading skills are lacking. This has already been covered, had you bothered to read the thread. Also, it obviously had little to do with arithmetic, and more with me not noticing the decimal point. While there is also not a "-1, Literally Incompetent", there is a -1 redundant. Perhaps you'll get one of those.
This is nothing new. I don't know why, but the article says it's revolutionary, and so that's a guarantee that someone will post about something vaguely similar if you squint just right, and so claim that this thing is nothing new.
Slashdot Mirror
The original argument was that Photoshop on Linux couldn't happen if MDI wasn't supported. Pointing out that the Mac version does not was done to counter that argument.
since Photoshop was designed with MDI in mind, then adapted to fit the Mac idea of what's "usable."
Photoshop was first developed for the Mac, so it seems more likely that it was the other way around.
Makes no sense. They were only duplicating tickets for winning bets which have already been made. So how could they then forge a ticket worth millions? I think maybe you're not quite remembering it correctly.
You need to get out more.
The things I read blindly, well, I have trouble seeing them.
Maybe it's a volume, not a weight.
If you think that all slashdot stories are on the main page, then there's a whole lot of slashdot you're missing.
They make somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 per iPod, and they've sold hundreds of thousands of those.
This one is pretty good.
This article gives a few more details, and here is the actual press release.
Well, a lot of people use Windows, too, but I still don't write for that.
And your word "take" is misleading as well. To copy is not synonymous with to take.
But that way does not fit the definition. It is one part of it, but not the complete definition. If theft doesn't mean what you want it to, you can't just pretend that it does. You have to find another word.
Yes. Omniscience has its rewards.
Under those pesky rules we call "laws," he has.
"Harmed", maybe, if his business model depended on charging high prices for something easily copied.
If he's charging too much, your legitimate choices are A) pay it anyway, or B) do without. Option C, "fuck him, I'm gonna have it anyway" is not a legitimate choice.
Words matter.
Why would you post this? Do you think it's even the slightest bit funny anymore?
Well see if you can program those seniors not to pee in their pants, then.
I agree one hundred percent! And I'm not just spouting off, there's actually a very good reason why he shouldn't. But it's complex and difficult for me to put in words. I'm sure you can find it online somewhere, though.
And even more so, for the week end.
UNfortunately, your reading skills are lacking. This has already been covered, had you bothered to read the thread. Also, it obviously had little to do with arithmetic, and more with me not noticing the decimal point. While there is also not a "-1, Literally Incompetent", there is a -1 redundant. Perhaps you'll get one of those.
Oh yeah, look at that. I withdraw my smart ass remark.
Fortunately Y2003K is a long way off.
This is nothing new. I don't know why, but the article says it's revolutionary, and so that's a guarantee that someone will post about something vaguely similar if you squint just right, and so claim that this thing is nothing new.
You receive interest. You sold the stock, and money came from that. That money is collecting interest.
Defies the notion that nobody reads the articles before posting, doesn't it?