Although neodymium is classed as a rare earth, it is a fairly common element, no rarer than cobalt, nickel, or copper, and is widely distributed in the Earth's crust
I think WindBourne just discovered the cure for the common cold, just travel to another country and the virus won't be allowed in. I think it's because the virus doesn't have a passport and gets sent home.
Maybe you can explain exactly how it works if I'm wrong?
You couldn't just pretend you made a mistake, but had to double down on your lie?
I hate sayings like this since no part of USA was EVER owned by Mexico. The New Spaniards/Mexicans were TRYING to take the now USA land from the natives, but they did not. In order to claim a land, you had to be the dominate ppl in there. There were 10's of MILLIONS, if not 100+ million, of Indians here, while the Mexicans never got over 250K in ALL of USA.
You mentioned USA 3 times...
While it is difficult to determine exactly how many Natives lived in North America before Columbus,[6] estimates range from a low of 2.1 million[7] to 7 million[8] people to a high of 18 million.
The upper estimate of 18 million is barely even 10's of millions, it's clearly not 100+million...
Again you lie at every twist and turn but claim others are lying.
You are the fool trying to build a nonsense scenario in an attempt to hide the fact you are flat our wrong.
Even more wrong than WindBourne, which in itself is amazing.
Don't know why you are telling me, but I'll claim the easy win. It's written clearly on that page that Australia by itself is 1%, so more obvious lies from you WindBourne.
Hahaha, that's the unrealistic estimate for the whole of the America's, North and South, with the vast majority being in the South.
While it is difficult to determine exactly how many Natives lived in North America before Columbus,[6] estimates range from a low of 2.1 million[7] to 7 million[8] people to a high of 18 million.
Try again, where did you get your 100+ million native American Indians from?
Someone would obviously notice if a country started mass vaccinating its entire population for an unknown mystery virus. It wouldn't be hard to get a sample and see whats going on. On the plus side though all the anti-vaxxers would be rendered infertile, so it's not all bad.
If Wikileaks declared war on America and took up arms against it, any Americans working for Wikileaks or helping them could be tried for Treason.
Didn't you round up a few Japanese people? They probably could have charged them with treason if they were actually helping Japan. But America found a much simpler way to deal with them anyway.
Don't get distracted from the main point though, WindBourne is wrong as usual.
Where did you get your 100+ million Indians? not even close
Why do you constantly just make shit up? You must know I'll spend the 5 seconds to prove you are wrong...
Early judicial interpretation of the meaning of treason in terms of levying war was conditioned by the partisan struggles of the early nineteenth century, which involved the treason trials of Aaron Burr and his associates. In Ex parte Bollman,1479 which involved two of Burr’s confederates, Chief Justice Marshall, speaking for himself and three other Justices, confined the meaning of levying war to the actual waging of war. “However agitious may be the crime of conspiring to subvert by force the government of our country, such conspiracy is not treason. To conspire to levy war, and actually to levy war, are distinct offences. The first must be brought into open action by the assemblage of men for a purpose treasonable in itself, or the fact of levying war cannot have been committed. So far has this principle been carried, that . . . it has been determined that the actual enlistment of men to serve against the government does not amount to levying war.” Chief Justice Marshall was careful, however, to state that the Court did not mean that no person could be guilty of this crime who had not appeared in arms against the country. “On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors. But there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war.”
Wikileaks has clearly not taken up arms or declared war on America, you're full of shit as usual.
Early judicial interpretation of the meaning of treason in terms of levying war was conditioned by the partisan struggles of the early nineteenth century, which involved the treason trials of Aaron Burr and his associates. In Ex parte Bollman,1479 which involved two of Burr’s confederates, Chief Justice Marshall, speaking for himself and three other Justices, confined the meaning of levying war to the actual waging of war. “However agitious may be the crime of conspiring to subvert by force the government of our country, such conspiracy is not treason. To conspire to levy war, and actually to levy war, are distinct offences. The first must be brought into open action by the assemblage of men for a purpose treasonable in itself, or the fact of levying war cannot have been committed. So far has this principle been carried, that . . . it has been determined that the actual enlistment of men to serve against the government does not amount to levying war.” Chief Justice Marshall was careful, however, to state that the Court did not mean that no person could be guilty of this crime who had not appeared in arms against the country. “On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors. But there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war.”
Wikileaks has clearly not taken up arms or declared war on America, you're full of shit as usual.
Half the numbers in this post you just made up. You knew they were made up because I showed you the actual numbers last time you pulled the same lies. You admitted one of them, but not the other, and still refused to explain where the made up numbers came from.
That was just one of many lies you keep trying to spread. Or things you just make up, to sound like you know something, when you clearly don't.
You constantly throw around accusations of lying at other people as a distraction for your own lies, but never show a single one about anyone else.
Care to show even a single post where I haven't been decent or honest?
But you still didn't show where you got your "wrong" information.
Did you just make it up, or is your source lying to you? Let us know which is lying so we can avoid them, you or your source?
And how about the next lie? 80% of Chinese electricity isn't coal.
Slashdot Mirror
Although neodymium is classed as a rare earth, it is a fairly common element, no rarer than cobalt, nickel, or copper, and is widely distributed in the Earth's crust
Don't worry, they'll put a Gigafactory in China soon. Then everyone can make them ;)
Pointing out WindBourne's lies isn't offtopic, it fits any topic he lies about, which is just about all of them.
OK, ok, they're both true, don't tell anyone.
Rhino virus does NOT spread around the globe.
I think WindBourne just discovered the cure for the common cold, just travel to another country and the virus won't be allowed in. I think it's because the virus doesn't have a passport and gets sent home.
Maybe you can explain exactly how it works if I'm wrong?
Do you just reply to yourself with obvious nonsense, just so you can blame it on me?
Doesn't seem very honourable of you.
You seem to see a lot of things "differently" to most people, (and reality,) why is that?
Again with baseless accusations, yet you wonder why I still like to point out your lies...
Buy a clue WindBourne.
I hate sayings like this since no part of USA was EVER owned by Mexico. The New Spaniards/Mexicans were TRYING to take the now USA land from the natives, but they did not. In order to claim a land, you had to be the dominate ppl in there. There were 10's of MILLIONS, if not 100+ million, of Indians here, while the Mexicans never got over 250K in ALL of USA.
You mentioned USA 3 times...
While it is difficult to determine exactly how many Natives lived in North America before Columbus,[6] estimates range from a low of 2.1 million[7] to 7 million[8] people to a high of 18 million.
The upper estimate of 18 million is barely even 10's of millions, it's clearly not 100+million...
Again you lie at every twist and turn but claim others are lying.
The tech hasn't changed much since 1981? LOL
You are the fool trying to build a nonsense scenario in an attempt to hide the fact you are flat our wrong.
Even more wrong than WindBourne, which in itself is amazing.
Don't know why you are telling me, but I'll claim the easy win. It's written clearly on that page that Australia by itself is 1%, so more obvious lies from you WindBourne.
While it is difficult to determine exactly how many Natives lived in North America before Columbus,[6] estimates range from a low of 2.1 million[7] to 7 million[8] people to a high of 18 million.
Try again, where did you get your 100+ million native American Indians from?
Someone would obviously notice if a country started mass vaccinating its entire population for an unknown mystery virus. It wouldn't be hard to get a sample and see whats going on. On the plus side though all the anti-vaxxers would be rendered infertile, so it's not all bad.
If Wikileaks declared war on America and took up arms against it, any Americans working for Wikileaks or helping them could be tried for Treason.
Didn't you round up a few Japanese people? They probably could have charged them with treason if they were actually helping Japan. But America found a much simpler way to deal with them anyway.
Don't get distracted from the main point though, WindBourne is wrong as usual.
We have had the ability to detect strains of virus for a long long time.
Where did you get your 100+ million Indians? not even close
Why do you constantly just make shit up? You must know I'll spend the 5 seconds to prove you are wrong...
I enjoy pointing out your stupidity
Early judicial interpretation of the meaning of treason in terms of levying war was conditioned by the partisan struggles of the early nineteenth century, which involved the treason trials of Aaron Burr and his associates. In Ex parte Bollman,1479 which involved two of Burr’s confederates, Chief Justice Marshall, speaking for himself and three other Justices, confined the meaning of levying war to the actual waging of war. “However agitious may be the crime of conspiring to subvert by force the government of our country, such conspiracy is not treason. To conspire to levy war, and actually to levy war, are distinct offences. The first must be brought into open action by the assemblage of men for a purpose treasonable in itself, or the fact of levying war cannot have been committed. So far has this principle been carried, that . . . it has been determined that the actual enlistment of men to serve against the government does not amount to levying war.” Chief Justice Marshall was careful, however, to state that the Court did not mean that no person could be guilty of this crime who had not appeared in arms against the country. “On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors. But there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war.”
Wikileaks has clearly not taken up arms or declared war on America, you're full of shit as usual.
Early judicial interpretation of the meaning of treason in terms of levying war was conditioned by the partisan struggles of the early nineteenth century, which involved the treason trials of Aaron Burr and his associates. In Ex parte Bollman,1479 which involved two of Burr’s confederates, Chief Justice Marshall, speaking for himself and three other Justices, confined the meaning of levying war to the actual waging of war. “However agitious may be the crime of conspiring to subvert by force the government of our country, such conspiracy is not treason. To conspire to levy war, and actually to levy war, are distinct offences. The first must be brought into open action by the assemblage of men for a purpose treasonable in itself, or the fact of levying war cannot have been committed. So far has this principle been carried, that . . . it has been determined that the actual enlistment of men to serve against the government does not amount to levying war.” Chief Justice Marshall was careful, however, to state that the Court did not mean that no person could be guilty of this crime who had not appeared in arms against the country. “On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors. But there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war.”
Wikileaks has clearly not taken up arms or declared war on America, you're full of shit as usual.
Half the numbers in this post you just made up. You knew they were made up because I showed you the actual numbers last time you pulled the same lies. You admitted one of them, but not the other, and still refused to explain where the made up numbers came from.
That was just one of many lies you keep trying to spread. Or things you just make up, to sound like you know something, when you clearly don't.
You constantly throw around accusations of lying at other people as a distraction for your own lies, but never show a single one about anyone else.
Care to show even a single post where I haven't been decent or honest?
What would you know about decent or honest or proof?
But his real wish isn't that he doesn't see them, that's easy. His real wish is that no one else sees the AC people pointing out his lie after lie.
Did you mean to say you get sick of writing so many lies?
I know I get sick of reading them.
Mules are clearly the best. Being infertile they can't go all Planet of the Apes and take over, like AI cars inevitably will.
But you still didn't show where you got your "wrong" information.
Did you just make it up, or is your source lying to you? Let us know which is lying so we can avoid them, you or your source?
And how about the next lie? 80% of Chinese electricity isn't coal.