Runs embedded Linux. They will SELL you a copy of it. I see nothing on the site about sharnig the source modifications and NOTHING about GPL. I'm no Linux wiz here but umm - isn't something missing ala Linksys here?
The MediaBoxOS distribution is a royalty free software package which means you can build/distribute as many copies as you want.
Their screenshot shows Apache, Joe, and a few other OSS packages ready to install. Hrm, have I overlooked something?
The Xenarc screens are supposed to be better than the Lilliput screens FWIW. I've purchased a 7inch version with vid capability as well as VGA for under $400 off of EBAY.
I've been looking into this in order to monitor what's going on with my car's standalone EFI system. Since that EFI system's software allows me to build "dashboards" I can do LOTS of interesting displays. I have been collecting URLs and you can see pics of other's progress and discussion here -> http://forum.aempower.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?t=9604
Some URLs I've collected in no distinct order or organization:
Hopefully some of those will be of help to others considering this sort of thing, I'd be interested in working with others to research this! My plans are to mock up something with the touchscreen and front-end software working with the WINTV, XM PCR, my MP3 collection, GPS mapping, the RLTC software, and my AEM datalogging software. IF it works well (or even halfway well) THEN I'll buy hardware to put IN the car. No sense spending the money if the interface turns out to suck or be too distracting while driving. I'll likely be able to play DVDs too but honestly that's pretty se
So it seems that some cameras can be done remotely without mechanical crap. Never found any of this in my previous research! Apparently, according to one site, some folsk run video cameras up with the kite so they can see what the camera will be taking pics of and even zoom using these dgital switches. Interesting stuff....
How long does everyone think it will be before someone gets arrested taking pictures of a bridge using a kite? Or maybe they will simply arrest people for flying kites cameras be damned?
I looked into doing this awhile back myself after having had a BLAST at the beach flying a kite of mine QUITE high. Suspendnig the camera is one issue but something I think could be solved. Figuring out how to remotely trigger it is the PITA. I found one site talking about using a remote control which it looks like this guy is doing too. Getting the camera to not shut down after a shoert time period while you were still getting the kite up in the air might also be a hassle. I've got two crappy digital cams that I'll not ever be using again - one of them looks like it might be perfect for this despite it's crappy resolution.
Hrm, wonder what a night shot would look like? Put a light stick on the kite to track it maybe? Need to figure out how best to trigger the darned thnig - mechanical servos and whatnot seem silly, there needs to be a way to remotely trigger a switch without alot of extra crap going up with it...
Right there with you only I managed to find one - I THINK. The same shop was also selling modified ones with optical digital outputs for about $50 more. They were the ONLY place I could find them ni stock and I'm sure that's no longer the case. paid $69 for mine and have been sent tracking info so fingers are crossed that it arrives.
Yes, I've sent hate mail to XM about this. Were it not for this package - that records ANALOG BTW - I'd have not gotten off the fence and purchased an XM device...
No, I've not tried either one unfortunatly. I only learned of the Buffalo unit here in this thread. Since most of the pages about hacking it are in a language I cannot read I'm not sure just what all can be done with it:-( Very interested in learning more though!
Japan? checkout the Buffalo Linkstation mentioned above. If you can read Kanji it looks like this device has HUGE support over there and has been hacked pretty good - it comes with a built-in HD and USB 2 support along with the 10/100 NIC...
Re:Alternative: Buffalo technologies LinkStation
on
NSLU2 Now More Useful
·
· Score: 1
The buffalo DOES look like a possible alternative that might be better - I'm surprised no one has picked up on it in the US. this site appears to have some source downloads... -> http://linkstation.yi.org/index.php?cmd=read&page= Kernel_source%2FDownload
I looked long and hard for USB 2 enclosurers that housed more than one or two drivers and were LBA48 cmopatible. I found NONE for a reasonable price. However I did find Firewire b enclosures and purchased one. My computers all have both interfaces but if this box had Firewire I would've purchased it instead and had myself a nice network storage device instead of hanging my new box off of an existing computer.:-( As it is I may still purchase one to hack but it's not as useful and I see no Firewire version of it. Cooldrives.com was the site that I got my enclosure from as I recall - nice selection of stuff. I got the 4bay enclosure. The EBAY stuff is NOT LBA48 or doesn't support Firewire B...
Nah, that would require way too much thought and it's not like Microsoft is looking to pad anyone's pocket but their own. As to folks writing everything down as another has suggested - I don't see that. And I'd argue that the first time they downloaded and attempted to install a product that threw them into dependency hell they would NOT be happy!
I'd agree though that OSX just might be a good way to go. IF Apple EVER makes that OS available on something other than their overpriced hardware I WILL purchase it and try it out. That is a UNIX I think is worthy of desktop use from what I can tell...
I've enver run into this myself but a friend who was unhosing a machine this weekend called me up with this very issue. A quick search found this site-> http://cexx.org/lspfix.htm
Ya', it's not a link sue me. I can see how this issue could opccur with some of the "cleaners" out there not being real gentle onhow they rip stuff out of the Registry. I'd also agree that the guy who waded into this fight could've been better prepared. One of my hard rules for thi sort of activity is that I make NO HOUSECALLS! you want your machine fixed you bring the CPU box to my home or meet me somewhere and I fix it someplace where I have FULL access to tools and a high speed connection for updating your crap when I'm done. I don't get paid to do this so if folks want this service they come to me...
So yeah blow away her software and replace her OS with Linux and then spend HOW much time installing products that might do what she needs? Then teaching her how to use them? Remember - this was someone who wasn't bright enough to know how to stop this crap in the first place.
Reinstalling the OS is also not always an option. Computers are much like people's homes in that they become heavily customized over time. Do you level your home and start over everytime the faucet leaks? Does everyone keep track of ALL of their registration keys? All of their passwords stored in cookies? All those tweaks to the interface and 3rd party products that do little things? All those funky drivers for oddball hardware from manufacturers no longer in business? From what I've seen hell NO they don't. Telling someone you have to trash their machine and that they have to reinstall from scratch will put many users in tears. I try VERY hard not to do it unless I absolutely have to. Besides, it's a challenge not to do it:-)
I am now cleaning up machines just like the machines described several times a month. It takes me, on average, about 4-10 hours per machine and I'm pretty experienced at it too. Much of this time is spent kicking off automated programs, interpeting the output, and then cleaning out the crap. I have to do this with a second machine connected to the 'net just to research all of the TRASH I find on machines and sometimes to DL updates to USB fobs. There is even spyware out there that will disable virus scanners, disable Windows Update, and shut down many of the anti-spyware tools. It also doesn't help that these jerks have gone out and put up Web sites that look like they supply spyware cleaners that in reality install *drum roll* MORE SPYWARE! Some of this stuff even redirects searches for these products to bogus pages or to 404 errors. The scum of the Earth builds this stuff, how they actually make any money doing it is beyond me. The last machine I worked on had it's home page directed to an IP address that when visited actively ATTACKED the user's machine. It's tons of fun to finally get a machine back to working, hit MS Update, and find out that there are 35+ "critical" updates out there missed because a piece of crap turned off their update mechanism.
The folks getting hit with this are much like the article's author. They don't understand security, they run sub optimal machines, they refuse to update their AV products when they expire (MicroTrend's Housecall is a godsend as an initial check), and they let their kids download and install anything they want. When I get my hands on them they are fairly glowing chock full of nasty crap. I clean them and I don't charge but it sure as hell takes up alot of my time. I learn something just about each and every time though so I DO get something out of it...
KatieR.com (fatfinger) gets you in pop-up hell!:-O
Glad to see these twits do the right thing. I think we can chalk much of this up to/. since previous spotlights on this problem never seemd to have made much in the way of change. Very cool...
Good information! Frankly, I could give diddly what OS is actually doing it and am interested in how it works and what hurdles you encountered! Can you talk some about the video recognition? From the article it sounded as if the plane had to "recognize" objects on the ground - yes? The article also stated that there was a fire, can you give any details? Bummer that you couldn't compete! How much payload capacity was left on the plane? CPU capacity? In other words could you task it to do other things or do something arguably more useful with it? Take pics of things perhaps? Can the plane avoid things in it's path like trees and does it take into account altitude? Ergo - is it "thinking" in two dimensions and flying at a static height?
Do you guys have a WEB site someplace detailing the project?
Amen! If Katie.com puts up a link I and I'm sure many others will pitch in what they can. It's not a big deal to donate a few bucks and if nothing it will help alleviate the bandwidth costs we may have incurred and the aggravation she's undergoing.
Sure - the hack is quite simple and requires little to no Linux skill. I had a Replay, I now have a DTIVO. I wanted the ability to record one thing while watching another or record two things while watching something archived. I also wanted to NOT suffer a double encoding loss on SAT shows I was recording. The Replay networking was slick, however the multitude of things I couldn't do was simply too great - it now sits in a closet. Oh, and I dropped DISH while I was at it since they didn't support my hardware of choice. I'd had them for 5 years and the rep seemed a tad surprised until we explained why we were dropping them...
Crap, seems my response was lost. In short the difference between his stated upgrade and mine to get network connectivity and video off of the DTIVO consisted of my buying and plugging in a USB 100meg NIC. I likely used the SAME CD to upgrade and install software he described (Sleeper's ISO).
While you don't have to use a TORX driver you do have to use a Phillips and in my home TORX are just about as common - as they should be in any home inhabited by a tinkerer!
I've owned a Replay hooked to DISH. when I (quickly) realized it's shortcomings I pitched them both after a bit of research. Hacking a TIVO is CAKE, DISH needs to get a clue. A shame the Replay only had one tuner - networking it was EASY! Now if Replay was integrated with a SAT system that would rock...
Note that the Tivos with DVD burners in them do a Digital to Analog to Digital conversion during the burn process. You WILL lose resolution doing this. The DealDatabase forums covered this pretty well awhile back.
My DTivo has been hacked with Sleeper's ISO and I'm quite happy being able to transfer off whatever I'd like. When something liek this is available for the HDTivos along with DTV THEN and only then will HDTV be appealing to me. Lock the box, lose the sale....
Well that and hiding out from the folks who wanted to prosecute him for playing that game. Also apparently attempting to use an invalid US passport. If the reports of his popping up in the Phillipines and in Japan alternately are true then certainly he may have some other immigration questions to be answered as well.
At this point I'd say his problems are far less simple than having violated a sanction against Yugoslavia...
That blows but is no surprise. Advertise that you're doing something and then drag feet like mad while reaping press benefits. Funny that folks think this has already been implemented. At least they seem to have stopped with the crappy Javascript that prevented me from drag\dropping e-mail entries fromone window into another in order to browse more effeciently. Bummer that I cannot do that with Gmail but I've got no space worries and the interface is fast - refreshing to show me new mail is a bonus too. I'm pretty close to ditching otMail, Yahoo! is even worse...
a shame it looks like you must sign up for an account in order to see any of these features. It would be nice if you had some screenshots for folks just interested in looking at the interface without signing up first.
The Oddpost interface looks pretty nice, if Yahoo! manages to adopt it I might actually use my account with them. Currently I cannot stand the way their ads appear in the midst of doing thnigs - I FAR prefer the way G-mail does their's and have actually followed a few of their links. I cannot say the same for Yahoo! or HotMail since their ads just plain suck! In particular the damned HotMail ads that play sounds when you roll over them - AUGH!!!!
As of the next service pack XP will indeed support this, release candidates are floating about already I believe. Intel supposedly supports it in their XEON CPUs and their 64BIT CPUs. AMD has it in their 64BIT CPUs and is supposed to be putting it in their new line of CPUs that are going to supercede the DURON CPUs (think that's right). I ASSume the Athlon line of CPUs or whatever is about to be released in addition to the DURON replacement will support it as well which completes AMD's support across the line.
AMD appears to be making this mainstream, Intel hasn't yet done this. Microsoft has a security problem on their hands so certainly has some incentive to support it if possible. Just seemed odd to me that Intel didn't appear to be responding in kind to AMD's support of this CPU instruction...
Slashdot Mirror
Hacked to take control of your car?! Get a grip. what connection exactly will it use to take over the car - the power wires. Is the sky falling yet?
Their screenshot shows Apache, Joe, and a few other OSS packages ready to install. Hrm, have I overlooked something?
The Xenarc screens are supposed to be better than the Lilliput screens FWIW. I've purchased a 7inch version with vid capability as well as VGA for under $400 off of EBAY.
I've been looking into this in order to monitor what's going on with my car's standalone EFI system. Since that EFI system's software allows me to build "dashboards" I can do LOTS of interesting displays. I have been collecting URLs and you can see pics of other's progress and discussion here -> http://forum.aempower.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?t=9604
Some URLs I've collected in no distinct order or organization:
http://www.logisysus.com/catalog/product_info.php? cPath=74&products_id=189
http://logisysus.com/catalog/product_info.php?prod ucts_id=334
http://www.kingyoung.com.tw/s620.htm
http://littlepc.com/
http://www.diamondsystems.com/
http://www.viaarena.com/
http://www.media-car.fr.st/
http://www.everythingusb.com/hardware/index/Griffi n_RadioSHARK_AM-FM_Radio.htm
http://www.xmradio.com/xmpcr/ (I bought one, have added optical output, and have purchased TimeTrax!)
http://www.hauppauge.com/html/wintvpvr usb_datashee t.htm> (have one on the way, thanks EBAY!)
http://store.karpc.com/cat-LCD-Touch-Screen--lcdmo nitor.htm
http://www.mp3car.com/
http://www.soundblaster.com/products/audigy2NX/
http://www.carbotpc.com/products/
http://www.powerstream.com/DC_PC.htm
http://www.powerstream.com/mini-itx.htm
http://www.media-car.fr.st/
http://drivesoft.net/
http://www.gnetcanada.com/
http://www.lighttek.com/talisman.htm
http://skylab.org/~chugga/mpegbox/MPBS1/
http://www.compucar.be.tf/
http://www.autonode.com/ig710specs.html?
http://www.trc12volt.com/
http://www.intraplexcorp.com/tx3.asp
http://www.sfftech.com/
http://www.mini-itx.com/store/
http://www.dashmatics.com/forum/faq.php
Hopefully some of those will be of help to others considering this sort of thing, I'd be interested in working with others to research this! My plans are to mock up something with the touchscreen and front-end software working with the WINTV, XM PCR, my MP3 collection, GPS mapping, the RLTC software, and my AEM datalogging software. IF it works well (or even halfway well) THEN I'll buy hardware to put IN the car. No sense spending the money if the interface turns out to suck or be too distracting while driving. I'll likely be able to play DVDs too but honestly that's pretty se
Following the links in the Archive.org site I've found som interesting things...
s hop.com/switch.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040309130531/www.kap
and
http://www.harbortronics.com/digisnap5000.asp
So it seems that some cameras can be done remotely without mechanical crap. Never found any of this in my previous research! Apparently, according to one site, some folsk run video cameras up with the kite so they can see what the camera will be taking pics of and even zoom using these dgital switches. Interesting stuff....
How long does everyone think it will be before someone gets arrested taking pictures of a bridge using a kite? Or maybe they will simply arrest people for flying kites cameras be damned?
I looked into doing this awhile back myself after having had a BLAST at the beach flying a kite of mine QUITE high. Suspendnig the camera is one issue but something I think could be solved. Figuring out how to remotely trigger it is the PITA. I found one site talking about using a remote control which it looks like this guy is doing too. Getting the camera to not shut down after a shoert time period while you were still getting the kite up in the air might also be a hassle. I've got two crappy digital cams that I'll not ever be using again - one of them looks like it might be perfect for this despite it's crappy resolution.
Hrm, wonder what a night shot would look like? Put a light stick on the kite to track it maybe? Need to figure out how best to trigger the darned thnig - mechanical servos and whatnot seem silly, there needs to be a way to remotely trigger a switch without alot of extra crap going up with it...
Right there with you only I managed to find one - I THINK. The same shop was also selling modified ones with optical digital outputs for about $50 more. They were the ONLY place I could find them ni stock and I'm sure that's no longer the case. paid $69 for mine and have been sent tracking info so fingers are crossed that it arrives.
Yes, I've sent hate mail to XM about this. Were it not for this package - that records ANALOG BTW - I'd have not gotten off the fence and purchased an XM device...
No, I've not tried either one unfortunatly. I only learned of the Buffalo unit here in this thread. Since most of the pages about hacking it are in a language I cannot read I'm not sure just what all can be done with it :-( Very interested in learning more though!
Japan? checkout the Buffalo Linkstation mentioned above. If you can read Kanji it looks like this device has HUGE support over there and has been hacked pretty good - it comes with a built-in HD and USB 2 support along with the 10/100 NIC...
g e= Kernel_source%2FDownload
http://linkstation.yi.org/index.php?cmd=read&pa
The buffalo DOES look like a possible alternative that might be better - I'm surprised no one has picked up on it in the US. this site appears to have some source downloads... -> http://linkstation.yi.org/index.php?cmd=read&page= Kernel_source%2FDownload
I looked long and hard for USB 2 enclosurers that housed more than one or two drivers and were LBA48 cmopatible. I found NONE for a reasonable price. However I did find Firewire b enclosures and purchased one. My computers all have both interfaces but if this box had Firewire I would've purchased it instead and had myself a nice network storage device instead of hanging my new box off of an existing computer. :-( As it is I may still purchase one to hack but it's not as useful and I see no Firewire version of it. Cooldrives.com was the site that I got my enclosure from as I recall - nice selection of stuff. I got the 4bay enclosure. The EBAY stuff is NOT LBA48 or doesn't support Firewire B...
Nah, that would require way too much thought and it's not like Microsoft is looking to pad anyone's pocket but their own. As to folks writing everything down as another has suggested - I don't see that. And I'd argue that the first time they downloaded and attempted to install a product that threw them into dependency hell they would NOT be happy!
I'd agree though that OSX just might be a good way to go. IF Apple EVER makes that OS available on something other than their overpriced hardware I WILL purchase it and try it out. That is a UNIX I think is worthy of desktop use from what I can tell...
I've enver run into this myself but a friend who was unhosing a machine this weekend called me up with this very issue. A quick search found this site-> http://cexx.org/lspfix.htm
Ya', it's not a link sue me. I can see how this issue could opccur with some of the "cleaners" out there not being real gentle onhow they rip stuff out of the Registry. I'd also agree that the guy who waded into this fight could've been better prepared. One of my hard rules for thi sort of activity is that I make NO HOUSECALLS! you want your machine fixed you bring the CPU box to my home or meet me somewhere and I fix it someplace where I have FULL access to tools and a high speed connection for updating your crap when I'm done. I don't get paid to do this so if folks want this service they come to me...
So yeah blow away her software and replace her OS with Linux and then spend HOW much time installing products that might do what she needs? Then teaching her how to use them? Remember - this was someone who wasn't bright enough to know how to stop this crap in the first place.
:-)
Reinstalling the OS is also not always an option. Computers are much like people's homes in that they become heavily customized over time. Do you level your home and start over everytime the faucet leaks? Does everyone keep track of ALL of their registration keys? All of their passwords stored in cookies? All those tweaks to the interface and 3rd party products that do little things? All those funky drivers for oddball hardware from manufacturers no longer in business? From what I've seen hell NO they don't. Telling someone you have to trash their machine and that they have to reinstall from scratch will put many users in tears. I try VERY hard not to do it unless I absolutely have to. Besides, it's a challenge not to do it
I am now cleaning up machines just like the machines described several times a month. It takes me, on average, about 4-10 hours per machine and I'm pretty experienced at it too. Much of this time is spent kicking off automated programs, interpeting the output, and then cleaning out the crap. I have to do this with a second machine connected to the 'net just to research all of the TRASH I find on machines and sometimes to DL updates to USB fobs. There is even spyware out there that will disable virus scanners, disable Windows Update, and shut down many of the anti-spyware tools. It also doesn't help that these jerks have gone out and put up Web sites that look like they supply spyware cleaners that in reality install *drum roll* MORE SPYWARE! Some of this stuff even redirects searches for these products to bogus pages or to 404 errors. The scum of the Earth builds this stuff, how they actually make any money doing it is beyond me. The last machine I worked on had it's home page directed to an IP address that when visited actively ATTACKED the user's machine. It's tons of fun to finally get a machine back to working, hit MS Update, and find out that there are 35+ "critical" updates out there missed because a piece of crap turned off their update mechanism.
The folks getting hit with this are much like the article's author. They don't understand security, they run sub optimal machines, they refuse to update their AV products when they expire (MicroTrend's Housecall is a godsend as an initial check), and they let their kids download and install anything they want. When I get my hands on them they are fairly glowing chock full of nasty crap. I clean them and I don't charge but it sure as hell takes up alot of my time. I learn something just about each and every time though so I DO get something out of it...
And if I hadn't been on a corporate configured software mandated machine then I wouldn't have either! :-P
KatieR.com (fatfinger) gets you in pop-up hell! :-O
/. since previous spotlights on this problem never seemd to have made much in the way of change. Very cool...
Glad to see these twits do the right thing. I think we can chalk much of this up to
Good information! Frankly, I could give diddly what OS is actually doing it and am interested in how it works and what hurdles you encountered! Can you talk some about the video recognition? From the article it sounded as if the plane had to "recognize" objects on the ground - yes? The article also stated that there was a fire, can you give any details? Bummer that you couldn't compete! How much payload capacity was left on the plane? CPU capacity? In other words could you task it to do other things or do something arguably more useful with it? Take pics of things perhaps? Can the plane avoid things in it's path like trees and does it take into account altitude? Ergo - is it "thinking" in two dimensions and flying at a static height?
Do you guys have a WEB site someplace detailing the project?
Amen! If Katie.com puts up a link I and I'm sure many others will pitch in what they can. It's not a big deal to donate a few bucks and if nothing it will help alleviate the bandwidth costs we may have incurred and the aggravation she's undergoing.
Sure - the hack is quite simple and requires little to no Linux skill. I had a Replay, I now have a DTIVO. I wanted the ability to record one thing while watching another or record two things while watching something archived. I also wanted to NOT suffer a double encoding loss on SAT shows I was recording. The Replay networking was slick, however the multitude of things I couldn't do was simply too great - it now sits in a closet. Oh, and I dropped DISH while I was at it since they didn't support my hardware of choice. I'd had them for 5 years and the rep seemed a tad surprised until we explained why we were dropping them...
http://us.lexusownersclub.com/forums/index.php?sho wtopic=11024&
/. them too. Yes, that's the same Sal! Spread the word - these folks are thieves.
Might as well
Crap, seems my response was lost. In short the difference between his stated upgrade and mine to get network connectivity and video off of the DTIVO consisted of my buying and plugging in a USB 100meg NIC. I likely used the SAME CD to upgrade and install software he described (Sleeper's ISO).
While you don't have to use a TORX driver you do have to use a Phillips and in my home TORX are just about as common - as they should be in any home inhabited by a tinkerer!
I've owned a Replay hooked to DISH. when I (quickly) realized it's shortcomings I pitched them both after a bit of research. Hacking a TIVO is CAKE, DISH needs to get a clue. A shame the Replay only had one tuner - networking it was EASY! Now if Replay was integrated with a SAT system that would rock...
Note that the Tivos with DVD burners in them do a Digital to Analog to Digital conversion during the burn process. You WILL lose resolution doing this. The DealDatabase forums covered this pretty well awhile back.
My DTivo has been hacked with Sleeper's ISO and I'm quite happy being able to transfer off whatever I'd like. When something liek this is available for the HDTivos along with DTV THEN and only then will HDTV be appealing to me. Lock the box, lose the sale....
Well that and hiding out from the folks who wanted to prosecute him for playing that game. Also apparently attempting to use an invalid US passport. If the reports of his popping up in the Phillipines and in Japan alternately are true then certainly he may have some other immigration questions to be answered as well.
At this point I'd say his problems are far less simple than having violated a sanction against Yugoslavia...
That blows but is no surprise. Advertise that you're doing something and then drag feet like mad while reaping press benefits. Funny that folks think this has already been implemented. At least they seem to have stopped with the crappy Javascript that prevented me from drag\dropping e-mail entries fromone window into another in order to browse more effeciently. Bummer that I cannot do that with Gmail but I've got no space worries and the interface is fast - refreshing to show me new mail is a bonus too. I'm pretty close to ditching otMail, Yahoo! is even worse...
a shame it looks like you must sign up for an account in order to see any of these features. It would be nice if you had some screenshots for folks just interested in looking at the interface without signing up first.
The Oddpost interface looks pretty nice, if Yahoo! manages to adopt it I might actually use my account with them. Currently I cannot stand the way their ads appear in the midst of doing thnigs - I FAR prefer the way G-mail does their's and have actually followed a few of their links. I cannot say the same for Yahoo! or HotMail since their ads just plain suck! In particular the damned HotMail ads that play sounds when you roll over them - AUGH!!!!
As of the next service pack XP will indeed support this, release candidates are floating about already I believe. Intel supposedly supports it in their XEON CPUs and their 64BIT CPUs. AMD has it in their 64BIT CPUs and is supposed to be putting it in their new line of CPUs that are going to supercede the DURON CPUs (think that's right). I ASSume the Athlon line of CPUs or whatever is about to be released in addition to the DURON replacement will support it as well which completes AMD's support across the line.
AMD appears to be making this mainstream, Intel hasn't yet done this. Microsoft has a security problem on their hands so certainly has some incentive to support it if possible. Just seemed odd to me that Intel didn't appear to be responding in kind to AMD's support of this CPU instruction...