Maybe yes, maybe not. Suppose that he win the Best Actor Oscar, and when he receives it, says something like "My preciouss Oscar" or something more like Gollum, and then all that have doubts see that he was really the one that did the Gollum acting?
How far could be this digital animation from makeup?
In any case, unless you have all the tapes on how was filmed Gollum, you can't tell when something is Serkis and when is the team behind, even if Serkis really did the best acting. It would be unfair, but at least the one you choose will be clear for all why you think is the best acting.
If any mail infrastructure reorganization were done before the finding this mount of this
sendmail hole
, that would have been be a good way to have a mostly forced deploy of compliant mail servers around the world.
But did say that IETF is willing to get involved in developing (technical) measures, probably making/suggesting changes on the base protocols, and that is stronger than any particular trying to do the same.
The site also links to the O'Reilly Google Hacks book, where you not only find how to use google more effectively, but also have example hacks likes the one in that site whith source (some of them can be seen in the O'Reilly site). This hacks are good, but sometimes you want something a bit different (i.e. the recipes but in spanish), and is nice to see what kind of things you can do.
For me, the site is good example of what else you can do with google if you go a bit under the plain interface it have, but, like in the World of Ends site say for internet, the main google interface and main use should be as "dumb" as it is now, and top of it anyone could do this kind of hacks (you can do even a directory of hacks, like Yahoo but pointing to google hacks for each category)
Sagan and Asimov (at least I'm concious about this two, must be a lot like them) did a good job of scientific diffusion, afaik there was not journalism, but in both cases their approach was somewhat easy to understand and not boring (check Sagan's
Broca's Brain for some discussion on pseudoscience)
With those two antecedents, I could hope that some journalist could do a comparable job reporting on this kind of topics, I can't say if there one now.
Is like driving a ballon, wasting a very little energy to go to up or down the next "wind" that goes in the rigth direction. With gravity forces, inertia, and a bit of calculus to find where is the best moment to start the ride, you can go very far without wasting combustible or whatever you use to move, just letting gravity to do their job.
Bus, as far I understand, that "highway" must be very dinamic, is like saying that in a year, 6 months and 3 days there should be a "road" to Pluton, but if you try this every other moment it will be very costly or the trip will last 4 months more.
And, well, this "highway" is beloved as well for good hard sci fi writers, taking advantage of gravity to do "impossible" tricks is very used, and is funny to see everyone surprised in the story of that kind of tricks
If they have a security hole, do not suppose that a simple non-standard format will stop knowing the data content. Feeling safe with the format of the file (at least, if it don't have strong encription) is in fact another vulnerability.
The main problem with not using a open, universal standard is that you tie you information (that should last teorically at least, forever) to some vendor format, if the vendor don't support that standard anymore, or the vendor is gone, then you data simply becomes inaccesible (specially if you have to thank DMCA to give you the inability to make alternative programs to open that format). And losing all your data is a major security problem, and is a risk you have if you don't use an open standard or at least a format that you own.
What about putting this kind of things in a satellite instead of a plane. For a laser (that could depend on the kind of laser, I suppose) this normally don't have to be a big problem, and most of the problems of availability in the place that should be and maintenance cost must be solved.
Of course, having this kind of planes or satellites is not very nice.
I suppose that the next question (if this is a good briefing of the document) is that is enough to solve the main problems of DMCA and stop the
abuses of it.
Anyway, is a good first step, in the case if its not enough.
Wheel, fire, geometry, and so on. Probably the ones that made or discover them supposed that it will be here forever, but, with the reach and diversity of today's world?
Think in a wheel, something that rolls and could facilitate transport of... well, big pieces of stone, i.e., but that a variation of this made posible mechanical clocks, cinema, orbital stations, and a big percent of what are here right now?
by far, I think the is one of the technologies that goes more far from their expectations. Or if you want, the World Wide Web itself is pretty impressive alone.
When I read the article, the first I thinked that this guy should not have been running a BBS in the old days. Most of this points could be correlated to an (hypotetical? there was ever one published?) list of 10 reasons you don't want to run a commercial BBS (specially if you programmed it, as myself). Of course, this list is more actual and have problems that are not fully related to the BBS ones, but anyway, gived me some sort of deja-vu.
Re:Theorem
on
World of Ends
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Think in i.e. Riverworld of P.J.Farmer, you have a river that connects all places in the world, the river is owned by nobody, everyone can use it, and everybody can build whatever they think around and over it, but if you change the river itself (contaminating water, redirecting or trying to stop it, adding to it some drink concentrate to make the water taste better, whatever), all the world loses, they can't use the same river in all the possible ways that they could before (and, if I remember well the book series, you will face a war very soon:)
Anyway, it could collect or link comments about the book at amazon or other book related communities, to build fast a reasonable big initial collection, and start adding to it.
To be honest, I had to search google to find how exactly the "hippie" phrase is spelled because I usually think in spanish. Names, phrases, a lot changes between languages and writing jokes in other languages is sometimes hard.
And even if in technical books I don't read "subtle" a lot to make it sound all the alarms, I just don't had to hurry writing the title and don't checking if it was ok. But I agree that is bad enough that all must talk one language here to add another language to understand to be capable to read slashdot properly.
The problem of not being a so good english reader is that when you read "You also need to hit the checkbox to disable ads on the Index" the first thing you think it means is that you have to hit your checkbook.
Anyway, is fair, subscribers could check the referred site before it gets slashdotted, non-subscribers maybe don't see dupes or at least their first view of the article already includes "obvious" corrections and addition to the article text,, first posts will be a right, not just luck and their first view of articles could be clean that are now, before moderation.
But if slashdot want to attract subscribers, I suggest that the stories that "shows the future" are about sports results, investments, lotto numbers and things like this, so subscribers feel that are not spending money, but investing it.
I wonder if this have something to do with "missing" articles that appeared lsat days in the rss but not in the first page, and things similar to this.
If you see the article hours before most of slashdot readers, I think that yes, this will be a subscriber benefit. For the others a lot of discussions will start half full just when the article is widely available.
There are a lot of things that must be developed/discovered to make it possible. With that kind of hypotesis, well we can discover antigravity before.
Ok, at least what must be done is teorically possible and have a lot of work done, but some of this depend that some things can really be done.
But when the space elevator is done, and if the ticket is not as sideral as its heigh, will be fun to go to an elevator with only 2 buttons: 1st floor - 1billonth floor
"Slashdot effect" for the masses. You only need to have a small community, far as big as Slashdot, and do it yourself Slashdot effect for vblog sites! Just point to them in your main page and measure your own popularity counting seconds before the other site get slashdotted (hey! you can even could say something like [my-own-site-name]ted, expanding english and popularity).
Slashdot Mirror
How far could be this digital animation from makeup?
In any case, unless you have all the tapes on how was filmed Gollum, you can't tell when something is Serkis and when is the team behind, even if Serkis really did the best acting. It would be unfair, but at least the one you choose will be clear for all why you think is the best acting.
If any mail infrastructure reorganization were done before the finding this mount of this sendmail hole , that would have been be a good way to have a mostly forced deploy of compliant mail servers around the world.
But did say that IETF is willing to get involved in developing (technical) measures, probably making/suggesting changes on the base protocols, and that is stronger than any particular trying to do the same.
For me, the site is good example of what else you can do with google if you go a bit under the plain interface it have, but, like in the World of Ends site say for internet, the main google interface and main use should be as "dumb" as it is now, and top of it anyone could do this kind of hacks (you can do even a directory of hacks, like Yahoo but pointing to google hacks for each category)
With those two antecedents, I could hope that some journalist could do a comparable job reporting on this kind of topics, I can't say if there one now.
In the life are always balance... subscribers gets a glimpse of the future, and non-subscribers get one of the past
... gene modifies gene researchers! er... wait, nevermind, here also.
Bus, as far I understand, that "highway" must be very dinamic, is like saying that in a year, 6 months and 3 days there should be a "road" to Pluton, but if you try this every other moment it will be very costly or the trip will last 4 months more.
And, well, this "highway" is beloved as well for good hard sci fi writers, taking advantage of gravity to do "impossible" tricks is very used, and is funny to see everyone surprised in the story of that kind of tricks
If they have a security hole, do not suppose that a simple non-standard format will stop knowing the data content. Feeling safe with the format of the file (at least, if it don't have strong encription) is in fact another vulnerability.
The main problem with not using a open, universal standard is that you tie you information (that should last teorically at least, forever) to some vendor format, if the vendor don't support that standard anymore, or the vendor is gone, then you data simply becomes inaccesible (specially if you have to thank DMCA to give you the inability to make alternative programs to open that format). And losing all your data is a major security problem, and is a risk you have if you don't use an open standard or at least a format that you own.
Of course, having this kind of planes or satellites is not very nice.
Anyway, is a good first step, in the case if its not enough.
Maybe for this that SuSE is now reevaluating their relationship with SCO
For what the article say, it is more a BSODkit than anything else.
Think in a wheel, something that rolls and could facilitate transport of... well, big pieces of stone, i.e., but that a variation of this made posible mechanical clocks, cinema, orbital stations, and a big percent of what are here right now?
by far, I think the is one of the technologies that goes more far from their expectations. Or if you want, the World Wide Web itself is pretty impressive alone.
When I read the article, the first I thinked that this guy should not have been running a BBS in the old days. Most of this points could be correlated to an (hypotetical? there was ever one published?) list of 10 reasons you don't want to run a commercial BBS (specially if you programmed it, as myself). Of course, this list is more actual and have problems that are not fully related to the BBS ones, but anyway, gived me some sort of deja-vu.
Think in i.e. Riverworld of P.J.Farmer, you have a river that connects all places in the world, the river is owned by nobody, everyone can use it, and everybody can build whatever they think around and over it, but if you change the river itself (contaminating water, redirecting or trying to stop it, adding to it some drink concentrate to make the water taste better, whatever), all the world loses, they can't use the same river in all the possible ways that they could before (and, if I remember well the book series, you will face a war very soon :)
Anyway, it could collect or link comments about the book at amazon or other book related communities, to build fast a reasonable big initial collection, and start adding to it.
What opinion you have about this?
And even if in technical books I don't read "subtle" a lot to make it sound all the alarms, I just don't had to hurry writing the title and don't checking if it was ok. But I agree that is bad enough that all must talk one language here to add another language to understand to be capable to read slashdot properly.
Anyway, is fair, subscribers could check the referred site before it gets slashdotted, non-subscribers maybe don't see dupes or at least their first view of the article already includes "obvious" corrections and addition to the article text,, first posts will be a right, not just luck and their first view of articles could be clean that are now, before moderation.
But if slashdot want to attract subscribers, I suggest that the stories that "shows the future" are about sports results, investments, lotto numbers and things like this, so subscribers feel that are not spending money, but investing it.
I wonder if this have something to do with "missing" articles that appeared lsat days in the rss but not in the first page, and things similar to this.
If you see the article hours before most of slashdot readers, I think that yes, this will be a subscriber benefit. For the others a lot of discussions will start half full just when the article is widely available.
Ok, at least what must be done is teorically possible and have a lot of work done, but some of this depend that some things can really be done.
But when the space elevator is done, and if the ticket is not as sideral as its heigh, will be fun to go to an elevator with only 2 buttons: 1st floor - 1billonth floor
Hippie: "Make love, not war"
Yuppie: "Make lan, not war"
"Slashdot effect" for the masses. You only need to have a small community, far as big as Slashdot, and do it yourself Slashdot effect for vblog sites! Just point to them in your main page and measure your own popularity counting seconds before the other site get slashdotted (hey! you can even could say something like [my-own-site-name]ted, expanding english and popularity).