"they could invest their money in a means of production and then sell that product"
If that product were sold at voluntary market rates, and its means of production were not grossly subsidized, all the more power to them. (Neither would be true around here in the great white up.)
Not that I know anything, but there exist valves and such to relieve excess pressure from enclosed spaces. Just the fact that a reactorful of fuel is sitting almost in the open - and has been there for two years - boggles this little mind here. No wonder they're reinforcing the concrete structure -now-, but what were the original GE engineers thinking?
Remember, those were removed from reactor 4 for maintenance, sometime before the tsunami. That's a full reactor worth of live & hot fuel rods, in an open pool. Pretty crazy.
"If so, the marketing must be better than the Volt's. Otherwise, it won't matter how good the car is."
That's like asking the president to give a New Glorious Speech to fix a deep problem. No, the problem has not been marketing - it has been mainly the cost (both to the purchaser and the subsidizing taxpayer), and to some extent performance (size, garages on fire).
... and the same goes for firearms. Go to a gun show, ask about altering firearms to make them fully auto. If anyone answers, arrest them: old BATF trick apparently.
OK. When it comes to what some people complain about; or discuss whether Zimmerman could have had a "stand your ground hearing" before the trial, they're referring to other sections. The ambiguity/error is politically useful sometimes.
"... except with the judge who used SYG language..."
It wasn't her place to raise that issue at all; it's a possible defense pre-trial motion. It's almost as though she wanted to get some noise into the record.
Even light that is laser-focused toward the ground tends to bounce back up from the gray concrete. Take a night flight at your nearby general aviation airport and look down. You'll see few lights directly, and large swaths of glowy orange.
Slashdot Mirror
Why can't a conclusion be phrased as a statement instead of as a rhetorical question?
"they could invest their money in a means of production and then sell that product"
If that product were sold at voluntary market rates, and its means of production were not grossly subsidized, all the more power to them. (Neither would be true around here in the great white up.)
Well put, thanks lgw.
"But the reality of a police state include mass graves ..."
We're witnessing baby steps...
They aren't customers if they're forced to buy.
If one can expect a SWAT raid for exercising one's freedoms, the exact details of the oppression are insignificant.
Indeed. See also http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1717
"they are making unsterilized withdrawals of money from the system"
As the governments are still running deficits, this type of withdrawal could be called a net deposit.
.... because there has never been a road not made by government, or cheating prevented by someone other than it.
"unsterilized" new money is purely inflationary, and thus takes money/value from the citizenry at large.
Perchance such a valve could be plumbed to a facility more radiation-tolerant than the general atmosphere.
Not that I know anything, but there exist valves and such to relieve excess pressure from enclosed spaces. Just the fact that a reactorful of fuel is sitting almost in the open - and has been there for two years - boggles this little mind here. No wonder they're reinforcing the concrete structure -now-, but what were the original GE engineers thinking?
Remember, those were removed from reactor 4 for maintenance, sometime before the tsunami. That's a full reactor worth of live & hot fuel rods, in an open pool. Pretty crazy.
OTOH, a terribly degrading thing doesn't have to be called rape.
"As nearly being killed by a txt'ing driver myself," ... by someone stopped at a red light?
"If so, the marketing must be better than the Volt's. Otherwise, it won't matter how good the car is."
That's like asking the president to give a New Glorious Speech to fix a deep problem. No, the problem has not been marketing - it has been mainly the cost (both to the purchaser and the subsidizing taxpayer), and to some extent performance (size, garages on fire).
... and the same goes for firearms. Go to a gun show, ask about altering firearms to make them fully auto. If anyone answers, arrest them: old BATF trick apparently.
OK. When it comes to what some people complain about; or discuss whether Zimmerman could have had a "stand your ground hearing" before the trial, they're referring to other sections. The ambiguity/error is politically useful sometimes.
"included the specific language of the law"
Regarding stand-your-ground? No, just that term was mentioned in passing, with no explanation as to how it fails to relate to the case.
See also:
http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/floridas-self-defense-immunity-law-how-it-really-works/
"... except with the judge who used SYG language ..."
It wasn't her place to raise that issue at all; it's a possible defense pre-trial motion. It's almost as though she wanted to get some noise into the record.
Well put, AC.
Plus the bonus for both-cooperating is purely hypothetical.
Even light that is laser-focused toward the ground tends to bounce back up from the gray concrete. Take a night flight at your nearby general aviation airport and look down. You'll see few lights directly, and large swaths of glowy orange.
" there are scientists considering "
A reference to an expert scientist would have been helpful.
"That they've both given TED Talks doesn't impress me"
Likewise, since before Onion's parodies were so close to the real thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEzMNp2d6Bk&list=PL4NL9i-Fu15hhYGB-d0hmSWD1fcIvLvn1